doest advise upon or determine nothing thou doest attempt or accomplish but it is known to me yea thou doest nothing but what I have determined shall be done and this is fully that which David acknowledgeth concerning himself Psalm 139.2 3. Thou knowest my down sitting and mine uprising thou understandest my thoughts afarre off thou compassest my path and my lying down and art acquainted with all my wayes Vers 29. And this shall be a signe unto thee Ye shall eat this yeare such things as grow of themselves c. That is though ye have been hindred from sowing and planting this yeare by reason of the Assyrians that have invaded your land yea though there be no sowing nor planting the next yeare to wit either because it was the sabbath yeare the yeare of the lands rest or because the Assyrians left not the countrey till seed time was past yet there shall be sufficient that shall grow of it self of the scattered seeds of corne that fell upon the earth and hereby some inferre that the Assyrians continued a time in the land even after this promise was made to Hezekiah by the prophet Isaiah at least till the seed time of the second yeare was past and a very miraculous passage this was that for three years they should live of that which grew of it self nor is it any wonder that the Lord gives that for a signe to strengthen their faith which was not accomplished till the Assyrians had left the land we see the like Exod. 3.12 And he said Certainly I will be with thee and this shall be a token unto thee that I have sent thee when thou hast brought forth the people out of Egypt ye shall serve God upon this mountain Concerning which see the note there Vers 30. And the remnant that is escaped of the house of Judah shall yet again take root downward c. Because though they should at present be delivered from the Assyrians they might fear that being brought to such a poore number their nation would never be able long to subsist this promise is added concerning future times to wit that that small remnant of them which had escaped the sword of the Assyrians should like a thriving flourishing tree grow and prosper and replenish the land again as in former times Vers 31. For out of Jerusalem shall go forth a remnant and they that escape out of mount Zion That is that poore remnant that now for fear of the Assyrians is shut up within the walls of Jerusalem shall go forth thence the enemies being fled and shall again replenish the land The zeal of the Lord of hosts shall do this The Lords zeal for his own glory the fervent love he beares to his people and his just indignation against the enemy shall move him to do this however his people have deserved no such favour at his hands Vers 32. He shall not come into this citie nor shoot an arrow there c. It is evident that Rabshaketh came up against Jerusalem with a great army chap. 18.17 if he removed his army thence when he went to Sennacherib to Libnah vers 8. which perhaps he did having heard of the Ethiopian that was coming against them then the meaning of this place is clear that notwithstanding the threatning letters he had sent he should not return again to lay siege unto Jerusalem but if the army of Rabshakeh lay still before Jerusalem then the meaning of these words may be that though the army of Rabshakeh had blockt up Jerusalem and waited for the coming of Sennacheribs army who was happely gone against the Egyptian and Ethiopian army intending then with their joynt forces to assault Jerusalem yet he should never cast a bank against it but should return the way he came which accordingly came to passe vers 35. as was formerly prophecyed by Isaiah chap. 14.25 I will break the Assyrian in my land and upon my mountains tread him under foot then shall his yoke depart from off them and his burthen depart from off their shoulder Vers 34. For I will defend this citie to save it for my own sake and for my servant Davids sake That is because of my promise made to David concerning the perpetuity of his throne which had respect chiefly to Christ the sonne of David of whom David was a type Vers 35. And it came to passe that night that the angel of the Lord went out c. That is that very night after the Prophet had sent this message to Hezekiah concerning the deliverance of Jerusalem or that night when the Lord performed this which the prophet had foretold the angel of the Lord went out and smote in the camp of the Assyrians one hundred fourescore and five thousand and amongst others the captains and leaders of his camp perhaps even Rabshakeh amongst the rest who had lately belched forth such execrable blasphemies against the God of Israel 2. Chron. 32.21 And the Lord sent an Angel which cut off all the mighty men of valour and the leaders and captains in the camp of the king of Assyria c. Vers 36. So Sennacherib king of Assyria departed c. With shame of face 2. Chron. 32.21 So he returned with shame of face to his own land c. the book of Tobit also telleth us that at his return he in a rage slew many of the Israelites in Nineveh Tobit 1.18 but of this we find no mention in any of the canonicall books of Scripture Vers 37. And Esar-haddon his sonne reigned in his stead Who in the beginning of his reigne sent new troops out of Syria into Samaria to fortifie the colony therein planted by his grandfather Shalmaneser Ezra 4.2 CHAP. XX. Vers 1. IN those dayes was Hezekiah sick unto death That is immediately after the slaughter made in the Assyrian army by the angel related in the end of the former chapter and indeed manifest it is that Hezekiah sickned in the fourteenth yeare of his reigne which was the yeare wherein Sennacherib invaded Judea chap. 18.13 Now in the fourteenth yeare of Hezekiah did Sennacherib king of Assyria come up against all the fenced cities of Judah and took them for he reigned in all but nine and twenty years chapter 18.2 now a promise was made him of living fifteen years longer vers 6. and withall it is most probable that he fell not sick before the departure of the Assyrian army because not long before that when he had received those blasphemous letters from Sennacherib he went into the temple and prayed unto the Lord c. chap. 19.14 though he was newly delivered from so great feares yet partly for the further triall of his faith and partly to render him yet better and to honour him with the ensuing miracle God was pleased to visit him with this dangerous sicknesse Thus saith the Lord Set thy house in order c. That is make thy will and dispose of those things which it is fit should be set in
basons 2. Chron. 4.8 It is expressed that there were an hundred basons CHAP. VIII Vers 1. THen Solomon assembled the Elders of Israel c. To wit to attend upon the ark when it was removed out of the City of David which is Zion where it had been ever since David brought it thither 2 Sam. 6.12 of which see the note there unto the Temple which Solomon had now built in mount Moriah for by this personall attendance both of Princes and people upon the ark they did acknowledge the Lord of whose presente the ark was a type to be the God and Lord of Israel and themselves his servants A great question indeed it is how it can be said here that the ark was carried out of Sion that it might be placed in the Temple seeing ordinarily in the Scripture Sion is spoken of as the place where God dwelt in his Temple amongst his people as Psal 78.68.69 where it is said that God chose the tribe of Judah the mount Zion which he loved and he built his Sanctuary like high places c. and Esa 8.18 where God is called the Lord of hosts that dwelleth in mount Zion and so in many other places But for this we must know that to speak properly and in a strict sence the Temple was not built in mount Sion but in mount Moriah 2. Chron. 3.1 therefore it is said here that the ark was carried out of the citie of David which is Zion into the Temple but because the whole citie of Jerusalem is usually called Sion and mount Sion from that mount which was a chief part of it thence it is that the Temple Gods dwelling place is so usually said to have been in Sion Vers 2. And all the men of Israel assembled themselves unto king Solomon at the feast c. That is at the time when they were from all parts of the land to assemble themselves together to keep the feast in the moneth of Ethanim which is the seventh moneth By the feast is meant as is most probably held by the most of Interpreters the feast of tabernacles which began the 15 day of the seventh moneth Levit. 23.34 and was indeed the chief feast of this moneth as being one of those three feasts whereto all the males of Israel were bound to resort yet it must needs be that the people assembled at least the heads of the tribes and the chief of the fathers seven or eight dayes before the feast of tabernacles for the feast of tabernacles was kept from the fifteenth to the end of the two and twentieth day and on the three and twentieth day Solomon dismissed the people 2. Chron. 7.10 And on the three and twentieth day of this seventh moneth he sent the people away unto their tents so that the seven dayes which he kept for the dedication of the temple whereof mention is made vers 65. of this chapter and 2. Chron. 7.9 were before the feast of tabernacles yet if they were the seven dayes immediately foregoing the feast of tabernacles which was on the fifteenth day of the moneth doubtlesse the tenth day was excepted which was the day wherein they afflicted their souls with fasting Levit 23.27 and therefore not likely to have been one of the dayes of this festivitie of the Temples dedication now whereas it may be objected that till the eight moneth the Temple was not finished chap. 6.38 And in the eleventh yeare in the moneth Bul which is the eight moneth was the house finished to this I answer that the dedication therefore was doubtlesse in the seventh moneth of the following yeare that moneth being chosen for the peoples convenience who were then to assemble themselves to keep the feast of Tabernacles and that in the interim there might be time for the drying of the walls and to make all things ready for the dedication of it Vers 3. And the priests took up the ark In 2. Chron. 5.4 it is and the Levites took up the ark but that is onely because the priests also were of the tribe of Levi. Vers 4. And they brought up the ark of the Lord and the tabernacle of the congregation c. To wit that which was made by Moses which onely was called the tabernacle of the congregation this had been hitherto in Gibeon 2. Chron. 1.3 but was now removed thence with all the holy vessels thereof and laid up in the treasuries of the Temple not onely because they had been consecrated to God but also to make sure that the Temple should now be the onely place of Gods worship Vers 5. Sacrificing sheep and oxen that could not be told nor numbred for multitude To wit when they were going in a solemn manner before the ark to remove it from the citie of David into the Temple and therefore perhaps in the same manner too that was observed by David when he removed the ark from the house of Obed Edom 2. Sam. 6.13 And it was so that when they that bare the ark of the Lord had gone six paces he sacrificed oxen and fatlings Vers 8. And they drew out the staves that the ends of the staves were seen out in the holy place c. Some conceive the meaning of this hard place is this to wit that they drew out the staves quite out of the rings of the ark thereby to signifie that the ark was now to be removed no more and so the staves being laid upon the ground in the fore part of the Sanctuary their foure ends or heads might be seen as one went out of the holy place into the most holy but out of that place they were never seen because the ark was never removed but it is hard to make this exposition agree with the words the most approved exposition therefore is this when they had set the ark in his place behind the Cherubims to wit the two great Cherubims which Solomon had made neither the ark nor the staves could be seen but then they drew out the staves eastward that so though the ark was not seen yet the end of the staves might be seen to put them in mind of the ark which was behind the wings of the Cherubims for by this means the ends of the staves were seen out in the holy place before the oracle that is in that part of the most holy place which was before the ark which was more especially called the oracle and they were not seen without that is they were not seen out of the ark they that were before the oracle in the most holy place might discern by the ends of the staves that they were in the ark as it is expressed 2. Chron. 5.9 And they drew out the staves of the ark that the ends of the staves were seen from the ark before the oracle but the staves were never seen out of the ark for that was against Gods Law Exod. 25.15 The staves shall be in the rings of the ark they shall not be taken from it
had fought against the former king of Moab and taken all his land out of his hand even unto Arnon which might be the ground of that challenge which the king of the Ammonites made to this land Judg. 11.13 And the king of the children of Ammon answered unto the messengers of Jephthah because Israel took away my land when they came up out of Egypt from Arnon even unto Jabbok and unto Jordan now therefore restore those lands again peaceably For otherwise the Israelites were forbidden to take any part of the Ammonites land away from them Deut. 2.19 And when thou comest nigh to the children of Ammon distresse them not nor meddle with them Vers 26. And from Heshbon unto Ramath-mizpeh c. Called Ramoth in Gilead chap. 20.8 Vers 29. And Moses gave inheritance unto the half tribe of Manasseh See the note upon Num. 32.33 Vers 30. And all the towns of Jair which are in Bashan threescore cities See the note upon Num. 32.41 Vers 31. And half Gilead and Ashtaroth and Edrei cities of the kingdome of Og in Bashan were pertaining unto the children of Machir the sonne of Manasseh See Num. 32.39 Even unto the one half of the children of Machir by their families For Manasseh had onely one sonne to wit Machir whose sonnes had their inheritance half within Jordan and half without Vers 33. But unto the tribe of Levi Moses gave not any inheritance See the note above upon verse 14. CHAP. XIIII Vers 1. WHich Eleazar the Priest and Joshua the sonne of Nun and the heads of the fathers of the tribes of the children of Israel distributed for inheritance unto them Who were chosen by the Lord and expressed by name Num. 34.17 See the note upon that place Vers 2. By lot was their inheritance c. For the manner how this was done see the note upon Num. 26.55 Onely the place where they should have their portion was divided by lot and afterward the quantitie of their severall portions was laid out by Joshua Eleazar and the heads of the tribes according as the tribe was more or fewer in number the first being done by casting of lots to prevent all murmurings and discontents and to make it the more evident that the prophesies both of Jacob and Moses concerning the severall inheritances of the tribes were from God Vers 4. For the children of Joseph were two tribes c. This is added to shew how there were still nine tribes and an half remaining amongst whom the land was to be divided notwithstanding the Levites were not reckoned amongst them See also the note Gen 48.5 Vers 6. Then the children of Judah came unto Joshua in Gilgal and Caleb c. It is evident by this place that they began the division of Canaan in Gilgal though they finished it afterwards in Shiloh chap. 18.1 6. and that because the Tabernacle was at present in Gilgal and it was fit this work should be done in the presence of God both that it might be done the more reverently and religiously and that hereby they might be put in mind that it was the Lord their God that would reach forth unto each tribe the lot which he had assigned for their portion Now when they were met together about this great businesse it is said here that Caleb who is called the sonne of Jephunneh the Kenezite because he was descended from Kenaz of the tribe of Judah 1. Chron. 4.13 15. and to distinguish him from another Caleb who was the sonne of Hezron 1. Chron. 2.18 came to Joshua to demand that portion of the land by way of speciall priviledge which God had long since promised him and because many of his tribe that is of the chief men of his tribe went along with him to wit to countenance him and to further him in his suit both in regard that Caleb was a man of great eminency in their tribe and also that the whole tribe were to be in some sort gainers by this extraordinary portion conferred upon him therefore it is said in the first place that the children of Judah came unto Joshua and then afterwards that Caleb attended thus with the chief elders of Judah propounded to Joshua the businesse about which they came Thou knowest the thing that the Lord said unto Moses the man of God concerning me and thee in Kadesh-barnea It is much questioned by Expositours what the thing is that the Lord said unto Moses concerning Caleb and Ioshua which Caleb here means Some hold that so far as it concerns Caleb it is meant of that particular promise which afterwards he doth plainly expresse vers 9. to wit that Hebron and the land adjoyning should be his inheritance and for Ioshua they say it is meant of some such like particular promise that was then also made to him though it be not expressed in the story as happely that he should succeed Moses in the government of Israel or that he should chuse what city or portion in the land he pleased to be his peculiar inheritance and this they judge the more probable First because it is not likely but that he dealing faithfully in the answer they returned concerning the land which they had searched as well as Caleb the Lord also rewarded him by some speciall promise as well as Caleb and Secondly because it is expressely said chap. 19.50 that according to the word of the Lord they gave him the citie which he asked even Timnath-serah in mount Ephraim Again others hold that the thing here meant that the Lord said to Moses both concerning Caleb and Ioshua is that mentioned Num. 14.30 Doubtlesse ye shall not come into the land concerning which I sware to make you dwell therein save Caleb the sonne of Jephunneh and Joshua the sonne of Nun. But all things considered I conceive it most probable that Caleb spake this indefinitely of every thing which the Lord had spoken to Moses concerning Ioshua and Caleb to wit that he doubted not but Ioshua knew well what God had said to Moses in Kadesh-barnea concerning them both when they returned thither from searching the land and so by affirming this in generall he makes way to the propounding of that particular promise vers 9. which God had made to him that Hebron and the countrey adjoyning should be his inheritance concerning which it was necessary that he should appeal to Joshuas knowledge because there were none else now living that could be witnesses of it and in propounding this introduction to that which he had further to say he calls Moses the man of God that what God had promised by Moses his speciall servant might be the more regarded by them Thou knowest saith he the thing that the Lord said unto Moses the man of God concerning thee and me in Kadesh-barnea Vers 7. Fourtie yeares old was I when Moses the servant of the Lord sent me from Kadesh-barnea See the note chap. 11.18 And I brought him word again as it was in mine heart That
of Edom southward were Kabzeel c. It is called Iekabzeel Neh. 11.25 Vers 32. All their cities are twenty nine with their villages There are indeed eight and thirty cities or towns named in the foregoing verses and therefore for the clearing of this some hold that because nine of these were afterwards assigned to the tribe of Simeon therefore it is said here that all the cities of Iudah in those parts were nine and twenty But the better answer I conceive is that nine and twenty of them onely were walled cities the other were the most famous towns and villages in those parts And here in this first catalogue of Iudahs cities in the Southern parts the most noted towns are expressed by name as well as the walled cities that in the following catalogues we may conceive the same to wit that there were many towns of note besides the cities there mentioned though they be not expressed by name as here they are Vers 36. Fourteen cities with their villages There are fifteen named in the foregoing verses either therefore one of them was no citie but some noted town or rather it may be very probably conceived that Gederah and Gederothaim were but one citie and therefore some reade it as it is in the margin of our bibles Gederah or Gederothaim Vers 62. And Nibshan and the citie of salt This citie might have its name The citie of salt from the salt pits that were there and the abundance of salt that was dayly made by the inhabitants of the citie Vers 63. As for the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem the children of Judah could not drive them out It is a question much argued amongst writers whether Jerusalem stood in Judahs or in Benjamins portion By many places of Scripture it seems evident that it was in Benjamins portion For in the 18. chapter of this book vers 28. it is reckoned amongst the cities that were in Benjamins lot and we see that Moses did before his death prophesie concerning Benjamin that the Temple which was in Jerusalem should be built in Benjamins portion for that is the drift of those words Deut. 33.12 And of Benjamin he said The beloved of the Lord shall dwell in safety by him and the Lord shall cover him all the day long and he shall dwell between his shoulders yea and Jer. 6.1 the inhabitants of Jerusalem are expressely called the children of Benjamin O ye children of Benjamin gather your selves to flee out of the midst of Jerusalem and Judg. 1.21 the same that is here said of the children of Judah is likewise there said of the children of Benjamin The children of Benjamin did not drive out the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Benjamin in Jerusalem unto this day But now again by other places of Scripture it seems as evident that Jerusalem was in Judahs portion For first mention is here made of it as one of Judahs cities The Jebusites dwell with the children of Judah at Jerusalem unto this day and secondly Jerusalem is said to have been taken by the children of Judah Judg. 1.8 and thirdly it is reckoned as the great priviledge of the children of Judah that the Lord in his Temple dwelt amongst them Psal 78.67 68 69. Moreover he refused the Tabernacle of Joseph and chose not the tribe of Ephraim but chose the tribe of Judah the mount Sion which he loved and he built his Sanctuary like high places c. but the truth herein is that Jerusalem stood in the border of these two tribes and so was part in Judahs and part in Benjamins portion and therefore the places of Scripture before cited do not any way contradict one another the fort of Sion and some of the south skirts of the city were in Judahs portion but the greatest part of the city in Benjamins and therefore it may well be that when they went about to expell the Jebusites that dwelt there both Iudah and Benjamin joyned their forces together as Judah and Simeon did in a like case Judg. 1.3 And Judah said unto Simeon his brother Come up with me into my lot that we may fight aganst the Canaanites and I likewise will go with thee into thy lot As for that which is here said concerning Jerusalem to wit that the children of Judah could not drive out the Jebusites thence and the like we see is said concerning the children of Benjamin Judg. 1.21 we must know that the Iebusites continued in Ierusalem unto Davids time Indeed Adoni-zedek the king of Jerusalem was slain by Ioshua chap. 10.23 26. for he was one of those five kings that made warre against Gibeon though we find no mention there of his taking Ierusalem yea and it is expressely said Iudg. 1.8 that afterwards the children of Iudah took the city of Jerusalem and burnt it with fire that is some part of it Well but yet the fort of Sion which was the chief strength of Ierusalem was not at that time taken by them for that the Iebusites held till David took it 2. Sam. 5 6 7. yea and it seems that afterward the Iebusites did also by the help of this fort recover the city again at least so farre that they forced the Israelites to let the Iebusites dwell there amongst them as it is said here For in the dayes of the Iudges we see that Iebus that is Ierusalem was still inhabited by the Iebusites Iudg. 19.12 We will not turn aside hither into the city of a stranger that is not of the children of Israel saith the Levite there concerning Iebus we will passe over to Gibea But however we must not think that this which is said here that the children of Judah could not drive them out is added by way of excusing them no but rather to their shame and reproch for though the fort of Sion was a place of great strength so that when David set himself down with his army before it the Iebusites scorned him bragged that their lame and blind and impotent people should defend it against him 2. Sam. 5.6 Yet God would certainly have driven them out according to his promise had they not been wanting to themselves But they grew slothfull and faint hearted and by these and other their sinnes provoked the Lord to withdraw himself from them and so then indeed they could not drive out the inhabitants but were glad to purchase peace upon any tearms according to that Iudg. 2.20 21. And the anger of the Lord was hot against Israel and he said Because this people hath transgressed my covenant which I commanded their fathers and have not hearkned to my voice I also will not hence forth drive out any from before them of the nations which Joshua left when he died c. CHAP. XVI Vers 1. ANd the lot of the children of Joseph fell from Jordan by Jericho unto the water of Jericho on the east c. It is the opinion of some learned writers that
in the utmost north-end of Canaan whence the length of the land is ordinarily described to be from the entrance of Hamath to the river of Egypt 1. Kings 8.65 See Num. 13.22 and Cinnereth was a city in the eastern parts whence the lake so often mentioned in Scripture was called the lake of Genezereth Vers 38. Nineteen cities with their villages For some of them mentioned before in drawing the border of their lot stood happely in the portion of the bordering tribes Vers 40. And the seventh lot came out for the tribe of the children of Dan. Though this tribes lot was not wholly taken out of that which was given to Judah as Simeons was yet that a part of it was is manifest by some of the cities mentioned here that chap. 15. are numbered amongst those that were at first in Judahs portion it was compassed with the sea and the borders of the other tribes formerly described and so the borders of this tribe are here omitted Vers 41. And the coast of their inheritance was Zorah and Eshtaol c. In this Zorah Samson was born Judges 13.2 and between Zorah and Eshtaol he was buried Vers 43. And Elon and Timnathah c. Whence Samson took a wife Judges 14.1 Vers 47. Therefore the children of Dan went up to fight against Leshem c. Or Laish The story we have Judges 18. This then happened after Joshuas death but here it is mentioned lest it should seem strange how the Danites came to inhabite the north parts of the land when their lot fell to them in the south parts even close by Judahs portion the reason was because being not able to drive out the Philistines out of their land they were streightned for room so went out and took Laish a city that was in Naphtalies lot though then in the Zidonians possession and transplanted a Colony thither calling it Dan from their father Dan the sonne of Jacob it stood almost in the furthest north part of the land Judges 20.1 The congregation was gathered together as one wan from Dan to Beersheba Vers 50. According to the word of the Lord they gave him the citie he asked even Timnath-serah in mount Ephraim c. To wit the word of the Lord which he spake to Moses not onely concerning Caleb but concerning Joshua for why indeed should he be left out see Iosh 14.7 to wit that he should chuse a peculiar portion to himself where he would yet it may be meant also of some direction given him by Eleazar the priest upon his inquiry of God for him However herein first was the modesty of Ioshua remarkable that he was content to stay till all the tribes had their portion ere there was any motion made of that which by way of speciall Prerogative was to be conferred upon him secondly That he was content to receive what God had promised him as by way of gift from the people he asked and they gave him the city he asked thirdly That whereas he might have chosen the fairest and goodliest city in all their tribes he chose his seat in a mountainous countrey nothing so pleasant and delightfull as many other places were yea and it seems a city that was ruinated so that he was fain to build it ere he dwelt in it for so it follows in the next words and he built the city and dwelt therein CHAP. XX. Vers 2. APpoint out for you cities of refuge c. Concerning these cities of refuge see the notes Numb 35.6 and 24 c. Vers 6. And he shall dwell in that city untill he stand before the congregation for judgement and untill the death of the high priest c. That is untill he be fetched thence to the place where the fact was done that it may be there tryed whether it were done wittingly or unwittingly so long he was to abide there however or untill the death of the high Priest if it were found that he did it unwittingly for then he was to be sent back to the city of refuge and to be kept there till the high priest dyed Concerning the mysticall reason of the man-slayers staying in the city of refuge till the death of the high priest see the note upon Num. 35.25 But to this some also do adde a literall reason to wit that hereby was implyed how hainous a fault it was to shed the bloud of a man and how displeasing to God in that the man that was but unwittingly defiled with the shedding of bloud must be thus shut up lest he should happen to come into the sight of him who did as it were represent Gods person amongst them to wit the high priest nor could be suffered to stirre from thence till he was dead Vers 8. And on the other side Jordan by Jericho eastward they assigned Bezer c. That is they confirmed and ratified these to be cities of refuge without Jordan which Moses himself had formerly chosen and set apart for that use See Deut. 4.41 42 43. CHAP. XXI Vers 1. THen came near the heads of the fathers of the Levites unto Eleazar the priest c. It was doubtles immediately after they had made an end of dividing the land that the Levites came thus to Eleazer and the rest of the Commissioners to receive from them the cities which God had appointed to be set apart for their dwelling For first it is not probable that there was any delay which might move the Levites to challenge their right and secondly it is as improbable that the Israelites did first settle themselves in these cities and then were afterwards put out to give way to the Levites Vers 2. The Lord commanded by the hand of Moses to give us cities to dwell in c. See the notes upon Numb 35.2 c. Vers 4. And the lot came out for the familie of the Kohathites God had expressed the number of cities that were to be given them to wit fourty eight Numb 35.7 So all the cities which ye shall give to the Levites shall be fourty and eight cities he had also given them directions to take these cities out of each tribe some according as their proportion was greater or lesser and therefore the Commissioners for the dividing of the land made choice no doubt of these cities as in their wisdome they found them most convenient for the Levites and for the people and then having divided the cities they had chosen into foure parts one for the priests a second for the Levites of Kohaths familie a third for the Gershonites and a fourth for the Merarites then was it at last decided in which of the tribes the priests should be placed and so of the rest or at least of those cities which were judged convenient they took the number agreed upon by lot See vers 11. And the children of Aaron the priest which were of the Levites had by lot out of the tribe of Judah c. Thus by Gods speciall providence the
these first that he might be near hand to Joshua who dwelt in mount Ephraim to the end that by him he might enquire of the Lord upon any speciall service Secondly that he might be the nearer to the Tabernacle which at this time was in Shiloh a city in Ephraim ANNOTATIONS Upon the book of JUDGES CHAP. I. NOw after the death of Joshua c. In this book the history of the Commonwealth of Israel is continued from the death of Joshua to the dayes of Eli all which time at least the most of which time they lived under the command and government of certain Judges whom God successively raised up to rule over them as his deputies and vicegerents and therefore is this book called the book of Judges for though Eli and Samuel may well be numbred amongst the Judges of Israel because they commanded in chief after the same way of government as these did whose history is recorded in this book yet because the change of the government from that of Judges to that of Kings happened in the daies of Samuel and the story of Samuel must needs be begun from the dayes of Eli therefore the acts of their times are not recorded here but are reserved to another book Who wrote this book is no where expressed it sufficeth us to know that it hath alwaies been kept in the Church amongst those Oracles of God whose penmen were guided by the infallible inspiration of his Spirit and indeed one passage of this book to wit that concerning Sampson chap. 13.7 the child shall be a Nazarite to God is by the judgement of many learned Expositours principally intended by the Evangelist S. Matthew where he undertakes to alledge a testimony out of the writings of Gods Prophets Matt. 2.23 And he came and dwelt in a citie called Nazareth that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Prophet He shall be called a Nazarene The children of Israel asked the Lord saying Who shall go up for us against the Canaanites first to fight with them In the last years of Joshua his government the Israelites had lived in peace Josh 21.44 And the Lord gave them rest round about according to all that he sware unto their fathers and there stood not a man of all their enemies before them the Lord delivered all their enemies into their hand the Canaanites not daring to provoke them and the Israelites not yet attempting any further upon the Canaanites partly because the land they had already vanquished was as much as they could well people partly perhaps out of an over-eager desire to and love of the rest they now enjoyed and indeed they knew it was agreeable to the will of God that they should not drive out all the inhabitants at once but by degrees Deut. 7.22 And the Lord thy God will put out these nations from before thee by little and little Thou maist not consume them at once lest the beasts of the field encrease upon thee But now Joshua being dead who a little before his death had encouraged them to go forward in expelling the Canaanites though they had no man chosen of God to command over them in chief as Moses and Joshua did yet finding that indeed it was now fit they should proceed on in the warre they assembled themselves together as it seems at Shiloh and there resolved to renew their battels against the inhabitants of the land onely because the successe of their first attempts would be a matter of great consequence either for the encouragement or disheartning the people therefore they would first enquire of the Lord which accordingly they did they asked the Lord as it is here said to wit by Phinehas the high priest or Eleazar if he were yet living which is doubtfull because he died immediatly after the death of Joshua Josh 24.33 before the propitiatory or mercy-seat who shall go up for us against the Canaanites first to fight against them that is which of our tribes shall first begin and set upon the inhabitants that still abide in their lot for this is doubtlesse the meaning of this question they asked Vers 2. And the Lord said Judah shall go up c. That is the tribe of Judah because that was the most populous and the strongest of the tribes and had their portion in the chief of the land which it was therefore fit should be first cleared of the enemie therefore they were appointed first to begin the warre and besides thus was that still accomplished which Jacob prophecied concerning the preheminence this tribe should have above the rest Gen. 49.8 Judah thou art he whom thy brethren shall praise thy hand shall be in the neck of thine enemies thy fathers children shall bow down before thee Vers 3. And Judah said unto Simeon his brother Come up with me c. The Simeonites were brethren to those of Judah both by father and mother but besides their cohabitation was another tie betwixt them in regard whereof they lived in the same lot as brethren in one and the same house and in this respect chiefly is Simeon called Judahs brother Vers 4. And Judah went up and the Lord delivered the Canaanites c. That is one particular people of this countrey so called And they slew of them in Bezek ten thousand men That is in and about Bezek to wit in taking the town or after they had taken it when the king fled thence to save his life as is more particularly after related Vers 6. But Adoni-Bezek fled and they pursued after him and caught him and cut off his thumbs and his great toes And thus as he had done to many other kings as himself confesseth in the following verse to wit either out of a kind of barbarous sporting crueltie or else to render them thereby unfit for warre ever after that by the al-ruling providence of God is now done to him by the Israelites that had now taken him prisoner Indeed we reade not that Gods people were wont to inflict any such strange kind of punishment upon those that were vanquished by them nor doth it stand with piety thus to torture and afflict those that are taken in warre with such studied and uncoucht wayes of punishment and besides the Israelites had an expresse command not to spare the lives of any of these nations but presently to cut them off and therefore as it is likely that some speciall reason moved the Israelites to inflict this unusuall punishment upon him so I conceive it most probable that either when they took the city they found some of these poore captive kings that had been thus inhumanely used by him a spectacle that might well stirre their spirits against him or at least that they might receive information from others herein and so might be moved thereby to deal with him as he had dealt with others as judging it consonant to that Law of retaliation which God established amongst his people Eye for eye tooth for tooth hand for
of the Church and people of God and that she preferred their welfare before any thing that concerned her self CHAP. V. Vers 1. THen sang Deborah and Barak the sonne of Abinoam c. Deborah is first named here because she was a prophetesse and as upon this ground it is probably thought the composer of this song and in every respect the chief in this businesse as we see in the former chapter yet with her Barak is joyned too who as he was the chief Commander in the victory gotten so he was also one of the prime in singing Gods praises and he being of the tribe of Naphtali we have in this sweet song one instance of the accomplishment of that prophecy of Jacob concerning the tribe of Naphtali though it were not intended of this onely to wit that this tribe should give goodly words Gen. 49.21 Naphtali is a hind let loose he giveth goodly words Vers 2. Praise ye the Lord for the avenging of Israel when the people willingly offered themselves Principally hereby are meant those of the tribe of Zebulun and Naphtali of whom Baraks army did chiefly consist though such of the other tribes as did put too their helping hand are not excluded and these are said to have offered themselves willingly because they did readily yield to follow Barak when he called them together though he had no authority to constrain them to take up arms God working their hearts thereto to whom therefore the praise is principally given Praise ye the Lord for the avenging of Israel when the people willingly offered themselves Vers 3. Heare O ye kings give eare O ye princes c. Deborah undertaking in this song to ascribe to the Lord the glory of that victory which she and Barak had gotten over Sisera to shew what a glorious work God had therein done for his people in the first place in a poeticall strain she calls upon kings and princes to hearken to her Heare O ye kings give eare O ye princes thereby onely to imply that in the ecstasie of her joy she could be glad if all the kings and princes of the earth could heare what she had now to say concerning this great work which God had done for his Israel and she addresseth her speech particularly to kings and princes First because they are most ready to ascribe to themselves the glory which is due to the Lord onely and secondly because they are wont in their pride to oppresse others and to think they may do whatsoever they please and therefore she desired they might know what God had done to Jabin and Sisera and so beware of provoking God by oppressing others as these had done Vers 4. Lord when thou wentest out of Seir when thou marchest out of the field of Edom the earth trembled c. The most of Expositours understand this to be a poeticall expression of the terrours werewith the neighbouring nations were affrighted when the Lord carried the Israelites from the borders of Edom towards the land of Canaan to wit that there was then a trembling on every side so that not men onely but even the heavens and mountains and hills seemed to tremble and melt away and that even as Sinai trembled and shook at the Lords coming down upon it when the Law was given for to that end they conceive the melting or shaking of Sinai is mentioned vers 5. The mountains melted from before the Lord even that Sinai before the Lord God of Israel to wit by way of similitude so when the Lord in a pillar of fire marched before the Israelites against the Amorites the neighbouring nations were terribly amazed the Lord casting such a fear upon them as if the earth had trembled and great storms and tempests intermixt with thunder and lightnings had been showred down from the clouds yea as if the mountains had melted c. according to that Deut. 2.24 25. Rise ye up take your journey and passe over the river Arnon c. This day will I begin to put the dread of thee and the fear of thee upon the nations that are under the whole heavens who shall hear report of thee and shall tremble and be in anguish because of thee But I rather conceive that it is to be understood of those thunders lightnings earthquakes tempests and such other terrible expressions of Gods majestie wherein he manifested himself unto his people at the giving of the Law for then he is also said to come from Seir Deut. 33.2 And he said The Lord came down from Sinai and rose up from Seir unto them he shined forth from mount Paran and he came with ten thousand of saints from his right hand went a fiery Law for them and the shaking of Sinai we see is expressely mentioned vers 5. The mountains melted from before the Lord even that Sinai before the Lord God of Israel as it is also Psal 68.7 8. O God when thou wentest forth before thy people when thou didst march through the wildernesse Selah The earth shook the heavens also dropped at the presence of God even Sinai it self was moved at the presence of God the God of Israel and though there be no mention of the clouds dropping water at the giving of the Law yet there is of thunders and lightnings which are usually accompanied with violent showers But why should Deborah mention this here I answer first because Gods entring into covenant with them is the ground of all that he doth for his people and secondly because she would the better expresse how terrible God had been now to their adversaries by comparing the terrours of this day with those when the Law was given on mount Sinai and to intimate that God continued to do the same things still for his people that he had done for them from their first coming out of Egypt Vers 6. In the dayes of Shamgar the sonne of Anath in the dayes of Jael the high-wayes were unoccupied c. That is even from the death of Ehud whom Shamgar succeeded though he was a worthy champion and did miraculously avenge the Israelites upon the Philistines unto this present time wherein Jael lived though she were a woman of an heroicall spirit and one that grieved to see the poore people of God so miserably oppressed as was evident by that which she had now done for them the land was held in miserable desolation the people not daring to travell in the high-wayes nor to dwell in the villages but onely in the walled cities whither they all fled to secure themselves till God was pleased by me a poore woman to set on foot this work of their deliverance Vers 8. They chose new gods then was warre in the gates That is then was there warre in every city the Lord letting loose the neighbouring nations to make warre against the severall cities of Israel because they were corrupted with their idolatry Because a great part of the strength of their cities was in their gates therefore
herewith Abimelech hired vain and light persons that is worthlesse and unsettled men men of no wisdome nor grace nor yet abilitie for their outward estate idle giddyheaded loose and wandring rascalls of the froth and scumme of the people that for a little hire were easily drawn to undertake any cause though never so bad and these he armed that with their aid he might by force accomplish what he had projected with himself Vers 5. And slew his brethren the sonnes of Jerubbaal being threescore and ten persons upon one stone notwithstanding yet Jotham c. That is there being seventy of his brethen he slew all but Jotham and that doubtlesse under some pretence of Justice as if they had some plot upon the state tending to the utter ruine of the whole land Vers 6. And all the men of Shechem gathered together and all the house of Millo and went and made Abimelech king c. By the house of Millo may be meant either the Magistrates of the city who were wont to meet in a town-house or common-hall called the house of Millo or else the inhabitants of some village or town adjoyning that belonged to Shechem or else the Garrison of some fort happely the same which vers 17. is called the tower of Shechem or it may be meant of his mothers family who are named a part by themselves because they had been and were still the chief stirrers in this businesse However when Abimelech had slain his brethren the men of Shechem and this house of Millo joyned together and chose and proclaimed him king of Israel and happely annoynted him for so ancient was the custome of anointing kings as Jotham in his parable doth plainly imply vers 8. The trees went forth on a time to anoint a king over them Manifest it is that he was made king not of Shechem onely but of all Israel in generall vers 22. When Abimelech had reigned three years over Israel Indeed it may seem strange that the inhabitants of one city should dare to do this alone of themselves it being expressely too against the Law of God Deut. 17.14 15. Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee whom the Lord thy God shall chuse but the wonder of this may be removed by considering first that though the Shechemites be onely here mentioned because they were the ringleaders in this businesse yet it may be that many other Israelites both of other towns and tribes did come in moved by their example and perswasion and joyned in the election of Abimelech and secondly that they well might hope to carry it now his brethren were slain though some should oppose it both because of his pretended title to wit that proffer of settling the kingdome upon Gideons posterity chap. 8.22 Then the men of Israel said unto Gideon Rule thou over us both thou and thy sonne and thy sonnes sonne also and likewise because they might know that generally the people began to be weary of the government God had established over them and longed to be like other nations in having a king to reigne over them as was manifest by the proffer they made to Gideon and that which Jotham saith in his parable vers 8. and if they would have a king who so likely to be the man as Gideons sonne and thirdly because however by those forces he had suddenly raised he was able to effect it by constraint As for the place where he was made king called here the plain of the pillar or as some reade it the oke of the pillar that was in Shechem see Josh 24.25 26. Vers 7. And when they told it to Jotham he went and stood in the top of mount Girizim c. The Lord intending to punish Abimelech the Shechemites for their changing of the government which God had established in Israel and especially for the bloudy murther committed upon the sonnes of Gideon it seems by a speciall instinct of his Spirit he moved Jotham who alone of the sonnes of Gideon escaped the hands of Abimelech to go to the inhabitants of Shechem when the tydings was brought him that they had made Abimelech king and to give them warning before hand of the calamities and judgements that were likely to befall them if they did not repent of this their wickednes therefore it was that he began his speech with those words Hearken unto me you men of Shechem that God may hearken unto you intimating both that God had sent him with that message to them and that if they would not now hearken to the admonition that was given them God would not hear them in the time of their distresse when they called upon him As for mount Girizim from the top whereof Jotham spake to the Shechemites it seems it stood very close upon Shechem and was purposely chosen by Jotham as a place convenient whence he might speak in the audience of the inhabitants at that time perhaps upon some occasion assembled together and likewise as a place of safety whence he might presently fly and escape away if they should offer to surprise him for so it is said he did vers 21. And Jotham ran away and fled but withall it may seem to be not without a mystery that Girizim the mountain whence the blessings were to be pronounced by the tribes of Israel Deut. 11.29 was chosen for this work rather then mount Ebal for what a terrible token was this that they were to expect no mercy from God when from the mountain of blessings they heard nothing but Gods curses denounced against them Vers 8. The trees went out on a time to anoint a king over them c. The drift of Jotham in propounding this fable to the men o Shechem was to shew first the folly of the Israelites in going about to change the government which God had established amongst them out of a fond affectation of having a king to reigne over them secondly the vain and causelesse pride and ambition of that tyrant Abimelech in exalting himself to be their king and thirdly the misery that would certainly befall both the men of Shechem and their new made king for their casting off Gods government and their dealing so wickedly with the sonnes of Gideon So that first by the trees that went to make them a king he intended the Israelites in generall that were fond to have a king reigne over them but more particularly the men of Shechem that had actually made Abimelech king secondly by the olive tree fig tree and vine that are good noble and usefull trees that yield yearly sweet and pleasant fruit and that refused to accept of being king over the trees may be meant not onely Gideon who had refused the kingdome when the Israelites proffered it to him and his posterity successively chap. 8.22 23. but also the foregoing Judges Ehud and Deborah and happely too the other sonnes of Gideon for though we reade not that they refused the kingdome or had it ever
answered c. and her father his father in law in severall places Why Bethlehem from whence this Levite had his concubine is called Bethlehem-Judah See in the note chap. 17.7 Vers 2. And his concubine plaid the whore against him went away from him unto her fathers house c. It seems upon some discoverie of her whoredome or at least some suspition the Levite had of it there arose some quarrell betwixt him and his concubine and thereupon she left him and went home again to her fathers house who was too ready to entertain her The sad effects that followed upon this Levites taking a concubine makes it manifest that even in those times though it were an ordinary thing amongst all sorts of men even amongst the Levites to have concubines yet God was not pleased with it from the beginning it was not so saith our Saviour Matth. 19.8 Vers 3. And her husband arose and went after her to speak friendly unto her and to bring her again having his servant with him and a couple of asses To wit to carrie their provision and happely that both himself and his concubine if she would return with him might sometimes ease themselves by riding as occasion served Vers 11. Come I pray thee and let us turn in unto this citie of the Jebusites and lodge in it For though the children of Judah had taken from the Jebusites that part of Jebus that is Jerusalem which was in their tribe chap. 1.8 The children of Judah had fought against Jerusalem and had taken it and had smitten it with the edge of the sword yet out of that part which belonged to Benjamin on which side the Levite was now travelling the Jebusites were not wholly expelled chap. 1.21 The children of Benjamin did not drive out the inhabitants of Jerusalem but the Jebusites dwell in Jerusalem with the children of Benjamin unto this day Vers 14. And the sunne went down upon them when they were by Gibeah which belongeth to Benjamin There was a Gibeah in the tribe of Judah Josh 15.57 to distinguish this from that it is here called Gibeah which belongeth to Benjamin and else where Gibeah of Saul 1. Sam. 11.4 it is thought to be the same which Josh 21.17 is called Gebah which was a citie given to tho Priests the sonnes of Aaron Against which it makes nothing that here it is said vers 16. the men of the place were Benjamites for the priests did not dwell alone in such cities though they were the lords and owners of them Vers 15. And they turned aside thither to go in and to lodge in Gibeah Though it were a pious resolution in the Levite rather to chose to lodge in Gibeah then in Jebus and that because Jebus was a citie wherein the idolatrous and uncircumcised Jebusites dwelt yet this proved fatall both to him and his as the best counsell may have the worst successe and that because there is a secret over-ruling hand of God that may by this means bring about what he hath determined for the punishment of some other sinnes which we mind not Vers 16. And behold there came an old man from his work out of the field at even which was also of mount Ephraim Though he were an old man yet he followed his work in the field and that untill the even which is doubtlesse noted to his praise As for that last clause that he was also of mount Ephraim that no doubt is expressed to intimate that this amongst other things made the old man the readier to entertain the Levite when he heard him say vers 18. that he was of mount Ephraim too Vers 18. But I am now going to the house of the Lord. The Tabernacle at this time was in Shiloh Josh 18.1 and Shiloh was in the tribe of Ephraim either therefore there the Levites dwelling was or else he meant first to go to the house of the Lord to do his service there and then afterwards to passe forward on his journey homeward However it is probable that he mentions his going to the house of the Lord that he might know him to be a Levite Vers 22. Behold the men of the city certain sonnes of Belial beset the house round about c. A like fact to this we have formerly related concerning the Sodomites of which see the note Gen. 19.4 as for this term Sonnes of Belial see Deut. 13.13 Vers 24. Behold here is my daughter a mayden and his concubine them I will bring out now c. See the note Gen. 19.8 Vers 25. So the man took his concubine and brought her forth unto them and they knew her c. In the foregoing words it is said that when the old man the Levites host proffered these varlets his daughter a virgin and the Levites concubine thereby to take them off from that unnaturall uncleannesse wherewith they meant to satisfie their lust upon the Levite himself the men would not hearken to him yet when immediately by the Levites means his concubine was indeed brought out unto them and left amongst them they fell upon her and defiled her and that in such an outrageous barbarous manner that she died of it which was doubtlesse because having once an object for their lust in their power they could not forbear and so forgetting their former resolutions they laid hold on her and abused her in a most inhumane and execrable manner Vers 26. Then came the woman in the dawning of the day and fell down at the doore of the mans house c. That is she fell down dead at the doore of the mans house and there lay till break of day when her husband going forth to see what was become of her found her dead and thus though her husband had pardoned her whoredome yet God punished it and that too with her own sinne adulterie was her sinne and adulterie was her death she had dealt treacherously against her husband one would not satisfie her but she exposed her self to the lust of a stranger and now she was abused to death by the lusts of so many barbarous wretches whom she knew not that by so abusing her they murdered her Vers 27. And her hands were upon the threshold This is added to implie the reason of that which follows why the Levite spake to her to rise vers 28. And he said unto her Vp let us be going to wit because she lay in such a manner her hands laid upon the threshold under her head as if she had been asleep Vers 29. He took a knife and laid hold on his concubine and divided her together with her bones into twelve pieces and sent her into all the coasts of Israel That is to each of the twelve tribes a piece for to the tribe of Levi that was dispersed through all the land there was none sent and this was done that the fight of her dead limbs might affect them the more and stirre them up to be the more zealous for the punishment
Christs government to wit because God the father appointed him to be our king according to that Psal 2.6 I have set my king upon my holy hill of Sion and in that David rejected not these Israelites that so long opposed the government which they knew God had appointed there is an intimation of comfort for those that being convinced of the truth of the Gospel do yet stand out a long time against knowledge to wit that if at last yet they repent and come in Christ will not reject them Vers 3. And king David made a league with them in Hebron before the Lord. To wit concerning the government they binding themselves to obey him as their king and he binding himself to forget all that was past and to govern them like a good king according to the Law and because this was done with invocation of God as a witnesse of their league therefore it is said that this league was made before the Lord. And they anointed David king over Israel This was the third time that David was anointed king and so was Christ three times by an audible voice from heaven declared to be the Sonne of God and the promised Messiah First at his baptisme Matth. 3.16 17. And Jesus when he was baptized went straightway out of the waters And lo the heavens were opened unto him and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and lighting upon him And lo a voice from heaven saying This is my beloved Sonne in whom I am well pleased Secondly at his transfiguration Matth 17.5 While he yet spake behold a bright cloud overshadowed them and behold a voice out of the cloud which said This is my beloved Sonne in whom I am well pleased Heare ye him And thirdly a little before his death whilest he was teaching the people John 12.28 when Christ had said Father glorifie thy name then came there a voice from heaven saying I have glorified it and will glorifie it again Vers 4. David was thirty years old when he began to reigne At the same age was Christ also inaugurated as it were into the office of the Mediatour Luke 3.22 23. Vers 6. And the king and his men went to Jerusalem unto the Jebusites the inhabitants of the land c. Jerusalem stood in the very confines of Judah and Benjamin so that part of it which stood on the hill Salem was in Judahs lot and part of it yea the greatest part of it which stood in mount Sion was in Benjamins the men of Judah took that part of it which belonged to them and smote it with the edge of the sword Judg. 1.8 But the children of Benjamin could not drive out the Jebusites out of their portion Judg. 1.21 no not when they had the help of their brethren the men of Judah as may be gathered by that whith is written Josh 15.63 As for the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem the children of Judah could not drive them out but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Judah at Jerusalem unto this day And therefore we reade that afterward it was a city of strangers when the Levite and his concubine went that way Judg. 19.10 11 12. yea so it continued till this time when David intending not without the instinct of the spirit of God to make Jerusalem the chief seat of his kingdome and having now the advantage of a mighty assembly of the men of warre of Israel that were come up armed to Hebron to make him king took this opportunity and led them forth against Jerusalem resolving that the wresting this out of the Jebusites hands should be his first enterprise Except thou take away the blind and the lame thou shalt not come in hither c. There are many severall expositions of this passage concerning the Jebusites scoffing at David when he came to besiege them But two expositions there are which are both very probable The first which indeed most Expositours follow is this That being over-confident in the strength of the place they in a flouting manner answered David when he required them to yield up the fort that except he could take from them the blind and the lame amongst the inhabitants he should not come in thither implying that though they should man their walls onely with the blind and the lame of the people even they should be able to defend that place against him and all the forces he could make And indeed it seems to have been a place of exceeding great strength because they had held it ever since Joshua entred the land that is almost foure hundred years and yet it was even in the heart of their countrey The second Exposition is That they spake this of their gods in whom they were never a whit the lesse confident because the Israelites despised them except thou take away the blind and the lame thou shalt not come in hither that is even those gods of ours which you in contempt call blind and lame gods shall easily defend us against all thy forces and will in that be found to be neither lame nor blind And indeed this exposition seems best to agree with the following passages in the 8. verse And David said on that day Whosoever getteth up to the gutter and smiteth the Jebusites and the lame and the blind that are hated of Davids soul he shall be chief captain Wherefore they say The lame and the blind shall not enter into the house Nor need it seem strange that they call their own gods blind and lame for this they might do purposely to let the Israelites see how little they were discouraged by these reproches which the Israelites cast upon their idol-gods from putting their trust in them as being most confident of their aid and assistance Vers 7. Neverthelesse David took the strong hold of Sion the same is the city of David For David having proclaimed that whosoever should first scale the walls and so get up to the gutter as it is expressed in the next verse and enter the fort he should be chief captain that is the Generall of his forces Joab the rather happely that he might recover Davids favour whom he had highly offended by killing Abner did hereupon first scale the walls and so was made the Lord General of the kings forces as it is more fully expressed 1. Chron. 11.6 and this was that strong hold of Sion which because it was taken by him was afterward called the city of David Vers 8. Whosoever getteth up to the gutter and smiteth the Jebusites and the lame and the blind that are hated of Davids soul c. That is the blind and the lame Jebusites wherewith they had or pretended they could manne their walls and that it should be sufficient for the defence of the place which are here said to be hated of Davids soul because of that bitter taunt wherewith he had been flouted concerning them and herein David gives his souldiers to understand that if they took the fort
sonnes Ahimaaz and Jonathan went not with their fathers into Jerusalem is evident chap. 17.17 Now Jonathan and Ahimaaz stayed by En-rogel for they might not be seen to come into the citie and therefore it seems their fathers appointed them to stay at En-rogel Vers 30. And David went up by the ascent of mount Olivet and wept as he went up and had his head covered c. His weeping was no doubt especially because he was afflicted with the remembrance of his sinne that had brought these troubles upon him and his covering his head was suitable hereto for so was the custome of mourners to wit partly that their tears might not be seen and partly that the seeing of other objects might not divert their minds from intending their sorrows as being desirous to give up themselves wholly to bewail their miâ—eries of which custome see Jer. 14.3 And their nobles have sent their little ones to the waters they came to the pits and found no water they returned with the vessels emptie they were ashamed and confounded and covered their heads chap. 19.4 The king covered his face and cried with a loud voice c. and Esther 6.12 Haman hasted to his house mourning and having his head covered Vers 32. When David was come to the top of the mount where he worshipped God behold Hushai the Archite came to meet him c. He worshipped the Lord on the top of the mount because thence he might best behold the ark the testimony of Gods presente as the priests were carrying it back to Jerusalem and be thereby stirred up the more affectionately and effectually to call upon the Lord and because being gone over that mount he was like for a time to see it no more but that which is most observable is that no sooner had David prayed against the counsels of Ahithophel O Lord I pray thee turn the counsel of Ahithophel into foolishnesse but presently there came to him Hushai who is called the Archite from the place of his birth or habitation to wit Archi a place mentioned Josh 16.2 which was in the borders of the children of Joseph by whom God had determined to defeat his counsels Vers 33. Unto whom David said If thou passest on with me then thou shalt be a burden unto me Whereas by going back to Jerusalem he might there do him better service and withall be no way burdensome to him and indeed though David had cause enough to be glad to see his party encrease yet no wonder it is that he should tell Hushai that staying with him he would be a burden to him first because he and his attendants that came with him would help to expend their provision which was yet but small and secondly because his care for those that went with him and his grief for the misery they were like to sustain was â—ch that the more his company encreased the more his burden encreased too Vers 34. Say unto Absalom I will be thy servant O king c. Herein David teacheth Hushai to dissemble with Absalom and an easie thing it is for the best men in their extremities to pitch upon such counsels as are not exactly such as they ought to be CHAP. XVI Vers 1. ZIba the servant of Mephibosheth met him with a couple of asses sadled c. Though David was under a cloud for the time yet Ziba concluded that ere long this rebellion against him would be suppressed and then they that shewed him favour in this time of his affliction would be well rewarded for it and this made him come now with these presents to David And thus many side with Christ and that too in the time of persecution and trouble that yet have false hearts and aim merely at their own advantage though his Church be for the present the weakest yet they hope it will prove the strongest and upon that ground they side with them they follow Christ for his loaves and fishes Joh. 6.26 Vers 2. And the king said unto Ziba What meanest thou by these The king might easily guesse that the provision which Ziba brought was brought for his supply yet to invite him to declare why he had brought them the rather happely because he questioned whether it was done by his masters command or of his own mind he asketh him concerning those things What meanest thou by these And Ziba said The asses be for the kings houshold to ride on and the bread and summer-fruitâ— for the young men to eat c. As if he should have said the things which I have brought though too mean for thy self yet might I thought be usefull for thy servants and such as belong to thee Vers 4. Then said the king to Ziba Behold thine are all that pertained to Mephibosheth It is very strange that David so just and good a king should now when the hand of God was upon him pronounce such an unjust sentence as this was against a poore cripple that was not very likely to affect the crown as Ziba had slandered him nor very well able to come and plead for himself yea against the sonne of his dear friend Jonathan who had alwayes been so loving to him and with whom he had made a solemn covenant that he would shew kindnesse both to him and to his seed after him 1. Sam. 20.14.17 but for this we must consider first that there were many probabilities to induce David to believe that false tale that Ziba had told him as because Mephibosheth came not out to David as other his friends did and because for all his lamenesse Mephibosheth the true heir of Saul might in these troublous times hope that Sauls family might be remembred and so might prove treacherous as many others did and secondly that David did this in a passon being mightily enraged to heare that Mephibosheth should so requite all the kindnesse he had shewn him and thirdly doubtlesse God was pleased herein to leave David to himself that so he might see by this grosse failing that it was not for any merits in him but of Gods own free grace that his enemies were afterwards suppressed and he again settled in the throne And Ziba said I humbly beseech thee that I may find grace in thy sight my Lord O king That is I acknowledge thankfully the bounty of my Lord yet I esteem thy favour more then the gift which thou hast given me I came not to accuse Mephibosheth that so I might wrest his estate from him but I came to procure thy favour O king and that it is which I chiefly desire may be continued to me Vers 5. And when king David came to Bahurim See the note chap. 3.16 Vers 8. The Lord hath returned upon thee all the bloud of the house of Saul c. Shimei might in these words have respect to the death of Ishbosheth and Abner as pretending that David had secretly a hand therein yea and perhaps too it was before this that those seven sonnes of Saul were
reared and sacrifices offered thereon which was doubtlesse to teach them that there was no way to obtain the pardon of their sinne and the removall of their present judgement but by faith in that propitiatory sacrifice which their promised Messiah was to offer up for them but why was this altar appointed to be reared in the threshing floore of Araunah the Jebusite I answer first to intimate the end of this sacrifice to wit that it was to stay the plague that it might go no further there it was that the Angel appeared in a visible shape with a drawn sword 1. Chron. 21.15 The Angel of the Lord stood by the threshing floore of Ornan the Jebusite thither therefore David was sent to rear up an altar and to offer sacrifices secondly because of Davids fear the Lord having a gracious respect herein to the sad condition of his poor servant which we find expressed 1. Chron. 21.29.30 The tabernacle of the Lord which Moses made in the wildernesse and the altar of tht burnt offerings were at that season in the high places at Gibeon But David could not go before it to enquire of God for he was afraid because of the sword of the Angel of the Lord that is he durst not give over interceding there to go unto Gibeon for fear of the slaughter that might be made in the interim by the sword of the Angel amongst the inhabitants of Jerusalem or else he was so weakened with the terrour of seeing the Angel with a drawn sword that he was not able to go thither and when he could not go to Gibeon what place was then sitter to reare an altar in then that where the Angel appeared with a drawn sword thirdly to signifie the calling of the Gentiles for Araunah being of the stock of the Jebusites though doubtlesse at present a proselite that is one that was converted to the faith of Israel the Lords appointing David to rear an altar in his threshingâ—floore did notably shadow forth that the day should come when God would dwell amongst the Gentiles and be worshipped by them and fourthly because God had determined in this very place to have the Temple built as is evident 2. Chron. 3.1 Then Solomon began to build the house of the Lord in Jerusalem in mount Moriah where the Lord appeared unto David his father in the place that David had prepared in the threshing floore of Ornan the Jebusite and so the Lord would have this place consecrated as it were and endeared to the people by the sacrifice that procured so great a blessing for them as was the staying of this raging pestilence Vers 22. Behold here be oxen for burnt sacrifices and threshing instruments and other instruments of the oxen for wood In 1. Chron. 21.23 there is added that he offered him also his wheat for a meat-offering Lo I will give thee the oxen also for burnt-offerings and the threshing instruments for wood and the wheat for the meat-offering I give it all partly because of the terrour he was stricken into by seeing the Angel with the drawn sword for as it is noted before from 1. Chron. 21.20 both he and his sonnes had seen the Angel and hid themselves and partly because he was told that the altar and sacrifices intended were for the removing of that heavy judgement that lay now upon the people in stead of selling he proffered to give unto David not the threshing floore onely but the oxen also the threshing instruments wheat and all not caring how much he gave for so good a use Vers 23. All these things did Araunah as a king give unto the king The most Expositours do hereupon inferre that this Araunah had been king of the Jebusites and embracing the faith of Israel was content to live as a private man and to let David reigne as king in Jerusalem and indeed in the Hebrew it is All these things did Araunah a king give unto the king but this ground methinks is not sufficient to warrant this conceit rather I conceive this expression is used by way of extolling the bounty of Araunah that he did herein as it were match David the king in bounty carried himself more like a king then a private subject in this his princely bounty Vers 24. And the king said unto Araunah Nay but I will surely buy it of thee at a price c. Some conceive that David would needs give the full price for these things because he would not take away that which was anothers to give unto God as knowing well that sometimes a kings request is in effect a command that subjects do often give what they would not part with but that they dare not but give it but because David might well see that Araunah offered these thing freely it is better said by others that this was from the ingenuity of David because he was not willing to serve God cost-free So David bought the threshing-floore and the oxen for fifty shekels of silver 1. Chron. 11.25 It is said that David gave to Ornan for the place six hundred shekels of gold by weight which seeming difference is thus reconciled to wit that he bought the thresning-floore and the oxen as here for fifty shekels of silver but for the whole place and the ground with the houses where afterward the Temple was built he gave six hundred shekels of gold Vers 25. So the Lord was intreated for the land and the plague was stayed from Israel And this the Lord testified by sending fire from heaven to consume the sacrifices as is expressed 1. Chron. 21.26 and he answered him from heaven by fire upon the altar which must be meant onely of burning the burnt offerings for the sacrifices of peace offerings were not burnt upon the altar but were to be eaten as a holy feast so that it seems the burnt-offerings were first offered on the altar which were miraculously consumed by fire from heaven and then afterwards the peace-offerings were offered upon the same altar ANNOTATIONS Upon the first book of KINGS Otherwise called The third book of the KINGS CHAP. I. NOw king David was old and stricken in years and they covered him c. The scope of these two following books is to declare the history of the Commonwealth of Israel when it was divided into two several kingdomes under the command of the severall kings of Judah and Israel and therefore it is that they are called The books of the Kings The history of Saul and David were related in the two foregoing books of Samuel because they reigned over the whole people of Israel united in one body Onely Solomons reigne is here described and the death of David as making way thereto because in his reigne we are to see the first cause of that following schisme and rending of the kingdome of Israel into two severall kingdomes to wit that of Judah and that of Samaria By whom these books were written we cannot say that they were written by the
the commonwealth of Israel namely four hundred and fourscore years and how this summe agrees with the severall years of the government of such Judges and Kings as had since that time ruled over Israel we may see in the notes upon Josh 24.29 three years and upward had been spent in settling the affairs of the kingdome against the opposition of those that looked with a malignant eye upon Solomons advancement to the crown and in taking order for making such further provision as was necessary besides what David had prepared both for the Temple and for his own palace and now in the fourth yeare the foundations of the Temple were laid in 2. Chron. 3.1 the place is also expressed where the Temple was built to wit that it was at Jerusalem in mount Moriah the very place in which Abraham was commanded to sacrifice his sonne Gen. 22.2 where the Lord appeared unto David his father in the place that David had prepared in the threshing floore of Ornan the Jebusite Now both the place and the time when the foundation of this house was first laid are thus punctually expressed not onely because it was indeed the most glorious and sumptuous building that ever was in the world but also especially because it was the house of the Lord as it is here called the place which he chose for his settled habitation amongst the children of Israel and so was a type or figure first of Christ for in him dwelleth al the fulnesse of the God-head bodily Col. 2.9 secondly of every true Christian and that because God dwells in them by his holy spirit Know ye not that your bodie is the Temple of the holy Ghost which is in you 1. Cor. 6.19 and thirdly of the Church of Christ Ye also as living stones saith Peter are built up a spiritual house to offer up spirituall sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ 1. Pet. 2.5 but especially of the Church triumphant in heaven for indeed as the tabernacle did principally signifie the Church in her militant condition when she is in an unsettled restlesse estate travelling up and down in the world towards the heavenly Canaan so the Temple did chiefly signifie the Church in her rest when she comes to be settled in heaven whence it was also that the Temple was farre larger and farre more magnificent then was the tabernacle to signifie that the glory of the Church there should wonderfully exceed that she hath here even then when she is in her greatest glory Vers 2. The length thereof was threescore cubits c. Here the dimensions of the Temple are set down first the length thereof threescore cubits that is the length of the whole Temple containing both the holy and the most holy place which is therefore called the length by cubits after the first measure 2. Chron. 3.3 for first they measured out sixty cubits of ground for the whole house and then afterwards divided it assigning twenty cubits to the oracle or the most holy place and fourty to the Temple before it as vers 17. so that the Temple therefore was double the length of Moses tabernacle for that was but thirty cubits long see Exod. 26.18 secondly the breadth thereof twenty cubits which was also double the breadth of the tabernacle for that was but ten cubits broad Exod. 26.24 and thirdly the height thereof thirty cubits that is at least on the outside for some gather from vers 20. that the most holy place was but twentie cubits high within and it is most likely that the roof of the whole house was of the same height so that by this it might appear that the Temple was on the inside twice as high also as was the tabernacle for that was but ten cubits high Exod. 26.16 and on the outside thrice as high see the note vers 20. and all this was thus ordered by Gods direction 2. Chr. 3.3 Now these are the things wherein Solomon was instructed for the building of the house of God c. Vers 3. And the porch before the Temple of the house twenty cubits was the length thereof c. This was joyned to the house in the front thereof 2. Chron. 3.4 whence is that Joel 2.17 Let the priests the ministers of the Lord weep between the porch and the altar and let them say Spare thy people O Lord c. there is mention of a porch called Solomons porch wherein Christ and his Apostles and the people did so usually meet Joh. 10.23 24. and Acts 3.11 and 5.12 but that porch was neither built by Solomon for Solomons Temple was burnt by the Chaldeans nor was it in the same place for this joyned to the Temple within the priests Court whither none but the priests might come as for the dimensions of this porch first twenty cubits was the length according to the breadth of the house that is from north to south for though the length of the rest of the Temple is counted from east to west yet because this porch was larger from north to south then from east to west therefore this is counted the length of it secondly ten cubits was the breadth thereof before the house the breadth therefore of this porch being added to the length of the Temple the whole house porch and all was threescore and ten cubits long how high this porch was it is not here expressed but 2. Chron. 3.4 that is added to wit that it was one hundred and twenty cubits high so that it was as a tower to the rest of the house Vers 4. And for the house he made windows of narrow lights That is broad within and narrow without or else as some conceit broad both without and within but narrowed in the midst of the wall some Expositours understand by the house in this place only the holy place concluding that the most holy place had no windows but there is no great waight in any of the reasons they give to prove this for considering first the thicknesse of the wall secondly the fashion of the windows above described purposely no doubt so made both to keep out birds and the gazing in of any that should attempt to looke in at them and thirdly the place where these windows were made which was toward the roof of the house at least above fifteen cubits high in the wall for so high the chambers were built on the outside of the wall and there were three stories of chambers one over the other verse 8. and verse 10. and fourthly that the Tabernacle had no windows at all neither in the holy nor in the most holy place since it is expresly said that in this house which Solomon built he made windows for the house I see no reason why it should be restrained only to the holy place Vers 5. And against the wall of the house hee built Chambers round about c. That is westward northward and southward round about the house he built Chambers for on the east side before
or else they were not seen without that is the staves were drawn out so little that in the most holy place they might be discerned or happely at the very doore where they went out of the most holy place into the Temple but further out in the Temple they could not be discerned Vers 9. There was nothing in the ark save the two tables of stone For though the pot of Manna Exod. 16.34 and Aarons rod Numb 17.10 and the book of the Law Deut. 31.26 were laid up before the ark yet they were not put into the ark as were the two tables of stone and accordingly we must understand that place Heb. 9.3 4. And after the second vail the tabernacle which is called the holiest of all Which had the golden censer and the ark of the covenant overlaid round about with gold wherein was the golden pot that had Manna and Aarons rod that budded and the tables of the covenant Vers 10. And it came to passe when the priests were come out of the holy place that the cloud filled the house of the Lord. When the priests had set the ark in his place and were come out immediately there were an hundred and twenty priests with trumpets and the Levite-singers standing at the east end of the altar with their Cymballs Psalteries and Harps appointed to sound forth the praises of God and whilest they were thus employed suddenly the house of the Lord was filled with a cloud so that the priests were not able to minister no not in the court where the brasen altar stood for thus it is expressed 2. Chron. 5.11 c. Vers 12. Then spake Solomon The Lord said that he would dwell in the thick darknesse Solomon standing where he saw how on a sudden the house was filled with a cloud to wit upon the brasen scaffold that was built for him in the outward court which was therefore it seems right before the door of the priests court through which he might look 2 Chron. 6.13 For Solomon had made a brasen scaffold of five cubits long and five cubits broad and three cubits high and had set it in the midst of the court and upon it he stood c. apprehending rightly that it was sent of God as a signe of his presence in that rapture of his joy he brake forth into these following words the Lord said that he would dwell in the thick darknesse c. that is the Lord hath said he would appear in a cloud Levit. 16.2 I will appear in the cloud upon the mercy seat and by a cloud he hath usually testified his presence amongst his people as in the leading of the Israelites by a cloud Exod 13.21 in the thick cloud that was upon mount Sinai at the giving of the law Exod. 19 16. in the cloud that covered and filled the tabernacle so soon as it was reared up by Moses Exod. 40.34 and therefore saith Solomon doubtlesse by this cloud the Lord doth shew us that he hath favourably accepted our service in building this house and that he hath taken it to be the settled place wherein he will abide for ever Vers 14. And the king turned his face about and blessed all the congregation of Israel For hitherto he had stood with his face toward the altar observing what was done at the carrying in of the ark Vers 16. Since the day that I brought forth my people Israel out of Egypt I chose no city out of all the tribes of Israel to build an house c. See this more fully expressed 2. Chron. 6.5 6. Vers 18. Thou didst well that it was in thine heart See the notes 2 Sam. 7.5 6. Vers 22. And Solomon stood before the altar of the Lord c. That is having turned himself from the people he stood upon the brasen scaffold with his face toward the altar and then kneeling down upon his knees as is expressed vers 54. and 2. Chron. 6.13 he lift up his hands towards heaven and so prayed unto the Lord. Vers 25. Therefore now Lord God of Israel keep with thy servant David my father that thou promisedst him That is seeing thou hast kept with thy servant David my father that thou promisedst him in raising me his son up to build a Temple for thee therefore now also keep with thy servant David my father that thou promisedst him saying There shall not fail thee a man in my sight to sit upon the throne of Israel c. Vers 27. Behold the heaven and heaven of heavens cannot contain thee See the note Deut. 10.14 Vers 30. And hearken thou to the supplication of thy servant and of thy people Israel when they shall pray towards this place Or in this place as it is in the margin even herein as in other things was this Temple a type of Christ As the prayers of Gods people were the more accepted of God when they prayed in the Temple or but with their faces towards the Temple so are now the prayers of Gods righteous servants accepted of God because they are put up in Christs name with an eye of faith fixt upon him as their Mediatour Joh. 14.13 14. Whatsoever ye ask in my name that I will do c. And when thou hearest forgive This clause is added first because pardon of sin is the chief thing to be begged of God in all our prayers for hereby a way is made for the obtaining of other blessings and besides there is no true comfort in obtaining any blessing if our sins should still remain unforgiven and secondly because the best are subject to so many failings in prayer that should not the Lord pardon the sin of their prayers there would be no hope that any prayer of theirs should do them good Vers 31. If any man trespasse against his neighbour and an oath be laid upon him c. That is if a man be charged that he hath trespassed against his neighbour and be brought before the altar to clear himself by oath as in case where sufficient proof and witnesse was wanting they used to do Exod. 22.8.11 Numb 5.12.19 do thou accordingly deal with the man that takes the oath punishing him if he be faulty and acquitting him if he be innocent Vers 33. When thy people Israel be smitten and shall turn again to thee and confesse thy name c. To wit thy Justice by laying all the blame upon themselves acknowledging that they have deservedly suffered and thy mercy and power by seeking to thee for pardon and succour Vers 34. And bring them again unto the land which thou gavest unto their fathers This may be meant either of those that were taken prisoners in battel to wit that upon the prayers of their brethren in the Temple or their own prayers towards the Temple the Lord would be pleased to bring them again into the land or else of those that by the enemy should be driven out of their dwelling places yet not out of the land of Canaan to
yeare he did and Asa his sonne succeeded him yet having reigned two years complete and somewhat more it is said here that he reigned three years in Jerusalem And his mothers name was Maachah the daughter of Abishalom Rehoboam had eighteen wives and sixty concubines by whom he had eight and twenty sonnes and sixty daughters but amongst all his wives he loved this Maachah the mother of Abijam best and therefore allotted him to succeed him in the throne 2. Chron. 11.18 23. elsewhere she is called Michaiah the daughter of Uriel of Gibeah 2. Chron. 13.2 and Maachah the daughter of Absalom 2. Chron. 11.20 Some therefore conceive that she was the daughter of Tamar the onely daughter of Absalom whose husband this Uriel of Gibeah was so she was the daughter of Uriel and withall the daughter that is the grand-child of Absalom And this they judge the more probable because the mother of Absalom was called Maachah 2. Sam. 3.3 but indeed the most Expositours hold that it was not Absalom Davids rebellious sonne of whom she was descended but another of that name called also Abishalom as here we have it Vers 3. And he walked in all the sinnes of his father c. That is of Rehoboam whereby it is evident that though Rehoboam and his princes humbled themselves before the Lord upon the preaching of Shemaiah to them when the king of Egypt made such a dangerous incursion into the land of Judah 2. Chron. 12.6 yet when the king of Egypt was out of his land he soon returned to his former evil wayes and so his sonne after him trod in his steps Vers 5. Because David did that which was right in the eyes of the Lord and turned not aside c. That is he did not wittingly and presumptuously do any thing wherein he did openly and scandalously turn aside from that which God had commanded him especially in the point of his government save onely in the matter of Uriah Vers 6. And there was warre between Rehoboam and Jeroboam all the dayes of his life In the story of the reigne of Abijam this is inserted concerning the continuall warre which was betwixt his father Rehoboam and Jeroboam to intimate that the cause of the warre betwixt Abijam and Jeroboam was the old quarrell about the rending away of the ten tribes this quarrell was not yet appeased there was for this continuall warres betwixt Jeroboam and the house of Solomon first in the dayes of Rehoboam the father and afterward in the dayes of Abijam his sonne Vers 7. Now the rest of the acts of Abijam c. See the note chap. 14.19 Some of these acts we have also recorded in the sacred Chronicles as his marrying foureteen wives by whom he had two and twenty sonnes and sixteen daughters 2. Chron. 13.21 but especially that famous battell which he fought with Jeroboam wherein with foure hundred thousand men he encountred and beat Jeroboam that had in his army eight hundred thousand and slew of them five hundred thousand and then being master of the field recovered Beth-el Jeshanah and Ephraim from him Vers 10. And fourty and one yeares reigned he in Jerusalem A long reigne which was no doubt by the speciall providence of God that he might have the more time to reform a kingdome so exceedingly out of order as his was when he first came to the crown And his mothers name was Maachah c. That is his grand-mothers see vers 2. Vers 12. And he took away the Sodomites out of the land To wit all that he could discover but some remained till his sonne Jehoshaphat came to the crown and then he removed them chap. 22.46 Vers 13. And also Maachah his mother even her he remooved from being queen c. That is from being queen regent for how else she should be remooved from being queen I cannot conceive Abijam the father of Asa sitting in the throne not full three yeares complete it is most probable that Asa was very young when he came to the crown and that hereupon Maachah his grandmother once the wife of Rehoboam his mother happely being dead was made queen regent during the kings minoritie but then Asa coming to some ripenesse of yeares and being well affected in matters of religion an enemy to the idolatry that was in the land and desirous to promote the true worship of God a thing the more wonderfull because he was trained up under such a guardian because his grandmother had set up some new abominable idol in a grove and that perhaps contrary to his command despising his youth and exalting her self because of her power as queen regent he took courage and assuming the government into his own hands deposed her from being queen regent any longer and withall he destroyed her idol and burnt it by the brook Kidron which is expressed thus 2. Chron. 15.16 Asa cut down her idol and stamped it and burnt it at the brook Kidron Vers 14. But the high places were not removed That is the high places wherein the people served and worshiped the god of Israel those high places which were dedicated to the worship of strange gods he took away 2. Chron. 14.3 but these wherein the true God was worshiped he removed not either for feare of the people or because he conceived there had been no great hurt in them since of old yea in the dayes of David the people had been inured to worship there as for the high places which Solomon built in mount Olivet see the note upon the 2. King 23.13 Neverthelesse Asa his heart was perfect with the Lord all his dayes That is the whole bent of his heart was sincerely to do what God required though through ignorance or the prevailing of his corruptions he many times did that which was not approveable but evil in Gods sight and though many of his people sacrificed in the high places yet it was altogether without his approbation Vers 15. And he brought in the things which his father had dedicated c. To wit silver gold and vessels 2. Chron. 15.18 It may be probably conceived that great victory in the battel which he fought with Jeroboam 2 Chron. 13.17 but not living to perform his vow his sonne Asa did it for him adding somewhat more of his own free gift Vers 16. And there was warre between Asa and Baasha king of Israel all their dayes The first ten yeares of his reigne he enjoyed peace 2. Chron. 14.1 In his dayes the land was quiet ten yeares the courage and the strength of the ten tribes being much abated by that great overthrow which Abijam his father had given them and in this time Asa reformed those things that were out of order concerning matters of religion and withall fortified many cities and other places providing for the troubles of warre in the leisure of peace 2. Chron. 14.2 7. when those ten years of peace were expired in which time Jeroboam died and Nadab his sonne was slain by
the impotencie or her rage and passion which God by his all-ruling providence did now make use of for the preservation of his Prophet for else she would never have sent him word what she meant to do thereby giving him warning as it were to be gone Concerning this form of swearing So let the gods do to me and more also c. See the note Ruth 1.17 Vers 3. And when he saw that he arose and went for his life and came to Beersheba c. That he might not be exalted in mind because of those great wonders that had been wrought by him the Lord suffered him to be over-born with fears that he might see his own weaknesse insomuch that he who erewhile feared not Ahab and all his Baalites did now at the threats of a woman not onely flie into another kingdome the kingdome of Judah where good Jehoshaphat then reigned yea to the uttermost parts of that kingdome to Beersheba that was southward in the farthest part of all that land but also from thence withdrew himself into the wildernesse not as suspecting any evil from good Jehoshaphat the king of Judah but as fearing lest Ahab or Jezebel should send some or other into Judah to dispatch him there and happely the rather because there was too great correspondence betwixt Jehoshaphat and them and therefore when he went from Beersheba because he would not expose him to the wants of the wildernesse and because being alone he might the better hide himself he left his servant there Vers 4. And he requested for himself that he might die c. The misery that at present he underwent made him now as desirous to be rid of his life as before he was solicitous by flight to preserve it especially considering that dying here in an ordinary way Jezebel and her Baalites could not triumph over him It is enough saith he that is I have lived long enough I know I must die for I am no better then my fathers that have all dyed before me and therefore since my life is full of nothing but troubles and misery I desire to end my dayes presently Vers 6. And he looked and behold there was a cake c. This word behold intimates how wonderfull it was to him he not knowing from whence it came Vers 7. Arise and eat because the journey is too great for thee c. Though Elijah happely had not pitched upon the place whither he meant to go yet the Lord gives him notice that so farre and long he should still wander that it was fit he should well refresh himself with that provision which by his angels he had now sent to him Vers 8. And he went in the strength of that meat fourty dayes and fourty nights unto Horeb the mount of God So called because there the Lord appeared to Moses in a burning bush and there afterwards he gave the law to the Israelites How the strength of this meat could sustain Elijah so long it is needlesse to enquire since it was done miraculously by the command of God as he was pleased to sustain Moses as long without food so he was pleased by the strength of one meal thus to sustain Elijah thereby to shew with how little he can uphold the life and strength of his servants if they be brought into straits However observable it is that both Christ Moses and Elijah who appeared together when Christ was transfigured did each of them fast in their severall times fourty dayes and fourty nights without any sustenance Vers 9. What doest thou here Elijah As if he should have said why art thou not amongst my people executing the office of a prophet amongst them to which I have called thee Vers 10. And he said I have been very jealous for the Lord God of hosts c. That is I have been zealous for thy glory and worship and grieved in thy behalf to see thy people forsake thee and go a whoring after strange gods yea and I have opposed what in me lay the horrible apostacie of the times and hereby I have incensed the adversaries against me so that they seek to slay me as they have done the rest of the prophets and this is the reason I am here forced to hide my self but howsoever observable it is that the prophet makes not a direct answer to the question propounded but chooseth rather to imply the cause of his fear and flight then plainly to confesse that he fled thither which was his fault for fear of Jezebel For the children of Israel have forsaken thy covenant thrown down thine altars c. That is the altars in the high places whereon the people had formerly sacrificed before the temple was built by Solomon for though it was a sinne to offer sacrifice upon any altar but that at the temple in Jerusalem and therefore those kings that pulled down these altars and took away these high places are highly commended for it yet the Israelites not doing it for this reason but onely out of their zeal for Baal that his worship might be promoted and that there might not be any memoriall left of the true God in the land of Israel it is reckoned as a sinne in them and a manifest proof of their bitter hatred of the true religion from which they were revolted Thus these words are usually understood by Expositours yet there may be another probable sense given of them they have thrown down thine altars that is they have destroyed thy worship to wit by restraining men from Gods altar at Jerusalem I even I onely am left and they seek my life to take it away That is there is none left but my self that do openly plead thy cause against thine enemies all the rest being either slain or hiding themselves chap. 18.13 Vers 11. And behold the Lord passed by c. That is the glory of the Lord wherewith he was pleased to manifest himself at present to his servant Elijah Thus in the first words the generall summe of the whole vision is expressed and then in the following words we are told more particularly how this was done first there was a great and strong wind that rent the mountains and brake the rocks in pieces before the lord then after that there was an earthquake and after that a fire but the Lord was in none of these that is the Lord did not in these appear to Elijah speak and make known his will to him as he did afterward these were but glorious forerunners of Gods presence but then at last there came after the fire a still small voice and then the Lord appeared to him and instructed him what he should do Now the end of this vision or apparition I conceive was first to humble Elijah with those terrible foregoing signes of Gods Maiestie and power that so he might with the more awfulnesse and sear and readinesse to obey hearken unto that which God should say to him and withall acknowledge Gods mercy in that he
did not overwhelm him with his terrours and judgements notwithstanding his cowardise in withdrawing himself from the work of his calling but was content to deal with him in such a gentle and gracious manner as at present he did Secondly to strengthen his faith in Gods protection by letting him see that God who had all the creatures at his command was able if he saw cause to destroy and consume all his enemies even in a moment And thirdly to instruct him how he was purposed to deal with his enemies thereby to appease the griefe and discontent of his spirit concerning them and then a chief part of the significancie of this apparition must consist in this that God was not in the wind nor in the earthquake nor in the fire as is noted vers 11.12 namely that though the Lord were of infinite power to destroy all his wicked adversaries and could by divers terrible and unresistable judgements punish Ahab and Jezebel and other his proud persecutours yet he would rather still deal with them according to his wonted long suffering and patience by the still and gentle voice of the ministery of his prophets or happely that though he could sweep them away instantly with his judgements yet rather he would effect their ruine in his good time in a more secret hidden and tacit way Yea and fourthly it is not improbable which some also adde that hereby likewise was signified that Gods saving manifestation of himself is not to be expected in the terrours of the law but in the still and gracious voice of the Gospel Vers 13. He wrapped his face in his mantle and went out and stood in the entring in of the cave The Lord did before enjoyn Elijah to come up out of the cave and to stand upon the mount before him vers 11. and no doubt he went immediately up at least to the mouth of the cave else could he not have seen the fire that passed before the Lord but yet it seems there he stayed and kept himself somewhat inward till knowing that with that still small voyce the Lord would appear to him he then went out to the very entring in of the cave onely withall casting his mantle about his face which he did out of an awfull fear of Gods majesty as Moses did Exod. 3.6 concerning which see the notes there There came a voice to him and said What doest thou heare Elijah The very same question that God had propounded to him before he now propounded again either thereby to let him know that it was he that now spake again to him or that his former reply was no sufficient excuse for his deserting those propheticall employments to which God had called him or else that Elijah returning the same answer that he had formerly given him the Lord might thence take occasion to give him that further satisfaction concerning his fears and directions what he should do which now he intended him Vers 15. Anoint Hazael to be king over Syria c. We reade that Elisha foretold Hazael that he should be king of Syria 2. Kings 8.13 and that a young Prophet by Elishaes directions did long after this anoint Jehu king of Israel 2. Kings 9.1 6. and here in the following words is expressed that Elisha was called to be a Prophet by the casting of Elijahs mantle upon him vers 19 20 21. but that Hazael or Elisha were ever anointed we reade not nor that Jehu was anointed by Elijah and hence the most Interpreters do hold that by anointing here is meant onely the designing of them to their offices and that this Elijah did to Hazael and Jehu by appointing Elisha to do it when he was gone and to Elisha by casting his mantle upon him whereupon he had presently the gift of prophesie that unction of Gods spirit whereof the outward anointing was a signe But rather I think we may say that Elijah did what now he was enjoyned that is that he did indeed anoint Hazael Jehu an Elisha though it be not expressed and indeed to what end was Elijah now presently to go to Damascus if it were not to anoint Hazael Vers 17. Him that escapeth the sword of Hazael shall Jehu slay Though Israel suffered most of Hazaels crueltie in the latter dayes of Jehu 2. Kings 10.32 In those dayes the Lord began to cut Israel short and Hazael smote them in all the coasts of Israel and in the dayes of Jehoahaz his sonne 2. Kings 13.1 3. yet in the dayes of Joram the sonne of Ahab before Jehu did Hazael begin to afflict Israel as is evident by the battel which Joram fought with Hazael 2. Kings 8.28 Now with respect to this it is said here that him that escapeth Hazaels sword shall Jehu slay And him that escapeth from the sword of Jehu shall Elisha slay That is say the most Expositours by threatning them and adjudging them by a propheticall spirit to those calamities and to that destruction which afterward fell upon them and indeed we find the like expressions which upon this ground the Lord elsewhere useth concerning his Prophets as Jer. 1.10 See I have this day set thee over the nations and over the kingdomes to root out and to pull down and to destroy and to throw down to build and to plant and Hos 6.5 Therefore have I hewed them by the prophets I have slain them by the words of my mouth Some Expositours adde further that these words are particularly intended concerning those children of Beth-el that were torn by two she beares immediately upon Elishaes cursing them in the name of the Lord 2. Kings 2.24 and concerning those that died of the famine that was in Samaria which it seems indeed Elisha had beforehand threatened should come upon them because the king was so enraged against the Prophet for it God saith he do so and more also to me if the head of Elisha the sonne of Shaphat shall stand on him this day But because these things were done before the dayes of Jehu and these words seem plainly to speak of something to be done after Jehu had begun to execute Gods wrath upon them him that escapeth from the sword of Jehu shall Elisha slay I rather think that this is meant of some other judgements not expressed in the story which upon the prophecying or prayers of Elisha did after that fall upon the idolatrous Israelites yea perhaps the people might be wonne by Elisha to do some execution upon the Baalites as they were formerly by Elijah 1. Kings 18.40 Vers 18. Yet have I left me seven thousand in Israel c. That is many thousands that have not worshiped Baal and this is added to comfort Elijah concerning that complaint of his I even I onely am left vers 14. because they used not onely to bow and kneel before their idols but also to kisse them according to that Hos 13.2 Let the men that sacrifice kisse the calves or if they could not come so near their idol-gods
time all their chief officers were called Eunuchs As we see Potiphar to whom Joseph was sold though he were a married man is termed an Eunuch Gen. 37.36 Vers 7. And Elisha came to Damascus and Ben-hadad the king of Syria was sick c. The most received opinion is that Elisha went now to Damascus according to a charge given him by Elijah purposely to anoint Hazael king but why was Elijah sent from mount Horeb to Damascus if God meant not that he himself should anoint Hazael 1. Kings 19.15 And the Lord said unto him Go return on thy way to the wildernesse of Damascus and when thou comest anoint Hazael to be king over Syria rather therefore I conceive that Elisha went now by the speciall instinct of Gods Spirit to confirm that to Hazael by a second prediction which formerly upon Elijahs anointing he did not much believe and that the rather because of the present famine in Israel and so coming thither found Ben-hadad sick whether his sicknesse was occasioned through grief as Josephus saith for the shamefull flight of his armie from the siege of Samaria chap. 7.6 especially when he heard it was occasioned by a causelesse feare the Scripture expresseth not but onely notes how in his sicknesse he was glad to consult with the Prophet concerning his recovery whom ere while he sent to apprehend in Dothan chap. 6.13 14. encouraged happely thereto also by the miraculous cure that he had wrought upon the leprosie of his servant Naaman Vers 10. Go say unto him Thou mayest certainly recover c. That is thy disease is not mortall Thou mayest certainly recover of thy sicknesse that therefore which the Prophet addes concerning his death howbeit the Lord hath shewed me that he shall surely die doth not contradict this which he said concerning his sicknesse The question was whether he should recover of that sicknesse wherewith he was visited to this a direct answer is given that he might well recover notwithstanding his sicknesse but withall an intimation is given to the messenger that he should surely die to wit by another means though not by his sicknesse Vers 11. And he settled his countenance stedfastly till he was ashamed That is Elisha did fix his eyes stedfastly upon Hazael untill he began to be ashamed because he saw he could not forbear weeping or rather untill Hazael began to blush and to be ashamed because he saw the Prophet look so earnestly upon him Vers 13. And Elisha answered The Lord hath shewed me that thou shalt be king over Syria Intimating that in this regard it was likely enough he would exercise those cruelties upon the Israelites which now he made so strange of and that because he should then have power to do it and withall when once he sate in the throne of Syria he would bear the same deadly hatred against Gods people which his predecessours had done before him and thence is Damascus threatned under those terms Amos 1.4 I will send a fire into the house of Hazael which shall devoure the palaces of Ben-hadad Vers 15. He took a thick cloth and dipt it in water and spread it on his face c. And thus Ben-hadad was strangled by Hazael and that so that no signe or token could be seen in his dead body of any violence that was offered him and perhaps too under a pretence of allaying the distemper of heat he was in by reason of his sicknesse Vers 16. And in the fifth yeare of Joram the sonne of Ahab king of Israel c. Jehoshaphat had designed his sonne Jehoram to be king and appointed him to govern the kingdome in his absence in the seventeenth yeare of his reigne a little before he went with Ahab against Ramoth Gilead and thence the yeare of Jehoram king of Israel his beginning to reigne is counted to be both the eighteenth yeare of Jehoshaphat 2. Kings 3.1 and the second yeare of Jehoram the sonne of Jehoshaphat 2. Kings 1.17 but at his return he resumed the royall power wholly to himself not communicating the same again to his sonne untill the fifth yeare of Joram king of Israel which was the two and twentieth of Jehoshaphat and then this old king took unto him this his eldest sonne as partner in the government himself yet living the cause whereof in all probabilitie was some discord and differences which brake out even then between him and his younger brethren which as they moved Jehoshaphat to commit to his younger sonnes the custody of strong fenced cities in Judah 2. Chron. 21.3 the better to assure them if it might have been against the power of their elder brother so also on the other side it caused him to put this his eldest sonne in possession of the kingdome whilest himself was living for fear of tumult after his death Vers 17. And he reigned eight years in Jerusalem To wit foure years together with his father and foure years himself alone Vers 18. For the daughter of Ahab was his wife To wit Athaliah vers 26. Vers 19. Yet the Lord would not destroy Judah for David his servants sake as he promised him to give him alway a light c. That is one of his seed in whom the soveraigntie of Judah should be continued though farre short of the glory that formerly they enjoyed before the revolt of the ten tribes Vers 20. In his dayes Edom revolted from under the hand of Judah c. The Edomites ever since Davids time 2. Sam. 8.14 had been tributaries to the kings of Judah and had been governed by a Viceroy whom they set over them 1. Kings 22.47 There was no king in Edom a deputy was king But now they cast off this yoke and so the prophecie of Isaac began to take effect Gen. 27.40 that Esau should break the yoke of his brother Jacob from off his neck 2. Chron. 21.2 we reade first that so soon as his father was dead he presently made use of his power against his six younger brethren and having gotten them into his hands slew them and together with them for company many of the great men of the land such belike as either formerly or then had taken their part that withall he took upon him to make innovations in Religion erecting high places in the mountains of Judah and forcing the people to embrace that idolatry which himself had learned from the house of Ahab vers 10.11 And these combustions in the land of Judah we may well think gave encouragement to the Edomites to revolt at this time and so God punished these his abominable courses Vers 22. Yet Edom revolted from under the hand of Judah unto this day That is though Joram overthrew the Edomites in that forementioned battel vers 21. yet they retiring into their places of advantage persisted resolutely in their revolt and so he was forced to return again into his own land which indeed is not so strange if we consider that he might perhaps heare of the revolt of
14. And Hezekiah went up into the house of the Lord and spread it before the Lord. That is he spread Sennacheribs letter before the altar the signe of Gods presence amongst them and this he did partly to quicken his own spirit and to strengthen his own faith in prayer by the sight of that blasphemous writing and partly by that outward signe to imply what he desired of God namely that God would take notice of and revenge the horrible blasphemies of that daring wretch against his great and glorious name Vers 16. And heare the words of Sennacherib which hath sent him to reproch the living God That is the messenger that brought his letter Vers 21 This is the word that the Lord hath spoken concerning him The virgin the daughter of Sion hath despised thee c. That is the inhabitants of Sion Jerusalem shall laugh thee to scorn The people inhabiting any citie or countrey are in the Scripture usually called the daughter of that citie or countrey Psal 45.12 And the daughter of Tyre shall be there with a gift Psal 137.8 O daughter of Babylon who art to be destroyed because they have been bred born and nourished theâ—e and have lived under the defence government thereof and ought to be faithfull and obedient to the government under which they live whence naturally all nations are wont to stile their countrey their mother 2. Sam. 20.19 Thou seekest to destroy a citie and a mother in Israel and they are called the virgin daughter of Sion not so much because they were not now defiled with idolatry which is spirituall fornication for even heathen people are so called Isa 47.1 Come down and sit in the dust O virgin-daughter of Babylon sit on the ground there is no throne O daughter of the Caldeans Jer. 46.11 Go up into Gilead and take balme O virgin the daughter of Egypt and where had been grosser idolatry then amongst the inhabitants of Jerusalem in the dayes of Ahaz nor because she had never yet been subdued and brought under the command of any forrain prince for after they were under the Babylonian command they are still called so Lam. 1 15. the Lord hath troden the virgin the daughter of Judah as in a winepresse and 2.13 What thing shall I liken to thee O daughter of Jerusalem what shall I equall to thee that I may comfort thee O virgin daughter of Sion but rather because of their constant abode in those places for in that regard they might most fitly be resembled to a virgin daughter that lives with her mother tenderly and delicately brought up by her yea perhaps in this place this phrase is used also to imply the weaknesse of Jerusalem at this time Vers 23. By thy messengers thou hast reproched the Lord. By this circumstance doth the Prophet aggravate the insolent pride of Sennacherib that he set his servants to blaspheme the holy name of God With the multitude of my chariots I am come up to the height of the mountains c. That is the strongest places of the kingdome I have subdued and passed through as a conquerour even those that seemed to them most inaccessible and am now come to the sides of Lebanon that is their chief citie and strength the citie Jerusalem and hereby is intimated that nothing could or should stand in the way of his armies that as he had hitherto so he would still subdue the land before him take possession of their forts and castles cut down the tall cedar trees and the choice firre trees that is destroy there Princes Nobles and great men enter the lodgings of his borders and into the forrest of his Carmel that is possesse himself of their frontier towns and all the fruitfull and pleasant places of their countrey even as conquerours in a land subdued are wont to do as they go along what they please themselves Vers 24. I have digged and drunk strange waters and with the sole of my feet have I dried up all the rivers of besieged places That is when I have come in places most destitute of water it hath been no hindrance to me because even there I have digged up strange waters that is fountains waters where never any were seen before on the other side where cities have been environed with great deep waters no sooner have I set my foot there to besiege them but with the multitude of my souldiers I have dried them up Thus he boasts that nothing could be a let to his numerous army and laughs to scorn Hezekiahs policie in cutting of the waters 2. Chron. 32.3 Vers 25. Hast thou not heard long ago how I have done it and of ancient times that I have formed it c. As if the Lord should have said Thou boastest of the conquest of many nations but didst thou never heare that there is a God in heaven that ruleth the world by whose providence and decree all such things are done surely thus it is with thee now have I brought it to passe that thou shouldest be to lay waste fenced cities into ruinous heaps that is that which I before determined I have now by thee brought to passe using thee as my scourge to punish the wickednesse of men and to turn their strong fenced cities into ruinous heaps which agrees with that which the Prophet saith elsewhere Isaiah 10.5 6. O Assyrian the rod of mine anger and the staffe in their hand is mine indignation I will send him against an hypocriticall nation and against the people of my wrath will I give him a charge to take the spoil and to take the prey and to tread them down like the mire in the streets there is indeed another translation of these words which is set in the margin of our Bibles Hast thou not heard how I have made it long ago and formed it of ancient times should I now bring it to be laid waste and fenced cities to be ruinous heaps and according to this translation the meaning may be that God had long ago and of ancient times made and formed the Israelites to be his peculiar people and had planted them in the land of Canaan which he had provided for their inheritance a thing so famously known that Sennacherib must needs have heard of it and that therefore it was not likely that God would now suffer him wholly to lay waste their countrey and to turn their cities into ruinous heaps but the first exposition doth farre best agree with the scope of the Lords upbraiding the pride of Sennacherib in boasting of what he had done to so many nations Vers 26. Therefore their inhabitants were of small power they were dismaied and confounded they were as the grasse of the field c. That is because I gave them up into thy power therefore they were soon and easily destroyed Vers 27. But I know thy abode and thy going out c. That is I know all thy counsels and enterprizes there is nothing thou
all the priests out of the cities of Judah and defiled the high places c. To wit by beating down their altars c. and turning the places to prophane and unclean uses or doing something to them which in the judgement of those that esteemed them sacred must needs render them unfit for any sacred imployment as by burning dead mens bones in them vers 14. or any thing of the like nature And brake down the high places of the gates that were in the entring of the gate of Joshuah the governour of the citie c. It is very probably thought by some Expositours that these high places of the gates were high places built for the worship of some tutelary gods whom they esteemed the Gods that were the guardians and protectours of their citie which were therefore erected nigh to the gate of Joshua the governour of the citie that is one that was at that time the chief captain or the chief Magistrate of Jerusalem now the breaking down of these high places is particularly expressed to shew that Josiah regarded not the greatnesse of any that had any speciall interest in any idolatrous monuments but suppressed them all Vers 9. The priests of the high places came not up to the altar of the Lord in Jerusalem but they did eat of the unleavened bread c. These priests were such as were of the linage of Aaron that yet had defiled themselves with the idolatry of the high places where they worshipped the true God in a false manner now though these were deposed from their offices nor were ever suffered more to serve at Gods altar yet they were allowed to eat of the unleavened bread that is of the provision allowed for the maintenance and nourishment of the priests Vers 10. And he defiled Tophet c. This Tophet was a high place on the east side of Jerusalem in a very pleasant valley called the valley of the children of Hinnom or as it is Josh 15.8 the valley of the sonne of Hinnom where the sacrificed their children to Molech and it was called Tophet as it is generally held from an Hebrew word that signifies a drum or a timbrel either because of the musick and dances which they used at the time of those sacrifices or rather because by the noise of drummes and tabrels they sought at those times to defenâ— the eares of the parents that they might not heare the shreekes and cryes of their children and hence it was that the prophet Jeremy threatned that in that very valley there should be a mighty slaughter of the people so that it should be no more called Tophet nor the valley of the sonne of Hinnom but the valley of slaughter Jer. 7.31 32. yea and the prophet Isaiah as in allusion to the shreekes or torments of those that were slain here calls hell Tophet Isaiah 30.33 for Tophet is ordained of old yea for the king it is prepared he hath made it deep and large the pile thereof is fire and much wood the breath of the Lord like a stream of brimstone doth kindle it and so the Evangelist calls hell Gehenna as Mat. 5.22 and so in divers other places as in relation to the Hebrew word Gehinnom that is the valley of the sonne of Hinnom Vers 11. And he took away the horses that the kings of Judah had given to the sunne c. By these horses of the sunne some conceive is meant onely a carved statue or representation of the sunne sitting in a chariot drawn with fiery horses but why is it then distinctly said that he took away the horses and burnt the chariots and that these horses were kept in the suburbs of the citie others conceive that they were horses kept to be offered in sacrifice to the sunne as judging the horse for his swiftnesse a fit sacrifice for the sunne that runnes so swiftly about the earth but for what use then were the chariots more probable therefore it is that they were horses consecrated to the sunne wherewith in chariots either the princes were wont to ride forth when they went to worship the rising sunne or else the image of the sunne was carried about the citie at some certain times for which onely use they were still kept at the charge of the kings of Judah in the suburbs of Jerusalem Vers 12. And the altars that were on the top of the upper chamber of Ahaz which the kings of Judah had made For on the roofs of their houses they used to sacrifice to sunne moon and starres as we see Jer. 19.13 And the houses of Jerusalem and the houses of the kings of Judah shall be defiled as the place of Tophet because of all the houses upon whose roofs they have burnt incense unto all the host of heaven c. Zeph. 1.4 5. I will also stretch out my hand against Judah and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem and will cut of the remnant of Baal from this place and the name of the Chemarims with the priests and them that worship the host of heaven upon the house tops c. And the altars which Manasseh had made in the two courts of the house of the Lord c. It is expressely said 2. Chron. 33.15 that Manasseh repenting him of his former wickednesse took away all the altars which he had built in the mount of the house of the Lord and in Jerusalem and cast them out of the city but though he cast them out of the city yet his sonne Amon after his death restored them it seems to their former places or if they were demolished and ruined yet at least he built others in their room and yet these which Josiah now did beat to dust are called Manassehs altars because he first set them up in the two courts of the Temple Vers 13. And the high places that were before Jerusalem which were on the right hand of the mount of corruption c. This mount whereon Solomons high places stood was the mount Olivet near unto Jerusalem 1 Kings 11.7 called here the mount of corruption because it was so full of idols wherewith the people had corrupted themselves according to that expression Deut. 32.5 they have corrupted themselves yet it is but a weak conceit to think that Solomons high places erected to these heathen gods had continued to this day as some men hold seeking hence to inferre that Solomon did never repent and turne unto the Lord for what likelyhood is there that neither Asa nor Jehoshaphat nor Hezekiah did meddle with defacing these idolatrous monuments which were doubtlesse in most esteem amongst the people questionlesse Asa that would not spare his grandmothers idol and Hezekiah that brake in pieces the brazen serpent would not suffer these execrable high places to stand undemolished in the very face of the Temple but what these good princes pulled down the idolatrous kings that succeeded in the throne of Jupah did soon set up again and because they were erected as in the room
mercies of David thy servant That is the mercies which thou hast promised to David CHAP. VII Vers 1. NOw when Solomon had made an end of praying the fire came down from heaven c. See the notes Levit. 9.24 and 1. Kings 8.54 Vers 3. And praised the Lord saying For he is good for his mercy endureth for ever That is they sang Psalmes of praise the burthen and foot whereof was this for he is good for his mercy endureth for ever And such we see the 136. Psalme was and therefore happely that was sung at this time the like expression we have again vers 6. Vers 6. David praised by their ministery That is the Levites sung the Psalmes which David composed and appointed to be sung Vers 7. Moreover Solomon hallowed the middle of the court c. See 1. Kings 8.64 Vers 8. Also at the same time Solomon kept the feast c. Concerning this feast see also the notes 1. Kings 8.65.66 Vers 12. And the Lord appeared to Solomon by night c. See 1. Kings 9.1 2. CHAP. VIII Vers 2. THe cities which Huram had restored to Solomon Solomon built them c. Solomon had given them to Huram and Huram not liking them had restored them to Solomon and so Solomon built them See 1. Kings 9.11 12. In which chapter we have also most of the other passages of this chapter and therefore I must referre the reader to the annotations there Vers 11. For he said My wife shall not dwell in the house of David c. In the foregoing words it is said that Solomon brought up the daughter of Pharaoh out of the city of David unto the house that he had built for her and here the reason given for this is for he said My wife shall not dwell in the house of David king of Israel and why so Because the places are holy whereunto the ark of the Lord hath come Concerning which a question of great difficulty may be moved to wit why the house of David should be counted so holy that Solomons wife might not be suffered to dwell there and that even after the ark was already removed thence into the Temple we reade not any where else that the presence of the ark made any place holy any longer then it continued there for was the house of Obed-edom holy after the ark was carried from thence yet here thirteen years after the ark was carryed into the Temple for so long it was after the finishing of the Temple ere Solomon had built his own house and the queens house 1. Kings 7.1 Solomon refused to let his wife dwell in Davids house because the ark had been there yea the words seem to imply that all places were esteemed holy where the ark had been the places are holy saith Solomon whereunto the ark of the Lord hath come But for resolving of this two answers may be given First that those words for he said My wife shall not dwell in the house of David king of Israel because the places are holy c. contain the reason why Solomon resolved to build an house for his wife at which time the ark was yet in the house of David not why he brought up his wife into the house he had built for her when indeed the ark had been long before removed into the Temple and so must be referred to the words immediately foregoing the house that he had built for her Solomon brought up the daughter of Pharaoh out of the city of David unto the house that he had huilt for her and then to shew what moved him to build an house for her this clause is added for he said My wife shall not dwell in the house of David king of Israel because the places are holy whereunto the ark of the Lord hath come Or secondly that Solomon resolved that because the places were holy whereunto the ark was brought therefore it was not fit that his wife who was born of heathen parents and had not her self perhaps at that time embraced the faith of Israel should dwell in the house which had been holy in this regard though Davids house ceased to be holy after the ark was removed thence in regard of the Symbolicall signe of Gods presence yet out of his superabundant respect unto that signe of Gods presence he thought it not fit to make that a dwelling place for her and her followers that were aliens and strangers to the house of Israel which had been the holy dwelling place of the most high God and this I conceive to be the best and most satisfying answer CHAP. IX Vers 1. ANd when the Queen of Sheba heard of the fame of Solomon c. See 1. Kings 10.1 where also many other passages of this chapter are explained in the Annotations upon the severall passages there Vers 8. Which delighted in thee to set thee on his throne That is the throne of Israel 1. Kings 10.9 All thrones are Gods because all power is of God and he disposeth all the kingdomes in the world to whom he pleaseth Daniel 4.32 The most high ruleth in the kingdome of men and giveth it to whomsoever he will But the throne of Israel was the Lords in a more speciall respect because there was a speciall covenant betwixt God and Israel in regard whereof he was more peculiarly their God and king and their kings his deputies and types of Christ Psal 2.6 I have set my king upon my holy hill of Sion Vers 10. And the servants of Huram c. See 1. Kings 10 11 12. Vers 12. And king Solomon gave to the Queen of Sheba all her desire whatsoever she asked besides that which she had brought unto the king That is besides what he gave her of his own royall bounty 1. Kings 10.13 in lieu of those guifts which she had brought to him or rather besides what he gave her in gifts of the same kind with those which she had given him to wit gold and spices and precious stones he gave her also other things that were greater rarities to her because she had them not in her own countrey Vers 13. Now the weight of gold that came to Solomon c. See 1. Kings 10.14 c. Vers 25 And Solomon had foure thousand stalls for horses and chariots c. See 1. Kings 4.26 Vers 28. And they brought unto Solomon horses out of Egypt c. See 1. Kings 10.28 Vers 29. Now the rest of the acts of Solomon first and last are they not written in the book of Nathan c. See 1. Kings 11.41 CHAP. X. Vers 1. ANd Rehoboam went to Sechem This story is related as here in 1. Kings 12.1 Concerning which therefore see the Annotations there CHAP. XI Vers 4. ANd they obeyed the words of the Lord c. See 1. Kings 12.24 Vers 11. And he fortified the strong holds and put captains in them c. That is many places that were by situation and nature strong he fortified also
Azariah himself he also being here called by the name of his father Oded As for that which is said that when Asa had heard these words and this prophesie he took courage and put away the abominable idols out of all the land c. we see that he had in a great part done this before chap. 14.3 but it seems now upon a more diligent search made throughout his kingdome he put away the remainder of the idols that were found amongst them and that not onely out of the land of Judah and Benjamin but also out of the cities which he had taken from mount Ephraim which may be meant of the cities which his father Abijam had taken chap. 13.19 but yet there is mention made of cities of Ephraim which Asa himself took chapter 17.2 And renewed the altar of the Lord. That is the altar which Solomon had built having some way lost its beautie in so many years which is no wonder considering how continually it was used and stood in the open court he renewed it and beautified it again and then in a solemne manner observed again sacrifices thereon Vers 9. And he gathered all Judah and Benjamin and the strangers with them out of Ephraim and Manasseh and out of Simeon Hereby it is manifest that even the tribe of Simeon did revolt from the kingdome of Judah or at least the greatest part of them however they had their inheritance within the portion of Judah Josh 19.1 and that therefore either they removed from their first habitation and transplanted themselves amongst other tribes of Israel or else that they stood out against Judah and clave to the party of the other tribes yea though they had their dwelling within Judahs portion Vers 10. So they gathered themselves together at Jerusalem in the third moneth in the fifteenth yeare of the reigne of Asa Which was the twelfth of Baasha king of Israel By this it appears that Zerah the Ethiopian did not invade the land of Judah till the fourteenth yeare of Asa Indeed Asa lived in peace but ten years chap. 14.1 But it was therefore Baasha king of Israel not Zerah that immediately after those ten years were ended made warre against Asa As for the third moneth it was that wherein the feast of Pentecost was kept Vers 15. And the Lord gave them rest round about To wit at that time when Asa and the people made this covenant with God then the Lord gave them rest the land not being invaded by any of her enemies Vers 16. And also concerning Maachah the mother of Asa c. That is the grandmother The Annotations concerning these three following verses see 1. Kings 15.2 10 14 15. Vers 19. And there was no more warre unto the five and thirtieth yeare of the reigne of Asa Vnto the five and thirtieth yeare that is untill the five and thirtieth yeare was ended whence is that chap. 16.1 In the six and thirtieth yeare of the reigne of Asa Baasha king of Israel came up against Judah c. of the reigne of Asa that is of the kingdome of Judah since it was divided from that of Israel which was the fifteenth yeare of Asa for that thus these words must be expounded is evident because Baasha died in the six and twentieth yeare of Asa 1 Kings 16.8 and therefore could not come up in the six and thirtieth yeare of Asa as is expressely said in the first verse of the following chapter we have a like passage afterward chap. 22.2 CHAP. XVI Vers 1. IN the six and thirtieth yeare of the reigne of Asa Baasha king of Israel came up against Judah and built Ramah c. That is in the thirty sixth yeare of the kingdome of Judah which was the sixteenth yeare of Asa and the fourteenth of Baasha See the last note in the former chapter as also see the note 1. Kings 15.17 where also severall other passages in the five first verses of this chapter are already explained Vers 7. Because thou hast relyed on the king of Syria and not relyed on the Lord thy God therefore is the host of the king of Syria escaped out of thine hand Whereas if he had gone on as he intended vers 3. in his league with the king of Israel to invade thy land thou shouldest have overcome him as thou diddest the Ethiopian now thou hast deprived thy self of this glory and booty Vers 9. Therefore from henceforth thou shalt have warres To wit with Basha 1. Kings 15.16 And there was warre betwixt Asa and Baasha king of Israael all their dayes Vers 12. And Asa in the thirty and ninth yeare of his reigne was diseased in his feet About the six and twentieth yeare of his reigne Baasha died and Elah his sonne succeeded him 1. Kings 16.8 about the seven and twentieth yeare of his reigne Zimri one of his captains slew Elah and all the house of Baasha 1. Kings 16.9 c. and within a few dayes Omri being made king by the souldiers forced Zimri desperately to burn himself and about the one and thirtieth yeare of Asa was peaceably settled in the throne of Israel Tibni his competitour dying 1. Kings 16.22.23 And about this nine and thirtieth yeare wherein Asa fell sick of the gout Omri died and Ahab his sonne succeeded him 1. King 16.29 Vers 14. And laid him in the bed which was filled with sweet odours and diverse kinds of spices c. After the manner of embalming kings used in those times they filled the beer whereon he was laid or coffin whereinto he was put with all kinds of odours and sweet spices And they made a very great burning for him That is they burnt sweet prefumes at his buriall in very great plenty CHAP. XVII Vers 1. ANd Jehoshaphat his sonne reigned in his stead and strengthened himself against Israel In the latter dayes of Asa after he fell into those grievous sinnes mentioned in the former chapter the kings of Israel as God threatned chap. 16.9 did it seems in their severall times renew their warres against Judah to wit Baasha Omri and Ahab and had happely often the better of them but about the third or fourth yeare of Ahab Asa dying 1. Kings 22.41 Jehoshaphat succeeded him and making great preparations to withstand them he was greatly strengthened against the kingdome of Israel Vers 3. And the Lord was with Jehoshaphat because he walked in the first wayes of his father David Which were purer and freer from sinne then were his latter dayes for whilest he was in continuall troubles we reade not any such foul sinnes he fell into as afterwards being settled in his kingdome when he committed adultery with Uriahs wife and many other wayes transgressed Gods Laws And sought not unto Baalim To wit as did Ahab at this time king of Israel whether by Baalim we understand all false Gods in generall or in particular the the idols of Baal the God of the Sydonians 1. Kings 16.31 32. for that these words are spoken by
spoken an expression this is therefore much like that Jer. 2.12 Be ye astonished O ye heavens at this and be horribly afraid be ye very desolate saith the Lord. Vers 29. Joshua the sonne of Nun the servant of the Lord dyed being an hundred and ten years old It is manifest there were but foure hundred and eighty years betwixt the building of the Temple and the Israelites coming out of Egypt 1. Kings 6.1 And it came to passe in the foure hundred and fourescore years after the children of Israel were come out of the land of Egypt in the fourth yeare of Solomons reigne over Israel in the moneth Zif which is the second moneth that he began to build the house of the Lord of which yielding fourty years to their travels in the wildernesse and then to Othniels government fourty years Judges 3.11 to Ehuds eighty years verse 30. to Shamgars some few moneths vers 31. to Deborah and Barak fourty Judges 5.31 to Gideon fourty Judges 8.28 to Abimelech three Judges 9.22 to Tolah three and twenty Judges 10.2 and to Jair two and twenty years verse 3. to Jephthe six Judges 12.7 and Ibzan seven verse 9. and Elon ten verse 11. and Abdon eight verse 14. to Samson twenty Judges 15.20 to Elie fourty 1. Sam. 4.18 to Samuel and Saul fourty years Acts 13.21 to David fourty 1. Kings 2.11 and then foure to Solomon ere he began the temple all together make foure hundred sixty and three and then the most left for Joshua will be seventeen though there should be no interregnum between the Judges Vers 32. And the bones of Joseph which the children of Israel brought up out of Egypt buried they in Shechem c. Joseph had commanded the Israelites to carry his bones with them out of Egypt Gen. 50.25 which accordingly they did Exod. 13.19 Here now we are told where they buried his bones to wit in Shechem in a parcell of ground which Jacob bought of the sonnes of Hamor the father of Shechem for an hundred pieces of silver Which was doubtlesse the parcell of a field mentioned Gen. 33.19 which Jacob bought of Hamor the father of Shechem and which when he lay upon his deathbed he gave to Joseph as a speciall legacy Gen 48.22 and this might well be the reason why they buried Josephs bones here whereas it is evident that his forefathers and their wives too were buried in the cave of Machpelah Gen. 49.29 30 31. I am saith Jacob to be gathered unto my people Bury me with my fathers in the cave that is in the field of Ephron the Hittite In the cave that is in the field of Machpelah which is before Mamre in the land of Canaan which Abraham bought with the field of Ephron the Hittite for a possession of a burying place There they buried Abraham and Sarah his wife there they buried Isaac and Rebekah his wife and there I buried Leah to wit because it was the inheritance peculiarly bequeathed him by his father Indeed by the words of Stephen Acts 7.15 16. it might seem that all the Patriarchs the sonnes of Jacob and so Josephs bones amongst the rest were buried not in the field which Jacob bought Gen. 33.19 but in the burying-place which Abraham bought of Ephron in Machpelah Gen. 23.17 18. For though Stephen saith they were buried in a field bought of the sonnes of Emor the father of Sichem yet withall he saith expressely that they were buried in a Sepulchre purchased by Abraham Acts 7.15 16. So Jacob went down into Egypt and died he and our fathers and were carried over into Sichem and laid in the sepulchre which Abraham bought for a summe of money Now we reade of no burying place which Abraham bought but that of the cave of Machpelah which he bought of Ephron the Hittite Gen. 23.16.17 c. wherein it is evident Gen. 49.29 30 31. that Abraham and Sarah and Isaac and Rebekah and Jacob Leah were buried but to this I answer that many of our best Expositours are of opinion that this place in the Acts of the Apostles is corrupted by the carelesnesse or rather the mistake of those that transcribed the copies yet because it is dangerous to allow that the Greek copies of the new Testament are generally falsified in any one passage I think it is better answered that though Stephen said that the fathers were laid in the sepulchre of Abraham bought for a summe of money of Emor the father of Sichem yet he meant onely thereby that they were laid in the Sepulchre which the posterity or the sonne of Abraham bought of the sonnes of Emor and that was Jacob because that which the sonne doth the father may be said to do in him and if so then it seems that the bones of the other Patriarchs the sonnes of Jacob were buried here together with Josephs At what time they buried Josephs bones here it is not expressed yet by the last clause of this verse where it is said of this parcell of ground and it became the inheritance of the children of Joseph it appears that it was done after they had rest in the land and had divided the whole countrey of Canaan amongst the tribes and so this part of Canaan where this parcell of land lay falling then by lot to the sonnes of Joseph to whom Jacob at his death had bequeathed it here they buried the bones of their father Vers 33. And they buried him in a hill that pertained to Phinehas his sonne which was given him in mount Ephraim Because the cities that fell to the priests by lot were taken out of the tribe of Judah and out of the tribe of Simeon and out of the tribe of Benjamin chap. 21.4 and thence it might seem strange that Eleazar or Phinehas his sonne should have any inheritance in mount Ephraim wherein for that cause Eleazar the high priest should be buried since mount Ephraim belonged to the sonnes of Joseph therefore in the last clause of this book it is expressely said that it belonged to Phinehas by warrant of a speciall and extraordinary gift and not by the designement of the lot which was drawn forth for the priests it was given him in mount Ephraim Whether this hill was given to Eleazar or Phinehas it is not fully and clearly expressed the words seem rather to imply that it was given to Phinehas they buried him in a hill which pertained to Phinehas his sonne which was given him in mount Ephraim but yet it may be that the place where Eleazar was buried is here said to be the hill of Phinehas or a hill that pertained to Phinehas not because it did not first pertain to Eleazar but with relation to future times whence it seems it was usually called the hill of Phinehas and the reason that Expositours give why this place in mount Ephraim was by extraordinary gift conferred upon the high priest whereas the priests had their dwellings by lot in the other tribes above mentioned are