their omission of the word quibusdam in their said protestation the said Learned King James the First did actually take the said protestation out of the Journal Book propriâ suâ manu and on the sixth of January Dissolved the Parliament and some eminent Members of the Parliament were committed to the Tower and others to other Prisons and some sent into Ireland rather for Punishment than to Enquire as was pretended of sundry Matters concerning his Majesties Service There then appeared some Men of Antimonarchial Spirits and that insisted too highly upon Priviledges little regarding or rightly considering the measures chalked out to them by the Kings Writ by which they are summoned and impowered to sit in Parliament The Members before spoken of remembred not what the said King James the First in time before said the Parliament is a thing composed of a Head and a Body the Monarchy and the Three Estates it was first a Monarchy then after a Parliament that there were no Parliaments but in Monarchical Governments for in Venice the Netherlands and other free Governments there are none the Head is to call the Body together and for the Clergy the Bishops are the Chief for Shires their Knights for Towns and Cities their Burgesses and Citizens these are to treat of the certain difficult Matters and to Counsel their King with their best advice to make Laws for the Commonweale and the Lower House is also to Petition their King and acquaint him with their Grievances and not to meddle with their Kings Prerogative they are to offer supply for his necessity and he is to distribute in recompence thereof Justice and Mercy If this Head and Body Monarch and Three Estates be at unity within themselves they then make le treshault Court de Parliament the Supreme and in the superlative Degree the highest Court of Parliament Their Priviledges are so great that whilst that Court is at unity within it self I know not what it may not do and as directed by Mr. Plowden I shall not think much less speak any thing dishonourable of that Court but as in Arithmetick Three Cyphers with a Figure of One prefixed makes the compleat Number of one Thousand so take away the Number or rather the beginning of Number of One and the Three Cyphers that remain signifie nothing For when the Parliament is stiled the Supreme Court it must be understood properly of the King sitting in the House of Peers in Person and improperly of the Lords or Commons without him the Consultive Directive or Deliberative Power is in the House of Peers the Performing and Consenting Power is in the House of Commons but the Legislative Power lodgeth in the Person of the King yet altogether that is to say King Lords and Commons make Parliamentary binding Laws and Statutes 7. H. 7. 14. it is said that there are many Statutes indicted quod dominus Rex Statuit that our Lord the King hath ordained yet if they are in the Parliament Roul and have always been allowed as Statutes it shall be intended that they were made by Authority of Parliament But if a Statute be made thus the King with the Assent of the Lords or the King with the Assent of the Commons It hath been held from about the time of H. 3. to the time of the late Rebellion not to be good for all ought to Assent Coke 8.20 21. so that as Sir John Fortescue saith Fol. 40. a. b. Statutes are made in England not only by the Princes pleasure tho he saith not that in England they can be made without the Princes pleasure or Royal Assent but by and with the Assent of the whole Realm in Parliament assembled by their Representatives so that of necessity they must procure the Wealth of the People and in no wise tend to their hindrance which well they cannot do seeing they are ordained not by the device of one Man alone or of a Hundred wise Councelors only but of more than three Hundred chosen Men much agreeing with the number of the Ancient Senators of Rome and if it chance these Statutes being devised with such great Solemnity and Wit not to fall out so effectually as the intent of the makers did wish they may quickly be Reformed in a Subsequent Parliament but not without the Assent of all the Powers by whose Authority they were first passed and devised CHAP. II. Sheweth how King Charles the First found things at his first coming to these Crowns and there is also said something as to the learning of the Customs the chief Maintenance of the Crown in his time I Further observe that at the first coming to the Crown of the said King Charles the First his first Parliament in the first Year of his Reign or the Major part of them met not without being armed with some prejudice to his said Sacred Majesty King Charles the First for therein the Act for Tonnage and Poundage passed not which in the first Parliaments from the time of H. 7. to this time as it were accustomably and of course had been granted and passed to all his Royal Ancestors Kings and Queens of this Realm The sudden Dissolution of that Parliament preventing the Act of Subsedies he was forced to draw from his People by borrowing of Persons able to lend such competent Sums of Money as might discharge his present Occasions and to that purpose directed Letters to the Lord Lieutenant of Counties to return the Names of Persons able to lend omitting the Names of Noble Men and Clergy-men and the Names returned the Comptroler of the Kings Household by the Councils order issued forth Letters in the Kings Name under the Privy Seal to the several Persons returned for Loane of Money Though this was not the first time that ever such Loanes under the Privy Seal were had upon certain emergent Occasions and in cases of urgent necessity by failer of Parliamentary Supplies Yet in the Parliament next after in tertio Caroli primi many of the Members took the occasion to strive as to their insisting upon their Priviledges to outdo one another Then the modesty of the House of Commons which was very great in former times was by them forgotten and they began to arrogate more Power than what the Kings Writ gave them heretofore they evaded matters of State as much as they could and when their Advice hath been desired they have humbly desired not to be put to consult of things of which they had no knowledge and at other times they have humbly desired that the King would be advised in matters of War or Peace by the Lords being of more Experience than themselves in such Affairs and have used modestly to excuse themselves as too weak to consult in so weighty Matters But then several Speeches and Resolves made by divers Champions of the House of Commons who were no friends to Prerogative put the Lords and Commons then Assembled in Parliament upon their Petition concerning divers Rights and Liberties of
Laiety by Sequestrations Decimations and otherwise ensued whereof we of the Loyal Party were not only Witnesses and Spectators but therein we were fellow Sufferers Now the Writs of the King suffered Violence of which Mr. Fitzherbert in his Preface to his Natura Brevium saith that they be the Foundations whereupon the whole Law doth depend of the which Writs and Processes as be appointed in the Law it is said in St. Jermin in his Book Written by way of Dialogue called Doctor and Student Fol. 64. a. That the King as Sovereign and Fountain of the Law is bounden of Justice to Grant them to every Person that will Complain be his Surmise true or false Yet in stead of Carolus Secundus Dei Gratia c. Vicecomiti c. was used The Keepers of the Liberties of England by Authority of Parliament To the Sheriff of c. But those who had built this Babel by their Divisions and Jealousies one had of another were in time brought to strange Confusions The Writs were to run no longer in the Name of the Keepers c. But all Writs and Process were issued forth in the Name of Oliver their General The Independent though the Younger now prevailed against the Presbyterian the Elder Brother whath the Elder had hunted after the Younger now catched for himself And now also it may be observed that a House of Commons singly Assumed to themselves the Title of and were stiled the Parliament of England though his Sacred Majesty King Charles the First had before truely told them in his Speech to them 3. Car. that none of the Houses of Parliament joint or Separate had any Power either to Make or Declare a Law without his Consent CHAP. V. Sheweth about what time the Kings Writs were first framed for the induction of the Commons into the Parliaments of England FRom the Norman Conquest untill some time in the Reign of H. 3. Parliaments were holden by the King and his Barons Spiritual and Temporal in whose days it is thought the Kings Writ for Election of Kinghts c. was first framed and that the Commons were reduced to a House by the Advice of the Bishops to the King in the heat of the Barons Wars It was thought expedient then to frame a Writ for their Induction that they might allay and lessen the Pride and Power of the Peers who had waged War so many years against the Crown However least they should arrogate too much Authority to themselves they never could so much as exhibit an Oath nor impose a Fine or inflict Punishment upon any but their own Members until the time of the late Usurpers when they were grown to that height of Impudence that the King himself and Lords Spiritual and Temporal were Excluded by them of whom as well before the Norman Conquest as since the Ancient Parliaments of England consisted only without them For it is true the People were wrought under by the Sword of the first William and his followers to a Subjected Vassallage Division and Power had Mastered them none of their old Nobility and Heads were left either of Credit or Fortunes what he Detained not in Providence as the Demeans of the Crown or reserved in Piety as for the Maintenance of the Church he parted and divided amongst those Strangers that Sailed along with him in the same Bark of his Adventure leaving the Natives for the most part as may be seen by his Survey called Domesday Book now in the Exchequor in no better a condition than Villenage To supply his Occasions of Men Money or Provisions he Ordered that all those who injoyed any fruit of his Conquest should hold their Lands proportionably by so many Knights Fees of the Crown And permitted them to Enfeofle their followers with such parts as they pleased of their own Portions which to ease their charge they did in his and his Sons time This course provided him the Body of his War the Money and Provision was by Hidage Assessed on the Common People at and with the consent of their Lords who held in all their Seigniories such right of Royalty that to their vassals as Paris saith they were quot domini tot Tyranni and in time provided to the Kings so great a Curb and restraint of Power that nothing fell into the Care of Majesty after more than to retrench the force of Aristocracy that was like in time to strangle the Monarchy Though others foresaw the Mischief betimes yet none attempted the remedy until King John whose overhasty undertakings brought in the mentioned broiles of the Barrons Wars there needed not before this Care to Advise with the Commons in any Parliamentary or Publick Assemblies when every Man in England by Tenure held himself to his great Lords Will whose Presence was ever required in their Parliaments and in whose Assents his dependant Tennants consent was ever included from what is aforesaid the Commons of England or rather they whom the Commons shall Elect to future Parliaments and are properly said in Parliament Assembled to be the Representatives of all the Commons of England may take notice that Anciently was in use only one Writ of Summons to Parliament by which the King Summoned the Lords Spiritual and Temporal separately to come to his Parliament at a certain Day and Place appointed in the Kings Writ And of latter times with the reasons for the one and the other there hath been an Additional Writ framed which is sent to every Sheriff of England and Wales for Election of Kinghts c. for the Parliament in the Kings Name and when sent it is called the Kings Writ and is directed to his Subordinate Officer the Kings Sheriff For the truth is the King by his Writ giveth the very Essence and Form to the Parliament which is to be Summoned when he pleaseth to be Adjourned Prorogued and Dissolved when he pleaseth And in all good times of Government before and since the Conquest it was ever in the Kings power and was and is his Priviledge Royal Prerogative and Regality to Grant or Deny such Petitions as he pleaseth and all Acts of former times and some of latter time were and are in form of Petitions CHAP. VI. Sheweth the difference between Parliamentary Priviledges and the Priviledges of the King and sheweth how at first Kingly Government was constituted by God himself and that by Gods Law also the Legislative Power and the Power of the Militia was given to the King and that in these highest Points of the Kings Prerogative the Law of England is agreeing with the Law of God and that God is vindex sui Ordinis the avenger of his own Ordinance THE Speaker uf the House of Commons on the first day of every Parliament is usually Presented to the King and in the Name of the Commons of England he humbly Prays his Majesty would be Graciously Pleased to Grant them their Liberties and Priviledges which is a strong Argument that their Priviledge their
the Death of the Natural Body of the King is called Plow 234. a. the Demise of the King because that thereby he Demiseth the Realm to another and the Body Politick is transferred from one Body Natural immediately to another Body Natural that Right hath and that because our Realm doth not admit of any Interregnum Hence it was that in the year of our Lord 1660. at the very instant of his late Sacred Majesties most happy Restauration all Charters and Writings whatsoever were Written Reputed and Esteemed to be made in the Twelfth year of his Reign though that from 1648. to that time he was injuriously and wickedly Deprived Robbed and kept out from his Inheritance of all his Regal Rights of the Crown whereof he was the undoubted right Heir by the late Usurpers CHAP. X. Herein you have an Heir defined and divided and is shewed that the Right Heir of the Crown ought not nor can lawfully be Disinherited that a Bastard ought not nor can be Heir to the Crown and further something is said to the late Bill for the Exclusion of the late most Illustrious Prince James Duke of York now our Soveraign Lord King James the Second NOW Sir Edward Coke in the First part of his Institutes Fol. 7. b. saith that in the Legal understanding of the Common Law he is said to be haeres an Heir that is ex justis nuptiis procreatus for haeres legittimus est quem nuptiae demonstrant and is he to whom Lands Tenements or hereditaments by the Act of God and right of Blood do descend of some Estate of Inheritance for solus deus haeredem facere potest non homo God alone can make an Heir not Man And Heirs are either Lineal who ever shall first Inherit or Collateral who are to Inherit for want of Lineal Lineal descent is conveyed downwards in the right Line as from the Grandfather to the Father from the Father to the Son c. Collateral descent is derived from the side of the Lineal as Grandfathers Brother Fathers Brother c. Now in Mr. Swinb 5th part Fol. 289. he that hath Issue Natural but not Lawful is said to die without Issue and in such Case the Fathers Brother shall Inherit and not the Issue Natural of the Father for such Issue Natural in our Law is said to be nullius filius no Mans Son whence may be Inferred that no Mans Son shall Inherit no Mans Land much less a Crown And in the 23d chap. of Deuteron the 2d verse is said a Bastard shall not enter into the Congregation of the Lord even to his Tenth generation shall he not enter into the Congregation of the Lord. And 10. H. 7. 18. it is said that Rex est persona mixta cum sacerdote quia tam Ecclesiasticam quam temporalem habet jurisdictionem The King is a person mixt or participating with the Priest in the Priesthood because he is said to have Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction as well as Temporal And Sir John Fortescue Fol. 95. a. b. saith that it is convenient that Mans Law in the benefit of Succession should cut them short whom the Church judgeth unworthy to be received into Holy Orders yea whom Holy Scripture judgeth as touching their Birthright inferior to the Legitimate or Lawfully Begotten as we read in the 25th chap. of Gen. 5 and 6th verses Abraham gave all his Inheritance to his Son Isaac and to the Sons of his Concubines he gave Gifts And again in Mr. Swinb part 5th Fol. 17. is said A King may ex plenitudine potestatis make his unlawful Issue capable of whatsoever by Will deviseable he doth give or bequeath unto him But Mr. Plowden saith 247. a. b. It is an evil or unlawful thing to Disinherit the Right Heir And Mr. Swinb in his 2d part Fol. 118. saith that by the Civil Canon and Common Laws also of this Realm of England It is unlawful for a King to give away his Kingdom from his Lawful Heirs However we had lately a House of Commons or rather a Major part of them that had framed a Bill for the Excluding and Disabling the then most Illustrious Prince James Duke of York now King James the Second for ever from Possessing Having Holding Inheriting and Enjoying of the Imperial Crowns of this Realm and Kingdoms It was a Presumptuous Bill for the Excluding of the Presumptive Heir of these Crowns However it was refused by the Lords House and so could not be offered to his late Majesty for his Royal Assent to make it a Law Have me excused for saying it was a Presumptuous Bill Matters of that nature have been in times past esteemed so in 35o. Eliz. Mr. Peter Wentworth and Sir Henry Bromley delivered a Petition to the Lord Keeper desiring the Lords of the Upper House to be suppliants with them of the Lower House unto her Majesty for entailing the Succession of the Crown whereof a Bill was ready drawn the Queen was highly displeased herewith and charged her Council to call the Parties before them so Sir Thomas Heneage was sent to fetch them they were first commanded to forbear going to the House and not to go out of their several Lodgings afterwards they were called before the Lord Treasurer the Lord Buckhurst and Sir Thomas Heneage Wentworth was Committed to the Tower Bromley to the Fleet together with Mr. Stevens as also Mr. Welch Knight for Worcester-shire and yet it was then thought no Breach of Priviledge They that meddle with this matter of the Succession to the Crown do not only trench upon the Power and Priviledge of Almighty God who as the Prophet Daniel tells us in his 4th chap. is the most High that Ruleth in the Kingdom of Men and giveth it to whomsoever he will but also we have found by woful experience that they Praevaricate with the King himself for in the very word King is included all Succession so that where a Guift is made to the King a Fee-simple passeth without the words either of Heirs or Successors or both as may be seen C. Inst. 1. part 9. b. and in the same Book Fol. 22. b. is said a Man cannot have an Heir during his Life for non est haeres viventis And Mr. Plowden 45. b. saith no Heir hath Right or Title till after the Death of his Ancestor that hath the Inheritance be the Heir either Lineal or Collateral and not in his Life and this is because let all the provision imaginable by Man nay by a Parliament be appointed yet the same by the death of the Presumptive Heir or Heir apparent in the Life time of the Ancestor by the Act of God not otherwise may and can be disappointed And Anciently and now also as in C. 8. 28. it is held That Princeps coruscat radiis Regis censetur una persona cum Rege the Prince is enlightned and made splendid by the shining brightness of the King and is esteemed to be one and the same Person with the
amongst the rest he gave him a special charge to shew kindness not unto Chimham only but unto all the Sons of Barzillai the Gileadite charging him that he let them be of those that Eat at his Table rendring this for reason for so they came to me when I fled because of Absalom thy Brother Absit be it far from me I do not mention this matter as if I would thence infer that King David was obliged to have done this Honour to Barzillai and his Sons No! Cujus est dare ejus est disponere he that hath the power to give Honour or Reward hath also the disposing power to give to whom what and when he pleaseth and the very words of Barzillai and why should the King recompence it me with such a reward manifest that good old Barzillai thought it his bounden Duty to do what he had done And as appears by the preamble of the Statute of 11th H. 7th ca. 1. Every Subject of this Realm of England by Duty of Allegiance is bound to serve his Prince and Soveraign Lotd in his Wars for the defence of him and the Land against every Rebellion Power and Might reared against him and with him to enter and abide in service in Battel And Sir Edward Coke also in the 7th parr of his Reports Fol. 7. b. 8. a. saith that all Subjects are bound to go with the King in War infra extra regnum both within and without the Kingdom CHAP. IX Herein you have a Subject defined you have Ligeance defined and is shewed that the King hath two Capacities the one Natural and the other Politick that the body Politick cannot be separated from the Body Natural that Ligeance is due to the Natural Body of the King that the Kingdom of England admits of no interregnum and that the Disherison of the Right Heir of a Kingdom is wont to be the beginning of Civil Wars NOW whosoever is born under a natural Ligeance due by the Law of Nature is a Subject And it is neither caelum Heaven nor solum the Soil that makes the Subject but Ligeance which is of as large extent and Latitude as the Royal Power and Protection of the King is which Allegiance or Ligeance is a true and faithful Obedience of the Subject due to his Soveraign and is or ought to be an incident inseperable to every Subject because Ligeantia est vinculum fidei the bond of Faith est quasi Legis essentia est ligamentum quasi ligatio mentium quia sicut ligamentum est connexio articulorum juncturarum c. As the Ligatures or Strings do knit together all the Joints of all the parts of the Body so doth this Ligeance joyn together the Soveraign and all his Subjects quasi uno ligamine as in one knot or tye In some Acts of Parliament Subjects are called Leige Subjects or Leige People and again in some Acts of Parliament the King is called Leige Lord of his Subjects so that I may further say Ligeantia est quid quodamodo reciprocum a certain Reciprocal thing hence it is we say Protectio Regis tiahit subjectionem subditi subjectio subditi trahit protectionem Regis The Protection of the King doth draw or attract the Subjection of the Subject and the Subjection of the Subject doth draw or attract to it the Protection of the King So that this Ligeance is the mutual Bond and Obligation between the King and his Subjects whereby Subjects are called his Leige Subjects because they are bound to Obey and Serve him as well in times of War as in times of Peace and he is called their Leige Lord because he is to maintain them in their just Rights and Liberties by the power of the Sword times of War and by the Legislative power to defend them in times of Peace from Injuries and Oppressions Now the King is said to have Two Capacities one Natural the other Politick one framed of God the other by the Policy of Man one subject to Infirmities the other not And the Estate Royal or Politick doth not confound the capacity of his Body Natural but their Capacities remain distinctly as in other Persons that have double capacity as a Bishop or a Dean c. Plow 234. a. and the Body Politick of the King may not be disjoyned or separated from his Body Natural Plow 230. a. 242. b. So that when the King is Sworn to his Subjects as he is at his Coronation he taketh Oath in his Natural Person for the Politick Body is immortal and invisible nay the Politick Body hath no Soul for as is aforesaid it is framed by the Policy of Man and therefore the King cannot be said to Swear in his Politick Capacity In likewise when at the Assizes by the Judge of the Goal delivery at the Sessions of the Peace by the Justices or the Commissioners of the Peace when at or in the Leet by the Steward there the Subject is or shall be Sworn to the King to bear Faith and true Allegiance to his Majesty his Heirs and Successors then the Subject is Sworn to bear Faith and true Allegiance to the Natural Body of the King And accordingly in all Indictments of Treason when any intend or compass mortem destructionem Domini Regis which must needs be intended and understood to be of his Natural Body for his Politick Body is Immortal and not subject to Death the Indictment always concludeth with contra Ligeantiae suae debitum contrary to the Duty of their Allegiance and therefore Ligeance is due to the Natural Body of the King And Sir Edward Coke says this Ligeance or Faith of the Subject is proprium quarto modo to the King a degree beyond the Grammarians Superlative omni soli semper to every King to the King alone and always to the King And it will be material and not contrary to Sir Edward Cokes meaning to add these words de jure to every of his omni soli semper And so Ligeance will be due as it is to every King that is so de jure of Right to him alone that is so and always to him that is King de jure of Right Thereby every King de facto and Usurper will be excluded and the greater safety will be secured to the King and to the Subject too for the Disherison of the Right Heir of a Kingdom is always wont to be the beginning of Civil Wars But however Sir Edward Coke omitted those words de jure yet his meaning was without question the same as if those words had been added because C. 7. 10. b. he saith that the King holdeth the Realm of England by Birthright upon which Succession is ever attendant and in the same place he saith that the King in individuo moritur but not in genere which is as much as to so say that the Natural Body of the King is subject to Death but the body Politick of the King dyeth not And therefore