thought fit to omit it and I would not have the good Man depriv'd of such a publick testimony of his Modesty and love for Truth About the Year 1637. Sir William Dugdale acquainted our Author that many Learned Men were very desirous to see the Second Part publisht and requested of him to gratifie the world with the Work entire Upon that he show'd him the Second part as also the improvements that he had made upon the First but withall told him what great discouragements he had met with from the Booksellers So for that time the matter rested and upon the Author's death all the papers came into the hands of his eldest Son Sir John Spelman a Gentleman who had sufficient parts and abilities to compleat what his Father had begun if death had not prevented him After the Restoration of King Charles II. Arch-bishop Sheldon and the Lord Chancellor Hyde enquir'd of Sir William Dugdale what became of the Second part of the Glossary or whether it was ever finisht He told them that it was finisht by the Author and that the Copy was in the hands of Mr. Charles Spelman Grandson to Sir Henry They desir'd that it might by all means be printed and that he would prevail upon Mr. Spelman to do it for the Service of the Publick and the honour of his Grandfather Whereupon having got a good number of Subscriptions the management of that whole affair was referr'd to Sir William Dugdale as well to treat with the Booksellers as to prepare the Copy for the Press The share that Sir William Dugdale had in the publication of this Second Part has been made the ground of a suspicion that he inserted many things of his own that were not in Sir Henry Spelman's Copy and particularly some passages which tend to the enlargement of the Prerogative in opposition to the Liberties of the Subject The objection has been rais'd on occasion of a Controversie about the Antiquity of the Commons in Parliament the Authority of Sir Henry being urg'd to prove that there was no such thing as a House of Commons till the time of Henry III. It is agreed on all hands that this Learned Knight was a very competent Judge of that Controversie that as he had thoroughly study'd our Constitution so he always writ without partiality or prejudice that he was not engag'd in a party nor had any other design but to publish the truth fairly and honestly as he found it asserted by the best Historians Upon these grounds his Opinion in matters of this nature has ever been thought confiderable and his bare Judgement will always be valu'd when we can be sure that it is his own And there can be no doubt but his Assertions under the Title Parlamentum upon which the controversie is rais'd are his own and not an interpolation of Sir William Dugdale's For the very Copy from which it was Printed is in the Bodleian Library in Sir Henry Spelman's own hand and agrees exactly with the Printed Book particularly in the passages under dispute they are the same word for word So far then as this Copy goes for it ends at the word Riota it is a certain testimony that Sir William Dugdale did no more than mark it for the Printer and transcribe here and there a loose paper And tho' the rest of the Copy was lost before it came to the Oxford Library and so we have not the same authority for the Glossarie's being genuine after the Letter R yet it is not likely that Sir William had any more share in the seven last Letters of the Alphabet than he had in the others For all the parts of such a Work must be carry'd on at the same time and so to be sure the Author left equal materials for the whole The Gentleman also who is concern'd to prove the Second Part to be all genuine has urg'd Sir William Dugdale's own authority for it and that too while he was living Then I have seen a Letter from Sir William Dugdale to Mr. Spelman giving him an account of the great losses he had sustain'd by the Fire of London and the pains he had taken in the publication of the Councils and Glossary As to the former he expresly lays claim to the better half of it as his own Work and Collection adding that if the Impression had not perisht in all right and reason he ought to have had consideration for the same as also so he goes on for my pains in fitting the Copy of the Glossary for the Printer by marking it for the difference of Letter and introducing and transcribing those loose papers left by your Grandfather without fit directions where they should come in This is all that he pretends to in the Glossary and if he had any further share in it t is likely he would have insisted upon it on this occasion to convince Mr. Spelman the more effectually of the good services he had done him in that business I have been the more particular in this matter because if it should appear in the main that Sir William had taken the liberty of adding or altering every single passage after would be lyable to suspicion and the authority of the whole very much weaken'd For tho' that worthy Person was extremely well vers'd in our English affairs yet it must be own'd that Sir Henry Spelman was a better judge of our ancient Customs and Constitutions and consequently whatever he delivers as his opinion ought to be allow'd a proportionable authority Had he put his last hand to this Second Part the Glossary as it is now printed together would have made a much nobler Work But the latter part in comparison of the other is jejune and scanty and every one must see that it is little more than a collection of Materials out of which he intended to compose such Discourses as he has all along given us in the First Part under the words that are most remarkable It was my good fortune among others of his papers to meet with two of these Dissertations De Marescallis Angliae and De Milite which are publisht among these Remains for the present and will be of use hereafter in a new Edition of the Glossary as properly belonging to it and originally design'd for it by the Author Tho' it is not likely that he should lay aside his Glossary for the sake of the Councils yet it is certain that he enter'd upon this latter Work before the Glossary was finisht He was particularly encourag'd in it by Dr. George Abbot and Dr. William Laud successively Arch-bishops of Canterbury and above all by the most Learned Primate of Armagh Archbishop Usher And in his Preface he tells us that he was much confirm'd in his design by what he had heard from Dr. Wren first Bishop of Norwich and afterwards of Ely He told him how Dr. Andrews the then late Bishop of Winchester had been reflecting with great concern upon the
pag. 89. concerning this Treatise I shall here briefly exhibit some particulars which I acknowledge to have gather'd from an ample and most judicious discourse on this Subject written by the Learned Sir Henry Spelman Knight in 1614. very well worthy to be made publick THE Occasion of this Discourse ABout fourty two years since divers Gentlemen in London studious of Antiquities fram'd themselves into a College or Society of Antiquaries appointing to meet every Friday weekly in the Term at a place agreed of and for Learning sake to confer upon some questions in that Faculty and to sup together The place after a meeting or two became certain at Darby-house where the Herald's-Office is kept and two Questions were propounded at every meeting to be handled at the next that followed so that every man had a sennight's respite to advise upon them and then to deliver his opinion That which seem'd most material was by one of the company chosen for the purpose to be enter'd in a book that so it might remain unto posterity The Society increased daily many persons of great worth as well noble as other learned joyning themselves unto it Thus it continu'd divers years but as all good uses commonly decline so many of the chief Supporters hereof either dying or withdrawing themselves from London into the Country this among the rest grew for twenty years to be discontinu'd But it then came again into the mind of divers principal Gentlemen to revive it and for that purpose upon the day of in the year 1614. there met at the same place Sir James Ley Knight then Attorney of the Court of Wards since Earl of Marleborough and Lord Treasurer of England Sir Robert Cotton Knight and Baronett Sir John Davies his Majestie 's Attorney for Ireland Sir Richard St. George Knt. then Norrey Mr. Hackwell the Queen's Solicitor Mr. Camden then Clarentieux my self and some others Of these the Lord Treasurer Sir Robert Cotton Mr. Camden and my self had been of the original Foundation and to my knowledge were all then living of that sort saving Sir John Doderidge Knight Justice of the King 's Bench. We held it sufficient for that time to revive the meeting and only conceiv'd some rules of Government and limitation to be observ'd amongst us whereof this was one That for avoid offence we should neither meddle with matters of State nor of Religion And agreeing of two Questions for the next meeting we chose Mr. Hackwell to be our Register and the Convocator of our Assemblies for the present and supping together so departed One of the Questions was touching the Original of the Terms about which as being obscure and generally mistaken I bestow'd some extraordinary pains that coming short of others in understanding I might equal them if I could in diligence But before our next meeting we had notice that his Majesty took a little mislike of our Society not being enform'd that we had resolv'd to decline all matters of State Yet hereupon we forbare to meet again and so all our labours lost But mine lying by me and having been often desir'd of me by some of my Friends I thought good upon a review and augmentation to let it creep abroad in the form you see it wishing it might be rectify'd by some better judgement SECT I. Of the Terms in general AS our Law books have nothing to my knowledge touching the original of the Terms so were it much better if our Chronicles had as little For tho' it be little they have in that kind yet is that little very untrue affirming that William the Conquerour did first institute them It is not worth the examining who was Author of the errour but it seemeth Polydore Virgil an Alien in our Common-wealth and not well endenized in our Antiquities spread it first in Print I purpose not to take it upon any man's word but searching for the fountain will if I can deduce them from thence beginning with their definition The Terms be certain portions of the year in which only the King's Justices hold plea in the high Temporal Courts of causes belonging to their Jurisdiction in the places thereto assigned according to the ancient Rites and Customs of the Kingdom The definition divides it self and offers these parts to be consider'd 1. The Names they bear 2. The Original they come from 3. The Time they continue 4. The Persons they are held by 5. The Causes they deal with 6. The Place they are kept in 7. The Rites they are performed with The parts minister matter for a Book at large but my purpose upon the occasion impos'd being to deal only with the Institution of the Terms I will travel no farther than the three first stages of my division that is touching their Name their Original and their Time of continuance SECT II. Of the Names of the Terms THe word Terminus is of the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth the Bound End or Limit of a thing here particularly of the time for Law matters In the Civil Law it also signifieth a day set to the Defendant and in that sense doth Bracton Glanvil and others sometimes use it Mat. Paris calleth the Sheriff's Turn Terminum Vicecomitis and in the addition to the MSS. Laws of King Inas Terminus is applied to the Hundred-Court as also in a Charter of Hen. I. prescribing the time of holding the Court. And we ordinarily use it for any set portion of Time as of Life Years Lease c. The space between the Terms is named Vacation à Vacando as being leasure from Law business by Latinists Justitium à jure stando because the Law is now at a stop or stand The Civilians and Canonists call Term-time Dies Juridicos Law-days the Vacation Dies Feriales days of leasure or intermission Festival-days as being indeed sequester'd from troublesome affairs of humane business and devoted properly to the service of God and his Church According to this our Saxon and Norman Ancestors divided the year also between God and the King calling those days and parts that were assigned to God Dies pacis Ecclesiae the residue alloted to the King Dies or tempus pacis Regis Divisum Imperium cum Jove Caesar habet Other names I find none anciently among us nor the word Terminus to be frequent till the age of Henry II. wherein Gervasius Tilburiensis and Ranulphus de Glanvilla if those books be theirs do continually use it for Dies pacis Regis The ancient Romans in like manner divided their year between their Gods and their Common-wealth naming their Law-days or Term-time Fastos because their Praetor or Judge might then Fari that is speak freely their Vacation or days of Intermission as appointed to the service of their Gods they called Nefastos for that the Praetor might ne fari not speak in them judicially Ovid Fastorum lib. 1. thus expresseth it Ille Nefastus erat per quem tria verba silentur Fastus erat per
of Peace between their Neighbours Congratulations Embassages and such like Viand But what moves you to let slip King John Edward II. Richard II. Henry VI. and Richard III. Selv. Not for that they were free from foreign Expences which is not possible for it oppressed them all but for that most of them omitted such necessary charge as in policy they ought to have undergone both for strengthening themselves with Friends and weakning their suspected Enemies such as when occasion serv'd were like to do them damage For if Edw. III. had not by this means fortify'd himself with the alliance and friendship of the noble Knight Sir John of Henault the Dukes of Brabant and Gelderland the Arch-bishop of Colein the Marquess Gulâ—ck Sir Arnold de Baquetien the Lord Walkenbargh and others and also greatly impaiâ—'d the power of the French King by winning the Flemings from the obedience of the Earl of Flanders his assured friend and by procuring the stay of much of the aid by him expected out of the Empire Scotland and other places he had not only fail'd in his French attempts but also put his Kingdom of England in hazard by the Scots who were sure of all the help and backing that France could any way afford them So had it not been for the aid and friendship of the French King the Earls of Bullogne St. Paul the Gascoines and other foreigners Henry III. had been bereav'd of his Kingdom by his own Subjects which notwithstanding he held with great difficulty So the rest likewise But on the contrary part the others whom you nam'd neglecting this right precious tho' costly ground work not only wanted it when need required but with the ruine of their People State and Kingdom lost their Crown and dearest lives by the infernal hands of cursed Murtherers their rebellious Subjects getting once the better hand Viand But Edw. II. used means also to have procured the amity and assistance of divers foreigners as the Duke of Britain the Lord Biskey the Lady Biskey Governess of the King of Castile and Leon James King of Arragon and others And Rich. II. sought the like of the hands of the French King and so the rest likewise of others Selv. True not examining the dependencies of time present they imagined in their prosperity that things to come would ever have good success and therefore deferr'd still the doing of it till extream necessity compell'd them to it and then their Estates being utterly desperate and ruinated no man willingly would lend them aid or ear Knowing that when the fury of the disease hath once possessed the vital places it is then too late to apply Physick This reason made the Princes you speak of to refuse King Edward II. And as for Richard II. when the French King saw how he was entangled and overladen with dangerous Rebellions and Divisions of his Nobles and Commons at home war in Scotland Flanders Spain Portugal Ireland sending forces against the Infidels releiving the expell'd King of Armenia and many other such turbulent affairs he then thought and truly that there was more to be gotten by being his Enemy than his Friend and taking advantage of that opportunity defied him also and warr'd upon him So that King Richard wholly void of aid and hope fell into the hands of his proud Barons and lost both Crown and Life In like miserable sort stood the case with Henry VI. For being once descended to the lowest exigent who almost durst releive him or any of the rest for fear as our Proverb saith of pulling an old house upon his own head Whereas if in their flourishing estate they had employ'd their treasure to encounter future perils being yet afar off they had no doubt securely held their Crowns and perhaps without much business illuded all the practices of their Enemies drawing nearer Had Richard II. at the time when being in France he bestow'd the value of 10000l. in gifts upon the fickle French King stay'd there and employ'd the other 300000. and odd marks by him also wasted at that bravery in gaining the amity of his neighbour Princes to serve his turn when need should be it is not unlikely but afterwards it might have sav'd all the rest For it is a good rule that is taught us in the art of Fencing to break the blow or thrust that might endanger us as far from our Bodies as we can For as I said before when things be drawn to the last period the time of help is past according to the saying of Hecuba to her betray'd husband being about to arm himself Quae mens tam dira miserrime conjux Impulit his cingi telis aut quo ruis inquit Non tali auxilio nec defensoribus istis Tempus eget non si ipse meus nunc afforet Hector Most Royal therefore are the Providence and Expences of her Excellent Majesty who as it were with Linceus eyes looking into the lowest secrets of the practices of her Enemies hath not only for these 36. years utterly cancell'd and made them frustrate but foreseeing also what mighty consequences may depend on mean beginnings omitteth no diligence to defeat them whilst they are yet in the shell or so to environ the mark whereat they are levell'd as being hatch'd they shall be able to perform nothing Knowing it to be far greater wisdom to preserve the body whilst it is sound from all infirmities than by admitting a dangerous disease to gain the credit of an excellent cure And tho' mony be the Blood wherein the Life of all Common-wealths as in a nest is cherisht yet nature teacheth that to preserve health and cure an impostumate disease we ought to let blood out and that sometimes in great abundance And as Themistocles said Pecunia nervus belli mony is also the sinews of war and look how necessary Peace is in a Common-wealth so necessary is War to beget Peace for Peace is Belli filia the daughter of war But to return to our matter lest we fare like the unskilful hounds that undertake a fresh hare when they have hunted the first till she be almost spent It appeareth by that that hath been said that a main Port by which our treasure hath been vented from us heretofore is now shut God be thank'd and that instead thereof no new is opened So that thereby our store must needs remain better by us than it hath and we by consequence must be the richer It is also to be added that whereas in former times much of the treasure that came into the land was buried up in superstitious employments as about Images Shrines Tabernacles Copes Vestiments Altar-cloaths Crucifixes Candlesticks c. by means whereof the Common-wealth became no whit richer than if that part so employed had never come within the Land Now we do not only retain that Idolatrous charge still in our purses which makes us much the wealthier but the rest also which for many hundred years together was so employ'd is
Northampton who builded the gallery there but in Queen Mary's time the same was restored to that See where it so continueth 5. The Lord Arch-bishop of YORK'S house was the White-hall much enlarg'd and reedify'd by the Cardinal Wolsey then Arch-bishop of York as by the Arms remaining in wood stone and glass in sundry places of that house may appear And after the said Cardinals conviction of Premunire and Death the same was made parcel of the King's Palace at Westminster by purchase from the Arch-bishop of York as appeareth by the Stat. of 28. Hen. VIII ca. 12. But afterwards until anno 2. or 3. of Queen Mary the Arch-bishop of York had no other dwelling-place near London in right of his See or by reason of his Arch-bishoprick but the house at Battersey and then Queen Mary gave to Arch-bishop Heath and his Successors the late Duke of Suffolk's house called Suffolk-place in Southwark which the Arch-bishop of York by confirmation of the Dean and Chapter there shortly after sold away to others and purchased to his See York-place where the Lord Chancellor remaineth together with the houses adjoining to the Street Which house was sometime the Bishop of Norwich's Place and the same among all or the greatest part of the possessions of the See of Norwich about an 27. Hen. VIII were convey'd to the King by a private Act of Parliament in recompence of the union of the Monastery of St. Bennets and the possessions thereof to that Bishoprick being of far better value than the ancient Lands of the Bishoprick of Norwich assur'd to the King as is recited in the Statute of 32. Hen. VIII ca. 47. whereby the Bishop of Norwich is made Collector of the Tenths of his Diocess as other Bishops were being formerly free'd thereof by the said private Statute of 27. Hen. VIII Which said now York-place by Hen. VIII was convey'd in fee to Charles Brandon Duke of Suffolk and after the death of the said Duke's sons the coheirs of the Duke's sons sold the same to the said Arch-bishop Heath and his Successors 6. But the Bishop of NORWICH was limited by the said private Act of 27. Henry VIII to enjoy perpetually in succession a Prebend in the Free-Chappel of St. Stephens at Westminster after dissolv'd by the Statute of Dissolution of Colledges and Free-Chappels 1. Ed. VI. and the house thereto belonging in Chanon-row whereof then was incumbent one Knight but the house is said to be Leas'd for some small Rent by the Bishop of Norwich to Sir John Thinn Knight in Edw. the Sixth's time for many years enduring And that the house now call'd York-place was belonging to the Bishop of Norwich is proved by a Case 21. Edw. IV. fol. 73. in a Presentment against the Bishop of Norwich in the King's Bench for annoyance of a way inter hospitium Episcopi Norwicensis Dunelmensis in parochia Sancti Martini in Campis 7. DURHAM-HOUSE as appeareth in that Case was the Bishop of Durham's house and Bishop Tonstal about the 26 th of Hen. VIII convey'd the same to the King in Fee and King Henry VIII in recompence thereof granted to the See of Durham Coldharborrowe and certain other houses in London And after Edw. VI. about an 2. granted Durham-house to the Lady Elizabeth his Sister for life or until she be otherwise advanced After the Bishoprick of Durham by a private Statute not printed of 7. Edw. VI. was dissolved and all the possessions thereof given to King Edw. VI. who shortly after convey'd in Fee the said Bishop's late house at Coldharborrowe and other houses in London to Francis Earl of Shrewsbury and his heirs And after the 2d. Mariae ca. 3. The Stat. of 7. Edw. VI. for dissolving that Bishoprick is repeal'd but the Mansion-house of Coldharborrowe and other Tenements in London so granted to the said Earl be confirm'd And the Bishop by that Act prayeth a recompence from the Queen at his charge Whereupon Queen Mary about anno V. or VI. of her reign granteth to the said Bishop of Durham her reversion of Durham-place in succession which coming into possession by the death of Queen Elizabeth the late Bishop of Durham now Lord Arch-bishop of York enter'd into and enjoy'd the same in the right of his See by opinion of the chief Justices of the Land referr'd by the King being opposed by Sir Walter Rawleigh as likewise doth the now Bishop of Durham 8. The Bishop of LICHFEILD and COVENTRY of old call'd the Bishop of Chester before the new erection of the new Bishoprick of Chester had his Place where Somerset-house is builded 9. 10. As likewise the Bishops of WORCESTER and LANDAFF had there sometime a house as Stow in his Book of Survey of London saith But the said three Bishops Places together with a Parish Church call'd Straunde-Church and the greatest Inn of Chancery call'd Straunde-Inn belonging to the Middle Temple were defaced without recompence to any of the said three last mentioned Bishops Parish Church or Inn of Chancery Other than to the Bishop of WORCESTER who had in respect of his former house a house in the White Fryers which he enjoyeth 11. Arondell-house now the Lord Admiral 's was the Bishop of BATH and WELLS'S and was assured in Edw. VI. time to Admiral Seymer and is now quite sever'd from that Bishoprick without recompence 12. Likewise the Bishop of EXETER'S Place after call'd Paget Leicester and Essex-house of the several Owners of the same And it is thought the Bishop of Exeter hath likewise no recompence for the same of any other house in or near London 13. The Bishop of SARUM'S Place now call'd Dorset-house before call'd Sackvile-house and of former time Salisbury Court being in long Lease made by Bishop Capon who was Bishop there in Hen. VIII Edw. VI. and Queen Mary's time was exchang'd temp Reginae Elizabethae by the great Learned Reverend Father Bishop Jewel for recompence of good value in Lands in his Diocess or elsewhere in the West Country 14. The Bishop of St. DAVID'S Place was near adjoyning to Bridewell upon the ditch that runneth to Fleet-bridge into the Thames and was granted in Fee-farm for a Mark Rent temp Edw. VI. to Dr. Hewick the Physician under which purchase the same is now enjoy'd 15. The Bishop of HEREFORD'S Place as Stow in his Survey of London pag. 357. saith is in the Parish of St. Mary de Monte alto or Mount-halt in London of which Bishops Patronage the said Church also is which Place is in the tenure of the Bishop of Hereford or his Tenants 16. 17. The Bishop of LONDON'S Place at Pauls was never sever'd from the Bishop's possession And likewise ELY Place from the Bishop of that See other than such part thereof as the late Lord Chancellor Hatton had by Lease for many years from the late Bishop Cox 18. The Bishop of BANGOR'S house is or lately was Mr. Aleworth's house
Surrey 23. King Edgar's Charter of donation of certain Thane-lands 19. Another Charter granted by him to the Monastery of Hide near Winchester 20. By whose advice his Laws were made 61. King Edward the elder how he propos'd his Laws 61. The first that prohibited Law business on Festivals 77. King Edward the Confessor's Charter of donation to Thola 20. Several priviledges granted to the Cinque-Ports 26. His Laws by whom collected 61. His Constitution touching Festivals 79. Edward Earl of Norfolk and Marshal of England 168. Dyed in his minority ibid. Edwin son of Othulf gave certain lands to Arch-bishop Odo 29. Elfere a Saxon bequeath'd Snodland to the Church of St. Andrews 128. Publish'd his Will before Odo Arch-bishop of Canterbury c. 130. Elfstane Bishop of Rochester 130. Elfsy Priest of Croyden 130. Ellingham 161. Elmham 150. Erpingham 151. Erpingham Tho. Commissioner for executing the Office of Earl Marshal of England 169. Escheats the signification of the word 37. No feodal Escheats among the Saxons 37 38. Escuage what in the Empire 36. Neither its name nor rules us'd by the Saxons 37. Essoyning the manner of it not in use before the Conquest 27. King Ethelbald's Charter to the Monks of Croyland 22. Ethelbert the first Christian King of the Saxons 8. He causes his Laws to be put in writing ibid. He took somewhat from the Roman law 102 Etheldreda daughter of K. Alfred her dowry 8. King Etheldred ordain'd every eight Hides of land to find a man for the naval Expedition 17. His Charter of donation to Aethelwold 19. Another Charter granted by him to his Thane Sealwyne ibid. King Ethelstane whom he consulted in making his Laws 61. King Ethelwulfs Charter of priviledges 23. He divided his lands by Will among his three sons 128. Euricus King of the Goths 102. Exauctoratio Militis 185. Expeditio what it signifies in Latin 17. F Fakenham 150. Fasti or Law days among the Romans why so nam d. 72. Seldom two Fasti together 75. Fasti proprie ibid. Fasti intercisi ibid. Fasti Comitiales ibid. All the Fasti not apply'd to Judicature ibid. Fealty the definition of it 35. No Fealty but for a fee. 36. What manner of Fealty among the Saxons ibid. Felbrig 152. Felewell 161. Feodal words none among the Saxons 7 8 9. Feorme what it signifies in the Saxon tongue 15 Ferdwite 37. Festa majora vel principalia 91. Festivals how exempted from Law days 76. The differences of them 91. The Festivals of St. Peter and Paul 92. Of St. George 93. Of Gun-powder Treason ibid. A Feud what it is 1. It s general and particular definition 2. Feuds among the Jews ibid. Among the Gauls 3 Their original 4. Made perpetual and hereditary 5. When and how they became so ibid. Especially in England ibid. The difference between them and Benefices 6 9. The great growth of them ibid. No proper Feuds before the Conquest ibid. Feudal-law generally receiv'd in every Kingdom 5. It s youth infancy and full age 9. Where it had its original ibid. Feudatarii 9. Feudum militare nobile 4. Rusticum ignobile ibid. Feuda majora regalia ibid. The word Feudum or Feodum not us'd in K. Beorredus's days 9. Fideles who 4. Fidelity what 59. Fines for Licence of alienation 33. The Thane-lands free from them ibid. Not in use among the Saxons 34. Fitz-Alan Jo. Lord Maltravers Marshal of England 168. Fitz-Osborn Will. Lord Marshal to King William the Conquerour 165. Flegg 154. Flitcham 145. Flitchamburrough 52 145. Folcland what 12. Not alienated without licence 33 34. Free from homage 35. Ford-Park 110. Forests belong to the King alone 118. Subjects can have 'em only in custody ibid. Fouldage 162. Franc-almoin 2 7. Frank-tenements 12. Freeborgs or Tithings 51. Frekenham 153. G Garbulsham 158. Gavelkind what and why so call'd 12. Observ'd throughout all Kent 43. At first the general Law of all Nations ibid. Germans their Customs and Tenures carry'd into several Countries 5. They receiv'd the Roman Law 127. Gey-wood 143. Gilbert the third son of William the King's Marshal 166. Made Marshal of England ibid. Kill'd in a Tournament ibid. Gimmingham 152. Goths carry the German Laws into Spain Greece c. 5. They were the first that put their Laws in writing 102. Trusted Priests with the passing of wills 130 Government the ancient Government of England 49. c. 53. Grand-days in France and England 92. Grand Serjeanty 2. Grantesmale Hugh Marshal under K. William I. 165. Greeks from whom they had much of their ancient Rites 74 127. Gresham 152. Gressenhall 150. Grey Rad. de exauctoratur 185. Guthrun the Dane 61 77. H Hales 156. Harkela Andr. de exauctoratur 185. Harleston ibid. Hartlebury-park 110. Hawkins Pet Keeper of Bramsil-park wounded by Arch-bishop Abbot 109 c. Hengham 157. King Henry I. imprison'd the Bishop of Durham 62. His Constitution about Festivals and Law-days 81. King Henry II. ratify'd the Laws of Edw. the Confess and Will the Conquerour 81. Henry Bishop of Winchester conven'd K. Stephen to his Synod 132. Heribannum what 17. Heriots paid after the death of great Men. 31 32 To whom forgiven 32. The difference between them and Reliefs 32 33. By whom and when first ordain'd 32. What the word Heriot signifies ibid. Heriots and Reliefs issuing out of the same lands 33. No badge of lands held by Knight-service ibid. Heydon 151. High Courts see Court of Justice Hikifricus Pugil quidam Norfolciensis 138. Hilary-Term its ancient bounds 82 83. The end of it sometimes held in Septuagesima 95. Hockwold 161. Holkham 149. Holland Tho Marshal of England 168. Holland Tho. Earl of Kent Duke of Norfolk 169. Made Earl Marshal of England ibid. Holland Tho. Farl Marshal of England during the minority of John Mowbray 165. Holme in Norfolk 147 152 Homage by whom first instituted 5. Feodal homage 34. Of two sorts ibid. When begun in France and England ibid. The reason of it 34 35. Who are to do it 35. Usual in Soccage-tenure 35. As well a personal as a praedial duty ibid. Homines commendati 35. Hominium homagium what 34. Homagium ligeum ibid Feodale aut praediale ibid. Hoveden Roger when he wrote 31. Howard Sir John Kt. created Duke of Norfolk and Earl Marshal of England 17â— Slain in Bosworth-field ibid. Howard Tho. the son of the former Earl of Surrey 170. Imprison'd in the Tower ibid. Defeated the Scotch under K. Henry VII ibid Made Lord Treasurer of England and restor'd to his fathers dignities ibid. Kill'd James IV. K. of Scotland in battel ib. Sent Ambassadour into France ibid. Made Vice-Roy of England ibid. Where he dy'd ibid. Howard Tho. the fourth Duke of Norfolk of that name and Earl Marshal of England 1â—1 Howard Tho. the Grand-son of the former Earl of Arundel and Surrey ibid. The first Earl of England ibid. Made Earl Marshal for life ibid. Hugh Bishop of Coventry exercis'd the Sheriffs place 116. Excommunicated ibid. De Humâ—z
Reliquiae Spelmannianae THE POSTHUMOUS WORKS OF Sir HENRY SPELMAN Kt. Relating to the LAWS and ANTIQUITIES OF ENGLAND Publish'd from the ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS With the LIFE of the AUTHOR Sine dubio domus Jurisconsulti est totius oraculum Civitatis Cicero OXFORD Printed at the THEATER for Awnsham and John Churchill at the Black-Swan in Pater-Noster-Row LONDON 1698. Imprimatur JOH MEARE VICE-CAN OXON Jan. 17. 1698. TO THE Most Reverend Father in God THOMAS LORD ARCH-BISHOP OF CANTERBURY PRIMATE of All ENGLAND And METROPOLITAN And one of his Majesty's most Honourable Privy Council MY LORD I BEG leave to lay before your Grace these Posthumous Discourses of Sir Henry Spelman promising them a favourable reception both for their own worth and for the sake of their Author He was a Person endow'd with those excellent Qualities which never fail to recommend others to your Grace's good opinion and esteem A Gentleman of great Learning and a hearty Promoter and Encourager of it In his Temper Calm and Sedate and in his Writings Grave and Inoffensive a true lover of the Establisht Church and a zealous maintainer of her Rights and Privileges In which respect the Clergy of this Nation were more particularly engag'd to Him because being a Lay-man and so not lyable to the suspicion of Prejudice or Interest his Reasonings carry'd in them a greater weight and authority than if they had come from one of their own Order I might add as some sort of excuse for this Trouble that He had the honour to be particularly respected by two of your Grace's Predecessors and some of his Posthumous Works by a third Arch-bishop Abbot and his immediate Successor were the chief Encouragers of the First Volume of his Councils and after his death the Second Part of his Glossary was publisht by the procurement of Arch-bishop Sheldon So that these Papers have a kind of hereditary right to your Grace's Protection All the share that I have in this Work is the handing it into the World and to make the first Present to your Grace would be no more than a decent regard to the Eminence of your Station though I had no particular obligation to do it But in my Circumstances I should think my self very ungrateful if enjoying so much Happiness under your Grace's Patronage I should omit any opportunity of expressing my Thankfulness for it Especially since such small Acknowledgements as this are the only Returns that I can ever hope to make for the Encouragement which You daily afford to Your GRACE'S most obliged and most dutiful Servant EDMUND GIBSON THE PREFACE I Shall not make any Apologie for the publication of these Treatises They seem'd to me to be very useful towards a right understanding of the Laws and Antiquities of England and I hope they will appear so to others too Nor need I endeavour to recommend them to the world any otherwise than by shewing them to be the genuine Labours of Sir H. Spelman whose Learning Accuracy and Integrity are sufficiently known The first of them concerning Feuds and Tenures in England was written in the Year 1639. and is printed from a fair Copy in the Bodleian Library corrected with Sir Henry Spelman's own hand The Occasion of writing it was the Great Case of Defective Titles in Ireland as may be gathered in some measure from the hints that our Author has given us but is much more evident from the Case it self printed afterwards by order of Thomas Viscount Wentworth the then Lord Deputie The Grounds thereof with the Pleadings and Resolutions so far as they concern the Original of Tenures were in short thus The several Mannours and Estates within the Counties of Roscomon Sligo Mayo and Gallway in the Kingdom of Ireland being unsettl d as to their Titles King James I. by Commission under the Great Seal dated the 2d day of March in the 4th Year of his Reign did authorize certain Commissioners by Letters Patents to make Grants of the said Lands and Mannours to the respective Owners Whereupon several Letters Patents to that effect passed under his Majesties Great Seal by virtue of the said Commission for the strengthening of Titles that might otherwise seem defective And afterwards in the Reign of King Charles I. upon an Enquirie into his Majestie 's Title to the Countie of Mayo there was an Act of State publisht commanding all those who held any Lands in that County by Letters Patents from the Crown to produce them or the Enrollment thereof before the Lord Deputie and Council by a certain day To the end that they might be secur'd in the quiet possession of their Estates in case the said Letters were allow'd by that Board to be good and effectual in Law In pursuance of this Order several Letters Patents were produc'd and particularly the Lord Viscount Dillon's which last upon the perusal and consideration thereof by his Majestie 's Council were thought to be void in Law And therefore it was order'd by the Lord Deputie and Council that the doubt arising upon the Letters Patents should be drawn up into a Case and that Case to be openly argu'd at the Council-Board The Case was drawn up in these words King James by Commission under the Great Seal dated the second day of March in the fourth year of his Reign did authorize certain Commissioners to grant the Mannour of Dale by Letters Patents under the Great Seal of this Kingdom to A. and his heirs and there is no direction given in the said Commission touching the Tenure to be reserv'd There are Letters Patents by colour of the said Commission pass'd unto A. and his heirs to hold by Knights Service as of his Majesties Castle of Dublin Here it was agreed on all hands that the Letters Patents were void as to the Tenure and that the Commissioners had acted beyond their Commission in reserving a mean Tenure to the prejudice of the King when they ought either to have reserv'd an express Tenure by Knight's Service in Capite or have mention'd no Tenure at all but have left the Law to imply a Tenure in Capite The question therefore was Whether the deficiency of the Tenure did so far affect the Grant as wholly to destroy the Letters Patents Or Whether the Letters Patents might not be good as to the Land and void only as to the Tenure The Case was argu'd several days by Counsel on both sides and was afterwards deliver'd up to the Judges who were requir'd by the Lord Deputie and Council to consider of it and to return their Resolution But upon private Conference not agreeing in their Opinions it was thought necessary for publick satisfaction to have it argu'd solemnly by them all which was accordingly done And when it came to be debated whether the reservation of a Tenure so different from that intended and warranted by the Commission could make void the whole Grant this happen'd to lead them to a more general Enquirie What the reservation of a Tenure is
to all these was the Tenant by Knights-service ty'd by his oath of Fealty swearing to be feal and leal As the oath was at those times interpreted as well by Divines and Canonists as by Feodists and Lawyers And as these were inherent to this Tenure of Common right so was there many other grievous exactions impos'd by the Lords upon their Tenants some by custom of the Mannour some by Composition upon granting the Fee and many by Signioral Authority as tho' the Lord besides his Legal Power might do some things like the King by Prerogative By Custom when the Lord or Lady came into the Mannour the Bailiff was to present them 18 oras denar and every of their servants 10s. with some summs of mony as gratuities ut essent laeti animo That the Tenants should pay 32d. for every daughter they married It was an ordinary custom that Lords might take not only of their Tenants but of all the Country thereabout Victuals and all other necessaries for furnishing their Castles which how grievous it was may well enough be conceiv'd tho' the Statute that restrain'd it did not testifie it So other Lords took provision for their houshold and hospitality within their Mannours By Composition as to have their Tenants attend them with horse and man in their journies whom they call'd Road-knights To present them yearly at times Horses Hawks and other things of profit and pleasure By Signioral Authority as to lye and feast themselves and followers call'd Coshering at their Tenants houses and when any matter of extraordinary charge fell upon them then to extort the same amongst their Tenants which the Irish about fourty years since of my own knowledge still continu'd calling it Cuttings according to our old word Tallagium But among us it was taken away by the Magna Charta of King John I speak not of the innumerable Carriages Angaries and Vexations with which they otherwise harrowed if not plagued their Tenants Yet must I not let that pass which every where was then in use for Lords of Castles to imprison men at pleasure to hold and keep distresses there against common justice and to do many outrages all about them Wherein the Lords of Mannours imitating them would also imprison their Tenants and followers which Custom I saw also yet not laid down in Ireland fourty years since For a Meane-Lord would ordinarily say upon offence taken against a Churle c. Take him and put him in bolts But let Matthew Paris who liv'd long after many of these oppressions were abolish'd tell you the fashions of those times Every Lord having this authority over his Tenant the Superiour as comprehending them all and holding in Capite was tyed to the King to see all under his tenure to be of good Government good behaviour and forth-coming whensoever they should be demanded to answer any misdemeanour This appeareth by the Laws of Edward the Confessor where it is said Archiepiscopi Episcopi Comites Barones omnes qui habuerint Sacam Socam c. milites proprios servientes sc dapiferos pincernas c. sub suo friburgo habeant That is sub sua fide-jussione de se bene gerendo By reason whereof whatsoever those their Lords agreed or disagreed unto in matters of the State and Common-wealth it did bind every of them their inferiors Unto whom they themselves might then also appoint Laws and Ordinances in their own Courts And this is that which Tacitus affirmeth to have been the ancient manner of the Germans our Ancestors Agricolis suis jus dicere where under the word Agricolis he intendeth all them whom we call Tenants Hence then it comes to pass that in making Laws of the Kingdom the common people were not consulted with but only the Barons and those which held in Capite who then were call'd Consilium Regni And the common people being as I said by way of tenure under one or other of them did then by him that was their chief Lord as by their Tribune or Procurator and as now by the Knights of the Shire consent or dissent in Law-making and are not therefore nam'd in the title of any ancient Law Look Doomsday-book and there ye shall see the whole Kingdom divided only among the Barons and great Persons and the whole Commons of the Kingdom distributed and plac'd under some of them tho' not by name yet by number in their several qualities Let us then see how the practice of those ancient ages agreed with this Theoreme King Ina made his Laws by the advice of Kenred his father and as he saith himself Heddis Erkenwaldi Episcoporum meorum omnium Aldermannorum i. e. Procerum meorum seniorum sapientum Regni mei multa aggregatione servorum Dei which is of Church-men as I take it Alured briefly Consilio sapientum meorum Edward the Elder proposeth his Laws not as Senatus-consultum but as Edictum Principis viz. Ego Edouardus Rex iis omnibus qui Reipub. praesunt etiam atque etiam mando ut c. And after by the absolute words Praecipio Statuimus Volo Yet those wherein he and Guthrun the Dane joyned are call'd Senatus-consulta Ethelstane made his Ex prudenti Vlfhelmae Archiepiscopi aliorumque Episcoporum suorum consilio nec-non omnium Optimatum sapientum mandato suo congregatorum Edmund in a great Assembly Tam Ecclesiasticorum quà m Laicorum cui interfuerunt Oda Wulstanus Archiep. plurimique alii Episcopi Edgar In frequenti sapientum Senatu Ethelred In sapientum Concilio Canuius saith Sapientum adhibito Consilio per omnem Angliam observari praecipio As for Edward the Confessor his Laws come not to us as they were composed by himself but as the Paragraphs of them were collected by the Conqueror and augmented afterward In which collection there is no mention made of the manner of their Institution But reciting of a passage of St. Austens touching Tithes it is spoken as of former time that Haec concessa sunt à Rege Baronibus populo meaning the several kinds of Tithes there mention'd But whether these words extend to a concession of them by Parlament as we now call it or by a voluntary contribution of them yeilded unto by the King the Barons and the people according to the Canons of the Church I leave to others to determine To come to times of the Conquerour wherein Novus seclorum nascitur ordo and from whence as from a new period we must now take all our projections The great establishment of his own and of Edward the Confessor's Laws is said in the title to be that which Gulielmus Rex Anglorum cum Principibus suis constituit post conquisitionem Angliae Other Authors instead of Principibus have Barones And tho' all his Laws for the most part were ordain'd by his Charter in his own name only yet they seem to be made by the
consent of the Bishops and Barons For in his Charter whereby he divideth the Court-Christian from the Temporal he saith thus Sciatis quod Episcopales Leges communi Concilio consilio Archiepiscoporum meorum caeterorum Episcoporum Abbatum omnium Principum regni mei emendandas judicavi And this seemeth to be that same Commune Concilium totius Regni whereby he made the Laws he speaketh of in his Charter of the great Establishment aforesaid William Rufus in An. 1094. calls Episcopos Abbates cunctosque Regni Principes to a Council at Rochingheham 5. Id. Mar. Henry I. de communi Concilio gentis Anglorum saith Matthew Paris posuit Dunelmensem Episcopum in vinculis Where Gentis Anglorum might be extended to such a Parlament as we use at this day if the use of that time had born it But Eadmere speaking of a Great Counsel holden a little after at Lambith calleth it Concilium Magnatum utriusque Ordinis excluding plainly the Commons And to that effect are also all the other Councils of his time But our later Chroniclers following Polydore as it seemeth for they cite no Author do affirm that Henry I. in the sixteenth year of his reign held the first Parlament of the three Estates The truth whereof I have taken some pains to examine but can find nothing to make it good Eadmerus who flourisht at that very time writing particularly of this Council or Assembly saith XIII Kal. Aprilis factus est conventus Episcoporum Abbatum Principum totius Regni apud Serberiam cogente eos illuc sanctione Regis Henrici I. And among other causes handled there he sheweth this to be the principal viz. That the King being to go into Normandy and not knowing how God might dispose of him he desir'd that the succession might be confirm'd on his son William Whereupon saith Eadmer omnes Principes facti sunt homines ipsius Willielmi fide Sacramento confirmati Florentius Wigorniensis who liv'd at that time and dy'd about two years after reporteth it to the same effect Conventio Optimatum Baronum totius Angliae apud Sealesbiriam 14. Cal. Apr. facta est qui in praesentia Regis Henrici homagium filio suo Gulielmo fecerunt fidelitatem ei juraverunt Here is no mention of the Commons whom in likelyhood they should not have pretermitted if they had been there assembled contrary to the usual custom of those times Nor doth any succeeding Author that I can find once touch upon it I conceive there might a mistaking grow by Polydore or some other for that many of the Commons if not all were at this time generally sworn to Prince William as well as the Barons were and as after in the year 1127. to Maud his daughter Prince William being then dead But I no where find in all the Councils or Parlaments if you so will call them of this time any mention made of any other than the Bishops Barons and great Persons of the Realm And so likewise in the time of King Stephen The first alteration that I meet with is in the twenty second year of Hen. II. where Benedict Abbas saith Circa festum S. Pauli venit Dominus Rex usque ad Northampton magnum ibi celebravit Concilium de Statutis regni sui coram Episcopis Comitibus Baronibus terrae suae per consilium Militum Hominum suorum Here Militum Hominum suorum extendeth beyond the Barons and agreeth with the Charter of King John as after shall appear Yet Hoveden speaking of this Council doth not mention them but only termeth it Magnum Concilium But there hapn'd about this time a notable alteration in the Common-wealth For the great Lords and owners of Towns which before manur'd their lands by Tenants at Will began now generally to grant them Estates in fee and thereby to make a great multitude of Free-holders more than had been Who by reason of their several interests and being not so absolutely ty'd unto their Lords as in former time began now to be a more eminent part in the Common-wealth and more to be respected therefore in making Laws to bind them and their Inheritance But the words Militum Hominum suorum imply such as held of the King in Capite not per Baroniam and therefore were no Barons yet such as by right of their Tenure ought to have some voice or Patron to speak for them in the Councils of the Kingdom For holding of the King as the Barons did they could not be patronized under them And doubtless they were not many at this time tho' much encreased since the making of Domesdei book where those few that were then are mentioned And it may be the word Hominum here doth signify those that serv'd for Burrough-Towns holden of the King for it must be understood of Tenants not of Servants To grope no further in this darkness The first certain light that I discover for the form of our Parliaments at this day is that which riseth fourty years after in the Magna Charta of King John The words whereof I will recite at large as they stand not only in Matthew Paris but also in the Red-Book of the Exchequer with some little difference hapning in the writing Et Civitas Londinensis habeat omnes antiquas libertates liberas consuetudines suas tam per terras quam per aquas Praetereà volumus concedimus quod omnes aliae Civitates Burgi Villae Barones de quinque Portubus omnes Portus habeant omnes libertates omnes liberas consuetudines suas Et ad habendum commune Consilium Regni de Auxiliis assidendis aliter quam in tribus casibus praedictis de Scutagiis assidendis summoneri faciemus Archiepiscopos Episcopos Abbates Comites Majores Barones Regni sigillatim per literas nostras Et praetereà faciemus summoneri in generali per Vice-Comites Ballivos nostros omnes alias qui in Capite tenent de nobis ad certum diem scil ad terminum 40. dierum ad minus ad certum locum in omnibus literis summonitionis illius causam summonitionis illius exponemus Et sic facta summonitione negotium procedat ad diem assignatum secundum consilium eorum qui praesentes fuerint quamvis non omnes summoniti venerint Here is laid forth the Members the Matter and the Manner of summoning of a Common Council of the Kingdom which as it seemeth was not yet in the Records of State call'd a Parlament The Members are of three sorts First the Arch-Bishops Bishops Abbots Earls and the Greater Barons of the Kingdom so call'd to distinguish them from the Lesser Barons which were the Lords of Mannours Secondly Those here before mention'd by Bened. Abbas to be call'd to Clarenden that held of the King in Capite whom I take to be now the Knights of the Shire And thirdly those of Cities Burroughs and