Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
lord_n henry_n king_n thomas_n 15,514 5 7.4520 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A38171 Votes of both Houses of Parliament with sundry articles or acts of Parliament to confirm the same taken out of the records of the tower. England and Wales. Parliament. 1642 (1642) Wing E2446_VARIANT; ESTC R172037 3,610 1

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

the aforesaid Lords and all others which were assenting to the making of the said Ordinance Statute and Commission unto the destruction of the King and his Kingdom Article 39 Item The said Robert de Vere Duke of Ireland false traytor to the King and Kingdom assembled a great power of men at Arms and Archers of the Counties of Lancaster Chester and Wales and of divers other places to the intent to have trayterously destroyed so farre as in him lay the Lord Thomas Duke of Gloucester Constable of England Henry Earl of Derby Richard Earl of Arundel and Surrey Thomas Earl of Warwick and Thomas Earl Marshall and other loyall Subjects of our Lord the King as well to the destruction and annihilation of our Lord the King and of His whole Kingdom and so he rid with great power and force of men at Arms and Archers from the County of Chester through the Kingdom till he came neer to a certain place which place is called Rotcotbridge neer to Cotswold inchroaching to himself Royall power caused the banner of the King to be displayed in his company contrary to the dignity of the King and of his Crown at which time the said Duke of Ireland and his company were by the grace of God disappointed of their wicked purpose Memorand That the same Roll containing the Petition of the aforesaid appeal distinguished by Articles as above by quotation is marked was delivered in the present Parliament by the aforesaid Duke and Earls appellants And Memorand that afterwards in the same Parliament the 1. 2. 11. 15. 17. Articles aforesaid are declared and adjudged treason and every one of them is declared and adjudged treason And that that which is contained in the 22. Article of the aforesaid Articles concerning the levying of men to make warre and destroy the Lords Lieges of the King is likewise declared and adjudged treason And that the 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 37. 38. 39. Articles aforesaid are also declared and adjudged treason and every one of them is declared and adjudged treason as is set down in the Record and the processe annexed and affixed to this Roll on the back side of the said Roll by these words Quelle petition levee in presence du Roy nre dit Sr. c. This judgement was confirmed by Act of Parliament 11. R. 2. cap. 3. 1. H. 4. cap. 3. and 4. of the old Printed Statutes and the said Statute 1. H. 4. repeals and makes void the Parliament of 21. R. 2. and all the proceedings thereof in which forc'd and tumultuary Parliament the Acts of the Parliament of 11. R. 2. had been reversed Rot. Parl. 11. Rich. 2. MEmorandum quod iste idem Rotulus continens petitionem appelli supradicti per articulos distinctè pro ut superius per quotationem annotatur liberatus fuit in praesenti Parliamento per praedict Ducem Comites appellantes Et mem quod postea in eodem Parliamento primus secundus undecimus quintus decimus decimus septimus articuli praedicti declarantur adjudicantur proditio eorum quilibet declaratur adjudicatur proditio quod illud quod continetur in vicessimo secundo articulo praedictorum articulorum tangens levationem gentium ad guerrand destruend dominos legeos legis similiter declaratur adjudicatur proditio Et quod vicessimus octavus vicessimus nonus tricessimus tricessimus primus tricessimus secundus tricessimus septimus tricessimus octavus tricessimus nonus articuli predicti declarantur Proditio eorum quilibet declaratur adjudicatur Proditio prout annotatur in Recordo processu huic Rotul consutis annexis In dorso Ejusdem Rotuli per haec verba Quelle petition lui in presence du Roy nostre dit Henneres c. Crom at per Statut. 1. H. 4. cap. 3. 4. In the old Printed Statutes London Printed for Joseph Hunscott 1642