Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
lord_n word_n world_n wound_v 71 3 7.9683 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A87005 Syons redemption, and original sin vindicated: wherein are these particulars largely handled and discovered. I. That sprinkling of water in the name of the father, son and Holy Ghost is not baptism, ... II Infants not the subjects appointed by God to be baptized, ... III That the second death was never threatned to be inflicted upon Adam ... IV A clear and large discourse as touching Gods decree, of election and reprobation. V A large exposition upon the ninth chapter to the Romanes, ... VI A brief disproof of the unlawfulness of the paying or receving of tithes, ... VII The ordination of the national ministery examined and disproved. VIII The answer of objections against the Jews return out of their captivity ... IX A clear discovery of the glorious effects (or that which will be effected) under the sound of the seventh trumpet. X A full discovery of Judah and Israels glory to be enjoyed in their own land, ... Published for the instruction and comfort of all that wait for the appearing of the Lord Jesus and Zions redemption. Being an answer to a book of Mr. Hezekiah Holland, sometimes preacher in Sutton-Valence in Kent. By George Hammon pastor to the Church of Christ, meeting in Biddenden in Kent. Hammon, George. 1658 (1658) Wing H504; Thomason E958_1; ESTC R207642 184,723 213

There are 23 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

spirits in prison which implies that there is a place of Purgatory that Christ went thither o● to hell to preach and bring them f●om thence and so they shall come forth when they have paid the utmost farthing and this is Romes doctrine and the article of your faith he descended into hell And again you by your Articles must believe in the Catholick Church but you were better to believe and put your trust in God and how can you have a Catholick or universal Church so as to be an over spreading Whore unlesse you uphold Infant Baptisin the which makes all persons to be of the Church and so receiving the mark of the first Beast and are a cage of all man●er of unclean birds for as saith the Spirit All Nations have drank of the wine of her fornication and the Kings of the earth have committed fornication with her and you Merchants have been made rich through her and therefore you uphold and plead for her But wo wo wo unto thee Virgin daughter of Babylon thy Mothers pride and uncleanness and traditions seen in thee wo unto the Cities of Nations you must f●ll and then your Mother MISTERY BABYLON through whose loyns ye came shall come in remembrance before God so that both she and you that have commited fornication with h●r shall be cast into a bed together And again wo wo unto thee thy day is coming it hastens therefore flee out of her that the day of the Lords wrath fall not on you because it will fall with a heavy consumption on all that are found out of the simplicity of the Gospel but I passe to the next thing which is say you We may be true Ministers although come from Rome as Christ was the true Christ which came from Adam which wa● finful lines This is plainly the sense of what you say To which I answer and say That although Christ came through the womb of the holy Virgin yet he was not begotten of or by man for if he had been in Adam as we were then had he been a sinner as we were for we all sinned in him and then no Saviour Rom. 5. but I passe this advising you to learn that great mystery of godliness to wit God minifest in flesh c. And whereas you say you may be a true Ministery and yet have your Ordination in or thorow Rome because Christ came from Adam as aforesaid to which I say there is no parallell because Christ was not of Adam or by the will of Adam as your Ordination was of the Pope and by the will of the Pope through his assigns viz the Bishops and much I might say to shew that there is no fit parallel either in Christ coming through the womb of the Virgin which was Gods appointment or Aaron● Priesthood Christ owns not that Priesthood that comes through Roms the which was according to Gods appointment but that God hath appointed a true Ministers approbation and Ordination to be from or through Rome or that they may be accounted as true Ministers which have their Ordination that way and so come through Rome I am yet to learn for who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean no not one and also such stones as come from Babylon must not be a corner-stone in Zion Christs Priesthood came not through a false state but was to be ordained in and by a true Church and all Ministers that are otherwise Ordained are not Christs Ministers And again whereas you tell me of a great story of several that lived in England who did refuse to submit to the Popes Supremacy and that also say you Origen confesseth that Christianity was in England in his time To this and such like discourse of yours I answer and say suppose it was granted that Christianity was in England long before Origens time to which possibly I could speak somewhat but if I should when I have done all possibly as few would believe me in that as do believe you in this which you have said Therefore our businesse is not to shew how long ago it was that Christianity was believed or practised in England but our businesse is to shew whether the Ministery or our Nation had their Ordination by a true Church or Presbyter or whether it were from the salse Church and Presbyter as the Lord B●shop and so consequently from the Pope for what if the Gospel were preached and believed in England and so we may comparatively say that one of the Beasts heads was wounded yet there hath been time for his deadly wound to be healed and all the world to wander after him bence it comes to passe that we have in England a worldly Sanctuary and a worldly Ministery the which is not of God or by his appointment and therefore must fall and so I come to shew these two things First That the Ministery of the Nation as they now stand and have for a long time so stood are not Christs Ministers First in respect of the persons qualification ordaining And secondly the persons qualification ordained And thirdly their Office or work what they are appointed to and these in order And first to the first which is The persons qualification ordaining and the first is whether the Lord Bishop was a lawful Presbyter yea or nay the which if not then it wil appear plainly that the Ministery of the Nation is not a lawfull Ministery being not lawfully Ordained to the work of the Ministery The Ministry of the Nation no true Ministers of Christs appointment And fi●st we may consider his ordination or appointment whence it was whether by a true Presbyter or whether it were from a false to which I say of necessity it must be a false for whether it were the Pope Gregory the great or the like it is plain it was not from a true Presbyter because your own grant is that your Ordination came from Rome in the 27 page say you We were in Rome or came through Rome therefore I shall not trouble my self about the succession of your Ministery because it is affirmed by you and readily believed by me that it came from Rome But Secondly To his qualification as touching his good manners in life and conversation all England knowes that knows any thing that he was of such an evill conversation that he did not onely tollerate sin in himself but also in others 2 Tim. 4.2 so far he was from charging the Ministers ● as Paul did Timothy to preach the word instant in season and out of season that he in P●int gave liberty to propha●ation and to lay aside the preaching or Gods word for a season and to interpose Romes inventions together with dancing and laciviousness upon the first day when persons ought to be imployed in holy duties these things together with imprisoning men that were conscientious was the practice of him from whom as under the Pope you Ministers of the Nation were assigned and appointed
return to their own Land onely the drying up of the River may be a little the precedent work as if time would give leave I would shew you and that the gathering of the dispersed of Israel and bringing them into their own Land will be fully effected under the sound of the seventh Trumpet which by the Prophet Isaiah is called the great Trumpet because under his sounding greater things will be effected than under any of the sounding of the other six Trumpets and therefore see what the prophet Isaiah saith Isa 27.12 13. which is as followeth And it shall come to passe in that day that the Lord will heat off from the channel of * Chap. 11.15 16. Rev. 16.12 the River to the stream of Aegypt called the tongue of the Aegyptian sea and ye shall be gathered one by one O ye children of Israel and it shall come to passe in that day that the GREAT TRVMPET shall be blown mark that and they shall come which are ready to perish in the land of Assyria and the out-cast of the land of Aegypt and shall worship the Lord in the holy mountain of Jerusalem And thus having shewed what the second thing will be that will be effected in the time of the sounding of the seventh TRUMPET I come now to shew what will be the third thing effected at that time which is The Kingdomes of this world shall become the Kingdom of Christ and he shall take his great power and Reign Rev. 11.17 Do you know what is meant in these Petitions in the Lords Prayer Thy Kingdome come Thy will be done in earth as it is in heaven surely if you did you would understand the Prophets a little better than you do So that Christ is yet to have a Kingdome in this world or that the Kingdoms of this world is to become the Kingdoms of the Lord Christ under the sounding of the seventh Trumpet as aforesaid Rev 11.15 for the proof hereof read the words of John which saith And the seventh Angel sounded and there was a GRAET voice in HEAVEN saying the KINGDOMES of this world are become the KINGDOMES of our Lord and of his Christ and he shall reign for ever and ever From hence we see that although Christ would not be King on earth before his suffering yet afterwards he is to receive a kingdome to himself even the kingdomes of this world and that he will take his great power and reign and then according to the words of the Psalmist Psal 22.27 All the ends of the world shall remember and turn to the Lord and all the kindreds of the Nations shall worship before thee for the kingdom is the Lords and he is the Governour amongst the Nations because of thy Temple at Jerusalem shall Kings bring presents unto thee Psal 68.29 and the kingdome and dominion and greatness of the kingdome under the whole heaven shall be given to the people of the Saints of the most high Dan. 7.27 whose kingdome is an everlasting kingdome and all dominions shall serve and obey him and Saviours shall come upon mount Zion and judge the mount of Esau Obed 21. and the kingdome shall be the Lords for he that overcometh will I give power over the Nations Rev. 2.26.27 and he shall rule them with a rod of iron Psal 149.8 9. and binde the Kings in chains and their Nobles in fetters if iron to execute upon them the judgment written Rev. 5.10 this honour hath all the Saints praise ye the Lord. From hence we may see the Kingdomes of this world is to become the Kingdome of Christ and his Saints and they shall reign upon earth But you say Page 36. 37. The Saints reign is to be understood spiritually as by prevailing with God in prayer and the like To which I answer and say it is as likely to be true as that the Kingdome of Syria is the fourth Monarchy or Kingdome but that it cannot be so understood is plain for as yet I never read that any one man governed or reigned over all Nations or reigned over them by his prayers although it might bring judgments on many places and people Jam. 5.17 as Elias did when he prayed and it rained not for the space of forty six months but what hurt did that do to Aegypt where it raineth not and did ever any one by his prayers binde his King or Nobles in fetters of iron but admit we might grant that there were an hundred did so yet it would not prove the matter but be too narrow unlesse you could prove every man in particular to do so for this honour shall every Stint have viz. to reign and the wicked to be as ashes under the soles of their feet there might be very much said to the confutation of this but I shall not play the coward to fight with that which is so decripped and not able to look truth or sound reason in the face but that Christ and his Saints shall reign together on earth is plain first because there is plain text of Scripture for it Rev. 21.1 2 3 4 5 6 7. as above written secondly the Tabernacle of God is to be with men mark that and the Lord Jesus is to descend Zach. 14.4 and his feet standing in that day upon the Mount of Olives Job 19.24 25 26 27. the confideration whereof did uphold Job in his troubles that he should see his Redeemer in the latter dayes upon the earth whom he should behold for himself and not another And wereas you say Page 38. Christ is gone to prepare a place for us and that we shall becaught up to meet him in the ayre and be ever with him To which I answer and say and first if we shall be caught up to meet him it argues plainly that he is coming to live or he with us otherwise we may not be properly said to meet him if he be not coming towards us Obj But if it should be said it is true The Lord will come to judgement possibly here on earth but not to reign here To which I answer and say If he do hold his judgement here that implies that he will reign here for he shall reign when he sits in judgement but we finde plainly in Scripture that there is a great work to do when Christ comes before he shall give the ultimate sentence in so much that the Apochalips saith it will be a thousand years if I should say that the new Jerusalem should for ever abide in the Land of Canaan The meek shal inherit the earth which ●s yet they do not and we ever remain in it you would not know how to disprove it for although the Text say that we shall be ever with the Lord yet it doth not say that we shall be ever in the ayre for although Christ shall be seen in the ayre with the Saints and Angels which
simply in it self as a hand-maid as I may say to a Minister but I ever spake against it so as to deny it to be the efficient or suparlative cause of a Minister and do say that Christ ascending up on high and leading captivity captive and giving gifts to men is that which makes a Minister although learning may not be denyed to be a useful hand-maid neither may such be denyed to be Ministers whom Christ hath gifted to preach the Gospel to edification exhortation and comfort although they be altogether ignorant of that humane edification of Oxford and Cambridge and let me tell you without offence that I know none more ignorant in the mysteries of the Gospel than those of your stamp for the greatest part of them but I suppose the reason is because they ascribe preheminence to that which should be subordinate Finally Sir this is my advice to you and despise it not be more frequent in reading the Scriptures and compare them together trust not too much to this or the other mans opinion for if they were zealous yet they lived but as it were in the twilight and know that near the time of the end 1. 12.14 * men are to run to and fro and knowledge to encrease Whoso is wise and will observe these things even they shall understand the loving kindnesse of the Lord and that you may partake of the benefit of an understanding heart search after it as for hidden treasure and then shall ye finde it and have the closet of your heart filled with all precious and pleasant riches the which is the desire of him that desireth the welfare of your soul and all mens who am your and their servant for Christs sake George Hammon The Epistle to the Reader CHristian Brethren and friends and to whom soever feareth the Lord and especially you the Inhabitants of Sutton-valence and Boughton Munchalse and Maidstone together with the places there abouts the Authors desire is that grace and peace might be multiplied unto you through the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ My dear friends the knowledge of the truth is of such great worth that it calls for our earnest endeavour after it to seek it and not silver and to search after it rather than fine gold and therefore for thy further understanding in the mysteries of God I have added this small pains of mine contained in the following Treatise in bringing to a publick view such objections as stand like a cloud to ecclipse or hinder the light of Christs doctrine from shining into the understandings of the sons of men and have answered them although I should have been more at large upon it if time would have given leave in reference to other occasions that daily called me from it when it was in hand the which also was the cause that it was brought to a publick view no sooner and therefore excuse its long absence I pray you and now my desire is that thou wouldst read it diligently and weigh what is written with an unbyassed affection and in so doing thou mayest come to see those things that happily thou hast not yet seen and know those things that yet now thou hast not known for how ready have we been to receive mens doctrine without tryall especially when they have had a name to be great learned men never considering the words of the Lord which saith Not many wise or learned men hath he chosen to reveal his hidden wisdome to but hath hid it from them and revealed it to Babes and sucklings and was it not Gods way to chuse Heardsmen to be his Prophets and Fishermen to be his Apostles and in a word such as were accounted ignorant men such as knew little of the law even such God did chuse to reveal his Son in that none might glory in men therefore take heed of being deceived upon such account but now prove thy self to be like the men of Berea the which were more noble than the men of Thessalonica because they searched the Scriptures to see whether those things that was preached to them were truth yea or nay therefore be exhorted for the time to come to give all diligence in cases of weight to try it by the Scriptures and seek to the Lord to give thee understanding therein and then doubtless thou shalt do well I have opened the ninth Chapter to the Romans and when thou readest it consider that it is a discourse touching the house of Israel that God was just in casting them off for their sins although they were the seed of Abraham shewing that Israel was also of Abrahams lines and Esau of the lines of Isaac and yet for their wickedness were rejected and also Pharaoh that hardened himself against the Lord and his people as Israel did the Lord chose his delusion by giving him up to hardness of heart to make his Name known throughout all the earth that all men might take warning by him And as to that which is spoken concerning the return of the house of Israel and the house of Judah out of their captivity and the Reign of Christ in Jerusalem I desire thee to weigh seriously because if thou understand it aright it will help thee much in the understanding of all the Scriptures in a great measure as Daniel Zachary and the Book of the Revelations when others will be found to turn the Scriptures into allegories not knowing what they say nor whereof they do affirm being never able to keep the Scriptures in a harmony it will also strengthen thee to stand fast in these times when the mystery of iniquity is geting up apace where there is no other Mount Zion taught up as Christs seat but what is in us and ere long in giving heed thereunto we shall not think our selves onely Mount Zion viz. Christs seat but will also think that we are the Christ to wit God manifest in our flesh for the mother of Harlots and her daughters viz. Rome and the rest of the Nations which have been upon her sides and suck of her breast have taught up such a kind of doctrine as a spiritual Reign of Christ to be understood in such Scriptures as speak of Christs Reign on earth the which is as a footing for the mystery of iniquity to work but thanks be given to our good God that hath given some to understand the mystery of the kingdome who will travel to bring forth the man child as I comparatively may say that shall rule all Nations with a rod of iron namely Christ upon his holy hill of Zion therefore read the Prophets diligently the which I have cited thou mayest also at thy leasure peruse Esdras which I have not cited in my discourse because some doubt whether it be Canonicall yea or nay the which I shall not trouble my self to prove it holy writ because there be Prophets enough that prove the same thing besides Esdras although he speak very fully to it as in many Chapters
Church To which I answer and say that your word federately your matter intimated in it are far ferched consequences that the holiness spoken of in 1 Corinths 7. will not admit any to Baptisme the which if it would then the unbelieving Wife or Husband which is as holy as the Child ought to be Baptized and how far that is from truth I shall leave the Reader to judge but that the Text doth say that the unbeleever is Holy read it and you shall see to difference in the word Sanctification and Holiness in that place for Tindal readeth it thus E●uxor infidelis sanctificata est inviso alioqui c●rte liberi vestri improbri essent nunc aut●m sanctisunt So that the word may be red the unbeleeving woman is Holy or hallowed to or by the man as well as sanctified but the holiness mentioned in 1 Cor. 7. is no other but a matrimonial holiness as I also have proved in my precedent treatise and so I pass and leave you to read your answer there Again you say God owned those children presented to him in Circumcision Ezek. 16.20 21. and called them his children To which I answer and say if you were demanded how you could prove that those children were Circumcised you would be much troubled to prove it for surely their Parents were not so careful to give heed to Gods Commands the which if they had they would not have offered their children to Molech which was fobidden and theresore Circumcised they were not doubtless and if they were prove it Exod. 22.39 Exod. 13.2 Nehem. 10.35 36 37. But you will say how cometh it to pass that God calleth them his children The answer is those that were offered up in the fire was the first born and the Lord before had commanded for himself all the first born and they are said to be Holy to the Lord and hence he calleth them his children yet take notice that I do not deny but God did own such as was offered to him in Circumcision but it doth not follow therefore that he will own such offered up in Baptism for he had commanded children to be Circumcised at eight dayes old and therefore good reason that he should own them but he never commanded children of eight dayes old to be Baptised and therefore it is a vaine conceit to think that God will own that which he never appointed Again you say That the premise under the Gospel is to Beleevers and their children by vertue of the Parents Faith Act. 2.39 Answer The Text doth not say that the promise under the Gospel is to beleevers and their children upon their Parents Faith surely your eyes be very dim or your understanding very shallow in looking on that place see the Text Act. 2.39 Repent and be Baptised every one of you and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit for the promise of the gift of the Holy Spirit is to you and your Children in their non-age are not heirs to the Holy Spirit and heaven by vertue of their Fathers Faith as you fondly conceit children and to all that are afar of even to so many as the Lord our God shall call Now I pray see doth this Text say that the Gospel promise belongeth to children of Beleevers upon their Parents Faith the text hath not such a consequence in it the meaning of the Text is briefly thus the Jews were pricked at the heart for Crucifying of Christ and desiring his blood to be on them their children the Apostle knowing that all sins should be forgiven unless that against the Holy Ghost saith to them not when they were beleevers but before they did beleeve Repent but as if they should say there is no hope of mercy if we should repent yet there is saith Peter for God hath promised to pour out af his Spirit in the last dayes upon all flesh and also on your children even on your sons and daughters and therefore your condition is not so bad as by you supposed nor your childrens but they shall receive the Spirit even so many of them as God shall call your wicked practice in Crucifying Christ hath not so far deprived you or them from mercy but if you or they obey the voice of Gods call he will give you or they after you the Holy Spirit therefore repent every one of you here is ground enough for you to repent and to be Baptised and gladly to walk in Christs wayes That promise Act 2.39 was the promise of the Holy Spirit and it was made to all upon condition of obedience and Faith and declared to those poor wounded Souls that they might have ground to repent and beleeve the Gospel and thus you see the Text saith the promise was to them before they did beleeve that they might have ground to beleeve and obey the Gospel and therefore this maketh not for beleeves seed being under a Gospel promise for these did not beleeve when the Apostle saith the promise is unto you but if the promise of the Spirit be made to all children upon their Parents Faith then every beleevers child most consequently have the Holy Spirit or otherwise God not so good as his promise but the promise in Acts the second is a general promise of the giving forth of the Holy Spirit to all flesh Jews and Gentilis Fathers and Children even so many as are the called ones of God but in my former Treatise I have shewed the reason why the Apostle maketh mention of their children in this Text and so refer you to that further to peruse and pass to the next thing the which is A cha●ge of evil on us in denying the children of Beleevers Church Priviledge To which I answer that in that particular your selves do lie under evill in denying children Church priviledges namely that priviledge of the Lords Supper the which of right belongeth to every member of Christs Church for they that were or are to be Baptised or to continue in the Doctrine of Christ in breaking of bread and prayer and Baptism is not properly a Church priviledge but that which is to be done without the Church and those priviledges that are properly accounted Church priviledges you do deprive children of and also when you write again resolve this question whether the Lords Supper of right do not belong to all that are Baptised unless they are cast out forsin and if so then clear your selves if you can of depriving children of Church priviledges but you may see this also is discoursed and answered in my former Treatise entituled Dagons Down-fall And so I come to the Examination of that cited place Mat. 28.29 Go disciple all Nations or make disciples all Nations and Baptize them to which you would have me read Iohn 4 1 2 3. the which is equivolent with the words in Mat. 28. the which is read thus When therefore the Lord knew how the Pharisees had beard that Iesus made and
in the Gospel by Christ It was said of old time thou shalt not commit adultery but I say saith Christ that he that looketh on a Woman to lust after her hath committed adultery already with her in his heart That which hath been often mentioned are commanded in the Old Testament if it be moral and perpetual is also mentioned and commanded in the New-Testament And what is taught more than love and holiness and righteousness in the Old Testament and yet it is also taught up frequently and the people blamed for neglect of their duty in these particulars in the New Testament these with many things of the same nature I might offer unto you they will shew thee that those things that are moral and perpetual are frequently enjoyned in the Gospel although they have been commanded in the Old Testament also and now I am come to the examination of that which you call your digression in your eighth page which is as followeth We have a former Ordinance ●or Tithes 1 Cor. 9. Even so hath God ordained that those that preach the Gospel the Apostle quoteth a former statute or ordinance for Ministers maintenance and it seemeth out of Moses Law for v. 9. the Levitical Text is alledged Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the Ox Now ever did God appoint any way to maintaine such as did his service but the way of Tithes which was never a tipe of any thing nor never repealed To the answer and that in its particular order and first a few words to your word digression the which I say you may properly call digression for it doth not onely digress from the matter in hand but also from the truth and I believe is the cause of your great Transgression in pervering the right way of the Lord even your greediness of gain that many of you take the Ministry for filthy lucres sake and so buy and sell the word of the Lord and live by the gain thereof and were not your eyes so full of covetousness you might come to see the truth but to pass that and come to examine more of what weight is in your matter called digression the first is We have a former Ordinance for Tithes say you and cite 1 Cor. 9. To which I answer doth the Apostle say that God hath ordained that a Gospel Minister should have Tithes for his preaching if he had said so I do assure you that my eys have been very dim when I have read that 1 Cor 9 But have you a former ordinance for Tithes I pray Sir consider did ever God ordain that any should receive Tithes or Tenths save Levites in the type God never did ordain that any should receive Tithes or a Tenth but Levy in the type and Melchizedeck viz. Christ in the Antitype and Melchizedeck viz Christ in the Antitype And are you a Levite and have you no inheritance amongst your Brethren O are you Christ If you are neither Christ nor a Leavite I pray shew where you have a former ordinance to take Tythes because I never read that any other were to take the Tenth or Tythes but you cite that Levitical ●ex spoken of by Paul 1 Cor 9.9 For thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the Ox that treadeth out the Corn. From whence you think you have warrant to take the Tenth of the corn but first I think you have more reason than to suppose that the Ox●id eat up the tenth part of the Corn although you would if you might eat up the seventh part of it and more but the Apostle reasoneth thus that it was lawful for a Pre●cher of the Gospel or a Minister of Christ but you are none to eat and drink such things as are given them freely and that the Church ought not to muzzle their mouths if they troad out their corn that is if they did sow unto the Church spiritual things they ought to give them to eat and drink of their carnal things the which the Corinths did not for Paul did preach unto them and was fain to take of other Churches to satisfie his hunger for he was often in hunger and nakedness that is in very much want of food and cleathing the which is a vast difference between you and him for you are so far from being in hunger and nakedness to do service to the Church that some of you are often in silk and drunkennesse how beit there is a day coming that will try you in the which you shall givean account to God for your selves But you say The maintenance of the Gospel-ministry is not Tithes or a renth but such things as is freely set before them That if Tithes be not a Gospel maintenance for a Gospel Ministry then hath God appointed any other way To which I answer and that very briefly that the Gospel-maintenance is a free maintenance free from compulsion see Christ sending out his seventy commanding them to eat such things as was freely offered unto them and where ever there is a true Gospel Minister and a true Gospel people there will be no want of communicating each to other without constraint the Minister will freely communicate spirituals and the Church will freely communicate temporals Christs Ministers will labour with their hands rather than to be chargeable to the Church this will be in a true Gospel Church and also the Minister ought to labour with his hands rather than to be too chargeable to the Church and thus freely the one will do in communication to the other and so walk together in a sweet harmony of God not compelling one another but to serve each other in love And again whereas you say That Tithes are not typical nor repealed I doubt not but I shall prove them both typical and repealed and first that they are typical we may see the Apostle doth affirm to the Hebrews in these words Heb. 7.9 And as I may so say Levi also who received Tithes paid Tithes in Abraham for he was yet in the loins of Abraham when Melchizedeck met him From whence we may see that the Tenth or Tythes properly belong to Christ which was the Antitype of Melchizedeck but now to prove that Tyths are typical and that such as receive them or such as pay them deny Christ nailed to the Cross See these two Arguments briefly in the room of more that might be given First Arg. 1 if Tythes were part of the Levitical Law to be a maintenance of the Leviticall Priesthood which Law and Priesthood were to be done away by Christs nailing to the Cross then such as pay Tythes or receive them deny Christ crucified But Tyths was part of the Levitical Law to be a maintenance of the Levitical Priesthood which Law and Priesthood was to be done away by Christ nailed to the Cross Ergo those that pay or receive Tythes Heb. 7 12. are such as deny Christ crucified the minor is evidently cleared from the words of the
Apostle which saith For the Priesthood being changed there is also a necessity of the change of the Law From whence we see that both Law and Priesthood is done away by Christ so those that do uphold it by paying or receiving of Tythes deny Christ crucified and misery will be their portion Secondly Arg. 2 if Tythes or a Tenth was a type of the first fruits of the Converts of the Seed of Abraham to Christ in the primitive time then those that pay Tythes and such as receive Tythes deny the vertue of Christs death and the work of the Spirit in the primitive time But Tythes or the Tenth was a type of the first fruits of the converts of the Seed of Abrahnm which was to be given to Christ by his death and by the work of the Spirit Ergo they that pay or receive Tithes deny Christ Crucisied and the work of his Spirit That which will be questioned is the minor how I can prove that Tithes or a Tenth were a type of a Tenth that was to be converted from amongst the Jews as a first fruits to God and the Lamb and that the converts of Israel are the Anti-type of Tithes Esa 6.8 9 10 11 12 13. and that they are called a Tenth see the Prophet Esaiah will prove it in these words Also I heard the voice of the Lord saying whom shall I send and who will go for us Then I said here am I send me And he said go and tell this people hear ye indeed and understand not and see ye indeed but perceive not Make the heart of this people fat and make their ears heavy least they see with their eyes and hear with their ears and understand with their heart and convert and be healed Then said I Lord how long And he answered until the Cities be wasted without Inhabitant and the houses without man and the land be utterly desolate and the Lord have removed men far away and there be a great for saking in the midst of the land But yet in it mark that shall be a Tenth and it shall return and it shall be eaten as Teyl tree and an Oak whose substance is in it when they cast their leaves so the Holy seed shall be the substance thereof From these words we may see that although God did intend to harden Israel and cast them off for their sins yet there was to be a small number one amongst ten that was to be a Holy people and return to the Lord and be eaten that is to be received as a first fruit to Him and the Lamb I could say much to this but I pass minding this discourse was but a digression from the matter in hand And whereas you ask me What command women have to eat the Paschal Lamb or the Lords Supper under the Gospel Answer That the women were to eat the Passover is very evident being part of the Family and of the Congregation of Israel and not onely so but in most places where there is mention made of men as touching gifts to be bestowed on them the women are included as you have granted from the word Anthropos and that word is not only used in the Corinths but also to the Ephesians in the * A 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or homo which is a woman as well as a man fourth chapter and in the eight vers and at several other places and that there is a plain precept for women to receive the Lords Supper is plain from the Text in the first of the Corinths 11 28. according to the true signification of the word and your own grant And so I am come to your last Argument as touching Infants Baptism Ephes 2 3. the which I draw from the Ephesians in these words and were by nature the children of wrath as well as others the Baptisers say you say the Text calleth them children of Wrath onely who walked in sinful and evil courses but I answer say you that that exposition giveth the Text the lye To which I answer and say you are much mistaken in what you say for nature is that which leadeth from sin not to sin those that are not lead by it and do not obey it it will plead guilty and lay them under wrath and that it leadeth from sin and not to sin see Rom. 1.26 2.14 1 Cor. 11.14 Gal 4.8 But because I have answered this Text once and again in my former Treatise I shall be brief at present and say that nature in its region as I may say is pure although it teacheth not the Mysteries of the Gospel yet it is able to teach men to live purely according to the Law as saith the Apostle The Gentiles that have not the Law do by nature the things contained in the Law these are a Law to themselves c. From whence you may see nature leadeth from sin to do things that are Holy Just and Good and not to do that which is evil but if persons that have no other Law to guide as the Ephesians had not before conversion and yet sin against it that will lay them under wrath and so it came to pass that the Apostle saith they by nature were the children of wrath as well as others and so briefly thus as a man is a Malefactor by the Law of a Nation when he hath broken the Law so were these Ephesians by nature having transgressed against it the children of wrath that is nature convicted them and lay them under wrath and this is the meaning of the Text as you may see also more at large in my Dagons Down-fal Again Where you say I father Infants Baptism upon Pope Innocent the third the which say you was an errour because it was long in practice before him To which I answer although it might possibly be practised before yet it was not enjoyned as practise but let it be Pope Innocent or Cyprius or who it will that brought that practice and established it to be sure it was not by Christ nor his Apostles but I might say as Paul saith in another case a point of your own hath confessed it And in the last place you tell me of the antiquity of this practice of Infants Baptism and withal you say He that is wise will drink near the fountain head Answer I have also read what men have said for and against the antiquity of that practise but I finde Christ and the Apostles to be the very best Authors And whereas you say It was practised near the primitive time the which is near the fountain head Answer It argueth the truth of the practise of it never the more for being near the Apostles time unless you could prove it to be practised by the Apostles for we are not ignorant of this one thing that there was false doctrines crope in to the true Church in the primitive time and therefore likely it was that false doctrine should be broached in the world and
flesh and the Father of the Spirits and when that which Adam begat which was dust even like himself Genes 3. did and shall return to dust then that which liveth or dwelleth in it returneuh to God the Father of Spirits who gave it but I pass to the next thing that which you say is David was conceived in sin and therefore there was Soul as well as body Answer And first you abuse the Text for it doth not read it as you have read it for it doth not say In sin was I conceived but I was shapen in iniquity and in sin did my mother conceive me This far differeth one sense implyeth as if David lay the sin in the time of conception upon his mother in whom he was shapen in and your sense would imply thus much that is that David did acknowledge sin in himself in the time of conception but the Text it self will not emply it see it and read it distinctly Behold I was shapen in iniquity and in sin did my mother conceive me Psal 51.5 The Text is thus to be understood as if David should have said O Lord it is true I have sinned against thee and d●ne that which is evil in thy sight but take notice or consider or behold this one thing even of the frailty and weakness and imperfection of the mould that I was shapen in meaning her which is the mother of all living and so Davids mother and therefore Lord cast away my sins from before thee David doth not confess sin in himself in the time of conception but rather doth desire God to behold the weakness of his nature from the mould in the which he was shapen and consider my frame and remember that I am but dust agreeing with the words of the Psalmist in the 103. 11 12 13 14 in these words For as the Heaven is high above the earth so great is his mercy towards them that fear him as far as the East is from the West so far he removeth our transgressions from us like as a Father pitieth his children so the Lord pitieth them that fear him for he knoweth our frame he remembreth that we are dust So that David useth his mothers frailty and the imperfection of the mould in which he was shapen an Argument to prevaile with the Lord to have his sins removed out of his sight because he knew God was a God of righteousness weighing every thing as they are and considereth that we are but dust and therefore saith David that thou maiest in mercy pass by my faults that I have committed against thee remember my subjection unto sin for behold or take notice I was shapen in a lump of iniquity and in sin did my mother conceive me take notice there is a difference in a person being sinful in the time of conception and being conceived a sinful lump or shapen in an imperfect mould But you will say Who can bring a clean thing out of unclean no not one Answer Object And where it is said who ean bring a clean thing out of unclean it speaketh of the subjection to mortality see Job 14.4 Jesus Christ was clean and yet was conceived in sinful flesh and in reference to what he was shapen or conceived in he was in a subjection not to be tempted onely but did fear death when he prayed that the cup of sufferings might pass from him if it was Gods Will although he came into the world for the same purpose and yet in respect of the matter of which Christs flesh was made of it could not be subject to the least imperfection in that nature it being the word which became flesh But my exposition of the 51 Psalm Will clear the matter more to you and by what is said there and here it standeth undenyably true and what you have said hath not so much as a good collour of an answer Again I pass to the Examination of what you say to my alledged Argument passing your other discourse that of Ezekiel which saith The Soul that sinneth shall die I have made a difference between Adams sin and ours as well as the punishment that is Adams sin as he was natural and not spiritual so his sin brought death upon the natural part but the son is not disabled in respect of the Soul by his Fathers sin but the Soul that sinneth shall die but the Argument that I did urge is this That no defiled creature is fit or can enter into the Kingdom of Heaven But children in their non-age are fit for the Kingdom of Heaven Therefore children not defiled To which you answer thus The Kingdom of Heaven say you is taken two wayes first the Kingdom of Heaven is taken for the Kingdom of Grace as Mark. 9.1 and Math. 11.12 There are some that stand here that shall not taste death till the Kingdom of God come in power till Christened Churches gathered Ordinances administred and children of beleeving Parents belong to this Kingdom though such as you barr them from the Ordinances of the Kingdom of Grace To which I answer and say in what you affirm there is these two things mainely to be considered the first is that the Kingdom mentioned Mark 9.1 in these words There be some that stand here that shall not taste of death till they have seen the Kingdom of God come with power is the Kingdom of Grace to wit the Gospel Church and Ordinances And secondly children are fit for that Kingdom as you say but the question is whether we may beleeve you or not but upon Examination I shall prove it to be a false doctrine And first to the first That the Kingdom coming in power is not meant of the Gospel Church or Ordinances but of the power and glory of the Church triumphant agreeing with or being the same with the words of Matthew Mat. 16.22 the which are thus read Verily Verily I say unto you there be some standing here which shall not taste if death till they sie the Son of man coming in his Kingdom Now that this is not a Gospel Church or Ordinances which is called the Kingdom of God coming in power or the Son of man coming in his Kingdom is evident because it is no where so called Secondly if he had meant the Gospel Church or Ordinances he need not have said Some of them that stand here shall not taste of death till the Kingdom of God come in power or more properly the Son of man coming in his Kingdom because none of them that stood there did taste of death till they saw the Gospel Church and Ordinances unless Judas Iscariot but I shall shew most evidently that it is not meant of the Gospel Church and Ordinances coming but of Christs coming in Glory But by the way it is possible you will say What then is not all the Apostles dead I might say somewhat to it but admit they were all dead many hundred years ago yet there was some that did
then secondly shall shew also in what line the decree of God runneth both as touching Election Reprobation And thirdly shall shew that Gad doth decree to change the dispensation of Mercy or Justice according to the creatures acting And first to the first that is God respecteth not the person but the quality that you may see it clearly proved weigh the Scriptures in the ballance of your understanding And Peter opened his mouth and said Act. 10.34 of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons but in every Nation him that feareth God and worketh righteousness 1 Pet. 1.17 is accepted with him And therefore if ye call one Father who without respect of person judgeth every man according to his works spend your sojourny here in fear For the Lord your God Deu● 10.17 is God of Gods and Lord of Lords which respecteth not persons but he that doth wrong shall receive for the wrong that he hath done Col. 3.25 and there is no respect of persons Jer. 22.24 As I live saith the Lord though Coniah the son of Jeoiakim King of Judah were the signet upon my right hand yet would I pluck thee thence these Scriptures you may peruse with many more that tend to this purpose But that God respecteth the quality is clear for as saith the text Him that feareth God and worketh righteousness Gods decree unchangeable is accepted a humble heart and a broken Spirit is in the sight of God a pearle of great price and The prayers of the righteous are his delight so then God is no respecter of person but quality And secondly God hath decreed unchangeably to condemn such as die in their sins and also to save them that walk uprightly to shew also what line Gods decree runneth in both as touching Election and Reprobation God hath decreed unchangeably to save all that are in his Son namely such as walk before him in Righteousness and true Holiness and he hath also unchangeably decreed to render himself in flaming fire to the Everlasting destruction of all that walk in unrighteousness and disobey the Gospel of his Son I suppose I need not multiply words to prove this because I think none will deny it and this is Gods decree That of old he did ordain godly men to Salvation and ungodly men to Damnation and so if men walke righteously in Christ viz. Christs Commands then the decree of Salvation doth reach them or comprehend them and if they turn from righteousness to live in sinful courses then the decree of Condemnation reacheth or comprehendeth them So that God changeth not but it is man that changeth for Gods decree is to save righteous men and destroy wicked men not looking at this man or the other mans person but as he findeth them righteous or unrighteous unto which his decree hath respect I pray admit of this comparison presuppose we in this Country were all rebells to his Highness the Lord Protector and he being a man of great pitty maketh a decree although he might cut us off for our rebellion to pardon us if we cast down our armes and submit to him within twenty dayes or otherwise we shall perish by the sword or the like possibly some of us upon that account cast down our armes at ten dayes end and then we are comprehended within the decree of Absolution but possibly by reason of our companions that scoff at us and call us cowards and the like we at fifteen dayes end take up our armes again and then we are comprehended within the Decree of Death not that his Highness decree changeth but it is by our changing that we are under the decree of Absolution or Condemnation and although comparisons run not upon four wheels as we say yet this comparison reacheth the manner of Gods decree or is a plain similitude of it and that it is so read the Scriptures seriously Ezekiel the 18.21 and 26. in these words But if the wicked shall turn from all his sins that he hath committed Ezek. 18.21 24. 26. chap. 33.18 19. 1 Tim. 5.12 2 Pet. 2.20 21. and keep all my Statutes and do that which is Lawful and Right he shall surely live he shall not die but When a righteous man turneth away from his righteousness and committeth iniquity all his righteousness shall not be once mentioned but in his sins that he hath committed in them shall he die I might speak much of this both from the Old Testament and the New you may look in the margen and so I pass to the third last particular the which is to prove That although God change not in what he hath absolutely decreed yet God hath decreed to change his dispensation of Mercy or Misery according to the creatures obedience or disobedience And first Jer. 18.7 8 9 10. see the words of the Prophet Jeremy which saith In what instant I shall speak concerning a Nation or a Kingdom to pluck up and pull down and destroy it If that Nation against whom I promunce turn from their evil I will repent of the evil that I thought to do unto them And it what instant I speak concerning a Nation and concerning a Kingdom to build and to plant it If it do evil in my sight that it obey not my voice then will I repent of the good that I said I would benefit them withal The very same you may see concerning the house of Eli in 1 Sam. 2.30 these words Wherefore the Lord God of Israel saith I said indeed that thy house and the house of thy Fathers should walk before me for ever but now the Lord hath said be it far from me for them that honour me I will honour and they that despise me shall be lightly esteemed And hence it came to pass Jonah 3.10 that Nineveh was not destroyed although the Lord commanded Jona to cry forty dayes and Nineveh shall be destroyed God did decree to change the dispernation of Mercy or Justice according to the creatures obedience or disobedience And God saw their works that they turned from their evil wayes and God repented viz. changed his mind of the evil that h● had said he would do unto them and he did it not Hence we may see that God changeth the dispensation of Mercy and Justice according to the creatures acting for he said Elies house should abide or be established before him but because Eli preferred his sons above Gods sacrifice suffering them to kick against it caused the Lord to toot him up And again whereas God did say he would destroy Nineveh they humbling themselves the Lord did not doe unto them in punishment as he said he would And thus I have proved the three particulars and fully answered what you have said namely That to love and hate Esau you dargue a change in God and so I p●ss to your second assertion as to this matter which is say you God
had a purpose about them before they were born was it to love him on hate him Answer Because I shall give forth the Exposition of this Chapter in its particular order I shall give a short answer to the question here and the answer is thus Israel stood much upon a fleshly account as I shall show you more at large in the discourse of the Chapter and pleaded their birth-priviledges very much and God did purpose both by Ishmael and Isaac and Esau and Jacob to take them off from that fond conceit and therefore as he purposed not to choose heirs to the heavenly Canaan by a fleshly discent or eldership according to the flesh so he purposed to discover it by these Esau and Ishmaels casting off sheweth the casting away of Israel and grafting the Gentiles in their place to type to wit Ishmael and Esau who were the eldest and so by consequence heirs to that inheritance which was but a type of Heaven the which the Lord shewed by dispriviledging of them of that earthly land and promises and giving it to the younger that also fore-seeing Israels unworthiness he would take away the Kingdom to wit the Gospel which of right did belong unto them and was first preached unto them and give it to the younger brethren to wit the Gentiles and yet notwithstanding did bestow great inheritances upon them and hated neither of them but for their sins committed personally and so I pass to the next thing which is a question also that you ask How Malachy comes to quote that place of Gen 25. and Paul to quotē both Answer The very reason that Paul quoteth it is to prove the choice of the Gentiles as in Rom. 9.24 25 26 30 They being counted the younger people as Luke 15. And for the very same reason Malachy quoteth it and calleth it the burthen of the word of the Lord to Israel and sheweth them although Esau or Edom were the elder people yet for their sins the Lord cast them off and you Israel as if the Prophet should say who are accounted the eldest people to whom the service of God hath been committed yet you have broken it and done abomination before me and poluted my Ordinances and therefore as I was magnified upon Pharaoh and Edom by impoverishing them so will I be magnified by impoverishing you O house of Israel For I have no pleasure in you saith the Lord neither will accept an offering at your hands For from the rising of the Sun even to the going down of the same my Name shall be great among the Gentiles Mat. 1 11 12. and in every place Incense shall be offered unto my Name and a pure offering For my Name shall be great among the Heathens saith the Lord of Hosts but ye have prophaned it c. From whence take notice the Apostle Paul quotes his saying As it is written Esau hated for his sins which he committed in time and not for Adams Jacob have I loved but Esau have I hated For the very same cause that the Lord hated Israel and cast them out and calleth them the people of his wrath for the same cause he hated Esau And that he hated Esau for his sin and not before he was born see Amos 1.11 Obad. 6.9 10 11 15. How are the things of Esau sought out thy mighty men O Teman shall be dismayed to the end that every one of the mount of Esau might be cut off by slaughter for the violence against thy brother Jacob Shame shall cover thee and thou shalt be cut off for ever Thou shouldest not have looked upon thy brother in the day that he became a stranger as thou hast done it shall be done unto thee thy reward shall return upon thy own head From whence we may see Esau was hated for his evil and not before he was born Again there is not one Text in the whole book of God that saith Esau was hated before he was born Rom. 9. saith no such thing As God respecteth not persons but looketh upon one man in misery as well as another with the eye of pity so he wanteth not ability to do them good Again If God did hate Esau before he was born then he must be a respector of persons for illustration take this comparison If two men were in misery and a third should redeem one out of his misery and leave the other in misery he must want ability or otherwise be a respector of persons the which neither of them is in God he is no respector of persons and to say he wanteth ability is Blasphemy but God hated not Esau before he was born but all that were lost by the first Adam was redeemed by the second otherwise the free gift was not so large as the transgression For as by the offence of one Judgement came upon all men to condemnation So by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men to justification of life So that if Christ did redeem but a part then there was but a part lost for so many as were made sinners by the first Adam so many were made righteous by the second Adam or otherwise Christs redemption was not as large as Adams transgression and then an imperfect Saviour the which to say were Blasphemy but the Scripture saith He tasted death for every man and a Sacrifice for the whole World and gave himself a ransome for all men and the like but it no where saith that he did not die for all or that he dyed for part of the world But you will Object Object and say That his bloud is said to be sh●d for many Answer All are not a few then they are many but no man can rationally conclude that Christ did not die for all from the Text that saith he dyed for many or this is the blood of the New Testament Sometimes the word many is to be understood all which is shed for many If they consider that all are not a few as aforesaid and if not a few then it must be many and you shall see that the word many in Scripture sometimes must be understood all 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from Daniel 12.1 2 3 4. Many of them that sleep in the dust shall arise some to Everlasting joy and some to Everlasting shame and contempt From 〈◊〉 if your sence be to be understood in the word many not to imply all in some places then at the general Resurrection when good and bad shall arise some to joy and some to shame all shall not rise onely some of both sorts and this is the manner of your reasoning from the word many but it cannot be proved that Esau was reprobated before he was born And although it be read in Romans the 9. That before the children w●re born or had done good or evil it was said uwo her the elder shall serve th● younger But in the 25. of Gen. it is not said children But two
repent and there is a sort of men that cannot or more properly a time when a sort of men cannot repent First There is a time when all men may repent if they withstand not the work of grace and there is a time when they cannot repent All men may repent if they have not withstood the day of grace because they are given up or shut up to condemnation And first to prove that there is a time wherein all may repent the wch I thus prove If God hath commanded to do no man more than he hath given him ability to do and yet command all men every where to repent upon pain of eternall destruction then God hath given every man ability so as they may repent if they withstand not the time of grace but God hath commanded no man to do more than he hath given him ability to do and yet hath commanded all men every where to repent upon pain of eternall destruct on That God doth command all men to repent is plain from there Scripturs Ezek. 14 6 18 30. Mat. 11.20 Luke 13.3 Act. 1.30 Rom. 2 4. 2 Pet 3.9 Ergo God hath given every man ability to repent this argument is naden●ble because I hope no sober man will dare to say that God commandeth men upon pain of eternal death to do that which he hath not given them ability to do and yet destroyeth them because they do not that which he never meant they should do when he commanded them to do it nor gave them ability Sirs look about you how do you abuse the A●ribu●e of Gods mercy sincerity uprightnesse and faithfulnesse the Lord will meet with you ere long and overth o● you he hath a controvercy to trye with you for laying the main cause of all the murder fornicatron and thest and drookenness upon his neglect in not giving the creature ability to do otherwise We as much ability to stand as Adam had Adam did sin so soon as he was tempted and we sin not before we be tempted thereunto But you will say they lost their ability in Adam Sir I tell you nay for the Scripture saith no such thing and also I pray resolve this question How Adam came to loose his ability that he withstood not the temptation in Paradice or had not God given him ability or did God intend he should eat and so fall when he forewarned him not to eat For I find that Adam had no more power to stand in Paradice than the sons of men have now for Adam did sin so soon as he was tempted thereunto and we sin not before temptation But you will say there is lust or desire in us to do evill It is true when by the temptation of Sathan set before us or suggested in us and so there was a desire in our first Parents to the fruit when it was by temptation represented unto them for as faith the Text it was fair to look on and desirable to make one wise and so forth● So it will appear there was lust or desire in our first Parents to the fruit before they eat it I could thorough the strength of God say more to this and the Argument before mentioned than you will be able to answer before you go to Ireland or after you come there but I spare you and passe to the second thing which is to shew there is a sort of persons that cannot repent or more properly as I have said there is a time when persons cannot repent the which I shall shew and also when the time is or the cause why they cannot repent There is a day of grace exhibited to the sons of men First That there is a time that men are so given up to a reprobate sense hat they cannot repent is clear from Heb. 6.4 5 6 and Rom. 1.24 and 1 Iohn 5.15 16. so that if Daniel Noah and Iob should pray for them they could not have such repentance to do them good but I need not trouble my self to prove this because it is your assertion But I shall shew the time or cause of this their deplorable condition and shall excuse Adam of this evill that is it came not by sin committed in him but by their own personall sins but to the cause and time of this hardnesse of heart and the time is when they have withstood the day of grace and so shall prove some had a day of grace and have out or The Spirit of God hath strived with such as are lost to repent that they might be saved withstood it and that there was a day of grace to the old world see these two places of Scripture Gen. 6 1 2 3 4. and 1 Pet. 3.19 20. Secondly that Israel had a day of grace in which they might have attained everlasting peace see Luk. 19.42 Matth. 23.37 And thirdly that the Spirit of God striveth with such to fasten grace and mercy on them that never do receive it Prov. 1.22 23 24. And fourthly the very cause why there is such a time when men cannot repent is because they do refuse grace and repentance when God offereth it for the Lord did strive by his Spirit to reclaim Israel from their sinnes that he might not cast them away and shut them up in unbelief but they refused to hearken and pulled away their shoulden Zach. 7.8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Iob. 21.12 13. Prov. 1.22 23 24 25 26 27 Esa 66.3 4 5. ch 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14. and stopped their ears that they should not hear yea they made their hearts as an adamant stone least they should hear the law and the words which the Lord of Host sent in his Spirit by the former Prophets and said to God depart from us for we desire not the knowledge of thy laws THEREFORE 〈◊〉 a great wrath from the Lord of Host THEREFORE it came to passe as he cryed and they would not hear so they cryed and I would not hear saith the Lord of Host for that they have hated knowledge and did not chuse the fear of the Lord. From whence we may see there are some that although they do reprint and cry to the Lord in their 〈◊〉 it will be to no purpose the Lord will laugh at their calamity and mock when there fear cometh from these and much more that I could instance you may see the cause and time of an hardened heart that is when a soul hath means of grace and maketh not use of it but walketh in his old sinnes and is not reclaimed at last the Lord giveth them up to hardness of heart and clappeth an oath upon their head that they shall never enter into his rest Heb 3.11 now what use may we make of this even to prise opportunity of grace and not to put the evill day far from us and so fould our arms in security untill misery cometh upon us as an armed man for assuredly when
he dyed for every man But he dyed for such as are saved and such as perish Ergo he dyed for every man That he dyed for them that perish see 2 Pet. 2 2. there are some said to have swift destruction The Apostle Peter saith that such as bring on themselves swift destruction were bought by the Lord. so lowing them that deny the Lord that bought them and from thence we may see that some that were bought by Christ our LORD did deny him and that he bought or purchas'd with his blood is clear from 1 Pet. 1.18 and so I pass from this to the next which is the Text 2 Pet. 3 9. thus read But his long suffering to us-wards is not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance your answer is that the Apostle speaks of Saints and he loved us and tells them why God was so slack in coming to judge the wicked why so patient and that Gods long suffering to us-ward not the wicked is not willing that any to wit of us the Elect should perish To which I Reply and say and first that to say Peter wrote to Saints and beloved is true but to say where he speaketh of Gods long suffering to us not willing that any should perish me aneth Saints I deny then you will possibly ask me who then the Apostle means when he saith his long suffering to us not willing that any should perish but all should come to repentance Answer first I shall shew you who it is not and then I shall shew you who it is and first who it is not it is not the Saints there meant because in Gods for bearing or delaying his coming conduces to the Elects hurt not to their good and Christ hath said the days shal be shortned for their sakes but never saith he will forbear or be slack or defer or suffer long for their sakes for as God will hasten the time for their sakes so it cannot come too soon to them for they then shall lift up their heads from whence you may see that it is not for the Elects sake that God suff●reth long but for their sakes God hasteneth his coming and shorteneth the dayes I could speak much more to this first but I hasten for the Press Where the Apostle saith his long-suffering to us respect the world present in opposition to the severity of Gods justice passed And Secondly I now shall shew who is included in the word Us in the Text His long-suffering to us-ward and that is the whole world of unregenerate sinful men and that is implyed in the Text although I might cite many Scriptures to that purpose but I shall onely examine the Text it self the which will prove it clearly and first the Apostle is speaking of scoffers coming in the last dayes that should be of an Atheistical spirit supposing the Heavens and Earth to continue in their old posture for ever saying Where is the promise of his coming for since the Fathers fell asleep all things continue as from the beginning but the Apostle saith that this they are willingly ignorant of that by the Word of God the Heavens were of old and the earth standing out of the water and in the water whereby the world mark that that then was being overflowed with water perished here lyeth the dependance of the Text but the Heavens and Earth that now is by the same word are kept for fire against the day of judgement and perdition of ungodly m●n but be not ignorant of this one thing that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day the Lord is not sl●ck he will come and will not stay and the reason is as if he should say because he is not willing that any of us v z. he World th●t now is should perish but all viz. the World that now is should come to repentance so that the word U his long-suffering to us means the World then and now in being this only may be worth a question What you say bringeth the certainty of your Election in question how it can be proved that the word Us and We when it is spoken by the Apostle can mean the World and that I could give you many Texts but I shall onely cite those mentioned in Acts 17.27 28 29. and shall pass only shewing you how you bring the certainty of your Election in question implying a possibility that some of the Elect may perish that is if he should not suffer long then they would perish but that they may not perish God deferreth his coming and suffereth long with the wicked in their wicked practises But you will say that Gods long suffering is salvation Answer it is true it is salvation which sheweth plainly that the long-suffering of God respecteth not the Elect but the Wicked for the Elect cannot be in a better estate than in Gods favour and in a state of Salvation in which they are already as you say and therefore it cannot do them any good or be Salvation to them but rather hurt for if the dayes of his coming should not be shortned no flesh should be saved but for the Elects sake those dayes shall be shortened as if Peter should have said comfort your selves it is not long before the day of Christ will come and you enjoy your Inheritance namely the new Heaven and the new Earth and therefore be patient establish your hearts for the Day of the Lord draweth near remember the Husbandman waiteth for the precious fruit of the Earth and also remember God hath a good end in his forbearing to hasten his coming that it might be salvation to poor souls that if peradventure some of them would be provoked to return from their wickedness and live for so Gods long suffering waited in the dayes of Noah in the old world and The long-suffering of God ha hoften waited upon wicked men and the Spirit of God strived with them to reclaim them from their sins But for whose sake was the long-suffering of God waited with whom did Gods Spirit strive with the righteous or the wicked it was with the disobedient that he might bring them to God and the very word long suffering respects not the Elect but the Wicked and that Gods long-suffering waiteth upon the Wicked to be salvation to them and not to the Elect see what the Apostle saith Rom. 2.4 Or despisest thou the riches of his goodnesse and forbearance and long-suffering not knowing that the goodnesse of God leadeth thee to Repentance or is appointed to lead thee to Repentance but after thy hardness and impenitent heart measureth up unto thy self wrath against the day of wrath From whence we may see that what you have said falleth to the ground and also you do contradict your own opinion in implying that such as are elected from the foundation of the World so as Devils or Men cannot do them hurt
neither is there any doubt of their Election and yet you say that the Apostle Peter when he saith he is not willing that any should perish but all to come to Repentance means the Elect the which implyeth a possibility of some of the Elect to perish although he be not willing they should but it is meant that Gods grace is such to the whole lump of Mankind the work-manship of his hands that he is not willing that any of them should perish some of them will perish but God is not willing they should so do for he sweareth by himself that he hath no pleasure in the death of him that dyeth and if he have no pleasure in their death he is not willing they should dye but rather that all might come to Repentance and so I pass from this Text of Scripture And whereas you tell me of Mr. Ruttons ability in the Scripture to expound them beyond thousands of us Answer It is not my business in this place or elsewhere to commend my self or others with me because I know that as of our selves we are not able to speak a good word or think a good thought for all our sufficiencie is of God and therefore having nothing but what we have received I dare not boast but this I say as in respect to Mr. Rutton or your self if your ability be such in the Scripture as you seem to boast of it is hid from me although I have heard you declare your selves in preaching and praying and conference but I pass and examine your answer as touching the potter and the clay Ier. 18. and Rom. 9. Which Texts are not alike for say you that Text of Ieremy either means first that the Potters work was Adam and we in him Secondly Adams marring and we in him or else it means 1. Gods work in making of Israel a people Church or State Secondly they marred by disobedience but co●ldought be marred in his hands against his will was it want of power and doth God lack power to save those that are lost could he have done no more to Israel then must he cease to be omnipotent and cease to be God he did enough to Israel to make them inexcusable To which I answer and that in particular and first you say the Text in Ier. 18. and Romans 9. are not alike and yet you confess that the Text in Ieremy may mean that God There is great correspondency between the Text Ieremy 18. and Rom. 9. made Israel a State and Church and they marred themselves in his hand by their disobedience and that it is the same people and cause that Paul speaks to in the 9. of the Romans is very plain to any man that hath not his understanding darkened and that it was the State of Israel that the Apostle speaks to read the fore-going verses and you shall see that Paul tells us that they were Israelites to whom did appertain the adoption and the glory and the Covenants and the giving of the Law and the service of God and the promise and also saith they were a disobedient people and so by their disobedience they were marred in his hand for God did strive with them by his Prophets rising early and lying down late saying O that they would hearken to my Commandements then should their peace have been like a River and their Righteousness like unto the waves of the sea but as saith the Apostle in the ninth of the Romans that although the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the Sea-shore yet a Remnant shall be saved because saith he all the day long have I stretched forth my hands to a disobedient and gain-saying people but my people would not hearken to my voice Israel would have none of me O that my people had hearkend and Israel had walked in my waies Isa 63.9 For in all their afflictions he was afflicted and the Angel of his presence saved them and in his love and pity he bare them all the dayes of old but they rebelled viz. were marred in his hands and vexed his Holy Spirit therefore he turned to be their enemy and fought against them and thus God rejected them and made them another vessel being marred in his hands by their sins But here lyeth the Objection He made them another vessel faith Jeremy 18. but the Apostle in Rom. 9. speaketh of making of the same lump or vessel to honour and another to dishonour Answer It is evident that the Apostle reasoneth Gods power from his derree or determination concerning Israel because it is in answer to this Objection Obj. Why doth he yet find fault who hath resisted his will the answer is thus Nay O man who art thou that replyeth against God shall the thing formed say unto him that formed it why hast thou made me thus hath not the Potter power over the Clay to make of the same lump one vessel to honour and another to dishonour As if the Apostle should have said unto them do you ask why God doth find fault and who it is that hath resisted his will are you ignorant that you have alwayes resisted the Holy Ghost as did your Fathers surely you may remember that you are such as have stoned the Prophets and also crucified the Lord Jesus and yet do you say why doth he yet find fault who hath resisted his will nay O man remember who thou art that replyest against God canst thou have ought against him for scattering of thee into all parts of the earth as the chaffe is dispersed before the wind for hath not the Potter power over the clay to make it a dishonourable Vessel when it is marred in his God hath power according to his justice and mercy to save some of the lump of Israel even such as did humble themselves and cast away others that were stiff-necked 2 Tim. 2.20 hand and you are the clay and the Lord is the potter and ye have been marred and tempered by the Lord that is he hath sent his former Prophets and also his latter Prophets crying out unto you to return that sin might not be your ruine but you have resisted the Word of the Lord and put it far from you therefore the Lord hath power to deal with you as Jeremies potter did with his clay nay God hath power of the same lump to make one vessel to honour and another to dishonour that is God hath power to save some of the lump of Israel even such as did believe and obey the Gospel and also to cast away others of the same lump of the house of Israel which did refuse and rebell against him and yet be just when he judgeth and this is agreeable with the words of Paul to Timothy which saith But in a great house there are not only vessels of gold and silver but also of wood and of earth and some to honour and some to dishonour And whereas the Apostle saith hath not the Potter
Answer There is not the word children mentioned in the 11. vers but it is mans word and not Gods that is the word children is put in by man there is not the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 viz. children in that eleventh verse of the ninth chapter to the Romans in the original but I read as beforesaid 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and so forth the word children being not mentioned and if you take notice of the word children it is printed in a less letter than the other words are the which implyeth that it is not in the original and also observe the words of God to Rebecca he doth not say two children are in the womb and the Younger shall serve the Elder but saith thus Gen. 25.23 Two Nations are in thy womb and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels and the one people shall be stronger than the other people and the elder shall serve the younger From hence we see that as there is no mention made of hating one and loving the other in this Text neither is there mention made of children at all in that Text and because my time is very precious I shall in few words sum up the matter contained in these two verses and so to the next verse and the scope of the verse in short is this That God did by these two types shew his purpose concerning the Jews and Gentiles as touching their admittance into Evangelical blessings that is that it might not depend upon any fleshly account or works of the laws but might depend only upon Gods free grace thorow his call in the Gospel so that the Jews might not have admittance thorow the law the which is a way of dept but thorow Faith in Gods call which is of or by grace and so in the next verse I shall shew that God hated not Esau before he was born but rather shews Rebecca and also all those that would take notice of it that not only Edom were to be Israels servants but also that the first should be last and the last first that is that although the Jews were such as of right were and had the kingdom first tendred to them thorow the Gospel yet were the last that should enjoy it Vers 12. It was said unto her the elder shall serve the younger Annot. In this Verse we may understand Gods mind was to make either Esau subordinate to Iacobs literally or else to make Edom subordinate to Israel let it be taken either way it mattereth not how beit all that was said either of Jacob or Esau before they were born was no more but this that one should be servant to the other and this might be and yet both in a state of salvation so then what the Lord saith as touching Esau before he was born argueth not his reprobation but you will say that the Apostle saith he was hated the which brings me to the examination of the thirteenth verse which is as followeth Vers 13. As it is written Jacob have I loved but Esau have I hated Annot. From hence observe that the Apostle doth not say that Esau was hated before he was born but adds Malachies words saying as it is written mark that Jacob have I loved but Esau have I hated now that we may the better understand whether God hated Esau before he was born or afterwards for his wickedness let us take good notice what Malachy saith as touching it because Saint Paul refers us to him saying as it is written Jacob have I loved but Esau have I hated and it is not written so in Genesis 25. therefore take notice of the words of the Lord as touching Esau or Edom spoken by the mouth of Amos Obadia and Malachy and first Amos speaks of Edom which imputively is Esau they being his lo●nes saying For three transgressions of Edom and four I will not turn away the punishment thereof because he did pursue his Brother with a sword and cast off all pitty and his anger did bear perpetually and kept his wrath for ever and Malachy joyning issue as it were with Amos saith as concerning Israel and Edom thus I have loved you saith the Lord viz. Israel yet ye say wherein hast thou loved us was not Esau Jacobs brother yet I loved Jacob and hated Esau and laid his mountains and heritage wast for the Dragons of the wilderness where as Edom saith we are impoverished but we will return and build the desolate places thus saith the Lord they shall build but I will throw down and they shall call them the borders of wickedness mark that and the people against whom the Lord hath indignation for ever and Obadiah sheweth the very cause wherefore the Lord hated Esau and that was for his wickedness committed in time as you may see if you seriously read him his words are these How are the things of Esau searched out how are his hid things sought out all the men of thy confederacy have deceived thee for thy violence against thy Brother Iacob shame shall cover thee and thou shalt be cut off for ever Ob●d 7 8 9 10 11 12. From hence we may see the Lord did hate Esau and also the cause wherefore he so did but there is no Text that saith God hated Esau before he was born for as I have said Saint Paul doth not say that God hated him before he was born but only makes use of Gen 25. and Mal. 1. to shew the house of Israel that although Edom from Esau was of right the people that should have enjoyed Canaan and those outward administrations by vertue of the fleshly descent if God did chuse only according to that way as Israel supposed was Gods way in his choice but God had another way to chuse viz. thorow Faith in calling and therefore sheweth Rebecca that the elder People or Nation viz Edom should be subordinate to the younger people or Nation viz. Israel and when Esau and Edom had done wickedly then the Lord saith by his Prophet Malachy that therefore he hated them and this is the sum of what Paul saith Rom 9. v. 13. and now for brevity and memories sake I shall sum up the matter contained in this verse in short and so pass to the next the words are these As it is written Jacob have I loved but Esau have I hated Annot. The scope of the verse is this for asmuch as Israel did murmur against the Gentiles for Christs sake and the Gospels because Christ would eat and be familiar with them and also that they were admitted to Gospel priviledges by faith thorough the preaching of the Apostles and therefore would persecute them the Apostle reasoneth with them on this wise as if he should say take heed you house of Israel how you murmur and persecute your younger brethren the Gentiles for you may know that God may chuse them who are the younger people to the administrations of the Gospel as well as he did chuse you that were
the younger as in respect of Adam and therefore be contented and do not hate your brethren for you also may have salvation if you f●ll it not by your sins the which if you do by hating and casting out your brethren know it was written for your admonition that for Esaus violence against his Brother Jacob the Lord ha●ed him at the last Deut. 2.5 although he loved him at first when he was courteous to Jacob and you Mount Seir unto him so that Israel must not meddle with it but when Esaus cruelty began against his Brother then the Lord hated him and at last laid his mountains and heritage the which he gave him waste for the Dragons of the Wilderness and this was the Apostles reasoning to Israel to admon sh them from their murmuring and cruelty and the like against the Gentiles but God hated not Esau before borne and yet afterwards did hate him for his wickedness and that God may love and hate one and the same creature and not change in his Decree I have already proved by Gods loving and hating the Angels and I have also shewed how the execution of his Decree depends on his two Attributes viz. Mercy and Justice and where the Apostle speaks of children he means the Nation as aforesaid or otherwise saith nothing to the matter to wit of the controversie between Jew and Gentile which is the sum of his discourse in Romans 9. and that you may see that which is spoke in Scripture as of Esau means the Nation of the Adamites read Gen. 36 8. in these words Thus dwelt Esau in Mount Seir Esauis Edom from whence we may learn that when the Lord speaks of hating of Esau he means Edom because Esau is Edom. Objection But you will say that Esau could not repent and therefore reprobated before he was born Answ To which I answer Heb. 12 27. the meaning of the Text is this that when Esau had sold his birth-right and neglected the time and opportunity of his blessing by his being abroad a hunting in the field that then there was no seasorable time neither was there room or plice for repentance so as to be accepted in reference to the obtaining of that which he before had despised ●ould and neglected although be might repent or cry or tear his heart for it is a true maxime that the last of time is without recovery and therefore saith Christ to Jerusalem If thou hadst known even thou at least in this thy day but now is it hid from thine eyes and so forth Luke 19.42 But take this in short that Esau having despised his birth right and sold it that then there was no reason that he should enjoy the blessing which depended on the birth-right and was to be given as a consequence of this and much more I might say but I pass and leave you to examine what I have said as to this in my former discourse and by the way take notice that this was but an external blessing and also that he had sold it and therefore no room or place for him to regain it again after he had despised it although he might seek it with tears and this is set out for our warning that we might not despise or neglect or ell for this Worlds enjoyment our inheritance which is not the mount that might not be touched but mount Zion the City of the living God and the heavenly Ierusalem and the innumerable company of Angels and so forth and so I pass to the fourteenth verse Verse 14. What shall we say then Is there unrighteousnesse with God God forbid Annot. This verse we may see implies an objection in these words Is there unrighteousnese with God to which the Apostle answereth nay God forbid as if he should have said there is no injustice with God for he doth every thing very justly for he might hate Esau or Edom for their wickedness although they were from Isaacs loins and also the elder people too were of right external blessings did belong by vertue of the fleshly line but Gods choice and blessing depends not on Nations or Generations upon a fleshly account but every Nation that feareth him and worketh righteousness shall be accepted of him and this the Apostle further clears in the fifteenth verse which is the reason that the Apostle urges from Gods words to Moses Vers 15. For he saith to Moses I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion Annot. In this verse we may see Paul clears up Gods Justice in casting off the people of Israel for their sins in shewing that God is not so ingaged to any people upon a fleshly account or upon an account of choosing them to bear his name so as if they rebel against him not to punish them and cast them out of his sight and therefore repeateth what the discourse was between Moses and the Lord as touching Israel and saith the Lord said to Moses that he would have mercy on whom he would have mercy that is as if the Lord should have said to Moses trouble not thy self so much about this people as to wish thy self blotted out of my Book that I may have mercy on this people for they are a rebellious stiff necked people therefore pray not nor intercede for them for I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy thou shalt not appoint me whom I shall have mercy on for I will have mercy on whom I please that is I will have mercy on humble obedient souls and such as sin will I blot out of my book and this is meant by the words of the Apostles saying He will have mercy on whom he will have mercy and that you may more clearly know what is meant by these words premised consider these two things First the occasion of Gods saying to Moses I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy and that was Israel had grievously sinned against the Lord by making them gods to go before them Moses undertook to intercede for them to the Lord and in his intercession useth many motives to move God to have mercy on them Exod. 32.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13. as first he beseecheth the Lord to spare them because saith he the Egyptians will speak and say for mischief did he bring them out that he might slay them in the mountains Secondly Moses desires the Lord to remember Abraham Isaac and Israel viz Jacob thy servant to whom thou swarest by thy own self and saidst unto them I will multiply your seed as the starrs of Heaven these and such like motives Moses useth to prevail with the Lord to turn away his anger but the Lords answer is that Israel was a stiff-necked people and therefore saith he Let me alone that I may consume them and I will make of thee a great Nation Nevertheless Moses was not satisfied but did go on to
particular order and first because the Text saith that the scripture saith to Pharaoh for this purpose have I raised thee up that I may shew my power in thee I shall shew the Text and the cause why the Lord raised up Pharaoh and first see the Text Exod. 9.16 17. the which is thus read And in very deed for this cause have I raised thee up for to shew in thee my power and that my name might be declared thorowout all the earth as yet thou exaltest thy self against my people that thou wilt not let them go from which word we may see that there was a cause wherefore the Lord raisedup Pharaoh and that was from these two great evils first because Pharaoh had persecuted his people by laying great burthens on them under which they grievously groaned insomuch as their sighing groans and cries went up into the ears of the LORD OF HOSTS besides his murdering their poor innocent Babes and only for this cause because he saw the Lord prospered them and they did multiply and secondly the cause why the Lord raised him up was for his contempt in saying when the Lord sent admonition to him Exod. 5.2 Who is the Lord that I should obey his voice to let Israel go I know not the Lord neither will I let Israel go as if he should have said in contempt of the Lord what is it to me you Moses and Aaron what the Lord saith What is he that wil assume such authority as to command me to let you go I know him not nor will I take notice what he saith by way of command neither will I let you go for this cause the Lord raised him up that Pharaoh might see him to be a God of power as if the Lord should have said will Pharaoh strive with his maker or doth he suppose that he is stronger than he for this cause I will try the title with him I will raise him up and harden him that he may try the best of his valour and in as much as he will not know me here yet I will make him to feel and know my power in the read sea and thus the Apostle makes use of this of Pharaoh as a President to Israel as if he should have said O house of Israel take heed of striving with your Maker in chusing of your own wayes and persecuting his people as you have done his Prophets and also his Son yet know that there was none that ever hardened themselves against God which went unpunished you might take notice how the Lord dealt with Pharaoh and the Lord railed him up on purpose to shew all men and more especially you O house of Israel what misery would befall such as chuse their own wayes and harden themselves against God in not hearing and obeying of his voice Obj. But peradventure some will object and say That God raised up Pharaoh and hardened his heart not for any evil he had done but because the Lord would have all men know that he would reprobate some and harden their hearts not for their personal sin but that they might do evill and so he be just in punishing of them Ans Let the Objection lye this or any way in this nature it will appear very far from truth it having neither Mercy or true Justice in it First by the way it it very strange that God should proclaim himself throughout the earth to be a God slow to anger and of great kindnesse and not willing to punish or afflict the children of men and yet would have his name known by hardening of men simply of his own will and not for any evill personally committed that they might then sin and then punish them because they do sin is this Gods doings surely no such a thing is to be found in God but this by the way but now to shew that there is no Mercy or true Justice in it and also to offer some Objections of the same nature and so pass to the next verse and first that there is no mercy in it is clear because Mercy respects and pitieth men which are in misery especially when they were made so not of their own Will but made subject to it by another the which is the very c●se with the Sons of men if what you say be true for they were made subject to misery and that not of their own Will or personal fault but by reason of Adam that made them subject thereunto so then if the Lord leave such in misery and not put them in a state of Salvation there was never any mercy shewed them and then his mercy is not above or over all his Works for mans glory in Creation was not of Gods mercy but of his love for mercy opposeth misery but misery was not before the Fal therefore no place for mercy where there was no misery Obj. And if it should be said Gods mercy was to all men in raising them from the dead Answ I answer and say that there is as much mercy shewn to the Reprobates in raising them from the Dead if your opinion be true as there is shewn to a man that is taken from Prison where he lives at ease and carried to the Gallows and hanged secondly that there is no true Justice in it is clear for if God do proclaim mercy for every man and say it is his desire that such as perish should turn from sin and enjoy his Holy Spirit Prov. 1.22 and yet notwithstanding before they were born or have done good or evill appoint them for condemnation Ezek. 33.11 and so shut them up under unbeliefe and withhold Faith and Repentance from them and yet command them to Believe and Repent upon pain of Damnation and at last condemns them because they did not Repent and Believe the Gospel when before they were born he did appoint their Ruine and shut them up under unbelief that they might not believe how this will appear to be true or pure Justice I know not because it is just as if a man that hath a quarrel against his Servant should appoint him a great days Work beyond what he was able to do by the judgement of all men living to that end he might take an advantage against him and then punish him because he did not do it how this is pure justice I know not Again how it can be pure Justice in God to command such to Repent as he never did intend should Repent and shut them up in unbelief that they might not Repent and then punish as aforesaid because they did not Repent this seems a very strange Paradox to me but Gods Mercy is over all his works and his Justice is full of Righteousness Faithfulness and Purity therefore such things as aforesaid are not in God its only mens gross mistake in Scripture Obj. But again peradventure some will object and say doth not the Scripture say that God hath of old ordained some to condemnation Answ To which I answer
sinners to hardnesse of heart although they be the children of a father beloved of God and also if Daniel Noah and Job should intreat for them as Moses did saying have mercy on these people and remember their fathers viz. Abraham Isaac and Jacob yet they should deliver but their own souls for he will have mercy on whom he will have mercy that is on the penitent as afore said for he will by no means clear the guilty but such as sin will be blot out of his book and so I passe to the next verse which saith Vers 19. Thou wilt say then unto me why doth he yet finde fault for who hath resisted his will Annot. In this verse we may clearly see the Apostle raiseth an octjection the which he answereth in the following verses the objection lyes in these words why doth he yet finde fault for who hath resisted his will As if the Apostle should have said peradventure you house of Israel may say to the Lord for what cause dost thou finde fault with us who of us have resisted thy will why wilt thou or for what cause wilt thou reject us But the Apostles answer to them in order to clear God in his justice saith Vers 20. Nay but O man who art thou that replyest against God shall the thing formed say unto him that formed it why hast thou made me thus Annot. In this verse the Apostle doth as it were preface to the answer of the objection but his full answer lyeth in the following verse but in this verse he reasons on this wise as if he should have said dost thou ask why God finds fault with thee and punishes thee who it is that hath resisted his will as though thou was clear and innocent and knew not why God had made thee a dishonourable vessel and therefore saith the Apostle who art thou or how canst reply against God and say why hast thou made me thus a dishonourable vessel for saith he God did before appoint that although he did intend to make you an honourable people that if you did harden your selves against your Maker and sin against him that then he would make you another vessel as pleas'd him best which without doubt would be a dishonourable one of this the Lord hath before preached to you by the Prophet Jeremy when he made him go down to the Potters house see the work upon the wheel and the clay marred in the Potters hands Jer. 18 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. and him making of it another vessel as seemed good to the Potter at which time the word of the Lord came to Jeremiah saying As the Clay is in the Potters hands so are ye O house of Israel in my hands therefore in what instant I speak of a Nation or Kingdom to build and to plant if they do evill in my sight I will repent of the good that I said I would benefit them withall and therefore saith the Apostle do you ask why he doth finde fault with you and make you thus a dishonourable vessell hath he not power so to do and that according to true justice you being made in the hands of his mercy by your disobed●ence as the clay was in the Potters hand and he made it another vessel as seemed him good and cannot God do so with yon and yet be just and thus the Apostle answereth the objection in the next verse saying Vers 21. Hath not the Potter power over the Clay of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour and another unto dishonour Annot. In this verse the Apostle answereth the objection as if he should have said O house of Israel take notice of this as the Potter had power over his clay that is when it was marred in his hand otherwise to dispose of it although at the first he did intend to make it an honourable vessell yet afterwards he had power and wisdome otherwise to dispose of it that is to say to convert that which was stubborn and brittle to a dishonourable vessel and that which was flexible and yielding to an honourable vessell and this is Gods power and priviledge over you even you O ye house of Israel you being marred in Gods hand he may disappoint you of that glory which he did intend to bestow upon you as you were a Nation whom once the Lord loved and called his peculiar people and yet might have mercy upon a small remnant of that lump or Nation who did believe and were humble yielding and penitent before the Lord. And thus the Apostle clears up Gods Justice and thus I passe to the next verse because those things that might be offered as objections to some particulars in this verse I have already answered in my precedent discourse in this Treatise and also the necessity of my present occasion causeth me to study brevity Vers 22. What if God willing to shew his wrath and to make his power known indured with much long suffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction Annot. In this verse we may understand the Apostle sheweth that God had been just if he had destroyed the Nation of the Jews long before for their rebellion but for these two causes God did suffer long The first is because he would make his power and wrath appear the more severe toward that rebellious people for our admonition and forewarning unto us And secondly that he might make known his mercy in a more larger manner and measure on that part of the house of Israel who did believe and fear before the Lord that they might say it was of his mercy that we were not consumed Obj. But if it be objected and said that the Text saith The vessels of wrath are fitted to destrustion Answ To which I answer and say That as the receiving and cherishing of the gracious motions of Gods Spirit it sits us or prepares us for glory even so the receiving of the motions of sin and cherishing of it fits us for destruction and thus one part of Israel was fitted for destruction by their receiving sin and Satan so as to be guided thereby and secondly so was the other part or remnant fitted or prepared for glory thorough the receiving the motions of the Spirit of Christ and being guided thereby the which as it sits for glory so at last it brings us to glory and so I passe to the next verse which is as followeth Vers 23. And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy which he had before prepared unto glory Annot. I having opened this verse before I shall passe it briefly saying that there is no soul that ever shall enjoy glory but such as are fitted for it in this life and that by the Lord. And secondly I say that such as perish have been strived with by the Spirit of God that thereby they might have been fit for glory but they would have none of his counsell for they desired not
tell the truth and what am I become your enemy because I tell you the truth receive fools gladly for as much as you are wise and remember there was a time in which you were a fool if you are yet grown wise And thirdly I am hot troubled because you call me Asse because an Asse is an innocent usefull creature and doth his master better service than a lasie slumbring Dogg that loveth to sleep and yet is greedy to seek gain at his quarters moreover I have once read that an Asse could see better than his Rider by which he reproved the folly of his Master but no more of this a word to the wise is sufficient but I shall try the next thing which is a question you ask say you Is not our Ordination good we had imposition of hands by the Ministers Answ It is not the imposition of hands in Ordination that I question but the lawfull subject who is to have hands laid on him and the lawful Presbyter and the like that is the thing which will be questioned in its time and place Page 27. And again whereas you say that It is in the Presbyters power and not in the Churches to appoint their Ministery for say you Paul left Titus in Creet to ordain Elders there and it is the same word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is used in Act. 7.10 where it is said the King of Aegypt did appoint Joseph Governour over Aegypt the which power say you was conceived to be in the King and not in the people To which I answer and say and first I know that a proud generation of men would willingly reign as Lords and would be masters to such as they ought to be servants to and exclude the Church in their Election or Ordination although they will not excuse the Church in donation so that one month in a year viz. harvest the Priest will make the people believe that he is their servant but eleven months he will be their master but this by digression and so to the matter which is you say It is in the Presbyters power and not the Church to appoint who shall be their Minister the reason is because say you Pharaoh did appoint Joseph to be Governour over Aegypt as supposed without the peoples consent and it is the same word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is used by Paul to Titus To which I answer what although the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to signifie Ordination or appointment will it therefore follow because it is supposed that Pharaoh an heathen King did appropriate such power and authority to himself as to appoint a Governour without the peoples consent that therefore Paul d●d license Titus so to do or did Paul appoint Titus to be a second Elius over the Church a very pretty comparison as you think or strong reason to prove that Titus did Lord it over the Church to appoint what Governours he pleased because Pharaoh the heathen King did so as it is supposed and know ye not what our bl●sled Saviour saith That the Princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them and they that be great exerciseth authority over them but it shall not be so amongst you but who so would be great amongst you Mar. 20.26 let him be your minister viz servant or under servant 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from Mat. 20 26 27. as from the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and he that will be chief amongst you let him be your servant From whence we may learn that Christ doth not appoint unlesse in Churches such authority to sit as Lords amongst them but to walk humlby and self-denyingly as to be an example to the flock and moreover we finde the Church of Antioch did ordain Paul and Barnabas by imposition of hands and yet no Presbyter there that I find neither was Paul and Barnabas called Apostles before they were ordained and indeed the power lyeth originally in the Church as faith our Saviour If thy brother sin against thee tell him of his fault between thee and him and if he refuse to hear thee then take another with thee and if he refuse to hear you tell the Church and if he neglect to hear the Church let him be as an heathen or a publicane for whatsoever ye binde on earth in the plurall number mark that shall be bound in heaven From whence we may see that the power lyeth originally in the Church Finally God hath appointed the Church as in reference to have officers for choice and approbation and the Presbyters to appoint by prayer and laying on of hands as for charge and designation and thus they are to go hand in hand in that work as may further appear from the Apostles words to the Church at Jerusalem saying Chuse out amongst your selves men of honest report whom we may appoint or give charge over that matter Act. 6.3 So then if he that is but to take care of the body must not be imposed on the Church without their choice much lesse may there be a man imposed on them which is to take care and watch over their souls without their choice and approbation I might say very much to this but I passe briefly to the next thing which is say you Although we were in Rome and came through it yet we are now separated from their Ceremonies Page 27. and walk according to the rule of Gods word and pray did not our Saviour come from Adam through sinful lines Answ To which I answer and say That whereas you say that although you came through Rome or were in Rome yet you are now separated from the ceremonies thereof to which I say I do believe that you are separated from some of Romes Ceremonieis as may be compared to Anise and Cummin and the like but the fundamentals you stil practice and uphold that is your Ordination is from them and you in your Ordination are made a petty Pope by them witnesse your absolution of sins Although you suppose that you are separated from Rome yet you stand in her authority and own her doctrine that is they in your Ordination appoint you to forgive men their sins they that doubt of the truth of this may read the Book of Ordination of the National Ministery the which will shew them the truth of what I have said and secondly you practice and uphold that Ceremony of Baby-Baptism which was confirmed by Pope Innocent the third as was granted by one that was better read in the Fathers as I verily judge than your self but this by the way for it is both in the Articles of your faith and your I evident that Infant-Baptism that you are not separated from Romes Ceremony for first you do declare in the Articles of your faith that Christ did descend into hell and some of you have cited the Text in Peter 1 Pet. 3 19. which saith he went and preached to the
what had he to do to meddle with Gods word or ordinances 〈◊〉 16. see●he hated to be reformed and Si●s this was your Reverend Father in God and hence the Pope and you come to be so near kin that he hath given each of you a Livery that you might remember him this was your Lord Bishop and Reverend Father in God and your head Presbyter from whom you received your Ministerial Function and therefore no doubt as you think but your Ministery is likely to be very good But I remember that 〈◊〉 of y●u have changed your vizzard and are gotten into another shape of Ordination and instead of being made Ministers under or by authority of the Pope you now becove Ministers by authority of Parliament they O 〈◊〉 you or by authorizing some to do the work for them but know the Lord will try you ere long and sweep away your refuge and hiding place for he knoweth full wel that you are a time-serving people and seek honour of men and that his love is not in you But I passe this and come to the second thing which is your Office or work that you are given in change to do namely your forgiving men their sins the which you know is a great work enjoyned on you to do as in your charge and also I have heard your tribe contending for it and I do assure you it giveth such a sound or eccho as if it came frome the bottome of the Popes belly 〈…〉 person and therefore hath raught you in the Articles of the Creed to believe in the Church not in the Pope for the Romane Chatholick himself is scarce so had because although he doth say that the Pope may forgive sins and that his words are of great authority yet it is not impossibe for h●m to erre say they as he is a single person but he and his Council or Church considered together cannot erre So that infalibility is not concluded by them at all times to be in the Pope considered as a single person but considered as with the Church And therefore the Article of your Creed doth not teach you to believe in the Pope as a single person but doth teach you to believe in the Catholick Church that is the Church and Pope as considered together Therefore he that appropriates all to the Ministery is worse than a Papist except he believe none be of the Church but the Ministery And now to shew you that the power of Remission or retaining of sins lies in the Church and not in the Ministery singly considered as such And first I shall begin with your own cited text as by some of you which is read thus Joh. 20.19 20 21 22 23. Whosesoever sin ye remit they are remitted and whosesoever sins ye retain they are retained In this Text we are to consider who the void YE respects whether the Church or Ministery the which is pain that the word YE respect the Church and not the Ministery unlesse we consider the among ther as the Church the first reason why I believe it 〈◊〉 the Church and not the Ministery is because there is no mention of the Ministery or Ministers but it is given to Disciples as such and therefore you have not the w●rd Ministery or Ministers read in the Original The power of binding and loosing is in the Church considered as such and not in the Ministery singly considered as such as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is Disciples as such and not Elders or Paltors or Apostles as such not that say that it is spoke to the Church exclusively so as to exclude the Ministery when they are considered together as a part of the Church neither do I say that there was not Ministers an ongst the Disciples at that time for I do believe that there was some of the eleaven but this is that which I say it was not given to them considered as Ministers or Apostles but that power of remitting or retaining of sins was given to them as considered a Congregation or Church of Disciples met or gathered together as such mark that and as it will appear in this Text considering the presidence so it will appear fully in my second Reason Mat. 18.1 18 19. which is gathered from the words of Christ in the Gospel of St. Matthew which saith Tell it to the Church and if they neglect to bear the Church let him be to thee as an heathen or publicane for whosoever YE viz. the Church binde on earth shall be bound in heaven Therefore faith the Apostle to the Corinthians 1 Cor. When YE viz the Church come together with my spirit and the power of the Lord Jesus deliver such an one to Satan shewing that the Church ought and had power to bind together with the Minister as considered a Church in order and as they had power to binde so they had power also to loose for saith Paul 2 Cot. 2.7 Sufficient is his sorrow Wherefore YE viz. the Church ought rather to forgive him and comfort him lest peradventure such an one should be swallowed up with overmuch sorrow From whence we may see that the power of binding and loosing lyeth originally in the Church as such and not in the Ministery singly as such b●● being considered together they are an intire Church or a Church in intire order and so the power is committed to them and therefore God will not have any to be Lords over his heritage for he hath overthrown s●me of them already and ere long will trise and mightily sh●ke the earth and then the Lord ●ill overturn overturn overturn the r●sidue of them and make them as the chaff of the summer thr●shing floor and the whirl-wind of his wrath small scatter them so as their place shall not be found Obj. But if it should be objected and said That Christ gave the keyes of the kingdome to Peter Mat. 16.18 to binde and loose whom he pleased and therefore the power is committed to Ministers as such and not to the Church Ans To which I answer and say that where it is said Thou art Peter and upon this rock viz. the Son of God will I build my Church and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it viz the Son of God which was IT the rock and I will give unto thee viz the Church that is built on ME the rock the keyes of the Kingdom and whosoever thou viz the Church that is so b●●t bind on earth shall he bound in heaven So then where the word is rendred thee and thou as if it were to Peter as a single person may respect the Church which is built upon that rock which indeed is considered but as one single Woman or Spouse they being but one body of whom Chist is the head And therefore in the metaphorical discourse of Christ and his Church in the Canticles he speaks to her as a single
From whence we may see that when God hath given any man his Spirit so as to qualifie him for the work of the Ministery and the Church Elected him for the same then according to the practice of the Church of Antioch and others also they ought to keep a day solemnly unto the Lord by fasting and prayer Act. 3.1 2 3. at which time the Eldership ought to lay their hands upon the person or persons so Elected and approved of as aforesaid and give them their charge in the presence of all the Congregation and this is Gods method and our practice in Ordaining of Ministers And again their charge is mainly to preach the Gospel instant in season and to study that they may divide the word of truth aright that their profiting may appear to all men that behold them and several other thing of this nature that might be added as matter of their charge but I shall passe both from this particular and this subject and come to the vindication of Zions Redemption Zions Redemption Redeemed IN the answer of this discourse viz. Zions Redemption your ignorance as I suppose is very much discovered As first say you The ten Tribes are threatned never to be a people more and Hose a tells us say you God will love them no more Isa 7.8 Hosea 9.15 16 17. God will cast them away and they shall be wanderers amongst the Nations and yet say you I believe there is hope of their call for they are elected and beloved page 31. To which I answer and say That although you know not the mystery of God in the prophets yet you might have learned to lay your contradictions farther asunder for say you in page the 29 that God saith by the Prophet Hosea He will love them no more and yet in your page 31. you say They are elected and a beloved people as in Rom. 11. Gould discover your ignorance at large but because time is precious I shall onely disprove what you say and not so much paraphrase on your words to shew the contradistions as possibly I might do if I had time But say you Israel shall not return again into their own land for God will love them no more Therefore it will be necessary for me to open your Text of Scripture cited by you and secondly to prove that God had an everlasting love to the house of Israel as in reference to the manifestation thereof in time And thirdly to prove that the ten Tribes viz. Israel shall return and also Judea into their own Land and these in their particular order And first to the first Isa 7.8 which is to open these two Texts of Scripture Hos 9.15 16.17 namely Isaiah and Hosea which saith the Prophet Isaiah 7.8 For the head of Syria is Damascus and the head of Damascus is Reazin and within threescore and five years shall Ephraim be broken that it be not a people Ans To which I answer and say 2 King 17.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 That this Text is a Prophecy of Ephraims extirpation from being a Nation in their own Land so that Israel for their sins was to be carried away captive as was done according to Gods word as is recorded in the Book of the Kings yet not such caprives as that they never were to return For the very same Prophet that prophecies of their Captivity also prophecies of their return as you may read in the eleventh Chapter of his Prophecy saying And he shall set up an ensign for the Nations Isa 11 12 13 14 15. and shall assemble the out-cast of Israel and gather the di●persed of Judah from the four quarters of the earth and the envy of Ephraim shall depart and the adversaries of Judah shall be cut off and the Lord shall utterly destroy●th tongue of the Aegyptian Sea and with his mighty wind shall he shake his hand over the River viz Euphrates as Rev. 16 12 and shall smite it in the seven streams and make men go over dry-shod and there shall be an high-way for the Remnant of his people which shall be left from Assyria like as it was to Israel in the day when that he came up out of the land of Aegypt From whence we may see that although Israel must be broken from being a Nation for a time yet there is a Remnant which spring from their loins which shall return again and enjoy their own Land But I shall passe at present to your next proof of Scripture which is the words of Hosea saying All their wickedness is in G●lgal Hos 9. for there I hated them for the wickedness of their doings I will drive them out of mine house I will love them no more all their Princes are revolters my God shall cast them away because they did not hearken unto him and they shall be wanderers among the Nations From these words you conclude that they shall never return because the Prophet saith That he will love them no more but his God will cast them out and make them wanderers among the Nations In these words we may learn these two things First the prophets zeal for the Lord that he doth not onely pray to the Lord to bring judgements upon them Jers 14. as in the foregoing ver but also saith that he wil love them no more also saith he My God will cast them out and make them wanderers amongst the Nations And secondly he giveth the reason why he thus spake and that was saith he Because they did not hearken unto the Lord but were revolters from him Now let the Reader judge whether you understood what you printed for doth this Text imply that Israel shall never return because the Prophet saith That HE will love them no more But admit the Prophet speaks as in the person as we may say of God yet the reason why he would love them no more was because of their sins now if they had repented God could not but have loved them according to the property of his mercy Do you not know what is the property of the Attribute of Gods Mercy Did you never read what the Lord said unto Israel in the tenth Chapter of the Book of Judges Judg. 10.12 13 14 15 16. In these words Ye have for saken me and served other gods wherefore I will deliver you NO MORE Go and cry unto the gods which ye have chosen let them deliver you in the time of your tribulation From whence we may see that God useth the word NO MORE in this place saying I will deliver you no more and also we see the cause was for their sins yet when they humbled themselves and said We have sinned do thou unto us whatsoever seemeth good unto thee Judg. 12 32 33. deliver us only we pray thee this day and they put away their strange gods from among them and served the Lord and his soul was grieved for the misery of Israel And
he did deliver them although he had said he would deliver them no more as you may read in the 32. and 33. verse of the 12. Chapter And thus for want of knowledge not ignorance in the Scriptures you may see how the eyes of your understanding are darkened so as you cannot see as it were at noon day Moreover take notice that the same Prophet Hosea whom you would if you could have proved your matter namely that Israel shall not return again fully proveth what I have affirmed as you may read in his Prophecy in these words Hos 13.9 ch 14.1 2 3 4 5 6. O Israel thou hast destroyed thy self but in me is thine help O Israel return to the Lord thy God for thou hast faln by thine iniquities I will heal their back-slidings and love them freely for mine anger is turned away from him I will be as the Jew to Israel he shall grow as the lillie and cast forth his roots as Lebanon his branches shall spread and his beauty shall be as the Olive tree and his smell as Lebanon From whence we may see that the very same Prophet doth prophecy of Gods love to Israel and their prosperous estate after their return although you say he will love them no more But whether we may believe you or the Prophet I leave the Reader to judge because your speech is opposite one to another and so passe to the second thing which is to prove that the Lord is so far from retaining wrath and hating Israel for ever that he loveth them with an everlasting love viz. that people that came from the loins of Abraham Isaac and Jacob as will appear from the words of the Prophet Jeremiah saying The Lord hath appeared unto me of old Jer 31.3 4. saying Yea I have loved thee with an everlasting love therefore with loving kindness will I draw thee again I will build thee and thou shalt be built O Virgin of Israel thou shalt again be adorned with thy Ta●rets and go forth in the dance of them that make merry c. Thus we see the Lords love to Israel proved to be everlasting so that what you say is found lighter than vanity And I so shall pasle to the third thing which is that Israel shall return out of their captivity into their own Land and also shall answer your grand Objection or beat down your strong hold cited by you Ezek. 16.55 in these words When thy sister Sodom and her daughters shall return to their former Page 30. estate and Samaria and her daughters shall return to their former estate then thou and thy daughters shall return to your former estate which is supposed not to be But first to prove that Israel shall return into their own land as aforesaid and that you may see it clear see what is spoken by the mo●●hes of the holy Prophets Jer. 33.7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16. saying I will cause the captives of Judah and the captives of Israel to return and I will build them as at the first I wil cleanse them of all their iniquiti●● and thus saith the Lord again there shall be heard in this place which ye say shall be desolate without man and without be●st even in the Cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusal●m which are desolate the voice of joy and the voice of gladnesss the voice of the BRIDEGROOM and the voice of the BRIDE the voice of them that shall say praise ye the Lord of host for the Lord is good for his mercy endureth for ever and of them that shall bring the sacrifice of praise unto the house of the Lord for I will cause to return the captives of the Land as at the first saith the Lord Behold the day cometh saith the Lord that I will perform that good thing which I have promised to the house of ISRAEL and to house of JVDAH in those daies and at that time will I cause the BRANCHES OF RIGHTEOVSNES to grow up unto DAVID and he shall EXECVTE JVDGEMENT AND RIGHTEOVSNES in the Land in those dayes shall JVDAH be saved and JERVSALEM There is a glorious return of Israel to their own Land proved at large from those Scriptures with several o●kers which are also mentioned dwell safely and this is his Name by which he shall be called the LORD OVR RIGHTEOVSNES for this saith the LORD DAVID shall never want A MAN to sit upon the THRONE of the HOVSE OF ISRAEL moreover the word of the Lord came to Jeremiah saying Considerest thou not what this people have spoken saying the two FAMILIES which the LORD hath CHOSEN he hath even cast them off thus they have despised my people that they should be no more a Nation before me thus saith the Lord if my Covenant be not with day and night and if I have not appointed the Ordinances of heaven and earth then will I cast away the seed of Jacob for I will cause them to return and have mercy upon them And that this respects the last return is very plain First because it speaks of both Families returning namely Israel meaning the ten Tribes and Judah meaning the Zionnites or the daughters of Zion And secondly because it speaks of Christ executing judgement in the Land as doth appear from the word the LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNES and that the place is mean Jerusalem in the letter Jer. 3 25 is plain from the thirteenth verse of the three and twentieth Chap●er of Jeremiah which saith That the places about Jerusalem and in the Cities of Judah sh●ll the flocks passe again and at that time they shall call Jerusalem the Throne of the LORD and all the Nations shall be gathered unto it to the name of the LORD to JERVSALEM neither shall they walk any more after the imig●nation of their evill hearts the which yet now they do mark that in those daies the house of Iudah shall walk with the house of Israel but yet they have not mark that and they shall come together out of the Land of the north to the Land that I have given for an inheritance unto your fathers Ezek. 37 21. and I will make them a Nation in the Land upon the mountains of Israel and one King shall be unto them all and they shall be no more two Nations neither shall they divide into two Kingdomes any more at all neither shall they defile themselves with their Idols any more at all and David viz. Christ my Servant shall be King over them according to the words of the Angel to Mary which saith For he shall be great and be called the Son of the most highest Luke 1.31 38 and the Lord God shall give unto HIM THE THRONE of his FATHER DAVID and he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever and of his Kingdome there shall be no end for behold in those daies and in that time will I bring the captives of Judah and Jerusalem
for the M●untains shall depart and the H●ll● be removed but my kindnesse shall not depart 〈…〉 ●hee neither shall the Covenant 〈◊〉 Jer 〈◊〉 22 23 24 2● peace be removed saith the Lord that hath me cyon th 〈◊〉 turn again O Virgin Israel turn again 〈…〉 Corts and I will cause the Captivity of 〈…〉 Captivity of Israel to return and I will build them 〈…〉 first Jer● 〈◊〉 For 〈◊〉 set mine eyes upon them for good and will 〈◊〉 the● again to this Land and I 〈…〉 do 〈◊〉 and I will plant then 〈…〉 nor throw them do●nany 〈…〉 〈…〉 of Israel ye shall shoot 〈…〉 your fruit to say people Israel 〈…〉 For behold I am for 〈…〉 be alled and sown 〈…〉 the jouse of Isreal 〈…〉 be inhibited and the 〈…〉 upon you man 〈…〉 and bring fruit and I will 〈…〉 and I will do better unto you than at your beginning and ye shall know that I am the Lord. Thus faith the Lord of Hosts in those dayes it shall come to passe Zach. 8.22 23 that ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the Nations even shall take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew saying we will go with you for we have heard that God is with you And it shall come to passe in the last daies Isa 2.2 3 4 5 that the Mountain of the house of the Lord shall be established in the top of the monntains and many people shall go and say come ye and let us go up to the Mountian of the Lord and to the house of the God of Jacob Mich. 4.1 2 3 4. and he will teach us of his wayes for the Law shall go forth of Zion and the Word of the Lord from Jerusalem For Zions sake will I not hold my peace and for Jerusalems sake will I not rest untill the righteousnesse thereof go forth as brightnesse and the salvation as a lamp that burneth Is 62.1 2 3 4 The Gentiles shall see thy righteousnesse and all Kings thy glory and thou shalt be called a new name which the mouth of the Lord shall name Thou shalt also be a crown of glory in the hand of the Lord and a royal Diadem in the hand of thy God Thou shalt be no more termed forsaken Isa 51.3 neither shall thy Land be termed desolate any more but thou shalt be called Hephzibah and thy Land Beulah Isa 35.10 Chap. 51.11 for the Lord delighteth in thee For the Lord will comfort Zion and he will comfort all her wast places and he will make her wildernesse like Eden and her des●rt like the garden of the Lord joy and gladnesse shall be found therein thanksgiving and the voice of melody For the Ransomed of the Lord shall come to Zion with songs and everlasting joy shall be upon their heads They shall obtain joy and gladdesse and sighing and sorrow shall flee away Zeph. 3.19 For he will gather them out of all places where they have been driven and get them fame in every place where they have been put to shame and for their shame they shall have double and for their confusion they shall rejoyce in their portion Isa 61.7 For in their Land double everlasting joy shall be upon them and they shall be put into a place of their own and move no more neither shall the wicked afflict them as aforetime But the sons also of them that afflicted thee shall come bending unto thee and all that despised thee shall bow themselves down at the soles of thy feet and shall call thee the City of the Lord the Zion of the holy one of Israel Isa 60.14 Ver. 18 21. Violence shall no more be heard in thy Land wasting nor destruction within thy borders but thou shalt call thy walls salvation and thy gates praise thy people also shall be all righteous they shall inherit the Land for ever and thine eyes shall see Jerusalem a peaceable habitation Isa 66.10 11 12 13. rejoyce you with Jerusalem and be glad with her all ye that love her rejoice for joy with her all ye that mourn for her that ye may suck and be satisfied with the breast of her consolation that ye may milk out and be delighted with the abundance of her glory for thus saith the Lord behold I will extend peace to her like a river and the glory of the Gentiles like a flowing stream then shall ye suck ye shall be born upon her sides and dandled upon her knees as one whom his mother comforteth so will I comfort you Chap. 65.18 Isa 30.19 and you shall be comforted in Ierusalem For behold I create Ierusalem a rejoycing and her people a joy for the people shall dwell in Zion at Ierusalem thou shalt weep no more He will be very gratious to thee at the voice of thy cry when he shall hear it he will answer thee Psal 102.13 14 15 16. For the Lord shall arise and have mercy upon Zion for the time to favour her yea the set time is come so the heathen shall fear the name of the Lord and all the Kings of the earth thy glory When the Lord shall build up Zion Ver. 21 22. he shall appear in his glory when the people are gathered together and the Kingdomes to serve the Lord to declare the name of the Lord in Zion and his praises in Ierusalem Look upon Zion the City of our solemnity thine eyes shall see Ierusalem a peaceable habitation a Tabernacle that shall not be taken down Isa 33.20 21 22 24. But there the glorious Lord will be to them a place of broad rivers And the inhabitants shall not say I am sick the people that dwell therein shall be forgiven their iniquities the Lord hath sworn by his right hand and by the arm of his strength surely I will no more give thy corn to be meat for thine enemies and the sons of strangers shall no more drink thy wine for which thou hast laboured but they that have gathered it shall eat it and praise the Lord and they that have brought it together shall drink it in the Courts of my holinesse Isa 62.8 9 10 11 12. Go through go through the gates prepare ye the way of the Lord cast up cast up the high-way gather out the stones lift up a standard for the people Behold the Lord hath proclaimed unto the end of the world say ye to the daughter of Zion behold thy salvation cometh behold his reward is with him and his work before him And they shall call them the holy people Ezek. 34.12 13 28. the redeemed of the Lord and thou shalt be called sought out a City not forsaken As the Shepheard seeketh out his flock in the day when he is amongst his sheep that are scattered so will I seek out my sheep and deliver them out of all places where they have been scattered in the cloudy and dark day and I
and his Disciples should be for signs and wonders in Israel it was so and as it was prophesied that the Jews should smite him on the cheek it was so and as it was prophesied that they would give him vineger to drink it was so and as it was prophesied that one should betray him for thirty pieces of silver by which the Potters field should be bought it was so and as it was prophesied that they should cast lots for his vesture it was so and that a bone of him should not be broken but that he should be peirced it was so done to him These and many such like things as touching Christ and also concerning Israels Captivity by the Bibylonians which was foretold by the Prophets was fulfilled in the letter multitudes of such like things as I could speak of but the time fails me which was fulfilled in the very letter Therefore let us believe that what the Prophets as touching Christs glorified condition in Jerusalem and Peter knew well what he said when he speaks of Christs Kingdome saying We have not followed cunning devised fables when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus but we were eye-witnesses of his glory and we have a more sure word of prophesie to which you do well if you give heed mark that knowing first that no prophesie of Scripture was of any private interpretation neither came it by the will of man but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost Hence we see the Prophets words are of great weight and also take notice that all the Prophets bare witnesse to the truth of what I have asserted and this intervening discourse I thought good to adde to that end that the courteous Reader might take notice that what the Prophets had foretold was and is to be fulfilled in the letter of the Scriptures unlesse they are proverbs or parables or the like and therefore I shall desire thee to read them the more diligently and distinctly they want not an interpretor but are very plain to him that hath any discerning spirit onely take notice of this that whereas the Prophet Ezekiel speaks of David he means the Son of David viz. Christ which is to sit upon his Throne for ever as the discourse of the Chapter will clearly shew as possibly I may give an hint of it in the marginal ●oat and these few things premised I come to the second part of the assertion which is That Christ shall Reign in Jerusalem And in order to the making of it appear to be truth I shall shew you that the Prophets have foretold it viz. that the Lord shall make Ierusalem or Zion at or in Jerusalem his seat and reign there before whom Kings shall fall down and shall worship before him therefore mark well the words of the Lord spoken by the mouth of his holy Prophets Psal 2.6 Zach. 2.10 11 12 13. which saith Yet have I set my King upon his holy hill of Zion Sing and rejoyce O Daughter of Zion for lo I will come and dwell in the midst of thee saith the Lord And many Nations shall be joyned unto the Lord in that day and shall be my people and I will dwell in the midst of thee Isa 31.4,5 6. and thou shalt know that the Lord of Host hath sent me unto thee And the Lord shall inherit Judah his portion in the holy Land Jer. 13.7 and shall chuse Jerusalem again Be silent O all flesh before the Lord Isa 24.23 for he is raised up out of his holy habitation So will the Lord of Hosts defend Jerusalem and in defending of it he will deliver it Ezek. 34.23 24. Then shall the Sun be ashamed and the Moon confounded when the Lord of Hosts shall Reign in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem David being prophesied to be a Shepherd and Prince in Jerusalem and so to remain for ever is to be understood Christ before his Ancients gloriously At that time they shall call Jerusalem the THRONE of the Lord and all the Nations shall be gathered unto it to the name of the Lord to Jerusalem neither shall they walk any more after the imaginations of their evill heart And I will set up one Shepheard over them and he shall feed them even my Servant David he shall feed them and he shall be their Shepheard And I the Lord will be their God and my Servant David viz. Christ a Prince a-amongst them I the Lord have spoken it Behold I will take the children of Israel from amongst the heathen whither they be gone Ezek. 37.21 10 29. and I will gather them on every side and will bring them into their own Land And I will make them a Nation in the Land upon the mountains of Israel and one King shall be King to them all and they shall be no more two Nations neither shall they be devided into two Kingdomes any more at all Neither shall they defile themselves with any of their transgressions but I will cleanse them so shall they be my people and I will be their God And David my servant viz. Christ shall be King over them It cannot be meant that David in the letter shall be their Prince for ever but Christ that is called the Son of David and is to sit upon his Throne for ever and they shall have one Shepheard and they also shall walk in my judgements and observe my statutes and do them And they shall dwell in the Land that I gave to Jacob my servant and they shall dwell therein even they and their children and their childrens children for ever and my servant David viz. Christ shall be their Prince for ever Moreover I will make a Covenant of peace with them and it shall be an everlasting Covenant and I will place them and multiply them and will set my Sanctuary in the midst of them for evermore My Tabernacle also shall be with them and I will be their God and they shall be my people The heathen shall know that I the Lord do sanctifie Israel when my Sanctuary shall be in the midst of them for evermore Rev. 21.3 4. And I heard a great voice from heaven saying the Tabernacle of God is with men and he will dwell with them and they shall be his people and God himself will be their God And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes Rev. 5.9 10. And they sung a new song saying thou art worthy to take the Book and lose the seals thereof for thou wast slain and hast redeemed us to God by thy bloud out of every kindred tongue and Nation And hath made us unto our God Kings and Priests and we shall reign on the earth Behold the dayes come saith the Lord that I will perform that good thing that I promised to the house of Israel and to the house of Judah In those daies and at that time will I cause a
Branch of righteousnesse to grow unto David and he shall execute judgement and righteousnesse in the Land Jer. 33.14 15 16 17. In those daies shall Iudah be saved and Israel dwell safely and this is his name whereby he shall be called the Lord our righteousnesse For thus saith the Lord David shall never want a man to sit upon the Throne of the house of Israel For the Lord shall roar o●t of Zion and utter his voice from Ierusalem and the heavens and the earth shall shake but the Lord will be the hope of his people and the strength of the children of Israel So shall ye know that I am the Lord your God dwelling in Zion my holy moutain then shall Ierusalem be holy Joel 3.16 17 18 19 20 21 and there shall no stranger passe through it any more But Iudah shall dwell forever and Ierusalem from generation to gener●tion For I will cleanse their bloud which I have not cleansed for the Lord dwelleth in Zion For the Lord hath chosen Zion he hath desired it for his habitation This is my rest for ever here will I dwell for I have desired it I will abundantly blesse her provision I will satisfie her poor with bread I will cloath her Priests with salvation and her Saints shall shout aloud for joy Psal 132.13 14 15 16 17 18. There will I make the horn of David to bud I will ordain a lamb for mine anointed His enemies shall be cloathed with shame but upon himself shall his Crown flourish in that day it shall be said to Ierusalem fear not and unto Zion let not thy hands be slack the Lord thy God in the midst of thee is mighty he will save he will rejoyce over thee with joy Zeph 3.14 15 16 17 18 19. Sing O daughter of Zion shout O Israel be glad and rejoyce with all thy heart O daughter of Ierusalem The Lord hath taken away thy judgements he hath cast out thine enemies the King of Israel even the Lord is in the midst of thee thou shalt not see evill any more But the captives of the host of the children of Israel shall possesse that of the Canaanites even to Zarephath and the captivity of Ierusalem which is in Sepharad shall possesse the Cities of the South And Saviours shall come upon Mount Zion Obed 18.19 20 21 to judge the Mount of Esau and the Kingdomes shall be the Lords Again the word or the Lord of Host came unto me saying Thus saith the Lord of Hosts I am jealous for Zion with a great jealousie and I was jealous for her with great fury Zach. 8.1 2 3 4. thus saith the Lord I am returned unto Zion and will dwell in the midst of Ierusalem and Ierusalem shall be called a City of truth and the mountain of the Lord of Hosts the holy mountain And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives which is b●fore Ierusalem and the Lord thy God shall come and all his Saints with him for Enoch also the seventh from Adam Enoch prophecied of Christ kingdom Judg 14 Zach 14.4 5 9. prophecied of these things saying behold the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his Saints And the Lord shall be King over all the earth in that day shall there be one Lord and his name one Repent ye therefore and be converted that your sins may be blotted out when the TIMES of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord for he will send Jesus Christ which before was preached unto you whom the heavens must receive untill the TIMES of restitution of all things which God Acts 3.19 Rom. 2.16 Acts 17.31 2 Tim. 4.1 hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy Prophets since the world began For he hath appointed a day in the which he will judge the world in righteousnesse by that man Christ Iesus at his appearance and Kingdome Behold upon the mountains the feet of him that bringeth good tydings that publisheth peace O Judah keep thy solemn Feasts perform thy vows Nah. 1.15 for the wicked shall no more passe through thee he is utterly cut off For thus saith the Lord of Hosts yet once is it a little while and I will shake the heavens and the earth and the sea and the dry-land And I will shake all Nations Hag. 2.6 7 8 9. Isa 61.1 2 3 Rev. 15.8.29 to 35. Psal 48.8 9. Psal 68. from Isa 66.6 Ezek. 41.14.15.20 21 23 25. and the desire of all Nations shall come and I will fill this house with glory saith the Lord of Hosts And the glory of this latter house shall be greater than of the former saith the Lord of Hosts and in this place will I give peace saith the Lord of Hosts Behold I will send my messenger and he shall prepare the way before me And the Lord whom ye seek shall suddenly come to his Temple even the messenger of the Covenant whom ye delight in Behold he shall come saith the Lord of Hosts But who may abide the day of his coming and who shall stand when he appears For he is like a refiners fire and like fullers soap And he shall sit as a refiner and purifier of silver and he shall purge the sons of Levi Mal 3.1 2 3 4. and purge them as gold and silver that they may offer unto the Lord an offering in righteousnes●e Then shall the offerings of Iudah and Ierusalem be pleasant unto the Lord as in the dayes of old and as in former years and I will be as the dew unto Israel he shall grow as the lilly and cast forth his root as Lebanon his branches shall spread and his beauty shall be as the Olive tree and his smell as Lebanon They that dwell under his shadow shall return Hos 14.5 6 7 8. they shall revive as the corn and grow as the vine the scent thereof shall be as the wine of Lebanon Ephraim shall say what have I to do any more with Idols Isa 55.11 12. who is wise and he shall understand these things For they shall be led forth with joy and the mountains shall break forth before them into singing And at that day will I raise up the Tabernacle of David Amos 9. from 11. to 16. that is fallen and close up the breaches thereof And I will raise up his ruines and will build it as in the dayes of old Balaams prophecy to Balack as touching the estate of Israel in the latter dayes Numb 24. from 14 to 20. That they may possesse the remnant of Edom. And I will plant them upon their own Land And there shall come a Star out of Jacob and a Srepter shall rise out of Israel and shall smite the corners of Moab and destroy the children of Seth and Edom shall be a possession Seir also shall be a possession for his enemies and Israel shall do valiantly Out of Iacob shall come he that shall have dominion