adversaries were as peremptory in this as the other charge Tertullian reckons the report that the Christians were Crucis religiosi amongst those scandals which were raised by malice in order to the eclipsing their reputation As for the Relicks of Saints we find no mention of any religious respect which was paid to them Those who have the greatest zeal for them are usually mounted upon tradition but finding it not able to carry them thro' the first Centuries in this particular they think good to alight and content themselves with some instances in Scripture which are nothing to the purpose as the hemm of Christ's garment the shadow of S. Peter the Handkerchiefs and Aprons that touched the body of S. Paul Because the Woman diseased with an issue of blood was healed by touching the first the sick were brought into the streets that they might be overshadowed by the second many were delivered from evil spirits by the third They have a mind to perswade us without any good reason that these particulars with all Relicks of an equivalent Nature challenge religious veneration No doubt Peter himself was every way as valuable as his shadow and yet when Cornelius made an attempt to worship him he prevented him by an express prohibition The Fathers in the ages next to the Apostles were not such good husbands as to make such an advantagious improvement of these instances but on the contrary we find them charging the Heathens with Superstition of a like nature as the worshipping the Monuments of the Dead and we never read that the Heathens did retort upon them their guilt in the same kind which no doubt they would have done in case there had been any such practice among them Celsus Lucian c. were not so dull as to overlook so signal an advantage They which use to charge them with too much would have paid them their own in case there had been the least appearance of reason for it As the most early Writers next to the Apostles never mention the Worshipping any else but God so all the words which import Divine Worship are by them exclusively applied to him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by Justin Martyr Apel. 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by Theophilus Antiochenus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by Tatianus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by Origen 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 L. 1. Cont. Cels Servire by Irenaeus Huic servire soli oportet discipulos Christi Colere adorare by Tertullian Apol. c. 17. Inst l. 1. c. 20. Quod colimus unus Deus est Praescribitur ne quem alium adorem Venerari by Lactantius veneratio nulla alia nisi unius Dei tenenda est Hitherto I have asserted the verity of this Proposition God only is to be Worshipped In the next place I will consider the opposition that has been made against it by the Church of Rome and those who adhere to Her Maldonate makes no scruple to pronounce n Mat. 5. v. 34. that it is a wicked error to maintain that religious Honour is to be tendered to none but God The Inquisitors have blotted out such Words and Sentences out of Books as cast a favourable aspect upon this Doctrine In a Sentence cited out of Gregory Nyssen by Antonius in his mellifluous Sermons in these words eam verò folummodò naturam quae increata est colere venerari didicimus they condemn the word Index Exp. solummodò to an expunction The Index to Athanasius's Works Printed at Basil has been treated with the same respect These words adorari solius Dei est are not permitted to remain in it The Gloss in the Margin of the Bible upon 1 Sam. 7.3 Prepare your hearts unto the Lord and serve him only has not escaped their severity Their decree concerning it runs in these terms deleantur illa verba serviendum Deo soli They have done with these Testimonies as Caesar Borgia used to do with men namely contrive the death of those who did impede the accomplishment of his designs This practice doth evidently declare that they are conscious that their Worship cannot stand without this Principle be taken out of the way The sence of it is opposed by them in many particulars as the Worship of the Sacrament the Invocation of Saints the Adoration of Images c. 1. The Worship of the Sacrament The Church of Rome hath given too much occasion to believe that the Accidents of the Bread and Wine are to be honoured with supreme Veneration The Council of Trent in plain words asserts that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is granted to signifie supreme honours is to be given to the Sacrament It does not say to a part only of it but useth the Word in general which must necessarily imply the whole and extend to all which is appointed to be received Now it is evident that the Accidents are a part of the Sacrament which is to be received They constitute the outward and visible sign L. 4. Saâ—r Bellarmine represents them as the principal ratio Sacramenti magis convenit speciebus ut continent Corpus quà m corpori Christi ut est sub speciebus The following words of the Council confirm this Interpretation nec enim minùs adorandum c. neither is it the Sacrament to be less adored because it hath been instituted by Christ the Lord that it may be taken for him the same God we believe to be present in it whom the eternal Father bringing into the World saith Let all the Angels adore him c. Here the Sacrament is represented as that in which our blessed Lord is present and contained under and by consequence as distinct from it That which contains any thing is always diverse from that which is contained in it Now what is there left for the Word Sacrament to import but the outward Elements the signifying part under which it is supposed that the Sacred Body of our blessed Lord is latent His Presence in the Sacrament is alledged as the reason of the Adoration given to it Tho' this is not sufficient to justifie the practice for then every thing in which God is present would be an adorable object as the Sun and Moon and whole Creation yet it leads us into the meaning of the Word Sacrament as it lies in the Council and assures us that it imports some thing besides our blessed Saviour which can be nothing but the outward Elements whereby he is represented A command to give civil honour to the Throne of a Prince because the Prince himself sits in it evidently implies that the Throne and the Prince are distinct one from the other To expound the Decree by the Canon in which there is mention only of Worshipping Christ in the Sacrament is very preposterous They aim at two distinct things The first obligeth us to Worship the Sacrament the second to Worship Christ who is present in the Sacrament These two are as different as to Worship the Palace in
competent Judges of their own ability The generality are very partial in their reflections upon themselves are easily flattered into a belief that the dominion of their Reason is as large as those Monarchs have fancied their Territories who by the strength of imagination have entituled themselves to the regency of the World and expressed displeasure against Cosmographers for not allowing them a bigger space in their Tables This unfitness in men to judg of themselves devolves a necessity upon others to do it for them otherwise the ends of the Ministerial Function will be disappointed by an intrusion of the unskilful and confusion take place of all good order Those who judge must be persons of Learning and experience in the same imployment None can judge but those who are fit and none have such a degree of idoneity as those who are thus qualified The business of a Spiritual Pastor is not only to lead his flock into advantagious places to feed in it but to defend it against the rapine of Wolves not only to exhort but convince gain-sayers Tit. 3.9 Many of those who contend against the Truth making use of their improvements in humane Studies for the accomplishment of their end it is but expedient That they who are designed to enter the Lists with them should have skill at the same weapon This was perceived by Julian an irreconcileable enemy to the Faith of Christ who commanded That the Christians should be deprived of all Books of Learning to compensate which damage Apollina the Elder turned the Books of Moses into Heroick Verse the Younger the Gospel into Dialogues after the method of Plato Of this skill which a Minister ought to be endued with every Christian is not a competent Judge Not only the Law but the Gospel doth pronounce it reasonable That every man should be tried by his Peers The judgment which they give must not be concealed but declared to the Church for her direction That She may know whom to refuse and whom to accept as Ministers And it cannot be better declared than by some important actions as Prayer which has a tendency to invite from Heaven a Benediction upon the Heads and Hearts of those who are found qualified and Imposition of Hands which solemnly points out unto the People whom they are to entertain as their Pastours These actions being exerted by one who is invested with authority change the state of private Men and translate them out of a Civil into an Ecclesiastical capacity A Sence of the necessity of such Persons has been always so great that there is no Age but will furnish us with instances of them Before the Flood we meet with Preachers which were solemnly Commissioned to dispence the mind of Heaven Noah is stiled 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Pet. 2.5 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a Person in Commission constituted to proclaim the Will of his Prince Didym in Hom. â—â— 6. p. 183. Shrev The Scholiast upon Homer says 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 every King has his proper Heraulds This Office doth not open to every one who can perswade himself that he is indued with abilities agreeable to the importance of it but is peculiar only to those who are ordained to it Noah is stiled the Eighth Preacher It is more congruous to refer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 than to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He spared not the old World but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not the Eighth Noah there being none of the name before but Noah the Eighth Preacher This contributes evidence to the act of Divine Justice in drowning the World which altho' eight eminent Preachers of Righteousness had been employed in order to the promoting a reformation neglected them all and entertained their advice with scorn and derision These Eight are Enos Cainan Mahalaleel Jared Enoch Mathusala Lamech Noah Enos challengeth the first place Of his time it is said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 then Preaching began in the name of the Lord. That 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may admit of this interpretation is evident Jonah 3.2 It has a plain affinity with the Chaldee 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from whence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is derived and is in the Septuagint expressed by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gen. 41.43 Exod. 32.5 Prov. 8.1 That which our Translation attributes to Men in general the Greek and Latin assigns to Enos only So that we are not destitute of authority if we thus read the Text Then Enos began to Preach in the name of the Lord. Namely concerning the desolation which the prophaneness of Cain's posterity would certainly draw upon the World if not prevented by a sincere and timely Repentance The Second Preacher is Cainan He was so eminent in this Sacred Function that the Kenites who were Scribes and solemnly ordained to expound the Divine Law 1 Chron. 2.55 received their denomination from him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Third Mahalaleel The Character of his Office is legible in his name He was set apart to Praise God and proclaim his Righteous Will The Fourth Jared which word imports humility from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 descendere The humble God delights to teach and he that is taught of God is not unfit to communicate instruction to others The Fifth Enoch S. Jude represents him as a Prophet declaring that the Lord was coming to execute judgment upon all v. 14 15. His name is derived from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to dedicate He was devoted solemnly to the Ministery and those words He walked with God argue that he exercised his Sacred Function The Jerusalem Targum expounds them He laboured in Truth before God even as the Elders are said to labour in Word and Doctrin 1 Tim. 5. The Sixth is Methusala He is the Son of a Prophet and in his very Name did foretel the Flood It is compounded of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to import that when he was dead God would send a universal Deluge He died according to this prediction in the beginning of the year in which the Flood was The Seventh was Lamech He gave an undoubted testimony of his being under the power of a Prophetick Spirit by naming his Son Noah and expounding the meaning of it in these words The same shall comfort us concerning our work and the toil of our hands because of the ground which the Lord hath cursed Gen. 5.29 They plainly presage some signal consolation which would accrue to mankind by him After the Flood until the time of the Law we are not without instances of a like importance The First-born in every Family did execute the Sacerdotal Function We read of Priests before the order of Aaron was instituted and young men sent by Moses to offer burnt offerings which the Chaldee Paraphrase renders the first-born Exod. 19.22 This is the reason why the Apostle in his Epistle to the posterity of Heber in allusion to this Institution saies Ye are come to
repeated These words the Lord spake and added no more Deut. 5.22 Altho' the reason taken from the Creation of the World Exo. 20. is totally omitted If the absence of this reason makes no alteration upon the Precept but the whole Law is said to be spoken altho it be wanting then the presence of a new reason taken from the deliverance out of the Aegyptian servitude cannot have any influence upon it either to make it Ceremonial or Moral The secondary reasons of a Ceremonial Command may be Moral and of a Moral Ceremonial and Positive It is to be observed That the reason we speak of has relation but to one particular in the Command namely the enjoyning of Masters to make the Sabbath a day of rest unto their Servants as well as to themselves Now to make the whole Command Ceremonial upon the account of an extrinsecal and secondary reason relating only to one circumstance in it I leave it to every unbiassed mind to determine whether it be agreeable to the usual rules of discourse 4. There is no inconvenience which will follow if we assert That as we are bound to the Fourth Command so likewise to the same measure of rest which that Precept limiteth A rest only in general is required and that in order to the keeping of One Day in a Week Holy This being the end and the end always modifying the means we have assurance That such a measure of rest is only understood as has a tendency to promote this purpose All who believe the Lord's day to be grounded upon Apostolical authority must necessarily grant that we are bound to rest upon it from all those works which are not reconcileable with the end of the institution namely The devoting of the whole day to the honour and worship of Christ If there be any stricter measures of rest enjoyned upon the particular Seventh from the Creation by any other Law it nothing concerns us no more than the day it self It is not true That the Fourth Command doth forbid all work whatsoever For if this was the sence of it it would be repugnant to the Law of Nature which requires That works of necessity piety and mercy be done at all times There was a Law amongst the Heathens That no work should be done on their feast days when Vmbro and Scaevola were consulted about the meaning of it they notwithstanding the strictness of the words made answer That such work might be done which did relate ad Deos ad urgentem vitae utilitatem quod praetermissum noceret What kind of work the Fourth Command prohibits may be collected from the words of it Six days shalt thou labour and do all thy work but the Seventh is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God in it thou shalt not do any work that is any which appertains to thy particular calling or function which might with equal advantage have been dispatched in the week time Therefore when servile work is expresly forbidden on the Passeover c. and dressing of meat allowed but on the Sabbath in the Fourth Command all work all work imports no more than servile Therefore the Chaldee Paraphrast expounds 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 opus servile and that which is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lev. 23.7 is expressed by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 only Ex. 12.16 Deut. 16.8 All the difference is That what is expressed in more general terms in the Fourth Precept is more explicitly and particularly set down in the Law touching the Passeover c. This will be very evident if we consider That the Passeover sometimes happened to be upon the Sabbath as in the year when our Blessed Lord was crucified and therefore by reason of these Two Solemnities meeting together That Sabbath is stiled a high day Jo. 19.31 If on the Passeover all servile work is forbidden and dressing of meat allowed but on the Sabbath all work whatsoever whether servile or not servile then by the Law of God the Jews were bound to contradictions when the Passeover fell upon the Sabbath they were bound and not bound to dress meat by the Law of the Sabbath they were bound not to do it By the Law of the Passeover they were bound to do it For the Lamb by a divine Precept was to be roasted with fire Irenaeus and S. Cyprian limit the work prohibited in the Fourth Command to servile work The Alexandrian Edition of the LXX L. 4. c. 19. c. 20. Cypr. de Sp. San. interprets 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the Syriack 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 opus servitutis Num. 29.7 It cannot in reason be thought That the Fourth Command prohibits the dressing of meat or kindling of fire on the Sabbath which speaks nothing of these particulars When as those particular Laws which carry a much fairer and more probable appearance of such an interdiction upon an exact inquiry will be found to import no such matter As for the dressing of meat the words usually alledged are these To morrow is the rest of the holy Sabbath unto the Lord bake that which will bake to day and seethe that which will seethe and that which remaineth lay up for you to be kept until the morning Exod. 16.23 This Text speaks of the Manna of which a double portion did descend from Heaven on the day preceding the Sabbath Of this portion one they might bake and seethe and eat that day the other part they were to lay up unbak'd and unsodden Bake that which you will bake and seethe that which you will seethe and that which remaineth not of what was baked or sodden but of what was gathered over and above the daily proportion That lay up to be kept till the morning This is plain from the miracle expressed in the next verse They laid it up till the morning and it did not stink neither was there any worm in it If it had not been raw the glory of the miracle had been celypsed Before they reserved some which they had gathered contrary to God's Command and it was putrified in the morning and now they reserve a portion according to his Command and no putrefaction is in it If it had been baked or sodden it would have been thought That that was the reason why it was not corrupted as before Indeed in the fifth ver it is said On the sixth day they shall prepare that which they shall bring in that is If any have a mind not to eat it raw but to prepare it for food whether by grinding it in Mills beating it in a Mortar Num. 11.8 or any other toilsome way all such elaborate preparations must be finished upon the Sixth day they containing too much servile work for a Sabbath Yet notwithstanding all this it does not appear from the Text but that upon the Sabbath they might do in order to a more immediate preparation of it what Christians usually do about their food on the Lord's day As for the
of Worship we may add Hearing Reading receiving the Sacraments The Liturgy joyns together the setting forth the Praise of God and the hearing his Word when we with holy reverence hearken to it we set forth the Praise of his Wisdom and Goodness which by our devout and serious attention we acknowledge to be sufficient and ready to instruct us He who reads the Scripture as the Word of the living God with an intention to be made wise unto Salvation by it doth thereby manifest his deep sence of the incomprehensible and profound understanding of the Author of it When Proselytes are admitted into the Church by Baptism and have the remission of their sins sealed unto them upon the terms of the new Covenant it is an evident indication of their humble resentments of the infinite goodness of God in granting an act of Amnesty and pardon after the violation of the first Covenant Their being baptised in the name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost is an expression of a reverential acknowledgment of and an entire devotion to the sacred and blessed Trinity The receiving the Symbols of the body and blood of our Lord imports a laudatory agnition of him It is not an empty remembrance which is intended but a solemn commemoration attended with the most emphatical expressions of Praise and Gratitude It is stiled a shewing forth in allusion to the Jewish 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which was a declaration made in praise of the benignity of Heaven in procuring redemption from the Aegyptian servitude The Wine is stiled by S. Paul 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Cup of Blessing and the Bread by Justin Martyr 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Bread of Thanksgiving These two Sacraments were not designed for the primitive times only but to continue to the last period of the World The reason of their continuance is common to all Ages we have now as much need to renounce our ghostly enemy profess our repentance promote sanctification be received into the Church commemorate the death of Christ renew our covenant gain a fuller Communion as they which lived in the first age And it is not now inexpedient that we should be taught by some visible signs our intellectual powers are in as much dependence upon sence as formerly Were the attainments of the present Age equal to the state of Paradise this way of instruction would not be disagreeable Eden was not without Two Sacramental Trees Their permanency is likewise ascertained to us by a Divine Revelation In the Commission to Baptise it is said I will be with you to the end of the world To interpret baptising nothing else but an initiating by Doctrine without Water and the end of the world the end of the age in which the Apostles lived is to offer too much violence to the Text. The proper Notion of Baptism includes Water We are not to depart from the proper signification of words and comply with a Metaphorical without a peremptory necessity The Context is so far from obliging us to this departure that on the contrary it holds forth a manifest discrimination betwixt baptising and initiating by Doctrine v. 19. v. 20. The first is expressed by the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the second by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That phrase 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is of the same importance with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mat. 13. v. 40. and there without controversie it signifies the last period of the world when the Angels shall sever the wicked from the just If 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 import the Age it must be remembred that the Jews divided the time from the Creation to the dissolution of all things into two Ages the first expiring at the coming of the Messias the second at the final period of the Universe and so I will be with you to the end of the age is as much as I will be with you to the end of the world The Age before the coming of the Messias cannot be understood he being in our nature when he spake these words therefore the age after must When the Apostle says as often as ye eat this bread and drink this cup ye shew forth the Lord's death till he come He evidently declares that the institution of the Supper is to continue till the last appearing of Jesus Christ There are but four comings of his usually spoken of The First in the Flesh when he assumed our nature the Second in the Spirit to sanctifie and rule his Church the Third in his vindicative Justice to destroy Jerusalem the Fourth in the last day to Judge the World The two first cannot be understood They were past when the Apostle wrote his Epistle The Messias was then come in the Flesh to all mankind In the Spirit at the solemn feast of Pentecost and in particular to the Corinthians they were sanctified in Christ Jesus 1 Ep. 1.2 But the coming which the Apostle aims at is future until I come Neither can we understand his coming to destroy Jerusalem For these words are inserted with a design to awake the Corinthians to a greater degree of circumspection in their preparations for the holy Communion intimating that it shall continue till Christ come to summon them before his Tribunal and judge them for their unworthy Approaches There was no summons of the Corinthians at the overthrow of Jerusalem and therefore the last coming must be understood These Acts which have been enumerated some in savour of the Mass would perswade us that sacrificing is to be added as a part of Divine Worship under the Gospel If this be so it must be warranted by some Divine Law and this must be either natural or positive Natural it is not as will be evident by the following considerations 1. A Sacrifice is an Oblation of some material thing unto God and in the offering destroyed The essential difference whereby it is distinguished from other Oblations is the destructive mutation This change cannot reasonably be esteemed an act of Worship but so far as it is an acknowledgment of some excellency appertaining to the Divine Nature as Sovereignty Wisdom Goodness c. In its self before it has an institution enstamped upon it it imports no such agnition Were we left to the conduct of natural light it would rather induce us to believe that the Godhead is dishonoured than worshipped by a dissolution of the creature in whose composure divine Power and Wisdom are eminently conspicuous 2. If the light of nature leads us to this practice it must be because it conduceth to the Honour of God and if so we being under an obligation to honour him in the superlative and most exalted degree the same reason will dictate that mankind the most excellent part of the visible Creation is to be singled out for this sacred purpose Nay that Abraham wanted not the warranty of a revelation for the offering up of Isaac but was sufficiently instructed by the light of Nature in that concernment
the Temple of God 1 Cor. 3.16 He is Eternal Heb. 9.7 Omniscient 1 Cor. 2.10 Omnipresent Psal 139.7 The whole Creation is represented as the effect of his power The host of Heaven Psal 33.6 Man the principal Work of God upon the Earth Job 33.4 The Fish in the Sea Psal 104.3 are all of his formation Before there was any Wind Immeasusque Deus super aequora vasia meabat which is peculiar to the Firmament a work of the second day the Spirit of the Lord is said to move upon the Waters The Chaos by his incubation was digested into Order and brought to a state of Maturation Certainly God who composed the Scripture and declares in it that he will not give his Glory to another would never have assigned his name nature and peculiar operations to the Spirit had he not been of the same Essence with himself To assert that all this is attributed to the Spirit because God makes use of him as an instrument to effect his Work will not remove the difficulty For there is some work attributed to the Spirit to which no instrument can concur as Creation There are other operations in doing of which God cannot be said to use the Spirit according to the sentiments of the Socinians as to know and search his deep things For the Spirit in their apprehensions signifies a Divine Power and it is very incongruous to say that God knows and searches things by his Power This Truth concerning the Trinity in Unity hath been so fully discovered that all sorts of men have taken notice of it The Mind of the Christians before Constantine may be very well known by Athanasuis Orat. 1.121 Ad Serapio tom 1. p. 366. de Spi. Sanâ—â—o Apol. 2. who wanted no opportunity to be acquainted with their Writings He expresly asserts that there was nothing established by the Nicene Synod but what was agreeable to them S. Basil cites several Authorities of the first Centuries for the same purpose In those Writings which are come to our hands there are many evident expressions of this doctrin Justin Martyr speaking of the Father of righteousness saies 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. him and the Son coming from him and the prophetick Spirit we receive and adore Athenagoras in vindication of the Christians whom the Heathens accounted Atheists saies 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. who would not admire to hear them called Atheists who own God the Father God the Son God the Holy Ghost Clemens Alexandrinus ends his Paedagogus with very lively expressions of this Truth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. to the only Father Son c. with the Holy Ghost all in one c. There are Testimonies of the same importance in Tertullian Cyprian Lactantius All these with many others agree that there is but one God and that there are Three which participate of the Deity and that one of them is the fountain of the rest from whence it inevitably follows that they must be personally distinct The fountain and the streams are always different one from the other Indeed there are some things spoken in the explication of this Mystery which are liable to an ambiguous construction as is manifest in the discourse of Justin Martyr with the Jew Tâ—â—â—h and the Treatise of Tertullian against Praxeas This Truth being not then encountred with so direct an opposition as it was in the time of Arrius some degrees of caution in point of expression are wanting and too great a condescension made to the Sentiments of the Philosophers by blending their notions with the ineffable Mystery that it might gain a more ready entertainment among them Such prudential accommodations must not be construed in such a sence as to prejudice the Truth which in other places of the same Authors is clearly acknowledged The clear must not be expounded by that which is obscure but the obscure by that which is clear The Jews have not been without some knowledge of this Mystery Pugio fidei p. 397. Raimundus Martini says that he scarcely ever conferred with any of them who were in any estimation for Wisdom who would not grant that God was Trinus Vnus They have a Tradition that when the Benediction Num. 6.26 was pronounced by the Priest he used when he came to the word Jehova to lift three fingers higher than the rest to denote the Trinity It was their manner to call the Father Son Voisin in Pug. fidei p. 400. and Spirit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Subsistences and to assert the unity of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the infinite God Those words The Lord our God is one God are in Zohar applied to the Trinity 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is interpreted the Father 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Son the second 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Spirit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is added with a great letter in the Hebrew Text to denote their Unity The Hebrew Scholiast says that the repetition of the name of God three times Psal 50.1 2. is to denote the three 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which created the World These are stiled inward persons It is observed that all the names of God have a plural termination Voisin p. 406. p. 400. except Jehova his essential name to import the plurality of Persons and unity of Essence It is a saying among the Cabalists 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. the Father is God the Son is God the Holy Ghost is God Three in One and One in Three By the Abbreviature 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they understand 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Father and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Son They say they are put together to express their Unity and that the three Letters do signifie the three Hypostases in one Essence Tho' this Doctrine is very much disguised in the Writings of the Heathens yet there is so much of it left unmask'd as it may be plainly discerned they were not totally strangers to it The chief God among the Persians was stiled 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 threefold with relation to this Sacred Mystery The first Hypostasis they called Oramasâ—les the second Mithras the third Arimanes Plato likewise mentions Three 〈◊〉 5. l. 1. l. 3. c. 15. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 These by Plotinus are represented as the three Hypostases which are Principles or first causes in the Universe When Thulis King of Aegypt went to the Oracle of Serapis to inquire Saidas in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who before him could do such exploits as he had done and who would be after him The Answer was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 First God after him the Word and then the Spirit concurring with both Bâ—rnier's Mâ—moirs â—â—m 3. p. 130. The Indians own Three in the Deity known by the names of Brahma Bischen and Mehaâ—denâ— Dervis â—rsielebi a Mahometan acknowledged to a Christian who was disputing with him about Religion that at the commencement of all their Negotiations Epito
are led by the context This do in remembrance of me When he pronounces the demonstrative This he points at that which he took and had in his hand and this is called Bread and therefore in the Latin Translation of the Aethiopick Version these words occur Hic panis Corpus meum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 must import his dead body as it is in the Syriack 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hoc cadaver meum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is derived from the Hebrew 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies a dead body 1 Sam. 17.46 Isa 14.19 These we have reason to believe were the words of our blessed Lord who at the institution of the Sacrament did undoubtedly use that language which was then familiar to the Jews and that was the Syriack which by reason of its affinity with the Hebrew is sometimes called by the same name Joh. 19.13 17. Act. 21.20 Now it is evident that what Christ gave at his last Supper could not be his dead body in a literal sence and therefore it must be so in a figurative which will amount to this This is a memorial of my Body as crucified for you Christ's body in the Sacrament is not given as living but dead upon our account and his blood not as contained in his veins but shed for our sins We have not only the Words to justifie our interpretation but the scope aimed at by him that spoke them It is agreed on all sides that God did design by them the institution of a Sacrament It is as unanimously asserted that in every Sacrament there must be a visible Sign and a Thing signified There is nothing here to import the outward Sign but the Demonstrative This or the Thing signified but that which is predicated of it my Body Now the sign is never essentially but always figuratively the thing which is signified by it As when we say of the formal sign or picture of Augustus or Tiberius This is Augustus This is Tiberius we do not mean their persons really but representations of them In the other part of the Sacrament it is said This Cup is the New Testament This cannot be true essentially as tho' the Cup was changed into the nature of the New Testament but figuratively only We have just reason to believe the same concerning the Words under debate that the Bread is no otherwise the Body of Christ than the Cup is the New Testament When this manner of Speech is used in relation to other Sacraments as Circumcision and the Passover Circumcision is my Covenant the Lamb is the Lord 's Passover it constantly bears this sence Neither Circumcision or the Lamb were really and essentially the things which are predicated of them but signs and memorials only The admitting a Trope in the Words is not contrary to the design of Christ in his last Will which undoubtedly was to deliver his mind clearly We may speak as plainly when we use a Trope or Figure as when our speech is without it If we walk in a Gallery adorned with Pictures and say this is Julius Caesar this is Constantine the Great we are as well understood as if we had said this is the Picture of such a Person That is not obscure whether figuratively or literally spoken which is expressed according to the manner which is familiar to those to whom the words are directed The known custom at the time when these words This is my Body were used was to speak after the like manner about the Passover into whose place the Sacrament of the Supper came It was the usual language of the Jews to call the Lamb the Body of the Passover The Lamb being a Figure of Christ our Passover and he putting a period to the old Institution and substituting Bread in the room of it to be a memorial and Type of himself under the Gospel he calls it by the same name As the Paschal Lamb had been his Typical Body under the Old Testament So now he declares that the Bread shall be his figurative Body under the New If a Trope makes the Words obscure and unfit to be a branch of the last Will of Jesus Christ then the interpretation of the Church of Rome is condemned by her own acknowledgment For she believes that when it is said This is my Body a living Body is meant and therefore Body by a Synecdoche is put for the Body and Soul The other part of the Sacrament is contained in his last Will as well as this and yet in the words which set it forth there is no less than two Tropes This Cup is the New Testament in my Blood The Cup is put for the Wine contained in it and the New Testament for the Sacrament of the New Covenant As the scope of our Saviour confirms the sence which we have given So likewise do the antecedents and consequences Before these words This is my Body were spoken it is said Jesus took Bread and blessed and brake it c. what can he mean by This but that which he took into his hand and blessed and brake and that is expresly called Bread After Consecration as that which is termed his Blood is stiled the Fruit of the Vine so that which he named his Body is by his Spirit in the holy Apostle said to be Bread As often as ye eat this bread 1 Cor. 11.26 Whosoever shall eat of this bread v. 27. Let a man examine himself and so let him eat of this bread v. 28. If before and after Consecration that which 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This doth import is called Bread then no such mutation is made as is contended for and the words must be interpreted in a Sacramental and Figurative Sence We have not only the Antecedents and Consequences to favour our interpretation but likewise the Analogy of Faith This says that Christ as man was made like unto his Brethren Heb. 2.17 This car not be true if he be corporally in the Sacrament The bodies of his Brethren are naturally confined to a certain place But according to this apprehension his Body may be in a thousand places at once even upon all the Altars in the World Wheresoever the Host is consecrated it is wholly in the whole and wholly in every part of it The Analogy of Faith asserts that Christ it gone to heaven in his bodily presence I am no more in the world Jo. 17.11 The interpretation which the Church of Rome gives of the words under debate makes him to be more in the World than when he conversed with his Disciples upon the Earth For then he was but in one place at a time but now according to the Creed of the Romanists he is the same moment in Millions of places The Analogy of Faith assures us that the body or flash of Christ shall see no corruption Act. 2.27 31. But if it be in the Sacrament then it is corporally eaten turned into Chyle and Nutriment and subject to all the corruption
which the ingredients of a humane body are exposed unto To what is received in the Eucharist the primitive Church in relation to the body attributes the power of Nutrition The Analogy of Faith obligeth us to believe that God will not command inhumanity But if the sence of the Church of Rome be true the greatest inhumanity is practised according to his Will What is more savage than to eat the body of a living man much more must it be to champ with our Teeth and swallow down the living Body of our blessed Lord to whom supreme Veneration is due This made a Pagan to say Who dost thou think Cott. in Cicer. de nat Decr. l. 3. can be so mad as to believe that to be his God which he eats It was an abomination to the Aegyptians to eat with the Hebrews Gen. 43.32 The Chaldee paraphrast gives the reason because the Hebrews eat those Cattle which the Aegyptians use to worship Those words except ye eat the flesh of the son of man c. Joh. 6.55 give no countenance to what is asserted by the Church of Rome By Flesh is meant the bread spoken of v. 51. The bread that I will give you is my flesh and by the Bread we are to understand our blessed Lord himself I am the bread of life v. 35. and by eating believing on him as is evident by the consequent words he that cometh to me shall never hunger and he that believeth on me shall never thirst As eating and drinking satisfie our natural appetite so believing in Christ our spiritual By faith we draw out of his fulness and plenitude a supply of our necessities This spiritual Sence is pointed at v. 56. and very agreeable to the manner of speaking amongst the Jews with whom Christ conversed when he spoke the words under consideration Maimon More Nevoâ— par 1. c. 30. The Hebrews use 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 comedere not only to express the feeding upon that which conduceth to the nourishment of the body but likewise the acquisition of Learning and Wisdom such as faith imports which tends to the nutrition of the Soul Psal 33. or 34 v. 2. S. Basil says that there is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an intellectual mouth of the inward Man With this we receive the impressions made by external objects and ruminate upon and digest them by meditation All this being considered it is evident that Transubstantiation is contrary to the Holy Scripture 2. Antiquity Those who assert the Body of Christ to be corporally present in the Sacrament and the substance of the Bread and Wine not speak contrary to the sence of all the primitive Fathers Ignatius who lived in the first Century 〈…〉 calls that which is broken and given in the Sacrament 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Justin Martyr in the second Century Apol. 2. stiles it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and attributes to it a nutritive power in relation to the body Tertullian in the third Century asserts L. 4 cont Marc. that Christ made the bread which he took to be his body that is a figure of his body Origen says L. 8. cont Celsum we have a symbol of thanksgiving to God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 bread which is called the Eucharist S. Cyprian affirms 〈…〉 that the Lord calls the bread compounded of many grains his Body Eusebius in the fourth Century terms L. 1 â—emon Evan. c. ult what is received in the Sacrament symbols of the Body and blood of Christ Cyril of Jerusalem stiles it Bread and Wine Catech. Mystagog 1.3 and compares the change which is made by consecration to that in consecrated Oil which doth not lose its old Nature but is dedicated and set apart to a higher use and purpose S. Ambrose affirms L. 4. de Saâ— c. 4. that the Bread and Wine in the Sacrament sunt a â—â—â—e panis vinum altho changed into the Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Christ Gregory Nissen owns that which he calls the Body of Christ by the name of Bread Orat. de San. Bapr and expresseth at large that the Bread and Wine being Consecrated retain their pristine nature even as Baptismal Water an Altar a Priest do after Consecration has passed upon them Gaudentius represents the Sacrament as an image of the passion and figure of the Body and Blood of Christ Tract 2. in Exo. S. Chrysostome in the fifth Century useth these words Epist ad Casâ—arium Monashum Before the Bread is sanctified we call it Bread when the Divine Grace hath sanctified it by means of the Priest it loseth the name of Bread and is held worthy to be called the Lord's Body altho the nature of the Bread doth remain in it and is not called two bodies but the body of the Son S. Austin says Ad Adamantum â— 12. That the Lord doubted not to say This is my Body when he gave the sign of his Body Cyril of Alexandria asserts L. 4. c. 14. in Evang. Joan. that our Lord gave fragments of Bread saying Take eat This is my Body Theodoret affirms 1. Dial. cont Eutyc that our Saviour honoured the visible Symbols with the name of his Body and Blood not changing the nature but adding grace to nature Gelasius is of the same mind De duabus Christi naturis The Sacraments which we receive of the Body and Blood of Christ are a divine thing by means whereof we are made partakers of the Divine Nature and yet the substance of the Bread and Wine doth not cease to be Bellarmine in his Polemical Discourse concerning the Eucharist useth most of the names which I have mentioned to a contrary purpose and brings them into the field with a great deal of pomp His policy seems to resemble that of a great Commander When he had drawn up his Souldiers into a military order and was ready to engage the enemy a great part of them declared they would not fight He being not in a capacity to retreat with honour or security told them that the only kindness which he desired of them was to march to a Hill a little way of and there be Spectators of the courage and fate of their fellow Souldiers hoping they might appear to the enemy as a Reserve and prove as great a discouragement to them as if they had actually engaged them I cannot imagine why these antient Fathers who have so positively declared in the Testimonies above-cited that they will not fight should be continued in view except it be with the like design to impose upon the Faith of those who are strangers to their intentions To the Authorities already produced I might add many more which do evidently manifest that the Church was a stranger to the doctrin of Transubstantiation for many hundred years What might be alledged I will sum up in the following particulars 1. They all agree in an imitation of the stile of Scripture and
which our holy Religion requires must be made in Faith Faith must be grounded upon a Divine Testimony There is no Testimony of this nature to assure us that our Prayers made upon the Earth are known to glorified Spirits in Heaven If there be any way whereby they come to be acquainted with them yet God has hid it from us as he did the body of Moses from the Israelites to prevent the occasion of an abuse 2. It is the prerogative of Jesus Christ to be the only Mediator for us in Heaven to whom we are to make our applications He is entered into the Holy of Holiest and there alone offers to God our Incense as the High Priest did here upon the Earth Upon this account it is said There is one God and one Mediator betwixt God and man the man Jesus Christ 1 Tim. 2.5 The Mediator is here represented to be one as the Deity is one As there is but one God so there is but one Mediator for us to address unto in the state of Glory When he was about to leave the World and enter into this Blessed State he gave his Disciples instructions to pray in his name only Joh. 14.13.16.23 He does not mention the name of any of the Saints As he was alone in the Work of his Meritorious Satisfaction So He is alone in the application of it by his Gracious Intercession Therefore the Apostle says Among the Gentiles there be Gods many and Lords many They had their Sovereign Deities and likewise their Baalims or Lords which they accounted as Mediators betwixt them and those Supreme Powers but to us who embrace the Christian Faith There is but one God and one Lord Jesus Christ is the only Mediator for us in Heaven This dignity he has purchased with the inestimable price of his blood He humbled himself and became obedient to the death of the Cross Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him Phil. 2.8 He sits at his right hand appears in his presence for us and lives for ever to make intercession As the price which he gave for this dignity could not be paid by any but himself so the office procured by it must be incommunicable and peculiar to him And therefore for any to set up other Mediators whether of Redemption or Intercession without a command from Heaven is an inexcusable injury to his prerogative The Romanists do not only Invocate Saints that they may make a charitable Interecession for them but that by their Merits they would procure the favours they are Petitioners for This Truth concerning one Mediator is so evident that the primitive Christians were unanimous in the reception of it For three Hundred years no instance can be produced out of any Authentick Record that the Mediation of any in Heaven beside our blessed Lord was made use of Two are chiefly pretended to the contrary and in both the Virgin Mary is concerned In the first She is represented as the Advocate of Eve in the second as invocated by Justina the Martyr Irenaeus mentions the first lib. 5. c. 19. Where he compares the obedience of Eve to the word of the Evil Angel with the obedience of Mary to the word of the Good He asserts that Eve was seduced that she might fall from God Mary obedient that she might be the mother of our Lord. And adds this moreover as a further design of her obedience Vt Virginis Evae virgo Maria steret Advocata All this comes very short of what is designed to be proved by it Advocata here is no more than Consolatrix Because 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Greek in which language it is believed Irenaeus wrote signifies both an Advocate and Comforter therefore advocare in the Latin Version is used for consolari as appears L. 5. c. 15. Ego vos advocabo in Hierusalem advocabimini I will comfort you and ye shall be comforted in Jerusalem So that his meaning will amount to no more than this As Eve by being seduced by the Evil Angel fell from God and brought sorrow dishonour and death upon her Sex So the Virgin Mary by being obedient to the word which was spoken by the Good Angel did make a full compensation and restore the Honour that Eve and all her Sex were impaired in This is the Consolation which she is said to receive from the Virgin Mary If this had been considered by Feuardentius he would not have drawn so peremptory a conclusion as he has done Ann. in Iren. Hinc evidentissimum est c. From hence it is most evident That the antient Fathers and Martyrs from the very times of the Apostles did Invocate the Virgin Mary The other instance concerning Justina is in Gregory Nazianzen The story is this S. Cyprian before his conversion was inamoured with the beauty of Justina In order to the obtaining his unchast desires he made use of Magick She having a deep resentment of her danger prayed to the Virgin Mary 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 To which I answer Pontius the Deacon of S. Cyprian who wrote his Life at large speaks no such matter but on the contrary That Cyprian before his Conversion was studied in all good Arts which tend to the utility of the Age amongst which Infernal Magick can have no place Indeed there was a Book extant in Nazianzen's time stiled Poenitentia Cypriani and now to be seen in the Oxford Edition of Cyprian in which Justina is mentioned but it is accounted a fabulous relation and was condemned under that notion by Gelasius Nazianzen from thence probably did borrow the sum of what he has expressed He using the freedom of an Orator and not the exactness of an Historian might be induced to make use of that which he found made ready to his hand without any strict examination and set it off with some Rhetorical Flourishes amongst which we may reckon the application of the Virgin Justina to the Virgin Mary In this he did accommodate himself to the inclination of the Age in which he lived which by frequent Apostrophe's made to Martyr's by some great Men in their Panegyricks was disposed to think favourably of such Addresses It is usual for Writers when they relate what was done in former Ages to dress it up in language and circumstances suitable to their own times Of this we have an evident instance in Nazianzen himself in his 22. Orat. Where he describes the Martyrdom of the seven Brethren and the deportment of their mother 2 Macc. 7. He says She snatched the drops of blood took the fragments of their members worshipped the remains If we consult the Author of the Maccabees and the History of Josephus where their sufferings are described at large no such thing is recorded It cannot reasonably be believed That a Woman who incouraged her children to die rather than to violate the Law of God should at the same time openly break it by touching the Dead contrary to the Masaical Institution So that the words
redounds upon the Prince whose character he bears provided that it keeps its proper bounds and has none of those peculiarities blended with it which are peculiar to the Sovereignty If Subjects should put a Crown upon the head of a Commissioner and instal him in the Throne with all the rites and ceremonies which are annexed to the Supremacy and call it not terminative but relative Honour the Prince would have more cause to suspect Treason was designed against him than believe any honour accrues to him by such actions The Gods on Earth are so far like him who is higher than the highest that they have their Regalia which are incommunicable If they should so far forget themselves as to be willing to part with them yet God cannot with his not because his Power is less but his Sovereignty greater They are Sovereigns by positive institution only His Sovereignty is essential and immutable He can no more allow the derivation of his peculiar Honour to another than he can deny himself The holiness of his essence will not permit him to do that which is intrinsecally evil So long as the honour done to a creature which is appointed to represent him has no mixture of the peculiarities which belong to the Celestial Crown it doth redound upon him it being an act of obedience to his Will but in case it has it degenerates into a palpable injury to the rights of Heaven Upon this account relative Worship is represented in the Scripture under the notion of Idolatry Three sorts of Idolaters it acquaints us with Either such as totally renounce the True God and his Law and go after other Gods to serve them Deut. 13.1 5. Or else such as retain the fear and worship of the True God and joyn strange Gods with him 2 King 17.33 Or lastly those who profess to Worship only the True God but do it by external Symbols and representations This is nothing but relative Worship and yet by the Penmen of the Sacred Oracles it is accounted Idolatry as is manifest in the Calf which Aaron made which was designed for a Symbol of the presence of the True God Whether it was erected in imitation of the Cherub which Aaron a little before had seen in the Mount or of the golden Bulls the Symbols of Osyris is not much material So much is certain That whatsoever was the reason of forming of it into this shape none but the True God was intended to be represented by it This will be evident if we consider the ground of the peoples desire They were under an expectation that in their travel in the Wilderness they should have a vilible Symbol of the presence of Jehova framed by Moses He being so long absent in the Mount that they were at a loss in their thoughts what was become of him they desired Aaron that he would act in his stead and do it for them Here is no intention to change the True God with whom they lately entred into Covenant but only to have a Symbol of his presence in the midst of those difficulties which the Desert might expose them to Their own words demonstrate this to be their meaning When they saw the Calf they said This is the God which brought thee out of Aegypt Neh. 9.18 They could not be so senceless as to think That the Aegyptian Deities had been propitious to them in their deliverance from thence when it was manifest That the True Redeemer had executed his judgments upon them Exo. 12.12 and caused them to fall down as Dagon did before the Ark. How is it possible after Moses had told them the name of him who was their deliverer confirmed his commission by many undoubted signs brought them to the Mount where the Divine Majesty manifested himself in the most awful manner to think that a strange God had set them loose from their servitude The words of Aaron put the matter beyond dispute When he saw the Symbol he made Proclamation and said To morrow is a Feast to Jehova at which time they offered their usual Sacrifices which were so far from importing any honour to an Aegyptian Deity that the Aegyptians accounted them abominations of the first magnitude Those beasts which the Israelites killed were treated by them with Sovereign Veneration The Aegyptian Worship was principally terminated upon the Host of Heaven The Sun was called Osyris and the Moon Isis both Deities of Aegypt But the Worship of the Golden Calf is plainly distinguished from it Diod. Sicul Bibl. Dionys Voss p. 5. Act. 7. v. 12. The Israelites being given up to Worship the Sun Moon and Stars is represented as the effect and punishment of their Worshipping the Calf and the effect is always diverse from the cause Parallel to this are the Calves at Dan and Bethel They were designed only for Symbols of the True God When Jeroboam erected them it was no part of his thoughts to renounce the God of Israel who a little before had acquainted him by his Prophet That he should be vested in the Government over the Ten Tribes His error lay in setting up external Representations and Worshipping the True God by them 2 Kin. 17. v. 28. The Samaritans are said to fear the Lord notwithstanding they Worshipped the Calves 2 Kin. 10.16 29. 1 Kin. 12.28 29. Jehu had a zeal for the Lord altho' he departed not from the sin of Jeroboam Jeroboam at the first erection declares his intention to Worship that God which brought them out of the land of Egypt The Heathen Idolatry 1 Kin. 16.30 32. which Ahab fell into is represented as distinct from the sin of Jeroboam The Israelites are accounted as a Church notwithstanding their gross miscarriage at Dan and Bethel which could not have been in case they had renounced the True God They retained the Law had Prophets to instruct them in it When Elijah contested with the Prophets of Baal he supposes the Israelites to Worship the True God before they fell to the Worship of Baal as is manifest by his words 1 Kin. 18.21 How long will ye halt betwixt two opinions if the Lord be God follow him if Baal follow him To the Calves of Jeroboam we may add Micha's Molten Image which was nothing but a Symbol of the True God Judg. 17.3 The Silver of which it was made was wholly dedicated to the Lord which makes it evident That the Worship given to it was not absolute but relative directed indeed to the Image immediately but with an intention to Worship the True God by it yet notwithstanding this it lies in Scripture under the imputation of Idolatry Bellarmine is so sensible of the inconveniences which attend the doctrin of giving 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to an Image that he would have it by no means uttered before the people his reason is very forcible Cap. 22. de Imag. Qui defendunt Imagines adorari latria coguntur uti subtilissimis distinctionibus quas ipsimet vix
them were employed to praise God upon instruments of Musick some to keep the doors of the Sanctuary 2 Chron. 25.6 11. 2 Chron. 24.34 2 Chron. 31.14 some to attend upon the Priests and do those things which were commanded by them We read of their killing the Sacrifices and pulling off their skins the distributing the oblations As for the Service of the Synagogue another provision was made Some Persons were likewise set apart in a solemn manner for it These are stiled Prophets and Scribes Of their Nature and Office we may gain a full information if we consider the Schools of Learning erected for their Education The Studies enjoyned them in those Schools Their Solemn Ordination after an improvement in those Studies The places where they exercised the Function they were Ordained unto First The Schools of Learning Of this nature was Jabez where the Families of the Scribes dwelt 1 Chro. 2.55 It was an University which did derive its name from Jabez whose devotion is recorded 1 Chro. 4.10 and whom the Talmudists represent as a Teacher of the Law The Hill of Moreh Jud. 7.1 and the Hill of God 1 Sam. 10.5 were places of the same importance The Chaldee Paraphrast calls Naioth in Rama 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a house of Learning Samuel after his retirement from his regency was Head of this Society He is said to be standing as appointed over them 1 Sam. 19.20 the Prophets being at his feet in the posture of Disciples We read of the Sons of the Prophets in Gilgal Bethel and Jericho and express mention of a College in Jerusalem 2 King 22.14 If any credit may be given to Solomon Jarchi there were no fewer than four hundred and eighty in the time of the Prophet Isaiah Isa 1.21 What kind of Studies they followed in these Colleges may be collected from the words of that Prophet Where is the Scribe Where is the Weigher Where is he that counted the Towers c. 33.18 At the time which the prediction has an aspect upon the righteous were in a prosperous state and that they might not fall into the usual temptations which sublunary felicities are accompanied with and be transported by the pleasure of them beyond the due measures of Sobriety they are commanded to meditate upon their former terrours as the most proper allay and call to remembrance their calamities when their circumstances were so intricate that those who had devoted themselves to the study of Wisdom were so far from offering the least expedient that it was commonly said by way of reproach Where is the Scribe Where is the Weigher Where is he who telleth the Towers Here are three sorts of Students 1. Scribes They studied to give the Sence of the Law as Ezra did In order to this end they read over the Writings of former Prophets Daniel was conversant in the books of Jeremy Dan. 9.22 Justin Martyr says 2 Kin. 6. Dial. cum Tryph. p. 313. That in the College which the Sons of the Prophets were building in the days of Elisha They did design 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. Polemical Divines These are stiled 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Weighers They did ponder and weigh in the intellectual ballance all arguments for and against the received sence of the Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is interpreted by S. Paul 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the disputer of this World 3. Mystical Divines These are stiled 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tellers of the Towers They applyed themselves to find out the sublime mysteries of the Gospel concealed under the shadows of the Law S. Paul expounds 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Wise There is no greater degree of Understanding than to arrive at a clear perception of the design of the Messias who is the Wisdom of God This was the study of Heman He was a Seer in the words of the Lord which did relate to the horn of Salvation 1 Chr. 25.4 5. That this was the principal inquiry of the Prophets is evident by the words of S. Peter Of which salvation the Prophets have enquired and searched diligently into 1 Pet. 1.10 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a Word which imports the greatest degree of diligence and industry such as those who dig in Mines use in the bowels of the earth they had not all their knowledge by Inspiration but took pains in their studies in order to the discovery of these Mysteries which were locked up in the figures of the Law After these Students were arrived at such a degree of maturity as made them fit for a publick sphere they were ordained by a solemn imposition of hands This was the usual rite whereby the Doctors and Teachers of the Law were created The Hebrews speak of a Threefold Ordination Maimon Selden de Syn. p. 282. either of such as were set apart only to teach and expound the Sence of the Law which is stiled Binding and Loosing in the Talmudical Records or of them who were Judges of the Law Or lastly Of those who had a faculty granted them to do both these Offices This doth make it evident that the publick teaching the Law did not lie open to every bold pretender but was appropriated to such as were solemnly Consecrated to that Sacred purpose This power of Ordination so fan as it did relate to the making Judges of the Law might be exercised only within the confines of Palestine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Maim San. c. 4. Buxt vo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and by him only who was Ordained before This is the reason why Rabbi Jehudi Ben Baba the only qualified person who was left for the performance of this Work did contrary to the Imperial Edict ordain Five in the open Field that the power of judiciary Ordination might not fail The honour of which Heroick Action he wears in his Title 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But the Power so far as it concerned the constituting Teachers of the Law might be exerted every where as well without as within the confines of Canaan Benjamin Tudelensis says P. 73. C. Lemper That the Synagogues of Babylon did receive power from the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to Ordain a Preacher by the Imposition of Hands Thesbites Elias Levita asserts the original of this Ceremony to be from Moses who by the Imposition of Hands made Joshua a Rabbi After these Students were thus Ordained the usual place where they exercised their Sacred Function was either an Academy stiled 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from the sitting of the Doctors there to instruct their Disciples or a Proseucha and therefore termed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a School of all Virtue L. 3. de vit Mosis by Philo Judaeus Or else a Synagogue The Scribes who had their Education in the Schools of the Prophets are said to sit in Moses's Chair This Chair was appropriated to the Minister of the Synagogue and therefore stiled Moses's because out of it he used to Preach
Heaven The words do not speak the indefectibility of that Church but the present state only This Pillar began to decay in Domitián's time Rev. 2.5 and is at this day utterly demolished If it be granted That the words under consideration have an aspect upon the Universal Church no advantage will from thence accrue to the plea for Infallibility She is not represented as the ground and pillar of all Truth but of Truth in general which may be limited to that which is fundamental Tho' she cannot fail in this particular for then she will lose her essence and cease to be yet she may in other points very useful to be known If by Truth we understand all Truth the words may set forth the duty of the Church what she ought to do and not the actual performance what she always does When the Disciples are stiled the salt of the earth this doth not argue an invincible quality in them whereby they are secured against the danger of losing their savour but a constant obligation upon them to retain it and season others with it 7. When it is said Dent. 17.12 That man that will not hearken to the Priest shall die no advantage will from thence redound to the Bishop of Rome except he can make it appear That He is Successour to the High Priest under the Law and vested in the same priviledges which he will never be able to do If this was so it would not amount to prove him infallible The high Priest with the whole Sanhedrim was liable to mistake as appears by the Sacrifice appointed for the expiation of their errour Lev 4.13 He that would not hearken was to die not because he was of a different opinion from the Priest but by reason of his Pride and contempt of the Supreme Authority which is plainly intimated in those words That Man which will do presumptuously c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This is a common case in all Communities In superbia where there is no such thing pretended to as Infallibility When a cause is under debate and the Law requires the last appeal to be made to the Supreme Authority and the person concerned so to do turns his back upon it arrogantly refuses a submission and by consequence evidently endangers the Peace and Security of the whole Community this is a fault of the first magnitude and justly deserves the most severe animadversion If it could be proved That the Bishop of Rome with a Council called by him has as good Authority over All the Churches of the World as the high Priest with the Sanhedrim had over the National Church of the Jews Tho' from thence it would not follow That he is exempt from errour yet none would doubt to assert That his power is not to be treated with contempt 8. That Text Thou art Peter and upon this rock will I build my Church and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it is no more propitious to the Infallibility contended for than those which have been already considered It is not agreed Whether by the Rock is to be understood Peter himself or Jesus Christ who is stiled a Rock or the confession which Peter made The ancient Fathers incline to the two last If they be preferred the Church of Rome can from thence reap no advantage If we should grant That S. Peter is the Rock spoken of it will not argue any Infallibility promised to him but the declaration of a Divine purpose to make him a firm and successful instrument in the propagation of the Gospel as the rest of the Apostles were and many of their Successours Here is nothing peculiar to S. Peter The other Apostles are represented to be as intimately concerned in the foundation of the Church as he Eph. 2.20 Rev. 21.14 The following words the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it rather prove That the Church shall never cease to be than any universal indefectibility It is certain That there shall be a Church upon the Earth teaching all truth of peremptory necessity to Salvation until the coming of our blessed Lord But that it shall be exempt from errour in all matters of Faith is contrary to experience It was once received as a truth That Infants ought to have the Eucharist administred to them and now it as unanimously exploded for a grand mistake 9. The Prayer of Christ That the faith of Peter might not fail argues rather his not finally falling away than a total exemption from errour He was under great misapprehensions after these words had been spoken to him He believed That Christ would continue upon the Earth and in those dayes restore the Kingdom to Israel That the Gentiles were not to be called in and made partakers of the like priviledges with the Jews If it should be granted That the Petition of our Lord did secure an Infallibility to Peter this would be of no advantage to our adversaries in the present controversie It cannot be made to appear That the Bishop of Rome is concerned in all the Prayers which were made for S. Peter There is in them no mention of any Successour If there had it would be difficult to prove That the Pope is the person Some doubt whether S. Peter was ever at Rome The Scripture is silent in this matter The first Asserters were but of a mean reputation Many figments were devised to support the credit of their relation The common fame which by degrees did grow out of these beginnings cannot be accounted a demonstration so long as there are Catalogues of errours which not only the Vulgar but Persons of Learning have been surprised with To erect Infallibility upon such a fluid foundation is as if an attempt should be made to build a Castle in the Air. If S. Peter was at Rome and left the Bishop of that place to succeed him this might be only in his ordinary power and not in his extraordinary qualifications as personal Infallibility a power of doing Miracles There is as much reason for the Pope to challenge to himself the last as the first and yet I cannot understand that he pretends to it The Miracles in the Church of Rome are usually attributed to some persons that cannot easily be spoken with in order to the knowing the truth If this power had been ascribed to the Pope daily experience would have given the Asserters a flat contradiction 10. Those words Feed my sheep c. do not import the conferring upon Peter any priviledge above the rest of the Apostles but only the insuring to him his interest in the general Commission given to them They were commanded to teach all nations It might lie as an objection against him That he was not included in the number of those who were thus commissioned By his denial of Christ he had in appearance forfeited his right to the Apostleship as Judas by betraying him fell really from it To give him and others assurance That he was one
him and his Successours 2. Such a Guide as the Romanists would have who must be followed blindfold and his dictates received with an implicit faith without examination is not consistent with the nature of an Intellectual Being Our understanding is appointed to be our immediate Guide insomuch That if we act contrary to it we pervert the order of Nature and vitiate the action It is designed by a divine institution to make scrutiny and search into that which is propounded to us Therefore when there were infallible guides upon the Earth the people were commanded to look into the facred Oracles and make tryal by them of what was tendered to them They were not to rely only upon the words of them who spake but examine their Authority by a standing rule and inquire into the sence of what was spoken by them Joh. 5. Act. 17.11 Our blessed Lord directed the Jews to take this course and the Beraeans are commended for the using of it To suffer our understandings to be lapped up in an implicite belief is to keep our talent in a napkin Our Intellect was given to us to be exerted to the uttermost that all the Acts of our Religion might become a reasonable Service 3. Such a Guide is destructive of true Virtue in the Acts of Religion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is defined by the Philosopher 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an elective habit It disposeth us when good and evil are set before us to make a free election to chuse the good and reject the evil Now the Guide supposed who must be followed without scrutiny deprives us of this liberty He must be believed whatsoever he propounds whether right or wrong If he commands us to believe that to be black which appears white to our sence we must not dispute his dictate Amongst the Eighteen rules of the prevailing Order in the Church of Rome the Thirteenth runs in these words Vt ipsi Catholicae Ecclesiae omnino unanimes conformesque simus Si quod oculis nostris albus apparet nigrum illa definierit debemus itidem quòd nigrum est pronunciare Bellarmine is very agreeable to this rule as is manifest by the following expression Si autem Papa erraret praecipiendo vitia vel prohibendo virtutes teneretur Ecclesia credere vitia esse bona virtutes malas c. If the Pope should err in commanding Vices or prohibiting Virtues the Church would be obliged to believe Vices to be good and Virtues evil 4. Such a Guide can be of no advantage to us in our present circumstances We have already an infallible Rule to walk by the true sence of which if we receive and comply with we cannot err Now this sence may as easily be obtained as the sence of an infallible Guide If there was such a one as is supposed he could not be spoken with by one of a Thousand of those who are concerned in the meaning of his determination And therefore they must receive it from the relation of others or by some Writing under his hand The Relators being fallible and obnoxious to the like infirmities with other men can give us no infallible assurance They may be byassed with partiality and irrelative respects A Writing from him is liable to the same exceptions which are usually formed against the Scripture We see that all parties among the Romanists pretend favour from the determinations of the Church They are like Pictures which seem to look upon every one in the room where they hang. When interest is concerned it will find out as many evasions as the most subtle Adversary can devise to elude any text of Scripture There are many divisions among the Romanists yet all assert the sence of the infallible Judge is on their side Why may not we as well understand the sence of the Bible immediately as the meaning of a Decree in Writing of such a Judge The Scripture was written by an unerring hand with a sincere purpose that it might be understood Clearness of stile is a necessary condition in order to this end and therefore must be designed by the Composer God undoubtedly is able to write with as much perspicuity and with as manifest accommodations to the meanest capacity as men are Thousands have had so firm a Faith grounded upon the sence which they immediately derived from his Word That rather than they would depart from it they have with alacrity endured the loss of their sublunary comforts and chearfully resigned up their lives to the inhumanity of their Persecutors The Divine Spirit is ready to assist those who are sincerely desirous of true knowledge Peculiar persons are devoted to the study of the Scripture in order to the dissipating of Clouds and the clearing of what is obscure Why a Writing composed by an infinitely Wife Being and attended with these advantages in order to the gaining the true meaning of it may not be as easily understood as the decrees of a Pope or the Canons of a Council I could never discern any good reason 5. Such a Guide is not reconcileable to the Divine Intention in giving us the sacred Oracles These are evidently designed as a rule which every one is obliged to consult Blessed is he which readeth Rev. 1.4 Reading is enjoyned in order to the gaining understanding Let the word dwell richly in you in all wisdom The supreme Head of the Church commands us to search the Scriptures S. Peter whom the Romanists assert to have been his Vicegerent upon the earth requires us to attend unto them as unto a light without suggesting the necessity of having recourse to himself or his Successors for interpretation All this assures us That we are to take our measures from the Bible and judge for our selves what is to be done or not done with a judgment of discretion that our conformity to the Divine Will may be an act of our Understanding Now a Guide whose Dictates we are to swallow down without examination is not consistent with the practice here enjoyned us To be bound to examine the rule with all diligence and yet to resign up our selves to the decrees of a Guide about the sence of it without any scrutiny are two contrary obligations If the first be intended as it is plain it is the last cannot God never wills that we should be engaged to those things which are contradictory one to another In a civil Community where there is a Law and a Judge If it be commanded That every Subject read this Law search it diligently use his best endeavours to understand it That his conformity to it may be an act of his own Reason this would plainly signifie That the Judge is not to be followed blindfold whether right or wrong but his Decree is to be compared and fully considered Tho' the Judge has the power of decision which the subject is so far to acquiesce in as not to disturb the publick order by any inutinous demeanour yet the judgment of discretion
third and fourth generation That one may be punished for another was not accounted unjust amongst those who were governed by the light of Nature as is evident by the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or sureties in capital matters which did engage life for life There can be no pretence of injury where the person suffering freely consents and has a dominion over his own life he having power to dispose of himself in his submission to the greatest passion he does no injury to any other and he consenting upon the clearest considerations no injury is done to himself When the understanding is weak and not a competent guide an injury may be done altho' the party concerned be willing But the case before us is quite otherwise Our Blessed Lord upon the clearest dictate of reason became willing to bear our sins He did in this comply with the propensities of his own benignity serve the necessities of Mankind justifie publick Order and assert the Majesty of the Law against all that contempt which our Sins had exposed it unto The Premises being well considered will make it manifest That Christ suffered the punishment of our Sins 2. What He suffered was in our stead This will be evident if we consider his blood which he shed either as a Sacrifice or a ransom as a Sacrifice The offering which he made to God was expiatory a Sacrifice for sin Heb. 10.20 This oblation must necessarily have the nature which is common to all offerings under the Old Testament of the same kind They were figures of this great Oblation and there must be an agreement betwixt the Type and the thing typified in that which is essential to the nature of the Type Now it is manifest That all the expiatory offerings in the Old Testament were in lieu of those persons for whom they were offered The Law did require death of every one that did not remain in the obedience of it The offences against it were of two sorts either such as were punished with the death of the offender as Murder and Idolatry c. without the benefit of Sacrifice Or else such for the expiation of which a Sacrifice was appointed and slain in the room of the Transgressour The blood of the beast in which the life consists was given upon the Altar to make atonement for the Souls of Men Lev. 17.11 As the Law was satisfied by the death of the offender in the first case So likewise by the death of the Sacrifice in the second The sin of the Delinquent was symbolically derived upon the Piacular Sacrifice and therefore he which carried the skin and flesh without the Camp to be burnt did by touching of them contract pollution and might not be admitted into the Camp again before he had washed his cloaths and bathed his flesh in water Lev. 16.28 This was the cause why he for whom the offering was made was obliged to lay his hand upon the head of it Theodoret says That the hand did import action and signifie That the actions of the Transgressour were laid upon the Sacrifice This was the apprehension of the ancient Jews as is evident by the form of words used when a sin-offering was made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 haec sit expiatio mea which they expound thus The evil which I have deserved let it fall upon the head of the Sacrifice Now If the expiatory offerings under the Mosaical Oeconomy were Types of the offering of Jesus Christ and it was essential to them to be slain in the room of the Transgressour we have just reason from hence to infer That our blessed Lord suffered not only for our good and advantage but in our stead and place In order to the disappointing the force of this argument Crellius says That Christ was not a Priest till he came into Heaven and that those Sacrifices only which were offered for the whole Congregation and at some stated times especially That upon the day of expiation were Types of his oblation and that those which were designed for this use did not represent him in his mactation but in that one action only whereby their blood was carried into the holy place and sprinkled before the Lord. To all which I will reply in order 1. Christ did execute the office of a Priest here upon the earth The Apostle says he gave himself as an Offering and Sacrifice unto God Eph. 5.2 The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 imports such a Sacrifice as is put to death 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Jo. 10. v. 10. Reconciliation the proper effect of a Sacrifice is attributed to the blood of the Cross Col. 1.20 His purging our sins did precede his sitting down on the right hand of the Majesty on high Heb. 1.3 His having obtained eternal redemption is antecedent to his entring into the holy place Heb. 9.12 He is said to be once offered up Heb. 9.28 And after this to sit down at the right hand of God Heb. 10.12 If this offering has been in Heaven it would not have been said to have been once done The representation of this oblation there is every day He continually makes intercession The offering upon which the Apostles words have an aspect imports passion For he says in case it was to be repeated then Christ must have often suffered since the foundation of the World but the Passion of Christ was over before he entred into Heaven Those words If he were on earth he should not be a Priest Heb. 8.4 do not imply That he did not execute his Sacerdotal Function when he was upon the earth All that can be collected from them is That if after he had made an offering upon the Cross he had remained upon the earth he could not have been our High-Priest Because He who was to bear this office was not only to die for us upon the Earth but to appear in Heaven and there by presenting the merit of that oblation which was made here below procure those aids which we stand in need of 2. Those Sacrifices which were offered for the whole Congregation at some set times were not the only Types of the offering of the Messias The Apostle when he tells us That the Sacrifice of Christ was substituted in the room of the Legal Offerings and that the first was taken away that the second might be established Heb. 10.9 He must necessarily have his eye upon such oblations which as if they were shadows which when the body came did disappear and vanish Now it is plain That the Apostle there has his eye upon more Sacrifices than those which were offered for the whole Congregation He useth so many words as can comprehend no less than all the Mosaical Oblations as Sacrifice Offering Burnt-offerings Offering for sin 3. It is not true That those Sacrifice which typified Christ did represent him only in that action whereby the blood was carried into the holy place and sprinkled before the Lord. The
because the Literal is decayed and vanished we say the whole Law is annulled The Law and the Letter of it always fall together Therefore If the Church had not believed every Law in the Decalogue in the Letter to be binding to us she would not have called every one of them a Law in that known form Lord incline our hearts to keep this Law Against all this it is objected Epilog l. 3. c. 21. p. 194. That the first and last Command of the Second Table are by the terms of them appropriated to God's antient People The Land of Promise in the Letter belongs to none but Israelites The Tenth Command forbiddeth to covet another man's wife altho' adultery was forbidden before and therefore to covet onother man's wife is to compass another man's wife which might be done where the Law alloweth divorces as Moses's Law doth To which I reply 1. If these words appropriated to the antient People of God import no more than the being delivered with some accommodation to them it is no good consequence because the first and last Precept in the second Table are thus appropriated That therefore they concern no body else The ritual Law was adapted to the circumstances of those Israelites More Nevochim p. 46. which were in being at the time when it was enacted The Law whereby the eating of blood is interdicted was therefore given because the Zabiists thought blood to be the food of infernal Gods and conceived the way to contract an acquaintance with them was to eat of it The Law which forbiddeth the eating of the fruits of the first three years was occasioned by an Idolatrous custome of the same People who use to offer part of the First-fruits of Trees to their Idol and to eat the other part in their Idol-Temple being possessed with an apprehension That the Trees would wither and die in case this custome was intermitted The preceptive part of the Writings of the Prophets is plainly accommodated to the Nation of the Jews Many parts of the New Testament are adapted to the condition of the Primitive times S. John's Gospel was intended to affront the assertions of Ebion and Cerinthus S. Paul's Epistles are proportioned to those distempers which some particular Churches conflicted with The Sermons of Christ were preached to the lost sheep of the house of Israel Both his Sacraments are not without their peculiar aspects In Baptism there is a special regard to the Jews who were no strangers to the custome of admitting Proselytes by Water Some rites in the Eucharist were derived from their Passeover Because the Law had a particular aspect upon the circumstances of the Israelites then living when it was first enacted it is no good consequence That it was not obliging to future generations which were in a different condition Or Because the Prophets were chiefly sent to the Jews That therefore Christians are not concerned in the mandatory part of their Writings Or Because the New Testament in the doctrinal and sacramental part of it was calculated for a Meridian different from that which the Church is now under That therefore it does not oblige the Church in her present state We see the same art which is used in undermining the perpetuity of the Decalogue should it prevail would be as forcible against the Old and New Testament Dominicus à Soto who maintained the principle did likewise own the consequence so far as it concerns the Old Testament Bellarm. de justif l. 4. c. 6. p. 930. He did assert Nullum testimonium ex libris Veteris Testamenti quoad vim obligandi adduci posse Christianis If those words appropriated to the ancient people of God be taken strictly it does not appear from any thing which has been produced that there is any such appropriation of those two Commands The first runs in these terms Honour thy father and thy mother This is the whole which appertains to the Precept properly taken what is annexed is a Promise and not of the essence of the Mandatory part of the Decalogue Neither is the Promise so peculiar to the Jews but that it may be applied unto others which will be evident if we consider the words That thy days may be long in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee Long life was not only the reward of obedience amongst the Jews but likewise the Gentiles Iliad 4. Homer says That the life of Simoisius was short because he did not cherish his loving Parents 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a word very general and may import any land where the sons of Adam dwell The Lord did not only give Canaan to the Israelites but Mount Seir to the children of Esau and Ar to the children of Lot The Earth being the Lord's what any Prince or People enjoy it is by his donation This title was so well known that the Heathens used to stand upon it Wilt not thou possess that which Chemosh thy God giveth thee to possess Judg. 9.24 This being manifest there is no Nation in the World but may lay a claim to this promise upon a supposition of obedience to the Precept As for the last Command I cannot find the least appearance of an appropriation in it The sence of what the Epilogue asserts must amount to this Because under the Law Divorce was allowed and for that reason Men might be induced to attempt the getting another man's wife from him by suggesting something against her which might occasion a Bill of Divorce therefore God enjoyned in the Tenth Command That no Man should covet another's Wife If this was so How comes it to pass that S. Paul represents this Command as in force among Christians who are not concerned in the Law of Divorce Why is it said not only that Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife but his maid-servant which was never married and his ox and his ass If the Law of Divorce was the only reason which did induce the supreme Legislator to give out this Law it must necessarily follow That a Man might give a Bill of Divorce not only to his Wife but likewise to his Ox or his Ass which supposeth him to be married to them I cannot see how to covet should signifie to compass For to compass or procure is an external act but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we translate to covet is an internal and therefore it is interpreted by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to put the mind upon an object The mind being conversant about that which is evil either it passeth thro' it without consent or else it is entertained with some unadvised delight or else it procures not only a sudden delight but a full and perfect consent In the first place the mind doth not sin in the second and third it doth and this is that which is interdicted in the Tenth Command altho' Adultery is prohibited before In the Precept concerning Adultery the outward act is forbidden explicitly the inward implicitely only Now because
exercise the Ministerial function imployed Peter to Preach and by his Sermon at the Third Hour converted Three thousand at the Ninth hour Five Thousand He held the Angels of the Asian Churches in his right hand and out of his mouth went a two-edged sword the Sword of the Spirit namely the Word of God All this is very agreeable to the nature of a day wholly devoted to Religion 4. The Holy Apostles and Disciples Upon the First of the Week when the Disciples came together to break Bread Paul preached to them Act. 20.7 Here are actions very suitable to the design of a Sabbath Preaching and Administring the Holy Sacrament The Time when these actions were performed is the First of the Week This was a constant custom we never read that the Apostle in any place where he found none but Disciples did upon the old Sabbath communicate with them in those Ordinances which the Gospel has appointed Now as touching a Collection for the Saints as I have given order to the Churches of Galatia so do ye Vpon the first of the week let every one of you lay up by him in store 1 Cor. 16.1 2. The duty here enjoyned is a Collection for the Saints The Apostle did design That it should be very liberal according to the estate of every Man Why he should wave the second third fourth fifth day of the Week and pitch upon the First for the doing of this generous and pious Work cannot be conceived except upon the First of the Week the Disciples of Christ use to meet and be engaged in such Religious performances as have a tendency to excite the mind to Christian liberality These were the thoughts of S. Chrysostome Hom. 43. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There was an idoneity and fitness in the day to dispose and lead them to the acts of Charity This custom was not only amongst the Corinthians but all other Christians The Epistle is addressed to all who in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ 1 Cor. 1.2 and it was not only upon one or two First days but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the First day of every Week There remaineth therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the keeping a Sabbath to the people of God For he that is entred into his rest he also hath ceased from his works as God did from his Heb. 4.9 10. These words are directed to the Hebrews who were inclinable thro' the efficaey of former impressions to disvalue the institutions of the Gospel That the Apostle might prevail with them to yield a chearful conformity to those appointments He demonstrates That Christ is more valuable than Moses and stiles their deserting the Gospel a departure from the living God and cites Psalm 95. which has a peculiar aspect upon the state of the Church under the Messias In it are described his Disciples under these names the People of his pasture the Sheep of his hand Their solemn meeting to Worship O come let us worship the duties performed at this meeting as Prayer Let us kneel before the Lord our maker v. 6. Singing of Psalms Let us make a joyful noise unto him with Psalms v. 2 3. Hearing the word if you will hear his voice v. 7. a particular day on which all these duties are to be performed To day if you will hear This day being intended for a Sabbath at which time all spiritual advantages are administred which tend to the bringing the Soul into truest satisfaction and rest an exhortation is given to the People not to harden their hearts as the Israelites did in the provocation lest they be deprived of this rest as the Israelites were of theirs in the land of Canaan Now because there are several sorts of rests recorded in the Scripture The heavenly rest in the world to come the rest of the old Sabbath rest in the land of Canaan the Apostle makes it manifest that it is none of these which the Psalmist means but the rest of a Sabbath under the Gospel Not the heavenly for the rest here spoken is confined to a certain day v. 7. Whereas the rest above is every day without interruption Not the rest of the old Sabbath for that was at the beginning when the works were finished from the Creation of the World But the rest mentioned by the Psalmist is some future thing under the Gospel as I have sworn if they shall enter Not the Rest in the land of Canaan If Jesus had given them rest then he would not afterwards have spoken of another day From these premises it is concluded there remaineth therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the keeping a Sabbath day to the people of God under the Gospel And that we may know this Sabbath is the Resurrection-day and by consequence the First of the Week it is added for he which entred into his rest hath ceased from his works as God did from his God the Father upon the Last of the Week ceased from his works and made it a day of rest unto his people Therefore God the Son has done the like with the First of the Week he then putting a period to his state of Humiliation and ceasing from his labour and trouble which he did undergo in the accomplishment of the work of our redemption I was in the Spirit upon the Lord's day Rev. 1.10 By the Lord's day we can understand no less than a day appointed by our Blessed Lord and devoted to his Honour and Worship This day must necessarily be the First of the Week For S. John in expressing this circumstance of Time designs a credit to his relation and therefore must necessarily mean some day which was very well known by this name at the writing of the Revelation It is manifest by Ignatius who was his contemporary That the common name then given to the First of the Week was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This day God was pleased to signalize by a communication of the Holy Ghost in some extraordinary measures S. John was in the Spirit upon it In the words there is an allusion to the manner of speaking amongst the Hebrews who say that a man besides the Soul which he is ordinarily endued with has another Spirit given to him upon the Sabbath which they stile 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an excellent Soul Manass Ben. Is reconc Buxt Syna Jud. c. 11. p. 288. Such allusions we have in the very Context The Seven Spirits v. 4. have a plain aspect upon the Seven Angels which the Jews say do constantly attend the throne of God And the Governours of the Asian Churches are called Angels with respect to the Rulers in the Synagogues which were known by that name 5. The testimony of the following ages He who consults the Writings which are extant will meet with these four Things which being laid together will amount to what has been asserted 1. That the First of the Week was owned by Christians as a Day of Worship 2. As a Sabbath
day 3. As a Day preferred before the old Sabbath 4. As a Day instituted by Christ in the place of the old Day The First is manifest from Justin Martyr Apol. 2. p. 99. Apol. c. 39. who says That all Christians use to meet together upon it for the Worship of God Tertullian gives an account of the whole Solemnity of the day Eusebius says Hier. de Script Ecc. Euseb l. 4. c. 22. That it was celebrated by all Christians dispersed throughout the World If it had not been universally observed no account can be given why the Ebionites who did keep Saturday in a conformity to the Jews should celebrate the Lord's day That they might be agreeable in their practice to the Christians and why the contest grew so high about Easter whether it should be upon the Lord's day There had been no ground for this dispute in case the First of the Week had not then been honoured above all other days If this day was so generally devoted to Religion then there was a cessation upon it from all those secular imployments which are not reconcileable with so sacred a purpose and such a cessation is an ingredient essential to the constitution of a Sabbath Secondly We find sometimes the First of the Week to be expresly called a Sabbath-day as appears by the words of Gregory Nyssen He stiles it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 De resurr Christitom 2. p. 814. Par. Ed. In Psalm explan Prologus p. 335. De temp p. 257. and represents this as the reason because the only begotten Son of God rested upon it from all his works S. Hilary owns it by the same name Nos octavâ die quae ipsa prima est perfecti Sà bbati festivitate laetamur S. Austin speaking How the glory of the old Sabbath was transferred to the First of the Week concludes in these words Sic quoque ritè sanctificamus Sabbatum Domini Isychius says concerning the Resurrection-day In Lev. 23. Haec est altera dies Sabbati The name whereby the Lord's day was anciently called amongst Aethiopian Christians Scaliger de emend tem l. 7. p. 645. is Sanbath Zachristos the Sabbath of Christ The Rythmes concerning a Jew in the time of Henry the Third make it manifest That this name was familiarly applyed to the First of the Week The Jews words to those who offered him their help to pull him off the Jakes upon Saturday were Sabbata nostra colo de stercore surgere nolo Mat. Par. Our Sabbath I so highly prize That from this dung I will not rise The Christians did reply the Lord's day being next Sabbata nostra quidem Solomon celebrabis ibidem Then Solomon it must be thy fate Our Sabbath there to celebrate It is stiled by our own Church the Sabbath-day in the Ecclesiastical Constitutions Can. 70. Thirdly It is represented as a day much preferred by Christians before the Jewish Sabbath It had so much the pre-eminence That the Last of the Week by Spectators out of the Church and the better and sounder part of those within had little or no notice taken of it or deference paid to it The Jews observing the singular regard the Christians had for the First of the Week called it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the day of the Nazarites Avodah Zar. Hor Hebr. 320. It was a common maxim among them On the day of the Nazarites a Jew must not negotiate with a Christian The Gloss interprets a Nazarite to be one who follows the errour of him who commanded his Disciples to keep holy the First of the Week Buxt L. Rab. 1384. In voc 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rab. Bechai commenting upon that expression behind one in the midst Is 66.7 says That it either denotes the cross of the Edomites or their solemn Feast-day By the Edomites he means Christians For the Jews in their private records where they give a greater indulgence to their blasphemous humour assert That the same Soul which was in Esau Lex Rab. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 did pass into Christ from thence his followers are called by this name The Feast-day which he terms 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the fixed or stated time for Christian Worship is no other but the Lord's day When Pliny attempts to represent the crimes which the Christians were guilty of he sets this in the front Quod soliti essent stato die ante lucem convenire carmenque Christo tanquam Deo dicere That they were wont to meet upon a certain day and to sing a Hymn unto Christ as unto God If it had been usual for them to meet upon the old Sabbath as well as the Lord's day Pliny who made it his business to inquire into their practice would have discovered it and then it would have been statis diebus not stato die Here is only mention of one particular day That this was the Lord's day is apparent from Ignatius Ad Magnes who lived in the time of Trajan to whom Pliny wrote He represents the Jewish Sabbath as a working day and attributes to the Lord's day a dominion over it The celebration of Sunday was so constant amongst the Christians that the Heathens conceived That they gave some veneration to the Sun Which misapprehension occasioned the words of Tertullian Diem Solis laetitiae indulgemus aliâ longè ratione Cor. Mâ—l quà m religione Solis The Heathen Inquisition use to put this question to the Martyrs Dominicum servâsti hast thou kept the Lord's day The answer was I am a Christian I cannot intermit it Ignatius calls the First of the Week the Queen of days and if it was the Queen it had a Sovereignty over all other days and would not permit the old Sabbath to sit in the same Throne with it Non benè conveniunt nec in unâ sede morantur Majestas Amor. Queens and Lovers will not agree In the same Throne long to be Justin Martyr asserts That the old Sabbath is of no use after the time of Christ Whereas when he speaks of the Lord's day he says That all Christians meet upon it hear the Prophets read have a word of Exhortation spoken to them and the whole performance is concluded with Prayer and a collection for those who are in distress These duties use to be discharged in the Synagogues upon the Old Sabbath but that being abrogated they are now translated to the New The Council of Laodicea declares That Christians ought not to rest on the Jewish Sabbath but work preferring the Lord's day before it The Church anciently was so far from having any respect to the old day Or. 29. p. 282. Hâ—er 30.31 Hist Eccl. l. 4. c. 22. Buxt l. Rab. vo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that those who believed That they were under an obligation to observe it were branded with the infamy of heresie 〈◊〉 the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Nazianzen the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Epiphanius the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Eusebius They are the same which the Rabbins call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sahbatharii Lastly The First of the Week is represented as a day instituted by Christ in the place of the Jewish Sabbath For this we have the plain words of Athanasius Hom. de Semente 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Lord hath translated the day of the Sabbath to the Lord's day In the Homily of the Place and Time of Prayer Sunday is Three times called the Sabbath and it is plainly asserted That there is both the Example and Commandment of God for the celebration of this day That this Example and Commandment the godly Christians began to follow immediately after the Ascension of our Lord Christ That we are bound to keep the same day not only for that it is God's express Commandment but also to declare our selves to be loving children in following the example of our gracious Lord and Father And now if we look back and consider what has been represented from the Law Prophets our Blessed Lord the Holy Apostles the Christians which lived in the following Ages we may find just reason to believe That when the Old Sabbath was abrogated the First of the Week was substituted in the room of it FINIS BOOKS Printed at the Theatre in Oxford and Sold by Walter Kettilby at the Bishop's Head in S. Paul's Church-yard 1. INstitutiones Grammaticae Anglo-Saxonicae Maeso-Gothicae Auctore G. Hickesio Ecclesiae Anglicanae Presbytero Quarto 2. Chr. Wasii Senarius sive de Legibus Licentia veterum Poëtarum Quarto 3. Misnae Pars Ordinis primi Zeraim Titul septem Latinè verrit Commentario illustravit Guiliel Guisius Accedit Mosis Maimonidis Praefatio in Misnam Edv. Pocockio Interprete Quar. 4. A Reply to two Discourses lately printed at Oxford concerning the Adoration of our B. Saviour in the Holy Eucharist Quar. 5. Some Reflections upon a Treatise call'd Pietas Romana Parisiensis lately printed at Oxford To which are added I. A vindication of Protestant Charity in Answer to some Passages in Mr. E. M's Remarks on a late Conference II. A Defence of the Oxford Reply to two Discourses there printed A.D. 1687. quar 6. Animadversions on the Eight Theses laid down and the Inferences deduced from them in a Discourse Entitled Church-Government Part V. lately printed at Oxford Quar. 7. Reflections on the Historical part of Church-Government Part V. Quar. 8. An Answer to some Considerations on the Spirit of Martin Luther and the Original of the Reformation lately printed at Ox. quar 9. Of the Unity of the Church a Discourse written 1430 years since in the time of Decius the Persecuting Emperor By Cyprian Bishop of Carthage and Martin Most useful for allaying the present Heats and reconciling the Differences among us 10. The Judgment and Decree of the University of Oxford past in their Convocation July 21.1683 against certain pernicious Books and damnable Doctrines destructive to the Sacred Persons of Princes their State and Government and of all Humane Society rendred into English and published by Command Fol. 11. Diadascaloeophus or the Deaf and Dumb Man's Tutor To which is added A Discourse of the Nature and Number of double Consonants Both which Tracts being the first for what the Author knows that have been published upon either of the Subjects By G. Dalgarno Oct. 12. The Depth and Mystery of the Roman Mass laid open and explained for the use of reformed and unreformed Christians By Dan. Brevint D. D. Twelves There are lately Printed for Walter Kettilby these following Books Dr. Burnet's Theory of the Earth the two last Books concerning the Conflagration of the World and the new Heavens and the new Earth Fol. Answer to Mr. Warren's Exceptions against the first Part. Consideration of Mr. Warren's Defence Relation of the Proceedings at Charter-House upon occasion of K. James II. his presenting a Papist to be admitted into that Hospital in virtue of his Letters Dispensatory Fol. Telluris Theoria Sacra Libri duo posteriores de Conflagratione Mundi de futuro rerum statu Quarto Archaeologiae Philosophicae Sive Doctrina antiqua de Rerum Originibus Libri Duo Bishop Overal's Convocation Book 1606. concerning the Government of God's Catholick Church and the Kingdoms of the whole World Quarto Mr. Nicholl's Answer to an Heretical Book call'd The Naked Gospel Quarto Turner de Lapsu Angelorum Hominum Mr. Lamb's Dialogues about the Lord's Supper Octavo Mr. Raymond's Pattern of pure and undefiled Religion Octavo Exposition on the Church Catechism Oct. Animadversions on Mr. Johnson's Answer to Jovian in Three Letters Octavo Mr. Dodwell's Two Letters of Advice about Susception of Holy Orders c. Mr. Milbourn's Mysteries in Religion Vindicated Or Filiation Deity and Satisfaction of our Saviour asserted against Socinians and others with occasional Reflections on several late Pamphlets Octavo Bishop of Rath and Well's Reflections on a French Testament printed at Bourdeaux Quar. Dr. Sharp's now A. B. of York Sermon before the Queen April 11. 1690. on Gal. 15.13 Fast Sermon before the House of Commons May 21. 1690. on Deut. 5.21 Farewel Sermon at S. Giles's June 28. 1691. on Phil. 4.8 Sermon before the House of Lords November 5. 1691. on Rom. 10.2 Sermon before the King and Queen on Christmas-day 1691. on Heb. 19.26 Sermon on Easter-day 1692. on Ph. 3.10 Sermon of the Things that make for Peace before the Lord Mayor Aug. 23. 1674. on Rom. 14.19 Sermon before the L. Mayor Jan. 1675. on 1 Tim. 4.8 both new Printed Archbishop of York's Thanksgiving Sermon before the King and Queen Novem. 12. 1693. Dr. Grove's now L. Bishop of Chichester Sermon before the King and Q. June 1. 1690. Dr. Pelling's Sermon before the King and Queen Dec. 8. 1689. Vindication of those that have taken the Oaths Quarto Dr. Hooper's Sermon before the Queen Jan. 24. 1690. Kelsey Concio de Aeterno Christi Sacerdotio Sermon of Christ crucified Aug. 23. 1691. Dr. Hickman's Thanksgiving Sermon before the House of Commons Octob. 19. 1690. Sermon before the Queen Oct. 26. 1690. Mr. Lamb's Sermon before the King and Queen Jan. 19. 1689. Sermon before the Queen Jan. 24. 1690. Dr. Worthington of Christian Love Octavo Faith and Practice of a Church of England Man Twelves Fourth Edition Mr. Jeffery's Religion the Perfection of Man Octav. Dr. Scot's Sermon before the Q. May 22. 1692. Mr. Marriot's Sermon before the L. Mayor on Easter-day 1689. Sermon of Union at the Election of the L. Mayor Mich. 1689. Mr. Stainforth's Serm. Jan. 30. 1688. at York Dr. Lynford's before the Lord Mayor Feb. 24. 1688. Mr. Young's Sermon of Union May 20. 1688. The Protestant and Popish Way of interpreting Scripture in Answer to Pax vobis Dr. Resbury's before the Lord Mayor Oct. 21. 1688. Amiraldus of Divine Dreams Discourse of the Nature of Man both in his Natural and Political Capacity both as he is a Rational Creature and member of a Civil Society with an Examination of some of Mr. Hobbs's opinions relating hereunto both by J. Lowde Rector of Vttrington in Yorkshire sometime Fellow of Clare-Hall in Cambridge True Conduct of Persons of Quality Translated out of French The Interest of England considered in an Essay upon Wool our Woolen Manufactures and the Improvement of Trade with some Remarks upon the Conceptions of Sir Josiah Child Mr. Young's Sermon concerning the Wisdom of Fearing God Preached at Salisbury Sunday July 30. being the time of the Assizes Printed at the request of the Lawyers A Sermon Preached before the Right Honourable the Lord Mayor of the City of London and the Court of Aldermen at Guild-Hall Chapel on Sunday Aug. 20. 1693. By Jonas Warly M. A. Vicar of Witham in Essex A Sermon Preached before the Right Honourable the Lord Mayor Aldermen and Livery-men of the City of London in the Parish Church of S. Lawrence-Jewry on the Feast of S. Michael 1693. at the Election of the Lord Mayor for the year ensuing by William Strengfellow M. A. Lecturer of S. Dunstan's East FINIS
8. and the Law requiring That those for whom the Sacrifice was offered should be present and put their hands upon the head of it and there being an impossibility That every Man should appear in his own Person it was appointed That the several stations should appear in their turns as the representatives of the whole Community These Maimonides stiles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Men of the station Those which were near to Jerusalem belonging to such a station constantly appeared in their course according to what was appointed Those who lived at a greater distance Vid. Temp. Service 62. used to assemble themselves in Synagogues and to pray and read the Law that they might maintain Communion with their Brethren at Jerusalem Besides the Temple the Jews had their Proseucha's and Synagogues By the express words of the Law the Males were obliged to appear thrice a year at Jerusalem The same Law obliging them to the celebration of a Sabbath every week their reason did lead them to make choice of such places where they might conveniently assemble for that purpose These are stiled Proseucha's and Synagogues Such was the Sanctuary in Sichem Jos 24.26 And the place of Prayer in Mizpeh 1 Sam. 7.6 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Macc. 3. â— 40. And the houses of God Ps 74.8 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Aquila translates 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Jerusalem it self was not without them as is evident from S. Paul's words He making an Apology for his behaviour there says They neither found him in the Temple disputing with any man nor raising up the people neither in the Synagogues nor in the City Act. 24.12 Tho' there is some distinction usually made betwixt a Proseucha and a Synagogue as that a Proseucha was in the Field a Synagogue in the City The Proseucha open at top The Synagogue covered The Proseucha built in some place near a River The Synagogue in the highest place of the City The Proseucha might entertain the least number The Synagogue no fewer than Ten yet we find the words promiscuously used by Philo Judaeus He calls the Synagogues 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 De vita Mâ—sis l. 3. It is probable where the Magistrate would not permit the Jews the exercise of their Religion in Cities that they built places in the Fields equivalent to them where they might convene for the Worship of God So that tho' a Proseucha and a Synagogue might differ in some external modes yet they did agree in the main end After the Law when the Messias was come these places were frequented for some time Notwithstanding there was corruption in the publick administrations yet our Blessed Lord did not forsake them The Scribes and Pharisees Ministers in the Jewish Church were chargeable with many personal defects by their procurement unnecessary Rites were blended with the Worship of God The persons which they ministred unto were so enormous in their conversion That the Temple upon the account of their presence is stiled a Den of Thieves Yet for all this our Saviour did not withdraw himself from their Assemblies Into this Church he was admitted by Circumcision Luk. 4.16 did frequently celebrate the Passeover with them honour their Synagogues with his presence every Sabbath and commands his Disciples to hear the Scribes and Pharisees Jo. 11.49 Tho' there was an innovation about the Priesthood the Office of the High Priest which was perpetual by the Law of God was made annual by the Law of Man yet when he had cured the Leper he sends him to the Priest Mat. 8.4 He continued in a Proseucha praying all night Luke 6.12 After his Death his Disciples did tread in his steps So soon as he was ascended the principal of them which were a Hundred and Twenty did presently gather together in an upper room belonging to the Temple and continued in Prayer and Supplication When such multitudes of Converts were added to the Church as one room would not contain them they made use of diverse They continued in the Temple and brake Bread 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from room to room S. Peter and S. John went up to the Temple at the hour of prayer Act. 3.1 The Disciples were all with one accord in Solomon 's Porch Act. 5.12 The Apostles are bid to speak in the Temple to the people Act. 5.20 S. Paul preached Christ in the Synagogues Act. 9.20 At Antioch in Pisidia he and Barnabas did repair thither on the Sabbath day Act. 13.14 This was his practice at Iconium Thessalonica Corinth Ephesus and so much a general custome That the assembling of Christians together is stiled 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Heb. 10. This Communion of the Christians with the Jews continued as long as their circumstances were reconcileable with it Afterwards they held their Assemblies apart and had peculiar places for their Sacred Conventions known by the name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 When ye come together in the Church 1 Cor. 11.18 Here is first a coming together which makes the Congregation and then the place is expressed where the Congregation is met 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The word imports something antecedent to and distinct from the Assembly Upon this account the Church is opposed to private houses Have ye not houses to eat and drink in or dispise ye the Church of God Let the women keep silence in the Churches and if they will learn any thing let them ask their husbands at home 1 Cor. 14.34 As Houses and home signifie private dwellings so the rule of opposition will justifie us in asserting That the Church or Churches which are opposed to them must signifie publick set apart for Religious Conventions Such were the Houses of Nymphas Philemon Priscilla and Aquila Col. 4.15 Rom. 16. Priscilla and Aquila We read of the Church in them that is The Congregation which use to meet there for the Worship of God these persons having set apart some part of their dwelling for that sacred purpose If by the Church in their Houses we must understand only the members of their families which were converted to the Faith no good reason can be given why the same form of salutation should not be addressed to others as well as to them Rom. 16. â— 10 11. There were many others as Narcissus and Aristobulus who had in their housholds those who did embrace the Doctrine of Christ We are not destitute of very early Testimonies to the same effect in Ecclesiastical Writers L. 8. c. 1 â—u l. 2. c. 17. Lamprid. Eusebius stiles the Churches 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ancient edifices Several of them were in Alexandria in S. Mark 's time Alexander Severus upon a controversie did adjudge such a publick place to the Christians Irenaeus and Clemens Alexandrinus use the word Ecclesia in the sence which we contend for Such a place is stiled Domus Dei in Tertullian and Dominicum in S. Cyprian These words import a resignation of the right
which the owner was vested in and a solemn appropriation to the service of our Blessed Lord. There is all the reason imaginable why there should be such conveniences for the Christians in those early times They were passionate in their desires to propagate their Religion Known places for their Assemblies were signally conducing to this end Every one might have recourse to them to gain instructions in the Faith The severity of the Age was not such as always to hinder them from building It was as great against the Jews At first The Disciples were persecuted under that name Act. 18.2 And yet they had their Synagogues in divers places From Julius to Constantine the Great are reckoned above Forty Emperours and Ten Persecutions In the intervals betwixt these violent storms there is no reason to believe but that the Christians might erect appropriate places for the Worship of Christ The Greeks at this day tho' they live under severities not unequal to those which the Primitive Christians were exercised with yet have their Churches allowed them The several steps which the Penitents were to take before they could be admitted to the Communion is an evident demonstration of that which we argue for First They must stand without the doors of the Oratory and there with the greatest importunity beg the Prayers of those who went in and came out of it These were named 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 After this part of their penance was finished they were admitted within the doors and stood in the place called the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ad Longinum not p. 12. and heard the Scriptures read and preached these were stiled 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The next step was to that part of the Church which was behind the Ambo or Pulpit These did hear as the former and went out with the Catechumens and were termed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The next step was their standing and remaining together with the Faithful and communicating in Prayers and Psalms but not in the Holy Sacrament These were known by the title of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 All this can argue no less than That the Christians did not promiscuously meet in any place but had peculiar Edifices digested into parts suitable to these ends This way of discipline was earlier than the times of Gregory Bishop of Neo-Caesaria He speaks of it as a thing which the Church had been familiarly accustomed to and He flourished about the middle of the Third Century The Concession of Origen Minutius Foelix Arnobius Lactantius That the Christians had no Temples is no prejudice to what has been asserted These Authors lived within the Third Century In that age we have evident Testimonies for peculiar places dedicated to Christian Worship Therefore by the Temples which the Christians had not must be understood such as were in use amongst the Heathens namely Edifices in which some Daemon was enclosed and kept from wandring abroad by Magical incantations After the Three first Centuries were past we have a cloud of Witnesses Churches were then made more conspicuous by a greater magnificence in the structure of them Constantine made a Law to build the Oratories higher and to enlarge both in breadth and length the Churches of God Eusebius says Eusâ—de vita Con. l. 2. c. 44. Hist l. 10. c. 2. That Churches then were more splendid than those which had been demolished by the Impiety of Tyrants There was likewise a more solemn Consecration than the Imperial Laws did permit before Theod. Ecc. His l. 1. c. 31. When Constantine was setled in the Throne he sent his Commands on every side to the Bishops to Consecrate the Temples which were built by him The Historian says That when Dedications were made according to this Imperial Edict it was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Eus Eccl. H. l. 10. c. 3. to all Christians a desirable Spectacle This 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in a little time gained so high a reputation That it was thought to be an errour to meet in any Church which had not been first solemnly Dedicated Athan. Apol ad Const tom 1. p. 682. Seld de Syned l. 3. c. 15. p. 343. The Arrians accused Athanasius upon the account of his meeting in the great Church in Alexandria 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 before it was perfected by Consecration In after ages None doubt whether there were such places or no. All the question is Whether they may be used now by reason of those abuses which have been formerly practised in them the too much Sanctity which some continue to attribute to them To which I reply 1. Former abuses can be no just ground for our not frequenting of them The corruptions are removed by the Reformation as the Buyers and Sellers were whipt out of the Temple Superstition doth not like the Leprosie in Houses so cleave to the Walls as not to be separated without pulling them down The introduction of the True Worship of Christ doth as naturally remove it as Light expells Darkness If this principle of not using that which has been abused was throughly followed it would lead us into Vaults and Caverns and perswade us to make our perpetual abode there lest the light of the Sun which to this day is stained with the Idolatry of some Nations should be useful to us Bethaven is changed into a Bethel when God is worshipped there in a right manner The place which is stiled the Mount of Corruption when abuses were removed is called Mount Olivet The Censers of Korah and his Company were made into broad Plates for a covering of the Altar Num. 16. v. 38. Gideon offered a burnt Sacrifice unto the Lord with the wood of an Idolatrous Grove Constantine the Great converted Heathen Temples into Christian Churches The Command to demolish Idolatrous Altars in Canaan and break the Brazen Serpent is not applicable to the case in hand The First was enjoyned because the Law did allow but one Altar The Second Because the abuse was grown so high as to make the Serpent the Object of the Supreme Veneration and the use for which it was at first designed had a period put unto it As for the Sanctity which some attribute to Churches they alledge in justification of themselves the following Considerations They are Holy not upon the account of any inherent quality but a Relation This Relation is produced by a Solemn Dedication This Dedication is countenanced by that general Command Prov. 3.5 Honour the Lord with thy substance When Men expend their Estates in the erecting such Edifices and devote them to be places for the Celebration of Religious Worship They lay out their substance in that way which has a tendency to promote the Divine Honour The Jews did attribute this kind of Sanctity to their Synagogues and yet Jesus Christ and his Apostles Seld. de Syn. l. 3. c. 16. did not decline the use of them SECT VI. Concerning the Time of Divine Worship THE only excuse why we are