who dyed young 3. William 4. Sir Charles Percy Knight 5. Sir Richard Percy Knight 6. Sir Alan Percy Knight 7. Sir Josceline Percy Knight 8. George Percy Esq Henry Lord Percy 9th Earl of Northumberland Lord of the Honours of Cockermouth and Petworth Lord Percy Lucy Poynings Fitz-payne and Bryan and in his Mothers right Lord Latimer He was Knight of the most Noble Order of the Garter by Qu. Elizabeth in the Year of our Lord 1593. Who marryed Dorothy Daughter of Walter Devereux Earl of Essex by whom he had Issue 1. Algernon the 10th Earl 2. Lord Henry who dyed without Issue Algernon the 10th Earl of Northumberland Lord of the Honours of Cockermouth and Petworth Lord Percy Lucy Poynings Fitz-payne Bryan and Latimer Knight of the most Noble Order of the Garter Lord Admiral of England and General over His Majesties Forces for his Expedition 1640. and one of His Majesties most Honourable Privy Council He marryed Two Wives by the former he had 4 Daughters and by the latter Wife 1 Son viz. Josceline Josceline the 11th Earl of Northumberland Lord of the Honours of Cockermouth and Petworth Lord Percy Lucy Poynings Fitz-payne Bryan and Latimer Deceased Who married Elizabeth Daughter to the Earl of Southampton by whom he had Issue 1. Henry who dyed young 2. Elizabeth who marry'd the Lord Ogle Heirs Males Extinct The Collateral Line Sir Ingelram Percy the 3d. and youngest Son of Henry Percy the 5th Earl of Northumberland who married and had Sons and Daughters as by the Oath of Mr. Henry Champion who kept the Percies Books and Records where he found what he testify'd upon Oath at the Tryal between Vtting Plaintiff and Coppleston Defendant He had Issue 1. Henry Percy 2. Robert Percy and 2 Daughters About 1559. these 4 Children were in the time of Troubles in Queen Elizabeths Days sent out of the North in Hampers to old Dame Vaux at Haraden in Northamptonshire and there were brought up preserved and provided for Therefore it is concluded by all that Sir Ingelram's Lady the Mother of those Children must be related to Dame Vaux's Family The Countess Dowager of Dorset Pembrook and Mountgomery said That if the Claimant James Percy were her Kinsman he must be descended of those Children that were sent into the South in Hampers Note There were but few Coaches in those days Margaret that married the first Earl of Cumberland whom the Countess of Dorset descended from was Sir Ingelram Percie 's own Sister And while the Claymant was with this Lady enquiring and delivering Declarations in Ejectment the Estate was all-begg'd as his printed Book makes appear more at large That which wildernized the Claymant was the rending the matchings of the Percies out of the Herald's Book and likewise the Herald-painter left Sir Ingelram quite out of the first Pedegree Henry the eldest Son of Sir Ingelram marryed the Daughter of one Tibott by whom he had Issue 1. James Percy who dyed about the year 1654. in Ireland without Issue-male 2. William who died young 3. Henry And 3 Daughters Henry Percy married Lidea the Daughter of Mr. Robert Cope of Horton in Northamptonshire by whom he had Issue 1. Henry who dyed young 2. James 3. Henry who dyed young 1 Daughter named Elizabeth James the now Claymant born 1619. of Henry and Lidea his Wife who was 2d Son of Henry who was first Son of Sir Ingelram who was 3d. Son of Henry 5th Earl of Northumberland who was great great Grandfather of the Claymant James Percy who married Sarah the Daughter of John Sayer of Norwich Gent. by whom he hath Issue 1. Anthony Percy married and hath a Son viz. Henry 2. Henry 3. John UPon a tripartine Exchange the Countries from Trent Sir W. Churchil's History fel. 257. to the North-ward was the Lot of the Percies in Memory whereof the same being in the Georgraphical Form of an Malf-moon Crescent for their Cognizance A short Abstract of the fore-going Narrative co-temporizing down from Henry the 5th Earl of Northumberland who had as before the following Issue 6th Earl of Northumberland Henry eldest Son who dyed without Issue Thomas second Son had two Sons both Earls 7th and 8th Earls Thomas and Henry first Cousins unto 9th Earl Henry and his Bretheren second Cousins unto 10th Earl Algernon and his Brother third Cousins unto 11th Earl Joscelin fourth Cousin unto The Lady Elizabeth Percy married to the Lord Ogle 5th Cousin unto Sir Ingelram Percy third Son had two Sons viz. Henry James Henry James Anthony Henry Henry John Robert This may satisfie all wise Men of the Truth of this Pedigree As for the Claymant James Percy he doth acknowledge the mistake of claiming under Sir Richard Percy who was born Anno 1573. And James Percy who was Unckle and Godfather to the Claymant was born 1581. So by this Account Sir Richard must have been a Grandfather at 8 years of Age. This is an impossible thing indeed But here lies the Mystery and the very Truth of this matter and it was his Councels advice to fix upon a wrong party which said they would be the only way to find out the right party For the Matches of the Percies was rent out of the Heralds book and Sir Ingelram Percie 's Name was quite left out of the first Pedegree which wildernized the Claymant and the Councels too which forced the Claymants Councel to tell the Lords in Parliamant that the Cause did not lie before their Lordships but ought to be tryed before the inferiour Courts first and if the Law could not end it then it was to return and come before their Lordships again to debate and to determine Since which time it hath been found out by a Verdict at Law that James Percy is the Legitimate Son of Henry Percy and Lidia his Wife And upon Petitions as in the printed Book may appear The Kings Most Excellent Majesty hath graciously condescended that the Lords in Parliament shall determine the said Cause It is hoped that this just account will abate that mistake of Clayming under Sir Richard for the Lord Chief Justice Hayls said at the first Tryal That the Plaintiff had proved himself Legitimate by Father and Mother by Grandfather and Grandmother but had taken his Descent too Low he must go a step or two Higher And the Lord Chief Justice Rainsford said to the Jury at that Tryal against Wright for Scandal That the Plaintiff had proved himself Legitimate and therefore did not examine the third part of his Witnesses but said His Pedegree was fully proved at a Tryal before that Court. So that the Plaintiff ought to have had a Verdict then when Mr. Henry Champion's Oath did perfect and fix'd the Pedegree as before-declared And the Lord Chief Justice Scroggs at the last Tryal against Blaickstone for Scandal and the whole Court did own the Pedegree of the Plaintiff only said The Declaration was nought When in Truth it was debated and allowed at the first part of the
of Northumberland that hath stood to justify his Claim about Ten Years and hath proved himself a Legitimate Percy in the Kings Bench doth likewise publish to the world that he will justify his Right durante vitae and hopes the World will not be deceived by any Artifice for he desires no more but a free and final determination of his said Claim Fiat Justitia ruat Coelum James Percy Notwithstanding your Loyal Petitioner verily believes your most Excellent Majesty is much Mis-inform'd yet your Petitioner had not published this Advertisement had not he found my Lord Ogle to have changed his Name from Cavendish to Percy printed in Mercurius Anglicus But now the Petitioner is resolved like Hester by Gods powerful Assistance and your Majesties gracious Acceptance to stand up for the Name of Percy as that Queen kneeled down to save her people King Darius took Daniel out of the Lyons Den and God in a most Miraculous manner Restored your Majesty to your Kingdoms And according to the Coronation-Oath and your Majesties Royal and Gracious Act of Free pardon and Indempnity the Petitioner in Justice ought to be restored to his Birth-right and Title or such an Immediate Allowance as is usual in such Cases to keep the White-Horse or Honour from starving until his Case be determined according to the prayer of the Petition The President the Lord Ogles Agents will insist upon is as followeth NOte the Lady Agnes Percy would not inter-marry with the Lord Josceline De Lovaine Son and Heir to the Duke of Brabant the then Queen of Englands Brother without he assumed her Name The Reason was There was not an Heir-Male then living of the Percies Therefore that was done purely to preserve the Name of Percy But now my Cozen the Lady Elizabeth Percies Case is not the same For the Heirs-Males of the Percies are not dead as by the Claymants printed Book appears But the Mystery of assuming the Name of Percy is as follows AS is the Settlement of Arundel-Castle even so is the Settlement of the Honour of Petworth and Cockermouth and divers other Lands upon the Heirs-Males of the Percies for ever And all those Lands so Settled and in the Crown the Rents and Fines can be Recovered no wayes but under the Name of Percy and the Tenants have over-thrown the Ladies Agents at two several Tryals upon the same Acount The Petitioner commits this Cause to the Kingsmost Excellent Majesty the Parliament and Leige People of England to judge whether or no this be a Fraud intended or not Therefore I humbly beg your Majesties Pardon For as the Petitioner hath often demanded the Fines and Rents of the Tenants and they durst not obey by reason his Pedigree was not then proved But now his Pedigree is proved to be the true Heir-Male of the Blood and Family of the Percies of Northumberland that they stop all their Rents in their hands and Prepare those Fines that have been a long time kept from the true Heir-Male JAMES PERCY To the Right Honourable Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament Assembled The Humble Petition of JAMES PERCY SHEWETH THat this is the 11th year of the Petitioner's Claim to the 〈◊〉 and Estate belonging to the Earldom of Northumberland That your Petitioner hath had several Tryals at Law where he is proved a true Percy legitimate and no Impostor as once a Gazer published That through the high Priviledges Policy and Potency of the Opponents and Treachery of his Solicitor and falling area the of some of his Councel all which occasioned Errors both particular and general That as William Percy the Brother of the Claimant was out up to obstruct Proceedings and now Francis Percy Stone Cutter is cryed up who declared himself to be the Grandson of Thomas Percy that was in the Gunpowder-Plot down in truth was the Son of Robert Percy the Petitioner's great Uncle He therefore prays That a set day may be appointed allowing 14 days time to summon in Witnesses so that the Pedigree may be fully proved that 〈◊〉 true Decision may be made according to Justice and that Truth may be preserved and Errors corrected And your Petitioner shall ever pray c. JAMES PERCY THat whereas the Kings most Excellent Majesty hath been graciously pleased to refer the Petitioner's Cause to the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament to Hear and Determine his said Claim to the Earldom of Northumberland That the Right Honourable Lords were pleased to receive the above-mentioned Petiition of James Percy the Claimant at the Bar of the said House of Lords the 17th of November 1680. That your Lordships will be further graciously pleased to Call for the said Petition and cause it to be Read and appoint a day for Tryal according to the Prayer of the aforesaid Petition so that the Pedigree of your Petitioner may be fully Tryed with the two Writs of Error And your Petitioner shall ever pray c. JAMES PERCY Die Jovis 25. Novembris 1680. WHereas JAMES PERCY Esq hath brought two Writs of Errour into this House In One of which the said JAMES PERCY is Plaintiff and John Blackstone Esq is Defendant And in the other Robert Utting is Plaintiff and Sir John Coppleston is Defendant Upon both which Writs the Errors being assigned and Issue joyned It is this Day Ordered by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in PARLIAMENT Assembled That this House will hear the Errors upon the said Two Writs of Errour Respectively Argued by Councel at the BAR on both Parts on Thursday the 9th Day of December next at Ten of the Clock in the Forenoon Whereof the said John Blakestone and Sir John Copplestone respectively are to cause Timely Notice to be given to the said JAMES PERCY for that Purpose JOHN BROWNE Cleric ' Parliamentor ' The Councel's Opinion to prove the Pedigree manifests Errours Removes Mistakes and Scandals and makes a clear way to Justice Therefore the following Pedigree is prepar'd for the Right Houourable Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament at the Day of Hearing To the Kings Most Excellent MAJESTY The Humble Petition of James Percy SHEWETH THAT this is the 11th Year of Your Petitioners Claim to the Title and Earldom of Northumberland That the 9th Instant at 10. of the Clock is appointed the day of Hearing before the Right Honourable Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament Assembled Therefore he most humbly Prays that Your Majesty would be graciously pleased to be present at the hearing of the Cause and then Your Majesty will understand how the Moon hath been set under the horrid Black Cloud of Oppression and to see the Moon rise into the Serene Horoscope of Justice And Your Petitioner shall Pray c. JAMES PERCY To the King 's most Excellent Majesty The Humble Petition of James Percy Cousin and next Heir-Male of Josceline Percy late and Eleventh Earl of Northumberland Deceased Sheweth THat Your Petitioner hath about Ten Years waited for the Justice of the Laws of Your
the Dungion Then God fil'd Pharao's Barns with his Blessings To which God Annex long Life and a Prosperous Reign And Your Petitioner shall Pray JAMES PERCY This Petition was presented into his Sacred Majesties Hand Jan. the 17th 1681. And did indeavour to present the two Books mentioned in the Petition But a Gentleman stepping betwixt the King and my self pusht me away so that I could not Present the Complaint prepared for the House of Lords against the day of Hearing Nor this Complaint which is prepared for the House of Commons my Opponants are great and Numerous which forces the Claimant to Pray for Justice An Affidavit made by JAMES PERCY Claimant to the Earldom of NORTHUMBERLAND WHereas Mr. James Hooton did undertake the Carrying in two Writs of Error in Parliament between James Percy Plaintiff and John Blackeston Esq Defendant for Scandalous Words and in Ejectments for Lands Robert Vtting Gent. Lessee of the Plaintiff and Sir John Copleston Defendant And the aforesaid Mr. Hooton did receive Writings of Percy the Claimant long before the day of Hearing before the Lords And did promise to fix all the Claimants Breviats so as they might be ready for some Lords and for the Council But when the Claimant should have been prepared for his Counsel then Mr. Hooton could not be found till the very Morning the Hearing should have been had then he meeting the Deponent James Percy at Fetter-lane-end in Fleet-street and said whither are you going Percy told him I am a going to make my Complaint against You for keeping my Writings and not making my Breviats ready for my Council And when James Percy had made his complaint in Parliament and offered to make Oath before their Lordships to Confirm the truth And when the Lords Commanded to withdraâ— then Mr. James Hootons Man came into the Lobby and there delivered the Writings to the Deponent upon the 9th of December 1678. Moreover the said Hooton said some time before that he was offered a Hundred Guinneys to betray the said Deponents Case And on the 7th of January 1681. The said Hooton came to the Deponants Chamber and desired to see those Writings that belonged to those Writs of Errors and did Write something out of them saying He had not kept a Copy of them which he ought to have done but said He had enough now to do his business and further said there was one sheet wanting Which shews how careful he was of his Claimants Cause And yet threatens he will Sue the Claimant for Defaming him in his Practise JAMES PERCY Jur ' 18. die January 1680. coram me Magistro Canc ' John Hoskyns The Deponant Humbly Prays for speedy Justice and that he may be forthwith called from the Prison of Kings-Bench into Parliament to take the Place of his Ancestors Earls of Northumberland according to his Birth-right and that the two Writs of Error may be Re-manded back and the Execution stopt For his Witnesses continue still in Town Hoping by your Mature Wisdoms to obtain an Order for a new day of Hearing for which he Prays as by his Petition all along appears An Affidavit made by JAMES PERCY Claimant to the Earldom of NORTHUMBERLAND WHereas Adlard Welby Gent. is Attourny for John Blackston Esq Def. this Deponent James Percy on the 21â—h instant went to Mr. Welby and offer'd an Agreement And whereas Cost of 70 odd l. is demanded of me the Plaintif the Deponent demanded 90 l. which was but tendred into Court upon my Lord Chief Justice Scrogs's promise that the Lord of Essex would not insist upon Priviledge and that the Deponent JAMES PERCY should have a fair Tryal the Money was not intended for the L. of Essex really but it ought to have been remanded back again to the Plaintiff JAMES PERCY for that 90 l. costs pretended for Mr. Clark was Sued for by Capt. Biggerstaff that married the Relict of Mr. Clark And that 90 l. Costs ought to have been set aside upon their own Demurrer therefore Mr. Welby Reply'd I must complain in Court The Writs of Error ought to have been heard debated and determined by the Right Honourable Lords in Parliament But it was blown over as by the Printed Complaint prepared to present to the Honourable House of Commons appears But it is hoped the Writs of Error may be Re-manded back into Parliament to have a fair Hearing Or if the Plaintiff and Deponent be forced to pay the 70 odd Pounds Cost then the 90 l. ought to be Refunded to the Deponent JAMES PERCY Jurat 22. die Jan. 1680. John Hoskins IT is very hard for a man to be kept out of Possession and his Opponents mannage all their Suits at Law against him with his own Estate and that will not serve their turns but they covet to get from the Claimant by Fraud so that they may totally Ruine and disable him from prosecuting his Birth-right JAMES PERCY the true and lawful Heir-male to the Percy 's Earls of Northumberland hath found more Injustice and Hardships here in England than the Children of Israel found in Egypt when they made Brick and were forc'd to gather their own Straw to burn them When Joseph's good Works were forgot then his Brethren suffer'd But now the PERCY' 's good deeds are forgot their lawful Successor suffers in Prison And therefore earnestly prays for a speedy Deliverance My great Pains and Charge in Printing is really intended rightly to inform the world thereby to remove Oppression and to revive justice To the Kings Most Excellent Majesty The Humble Petition of JAMES PERCY Sheweth THat Your Petitioners Opponents have obtain'd their Desires for your Petitioner is in Prison That Your Majesty was Graciously pleased to say God forbid that We should hinder an Heir but that he should have the Benefit of the Law And to that end Sir John Berkenhead was sent by Your Majesty to the Attourny General That Your Petitioner hath proved his Legitimacy and Pedegree at four several Tryals at Law whereof one is exemplified under the Great Seal of Your Majesties Court of Kings-Bench where Your Petitioner is now a Prisoner upon that Writ of Error the Lord Chief Justice Soroggs so wilfully gave the Cause away after Your Petitioner had fully proved his Pedegree and to be Descended from the Body of Henry Percy fifth Earl of Northumberland and Cousin and next Heir-Male to Josceline Percy late and eleventh Earl deceased Therefore He most Humbly Prays that Your Most Excellent Majesty would be Graciously pleased to Order the Lord Chancellour forthwith to call by Your Majesties Royal Writ of Summous Your Petitioner from the House of Prison to the House of Peers to take the Place and Seat of his Ancestors Earls of Northumberland as it is his Birth-right and Title proved at Law God in his Justice and Mercy restor'd Your Majesty to Your Crown and Kingdoms even so let Your Majesty in Equity and Pity Restore Your poor Distressed Subject And Your Petitioner shall ever
this Court When Mr. Blackeston was asked Whether he went to London to look after Percy 's Tryal he said It concerns me not for the Countess of Northumberland is to bear me Harmless Upon the Fourteenth of May 1678. there was a Tryal had at the King 's Bench-Bar Westminster for Scandalizing the Petitioner's Right and Title where-on a Verdict was given for Three Hundred Pound Dammages to the Petitioner and Judgment obtained thereon As by the said Judgment exemplifyed under the Seal of the Court appears Lastly That your Petitioner hath been all a-long perplexed and troubled by many Suits at Law unjustly Commenced against him by the Agents of the Defendants or some of them on purpose to Tire him out and Ruin him by Chargeable Defences For it is now almost Eight Years since he began his Claim And therefore Humbly prayes this most High and Honourable Court to open some way for the Hearing and Determination of this his Just Claim as it shall in your Mature Wisdoms seem meet and convenient for the Preserving Property and Right This further Complaint since the Late PARLIAMENT was Prorogued and Dissolved Percy is Plaintiff Blackeston the Defendant In Banco Regis Mich. Term. MR. Blackeston being Steward to the Lady Elizabeth Percy and the Countess Dowager of Northumberland being her Guardian the said Blackeston stood upon the Countesses Priviledge until upon another Occasion the Duke of Monmouth by an Order of the House of LORDS took off the Countesses Priviledges as to the Guardian-ship Then Mr. Blackeston sheltered himself under the Earl of Essexes Priviledge until the Plaintiff put his Petition into the House of LORDS that Mr. Blackeston might not be Priviledged by the said Earl Upon which the Earl agreed with the Plaintiff's Counsel That if the Ninety Pound Costs that was unpaid upon the Non-suit between Percy Plaintiff and Clarke Defendant were paid that then Mr. Blackeston should not stand upon Priviledge but go to a Tryal which he accordingly did in his Majestie 's Court of King's Bench. Before which time in the said Term the Plaintiff's Councel informed the Court what the Earl had agreed unto Then the Lord Chief Justice stood up and said to the Plaintiff That the Earl of Essex did promise upon his Honor to set aside his Priviledge and that the Plaintiff should have a Tryal against Mr. Blackeston this Term if the Plaintiff paid Mr. Clarke's Costs first And we do promise the Plaintiff shall have a fair Tryal The Plaintiff thereupon paid the said Ninety Pound Costs into the Court accordingly Monday the Eleventh of November the Plaintiff brought on his Tryal The Declaration being read Counsellor Scroggs opened the Cause and upon a Word in the Declaration there was some Debate But it was waved the Declaration allowed and the Scandalous VVords in the Declaration proved Mr. Atturney General moved that the VVitnesses might be heard to prove the Pedigree upward it being the better way to Satisfy the Court and to Inform the Jury And withal said That his Clyant had no better way to prove his Pedigree but by his Action of Slander For he hath delivered Declarations in Ejectment in several Countries and the Lands are all in great Persons Hands which still delay him by Priviledges Then was the Pedigrees delivered to the Judges But the Lord Chief Justice said What need we trouble the Court to Examine all these Witnesses if there be no Lands Therefore let us see first what Lands there are to make good the Declaration The Plaintiff produced Records out of the Tower and other Places which made out That the Lady Lucies Lands in Cumberland and other Countries were settled upon the Heirs-Males of the Percies for ever upon the Payment of Three Hundred Pound to the KING c. and Quartering the said Lucies Coat of Arms with the Percies Here the Defendant's Counsel started up an Attainder which the Plaintiff's Counsel was not ready to Answer the Plaintiff's Sollicitor having made no Provision against the said Attainder being confident that Attainder could not Hurt nor Prejudice the Tryal And this caused the Jury to be with-drawn The Jury appeared three several Times in this Cause which was occasioned by the Delayes and Priviledges which the Defendant sheltred himself under The Plaintiff payd all the Jury and the Ninety Pound was to be continued in Court till there had been a Fair Tryal But upon a Motion of the Defendant's Counsel there was a Peremptory Rule granted to take the Mony out of Court which was accordingly paid to the Defendant The Second Part of the Tryal should have been had in Michaelmass-Term 1678. while the Witnesses were in Town But the Tryal of Mr. Stayley prevented it So that the Plaintiff's Tryal was put off till Hillary-Term following viz. 27th January 1678. The Defendant's Counsel moved the Court the first Day of Hillary-Term for a New Jury and a longer Time pretending they had but Seven dayes Notice When in Truth the Defendant's Atturney had a Months Notice by the Plaintiff and Twelve dayes Notice by the Plaintiff's Atturneys Clark Upon which the Court gave a Rule for Seven dayes longer and for a New Jury which was Appointed accordingly Then the Defendant's Counsel afterwards moved the Court for a longer Day by reason that their Writings were mis-placed by the Fire in the Temple which further Day was granted till Thursday the Sixth of February and no Costs considered to the Plaintiff for keeping his Witnesses in Town all that Time notwithstanding the Plaintiff's Counsel moved for Costs Note The Lord Chief Justice Hales in the Case of Percy Plaintiff and Clarke Defendant The Defendant's Counsel moved the Court for Seven Dayes time pretending they were not Prepared And the Rule of Court was to pay Thirty-Five Pound to the Plaintiff to maintain his Witnesses in Town for that time which was paid Now on the Sixth of February 1678. the Tryal came on again The New Jury did appear the Declaration was read and Councellor Scroggs opened the Cause as he did before And one of the Witnesses was called to prove the Words And when he appeared the Court acknowledged he had proved the VVords sufficiently before And the Defendant's Counsel made no Objection against the Declaration So the Tryal was to go on where it broake off The Records of the Patents in Queen Maries time one for the Barony and the other for the Earldom produced And he that was the Clark that Examined them appeared but was not suffered to prove them upon Oath Note The afore-said Clark of the Rolls not appearing upon the last Tryal was the Cause of with-drawing the Jury Then when the Court saw the Plaintiff was ready to Answer to their Objections declared That the Plaintiff was Descended Paramount the Attainders And did own the Attaint could not hurt the Plaintiff Then Mr. Atturney General moved as at the first Part of the Tryal That the VVitnesses might be Examined to prove the Pedigree VVhereupon the Defendant's Counsel started up an Act
of Parliament concerning the Exchange of Lands between King Henry the Eighth and Henry Percy the Sixth Earl of Northumberland and others The Plaintiff's Counsel replyed Here is the same Act with several Savings That Saving of the Lady Lucies Lands was read till it came to Sir John Melton Then The Lord Chief Justice replyed This doth not concern you There are no Lands but are all given away by that Act of Parliament The Plaintiff humbly replyed The Melton's could not Claim so long as there was an Heir-Male of the Percies living And the Lady Elizabeth Percy keeps in Possession of the Lady Lueies Lands to which she hath no Right as she is the Heir-Temale For her Agents had Two Tryals against the Tennants and she was Overthrown in both Therefore the Plaintiff's VVitnesses ought to be heard that his Pedigree may be fully proved This will wash the Scandal clear off the Plaintiff from that Brand of an Imposture set forth in the Gazet And present the Claimant's Cause fairly to the KING and the House of LORDS The Lord Chief Justice said VVhat will you prove the Pedigree for when there are no Lands to support the Title The Plaintiff replyed And what have we to do with Lands if we do not prove the Pedigree The Plaintiff prayed That the Saving might be Read concerning Somerset-shire Lands for which Sir John Coppleston is Trustee VVhich Lands were beg'd of His Majesty and kept under pretence that there is no Heir-Male of the Percies living The Lady Elizabeth Percy claimes no Right therein But if she were in Possession of the Lands she would endeavour to keep them as they do by the Lands claim'd by the Plaintiff The Plaintiff also prayed The Record might be Read concerning the Lands the Duke of Monmouth had Recovered at a Tryal against the Countess of Northumberland under pretence there was no Heir-Male of the Percies which was not allowed by the Court to be read although the Duke was pleased sometime to say He had no Right to those Lands if there was an Heir-Male of the Percies living The Plaintiff produces the Patent of Restitution in Edward the Sixth's Time to Thomas Percy the Son of Sir Thomas Percy that Rebelled Likewise the Two Patents of the New Creation of the Barony and Earldom to Thomas and Henry Granted by King Philip and Queen Mary And an Act of Parliament in Queen Elizabeth's Time which Act if it had been Read it would have Encouraged the Plaintiff's Counsel to have pleaded an Abatement to that Act profusely Condescended unto by Henry Percy Sixth Earl of Northumberland in the Time of King Henry the Eighth when the said Earl had no Heirs-Males of his own Body Two Orders of the House of LORDS The First in King Charles the First his Dayes Then Resolved upon the Question Nemine Contradicente That no Person that hath any Honor in him and a Peer may Alien or Transfer the Honour to any other Person Resolved c. That no Peer of this Realm can Drown or Extinguish his Honor but that it Descend to his Descendants neither by Surrender Grant Fine nor any other Conveyance to the KING The Second in King Charles the Second's Time Resolved and Adjudged That no Fine Levied or at any time here-after to be Levied to the King can barr such Titles of Honor or the Right of any Person claiming such Title under him that Levied or shall Levy such Fine Moreover Charles 2d Act of Oblivion The KING 's Gracious Act of Free Pardon Oblivion and Indempnity at Breda If it Extended to Rebels then well may Royalists claim their Birth-rights By the Pedigree from Henry the First Earl of Northumberland to Josceline Percy the Eleventh Earl of Northumberland After every Rebellion in the Head-Line there were still New Creations and New Restitutions in Blood to the Heirs-Males of the Head-Line that was Attainted If so then great Reason the Collateral Line that proves Innocent should claim their Birth-Right after the Head-Line is spent Therefore it is requisite the Pedigree should be fully proved up to his Great-Grand-Father The Defendant's Counsel replyed We own your Pedigree and your Title But would not suffer any more of the Writings to be Read nor the Witnesses to be Examined The Plaintiff replyed What will the Owning signify if you will not suffer him to prove his Pedigree If you will not examine the Witnesses be pleased to Confirm what you own by a Rule in Court The Lord Chief Justice thereupon said Confirm or not Confirm the Declaration is naught Discharge Blackeston from the Suit of Percy Whereupon the Plaintiff was Non-suited And the Costs are Taxed to 100. Marks without any Consideration of the Plaintiff's vast Charge he was put to by the Defendant's Delayes and Puttings-off by Priviledges As by this and the former Tryals doth appear ☞ And the Plaintiffs own Counsel are of Opinion That there is no Relief in this Case at Law but by Act of Parliament And therefore hath prepared his Bill And prayes It may find Admittance A Short ABSTRACT of the Claymant's Proceedings ever since the Death of Josceline Percy late Earl of Northumberland 1. UPon the 11th of October 1670. the Claymant Landed in England First applyed himself to the Senior Countess Dowager of Northumberland And she was pleased to send him to the Junior Countess And then it was Reported she was with Child 2. The Claymant did then forbear till Time made out to the contrary And on the Third Day of February 1671. he put in his Caveat and Claym as followeth James Percy Esq as Cozen and next Heir-Male of the Right Honorable Josceline Lord Percy and Earl of Northumberland lately Deceased doth Claym the Title Stile Honor and Dignity of Baron Percy and Earl of Northumberland Cum pertinentijs and the Annual Rent or Fee of Twenty Pound where-with the said Dignity and Honor was and is Endowed payable by the Sheriff of Northumberland out of the same County And humbly desires a Legal Tryal of his Right herein and that no Grant in the interim may be made thereof being his Inheritance and Birth-Right Dated under my Hand this Third Day of February 1671. JAMES PERCY Copia Vera Entred into the Signet-Office at White-Hall 3. He met with Mr. Henry Champion and Mr. Orlando Gee at Dr. Lamplughs and pray'd them to inform him of his Great-Grand-Father But they rather took Advantage of his Ignorance But Mr. Henry Champion did very honestly upon his Oath at Sir John Coppleston's Tryal declare That Sir Inglexam Percy was Marryed and had Sons and Daughters which did not only time but fix the Claymant's Pedigree Sir Ingleram Percy being left out of the First Pedigree did much Wildernize the Claymant 4. The Claymant petitioned the KING and his Gracious Answer was God Forbid we should hinder an Heir but that he should have the Benefit of the Law 5. Also he Applyed himself to the Earl Marshal supposing to have been Relieved by the Court of Honor but
the Defendant Mr. Blakeston should not stand upon Priviledge but go on to Tryal Then the Lord Chief Justice Scrogs stood up and said Mr. Percy if you will lay down the 90 l. Mr. Clerk's Cost in Court the Lord of Essex will not insist upon Priviledge and we do promise you shall have a fair Tryal Whereupon the Money was tender'd accordingly and the 90 l. was got out of Court before he had notice by his Attorney Mr. Hancock or before the Tryal was ended And in truth the 90 l. the Opponents ought not to have had by reason the 90 l. Cost ought to have been set aside upon their own Demurrer Moreover it is to be noted that Sir George Jeffreys was Councel for the Plaintiff at the fore part of the Tryal and had taken 40 s. a Retaining Fee and 3 l. a Pleading Fee and had the Petitioner's Breviate but at the latter part of his Tryal pleaded against the Petitioner notwithstanding the Plaintiff tender'd him new Fees and complained of him in Court. All which caused the Plaintiff to Appeal to the Parliament by two Writs of Error to have the Errors argued and his Title to be brought to an Issue to be call'd to the Place and Seat of his Ancestors according to his Birthright That the Kings most Excellent Majesty hath been graciously pleased to referr your Petitioner to the Lords in Parliament to hear and determine his said Cause and to that purpose he hath been at vast Charges in renewing his two Writs of Error after every Prorogation and his Attorney hath received 60 l. only for the Kings Hand besides all other Charges which far exceeded And his said Attorney did promise your Petitioner to get all his Breviates in a readiness against the Tryal but did altogether fail as the printed Petition hereunto annexed makes appear Moreover he told your Petitioner sometime before that he could have had a hundred Goineys to betray your Petitioner and some other of your Petitioners Councel have been tempted with Bribes but they were so Just as to refuse And now the Agents have surprized your Petitioner for they knew the Error must have been proved against the Plaintiff Mr. Blakeston so that they would not take their Cost for that days disappointment according to the prayer of the printed Petition but have obtained the Writ of Error to be dismist the Lords House without any fair Hearing so that all they have done and do is by way of surprizal to tire the Claimant out of his just Right He therefore most humbly beseeches the Honourable House of Commons as he is yet but a Commoner that for the Glory of God the Honour of our King and Kingdom to stand up for Justice so that Property and Right may be preserved and the Oppressed may be relieved for this is the 11th year of your Petitioners Claim And intercede with the Kings most Excellent Majesty and the Right Honourable Lords Spiritual and Temporal not to suffer a Loyal Subject to be over-powered but that his just Claim may be heard with patience and determined in Justice and that your Petitioners Bill may be made an Act to restore the true Heir to his Birth-right and that the Title and the Estate that is now dispersed into several hands may be forthwith settled by an Act of Parliament And he shall ever pray Near 300 l. the two Writs of Error have cost for putting into Parliament continuing and renewing after every Prorogation and now they have Execution upon Blakeston's Writ of Error before the Case is heard The Attorney-General said Mr. Percy Now you have no where to Appeal but to Heaven But if Justice be not done on Earth we may fear Gods Vengeance will come from Heaven Therefore the Petitioner is forc'd to Appeal to those Worthies in the House of Commons for Justice and therefore he hath annexed the printed Petitions To the KINGS most Excellent Majesty And to the Right Honourable Lords Spiritual and Temporal in PARLIAMENT Assembled The Humble Petition of JAMES PERCY SHEWETH THat after your Petitioner's Complaint against his Attorneys James Hooton Edward Fyfield and John Hancock Mr. James Hooton one of your Petitioner's Attorneys understanding the Complaints against him sent the Writings by his Man which came too late out of which Papers his Breviates ought to have been drawn which doth testifie the Truth of your Petitioner's Complaint and what he offered to confirm upon Oath before your Lordships Therefore your Petitioner most Humbly prays That the two Writs of Error may be continued between Percy Plaintiff and Blakeston Defendant and Utting Plaintiff and Coppleston Defendant and that his Councel that he hath Retained formerly may be allowed your Petitioner to argue the said Cause that is to say Sir William Jones Serjeant Pemberton and Serjeant Simpson and that a new day may be ordered now his Witnesses are in Town and desires no longer time then his Councel may well consider And further prays That a moderate Costs may be tax'd upon account of the Attorneys Negligence And your Petitioner shall ever pray c. JAMES PERCY It is hoped that the Neglect of the Attorneys shall not destroy a man's Birth-right Title and Inheritance Your Petitioner's Cause being before your Lordships to hear and determine therefore humbly prays that a new day may be Ordered before his Witnesses be dispersed To the KINGS most Excellent Majesty in PARLIAMENT The Humble Petition of JAMES PERCY SHEWETH THat this annexed Petition fairly writ was presented at the Bar of the Lords House the 10 th Instant That your Petitioner is at a vast Charge in keeping his Witnesses in Town waiting for an Order and a Day appointed according to the prayer of the said Petition He therefore prays That your Majesty would be graciously pleased to call for the said Petition and cause it to be Read and that a short day may be appointed that a fair Hearing may be had to find out the Truth and that Justice may be done accordingly And let it not be said in England that the Innocent are punished and the Guilty go free But call to mind how merciful God hath been in Restrring your Majesty Even so in pity Restore your poor distressed Subject And he shall ever pray c. JAMES PERCY This Petition was presented into his Majesties Sacred Hand the 15 th of December 1680. To lose such an Opportunity as offered on Thursday last and now to trouble so good a King so oft doubles your Petitioner's sorrows And that which adds to your Petitioner's misery is that he cannot dispose of his Witnesses till a positive Order be had for which he humbly prays Note these three following Presidents I. THe Lord of Newport begg'd the Percies Land of the King for the Duke of Monmouth when the Duke was in France but at the Duke's return Percy the Claimant waited upon the Duke to know his pleasure and told him That my Solicitor had betrayed me for the Percies Lands were begg'd without the