Nicholas Plunket Sir Robert Talbot Sir Richard Everard Dermot O Brien Patricke Darcy Geofrey Browne Iohn Dillon and Richard Martins Esquires authorizing them or any five of them to treate agree and conclude with the Maâ—ques of Ormond a firme lasting and setled peace in such manner as they in their iudgements should thinke fit and most available for the said Catholiques and generall good of this realme 34. For the Councells warrant to grant this commission they alleage in the same act an act past in the generall assembly held at Kilkenny the 20. of Iuly 1644. Where say they in the act of their Councell the said assembly authorized the foresaid 13. persons to treate agree and conclude with the Marques for setling and concluding of a sirme and perfect peace otherwise to conclude of a further Cessation Where the Reader is carefully to observe that the assembly according to the Councels own relation appoints indeed those 13. persons as a Committee of the Treatie but doth not limit the same unto any five of them as the act of the Councell hath done I have made search among the Acts of that assembly but could not finde any act dated the twentieth of Iuly 1644. I have indeed found an act of assembly made 10 Augusti 1644. where it is ordered that the undernamed shall be super added to the Commissioners lately authorized by Commission to goe to His Maiestie now to goe to the Lord Lieutenant to treate with his Honour for setling a firme peace within this Kingdome or a further Cessation of Armes The persons undenamed are the Lord Archbishop of Dublin Earle of Antrim Lord Viscount Mountgaret Sir Richard Everard Patricke Darcy and Iohn Dillon Esquires The Commissioners to goe to His Majestie were the Lord of Muskerie Nicholas Pluaket Alexander Mac Donnell Sir Robert Talbot Colonell Dermot O Brien Geoffrey Browne and Richard Martin The like Commission was made by the second and last Supreme Councell unto the same Committee of Treatie de verbo ad verbum as appeareth in the abridged registers of the Acts of the same Councell 35. To shew the insufficiencie defects and nullitie of the said commission wee neede not entertaine sharpe-sighted Lawyers the errors and defects thereof are so grosse and palpable as men meanly versant in that profession may without difficulty discover them Wee say then in the first place that it appeareth not by any act of assembly that I could light on that either of both Councells were ever authorized or enabled by the Kingdome to give any Commission to the foresaid Committee of Treatee either to treate of or conclude a peace with his Excellency Not in any act of assembly past the twentieth of May 1644. as the foresaid Commission given by the first Councell doth mention for no such act can I finde in the Records of the assembly notwithstanding I have together with the Clarke of the assembly made diligent soarch for the same As for the Act of assembly 10. Augusti 1644. even now mentioned number 34. you see the kingdome selected indeed the foresaid Committee of Treaty but never by that act authorized the Supreme Councell to give them a Commission to that effect Yet that such an authoritie is necessarie is supposed by the Councell it selfe which groundeth it selfe on the like authoritie as you have heard numb 34. for as the assembly onely in the name of the whole kingdome and not the Supreme Councell had power to send Commissioners to His Majestie so the Assembly onely and not the Councell had power to send Commissioners to His Lieutenaut to treate and conclude a peace Yet supposing such a Commission or power were given by the Assembly unto the first Supreme Councell wee say in the second place the same or the like commission and power ought to have beene renewed by act of Assembly and given unto the new Supreme Councell authorizing them to give Commission to the foresaid committee of Treaty to conclude a peace and to guide and direct them therein because if any such Commission was given by any assembly unto the first Supreme councell both that commission and any other commission given by the Councell in vertue thereof to the Committee of the Treaty is extinguished and dyes with the same Supreme Councell because as morte mandantis so morte mandatarij extinguitur mandatum saith the law as by the death of him that gives a Commission or mandat so by the death of him that receives it the Commission or mandat is extin guished If he for example that gives or receives a letter of Atturney to prosecute a cause or to doe any other service dyes the letter of Atturney dyes with him The same wee may say of Agents or Ambasladors sent from or to any Pâ—inces or Prelates Accordingly wee say that the first Supreme Councell being removed from that office are civilly dead and therefore any authority given them in this particular or by them in vertue thereof given to the Committee of Treatie for in these two respects the Councell may be called Mandatarij and Mandantes is extinguished and dyes with the late removed Councell 36. It is true that the common power and authoritie given to the Supreme Councell by the Modell of Government may peradventure descend upon the succeeding Supreme Councells because by the Modell of Govurnment that common power is expresly declared to be conferred by the Kingdome on the Supreme Councell for the time being but the case is other wise in this weighty matter whereon depends the securitie and safetie of Religion King and Subject and therefore being transcendent and extraordinarie it must be acted by and concluded by transcendent and extraordinarie power and as the Commissioners appointed to goe to his Majestie must have beene established and appointed by the whole Kingdome because indeed their imployment concerned the whole Kingdome so for the same reason the Commissioners appointed to treate with His Majesties Lieutenant in this particular must be authorized either mediatly or immediatly by the whole Kingdome for as much as their imployment concernes the whole Kingdom If His Majestie did conferre any power or authoritie upon any Corporation which hee would have to continue in the succeeding Magistrats thereof hee is carefull in his patents or Charters to use these words to the Maior or to the Maior and Citizens for the time being to shew that his intention is not to make this power personall onely but in that commission which the first Supreme Councell pretend to have had from the assembly there are no such words used authorizing the Supreme Councell for the time being Much more may be here said which I leave to our learned Lawyers discussion whereof some vnto whom I have propounded this difficultie have assured me that for this respect the Commission given our Committee of Treaty by the Councell wassufficienr and invâ—alid And when I admired that the Supreme Councell dared attempt such an enterprize without a full and
Church did positively recall all Commissions given to such Committees or Agents as the Clergy of Ireland hath done in this present peace How generall soever a Commission may be yet this exception is alwayes involved therein that nothing that is unlawfull may be done by vertue thereof mandatum si generale sit solum prohibet quae licita non sunt which the law exemplyfieth by this case if a Commission be given to elect any one in generall tearmes to any dignity office or benefice it is to be understood that a fit one be chosen Vnde mandatum de aliquo eligendo intelligitur de eligendo idâ—neo What could be done more unlawfull in the execution of any Commission than what hath beene done by our Committee of Treaty in the execuâ—ion of their commission they rejected the graces our Soveraigne granted unto us for gayning whereof they had a Commission and engaged the kingdome in matters of high concernment for which they had no commission Can that peace be a good peace wherein thereis no securitie for our Religion lives liberties or estates The limitation of our Committee of treaties Commission proved out of the Modell of government by which Magna Charta is to be maintayned and the Church livings granted to the Catholicke Clergy 39. In the very first Article of the Modell of Government I reade thus Inprimis That the Roman Catholicke Church in Ireland shall have and enioy its priviledges and immunities according tâ— the GREAT CHARTER enacted and declared within the Realme of England in the ninth yeare of the raigne of King Henry the second sometimes King of England and Lord of Ireland and ofterward enacted and confirmed in Ireland and that the common-law of England and all the statutes in force in this kingdome which are against the catholicke Roman Religion and liberties of the Natives Marke the resolution to procure the repeale of the penall lawes c and other subiects of this kingdow shal be observed c. That every branch of MAGNA CHARTA all other statutes confirming expounding or declaring the same shal be punctually observed Know yee saith the King in that Charter That we in the Honour of Almighty GOD the SALVATION of the SOVLES of our Progenitors and Successors Kings of England to the ADVANCEMENT of HOLY-CHVRCH and the amendment of our Realme of our meere and free-will have given and granted unto the Archbishps Abbots Pryors c. That the Churches of England shall be free and shall have all her whole rights and liberties inviolable Reserving to all Archbishops Abbots Pryors Templers Hospitlers Earles Barons and all persons aswell Spirituall as Temporall all their free liberties and free customes which they had-in times past and all these customes and liberties aforesaid which we have granted to be holden within this our Realme asmuch as pertayneth to us and our heires we shall observe And all men of this our Realme aswell Spirituall as Temporall asmuch as in them is shall observe the same against all persons in likewise This great Charter which contayneth the immunities of the Church and liberties of the Subject hath beene confirmed by thirty Parliaments in the succession of 18. Kings Edward the third in the 14. yeare of his raigne augmented the same by the addition of five speciall priviledges granted the Church and Clergy and in the 25. yeare of his raigne added a surplus of nine priviledges more And this is it which the Earle of Glamorgan hath in part granted unto us and which our Kings of England have sworne to maintayne unto us Henry the 8. indeed deprived us of the benefit thereof I wish our owne bosome friends at home had not too neerely imitated him In all the articles of peace there is not somuch as once mention made of this GREAT CHARTER though it be the first and prime article the kingdome resolved to insist upon 40. In the six and twentieth Article of the same Modell of Government It is ordered and established that the possessions of the Protestant Archbishops or Bishops Deanes Dignitaries and Pastors in the right of their respective Churches or their Tenants in the beginning of these troubles shall be deemed taken construed as the possessions of the Catholicke Archbishops Deanes Dignitaries Pastors and their Tenants respectively to all intents purposes and that those possessions are intended within the precedent order for setlement of possessions And this publicke order of the kingdome you see is conformable to MAGNA CHARTA for somuch and agreable to the publick Declarations of the kingdome and other acts of Assembly The like limitation of the same Commission is expressed in both our declarations made anno 1642. 41. In our Declaration printed in France 1642. we declared it to be a meanes to reduce Ireland to peace and quietnes among other things that by act of Parliament it be declared that the Parliament of Ireland hath no subordination to the Parliament of England that Poynings act the penall lawes be repealed That all Marks of nationall distrinction betweene English and Irish be taken away by act of Parliament That the Bishopricks Deaneries and all other spirituall promotions of this Kingdome and all Frieries and Nunneries may be restored to the Catholique owners and that Impropriations of tiâ—hes may be likewise restored and that the scity ambits and precincis of the Religious houses of the Moâ—ks may be restored to theÌ„ but as to the residue of their temporall possâ—ssions it is not desired to be taken from the present proprietareis but to be left to them untill that God shall otherwise encline their owne hearts That all Plantations made since a. 1610 may be avoyded by Parliament if the Parliament should hold this act â—ust and their possessions restored to those or their heires from whom the same was taken they neverthelesse answering to the Crowne the rents and services proportionably reserved upon the undertakers 42. In our Remonstrance delivered to His Majesties Commissioners at the towne of Trim 17. March 1642. among many other grievances we desired redresse against the penall lawes of 2. Eliz. imposing incapacities on the Catholiques in places of trust honour or profit both in Church and Commonwealth against false inquisitions taken upon feined titles of the Catholiques estates against many hundred yeares possession against the two impeached Iudges who illegally avoided 150. letters patents in one morning for securing the subjects lives liberties and estates for exempting the Parliament of Ireland from any dependency on the Parliamâ—nt of England and for the power and authoritie of the same Parliament of Ireland against the dismembred Parliament of Dublin against the Continuance of poynings ast the lawes and incapacitie to sit in the next Parliament While our Commissioners the Lord Viscount Gormanston Sir Luke Dillon Sir Robert Talbot and Iohn VValsh Esquire presented this Remonstrance to his Majesties commissioners at Trim 17. March 1642. with hopes of redresse for our grievances and a happy accommodation the Marques of
Sapientiae my language is low my conceptions plaine my thoughts the best to Religion and Contry I doubt not many iudgements will pass vpon me some will terme me precipitant others hott and others bitter I can giue to all the answere of S. Paul si hominibus placerem Christi seruus non essem Nor are my lines to feede mens humour but with reasons to ouercome theire vnderstanding I may be precipitant out of weaknes of reason and hot out of frailtie of nature but bitter I am not out of malice If the purgation proue bitter the Patient may not blame the nature of his Phisician but the malignant nature of his owne disease Renowned Catholikes Religion and Ireland are vnder your hands you haue it in your power next God to kill or saue both I know you all intend to make a peace let it be a good one I haue remoued a blocke out of your way I meane that vniust inualid coloured peace vniō is the onely way to make a good peace or a good warre vnion will saue you and diuision will destroy you My prayers shall euer be ut pacis non dissentionis Deus may be euer with you I am your most humble seruant Walter Enos Aduertisments to the Reader Firstnote that the worke is compleat though the pages 36. and 41. meete not together because the worke was printed in seuerall places 2. the number of ministers Coates mentioned pag. 12. n. 11 are but. 4. surplisses 7. and so many Robes for Doctors they resolued to walke in station to possesse our Churches 3. the Lawyer mentioned pag. 117. n. 76. is not learned Mr. Darcy but Mr. T. T. 4. If lay men should take upon them to Censure this worke which hath beene approued by the Clergie thei are excommunicated in bulla caenae see Tolet. excom 9. Trid. sess 23. c. 23. de Reformat totam dist 96. 11. q. 1. authent vt Cleri proprios iudices conueniant collat 6. yet is it left free to any man to refute if he can the arguments produced by the Author THE SECOND PART OF THE SVRVEY OF THE Articles of the late rejected Peace wherein the invaliditie and nullitie of the said Peace is evidently proved out of many heads or causes 1. IN the first part of this Survey we proved the injustice and iniquitie of the said Peace by notable observations on cach or most of the Articles included in the same peace In this second part wee further proceede to prove also the invaliditie and nullitie thereof out of those heads or causes which are expressed in the lawes and accepted as generall Maximes among Divines and Lawyers to the end the Catholique Confederates may be rightly enformed how farre they are exempted from any obligation to embrace such a Peace in the contriving whereof injustice accompanied with nullitie had full and perfect concurrence As in other Contracts so in Contracts past by mandate or Comission the nullitie and invaliditie thereof is derived from many sources or heads Six are principally enumerated by Schoolemen in contractu mandati and among those six that nullitie or invaliditie which proceeds from the revocation of their Commission that have power to treate conclude the contract before they have concluded any such Contract hath a prime place That the like revocation of the Commissions or mandates given to the Marques of Ormond and to our Committee of the Treatie hath hapned in the concluding of this Peace before the same was concluded is the point among other which we are to prove in the following paragraphes In the. §. 1. The invaliditie of the foresaid Peace is proved by the revocation of the Marques of Ormonds Commission given him to conclude a Peace before the same was concluded 2 THis invalide and unjust Peace was indeed signed and sealed by five of our Committee on the 28. of March 1646. but never DELIVERED interchangeably by both parties untill the 29. of Iuly following during the interjacent time it lay as an Escroule or Scroule on the hands of the Marques of Clanrickard without any power or force to oblige in law either parties Though this be a truth confessed in private by the Committee of Treatie and well knowne to the then Supreme Councell and Committee of Instructions yet because the knowledge thereof is suppressed from the rest of the Confederate Catholiques and that the Peace hath beene published as if the same were absolutely concluded on the 28. of March I here thinke fit to discover the mysterie of iniquitie out of that which I sinde written by Mr. Darcyes owne hand one of the five that signed and delivered the said Peace on the out-side of the manuscript draught of the articles of Peace delivered by Mr. Plunket himselfe in VVaterford to the Congregation of both Clergies Signed and Sealed ONLY note the exclusive partticle ONLY 28. March 1646. anno 22. Regis Caroli in the presence of the Lord Digby Sir Maurice Eustace Doctor Fennell and George Lane and DEPOSITED on the Marques of Clanrickards hands till 1. May and untill the ten thousand be sent into England Thus farre one note In another note there written I reade thus This meaning the Articles of Peace was DELIVERED 29. Iuly 1646. in my Lords STVDY by my Lord Lieutenant on the one part Lord of Muskery Sir Robert Talbot Iohn Dillon Patricke Darcy and Geofrey Browne of the other part witnessed by the Marques of Clanrickard Lord Taaffe Lord Digby Monsieur du Moulin the French Agent and Daniel O Nealc Present besides the Earle of Roscoman Lord Dillon Colonell Trafford and George Lane c. on the same 29. day of Iuly and not before the defeasance which past betweene the Marques of Ormond and our Committee obliging the kingdome to send over 10000. men were cancelled and an Instrument avoyding the defeazance then perfected witnessed ut supra saith a third note written also by Mr. Darcyes owne hand on the foresaid manuscript Copie 3. By all which it appeareth that the Peace was never concluded untill the 29. of Iuly and that both parties did suppose the same for a certaintie aswell because they never cancelled the foresaid defeazance untill the foresaid 29. day of Iuly as also because the Marques of Ormond having before that day received His Majesties letter revoking his Commission supposing himselfe not to be obliged by any act that passed on the 28. of March rejected our Committee of Treatie and would by no meanes proceede to the conclusion of the foresaid peace affirming that his Commission was recalled and that he had no authoritie to treate further with them as you shall heare as yet more hereafter This is further confirmed by the letters of the late Supreme Councell and Committee of Instructions dated at Lymericke the first of Iune 1646. delivered unto the Lord Nuncius where they confesse the Peace was not then concluded but that shortly they expected the same to be both concludedand published 4. We presse the
pax Ierem. 6. 14. See 1. part art 15. c. And p. 2. § 2. See hereafter numb 35. The danger of the kingdome aggravated by the foresaid Councels Letter unto the Nuncius taken away before they concluded any peace 33. IN that Letter you have heard the Councell and Committee aggravat vehemently the dangerous state and condition wherein then 1. Iunij 1646. the kingdome was and to avoyde this danger they would needs make any peà ce upon what conditions soever This was the chiefe pretence they had to make this unhappy peace Now marke the just judgement of God discovering the corruption of this pretence before ever they concluded this peace this dangerous state and condition wherein the kingdome then stood was quite taken away by the wonderfull hand of God insomuch as Ireland was never in a better posture or condition than it was when they concluded this peace Marke it well I pray you the peace was never concluded untill the 29 of Iuly 1646. neyther were they by vertue of any anteriour contract bound then to conclude that contract as above I have proved but they remayned still in their full liberty till the foresaid 29. day of Iuly to conclude or not conclude a peace Before that 29. day of Iuly namely the sift day of Iune the glorious victory against the Scots in Vister was obtayned by the Confederate Catholickes under the conduct of the renowned Commander Eugenius O Neyle and by that meanes the dangerous state and condition of that part of the kingdome quite taken away On the 7. of Iuly which was 22. dayes before the peace with Ormond was concluded the noble and vigilant Commander Preston after deleating all the power strength of the Scots-horse which was upwards of 600. reduced to the obedience of the Confederate catholickes for his Majesties ufe Roscoman Abbey of Boyle c. and immediatly freed all that Province of Connaght Slygo onely excepted from the infesture of the rebellious Scot and had cleerely chased them out of Slygo also had not this wret ched peace given interruption to his fortunat endevours Sâ— as the dangerbus condition wherein that Province was likewise taken away before the foresaid 29. of Iuly On the 13. of Iuly which was 16. dayâ—s before the foresaid peace was concluded Bunratty was taken in the enemies chased out of that part of the Province of Mâ—unster so as the greatest danger which might be there feared was also taken away Et persecuti sunt filios superbiae prosperatum est opus in mambâ—â— eoruâ— This expedition was done by the army commanded by the Lord Viscount Muskry seconded by the auspicious accesse of the most Illustrious Iohn Baptist Archbishop Prince of Firmo Nuncius Apostolicke by whose largesses the foresaid armies of Vlster and Connaght were maintayned 34. Compare these with the Lord Nuncius his answer judicious Reader and judge whether our intrusted councell and committees have proceeded bona side in concluding this unwarrantable peace whether they have with that integritie which is sutable to the qualitie of such noble Catholiques discharged the trust imposed in them by the whole Kingdome in the weightiest affaires that ever concerned a Nation After that the God of Hosts had prodigiously rescued Ireland from those dangers and calamities which were imminent after that those great clouds which were feared to burst into a terrible storme had beene in a moment dissipated after the revocation of the Marques of Ormonds commission and of the commission given unto our committee of treatie after so many advertisments given unto them by the Nuncius and Clergie not to conclude any peace after so many exclamations of the Catholique confederates at home and of Christian Princes and Prelats abroad against the oblique proceedings of our intrusted partie and after the opposition made by the soundest part of the councell and committee It pleased the rest of them notwithstanding all this to conclude without power or commission this fatall peace whereby they have stopped our happy progresse in further victories and given occasion of the greatest division that ever yet hath been in Ireland Whereas if they were pleased to abstaine from concluding this fantasticall peace with our Enemie in one part of the Kingdome we had ere now had a true peace with all our enemie in all parts of the kingdome for indeed by Gods blessiâ—g we had either chased them out of the kingdome or we had forced them to such conditions as would secure Religion King and Countrey So as in very deed the making of this peace hath made a warre and no peace increased our daâ—gâ—rs necessities weakenesse and calamities but tooke noâ—e away Deceperunt populum meum dicentes pax non est pax Ezech 13 10. 34. It s remarkable how in then foresaid answer they aggravate only the present state condition of the kingdome in the temporallitie as if they weigheâ—â— not the staie and condition of the kingdom in the spirituallitie which was the point the Nuncius urged and the whole kingdome in their severall declaâ—aâ—ions resolved to rectifie They â—ffiâ—me that obedience due to his Majestre enforced them to any peace with what Divines did they consult to informe them how farre the subjects obedience to his Prince did extend Is it not knowne the divines that saâ—e in the same councell with them were against them can not wee render due obedience to our King without disâ—bâ—ying our God they ought to remâ—mber that lesson of the Aposties Oportet obedire Deo magis quam hominibus How shall we give to God what is due to God if we give all to Cefar and leave nothing for God But this was a worke of supererogation of theirs the Kings Majestie looked for no such blind obedience from them He gave them the repeaâ—e of the penall lawes they rejected them he gave them by publicke contract their Churches Church-livings jurisdiction and free exercise of Religion they contemned them Yet if they would needs appeare such obedient subjects why did they disobey the Kings letâ—er of the eleventh of Iune commanding no peace should be made with them I wish it appeare not their obedience was to the subject and disobedience to the Prince The Lord Nuncius in his Letters exhorteth them to fidelitie to their Prince and yet diswadeth them to mâ—ke any peace with the Marques protesting that all the damage that should befall the King and this kingdome by concluding that unjust peace should be imputed to them as to men who abuse their private affection and lucre to the destruction of the Common-wealth So as in the Lord Nuncius his opinion by whom our councell and committee should be directed if they stood to the principles of Catholique doctrine and their owne covenant with him its disobedience to the King to obey Ormond and to disobey him is obedience to the King 35. But the councell and committee in their foresaid letter to the Nuncius say they will ratify
he so earnestly urgeth in his letters above mentioned And herein we charge the councell and committees with notable breach who contrarie to their promise and vow and contrarie to the severall protestations and inhibitions of the said Lord Nuncius concluded a peace which he thought not expedient and whereunto he would never yeeld consent See our observations on the 14. article numb 26. 27. §. 19. A publicke Contract made by the kingdome with the Lord Nuncius not to conclude any peace untill he and Glamorgan concluded on a peace for the Spiritualtie c. 56. Articles agreed upon betwixt the most Illustrious and most Reverend Lord Iohn Bâ—â—â—ist Lord â—rchbishop and Prince of â—â—rmo extraordinary â—postolicke Nuncâ—o to the Confederate Catholickes of Ireland and the Nobility imployed by the said Consederate Catholickes together with the Earle of Glamorgan to the said Illustrious Nuncius at Kilkenny the 19 of February 1645. Inprimis a Cessation shal be continued till the first of May by which time or sooner if the most â—llustrious Lord Nuncius doe not bring the Originall agreements under hand and Seale betwixt his Helynesse and the Queene of great Britaine the said most illustrious Lord Nuncius shall ratifie whatsoever shall seeme meete to him on the behalfe of his Holynesse and the Earle of Glamorgan in the behalfe of the King of England that an honourable and wished peace be not any longer deferred 57. Secondly In the meane time if the Confederate Catholickes doe send from hence to treate with the Vice-roy about politicall affaires and differences it is declared that no prejudice shall be inferred by that treaty to this Treaty that is to be betwixt the most illustrious and most Reverend Lord Nuncius and the Earle of Glamorgan that untill there be a conclusion and publication of it the other also may not be concluded or published And that there be no change in the inâ—erim of the Politicall or Civill government so that both may be at once and together concluded and published by the approbation of the generall assembly if it shall be seene necessary to the said Lord Nuncio and Earle of Glamorgan to call it Thomas Tyrell Emerus Clogherensis Nich. Plunket Gerald Fenell Richard Bellings Patricke Darcy Thomas Cashell Castle-haven Audly Net â—ervile Muskry Thomas Preston Daniell O Brien Lucas Dillon Terlagh O Neyle George Comin 58. Here we are to note First the circumstance of time to wit the 19. of February which was when the assembly of the kingdome was fully gathered together Within 12. dayes after namely the second of March an order was conceived by the same assembly to Treate with the Marquesse of Ormond and to prepare things for a peace with his Excellency but not one word authorizing the Committee to conclude a peace for that had been a manifest violation of this contract made with the Nuncius nay by this very act of assembly and solemne contract whereunto the whole kingdome condescended iâ— before then eyther Conncell or Committees had any power communicated unto them by any former act of assembly which I could never yet reade it was now sufficiently recalled Secondly we are to note the persons that subscribed to the contract in the behalfe of the Confederate Catholickes are the persons chiefly intrusted by the kingdome M Tyrell chayreman of the committee of Instructions the Lord Viscount Muskry and M. Darcy are two of thâ— five that subscribed to the peace contrary to their owne contract here agreed upon the rest were then of the Supreme Councell or Committee whereof most of them being of the following Supreme Councell or Committee of Instructions approved also the peace contrary to this their own contract wherein they engaged themselves and the kingdome never to conclude or publish any peace untill the peace to be agreed upon betweene the Nuncius and Clamorgan were concluded and published together with it Thâ—â—dâ—y this contract cleerely discovers how frivolous that part of the Councell and Committees answer to the Nuncius 1. of Iune was wherein they say they expected untill the first of May according the Nuncius his pleasure before they concluded any peace for they were indeed to expect VNTILL a conclusion or publication were made of the peace to be agreed upon between him and Glamorgan in the behalfe of his Holynesse and his Maiestie and if the Origâ—nals came not from Rome by May they were to expect untill the Nuncius did ratifie whatsoever should seeme meete unto him c. which was agreable to the publicke Faith of the kingdome past by them unto him before his coming unto the kingdome by the above mentioned Letter sent unto him in October 1645. wherein they promised to doe nothing but what should seeme expedient unto him So as if I had â—â—â—ely seene this contract I might well have spared the twelve answers I made above to this objection wherefore the Nuncius and the Clergy did justly protest against all their proceedings in the late rejected peace as being without ground or Commission and in violation of the publicke Faith given Fourthly no withstanding this contract they changed the government by concluding that peace and contrary to the same contract they would not dayne to call together a generall assembly as the Nuncius desired and as by this contract they were bound before they concluded the peace How herein they may be excusable I understand not §. 20. The Oath of Association which being compared to what we have delivered in this Survay proves the iustice of the Clergies Decree of periury c. 59. I A. B doe promise sweare protest before God his Saints his Angels that I will during my life beare true faith and allegeance to my Soveraigne Lord CHARLES by the grace of God King of great Brittaine France and Ireland and to his Heires and lawfull Successors and that I will to my power during my life defend uphold and maintayne all his and their just prerogatives estate rights the power and priviledge of the Parliament of this Realme the fundamentall Lawes of Ireland the free exercise of the Roman catholicke faith and Religion throughout this Land and the lives iust liberties possessions estates and rights of all those that have taken or shall take this Oath and performe the contents thereof and that I will obey and ratifye all the orders and decrees made and to bee made by the Supreme Councell of the Confederate Catholickes of this kingdome concernig the said publicke cause and that I will not seeke directly or indirectly any pardon or protection for any act don or to be don touching this Generall cause without the consent of the Major part of the said Councell and that I will not directly or indirectly doe any act or acts that shall preiudice the said cause but will to the hazzard of my life and estate assist prosecute and maintayne the same So helpe me God and his holy Gospel 60. This Oath was established for preservation of union among the Confederate Catholickes
THE SECOND PART OF THE SVRVEY OF THE ARTICLES OF THE LATE REIECTED PEACE WHERIN THE INVALIDITIE AND NVLLITIE OF THE SAID PEACE IS PROVED 1. By the revocation of the Marques of Ormonds Commission before any Peace was legally concluded c. 2. By the defect of sufficient Commission or authoritie on the part of our Committee of the Treaty 3. By the revocation thereof by the Protestation of the principall part of the Body Politique of the Kingdome and other Inhibitions 4. By exceeding their Commission 5. By deviating from the rules established by assembly by which they ought to regulat themselves namely from the Oath of Association Modell of government Acts of Assembly Grievances Declarations and Propositions made by the Kingdome to His Majestie c. 6. By rejecting the Kings favours and graces 7. By their surreptitious and clancular concluding of a Peace contrary to their promise made unto the Lord Nuncius 8. By the Kingdoms non acceptance thereof 9. By theire violation of the publike faith of the kingdome past by Solemme Contract vnto the L. Nuncio 19 February 1645. Whence the Iustice of the Clergies Decree of Perjurie and excommunication against the Adherents to so impious and invalid a Peace is evidently deduced By Walt. Enos Dublinian Priest D. of Divinitie treasurer of Ferns Viri faederis tui illuserunt tibi inualuerunt aduersum te viri pacis tuae Abdiac 1. Printed at Kilkenny by permission of Superiors and approbation of Schoolemen in the yeare 1646. MANDATVM ILLVSTRISSIMI NVNCII ET CONGREGATIONIS ECCLESIASTICI VTRIVS QVE CLERI REGNI HIBERNIAE NOs Ioannes Baptista Rinuccini archiepiscopus Princeps Firmanus apud Hibernos Confoederatos Nuncius apostolicus extraordinarius necnon uenerabilis Congregatio utrius que Cleri Regni Hiberniae uobis RR. PP quorum nomina inferius Scripta sunt cuilibet uestrum facultatem facimus per praesentes pariter mandamus ut post diligentem perlectionem secundae partis libelli cui titulus est a sur vey of the articles of the late reiected peace ab eximio Domino Magistro Gualtero Enos S. T. Doctore de mandato nostro compositi censuram uestram calculum pro qualitate vtilitate operis eidem apponatis adeoque confirmetis corroboretis ut qui ante Autoris argumenta de iniquitate reiectae pacis in primâ parte proposita comprobastis modò eiusdem argumenta in hac secundâ parte de inualiditate dictae pacis proposita uicissim comprobetis ut uel inde iustitia nostrorum decretorum contra Authores eiusdem pacis orbi terrarum innotesceat Datum Kil Kenniae 18. Ianuary 1646. Ioannes Baptista Archiepiscopus Firmanus Nuncius Apostolicus THe touchstone of disouering an act to be invalid is the law the Author sincerly conferrs the treaty of peace with the Maximes of law and finds the same lawlesse consequentlie inualid and not obliging This survey ingenuouslie traced ouer the iniquitie of the peace and plainly proues the inualiditie his worke is learned meritorious and intended for our good according lie I approue it FR. PATRICKE PLVNKET Abbot of St. Maries Abey of Dublin diffinitor late president generall of the Congregation of St. Malachias and St. Bernard in Ireland THis Second parte of Doctor Enos his suruey c. diserues no less credit and acceptance then was attributed to the first parte by the not praeiudicating opinion of Tho. Roth. Deane and Vicar Generall of Ossory I Am of the same opinion NICOLAVS TAYLOR Sactae Theol. Doct. Protonâ—tar Apostolicus Rector Eccl de Swords HAuing perused this second part of the Survey of the late reiected peace I thinke it to be noe lesse worthy of publique view then the first it beinge a plaine discouerie of the inualiditie thereof It needes therefore noe other shew to purchase a publique welcome then the name of its lerned author walter Enos Doctor of diuinitie Ita censeo IOANNES SHEE THEOL Praeb de Main Vicarius Sancti Ioannis Evangelistae IN obedience to the forsaid mandat we haue with diligence reade and perused this second part of the forsaid Suruey wherin we finde nothing dissonat to faith or good manners but very many things conduceing to the honour and saftie of faith and Religion wherefore as in the first part we approued the Authors arguments proueing the iniquitie of the late reiected peace so we approue his arguments produced in his second part to proue the inualiditie of the same peace and accordinglie we censure it no lesse worthy than necessarie to be exposed to publike view Dated at Kilkenny the 27. th of Ianuary 1646. Fr. Hugh Duigin Suprior of the Frs Preachers of Kilkeny Fr. Faelix Connor S. T. Professor Fr. Iohn O Hairt S. T. Professor EX Commissione Supradictâ accuratè Legimus hanc secundam partâ—m in qua nihil orthodoxa fidei dissonum reperitur quin potius pro ea acertimè certat Hoc opere suo solito more author animo calamoque poteâ—s delirescentem alto puteo veritatem extrahit eaque in sua basi expositâ opposita Commenta vsurpato limine deturbat Sic censemus in hoc Coonobio Sancti Francisci Kilkeniae Kalendis February 1646 Fr. Antonius MacGeogheganus Exprouincialis Hyberniae Et Guardianus KilKenniensis Fr. Paulus King S. T. Lector VVE doe finde that the learned and zealous author accordinge to his groundes and principles doth well shew and proue the inualiditie of the peace he treates of William Saint Leger Iohn Mac Egan To the right honourable the Lords Knights Cittizens and Burgesses of the Confederat Catholikes of the Kingdome of Ireland assembled together at Kilkenny REnowned Catholikes A peace contained in 30. Articles made ad published at Dublin 29 Iulij 1646 being put vnder the consideration of the Venerable Congregation of the Clergie at Waterford in August last was found vnsafe for Religion contrie and the liues and liberties of the Confederat Catholickes the fortes and gouernment of this Kingdome being by that peace to come vnder an other power and that of an aduerse Religion Some cri'd vp this peace as a blessing from God and the period of fire warre and desolation and though it was reputed a blessing yet was an army a preparing to enforce it vpon vs others who look'd neerer vnto it said it would proue fatall to Ireland and Religion and vnexpectedlie a great army as it were of meÌ„ risen out of the Earth came from the North to oppose it While the Souldier had sword in hand to proscribe this rotten peace my Superiours put a pen in my hand by way of suruey to lay open to the world the iniquitie and inualiditie thereof The first part of this Suruey containing the iniquitie I dedicated to the right Reuerend Prelats and Congregation the second part speaking the inualiditie of it I addresse with all humilitie and candor to the power and great wisedome of this assemblie I will say with S. Paul ueninon in sublimitate sermonis aut
Ormond in his briefe of Concessions from which he shrunke in this peace limitteth this generall Commission vnto the penall lawes onely that concernes the exercise of our religion who is herein imitated by the Marques of Clanrichard or rather by the politike Contriuers of his engagment where a promise is made of a reuocation of any penaltie c imposed on vs for the free exercise of our riligion vnto what wofull dayes are we come when subjects doe presume not only to limitat theire kings commands as they please but also vtterlie to reiect them and by that disobedience to be the occasion of his present disasters and hazard of the losse of his kingdomes 29. By which letter and by these other two aboue mentioned the iudicious Reader may obserue what great confidencie his majestie reposeth in the aid and assistance of the Confederat Catholikes aswell at home as abroade in England and scotland by sea and by land and how earnestlie he presseth a speedie dispatch of the peace to that end Be it on them and theire posteritie that haue hindred the same Glamorgans articles do as yet further confirme aswell the kings confidence in our assistance as our alacritie willingnes and earnest desire to comply therein with his Majestie but the same authors who contemned the commands of his Majestie haue also laid obstacles to the assistance promised to his Majestie vpon the conclusion of Glamorgans peace It shal be euer verified what Iohn Dauies sometimes the kings Attutnie left written to posteritic that the Irish gladlie continue obedient subiects without defection or adhering to any other lord or king c and that there is noe nation or people vnder the sunne that doth loue equall and indifferent iustice better then the Irish and will better rest satisfied of the execution therof c farre different I wisse was the Censure of this well experienced lawyer and of many others whose testimonie for the present I omitt concerning the loyaltie of the Irish from the Censure of the present lord Chancellour of Ireland who hauing receiued in his Chamber in the Ins of Dublin from the Councell-table by the hands of a purseuant a printed booke setting forth the kings resolution to come for this kingdome said God forbid his maiestie should come vnto this kingdome for the Irish would massacre him as soone as any other wherunto his sonne sir Edward Bolton now chiefe Baron answered nay father I am confident if his Maiestie came hither that the Irish would lay downe theire armes at his feete and kisse the ground he went on The father admiring at the sonnes confidence in the fidelitie of the Irish the sonne confirmed his confidence by affirming he would lay his head at the stake if they would not doe it This dialoque past betweene the father and the sonne in the presence of the Lady Bolton Bently the Purseuant and R. S. a Cittizen of Dublin who is my author The sonne here proues the loyaltie of the Irish the father shewes his ingratitude towards the Irish that Nation that charitablie entertained him in his flight from England to shun the Censure of the Castle Chamber there who being raised from the lowest ebbe of fortune by Ireland now floateth in the highest spring of posteritie Qui reddit mala pro bonis non recedet malum a domo eius Such as repined at his Maiesties coming into Ireland repined at his happines and adhered in opinion and affection to the Parliament Histories recount and the present damnable Rebellion of England doth confirme more bloodie warres to haue beene raised in England by the English against theire naturall soueraignes and more horrid violence to haue beene offered to theire persons than euer hath beene raised in Ireland against them or offered by the Irish vnto them wherefore what the Chancellour affirmed of the Irish is more applicable to him and to his ill affected Contrymen wherin all Europe may be produced as witnesses who behould the present calamities wherunto the Rebellions Parliament haue reduced him what here might be more particularized concerning the ill-affected of that nation might be also particularized in the ill affected Scots Who are said to haue imbrued theire hands in the blood of many theire owne naturall Princes-from both I abstaine for the honour I beare vnto England the sister of Ireland and vnto Scotland the daughter of Ireland wishing with all the faculties of my soule the occasion of such recrimination among indeered fellow subjects were neuer giuen or being giuen might be totallie taken away Deus aeternetu scis quoniam falsum testimonium tulerunt contra Hibernos §. 7. The Marques of Ormonds Commission recalled as to somuch hy the Earle of Glamorgans Commission 30. Our Diuines and Canonists doe teach vs that the second mandat or Commission doth not indeed derogat vnto the first vnles it make mention therof yet that sometime the second preuaileth and not the first namely because the second is of a more strict obligation as tending to the publicke vtilitie and Commoditie wheras the first conduced to the priuat onely Ormonds Commission granted by his Majestie is in our case the first being giuen 24. Iunij 1644. Glamorgans is the second being giuen the 12. of March 1644. which was full eight months after In this later Commission mention is made of the first thus we giue you power to treate and conclude with the Confederat Roman Catholikes in our kingdome of Ireland if vpon necessitie any thing be to be condescended vnto wherein our lord lieutenant can not be so well seene as not fitt for vs at the present publickelie to owne c. loe mention made expresselie of the first Commissioner and implicitlie of his Commission and by consequence a reuocation as to so much at least of the Marques his Commission yea his Majestie did by his expresse letters signifie vnto the Marques of Ormond that he gaue vnto the Earle of Glamorgan this second Commission therein expressing the ends and causes wherefore he gaue the same and wherfore he would haue the matters and points committed to Glamorgans trust exempted from all other matters comprehended in the Marques of Ormonds Commission and these matters concerned the spiritualtie for example the free and publike exercise of our religion the securitie of our Churches the exemption of the Catholikes from the iurisdiction of the Protestant Clergie the repeal◠of all penall lawes made against Catholikes c. This Commissio◠being granted by his Majestie vpon the neglect of the Marques his obedience to his Majestiès Command requiring him to grant vnto vs the present taking away of the penall lawes and the suspension of Poynings act I admire how his Excellencie attempted to conclude a peace for these matters soe exempted out of his Commission and to referre those matters which were agreed and concluded by his Majesties speciall Commissioner namely the repeale of the penall lawes the free and publicke exercise of our religion c. vnto any new