the Prisoners Mrs. Gaunt to be burnt and the other 3 to be drawn hang'd and quarter'd which was accordingly executed upon them and Mr. Cornish was hang'd in Cheapside over against Kings-street on Friday October 23 1685. and his Quarters afterwards put up in several Places and his Head upon the Guild-Hall where it stood till the tidings of the Dutch Invasion summon'd it with the other Quarters into the Grave after they had been expos'd in that infamous manner the space of 3 Years The Trial of Henry Baron Delamere in Westminster-Hall before George Lord Jefferies constituted Lord High-Steward on this Occasion on Thursday Jan. 14 1685. THen and there the Court being met the Lord High-Steward's Commission was first read and the Staff being carried between Garter King at Arms and the Gent. Vsher of the Black Rod was with 3 Reverences delivered upon the knee to his Grace and by him redelivered to the Gent. Vsher of the Black Rod to hold during the Service Then Proclamation was made by a Serjeant at Arms for all Persons present except Peers Privy Councellors and the reverend Judges now assistant to be uncovered and for all to whom any Writ had been directed for the certifying of any Indictment before his Grace to bring in the same forthwith After which Sir Edward Lutwich deliver'd in his Writ and Return which were read And then the Lieutenant of the Tower was call'd to bring his Prisoner to the Bar which having done Sir Roger Harsnet Serj. at Arms was called to return the Names of the Peers which he had summoned who were then called over by the Clerk of the Crown and those that appeared were these following who standing up uncovered answered to their Names each making a Reverence to the Lord High Steward Lawrence Earl of Rochester Lord High-Treasurer of England Robert E. of Sunderland Lord President of His Majesties Privy-Council Henry Duke of Norfolk Earl-Marshal of England Charles D. of Somerset Henry D. of Grafton Henry D. of Beaufort Lord President of VVales John Earl of Mulgrave Lord Chamberlain of His Majesties Houshold Aubrey E. of Oxford Charles E. of Shrewsbury Theophilus E. of Huntingdon Thomas E. of Pembroke John E. of Bridgwater Henry E. of Peterborow Robert E. of Scarsdale VVilliam E. of Craven Louis E. of Feversham George E. of Berkley Daniel E. of Nottingham Thomas E. of Plimouth Thomas Viscount Falconberg Francis Viscount Newport Treasurer of His Majesties Houshold Robert Lord Ferrers Vere Essex Lord Cromwell VVilliam Lord Maynard Comptroler of His Majesties Houshold George Lord Dartmouth Master-General of His Majesties Ordinance Sidney Lord Godolphin John Lord Churchill The Lord High Steward then having acquainted the Prisoner with the occasion of this meeting order'd the Bill of Indictment to be read which was done twice at the Prisoner's desire And then the Prisoner deliver'd in his Plea to the Jurisdiction of this Court that he ought to be tried by the whole Body of the House of Peers in Parliament the Parliament still continuing being under a Prorogation and not dissolved and because there was some agitation of the matter concerning this Prosecution upon his Petition in the House of Lords c. To which the Attorny General answer'd that the Plea was not good there never having been so much as any Indictment returned there nor found during the Session of Parliament besides that the Plea was in Paper and English The Prisoner then desired Counsel to put it into Form But it being a Plea against the Jurisdiction no time could be allowed and the Prisoner having no Counsel ready to plead his plea was over-ruled and he pleaded Not Guilty After which the Lord High Steward gave the Charge to the Peers and Sir Thomas Jenner Recorder of London opened the Indictment and Mr. Attorny General the Evidence And then the Lord Howard was first sworn Who gave the same account about the Earl of Shaftsbury's design'd Insurrection as before he had done at the other Trials where he was a Witness to which therefore the Reader is referred The Lord Grey deposed that Cheshire was one of the Places pitch'd upon for the Rising and for that end the Duke of Monmouth went his Progress into those Parts to make his Interest there and that the Prisoner was one he was directed to advise with That after the late King's Death the Duke of Monmouth was at Amsterdam with the Lord Argyle where there was an Account given of the Design that was in Hand of an Insurrection in Scotland and at that time came over to Holland Mr. Crag from Major Wildman to promote and recommend a Reconciliation between the Duke of Monmouth and the Lord Argyle who till that time had acted in separate interests giving some account that Means and Money were prepared This encouraged the Duke of Monmouth to send Capt. Matthews into England to Major Wildman to desire him to acquaint several Persons among whom the Prisoner was one that he was designed to join the Lord Argyle When Crag return'd to the Duke he gave an account that Major Wildman had convers'd with these Persons and that their Opinion was that the Duke should go for Scotland whereby they might know the strength of the Enemy here by their sending to suppress the Rebellion there and also that Major Wildman desired the Duke to bring over with him a Broad Seal to seal Commissions with and to take upon him the Title of King That soon after Crag's return Jones came with a Message to the Duke from England and was sent back shortly after by the Duke with a Letter of Instructions And the Duke intended first to have landed in Cheshire he very much depending upon that County but afterwards considering that the Persons there being of great Quality and Interest in their Country and able to manage it without his Assistance he chose rather to land in the West the Friends he relyed on there not being of that Quality Mr. Nathaniel Wade deposed that at Amsterdam soon after the Death of the late King the Duke of Monmouth and the Lord Argyle had a Consultation together and agreed that at the same time the Lord Argyle made an Insurrection in Scotland the Duke should invade England For which end the Duke sent Capt. Matthews into England to acquaint his Friends among whom he heard the Lord Delamere named to be ready for his Assistance Crag was sent over for Money but could get none and therefore the Duke sent him over again to pawn his Jewels and get what Money he could wherewith he fitted out 3 Ships laden with Ammunition and having before ordered his Friends to repair to their own Countries to be ready he set Sail and landed at Lyme and ordered his March so as that he might most conveniently meet with his Cheshire Friends In pursuance whereof they came to Keinsham Bridge where a Party of the Kings Horse set upon them of whom they took some Prisoners and thereupon thought it advisable not to let the Kings
AN EXACT ABRIDGMENT Of all the TRIALS Not omitting any Material PASSAGE therein which have been published since the Year 1678 Relating to the Popish and pretended Protestant-Plots In the Reigns of King Charles the 2d and King James the 2d LONDON Printed by J. D. for Awnsham Churchill at the Black-Swan in Avy-Mary Lane MDCXC To the Right Honourable HENRY LORD BOOTH Baron DE LA MER of Dunham-Massy Lord Lieutenant of the County-Palatine of Chester one of the Lords of the Treasury and one of his Majesty's most Honourable Privy-Council My Lord THat I presume to present this Abstract to your Honour the just Interest your Lordship hath both in it and its Author is sufficient Apology It must never be forgot what good Service Your Trial though Your own extraordinary Prudence and couragious management thereof did to the Publick in stopping that Sluce of Blood which had unjustly been then opened with a Design which had well-nigh effected to suffocate our Laws and feed their Tyrannical Arbitrary Power For 't is evident the Fanatick Plot then like them that made it afterward disserted the Stage and though your Honour 's undaunted Appearance and powerful Aid have never since as 't is hoped they never will dare to appear amongst us the unavoidable Mischief whence otherwise would have followed most Men now are wise enough to apprehend Your Lordship's Vertues indeed have always from a very early beginning rendred You a no less real Friend to your Country than a formidable Enemy to the mightiest of its Opposers And Your generous Courage hath embolden'd You to express it even with the greatest Hazard in the worst of Times You have done and suffered much I 'me sure Your share for the Publick and your Lordship's last generous Essay hath now made all Men very sensible of it so that your Honour's Fame needs not the Aid of my Breath to blow it further Abroad Only I must crave your Lordships leave to say that I am proud of this Occasion to tender your Honour even so small a Testimony of real Gratitude from one who is a Member of a Family that hath been honour'd with a long and uninterrupted Friendship of Yours not only in Your Father's Time but in Your Lordship 's since May Your Honour go on to dazle and outshine all your Enemies in faithfully serving the best of Princes and the most ungrateful of Nations May Almighty God long preserve your Person and Vertuous Family in Grace Health and Prosperity And may this your Trial be the last that ever may entitle You to the Patronage of the like Abstraction is the sincere Prayer of My Lord Your Honours most Humble and Faithful Servant P. N. TO THE READER AS in these ten or eleven Years last past have happened as wonderful Passages within this our Island as ever History mention'd so are the Records thereof surely very valuable to the considering part of Mankind A Collection whereof thou art here presented with in a Volume that will spare thee both in thy Purse and Time without defrauding thee of the least drachm of any material Information Here thou hast the substance of Forty nine Trials consisting of near seven hundred Sheets of Paper and which bought singly as they were published cost five Pounds or more and which now would be difficult to collect at almost any price carefully reduced comparatively to a small Bulk and Price yet so as to preserve a perfect remembrance of Things and Persons any way materially concerned therein As herein was designed nothing of Reflection so must thou expect only an Abstraction And for the Compleatness and Sufficiency of this I submit to thy Censure after thou hast read what follows I say nothing of the usefulness thereof because none can have so little Concern for the Knowledg and Remembrance of past Transactions as not to be aware of it If it be well done I am sure it cannot be ill took A CATALOGUE of the following TRIALS Abridg'd 1678. The Trials of 1. WIlliam Staley Pag. 1 2. Edward Coleman Pag. 5 3. William Ireland Thomas Pickering and John Grove Pag. 13 4. Robert Green Henry Berry and Lawrence Hill Pag. 19 5. Nathaniel Thompson William Pain and John Farrell Pag. 31 1679. The Trials of 6. Nathaniel Reading Pag. 42 7. Thomas Whitebread William Harcourt John Fenwick John Gavan and Anthony Turner Pag. 50 8. Richard Langhorn Pag. 62 9. Sir George Wakeman William Marshal William Rumley and James Corker Pag. 71 10 Andrew Brommich William Atkins and Charles Kern Pag. 80 11 Thomas Knox and John Lane Pag. 85 12 Lionel Anderson William Russel Charles Parry Henry Starkey James Corker Will. Marshal and Alexand. Lumbsden Pag. 98 13 Sir Thomas Gascoyne Pag. 101 1680. The Trials of 14 Henry Care Pag. 112 15 Elizabeth Cellier Pag. 115 16 Roger Earl of Castlemain Pag. 118 17 John Giles Pag. 123 18 Elizabeth Cellier Pag. 131 19 Thomas Twing and Mary Pressicks Pag. 139 20 William Viscount Stufford Pag. 145 1681. The Trials of 21 Edward Fitz-Harris Pag. 190 22 Oliver Plunket Pag. 198 23 Sir Miles Stapleton Pag. 204 24 Georgt Busby Pag. 209 25 Stephen Colledge Pag. 214 26 Anthony Earl of Shaftsbury Pag. 243 27 Charles John Count Coningsmark Christopher Vratz John Stern and Charles George Borosky Pag. 255 1683. The Trials of 28 Thomas Pilkington Samuel Shute Henry Cornish Ford Lord Grey of Werk Sir Thomas Player Slingsby Bethel Francis Jenks John Deagle Richard Freeman Richard Goodenough Robert Key John Wickham Samuel Swinock and John Jekyll sen the pretended Rioters Pag. 266 29 Capt. Thomas Walcot Pag. 274 30 William Hone Pag. 289 31 William Lord Russel Pag. 292 32 John Rouse Pag. 303 33 Capt. William Blague Pag. 307 34 Col. Sidney Pag. 311 35 John Hambden Pag. 325 36 Lawrence Braddon and Hugh Speke Pag. 332 37 Sir Samuel Barnardiston Pag. 351 1684. The Trial of 38 Sir William Pritchard Plaintiff and Thomas Papillon Defendant Pag. 364 1685. The Trials of 39 Dr. Titus Oates Pag. 372 40 Dr. Titus Oates Pag. 384 41 William Ring Pag. 397 42 John Fernly Pag. 400 43 Elizabeth Gaunt Pag. 402 44 Henry Cornish Pag. 404 45 Henry Baron Delamere Pag. 404 45 Henry Baron Delamere Pag. 410 1686. The Trial of 46 Henry Lord Bishop of London Pag. 424 1687. The Trial of 47 William Ld. Arch Bp. of Canterbury William Ld. Bp. of St. Asaph Francis Ld. Bp. of Ely John Ld. Bp. of Chichester Thomas Ld. Bp. of Bath and Wells Thomas Ld. Bp. of Peterborough Jonathan Ld. Bp. of Bristol Pag. 434 The following Petition and Trials were omitted in the former Collection are now added in the Appendix Col. Sidney's Petition to K. Charles II. Pag. 1 The Trial of Charles Bateman Chirurgeon P. 2 The Trial of John Hambden Gent. P. 10 This may be printed ROB. MIDGLEY June 17. 1689. The Trial of William Stayley Goldsmith at the King's-Bench-Bar on Thursday Novemb. 21. 1678. HIS Indictment was for Treasonable Words against his most
that Robinson and his Wife upon their Examinations before a Justice of the Peace said they did not know him Then the Statute of 27. Eliz. Cap. 2. was read and the Ld. Ch. Justice summ'd up the Evidence and the Jury brought him in Guilty Then VVilliam Atkins was set to the Bar having been Arraigned for being a Romish Priest and his Indictment read to the same Jury Then VVilliam Jackson being sworn said He could say nothing Francis VVilden deposed That he heard him say Prayers in an Unknown Tongue in a Surplice and had seen him give the Sacrament to seven or eight according to the manner of the Church of Rome in a Wafer at Mrs. Stamford's House in VVolverhampton Then John Jarvis being called refused to be sworn saying He was troubled with a Vision last Night But the Ld. Ch. Justice told him he mistook for Old Men dream Dreams 't was Young Men see Visions and that he was an old Man Bidding him speak the Truth and he 'd warrant him he should not be troubled with Visions any more this being a Trick of the Priests So he being sworn deposed That he had often been relieved by this Atkins and had heard him say somewhat in an Unknown Tongue and had Confess'd to him and often received the Sacrament from him he being in a Priests Habit. Henry Brown also deposed That he was almost turned from the Protestant Religion to that of the Church of Rome but never went further than Confession and that was to this Man and then he left them Then Thomas Dudley deposed That he likewise was given that way and had been at Confession with one Atkins whom he believed to be this Man and had seen him perform several Rites of the Church of Rome at VVell-Head at Ham. Then the Statute was read and the Prisoner saying He had neither any Witnesses to call nor any thing to say The Ld. Ch. Justice summ'd up the Evidence and the Jury brought him also in Guilty And the Ld. Ch. Justice sentenced them both to be Drawn Hang'd and Quarter'd ON Monday Aug. 4. 1679. at Hereford Charles Kerne was brought to the Bar and being Arraigned he pleaded Not Guilty to the Indictment which was for being a Romish Priest Then the Jury being sworn whose Name 's are not inserted into this Trial only that one VVill. Barret was Foreman the Court proceeded to call the Evidence against him And first Edward Biddolph was sworn who deposed that he did not know the Prisoner that he had seen one of that name 6 Years agone at Mr. Somerset's at Bellingham but would not say this was he Then Margaret Edwards deposed That she had known Kerne five or six Years That the first time she ever saw him was at Mr. VVigmore's of Lucton who told her it was he That she hath seen him several times since twice or thrice at VVoebly and the last time was the 29th of May was Twelvemonth at Sarnsfield at Mrs. Monington's where she saw him deliver the Wafer and remembred the Words Corpus Christi to four persons that were there but she her self did not receive She gave also an account of the Reason of her then coming thither it being at the request of one Harris of Lempster whose Wife was sick to seek some Remedy from Mrs. Monington for her Telling how the Maid brought her up to the Mistress how she acquainted her with her Errand what advice was given her and how Mrs. Monington understanding she was a Papist took her into the Chappel whereof she gave a Description Then Mary Jones deposed That she knew Mr. Kerne about eight Years ago when she lived at Mr. Somersets and that Mr. Kerne lived in the House about half a Year That she hath seen several Persons come thither And that one Sunday Morning she saw several Persons go up with Mr. Kerne and listning she heard Mr. Kerne say something aloud which she did not understand there being but a Wall between them That also there was a Child Christned in the House and no one there but Mr. Somerset and his Wife Mr. Latchet and his Wife and Mr. Kerne to do it but she did not see him do it though she heard his Voice And that once she wash'd a Surplice but knew not whose it was Then the Prisoner in his own Defence called one Mr. Hyet who said That Margaret Edwards had denied to him that she knew Mr. Kerne but not being on her Oath when she said so it was not regarded Mr. Weston's maid affirmed That she saw Margaret Edwards and Mary Jones talking together and Marg. Edwards instructed the other what she should say but being called they both denyed it upon their Oaths Then Mrs. Monington appear'd who said She neither knew Marg. Edwards nor James Harris and Mrs. Monington's Maid denied that ever she saw her at her Mistresses House Then the Statute being read of 27 Eliz. the Prisoner urged that Persons that are not Priest's may say Mass except that of Bread and Wine and Christen too in extremis Then the Ld. Ch. Justice summ'd up the Evidence concluding Margaret Edwards to be a Positive Evidence but leaving the other doubtful to the Consideration of the. Jury who brought the Prisoner in Not Guilty The Trial of Thomas Knox and John Lane at the King's-Bench Bar on Tuesday Novemb. 25. 1679. before the Lord Chief Justice Scroggs and the other Judges of that Court. THen and there the Prisoners were indicted for a Conspiracy to defame and scandalize Dr. Oates and Mr. Bedloe thereby to discredit their Evidence about the Horrid Popish Plot. To which having pleaded Not Guilty the Jury was sworn viz. Sir John Kirke Thomas Harriot Henry Johnson Simon Middleton Hugh Squire Francis Dorrington John Roberts Rainsford Waterhouse Thomas Earsby Joseph Radcliffe James Supple Richard Cooper To whom the Indictment being read Trenchard Esq of Counsel for the King in this Cause opened the Indictment Serjeant Maynard pursued the Charge and Sir Creswel Levinz his Majesty's Attorney General opened the Evidence Then the Attainders of those Persons executed for the Plot and the Impeachments of the Lords in the Tower and of the Earl of Danby mentioned in the Indictment being allowed Robert Radford one of his Majesty's Yeomen of the Guard being call'd and sworn deposed That Richard Lane who was a Yeoman of the Guard extraordinary and Father of this John Lane told him about a Year ago that Doctor Oates did attempt many times to Bugger his Son but knowing him to be a lying Fellow he durst not speak of it again for fear he would have put it upon him Mr. Thomas Allen only deposed that in December last when Lane was out of Dr. Oates's Service he desired him to interceed for him which he did till he was admitted again Mr. Samuel Oates the Doctor 's Brother deposed That in April last about a Fortnight before Lane went from his Brother he heard him say having before wished for 1000 l. that he questioned not
Papers that had been charged upon him that they were none of his nor did he ever own them for his nor could he ever make Pictures nor did he ever in his Life and that that very Person whom Mr. Dugdale said he owned he got it to be printed by had denied it before the King and Council Then Elizabeth Hunt the Prisoner's servant appeared who testified That about 7 or 8 Weeks before the seizure of the Papers a Porter brought three Bundles of Papers for her Master in his absence which lay in a Box in his Counting-house a Week or Fortnight before she told him of them And as to Mr. Dugdale that she going to him for Mony he owed her Master after he was in Prison and he not paying her it as he promised she said to him Sir I think 't is very hard that you should keep my Master's Mony from him and yet go and swear against his Life too he said to her There was a great deal of do about his swearing against her Master more than needs but as he hoped for Salvation he did not believe Mr. Colledge had any more hand in any Conspiracy against his Majesty than the Child unborn Mr. Colledge inform'd the Court that this Maid moreover told him in the Tower before he came away that Mr. Dugdale desired to be remembred to Mr. Smith Colledge's Counsel and told her he had nothing against her Master that could touch his Life or an Hair of his Head and that he knew nothing of a Plot against the King and that if he could help it he had as lieve he had given 100 l. he had never spoken what he had Which she own'd for truth and Dugdale then denied evading it by telling the Story another way Then Mrs. Godwin being called appeared who related concerning the Papers that three Messengers coming to search for them on the Saturday after her Brother's confinement and they not finding them she got her Brother-in-law George Spur to carry them away to his House at Busshie to secure them till they should know what they did concern Then Spur being called did not appear Then the Attorny General called for one John Shirland who appeared to be a Man that lived by his Shifts and had been whip'd in Bridewel who swore that Mr. Bolron would have given him 10 l. and an Horse to go down and swear against Sir Miles Stapleton Which Bolron denied Then Smith deposed likewise against Mr. Bolron that he told him as they were traveling that he had as much to say against Colledge as any Body and that if he would speak for him he would evidence against Sir John Brooks for a discourse at Ferry-Bridge Which Mr. Bolron deny'd likewise Then no more Witnesses being called Mr. Colledge began to make his Observations upon the Evidence to the Court Professing his own Innocency as to what had been sworn against him and upon what had been attested for him owning his Zeal for his King Parliaments Church of England and against Popery Relating how he came acquainted with Haynes and the discoveries he made to him of the Popish Plot and of Sir Edmondbury Godfrey's Murder for which the Court interrupted and reproved him as not to the purpose and then he went on to sum up his own Evidence complaining of his close Confinement so that he could not procure that Evidence he otherwise might have done for himself The Statute of Decimo tertio was read to him and then Mr. Colledge very pathetically recommending himself to the Justice of his Jury concluded his Defence Then Mr. Sollicitor General largely summ'd up the Evidence and Mr. Serjeant Jefferies and the Lord Chief Justice did the same Then the Court called for two Bottles of Sack which the Jury divided among themselves at the Bar for their Refreshment in the presence of the Prisoner After which a Bailiff was sworn and the Jury withdrawing to consider of their Verdict the Court adjourned for half an hour and when they returned the Jury brought the Prisoner in Guilty At which there was a great Shout given whereat the Court being offended one Person who was observed by the Cryer to be particularly concerned in the Shout was committed to Goal for that Night but the next Morning having received a publick Reproof was discharged without Fees Then it being about 3 a Clock in the Morning the Court adjourned to 10. At which hour the Court being sat and first Mr. Aaron Smith having entred into a Recognizance of 500 l. to appear the first day of the next Term at the Court of King's-Bench the Lord Chief-Justice after a short speech directed to the Prisoner pronounced Sentence upon him to be Hang'd Drawn and Quartered which was accordingly executed upon him over against the Gate of the Castle at Oxford on Wednesday August 31. 1681. And his Head and Quarters through his Majesty's Grace were delivered to his Relations and by them brought up to London and privately interred The proceedings at the Sessions-House in the Old-Baily London on Thursday November 24. 1681. before his Majesty's Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer upon on the Bill of Indictment for High-Treason against Anthony Earl of Shaftsbury The Grand Jury Sir Samuel Barnardiston John Morden Thomas Papillon John Dubois Charles Herle Edward Rudge Humphrey Edwin John Morrice Edmund Harrison Joseph Wright John Cox Thomas Parker Leonard Robinson Thomas Shepherd John Flavell Michael Godfrey Joseph Richardson William Empson Andrew Kendrick John Lane John Hall THE Lord Chief Justice Pemberton gave the Charge wherein he explained the Nature of Treason particularly from the Statute of the 13th Car. 2. and explained the Validity of two Witnesses and the Jury's present Duty After which a Bill of High-Treason was offered against the Earl of Shaftsbury and Sir Francis Withens moved That the Evidence might be heard in Court Then the Jury desired a Copy of their Oath which the Court granted and then they withdrew After some little time they returned and being called over by their Names The Foreman acquainted the Lord Chief Justice That it was the Opinion of the Jury and they claim'd as their Right that they ought to examine the Witnesses in private But the Lord Chief Justice deny'd that it was their Right but was their Advantage and it was the King's desire it should be publick in which also the Lord Chief Justice North concurr'd and then therefore the Indictment was read wherein the Earl of Shaftsbury was charged with High-Treason for conspiring the Death of the King and subversion of the Government The Jury then desired a List of the Names of the King's Evidence But they were told that they being indorsed upon the back of the Indictment which they were to have out with them it was needless Then they requested to see the Warrant by which the Earl of Shaftsbury was committed but that they being told that the Lieutenant of the Tower kept for his Indemnity could not be granted Then they requested that the Evidence might
be put apart and examined one by one which was granted And then William Blathwayt Esq appeared and delivered in a Paper deposing that it was put into his Custody by Mr. Gwyn Clerk of the Council who seiz'd it among others in my Lord Shaftsbury's House and brought them to the Council-Office put them into one of the Rooms look'd the Door and deliver'd the Key to him And being ordered by the Committee of Examinations he fetch'd up the Trunks and Papers into the Council-Chamber and this Paper he took out of a Velvet Bag which was in the great Trunk that was sealed and then opened on July 6. in the presence of Mr. Samuel Wilson and Mr. Starkey who were both appointed by the Lord of Shaftsbury Then Mr. Gwyn being called deposed That on July 2. by a Warrant from the Secretary he searched the Lord Shaftsbury's House for Papers where was a great Hair-Trunk in which were several sorts of them and a Velvet Bag into which he put some loose Papers and sealed up the Trunk and being sent another way he deliver'd it to Mr. Blathwayt That all the Papers that were in the Velvet Bag he had in my Lord's Closet and that nothing was in that Bag but what he had there when he delivered it to Mr. Blathwayt Then Mr. Secretary Jenkins deposed That that was the Paper that Mr. Blathwayt delivered into his Hands in the Council-Chamber with nine more which he had kept under Lock and Key ever since till Monday last when he took them out and being numbred sent them sealed to Mr. Graham who brought them back to him again without any alteration whatsoever The Paper then was read which was to this effect That We the Knights c. finding to the grief of our Hearts the Papists Contrivances against the Protestant Religion the Life of the King and Laws and Liberties of the Nation to set up Arbitrary Power and Slavery And it being notorious that they have received Encouragement and Protection from James D. of York and from their Expectations of his succeeding to the Crown c. And that by his Influences Mercenary Forces have been levied Parliaments unreasonably Prorogued and Dissolved and the Army and Ammunition put into the hands of his Party and the Reputation and Treasure of the Kingdom hereby wasted That therefore they endeavoured to Exclude him from the Succession to the Crown and that failing they have now thought fit to propose to all true Protestants an Union amongst themselves by solemn and sacred Promise of mutual Defence and Assistance in the Preservation of the Protestant Religion the King's Person and State and our Laws Liberties and Properties in a Declaration in the Form ensuing Which was to this effect First The Person swears to maintain the Protestant Religion against Popery Secondly The King's Person and State as also the Power and Priviledges of Parliaments Rights and Liberties of Subjects c. Thirdly That J. D. of Y. having profess'd himself a Papist and given Life to the Plot that therefore he would oppose his or any other Papist's coming to the Crown by all lawful Means and by force of Arms if need so require c. To this end they mutually obliged one another to pursue unto destruction all that oppose the Ends of this Association and to defend all that enter into it And do engage that they will obey such Orders as they shall from time to time receive from this present Parliament whilst it shall be sitting or the major part of the Members of both Houses subscribing this Association when it shall be Prorogued or Dissolved and obey such Officers as shall by them be set over them in their several Counties c. until the next meeting of Parliament c. And that they would stick to this Association during Life c. In witness whereof c. Never a Hand was to this Paper Which being read and briefly descanted upon by the Counsel for the King John Booth was then called forth who deposed That about the middle of January last be was introduced into the Lord Shaftsbury's Acquaintance by Captain Henry Wilkinson a Yorkshire Gentleman an old Royalist and an old Acquaintance of his about some Concern relating to Carolina After which he went frequently to my Lord's House and between Christmas and March four or five times Where he hath heard him sharply inveigh against the Times and thought himself undervalued and feared that Popery would be introduced And that the Oxford Parliament that was then shortly to meet would give the King no Mony unless he would satisfy them in what they would insist upon which he said would be the Bill of the Exclusion and the abolishing the Statute of the 35th of Eliz. and passing a New Bill to free the Dissenters from the Penalties of the Laws which if refused would make a Breach between the King and Parliament whose meeting at Oxford was designed only to over-awe them And therefore that himself and divers Noble Lords and Members of the Commons had considered their own Safety and that he had establish'd a matter of fifty Men Persons of Quality that he believed would have Men along with them and he intrusted Capt. Wilkinson with the Command of these Men who were to come to Oxford at such a time and if there were any Breach or Disturbance they were to be ready to assist him and those other Persons in his Confederacy to purge the Guards of all Papists and Tories and purge from the King those evil Counsellors which were about him naming the Earl of Worcester the Lord Clarendon the Lord Hallifax Lord Feversham and Mr. Hide now Lord Viscount Hide whom he look'd upon as dangerous Persons and then to bring the King away to London where those things should be established which they designed for the Preservation of the Protestant Religion and keeping out of Arbitrary Power and Government Upon which Capt. Wilkinson desired him to be one under his Command and to provide Horse and Arms to which he consented and did so expecting to be sent for after the Parliament was sat they insisting upon the things the Lord Shaftsbury had predicted but the unexpected News of their Dissolution prevented it Then being ask'd when he first discovered this he answered about six Weeks ago and related the occasion and manner of his doing so Next Mr. Edward Turbervile deposed That in February last he waiting upon the Lord Shaftsbury about his getting some Mony and requesting his Letter to the President of the Council to stand his Friend my Lord said There was little good to be had from the King as long as his Guards were about him were it not for whom they would quickly go down to White-Hall and obtain what terms they thought fit And that the Rabble were all of that Side especially the People about Wapping and Aldersgate-Street That the Rich Men of the City would Vote for Elections but they could not expect they should stand by them in case there
seemed much concern'd and his Countenance altered and desired to lie down Then Mr. Gibbons deposed That when they had apprehended the Count they carried him to the Mayor's and thence to an Inn for 2 or 3 hours and there the Count asked him his Name because he said he would come and give him Thanks after his Trouble was over he owned his Name Gibbons and that he belonged to the Duke of Monmouth Said he the Duke of Monmouth hath no Command now and therefore how could he take him by his Order He said he did not come upon his Command but he had killed a very good Friend of his and a Country-Man and if Providence had not ordered it otherwise he had killed a more particular Friend of mine and a Master whom he had served many Years He said he did not think they would have done the D. of Monmouth any Injury After which walking up and down he said 'T was a stain upon his Blood but one good Action in the Wars or Lodging upon a Counterscrap will wash away all that Then he asking what the People said he told him the Captain had made a Confession though it was a thing he did not then know the Count said he did not believe the Captain would confess any thing To all this the Count by his Interpreter Sir Nathaniel Johnson reply'd That he came into England with a design to have got a Regiment and serv'd England against France hearing of an Alliance to be between England Holland and Sweedland against France That he lay incognito because he was broke out in Spots on his Arms and Breast and designed to take Physick and avoid drinking of Wine and his Equipage was not come to him till after That he removed his Lodgings the first because it was too cold for him and the second because of a smoaking Chimney That he sent for the Polander over to dress his Horses after the German way which he came to buy and had return'd 1000 Pistols for that end and had bought one Horse which the Count's Brother testified That had it not been for the stormy Weather the Polander had arrived sooner he having writ for him 4 Months ago That he had no Quarrel with Mr. Thynn nor to the best of his knowledg ever saw him That it was strange he should ask a Scullion-boy whether People might ride on Sundays when he himself over and over again has rid upon Sundays to Hide-Park which was testified by Major Oglethorp and divers other Gentlemen That Capt. Vratz visited him on Sunday only because he was sick That he gave the Polander to the Captain because he should have no use for him himself bought him Clothes and a Sword because he wanted them That he absconded because one Markham his Taylor told him he heard him named as concern'd in the Murder and that if the Common People should catch him they would tear him to pieces and so his Friends did counsel him to withdraw That he heard the People say the Murderers follow'd Mr. Thynn's Coach but would not shoot till the Duke of Monmouth was gone out That he spoke of his Apprehension and Imprisonment as being a stain to his Blood And then the Count speaking something of the Repute of his own Family and Zeal for the Protestant Religion and Love for the English c. Sir Francis Winnington summ'd up the Evidence whereat the People made a great shout but were rebuked for it by the Court Mr. Williams did also the like and then the Ld. Ch. Justice gave the Charge and the Jury withdrew and the Court Adjourned for half an hour and then sent for the Jury who brought in Borosky Vratz and Stern Guilty and the County Not Guilty Who being dismiss'd Mr. Recorder sentenc'd the other 3 to be hang'd Who were accordingly Executed in the Pall-Mall on Friday Mar. 10 following and Borosky was afterwards hung up in Chains a little beyond Mile-End by his Majesty's Command The Trial of Sheriffs Thomas Pilkington Esq Samuel Shute Esq Henry Cornish Alderman Ford Lord Grey of Wark Sir Thomas Player Kt. Chamberlain Slingsby Bethel Esquire Francis Jenks John Deagle Richard Freeman Richard Goodenough Robert Key John Wickham Samuel Swinock and John Jekyll sen Before the Lord Chief Justice Saunders at the Guild-Hall London on Tuesday May 8. 1683. THen and there the Defendants appeared for their Trial upon an information against them for the Riot at Guild-hall on Midsummer-day 1682. being the Day for Election of Sheriffs for the Year ensuing To which they had pleaded Not Guilty And the Jury appearing the Defendants Counsel challenged the Array because returned by Sir Dudley North whose legally being Sheriff was now in question Which Challenge was read in French and English and admitted of a long Debate but was over-ruled As was also another Challenge offered on behalf of the Lord Grey The Defendants Counsel then prayed a Bill of Exceptions which also was over-ruled The Jury sworn were Sir Benjamin Newland Sir John Matthews Sir Thomas Griffith Sir Edmund Wiseman Sir John Buckworth Percival Gilburn Henry Wagstaff Barthol Ferriman Thomas Blackmore Samuel Newton William Watton George Villars To whom the Information being read the same was opened by Mr. Dolbin and Mr. Attorn Gen. Mr. Sol. Gen. and Mr. Serj. Jefferies opened the Evidence And then the Common Serjeant Mr. Lightfoot Mr. Wells the Common-Crier Mr. Man the Sword-Bearer Mr. King Sir William Hooker and Mr. Bancroft all being sworn deposed their knowledg about the Method of the City Elections all concurring That the Lord-Mayor always used to summon and adjourn and dissolve the Common-Hall and that the Sheriffs as Sheriffs were no more concern'd in the Case than any private Man Then Mr. Craddock deposed as to the Persons concern'd in the Riot That he was then standing where they poll'd and the Lord-Mayor coming thither also to protest against their manner of Proceeding Sheriff Bethel bid him oppose or resist him for that he had nothing to do there And that this was before the Poll was adjourn'd Mr. Reeves then depos'd That he saw Mr. Shute and Mr. Pilkington encouraging the People to Poll after the Lord-Mayor was gone and that while the Lord-Mayor was there he saw a great Contest among the People some saying he had nothing to do there another cried Stop the Sword stop the Sword whom he laid hold of but some Body got him again from him Mr. John Hill deposed That he saw then Mr. Robert Key Mr. Goodenough and the Lord Grey among the People as also Mr. Cornish Mr. Richard Fletcher deposed That he also was there on that Midsummer-day by Order of Sheriff Shute after the Lord-Mayor was gone to call all Men that were to poll to come forward for the Books were to be shut up and that he could only testify that Mr. Pilkington and Mr. Shute were both there Then Capt. Clark depos'd That when Proclamation was then made for adjournment of the Court and God save the King was
and Riot The Trial of Capt. Thomas Walcot at the Old-Baily London on a Commission of Oyer and Terminer held there for the City of London and County of Middlesex on Thursday July the 12th 1683. THen and there the Prisoner was Arraign'd together with William Hone John Rouse and Capt. William Blague upon an Indictment for High-Treason for conspiring the Death of the King and raising a Rebellion in this Kingdom To which he pleaded Not Guilty with the other three And after some Exceptions the following Jury was Sworn Nicholas Charlton Christopher Pitts Robert Beddingfield John Pelling William Winbury Thomas Seaton William Rutland Thomas Short Theophilus Man John Genew John Short and Thomas Nicholas To whom the Indictment being read Mr. North of Counsel for the King in this Cause opened the same and Mr. Attorney-General Mr. Serjeant Jefferies and Mr. Sollicitor-General opened the Evidence And then Col. Rumsey deposed That about the latter end of October or beginning of November he was sent by the Lord Shaftsbury to Mr. Shepherd's House near Lombard-street to the D. of Monmouth Lord Russel Lord Grey and Sir Thomas Armstrong to know of them what was done about raising Arms at Taunton who told him that Mr. Trenchard had failed them about the Men and they could proceed no further at that time Whereupon the Lord Shaftsbury said there was no dependance upon those Gentlemen and so prepared to be gone for Holland That about a fortnight or three Weeks afterwards there was a meeting at Mr. West's Chamber where was Mr. West Mr. Goodenough Mr. Wade and another where the taking off the King and the Duke was proposed as the surest way and for that end Mr. Ferguson was writ for out of Holland who came over upon that Letter and Capt. Walcot with him upon Ash-Wednesday And they had several meetings about getting a sufficient number of Men and Mr. Goodenough and Mr. Rumbold brought Notes of many Names and Capt. Walcot was then present and undertook to be one of the Men that should help to kill the King at Rumbold's House near Hodsden in Hertfordshire as he should come from New-Market the Saturday before Easter but Capt. Walcot refused to have an hand in attacking the Coach only he would command a Party that should charge the Guards For there was to be several Parties one small Party was to have killed the Postillion another to kill the Horses and Mr. Rumbold with a certain number to seize the Coach and Captain Walcot the Guards but the Fire at New-Market causing the King to return on the Tuesday before Easter they could not have their Men in a readiness and so were disappointed Immediately upon this it was resolved on in another meeting whereat the Prisoner was that Money and Arms should be provided and Mr. Ferguson undertook the raising of Money and Mr. West the buying of Arms therewith and Mr. Goodenough and Mr. Rumbold the providing of Men to be in a readiness against the first opportunity that happened further designing to kill the King as he came from Windsor to London or from Windsor to Hampton-Court or the Play-House and that Mr. West did tell him he did buy Arms and received 100 l. of Mr. Ferguson for them That the Thursday before the Discovery they met at the Salutation in Lombard-street where was Captain Walcot Mr. West Mr. Wade the two Goodenough's Mr. Nelthrop and himself discoursing about the Division of the City into 20 parts 7 of which Mr. Goodenough gave an account of That on the Saturday following they appointed another meeting at the George on Ludgate-hill but the Discovery coming out there met only four of them And the Monday after the Discovery they met again at Capt. Tracy's there being the Prisoner Mr. West Mr. Wade Mr. Nelthrop the two Goodenough's and Mr. Ferguson who exclaimed against Keeling and resolved to be gone Then Mr. Keeling being Sworn related how before the King went to New-Market he was drawn in by Goodenough and provided Burton Thompson and Barber to join in killing the King whom Rumbold encouraged thereto by telling them the conveniences of his House for that purpose being a lone House and having a Court-Wall using this as an Argument That to kill the King and the D. of York would be a keeping one of the Commandments because unless that were done there would be a great deal of Blood-shed committed telling them the way how they designed to effect it as before and if this way failed then there should be Men in the Habit of Countrey-men with a Cart in the Lane who should run the Cart a-thwart the Lane and so stop the Coach That at the Dolphin-Tavern in Bartholomew-Lane where were Rumbold West Goodenough and Hone the Joyner he heard West talking to Rumbold about the King 's returning from New-Market asking him how many Swan-Quills Goose-Quills and Crow-Quills with Sand and Ink he must have To which was answered 6 Swan-Quills 20 Goose-Quills and 20 or 30 Crows-Quills saying that by Swan-Quills was meant Blunderbusses by Goose-Quills Muskets and by Crows-Quills Pistols and by Sand and Ink Powder and Bullets That he was at the Salutation-Tavern in Lombard-street with the Prisoner and others the Thursday before the Discovery where some of them call'd him Gulick there being then a Report of one Gulick that headed a Rising at Cologn Mr. West telling him that Gulick in Dutch was Keeling in English and that he hoped to see him at the Head of as good an Army in Wapping as Gulick was at Cologn which was all he could say as to the Prisoner He gave them a further account how Goodenough gave him 3 Papers of 3 Divisions of the City one for himself and the other 2 for whom he could trust advising him to take 9 or 10 Men to his Assistance who were to ask several Persons Supposing that the Papists should rise or be a French Invasion Are you in a Posture of Defence Which was all they were to communicate and by this means feel them and see how many Men could be raised telling him moreover of a Design to kill the King and the Duke at the Bull-Feast and lay it upon the Papists as a Branch of the Popish Plot and that one was drawing a Declaration to take away the Chimney-Money that so the common People might fall in with them more readily Saying that it was trouble of Mind caused him to make this Discovery which he did to one Mr. Peckham who brought him to the Lord Dartmouth and thence to Mr. Secretary Jenkins Acknowledging himself to be the Person who arrested the Lord-Mayor and that Goodenough did tell him that the Design was to secure the Lord-Mayor and the Sheriffs and the Tower Then Mr. Zachary Bourne depos'd That he came acquainted with the Prisoner by means of Mr. Ferguson who lodg'd at his House That he was at their Meeting at the Dragon upon Snow-hill where the Prisoner was and their Discourse was about a Design of raising and dividing the
had the Assassination gone on these things were to be done The Lord-Mayor and Sheriffs were to be kill'd and as many of the Lieutenancy as they could get and Papillon and Dubois be forc'd to take the Office of Sheriff upon them or else be used as the rest And Sir Thomas Gold Sir John Shorter or Alderman Cornish who was thought the fittest Person be set up for Lord-Mayor The Principal Ministers of State also were to be kill'd the Lord Hallifax the Lord Rochester and the Lord Keeper whom they said they would hang upon the same post that Colledge was hang'd upon for his Murder Sir John Moor was to be kill'd and hung up in Guild-Hall and the Judges to be flead and stuffed and hung up in Westminster-Hall And several of the Pentionary Parliament were to be hang'd up also The King 's Natural Sons they said were good lusty Fellows and would serve for Porters or Water-men and the Lady Ann they would marry to some Country Gentleman for a Breed to keep out Foraign Pretences And that the Prisoner at the Bar was sometimes at these Meetings when these things were discoursed of though not so often as the rest And after the News of the Fire he said he believed God shew'd his disapprobation of the thing desiring to have his Name concealed whereupon Ferguson told him he needed not to be ashamed for that it was a glorious Action and such an Action as he hoped to see publickly gratified by the Parliament and question'd not but they should be fam'd for it and have Statues erected for them with the Title of Liberatores Patriae That he had told some Nonconformists who desired him to forbear but says he they are silly People that do not know how to distinguish between killing a Prince for difference in Opinion about Religion and destroying a Tyrant for preservation of the Rights and Liberties of the People saying it was an Action that would make all the Princes of the World tremble and teach them to use their Subjects kindly That about Christmass Col. Rumsey acquainted him of an Insurrection design'd to be about March carry'd on by the D. of Monmouth Ld. Russel Ld. Grey Ld. Howard Col. Sidney Major Wildman and Mr. Hambden to whom they drew up some things to be done for the People but they were rejected in regard all was to be left to a Parliament That he was at the Salutation where Mr. Nelthrop called Mr. Keeling Culing That there was a Treaty with the Scot's but was broke off as Mr. Ferguson told him because they would not presently declare for a Common-Wealth That at the Young Devil-Tavern he met with the Prisoner and others where Holloway did propose that since the Scotish Business was broken off they should try what Forces could be rais'd here and Mr. Ferguson did say that if 3000 Men could be had he believed the D. of Monmouth and the Lord Russel would appear in the head of them That a Map was brought and the City divided into 20 parts and each 20th part into 14ths and 15ths and one principal Man was to have one 20th Part and that Goodenough reported afterwards that there were 1300 Men out of two of the Hamlets That Mr. Bourn told him he had spoken to one Parson Lobb who said he would try what his Congregation would do That about a fortnight before the discovery Rumbold told him the jealousy he had of Keeling which if he could be satisfied of that he design'd to betray them he would get him into the Country and kill him but upon the Saturday before the Discovery Rumbold and one Gale that was to be one of the Assassinates lent Keeling 100 l. he being in need and they unwilling to discourage him On the Monday after the Discovery they met in the Morning at Capt. Walcot's Lodging where it was agreed to go beyond Sea only the Witness had no mind to go and a Boat was hired and 5. l. given in earnest But understanding the Messengers were abroad and believing the River was beset every Man shifted for himself and the Witness shifted by the means of Mr. Bourne who help'd him to a Conveniency for two or three days That being thus retired they got Mr. Keeling in the City and Rumbold discours'd him in the presence of several Persons who denied that he had discovered wishing a great many Imprecations upon himself That after some discourse of killing him they propos'd to him to go out of Town which he refused That the same Night upon tracing him they found he had called out his Brother and was gone to the Secretary's whereupon it was took for granted that the Discovery was made and that every Man must shift for himself That upon that Mr. VVade said That if the Duke of Monmouth would go into the West they might try a Push for it still And the Prisoner at the Bar said he was satisfied God would deliver the Nation but that he did not approve of the present Instruments Thus the sum of what was fastned on the Prisoner was That he was at several Meetings where the killing of the King and Duke was consulted of that he went down to Rumbold's House to view the Place and undertook to fight the Guards To this he pleaded that he never was at Rumbold's House but once as he travell'd from York by Norwich and so to London And that he was not so natural a Fool to think for him to charge the Guards when another kills the King but that he should be as Guilty as he that kills And that he was ill of the Gout all the while the King was at New-market And for that Assassinating the King it never entred into his thoughts more or less But a Letter was then produc'd under his own hand to Sir Lionel Jenkins Secretary of State purporting His trouble to see himself in his Majesty's Proclamation and his resolution to lay himself at his Majesty's Feet and acknowledg his Crime and discover all he knew relating to England Scotland and Ireland which he supposed might be more than the Original Discoverer was able to acquaint his Majesty with And farther That if his Majesty thought fit he would follow those Lords and Gentlemen who were fled and as soon as he could would inform his Majesty what Measures they intended to take next Otherwise he was resolved to give his Majesty no further trouble but to lie at his Mercy let him do with him what he pleased This letter Mr. Blathwait swore Capt. VValcot owned for his when he was examin'd before the King And Capt. Richardson swore likewise that yesterday his Clerk discover'd a piece of Paper in the Prisoner's Hand which he designed to have given his Son which was a Letter to Capt. Tracy his Landlord to desire him to speak to Col. Rumsey and Mrs. VVest to speak to her Husband to be tender of him have ground enough to serve the King upon other Men and the last words of the Note were If
July 13. 1683. THen and there the Prisoner appearing he was Arraigned upon an Indictment of High-Treason for conspiring the Death of the King and subversion of the Government To which being required to plead he desired a Copy of his Indictment but being told nothing could be granted till he had pleaded he pleaded Not Guilty And then complain'd of his being arraign'd and tried at the same time desiring a Copy of his Panel having had only some Names of Persons usually upon Juries and that his Trial might be deferr'd till the Afternoon in regard he had a Witness that was not in Town But the Attorn Gen. urg'd the Jury might be called Then the Prisoner desired a Pen and Ink and some to write for him and to have the use of his Papers all which were granted And then John Martin being named the Lord Russel asked if he were a Free-holder of forty Shillings a Year saying that he thought none were allowed but such as were Free-holders To which the Court replied That no Pannel was made in London by Free-holders for that London Estates belonging either to the Nobility or Gentry that lived out of the City or to Corporations London was excepted To this his Lordship urged the Statute of 2 Hen. 5. wherein he said it was positive that in Cases of Life and Death no Man should be judged but by those that have forty Shillings a Year But the Attorn Gen. not allowing the Prisoners Exceptions his Counsel were called and again assigned him by the Court Mr. Pollexfen Mr. Holt and Mr. Ward who learnedly urged what they took to be Law in that Case and were answer'd by the Attorn Gen. Mr. Sol. Gen. Sir George Jefferies and Mr. North the King's Counsel And then it was adjudged by eight of the Judges being present viz. the Ld. Ch. Justice the Ld. Ch. Baron Mr. Justice Wyndham Mr. Justice Jones Mr. Justice Charlton Mr. Justice Levins Mr. Baron Street and Mr. Justice Withens that in case of Treason Free-hold was no good cause of Challenge The Jury-men therefore were called and after the Lord Russel hah challenged 31 of them the following Persons were sworn viz. John Martin William Rouse Jervas Seaton William Fashion Thomas Short George Toriano VVilliam Butler James Pickering Thomas Jeve Hugh Noden Robert Brough Thomas Oneby To whom the Indictment being read the same was opened by Mr. North and the Attorny-General opened the Evidence And then Col. Rumsey being sworn deposed That about the latter end of October or beginning of November the Lord Shaftsbury sent him from his Lodging by VVapping to Mr. Shepherd's to the Duke of Monmouth the Lord Russel Lord Grey Sir Thomas Armstrong and Mr. Ferguson there met to know what Resolution they were come to about the rising of Taunton Their answer was That Mr. Trenchard had failed them that he had promised 1000 foot and 300 Horse but when he came to perform it he could not He thought the People would not meddle unless they had some time to make Provision for their Families That Mr. Ferguson made this Answer the Lord Russel and the Duke of Monmouth being present and the Lord Grey saying something to the same purpose And upon this it was the Lord Shaftsbury prepared to be gone That he was with them at Shepherd's about a quarter of an hour and that there was some discourse about seizing of the Guards at the Savoy and Mews in case the Insurrection had gone on which was to have been on Novemb. 19. and that the Duke of Monmouth the Lord. Grey and Sir Thomas Armstrong undertook to view the Guards and that the Lord Russel assented to all this and the Witness was to have gone to Bristol by the order of the Earl of Shaftsbury against that time Then Mr. Shepherd deposed that in October Mr. Ferguson came to him in the Duke of Monmouth's Name to request the conveniency of his House for him and some other Persons of Quality to meet That in the Evening came the Duke of Monmouth the Lord Grey the Lord Russel Sir Thomas Armstrong Col. Rumsey and Mr. Ferguson one after another That Sir Thomas Armstrong desired they might be private and therefore what they wanted he fetch'd up himself not suffering his Servants to come up That their Discourse was about seizing the Guards and the Duke of Monmouth Lord Grey and Sir Thomas Armstrong went one time to view them and the next time they met at his House he heard Sir Thomas say the Guards were very remiss in their Places and not like Soldiers and that the thing was feasible if they had strength to do it That they met twice at his House and the Prisoner was there both times That Mr. Ferguson read a Paper in the Nature of a Declaration setting forth the Grievances of the Nation in order to a Rising He could not say the Lord Russel was present at the reading of it but Col. Rumsey was who then deny'd it saying it was over before he came Then the Lord Howard being sworn began his long Evidence with a low Voice pretending the News he had just then receiv'd of the Earl of Essex's Fate had sunk his Voice and a long Story of the Designs of the Earl of Shaftsbury an Account of which he had from Capt. VValcot whom he brought acquainted with the Earl of Shaftsbury and by whom the Earl of Shaftsbury sent for him while he absconded at one VVatson's at the end of VVoodstreet and there discover'd to him his Design of the Rising and that he had 10000 brisk Boys ready to follow him whenever he held up his Finger who were to possess themselves of the Gates and would in an Hour's time be 5 times multiplied But that his Design was much retarded by the backwardness of the Duke of Monmouth and the Lord Russel who failed him in not being ready prepared to concur with him in the Country that he then endeavour'd to shew the Earl of Shaftsbury the necessity of having those Lords concurrence in so weighty an Undertaking and proffer'd his Service to bring them to a right Understanding among themselves to this end he spoke with the Duke of Monmouth who deny'd that either he or the Lord Russel had given the Earl of Shaftsbury any incouragement to be so forward because they knew the Country could not be ready to stir so soon That a Meeting was then propos'd but afterwards put off by reason of the Earl of Shaftsbury's fears of being discover'd That the Duke of Monmouth told him that the Lord Russel had been with the Earl of Shaftsbury and preswaded him to put off his Rendezvouz for only a Fortnight against which time they would try to be ready for him But the Country not being ready that Design was disappointed That in October Captain Walcot acquainted him with the Design upon the King with which he acquainted the Duke of Monmouth who said he would never suffer it and they did all they could to prevent it This failing the
1684. was brought from thence by Habeas-Corpus to the Bar at the King's-Bench at Westminster where being Arraign'd he was told of his being Indicted and Outlaw'd and thereby Attainted for High-Treason and ask'd what he had to say why Execution should not be awarded against him upon that Attainder To which be reply'd that since he had made an Ingenuous Confession to his Majesty of all that he knew of any manner of Conspiracy against him he hoped That would render him Capable of Mercy and Pardon Upon which the Attorny-General offer'd him a Trial that if he had any thing to say he Defend himself from the Indictment but he Confessing himself Guilty of many things therein declin'd it and threw himself wholly upon the King's Mercy But the Court telling him that the King was the Dispenser of his own Mercy and that they were only to Execute his Justice gave a Rule for his Execution upon Wednesday Sevennight after there being no other Judgment to be pronounced in such Cases as the Court told the Attorny-General when he moved for it the Outlawry it self being the Judgment Which accordingly was Executed upon him on Wednesday the 30th of April 1684. at Tyburn Proceedings in the Court of King's-Bench against Sir Thomas Armstrong June 14. 1684. Sir George Jefferies being Lord Chief Justice SIR Thomas Armstrong Kt. was upon the 14th of June 1684. brought by a Writ of Habeas-Corpus from Newgate to the Bar of the Court of King's-Bench at Westminster and there Arraign'd upon an Outlawry of High-Treason for conspiring the Death of the King c. And being ask'd what he had to say for himself why Sentence should not be awarded against him upon that Attainder pleaded his being beyond-Sea at the time of the Outlawry and desired to be tried upon the Indictment Which the Court refusing to grant him he pleaded the Statute of the 6th of Edw. the 6th which gives the Person Outlaw'd a Year's time to reverse the Outlawry and desired it might be read which accordingly was done But it appearing by the Statute That the Person Outlaw'd ought to render himself to the Chief Justice of England within a Year's time Sir Thomas was told this did not concern him for he had not rendred himself but was taken and brought thither against his Will To which he answered That the Year was not then expir'd fie was there and did now render himself and pray'd Counsel might be assign'd him to argue it in Point of Law but the Court over-rul'd him in it telling him There was no such Doubt or Difficulty in the Matter as to need any such thing Upon which insisting much upon his Innocency and offering to make proof of it if he might be admitted to a Trial he produc'd Holloway's Case as a Precedent for it who had but a little before been offer'd it at the same Place but the Court told him that what had been done therein was meerly from the King's Grace and Mercy and that the King might extend the same Mercy to him also if he so pleas'd but since he had not done so and it not being their Business they must proceed to award Execution upon the Outlawry Upon which Mrs. Matthews Daughter to the Prisoner call'd out to the Court not to Murder her Father For which the Chief Justice caus'd her to be committed to the Marshal and accordingly she wishing that God Almighty's Judgments might light upon them was carried away the Chief Justice saying That he thanked God he was Clamour-proof After which the Attorn Gen. offered to shew the Reasons why the King extended that Grace to Holloway but ought not to extend it to Sir T.A. as not at all deserving any sort of Indulgence or Mercy but that having relation to the Evidence and not to the Outlawry the Court refus'd to hear any thing of it and so proceeded to give a Rule for his Execution the Friday following telling him upon his earnest pressing to have the Benefit of the Statute he had cited the he should have the Full Benefit of the Law And accordingly on Friday the 20th of June he was Executed at Tyburn Mrs. Matthews upon a Petition being before releas'd out of Custody without Fees The Trial between Sir William Pritchard Kt. and Alderman of the City of London Plaintiff and Thomas Papillon Esq Defendant in an Action upon the Case at the Sessions of Nisi Prius holden for the Court of Kings-Bench at the Guild-hall in the City of London on Thursday the 6th of November in Michaelmas Term in the 36th Year of the Reign of King Charles the Second 1684. Before Sir George Jefferies Kt. and Baronet then Lord Chief Justice of the said Court of Kings-Bench SIR William Pritchard late Lord Mayor of the City of London having in Easter Term last brought an Action upon the Case for falsly maliciously and without probable cause procured him to be arrested and imprisoned in his Mayoralty against Thomas Papillon Esq The Defendant pleaded Not Guilty and thereupon issue being joined it came this day to be tried before the Lord Chief Justice Jefferys and the Jury sworn to try this Cause were these Bartholomew Ferryman Thomas Blackmore Thomas Symonds William Whatton John Green Thomas Amy Joseph Baggs Daniel Chandler John Reynalds John Allen Joseph Caine William Withers jun. Then Mr. Munday being of Counsel for the Plaintiff opened the Case to which Mr. Attorney General added something And then Mr. Solicitor General called Mr. Keeling who being sworn deposed That on April the 24th he being sent for by a Letter from Mr. Goodenough came to Mr. Russel's a Cooks-shop in Iron-monger-lane to meet him where were 30 or 40 Persons together By whom while he was gone for a little while his Name was put into a Warrant to be a special Bailiff to arrest the Lord Mayor which he seeming unwilling to do was urged thereto for fear of displeasing the Discontented Party which he said were such as he and the Goodenoughs were of even such as would have killed the King and the Duke that being prevailed upon he went along with the Coroner Mr. Burton and Mr. Francis Goodenough to Grocers-hall where Sir William Pritchard kept his Mayoralty to whom the Coroner came up and said he had a Warrant against him and therefore pray'd him to give an Appearance at the Suit of Mr. Thomas Papillon and another at the Suit of Mr. John Dubois whereupon some Words passed between them and the Lord Mayor refusing to give any Appearance the Coroner bid us execute our Warrants upon which he came up to the Lord Mayor and touched him upon the Shoulder telling him that he did arrest him at the Suit of Thomas Papillon Esq and one Ferdinando Burley arrested him then again at the Suit of Mr. John Dubois and then the Coroner dismissing them and taking the Lord Mayor into his own Custody he went thence to Sir Henry Tulse's and arrested him also Then Sir Henry Tulse being called and sworn deposed that about
Messengers attending the Court delivered to the Dean of St. Pauls a Warrant from the Ecclesiastical Commissioners to cause this Sentence to be affixt on the Door of that Chapter-House and to certify them of the due Execution hereof Dated Septemb. 28 1686. and sealed with the same Seal as the Sentence which was annexed thereto but no Persons Names Subscribed To the Dean and Chapter of London The Proceedings and Trial in the case of the most Reverend Father in God William Lord Arch bishop of Canterbury and the Right Reverend Fathers in God William Lord Bishop of St. Asaph Francis Lord Bishop of Ely John Lord Bishop of Chichester Thomas Lord Bishop of Bath and Wells Thomas Lord Bishop of Peterborough Jonathan Lord Bishop of Bristol in the Court of Kings-Bench at Westminster in Trinity-term in the 4th Year of the Reign of King James the 2d Annoque Domini 1688. THese Peers were present on Friday June the 15th 1688 when the Lords the Archbishop and Bishops were brought into Court from the Tower upon the Habeas Corpus Viz. Ld. Marq. of Hallifax Ld. Marq. of Worcester Earl of Shrewsbury Earl of Kent Earl of Bedford Earl of Dorset Earl of Bullingbrook Earl of Manchester Earl of Burlington Earl of Carlisle Earl of Danby Earl of Radnor Earl of Nottingham Ld. Visc Fauconberge Ld. Grey of Ruthyn Ld. Paget Ld. Chandoys Ld. Vaughan Carbery The aforesaid Bishops appearing then and there about eleven a Clock at Mr. Attorney General 's motion the Writ and Return were read in Court Sr. Robert Wright Ld. Ch. Justice Judges Mr. Justice Holloway Judges Mr. Justice Powell Judges Mr. Justice Allybone Judges Then the Bishops being sat in Chairs provided there for them the Attorney General motion'd an Information to be read against them which Sir Robert Sawyer Serj. Pemberton Mr. Pollexfen and Mr. Finch oppos'd being of Counsel for the Bishops requiring a Discharge for the Prisoners because their Imprisonment was illegal the Persons committing having no Authority to commit being said to be Lords of the Council and not in Council and the Fact for which they were committed being a bare Misdemeanour the Bishops as Peers of the Realm ought to be served with the usual Process of Subpoena and not to be committed to Prison and therefore the Bishops not being now regularly in Court they ought to be charged with no Informatian by the express Statute of Edward the 3d. The which Objections caused a long and learned Debate on both sides till at length the Judges over-ruled it only Mr Justice Powell refused to determine without consulting Precedents Then the Information against the Bishops was read the Substance whereof was That whereas the King put out his Declaration for Liberty of Conscience on the 4th of April in the 3d Year of his Reign in which is contained c. Here that Declaration was inserted and on the 27th of April in the 4th Year of his Reign did publish his other Declaration entitled c. Here that Declaration also was inserted which last Declaration he on the 30th of April following caused to be printed and for the more solemn Notification of his favour therein did on the 4th of May following order the same to be read in all Churches c. Here that order of Counsel was inserted After the making of which Order viz. on the 18th of May following at Westminster in Middlesex the seven Bishops being here named did consult and conspire among themselves to diminish the Regal Authority and Royal Prerogative Power and Government of the King in the Premisses and to infringe and elude the said Older and in Prosecution and Execution of the Conspiracy aforesaid they the said Bishops here again naming them with Force and Arms c. there and then falsly unlawfully maliciously seditiously and scandalously did frame compose and write c. a certain false feigned malicious pernicious and seditious Libel in Writing concerning the King his Declaration and Order aforesaid under pretence of a Petition then and there subscribed by them and in the presence of the King did publish wherein is contained Here the Bishops Petition was inserted Whereupon the Attorney General pray'd the Advice of the Court and due Process of Law to be made out against the aforesaid Bishops c. to answer to our Lord the King in and concerning the Premisses Then the Bishops Counsel moved for an Imparlance till the next Term and very learnedly and largely debated with the Kings Counsel concerning the course of the Court as to that Particular but were over-ruled in it Then the Arch-bishop in behalf of himself and his Brethren the other Defendants tender'd their Plea in writing which was read and its Receipt debated but because it was writ upon Paper and not upon Parchment and contained no more than what had been already debated and over-ruled the Court rejected it and put them therefore upon it to plead presently to the Information which they all did Not Guilty and this day fortnight appointed for their Trial at this Bar the Court taking the Bishops own Recognizance of the Arch-bishop in 200 l. and the rest in 100 l. apiece then and there to appear after which the Court arose ON Friday the 29th day of June being the Feast of St. Peter and St. Paul the Bishops then and there made their Appearance Sr. Robert Wright Ld. Ch. Justice Judges Mr. Justice Holloway Judges Mr. Justice Powel Judges Mr. Justice Allybone Judges These Peers being present viz. Ld. Marq. of Hallifax Ld. Marq. of Worcester Earl of Shrewsbury Earl of Kent Earl of Bedford Earl of Pembrook Earl of Dorset Earl of Bullingbrook Earl of Manchester Earl of Rivers Earl of Stamford Earl of Carnarvon Earl of Chesterfield Earl of Scarsdale Earl of Clarendon Earl of Danby Earl of Sussex Earl of Radnor Earl of Nottingham Earl of Abington Ld. Visc Fauconberge Ld. Newport Ld. Grey of Ruthyn Ld. Paget Ld. Chandoys Ld. Vaughan Carbery Ld. Lumley Ld. Carteret Ld. Ossulston 'T is possible more of the Peers might be present both days whose Names by reason of the Croud could not be taken The Bishops Names being called over the Jury was sworn whose Names follow viz. Sir Roger Langley Bar. Sir William Hill Kt. Roger Jennings Esq Thomas Harriot Esq Jeoffery Nightingale Esq William Withers Esq William Avery Esq Thomas Austin Esq Nicholas Grice Esq Michael Arnold Esq Thomas Done Esq Richard Shoreditch Esq To whom the Information against the Bishops was read And then Mr. Wright opened the charge to which Mr. Attorney General spoke shewing that the Bishops were prosecuted not as Bishops or for any point of Religion but as Subjects and for a Temporal Crime And that also they were prosecuted not for omitting any thing but for doing something even censuring of his Majesty and Government The Heinousness of which Crime he opened and laid down the Method they would proceed in to prove it And according to the Method observ'd in the Information that every thing might
a Paper to the Court containing Observations upon the Indictment which she desired might be read but it was refused and she bid to give it her Husband Green produced for his Defence the Testimony of James Warrier his Landlord and his Wife and Maid which being found to relate to October 19. was deemed nothing to the purpose Berry produced Corporal William Collet who affirmed that he on that Wednesday Night placed his Sentinels at Somerset-House Nicholas Trollop from seven to ten who confessed that in his time a Sedan was brought in Nicholas Right stood from ten to one who said no Sedan came out in his time and Gabriel Hasket who affirmed the same for his time And Eliz. Minshaw Berry's Maid affirmed that her Master was in Bed that Night by twelve a Clock The Sentinels Evidence was only though material but in regard they could not be so positive but that they might be mistaken by reason of the darkness of the Night and Privacy of the Conveyance their Evidence was not thought substantial Mr. Attorney General then spoke to the Concurrency of Prance's and Bedloe's Evidences and Mr. Solicitor General to the Consistancy thereof After which the Ld. Ch. Justice sum'd up the Evidence and directed the Jury in a very tart Speech against the Cruelty of the Romish Principles Then the Jury withdrawing for a short space brought the Prisoners all in guilty Upon which the Ld. Ch. Justice told them that they had found the same Verdict that he would have found if he had been one with them and if it were the last word he were to speak in this World he should have pronounced them guilty At which Words the whole Assembly gave a great shout of Applause The next day the Prisoners being brought again to the Bar Mr. Justice Wyld who as second Judg in that Court pronounceth the Sentence in all Criminal Matters except High-Treason spoke an excellent Speech to them wherein he shewed them the Greatness of their Crime and gave them good Advice and then sentenc'd them to be Drawn Hang'd and Quarter'd which was accordingly executed upon them at Tyburn on Fryday the 21st of Feb. they all denying the Fact to the last ADVERTISEMENT THE Tryals of Thompson Pain and Farrel tho not immediately succeeding the Preceeding yet relating to the same matter and giving not little light thereto is judg'd not inconvenient to be placed next The Tryal of Nathaniel Thompson William Pain and John Farrel at Guild-Hall before Sir Francis Pemberton Lord Chief Justice of his Majesty's Court of Kings-Bench on Tuesday June the 20th 1682. The Jurors Names were Peter Houblon John Ellis William Barret Joshua Brooks Gervas Byfield Jonathan Lee George VViddowes William Sambrooke William Jacomb John Delmee Samuel Bayly Samuel Howard TO whom an Information exhibited by the Kings Attorney General against the said Thompson Pain and Farrel was read for writing and printing several scandalous Libels about the Death of Sir Edm. Godfrey reflecting on the Justice of the Nation in the Proceedings against his Murtherers Which Information Mr. Thompson opened and Serjeant Maynard aggravated the Crimes therein contained Mr. Clare then was sworn and produced a Copy of the Record of the Conviction and Attainder of Sir Edm. Godfrey As also a Copy of the Inquisition take by the Coroner of Middlesex upon the view of the Body of the said Sir Edm. Godfrey whereby it was found by them that he was murthered strangled with a Cord by Persons unknown Both which Mr. Clare having sworn to be true Copies were read Then the Execution of Green Berry and Hill was attested by the Oath of Capt. Richardson and Mr. Prance and Curtis swore that they and Bedloe were Witnesses at their Tryals Then Sir John Nicholas Sir Philip Lloyd and William Bridgman Esq swore that the two Letters in the Information which were shewed them were the same that were shewed to Thompson Pain and Farrel at the Council and that Thompson owned the printing of both and Farrel owned the bringing of the first and Pain owned the bringing of the other to Thompson both which Letters was then read in the Court. The first which Farrel owned he writ was intitled A Letter to Mr. Miles Prance in relation to the Murder of Sir Edm. Godfrey The Design whereof was to contradict the Evidence given at the Trial of his Murderers and to fix the Guilt upon himself affirming that the Coroner's Inquest were first of Opinion he was Felo de se and there was much Art us'd to procure their Verdict to the contrary That the Body was refused to be opened and the Coroner of Westminster's Assistance rejected and he dismist with a Guiny That he was not dogg'd as was sworn but was seen in several places and about three in the Afternoon about Primrose-hill walking in the Fields That he was found in a place inaccessible by a Horse and in such a posture as inferr'd he could never be thrust into a Sedan That his Body was full of Blood and when the Sword was pulled out Blood and Water very much issued out of that Wound and that part of the Sword which was in the Body was discoloured and the Point which was through was rusty his Clothes Belt and Scabbord were weather-beaten to Rags his Body stunk and his Eyes Nostrils and Mouth were Fly-blown his Eyes shut his Face pale no Dirt on his Shoes nor Horse-hair on his Clothes and that Bedloe's and Prance's Evidence before the Committee of Lords very much differ'd And that all this would be proved by divers credible and undeniable Eye and Ear-Witnesses Dated from Cambridg Feb. 23. 1681. Subscribed Truman London printed for M. G. at the Sign of Sir E. B. G's Head near Fleet-bridg The other Letter writ by Pain was intituled A second Letter to Mr. Miles Prance in Reply to the Ghost of Sir E. Godfrey Which was a Vindication of the First in Reply to the Answer given thereto by a Paper Intituled The Ghost of Sir E. Godfrey Disclaiming the concurrence of any Papists in publishing that Paper asserting for Truth all that had been said therein which was ready to be proved by many Witnesses who were not willing to expose themselves to the fury of that Torrent which then carried all before it in favour of the Plot by appearing at the Trial running over all the Paragraphs of the other Letter asserting what had there been said for Truth endeavouring to wipe off the Objections given in a scurrilous manner imputing Melancholy to be predominant in Sir Edm. Godfrey's Family and that such Accidents were no News thereto c. Dated from Cambridg March 13. 1681. subscribed Truman London Printed for Nath. Thompson 1682. Then was read a Paragraph out of N. Thompson's Loyal Protestant Intelligence Numb 125. Tuesday March 7. 1681. which was a kind of Advertisement of this second Letter's coming out and an Assertion that all things in the first were true and were ready by undeniable Evidence to be made out Then a
testified that he being to carry Mrs. Pressicks before Justice Lowther Bolron's Wife said she was sorry for it for she believed her to be an honest Woman and had been a good Neighbour amongst them Mary Walker Servant-maid to Mrs. Lassels Thwing's Sister testified that Bolron proffer'd her 10 l. to swear Thwing was a Priest Then William Bacchus said that when he served a Warrant on the two Mrs. Bolron's to go before Mr. Lowther they said they could say nothing against Six Tho. Gascoyne nor any of the Family Cuthbert Hamsworth said that fie heard Bolron swear Revenge against the Lady Tempest for prosecuting a Suit against him Then the Prisoner endeavoured to prove he was not at Barnborow-hall in 1677. by George Twisley Groom to Sir Tho. Gascoyne who could only say that he used to come there but a night or two in a Year Joseph Cooper said that about a Year ago he heard Mowbray say he knew nothing of the Plot and that he believed Sir Tho. Gascoyne was guilty of no such thing for if he had he should have known it as soon as Bolron and he was a Rogue and a Knave for saying any such thing Edward Cooper sen said he then heard Mowbray say he thought Sir Thomas Gascoyne was not guilty of the Plot. Isabel Heyward a Girle that lived with Bolron as a Servant testified that her Master and Mistrifs falling out she said she would not go to London and if he made her go she would swear that what he had sworn against Mrs. Pressicks was out of Malice Alice Dawson testified that the day after New-years-day was twelve-month Mrs. Bolron said she was sorry for nothing but that her Husband had meddled with Mrs. Tressicks One or two Witnesses more were called but nothing to the purpose Therefore Mr. Justice Dolben summ'd up the Evidence and Mr. Baron Atkins proceeded to do the same And the Jury withdrawing for a while brought in Thomas Thwing Guilty and Mary Pressicks not Guilty And on the Monday following Mr. Justice Dolben sentenced him to be Drawn Hang'd and Quarter'd The Trials of William Viscount Stafford in Westminster-hall from November the 30th to December the 7th 1680. before the House of Peers ON Tuesday Nov. the 30th the Right Honourable Henege Lord Finch Baton of Daventry Lord High Chancellor of England being constituted Lord High Steward for the present occasion and all things fitted for the purpose in VVestminster-hall and both Houses being seated and the Commons all bare VVilliam Viscount Stafford was brought to the Bar kneeling till the Lord High Steward bid him rise and a Chair set for him After which making a short Speech to him concerning the occasion of his appearing there the Articles of Impeachment High Treason against him and the other Lords in the Tower by the Commons of England were read which consisted of seven Heads The 1st That there hath for many Years a Plot been contrived c. 2ly Naming the Persons concerned therein and particularly the Noble Lord at the Bar. 3ly That consults had been held and the Murder of the King resolved on therein c. 4ly That consultations have been for the raising of Men Mony Arms c. 5ly That Commissions had been given and received and particularly a Commission for the Lord Stafford to be Pay-master of the Army 6ly That to hide and hinder a Discovery an Oath of Secresy and the Sacrament had been given and taken and Sir Edm. Godfrey murdered 7ly That the Guilt of that Murder was endeavoured to be put upon Protestants c. The Lord Stafford's Answer to which was then also read wherein he put himself upon his Peers for Trial affirming himself Not Guilty After this Serjeant Maynard Sir Francis VVinnington and Mr. Treby being of the Committee appointed for the Management of the Evidence opened the Charge and Evidence in very excellent Speeches And proposed to prove first the Plot in general and the Guilt of this Lord therein in particular And therefore as to the first Mr. Smith being sworn gave a full relation of his Travels and Perversion and of what he had heard beyond Sea and in England concerning this Plot. How Abbot Montague and Father Gascoyne in France and other Priests and Jesuits told him that if he would turn Catholick he should have Employment among them there and afterwards England for that they doubted not but the Popish Religion would come in very soon and that because as the Abbot said they doubted not to procure a Toleration of Religion and because the Gentry that went abroad did observe the Novelty of their own Religion and the Antiquity of theirs and the Advantages that were to be had by it But one Father Bennet and others said they doubted it not because their party was very strong in England and in a few Years they would bring it in right or wrong That it was Cardinal Crimaldi who perverted him about 1671 to the Romish Religion at Provence and that afterwards he lived several Years in the English Jesuits Colledg at Rome where he hath often heard it disputed and preached and exhorted that the King of England was an Heretick and that there was no King really reigning and whoever took him out of the way would do a meritorious Action particularly by Father Anderton Mumford Campion but chiefly Southwel one of the chief of the Jesuits That when he came away thence for England these Fathers for a whole Month were exhorting that the King of England was not to be obeyed and that in all private Confessions all Persons who might be thought capable of any design were to be instructed that they should use all their Endeavours for promoting Popery That while he was at Rome he read Coleman's Letters of Intelligence once a Month and therein how the Duke and the Queen and the chief of the Nobility were of their side how they carried matters several times the ways the Lord Clifford and Sir VVilliam Godolphin did use to effect the work and that they question'd not to get the Lord Danby on their side too That when he return'd into England he found all the Popish Clergy in great hopes of Popery coining shortly in That he knew of Money gathered in the North but refused to joyn therein That as to the Lord Stafford he knew nothing but that Sir Henry Calverley was turned out of Commission of the Peace through Complaint made to my Lord Stafford of his being active against Popery And that he writ to one Smith that he would not make over his Estate as others did for that he expected some sudden Change or Alteration That the Cardinal who perverted him at the same time spoke of great Assurances that Popery would prevail in England that there was but one in the way and tho that Man was a good natured Man yet they could not so far prevail upon him but that to accomplish their designs they must take him out of the way That now he had been a Protestant two
nor could ever endure him reviling him as having been a poor Boy found at the Door then a Thresher then a Baily and now a Witness for the King To this end he acknowledged that he spoke to Dugdale on the 20th of September in his Chamber but not alone nor about any thing but a Race to be run that day on Etching-Hill which he proved by the Testimony of his own Servants Nicholas Furness a Dutch-man whose Blunder in his Evidence made the Auditory laugh and George Leigh He produced also Thomas Sawyer a Servant to the Lord Aston and Mr. Phillips Parson of Tixal as to the Reputatiof Dugdale who said little more to disparage him than that he ran away from the Lord Aston and was apprehended and would then have been own'd by my Lord as his Servant which was refused and Six Walter Bagot Mr. Thomas Kinnersley and Sir Thomas Whitgrave being the Justices before whom he was brought affirmed That then he took the Oaths of Allegiance c. and protested he knew nothing of the Plot. Then the Lord Stafford offered to prove further against Dugdale that he had offered Mony to some to swear falsly against his Lordship to this end William Robinson a Worcestershire-man affirmed That about Midsummer was twelve-month Dugdale offered him Mony in London to swear against the Lord Stafford and John Morral a Barber in Ridgley in Staffordshire that he proffer'd him 50 l. in Hand and 50 l. more when the thing was done to swear against Mr. Howard Sir James Symonds Mr. Herbert Aston and several others as concern'd in the Plot And Samuel Holt a Black-smith at Tixal that he proffered him 40 l. to swear that Walter Moor carried Ewers away Then the Lord Stafford proceeded to prove that Dugdale deposed at the Trial of the five Jesuits That he communicated the News of Sir E. Godfrey's Death which was on Saturday to Mr. Sambidge the Tuesday following which Mr. Sambidge denies That he so swore Mr. John-Lydcott a Fellow of King's-Colledg in Cambridg and one Charles Gifford who were present at that Trial and took Notes did testify And Mr. Sambidge denied that he heard of the News till Friday or Saturday or that he was at the Ale-house with Dugdale at all but that he was an ill Man and very abusive especially to the Clergy Then the Lord Stafford proceeded against Dr. Oates objecting against him That when he was examin'd before the Council having named many and not naming the Prisoner he said he had no more to accuse and for the proof of this he call'd Sir Philip Lloyd who remembred nothing of it and appealed to the Lords then present but none could speak to it till at length the Earl of Berkley did say That he remembred in the House of Lords when Dr. Oates was asked If he could accuse any other Person of what Quality soever Oates answered That he had no more in relation to England to accuse but in relation to Ireland he had which was after he had accused the Lord Stafford though before he had accused the Queen Then he called for Mr. Dugdale again and objected further against him That he did depose before Tho. Lane and J. Vernon two Justices in Staffordshire Decemb. 24. 1678. That presently after one Howard Almoner to the Queen went beyond-Seas he was told by Geo. Hobson Servant to the Lord Aston that there was a Design c. Whereas this Hobson was not a Servant to the Lord Aston of three Years after the Almoner went and yet here he says presently But Dugdale explained that his meaning was that Hobson told him there was a Design presently after the Almoner went c. Which was contested but at last submitted to Then Mr. Turbervile was called again and the Prisoner objected against him his deposing to the Year 1673 one day and to 1672 the next whence he concluded him to be necessarily perjured But Sir William Poultney who took his Affidavit related the whole Story which shewed him to be mistaken in the Year which he finding out that Night by a Paper he found came and corrected it himself the next Morning And whereas the Lord Stafford had charged him for a Coward and for running away from his Colours he produced his Discharge from his Captain which certified otherwise Then whereas Turbervile had before deposed that his Lordship was lame of the Gout when he waited upon him in France he declared he had not been lame these forty Years and never had the Gout in his Life and his two Servants Furness and Leigh testified the same for the time they had lived with him and who were with him then in France but denied that ever they saw Turbervile with him And whereas Turbervile deposed That he came to England by Calice he said he came by Diep and produced one Mr. Wyborne who testified the same together with his aforesaid two Servants Again whereas Turbervil deposed That when he came from Doway his Relations were angry with him and the Lord Powis and his Lady he affirmed that he was upon his return received courteously at the Lord Powis's House and by his Relations which was testified by John Minhead one that belonged to the Lord Powis and a French-Man And whereas Turbervile said he was disinherited his elder Brother by another Mother testified the kindness of his Relations towards him and that there was no Estate likely ever to come to him there being so many Heirs before him Finally whereas Turbervile also in his Affidavit had said the Lord Castlemain was at the Lord Powis's at such a time which must be either in the Years 1672 1673 or 1674 he called Mr. Lydcott again to testify he was not in Wales in any of those Years who by his Notes which he confessed he had transcribed out of another Book spoke very particularly to the times only the beginning of 1672 he could not tell how to account for nor did Turbervile ever say positively to a Year So the Lord Stafford being asked if he had any more Witnesses and answering he had three or four the Peers thought it too late to proceed and so adjourned into the Parliament-Chamber and the Commons went back to their House to whom the Lords sent a Message that they had ordered the Prisoner again to the Bar at Ten next Morning The Fourth Day FRiday Decemb. 3 1680. about Ten the Court being sat and the Prisoner at the Bar the Ld. High Steward reminding him how far he had gone and where he left off in his Defence desired him to go on Who called therefore John Porter Butler to the Lord Powis who said That about a Year ago in several places in London he heard Turbervil say that he believed neither the Lord Powis nor the rest of the Lords were in the Plot and the Witnesses that swore against him he believed were perjured and he could not believe any thing of it and that as he hoped for Salvation he knew nothing of it neither directly
nor indirectly and altho he was a little low at present and his Friends would not look on him yet he hoped God would never leave him so much as to let him swear against innocent Persons and forswear and damn himself Mr. John Yalden a young Barrister of Greys-Inn also affirmed that as he walked with Turbervil in February or March last in Greys-Inn-Walks he heard him say God damn me now there is no Trade good but that of a Discoverer but the Devil take the D. of York Monmouth Plot and all for I know nothing of it Afterwards Yalden being gone words passing between Turbervile and him they both complain'd of one another to the Court The Ld. Stafford then call'd for Oates again objecting against him his swearing before the Council that he saw in Spain Don John of Austria but the Lord Privy-Seal affirm'd that he only then said that he saw one whom he was told was that Person and that he did not know him of himself The Prisoner further objected that none of his Letters nor no Commission was produced that he knew neither Oates nor Fenwick nor ever saw Oates either at Fenwick's or Dr. Perrot's tho Oates instanced in a Circumstance at Dr. Perrot's how he offer'd him half a Crown to call Perrot home to him which he refused saying he was no Porter and that he was not to be look'd on as a credible Witness because he dissembled with God in as much as he deposed that he never was but seemingly a Papist Saying also that but last night he called the Lieutenant of the Tower Jaylor and Rascal which became not a Man of his Coat He charged then Dugdale again that he was a Prisoner for Debt in Stafford when he made his first Affidavit and Dugdale acknowledge'd he was then under the Serjeants hands He objected moreover Oates Poverty and that he said in a former Trial that he was 700 l. out of Purse Whereupon Dr. Oates confess'd his Poverty and offer'd to prove how he had disburss'd so much Mony relating how he had so much given him and got so much by printing some Copies And here the Prisoner ending his Defence the Managers offer'd before they summ'd up the Evidence to produce their Witnesses to fortify their Evidence and to discover what kind of Witnesses have been made use of against it and to falsify what the Prisoner's Witnesses have said in some Particulars And first of all Mr. William Hanson of Wilnal in Staffordshire deposed that he had seen Dugdale alone with the Prisoner in the Lord Aston's Parlour Then Mr. James Ansell of Heywood in Staffordshire deposed also that being of Tixal he saw the Prisoner and Dugdale walking alone together in the Court and that after the Plot was discovered that Dugdale was fearful of coming into Company That also he and Mr. Hanson was at Eld's the Ale-house Oct. 14. on Monday Morning and heard Mr. Dugdale tell of the Murther of a Justice of Peace of Westminster in the presence of Mr. Phillips and Mr. Sambidg who before have denied it and Hanson being called again deposed the same Mr. Birch also deposed that it was all about those parts by Tuesday and Wednesday Octob. 15 and 16. that a Justice of Peace of Middlesex was killed John Turton Esq deposed that he was told of the Rumor on Tuesday Octob. 15. and that it was Sir Edm. Godfrey that was murthered and as it was supposed by the Papists Then against the Testimony of William Robinson Mr. Booth a Member of the House of Commons deposed that he heard him in Cheshire talk the most atheistically as ever he heard any Man in his Life ridiculing the Sabbath it being on a Sunday and that from others he had heard how he went about the Country to cheat The Earl of Macclesfield deposed much to the same purpose and that he had heard him confess himself a Rogue and false Dice were found about him being before a Justice of Peace Against Samuel Holt another of the Prisoner's Witnesses Sampson Rawlins deposed that he was a Man of a very ill Report where he lived a lewd drunken Fellow and said to keep another Man's Wife and that he said none but Rogues would take Mr. Dugdale's part and be cause the Witness did so he would have murder'd him and that he broke the Lord Aston's Wine-Celler and my Lord bid Mr. Dugdale send him to Goal but he begg'd him his Pardon that he had known Mr. Dugdale this 14 or 15 Years in good Repute and an honest Man Thomas Launder deposed much to the same purpose against Holt adding that he was by a Consult of them at Tixal proffer'd Mony to have sworn Anselm a perjured Rogue at the Lord Aston's Trial. Against John Morrall Thomas Thorne deposed that he was a poor needy Fellow that wandred about the Country and but of an indifferent Reputation Then Simon VVright deposed that one Plessington had proffer'd him 700 l. to own himself perjured at Mrs. Price's Trial and to swear that Dugdale would have given him Money to swear against Sir James Simons and Mr. Gerard and they made him write Letters to this purpose this Plessington was the Lord Bellasis's Steward Then Elizabeth Eld deposed that she and her Sister help'd to burn Mr. Dugdale's Papers that Morning he went away from the Lord Aston's and one little Book he said had no Treason in it and needed not therefore to be burnt Why said the Witness is there Treason in any of the other Papers to which he only answered Do you think there is Ann Eld her Sister deposed also the very same things Then one Mr. Michael Noble deposed that he had help'd him to make up his Accounts and been with Mr. Dugdale at the Tower to account with the Lord Aston twice and one time the Lord Aston would not be spoke with and another time they spake with him with great difficulty but he would not produce the Book wherein Mr. Dugdale said the Discharges were Then Mr. Stephen Colledge deposed he was with Mr. Dugdale at the Tower when he went to make up his Accounts with him but they could not be admitted and that then he heard one of the Lord Aston's Men say that Mr. Dugdale was as honest a Gentleman as ever lived in their Family Then Mr. Nich. Boson who was with Mr. Dugdale at the same time with Mr. Noble and Mr. Colledge deposed to the same purpose Then for the Vindication of Dugdale's Credit Thomas Whitby Esq deposed that he had known Mr. Dugdale nine or ten Years in the Ld. Aston's Service and that he was his Steward and all the Servants under him and was entrusted with all his Estate and counted faithful to his Master's Interest only he hath heard some Tradesmen say that he hath put them off without Mony Then Mr. William Southall a Coroner of Staffordshire was sworn who testified to the Reputation of Dugdale having known him eight Years and gave a large account of his first Discovery of the
which the Court adjourned and the Lords sent a Message to the Commons that they had ordered the Prisoner to the Bar again on Monday morning at 10 a Clock The sixth Day MOnday December 6. 1680. about 11 the Court being sat and the Prisoner at the Bar his Petition was read which was for leave to offer a few things more to clear himself and which the Ld. H. Steward told him the Lords had granted He then said that seeing he had received their Order that his Counsel should not be heard touching the continuance of Impeachments from Parliament to Parliament he desired that he might offer them his own Conceptions concerning that urging that they had not yet declared their own Judgments either as to that or whether they did acquiesce in the Judges Opinions praying that his Counsel might be heard as to the other points protesting his own Innocency and Abhorrency of Treason reading then his Case and repeating his Defence c. After which the Lords adjourned into the Parliament Chamber and the Commons returned to their House and received a Message from the Lords that they had ordered the Prisoner to the Bar to receive Judgment to morrow at 10. The seventh Day TUesday December 7 1680. About 11 the Court being sat the Ld. H. Steward took the Votes of the Peers upon the Evidence beginning at the Puisne Baron and so upwards in order the Lord Stafford being as the Law required absent The Ld. H. Steward began then saying My Lord Butler of VVeston Is VVilliam Lord Viscount Stafford Guilty of the Treason whereof he stands impeached or not Guilty Lord Butler Not Guilty upon my Honour The same Question was put to the rest whose Names and Votes follow Ld. Arundel of Trerice Not Guilty upon my Honour Ld. Crewe Guilty upon my Honour Ld. Cornwallis Guilty upon my Honour Ld. Holles Not Guilty upon my Honour Ld. VVootton Not Guilty upon my Honour Ld. Rockingham Guilty upon my Honour Ld. Lucas Not Guilty upon my Honour Ld. Astley Guilty upon my Honour Ld. VVard Not Guilty upon my Honour Ld. Byron Not Guilty upon my Honour Ld. Hatton Not Guilty upon my Honour Ld. Leigh Guilty upon my Honour Ld. Herbert of Cherbury Guilty upon my Honour Ld. Howard of Escrick Guilty upon my Honour Ld. Maynard Guilty upon my Honour Ld. Lovelace Guilty upon my Honour Ld. Deincourt Not guilty upon my Honour Ld. Grey of Wark Guilty upon my honour Ld. Brook Guilty upon my honour Ld. Norreys Not guilty upon my honour Ld. Chandos Guilty upon my honour Ld. North and Grey Guilty upon my honour Ld. Paget Guilty upon my honour Ld. Wharton Guilty upon my honour Ld. Eure Guilty upon my honour Ld. Cromwel Guilty upon my honour Ld. VVindsor Not guilty upon my honour Ld. Conyers Guilty upon my honour Ld. Ferrers Not guilty upon my honour Ld. Morley Not guilty upon my honour Ld. Mowbray Not guilty upon my honour Ld. Viscount Newport Guilty upon my honour Ld. Visc Faulconberg Guilty upon my honour Earl of Conway Guilty upon my honour E. of Berkley Not guilty upon my honour E. of Maclesfield Guilty upon my honour E. of Hallifax Not guilty upon my honour E. of Feversham Not guilty upon my honour E. of Sussex Guilty upon my honour E. of Guilford Guilty upon my honour E. of Shaftesbury Guilty upon my honour E. of Burlington Guilty upon my honour E. of Ailesbury Not guilty upon my honour E. of Craven Not guilty upon my honour E. of Carlisle Guilty upon my honour E. of Bath Not guilty upon my honour E. of Essex Guilty upon my honour E. of Clarendon Not guilty upon my honour E. of St. Albans Not guilty upon my honour E. of Scarsdale Guilty upon my honour E. of Sunderland Guilty upon my honour E. of Thanet Not guilty upon my honour E. of Chesterfield Not guilty upon my honour E. of Carnarvan Not guilty upon my honour E. of Winchelsea Guilty upon my honour E. of Stamford Guilty upon my honour E. of Peterborough Not guilty upon my honour E. of Rivers Guilty upon my honour E. of Mulgrave Guilty upon my honour E. of Barkshire Guilty upon my honour E. of Manchester Guilty upon my honour E. of Westmoreland Guilty upon my honour E. of Clare Guilty upon my honour Earl of Bristol Guilty upon my honour E. of Denbeigh Not guilty upon my honour E. of Northampton Guilty upon my honour E. of Leicester Guilty upon my honour E. of Bridgwater Guilty upon my honour E. of Salisbury Guilty upon my honour E. of Suffolk Guilty upon my honour E. of Bedford Guilty upon my honour E. of Huntington Guilty upon my honour E. of Rutland Not guilty upon my honour E. of Kent Guilty upon my honour E. of Oxford Guilty upon my honour Ld. Chamberlain Not guilty upon my honour Marquess of Worcester Not guilty upon my honour D. of Newcastle Not guilty upon my honour D. of Monmouth Guilty upon my honour D. of Albemarle Guilty upon my honour D. of Buckingham Guilty upon my honour Ld. Privy-Seal Guilty upon my honour Ld. President Guilty upon my honour Ld. H. Steward Guilty upon my Honour Prince Rupert Duke of Cumberland Guilty upon my Honour The Ld. H. Steward then declared that upon telling the Votes he found there were 31 that think the Prisoner Not Guilty and 55 that have found him Guilty Whereupon the Prisoner was brought to the Bar and the Ld. High Steward informing him the Lords had found him Guilty He said God's Holy Name be praised for it confessing it surpriz'd him for he did not expect it and that he had only this to say for suspending of Judgment That he did not hold up his Hand at the Bar which he conceived he ought to have done and that though he was tried upon the Act of 25. Edw. 3. yet there being nothing more in that Act than what is included in the Act of the 13th of this King he ought only to lose his Seat in Parliament which was the Punishment there put down for a Peer submitting to their Lordships and desiring their Judgments in these Points Then the Lords Adjourned into the Parliament-Chamber and the Committee of Commons returned to their own House and the Speaker having re-assumed the Chair the whole Body of the House went with their Speaker to the Bar of the House of Lords to demand Judgment of High-Treason against William Viscount Stafford upon the Impeachment of the Commons of England in Parliament in the Name of the Commons in Parliament and of all the Commons of England Then the Commons with their Speaker went back to their House Then the Lords took into Consideration what Judgment was to be given and it was moved that he might be beheaded After some Debate the Judges were asked Whether if any other Judgment than the usual Judgment for High-Treason were given upon him it would attaint his Blood The Judges were of Opinion that the Judgment for High-Treason appointed by Law is to
should be any Disturbance for they valued their Riches more than their Cause And at Oxford that he heard my Lord say again He wondred the People of England should stickle so much about Religion if he were to choose a Religion he would have one that should comply with what was apt to carry on their Cause Mr. John Smith deposed That he had often both in publick and private heard the Lord Shaftsbury speak very irreverently and slightly of the King saying He was a weak Man an inconstant Man of no firm or settled Resolution easily led by the Nose as his Father was before him by a Popish Queen which was the Ruin of his Father And that the King should declare That the Earl of Shaftsbury was not satisfied to be an ill Man himself but got over the E. of Essex too And that he was the chief promoter of the Rebellion in Scotland which when it was told him that he should send back word to the King That he was glad that the King saw not his own Danger But if he were to raise a Rebellion he could raise another-guess Rebellion than was that in Scotland One time particularly being sent for to the Lord Shaftsburies expressing his jealousy of the Irish Witnesses being drawn over to the Court-Party and retracting what they had said he order'd him to persuade them from going nigh that Rogue Fitz-Gerald maintain'd by the King and Court-Party to stifle the Plot in Ireland Saying also That when he was in the Tower he told some he saw Popery coming in and that it was hard to prevent it And that if the King were not as well satisfied with the coming in of Popery as ever the D. of York was the D. would not be so much concern'd about it as he was Afterwards having executed my Lord's Order one Mr. Bernard Dennis gave in an Information before Sir Patience Ward Lord-Mayor against Fitz-Gerald that he had tamper'd with him to forswear all he had sworn before the Copy of which Information he brought to the Lord Shaftsbury who when he had read it was very well pleased with it and said Mr. Smith don't you see the Villany of that Man and that factious Party and that the King runs the same steps as his Father did before him for that nothing of this Nature could otherwise be done I says he these are the very Steps that his Father followed when he was led by his Popish Queen and the poor Man doth not see his Danger Another time before the Parliament went to Oxford in discourse my Lord was saying to him That there was great Preparations made and a great many gathered together upon the Road between London and Oxford which he said was to terrify the Parliament to comply with the King's Desire which he was sure they never would for that the King aimed to bring in Popery But said he we have this Advantage of him if he offer any Violence to us for we expect it that we have the Nation for us and we may lawfully oppose him for it has been done in former Times and he will meet with a very strong Opposition for all that come out of the Country shall be well Hors'd and well Arm'd and so we shall be all and as old as he was that he would be one that would oppose to his Power and die before he would ever bring in Popery or any thing of that Nature Then Mr. Brian Haines deposed That he had often heard the Lord Shaftsbury vilify the King And that he and Mr. Ivey going to him one day about the Narrative he made of Sir Edmondbury Godfrey's Death he desired him not to expose his Person to the King's Anger because he was sure he would never grant a Pardon to any Man that impeached the Earl of Danby Says he Do not fear if he does not grant you a Pardon he makes himself the Author of the Plot and says he the Earl of Essex the Lord Maxfield and I we do all resolve if you 'l put in a Writing we will go to the King and beg a Pardon of him for you which if he does not grant we will raise the whole Kingdom against him for he must not expect to live peaceably in his Throne it he doth not grant it and this is the best Pretence we can have in the World we are prepar'd to raise Arms against him And after having heard a Pardon could not be had being begg'd for by the two Mr. Godfries he praying my Lord for a little Mony to help him to go beyond-Sea because he was sure he could not be safe in England My Lord told him the King durst as well be hang'd as meddle with him And one Day he being in Conference and giving my Lord an exact Account of Transactions having been a Traveller he asked my Lord What Model of Government was designed if they pulled the King down Says he Do you think there are no Families in England that have as much pretence to the Crown as any of the Stewarts Says he There is the Duke of Bucks that is descended of the Family of the Plantagenets one of the Edwards by his Mother and in her Right he should have the Barony of Ross and has as good a Title to the Crown of England as ever any Stewart had Then John Macnamarra being sworn deposed That he being with the Lord Shaftsbury after his return from the Parliament at Oxford concerning some Provision for the Witnesses he heard him express himself That the King was Popishly Affected and did adhere to Popery taking the same Methods that his Father before him took which brought his Father's Head to the Block and that they would also bring his thither and that he had told some Persons of Quality that this would fall out five Years before And at the same time that he said the King was a Faithless Man and no Credit was to be given to him and that the Dutchess of Mazarine was of his Cabinet-Council who was the worst Woman-kind And that he deserved to be deposed as much as ever King Richard the Second did Then Dennis Macnamarra deposed That he also heard the Lord Shaftsbury say in March or April in his own House Mr. Ivey being present That the King was not to be believe there was no Belief in him and he ought to be deposed as well a King Richard the Second and that the Dutchess of Mazarine was of his Cabinet-Council and he nothing but by her Consent Then Mr. Edward Ivey deposed That being at my Lord's House soon after the Parliament was dissolved at Oxford he heard him speak against the King saying He was an unjust Man and unfit to Reign and he wondred her did not take Example by his Father before him and that he was a Papist in his Heart and intended to introduce Popery And afterwards being with him with Hains he bid Hains to put what he had to say about the Death of Sir Edmondbury Godfrey into writing
and he should have a Pardon and that if the King did deny it as he durst not they would rise upon him and force him After him Bernard Dennis being sworn gave some account of his first coming into England and how he began his Acquaintance with the Earl of Shaftsbury and was recommended by him understanding him to be a Clergy-Man to Dr. Burnet and afterward to Mr. Ferguson in order to the bringing him over and how my Lord proffer'd him a Benefice And that one time being with him my Lord asked him How many there might be of his Name in his Country and told him that he would have him to advise those of his Name and Friends to be in a readiness when-ever occasion shall serve to stand by and assist the Common-Wealth of England for that they did really intend to have England under a Common-Wealth and would extirpate the King and all his Family as near as they could And said he admir'd at the Irish Nation to be such Fools for that it was very certain that King James Queen Elizabeth King Charles the First and the King that now is does wrong them to very Destruction But that a Common-Wealth would take more pity of them than any do now in this time wherein the King governs Here the King's Evidence ceasing the Jury enquired upon what Statute the Indictment was grounded and whether any of these Witnesses stood indicted To which the Court returning a satisfactory Answer they withdrew and the Court adjourned till three of the Clock When being sat again the Witnesses were all called one by one and examined by the Jury concerning what they had severally deposed Wherein nothing was remarkable but what they examin'd Mr. Secretary Jenkins Whether he heard not a Debate in the House of Commons about an Association And that Booth acknowledged himself to be in Orders tho now not Beneficed Turbervile and John Macnamarra that though they signed the Petition to the Common-Council for some Maintenance and that they were tempted to revoke their Evidence yet never read it nor knew what was in it And that Haynes further said That he heard the Lord Shaftsbury say at a Pastry-Cook's Shop in Iron-Monger Lane that the King had no more Religion than an Horse That when he came came first to England he was inclined to Popery but since he was degenerated from all the Principles of Christianity being just like a perfect Beast The Witnesses being examined the Jury withdrew and took the Statute-Book with them and returned the Bill Ignoramus Upon which the People fell a Hollowing and Shouting which Mr. Attorn Gen. desired might be recorded The Trial of Charles John Count Conningsmark Christopher Vratz Captain John Stern Lieutenant and Charles George Borosky alias Boratzi before the Lord Chief Justice Pemberton At the Old-Baily on Tuesday February the 28th 1681. THE Prisoners then and there appearing were Arraigned for the barbarous Murder of Thomas Thynn Esq And being Foreigners Mr. Vandore and Sir Nathaniel Johnson were sworn Interpreters They pleaded Not Guilty and desired their Jury might consist of half Foreigners which was granted And the Count desired his Trial might be put off a day or two and that he might be tried by himself neither of which were granted Then after some Challenges on both sides the Jury sworn were Sir William Roberts Bar. Moses Charas Gent. Richard Pagett Esq Charles Beelow Gent. George Hocknal Esq Peter Vandenhagen Gent. Walter Moyle Esq Christopher Ripkey Gent. Thomas Henslow Esq Daniel Griggion Gent. John Haynes Esq John Lebarr Gent. To whom the Indictment was read and Mr. Keen and Sir Francis Withens opened the same and then William Cole deposed That on Sunday Feb. 12. about a quarter after Eight at Night his Master Thomas Thynn Esq was coming up St. James-Street from the Countess of Northumberland's and he was walking with a Flambeau in his Hand before the Coach and coming along at the lower end of St. Albans-Street he heard the Blunderbuss go off and turning his Face back saw a great Smoke and heard his Master cry out he was murdered and saw three Horsemen riding away on the right side of the Coach whom he pursued and cried out Murder He ran to the upper end of the Hay-Market till he was quite spent and then turning back again his Master was got into the House whom he understood was wounded One of the Men was upon a little Bay Horse William Ellers deposed That then and there he coming with his Master from the Lady Northumberland's there came three Men riding by the right side of the Coach and as they rid one of them turned about and said Stop you Dog And just as he looked about the Fire was let into the Coach upon his Master and the Men ran away as fast as they could and that he could not know any of their Faces Mr. Hobbs the Chirurgeon deposed That he was with Mr. Thynn about nine or ten a Clock that Night he was wounded and found him shot with four Bullets which entred into his Body tore his Guts and wounded his Liver and Stomach and Gall and broke one of his Ribs and wounded the great Bone below of which Wounds he died and believed there as never a Wound but was Mortal He shewed the Court the four Bullets two of which he thought might be Iron one he found in the Stomach one between the Ribs and the Skin and two were lodged in the Back-bone Then Mr. White the Coroner deposed That on Feb. 13. he sat upon the Body and found four Holes on the right Side behind his short Ribbs as if made with Bullets and he gave order to open the Body and saw Mr. Hobbs take out the four Bullets Boresky being then told what was said replied That he fired the Blunderbuss but did not know how many Bullets there were because he did not charge it but he could tell who did But the Ld. Ch. Justice said that would not be material because his Evidence could charge no Body but himself Then Mr. Bridgman and Sir John Reresby deposed That Borosky Vratz and Stern were examined by them and proffer'd to read their Examinations but the Ld. Ch. Justice would not suffer it because their Evidence could charge no Body but themselves and he would not let the Jury be possess'd by that which is not Evidence And therefore they were only suffer'd to help their Memories by the Examinations and to mention only what they had confessed as to themselves Therefore they said that Borosky then confessed that he came into England at the desire of Count Conningsmark But here the Ld. Ch. Justice interrupted again the Evidence and bid Mr. Bridgman only relate his Confession as to himself which was That he fired the Musquetoon by the Captain 's Order who had before bid him to fire as soon as ever he stopped the Coach Capt. Vratz confessed that he came with a Design to fight Mr. Thynn having sent him Challenges by Post from
next Design was to be on Novemb. the 17th but the Country not being then in a readiness the Earl of Shaftsbury upon hearing it went away for Holland That after this they all began to lie under a sense that they had gone so far and communicated it to so many that it was unsafe to make a Retreat And for the carrying it on thought it necessary there should be some General Council that should take upon them the care of the whole Whereupon they erected the Council of six which consisted of the Duke of Monmouth Earl of Essex Lord Russel Mr. Hambden jun. Col. Sidney and himself That these met at Mr. Hambden's House about the middle of January last and there the Particulars offer'd to their Consideration whereto they were to bring their Advice were Whether the Insurrection were most proper to be begun in London or in the Country or both in an Instant What Countries and Towns were fittest and most dispos'd to Action What Arms were necessary to be got and how to be disposed How to raise a Common Bank of 25 or 30000 l. to answer all Occasions And lastly How to draw Scotland to consent with them it being thought necessary that all Diversion should be given That about ten Days after the same Persons met again at the Lord Russel's where it was resolv'd to send into Scotland to invite some Persons hither who could give the best accompt of the State thereof viz. Sir John Cockram the Lord Melvil and Sir Hugh Campbel and that in Discourse it was referr'd to Col. Sidney to take care of that Business who afterwards told him he had sent Aaron Smith and given him 60 Guinies for his Journey That to avoid Observation they concluded not to meet till the return of this Messenger and he going in the mean time to his Estate in Essex and thence to the Bath he knew nothing more only when he came back he was informed Smith was come back and Sir John Cockram with him That he was sure the Lord Russel was present at these Meetings and to his understanding did consent though nothing was put to the Vote And he wished he could say the Lord Russel was not there To this the Prisoner insisted that most he had said was only hearsay and the two times they met was not upon any formed Design but to talk of News and they were delighted to hear the Lord Howard talk being full of Discourse of a voluble Tongue and talk'd well And that he never saw any of the Scotch Gentlemen only the Lord Melvil but never upon this Account Here the Attorny General urged that Aaron Smith did go into Scotland and that Campbel he went for was taken which Mr. Atterbury swore that he was then in his Custody and that he had been by his own Confession four days in London before he was took Then Mr. West deposed That he never had any Conversation with the Prisoner only he had heard Mr. Ferguson and Col. Rumsey say that the Lord Russel in the Insurrection in November intended to take his Post in the West where Mr. Trenchard had failed them and that they most depended upon him because he was looked upon as a Person of great Sobriety But this being all but Hear-say the Court would not admit it as Evidence The King's Counsel therefore left the Evidence here and call'd on the Prisoner to make his Defence who to all this made Answer That he could not but think himself mighty unfortunate to stand there charg'd with so high a Crime and that intermixed with the horrid Practices and Speeches of other People the King's Counsel taking all Advantages and improving and heightning things against him That he was no Lawyer an unready Speaker and not so well prepared as he should be c. That he thought his Jury were Men of Consciences and would consider that the Witnesses against him swore to save their own Lives Neither was what Col. Rumsey swore enough to take away his Life or if it were the Time was elapsed by the 13th of this King which limits Prosecution to six Months Neither was a design of Levying War Treason unless it appeared by some Overt-Act as appears by the 25th of Edw. 3d. And then desiring to know upon what Statute he was indicted it was told him upon the 25th of Edw. the 3d. Whereupon he desired Counsel upon these two Points as Matter of Law Whether the Treason were duly proved and if it were Whether it were punishable by the Statute In Answer to which the Court inform'd him That if he were contented that the Fact should be taken as proved against him and desired Counsel upon what was bare Matter of Law he should have it granted but there could be no Matter of Law admitted but upon a Fact admitted and stated And whereas he insisted that the Business at Mr. Shepherd's House was sworn to only by one Witness It was answered that if there were one Witness of one Act of Treason another of a 2d and another of a 3d that manifested the same Treason it was sufficient The Statute then of 25th of Edw. 3d. c. 2. was read And then the Prisoner insisted that he was never but at one Meetings at Mr. Shepherd's and Col. Rumsey was there before he came in but Rumsey said No the Duke of Monmouth and the Lord Russel went away together Then in behalf of the Prisoner the Earl of Anglesey declared That visiting the Earl of Bedford last week the Lord Howard came in and told the Earl of Bedford that his Son could not be in such a Plot or suspected of it and that he knew nothing against the Lord Russel or any Body else of such a Barbarous Design And then going on to tell what the Lady Chaworth had told him the King's Counsel interrupted him telling him as the Court would not permit them to give Hear-say-Evidence against the Prisoner so they must not permit his Lordship to do it for the Prisoner Mr. Edward Howard declared That the Lord Howard took it upon his Honour and his Faith he knew nothing of any Person concerned in that Business and noâ— only thought the Lord Russel unjustly suffered but he took God and Man to Witness he thought the Lord Russel the Worthiest Man in the World Dr. Burnet declared The Lord Russel was with him the Night after the Plot broke out and did then as he had done before with Hands and Eyes lifted up to Heaven protest that he knew nothing of any Plot nor believ'd any and treated it with great Scorn and Contempt The Lord Cavendish testified to the Prudence and Honour of the Lord Russel and how unlikely it was for him to be concern'd and had heard him declare his ill Opinion of Rumsey two or three Days after the Discovery and therefore that it was unlikely he would entrust him with such a Secret Dr. Thomas Cox and Dr. Burnet again testified as to his Life and Conversation and of his aversness to
time coming again he said he knew nothing of this Plot and he was sure had Col. Sidney known any thing he would have told him And that he then telling my Lord he was not safe in his House the Ld. Howard said he had been a Prisoner and he had rather do any thing in the World than be a Prisoner again Then the Ld. Paget declared that seeing the Ld. Howard presently after the breaking out of this Plot he told him he was glad to see him abroad and that he was not concern'd in this Disorder Which he said he took as an injury to him for that his saying so looked as if he were guilty but that he knew nothing of himself or any Body else nor had he seen any Body that could say any thing of him or give him any occasion to say any thing of any Body else Mr. Edward Howard declared That as soon as the Plot broke out the Ld. Howard having a great intimacy with him he expressed a great detestation and surprizing in himself to hear of it and assured great Asseverations that he could neither accuse himself nor any Man living and that he was much concern'd for certain Persons of Quality that they should be so much reflected on or troubled about it And that this he verily thinks my Lord spoke sincerely and that he knew his Disposition so well that if he had had any Guilt upon him be would never have stood his being taken That another time discoursing the Ld. Howard about this Plot which he omitted at the Ld. Russel's Trial by reason of the reproof accidentally given him that it was certainly a Sham even to his Knowledg too black for any Minister of of publick Employment to have devis'd but that it was forged by People in the dark such as Jesuits and Papists and that this was his Conscience And that he consented to Address the King under his Hand to testify his abhorrency of the thing but upon the Lord Russel's being taken this was laid aside That he really believed what my Lord said then was true and were he of this Jury he would not believe what he said now For saying which the Court told him he ought to be bound to his good Behaviour The Prisoner then urged the Mortgage which the Lord Howard acknowledged Mr. Blake then declared that about 6 Weeks since the Ld. Howard sent for him to come and see him and talking then of his Pardon he said he had a Warrant for it and their Word and Honour for it but that he would do nothing in it till he had further order and that he heard nothing of it and could ascribe it to no other Reason but that he must not have his Pardon till the drudgery of Swearing was over The Prisoner then called Mr. Hunt and Burroughs to prove that the Ld. Howard said he could not have his Pardon till he had done some other Jobs but they did not appear Then Grace Tracy declared that the Ld. Howard protested his Ignorance of the Plot and of Colonel Sidney's being concern'd in it Elizabeth Penwick declared to the same purpose and that he desired withal that the Colonel's Plate might be sent to his House for Security for that he was apprehended through Malice Then one Mr. Wharton stood up and offer'd to the Court that if the sheets might be shewn him he would undertake to imitate them in a little time that they should not know which was which It being the easiest Hand that ever he saw in his Life Then the Prisoner proceeding in his Defence urg'd the Statute upon which he was Indicted as consisting of 2 Branches which were confounded in his Indictment together though they were distinct species of Treason And that the business of Aaron Smith was only conjecturally and implicitly sworn And the Papers were imperfect and had been writ many Years and never publish'd and could have no concatenation with the Select Council which the Ld. Howard had sworn though selected by no Body urging how unlikely it was for a War to be rais'd by 6 Men not knowing nor trusting one another the Ld. Howard putting such things upon them as were impossible for any one to do that had but the sense of Porters and Grooms The Solicitor General then summ'd up the Evidence making the Ld. Howard and his Papers two very good Witnesses against him Then the Ld. Ch. Justice declared his Charge to the Jury who withdrew for half an hour and then brought the Prisoner in Guilty And upon Monday November the 26th being set to the Bar the Prisoner pleaded that he conceived he had had no Tryal for that some of the Jury were no Free-holders and were not summon'd by the Bailiff but were agreed upon by the Under Sheriff and others desiring the Indictment might be read again which was done and then he urged it was void because it depriv'd the King of his Title of Defensor Fidei which was Treason by the Law Urging that there was no Treason in his Papers and desiring the D. of Monmouth might be sent for to testify if there were any such thing as a Design c. complaining that his Evidence had not been rightly summ'd up and appealing to God and the World he not being heard After which the Ld. Ch. Justice pronounced Sentence upon him to be Drawn Hang'd and Quartered c. Upon which Col. Sidney cry'd out Then O God O God I beseech thee Sanctify these Sufferings unto me and impute not my Blood to the Country nor the City through which I am to be Drawn let no inquisition be made for it but if any and the Shedding of Blood that is Innocent must be revenged let the weight of it fall only upon those that maliciously Persecute me for Righteousness sake Whereupon the Ld. Ch. Justice told him he pray'd God fit him for another World for he saw he was not fit for this But the Prisoner holding out his Hand bid his Lordship feel his Pulse and fee if he was disordered blessing God he never was in better temper than he was now On Friday December the 7th following his Sentence being mitigated by his Majesty's Grace and Favour he was brought from the Tower to a Scaffold on Tower-Hill where after a short Preparation he was beheaded by the Common Executioner The Trial of John Hambden Esq before the Lord Chief Justice Jeffries at the King's-Bench Bar at Westminster on Wednesday February 6 1683. ON Wednesday November 28th 1683. John Hambden Esq was Arraigned at the King's-Bench Bar upon an Indictment of High Misdemeanour for contriving and practising to disturb the King's Peace and stirring up Sedition in the Kingdom To which having pleaded Not Guilty and Issue being joyned Bail was taken for his appearing the next Term. Accordingly on Wednesday Feb. 6th following the Defendant appeared and the Jury were impannel'd Joshua Galliard Esq and Mr. Richard Shoveditch were challeng'd by Mr. Williams of Counsel for the Defendant because they were both
four a Clock in the Asternoon Mr. Keeling came with two more to his house and arrested him at the Suit of Mr Papillon and another of them did the same at the Suit of Mr. Dubois telling him if he would not give Appearance he must go to the Lord Mayor who was at Skinners-hall but that they would take his word till the Morrow Morning However he immediately went to the Lord Mayor's-house and not finding him at home he went to Skinners-hall where he found him all alone and no Alderman only the Officers with him where he had been but a little while but was detained and he with him till about eleven a Clock abundance of People being gather'd together about the Door but a Company of the trained Band-Souldiers coming keptall quiet Then Mr. Wells the common Cryer was called and sworn who deposed That he being in the next room to the Hall wherein the Lord Mayor was arrested was presently sent for to my Lord who bid him send out the Officers to summon a Lieutenancy which he did and the Sword-Bearer being not just then at hand the Lord-Mayor bid him take the Sword and go along with him and so they were carry'd by the Coroner to his own house and the Lord-Mayor put up into a little Room by himself and he commanded by him to go and see for Sir James Edwards and Sir Henry Tulse and the Ld. Mayor that now is whom he found to be all arrested before he came Then Sir John Peake was sworn who deposed that upon the News of the Lord Mayor's being arrested he had order from the Lieutenancy to raise his Regiment which he did in a very little time and came with his Soldier to Skinners-Hall where he heard the Lord Mayor was and prevented any stir as it was feared there would have been Here the King's Counsel rested their Evidence till they had heard what the other said to it Whereupon Serjeant Maynard being of Counsel for the Defendant Mr. Papillon told the Jury in a very learned and excellent Speech that the Lord Mayor was as much subject to the Process of Law and Actions as any private Person in the City if he did injury or that which was not right in his Office That the Defendant did then suppose himself to have wrong done him and had therefore probable cause to bring his Action which he had done in a legal Manner against the Lord Mayor Then Mr. VVilliams insisted upon the probability of the cause of Action it being a controverted Question Whether Mr. Papillon and Mr. Dubois or Sir Dudley North and Mr. Box were chosen Sheriffs of London And some were so much dissatisfied with swearing Sir Dudley North and Mr. Rich Sheriffs as thinking them not duly Elected that they would have the Court of Kings-Bench moved for the Writ of Mandamus to swear Mr. Papillon and Mr. Dubois which Mandamus was granted to which the Mayor and Aldermen to whom it was directed made a Return that they were not Elected Sheriffs of London which Return was apprehended to be false and really to try the truth of this Return was the Action brought against the Plantiff which was the only way they had to right themselves and therefore they proceeded regularly and orderly in a decent Manner applying themselves to get an Appearance to their Action For that first they took out a Latitat against my Lord Mayor and by the Attorny gave him notice of it and desired an Appearance so that the Question in dispute might come to some determination But he was not pleased to give an Appearance to that Writ so they took out a Capias gave him notice of it and desired an Appearance but could have none whereupon they took out an alias Capias and the Coroner then told that he should be called upon to make some Return to the Writ which he acquainted the Lord Mayor with and desired again an Appearance which he refusing the Officer was constrained to arrest him and an Appearance at last was given Upon which they declared in the beginning of Hilary or Easter-Term 83. But it falling out that in Easter-Term 83 that that there was an Information for a Riot upon Midsummer-day before about this contested Election which being tried May the 10th was found to be so and the Sheriffs sworn to be duly elected thereupon being satisfied that they were mistaken they immediately discontinued their Action Then Mr. VVard of Counsel also for the Defendant spoke vindicating the Defendant from some unjust Reflections which the King's Counsel had made as if he had caused the Lord Mayor to be Arrested for the furtherance of some designed Insurrection against the King and Government and shewing the probability of the Cause then at that time though it be quite otherwise since the Question of the Right and Election being determined on the other side in the Trial about the Riot at the Election But the Ld. Ch. Justice here interrupting him would by no means allow that to be the Question then determined which raised some Words between them whereat there was a little Hiss begun which made the Ld. Ch. Justice in a great Fury ask who that Fellow was that durst hum or hiss while he sat there threatning to lay him by the heels and make an Example of him saying That indeed he knew the time when Causes were to be carried according as the Mobile hiss'd or humm'd and that he did not question but they had as good a will to it now Then he suffered the Defendants Counsel to call their Witnesses And therefore Mr Brome being call'd and swore deposed That aster he had the Writs he waited upon my Ld. Mayor praying his Appearance and gave him 9 or 10 days to consider and that the Defendants Attorny Mr. Goodenough did threaten to complain of him to the Court if he did not make a Return of the Writ And that when at last he could get no Appearance the Officers named in the Warrant by his Command did arrest him and carry him to Skinners-Hall and that soon aster he himself was taken into Custody and committed to the Compter Then after the Ld. Ch. Justice had cross'd Questions with him to have forc'd him a fall Mr. Cornish was swore who depos'd That Mr. Papillon and Mr. Dubois being at his house in came Mr. Goodenough the Attorny to receive their Orders what he should do telling them the time was almost spent and he had addressed himself from time to time to the Lord Mayor and some of the Aldermen to get them to appear but they would not They told him they had already given him Orders and desired that the matter might be brought to some Trial or issue and that he should desire an Appearance to the Action and if he would give it take it and remember my Lord Mayor is the Chief Magistrate of the City and pray'd him to carry it with all respect and regard imaginable to him The Ld. Ch. Justice then fell violently
That the Defendant was Guilty of the Perjury whereof he was Indicted which being Recorded The Ld. Ch. Justice gave it his Approbation â—o which the rest of the Judges assented and then the Court arose THE next day being Saturday May 9 1685 the Prisoner was again set to the Bar having also been arraigned upon another Information of Perjury which did set forth that he being a Witness for the King at the Trials of Ireland and the five Jesuits did therein swear that Ireland was in Town the 1st and 2d of September and between the 8th and 12th of Aug. 1678. and that he had forsworn himself in both Instances to which he had pleaded Not Guilty The Jury therefore sworn were Sir Thomas Vernon Kt. Nicholas Charlton Es q Thomas Langham Es q Thomas Hartop Francis Griffith John Kent George Toriano Henry Loades John Midgley John Pelling Thomas Short George Peck To whom the Information being read Mr. Phipps opened the same and Mr. Attorn Genopened the Evidence And then the Records of the two Trials were produced and admitted And then Mr. Thomas Harriot vvho vvas Foreman of the Jury at the Trial of the five Jesuits deposed That Dr. Oates vvas a Witness thereat and swore that Ireland took his leave of him and others at the said Ireland's Chamber between the 8th and 12th of August 1678. And Mr. Rainsford Waterhouse being another of the Jury at the same time deposed the very same Then Mr. Foster a Jury-man at Ireland's Trial deposed That the Prisoner also was a Witness then and swore that the said Ireland vvas in Town the 1st or 2d of September 1678 for he had then 20 s. of him And Mr. John Byfield another of the same Jury deposed the same To prove it false then Mrs. Ann Ireland deposed That on Wednesday July 31. being St. Ignotius's day her Mother and She and Brother were invited to Mr. Gifford's at Hammer smith that She and her Mother staid all Night but her Brother refused that on Saturday following August 3. 1678. she took leave of him he going then out of Town to the Lord Aston's House in Hartfordshire in order to go thence into Staffordshire that in his absence once one Mrs. Eagleston lodg'd in his Room her Maid falling sick and that he returned not till just a fortnight before Michaelmass Mrs. Eleanor Ireland deposed the very same saying he return'd Septemb. 14 before his Trial whereat she was a Witness but not suffered to speak what she knew Then Mrs. Duddle deposed also the same Evidence about his being out of Town And the like did Mrs. Ouino his Taylor 's Wife who brought him home some Clothes that had been mended but Saturday Morning he went and she saw him in his Boots and he took Horse as his Servant had testified at the Bull-Inn in Drury-lane Then the Ld. Aston deposed That Mr. Ireland came to his House at Staenden in Hartfordshire on Saturday Night August 3. 1678. and went with him on Monday to St. Albans where they met with his Brother and Sister Southcoat and thence travelled to Tixhall where they arrived on Thursday following Ireland as he believes being all this time in his Company Then Sir Edward Southcoat deposed That he came to the Lord Aston's Aug. 4. 1678. that the day following Mr. Ireland travell'd with them to St. Albans where they met with his Father and Mother and lay all Night at the Bull Inn that the next Night they lay at the George in Northampton and on Wednesday Night at the Bull in Coventry and the next came to Tixhall Mr. Ireland being with them all the Journey and staid with them there till the Tuesday following Aug. 13. And then they went to Nantwich and lay at the Holy-Lamb and the next day came to Holy-Well and lay at the Star and the next day came to Chester and return'd the next day after to Tixhall again being Friday August 16. Mr. Ireland still travelling with them That afterwards he cannot positively say how long Ireland was at Tixhall only that he remembred him there the day of Mr. Chetwin's Race with Sir Henry Gough and on a Thursday upon the Bowling-Green at Tixhall But he came back with them from Tixhall the 9th or 10th of September the first Night to the Bull in Coventry the next to the Altar-stone at Banbury the next to Agmondishman and the next to his Father's House in Kingston where his Brother bought Mr. Ireland's Horse of him being Thursday and the Saturday following Ireland went to London Septemb 14. Then Mr. John Southcoat Sir Edward's Brother who bought Ireland's Horse deposed the same things being with them all these Journeys After him one Harrison Sir John Southcoat's Man who likewise travell'd with them and was the Man that went with Ireland to London and brought back his Horse deposed the very same George Hobson a Servant of the Lord Aston's deposed That he also was these Journeys and saw Ireland every day that after they return'd from Holy-Well to Tixall he saw him again on August 26. and on the day he return'd thence for London which was Septemb. 9. 1678. George North another of my Lord's Servants deposed That he travell'd at the same time in Mr. Ireland's Company from Standen to Tixhall and that he saw him again at Tixhall after his return from Holy-Well and particularly on Septemb. 9. he then going back for London Richard Ingletrap the Hackney Coach-man a Protestant deposed that he travell'd also from Standen to Tixhall with Mr. Ireland and saw him August 13. when he set out for Holy-Well Andrew Wetton another Protestant deposed that he travelled from Tixhall to Holy-Well and so back again to Tixhall in Mr. Ireland's Company looking after his Horse and saw him that day he set out for London Thomas Sawyer deposed that Ireland was at Tixhall from Aug. 8. to Aug. 13. and came again Aug. 16. and went for London Semptemb 9. following Frances Allen one of the Lord Aston's Maids who wash'd Ireland's Linnen and look'd to his Chamber while he was at Tixhall deposed that he came to Tixhall Aug. 8. 1678. and went for Holy-Well the 13th and returned thence the 16th and went away the next day she delivering him the Linnen he carried with him and saw him several times afterwards at Tixhall professing her self a Protestant also Then Mrs. Jane Harwell deposed that Mr. Ireland came to her House in Wolverhampton Aug. 17. as from Tixhall and was every day there till the 26th when he return'd as she supposes to Tixhall again He came to her again Sept. 4. following and staid till the 7th when he went away for good and all That hearing of his Trial and what he had been accused of in December following she sent an Express at her own Charges to London to a Friend with a Petition to the King that they might bring in Witnesses to prove this Upon which his Execution was staid about five Weeks and they hoped for a second Trial but could not obtain
with being then call'd for to the Bar and discharged Upon which my Lord Delamere replied That he should pray to Almighty God to be thankful to him for his Mercy and to my Lords for their Justice and pray'd God to deliver their Lordsships and all honest Men from Wicked and Malicious Lying and False Testimony and pray'd God to bless his Majesty and that long he might Reign And I pray God added the Lord H. Steward to continue to him his Loyal Peers and all other his Loyal Subjects Then a Serjeant at Arms having made Proclamation to Dissolve the Court the Lord High Steward took the White Staff from the Usher of the Black Rod and holding it over his Head broke it in two A Narrative of all the Proceedings against Henry Lord Bishop of London in the Council-Chamber at White-Hall by the Lords Commissioners appointed by his Majesty to inspect Ecclesiastical Affairs On Wednesday Aug. 4. 1686. Present in Council Lord Chancellor Lord Bishop of Durham Lord Treasurer Lord Bishop of Rochester Lord President Lord Chief Justice Herbert UPon my Lord Bishop's then and there appearing before them according to a Summons sent unto him the Lord Chancellor Jefferies ask'd him Why he did not suspend Dr. Sharp when the King commanded and sent him express Order so to do and told him what it was for viz. for preaching Seditiously and against the Government The Bishop answered That if he had done amiss it was not a wilful Fault and that he had took the best Advice he could get and was inform'd he could not do it legally but by way of Express and hearing him That he was not provided with such a Defence as he might have been not knowing what would be laid to his Charge and therefore desired some time and a Copy of their Lordships Commission and of his Charge But his having a Copy of their Commission denied him it being already publickly abroad he desired either to read or hear it read Hereupon the Bishop and all the Company were desired to withdraw and returning within about a quarter of an hour the Chancellor told him All the Commissioners were of Opinion that his Request was not to be granted it being unreasonable But they were willing to allow him more time the Bishop therefore prayed that he might have till the beginning of the next Term but a Week vvas thought enough and so they adjourn'd only until Monday next Aug. 9. 1686. Then and there the Bishop came attended with his Nephew the Earl of Northampton his Brother-in-Law Sir John Nicholas and his Brother Sir Francis Compton c. There being present in Council the same as before The Chancellor told him they vvere now ready to hear his Reasons But the Bishop replied He vvas not so ready as he might have been because he could not light of the Commission to see it until last Night tho he imployed all his time to search for it and he had not had time since to take Advice vvhat to answer and that his Counsel vvas out of Town in vvhom he thought to confide Then vvithdrawing for a quarter of an hour the Chancellor told him They vvould not admit of any quarrelling vvith their Commission for that they were well assured of the Legality of it But asking him what Time he desired at his request they granted him a Fortnight and adjourned It vvas observed that vvhen the Bishop spake concerning the Commission Sir Thomas Clarges spake aloud saying VVell put well put my Lord speaks nothing but Truth There was also another Gentleman Sir John Lowther of Lincolnshire vvho as he vvas coming away in the Crowd said There are some who have represented me as a Papist but the contrary shall appear I will not be afraid nor ashamed to vindicate my Lord Bishop of London 's Cause before the Commissioners themselves Tuesday Aug. 24. 1686. There being present in Council the same as at first the Lord Bishop attending and being asked what he had to say after some Apology for vvhat he vvas about to say he said His Counsel tells him that their Proceedings in this Court are directly contrary to the Statute-Law and vvere there ready to plead it if their Lordships would admit them But the Chancellor told him they vvould neither hear him nor his Counsel in the Matter they being satisfied of the Legality of their Commission Then the Bishop urged that their Commission he conceived did not extend to the Crimes laid to his Charge for they were to censure Faults vvhich are committed But this that he vvas accused of vvas before the Date of their Commission The Chancellor confess'd there vvas such a Clause but that those vvere general Clauses that take in things past as vvell as future Then the Bishop protesting in his own Right to the Laws of the Realm as a Subject and the Rights and Priviledges of lie Church as a Bishop he would with their leave give them his Answer Which was accepted and the Bishop withdrew and left Dr. Sharp's Petition which Dr. Sharp carried on Sunday June 20. 1686. to Windsor and was not admitted to be read Which is as follows To the King 's most Excellent Majesty the humble Petition of John Sharp Clerk sheweth THat nothing is so afflictive to your Petitioner as his unhappiness to have incurred your Majesty's Displeasure vvhich he is so sensible of that ever since your Majesty vvas pleased to give notice of it he hath forborn all publick Exercise of his Function and still continues so to do Your Petitioner can vvith great sincerity affirm That ever since he hath been a Preacher he hath faithfully endeavoured to do the best Service he could in his Place and Station as vvell to the late King your Royal Brother as to your Majesty both by preaching and otherwise And so far he hath always been from venting any thing in the Pulpit tending to Schism or Faction or any vvay to the disturbance of your Majesty's Government that he hath upon all Occasions in his Sermons to the utmost of his Power set himself against all sorts of Doctrines and Principles that look that vvay And this he is so vvell assured of that he cannot but apprehend that his Sermons have been very much misrepresented to your Majesty But if in any Sermon of his any Words or Expressions have unwarily slipp'd from him that have been capable of such constructions as to give your Majesty cause of Offence as he solemnly professes he had no ill Intention in those Words or Expressions so he is very sorry for them and resolves for the future to be so careful in the discharge of his Duty that your Majesty shall have reason to believe him to be your most faithful Subject And therefore he earnestly prayeth that your Majesty out of your Royal Grace and Clemency vvould be pleased to lay aside the Displeasure you have conceived against your humble Petitioner and restore him to that Favour vvhich the rest of the Clergy enjoy under your
Indicted and which was given in Evidence before the Grand-Jury upon the Trial was there grounded To the first the Ed. Ch. Justice reply'd That a Conspiracy was prov'd if the Witnesses speak Truth by his publishing Libels and Pictures to make the King odious and contemptible in the Eyes of the People and his being the Author of some of them and they being found in his Custody To the Second it was answered That the Resolution of the Judges in my Lord Stafford's Case is contrary There being two Witnesses to an Indictment of Treason tho there be but one Witness that proves one Fact which is an Evidence of Treason and another that proves another that is an Evidence of the same Treason tho they be but single Witnesses to several Facts And to the Third it was answer'd in the Affirmative it being any Act of Treason that is of the same kind Then Mr. Colledge being call'd upon to call his Witnesses he express'd himself in a long Speech protesting his own Innocency not doubting to prove this one of the Hellishest Conspiracies that ever was upon the face of the Earth and these the most notorious wicked Men an absolute Design to destroy all the Protestants of England who have had the Courage to oppose the Popish Plot in which no Man of his condition had done more than he had done Declaring that he was bred a Protestant and continued so hitherto and by the Grace of God would die so That he had been concern'd with Persons of Honour and could not be reasonably deem'd such a Fool or Madman as to talk of such things to Papists Priests and Irish-Men who had broke their Faith with their own Party and upon whom he could lay no such Oaths and Obligations That his acquaintance with Haynes began upon a Discovery he made to him how Fitz-Gerald had employed him to setch over Macnamarra to swear against the Earl of Shaftsbury High-Treason as he had done viz. That my Lord should tell Fitz-Gerald that he had a Design to bring this Kingdom to a Common-Wealth and to root out the Family of the Stuarts which he swore was true and a great deal more which he knew and would discover about seizing and destroying the Parliament at Oxford about an Army in the North that was to be raised about the time of the sitting of the Parliament at Oxford Of a French Army that was to land in Ireland at the same time that the D. of York was to be at the head of them and the intention was to destroy all the Protestants Upon this it was that he resolved to come along with the Parliament and if there was any such Design to live and die with them That he was imployed by several Lords and Parliament-Men when the Parliament sat last at Westminster to search under the Parliament House whence he got the Name of the Protestant Joyner And that this Haynes did swear in his Affidavit before Sir George Treby the Recorder of London That there was a Design to destroy the Parliament at Oxford and there was not only his Oath for it but it was the general belief that some Evil was intended them But as for the seizing of the King that he never heard one word of it before he came hither that he knew not of one Man upon the Face of the Earth that was to stand by him and how impossible it was for him alone to attempt it all Men might judge That he hoped to prove these Witnesses suborned complaining of his close Imprisonment Then the First Witness that appear'd for the Prisoner was William Shewin who declared That he was in Turbervil's company on Thursday Night last at the Golden Posts at Charing-Cross and there he heard him say That if he were at Oxford he should hear strange things against Colledge and he would lay ten to one that Mr. Bethel and Mr. Wilmore should be hanged at Christmas and he would lead him by the Gold Chain along Fleet-street and down with his Breeches in the middle of Amsterdam Coffee-House with a Band about his Neck and a Cloak And that one told him there was one that did design to be return'd upon this Jury that was resolv'd to hang Colledge right or wrong Which the High Sheriff acknowledg'd also and that he had therefore left him out for which the Court gave him his due Commendations Then Henry Hickman who had been called before a Cabinet-maker at Holborn-Bridge appeared who declared That he knew Haynes very well he oft coming to his House to a Widow who lodged there a Papist and that therefore he took him for a Priest And that discoursing with his Tenant concerning him she told him that he was a dangerous Fellow though a Papist and that he cared not much what he sweared against any one And that he over-heard him discoursing with his Tenant in her Chamber and saying God dam-me I care not what I swear nor who I swear against for 't is my trade to get mony by swearing Then Elizabeth Oliver was called who only produced a Letter which she affirmed Haynes to have writ in her Father's Name and that he was an ill Man which being judg'd by the Court nothing to the purpose she was dismiss'd And Mrs. Hall was next call'd who declared That Haynes lodged at her House and that he told her enquiring of him about Fitz-Harris's Trial that Madam Portsmouth begg'd of Fitz-Harris upon her Knees that he would try to get Mr. Everard and some others over to make a Presbyterian Plot of it Another time that she heard him speak of a Message he had had from the King to come in and he should have his Pardon And that he read once to her an Advertisement in answer to something Thompson had written against him in his Intelligence which he said he had writ and was then going to get it put into one of the Intelligences it being to this purpose That whereas one Nathaniel Thompson had falsly and maliciously accused one Bryan Haynes for speaking Treasonable Words he the said Bryan Haynes doth declare that he challenges any Man to charge him with it but he owned he had an hand or was employed to put the Plot upon the Dissenting-Protestants Then Mary Richards Mrs Hall's Maid was called who owned the same things affirmed by her Mistress Next Mrs Wingfield whose Daughter Haynes married was call'd who would say nothing of Haynes but what was for his Credit Then Mr. John Whaley was call'd who declared That about 6 Years Ago when Haynes was a Prisoner in the King's-Bench he came down to drink in the Cellar which he had taken of the Marshal and stole a Tankard for which the Marshal removed him from the Master's Side and put him into the Common Side which was all he knew of him Mr. Colledge called next for Mr. John Lun who declared how that about three or four days after the Bill was brought Ignoramns by the Grand Jury upon Mr. Colledge he was
drinking with Haynes who fell very foul against the Grand Jury because they had not found that Bill and he said my Lord Shaftsbury was a little Toad but that he would do his Business very suddenly Then he railed upon the Parliament and said they were a Company of Rogues they would give the King no Mony but that he would help him to Mony enough out of the Phanaticks Estates And said that they would damn their Souls to the Devil before the Catholick Cause should sink And that on Munday last meeting with Haynes again at Vxbridge at the Crown in discourse he heard him say that Sheriff Bethel's Estate should be the King 's e're long To invalidate this Testimony Haynes deny'd that ever he saw Lun before he saw him at Vxbridge which was sworn also by Mr. White the King's Messenger who was by and whose Prisoner Mr. Lun had been two Years affirming that Lun ask'd him who Haynes was and that he heard no such words spoken after which Serj. Jefferies bespatter'd him with some of his Reflections Next Mr. Jeremiah Broadgate was call'd who said That drinking with Mr. Turbervile he told him how the King's Evidence were villified and looked upon as poor inconsiderable Fellows and that he had had very great Offers from the Court if he would disown the Popish Plot and go upon the contrary Side Which Evidence also was rejected as nothing to the purpose Then Mr. John Zeal was called who because he could say nothing but what he had heard Mr. Ivy tell him was set aside And Mr. Ivy was called who confessing that he had given Evidence against the Prisoner the Prisoner concluded he could be no good one for him Therefore Mr. William Lewes was called who declared he knew nothing of any of the Evidence as to the Prisoner that he could only say something of Mr. Ivy as to a Presbyterian Plot and my Lord Shaftsbury And therefore Dr. Oates was next called who produced a Petition to the Common-Council subscribed by Edward Turbervile John Macnamarra c. wherein they set out how they had been tempted to unsay what they had said against the Papists And declared he charging Turbervile as if he was to be a Witness at the Old Baily against Colledge Mr. Turbervile said He would break any ones head that should say so against him for he neither was a Witness nor could give any Evidence against him Of which telling him after he had been at Oxford he confessed he had been sworn against Colledge before the Grand Jury For said he the Protestant-Citizens have deserted us and God damn him he would not starve This Turbervile then flatly denied upon his Oath and the Doctor affirmed upon the Word of a Priest As for Mr. Smith the Doctor affirmed That upon some provoking words between him and Mr. Colledge at Richard's Coffee-House he heard him swear God Damn him he would have Colledge 's Blood For which Dr. Oates reproving him as unbecoming words for a Minister of the Gospel his reply was God damn the Gospel This Smith also denied As for Mr. Dugdale the Doctor said that he had declared to him upon the report of his being an Evidence against my Lord Shaftsbury and several Protestants that he knew nothing against any Protestant in England Afterwards the Doctor telling him he fear'd he had gone against his Conscience he was sure against what he had declared to him Said he It was all long of Col. Warcup for I could get no Mony else and said that the Colonel did promise he should have a place at the Custom-house This Dugdale deny'd So the Court took notice to the Jury of these three Mens Oaths against the Doctor 's bare Word Which Mr. Colledge complain'd of as not fair dealing And that if he could witness for himself he could discover more than this that Dugdale had said to him alone how that he was forced to keep Company with Warcup or he must starve and to stay for his Mony from the Attorney General because there was new Work to be done such as his Conscience would not serve him to do that there was more Roguery that they would never have done plotting and counter-plotting but that they would make a thousand Plots if they could to destroy the real One But this he could not prove because it was to him alone he said it The Prisoner call'd then Mr. Alexander Blake who said that Mr. Smith told him one Morning That one Haynes was under Examination and had discovered very material things against some great Persons which some time after he told was a Sham-Plot a Meal-tub Plot. Then Mr. Samuel Smith was call'd who own'd his acquaintance with Smith and that he had heard him say he believed a Popish Plot but not any Protestant Plot and that though he denied not but that he had sworn against Mr. Colledge he did not believe what Colledge had said for he did not believe it himself Then Mr. Thomas Gardner being call'd testified the same Smith repeating it in his Company with Mr. Samuel Smith at the Rummer in Queen's-street And withal that two or three of the Jury-men that acquitted Mr. Colledge were Rascals and Villains And says he they talk as if I intended to sham the Popish Plot and make a Protestant Plot which said he I vow to God and I will justify it before God and all the World that I know of no Protestant Plot nor is there any Protestant concerned in a Plot to my knowledg but this Colledge and upon his Trial I believe he will be made appear to be more a Papist than a Protestant Then the Prisoner call'd for Dr. Oates again to give an Account to the Court what treasonable Words he heard spoke at Alderman Wilcox's Treat at the Crown-Tavern without Temple-Bar Who appearing again did affirm That the Discourse between the Coffee-House and the Tavern was between Mr. Colledge and him and not at all with Smith who either went before or followed them and that when he heard Smith swear at the Old-Baily that it was with him he did really in his Conscience look upon him as forsworn in that Particular That at the Tavern the Discourse was between him and one Mr. Savage who had been formerly a Romish Priest concerning the Existence of God and Immortality of the Soul That Colledge and Smith had no Discourse at all together in his hearing and that immediatly after Dinner Smith went his way Then Mr. Thomas Smith a Lawyer was call'd who said That he was at Dinner but heard no treasonable Words spoke most of the Discourse being between Dr. Oates and Mr. Savage and that if there had been any such words spoke he must needs have heard them the Room being small and for that Reason that they could not divide themselves into Cabals as Smith had deposed but that Colledge was asleep most of the time And as to Arms he knew that Mr. Colledge used to ride with Pistols having borrowed his Horse and had