Chap. 48. Of the severall subservient jurisdictions by Marches Counties Hundreds Burroughs Lordships and Decennaries p. 131 Chap. 49. Of the immunities of the Saxon free men under the Norman government p. 135 Chap. 50. Recollection of certain Norman Laws concerning the Crown in relation to those of the Saxons formerly mentioned p. 138 Chap. 51. Of the like Lawes that concerne common interest of goods p. 142 Chap. 52. Of Laws that concerne common interest of Lands p. 144 Chap. 53. Of divers Laws made concerning the execution of justice p. 150 Chap. 54. Of the Militia during the Normans time p. 152 Chap. 55. That the entry of the Normans into this government could not be by Conquest p. 155 Chap. 56. A briefe survey of the sence of Writers concerning the point of conquest p. 158 CHap. 57. Of the government during the Reignes of Steven Henry the second Richard the first and John and first of their titles to the Crown and disposition in government p. 165 Chap. 58. Of the state of the Nobility of England from the Conquest and during the Reigne of these severall Kings p. 172 Chap. 59. Of the state of the Clergie and their power in this Kingdome from the Norman time p. 175 Chap. 60. Of the English Communally since the Norman time p. 188 Chap. 61. Of Judicature the Courts and their Iudges p. 189 Chap. 62. Of certaine Laws of judicature in the time of Henry the 2. p. 193 Chap 63. Of the Militia of this Kingdome during the Reigne of these Kings p. 205 CHap. 64. Of the government of Henry the third Edward the first and Edward the second Kings of England And first a generall view of the disposition of their government p. 207 Chap. 65. Of the condition of the Nobility of England till the time of Edward the third p. 221 Chap. 66. Of the state of the English Clergie untill the time of Edward the third and herein concerning the Statutes of Circumspecte agatis Articuli cleri and of Generall Councels and Nationall Synods p. 225 Chap. 67. Of the condition of the Free men of England and the grand Charter and severall Statutes concerning the same during the Reigne of these Kings p. 253 Chap. 68. Of Courts and their proceedings p. 284 Chap. 69. Of Coroners Sheriffs and Crowne pleas p. 286 Chap. 70. Of the Militia during these Kings reignes p. 294 Chap. 71. Of the Peace p. 300 PROLOGUE THe policie of English government so farre as is praise-worthy is all one with Divine providence wrapped up in a vaile of Kings and wise men and thus implicitely hath been delivered to the World by Historians who for the most part doe read men and weare their Pens in decyphering their persons and conditions some of whom having met with ingenuous Writers survive themselves possibly more famous after death then before Others after a miserable life wasted are yet more miserable in being little better then tables to set forth the Painters workmanship and to let the World know that their Historians are more witty then themselves of whom they wrote were either wise or good And thus History that should be a witnesse of Truth and time becomes little better then a parable or rather then a nonsence in a faire Character whose best commendation is that it s well written Doubtlesse Histories of persons or lives of men have their excellency in fruit for imitation and continuance of fame as a reward of vertue yet will not the coacervation of these together declare the nature of a Common-weale better then the beauty of a body dismembred is revived by thrusting together the members which cannot be without deformity Nor will it be denied but many wise and good Kings and Queenes of this Realme may justly challenge the honour of passing many excellent Lawes albeit its the proper worke of the representative body to forme them yet to no one nor all of them can we attribute the honour of that wisdome and goodnesse that constituted this blessed frame of government for seldome is it seen that one Prince buildeth upon the foundation of his predecessour or pursueth his ends or aimes because as severall men they have severall judgements and desires and are subject to a Royall kind of selfe-love that inciteth them either to exceed former presidents or at least to differ from them that they may not seem to rule by coppy as insufficient of themselves which is a kind of disparagement to such as are above Adde hereunto that it s not to be conceited that the wisest of our ancestors saw the Idea of this government nor was it any where in president but in him that determined the same from eternity for as no Nation can shew more variety and inconstancy in the government of Princes then this especially for three hundred yeeres next ensuing the Normans so reason cannot move imagination that these wheeles by divers if not contrary motions could ever conspire into this temperature of policy were there not some primum mobile that hath ever kept one constant motion in all My aime therefore shall be to lay aside the consideration of man as much as may be and to extract a summary view of the cardinall passes of the government of this Kingdome and to glance at various aspects of the ancient upon the moderne that so these divers Princes and wise councels in their different course may appeare to be no other then the instruments of him that is but one and of one mind whose goings forth have been in a continuall course of Wisdome and goodnesse for our selves in these latter daies and herein I am encouraged because I am not in danger of temptation to flattery or spleene nor pinched with penury of grounds of observation having to doe with a Nation then vvhich a cleerer miror of Gods gracious government is not to be found amongst all the Nations and peoples under Heaven The Contents of the severall Chapters of this Book I. THe sum of the severall Reignes of Edward the third and Richard the second fol. 3. II. The state of the King and Parliament in relation of him to it and of it to him fol. 13. III. Of the Privy Council and the condition of the Lords f. 26. IV. Of the Chancery fol. 35. V. Of the Admirals Court. fol. 41. VI. Of the Church-mens Interest fol. 45. VII Concerning Trade fol. 64. VIII Of Treason and Legiance with some considerations concerning Calvins Case fol. 76. IX Of Courts for causes criminall with their Laws fo 92. X. Of the course of Civill Justice during these times fo 96. XI Of the Militia in these times fol. 98. XII Of the Peace fol. 108. XIII A view of the summary courses of Henry the fourth Henry the fifth and Henry the sixth in their severall Reignes fol. 115. XIV Of the Parliament during the Reignes of these severall Kings fol. 127. XV. Of the Custos or Protector Regni fol. 134. XVI Concerning the Privy Councell fol. 141. XVII Of the Clergie and
meeting or concourse of people for the sale of such commodities as their neighbourhood would not take off their hands And thus the greater Towns that had walls or Castles became the greatest Markets and others lesse and this made the neighbourhood of those Towns to repaire thither to buy as others to sell But time discovering a double inconvenience herein viz. that by these lesse publique sales in smaller Villages where little or no care of right or justice was had and by which means the word Pagan became a word of reproach many mens goods by clandestine contracts were lost and no care had of their recovery and which was yet more prejudiciall to the publique that the greater Towns appointed for the strength and defence of the Kingdome became ill provided with supply of victuall either for the present or future and what was had for the most part was gotten at the second hand and higher rate then the Countrey Villages had The wise men by publique edict laid a restraint of Markets in smaller Villages and more private places and thus the greater Towns having Markets formerly became more publique Markets not by any new right or priviledge from the Crown for it neither had such power nor could have but upon usurpation against the common right of such Towns and places of publique defence This restraint upon the reasons aforesaid was made first in the Saxon times as may appeare by their Laws but more clearly declared and confirmed afterwards by the Laws of the Normans which never gave any new right of Market overt unto those places of publique defence but onely did inhibit the same in the smaller Villages and private places In which respect although the Kings of this Nation in future times tooke leave to abolish that restraint which did lie upon some of those more private places for certaine reasons of State and so these places became Markets overt which formerly were none yet could they never take away that priviledge which nature it selfe cast upon those greater Towns being the very limbs of the Kingdome without wrong done to common right and the publique good nor abridge them of that power but that they might still use their liberty at times and places within their precinct as might best conduce with the benefit of the inhabitants of those places even as any particular free man may govern his own estate as him liketh best And thus upon the whole matter it s to be concluded that the ancient Burroughs of this Kingdome properly doe not hold their liberty of Market overt by prescription or charter but by common right and not as a Corporation made by charter but as they are a multitude of people anciently gathered together and united upon whom the strength and wealth of the Kingdom doth or did formerly much more depend then on any of the smaller Villages open Towns even as every free man possesseth and useth his proper inheritance and estate without particular priviledge derived from the Crown nor can the King take away the liberty of Market overt from such places more then he can take away the liberty of buying and selling from any free man to whom the Law alloweth a liberty of ownership This I submit to the censure of the learned in the Laws in regard of the different opinions concerning the same This liberty of Township thus made and the place and people inhabitants thereof being of such consequence in the publique administration had for their better support and safety liberty of Fortification Ll. Edw. cap. 1. Ll. Aethelst cap. 12. Ll. Aethelst cap. 13. Gloss and power to charge one another with the maintenance of these Fortifications by an imposition called Burghbote and held their Tenements under a rent to their Lord or King called Burgage as they were a body aggregate CHAP. XXXIV Of the Forrests BEsides other prerogatives of the Saxon Kings they had also a Franchise for wild beasts for the Chase which we commonly call Forrest being a precinct of ground neither parcell of the County nor the Diocesse nor of the Kingdome but rather appendant thereunto This savoured of the old German sport but by custome turned from sport to earnest For although in the first times the Saxons were so few and the Country so spacious that they might allow the beasts their farme as well as themselves their own People neverthelesse so multiplyed as of necessity they must intercommon either with Beasts or Fishes the former whereof however more cleanly yet the latter had the surest footing and was chosen as the least of two evils rather then for any likelyhood of good neighbourhood for as nature taught beasts to prey for themselves so men to defend their owne and this bred such a fewd between beasts and men as that Kings doubting to loose their game tooke in with the weaker that the world might see the happinesse of England where beasts enjoy their Liberties as well as men But this was as it were by compromise for it had been very hard to have pleased the free men who had liberty of game within their own ground by common right Ll. Canut c. 77 and to preserve the Kings liberty of Forrest coincident therewith had not the King imployed on the one side the power of a Dane that looked somewhat like a Conquerour and on the other side that which looked as like to the bounty of a King in allowing liberty of ownership to men inhabiting within the bounds of the Forest which at the first was set apart onely for the Kings pleasure and all his wits to make a Law somewhat short of a full freedome and yet outreaching that of bondage which we since have commended to posterity under the Forrest charter and yet for all that it proved a hard matter for Kings to hunt by Law and the Law it selfe a yoke somewhat too heavy for a Common-wealth to beare in old age if selfe denying Majesty shall please to take it away CHAP. XXXV Concerning Judges in Courts of justice THus farre of the severall Tribes and members of this Commonweale which like so many Conduit heads derived the influence of government through the whole body of this Island and in every of which Judiciary power acted it selfe in all causes arising within the verge of that precinct some of which had more extraordinary triall before the King and his Councell of Lords according as the parties concerned were of greater degree or the cause of more publique concernment Examples hereof are the cases between the Bishop of Winchester and Leoftin in Aetheldreds time and between the two Bishops of Winchester and Durham in Edwards time but custome made this Court stoop to smaller game in latter times and to reach at the practise of the County court by sending the Kings Writs to remove certaine causes from the cognisance of those rurall judicatories to their sublime determination Glanvil lib. 6. cap. 6 7 8. And thus became the Councell of Lords as an Oracle to
them irrecoverably Thus favourites instead of Cement between Prince and people becomming rocks of offence bring ruine sometimes to all but alwaies to themselves The King foresaw the storme and thought it safest first to cry truce with the people and come to agreement with them by common consent Prerog Reg. 17 Edw. 2. for the extent of his prerogative in certaine particular cases questionable and this summed up become a Statute for future times to be a ne plus ultra between the King and people Stat. de Homag The like agreement likewise was concerning services of tenants to their Lords and an oath framed to vindicate them from all incroachments Stat. Templar And something was done to calme the Clergy for the demolishing of the Templer Knights but the wound was incurable words are not believed if actions doe not succeed nor will oaths now made to bind Kings Bishops Councellors of State Sheriffs Majors Bailiffs or Judges to justice nor directions for regulating of Courts nor Ordinances against false moneys and weights nor all of them settle the people but they adhere to the Queen burning with jealousie against the King and both her selfe and the Lords with rage against the Spencers The King flies and being forsaken of the people the Lords the Clergy his own sonne and the wife of his own bosome and of God himselfe as the most absolute abject that ever swayed Scepter lost the same and being made a monument of Gods revenge upon inordinate desires in a King and of the English people being enraged not long surviving his demise he died a death meet to be forever blotted out of the thoughts of all subjects but to be had in everlasting remembrance of all Kings For if a Kingdome or Parliament misleads the King at the worst he is but misled by his Councell but if he be drawn aside by favourites he must thanke his own lust in the one he hath but the least share in the burthen in the other he must beare the whole CHAP. LXV Of the condition of the Nobility of England till the time of Edward the third NOw was prerogative mounted up to the highest pitch or endeavoured so to be either through the weaknesse or power of these Kings of whom the first and last had little to ground upon but their own will and the other I meane Edward the first had more wisdome and power but was otherwaies distracted by forraine and more urgent imployments so as the worke fainted before it came to its full period The contest was between the King and Barons who till those daies were rather the great and richer sort of men then Peeres although they also were of the number I am not so sharpe sighted as to reach the utmost intentions of the Lords but their pretences are of such publique nature as its plaine that if their private interest was wrapped up therein they were inseparable and I shall never quarrell the Lords aime at private respects whenas its plaine the publique was so importantly concerned and yet I will not justifie all that I finde written concerning their words and Actions M Paris An. 1217. The speech of the E. of Cornwall to his elder brother and King Henry the third I will neither render up my Castle nor depart the Kingdome but by the judgement of the Peeres and of Simon the E. of Leicester to the same King That he lied and were he not a King the Earle would make him repent his word and of the Lords that they would drive the King out of his Kingdome and elect another and of the E. Marshall to Edward the first that he would neither goe into Gascoine nor hang such other doe savour of passion especially that of the E. of Leicester and the Lords and may seem harsh and unmannerly and yet may admit of some alay if the generall rudenesse of the time the Kings injurious provocations and the passions of colerick men be weighed together Yet will not all these trench upon the cause nor render the state of the Lords too high or disproportionable to their place in the policy of the kingdome of England as things then stood I say it was not disproportionable for where the degree of a King was mounting up to such a pitch as to be above law the Lords exceeded not their places in pressing him with their councels to conforme to the laws and in maintaining that trust that was reposed in them in keeping off such sinister councels and invasions as might violate the laws and liberties or hinder the currant of justice concerning which I shall shortly state the case and leave it to the censure of others The government of the people of this Nation in their originall was Democraticall mixt with an Aristocracy if any credit be to be given to that little light of History that is left unto us from those ancient times Afterwards when they swarmed from their hive in forraine parts and came over hither they came in a warlike manner under one conducter whom they called a King whose power whatever in the warre yet in time of peace was not of that heigth as to rule alone I meane that whereas the Lords formerly had the principall executory power of lawes setled in them they never were absolutely devested of that power by the accesse of a King nor was the King ever possessed of all that power nor was it ever given to him but the Lords did ever hold that power the King concurring with them and in case the King would not concurre the people generally sided with the Lords and so in conclusion the King suffered in the quarrell From this ground did arise from time to time the wanderings of the people in electing and deposing their Kings during the Saxon times Nor did nor could the Norman Williams shake off this copartnership but were many times as well as other ensuing Princes perswaded against their own minds and plotted desires Nor can it otherwaies be supposed where Councels are setled for whereto serve they if notwithstanding them the King may go the way of his inordinate desire If the Lords then did appeare against these Kings whereof we treat in cases where they appeared against the laws and liberties of the people it was neither new nor so heinous as it s noised for them who are equally if not more intrusted with the Common-wealth then the King by how much the Councellors are trusted more then the councelled to be true for the maintenance of their trust in case the King shall desert his But the greater question is concerning the manner by threats and warre It s as probable I grant that the Lords used the one as the other for it was the common vice of the times to be rugged yet if we shall adde to what hath been already said first that Knight service was for the defence of the kingdome principally Secondly that the greatest power of Knight service rested with the Lords not onely in
propriety and ownership but in point of direction for the benefit of the Common-wealth and lastly that the state of the times now was such as the kingdome was oppressed by strangers counsels and the Councels of the kingdome rejected that instead of law garisons of strangers ruled that no man could own his own that the subjects were looked upon as enemies and of all this the King made the principall instrument who had ruled and over-ruled in this manner and so was resolved to continue I shall leave it to the better judgment of others what other healing plaister was to be had for such a sore Albeit it cannot be denied that more due respects might have been tendred to kingly dignity then was in those times practised And yet there was a difference also in the occasions of warre for certainly that last warre with Edward the second was more fatall and yet lesse warrantable and in the issue declared that there was more of the Queene therein then of the Lords who knew a way of removing favourites from the King without removing the King from the kingdome or driving him out of the world In all which neverthelesse it cannot be concluded that the Lords party was increased more then in the former Kings times for the losse of the field in Henry the thirds time against the Prince kept them in awe all the succeeding reigne although they were not then tongue tied and their second losse against Edward the second which was yet more sharpe questionlesse quelled their spirits although they lost no right thereby and increased the Kings party much by the accesse to the Crowne of the services of such as held of those Lords that were attainted or disinherited And yet by a hidden providence the King was little the better when it came to the pinch for when Edward the seconds Queen came from beyond the Seas though with but a small force all forsake the King neither regarding the former terrour of the Army of a King nor the right of service nor oath of fealty nor promises nor lawes nor other ingagements and so the King becomes a prey to an enraged woman or which is worse to a jealous wife so little can the name of a King doe when his person is despised and so vaine for him to trust in his Militia that hath already disarmed himselfe of the hearts of his Subjects The summe then of all the labours of the Nobles during these times will rest in this that they won the day and yet lost the field although they lost their own bloods and estates yet they saved all to the people and left laws in force able to debate with prerogative in the hand of any King that should succeed Thus stood the matter in fact upon such grounds as it had the validity whereof it s not my worke to censure neither by the ballance of Law or Gospell but leave it as a sore time that scarce will indure touch nor beare a King further then he was good or brave CHAP. LXVI Of the state of the English Clergy untill the time of Edward the third and herein concerning the Statute of Circumspecte agatis Articuli Cleri and of generall Councels and nationall Synods IT was a time of much action throughout the whole Christian State and Rome now having attained to its full glory began to be eyed on all parts as an irregular motion crossing all affaires that it may like the sole Empresse command all and be controlled by none and this wrought some stirrings in France complainings in England M. Paris 720. and facing between the Emperour and the Pope How chargable this was to the Popes treasury it s not materiall but it occasioned or was pretended to be the occasion of all the intolerable exactions ensuing there being scarce one yeere passed over without some extraordinary exaction leavied upon the Churchmen either by provisors tenths procurations levies for the Holy warre Quindizmes benevolences or other such like and where money was not to be had by levies of Ornaments or of rich apparell by intimation begging perswading commanding threatning and in this course continuing till they had outfaced shame it selfe and that the whole law of Rome became comprehended in this one Quicquid libet licet In generall therefore the Church of Rome cannot be said to thrive during these extorting times although Rome did for if the Laity were pillaged by the King the Clergy much more both by Pope and King if the one complained the other cried the one sometimes found reliefe from the King but the other was helplesse for the Pope had no eares to heare M. Paris not the King hands to helpe he neither durst nor would crosse the Pope although the Clergy told him that by these exactions they were impoverished in such manner as they were disabled to doe him service for their lay Fees Thus Rome becomes a burden to Rome and the members weary of bearing their head Hereafter must the Pope beware of falling out with Kings for the English Clergy now though late see that all is not Gold that glisters nor is it any great priviledge to be the Popes men further then the Pope will be a good master but this was not to be expected Popes were grown so excellent as they could not amend and England so enamoured of them as it s become their vere bortus deliciarum M. Paris as the Pope called it when he saw the rich vestments of the English Church men And therefore they must now be contented to be the Popes viands as often as his hungry maw doth call or otherwise they must fall out An excellent posture of affaires and brave preparative to dispose the hearts of all sorts for intertainment of the easie yoke of Christs government which was now at the doore and ready to be revealed Neverthelesse poore and mean as the Clergy was they had courage enough not onely to stickle both with King and people for their own liberties but also to invade the liberties both of the Crown and Commons having this advantage that they had to doe with a King and people that were two and themselves well seconded by the Pope that had no lesse power in those times of publique distraction and was bound to serve the cattell well that yeelded him so much milke M. Paris An. 1257. Vid. Addit Baronius Anal. 1306. The particular matters of debate may appeare in their paper of grievances composed in Henry the thirds time and their resolutions thereupon their complaints were renewed againe in the time of Edward the first if we may give credit to Baronius after the Statute of circumspecte agatis To the end therefore that the whole may lie before us I shall set down the matter or substance of both these papers severally in regard they sound much alike and note the difference all which I shall doe to the end that it may more plainly appeare what the Churchmens Idea was and how farre the
Judicature to determine the validity of the Kings Grant made to the Church of Canterbury which is no proper worke for a Parliament unlesse it befall during the sitting of the same The next is but a bare title of a Councill supposed to be holden An. 850. And not worth its room for it neither sheweth whether any thing was concluded nor what the conclusions were The worke of the next Councill alleadged to be holden An. 851. was to confirme the Charter of the Monastry of Croyland and to determine concerning affaires belonging to the Mercians and if it had beene a Parliament for that people it might be worthy of inquiry how regularly the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and the Bishop of London and the Ambassadors from the West Saxons could fit amongst them and attest the conclusions therein made as wel as the proper members of that Nation He commeth in the next place to a Councill holden in the yeare 855. which is more likely to be a Parliament then most of them formerly mentioned if the Tithes of all England were therein given to the Church but hereof I have set downe my opinion in the former part of the discourse And though it be true that no Knights and Burgesses are therein mentioned as the Opponent observeth out of the Title yet if the body of the Lawes be duly considered towards the conclusion thereof it will appeare that there was present Fidelium infinita multitudo qui omnes regium Chirographum Laudaverunt Dignitates verò sua nomina subscripserunt Concil Brit. Pag. 350. And yet the Witagen-motes in these times began to be rare being continually inrerrupted by the invasions of the Danes The three next Councills alleaged to be in the yeares 930. 944. 948. Were doubtlesse of inferiour value as the matters therin concluded were of inferiour regard being such as concerne the passing of the Kings Grants Infeodations and confirmations The Councill mentioned to be in the yeare 965. is supposed to be one and the same with the next foregoing Concil Brit. Pag. 480. by Sir Henry Spelman which calls it selfe a generall Councill not by reason of the generall confluence of the Lords and Laity but because all the Bishops of England did then meet The Primi and Primates were there who these were is not mentioned but its evident that the King of Scots was there and that both he and diverse that are called Ministri Regis attested the conclusions It will be difficult to make out how these should be Members of the House of Lords and more difficult to shew a reason why in the attesting of the acts of these Councills which the Opponent calls Parliaments we finde so few of the Laity that scarce twelve are mentioned in any one of them and those to descend so low as the Ministri Regis to make up the number Five more of these instances remaine before the comming in of the Normans The first of which was in the yeare 975. and in a time when no Parliament Concil Britt Pag. 490. according to the Opponents principles could sit for it was an Inter regnum The two next were onely Synods to determine the difference between the Regulers and the Seculers in the Kings absence by reason that he was under age and they are sayd to be in the yeares 977 and 1009. But it s not within the compasse of my matter to debate their dates The last two were Meetings or Courts for Judicature to determine the crime of Treason which every one knowes is determinable by inferiour Courts before the high Steward or Judges and therefore not so peculiar to a Parliament as to be made an argument of its existence And thus are we at an end of all the instances brought by the Opponent to prove that Parliaments before the Norman times consisted of those whom we now call the House of Lords All which I shall shut up with two other notes taken out of the Book of Councils published by Sir Henry Spelman The first of which concerneth a Grant made by Canutus Pag. 534. of an exemption to the Abby of Bury Saint Edmonds in a Councill wherein were present Arch-Bishops Bishops Abbots Dukes Earles Cum quamplurimis gregariis militibus cum populi multitudine copiosa votis regiis unanimiter consentientes The other taken out of the confessors Lawes which tells us that Tithes were granted to the Church A Rege Baronibus populo Pag. 621. And thus shall leave these testimonies to debate with one another whiles the Reader may judge as seemeth most equall to himselfe Being thus come to the Norman times and those ensuing I shall more summarily proceed with the particulars concerning them because they were times of force and can give little or no evidence against the customes rightly setled in the Saxon times which I have more particularly insisted upon that the originall constitution of this government may the better appeare Now for the more speedy manifesting of the truth in the particulars following I shall pre-advise the Reader in three particulars First that the Church-motes grew more in power and honor by the aide of the Normans Law refusing the concurrence and personall presence of Kings whom at length they excluded from their Councils with all his Nobles and therefore it is the lesse wonder if we heare but little of the Commons joyning with them Secondly that the Norman way of government grew more Aristocraticall then the Saxon making the Lords the cheif Instruments of keeping Kings above and people underneath thus we meet with much noise of meetings betweene the King and Lords and little concernning the grand meetings of the Kings and the representative of the people although some footsteps wee finde even of them also For Kings were mistaken in the Lords who meaned nothing lesse them to serve them with the peoples liberties together with their owne which they saw wrapped up in the grosse Thirdly by this meanes the Councils of the King and Lords grew potent not onely for advise in particular occasions but in matters of judicature and declaring of Law ordering of processe in Courts of Plees which in the first framing were the workes of Wise and Learned men but being once setled become part of the liberties of every Free-man And it is not to be doubted but these Councills of Lords did outreach into things two great for them to mannage and kept the Commons out of possession of their right during the present heat of their ruffling condition yet all this while could not take absolute possession of the legislative power I now come to the remainder of the particular instances produced by the Opponent which I shall reduce into severall Categories for the more cleere satisfaction to the Reader with lesse tediousnesse First it cannot be denied but the Councill of Lords gave advise to Kings in cases of particular immergency nor is it incongruous to the course of government even to this day nor meere that the Parliament
this day hold the last in custome to all intents whatsoever The last branch provideth the remedy to recover to the heire his possession in case it be detained either through doubtfulnesse of age of the heire or his title and it directs the issue to be tried by twelve men This triall some have thought to be of Glanvils invention and it may well be that this triall of this matter as thus set down was directed by him yet he useth often in his booke the word solet and in his preface saith that he will set down frequentius usitata and its past question but that the triall by twelve men was much more ancient as hath been already noted One thing more yet remaineth concerning the widdow of the tenant whose dower is not onely provided for but her reasonable part of her husbands personall estate The originall hereof was from the Normans and it was as popular as that of Wardships was Regall and so they made the English women as sure to them as they were sure of their children The Justices shall by Assize try disseisins done since the Kings 10. comming over Sea next after the peace made between him and his sonne This is called the Assize of Novel disseisin or of disseisins lately made It seems that the limitation was set for the Justices sake who now were appointed to that worke which formerly belonged to the County courts Glanv lib. 13. cap. 33. and to prevent intrenchments of Courts a limitation was determined although the copy seemeth to be mistaken for the limitation in the writ is from the Kings last voyage or going into Normandy Justices shall doe right upon the Kings writ for halfe a 11. Knights fee and under unlesse in cases of difficulty which are to be referred to the King The Justices itinerant ended the smaller matters in their circuits the other were reserved to the King in his bench Justices shall inquire of Escheates Lands Churches and 12. women in the Kings gift And of Castle guard who how much and where So as the Judges itinerant had the worke of Escheators and made their circuits serve as well for the Kings profit as Justice to the subjects They used also to take fealty of the people to the King at one certaine time of the yeere and to demand homage also These matters of the Kings Exchequer made the presence of the Judges lesse acceptable and it may be occasioned some kind of oppression And as touching Castleguard it was a tenure in great use in these bloody times and yet it seemeth they used to take rent instead of the personall service else had that enquiry how much been improper 13. Of a tenants holding and of severall Lords That one man may hold severall lands of severall Lords and so owe service to them all is so common as nothing can be more neverthelesse it will not be altogether out of the way to touch somewhat upon the nature of this mutuall relation between Lord and Tenant in generall that the true nature of the diversity may more fully appeare The foundation or subject of service was a piece of land or other tenement at the first given by the Lord to the Tenant in affirmance of a stipulation between them presupposed by the giving and receiving whereof the tenant undertooke to performe service to the Lord Glanv lib. 9. cap. 4. and the Lord undertooke protection of the tenant in his right to that tenement The service was first by promise solemnly bound either by oath which the Lord or his deputy by the common law hath power to administer as in the case of fealty in which the tenant bound himselfe to be true to the honour and safety of his Lords person and to perform the service due to the Lord for the tenement so given or otherwise by the tenants humble acknowledgement and promise not onely to performe the services due but even to be devoted to the Lords service to honour him and to adventure limbe and life and to be true and faithfull to the Lord. This is called Homage from those words I become your man Sir and yet promiseth upon the matter no more but fealty in a deeper complement albeit there be difference in the adjuncts belonging to each For though it be true that by promise of being the Lords man a generall service may seem to be implied yet in regard that it is upon occasion onely of that present tenure it seemeth to me that it is to be restrained onely to those particular services which belong to that tenement and therefore if that tenement be holden in soccage although the tenant be bound to homage yet that homage ties not the tenant to the service of a Knight Lit. lib. 2. cap. 5 nor contrarily doth the homage of a tenant in Knight service tie him to that of socage upon the command of his Lord though he professeth himselfe to be his man Nor doth the tenants homage binde him against all men nor ad semper for in case he holdeth of two or divers Lords by homage for severall tenements Glanv lib. 9. cap. 1. Lib. 7. cap. 10. and these two Lords be in warre one against the other the tenant must serve his chiefe Lord of whom the capitall house is holden or that Lord which was his by priority who may be called the chiefe Lord because having first received homage he received it absolutely from his tenant but all other Lords receive homage of such tenant with a saving of the tenants faith made to other Lords and to the King who in order to the publique had power to command a tenant into warre against his own Lord. If therefore he be commanded by the King in such cases unto warre he need not question the point of forfeiture Glanvil lib. 9. cap. 1. but if he be commanded by a chiefe of his other Lords into warre against a party in which another of his Lords is engaged his safest way is to enter upon the worke because of his allegiancc to that Lord yet with a salvo of his fealty to that other Lord. Ibid. cap. 4. But in all ordinary cases tenants and Lords must have regard to their stipulation for otherwise if either breake the other is discharged for ever and if the fault be in the tenant his tenement escheats to his Lord and if the Lord faile he loses his tenure and the tenant might thence forth disclaime and hold over for ever Neverthelesse the Lords had two priviledges by common custome belonging to their tenures which although not mentioned in the stipulation were yet more valuable then all the rest the one concerning matter of profit the other of power That of profit consisted in ayds and reliefe The ayds were of three kinds Ibid. c. 8. one to make the Lords eldest sonne Knight the other to marry his eldest daughter the third to helpe him to pay a reliefe to his Lord Paramont which in my opinion
the whole Nation and the King amongst the rest as the Priest that many times rendred the answer or sentence of that Oracle in his own sence and had it confirmed to him by an oath se judicium rectum in Regno facturum justiciam per concilium procerum regni sui tenturum Ll. Edw. cap. 16. so as though he was the first in view yet the Councell of Lords was the first in nature and the Cynosure to direct his tongue and actions From this fountaine issued also streams of judicature into all parts by Judges itinerant under the Kings Commission to reforme errours punish defaults in the ordinary rurall judicatories Miror cap. 5. Sec. 1. ca. 1. Sec. 3. and to dissolve hard and knotty cases and these were occasioned at the instance of the party and Alfred whose birth this was sent them forth in way of Association with the Sheriff Lord of the fee or other ordinary Magistrate CHAP. XXXVI Of the proceedings in Judicature by Indictment Appeale Praesentment and Action FOr the proceedings in course the Saxons were wont to begin with matters belonging to the Church and afterward to secular causes In which if the matters were criminall the most ancient way of proceeding was by appeale of the party complaining but afterwards in cases that concerned dammage injury or violence done to the body of a man or his estate the King was found to be therein prejudiced besides the prejudice immediately done to the subject for a man disabled in body or estate is disabled to serve the King and publique Indictment and upon this ground a way was found out to punish the offender by indictment besides the satisfaction done to the party wronged The proceedings against such delinquents were by attachment of the party Lambert Ll. Inae 15. who thereupon gave pledges for his appearance If the party could not be found a fugam fecit was returned and that was a conviction in Law and pursuit was made after the party by huy and cry If he was thereby taken the ancient way was that of Halifax law but in later times he was imprisoned Ll. Inae Lam fo 7. Ll. Alured cap. 6. Miror c. 2. Sec. 24. Ll. Edw. cap. 4. Miror p. 255. Gloss 335. Miror cap. 5. Sec. 9 10. Ll. Edw. cap. 7. Ll. Canut cap. 45. Miror cap. 2. Sec. 22. or admitted to baile if the offences were baileable and if the party bailed made default or did not abide the triall his baile suffered as principall If no baile could be procured the delinquent was imprisoned till he was legally acquitted but this imprisonment was onely in nature of a restraint If the delinquent was found upon the huy and cry and would not yeeld himselfe he was in repute a common enemy and as a wolfe any man might kill him as the Law was also the same in case of Utlary At the time of tryall if at the Kings suit the delinquent was indicted in this manner by any party present I D.C. do say for the King that I. S. is defamed by good men that he upon day of c. into the house and goods of did cast fire and the same did burn or if it were for bloodshed with a Sword did strike and wound him in the left arme and that this was done feloniously or if the case required trayterously and if I. S. deny the same I will for the King prove the matter against him as the King ought to doe that is to say Appeale Miror cap. 2. Sec. 15â— by witnesses and twelve men But if the complaint was at the suit of the party then the prosecutor sued him upon Appeale in manner following I. C. appealeth D. H. here present for that E father brother sonne or Vnkle according as the case was to I.C. being in the peace of God and of our Soveraigne Lord the King in the dwelling house of E. at c. the said D.H. upon the day of in the yeere of with a Sword made a wound of two inches long and six inches deep in the left pappe of the body of the said E. whereof he died and this was done feloniously and of malice forethought And if the said D.H. shall deny the same the said I.C. is ready to prove the same against him by his body or as a Monk woman or Clerk behooveth to prove the same that is by Champion for neither Monke woman nor Clerke was by Law to justifie by battaile in their own person The severall causes of appeale and indictment may be found in the Law bookes to whom I referre the Reader it not being within the compasse of this discourse to fall upon the particulars I shall onely observe the difference between Indictments former and later and between them and appeales viz. that appeales are positive accusations in the name of the prosecutor of the fact done by the party appealed whereas indictments were onely a publication or affirmation of the fame of a fact done by the party indicted and wherein not guilty pleaded served onely as in nature of a Quere to usher in the votes of the free men Concerning the fact secondly the difference between former Indictments from these in these daies consists in this that the ancient Indictments were in the name of one man those of the later sort are in the name of the Jury and the former were onely of a fame the later of the fact Miror cap. 2. Sec. 23. Presentment A third way of bringing controversies unto judgement concerned onely such matters as were of lesse consequence and these were introduced by way of presentment in the name or behalfe of the King in nature of positive accuse of one for a crime first laid down generally and then asserted by a particular fact in this manner I say for our Soveraigne Lord the King that H. here is perjured and hath broken faith against the King because whereas H. is or was Chancellor of the King and was sworn that he would not sell right or any remediall Writ to any one yet upon the day of c. he sold to B. a Writ of Attaint and would not grant the same under halfe a Marke so as the difference between an Indictment and Presentment in those daies was onely in the degree of crime for which the party delinquent was accused and in the manner of conclusion of the Presentment which was without averment The last way of trials concerns such offences that exceed not the nature of trespasse done to a mans person or his goods Miror cap. 2. Sec. 24. Action and this was by way of Action and it was to obtaine recompence for dammage sustained Now because the former were called personall trespasses the Processe was by attachment of the person who thereupon put in baile or else his person was secured by imprisonment till triall and satisfaction made but in the later that concerned the realty Ll. Aetheldr cap. 20. Ll. Canut c. 10