Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n
Text snippets containing the quad
|
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
|
A63327
|
A true account of the irregular proceedings at Guild-Hall, in relation both to the election and swearing Dudley North, and Peter Rich, esquires, sheriffs of London and Middlesex, in the year 1682
|
|
1689
(1689)
|
Wing T2378; ESTC R222521
|
6,710
|
4
|
A TRUE ACCOUNT OF THE Irregular Proceedings At GVILD-HALL In Relation both to the ELECTION and SWEARING Dudley North and Peter Rich Esquires Sheriffs of London and Middlesex in the Year 1682. THE Citizens of London having a Legal Right to Chuse Sheriffs for the said City and for the County of Middlesex did in their Common Hall on the 24th of June 1682 duly Elect by View Thomas Papillon and John Dubois Esquires Sheriffs but a Poll being demanded for Dudley North and Ralph Box Esquires and the same being granted upon the Poll the majority fell upon the said Tho. Papillon and John Dubois Afterwards Sir John Moor then Lord Mayor contrary to Right and the Trust reposed in him combining with several other Persons did admit the said Ralph Box to Fine for Sheriff as if he had been Legally Chosen whereas he really was not And to carry on the Design then on foot to destroy the Rights of the said Citizens did by Armed Force of the Trained Bands commanded by Lieutenant Collonel Quiney cause the said Dudley North and Peter Rich to be sworn Sheriffs of London and Middlesex altho the said Dudley North and Peter Rich were not Chosen either by the View or by the Poll. The manner of their Admission and Swearing being formerly Publish'd is as followeth The 27th of of September at night the Lord Mayor issued out Tickets to the Aldermen in these Words Sir Your Worship is desired to be at a Court of Aldermen at Guild-Hall on Thursday next at nine of the Clock in the forenoon in your violet Gown and Cloak being the twenty eighth of September Accordingly several Aldermen appeared at Guild-hall and it being the day appointed for the Swearing of Sheriffs they attended Thomas Papillon and John Dubois Esquires into the Guild-Hall at the Hour appointed by the Lord Mayor which they found guarded by Foot-Companies of the Trained Bands a thing expresly contrary to the English Constitutions which have been jealous of nothing more than the preserving Elections free from force or terror some whereof were posted at the Doors and presented their Muskets tho there was no refusal of entrance but rather an opening of the Files and some respect shewn So all the aforesaid Aldermen passed into the Council Chamber where having staid a little while and supposing my Lord Mayor might go up to the Husting directly they went down into the Hall towards the Hustings-door and there abode some time attending his Lordship's coming the Soldiers with respect giving way But Lieutenant Collonel Quiney who was absent at their entry came up to them very much concerned and made several turns without speaking to them but commanded the Soldiers several times to stand to their Arms and so withdrew But after a quarter of an hour he came back again and commanded the Soldiers to face about and so alter'd their Figure and to advance so as to encompass or imprison the Aldermen for there was not six foot square left them to stand upon Whereupon Quiney said to the Aldermen I have a Command from the Lieutenancy to keep the Hall clear and suffer none to be here till my Lord Mayor comes Upon this several Aldermen demanded to see the Order being ready to obey all Legal commands and asked him whether he did not know that they were Magistrates of the City and could believe it reached them To which he answered I have none but it is with the Major of the Regiment and I do know you and you must remove Further the Aldermen declared they were summoned to wait on my Lord Mayor at the Guild-Hall and there attended in all peaceableness whereupon he withdrew again for some time but returning said Gentlemen You MUST withdraw I have a command to require it But being again demanded to shew his VVarrant or Order he answer'd in a great heat That he would shew none nor to none SUCH AS THEY Then laying hands first on Sir P. W's shoulder who stood next to him he said Sir You must remove and called on his Soldiers to advance close to the Bar so as to thrust them away Sir P. W. only replied to him We are in a lawful place and on our Duty desiring the other Aldermen that were present and the soldiers to take notice of the violence offered And surely it was such as is scarcely to be parallell'd especially in a well-governed City that their Civil Magistrates should be so affronted in their own Room But Quiney answered He cared not for Witness he would justify what he did having Orders from the Lieutenancy so to do Then he took hold on Sir J. L. who was leaning on the Bar and with very great and repeated Violence pulled him from off the Step and had like to have thrown him down who demanded still by what Order he did it And that he would shew the same But he replied again He would show none Then he took hold of Sir J. S. and Sir T. G. and Ald. C. who likewise demanding to see his Orders were answered to the same purpose as aforesaid Hereupon all the Aldermen desiring the Soldiers who were present to take notice of the Assaults and Misdemeanours of the said Quiney they withdrew into the West part of the Hall where divers Persons were walking viz. Withers Wiseman Nicels Steventâ—n c. some of them being of the Lieutenancy and others not To whom it was said Did not you see the Misdemeanours of Quiney But they instead of resenting the Indignities offered to those worthy Aldermen who had served the City to so great a degree that the Mouth of Malice it self may be stopt answered He followed 〈…〉 Oâ—ders of the Lieutenancy Then it was asked them being Acquaintance How they came by that Freedom in the Hall when the Aldermen were so ill treated there Whereupon they answered They were of the Lieutenancy and attended the coming of my Lord Mayor The which the Aldermen told them they also did but had not the same Civil Treatment Not long after came my Lord Mayor to whom these Aldermen joyned themselves and went up out of the Great Hall into the Council-Chamber and Mr. Papillon and Mr. Dubois with them where being entred the first Words my Lord Mayor said were these viz. Gentlemen here are fine doings to go and Swear Sheriffs and I not present Whereunto Sir J. L. answer'd Whoever told your Lordship so misinform'd your Lordship we came very peaceably to the Hall to perform our Duty and know well what it is to Administer an Oath and had not the least Intention of such a thing but to lay our claim by presenting Sheriffs Sir R. C. also told his Lordship He ought to be angry with those that had given him false Information rather than with these he was misinformed of and that nothing was intended or designed contrary to his Lorships frequent and publick Declaration which was That the matter should be determin'd by Law and it was advised that could not be done unless Mr. Papillon
came out of the Council-Chamber you said what we had to say on this Subject we might speak on the Hustings and therefore we claim it of right to be heard But he refused all and ordered to proceed in administring the Oath to North and Rich whereupon the duly Elected Sheriffs and Six Aldermen withdrew protesting against all the Irregular and Illegal Proceedings A Paper delivered to the Lord Mayor and Court of Aldermen purporting the Report made by those Worthy Citizens appointed to make a Scrutiny of the Poll taken for Lord Mayor on the behalf of Sir Tho. Gould and Alderman Cornish Octob. 24. 1682. London October 24. 1682. WE whose Names are here under-written having been appointed on the behalf of Sir Thomas Gould and Alderman Cornish to inspect the Poll lately taken for the Election of a Lord Mayor for the Year ensuing between Sir VVilliam Pritchard Sir Henry Tulse and the said Sir Thomas Gould and Alderman Cornish and to make a Scrutiny whether any person had polled who had not Legal Right do hereby certifie that we do find That the Numbers entred in the Books amount to for Sir William Prichard 2233 Sir Henry Tulse 236 Sir Thomas Gould 2289 Alderman Cornish 2259 And we do farther Certifie That the Gentlemen appointed to make the Scrutiny on the behalf of Sir William Pritchard and Sir Henry Tulse do make these Objections following viz. THat several Persons of the Merchant-Taylors Company are not duely qualified to Poll for that they have not taken the Livery-Man's Oath of that Company entred amongst the By-Laws Oaths and Orders of the same Whereunto we have given an Answer to this effect That the Master Wardens and Assistants of every Company have power to repeal set aside ot suspend the Execution and using of their By-Laws Oaths and Orders as often as they shall think convenient at their own Wills and Pleasures That the first of October 1680. the then Master and Wardens and Assistants of Merchant-Taylors Company did by their Order set aside the Imposition of the Oath before that time usually Administred to such as were admitted Livery-men of that Company upon their Admission and that the several Persons last named were admitted of the Livery of the said Company since the making of the said Order last mentioned all which we are ready to prove They farther make this Objection That several Persons of the Company of Glovers have polled and did not take the Livery mans Oath entred in their Books upon their Admission and therefore have no Legal Vote Whereunto we have given this Answer That this Oath is sometimes imposed and sometimes omitted according to the pleasure of the Master Wardens and Assistants this â—or the like Oath being no ways essential for making a Livery-man in any Company in London And if the Masters Wardens and Assistants have omitted to Administer the usual Oath the Livery-men are not to lose their Privileges or Franchises for the omission of others and therefore these Livery-men have Legal Votes And moreover we are ready to prove that all the said Persons but Twelve have taken the said Oath They furthermore have made this Objection That several persons of the Company of Upholders who have Polled are of other Companies and were not fairly Translated according to the Custom of the City from being Members of such Companies at the time of their respective Admissions into the Upholders Company and therefore were uncapable of being Livery-men of the same Whereunto we have given this Answer That any Citizen is capable to be at the same time a Member and of the Livery of several Companies and that the Use of Translation from one Company to another is for the ease of such Citizens he being not liable if once Translated according to the Custom to be put in any chargeable Offices by that Company from whence he is so Translated and the want of such Translation shall not take away his Right of Polling once if he was of Twenty Companies and therefore these persons have Legal Votes They farther object That many Quakers who are Freemen of this City and of the Livery have not Legal Votes which Assertion as we apprehend is very strange seeing they have not hitherto been disabled by any Law whatsoever which Answers of ours we doubt not will as well satisfy all indifferent and unconcerned persons as our selves that the Objections above-mentioned are of no weight or moment And therefore we do farther Certify not having any farther regard to the said Objections as followeth  Sir William Prichard Sir Thomas Gould Alderman Cornish That the Number of the persons who have Polled twice 7 2 The Names of the persons who are not of the Livery or were in the Countrey during the time of the Poll and yet their Names entred in the Poll-Books 76 28 The Number of persons Polled who are not Free of the City are 6 2  Votes So that Sir William Pritchard hath in the whole 2144 Sir Henry Tulse hath in the whole 0236 Sir Thomas Gould hath in the whole 2257 Alderman Cornish hath in the whole 2227 So that the Majority is fallen upon Sir Thomas Gould and Alderman Cornish John Ellis Jo. Hayes Len. Robinson Gilbert Nelson Jacombe Francis Jenkes LONDON Printed in the Year MDCLXXXIX