Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
lord_n esq_n james_n john_n 18,605 5 7.0018 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A35615 The Case of James Percy, the true heir-male and claimant to the Earldom of Northumberland to the honourable knights, citizens, and burgesses, and to the Committee of Grievances in Parliament assembled : the humble petition of James Percy, cozen and next heir-male to Joscelin Percy, the late and eleventh Earl of Northumberland, deceased. 1680 (1680) Wing C924; ESTC R19657 13,721 16

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

endeavours of Your Petitioner and the first Book was Prepared for the Right Honourable Lords Spiritual and Temporal to inform their Lordships And the second Book is prepared to make his Complaints known to the House of Commons so that They may Intercede in his Just Cause with Your Royal Majesty and the Right Honourable Lords in Parliament Therefore Your Majesties Loyal Subject and Petitioner most Humbly Prays That Your Royal Majesty will be Graciously pleased Patiently to Read and Seriously consider the Printed Complaints and do Your Poor distressed Petitioner Justice in restoring him by Your own Princely Power Prerogative and Clemency He having at Law fully proved his Pedigree And therefore hath prepared a Bill that it may be made an Act of Parliament and most Humbly Prays Your Majesties Royal Assent thereunto And that Your Majesties Royal Writ of Summons may forthwith call Your Loyal Subject from the House of Prison to the House of Peers And there to take the Place and Seat of his Ancestors Earls of Northumberland When King Pharao took Joseph out of the Dungion Then God fil'd Pharao's Barns with his Blessings To which God Annex long Life and a Prosperous Reign And Your Petitioner shall Pray JAMES PERCY This Petition was presented into his Sacred Majesties Hand Jan. the 17th 1681. And did indeavour to present the two Books mentioned in the Petition But a Gentleman stepping betwixt the King and my self pusht me away so that I could not Present the Complaint prepared for the House of Lords against the day of Hearing Nor this Complaint which is prepared for the House of Commons my Opponants are great and Numerous which forces the Claimant to Pray for Justice An Affidavit made by JAMES PERCY Claimant to the Earldom of NORTHUMBERLAND WHereas Mr. James Hooton did undertake the Carrying in two Writs of Error in Parliament between James Percy Plaintiff and John Blackeston Esq Defendant for Scandalous Words and in Ejectments for Lands Robert Vtting Gent. Lessee of the Plaintiff and Sir John Copleston Defendant And the aforesaid Mr. Hooton did receive Writings of Percy the Claimant long before the day of Hearing before the Lords And did promise to fix all the Claimants Breviats so as they might be ready for some Lords and for the Council But when the Claimant should have been prepared for his Counsel then Mr. Hooton could not be found till the very Morning the Hearing should have been had then he meeting the Deponent James Percy at Fetter-lane-end in Fleet-street and said whither are you going Percy told him I am a going to make my Complaint against You for keeping my Writings and not making my Breviats ready for my Council And when James Percy had made his complaint in Parliament and offered to make Oath before their Lordships to Confirm the truth And when the Lords Commanded to withdraw then Mr. James Hootons Man came into the Lobby and there delivered the Writings to the Deponent upon the 9th of December 1678. Moreover the said Hooton said some time before that he was offered a Hundred Guinneys to betray the said Deponents Case And on the 7th of January 1681. The said Hooton came to the Deponants Chamber and desired to see those Writings that belonged to those Writs of Errors and did Write something out of them saying He had not kept a Copy of them which he ought to have done but said He had enough now to do his business and further said there was one sheet wanting Which shews how careful he was of his Claimants Cause And yet threatens he will Sue the Claimant for Defaming him in his Practise JAMES PERCY Jur ' 18. die January 1680. coram me Magistro Canc ' John Hoskyns The Deponant Humbly Prays for speedy Justice and that he may be forthwith called from the Prison of Kings-Bench into Parliament to take the Place of his Ancestors Earls of Northumberland according to his Birth-right and that the two Writs of Error may be Re-manded back and the Execution stopt For his Witnesses continue still in Town Hoping by your Mature Wisdoms to obtain an Order for a new day of Hearing for which he Prays as by his Petition all along appears An Affidavit made by JAMES PERCY Claimant to the Earldom of NORTHUMBERLAND WHereas Adlard Welby Gent. is Attourny for John Blackston Esq Def. this Deponent James Percy on the 21 h. instant went to Mr. Welby and offer'd an Agreement And whereas Cost of 70 odd l. is demanded of me the Plaintif the Deponent demanded 90 l. which was but tendred into Court upon my Lord Chief Justice Scrogs's promise that the Lord of Essex would not insist upon Priviledge and that the Deponent JAMES PERCY should have a fair Tryal the Money was not intended for the L. of Essex really but it ought to have been remanded back again to the Plaintiff JAMES PERCY for that 90 l. costs pretended for Mr. Clark was Sued for by Capt. Biggerstaff that married the Relict of Mr. Clark And that 90 l. Costs ought to have been set aside upon their own Demurrer therefore Mr. Welby Reply'd I must complain in Court The Writs of Error ought to have been heard debated and determined by the Right Honourable Lords in Parliament But it was blown over as by the Printed Complaint prepared to present to the Honourable House of Commons appears But it is hoped the Writs of Error may be Re-manded back into Parliament to have a fair Hearing Or if the Plaintiff and Deponent be forced to pay the 70 odd Pounds Cost then the 90 l. ought to be Refunded to the Deponent JAMES PERCY Jurat 22. die Jan. 1680. John Hoskins IT is very hard for a man to be kept out of Possession and his Opponents mannage all their Suits at Law against him with his own Estate and that will not serve their turns but they covet to get from the Claimant by Fraud so that they may totally Ruine and disable him from prosecuting his Birth-right JAMES PERCY the true and lawful Heir-male to the Percy 's Earls of Northumberland hath found more Injustice and Hardships here in England than the Children of Israel found in Egypt when they made Brick and were forc'd to gather their own Straw to burn them When Joseph's good Works were forgot then his Brethren suffer'd But now the PERCY' 's good deeds are forgot their lawful Successor suffers in Prison And therefore earnestly prays for a speedy Deliverance My great Pains and Charge in Printing is really intended rightly to inform the world thereby to remove Oppression and to revive justice To the Kings Most Excellent Majesty The Humble Petition of JAMES PERCY Sheweth THat Your Petitioners Opponents have obtain'd their Desires for your Petitioner is in Prison That Your Majesty was Graciously pleased to say God forbid that We should hinder an Heir but that he should have the Benefit of the Law And to that end Sir John Berkenhead was sent by Your Majesty to the Attourny General That Your
Henry Percy 5 th Earl of Northumberland of Sir Ingleram Percy his youngest Son and that the Collateral Line was never Attainted and therefore ought to enjoy the Title and Estate of his Ancestors Earls of Northumberland Then the Defendants Councel and the Court did own the Plaintiffs Title and Pedigree but said there was no Lands to support the Title then the Plaintiff prayed that the Court would confirm what they owned by a Rule in Court whereupon the Lord Chief Justice Scrogs stood up and said Confirm or not-confirm the Declaration is naught discharge Blakeston from the Suit of Percy notwithstanding the vast Charge the Plaintiff had been put to by the Defendants sheltering under the senior Countess of Northumberlands Priviledges And when the Duke of Monmouth had set aside her Priviledges then he shelter'd himself under the Lord of Essex his Priviledge And when the Plaintiff had made his complaint to the House of Lords the Lord of Essex did agree with the Plaintiffs Councel that if Mr. Clerk's Cost was laid down in Court for his security the Defendant Mr. Blakeston should not stand upon Priviledge but go on to Tryal Then the Lord Chief Justice Scrogs stood up and said Mr. Percy if you will lay down the 90 l. Mr. Clerk's Cost in Court the Lord of Essex will not insist upon Priviledge and we do promise you shall have a fair Tryal Whereupon the Money was tender'd accordingly and the 90 l. was got out of Court before he had notice by his Attorney Mr. Hancock or before the Tryal was ended And in truth the 90 l. the Opponents ought not to have had by reason the 90 l. Cost ought to have been set aside upon their own Demurrer Moreover it is to be noted that Sir George Jeffreys was Councel for the Plaintiff at the fore part of the Tryal and had taken 40 s. a Retaining Fee and 3 l. a Pleading Fee and had the Petitioner's Breviate but at the latter part of his Tryal pleaded against the Petitioner notwithstanding the Plaintiff tender'd him new Fees and complained of him in Court. All which caused the Plaintiff to Appeal to the Parliament by two Writs of Error to have the Errors argued and his Title to be brought to an Issue to be call'd to the Place and Seat of his Ancestors according to his Birthright That the Kings most Excellent Majesty hath been graciously pleased to referr your Petitioner to the Lords in Parliament to hear and determine his said Cause and to that purpose he hath been at vast Charges in renewing his two Writs of Error after every Prorogation and his Attorney hath received 60 l. only for the Kings hand besides all other Charges which far exceeded And his said Attorney did promise your Petitioner to get all his Breviates in a readiness against the Tryal but did altogether fail as the printed Petition hereunto annexed makes appear Moreover he told your Petitioner sometime before that he could have had a hundred Goineys to betray your Petitioner and some other of your Petitioners Councel have been tempted with Bribes but they were so Just as to refuse And now the Agents have surprized your Petitioner for they knew the Error must have been proved against the Plaintiff Mr. Blakeston so that they would not take their Cost for that days disappointment according to the prayer of the printed Petition but have obtained the Writ of Error to be dismist the Lords House without any fair Hearing so that all they have done and do is by way of surprizal to tire the Claimant out of his just Right He therefore most humbly beseeches the Honourable House of Commons as he is yet but a Commoner that for the Glory of God the Honour of our King and Kingdom to stand up for Justice so that Property and Right may be preserved and the Oppressed may be relieved for this is the 11 th year of your Petitioners Claim And intercede with the Kings most Excellent Majesty and the Right Honourable Lords Spiritual and Temporal not to suffer a Loyal Subject to be over-powered but that his just Claim may be heard with patience and determined in Justice and that your Petitioners Bill may be made an Act to restore the true Heir to his Birth-right and that the Title and the Estate that is now dispersed into several hands may be forthwith settled by an Act of Parliament And he shall ever pray Near 300 l. the two Writs of Error have cost for putting into Parliament continuing and renewing after every Prorogation and now they have Execution upon Blakeston's Writ of Error before the Case is heard The Attorney-General said Mr. Percy Now you have no where to Appeal but to Heaven But if Justice be not done on Earth we may fear Gods Vengeance will come from Heaven Therefore the Petitioner is forc'd to Appeal to those Worthies in the House of Commons for Justice and therefore he hath annexed the printed Petitions To the KINGS most Excellent Majesty And to the Right Honourable Lords Spiritual and Temporal in PARLIAMENT Assembled The Humble Petition of JAMES PERCY SHEWETH THat after your Petitioner's Complaint against his Attorneys James Hooton Edward Fyfield and John Hancock Mr. James Hooton one of your Petitioner's Attorneys understanding the Complaints against him sent the Writings by his Man which came too late out of which Papers his Breviates ought to have been drawn which doth testifie the Truth of your Petitioner's Complaint and what he offered to confirm upon Oath before your Lordships Therefore your Petitioner most Humbly prays That the two Writs of Error may be continued between Percy Plaintiff and Blakeston Defendant and Utting Plaintiff and Coppleston Defendant and that his Councel that he hath Retained formerly may be allowed your Petitioner to argue the said Cause that is to say Sir William Jones Serjeant Pemberton and Serjeant Simpson and that a new day may be ordered now his Witnesses are in Town and desires no longer time then his Councel may well consider And further prays That a moderate Costs may be tax'd upon account of the Attorneys Negligence And your Petitioner shall ever pray c. JAMES PERCY It is hoped that the Neglect of the Attorneys shall not destroy a man's Birth-right Title and Inheritance Your Petitioner's Cause being before your Lordships to hear and determine therefore humbly prays that a new day may be Ordered before his Witnesses be dispersed To the KINGS most Excellent Majesty in PARLIAMENT The Humble Petition of JAMES PERCY SHEWETH THat this annexed Petition fairly writ was presented at the Bar of the Lords House the 10 th Instant That your Petitioner is at a vast Charge in keeping his Witnesses in Town waiting for an Order and a Day appointed according to the prayer of the said Petition He therefore prays That your Majesty would be graciously pleased to call for the said Petition and cause it to be Read and that a short day may be appointed that a fair Hearing may be
THE CASE OF JAMES PERCY The true Heir-Male and Claimant to the Earldom of Northumberland To the Honourable Knights Citizens and Burgesses And to the Committee of Grievances in PARLIAMENT Assembled The Humble Petition of JAMES PERCY Cozen and next Heir-Male to JOSCELIN PERCY the late and Eleventh EARL of NORTHUMBERLAND Deceased SHEWETH THAT your Petitioner was the Son of Henry Percy who was the Son of Henry Percy who was the Son of Sir Ingleram Percy who was the third Son of Henry Percy Fifth Earl of Northumberland By which Descent your Petitioner is Entitled to the Earldom of Northumberland and to several Baronies Honours Manors and Lands which to the Earldom and Baronies have been and still are annexed your Petitioner having proved his Pedigree questions not but by your Assistance to make appear they are or should be his Right and Just Inheritance as Cozen and Heir-Male to Joscelin late Earl afore-mentioned And therefore ought to fit in Parliament and enjoy the Place Seat and Preheminence of his Ancestors with the Dignities to him so descended and do of Right belong And therefore prays his Bill may be be made an Act to settle the Title and Estate together again that Property and Right may be had according to Justice That at his first coming to Claim your Petitioner petitioned the Kings most Excellent Majesty who was graciously pleased to say God forbid We should hinder an Heir but that he should have the benefit of the Law That your Petitioner applyed himself to the Lords in Parliament where he then could not prove his Great Grandfather which forc'd his Councel to tell their Lordships That the Claimants Cause lay not before them but ought to be Tryed at the Common Law first and when the Cause had went through the Inferiour Courts to prove his Pedigree and if the Law could not end it then the Cause ought to come before their Lordships again to Hear Debate and to Determine And at that time his potent Adversaries did publish in the Gazette that your Petitioner was an Impostor and at their Courts did declare to all the Tenants that the Claimants name was not Percy but that he was a Bastard and that Henry Percy whom he declared was his Father they could prove was never Married Yet they have made all the Waste imaginable cutting down Woods pulling down Castles over-working of Lead-Mines and Coal-Mines and not only so but it cast the Petitioner out of Favour in the World that His most Excellent Majesty was pleased to give the Title one way and the Land several ways which hath not only multiplied Enemies but by their Power Policy and Priviledge hath put off your Petitioner near Eleven Years Therefore your Petitioner renders this following Account that his Just Cause may be known what hard usage he hath found at Law That the first Tryal was in the year 1674. against Mr. John Clerke the chief Agent for scandalous words who shelter'd under Priviledge a long time and before the Tryal they offer'd to Own him and to assist the Claimant James Percy with their Books Pedigree and Records but would not be bound to perform Then the Plaintiff perceived it to be a baffle for a longer delay and there were no good Faith in them then said the Plaintiff Currat Lex I will have the Tryal if it be but to wash the dirt off which the Gazette and your evil practices have thrown upon me And at the Tryal the Attorney would suffer a Non-suit without the consent of his Client at which the Lord Chief Justice Hales seemed not to be satisfied but stood up and said That James Percy the Claimant and Plaintiff had proved himself a true Percy legitimate by Father and Mother Grandfather and Grandmother and of the Bloud and Family of the Percies of Northumberland and did verily believe that the Plaintiff was Cozen and next Heir-Male to Joscelin the late and 11th Earl of Northumberland only he was afraid he had taken his Descent a little too low And the Jury at a Treat which Mr. Clerke the Defendant gave them said to Mr. Clerke You are beholden to Mr. Percy for suffering a Non-suit for truly we must have given a Verdict for the Plaintiff his Cause was proved so clear and the Damages was laid in the Declaration 10000 l. The second Tryal was upon an Ejectment for Cannington and Rodoway Lands in Somersetshire which Lands of right fell to the Heirs-Males of the Percies after the Heirs-Males of the Rogers was extinct Doubtless it was by mis-information his Majesty was mistaken in his Gifts And at that Tryal the Pedigree was fully proved up to the Plaintiffs Great-Grandfather Sir Ingleram Percy youngest Son of Henry Percy 5th Earl of Northumberland by the Oath of Mr. Henry Champion who was Steward to the Earls of Northumberland and declared at that Tryal that he found in the Books and Records of the Percies that Sir Ingleram Percy was married and had Sons and Daughters so that a Verdict ought to have been had for the Plaintiffs Pedigree at that Tryal also And Sir John Coppleston did not only shelter under Priviledge but when the Writs of Error were put into the House of Lords he then sued the Plaintiff in the Court of Kings-Bench and got Cost and broke the Priviledge of Parliament The third Tryal was against one Mr. Wright for the like scandalous words where your Petitioner proved his Legitimacy again and not the Tythe of his Witnesses were examined for the Lord Chief Justice Rainsford stood up and said Gentlemen of the Jury we need not trouble the Court to examine more of the Plaintiffs Witnesses by reason his Pedigree was fully proved before at a former Tryal at the Bar of this Court And when the Jury brought in but 300 l. Damages the Lord Chief Justice was angry and told them they had undervalued the Plaintiffs Cause the Judgment exemplified under the Seal of the Court makes appear the same That the fourth Tryal against John Blakeston Esq who was likewise an Agent for the Lady Elizabeth Percy and kept her Courts and did declare the like scandalous words and gave it in all his Charges to the Jury and Tenants to take special notice thereof And at the Tryal on Monday the 11th of November 1678. the words were proved The Declaration was allowed after some debate upon a nice word which was amended But the Councel for the Defendant started up an Attainder in the Case which the Plaintiffs Councel was not prepared at that time to remove that Objection but the Tryal was put by at that time and the Jury was withdrawn as the Plaintiffs printed Book declares more at large But the second part of that Tryal was upon the 6th of February 1678. a new Jury upon the motion of the Defendants Councel did appear and the Plaintiffs Councel did clear that point concerning the Attainder by reason the Plaintiffs Councel made appear to the Court that James Percy was descended from the Body of