their places and then may proceed upon any thing there moved lawfully as lawfull persons for it is not convenient that they who are attainted should be in places of law full Judges And then another question was moved What shall be said of the King himself for he also was attainted by his Predecessour Rich. 3. and after communication had amongst themselves all did agree that the King was a person able and discharged of any former attainder ipso facto That he took upon him to raign and to be King by which it manifestly appeareth that by the Laws of England there can be no inter regnum within the same that presently by descent the next heir in blood is coÌ„pleatly and absolutely King without any essentiall Ceremony or act to be done ex post facto And that Coronation is but a royall ornament and outward solemnization of the descent and of this last matter Read Cooks 7 part fol. 10. 6. and that there followeth Of Dukes THe form of the Patent of Duke of York that now is Rex c. To all Archbishops Bishops Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts Barons Justices Governours Knights Ministers And to all Bailiffs and faithfull Subjects greeting Whereas We often times call to minde how many and innumerable gifts and what excellent benefits that great worker of all goodnesse of his only benignity and clemencie hath abundantly bestowed upon Us who by his power hath consociated divers and mighty Lyons in firm peace without any strife but also hath amplified and exalted the bounds and limits of our Government by his unspeakable providence above our progenitors with an indissolvible conjunction of the ancient and famous Kingdoms in the right of blood under our Imperiall Diadem in regard whereof we cannot but most willingly acknowledge our fruitfulnesse and issue plentifully adorned with the gift of Nature which he hath vouchsafed upon us because in truth in the succession of children a mortall man is made as it were immortall Neither unto any mortall men at leastwise unto Princes not acknowledging superiours can any thing happen in worldly cases more pleasant and acceptable then that their children should become notable in all vertues gooodnesse manners and increase of dignity so as they which excell others in noblenesse of bloud and indowments of Nature might not be thought of others to be exceeded Hence it is that that great goodnessâ— of God which is shewed unto us in our fertility to passe in silence or to be thought not to satisfie the Law of Nature whereby we are chiefly provoked to be well affected and liberall to those in whom we behold our blood to begin to florish coveting with great and fatherly affection that the perpetuall memory of our blood with honours and increase of dignity and all praise may be affected Our well-beloved Son Charls Duke of Albany Marquesse of Ormond Count of Rosse and Lord of Ardmannoth Our second begotten son in whom the Royall form and beauty worthy honour and other gifts of vertue do now in the best hopes shine in his tender graces We erect create make and ordain and to him the name stile state title dignity authority and honour of the Duke of York do give and him of that Name with the title state stile honour authority and dignity with other honors to the same belonging and annexed by the girding of the sword cap circlet of gold put upon his head and the delivery of a golden Virge we do really invest to have and to hold the same name and stile state and dignity authority and honour of the Duke of York unto the aforesaid Charles our second begotten son and to his heirs males of his body lawfully begotten for ever And that the aforesaid Charles our second begotten son according to the decencie and state of the said name of Duke of York may more honorably carry himself we have given and granted and by this our present Charter we confirm for us and our heirs unto the aforesaid Duke forty pounds to have and yeerly to receive to the foresaid Duke and his heirs for ever out of the Farms issues profits and other commodities whatsoever comming out of the foresaid County of York by the hands of the Sheriffe of the same County for the time being at the Terms of Easter and Michael the Arch-angel by even portions for that expresse mention of other gifts and grants by us unto the same Duke before time made in these presents made doth not appear notwithstanding These be witnesses the most excellent and most beloved Henry Prince our first begotten son Vlrick Duke of Holst brother of the queen our beloved wife and the Reverend Father in Christ Richard Archbishop of Canterbury Primate and Metropolitan of all England and also our welbeloved and faithfull Councellour the Lord Elesmore and Chancellour of England Thomas Earl of Suffolk Chamberlain of our houshold and also our dear cousin Thomas Earl of Arundel and our well-beloved cousin and Councellour Henry Earl of Northumberland Edward Earl of Worcester Master of our horse George Earl of Cumberland and also our well-beloved cousins Henry Earl of Southampton William Earl of Pembroke and also our well-beloved cousins Charles Earl of Devon Master of our Ordinance Henry Earl of Northampton Warden of the Cinque-Ports John Earl of Marr Robert Viscount Eranborne our principall Secretary and our well-beloved and faithfull Councellour Edward Lord Zuch President of out Councell in the Principality and Marches of Wales and also our wel-beloved and trusty Robert Lord Willoughby of Earsby William Lord Mounteagle Gray Lord Chandois William Lord Compton Francis Lord Norris Robert Lord Sidney our well-beloved and faithfull Councellours William Lord Knowles Treasurer of our houshold Edward Lord Wotton Comptroller of our houshold and our well-beloved and faithfull Councellour Alexander Lord and also our wel-beloved and faithfull Councellors George Dunbarr Lord of Barwick Chancellour of our Exchequer Edward Lord Bruse of Kinlose Master of the Rolls of our Chancery and also our faithfull and well-beloved Thomas Lord Eskine of Bielton Lord Balmermoth and others given by our hand at our Pallace of Westminster the sixth day of January in the second yeer of the Raign of K. James K. Edw. 3. in the 11 year of his Raign by his Charter in Parliament and by authority of Parliament did create Edw. his eldest son the Black-Prince D. of Cornwall not onely in title but cum feodo with the Dutchy of Cornwall as by the tenour of the said Letters Patents exemplified may appear Cookâ— 8 part in the pleading Habend ' et tenend ' eidem duci et ipsius et heraed ' suorum Regum Angliae filiâ—s primâ—gâ—niâ—is et dicti loci dâ—â—ibus in Regno Angliae bereditatoriae successoris To have and to hold to the same Duke and his heirs Kings of England the first begotten sons and Dukes of the same place in the kingdom of England and to hereditary succession so that he that is hereditable must be heir
King of England as also to our selfe by our Letters Patents doe grant and give licence for us and our heires so much as in us lyeth to the said Edmond to dispose and give all his Manours Lands Tenements and Knights fees with their appurtenances and Advowsons of Churches Abbies and Priories and Hospitalls which he holdeth of us in chiefe to whom he pleaseth To have and to hold to him and his heires for us and our heires by the service thereof for ever By which Grant the said Edmond gave all his Lands and Tenements to one William sonne of John Deyncourt and to his heires of his body comming And the said Edmond dyed the last yeere of Edward the second and the said William in the time of Edward the third was summoned among other Barons to the Parliament by vertue of the same gift untill his death which was Anno 3. E. 3. It appeareth by divers offices in the time of King Edward the third that John Handlow in the right of Maud his wife was seized of the Mannour of Holgate Acton Burnell c. for terme of her life remainder to Nicolas Handlow alias Burnell sonne to the said Maud and John by a fine in the Court levied and that John Lovell was next heire of the said Maud and her first-borne sonne by her first husband and afterwards the said Nicolas was summoned among other Lords to the Parliament by reason of the fine aforesaid and not the said John Lovel who was next heire Edward Burnell Baron of Holgate Philip Burnell Baron of Holgate Maud Burnell heire to her brother John Lovell the first husband John Lord Lovell Iohn Lord Lovell John Handlow second husband Nicolas Handlow Baron of Holgate Hugh Handlow alias Burnell Baron of Holgate Thomas de Beauchamp the elder Earle of Warwick by a fine levied 18. E. 3. entailed the Mannour and Castle of Warwicke with divers other possessions to himselfe for terme of his life the remainder whereof to Guy his eldest sonne and to the heires males of his body issuing for want of such heires the remainder to come to Thomes Beauchamp brother to the foresaid Guy and to his heires males of his body issuing c. And afterwards the said Gâ—y died without heires male of his body leaving two daughters and heires living afterward the said Earle dyed and the said Thomas the sonne entred into the Castle and Mannour aforesaid with other the premisses and was Earle of Warwick by reason of the entaile aforesaid notwithstanding that Katharine daughter of Guy and next heire to the said Thomas the elder was living 30. yeers after his death Thomas Beauchampe Earl of Warwick Guy de Beauchampe first son obiit ante patrem 30. E. 3 Katharine lived in 21. R. 2 Elizabeth Tho. de Beauchampe Earle of Warwicke by reason of the entail obiit anno 1. H. 4 Rich. Beauchamp Earl of Warwick obiit 17. H. 6 William Beauchamp de Beauchamp L. of Aberganey obiit 12. H. 4 Richard de Beauchamp Earl of Warwicke obiit 9. H. 5 Richard Earle of Arundell by a fine 21. E. 3. entailed the Castle Towne and Mannor of Arundell with other Lands to him and to his heires Males begotten of the body of Ellenor his wife By vertue of which entaile John Lord Matrovers Earle of Arundell after the decease of Thomas then Earle which died without heire Male although the sisters of the said Thomas possessed divers Lands and honors of the which the said Thomas died seised in Fee simple was Earle of Arundell Richard Earle of Arundell Richard Earle of Arundell obiit anno 21. R. 2 Thomas Earle of Arundell obiit anno 3. H. 5 Elizabeth married to Tho. Mowbray Duke Norfolk Jane Lady of Abergany Married to Lewthall John Arundell Knight Lord Matrovers John Arund Lord Matrovers obiit 6. H. 4 Io. Arund L. Matrovers obiit 9. H. 5 Io. E of Arun. by reason of the entail Thomas Lord Barkley was seised in his demesne as of fee of the Castle of Barkley and Mannour c. and a fine levied in the Kings Court 23 E. 3. of the aforesaid Castle Mannour c. to him for terme of his life remainder to Morrice his sonne and to the heires males of his body issuing with other remainders as aforesaid the which said Morrice had issue Thomas Lord Barkley and Iames Barkley Knight which Iames dyed in the life of his brother leaving Iames his sonne and heire living After the said Thomas Lord Barkley died Anno 5. H. 5. leaving Elizabeth his daughter and heir married to Richard Earle of Warwick after whose death Iames his Nephew on the brothers side entred into the Lands Castles and rem ' aforesaid by virtue of the entaile and was summoned among the Barons to the Parliament as Baron of Barkley 9. H. 5. which Elizabeth died in 1. H. 6. Tho. Lord Barkley Morrice Lo Barkley Tho. Lord Barkley Eliz. married to Rich. Earle of Warwick Sir Ia. Barkley died before his brother Iames Lo. Barkley by reason of the entaile Thomas Lord De la ware died seised in his demesne as of fee taile to himselfe and to the heires males of his body issuing by reason of a fine levied in the time of his ancestors of the Barony De la ware with divers other lands in other counties and died 5. H. 6. without heires of his body and Reignold West Knight of the halfe blood was next heire by reason of the entaile aforesaid and was summoned to the Parliament by the name of Reignold Lord De la ware Knight although Iohn Griffith was heire generall of the aforesaid Thomas De la ware being of the whole blood as appeareth by the genealogie ensuing Iohn Lord Delaware son of Roger. Iohn Lord Delaware Roger Lord Delaware Elisabeth daughter to Adam L. Wels. Iohn Lord De la ware died without issue Thomas Lord Dela ware died without issue Elisabeth daughter to the Lord Mowbray hâ—s second wife Iohn Griffin heire generall to the Lord Delaware Sir Reignold West Lord De la ware by the entail Katharine married to Nicolas Latimer Katharine married to Griffin Iohan married to Tho West Knight John de Vere Earle of Oxford seised in his demesne as of Fee taile to him and his heires Males of his body issuing of the honour and county of Oxford with divers other Lands Anno 18. H. 8. died without heires of his body and his three sisters were his next heires generall but Iohn de Vere his next heire Male as appeareth was Earle of Oxford by reason of the said entaile and none of the three sisters obtained Dignity Richard de Vere Earle of Oxford died 4. H. 5. Iohn de Vere Earle of Oxford deed 1. E. 4. John de Vere Earle of Oxford died without issue 4. H. 8. George de vere Knight Iohn de Vere Earl of Oxfo died without issue 18. H. 8. Eliz. married to Sir Antho. Wingfield Knight Ursula married to Edm. Knightley Esq Dorothy married to Nevill Sir Robert de Vere
signified unto the late Queene upon the Petition oâ— the sister and heire of Gregory late Lord Dacres deceased may appeare Moreover in the same Pedegree of the said Lord Dacres it is expressed that Thomas sometimes Lord Dacres had issue Thomâ—s his eldest son Ralph his second sonne and Humphrey his third sonne Thomas the eldest dyed in the life time of his Father having Issue Ioan his daughter and heire who was marryed unto Sir Richard Fines Knight And after Thomas Lord Dacres her Grandfather and Father unto the said Sir Ralph and Humphrey dyed After whose death Henry 6. by his Letters Patents bearing date at Westminster 7. Novem. Anno 7. regni reciting the said Peâ—egree and Marriage doth by his Lettâ—rs Pattents accept declare and repute the said Richard Fines to be Lord Dacres and one of the Barons of his Realme But afterward in the timâ— of Edw 4. the said Humphrey Dacres after the attaindor of the said Ralph and himselfe by an Act of Parliament which was in 1. Ed. 4. and after the death of the said Ralph and after the reversall of the same Act by another Act 12. Edw. 4. the said Humphrey made challenge unto the said Barony and to divers Lands of the said Thomas his Father whereupon both parties after their title had been considered in Parliament submitted themselves unto the Arbiâ—rement of King Edw. 4. and entred into Bond each â—o other for the performance thereof Whereupon the said King in his award under his Privie seale bearing date at Westminster 8. April Anno regni 13. did award that the said Rich Fines in the right of Ioan his wife and the Heires of his body lawfully begotten should be reputed had named and called Lord Dacres and that the said Richard Fines and the Heires of his body by the said Ioane begotten should keepe have and use the same state and place in every Parliament as the said Thomas Dacres Knight late Lord Dacres had used kept c. that the heires of the body of the said Thomas acres Knight late Lord Dacres lawfully begotten should have and â—old to them their Heites the Mannor of Holbech And furthermore the said King did award on the other part that the said Humphrey Dacres Knight and the Heires males of the said Thomas late Lord Dacres should be reputed had named and called the L. Dacres of Gillesland And that he and the heires males of the said Thomas then late Lord Dacres should have use and keepe the place in Parliament next adioyning beneath the said place which the said Rich Fines Knight Lord Dacres then had and occupied and that the heires of the body of the said Ioan his wife should have and occupie And that the Heires males of the said Thomas Dacres late L. Dacres should have to them to the heires males of their bodies begotten the Mannor of Jothington c. And so note that the name of the ancient Barony namely Gile sland remained unto the Heire male unto whom the land was entailed Moreover this is specially observed if any Baron by writ doe dy having none other issue then Female and that by some speciall entail or other assurance there be an heire male which doth enioy all or agreat part of the lands possessions and inheritances of such Barons deceased the Kings of this Realme have used to call to the Parliament by writ as Baron such here male omitting the Husband or issuâ— male of such heire female and this also appeareth by a notable controversie in the time of Henry 7. betweene Sir Robert Willoughby Lord Brooke and Richard Lord Latimer for the Barony of Latimer which in effect was The said Lord Brooke did challenge the Barony of Latimer as cosen and Heire to Elizabeth his great grandmother who was sister and heire to Iohn Nevill Lord Latimer who died without issue and hereupon exhibited a Petition to Henry 7. in Parliament whereto Richard then Lord Latimer was called to answer because he then enjoyed the said title and dignity The said Richard Lord Latimer by his answer did shew that it was true that after the death of the said Iohn Nevill Lord Latimer dying without issue the said Elizabeth was the sister and next heire and married unto Sir Thomas Willloughby Knight second son of the Lord VVilloughby but Henry 6. for that the said Iohn Nevill was dead without issue and that the next heire was female did therefore call to the Parliament George Nevill Knight second sonne of Ralph Earle of Westmerland to bee Lord Latimer as Cozen and next heire male of the said Iohn Nevillâ— Lord Latimer which George was grandfather of the said Richard Lord Latimer namely Father of Henry Lord Latimer Father of the said Richard In debate of which cause the question now in hand whether a Barony by writ may descend unto the heires females was advisedly considered of by the said King and his Nobility in Parliament and in the end adjudged with the said Richard Lord Latimer which President doth afford us two Iudgements in this point one in the time of Hen. 6. when the writ was directed to the said Sir George Nevill whereby he was summoned as Lord Latimer to the Parliament and as heire Male and not the said Sir Thomas Willoughby Knight husband of the said Eliz. heirâ— male And the second judgement was given in the time of Henry 7. wherby the Barony was adiudged vnto the said Richard Lord Latimer comming of the speciall heire male against the said Lord Brooke descended of the generall heire male But here the President before remembred of the Barony of Dacres may bee obiected to incounteâ— this confusion For there was an heire female married unto Sir Richard Fines who by the declaration of Hen. 6. was Baron of Dacres in the right of his wife and there was also Ralph and Humphrey the heires males before whom the heire female was preferred by the censure of Henry 6. and Edward 4. This obiection is easily answeared For although Hen. 6. through the Princely favour which he bare unto Sir Richard Fynes had declared him to bee Lord Dacres in the right of his wife yet notwithstanding did Ralph Dacres being heire male unto the then Lord Dacres deceased be are also the name of Lord Dacres by that name was attainted in Parliament Wherefore the reason why the heire male could not bee regarded was the said attainder of the said Ralph and Humfrey his brother and therefore when Humphrey 12. Edw. 4. laboured to have the said attainder reversed he submitted himselfe vnto the Arbitrament of the King who to satisfie both Competitors because both had well deserved of him after he had admitted them to his favour he allowed the one to be Lord Dacres the other to be Lord Dacres of Gillesland thus much concerning the second point whether a Barony by writ may discend unto the heire female or not As concerning the third point admitting such discent to bee to the heire female when there
is no accepter of persons for as unto the Lord he that is greater is as the lesser and he that doth govern as the servant but with men there is a difference of persons viz. The King and under him Dukes Counts Barons Vavasors and Knights Counts so called because they take their name from the County or from the word society who may also be tearmed Consull of Counselling For Kings do associate such men unto them to govern the people of God ordaining them into great honour power and name when they do gird them with swords that is to say ringis gladiorum with the Belts of their swords ringis so called * quasi renes girans circundans for that they compasse the Reins of such that they may keep them from incest and luxury because luxurious and incestuous persons are abominable unto God upon this cause were the stations and encamping of Arms called in the ancient language of Rome casâ—â—â— even of the word Castrare to geld since that they ought to be castrata vel castra In that place ought a good Generall to foresee that Venus delights be as it were gâ—lded and 〈◊〉 off from the Army vide Sir John Ferne his Book intituled The glory of generosity The sword also doth signifie the defence of the Kingdome and Countrey There be other Potents under the King which are called Barons that is to say robor belli the strength of Warre There be others which are called Vavasors viri magnâ— dignitatis â—en of great dignity for Vavasor cannot better be said to be any thing than Vas sortitum ad valetudinem a vessel chosen for valour or as men standing with their Generall ad valuas Regni and this is enough if not too much in generall spoken of the Nobility of England now follow I a more particular discourse of them according to their severall degrees The Prince THe Kings eldest Sonne and Heir apparant is stiled Prince Quasi primum locum capiens post Regem the first next the King To him it was permitted by the Statute of 24. Hen. 8. cap. 13. To wear Silk of the colour of Purple and Cloth of Gold of Tissue in his apparell or upon his horse but by another Statute made in the fourth yeer of King James Chap. 25. all Laws and Statutes concerning apparell are taken away And by the Statute of 34. Hen. 3. cap. 2. Taking shall not be from henceforth made by others then by the Purveyors of the King of the Queen and of the Prince their eldest Sonne and that if any other mans Purveyor make such taking it shall be done of them as those which do without warrant and the deed judged as a thing done against the peace and the Law of the Land and such as do not in manner aforesaid shall be duly punished To eschew maintenance and nourish peace and amity in all parts of the Realm many Statutes have been made in the Raign of Hen. 4. prohibiting the giving of signes or Liveries to any but to their menialls Neverthelesse by the Statute of 2. Hen. 4. cap. 21. It is provided that the Prince may give his honourable Liveries of signes to the Lords or to his meniall Gentlemen and that the said Lords may wear the same as they wear the Kings Livery and that the menialls of the Prince may also wear the same as the Kings menialls But afterwards by occasion of divers other Statutes of latter times made by sundry other Kings for the suppressing of that enormity of maintenance and of the generall words in them that priviledge of the Prince was abridged or rather taken away therefore the Statute of 12. Ed. 4. was made as followeth Item Our Soveraign Lord the King considering that the Prince the first begotten Sonne to the King of England hath been at their liberties to give their Liveries and signes at their pleasure and that divers Statutes against givers and takers of Liveries and signes as well in the time of his noble raign as in the time of his progenitors and predecessors hath been made and that by force of the said Statutes his dear beloved first begotten sonne Edward Prince of Wales Duke of Cornwall and Earl of Chester is as well as any other person restrained to give any such Liveries and signes as our Soveraign Lord the King willing that his first begotten sonne the Prince be at his liberty in receiving any person and giving his signes and Liveries in as large form as any Prince first begotten sonne of any of his Noble Progenitors and predecessors in time pasâ— have been hath ordained and established by authority of the said Parliament that the Prince shall be at his liberty to retain and give his honourable Livery and signe at his pleasure and that the persons so â—â—â—â—ined or to whom such Liveries or signes be or shall be given may be retained and received and wear the same Livery and sign without trouble impediment or impeachment pain contempt or forfeiture or any penalty contained in any of the said Statutes or in any thing in them comprised notwithstanding Nor that the said Statutes in any manner shall extend to any retaining to be made by the said Prince in giving taking or retaining of any Livery or signe of the Prince By the Statute 21. Hen. 8. cap 13. The Prince may retain as many Chaplains as he will though all others of the Nobility other then those of the Kings bloud be restrained to a certain number and they or any of them may purchase licence or dispensation and take receive and keep personages or benefices with cure of souls By order of the common Law a King might have a reasonable ayde of all his Tenents as well of those that did hold of his highnesse by Knights service as of those that did hold their Land in soccage That is to make his eldest Sonne But first note that the ayde is not to be recovered before the Sonne be of the age of 15. yeers or before the Daughter accomplish the age of 7. yeers Fitz Harbert Nat. brevium Knight and for the Marriage of his eldest Daughter and the summe of money was not in certainty but at the Kings pleasure till by the Statute made in the 25. of Ed. 3. cap. 11. by which is enacted as followeth Item It is assented that reasonable aid to make the Kings first Sonne Knight and to marry his eldest Daughter shall be demanded and levied after the forme of the Stature thereof made and not in other manner that is to say of every Knights Fee holden of the King without mean rate 20s and no more and of every 20â— of Land holden of the King without mean in soccagâ— 20s and no more and so rata pro rata of the Lands in soccage And for Lands of the â—enure of Chevalry according to the quantity of the Fee By another Statute made in the said 25. yeer of Ed. 3. cap. 2. amongst other things it is declared that to compasse
Kt Iohn de Vere Iohn de vere Earle of Oxford by vertue of the entaile Iohn de Vere William Lord Pagâ—t of Bewdesert was seised in his demesn as of fee of the Baronies of Langden and Hawood and of and in the Mannours of Bewdesert Landen c. And being so seised by fine quinto Mariae entailed the Baronies and Mannours aforesaid to him and his heires males of his body issuing And afterward Anno 5. Eliz. died leaving Henry his sonne next heire male Which Henry entred into the Baronies and land aforesaid by vertue of the foresaid fine and died thereof seised 11. Eliz. leaving Elizabeth his onely daughter and heire After whose death Thomas Paget brother and heire male of the said Henry entred into the Baronies and Mannours aforesaid and was summoned to the Parliament by virtue of the aforesaid fine William Lord Paget of Bewdesert died anno 5. Eliz. Henry Lord Paget dies An. 11. Eliz. Elizabeth his daughter and heire Thomas Lord Paget by force of the entaile after the death of his brother Robert Lord Ogle entred into the Barony of Bothal and Ogle with divers other Mannors and Lands in the County of Northumberland by conveiance which was to himselfe for terme of his life the remainder to the heires males of his body begotten and he took to his wife Dorothy Witherington by whom he had issue Robert Ogle his eldest sonne and Margery his daughter married Gregory Ogle of Chippington And the said Robert the father after the death of the said Dorothy his wife took to his second wife Ioane Ratcliffe by whom he had issue Cutbert his second sonne and after died After whose death Robert the sonne was Lord Ogle from whom the same descended to Cutbert being brother of the halfe blood by vertue of the said entaile and not to the said Margery nor unto her heires being of the whole blood unto the said Robert the sonne Robert Ogle Lord Ogle Dorothy daughter of Henry Withrington first wife Robert Ogle L. Ogle died without issue Margery maried to Ogle of Chippington Cuthbert Ogle of Chippington Joan the daughter of Cuthbert Ratcliff Kni. the second wife Cuthbert Ogle L. Ogle died Margery Ogle married Robert Witherington Thomas Ogle Moreover concerning the second objection it is very â—rue that many ancient Mannours which were anciently holden by Barony as the head or parcell of a Barony are now in the hands of Gentlemen meane and un-noble by blood who neither doe nor may claime any Nobility or honour thereby But the reason that some former gifts made by the Kings Majesties progenitouâ—s the supreme Soveraignes of this Realme to such as they honoured in augmentation and support of their honour and by honourable services should thus come to the hands of mean personages are twofold First for that such Mannours have been alieued by licence unto such persons before spoken whom such possessions alone cannot make noble Secondly and that was usually such Mannours as were holden by Barony have upon divers eâ—cheasons and occasions come to the Crowne by way of revertor or eschete or forfeit by meanes whereof the ancient tenures derived from the Crowne by reason of those lands so comming again to the Crown were extinct and after the said lands were given or conveyed to others reserving other services than those which at the first were due for the same so that it was no marvaile to see that some Mannours anciently holden by Barony or other honourable service should now bee holden in soccage or by other triviall or meane tenure As to that which was thirdly objected that some ancient Barons there are which have aliened and sold away those Castles and Mannours of the which they have and doe beare the name and dignity and yet neverthelesse themselves doe still retaine and keep lawfully their estate dignity and degree of a Barâ—â— and have been and are called to the Parliament such alienation notwithstanding To this I answer That it is true but it proveth nothing against the former resolution And therefore for better satisfaction of this observation it is to be considered that such Barons either be originally Barons by writ or Barons by tenure Barons by writ in this respect now in hand are of two kindes For either in such writ whereby they or their Ancestors were at first summoned they were named onely by their owne names or else there was addition given them of the principall place of their aboad which was done either for distinction sake to sever them from some honourable person of the same surname or else to give them such honourable title by addition of the place which place notwithstanding was not holden by Barony And therefore if such a Baron doe alien away that place which anciently was his seat he may neverthelesse retain his honourable title in respect had of such a place But if a Baron by tenure doe alien away the honourarable Castle or Mannour holden by Barony unto a mean person not capable of honour and that by sufficient licence so to doe and after the alienour which made such alienation be called by writ to the Parliament under the title or as Baron of such Honour Castle or Mannour so aliened he is not any more a Baron by tenure in respect of that place for that he hath aliened that away which he held by Barony but thenceforth after such writ of summons he is become a Baron by writ and may retaine the name of Baron by title of the place as Baron by writ such alienation notwithstanding forasmuch as the writ directed at the pleasure of the Prince doth give unto him that addition of name and dignity And thus much touching the resolution of the said question and satisfaction of the said objections and of Barons by tenure BARONS by writ which is the second kind of Barons mentioned in the former Divisions of BARONS A Baron by writ is he unto whom a writ of summons in the name of the King is directed to come to the Parliament appoinâ—ed at a certaine time and place to be holden and there with his Highnesse the Prelates Nobility and Peeres to treat and advise touching the waighty affairs of the Realme Tâ—e forme of which writ is much to the effect of the writ before mentioned in the title of Earle which kind of writ is as well directed to the Barons by tenure as Baâ—â—â—â— by creation Patent or otherwise But those which 〈◊〉 Barons by tenure nor by Patent and have onely 〈◊〉 writs are therefore called Barons by writ and upâ—◠〈◊〉 of such writ and place taken accordingly in 〈◊〉 ought to enjoy the name dignity and hoâ—â— of a Baron 〈◊〉 â—ouching the antiquity of Barons by writ onely and â—â—eir first institution I finde little or no mention before â—he time of H. 3. And therefore I conceive that either the first of all or at least that the first frequent use of such Barons was had and devised 49. H. 3. in case of necessity and upon a lamentable
is no heire male at all that may claime the same for then doth this question take place whether the husband of such heire female shall enioy the dignitie in the right of his wife or no wherein wee are to rest upon a resolution had and given in this speciall question which was in this manner In the time of Hen. 8. when Mr. Winbie tooke upon him the stile of Lord Talboys in the right of his wife having none issue by her the said King assisted both by Civill and Temporall Lawyers gave sentence that no husband of Baronesse in her right should use the stile and dignitie untill he had by her a Child whereby he should become Tenant by the courtesie unto her inheritance The speciall reasons that occasioned this sentence were two First it should be inconvenient for her husband this day to bee a Baron and Peere of the Realme and to morrow by the death of his wife to become none and that without the death of the partie Secondly if he had issue by his wife and were intituled to be Tenant by the curtesie of England of the wives land if hee shall not also beare the stile and dignitie of her Barony then should his sonne after the death of his mother dying in the life time of his father bee Baron and Lord without land for so the Father should have the land as Tenant by the curtesie and the sonne the Lordship without Land And thus much said concerning the nature quality and estate of a Baron by writ and for resolution of the severall points and Articles of the question proposed may suffice Barons by Patent which is the third kind of Barons mentioned in the former division of Barons THere is also a fourth meanes of creation by act of Parliament but the first 2. mentiond and this by Patent are most for the honour of the King for thereby the donation doth proceed from his highnes onely as from the fountaine of all honour and dignity but when the creation is by Parliament every one may bee said donator Cookes 8. part 19. A Baron by creation by reason of Letters Patents is that Noble person whom the Kings Maiesty or any of his progenitors Kings of the Realme have created Barons by such their Letters Patents But this manner of creating Barons by Patent began in the Raign of R. 2. who created first Iohn Beauchamp of Holt Baron of Kidderminster by his Letters Patents 8. October anno 11. But Mils saith in 30. H. 6. this was brought in This kind of dignity of Baron shall bee of such countenance in discent or otherwise as shall beelimited in the Habendi in such Letters Patents contained for it may be but for the life of him to whom it is given or for terme de anter vie of some other mans life as some hold opinion in 9. H. 6. 29. for Cujus est dare eius est dispoâ—ere it may be in speciall a generall tayle and this kind of estate tayle was usuall before the Statute made 13. E. 1. by which estate tayle in Lands and Tenements was created as appeareth by the Patent whereby Hubert de Burgo was made Earle of Kent in the time of H. 3. by these words Habend sibi hered suis de corpore Maâ—gaâ—etaeuxoris suâ— sororis Alexandri Regis Scotiâ— procreatis pro defectu talis exitus remaâ—ere rectis heredâ—bus dicti Huberti and that estates in tayle are at this day titles of honour by the Statute of Westm 2. vide Nevils case Cooks 7. part 33. For the better explanation of this kind of dignity the resolution also of certaine questions shall be very requisite Question If a Nobleman and his Progenitors have for a long time been called to the Parliament and be a Baron either by tenure or writ have had in regard thereof a place certaine in Parliament if afterwards the same Nobleman should be created a Baron of that Barony and by the same name by Letters Patents whether shall hee and his heires retaine his old place in Parliament which hee had according to the former dignity or whether shall he lose â—is old place and take a new place according to the time of his creation onely Answer The case of the Lord Delaware received a resolution Coo 11. part â—â—e Lord de la wares case somewhat answerable to this question Tho. Lord Delaware 3. â— 6. being in some displeasure with William West his Nephew and heire who was Father to the now Lord De la ware procured an Act of Paâ—liament by the which the said Wâ—ll West was during his naturall life only clearly disabled to clayme demand or have any manner of right title or interest by discent â—evenue or otherwise in or to the mannor lands tenements or hereditaments title and dignity of Thomas Lord De la wâ—re his Vncle Afâ—er the said Thomas De la ware dyed and the said VVilliam West was in the time of the late Queene Elizabeth restored and afterwards in the 8. yeare of her Raigne was â—teated Lord De la ware by Patent and had place in Parliament according to his creation by Patent for that by the said Act of Parliament in the time of E. 6. hee was excluded to challenge the former ancient Baâ—ony and after hee dyed whether the new Lord Dela ware should take his place to the ancient Barony by writ or according to his Fathers creation by Patent was the question the opinion of the late Queenes Counsell being Her Majesties Atturney Generall and Solicitor were that the acceptance of the new creation by the said William West could not distinguish the ancient dignity in him at the time of his creation but the dignity was at that time by the Act of Parlâ—ament 3. E. 6. in obeyance suspence or consideration of Law and hee thereby utterly disabled to have the same during his life only so as other acceptance could not extinguish that dignity which hee then had not nor could not conclude his hâ—ire who was not disabled by the said Act of 3. E. 6. to clayme the ancient Barony which opinion of theirs was seene and allowed by the resolution of the chiefe Iustice of England and Lord chiefe Baron and so signified unto the Lord Keeper but this is to bee noted by the reasons made for the said resolution that if the said William West had beene Baron and intituled or in possession of the ancient dignity when hee accepted the said creation the Law perchance might have been otherwise but that remayneth as yet unresolved neverthelesse the rule eodem mod quo quid constuitur dissolvitur but by grant which is made a matter in fact a man cannot transferre his title of honour Cook 7. part And thus much concerning the three degrees of Barons within this Realme may suffice to be said in geneâ—all upon this occasion for the better understanding and direction of that which followeth to be handled And in this place I thinke it not impertinent
Steward shall declare unto the people the cause why the King hath assembled thither those Lords and him and perswade him to answere without feare and then hee shall cause the Clarke of the Crowne to read his endictement unto him and aske him if hee bee guilty or not whereunto when hee hath answered not guilty the Clarke of the Crowne shall aske him how hee will bee tryed and then hee will say by God and his Peeres and then the Kings Sergeants and Attourney will give evidence against him whereunto when the Prisoner hath made answere the Constable shall bee commanded to retire the Prisoner from the Barre to some other place while the Lords doe secretly conferre in the Court together and then the Lords shall rise out of their places and consult amongst themselves and what they affirme shall bee done upon their Honour without any oath to bee ministred unto them and when they all or the greatest part of them bee agreed they shall returne to their places and sit downe and then the High Steward shall aske of the youngest Lord by himselfe if he that is arraigned bee guilty or not of the offence whereof hee is arraigned and then of the youngest next him and so of the residue one by one untill hee have asked them all and every Lord shall answere by himselfe and then the High Steward shall send for the Prisoner againe who shall bee led to the Barre to whom the High Steward shall reherse the verdict of the Peeres and give judgement accordingly Stamford Pleas del Coronae lib. 3. cap. 1. Poulton 188. The antiquity of this kind of triall by the opinion of the last recited Authours is grounded from the Statute of Magna charta so called not in regard of the quantity but in regard of the waight thereof Cooke Epistle to the 8. part fol. 2. c. 29. beginning thus Nullus liber homo c. nec supereum ibimus nec super eum mittemus nisi per legale judicium parvu ' suorum But I take it to bee more ancient then the time of Hen. 3. as brought into the Realme with the Conquerour being answerable to the Norman and French Lawes and agreeable with the Customes Fewdall where almost all the controversies arising betweene the Soveraigne and his vassall are tried per judicium Parvu ' suorum And if a Peere of the Realme upon his arraignement of treason doe stand mute or will not answere directly judgement shall bee given against him as a Traytour convicted and hee shall not bee pressed to death and thereby save the forfeiture of his lands for treason is out of the Statute of Westminster the first c. 12. 15. E. 4. 33. Dyer 205. and 300. But if hee bee arraigned upon an indictement of fellony hee may bee mute Iâ— appeareth by this Statute of Magna charta that a Peere of the Realme shall bee tried by his Peeres onely in case where hee is indicted at the Kings suite of treason or fellony for the words of the Statute bee Wee will not passe or sit in judgement upon him but by his Peeres But if an Appeale of murder or other fellony bee sued by any Common person against a Peere of the Realme hee shall bee tried by Common persons and not by his Peeres Stam. Pleas del Coron lib. 3. cap. 1. Brooke triall 142. Poulton 188. 6. This Priviledge hath some restraints as well in regard of the person as in the manner of proceedings As touching the person First the Archbishops and Bishops of this Realme though they bee Lords of the Parliament if they bee impeached of such an offence they shall not bee tried by the Peeres of the Realme but by a jury of Knights and other substantiall persons upon their oaths the reason thereof alleadged is for as much as Archbishops and Bishops cannot passe in like cases upon the triall of any other of the Peeres for that they are prchibited by the Common and Ecclesiasticall Lawes to bee Judges of life and death and reason would that the other Peeres should not trie them for this triall should bee mutuall for as much as is performed upon their Honours without any oath taken And so by the way you may see the great regard the Law hath to the word of a Peere of the Realme when hee speaketh upon his Honour even in a case concerning the life of a man and that of a Peere and therefore ought they much more to keepe their words and promises in smaller matters when they engate their Honours for any fast cause or consideration Crompton Courts 13. Secondly as touching the Persons no temporall Lords but they that are Lords of the Parliament shall have this kind of triall and therefore hereout are excluded the eldest Sonne and Heire apparant of a Duke in the life of his Father though he bee called an Earle and it was the case of Henry Howard Earle of Surrey Sonne and Heir apparent of Thomas Duke of Suffolke in 38. H. 8. which is in Brooks abridgement treason likewise the Son and Heir apparant of an Earl though he be called Lord or Baron And all the younger Sonnes of the Kings are Earles by birth though they have no other creation but shall not be partakers of this or other priviledges incident to the Lords of the Parliament Thirdly those that are Barons of the Nobility of Ireland or of Scotland if upon the like offence committed in England they be apprehended in England they shall not have their triall by Peeres no though they were borne within England for they received their dignity from a King of their Nations But if the King of England at this day do create one of his subjects of Scotland to be Viscount Roâ—hester within England or by ordinary summons under his great Seale doe call him to his upper House of Parliament do assign him a place and to have a voice there in his great Councell amongst the Lords and Peeres of the Realme he shall thereby also be a Peere of the Realme and be partaker with them in all priviledges and thus much concerning the restraint of the said priviledges in respect of the person as touching the manner of proceeding it appeareth by the said statute of Magna charta c 29. that a Peere of the Realme shall be tried by his Peeres only in case where he is indicted at the Kings suite of treason of fellony for the words of the statute be Nec super eum ibimus But if an appeale of murder or other fellony be sued by any Common person by a Peere of the Realme he shall be tried by Common persons and not by his Peeres Stam. Pleas del Corone lib. 3. cap. 1. Pâ—ulton 118. and so was Fines Lord Dacres tried in aâ—peale of murder 33. H. 8. Brooke Abridgement trials 142. The Nobility of this Realme enjoy that priviledge that they are not to be impanelled in any Iury or Inquests to mâ—ke tryall or Enquiry upon their corporall oathes betweene party and party for
this point is the civill Law Neverthelesse there was a judgment in the time of H. 3. touching the descent of the Earldome of Chester after the death of the Earle who dyed without issue his sisters being his heires which Judgement was that the said Earldome should bee divided amongst the said copartners as other lands and that the eldest should not have it alone 23. H. 3. Fitz. partic 18. But this judgement was holden erroneous even in those times wherein it was given For Bracton a learned Judge who lived in that age thus writeth thereof treating of Partition among Copartners lib. 2. cap. 34 fol. 76 b. De hoc autem quod dicitur quod de feodo militare veniunt in divisione capitalia messuagia inter cohaeredes dividuntur hoc verum est nisi capitale messuagium illud sit caput comitatus propter jus gladii quod dividi non potest vel caput Baeroniae castrum vel aliud aedificium hoc ideo ne sit caput per plures particulas dividetur plura jura Comitat ' Baroniarum deveniant ad nihilum per quod deficiat regnum quod ex Comitatibus Baroniis dicitur esse constitutum Si autem plura sunt aedificia quae sunt capita Baeroniae dividi possunt inter cohaeredes facta electione salvo jure essentiae quia cùm plura sunt ibi jura quodlibet per se poterit integrè observart quod quidem non est in uno ut praedictum est licet à quibusdam dicatur quòd in aliis regionibus aliquando de consuetudine dividatur sed quod nunquam dividi debeat in Anglia videtur nec visum fuit contrarium erit consuetudo regionis observanda ubi haereditas quae petitur personae nascuntur quae petunt unde sic dicatur quòd in regno Angliae aliquando facta fuit partitio hoc fuit injustum It is therefore evident that Baronies and dignities of Honour do by the Lawes of this Realm descend unto the eldest Coapercener and the Iudgement given once to the contrary thereof Bracton doth rightly account to be unjust his reason is notable for in as much as the honour of the Chivalry of the Realme doth chiefly consist in the Nobility reason would not that such dignitie should be divided amongst Coaparceners whereby through multitude of partitions the reputation of Honour in such snccession and so divided might be impaired or the strength of the Realme being drawne into many hands with the decrease of livelihood by partition should be enfeebled in which Resolution Britton the learned Bishop of Hereford who compiled his Booke of the Lawes of the Realme by the commandement and in the name of E. 1. according Britton 187. and therefore howsoever that Judgemâ—nt was given or whensoever it is neverthelesse very evident that it was soone redressed for if it were given upon the death of Renulph the last of that name the Earle of Chester who dyed about 17. H. 3. without issue the Writers of that time doe testifie that the Earledome of Chester came wholly unto Iohn Scot the sonne of David Earle of Huntington and Anguish and of Maud the eldest sister of the said Renulph if it were given upon the death of the said Iohn Scot who dyed without issue about 14. H. 7. yet notwithstanding the said Judgement stood not in force for that the said King assumed the said Earledome into his owne hands upon other satisfaction made to the sisters Coparceners of the said Iohn Scot. Ne tanta hereditas colos deduceretur Matth. Paris Monast S. Albani in Arr. fol. 3. 66. B. tamen vide Vill. fol. 75. et Ioh. Guill 78. For this it is to be observed out of Presidents and to be acknowledged of every dutiful Subject that the King is at liberty to call and advance to honour whom his Highnesse shall in his Princely wisdome thinke most meet and therfore whereas Ralph Lord Cromwell being a Baron by Writ dyed without issue having two sisters and co-heires Elizabeth the eldest married unto Sir Thomas Nevill Knight and Ioane the younger married unto Sir Hunt Burther hee who married the younger sister was called unto the Parliament as Lord Cromwell and not the said Sir Thomas Nevill who had married the eldest sister and Hugh Lupus the first and great Earle of Chester was by the Conquerour his Uncle created Earle of Chester Habemus sibi heredibus adeo libere per gladium sicut ipse Rex tenuit Angliam per Coronam Hugh dyed without issue and the inheritance of his Earledome was divided amongst his foure sisters and the eldest had not the Seigniory entire unto her selfe Reade Mills 74 75. Cookes b. part 53. 7. part 15. If a Woman be Noble by birth or by discent with whomsoever she doth marry though her Husband bee under her degree yet she doth remaine Noble for her Birthright Est Character in delibilis Cook 4. part 118. b. 6. part 53. b. Other Women are enobled by Marriage and the text saith thus viz. Women with the honour of their Husbands and with the kindred of their Husbands we worship them in the Court we decree matters to passe in the name of their Husbands and into the house and sirname of their Husbands wee doe translate them but if afterwards a woman doe marry with a man of baser degree then loseth she her former Dignitie and followeth the condition of her latter Husband Fortescue de laudibus legum Angl. 100. And as concerning the second disparaged Marriage as aforesaid many other bookes of the law doe agree for these bee rules received in those Cases Si mulier nobilis nupserit ignobili desit esse nobilis eadem modo quo quidem Constitut dissolvitur Cookes 6. part 53. B. 4. part 118. It was the Case of Ralph Hayward Esquire who tooke to his wife Anne the widdow of the Lord Powes they brought an Action against the Duke of Suffolke by the name of Ralph Hayward Esquire and the Lady Anne Powes his wife and exception was taken for misnaming her because shee ought to have beene named by the Husbands Name and not otherwise and the exception was by the Court allowed For said they by the Law of God shee is Sub potestate viri and by our Law her Name of Dignitie shall bee changed according to the degree of her Husband notwithstanding the curtesies of the Ladies of Honour and Court Dyer 79. And the like was also in Queene Maries Raigne when the Dutchesse of Suffolke tooke to her Husband Adrian Stoakes Prob. 456. and many other presidents have beene of latter time and herewith agreeth the Civill Law punctually Digest lib. 1. Tit. 9. Lege 8. Eodem de Dignitate Liber 12. Lege 2. In this case of acquired Nobility by Marriage of Question in Law be whereupon an issue is taken betweene the parties that is to say Dutchesse or not Dutchesse Countesse or not Countesse Baronesse or not Baronesse the