Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
lord_n john_n king_n sir_n 55,943 5 6.2501 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A88153 The afflicted mans out-cry, against the injustice and oppression exercised upon; or, An epistle of John Lilburn, gent. prisoner in Newgate, August 19. 1653. to Mr. Feak, minister at Christ Church in London. Lilburne, John, 1614?-1657. 1653 (1653) Wing L2078; Thomason E711_7*; ESTC R212915 13,792 15

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

The Afflicted Mans Out-Cry against the Injustice and Oppression exercised upon OR An Epistle of JOHN LILBURN Gent. Prisoner in Newgate August 19. 1653. to Mr. Feak Minister at Christ Church in London Honoured Sir THough I cannot say I am acquainted with you yet I have heard so much worth of you and of your tendernesse and zeal for the honour of the Lord Jehovah my long and sensible injoyed lot and portion that I am imboldned to present you with a few lines by way of complaint of that sad and unjust dealing that I find from those that would be reputed Christian and righteous Judges that now would take away my life upon a most unjust Act of Parliament grounded upon the most notorious Lye in the world and in which I am no more concerned in Law or Truth then the child in the Mothers womb for it is an Act for the execution of a Judgment past in Parliament against one Lieu. Col. John Lilburn the 15 of January 1651. for high Crimes and Misdemeanors but there was never any such Judgment either the said 15 day of Jan. 1651 or any day before or since p●st against me in Parliament in the least And therefore in Law and Verity I cannot be any more concerned to be the man mentioned in that unrighteous Act then the child in the Mothers womb And that there never was any such Judgment past in Parliament against me I give these Reasons for it Fi●st there was never any Charge Indictment or Information in the least filed or preferred in Parliament against me that ever I was summoned unto in the least to answer neither did the Parliament call me by any due process of Law in the least so much as to hear any Charge Information or Indictment read against me nor never so much as called me to their Bar to demand of me what I could say for my self why they should not pass Judgment against me Neither was I ever in all my life out-lawed for not appearing So that I do again with confidence aver it before God and all his People that I am no more in Law Reason Truth or Verity concerned in that Act upon which I am indicted for my li●e then the child in the Mothers womb Neither hath any man of honour conscience or common honesty the least ground in Law to say that I am the man meant in that Act for executing of a Judgment past against one Lieu. Col John Lilburn Jan. 15. 1651. for high Crimes and Misdemeanors And yet upon the Tryal for my life although the said Judgment be the foundation of the Act and the Act the foundation of the Indictment yet am I denied by the Court at Old bayley the hearing or seeing of that Judgment which is and ought to be the foundation and ground of all and which saith all the Councel I can speak with or hear from is the highest injustice that can be acted against a man in England by those that in the least professe themselves to be Judges or Executors of the Law Yea and when I desire from the Court but liberty from the pure and undefiled Law of God the true fundamental laws of England and multitudes of the late Parliaments own Declarations to prove that I ought to see and hear the said judgment And when in the first place I begun with Gods righteous and just dealing with Adam and although God was absolute supream over him yet he would clear up the justice of his wayes even to Man and therefore gave Adam a plain law to walk by Gen 2. And when Adam had transgressed and broken it although God knew well enough he had so done yet he abhorred to deal unjustly with him and condemn him without summoning him to answer for himself and therefore he sits him by saying Adam where a●t thou as much as if he had said Come forth and stand up for thy self and answer to the Bill of Indictment against thee for breaking the pure and undefiled Law of Me thy Soveraign Lord and King and speak the utmost that thou canst why thou shouldst not be condemned for thy Rebellion against me thy endeared Lord and Master But Sir while I was thus speaking steps up Col. John Barkstead the present Lieutenant of the Tower of London who as he is a souldier no more fit to be a Judge in a legal Court for a mans life then a Surgeon or a Butcher is to be a Jury-man for a mans life and he cryes out to me and commands me to hold my vain babling for what have we saith he to do with the law of God O rare Judge indeed and a fit man under the colour of justice and magistracy to murder the innocentest man in the whole world for the best and chiefest of the law-books of England do aver and glory in it that the foundations of the true law of England is built upon the pure law of God And saith the notable and ancient law-book called The Doctor and Student chap. 2. pag. 4. The law of God or law of Reason is written in the heart of every man eaching him what is to be done and what is to be fleed and because it is written in the heart therefore saith he it may not b● put away no it is never changeable by no diversity of place no time And therefore against this Law Prescription Statute nor Customs may not prevail And if any be brought in against it they be no Prescriptions Statutes nor Customs but things void and against justice And he saith this law of God or Reason ingraven in the heart of man teacheth that good is to be loved and evil is to be fleed also that thou shalt do to another that thou wouldst another should do to thee and that we may do nothing against Truth and that a man must live peaceably with others that justice should be done to every man and also that wrong is not to be done to any man In which Opinion that great and excellent Oracle of the law of England the Lord Cook sully concurs and therefore stiles the true and fundamental law of England the perfection of Reason But above my du●l commendation is that learned rational laborious and excellent piece or law-book entituled Rights of the Kingdom Or Customs of our Ancestors printed in London by Richard Bishop 1649. and commonly called Mr Sadler the Town Clerk of London's Works who is now a Parliament man and member of the Council of State Whose rare expressions in that excellent useful and profitable book especially in the first part pag. 91. and the 2d part pag. 60 63 68 74 123 159 160 161 164 168 170 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 184 185 186 188. are worthy to be written and printed in letters of Gold some of which although Time at present is exceeding precious to me I shall think it very profitable and useful here to insert and the first shall be out of his second part pag. 63. where he saith