Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
lord_n	james_n	john_n	sir_n	63,767	5	6.8706	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A56227	A seasonable, historical, legal vindication and chronological collection of the good old fundamental liberties, franchises, rights, laws of all English freemen ...; Seasonable, legal, historical vindication of the good old fundamental liberties, franchises, rights, properties, laws, government of all English freemen.	Prynne, William, 1600-1669.	1654 (1654)	Wing P4122; ESTC R13248	47,108	63

of the said KING robbing slaying spoiling a great part of his faithfull People Our said Soveraign Lord the King considering the promises with many other which were more odious to remember by advice and assent of the LORDS Spirituall and Temporall and at THE REQVEST OF THE COMMONS and by authority aforesaid hath ordained and established that the said Iohn Cade shal be had named and declared a false Traytor to cur said Soveraign Lord the King and that all His Tyranny Acts Facts false Opinions shall be voyded abated adnulled destroyed and put out of remembrance for ever And that all indictments in time coming in like case under power of Tyranny Rebellion and stirring had shall be of no regard nor effect but void in Law and all the petitions * delivered to the said King in his last Parliament holden at Westminster the sixth day of November the 29 of his Reign against his mind by him not agreed shall be taken and put in oblivion out of remembrance undone voided adnulled and destroyed for ever as a thing purposed against God and his Couscience and against his royall estate and preheminence and also dishonourable and unreasonable 5. In the a 8 year of King Henry the 8. William Bell and Thomas Lacy in the County or Kent conspired with Thomas Cheyney the Hermite of the Queen of Fairies TO OVERTHROW THE LAWS AND CVSTOMS OF THE REALM for effecting whereof they with 200. more met together and concluded upon a cause or raising greater forces in Kent and the adjacent shires this was adiudged high treason and some of them executed as traytors Moreover it b was resolved by all the Judges of in the reign of Henry S. that an Insurrection against the Statute of Labourers or for the inhansing of salaries and wages was Treason a levying war against the King Because it was generally against the KINGS LAW and the Offenders tooke upon them the REFORMATION thereof which Subjects by gathering of power ought not to do 6. On a December 1. in the 21. yeer of King Henry the 8. Sir Thomas Moor Lord Chancellor of England with 14. more Lords of the Privy Councel Iohn Fitz Iames Chief Justice of England and Sir Anthony Fitzherbert one of the Judges of the Common Pleas exhibited sundry Articles of Impeachment to King Henry the 8. against Cardinall Wolsy That he had by divers and many sundry ways and fashions committed High Treason and notable grievous offences misusing altering and subverting the order of his Graces Laws and otherwise contrary to his high Honour Prerogative Crown Estate and Dignity Royall to the inestimable great hinderance dimunition and decay of the universal Wealth of this his Graces Realm The Articles are 43. in number The 20 21 26 30 35 47 42 43. contain his illegal arbitrary practices and proceedings to the subversion of the due course and order of his Graces Laws to the undoing of a great number of his loving people Whereupon they pray Please therefore your most excellent Majesty of your excellent goodness towards the Weal of this your Realm and Subjects of the same to see such order and direction upon the said Lord Cardinal as may bee to terrible example of others to beware to offend your Grace and your Lawes hereafter And that he be so provided for that he never have any power jurisdiction or authority hereafter to trouble vex or impoverish the Commonwealth of this your Realm as he hath done heretofore to the great hurt and dammage of every man almost high and low His * poysoning himself prevented his Iudgment for these his practises 7. The b Statute of 1. Marie● 12. Enacts that if 12. or more shall endeavour by force to alter any of the laws or statutes of the Kingdome the offender shall from the time therein limited be adjudged ONELY AS A FELON whereas it was Treason before but this act continuing but till the next Parliament and then expiring the offence remains Treason as before 8. In the a 39. of Queen Elizabeth divers in the County of Oxford consulted together to go from house to house in that County and from thence to London and other parts to excite them to take arms for the throwing down of inclosures throughout the Realm nothing more was prosecuted nor assemblies made yet in Easter Term 39. Elizabeth it was resolved by all the Judges of England who met about the case That this was High Treason and a levying Warre against the Queen because it was to throw down all inclosures throughout the Kingdome to which they could pretend no right and that the end of it was to overthrow the Laws and Statutes for Inclosures Whereupon BRADSHAW and BVRTON two of the principall offenders were condemned and executed at Aic●ston Hill in Oxfordshire where they intended their first meeting 9. To come nearer to our present times and case In the last Parliament of King Charls Anno 16●0 1641 b The whole House of Commons impeached Thomas Earle of Stafford Lord Deputy of Ireland of high Treason amongst other Articles for this crime especially wherein all the other centred that he Treasonably endeavoured by his Words actions and Counsels to subvert the Fundamentall Lawes of ENGLAND and IRELAND and introduce an arbitrary and Tyrannicall Government This the whole parliament declared and adjudged to be High treason c in and by their votes and a speciall act of parliament for his attainder for which he was condemned and soon after executed on Tower Hill as a traytor to the King and Kingdome May 2● 1641. 10. The whole House of Common● the same Parliament impeached William L●●d archbishop of Canterbury of HIGH TREASON in these 〈…〉 1646. First that he hath traytorously endeavoured 〈…〉 Fundamental Lawes and Government of this Kingdome of England and instead thereof to introduce an Arbitrary and Tyrannical Government against Law And hee to that end hath wickedly and Traiterously advised his Majesty that hee might at his own will and pleasure levy and take Money of his Subjects without their consent in parliament and this hee affirmed was warrantable by the Law of God Secondly He hath for the better accomplishment of that his Trayterous design advised and procured Sermons and other Discourses to be preached printed and published in which the authority of parliaments and the force of the Laws of this Kingdome have been denyed and absolute and unlimited power over the persons and estates of his Majesties Subjects maintained and defended not onely in the King but in himself and other Bishops against the Law Thirdly he hath by Letters Messages Threats and promises and by divers other ways to Judges and other Ministers of Justice interrupted perverted and at other times by means aforesaid hath endeavoured to interrupt and pervert the course of Justice in his Majesties Courts at Westminster and other Courts to the subversion of the LAWES of this KINGDOME whereby sundry of his Majesties Subjects have been stopt in their

among your people who will be therby no less discouraged then disabled to supply your Majesty when occasion shall require In which memorable Petition the whole House of Commons resolve in direct terms 1. That the Subjects of England have old original Fundamental Rights and more particularly in the Property of their goods exempted from all Impositions whatsoever in times of Peace or War without their common consent in Parliament declared and ectablished both by the ancient Common Law of England and sundry Acts of Parliament and Records of former times 2. They declare the constant vigilant care zeal of our Ancestors and former Parliaments in all ages inviolably to maintain defend preserve the same against all encroachments together with their own care duty and vigilancy in this kind in that very Parliament 3. They relate the readiness of our Kings to ratifie these their Fundamental Rights by new Act of Parliament when they have been violated in any kind 4. They declare the benefit accruing both to Prince and People by the inviolable preservation and establishment of this old Fundamental Right and the mischiefs accruing to both by the infringement thereof by arbitrary illegal Impositions without full consent in Parliament 5. They earnestly in point of conscience prudence and duty to those for whom thy served Petition his Majesty for a new Law and Declaration against all new Impositions Taxes on Inland Goods or Merchandizes imported or exported without the Peoples free consent in Parliament as null void utterly to be abolished and taken away Whether it will not be absolutely necessary for the whole English Nation and the next ensuing Notional or real Parliament to Prosecute Enact Establish such a Declaration and Law against all such future arbitrary illegal oppressive Taxes Impositions Excizes that have been imposed and continued for many years together on the whole Kingdom by new extravagant self-created usurping Army-Officers and other Powers without free and full consent of the People in lawfull English Parliaments against all former Laws Declarations and Resolutions in Parliament to their great oppression enslaving undoing and that in far greater proportions multiplicity and variety ●hen ever in former ages without the least intermission and likewise against their late declared design to perpetuate them on our exhausted Nation without alteration or diminution beyond and against all Presidents of former Ages both in times of Peace and War for the future by the 27 28 29 3● 3● Articles of the Instrument entituled The Government of the Common-wealth of England c. I remit to their most serious considerations to determine it ever they resolve to be English Freemen again or to imitate the wisdom prudence zeal courage and laudable examples of their worthy Ancestors from which they cannot now degenerate without the greatest Infamy and enslaving of themselves with their Posterities for ever to the arbitrary wills of present or future Usurpers on their Fundamental Rights and Liberties in an higher degree then ever in any precedent Ages under the Greatest Conquerours or Kings after all their late costly bloudy Wars for their Defence against the Beheaded King The fifth is A learned and necessary Argument made in the Commons House of Parliament Anno 7. Jacobi to prove That each Subject hath a propriety in his Goods shewing also the extent of the Kings Prerogative in Impositions upon the Goods of Merchants exported or imported c. By a late learned Judge of this Kingdom printed at London by Richard Bishop 1641. and Ordered to be published in print at a Committee appointed by the Honourable House of Commons for examination and Licensing of Books 20. Maii 1641. In which Parliamentary Argument p. 8 11 16. I finde these direct Passages That the New Impositions contained in the Book of Rates imposed on Merchandizes imported and exported by the Kings Prerogative and Letters Patents without consent in Parliament is against THE NATVRAL FRAME AND CONSTITVTION OF THE POLICY OF THIS KINGDOME which is Jus Publicum Regni AND SO SUBVERTETH THE FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF THE REALM and introduceth a new form of State and Government Can any man give me a reason why the King can only in Parliament make Laws No man ever read any Law whereby it was so ordained and yet no man ever read that any King practised the contrary therefore IT IS THE ORIGINAL RIGHT OF THE KINGDOM AND THE VERY NATVRAL CONSTITVTION OF OUR STATE AND POLICY being one of the highest Rights of Soveraign Power If the King alone out of Parliament may impose * HE ALTERETH THE LAW OF ENGLAND IN ONE OF THESE TWO MAIN FUNDAMENTAL POINTS He must either take the Subjects Goods from them without assent of the Party which is against the Law or else he must give his own Letters Patents the force of a Law to alter the property of the Subjects Goods which is also against the Law In this and sundry other Arguments touching the Right of Impositions in the Commons House of Parliament by the Members of it arguing against them it was frequently averred and at last voted and resolved by the House 7. Jacobi That such Impositions without consent in Parliament were AGAINST THE ORIGINAL FUNDAMENTAL LAWS AND PROPERTY OF THE SUBJECT and Original Right Frame and Constitution of the Kingdom as the Notes and Journals of that Parliament evidence An express Parliamentary resolution in point for what I here assert The sixth is A Conference desired by the Lords and had by a Committee of both Houses concerning the Rights Privileges of the Subjects 3. Aprilis 4. Caroli 1628. entred in the Parliament Journal of 4. Caroli and since printed at London 1642. In the Introduction to which Conference Sir Dudley Diggs by the Commons House Order used these expressions My good Lords whilst we the Commons out of our good affections were seeking for money we found I cannot say a Book of the Law but many A FUNDAMENTAL POINT THEREOF NEGLEGTED AND BROKEN which hath occasioned our desire of this Conference Wherein I am first commanded to shew unto your Lordships in general That the Laws of England are grounded on Reason more antient then Books consisting much in unwritten Customs yet so full of Justice and true Equity that your most Honorable Predecessors and Ancestors propugned them with a NOLUMUS MUTARI and so ancient that from the Saxons daies notwithstanding the injuries and ruines of time they have continued in most parts the same c. Be pleased then to know THAT IT IS AN UNDOUBTED AND FUNDAMENTAL POINT OF THIS SO ANCIENT COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND THAT THE SUBJECT HATH A TRUE PROPERTY IN HIS GOODS AND POSSESSIONS which doth preserve as sacred that Meum and Tuum that is the Nurse of Industry and the Mother of Courage and without which there can be no Justice of which Meum and Tuum is the proper object But the UNDOUBTED RIGHT OF FREE SUBJECTS hath lately not a little been invaded and prejudiced by Pressures the more

exceeding Straffords 10. As it is a crime Odious in the nature of it so it is odious in the Judgement and Estimation of the Law TO ALTER THE SETTLED FRAME AND CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT IN ANY STATE Let those consider it who are guilty of it in the Highest Degree beyond Strafford Canterbery or the Shipmoney Judges in our own State The Lawes whereby all parts of a Kingdom are preserved should be very vaine and defective if they had not a Power to secure and preserve themselves The Forfeitures inflicted for Treason by our Law are of Life Honour and Estate even all that can be forfeited and this Prisoner although he should * pay all these Forfeitures will still be a Debtor to the Common wealth Nothing can be more equall then that he should perish by the Justice of the Law which he would have subverted Neither will this be a New way of blo●d There are marks enough to trace this Law to the very Originall of this Kingdome And if it hath not been put in execution as he alledgeth this 240 yeares it was not for want of Law but that all that time had not bred a man * bold enough to commit such crimes as these Which is a circumstance much aggravating his Offence and making him no lesse liable to punishment because he is THE * ONELY MAN that in so long a time hath ventured UPON SUCH A TREASON AS THIS Thus far Mr. John Pym in the Name and by the Order and Authority of the whole Commons House in Parliament which I wish all those who by their Words Actions Counsels and printed Publications too have trayterously endeavored to subvert the Fundamentall Lawes Liberties of England and Ireland and to introduce an arbitrary and Tyrannical Government against Law as much as ever Strafford did and out stripped him therein ever since his execution in all particulars for which he was beheaded would now seriously lay to heart and speedily reform lest they equall or exceed him conclusion in Capitall punishments for the same or endlesse Hellish Torments The next Authority I shall produce in point is The speech and declaration of Mr. Oliver St. John at a Conference of both Houses of Parliament concerning Ship-mony upon Judge Finches Impeachment of High Treason January 14. 1640. printed by the Commons Orders London 1641. wherein he declares the sense of the Commons p. 12. c. That by the Judges Opinions forecited concerning Ship-mony THE FUNDAMENTAL LAWS OF THE REALM CONCERNING OUR PROPERTY and OUR PERSONS ARE SHAKEN Whose Treasonable Offence herein he thus aggravates p. 20. c. The Judges as is declared in the Parliament of 11 R. 2. are the Executors of the Statutes and of the Judgements and Ordinances of Parliament They have here made themselves the * EXECVTIONERS OF THEM they have endevoured THE DESTRVCTION OF THE FVND AMENTALS OF OVR LAWS and LIBERTIES Holland in the Low-Countries lies under the Sea the Superficies of the Land is lower than the Superficies of the Sea It is Capitall therefore for any man to cut the Banks because they defend the Country Besides our own even Forreign Authors as Comines observes That the Statute DE TALLAGIO and the other old Laws are the Sea walls and Banks which keep the Commons from the inundation of the Prerogative These * Pioners have not onely undermined these Banks but they have levelled them even with the ground If one that was known to be Hostis Patriae had done this thought the Dammage be the same yet the Guilt is lesse but the Conservatores Riparum the overseers instructed with the Defence of these Banks for them to destroy them the breach of Trust aggravates nay alters the nature of the offence Breach of trust though in a private Person and in the least things is odious amongst all men much more in a publick Person in things of great and publick concernement because * GREAT TRUST BINDS THE PARTY TRUSTED TO GREATEST CARE AND FIDELITY It is TREASON in the Constable of Dover-Castle to deliver the Keys to the known enemies of the Kingdome because the Castle is the Key of the Kingdome whereas if the house-keeper of a private person deliver possession to his Adversary it is a crime scarce punishable by Law The * Judges under his Majesty are the Persons trusted with the Laws and in them with the Lives Liberties and Estates of the whole Kingdome This Trust of all we have if primarily from his Majesty and * in him delegated to the Judges His Majesty at his Coronation is bound by his Oath TO EXECUTE JUSTICE TO HIS PEOPLE ACCORDING TO THE LAWS thereby to assure the people of the faithfull performance of his Great Trust His Majesty again as he trusts of Judges with the performance of this part of his Oath so doth he likewise exact another Oath of them for their due execution of justice to the people according to the Laws hereby the Judges stand intrusted with this part of his Majesties Oath If therefore the Judges shall do wittingly against the Law they do not onely break their own oaths and therein the Common Faith and trust of the whole Ki●●dome but do as much as in them lies sperse and blemish the sacred Person of his Majesty with the odious and hateful fin of * Perjury My Lords the hainousnesse of this offence is most legible in the * severe punishment which formour ages have inflicted upon those Judges who have broken any part of their Oaths wittingly though in things not so dangerous to the Subject as in the case in question * Sir Thomas Wayland Chief Justice of the Common-pleas 17 E. 1. was attainted of Felony for taking bribes and his Lands and goods forefeited as appears in the Pleas of Parlament 18 E. 1. and he was banished the Kingdome as unworthy to live in the State against which he had so much offended * Sir William Thorp Chief Justice of the Kings Bench in Edward the thirds time having of five persons received five severall Bribes which in all amounted to one hundred pounds was for this alone adjudged to be hanged and all his goods and Lands forfeited The reason of the Judgement is entered in the Roll in these words Quia praedictus Wilielmus * Throp qui Sacramentum Domini Regis erga populum suum habuit ad custodiendum fugit malitiosè falsò rebeliter quantum in ipso suit There is a notiable declaration in that Judgement that this Judgement was not to be drawn into example against any other officers who should break their Oaths but onely against those qui predictum Sacramentum fecerunt fregerunt * habent Leges Angliae ad custodiendum That is onely to the Judges Oaths who have the Laws intrusted unto them This Judgement was given 24. E. 3. The next year in Parliament 25 E. 3. Numb. 10. it was debated in Parliament whether this Judgement was legall

Liberty of the Subject against Impositions maintained in an Argument in the Parliament of 7. Jacobi printed at London 1641. By Judge Crooks and Judge Huttons Arguments concerning Shipmony both printed at London 1641. By the Case of Shipmony briefly discussed London 1640. by Mr. St. Johns Argument and Speech against Shipmony printed at London 1641. By Sir Edward Cook in his 1. Institutes p. 46. and 57. to 64. and 528. to 537. By the 1. and 2. Remonstrance of the Lords and Commons in Parliament against the Commission of Array Exact Collection p. 386. to 398. and 850. to 890. and by my own Humble Remonstrance against Shipmony London 1643. The fourth part of the Soveraign power of Parliaments and Kingdomes p. 14. to 26. and my Legall Vindications of the Liberties of England against Illegall Taxes c. London 1649. and by the Records and Statutes cited in the ensuing Chapter referring for the most part to the first Proposition The second third and fourth of them are la●gely debated and confirmed by a Conference desired by the Lords and had by a Committee of both Houses concerning the Rights and Priviledges of the Subject 3. Ap●ilis 4. Ca●ol●printed at London 1642. By Sir Edward Cook in his Institutes on Magna Charta c. 29. p. 45. to 57. By the 1. and 2. Remonstrance of the Lords and Commons against the Commission of Array Exact Collection p. 386. c. 850. to 890. By Judge Crooks and Judge Huttons Arguments against Shipmony By Sir Robert Cotton his Posthuma p. 222. to 269. By my Breviate of the Prelates encroachments on the Kings Prerogative and Subjects Liberties p. 138. c. My new discovery of the Prelates tyranny p. 137. to 183. and some of the ensuing Statutes and Records The fifth and sixth of them are fully cleared and vindicated in and by the Prologues of all our Councils Statutes Laws before and since the Conquest By Sir Edward Cooks 4. Institutes ch. 1. Mr. Cromptons Jurisdiction of Courts Title High Court of Parliament My Soveraign power of Parliaments and Kingdomes p. 1 2 3 4. My Legal Vindication against illegal Taxes and pretended Acts of Parliament London 1649 Prynne the Member reconciled to Prynne the Barrester printed the same year My Historicall Collection of the ancient great Councils of the Parliaments of England London 1649. My Truth triumphing over Falshood Antiquity over Novelty London 1645. and some of the Records hereafter transcribed In this I shall be more sparing because so fully confirmed in these and other Treatises The seventh is ratified by Sir Edward Cooks 1. Institutes p. 97 98. 4. Institutes p. 89. and 5. Report Cawdries Case of the Kings Ecclesiasticall Lawes and Rastals Abridgement of Statutes Tit. Provisors Praemunire and Rome 11. H. 7. c. 1. and other Records and Statutes in the ensuing Chapter The eighth and ninth are fully debated in my Soveraign Power of Parliaments and Kingdomes Part. 2. p. 3. to 34. Part fourth p. 162. to 170. and touched in Sir Robert Cottons Posthuma p. 174. to 179. How all and every of these Fundamentall Liberties Rights Franchises Lawes have been unparalelledly violated subverted in all and every particular of late years beyond all Presidents in the worst of former ages even by their greatest pretended Propugners their own printed Edicts Instruments Ordinances Papers together with their illegall oppressions Taxes Excises Imposts Rapines violences Proceedings of all kinds whereof I shall give a brief accompt in its due place will sufficiently evidence if compared with the premised propositions Which abundantly confirm the truth of our Saviours words John 10. 1. 10. and this rule of Johannis Angelius Wenderhagen Politicae Synopticae lib. 3. c. 9. sect. 11. p. 310. Hinc Regulae loco notandum Quod omne Regnum Vi Armata acquisitum in Effectu Subdit is Semper in durioris Servitutis conditiones arripiat licet à principio Ducedinem prurientibus 〈◊〉 videatur Ideo cunctis hoc cavendum Nè temrè 〈◊〉 patiantur FINIS a Joh. 17. 17. 2 Cor. 6. 7. Eph. 1. 12. Ja. 1. 18 b 2 Sam. 22. 8 16. Iob 38. 4 6. Psal. 18 15. 102. 25. 1 4. 5. Prov. 8. 29. Isa. 24 18. 40 21. 48. 13. 51. 13 16. Ier. 31. 17. 24 Ephes. 4 4 Heb. 1. 10. 4. 3 9. 26. 1 Pet. 1. 20. c 1 King 5. 17 6. 37. 7. 9 10. Ezr. 4. 13 6 3. Ps. 137. 7. Ezek. 41. 8. Hag. 2. 8. Zech. 4 9 8. 9 Mat. 7 26 27. Luke 6. 48 49. d Isa. 28. 16. 54 11. Psal. 87. 1. 1 Cor. 3. 10 11 12. Heb. 11. 10. 1 Pet. 2. 6. Rev. 21. 14. 19. e 2 Tim. 1. 19. Heb. 6. 1 2. f Ier. 50. 15. Micah 1. 6 7. L●ke 6. 48 49. Mat. 7. 26 27. a Lib. tryed and cast p. 39 40 142 to 4● 154 Canne's Voice from the Temple which perswades the subversion and abolishing of all former Lawes especially for Tythes Ministers support a 2 Thes. 24 b See Exact Collect and a general Collect. 〈◊〉 Ordinances c. c See Culpeper's Lilly's Merlins Almanacks John Can's 2 Voice Lib. tried and cast with many Petitions and Pamphlets against the Law and Lawyers The Order of Aug. 19. 1653. That there should be a Committe selected to consider of a NEW BODY of the Law for the government of this Common-wealth * Summum jus est summa injuria Cic. de Offic●is p. 611. a Lib. tryed and cast p. 39. 40 142. to 148 and elsewhere John Can●●'s 2 Voice from the Temple John Rogers Mene 〈◊〉 Perex p 6. Lilly and Culpeper in their prognostication Anno 1653. 16 4 See the Arimies Proposals b See Math. Par●s p. 2. 6 Magna Chart. 9. 11. ● H. 3. c. 1. 38. 25 E. 1. c. 1 c. 28 E 1 c. 1 c Cook●s 2 Instit. p. 2. Not● See Prop. 1 6 in Chap 2. Nota. * See Cant. D●●m p 19 26 40. D●urn Occu● rences p. 13 See Propos. 1. in chap. 2. * O how are they now degenerated Nota. * And should they not be so now then * And shal we now at last fail herein ‖ How dare then any self-created powers who are neither Kings nor Parliaments now arrogate to themselves or exercise such a super-Regal arbitrary power and prerogative Nota. * And O that we would follow it now again Nota. * And do not those do so who now lay monthly Taxes Excizes Customs and New-Impost on us daily out of Parliament and that for many months and years yet to come against the Letter of their own Instrument and Oath too a See Canterburies Doom p. 19. Diurnal-Occurrences p. 13. b Exact Collection c. p. 112 113. See Chap. 2. P●oposition 3. 7. a Exact Collection p. 850. 854 887 888. * Do not the Army-Officers now enforce them to all this without a Parliament * These Expostulations reach to those at White-Hall now who presume to impose