Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
lord_n james_n john_n sir_n 63,767 5 6.8706 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A56162 The first and second part of A seasonable, legal, and historicall vindication and chronological collection of the good old fundamentall liberties, franchises, rights, laws of all English freemen ... wherein is irrefragably evinced by Parliamentary records, proofs, presidents, that we have such fundamentall liberties, franchises, rights, laws ... : collected, recommended to the whole English nation, as the best legacy he can leave them / by William Prynne of Swainswick, Esquire.; Seasonable, legal, and historical vindication of the good old fundamental liberties, franchises, rights, properties, laws, government of all English freemen. Part 1-2 Prynne, William, 1600-1669. 1655 (1655) Wing P3954; ESTC R19429 161,045 206

There are 6 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

cloak their intentions from the people they took an Oath of all they met Quod Regi Communibus fidelitatem servarent that they should keep Allegiance and Faith to the King Commons Yea Wat Tyler demanded a Commission from the King to behead all Lawyers Escheaters and others whatsoever that were learned in the laws or communicated with the law by reason of their Office conceiving in his minde that this being brought to passe all things afterwards would be ordered according to his own and the common peoples fancy And he made his vaunt putting his hand to his own lips That before scure dayes came to an end ALL THE LAWS OF ENGLAND SHOULD PROCEED FROM HIS MOUTH Which some of late times seem to speak not only in words but deeds by their manifold new laws and Edicts repealing or contradicting our old This their resolution and attempt thus to alter and subvert the Laws and Government upon full debate in the Parliament of 5. R. 2. n. 30. 31. was declared to be High-Treason against the King and the Law for which divers of the chief Actors in this Treasonable Designe were condemned and executed as Traitors in severall places and the rest enforced to a publike submission then pardoned Let these imitators now remember this old President 2. In the Parliament of 11. R. 2. as appears by the Parliament Rols and printed Statutes at large three Privy Councellours the Archbishop of York the Duke of Ireland and the Earl of Suffolk the Bishop of Exeter the Kings Confessor five Knights six Judges whereof Sir Robert Tresylian Chief Justice was one Blake of the Kings Councel at Law Vsk and others were impeached and condemned of High Treason some of them executed as Traitors the rest banished their lands and goods forfeited and none to endeavour to procure their pardon under pain of Felony for their endeavouring to overthrow a Commission for the good of the Kingdome contrary to an Act of Parliament by force of Arms and opinions in Law delivered by these temporizing Judges and Lawyers to the King through threats and terrour at Nottingham Castle tending to subvert the Laws and Statutes of the Realm overthrow the Power Priviledges and proceedings of Parliament and betray not all the House of Lords but only some of the Lords of Parliament Which Judgement being afterwards reversed in the forced and packed Parliament of 21. R. 2. was reconfirmed in the Parliament of 1 H. 4. c. 3 4 5. and the Parliament of 21. R. 2. totally repealed and adnulled for ever and hath so continued Read Statut. at large 3. In the Parliament of 17 R. 2. n. 20. and Pas 17 R. 2. B. Regis Rot. 16. Sir Thomas Talbot was accused and found guilty of High Treason for conspiring the death of the Dukes of Glocester Lancaster and other Peers who maintained the Commission confirmed by Act of Parliament 10. R. 2 and assembling people in a warlike manner in the County of Chester for effecting of it in destruction of the estates of the Realm and the Laws of the Kingdome 4. In the 29. year of King Henry the sixth Jack Cade under a pretence to REFORM alter and abrogate some laws Purveyances and Extortions importable to the Commons whereupon he was called JOHN AMEND ALL drew a great multitude of Kentish people to Black-heath in a warlike manner to effect it In the Parliament of 29 H. 6. c. 1 this was adjudged High Treason in him and his Complices by Act of Parliament and the Parliament of 31. H. 6. c. 1. made this memorable Act against him and his Imitators in succeding ages worthy serious perusal and consideration by all who tread in his footsteps and over-act him in his Treasons Whereas the most abominable Tyrant horrible odious and errant FALSE TRAYTOR John Cade calling himself sometimes Mortimer sometime Captain of Kent which Name Fame Acts and Feats be to be removed out of the speech and minde of every faithfull Christian man perpetually falsly and traiterously purposing and imagining the perpetuall destruction of the KINGS PERSON and FINAL SVBVERSION OF THIS REALM taking upon him ROYALL POWER and gathering to him the Kings People in great number BY FALSE SVBTIL IMAGINED LANGVAGE and seditiously made a stirring Rebellion and insurrection VNDER COLOVR OF JVSTICE FOR REFORMATION OF THE LAWS OF THE SAID KING robbing slaying spoiling a great part of his faithfull people Our said Soveraign Lord the King considering the premises with many other which were more odious to remember by advice and assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and at THE REQUEST OF THE COMMONS and by Authority aforesaid Hath ordained and established that the said John Cade shall be had named and declared A FALSE TRAYTOR to our said Soveraign Lord the King and that all his Tyranny Acts Feats false Opinions shall be voided abated adnulled destroyed and put out of remembrance for ever And that all Indictments and things depending thereof had and made under the power of Tyranny shall likewise be void adnulled abated repealed and holden for none and that the blood of none of them be defiled nor corrupted but by the Authority of the said Parliament clearly declared for ever And that all Indictments in time coming in like case under power of Tyranny Rebellion and stirring had shall be of no regard or effect but void in Law And all the Petitions delivered to the said King in his last Parliament holden at Westminster the sixth day of November the 29. of his Reign against his minde by him not agreed shall be taken and put in Oblivion out of Remembrance undone voided adnulled and destroyed for ever as a thing purposed against God and his Conscience and against his Royal estate and preheminence and also DISHONORABLE and UNREASONABLE 5. In the 8 year of King Henry the 8. William Bell and Thomas Lacy in the County of Kent conspired with Thomas Cheney the Hermite of the Queen of Fairies TO OVER THROW THE LAWS AND CUSTOMS OF THE REALM for effecting whereof they with 200 more met together and concluded upon a course of raising greater forces in Kent and the adjacent Shires This was judged High Treason and some of them executed as Traitors Moreover it was resolved by all the Judges of England in the reign of Henry 8. that an Insurrection against the Statute of Laborers or for the inhansing of Salaries and wages or against any Statute or to remove Councellors or to any other end pretending Reformation of their own heads was TREASON and a levying war against the King BECAVSE IT WAS GENERALLY AGAINST THE KINGS LAW and the Offenders took upon them THE REFORMATION THEREOF which Subjects by gathering of power ought not to do 6. On December 1. in the 21. year of King Henry the 8. Sr. Thomas Moore Lord Chancellour of England with fourteen more Lords of the Privy Councel John fitz-Fitz-James Chief Justice of England and Sir Anthony Fitz-Herbert Herbert
Bull the Jesuites after her decease disswaded the Romish-minded Subjects from yielding in any wise obedience to King James as their Soveraign and entr●d into a Treasonable Conspiracy with the Lord Cobham Lord Gray and others against him to imprison him for the ends aforesaid or destroy him pretending that King Iames was no King at all before his Coronation and that therefore they might by force of Arms lawfully surprise his person and Prince Henry his Son and imprison them in the Tower of London or Dover-Castle till they inforced them by duress to grant a free toleration of their Catholick Religion to remove some evil Counsellors from about them and to grant them a free Pardon for this violence or else they would put some further project in execution against them to their destruction But this Conspiricy being discovered The Traytors were apprehended arraighned condemned and Watson and Clerk two Jesuited Priests who had drawn them into this Conspiracy upon the aforesaid Pretext with some others executed as Traytors all the Iudges of England resolving that King Iames being right Heir to the Crown by descent was immediately upon the death of Queen Elizabeth actually possessed of the Crown and lawful King of England before any Proclamat●on or Coronation of him which are but Ceremonies as was formerly adjudged in the case of Queen Mary and Queed Iane 1 Mariae there being no Interregnum by the Law of ENGLAND as is adjudged declared by Act of Parliament 1 Iac. c. 1. worthy serious perusal 8. their horrid Gun-powder Treason Plot contrived fomented by Garnet Superiour of the English Jesuites Gerard Tensmod and other Jesuites who by their Apostolical power did not onely commend but absolve from all sin the other Jesuited Popish Conspirators and Faux The Sculdier who were their instruments to effect it Yea the Jesuitical Priests were so Atheistical as that they usually concluded their Masses with Prayers for the good success of this hellish Plot which was suddenly with no less then 36 Barrels of Gunpowder placed in a secret Vault under the House of Lords to have blown up and destroyed at once King James himself the Queen Prince Lords Spirituall and Temporal with the Commons assembled together in the Upper-House of Parliament upon the 5 of November Anno Dom. 1605. and then forcibly to have seised with armed men prepared for that purpose the persons of our late beheaded King then Dake of York and of the Lady Elizabeth his Sister if absent from the Parliament and not there destroyed with the rest that so there might be none of the Royal Line left to inherit the Crown of England Scotland and Ireland to the utter overthrow and subversion of the whole Royal Family Parliament State and Government of this Realm Which unparallel'd inhumane bloody Plot being miraculously discovered prevented the very day before its execution in perpetual detestation of it and of the Jesuites and their traiterous Romish Religion which both contrived and approved it the 5 day of November by the Statute of 3 Jacobi ch 1. was enacted to be had in perpetual Remembrance that all Ages to come might thereon meet together publickly throughout the whole Nation to render publick praises unto God for preventing this infernal Jesuitical Design and keep in memory this joyful Day of Deliverance for which end special forms of publick Prayers and Thankesgivings were then appointed and that Day ever since more or less annually observed till this present And it is worthy special observation that had this Plot taken effect It was agreed by the Jesuites and Popish Conspirators before-hand That the Imputation of this Treason should be cast upon the Puritans to make them more Odious as now they father all the Powder-Plots of this kinde which they have not onely laid but fully accomplished of late yeers against the King Prince Royal Posterity the Lords and Commons House our old English Parliaments and Government upon those Independents and Anabaptistical Sword-men whom they now repute and stile the most reformed PURITANS who were in truth but their meer under Instruments to effect them When as they originally laid the Plots as is clear by Campanella's Book De Monarchia Hisp ch 25. and Cardinal Richelieu his Instructions at his death to the King of France And it is very observable that as Courtney the Jesuite Rector of the English Jesuites Colledge at Rome did in the year 1641. when the name of Independents was scarce heard of in England openly affirm to some English Gentlemen and a Reverend Minister of late in Cornwal from whom I had this Relation then and there feasted by the English Jesuites in their Colledge That now at last after all their former Plots had miscarried they had found out a sure way to subvert and ruine the Church of England which was most formidable to them of all others by the Independents who immediately after by the Jesuites clandestine assistance infinitely encreased supplanted the Presbyterians by degrees got the whole power of the Army and by it of the Kingdom into their hands then subverted both the Presbyterian Government and Church of England in a great measure with the Parliament King and his Posterity as Monsieur Militiere a Jesuited French-Papist observes So some Independent Ministers Sectaries and Anabaptists ever since 1648. have neglected the observation of the fifth of November as I am credibly informed and refused to render publick thanks to God for the deliverance thereon contrary to the Act for this very reason which some of them have rendered That they would not mock God in publick by praising him for delivering the late King Royal Posterity and House of Lords from destruction then by Jesuites and Papists when as themselves have since destroyed and subverted them through Gods providence and repute it a special mercy and deliverance to the Nation from Tyranny and Bondage for which they have cause to bless the Lord Performing that for the Jesuites and Powder-Traytors which themselves could not effect The Lord give them grace and hearts to consider how much they acted the Jesuites and promoted their very worst Designes against us therein what infamy and scandal they have thereby drawn upon all zealous Professors of our Protestant Religion and what will they do in the end thereof 9. To omit all other Forraign instances cited in Speculum Jesuiticum p. 124 to 130. where you may peruse them at leisure By their poysoning King Iames himself in conclusion as some of them have boasted 10. By the Popes Nuntio's and a Conclave of Jesuites Conspiracy at London Anno 1640. to poyson our late King Charles himself as they had poysoned his Father with a poysoned Indian Nut kept by the Jesuites and shewed often by Conne the Popes Nuntio to the Discoverer of that Plot or else to destroy him by the Scotish wars and troubles raised for that very end by the Jesuites in case he refused to grant them a
are due to them and preserved for them shall be at the sole will and pleas●re of the Prince Army General and General Councel of Officers in their new High Courts of Injustice or other Martial Judicatories as now they are O consider consider seriously by these particulars to what a sad low despicable condition all English Parliaments are now for ever reduced and their pristine antient Priviledges Honor Freedom Power violently ravished from them by the late Army practises violences and rebellious insolencies against them never to be parallel'd in any age which hath really verified this clause in the Declaration of both Houses August 4. 1642. objected against the King and his popish Army in relation to the Parliaments Army purposely raised commissioned engaged for their defence That if the King by his Army may force this Parliament as the Parliaments Army both forced and dissolved it they may bid farewell to all Parliaments for ever receiving good by them And if Parliaments be lost they the People are lost their Laws are lost as well those lately made as in former times ALL WHICH WILL BE CVT IN SVNDER WITH THE SAME SWORD NOW DRAWN FOR THE DESTRVCTION OF THIS PARLIAMENT as we now find true by sad experience Athanasius Bishop of Alexandria about the year of our Lord 340. objected this as a great crime barbarism cruelty and violation of the priviledges of Councels to the Arrian Emperour Constantius That whensoever he called a Councel or Assembly of Bishops it was but for a shew For he would not permit them to be guided by the Ecclesiastical Canons but his Will alone must be their only Canon And when they advised him not to subvert the Ecclesiastical order nor bring the Arrian Heresie into the Church of God he would neither hear nor permit them to speak freely but grievously bending his brows if they had spoken cross to his designs and SHAKING HIS SWORD AT THEM COMMANDED THEM TO BE TAKEN AWAY Whereupon he thus infers What Liberty for perswasion or place for advice is there left when he that contradicteth shall for his labour lose either his Life or his Country Why hath the Emperour gathered so great a number of Bishops partly terrified with threats partly inticed with promises to condescend that they will not communicate wi●h Athanasius And Hilary Bishop of Poictou Ann. 360. in his first Book against this Tyrannical Arrian Emperour Constantius thus censures his violent proceedings of this kind to the subversion of the freedom and priviledge of Councils and their members Thou gatherest COUNCILS and when they be shut up together in one City thou TERRIFIEST THEM WITH THREATS THOU PINEST THEM WITH HVNGER THOU LAMEST THEM WITH COLD as the Army Officers did the secluded Members 6 and 7 Decemb. 1648. when they shut them up all night in Hell on the bare boards without beds in the cold and kept them fasting all the next day at Whitehall til 7 a clock at night Thou depravest them with Dissembling O THOU WICKED ONE what a mockery dost thou make of the Church and Councels Only Dogs return to their Vomit and thou compellest the Priests of Christ to sup up those things which they have disgorged and commandest them in their confessions to allow that WHICH BEFORE THEY CONDEMNED What Bishops hand hast thou left innocent What tongue hast thou not forced to falshood Whose heart hast thou not brought to the condemning of his former opinion Thou hast subjected all to thy will yea to thy violence And have not some swaying Army Officers by their frowns menaces frauds Swords open force upon the Parliament and its Members beyond all the presidents in any ages done the like and exceeded this Arrian Tyrant herein And is it not then high time for all friends to Parliaments to protest and provide against such detestable treasonable violences for the future destructive to all Parliaments if permitted or silently pretermitted without question exemplary censure righting of the imprisoned Members or any provision to redresse them for the future Our prudent Ancesters were so carefull to prevent all violence force arms and armed men in or near any places where Parliaments were held to terrifie over-awe or disturb their proceedings or Members That in the Parliament of 7 E. 1. as you may read in Rastals Abridgement Armour 1. Provision was made by the King by common consent of the Prelates Earls and Barons by a general act That in all Parliaments Treaties and other Assemblies which should be made in the Realm of England FOR EVER every man shall come without Force and without Armour well and peaceably to the honour of the King and of the peace of him and of his Realm and they together with the Commonalty of the Realm upon solemn advise declared That it belonged to the King and his part it is by his Royal Signiory strictly to defend Wearing of Armour and all other Force against his peace at all times when it shall please him especially at such times and in places where such Parliaments Treaties and Assemblies are held and to punish them which shall doe contrary according to the Laws and usage of the Realm And hereunto they are bound to aid the Kind as their Soveraign Lord at all seasons when need shall be Hereupon our Kings ever since this statute by virtue thereof and by the Law and Custom of the PARLIAMENT as Sir Edward Cook in his 4 Institutes c. 1. p. 14. informs us did at the beginning of every Parliament make a speciall Proclamation Prohibiting the bearing of Arms or weapons in or near the places where the Parliament sate under pain of forfeiting all they had Of which there are sundry presidents cited by Sir Edward Cook in his Margin whereof I shall transcribe but one which he omits and that is 6 E. 3. Rot. Parliament n. 2. 3. Because that before these days at the Parliaments and Counsels of our Lord the King Debates Riots and commotions have risen and been moved for that People have come to the places where Parliaments have been summoned and assembled armed with privy coats of plate spears swords long knives or daggers and other sort of arms by which the businesses of our Lord the King and his Realm have been impeached and the great men which have come thither by his command have been affrighted Our Lord the King willing to provide remedy against such mischiefs defendeth that no man of what estate or condition soever he be upon pain of forfeiting all that he may forfeit to the King shall be seen armed with a Coat of Male nor yet of plate nor with an Halberd nor with a spear nor sword nor long knife nor any other suspitious arms within the City of LONDON nor within the Suburbs thereof nor any place near the said City nor yet within the Palace of WEST MINSTER or any place near the said Palace by Land or Water under the foresaid pain except only such of the Kings men
a law to alter the property of the Subjects goods which is also against the Law In this and sundry other Arguments touching the Right of Impositions in the Commons House of Parliament by the Members of it arguing against them it was frequently averred and at last Voted and Resolved by the House 7. Jacobi That such Impositions without consent in Parliament were AGAINST THE ORIGINAL FVNDAMENTAL LAWS AND PROPERTY OF THE SVBJECT and Original Right Frame and Constitution of the Kingdome as the Notes and Journals of that Parliament evidence An expresse parliamentary Resolution in point for what I here assert 6. The sixth is A Conference desired by the Lords and had by a Committee of both Houses concerning the Rights and Priviledges of the Subject 3. Aprilis 4. Caroli 1628. entered in the Parliament Journal of 4. Caroli and since printed at London 1642. In the Introduction to which Conference Sir Dudley Digs by the Commons House Order used these expressions My good Lords whilest we the Commons out of our good affections were seeking for money we found I cannot say a ●ook of the Law but many A FVNDAMENTAL POINT THEREOF NEGLECTED AND BROKEN which hath occasioned our desire of this Conference wherein I am first commanded to shew unto your Lordships in general That the Laws of England are grounded on Reason more ancient than Books consisting much in unwritten Customs yet so full of Justice and true Equity that your most honorable Predecessors and Ancestors propugned them with a NOLVMVS MVTARI and so ancient that from the Saxons dayes notwithstanding the injuries and ruines of time they have continued in most parts the same c. Be pleased then to know THAT IT IS AN UNDOUBTED AND FUNDAMENTALL POINT OF THIS SO ANCIENT COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND THAT THE SUBJECT HATH A TRUE PROPERTY IN HIS GOODS AND POSSESSIONS which doth preserve as sacred that MEVM and TVVM that is the Nurse of Industry and the Mother of Courage and without which there can be no Justice of which MEVM and TVVM is the proper object But the VNDOVBTED BIRTH-RIGHT OF FREE SVBJECTS hath lately not a little been invaded and prejudiced by pressures the more grievous because they have been pursued by IMPRISONMENT contrary to the Franchises of this Land c. Which the Commons House proved by many Statutes and Records in all ages in that Conference to the full satisfaction of the Lords House since published in print 7. The Seventh is The Vote the whole House of Commons 16. December 1640. Nullo contradicente entered in their Journall and printed in Diurnall Occurrences page 13. That the Canons made in the Convocation Anno 1640. ARE AGAINST THE FUNDAMENTAL LAWS OF THE REALM the Property and Liberty of the Subject the Right of Parliament and containe diverse things tending to Faction and Sedition Seconded in their Remonstrances of 15. December 1641. 8. The eight Authority is The Votes of both Houses of Parliament concerning the security of the Kingdome of ENGLAND and Dominion of Wales 15. Martii 1641. Ordered by the Lords and Commons in Parliament to be forthwith printed and published as they were then by themselves and afterwards with other Votes and Orders Resolved upon the Question nemine contradicente That in case of extream danger and his Majesties refusall the Ordinance agreed on by both Houses for the MILITIA to secure the Houses Members and Priviledges of Parliament and Kingdome against ARMED-VIOLENCE since brought upon them by the MILITIA of the Army doth obliege the people and ought to be obeyed by the FUNDAMENTAL LAWS OF THIS KINGDOME A very vain and delusory Vote if there be no such Law as some now affirm 9. The nineth punctuall Authority is a Second Declaration of the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament concerning the Commission of Array Printed by their speciall Order of 12. January 1642. Wherein are these observable passages The main drift of all the answer is to maintain That the King by the Common Law may grant such a Commission of Array as this is upon this ground because it s for the Defence of the Kingdome And that the power which he hath to grant it by the Common law is not taken away by the Petition of Right or any former Statute but the King notwithstanding any of them may charge the Subject for Defence of the Kingdome so as the charge imposed come not to himself nor to his particular advantage These grounds thus laid extend not to the Commission of Array alone but to all other charges that his Ma●esty shall impose upon his Subjects upon pretence of Defence of the Kingdome for there is the same reason of Law for any other charge that is pretended for Defence as for this If his Majesty by the Common Law may charge his Subjects to finde Arms and other things in the Commission enjoyned because they are for Defence of the Kingdom by the same reason of Law he may command his People to build Castles Forts and Bulwarks and after to maintain them with Garrisons Arms and Victuals at their own charges And by the same reason he may compel his subjects to finde Ships and furnish them with Men Ammunition and Victuals and to finde Souldiers pay Coat and Conduct money provide victuals for Souldiers and all other things NECESSARY FOR AN ARMY these things being as necessary for Defence as any thing that can be done in execution of this Commission And for that exposition of the Petition of Right and other Statutes therein noted if it should hold doth it not overthrow as well the Petition it self at all other Laws that have been made for the subjects benefit against Taxes and other charges either 〈…〉 or any other Parliaments These Positions thus laid down and maintained Do shake the Fundamental Laws of the Kingdome the ancient Birth right of every Subject both for the Property of his Goods and Liberty of his Person Nay they strike at the root of Parliaments What need his Majesty call Parliaments to provide for Defence of the Realm when himself may compell his subjects to defend it without Parliaments If these grounds should hold what need the subjects grant subsidies in Parliament for Defence of the Kingdome in time of reall danger if the King for Defence at any times when he shall onely conceive or pretend danger may impose Charges upon his Subjects without their Consent in Parliament Upon that which hath been said in this and our former Declaration we doubt not but all indifferent men will be satisfied that this Commission of Array is full of danger and inconvenience to the Subjects of England AND AGAINST THE FUNDAMENTAL● LAWES OF THE LAND both for PROPERTY OF GOODS AND LIBERTY OF PERSON c. As it is against THE FUNDAMENTAL LAWS OF THE REALM so no statute makes it good c. And the Lords and Commons do upon the whole matter here conclude That they are very much aggrieved that
Kingdome And if it hath not been put in execution as he alledgeth this two hundred and fourty years it was not for want of LAW but that all that time had not bred a man bold enough to commit such Crimes as these which is a circumstance much aggravating his Offence and making him no lesse liable to punishment he is THE ONELY MAN that in so long a time hath ventured UPON SUCH A TREASON AS THIS Thus far Mr. John Pym in the Name and by the Order and Authority of the whole Commons House in Parliament which I wish all those who by their Words Actions Counsels and printed Publications too have traiterously endeavoured to subvert the Fundamentall Laws Liberties Government Parliaments of England and Ireland and to introduce an Arbitrary and Tyrannical Government against law as much as ever Strafford did yea far out stripped him therein even since his execution in all particulars for which he was beheaded would now seriously lay to heart and speedily reform lest they equal or exceed him in conclusion in capital punishments for the same or endlesse Hellish Torments 13. The next Authority I shall produce in point is The Speech and Declaration of Master Oliver St. John at a Conference of both Houses of Parliament concerning SHIPMONEY upon Judge Finches Impeachment of High Treason January 14. 1640. printed by the Commons Order London 1641. wherein he thus declares the sense of the Commons p. 12. c. That by the Judges opinions forecited concerning Ship-mony THE FUNDAMENTAL LAWS OF THE REALM CONCERNING OUR PROPERTIES and OUR PERSONS ARE SHAKEN whose Treasonable Offence herein he thus aggravates page 20. c. The Judges as is declared in the Parliament of 11 R. 2. are the Executors of the Statutes and of the Judgments and Ordinances of Parliament They have made themselves the EXECUTIONERS OF THEM they have indeavoured the DESTRUCTION OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF OUR LAWS and LIBERTIES Holland in the Low Countries lies under the Sea the superfices of the Land is lower than the superficies of the Sea It is Capitall therefore for any man to cut the Banks because they defend the Country Besides our own even Forraign Authours as Comines observes That the Statute DE TALLAGIO and the other Old Laws are the Sea Wals and Banks which keep the Commons from the inundation of the Prerogative These Pioners have not onely undermined these banks but have levelled them even with the ground If one that was known to be Hostis Patriae had done this though the Dammage be the same yet the Guilt is lesse but the Conservatores Riparum the Overseers intrusted with the Defence of these Banks for them to destroy them the breach of Trust aggravates nay alters the nature of the offence Breach of Trust though in a private Person and in the least things is odious amongst all men much more in a publike Person in things of great and publike concernment because GREAT TRUST BINDES THE PARTY TRUSTED TO GREATEST CARE AND FIDELITY It is TREASON in the Constable of Dover Castle to deliver the Keys to the known enemies of the Kingdome Whereas if the House-keeper of a private person deliver possession to his Adversary it is a crime scarce punishable by Law The Judges under his Majesty are the Persons trusted with the Laws and in them with the Lives Liberties and Estates of the whole Kingdome This Trust of all we have is primarily from his Majesty and from him delegated to the Judges His Majesty at his Coronation is bound by his Oath TO EXECUTE JUSTICE TO HIS PEOPLE ACCORDING TO THE LAWES thereby to assure the People of the faithfull performance of his GREAT TRUST His Majesty again as he trusts the Judges with the performance of this part of his Oath so doth he likewise exact another Oath of them for their due execution of Justice to the people according to the Laws hereby the Judges stand intrusted with this part of his Majesties Oath If therefore the Judges shall doe wittingly against the Law they doe not onely break their own Oaths and therein the Common Faith and Trust of the whole Kingdome but do as much as in them lies asperse blemish the sacred Person of his Majesty with the odious and hatefull sin of Perjury My Lords the hainousnesse of this offence is most legible in the severe punishment which former Ages have inflicted upon those Judges who have broken any part of their Oaths wittingly though in things not so dangerous to the Subject as in the case in question Sir Thomas Wayland Chief Justice of the Common Pleas 17. E. 1. was attainted of Felony for taking Bribes and his Lands and Goods forfeited as appears in the Pleas of Parliament 18 E. 1. and he was banished the Kingdome as unworthy to live in the State against which he had so much offended Sir William Thorpe Chief Justice of the Kings Bench in Edward the thirds time having of five persons received five severall Bribes which in all amounted to one hundred pounds was for this alone adjudged to be hanged and all his Goods and Lands forfeited The reason of the Judgment is entered in the Roll in these words Quia praedictus Willielmus Thorp qui Sacramentum Domini Regis erga populum suum habuit ad custodiendum fregit malitiose falsò rebelliter quantum in ipso fuit There is a notable Declaration in that Judgement that this judgement was not to be drawn into example against any other Officers who should break their Oaths but onely against those qui praedictum Sacramentum fecerunt fregerunt habent Leges Angliae ad custodiendum That is onely to the Judges Oaths who have the Laws intrusted unto them This Judgment was given 24 E. 3. The next year in Parliament 25 E. 3. Numb 10. it was debated in Parliament whether this Judgement was legall Et nullo contradicente it was declared TO BE JUST AND ACCORDING TO THE LAW and the same Judgement may be given in time to come upon the like occasion This case is in point That it is death for any JVDGE wittingly to break his OATH in any part of it This OATH of THORP is entred in the Roll and the same Verbatim with the Judges OATH in 18 Edw. 3. and is the same which the Judges now take And let those who have taken the same Oath with the OATHES OF SUPREMACY and ALLEGIANCE too remember and apply this PRESIDENT lest others do it for them Your Lordships will give me leave to observe the differences between that and the case in question 1. That of Thorp was onely a selling of the Law by Retaile to these five persons for he had five severall Bribes of these five persons the Passage of the Law to the rest of the Subjects for ought appears was free and open But these Opinions are a conveyance of the Law by whole sale and that not
Revenues Inheritances Rights and Perquisits of the Crown of England originally setled thereon for the ●ase and exemption of the people from all kind of Taxes payments whatsoever unlesse in case of extraordinary necessity and for defraying all the constant ordinary expences of the Kingdome as the expences of the Kings houshold Court Officers Judges Ambassadors Guard Garrisons Navy and the like ought not to be sold alienated given away or granted from it to the prejudice of the Crown and burdenning of the people And that all Sales Alienations Gifts or Grants thereof to the empairing of the publique Revenue or prejudice of the Crown and people are void in Law and ought to be resumed and repealed by our Parliaments and Kings as they have freqeuntly been in all former ages For the Readers fuller satisfaction in each of these propositions some of which I must in the ensuing Chapter but briefly touch for brevity sake having elsewhere fully debated them in print I shall especially recommend unto him the perusall of such Tractates and Arguments formerly published wherein each of them hath been fully discussed which hee may peruse at his best leasure The First of these Fundamentalls which I intend principally to insist on is fully asserted debated confirmed by 13. H. 4. f. 14. By Fortescue Lord Chief Justice and Chancellor of England de Laudibus Legum Angliae dedicated by him to King Henry the 6. f. 25. c. 36. By a Learned and necessary Argument against Impositions in the Parliament of 7. Jacobi by a late reverend Judge Printed at London 1641. By Mr. William Hakewell in his Liberty of the Subject against Impositions maintained in an Argument in the Parliament of 7 Jacobi Printed at London 1641. By Judge Crooks and Judge Huttons Arguments concerning Ship-mony both Printed at London 1641. By the Case of Ship-mony briefly discussed London 1640. By M. St. Johns Argument and Speech against Ship-mony Printed at London 1641. By Sir Edward Cook in his 2 Institutes p. 46. and 57. to 64. and 528 to 537. By the first and second Remonstrance of the Lords Commons in Parliament against the Commission of Array Exact Collection p. 386. to 398. and 850. to 890. and by my own Humble Remonstrance against Ship-mony London 1643. The Fourth part of the Sovereign Power of Parliaments and Kingdomes p. 14. to 26. my Legall Vindication of the Liberties of England against Illegall Taxes c. London 1649. and by the Records and Statutes cited in the ensuing Chapter referring for the most part to the first Proposition The second third and fourth of them are largely debated and confirmed by a Conference desired by the Lords and had by a Committee of both Houses concerning the Rights and Priviledges of the Subject 3 Aprilis 4 Caroli Printed at London 1642. By Sir Edward Cook in his Institutes on Magna charta c. 29. p. 45. to 57. By the first second Remonstrance of the Lords and Commons against the Commission of Array Exact Collection p. 386. and 850. to 890. By Judge Crooks and Judge Huttons Arguments against Ship-mony By Sir Robert Cotton his Posthuma p. 222. to 269. By my Breviate of the Prelates Encroachments on the Kings Prerogative and the Subjects Liberties p. 138. my New Discovery of the Prelates Tyranny p. 137. to 183. and some of the ensuing Statutes and records ch 3. See 1 H. 4. rot Parl. n. 22 23 24 26 28 43 44 47. The Fift and Sixt of them are fully cleared vindicated in and by the Prologues of all our Councills Statutes Laws before and since the Conquest By 1. H. 4. Rot. Parl. n. 33 34 36. an excellent full president Sir Edward Cooks 4 Institutes ch 1. Mr. Cromptons Iurisdiction of Courts Title High Court of Parliament Mr. St. Johns speech against the Ship-mony Judges p. 32 33. my Plea for the Lords my Levellers levelled my Ardua Regni my Epistle before my Speech in Parliament my Memento my Sovereign Power of Parliaments and Kingdomes part 1 2 3 4. my Legal Vindication against illegal Taxes and pretended Acts of Parliament London 1649. Prynnethe Member reconciled to Prynne the Bar●ester Printed the same year My Historical Collection of the Ancient great Councils and Parliaments of England London 1649. My Truth triumphing over Falshood Antiquity over Novel●y London 1645. 3 E. 1. c. 5 4 E. 3. c. 14. 36 E. 3. c. 10. 1 H. 4. c. 3 4. 5 R. 2. Stat. 2. c. 4. Rastal tit Parliament 1 H. 4. Rot. Parl. n. 21. 22. 48. 70. 31 H. 6. c. 1. 39 H. 6. c. 1. Rot. Parl. n. 8. 17 E. 4. c. 7. expresse in point and some of the Records hereafter transcribed In this I shall be more sparing because so fully confirmed in these and other Treatises The Seventh is ratified by Sir Edward Cooks 1. Institutes p. 97 98. 4 Institutes p. 89. and 5. report Cawdries case of the Kings Ecclesiasticall Laws Rastals Abridgement of Statutes Tit Provisors Praemunire Rome and other Records and Statutes in the ensuing Chapter The Eight is verified by the Statutes quoted in the Margin to it and by other Records in the third Chapter The Ninth and Tenth are fully debated in my Soveraign Power of Parliaments and Kingdomes par 2. p. 3. to 34. part 4. p. 1. to 13. and 162. to 170. touched in Sir Robert Cottons Posthuma p. 174. 179. confirmed by sundry Presidents in the next Chapter by 1 H. 4. Rot. Parl. n 32. How all and every of these Fundamentall Liberties Rights Franchises Laws have been unparalledly violated subverted in all and every particular of late years beyond all Presidents in the worst of former ages even by their greatest pretended Propugners their own Printed Edicts Instruments Ordinances Papers together with their illegall Oppressions Taxes Excises Imposts Sequestrations Rapines Violences unjust Proceedings of all kinds will sufficiently evidence if compared with the premised Propositions Not to insist on any fore-past illegall Imposts Taxes Excises under which the nation lately groaned imposed on us by unparliamentary Junctoes or the Army Officers alone from Anno 1648 to 1653. without any real Parliament by their own armed Iurisdiction I shall here instance onyl in 3. or 4 particulars relating wholly to the First Proposition being of most generall greatest present and future concernment of all other to the whole English Nation at this very instant most intollerably oppressed grieved by them directly sweeping away all their Fundamentall Right of Property and consequentially all their Liberty of person Laws Charters at once and that in perpetuity beyond all hopes of Future redemption if not timely prevented by the Vniversality Body of the Realm or their Trustees The first of them is the present imposition and continuance of the strange oppressive monstrous general high Tax of EXCISE imposed on most native and forreign Commodities throughout England and its Dominions which as it was a meer Stranger to all our Ancestors and those now living till within these few years so it was