Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
lord_n	great_a	king_n	see_v	19,681	5	3.7569	3	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A63621	A True narrative of the whole proceedings at the Sessions-House in the Old-Bayly, begun on Thursday the 12th of this instance July, 1683, against Captain Thomas Walcot, William Lord Russel, William Hone, Joyner, John Rouse, Captain William Blage, for conspiring the death of the King, &c. as also, an account of the tryals of several notorious malefactors for treason, felonies, &c., together with the judgment of the Court upon the same.		1683 (1683)	Wing T2840B; ESTC R12722	3,835	5

A TRUE NARRATIVE Of the whole PROCEEDINGS AT THE Sessions-House IN THE OLD-BAYLY Begun on Thursday the 12th of this Instant July 1683. against Captain Thomas Walcot William Lord Russel William Hone Joyner John Rouse Captain Willam Blage for conspiring the Death of the King c. As also an Account of the Tryals of several notorious Malefactors for Treason Felonies c. together with the Judgment of the Court upon the same The First Day THE first that came were three Persons accused for Clipping which being positively proved upon them by Persons that found them at work near Turn stile in Holbourne and several pieces of Money brought into Court clipped as also Crucibles c. they were found Guilty of the Indictment The next that came on were the two Persons that robbed Captain Hine of a considerable Sum of Money near Islington which being likewise proved they were brought in Guilty They were also Indicted for that being pursued on Suspition of the said Robbery they shot one man dead upon the place and wounded several of which they were found Guilty The Grand Juries of London having found the Bills against James Duke of Monmouth Ford Lord Gray Sir Thomas Armestrong Robert Ferguson William Lord Russel William Hone Joyner John Rowse Captain William Blage Captain Thomas Walcoat c. the five last were severally arraigned for High-Treason The first that came on was Captain Thomas Walcoat whose Indictment specified that he the second of March last and at divers other times together with many other Traytors conspired the Death of the King to depose him from his Right and Title to the Kingdom of England to subvert the Government raise Rebellions c. Upon this Mr. North Mr. Attorney General and Sir George Gefferies gave the Particulars of the Evidence that was to be produced insisting much on the Hainousness of the Fact and displaying it in its proper Colours and added that if the several Particulars specified in the Indictment were proved upon the Prisoner they would shew themselves True English men and Christians to find it The first Witness was Collonel Rumsey who deposed that there had been several Trayterous Conspiracies and Consults to take away the Life of the King and that Captain Walcoat was present at the said Consults and consented to the Models laid and Propositions made to effect that Horrid Treason Nay that they were so Cock-sure of their Success that they had already framed a Model of Government that was to ensue That an Ambuscade being to be placed at Rumbold's House the Maltster near Hogsden the said Captain Walcoat went to the House to see if it was convenient Mr. Keeling Boarn and West deposed much to the same effect and further that their New-market Project not being compassed they were to attempt it at his going to Windsor at the Play-house Bull-Feast c. all which was allowed of and encouraged by the Prisoner Then two Letters were produced under his own hand the one to Sir Lionel Jenkins to implore the Pardon of His Majesty and he would discover the whole Intreague the other seized by Captain Richardson directed to a Friend to perswade Collonel Rumsey c. to be favourable in their Evidence His Answers were very insignificant he alledging that he was Lame but yet could go to see Rumbald's House and that though he had often associated with the Conspirators yet he hoped it could amount to no more than Misprision of Treason but the Jury after some consideration brought him in Guilty of the Indictment The Second Day The first that came on this Morning was William Hone who desired that the Plea he made yesterday might be allowed which was that he was Guilty of a Conspiracy but not of providing Arms to raise a Rebellion which was not allowed and therefore pleaded not Guilty to the whole This Indictment imported that as a False Traytor he had Conspired to depose the King of his Crown and Dignity and that particularly at a Consult the second of March 25. Car. Secundi in the Parish of St. Michael Bishaw where were present Rumbold Ferguson Holliway Roe Francis and Richard Goodenough and many other of the Trayterous Conspirators and that when they spoke of killing the King and Duke they called the former Black-bird and the latter Gold-finch the Prisoner Confessing he did conspire the Death of the Black-bird but not the Gold-finch Mr. Keeling being sworn said that the Prisoner came acquainted with him by Goodenough and that he was one in the intended Assassination of His Majesty and Duke of York Mr. West insisted much to the same effect and Sir Nicholas Butler deposed that he confessed Matter in relation to the said Horrid Conspiracy which being plain proof to the Jury they brought him in Guilty of the Indictment without going from the Bar. The Lieutenant of the Tower having with great Guards brought the Lord Russel from the Tower surrendered him up the Sheriff North who immediately brought him up to the Court where his Indictment was read viz. for Conspiring the death of the King c. with James Duke of Monmouth Ford Lord Gray Sir Thomas Armestrong and Robert Ferguson to which having pleaded not Guilty and desired longer time which the Kings Councel opposed he excepted against the Jury as not being Free-holders which being a matter of Law the Court appointed Mr. Pollexfen Mr. Holt and Mr. Ward to argue it for his Lordship which being done the Court over-ruled it whereupon the Jury was called two and thirty of which his Lordship peremptorily challenged The Jury being Sworn and the Indictment read the Kings Council learnedly opened it and dilated much on the Hainousness of the Crimes alledged against him Collonel Rumsey being the first Witness deposed that the Prisoner together with the Persons aforesaid being at Mr. Shepherds a Vintner in the Parish of St. Nicholas Bashaw he was sent to them by the Earl of Shaftsbury to know what forwardness they were in as to an Insurrection and that they received answer that Mr. Trenchard who had promised to raise 1000 Foot and 4000 Horse to be aiding in the Design had certified them by a Letter that it could not as yet be effected because some would not rush on such a great Concern without deliberation correspondent to it Mr. Shepherd then deposed that being a Vintner the persons before mentioned being come to his house they desired a private room where he heard the consulting about an Insurrection and to his best remembrance there was a discourse of seizing the Guards The last was the Lord Howard of Escreek who upon Oath declared the Conspiracy at large wherein he said the Earl of Shaftsbury was the Contriver of it that he was dissatisfied in the coldness of the Lords in it that he had 10000 men in the City at his beck that divers Messages passed betwixt them but it being put off from time to time the Earl at last went for Holland to secure himself where he died that Aaron Smith

was dispatched to Scotland to perswade the Gentry to rise that they had constituted a Committee of six which consisted of the Lord Russel Lord Howard Duke of Monmouth Earl of Essex Mr. Sidney and Mr. Hambden the younger Sidney was sent by them to see what posture the Guards were in that they had Money ready to carry on the Design but expected more from Holland The Lord Russel confessed he was at the Consult but came late that he went to Shepherds only to tast Wines he then produced several Persons of Quality in his behalf touching his Reputation but the Jury after some consideration brought him in Guilty Then Rouse came on against whom it was sworn much to the same effect who was also brought in Guilty of the Indictment for endeavouring to kill the King c. Captain Blage was arraigned for that his part was to seize the Tower but several Circumstances appearing to the Jury of his Innocence they brought him in not Guilty The Third Day This Morning the Lord Russel was brought up to receive Judgment and being asked what he had to say why it should not be given he desired his Indictment might be read to him again which was accordingly done and therein he made an Exception but it being frivolous in the Opinion of the Court Mr. Attorney demanded Judgment in the King's Name which was accordingly done as the Law in such cases has prescribed the Recorder making a short but pathetical Speech Then Captain Walcoat William Hone and John Rouse were brought to the Bar the two first desiring only the liberty of their Friend to visit them which was granted and the last run on in a strange harangue of his Innocence and thereupon they immediately received the same Judgment Capt. Blage being brought in not Guilty by the Jury he was then discharged Then the Grand Jury for London presented an Address of Thanks to the Lord-Mayor for His Majesties deliverance from the Hellish Plot and humbly desired his Lordship to present it in their Names which his Lordship accordingly promised Then Thomas Vdal a Weaver in Spittle fields made his appearance who was bound over for making several Pieces of several sorts of Ribbon wherein was the Motto No Slavery no Popery and being asked by whose order he made them replyed by order of one Harrington who never called for them and is not to be found and proving himself a Loyal Church-man was discharged The first that was called among the rest of the Malefactors was Jonathan Ball for stealing Goods to the value of 5 l. of which he was found Guilty Elizabeth Mason and Margaret Nicolson were Indicted for Clippers but there being no positive Proof the Jury acquited them Francis English an Inn-keeper Indicted for stealing a Horse was cleared One P●unton an Apprentice was Indicted for stealing Silver Salts Spoons and Forks from his Master but the Jury acquitted him Rachel Bash and Sarah Day were Indicted for stealing a Yard of Bone-lace to the value of 1 s. 6 d. but were cleared Jane Dulton of Sunbury in Middlesex was Indicted for a Witch and several strange things were alledged against her by a great number of Witnesses and particularly her bewitching Ann Collins to death but the Minister of the Town giving a satisfactory account to the Court of her Faith confessed to him and often Prayer with him she was acquitted One Gratrix and Spittle were Indicted for robbing one Mr. Pits an Officer of the Court of about 9 l. and they being known old Offenders they were found Guilty Richard Fennel and George James confessed their Felonies and Robberies Anthony Simson a Cripple of the Hospital was Indicted for killing a Fellow-Cripple by throwing a Bed-staff but was cleared John Scot a Carman and Samuel Coldicol were Indicted for killing Mary Edwards in St. Pauls Church-yard by the fall of a Bale of Paper but the Jury acquitted them Lastly Elizabeth Hall was Indicted for stealing Goods to the value of 5 l. from Henry-Tayler of which she was cleared And there being much business remaining still on Middlesex side the Court thought fit to adjourn till Munday London Printed by George Croom in Thames-street over against Baynards-Castle 1683.