Abbots c. in their time were Pares inter seipsos and both of those Degrees were also Pares upon a Baronial account so the Dukes and Marquesses being Earls or Barons before they were created Dukes or Marquesses in respect of their Earldoms or Baronies were Peers to the Earls and Barons and the Viscounts also most of them being Barons before they were created Viscounts in respect of their Baronies were Peers also to the Barons so also upon a Baronial account they were Pares pari gradu Baroniali Till Patents of Creation did more exactly distinguish them without relation to Baronies so as now to speak properly each Degree are Pares or Prees to their distinct Degrees 9. I must here again make use of my former observation viz. That in the Writs to Dukes they were Summon'd to be present in Parliament Cum Magnatibus Proceribus and so are the Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons yet the Pattents to the Dukes do place them inter Proceres Magnates putting Proceres or Peers before Magnates or Lords and in the Pattents to Marquesses they are placed inter alios Marchiones and the Earls inter alios Comites and the Viscounts inter alios Vicecomites and the Barons inter alios Barones But none of the Lords Patentees except the Dukes in relation to their places do take any notice of the position of the words inter Proceres Magnates for the Earls and Barons Patents have reference only to their own Degrees and not to the three other Degrees so as Proceres or Peers is applied only to the Dukes in their Patents of Creation 10. This is all that I can satisfie my self in concerning the use of the words Lords and Peers Praelati Magnates Proceres and that this may be the more satisfactory to others I shall recite the words of the learned Selden in his Titles of Honour whose lasting Credit is beyond exception saith he Though there be a distinction of Degrees in our Nobility yet in all publick actions they are Peers or Equals as in the Tryals of Noblemen c. in which the Spiritual Lords never did or do concern themselves Personally because it is against their Canons to act in any matters which relate to Blood yet whatever Acts pass these words are inserted viz. We the Lords Spiritual and Temporal c. with the Kings Assent c. for though the Lords Spiritual consist of Archbishops and Bishops and the Lords Temporal of Princes of the Blood Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons yet they are all included as Peers in the words Lords Spiritual and Temporal and so in many cases the word Peers is also generally applied so that as the words Lords and Peers have been of latter times intermixedly used we cannot well make a difference between them otherwise than is before exprest 11. That the words Lords and Peers have been used promiscuously in relation to the five Degrees of the Lords Temporal is evident from the Commissions issued for the Trials of the Earl of Strafford 1640. the Lord Morley Anno 1665. the Lord Cornwallis Anno 1676. the Earl of Pembroke Anno 1678. wherein the words are Damus autem Vniversis singulis Ducibus Marchionibus Comitibus Vicecomitibus Baronibus c. without mentioning Praelatis for reasons before mentioned and though the Earl of Strafford and Earl of Pembroke were Earls yet by the Commission they were triable per Barones Viceomites Comites Marchiones Duces and not by Earls only and so though the Lord Morley and Lord Cornwallis were only Barons yet they were triable by Dukes Marquesses Earls and Viscounts and not by Barons only whereby the word Peers seems to be a word of eminency giving no real distinction to those five Degrees of Nobility so as all the Degrees of the Temporal Lords are Peers and the Peers Lords to confirm this I shall cite one passage more from Mr. Selden who saith That though we borrowed the word Peers from the twelve Peers in France yet here we apply it to all the Lords in Parliament and not to any set number of them because saith he the number of our Nobles may be more or less as the King pleaseth and as Marquesses and Viscounts were as I said interpos'd to Dukes Earls and Barons so he may abstract less or add more as he thinks most fit for the support of Nobility for he is Dominus Nobilitatis Honoris or the Fountain of Honour and that this Prerogative may be more fully seen herein in the 21. of Jacobi it being needless to quote former precedents five several Writs were issued after the Pawn was setled yet entred in the Margent of the Pawn for that year to five several persons viz. to the Lord Grandison Sir Robert Chichester Sir John Sucklin Knight Comptroler of the Kings House to Sir Thomas Edmunds Knight Treasurer of the Kings Houshold and to Sir Richard Weston Knight Chancellor of the Exchequer to summon and impower them to sit in the Lords House who otherwise had no right of Tenure Prescription or Creation So in the first of Caroli primi six several Writs were issued and also entred in the Margent of the Pawn for that year viz. to Oliver Lord St. John and again to Sir Thomas Edmunds Sir John Sucklin Sir Richard Weston and to Sir Robert Nanton Knight one of the Kings Privy-Council and to Sir Humphry May Chancellor of the Dutchy of Lancaster and so in 15 Car. primi two Writs were issued and also entred in the Margent of the Pawn for that year viz. to Charles Viscount Wilmot of the Kings Privy-Council and to Edward Newburgh Knight then Chancellor of the Dutchy of Lancaster and also of the Kings Privy-Council 12. To sum up all I apprehend That those Lords Spiritual which are summon'd by Writ to sit in Parliament are Vital Peers and the Lords Temporal so summon'd are hereditary Peers for there are other English Lords which may be but are not summon'd and thereby are no Parliament Peers yet are Lords and upon an hereditary account also for the King as I said can summon or not summon any of them when he thinks fit unless any Lord claims a right by Patent of Creation or otherwise and then upon that right he demands his Writ and it is seldom denied if the grounds of their demands be right if dubious the Case is debated in the Lords House as in the Case of the Lord Abergaveny c. Some are of opinion That the Lords Temporal are only to be accounted Peers and not the Lords Spiritual first Because they sit there rather by their Writs of Summons than Tenures as anciently they did secondly Their Titles of Lord is but vital at most thirdly In case of Treason or Felony committed by a Spiritual Lord or Lord Temporal the manner of trying them upon Indictment and Judgment upon Conviction are clearly different as will be shewn in the Chapter of Trial by Peers 13. Notwithstanding these
the effects upon our Souls but in its civil latitude and dimensions as having an influence and interest in every individual Man Woman and Child and in most of the Products of the Earth from their first Being to their Dissolution and this in all the fifty two Counties of England and Wales but for the distinction of the Civil and Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction these are comprised into a lesser number viz. of twenty six and are call'd Diocesses as being given to them from God by the hands of the King to whom they acknowledge a subordination The second Estate and so mention'd in our Laws is the Lords Temporal or rather Militial having the Lieutenancies of all the Counties of England and Wales comitted to their Trust Care and Charge and to these belong the managing of Embassies Treaties of War or Peace and all honorary Actions both Foreign and Domestick as the King who is the Fountain of Honour does usually confer upon them The third Estate is the Commons also mentioned in our Laws and this also subordinate to the King and these consist of Gentry Men of fixt and setled Fortunes designed for things of Gallantry and Hospitality and of the Yeomanry comprised under several appellations viz. Husbandmen Artificers and Labourers all driving on a Commutative Commerce as well to supply themselves as others with what the Land or Sea affords either necessary convenient ornamental or superfluous Besides these three there are three very great Interests which are not call'd Estates but Assistances and in truth they are the very Supporters of these three Estates viz. The first Religion the second Law the third Trade 1. Religion is to be managed by the Clergy of several Degrees as will be shewn some neither Freeholders nor Freemen by their winning of men with a persuasive or exemplary Power into all Pious and Virtuous Actions whereby the Souls and Minds of Men may be united to Love and Obedience and this is the cement of Vnity to the three Estates 2. The Laws are manag'd by Lawyers of several degrees some neither Freeholders nor Freemen by instructing Magistrates in their compulsory Power when occasion requires so as both the Laws of God and Man may be duely observed and that such whom the Clergy cannot invite to Piety and Virtue by Precept and Example may be compelled to it by the Rigour of the Laws and this is the cement of Severity to the three Estates 3. Trade is manag'd chiefly by Merchants some also neither Freeholders nor Freemen these give life to Industry whereby the Rich do help the Poor and the Poor the Rich and thus Trade Commerce and Industry are as necessary Cements to the Three Estates as either Religion or Law respecting only what morally concerns Justice and Obedience and this is the Cement of Prosperity to the whole Fabrick So we see that as there are Three Essential Estates so there are also Three Essential Assistances or Supportations of those Estates and without which those Estates cannot well subsist Now out of these Three Estates in general the King doth abstract a Parliament For when He gives notice of his intentions to have one he orders Writs to Archbishops and Bishops who are chiefly to manage the concerns of the Clergy At the same time He also orders Writs to such of the Nobility as He or His Predecessors have either by Patent created to that employment or otherwise invested with some right thereunto who are chiefly to manage the concerns of the Nobility and Kingdom At the same time He also orders Writs for Electing such a number of Commons out of Counties Shires Cities and Burroughs as may manage the concerns of the Commonalty and yet these three Estates thus distinctly Summoned are so admirably intermixt in this Supream Council or Parliament that these three Estates in that Council seem to have an interchangable power and check on each other in the more Safe and Wise carrying on the Affairs of the whole Kingdom considered either at Home or Abroad And as the Government of the Kingdom hath three sorts of Assistances as is before shewn so those three sorts of Assistances are disposed into three sorts of Assistants For the Bishops have a certain number of Deans Archdeacons and Proctors cull'd out of Prebends Parsons Vicars and the Clergy in general as may be Assistants to the Episcopal Interest The Nobility have a certain number of Lawyers viz. Justices of the Respective Benches and Courts of Judicature in Westminster-Hall as will be shewn cull'd out of the Profession of Lawyers to be Assistants to them The Commons have the bulk of every County contracted into Two Knights or one for each County and of Two Merchants for each City and of Two lesser Traders for each Burrough and yet the Electors of them are not so confined to the Persons Eligible but that such as they hold fit to manage such Imployment are capable to be Elected though they be not Knights Merchants or Traders yet they are confined to a set number as I said and of qualifi'd Persons as well to preserve the Honor of it as to prevent a surcharge of too great a concourse to this Assembling of a Parliament By this easie demonstration it is evident that the Lords Spiritual consisting of Archbishops and Bishops Successive but not Hereditary do Sit in the Lords House and there Represent the whole Clergy of this Kingdom The Lords Temporal consisting of Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons which Five Degrees by a Nobilitated Interest Hereditary and Successive do Sit there also Representing all the Nobility of those Degrees in the Kingdom The Commons consisting of Knights Citizens and Burgesses by an Elective Interest neither Hereditary nor Successive do Sit in the House of Commons Representing all the Commonalty of this Kingdom Over which Three Estates the King for the time being ever was and still is esteemed by an Hereditary and Successive Right the Supream and in the Eye of the Law the Immortal Balance of these Three Essential yet Subordinate Parts Interests or Estates of this Kingdom I say Immortal because our Laws do say that Rex nunquam moritur and thereby gives him a clear distinction from the Three Estates Now to undeceive some that would have the Three Estates to consist of King Lords and Commons because our Government seems to be framed of Monarchy Aristocracy and Democracy To clear their Judgments the Monarchy stands single but the Aristocracy is double viz. An Aristocracy of the Lords Spiritual and an Aristocracy of the Lords Temporal to which add the Democracy of the Commons and all is reconciled into Two Aristocratical Estates and one Democratical and the Monarchical as Superintendent to those Three and so this Vnity with the Triplicity is the due constitution of our English Parliament and indeed of the Kingdom it self THE CONSTITUTION OF PARLIAMENTS CHAP. I. The King's Warrant to the Lord Chancellor for Summoning the Parliament begun the 8th of May 1661. CHARLES the Second by the Grace
of God King of England Scotland France and Ireland Defender of the Faith c. To Our right Trusty and well beloved Counsellor Sir Edward Hide Knight Chancellour of England Greeting Whereas We by our Council for certain great and urgent Causes concerning Vs the good Estate and Common-wealth of this our Realm and of the Church of England and for the good Order and Continuance of the same have appointed and ordain'd a Parliament to be holden at our City of Westminster the eighth day of May next ensuing In which Case divers and sundry Writs are to be directed forth under our Great Seal of England as well for the Nobility of this our Realm as also for the Election of Knights Citizens and Burgesses of the several Counties Cities and Burrough Towns of the same to be present at the said Parliament at the Day and Place aforesaid Wherefore We Will and Command you forthwith upon receipt hereof and by Warrant of the same to cause such and so many Writs to be made and sealed under our great Seal for accomplishment of the same as in like Cases have been heretofore used and accustomed And this Bill signed with our Hand shall be as well to you as to every Clerk or Clerks as shall make or pass the same a sufficient Warrant in that behalf Given at Our Palace at White-hall this Eighteenth Day of February in the Twelfth Year of Our Reign and in the Year of our Lord One Thousand Six Hundred Sixty and One. Observations and Proceedings on this Warrant THe King of England by his undoubted Prerogative hath and his Predecessors ever had in himself the Power of Summoning as also to appoint the times of beginning continuing discontinuing or dissolving of Parliaments This Summoning for I shall speak of the rest in order or Uniting the chiefest Parts of his Kingdom into a Parliament or Representation of the Kingdom in a less Body than it self is performed by the King's Warrant in his Name and by his Authority only as Supreme not only of his Kingdom but of its Representation and from this Warrant all Writs of Summons for a Parliament are deriv'd The Warrant is in English Sign'd by the King 's own Hand and Seal'd with his Privy Seal or Signet but the Writs are always in Latin or anciently some few in French and are Seal'd with the King 's Great Seal in his Name with a Teste of his Approbation though not manually Sign'd or Seal'd by him The Warrant is General viz. for summoning the Nobility as also for Elections of Knights Citizens and Burgesses but the Writs deriv'd from those Warrants are to particular persons of particular degrees as will be shewn The Form of this Warrant is ancient and hath had little or no variation except in the leaving out of Abbots and Priors ever since the 36 of Henry the 8th and except in leaving out Prelates and Bishops in this very Warrant whereby the Bishops had no particular Writs before the sitting of this Parliament but within three Months after for which Omission Reasons will be given in the 7th Chapter Before this Warrant was issued the King and so former Kings did advise with their Privy Council which is manifested by the Words of the Warrant viz. Whereas We by our Council yet if these words had been omitted at any time and not inserted in the Warrant the Warrant was held good and sufficient for due Summons However for publick satisfaction the words of every Writ are always Quia de advizamento assensu Concilij nostri and this Council is call'd the King's Privy or Private Council of which I shall speak more and is the King 's constant or standing Council as well in time of Parliament as when there is none sitting so as before this Magnum Concilium or Parliament is summon'd this Privy Council consults and deliberates concerning the Motives and Reasons for calling it and after such deliberations and results doth advise the King to send out a Warrant And therefore I conceive it useful to set down the Names of such as were of the King 's Privy Council when the calling of this Parliament was advis'd and resolv'd upon At the Court of White-hall Feb. 1660 1. The KING Present His Royal Highness the Duke of York His Highness Prince Rupert William Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury Juxon Edward Earl of Clarendon Lord Chancellor of England Hide Thomas Earl of Southampton Lord Treasurer of England Wriothesley John Lord Roberts Lord Privy-Seal Baron of Truro John Duke of Latherdale Maitland Earl of Guilford James Duke of Ormond Lord Steward of the King's House Butler George Duke of Albemarle Monk Henry Marquess of Dorchester Pierpoint Montague Earl of Lindsey Lord great Camberlain Bertie Edward Earl of Manchester the King's Chamberlain Montague Aldjernoone Earl of Northumberland Piercy Robert Earl of Leicester Sydny Charles Earl of Berkshire Howard Thomas Earl of Cleveland Wentworth George Earl of Norwich Goring Henry Earl of St. Albans Jermin Edward Earl of Sandwich Montague Arthur Earl of Anglesey Annesly Charles Earl of Carlile Howard William Viscount Say and Seal Fiennes Francis Lord Seymour Baron of Troubridge Frederick Lord Cornwallis Baron of Ai. Anthony Lord Ashley Cooper Charles Berkley Knight and Baronet Sir George Carteret Knight Vice-Chamberlain Sir Edw. Nicholas Knights Secretaries of State Sir Will. Morrice Knights Secretaries of State After the Warrant is sign'd and seal'd by the King it is sent from the Signet-Office to the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper and Directions are given to the Heralds to make Proclamation at the Court-gate and Capital City of London of the King's Resolutions of which I shall speak more in the Chapter of Proclamations The Lord Chancellor c. upon the receipt of this Warrant doth issue out his Warrant also to the Master of the Rolls as the chief Clerk of the Pettibag-Office in this Form YOu are hereby requir'd forthwith to prepare for the great Seal of England the several Writs of Summons for the Lords Temporal As also for the Judges and others to appear at the Parliament to be holden the 8th of May next together with the several Writs of Election of the several Knights Citizens and Burgesses of the several Counties Cities Towns and Burroughs within the Kingdom of England Dominion of Wales and Town of Berwick upon Tweed as also of the several Barons of the Cinque-Ports to serve in the said Parliament in such Method and Form and directed to such persons as are and have been usual in such Cases all which said Writs are to bear date this present eighteenth of February 1661. and for the so doing this shall be your Warrant Dated c. Upon receipt of the Lord Chancellor's Warrant the Clerks of the Pettibag by the assistance of the former Precedents of Writs and anciently by help of the Masters of Chancery and by advice with the Heralds as to Titles and true Names of Persons do fix a Schedule or digest or Forms of Writs to be issued
Person to adjust their Parliamentary expences Westminster being anciently the Kings Court and still within its Verge and his Lordships Jurisdiction 4. His place is appointed by the Act of Precedency in this order not but that he was Summon'd to Parliaments before that Act as may be seen in several Clause-Rolls of Rich. the 2d c. but after the said Act viz. 36. H. 8. Charles Duke of Suffolk was Summon'd and his Writs directed Magno Magistro Hospitij sui but after that as in this very Parliament 1661. the Writ to the Duke of Ormond was Jacobo D'no Brecon being his English Title by which he sits in Parliament Vid. Cap. 2. Senescallo Hospitij Magnus Magister Senescallus being still the same Officer though varying in Title SECT XV. Of the Lord Chamberlain of the Kings Houshold THat High-Chamberlain before mentioned is called Magnus Camerarius Obs I. but this hath not that Epethite of Magnus and yet his authority is very great within the Verge of the Kings Court so that though there is some Subordination yet in many great Regalios he hath an intire command and even in some things which concern the conveniency of a Parliament and its places of Addresses to the King that the furniture of the Rooms may be sutable to the Majesty and Grandure of such as are imployed there 2. He hath been anciently summon'd to sit there as may be seen in the Clause-Rolls of the 25. and 27. and 28. of Edw. the 3d. in the Summons of Sir Bartholomew Bergehurst Camerario Hospitij he being also Guarden of the Cinqueports and in 1. H. 4. to Sir Tho. Erpingham Baneret Camerario Hospitij he being also Guarden of the Cinqueports and so the 10. H. 6. to Radulpho Cromwel Chevalier or Baron Camerario Hospitij I might instance many others but I shall skip as the Records do to the Act of Precedency 31. H. 8. where he is call'd the Kings Chamberlain and in the Pawns of the 36. H. 8. the Writ was Carolo Duci Suff. Magno Magistro Hospitij sui Praesidenti Consilii sui and in the same Pawn which may be observable the Office of great Chamberlain of England was supplied by Edward Earl of Hereford of a lesser Degree than a Duke in the 6. and 7. Edw. 6. the Writ was Tho. D'no Darcy Chevaleer Camerario Hospitij sui and in the 43. Eliz. to Tho. Cary Lord Hunsden Camerario Hospitij and continues in the same Office he was Summon'd again primo Jacobi and in the 15. Car. 1. Philip Earl of Penbrook was Summon'd Camerario Hospiti sui and to this Parliament first Edward Earl of Manchester Camerario Hospitij then Henry Earl of St. Albans Camerario Hospitij and after him Hen. Earl of Arlington Camerario Hospitij who continued his place and precedency in this Parliament to the Dissolution of it 3. Edward Earl of Manchester Lord Chamberlain of the Kings Houshold was Summon'd so by Writ 18. Feb. 1661. Vid. Cap. 2. SECT XVI Of the Principal Secretary of State HE brings up the Honourable Rere to all the 12. Officers of State both in this Act of Precedency and in the Pawns and therefore I may the more justifiably defer my Discourse of him till I come to his Writ of Summons and past the method of the Pawn as I have done the method us'd in the Act of Precedency and so conclude these Sections with some few Observations Observations WHen the Act of 31. H. 8. was made Obs I. the State Officers though now but 9 in use were then 12. a Number as I shall shew agreeable to the 12 Judges 12 Masters of Chancery 12 Constituting a Jury and much more of the efficacy of that number cited by the Learned Institutor and Petrus Bongus de Sacris Numeris and this number is thus used by us as t is thought in veneration either to the 12 Tribes of the Jews or 12 Tables Sacred among the Old Romans or to to the 12 Apostles of the Christian Religion or 12 Signs in the Zodiack reverenct in Astrology 2. That if the Writs to any of these Officers be to any of the Lords Spiritual or such Officers as have usually consisted of the Clergy as the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper the Lord Treasurer Lord Privy Seal then the Writs were like the Assistants Writs to the Judges of which I shall speak in order but if any of these Offices be executed by any of the Temporal Lords then the Writ is the same as to that noble Person to whom the Office is anext or if any be Summon'd meerly virtute Officij without annexation to the Degree of some Lord Spiritual or Temporal Lord then the Writ is only as an Assistant Writ and they sit in the Lords House but as Assistants without Vote c. as will be shewn 3. Sir Edward Nicholas Knight was summon'd by Writ dat 18. Feb. 1661. Vid. Cap. 2. and now I proceed to the fixt Nobility call'd Lords Temporal CHAP. V. SECT I. Of the Degrees of Nobles Obs I Have given a short Character of the Grand Officers and Ministers of State and now according to the Act of Precedency I shall speak of the fixt Nobility as they are consider'd in Distinct Degrees and these are not mention'd distinctly in the Kings Warrant for Summoning a Parliament but referr'd therein to the Lord Chancellor to distinguish them by their Writs 1. As for the Nobility in general most Authors derive the word Nobiles or Nobles in the Plural from Noscibiles viz. Viri Nobiles or Persons indu'd with great knowledge than other men and so conceive it may admit of another Etymology viz. Nobilis quasi Non-bilis i. e. men of such debonair and complacent tempers and so much Masters of their passions that they are not in respect of their better Education subject to choler wrath or fierceness for so the word Bilis is Englisht but of even and serene tempers which dispositions are fittest for Affairs relating to Government but to pass these niceties the Question is amongst some 2. How far the Degrees of Nobility do extend which is partly resolv'd by Sir Tho. Smith in his Republica who saith there be two sorts of Nobles viz. Majores and Minores and this was according to the Old Romans the Majores he calls the fixt Hereditary Nobles diversifide into 6 Degrees viz. Princes of the Bloud of whom I have spoken in Cap. the 4th Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons not of the Bloud and descend no lower and these are capacitated by such Creations and Writs to sit in the Lords House The Minores he begins at Knights for he wrote before Baronets were known Esquires and Gentlemen and descended no lower and out of these the Knights Citizens and Burgesses for Parliaments are Elected and Compos'd and thereby capacitated to sit therein as the Representatives of the Commons of England but of these Nobiles Minores I shall speak more in the second part of this Treatise
hath no place in the Lords House and particularly excepted to be chosen into the House of Commons by the Writs of Elections as will be shewn and the reason is because the Official Viscountship is in the King who gives only an annual Deputation to the Person who executes that Office in such County of which he is made Vicecomes or Deputy to the King and so is not the Noble Viscount who cannot be made Sheriff or return'd of a Jury but hath his constant Writ of Summons to every Parliament as will be shewn 4. Seven Viscounts Summon'd by Writ 18. Feb. 1661. and One Viscount Summon'd by Writ 20th Ap. 1661. And now I come to the Barons the last Degree of the Nobility but anciently the First or Second SECT VI. Of Barons I Shall refer the Etymology of this word Baron to my Annotations because the learned Cambden Selden and others have taken pains about it but for many ages as at present it comprehends all such Prelates and Bishops as are Summon'd by vertue of their Baronies or Tenures to sit in the House of Lords As also all such Dukes Marquesses Earls and Viscounts as did anciently mount to any of those 4 Degrees by the proportion of their Baronies which they obtain'd by gift from the King or other acquisitions so differing from the other 4 in Nominal gradations rather than Essential And though there were Nominal differences antiently in the Tenures of Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons yet they were all subject to a general Contribution to the Kings affairs according to their certain number of Knights Fees for as Baronies made the other 4 Superior Degrees so the increment of Knights Fees whereupon I conceive Sir Thomas Smith made that Degree of Nobiles Minores did capacitate a Baron to be made a Baron and so a certain number of Baronies to be a Viscount and Earl and of Earledoms to be a Duke as may be read in Sir Edward Coke and others more ancient by him cited and Mr. Selden forgiving the Knight saith that Istud verbum Baro est caput scala dignitatum Regalium i. e. Majoris Nobilitatis 2. In former times these proportions were observ'd amongst the Temporal Lords but not with the Spiritual for Mr. Selden tells us of a Bishop pag. 580. Tit. Hon. that had 220 Baronies and did sit in Parliament by vertue of his Baronies yet was neither Duke nor Earl so those were the computations of Honour and Contributions till the method of Creations were us'd and at last by the late Act of Parliament all Tenures in Capite were Dissolved and thereby the Tenurial Contributions but not the Titles of Honour yet for a little variety I may inform some that in former times the Spiritual Barons had some exemptions from Contributions unless there was as the learned Selden calls it Trinoda necessitas viz. of War of Repairs of Castles or Bridges but they were generally exempted from Personal Assistance in War for though as he saith that in the 4th year of William the First that King made the Bishops c. subject to Knights Service in chief by creation of their Tenures and so was the first King that turn'd their possessions by Frankalmoine a French word signifying charitable Gifts for so began their temporalities into Baronies and thereby made them Barons of the Kingdom by Tenure yet when it was pray'd by them in the 5th Hen. the 3d. Vt omnes Clerici tenentes Baronias c. personaliter procederent contra Regis adversarios c. it was answer'd by the Bishops and their Answer allow'd Quod non debent pugnare cum gladio materiali sed Spirituali scilicet cum Lachrymis orationibus humilibus devotis quod propter beneficia sua manutenere debent pacem non bellum Quod Baroniae eorum ab Eleemosynis puris stabiliuntur c. So as he conceives that the Baronies of the Clergy were made of such Lands as formerly were as I said held in Franckalmoine 3. But what ever exemptions the Spiritual Barons had the Temporal Barons were oblig'd by their Baronial Tenures of several natures to all defensive and offenfive duties for the King and Kingdoms preservation according to the proportion of their dependent tenures or territories and so are yet in honour oblig'd to perform and they all had and have equal Votes in Parliament by vertue of their Baronial Interest for as to matters Parliamentary the Title of Baron is more ancient copious and comprehensive than any of the other Titles of Lords in Parliament 4. This word Baron we see is appilicable not only to the two degrees of Lords Spiritual viz. Archbishops and Bishops but to the 5 degrees of Lords Temporal so as the noble Barons and all the Degrees above them do set in the Lords House virtute Baroniae and by Writs of Summons the Superior Titles to the Barons differing rather upon some extrinsick order than any real intrinsick distinction 5. As for those Titles of Barons which are given to Degrees equal or under the noble Barons they are of several sorts 1st Some noble Barrons by Ancienty never Summon'd to a Parliament yet capable of Summons 2ly The Barons of the Exchequer which are 4 in number who are Summon'd by Writ ad consulendum or to be Assistants in the Lords House as will be shewn 3ly Barons of the Cinqueports out of whose number 16 are usually Elected to sit in the House of Commons as will be shewn 4ly Barons of Court-Barons who are also capable of being Elected to sit in the House of Commons 5th Barons in the Law French call'd Baron i. e. and Husband and Feme the Wife but I here only speak of the Nobiles Barones distinct from these Titular Barons though such of them as sit in the Lords House are in some sort thereby Nobilitated of whom I shall speak more when I come to the Assistants and such as sit in the Commons House are thereby Dignified though not Nobilitated of whom I shall speak when I come to the House of Commons 6. Now it may here be observed that some Persons of merit have been Summon'd to sit in the Lords House as Barons which were not Barons or any otherwise capacitated to sit there but by Writs of Summons upon this occasion Sir Edward Coke cites a Case where one Summond by Writ to sit in the Lords House died before he sat there and it was adjudged that if he had sat there he had been Nobilitated thereby but having not sat there whereby that writ was not executed for want of his Personal attendance it was adjudg'd that the direction or delivery of the Writ barely to the Person to whom the Writ was directed without Personal appearance and investiture of Robes and a possession of place was not sufficient to enoble him without a conjunction of those Circumstances and Ceremonies 7. But Barons created by Letters Patents and made to them and their Heirs are thereby Nobilitated and to be
is remarkable that this William Lord Pawlet Marquess of Winchester was Exemplar in all the Parliament Pawns which are extant in the Pettibag from the first of Edw. the Sixth to the first of King James inclusive which is 55. years and was in that time Lord Treasurer 22. years which was longer than any of his Predecessors continued in that Office except Cicil who continued 27. years 1 Car. 1. Georgio Duci Buckingham for one Parliament Sir Thomas Coventry being then Lord Keeper and had a distinct Writ and Sir Richard Weston Treasurer who was then in Scotland 15 Car. 1. Johanni Marchioni Winchester for one Parliament Sir John Finch being then Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and had a distinct Writ also Will. Bishop of London was Lord Treasurer and had his Writ 13 Car. 2. Thomae Comiti Southampton for this Parliament Sir Edward Hyde being then Lord Chancellor and had his distinct Writ this Earl was Grandchild to that Wriotheslly mentioned in the 36. of Hen. 8. and died without Issue Anno. 166 So from the 36. of H. 8. to this Parliament of the 13. of Car. 2. there were three Exemplars to Three Barons Two of them being Chancellors and one Lord Keeper and to Two Marquesses to one Duke and to one Earl and all these not of the Blood Now as to the three Barons having Exemplars which Degree had not any before the 36. H. 8. it may be presumed that the Exemplars were given them in relation to their Offices as Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper or President of the Kings Council And as to the two Marquesses having Exemplars who had not any till the 6. of Edw. 6. one was as he was Treasurer and the other in the 15. of Car. 1. only as Marquess because there was no Duke Summon'd to that Parliament and Sir John Finch was then Lord Keeper and William Bishop of London Lord Treasurer and both had distinct Writs so there was none of the three great Officers of State remaining to be Exemplars except Henry Earl of Manchester then Lord Privy-Seal who according to the fore-mentioned Act of Precedency is placed in the Lords House before all Dukes Marquesses c. not of the Blood but I suppose because there was no President wherein the Lord Privy-Seal had been Exemplar since its first Institution in the 11. of Hen. 4. and being not called Lord Privy-Seal nor that place in the Lords House allotted to him till the 31. H. 8. possibly for those reasons it was not given to the Lord Privy-Seal but to the Marquess singly or else it was an omission in not minding the Act of Precedency These latter Writs from the 36. of Hen. 8. did seem to break the method of the former for before that Pawn of that year no Dukes or Marquesses were made Consimilars where an Earl was made Exemplar but in the Exemplar of the 36. H. 8. Wriothesly Earl of Southampton was made Exemplar and the Duke of Norfolk then Lord Treasurer of England and Charles Duke of Suffolk the Great Master of the Kings Houshold and President of the Council were besides the Marquess of Dorchester and Thirteen Earls and Twenty eight Barons made his Consimilars so as the precedency of his Exemplarity must be ascribed to his Chancellorship which according to the Act of Precedency was to be before all Dukes c. not of the Blood and upon the same reason Pawlet Lord St. John in the first Edw. 6. being then Lord Keeper had the Exemplar Writ and the Duke of Somerset though the Kings Uncle Governor of the Kings Person and Protector of England as also the Marquess of Dorchester and Marquess of Northampton and Thirteen Earls and Thirty Barons were his Consimilars which is the only President which I know of where the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper had the Exemplar to a Duke of the Bloud and upon the like reason as I conceive in the 6 of Ed. the 6. William Marquess of Winchester being Lord Treasurer the next in Precedency to the Lord Chancellor by the Act of 31. H. 8. had the Exemplar to two Dukes one Marquess Fourteen Earls One Viscount and Thirty one Barons all which were his Consimilars and it is probable the reason why this Exemplar was given to the Treasurer and not to the Chancellor was because Thomas Goodrick Bishop of Ely was then Lord Chancellor and so it was not proper for that Bishop to be Exemplar for the reasons before alledged Now in the first Car. primi Thomas Coventry being Lord Keeper and having a distinct Writ the Duke of Buckingham had the Exemplar who had one Marquess Thirty seven Earls Eleven Viscounts and Fourty seven Barons to his Consimilars Also in the 15. Car. 1. John Marquess of Winchester Son to the former Marquess of Winchester was made Exemplar Sir John Finch being Lord Keeper who had a distinct Writ and William Bishop of London being in Scotland but he had no Duke or other Marquess but Fifty eight Earls Five Viscounts and Forty four Barons his Consimilars and so reduced the proper Consimilars to its former method But the 14. Car. 2. Thomas Wriothesly Earl of Southampton Lord Treasurer Grandchild to the former Earl of Southampton altered it again there being now also a distinct Writ to Sir Edward Hyde Lord Chancellor for this Earl had three Dukes one being General Four Marquesses Fifty five Earls Eight Viscounts and Sixty eight Barons his Consimilars I conceive as Lord Treasurer for according to ancient Practice as I have shewn an Earl had not any Dukes entred as his Consimilars The number of all the Exemplar Writs extant from the 15. of Edw. the 2d in An. 1322. to the 13. of Car. 2di An. 1661. are but Twenty and but Fourteen Kings from whom they were granted The number of the Parliaments in which the Nobles did Sit to whom such Exemplars were issued were 107. and these 107. Parliaments were in the space of 341. Years As concerning the years when these Exemplars were first issued to the respective degrees of Nobles before mentioned they are in this order of time 15 Edw. 2. This first Exemplar Writ as I have shewn was to an Earl and 〈◊〉 was of the Bloud viz. to Edward 〈◊〉 of Chester Eldest Son to Edw. 2. and â—â—â—ter King Edw. the 3d. for there was then no Duke in England 3 Edw. 3. The first Exemplar Writ to a Prince of the Bloud was to the same Earl being then made Prince of Wales 37 Edw. 3. The first Exemplar Writ to a Duke of the Blood was not till this year though the first Duke in England distinct from that of Earl as Mr. Selden saith was the Eleventh of Edw. 3d. and then Edward the Kings Eldest Son was in Parliament created Duke of Cornwall yet Speed in his Chronicle of Edw. 3d. makes this Creation in the 3d of Edw. 3d. when saith he he was created Prince of Wales Duke of Aquitain and Cornwall which agrees with the Records of the Tower and
THE CONSTITUTION OF Parliaments IN ENGLAND Deduced from the time of King Edward the Second Illustrated by King Charles the Second In His Parliament Summon'd the 18 of February 1660 1. And Dissolved the 24 of January 1678 9. with an Appendix of its Sessions Observed by Sr. John Pettus of Suffolk Knight LONDON Printed for the Author and are to be sold by Tho. Basset at the George in Fleetstreet 1680. The Epistle To the Generous READER HAving the Honor of Consanguinity to some of the House of Lords and free access to most of the Rest who make up the Harmony of that Noble Judicature I thought it not convenient as well to prevent exceptions as dissatisfactions to dedicate this to any one of their particular Lordships well knowing that to offer any addition to their Universal Intuitions had been needless But I devote it in General to such whose Youth or diversions by other Imployments have made them unknowing or less knowing in this Subject which I have brancht out into 16 parts whereof 12 consist of Precognita or things fit to be known or done after Summons and before the sitting of any Parliament the 13.14 and 15. are of matters to be known or done only during the sitting of a Parliament the 16th hath a relation and is a Supplement of such matters as could not well be Inserted to the foregoing 15 Parts T is true this subject of Parliaments hath been treated on by many Learned writers but because none of them have proceeded in such a due Series as they might have done for they were more for the Modus tenendi than Inchoandi I have partly from them and partly from my own observations having been a member of the House of Commons about 12 years and thereby had intercourse with the House of Lords and partly by the help of some worthy Friends digested this Constitution into as clear a Method as my lesser abilities could perform First I shew the Gradations and Progresses to a Parliament from the Fountain viz. the Kings Warrant to the Lord Chancellor Impowering him to Summon it in Generals by Writs Next I shew his Lordships Warrant to the Clerks of the Pettibag for framing according to former Precedents Writs of Summons in Particulars Thirdly I shew that these Clerks did Anciently and do still use a Method therein which Method being fairly ingrost on one large Parchment is called a Parliament Pawn I doe not find that any writers before me have made any mention of these Pawns nor doe I put any weight on them but in their Method whereby they are compos'd because I find that the Clerks not conferring with the Heraulds have committed many mistakes in Christian and Surnames in Titles and Orthography However the Method therein hath continued for many Ages as will be shewn and though I have tried many ways to frame this Treatise yet none pleased me so well as the Method used in the framing of a Pawn which I have herein pursued The Writs which are contain'd and Methodiz'd in all Pawns have two Appellations viz. Exemplars and Consimilars and from those do arise the Method of this Treatise But as the Pawn doth only recite one Writ of one sort as an Example for Consimilar Writs of the same sort to be issued yet are not therein mentioned So I by that Method do take occasion only to Treat of the Exemplars except in some few places for to Treat of all the Consimilars had been too great a task by which means I have here only five Writs which gives me opportunity to treat of the Blood Royal of the Lords Spiritual of the State Officers of the Lords Temporal and of the most Eminent Togati as the Assistants in that noble House the other seven concerning the House of Commons I shall treat of in a distinct Part. And though my design is wholly to treat of what concerns that noble House in this part yet I could not avoid the Intermixtures of some necessary hints of what properly concerns the House of Commons which I intend afvente Deo to publish by it self It was scarce possible that a Subject which spreads it self into such varieties should be so collected as not to have Omissions some of which were purposely done First that I might not injure the Reader nor my Method by two long diversions and yet satisfy him in conclusion 2ly I have been as careful as I could to prevent mistakes but some will be yet those which are necessary to be corrected viz. my own oversights or the Printers I have added them to the end of this Epistle but as for the Printers Omissions of Marginal Authorities and distinctions of Sections and observations which were in my Copy and for his not putting some words into Italick Letters and for want of Comma's Points c. the Ingenious Reader may Easily pardon them I have so order'd this Impression that you have a System or the Contents of an Introduction and of 20 subsequent Chapters Sections and Observations which I thought fit to exhibit that those who have not the Leisure to read all the Chapters may turn to such parts as most suit with their Genius I begin the proper matter of this Treatise with the Kings Warrant in Feb. 1660 1 for Summoning that Parliament and I shall End all with His Proclamation for its Dissolution in 1678 9. In these discourses I take the liberty to look back into former Ages but not forward beyond the Dissolution of that Parliament Only as an Appendix I shall speak of some things that are to be done with Records Leidger Books c. and Allowances to Knights Citizens and Burgesses after any one Parliament is ended Corrigenda Pag. 20 l. 25 d. are read or P. 79 l. 23 after Seal read till of Late years P. 100 l. 17 r. Hertford P. 124 l. 16. r. forgeting the Title of Knight P. 129 fill up the blanck thus L. 15 Ric. 3 11 38 Â 0 38 Â L. 16 Hen. 7 10 42 Â 1 29 Â L. 17 Hen. 8 37 45 Â 1 36 dele 28 44 P. 137 d. son r. Heir to Blanch the Wife of John P. 139 l. 6 d. and 6. P. 383 l. 7 read by this The Reader may also take notice that after the Contents there are observations Printed concerning the Names and Titles of our English Kings especially of the Name Carolus or Charles with some Prophetick Interpretations of it which should have been plac'd next the 14 Page of this Treatise but being omitted by an Accident he is desir'd to read them after that Page if he please THE CONTENTS of this TREATIS The Introduction SHewing the Original of Councils and the several Names of Councils in other Nations and in this Kingdom How and when the Name of Parliament began Of its Etymology and Definition That a Parliament is the Abstract yet includes the whole Constitution and Fabrick of the Government of this Kingdom That it Consists of a King and three Estates and of three
when Created Of two sorts of Dukes how distinguisht A Duke as Generall is not provided for in the Act of Precedency as other degrees of officiall honors are SECT III. Of Marquesses When begun in the Empire and in France When in England the reason of placing him between Duke and Earl From whence the Title is suppos'd to come Noble Actions caus'd Noble Titles and by some Hereditary SECT IV. Of Earls Of the word Comes or Count signifying Earl 6. sorts of Counts according to Selden 22. sorts according to Cassiadore 3. sorts in England Of the incongruity of the words Comes and Earl and from whence the word Earl is derived when first given in England Titutarly and upon what occasion when by Creation Of the Tachygraphy of the word Earl Of the Antient Titular and Created Earls little difference Of Local and Personal Earls here in England SECT V. Of Viscounts Sometimes considered as Equal sometimes of a lesier degree then an Earl Two sorts in England why the Hereditary Viscount interpos'd to Earl and Baron Of the first Created Viscount in England of the Parliamentary dignity of the one and Official Dignity of the other SECT VI. Of a Baron Of the word Baron the Baronial Tenures were the foundation of the Superior Tenures and Degrees Of Contributions to the King from Barons Spiritual Barons how Exempted from Contributions Of several other sorts of Barons The advantages of Created Barons CHAP. VI. Of the Writ to Princes of the Blood Royal. Of the Writ to Edward Earl of Chester Eldest Son to King Edward the 2d Anno 15. Ed. 2. And the Writ to James Duke of York 13. Car. 2. Compar'd Observations on both Writs A Recital or Numeration of the Exemplars of Earls Princes and Dukes of the Blood from Edward the 2d to this Parliament 1661. Observations on the Title of York the Consimilar to the Duke of York Observations on the Consimilars CHAP. VII Of the Writ to the Arch-Bishop and Bishops with Observations Reasons for incerting this Exemplar in this Place shewing that the Idolatrous Jews brought in Paganism into Britain manag'd by Druids and Bards after by Arch-Flamins and Flamins which were Pagan Priests Afterwards Christ Himself or his Apostles or Disciples or some of them brought in Christianity into Britain Bishops had Eleven several Titles according to several Regions given to the first managers of Christian Religion All included in the Word Bishop as Inspector or Father Of the Antiquity of the word Bishop Aristobulus the first Bishop of Britain who were his Successors Of King Lucius his message to Pope Eleutherius and the Popes answer about the first ordering of Christian affairs in Britain Of Linus the first Bishop of Rome and his Successors till the time of Lucius and Eleutherius all subsequent to Aristobulus The Amity between the Bishop of Britain and the Bishop of Rome in that time without any discord about Supremacy Afterwards the Bishop of Rome assum'd the Title of Pope and also a Supremacy to Britain and planted their Dependents there some small Endeavours to oppose it but Fruitless Of several Laws made to lessen the Power and Revenue of the Pope in Britain from the 9th of Hen. the 3. to the 5th of Hen. the 5th Of other wayes us'd by Hen. the 8th from the 9th of his Raign till his death in support of his Supremacy What Countermines were us'd by the Pope Historical passages from Hen. the 8ths Death to the dissolution of this Parliament Anno 1678. against and for the Papal Interest Of the the Titles of Defensor Fidei Supremum Caput how Vs'd disus'd and alter'd from the 12. of Hen. the 8th to the 13. Car. 2d Of Writs to Bishops before and in Edward the 2ds time having both the same and a greater Extention of Power than what is given in the Writs to the Lords Temporal and so to the 31. and 36. of Hen. the 8th and the 13. of Car. the 2d how they continued and alter'd some Observations on the old Writs Of the first Writ in the first Pawn of the 21. Pawns now remaining in the Pettibag Observations on that Pawn Of the 2d Pawn there Of the 3d. Pawn there Of the Pawn of this Parliament begun the 8th of May 1661. wherein Bishops were Omitted though entred in all former Pawns and the reasons of that Omission Of their Writ of Restitution in the same year Aug. 1661. and where Recorded Of their Consimilar Writs Fifteen Observations on their Writs and Temporal Employments CHAP. VIII Of the Writ to the Lord Chancellor Of the Original of the Office of Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper and of the Discription of them Antiently distinct but now Vnited Of their different Seals Of their eminent Imployments Seates and Stations in the Lords Houss Of his single Writ of Summons as Assistant and of his other Writ if otherwise dignified The Office antiently dispos'd of to Ecclessiasticks and of later years wholly to Laicks Of some difference between the Warrant and Writ to Sr. Edw. Hide The form of the Writ Observations on this Writ and the nature of the Office CHAP. IX Of the Writ to the Earl of Southampton Lord Treasurer of England and to the Nobles not of the Blood Of the form of the Writ to the Lords Temporal Observations upon it that the Degrees of Nobles viz. Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons and Titles of the Officers of State are still intermixt in the Writs with some of those fiue Degrees Which of these Degrees are usually made Exemplars Of the Antiquity of the method us'd herein Of their Consimilars Observations concerning the various applications of the Titles Chevaleer Dominus Miles Eques Auratus Bannerettus CHAP. X. Of Patents of Creation enabling the Lords Patentees to sit in Parliament The difference between Writs and Patents and advantages of Patents what the word signifies Patents of 3. sorts viz. of Confirming Reviving and Creating that is given where none was before The form of those 3. sort of Patents Their ellegant preambles The Patents consisting of 4. parts Of the distinct form of the Patents to Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons impowring them to sit in Parliaments Of the Confies of Antient Patents Of Creation money Of the difference in the former and late value of moneys CHAP. XI Of Lords and Peers Of the words Dominus Pares or Lords and Peers what the words signifie When Peers us'd in France and of their number there when in England and of their number there Of the words Praelates Magnates Proceres how to be appy'd Who properly called Peers how placed in the Lords House the words Generally applyed and promiscuously us'd the number increase or decrease according to the pleasure of the King a Corrollary on the Subject CHAP. XII Of Proxies in the Lords House Of the word Procurator Proxie Proctor considered as distinct appellation Proxie only proper in the Lords House Licenced by the King and to whom and sometimes denied A
Indentur ' in t ' ipsum Vic' illos c. Nolumus autem quod idem Vic' c. Et Electionem illam in pleno Com' praedict ' sic factam distincte aperte sub sigillo Com' praedict ' sigillis eorum qui electioni illi interfuerint nobis in Cancellar ' nostram Angliae ad dictos diem locum certificetis indilate remitten ' nobis c. ut supra REX Camerario suo Com' Palatini sui Cestriae vel ejus locum tenenti ib'm salutem Quia c. usque tractatum Vobis mandamus firmiter injungend'quod per seperalia brevia nostra sub sigillo nostro Com' praedict ' debite conficiend'detis in mandatis tam Vic' nostro ejusdem Com' Cestr ' quam Vic' nostris Civitat ' Cestr ' quod facta proclamatione in prox ' Com' suis post receptionem eorundem brevium nostrorum tenend'de die loco praed'dictus Vic' dc'i Com' Cestr ' duos Milites gladio cinctos magis idoneos discretos Com' praed' praed'Vic ' dc'ae Civit ' Cestr ' duos Cives dc'ae Civit ' de discretioribus c. Et nomina eorundem Milit ' sic eligend'in quibusdam Indentur ' in t ' ipsum Vic' Civitat ' illos qui hujusmo'i Electioni interfuerint Ac nomina praed'Civium sic eligend'in quibusdam Indentur ' in t ' ipsos Vic' Civitat ' illos qui c. Nolumus autem quod idem Vic' dc'i Com' Cestr ' nec praed'Vic ' Civitat ' praed'nec aliquis c. Et Electiones illas in plenis Com' Civitat ' praed'sic fact ' distincte aperte sub sigillo Com' Palatini praed' sigillis eorum qui Electionibus illis interfuerint nobis in Cancellariam nostram Angliae ad dictos diem locum certifices indilate remitten ' nobis alteras partes seperal'Indentur ' praed'presentibus consut ' unacum hoc brevi T. ut supra REX Vic' Carnarvon salutem Quia c. usque tractatum Tibi praecipimus firmiter injungend'quod facta proclamatione in prox ' Com' tuo post receptionem hujus brevis nostri tenend'de die loco praedictis unum Militem Gladio cinctum magis idoneum discretum Com' praedict ' de quolibet Burgo vocat ' le shire Town ejusdem Com' unum Burgensem de discretioribus c. ut supra in Com' Cornub ' mutatis mutandis T. ut supra Consimilia Brevia diriguntur Vicecomitibus seperal'Com ' sequen ' sub dat' praed'videlt ' Radnor Brecon Carmarthen Mountgomery Cardigan Glamorgan Pembroke Flint Merioneth Denbigh Anglesey de uno Milite tantum eligend ' SECT II. Observations on this Pawn Obs I THis is the full Transcript of the Pawn or Record of the Writs which were issued for the Summoning this Parliament and that my Method in managing of them may be the clearer understood I shall set down some Observations pursuant to it In the Original of this Pawn or Record there are no Figures placed in the Margents of the respective Paragraphs of it but I have thought fit in respect of the several occasions referring to it to add the Figures of I. II. III. IV. V. being Paragraphs particularly relating to the House of Lords and then the Figures of VI. VII VIII IX X. XI XII being Paragraphs particularly relating to the House of Commons for of all these I shall speak distinctly in this and the Second Part of this Treatise All the Exemplar Writs are dated the 18th of Feb. 13 Car. 2. but there being several Creations of Lords or at least their Patents not perfect after the 18th all the subsequent Writs for such Lords were dated the 29th of April following and that is the reason of the different Dates of Writs in the Pawn but all were before the Parliament sat The first Exemplars in this Pawn for the Lords House do begin with the words CAROLUS Secundus Dei Gratia Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Rex Fidei Defensor And so the first Exemplar in the House of Commons Fig. 6. begins in the like words yet all the other Exemplars in the Pawn do begin only with the word Rex omitting the other words which must be understood that the single word Rex c. is so entred only for brevity not that the Form of the other Examplar or Consimilar Writs are so concise either in the preamble or body of the Writs for the same reason In respect I do make use of the words Exemplar Writs and Consimilar Writs it is fit I should speak of the Nature of Writs in general The Common and Civil Law calls a WrÃt in Latin Breve quia brevibus paucis verbis intentionem Legis exponit And of these in the Common Law some are call'd Original and others Judicial the Original if I do not miscount them from the Register of Writs are 727 in Number and these are us'd in the respective Courts in Westminster before any appearance had or other Process issued in all matters both real and personal and are always in the King's Name attested by the Chief Justice of the Court from whence they issue the other call'd Judicial Writs if I miscount not the number of them from the same Register are 371 which are sent out by order of those Courts where the original Writ is recorded and the Case depending and these latter do also issue in the King's Name and attested by the chief Justice of the respective Courts from whence they proceed and seal'd with green Wax with the Seals of the respective Courts But the Parliament Writs of which I am to treat are of another nature and quality issued only by the King 's immediate Command and Warrant and seal'd with the great Seal of England and these have two appellations viz. Brevia Clausa or operta and Brevia Patentia or Aperta The Brevia Clausa are Writs of Summons clos'd up in yellow Wax and so seal'd with the great Seal of England and then as will be more fully shewn after I have discours'd distinctly of the Writs sent with Labells to every individual Prince of the Blood Lords Spiritual Lords Temporal and Assistants and to every Sheriff of the Kingdom for Elections of Knights Citizens and Burgesses for the Commons House and so do concern both House of Lords and House of Commons as also the Convocation Houses dirivatively from the Arch-Bishops and Bishops Writs of which last I shall speak more distinctly in this Treatise concerning the Convocation House But the Brevia Patentia do chiefly concern the House of Lords viz. by Patents of Creations as also some Officers as will be shewn and all these are call'd Patentia or Letters Patents because they are not inclos'd but open with the Impression of the great Seal of England at large hanging to them yet all the Created Patentees have their distinct Writs of Summons but not the Official Patentees viz. Clerk of the Crown Clerk of the Parliament Clerk to the House
Privy Seal the Great Chamberlain the Constable the Marshal the Lord Admiral the Grand Master or Lord Steward the Kings Chamberlain and the Kings chief Secretary shall sit and be placed in such order and fashion as is before rehearsed and not in any other place by Authority of this Act. SECT I. Observations Obs 1. THis Act is observable being Enacted as it were by the King 's single Authority yet by the Preamble it seems to be only an Order or Ordinance at most and this upon Record in that House for it doth not concern the Commons 2. The Lords House is here call'd the High Court of Parliament i. e. the highest Court of Judicature in Parliament and so it is an Act by authority of the same including the Kings 3. It is also Parag. 2. call'd the Parliament Chamber and Parag. 8. the said House not the House of Lords or House of Peers as it is now call'd 4. Though this Act doth contain the Rules for Places as the several degrees do sit in their distinct degrees yet it doth not contain the intermixt Precedencies of the several Degrees both in calling over the House and at other Solemnities as will be more exactly shewn in the local part 5. In the 8th Paragraph the Lord great Chamberlain Constable Marshal Admiral Steward and King's Chamberlain are omitted because it is presum'd that those Titles were never given to any under the degree of a noble Baron 6. Here the Seat for the State-Officers being not Barons is call'd a Sack but in all Records where those Seats are mention'd they are call'd Wool-Sacks being stuff'd with Wool to mind them of the Staple Commodity of the Kingdom 7. The use which I make of this Act is to shew the several Titles of the Degrees of such as are mention'd therein 2dly the ordering of those Degrees and 3dly how this Act doth agree or disagree with the Pawns before and subsequent to it First The Degrees mention'd therein are four viz. first Princes of the Blood 2dly Lords Spiritual 3dly Ministers and Officers of State 4thly Lords Temporal 1st The Princes of the Blood are said therein Parag. 4. to be first the King's Son 2dly the King's Brother 3dly the King's Uncle 4thly the King's Nephew 5thly the King's Brother's Son 6thly the King's Sister's Son as in Paragraph the 1st and 4th 2dly The Lords Spiritual are said therein to be the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and York the Bishop of London Duresm and Winchester and all the Bishops of both Provinces according to their Ancientries Paragraph 2 3. 3dly The Ministers and Officers of State Ecclesiastical and Civil are in the 2d and 4th Paragraphs said to be the Vice-Gerent and eleven more therein mention'd of which I shall speak distinctly Paragraphs 2 4 5 6 8 9 10. 4thly The Lords Temporal are said to be those five Degrees mention'd in the seventh Paragraph viz. Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons of which I shall also speak more fully and lower than to these Degrees the Act doth not extend 5thly This Act doth agree with the Method of the Pawns in the placing of the Princes of the Blood as also of the Bishops but the Pawns do differ from the Act concerning the Ministers and Officers of State for they meddle with them no otherwise than they are annext to some Spiritual or Temporal Degrees but if they are under the Degree of those Degrees they have then only particular Writs of Assistance as shall be shewn 6. The Act doth not take notice of the several Assistants of the Long Robe viz. the Lords Chief Justices c. But the Pawn makes a Record of them also and of their Writs and of their Precedencies in relation to each other of whom I shall speak more particularly in the Thirteenth Chapter 7. This Act was made upon the dissolution of the Abbots and Priors and that there might be no more room for them in the House of Lords whereas the two preceeding Pawns remaining still in the Pettibag viz. of the 22 and 31 Hen. 8. did place them next the Bishops now their Abbies Monasteries and Priories being dissolved they in this Act were excluded as in all future Pawns only Queen Mary did venture to summon the Abbot of Westminster and the Prior of St. John's of Jerusalem but that being turn'd into a Deanry and this dissolved they were as useless as all the others the Ecclesiastical and Civil Estate of this Kingdom being thereby restor'd to its Primitive Constitution as will be shewn CHAP. IV. A Discription of the Degrees concern'd in this Act of Precedency HAving spoken of the Pawns or Digest of Writs of Summons in general as also of the Act of Precedency this having respect only to the House of Lords and other great Councils those both to the House of Lords and House of Commons this only to the Dignity of the Nobles those not only to the Dignity and Degrees of Nobles but also of the form and order of the Writs constantly enabling the Nobles to make a noble use of their distinct Degrees that to the Places and Precedencies of such persons whenever they meet in Parliament as by the King's favour may be summon'd those to the persons actually summon'd wherein these Pawns much ancienter than the Act were doubtless a good Guide to the framing of this Act I think it convenient before I proceed to particularize their Writs for the Titles must be fix'd before the Writs can be perfected to take a view of the order of such Degrees as are mention'd in the Pawns but better methodiz'd in the Act viz. 1st of the King's Counsellors comprehending all the following degrees and others 2dly of the Princes of the Blood consisting of seven Degrees 3dly of the grand Officers and Ministers of Church and State consisting also of seven Degrees some of them being of a mixt nature viz. Spiritual Ecclesiastical and Civil and 4thly of the Temporal and Hereditary Nobility consisting of five intire Degrees and this I shall do by a distinct account of them for the clearer understanding of the Writs and Persons concern'd in them And this I do to entertain the Readers time whilst the Clerk and others are busied in Drawing Writing and Ingrossing the Writs and carrying them to be Seal'd and then disposing them to the several persons and places to whom and where they are to be deliver'd which will admit of as much or more time than may be spent in reading these following Discourses intended for the reviving of the memory of some and improving the knowledge of others concerning the Persons to be imploy'd in the House of Lords as also concerning the Writs for the House of Commons and herein in this First Part as to the House of Lords I shall be guided by the ancient Method of the King's Warrant the Pawns and the Act of Precedency And first of the King's Counsellors SECT II. Of the Kings Privy-Counsellor AS to the Original of this Officer and of the reason
Rewards in store which they conferr'd proportionably to their Services and such Rewards were purposely reserv'd for such as had either given good Counsel or followed it by venturing their Lives and Fortunes for preservation of the Empire and some such Orders were made in our Edw. the 3ds time and confirmed by many Successive Councils as may be read in Sir Edw. Coke and Judge Dodridge 12. There are also other lesser Councils besides what I mentioned before as the Common Council of London and the like though not for number in other Cities which relate only to the Government of those Cities and Counsellors at Law and the meeting of such degrees as are qualified for that purpose are called in some of the Inns of Court Parliaments which relate only to matters of Law and Government of their Societies and Councils of War and Trade and many of these are great Assistants and often imploy'd both in the Privy and publick Council of the Kingdom 13. I have been the longer on this subject because all the Degrees hereafter mentioned are Members either of the Kings Privy Council or the Parliament or both yet their Writs of Summons are not singly Conciliario but by annexation to those Degrees which are capacitated to be Counsellors but the Degrees mentioned in the Act of whom I treat next are constantly of the Privy Council or Parliament but there are only some of the Parliament which are of the Privy Council by which means matters are more easily manag'd between the King the Privy Council and the Parliament the one constantly Sitting the other Summon'd only upon Emergencies of State which latter being thus Constituted it may well be call'd Magnum Concilium Animarum or a Council of Souls rather than Bodies so as the King may say with Cicero Conscientia conciliorum meorum me Consolatur i. e. The knowledge and Conscientious concurrence of minds or Souls for so Conscientia sometimes siguifies and integrity of my Counsellors are my Consolation 14. In the first Chapter I have shewn the List of the Privy Council who gave their Advice as t is said in the Warrant for Summoning the Parliament to begin the 8th of May 1661. and all but one of them had Summons and did sit in the Lords House or were Elected for the Commons House yet it may be observed that Prince Rupert was Summon'd as Duke of Cumberland The Duke of Laderdale being a Scotch Lord was not Summon'd till he was made Earl of Gilford some years after The Duke of Ormond was Summon'd as Earl of Brecknock in Wales the Lord Anthony Ashly Cooper was chosen a Burgess of Dorsetshire for the House of Commons but his Writ was time enough to sit in the Lords House Sir Charles Berkley Knt. was chosen a Burgess in Somersetshire and soon after made Lord Fitz Harding an Irish Title and so continued in the House of Commons to his death Sir George Cartret Knt. and Bar. was chosen Burgess for Portsmouth and continued in the Commons House to the end of that Parliament Sir Edward Nicholas Knt. was Summon'd to the Lords House but Sir William Morrice was chosen Burgess for Plymouth and continued with the Commons to his death Now I proceed with the chief of such as are for the most part of the Kings Privy Council mention'd in the Act and do with others of lesser Degreees Constitute both the Privatum and Magnum concilium or Parliament SECT III. Of the Princes of the Bloud IN this Act the King by vertue of his Kingly Office for so is the word in the Act and Prerogative Obs I. having power to give such Honors Places and Reputation to his Counsellors and other his Subjects as shall seem best to his most Excellent Wisdom especially to his Council or Parliament gives the Priority of all Places and Precedings to these following seven Degrees of the Bloud-Royal viz. 1. to the Kings Son first entituled Prince of Wales in the 11. Edw. the 3d. 2. to the Kings Children 3. to the Kings Brother 4. to the Kings Uncle 5. to the Kings Nephew 6. to the Kings Brothers Son 7. to the Kings Sisters Son all of these have Title of Earls or Dukes and any one of these where others in priority are wanting are to be accounted the first in their own seven Degrees and are Prior to the 5 following Degrees which comprehend all the Lords Temporal and these as they happen to be more or less have their distinct Writs as also their proceedings to all or any other Degrees either Spiritual or Temporal Official or Hereditary of whom I shall speak more in the following Sections and Chapters but if there be a failour of any of these or that they are absent from Parliaments in respect of Minority or otherwise then some of the Lords Spiritual have precedency to the Lords Temporal as will be shewn All that were Summon'd of this Degree to this Parliament were only the Duke of York the Kings Brother and Prince Rupert his Sisters Son Sect. Cap. 2. Fig. 1. and 2. SECT IIII. Of the Kings Vice-Gerent or Vicar-General Obs THe words of the Act are That forasmuch as the Kings Majesty is justly and lawfully Supream Head on Earth under God of the Church of England and for the good Exercise of that most Royal Dignity and Office viz. of Supream Head of the Church hath made Thomas Lord Cromwel who was not only Lord Privy Seal as in the Act is exprest but Master of the Kings Jewel-House Baron of Okham Knight of the Garter Earl of Essex and Lord Great Chamberlain 2. His Vice-Gerent for the good and due administration of Justice to be had in all Causes and Cases touching the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and for the Godly Reformation of all Errors Heresies and Abuses in the said Church so as he injoy'd Dignities and Offices of a mixt nature Ecclesiastical and Civil and thereby was placed above all the Lords Spiritual and above all the Lords Temporal of the following Degrees and not only in respect of his Temporal Dignities but as Vice-Gerent in Ecclesiasticals had power given him and to his Successors in that Office to sit above those Degrees in Parliament and to have a Voice and Liberty to assent or dissent as other Lords 3. But there hath been none imploy'd in this Office since that time as needless I conceive for the Archbishops of Canterbury and York in their Provinces and the Bishops in their Diocesses have ever since in a manner suppli'd the Duty of that Office under their own Titles and by their own Jurisdictions especially the Archbishop of Canterbury who is rankt in the next place in this Act and in all Pawns except this where some of the Bloud Royal are not exemplars SECT V. Of the Arch-Bishops and Bishops Obs I THE Title of Bishop is more ancient than the Title of Christian as I shall shew in the seventh Chapter however it became more general after Christianity spread it self The word comes from the
esteem'd Nobles though they do not Sit in respect of the power given them by Patent to Sit without restrictions or ceremonial qualifications and therefore Sir Edward Coke saith that though the Creation by Writ be ancienter than by Patent yet the Creation by Patent is the surer way for that one may be sufficiently Created by Patent and made Noble though he never sit in Parliament and he gives this reason That if issue be joyn'd whether one be a Baron or not that point shall not be tried by a Jury of 12 men but by the Records of the Parliament and if he did not sit there there can be no Record but a Patent is a Record 8. So there were 62 Barons Summon'd by Writs of the 18. of Feb. 1661. and 6 more by Writs of the 29. of Ap. 1661. whereby the number of Temporal Lords Summon'd to this Parliament began the 8th of May 1661. were 140. viz. 1. Two Dukes of the Bloud 2. Three Dukes not of the Bloud 3. Four Marquesses 4. Fifty five Earls 5. Eight Viscounts 6. Sixty eight Barons In all of the 6 Degrees 140. as in the Pawn Cap. 2. which we may compare with former times viz. Regno  Anno. The highest Number Summon'd in these Years Num. Maj. The lowest Number Summon'd in these Years Anno. Num. Mi. Edwar. 3. 25º 62 4º 18 Richar. 2. 8º 63 18º 36 Henry 4. 1º 50 11º 39 Henry 5. 2º 44 3º 29 Henry 6. 38º 55 1º 23 Edwar. 4. 7º 47 12º 37 Henry 8. 37º 45 28º 44 Edwar. 6. 6º 59 1º 47 Mariae  2º 56 1º 42 Elizabeth  30º 60 43º 52 Jacobi  21º 98 1º 84 Caroli 1. 15º 109 1º 97 Caroli 2. 13º 140   I do insert this observation That the Ingenious Historian may see whether the greater or lesser number of the Nobility in Parliament hath been most advantageous to its Constitution and the like may be observed concerning the number of the House of Commons of which I shall speak in the next part By which we may see that the highest Number was in 12. and 13. of Car. 2d and the Lowest in the 4th of Edw. the 3d. not troubling the Reader with the Numbers Summon'd to Intervening Parliaments Thus having given some short Illustrations of those Titles of Honour which are mentioned in the Parliamentary Writs and the Act of Precedency for the clearer satisfaction of such as are not verst in matters of that nature I may now with the more content to them and my self proceed to the particular Writs of Summons to those noble Degrees which I have regularly mention'd according to their prescrib'd Order both from the method of the Writs in the Pawns and Act and these Writs of which I am particularly to speak others falling in collaterally are Sect. 1. The form of the Writs to any of the Bloud Royal. 2. The form of the Writs to Archbishops and Bishops 3. The form of Writs to the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper 4. The form of Writs to Dukes not of the Bloud Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons wherein the Grand Official Titles beforementioned are inserted CHAP. VI. Of Writs of Summons and first of the Exemplar Writs for Summoning Princes Dukes and Earls of the Bloud-Royal to the Parliament SECT I. I Have shewn in Chap. 2. how Parliament Writs are sorted into Close Writs and Open Writs or Patents and those into Exemplars and Consimilars I need not inlarge more therein but proceed to the first Exemplar Writ of Summons and so to other such Writs of Summons to other Degrees as concern the Lords House for I shall speak of other Parliament-Writs of another nature when I have dispatcht the Summoning Writs and Patents of Creation according to the method of Pawns and Clause-Rolls made before the Act of Precedency as also in all Pawns since that Act. Those of the Bloud-Royal are placed in the first Rank of those Records and were still Exemplar to the rest and therefore the Writ which I am now to speak of viz. To the Duke of York Brother to King Charles the 2d is the Exemplar of the Consimilar Writ to Prince Rupert Duke of Cumberland being Son to the Sister of King Charles the First and so persuant not only to the said Act but to the most ancient methods of Writs of Summons as will be more fully shewn in the following Chapters But before I recite this Writ methinks I hear some say Nolumus consuetudines Angliae mutare therefore let us know what Writs of this nature were issued in former Ages by former Kings which is a Question so pertinent to my own scruples that I hope the same ease I gave to my self after my inquiry will serve to satisfie others for having gone backward with as much safety to the avouching of Records as I could and being not satisfied with what was delivered to us concerning the Parliament Writs in the Brittish Romans Danes Saxons or Norman times or by some of the Plantagenets or those of Hen. 3ds time from whence most Writers of our English Parliaments take their Original I fixt upon and took my Rise from the Writs in the 15th of Edw. 2d which are clear and still extant in the Records of the Tower which the other are not By these Records it is evident that in 97. Parliaments as I account them which were Summon'd from that 15th year to this Parliament there is no material difference in this Exemplar Writ from those Antecedent and therefore that this Writ to the Duke of York may be compar'd with that of Edw. 2d I have here set them both down verbatim so that upon 339. years experience viz. from the year 1322. to the year 1661. Inclusive we may acquiesce that we in this Age have not much trespass't or varied from the ancient and wise Form prescribed to us by so many former Kings and continued to this time The Form of the Exemplar Writ to the Princes of the Bloud Tempore Edw. 2.15 EDwardus Dei Gratia Rex Angliae Dominus Hiberniae Dux Aquitaniae Edwardo Comiti Cestriae filio suo Charissimo Salutem Super diversis arduis negotiis nos statum Regni nostri specialiter tangentibus Parliamentum nostrum apud Eboracum a die Paschae prox ' futuro in tres septi'anas teneri vobiscum cum ceteris Prelatis Magnatibus Proceribus dicti Regni habere proponimus colloquium tractatum Vobis Mandamus in fide diléctione quibus nobis tenemini firmiter injungentes Dictis die loco omnibus aliis pretermissis personaliter intersitis ibidem nobiscum cum ceteris prelatis magnatibus proceribus supradictis negotiis tractatur ' vestrumque Consilium impensur ' Et hoc Nullatenus omittat ' Teste me ipso apud Westm ' decimo quarto die Martii Anno Regni nostri decimo quinto Caroli 2.13 CArolus Secundus Dei Gratia Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Rex fidei defensor c. Praecharissimo
and die in that Persuasion But he did not think himself safe in carrying on so great an opposition as was like to be well knowing how the Papal Interest was dispers'd in all Kingdoms and States of Europe till he had incouraged the off-spring of the Waldenses and other opposers of Rome in France Germany and in other Kingdoms and States to revive their Doctrines as also to imbrace the Lutherans Centum Gravamina and the Calvinian Institutions and others less remarkable yet all serving to his purpose whereby in a few years after almost all Christendom was brought into a Papal and Antipapal Ballance or rather consisted of Professors of the Roman Religion and Protestors against both the Court and Church of Rome as Usurping and Antichristian 10. But on the other side the Pope seeing that he could not by forcible ways withstand this almost universal desertion of him he made his Applications to several Kings and Princes for his assistance And at last by a more plausible way he did obtain a Council of Trent wherein it is observable That he did not think fit to move in his Point of Supremacy till after eighteen years that That Council had been sitting by Adjournments and Prorogations and then the Question was That Episcopus Locum principalem teneret à Pontifice Romano dependentem to which the opposers did so far comply that they allowed principalem Locum sub Romano Pontisice but not dependentem so after that Council had sate nineteen years in the sixth of Queen Elizabeth it was dissolved by 4 Legats 20 Cardinals 3 Patriarchs 25 Archbishops 168 Bishops 7 Abbots 39 Proctors and 7 Regulars of General Orders without Determining that Point to the satisfaction either of England or other Kingdoms and States the Dispute of which begot 7 Civil Wars in France which lasted near 40 years till within 3 years of Queen Elizabeths Death also Inquisitions in Spain and Flanders Tumults and Wars in Germany and near 40 years Wars in the Netherlands between them and Spain and for some few years Fire Fagots and Insurrections in England 11. In this Hurly Burly about Supremacy H. 8. left his Crown to an Infant Edward the 6th Ed. 6. who had the Laws against Rome corroborated and his Revenues augmented by Chappels Chantries c. enjoying them but few years and then the Pope revived fresh experiments by Queen Mary Mary to reverse all especially after she was Married to King Phillip compelling a submission to the Popes Supremacy by Fire and Fagots so as in H. 8. time and even till now upon the suddain Changes of Religion it might be said by the Historian Deus bone hic suspenduntur Papistae illic comburuntur Antipapistae but her time being short the Supremacy was once more reverst and taken up by Queen Elizabeth Eliz. who managed it with such dexterity considering the conjuncture of Affairs in this and other Kingdoms and States that it was needless for the Pope to make any open Attempts but by Mariages Foreign Negotiations and the assurances given by some of the chiefest Nobility and Gentry of the Roman persuasion in this Kingdom who were as they pretended for the Church and not for the Court of Romes Supremacy of their peaceable resolutions the Billows of penal Laws seem'd to be calmed and this Kingdom thought it self as secure as the pretty Halcion in her Nest But those who kept to Calvins Institutions in England and Scotland were finely yoak't together to a disturbance for it being insinuated to them That the Title of Supream Head of the Church given by Act of Parliament was declined and dwindled into an c. and that the Title of Defender of the Faith given by the Pope did only remain with an c. made them call to mind what was alledged in the Council of Trent That the original of Church-Government was Aristocratical and Governed by a certain number of the Presbytery and afterwards it was thought fit to put it into a Monarchical way viz. by a Bishop as Superintendent and finding that the Popes and Kings of England and other Princes had long disputed about this Ecclesiastical Monarchy without determination only in a connivance they thought it convenient to return to the Primitive way of Aristocracy and set up Presbytery that original Government as was pretended and thereupon one all cried against Bishops which bravely workt for the Papal interest the clamour proved so geat that the Learned King James did what he could by Writing to quiet them his unfortunate thought Blessed Son King Charles the First tried it by Action but without Success For the Independent Anabaptist Fifth Monarchy-Men and others coming into the Presbyters assistance he was necessitated after the Wars with Scotland upon the same grounds amongst other condescentions to yield with the Consent of the Lords Temporal 17. Car. 1. and Commons and pass an Act for Abolishing the Bishops temporal Jurisdiction in this Kingdom Now see what followed instead of making of Earls Knights and Squires and maintaining of Hospitals as was proposed to Richard the 2d as I said the Bishops were not only put out of the House of Lords but the Temporal Lords soon after and the Knights and Squires secluded from the House of Commons and the Hospitals and all ruined by an intestine Bloody War the King Sacrificed and every one of the Machineers disappointed of their original plausible intentions and in conclusion by most miraculous Turns in Assairs there was a total submission to a Reestablishment of that Form of Church and State which they had before so zealously overthrown and the Bishops again brought into the Lords House 12. I should now proceed to the Writs which impowred the Bishops to sit in the Lords House but first I think it pertinent to shew how these two Titles of Fidei Defensor Caput Ecclesiae Anglicanae were used disused and altered in theirs and other Writs Though all the Kings of England at their Coronation are Sworn to defend the Christian Faith and the words defensionem Ecclesiae Anglicanae having been in most Parliament-Writs since the 11th of Edward the 3d. Yet the Pope as I said for the good Service which Henry the 8. had done in Writing against Luther sent him a Bull and therein intituled him Defensor Fidei with this Caution that it should be placed next his Title to France and before his Title to Ireland and it may be observed That in the same year he sent the like Bull to the Emperor Charles the 5th intituling him also Defensor Fidei upon which the Emperor took an Oath not only to be Defensor Fidei but Defensor Pontificiae dignitatis Romanae Ecclesiae i. e. Defender of the Court and Church of Rome But Henry the 8th though he accepted the Title did not think fit to be bound by an Oath nor do I find that he stiled himself in any publick Acts Defensor Fidei till the 2.1 of his Reign and then in a
therefore I conceive there is some mistake in Mr. Selden but however the mistake be the first Exemplar Writ to a Duke was not till this year for though Edward Prince of Wales was Duke in the Third or Eleventh year of his Father and Thomas Earl of Norfolk soon after was created Duke of Norfolk and Henry Earl of Lancaster soon after created Duke of Lancaster yet they had not any Exemplar Writs as Dukes but before as Earls so as John Duke of Lancaster in this Parliament of the 37. Edw. the 3d. was the first Duke which had an Exemplar Writ 47 Edw. 3. As I have shewn the first Exemplar to an Earl of the Bloud so this shews the first Exemplar to an Earl not of the Bloud which was this year to Richard Earl of Arundel for though there were many Earls before not of the Bloud yet they had only Consimilar Writs but no Exemplars extant to any of them till this Year 28 H. 6. And though there were many Dukes not of the Blood since the first Creation of that Title yet the first Duke not of the Blood who was thought fit to be an Exemplar was not till this Parliament and the Predecessor of this Duke was an Earl in Edw. 3ds time and even this Duke was Earl in the time of his Predecessors before any Duke was created 6 Edw. 6. Though the first Marquess created in England was in the 9th of Rich. 2d yet none were thought fit to be Exemplars till this 6. of Edw. the 6th that William Marquess of Winchester was made the first Exemplar in Parliament of that Dignity but his Exemplar had the additional Title of Lord Treasurer who is the second Officer of State 36 H. 8. Although a Baron is a more ancient Title with us in England than any of the other Degrees of the Nobles yet we find no Record now extant wherein a Baron singly as Baron had the Exemplar Writ for as I said Thomas Wriothesly Baron of Tichfield being Chancellor William Pawlet Baron of Bazing being Lord Keeper were Exemplars in those Parliaments and had Consimilars appointed them but Edward Hyde Baron of Hindon having a distinct Assisting Writ had no Consimilar allotted him either in respect of his Barony or Assistancy Thus we find that Earls Dukes Marquesses and Barons have been Exemplars but we do not find any Viscounts to be so in any Parliament since the creation of that Dignity which was as I said in Hen. 6ths time to John de Beaumont And the reason is because the word Vicecomes doth imply a Consimilar to Comes so it were improper for Comites to be Consimilars to a Vicecomiti Concerning the additionals of the Titles to those Nobles mentioned in their Exemplars it may be observed That in all those Writs to Hen. the 8ths time the words Consanguineo Charissimo Praedilecto Dilecto Fideli were not so positively sixt to the several Degrees in their Writs but since that time they have past in a more constant method viz. to Dukes and Marquesses Praecharissimo Consanguineo to Earls and Viscounts Charissimo Consanguineo to Barons Praedilecto Fideli and to the Lord Chancellor as chief Assistant Praedilecto perquam Fideli but to all the other Assistants of which I shall speak more only Dilecto Fideli SECT III. Observations on the Consimilars to the former Exemplars WHen Princes of the Blood were made Exemplars there was ever some Prince of the Blood in the Consimilars and then followed in the same Register in every Clause-Roll or Pawn the other Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons without interposition of the Lords Spiritual and Ecclesiastical to the Princes of the Blood and the Temporal Lords not of the Bloud so it continued in that method till the 21. of King James but then the Exemplar being to the Prince of Wales and no Consimilar to him there follows the Exemplar and Consimilars to the Lords Spiritual of which I have spoken and after them follows the particular Writ to John Bishop of Lincoln as Lord Keeper and after that the Exemplar to Lodowick Duke of Richmond who had one Duke one Marquess Thirty eight Earls nine Viscounts and Fourty seven Chevaliers his Consimilars and ever since the 21. Jac. there hath been an interposition either of the Lords Spiritual or Lord Chancellor between the Dukes of the Blood and the Nobles that were not of the Blood and so in the 13 Car. 2. though the Bishops were deprived from that Roll as I have shewn yet the Lord Chancellors Writ did interpose and it may further be observed That when Princes or Dukes of the Blood or not of the Blood were Exemplars other Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons were Consimilars but when Earls were Exemplars there were no other Consimilars admitted of Degrees above them but still under them viz. of Earls Viscounts and Barons and yet when the three Dukes beforementioned were made Exemplars 't is true the Duke of Suffolk and Oxford had Dukes to their Consimilars as formerly being pari gradu but the Duke of Norfolk had no Duke to his Consimilar for he had only four Earls one Viscount and Thirty one Barons of which there is no other precedent that I can find 2. As to the different Titles of these six Degrees viz. Princes of the Blood Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons of whom I have spoke more in the Fifth Chapter it is fit to be hinted here that Prince in English and Principi in the Latin Writ Duke and Duci Marquess and Marchioni Viscount and Vicecomiti have little difference in their Orthography but Comiti in all their Latin Writs and Earl which is their general appellation in English have very great difference concerning which and the other Degrees I have writ more at large before and in my Annotations to which I refer the Reader and so Baron and Baro have but little variation yet this may be observed here of this Title Baro that in all the Consimilar Writs in Clause Rolls or Pawns wherein those of that Degree are enumerated from the 15th of Edw. 2d to the 13. of Car. 2. neither the Titles or words Baro nor of Banerettus are mentioned in the Writs but either the Articles De or Le or La or the words Dominus Miles Equies Auratus or Chevalier are added to the Barons name viz. Hugo de Spencer Johanni de Bello Campo Johanni de St. John de Bazing Roberto de Monte albo Johanni de Sancto amando Willielmo de la Souch de mortuo mare Nicolao de Cantilupo le Quint Johanni de Insula de rubro monte Nicolao de Sancto Mauro Michaeli de la Pool who was then Banneret Admirallo Maris Johanni de Moubray Mariscallo Petro de malo lacu le Quint Hugo de le Spencer Willielmo la Zouch de mortuo mare Johanni le Strange Johanni le Shelton and many more and some only in their Christian names and Sirnames viz. Richardo Gray Richardo Talbot Gulielmo Aincourt
Richardo Percey Johanni Fitzwater Radulpho Dacres yet these were all Barons or Bannerets though the Title of Baroni was not in their respective Writs 3. Thus they continued without any other adjuncts to their names than what I have mentioned till the first of Richard the Second and then Willielmo de Morley Willielmo de Alborough Hugo de Dacres were writ Chevaliers amongst 48. others that were Intituled as before After in the 7th of Rich. the 2d William Botereaux was brought in and with the other Three written Chevaliers and in the second Parliament of that year that Title of Chevalier increas'd to three more viz. Johanni Falsly Henry le Scroop and Thomae Camois Chevaliers so there were then seven Chevaliers in all the rest of the Barons being then Fourty five were Intituled as before and so they continued not exceeding nine Chevaliers till the third of H. 6. and for that Parliament there were but twenty Barons Summoned whereof eleven were Stil'd Chevaliers and in the fourth of his Reign all the Barons but two were Stil'd Chevaliers and in the sixth year all the Barons were Stil'd Chevaliers and so to the Twenty third wherein all the Barons were written Chevaliers except Thomas de Scales Miles who was then Lord Scalds and Dominus de Molins so here came in Dominus for a Baron and in the Twenty fifth there were Twenty six Chevaliers whereof two Stil'd Milites and three Domini in the Twenty seventh Henry Percey is Writ Militi Domino and some others which shews that the words Militi Domino and Chevalier having Writs to Sit in the Lords House had one Denotation of a Baron and in the third of Edw. 4. almost all the Barons are written Domini and Chevaliers jointly yet in the end of these Consimilars it is writ in the Record Milites omnes except Audley and Clinton and so in the 3d. of Ed. 4. all are Chevaliers but in the Postscript is Equites aurati omnes praeter Dominum Scales by which must be understood that all the rest which were Summoned to those Parliaments and their names not entred in those Rolls were Milites or Equites Aurati Except Audley Clinton and Scales which latter in the Record of the 23d of Hen. 6. before mentioned is written Miles which shews there was a distinction then between Miles and Eques Auratus as may be seen in Mr. Seldens Titles of Honour and so in the 7th and 12. 22. and 23d of Ed. 4. all Chevaliers but two Milites which do argue some distinction though all intended to signifie a Baron Then passing over other Records to the 21. of Hen. 8. all the Barons are stil'd Chevaliers but in the 36. Hen. 8. the words Domini and Chevaliers are mixt and so they continued to the 28. of Eliz. and then all the Barons are writ Chevaliers and so have continued to this time singly with that Title of Chevaliers in all their Writs without adding Dominus miles or Eques Auratus Though the Title of Baro for Baron is not us'd in these Parliament Writs no more is Bannerettus or Banneret yet it is as evident that as Dominus does signifie a Baron so the word Miles and Chevalier did signifie a Knight Banneret and so I presume it was originally intended For by comparing the Writ in the 8th of Rich. 2d to William Botereaux with the Writ to him in the 15th of Rich. 2d where in one he is called Chevalier in the other Miles it may be presumed that the Titles are one and the same the words Chevalier and Miles being so interchangeably used and sometimes joyntly yet either being applicable to Denote a Baron or Banneret 8. This Identity of Chevalier and Banneret may be evident from the Writ to the Sheriff of Surry hereafter transcribed Cited by the Learned Mr. Selden where Thomas Camois beforementioned sometimes Stil'd Chevalier sometimes Miles for brevity omitting Bannerettus being then Lord Camois or Baron and being chosen Knight of the Shire for that County to serve in Parliament in the 8th of Rich. 2. the Sheriff was commanded by this Writ to make an Election of another Knight for that County because his place was in the Lords-House as a Banneret which Writ he sets down in these following words The Writ to the Sheriff of Surry 8. Rich. the 2d concerning Thomas Camois Banneret his being Elected Knight of the Shire REx Vic' Surr ' Salutem Quia ut accepimus tu Thomam Camois Chevalier qui Bannerettus est sicut quam plures Antecessorum suorum extiterint ad essendum unum militem venientium ad proximum Parliamentum nostrum pro Comunitate Comitatus predicti de assensu ejusdem Comitatus Elegisti Nos advertentes quod hujusmodi Banneretti ante haec tempora in militis Comitatus ratione alicujus Parliamenti eligi minime consueverunt ipsum de Officio Militis ad dictum Parliamentum pro Communitate Comitatus predicti ventur ' Exonerari volumus Et Ideo tibi precipimus quod quendam alium militem idoneum discretum gladio cinctum loco ipsius Thomae eligi eum ad diem Locum Parliamenti predicti venire facias cum plena sufficien ' potestate ad consentiend'hijs quae in Parliamento predicto fient juxta tenorem primi Brevis nostri tibi pro electione hujusmodi milit ' directi nomen ejus nobis scire facias Teste Rege apud Westm ' octavo die Octobris septimo Regis 8. R. 2. Accordingly the Parliament did sit the 3d. of March and Thomas Camois in the Lords House but that which Mr. Selden observes in this Writ is that this is not to be understood of any other Banneret than a Parliament Baron or a Banneret of that time The expressing of hujusmodi Bannoretti shews that it is not meant of all Bannerets but such only as have the Title either by inheritance or in such a kind that an inheritance might be of it which is apparent also by the precedent words in the Writ Bannerettus est sicut quam plures Antecessorum suorum extiterint for it was never conceived that the Title of Banneret as it denotes a Knight-Banneret was ever hereditary However another Knight for Surry was Chosen and this Thomas Camois being Lord Thomas Camois did sit that Parliament in the Lords House as his Ancestors had done for I find that in the 15th of Ed. 2d and 4th of Ed. 3d. Radulphus Camois was Summon'd by Writs and did sit in those two Parliaments but I find none in 54 years after viz. till the 7th of Rich. 2d and then that name continued in 37 successive Parliaments viz. to the 8th of Hen. 6. as may be seen in the Records I shall make no further use of this Writ here than that of the words Thomas Camois Chevalier qui est Bannerettus doe make it clear that Banneret was denoted by the word Chevalier and that that word Chevalier amongst the Lords did shew the difference between
in the year 778. when Charles the Great being then King of France and soon after Emperour of the West did put all the Government of France into the hands of Twelve of the most eminent Nobles who thereupon were call'd by the Title of the Twelve Peers of France being Pares Gubernatores Franciae or in their Language Paires d'France whereof six were Lords Spiritual viz. the Archbishop of Reims the Bishops of Laon and Langres who also were stil'd Dukes the Bishops of Beauvois Chalois and Nôyon which three latter were also stil'd Comtes or Earls and six were Lords Temporal viz. the Duke of Burgundy Normandy and Guienne the Earls of Flanders Champaigne and Tholose the six Ecclesiasticks do continue to this day but the Territories of the other six being either united to or alienated from the Crown do now consist of such Princes of the Blood or Favorits without limitation by number of six as the King thinks fit but those who are do injoy the Privileges of the Original Peers constituted by Charles the Great 4. From this Constitution it is conceived we in England upon the Normans coming did make use of something of that method and did then also first make use of the word Peers although in truth as I said both of us had it from the Romans we also made use of their number Twelve as may be observed in the Ecclesiastical Parliamentary Degrees viz. first Archbishops secondly Bishops thirdly Archdeacons fourthly Deans of Chapters fifthly Proctors of Chapters and sixthly Proctors of the Clergy and six also are of the Temporal Degrees viz. first Princes of the Blood secondly Dukes not of the Blood thirdly Marquesses fourthly Earls fifthly Viscounts and sixthly Barons These being so proportion'd into twelve Degrees but not into twelve Persons I shall pass to what others have spoken concerning the number of our Peers 5. In respect the Peers of France were anciently confin'd to a certain number of six and six some of our English Writers would also confine ours to a certain number some to five and some to fifty But herein we may trust that learned Selden who saith That the number of Peers with us was never confined to any more certainty than the Lords of the Parliament are for saith he whereas only the number of five Peers are mentioned in some Records that can be no Rule of certainty because at this day the number Five doth legally express Seven as it doth in the Parliament Writ to the Warden of the Cingqueports or five Ports There being in truth saith he Seven of them and so consequently returned whereas there are eight Ports called Cinqueports and so returned as will be shewn in the second Part but however the mistake be in that Grave Author yet with submission to his great Learning I conceive this might have been better reconcil'd for the old Writers who mentioned five might intend the five Degrees of Nobility under the Princes of the Blood viz. Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons which makes the compleat Temporal Degrees in Parliaments And what others write of Fifty that number without doubt did relate to the number of which those five Degrees did in those days consist which were now increast to Eighty eight as may be seen in this Pawn besides those of the Blood Royal and the Lords Spiritual and Assistants and have varied in number almost in every Kings Reign But I rather believe that there was some mistake in making use of this number Five by applying it Personally and not Virtually for anciently and even to this day the number five that is five Lords do with that number Constitute the House of Lords for the dispatch of lesser Affairs till a greater number come fit for greater Affairs and so the number of fourty Members whether Knights Citizens or Burgesses or some of either do Constitute an House of Commons yet these also do not proceed to weightier matters till they be supplied with a greater number so as the number five may be well thought to have its relation to the House of Lords and the number of fifty to the House of Commons 6. But not to insist further about the definite number of Lords or Peers or about the derivation of the words Lords and Peers I shall give a touch of the words Praelati Magnates and Proceres us'd in the Latin Writs and Patents and herein if we consider the first Institution of this House it did and still doth consist of Lords Spiritual and Lords Temporal diversified into several Degrees as Archbishops Dukes c. yet the Lords Spiritual were known only by the Title Archiepiscopi Episcopi i. e. Archbishops and Bishops and the Temporal only by the Titles of Comites and Barones i. e. Earls and Barons in general terms the Lords Spiritual were called Praelati i. e. Prelates in relation to matters which concern the Soul which hath preference or prelation to that of the Body and the Lords Temporal were called in general Magnates Proceres i. e. Lords and Peers intimating Persons of the greatest Power and Domination and being the chiefest Peers and Supports as I said of the King and Kingdom 7. But in Henry the thirds time certain Persons called Abbots and Priors who were the Fathers Heads and chief Governers of Monasteries or of such Houses as were possess'd by Monks and Canons living in those Houses with an intent or pretence of weaning themselves from the World and disposing their minds to a contemplative life and these being of a mixt nature partly Regular and partly Secular and in respect of their great access of Territories given by the charity of others to support them Baronial did step in between the Lords Spiritual and the Lords Temporal and so were called Praelati with the Bishops and Magnates Proceres with the Lords Temporal But Hen. the Eighth as I have shewn did dissolve them so that the Bishops have ow the single Title of Praelati and the Temporal Lords of Magnates Proceres for we see in the Summoning of this Parliament when Bishops were excluded the words Cum Praelatis was left out but being restored then they were equally Summon'd to sit inter Praelatos Magnates Proceres and the preposition Inter is properly inserted for however their sitting is yet the Bishops are called over between Viscounts and Barons 8. Now as Abbots and Priors were thus interposed in Henry the Thirds time so in the time of Edw. the Third as I have shewn Dukes began and as they increased did step in before Earls and Barons and in Rich. the Seconds time Marquesses began and as they increast also stept in between Dukes and Earls and in Hen. the 6ths time Viscounts began and as they increast did step in between Earls and Barons so as Originally according to the dates of their Admissions these Lords Spiritual and Temporal were all Peers i. e. Pares pari gradu the Bishops were Pares inter seipsos pari gradu Episcopali the
vicesimo primo Novembris Anno regni dicti Domini nostri Caroli Secundi Dei gratia Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Regis fidei defensoris c. Annoque Dom. 1662. 17. All derivative Proxee-Writs made either from a Lord Spiritual or Temporal to any of their own Degrees or of other Degrees do not continue longer than one Session without a new Derivative License or Proxee-Instrument 18. As to the places of the Proxees in the Lords House they are not mention'd in the Act of Precedency so I shall conclude with Mr. Elsing That surely they did not sit in the Lords Seat whose Proxee he was yet in all Councils and Dyets beyond the Seas he does 19. Though they are Nobilitated by sitting as Proxees yet they are not to be accounted Peers unless they were Peers before they were Proxees Thus having said as much as I think fit of Writs to the Lords Spiritual and Temporal both Original and Derivative I am come to the Fifth Exemplar concerning the Assistants to those Lords Peers and Proxees CHAP. XIII Of the Assistants to the House of Peers comprized in the Fifth Exemplar of the Pawn 1. HAving done with all the Degrees which are mention'd in the Act of Precedencies and given an account by four Exemplars of the Writs to the Princes of the Blood of the Writs to the Archbishops and Bishops of the Writ to the Lord Chancellor of the Writs to the Hereditary Nobles of Parliament viz. Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons as they are mention'd in the Pawn and also given an Abstract of such Patents of Creation as Intitle some of them to be the more capable of Summons as also of Peers and their Proxies I come now to the Degrees which are not mention'd in the Act of Precedency but are compriz'd under the fifth Exemplar-Writ recited in the foremention'd Pawn viz. to the Lord Chief Justice of England and of the Consimilars to his Writ and these are different from all the former except the Lord Chancellors of which I have spoken because these do not sit in the Lords House by vertue of any Tenure or Patent of Creation or according to the Act of Precedency but only by Writs as Assistants for none do sit there without Original Writs except Proxies and Masters of Chancery c. as will be shewn But before I treat of them distinctly I shall set down some Observations on their Professions 1. These Assistants do all profess the Study and Knowledge of Laws and therefore have their Places allotted in the very heart of the Lords House that they may with the more ease give their Advice to that Noble Body in all Matters which concern either the Theory or Practice of what is just or fit to be done 2. Now there are certain Faculties and Vertues springing from the Profession of these Assistants viz. Jus or Right Justitia or Justice Judicium or Judgment Ratio or Reason Prudentia or Prudence Aequitas or Equity Discretio or Discretion Sapientia or Wisdom and Scientia Legum or Knowledge of the Laws to whith it is presum'd they have attain'd and are thereby made fit for Assistants yet that these Vertues may be the more distinctly discern'd I shall take the freedom to explain them Jus the Latin for Right is the foundation on which Justitia or Justice is built Justitia is status or statio Juris quia Jus stat vel exercetur per Justitiam So that Jus is the principal Justitia the Efflux of it Judicium or Judgment is the fix'd resolution determination or sentence of what is true or false good or evil just or unjust Reason is a Ray of Divine Light which guides a man to judge what is Just or Justice Prudence is in the nature of Providence from Providere to foresee the conveniencies or inconveniencies of so doing or not doing right to one man that it may do good to one and not hurt another Discretion is also to discern the nature or difference of things represented and to manage them to their right end and by this Equity is usher'd in which is a conscientious care that all things may be equally and proportionably done towards those who exspect Justice when the matter concerns distinct persons or interests and then Sapientia or Wisdom advanceth it self and includes the Scientia Legum or Knowledge of the Laws and that imploys all the Faculties of the Soul and hath a particular Intellect and Inspiration to see improve and manage all things to a just and right end and teacheth the Professors to instruct others in the principal Rules of perfect Conversation with each other viz Honeste vivere neminem laedere suum cuique tribuere which is to live soberly and temperately to offend no man wilfully and to give tribute to whom tribute belongs and to every man what is their right to enjoy or in our power to perform All these do constitute a wise man and the Professors of Laws have more opportunities to demonstrate them to others and by these Vertues they become Accomplish'd Assistants to a Parliament both in Divine and Human Matters 3. But the Imbecility of our Human Nature is such that no man is so universally knowing in all things as to give a true Judgment of all particulars without a light or information from others whereby to judge of what is just right or fit to be done especially in the contentions arising from the Mechanick Arts or Trades and some other Sciences which are a significant part of the Fabrick of any Kingdom or State for supposing two Artificers professing different Arts are both imployed to the perfecting of some Publick Work wherein their joint Skills are necessarily required in which they are at variance upon some mystical parts in their Trades and without determination of their differences and concerns neither of them can proceed in the joynt Design and thereupon they refer themselves to one of the Professors of the Law to settle the matter between them But it is vulgarly thought beneath one of these eminent Professors to dive into Mechanick Trades or lesser Sciences yet both of these Artists informing him of the true state of the mysteries of their respective Trades the Judge from thence makes a rational determination of what is fit to be done as well for the support of their Trades as for the common good to others by preventing fallacies or circumventions or the like contests and this he gains from the impartments and arguments of these Artists and so weighing their alternate allegations in one balance and the common good in another he makes so peculiar a determination and Sentence as to convince both parties and this from the ground of their different Arts and Impartments Now the Judge or Justice even by these dayly accidents and references doth dayly gain Knowledge and by justly managing this Knowledge grows to be generally esteem'd a wise Man not only from these lower particulars upon which the Opinion of the Vulgar is founded
stand fair but if divulged they are sure not only to lose the credit of the Event but double the disrepute if both be bad Herein some men are naturally of a more reserved temper than others however those are only fit to be Counsellors and Secretaries of State who have no Windows in their Breast that is no such transparent Eyes as men may easily see their disposures of Affairs but can wisely keep the Secrets of State from other mens Inspections and in Parliaments I conceive such Tempers are very useful for if the People Trust them they do well in performing their Trust but appealing again to the People shews a diffidence in their own Judgments Thus having shewn the Kings Warrant in the Front and the Secretaries Writ in the Rear and fix't the Noble Lords betwixt those who manage the Laws Divine and those who are Assistants in Human Laws and run through the most constant Writs which are us'd for Summoning such as are to fit in a Parliament either as Essential or Assisting Members thereof I should now proceed to the House of Commons but I shall crave leave First To speak of some accidentall Writs for Assistants Secondly Of the manner of return of all the aforesaid Writs Thirdly Of such as sit there without Writ or Patent Fourthly Of such as sit there only by Patent and Fifthly Of some other Officers who are imployed there by vertue of Patents CHAP. XIV Of Consimilar Writs and Patents upon Emergent occasions 1. I Find in Mr. Prins Breviary That he cites many Records long before Henry the Eighth which I shall not examine because some of them have been so long disus'd Of Knights Justices of North Wales Treasurer of Carnarvan Treasurer of the Kings House Chancellor of the Exchequer Deans Archdeacons Escheators and one Magister Thomas Yong which he takes to be a Master of Chancery that have been Summon'd by Writ to sit in Parliaments in the Lords House but since Henry the Eighth in the Pettibag several Writs of Assistants were issued as I have shewn in the 11th Chap. Sect. 9. to shew the Kings Power some of which were Professors of the Law and some not 2. There was another Writ viz. to the Warden of the Cinqueports which was not constant but occasional for sometimes it was directed to an Earl and sometimes to some one Person under the Degree of a Baron yet by vertue of the Writ he was impowr'd to sit in the Lords House but since Henry the Fourths time when that Office was supplied by the Prince of Wales after called Henry the Fifth who had a Writ with the addition of Guardian ' Quinque Portuum that Trust hath been committed to some one of the Blood Royal and from that Writ other Writs are derived to all the Cinqueports But in respect this Writ as to a Parliament is mostly concern'd about Election of 16. Members to serve in the House of Commons I shall refer the Discourse of it to the second part in that Chapter which particularly treats of the Cinqueports 3. If at any time the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper be absent upon just occasion as when the Lord Keeper Bridgman in this Parliament was Sick a Patent was made for Sir John Vaughan then Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas to supply his place and the like to Sir Francis North Chief Justice of the Common Pleas also c. and though for the most part this happens in time of Parliament yet because it may happen between the time of Summons and the Sitting of a Parliament which is the chief design of this part of this Treatise I have thought fit to enter the form of that Patent in this place rather than defer it viz. CHARLES c. To Our Right Trusty and Welbeloved Sir Francis North Knt. Chief Justice of Our Court of Common Pleas Greeting Whereas Our Right Trusty and Welboved Councellor Heneage Lord Finch Our Lord High Chancellor of England is often so infirm that he is not able constantly to attend in the upper House of this Our present Parliament now holden at Westminster nor there to supply the room and place in the said upper House amongst the Lords Spiritual and Temporal there Assembled as to the Office of the Lord Chancellor of England hath been accustomed We minding the same place and room to be supplied in all things as appertaineth for and during every time of his absence have named and appointed you And by these Presents do Name Constitute and Appoint and Authorize you from day to day and from time to time when and so often as the said Lord Chancellor shall happen at any time or times during this present Parliament to be absent from his accustomed place in the said upper House to Occupy Vse and Supply the said room and place of the said Lord Chancellor in the said upper House amongst the Lords Spiritual and Temporal there Assembled at every such day and time of his absence and then and there at every such time to do and execute all such things as the said Lord Chancellor of England should or might do if if he were there personally present Vsing and Supplying the same room Wherefore We Will and Command you the said Sir Francis North to attend to the doing and execution of the premisses with Effect and these Our Letters Patents shall be your sufficient Warrant and Discharge for the same in every respect In Witness whereof We have caused these Our Letters to be made Patents Witness our Self at Westminster the Nineteenth day of March in the Nine and twentieth Year of our Reign Per ipsum Regem propria manu Signat And having now dispatch't all the Writs and Patents which concern the Summoning of such as sit in the Lords House it is proper to shew the manner of returning of those Writs which is usual in all Courts and ought to be strictly observed here CHAP. XV. Of Returns of Writs relating to the Summoning of such as are to Sit in the Lords House IN all Judicial Courts from whence Writs do issue there is care taken for their due Returns as may be seen in Fitz Herbert and such Authors who have treated of the nature of Writs and their Returns but none of them giving a full account of Parliament Writs and Returns gives me occasion to insert this Chapter As to the Return of the Writs to the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Assistants they ought by every individual Person who had a Writ to be deliver'd to the Clerk of the Parliament before the House Sit or immediately upon their Entrance into the House at the Table and by the said Clerk they are to be kept with the Records of that House By the omission of this method many inconveniencies have and may happen to their Successors or Posterity and therefore it is wisht there were more care taken in their due Returns to which they may be incourag'd being of so little trouble in the performance But as to the
return of Writs concerning the House of Commons the method consists of much trouble and perplexity not only from the time of the executing the Writs but in undue returns as will be shewn in their proper place This Chapter concluding all the Patents and Writs of Summons and Returns which concern the Lords House by vertue of which the Persons so Summon'd by Writ do sit there now I must speak of such as sit there without Patent or Writ of Summons and first of the Masters of Chancery CHAP. XVI Of the Masters of Chancery THE Secretaries of State did bring up the Rear of the State Officers and now the Masters of Chancery do bring up the Rear of the Assistants and though I have spoke something of the Master of the Rolls partly as chief of the twelve Masters of Chancery yet there he was considered as Master of the Rolls or Records rather than one of the twelve Masters of Chancery whereof as I said he is the chief and these twelve are called Masters in Ordinary 2. For there are also other Masters in Chancery called Extraordinary which are of an uncertain number according to the businesses of the respective Counties wherein they are imployed 3. As for the twelve they usually are chosen out of Barresters of the Common Law or Doctors of the Civil Law and eleven of them do sit in the Chancery or in the Rolls as Assistants saith Sir Edward Coke to the Lord Chancellor and to the Master of the Rolls every day throughout each Term of the year and to them are committed Interlocutory Reports and stating of Accounts and sometimes by way of reference to them they are impowr'd with a final Determination of Causes there depending 4. These twelve have time out of mind sat in the Lords House yet have neither Writs nor Patents for many Ages past impowering them so to do but I conceive as the Master of the Rolls is as is said by that Institutor an Assistant to the Lord Chancellor the remaining eleven may fairly be said to be Assistants both to the Lord Chancellor and Master of the Rolls in all or most Matters depending in both or either Courts and so Virtute Officij they are inclusively capacitated by the Writs to the Lord Chancellor or Master of the Rolls to be Assistants to them in the Lords House as they are in Chancery without any particular VVrit or Patent to them 5. Anciently this Title was higher than what Sir Edw. Coke affords them for I find in an old Manuscript in the hands of Sir J. C. one of the Masters but I have not the opportunity of searching the Records therein mentioned Intitutled De Cancellario Angliae ejus Cojudicibus de authoritate eorum and then follows viz. In dicta Curia Cancellarij sunt ordinati duodecem Cojudices viz. Magistri sive Clerici de prima forma ad Robas which in the 13. Chap. I call the first Orb pro Arduis negotis Regis Regni Reipublicae expediendis which agree verbatim and 't is observable with the very words of all Writs of Summons to Parliaments eidem Cancellario omnino assistentes secum continuo consedentes which in a manner Intitles them to sit in the Lords House with him and many other matters are mentioned therein which I shall refer to my Annotations because I cannot now warrantably insert them but I find in other Books that anciently they had the care of inspecting all Writs of Summons to Parliaments committed to them which is now as I have shewn performed by the Clerks of the Pettibag 6. As to the Title of Maister from Magister and from Magus a Wiseman it is as ancient as most of our borrow'd words from the Latin and was still apply'd to Persons of Knowledge and other Abilities above the Degrees of Yeomandry Amongst the old Romans as may be read in Livy Pomponius Aurelius and others they had twelve great Officers to whom that Title was given viz. Magister Populi or Dictator Magister Equitum Magistri Census Magister in Auctionibus Magistri Epistolarum Magistri Memoriae Magistri Militum Magister Navis Magistri Officiorum Magistri Scriniorum Magister Curiae Magistri Aeris and many more of a lesser Rank for I speak not of Magistri Familiae or Privatae or as the word is vulgarly applied to its relative word Servant but as a Title applied to Persons of Eminency for their Integrity and Learning and of these there are also twelve sorts with us which are found in the Law Books whereof the first we meet with in the Statutes is the Master of the Mint in 2 H. 6. c. 14. 2. the Master of the Rolls in the first of H. 7. Cap. 20. for till then he was call'd Clerk of the Rolls or Custos Archivorum and chief Clerk of the Chancery of which there are twelve as I said since which six chief Clerks and a greater number of a lesser Form are there Constituted whereby they are distinguisht from the ancient Clerks now the 12. Masters of Chancery which may be accounted the Third sort in point of time mentioned in the Statutes the Fourth The Master of the Horse in the first of Edw. the Sixth the Fifth The Master of the Postern in 2 Edw. 6. the Sixth The Master of the Kings Houshold in the 32 H. 8. chang'd to the Lord Stuard of the Kings Houshold Charles Duke of Brandon being the first of that Title mentioned in any Statute the 7th The Master of the Court of Wards in the 33 of Hen. the 8. now of no use the Eighth The Master of the Musters after in the 33 Eliz. called Muster Master General the 9.10.11.12 viz. The Master of the Armory the Master of the Kings Jewels the Master of the Ordinance and Master of the Kings Wardrop are mentioned in the Statute of 39 Eliz. not but these Officers were before but the Statutes as I said do not take notice of them till the times that they are quoted in the said Statutes 7. Now as the old Romans had others which had the Titles of Magistri viz. Magistri Vniversitatis vel Societatis so we in imitation at Cambridge have the Title of Magister fixt at the head of every College in that University which is an argument of their Antiquity of which I shall speak more whereas Oxford hath but three which bear that Title 8. It is also applied to the Heads of Halls of Companies in London and other Cities and it hath been formerly applied to all the Members of the House of Commons who were not actually Knights or Esquires or of higher Degrees but in the House of Lords I do not find it used to any to whom Writs of Summons were sent to sit there except to some Priors and Deacons who were sometimes called Magistri in their Writs and others of Religious Orders call'd also in their Writs Magistri as also to Officers in Chancery viz. 49 Edw. 3. Magistro Thomae Yong Officiario
Silver and guilt with the Kings Arms at one end and a Lyon Couchant at the other end and a guilt Knob in the middle which he carries in his hand he is always a Person of Quality and born the Kings Subject and if not a Knight is made one upon admission to this Office and hath his Office by Patent the first Grant of it beginning in Hen. the 8. time 1. Before the Sitting of Parliament he observes the Lord Chamberlains directions in taking care that the House be fitted with all things for the Reception of the King and those who are to sit there 2. His Imployment also is to introduce Lords into that House 3. And after that House is Sat he hath Imployments concerning the Commitment of Delinquents c. 4. He hath a Seat allowed him but without the Bar and to ease him more in these and many other Imployments he hath an Usher to assist him call'd the Yeoman Usher also Door Keeper c. as will be shewn And so I am come to the last Attendant Officer of Note in that House viz. the Kings Serjeant at Arms. CHAP. XIX Of the Kings Serjeant at Arms Attendant in the House of Lords I Have spoken of the Servientes ad legem or Serjeants at Law Now I come to the Servientes ad arma Serjeants at Arms these were such as amongst the Romans were call'd Satellites Caesaris or a Guard to the Emperor and sometimes they were call'd Macerones from whence probably the word Mace might be us'd which these Serjeant at Arms use to carry before the King c. Of these Serjeants at Arms for I meddle not with the lower degree in Corporations sometimes call'd Serjeants of the Mace or only Serjeants there are twenty in number which are call'd the Kings Serjeants at Arms and these are Created with great Ceremony for the Person who is to be Created kneeling before the King the King himself lays the Mace on the Serjeants Right Shoulder and says these words Rise up Serjeant at Arms and Esquire for ever He hath his Patent for the Office besides of which and of the particulars of his Imployments Segar in his Book of Nobility gives a full account but of these twenty the King appropriates sixteen to his Personal Service whereof four wait on him every Quarter the other four are thus distributed viz. in time of Parliament one is to attend the Speaker of the House of Lords in case he is not Lord Chancellor another to attend the Speaker of the House of Commons one other to attend the Lord Chancellor and another the Lord Treasurer as well in as out of Parliament But in respect the Lord Chancellor and Speaker of the Lords House is usually the same Person there were but three of the twenty us'd in this time of Parliament and but two out of Parliament so as the other one or two are reserv'd for accidental occasions The Serjeant at Arms who attends the House of Lords hath the privilege of carrying the Mace before the Speaker whether he be the Lord Chancellor or not within the Lords House up to the very Chair of State and after he hath made his Obeysances he lays it down on the first Woolsack by the Speaker and so departs till the Speaker hath occasion to use him again upon the Rising of the House And herein methinks the Serjeant at Arms of the House of Commons hath more respect afforded him than the Serjeant at Arms to the House of Lords for the Commons Serjeant hath the freedom to stand at the Bar and hear all Debates and when weary of standing hath an easie seat by the door but the Lords Serjeant is not permitted to be in the Lords House whilst it is Sitting nor hath any Station within the Bar nor Seat without the Bar as the Gentleman Usher hath and yet this Office is more ancient than that and is not only Serjeant at Arms to the Speaker and Chancellor the Parliament not sitting but is the chief of the twenty of the Kings Serjeants at Arms he hath his Duputy so as if there should be occasion of two viz. for a Speaker and Chancellor he may supply one and his Deputy the other and besides his Deputy he hath also other Agents under him and hath use for them For upon Commitments of Delinquents without door he is to see them forth coming and in bringing them to the Bar but upon consmements or Commitment of any Member within doors that peculiarly belongs to the Gentleman of the Black Rod. So as these 2 Officers set the first wheel of a Parliament in motion for the Serjeant at Arms conducts the Chancellor or Speaker into the House of Lords the King sends the Black Rod to the Commons to bring up their Speaker who being confirm'd by the King goes to his Chair in the Commons usher'd with the other Serjeants at Arms and so when each Speaker retires from each House each Serjeant is to each a Conducter A Corollary to this First Part. I Have now shewn the General Warrants for Summoning a Parliament and the particular Writs and Patents impowring those who are to sit in the Lords House as also the Act of Precedency to prevent Disorders of Places when they meet there and given a touch of Proxies and of the words Lords and Peers and of other Accidental Writs and of the Returns of their Writs and of some who sit there without Writs or Patents and of others who are imployed there meerly by vertue of Patents And of all these I have made some Discourses as well to revive the notions of those who need no other information as to inform others who have little knowledge therein but what they gain from the short Memorials of Writers or from the imperfect Discourses which they glean from such as know some things in part but have not the true Concatenation of the Grandeur of a Parliament These discourses and those intended will I hope contain the whole System of this Constitution This part hath applied it self wholly to the Offices Degrees and Qualities pertinent to the House of Lords in general but as to the particular Persons owning those Offices Degrees and Qualities I reserve them for the Subsequent Parts of this Treatise that is after I have discours'd of the seven remaining Exemplar Writs in the Pawn which particularly concerns the House of Commons Viz. To Cornwall To Cambridge To London To Dover To Lancaster To Chester To Carnarvan in Wales And also shewn the Writs or Precepts derivative of those seven Exemplars and the manner of Elections and Returns of Writs and Precepts the Discourse of which will comprehend all the County Shires Cities and Burroughs which have power of Electing Members for Parliaments I shall then shew you the Places adapted for both Houses to meet in as also of the Members Summon'd and imployed in both Houses in this Parliament After these I shall speak of such Ceremonies as are us'd before any Members be admitted into