Patents doe grant and give licence for us and our heires so much as in us lyeth to the said Edmond to dispose and give all his Manours Lands Tenements and Knights fees with their appurtenances and Advowsons of Churches Abbies and Priories and Hospitalls which he holdeth of us in chiefe to whom he pleaseth To have and to hold to him and his heires for us and our heires by the service thereof for ever By which Grant the said Edmond gave all his Lands and Tenements to one William sonne of John Deyncourt and to his heires of his body comming And the said Edmond dyed the last yeere of Edward the second and the said William in the time of Edward the third was summoned among other Barons to the Parliament by vertue of the same gift untill his death which was Anno 3. E. 3. It appeareth by divers offices in the time of King Edward the third that John Handlow in the right of Maud his wife was seized of the Mannour of Holgate Acton Burnell c. for terme of her life remainder to Nicolas Handlow alias Burnell sonne to the said Maud and John by a fine in the Court levied and that John Lovell was next heire of the said Maud and her first-borne sonne by her first husband and afterwards the said Nicolas was summoned among other Lords to the Parliament by reason of the fine aforesaid and not the said John Lovel who was next heire Edward Burnell Baron of Holgate Philip Burnell Baron of Holgate Maud Burnell heire to her brother John Lovell the first husband John Lord Lovell Iohn Lord Lovell John Handlow second husband Nicolas Handlow Baron of Holgate Hugh Handlow alias Burnell Baron of Holgate Thomas de Beauchamp the elder Earle of Warwick by a fine levied 18. E. 3. entailed the Mannour and Castle of Warwicke with divers other possessions to himselfe for terme of his life the remainder whereof to Guy his eldest sonne and to the heires males of his body issuing for want of such heires the remainder to come to Thomas Beauchamp brother to the foresaid Guy and to his heires males of his body issuing c. And afterwards the said Guy died without heires male of his body leaving two daughters and heires living afterward the said Earle dyed and the said Thomas the sonne entred into the Castle and Mannour aforesaid with other the premisses and was Earle of Warwick by reason of the entaile aforesaid notwithstanding that Katharine daughter of Guy and next heire to the said Thomas the elder was living 30. yeers after his death Thomas Beauchampe Earl of Warwick Guy de Beauchampe first son obiit ante patrem 30. E. 3. Katharine lived in 21. R. 2. Elizabeth Tho. de Beauchampe Earle of Warwicke by reason of the entail obiit anno 1. H. 4. Rich. Beauchamp Earl of Warwick obiit 17. H. 6. William Beauchampde Beauchamp L. of Aberganey obiit 12. H. 4. Richard de Beauchamp Earl of Warwicke obiit 9. H 5. Richard Earle of Arundell by a fine 21. E. 3. entailed the Castle Towne and Mannor of Arundell with other Lands to him and to his heires Males begotten of the body of Ellenor his wife By vertue of which entaile John Lord Matrovers Earle of Arundell after the decease of Thomas then Earle which died without heire Male although the sisters of the said Thomas possessed divers Lands and honors or the which the said Thomas died seised in Fee simple war Earle of Arundell Richard Earle of Arundell Richard Earle of Arundell obiit anno 21. R. 2. Thomas Earle of Arundell obiit anno 3. H. 5. Elizabeth married to Tho. Mowbray Duke Norfolk Married to Lewthall Jane Lady of Abergany John Arundell Knight Lord Matrovers John Arund Lord Matrovers obiit 6. H. 4. Io. Arund L. Matrovers obiit 9. H. 5. Io. E. of Arun. by reason of the entail Thomas Lord Barkley was seised in his demesne as of fee of the Castle of Barkley and Mannour c. and a fine levied in the Kings Court 23 E. 3. of the aforesaid Castle Mannour c. to him for terme of his life remainder to Morrice his sonne and to the heires males of his body issuing with other remainders as aforesaid the which said Morrice had issue Thomas Lord Barkley and Iames Barkley Knight which Iames dyed in the life of his brother leaving Iames his sonne and heire living After the said Thomas Lord Barkley died Anno 5. H. 5. leaving Elizabeth his daughter and heir married to Richard Earle of Warwick after whose death Iames his Nephew on the brothers side entred into the Lands Castles and rem ' aforesaid by virtue of the entaile and was summoned among the Barons to the Parliament as Baron of Barkley 9. H. 5. which Elizabeth died in 1. H. 6. Tho. Lord Barkley Morrice Lo Barkley Tho. Lord Barkley Eliz. married to Rich Earle of Warwick Sir Ia. Barkley died before his brother Iames Lo. Barkley by reason of the entaile Thomas Lord Delaware died seised in his demesne as of fee taile to himselfe and to the heires males of his body issuing by reason of a fine levied in the time of his ancestors of the Barony Delaware with divers other lands in other counties and died 5 H. 6. without heires of his body and Reignold West Knight of the halfe blood was next heire by reason of the entaile aforesaid and was summoned to the Parliament by the name of Reignold Lord Delaware Knight although Iohn Griffith was heire generall of the aforesaid Thomas Delaware being of the whole blood as appeareth by the genealogie ensuing Iohn Lord Delaware son of Roger. Iohn Lord Delaware Elisabeth daughter to Adam L. Wels. Iohn Lord Delaware died without issue Thomas Lord Delaware died without issue Roger Lord Delaware Elisabeth daughter to the Lord Mowbray his second wife Iohn Griffin heire generall to the Lord Delaware Sir Reignold West Lord Delaware by the entail Katharine married to Nicolas Latimer Katharine married to Griffin Iohan married to Tho West Knight John de Vere Earle of Oxford seised in his demesne as of Fee taile to him and his heires Males of his body issuing of the honour and county of Oxford with divers other Lands Anno 18. H. 8. died without heires of his body and his three sisters were his next heires generall but Iohn de Vere his next heire Male as appeareth was Earle of Oxford by reason of the said entaile and none of the three sisters obtained Dignity Richard de Vere Earle of Oxford died 4. H. 5. Iohn de Vere Earle of Oxford died 1. E. 4. John de Vere Earle of Oxford died without issue 4. H. 8. George de Vere Knight Iohn de Vere Earl of Oxfo died without issue 18. H. 8. Eliz. married to Sir Antho Wingfield Knight Vrsula married to Edm. Knightley Esq Dorothy married to Nevill Sir Robert de Vere Kt. Iohn de Vere Iohn de Vere Iohn de Vere Earle of Oxford by vertue of the entaile William Lord Paget of
act in law presently upon the death of the Ancestor unto the heire or not at all Wherefore the custome of our countrey and manifold presidents doe prove that this kind of Barony doth descend from the Ancestors to the heire and there needs not any words of heirs in the writ of summons Onely one president there is in a speciall writ sometimes directed to Sir Henry Bromsted in 27. H. 6. wherein he was stiled Lord Veysey wherein there are these words inserted Volumus tamen vos haeredes vestros masculos de corpore vestro legitimè procreatos excuntes Barones de Veysey existere which is to bee read in Co. 7. part 33. b. Wherefore as it is true that where the heire of any such Baron by writ is called to the Parliament that his descent of honour is thereby established and approved by the gracious judgment of our sacred Soveraigne so it is also true that if it shall stand with his Highnesse pleasure that such heire shall not be summoned at all for none can come to so high a Councel unlesse he be called then that Nobility is much empaired and in a manner extinguished in the censure of all men for that it had none other originall but by writ of summons from the which in the judgment of the supreme soveraign he is excluded As to the second principall point whether the Barony by writ may descend to the heires females it shall not be amisse likewise to view the reasons of either part and by conflict of argument the truth may the better be discerned Those that maintain the affirmative part do reason after this manner In reason the sexe of the heire female ought no more to bar her of the dignity than the nonage of the heire male ought to bar him although during his nonage he be unable to do the service but as the service of the one is forborne for a time so the sexe of the other may at all times be supplied by the maturity and sufficiency of her husband Offices of honour which do much import the publique weale being passed by inheritance do descend to the heire female if there be no nearer heire male As the office of the high Constableship of England which descended to the daughters of Humphrey de Bohun Earle of Hereford and Essex a memoriall whereof is in Dyer 285. but more at large in Keilway 6. H. 8. Also the office of Lord-Steward descended to Blanch daughter to H. Earle of Lancaster the like may be said of the office of Earle Marshall which descended by an heire female unto the house of Norfolk all which offices are unfit to be exercised by a woman as it is unfit for a woman to be summoned to the Parliament as a Baronesse by writ And many noble houses in England do support the dignity of Baronage unto them descended by women They which stand on the negative part of this controversie do encounter their adversaries on this manner viz. The writ of summons to the Parliament whereby the Baron by writ hath his originall is to call that honourable and worthy person so summoned to be one of the number of that right high and honourable Assembly and to be a Judge to sit heare and determine life and member plea and right of land if there shall come occasion likewise to give counsell and advice in the most weighty affaires of the Realme But these things are convenient for the quality of men unfitting and altogether unbeseeming the sexe of women Ergo having respect unto the finall purpose of such writs such inheritances should only descend unto the heire male and not unto the heire female Secondly if it shall be answered that although the heire female to whom such inheritance is descended be unfit in her owne person for the accomplishing of these things yet she may marry with one sufficiently able for her and in her behalf to execute the same this answer will neither satisfie nor salve the inconveniences For admit that such heire female were at full age at the death of her Ancestor unmarried it doth lie in her own choice who shall be her husband so shall the pleasure of the Soveraigne in the choice of his Councell in the great causes of the Realme be subject to the will of his subject in the choice of her husband which were altogether inconvenient Thirdly if such husband shall be called in the right of his wife the writ should make some mention hereof for otherwise it may well be taken that the husband was chosen in his own person and in behalfe of himselfe and not in regard of his wife or such pretended dignity descended unto him But there was never such writ of summons seen wherein the wife was mentioned and if the husband of such wife have been called to the Parliament which is alwayes by generally writ not mentioning his wife he is now made thereby a Baron of himself and in his own right by that writ Having thus heard both sides speak place doth now require to interpose opinion to compound this controversie This question or point is somewhat perplexed by means of difficult presidents for first it is observed that some presidents do prove that Baronies by writs have descended unto heires females whose husbands have beene called to the Parliament whether in regard of themselves or in regard of their wives it matten not But sure it is that the marriage of such Ladies gave them occasion so to be summoned and such husbands and their posterity have and do lawfully beare the same name of dignity which the Ancestors of such wife did before rightfully beare For by this controversie there is no purpose to call the right of such noble houses into question Howbeit secondly this is to be observed out of the presidents and to be acknowledged of every dutifull subject that the Kings Majesty is neverthelesse at liberty to call to the high Councell of Parliament whom his Highnesse shall in his Princely wisdom think most meet which his Majesties Progenitors have in former ages observed And therefore whereas Radulph Lord Cromwell being a Baron by writ died without issue having two sisters and coheirs Eliz. the eldest married to Sir Tho. Nevill Knight and Joan the younger married Sir Hunt Bourcher he who had married the younger sister was called to the Parliament as L. Cromwell and not the said Sir Tho. Nevill who had married the elder sister 3. It is to be observed that if a Baron by writ die without heire male having his daughter sister or other collaterall heire male that doth or can challenge the lands of the said Baron deceased by any ancient entaile or otherwise the title of such heire female hath bin heretofore allowed as by the honourable opinions and relations of the right honourable the late Commissioners in the office of Earle Marshall signified unto the late Queene upon the Petition of the sister and heire of Gregory late Lord Dacres deceased may appeare Moreover in the
same Pedegree of the said Lord Dacres it is expressed that Thomas sometimes Lord Dacres had issue Thomas his eldest son Ralph his second sonne and Humphrey his third sonne Thomas the eldest dyed in the life time of his Father having Issue Ioan his daughter and heire who was marryed unto Sir Richard Fines Knight And after Thomas Lord Dacres her Grandfather and Father unto the said Sir Ralph and Humphrey dyed After whose death Henry 6. by his Letters Parents bearing date at Westminster 7. Novem. Anno 7. regni reciting the said Pedegree and Marriage doth by his Letter a Pattents accept declare and repute the said Richard Fines to be Lord Dacres and one of the Barons of his Realme But afterward in the time of Edw 4. the said Humphrey Dacres after the attaindor of the said Ralph and himselfe by an Act of Parliament which was in 1. Ed. 4. and after the death of the said Ralph and after the reversall of the same Act by another Act 12. Edw. 4. the said Humphrey made challenge unto the said Barony and to divers Lands of the said Thomas his Father whereupon both parties after their title had been considered in Parliament submitted themselves unto the Arbitrement of King Edw. 4. and entred into Bond each to other for the performance thereof Wherupon the said King in his award under his Privie seale bearing date at Westminster 8. April Anno regni 13. did award that the said Rich Fines in the right of Ioan his wife and the Heires of his body lawfully begotten should be reputed had named and called Lord Dacres and that the said Richard Fines and the Heires of his body by the said Ioane begotten should keepe have and use the same state and place in every Parliament as the said Thomas Dacres Knight late Lord Dacres had used kept c. that the heires of the body of the said Thomas Dacres Knight late Lord Dacres lawfully begotten should have and hold to them their Heires the Mannor of Holbech And furthermore the said King did award on the other part that the said Humphrey Dacres Knight and the Heires males of the said Thomas late Lord Dacres should be reputed had named and called the L. Dacres of Gillesland And that he and the heires males of the said Thomas then late Lord Dacres should have use and keepe the place in Parliament next adjoyning beneath the said place which the said Rich Fines Knight Lord Dacres then had and occupied and that the heires of the body of the said Ioan his wife should have and occupie And that the Heires males of the said Thomas Dacres late L. Dacres should have to them to the heires males of their bodies begotten the Mannor of Jothington c. And so note that the name of the ancient Barony namely Gilestand remained unto the Heire male unto whom the land was entailed Moreover this is specially observed if any Baron by writ doe dy having none other issue then Female and that by some speciall entail or other assurance there be an heire male which doth enioy all or a great part of the lands possessions and inheritances of such Barons deceased the Kings of this Realme have used to call to the Parliament by writ as Baron such heire male omitting the Husband or issue male of such heire female and this also appeareth by a notable controversie in the time of Henry 7. betweene Sir Robert Willoughby Lord Brooke and Richard Lord Latimer for the Barony of Latimer which in effect was The said Lord Brooke did challenge the Barony of Latimer as cosen and Heire to Elizabeth his great grandmother who was sister and heire to Iohn Nevill Lord Latimer who died without issue and hereupon exhibited a Petition to Henry 7. in Parliament whereto Richard then Lord Latimer was called to answer because he then enioyed the said title and dignity The said Richard Lord Latimer by his answer did shew that it was true that after the death of the said Iohn Nevill Lord Latimer dying without issue the said Elizabeth was the sister and next heire and married unto Sir Thomas Willlonghby Knight second son of the Lord VVilloughby but Henry 6. for that the said Iohn Nevill was dead without issue and that the next heire was female did therefore call to the Parliament George Nevill Knight second son of Ralph Earle of Westmerland to be Lord Latimer as Cozen and next heire male of the said Iohn Nevil Lord Latimer which George was grandfather of the said Richard Lord Latimer namely Father of Henry Lord Latimer Father of the said Richard In debate of which cause the question now in hand whether a Barony by writ may discend unto the heirea semales was advisedly considered of by the said King and his Nobility in Parliament and in the end adjudged with the said Richard Lord Latimer which President doth afford us two Iudgements in this point one in the time of Hen. 6. when the writ was directed to the said Sir George Nevill whereby he was summoned as Lord Latimer to the Parliament and as heire Male and not the said Sir Thomas Willoughby Knight husband of the said Eliza. heire male And the second judgement was given in the time of Henry 7. whereby the Barony was adiudged vnto the said Richard Lord Latimer comming of the speciall heire male against the said Lord Brooke descended of the generall heire male But here the President before remembred of the Barony of Dacres may be objected to incounter this confusion For there was an heire female martied unto Sir Richard Fines who by the declaration of Hen. 6. was Baron of Dacres in the right of his wife and there was also Ralph and Humfrey the heires males before whom the heire female was preferred by the censure of Henry 6. and Edward 4. This objection is easily answered For although Hen. 6. through the Princely favour which hee bare unto Sir Richard Fines had declared him to bee Lord Dacres in the right of his wife yet notwithstanding did Ralph Dacres being heire male unto the then Lord Dacres deceased beare also the name of 〈◊〉 Dacres and by that name was attainted in Parliament Wherefore the reason why the heire male could not bee regarded was the said attainder of the said Ralph and Humfrey his brother and therefore when Humphrey 12. Edw. 4. laboured to have the said attainder reversed he submitted himselfe vnto the Arbitrament of the King who to satisfie both Competitors because both had well deserved of him after he had admitted them to his favour he allowed the one to be Lord Dacres the other to be Lord Dacres of Gillesland thus much concerning the second point whether a Barony by writ may discend unto the heire female or not As concerning the third point admitting such discent to bee to the heire female when there is no heire male at all that may claime the same for then doth this question take place whether the husband of such heire
Lawyers tearme matter in fact and not by any record Cookes 6. part 53. a. But a noble Woman by Marriage though she take to her a second Husband a man of meane degree yet shee may keepe two Chaplaines according to the Proviso in the Statute of 21. H. 8. c. 13. for and in respect of the honour which once she had viz. at the time of the retayner and every such Chaplaine may purchase ly cense and dispensation Cookes 4. part 117. Cowels Instutions lib. tit 10.15 but her Chaplaines may not be nonresident afterwards And forasmuch as the retayning of Chaplaines by Ladies of great estates is ordinary and neverthelesse some questions in law have beene concerning the true understanding of the said Statute law I thinke it not impertinent to set downe some subsequent resolutions of the Judges touching such matters Anne Baronesse of Mount Eagle in her Widdowhood did retaine two Chaplaines according to the Statute and one of them had but one Benefice and therefore did obtaine a dispensation with a confirmation from the Queene according to the tenour of the said Statute but before he was presented to his second Benefice the Lady did take to Husband Henry Lord Compton whereby she did forsake her former dignity of Baronesse of Mount-Eagle and afterward the said Chaplain did accept a second Benefice and was therunto admitted and inducted and the Judges have resolved that the Chaplain hath done nothing herein but according to the meaning of the Statute and that the Ladies marriage between his Retainer and acceptance of his second benefice was no Countermand Revocation or determination of that Retainer which the Lady lawfully then did make but that she living he might proceed to the filling up of the qualification Causa origio est materia negoti for though the wife of a Noble-man during the covecture cannot by Law rerain a Chaplain to be quallified according to the statute because by Intendment her Husbands Chaplains are sufficient for that Office yet forasmuch as the Retainer was lawfull then she was widdow that being the principall matter shall enable him to take use and benefice after her marriage for though the husband and wife are but one person in Law yet as the Text is sunt animo duo in carne uno Bracton lib. 5. fol. 363 a. And in this case by the death of the Lord Compton her first Retainer was not determined for without any neer Retainer her said Chaplain may take his second benefice and also for that cause so long as the said Chaplains do attend upon their said Lady in her House they shall not be endammaged for Non-residency Cooks 4. part 117. fol. 90. 76. That which remains concerning the further exposition of this statute you may read before in the title of priviledge of Lords So long that the wise of a Duke be called Dutchesse or of an Earl be a Countesse and have the fruition of all the Honours appertaining to that estate with kneeling tasting serving and the rest and so long shall a Barons widow be saluted Lady and a Knights wise also by the courteous Speech of England quandiu Maj. aut viduitâ— vic durant except she happen to relaps with an Adulterer for as the Laws of this Kingdome do adjudge that 〈◊〉 woman shall lose her dower in that case viz. west cap. B. F.N.B. fol. 150. H. Perk. fel. 70. Kitchin 162. b. as Ruâ—oâ— Lands and Tenents so justly so doth the Laws of Gentry and Noblenesse give sentence against such a womaâ— advanced to Titles of Dignity by the husband to be unworthy to enjoy the same when she putting her husband out of mind hath subjected her self to another If a Lady which is married come through the Forrests he shall not take any thing but a Dutchesse or 〈◊〉 Countesse shall have advantage of the statute de Charâ—â— Porest 11. Art during the time that she is unmarried Cromptons Court fol. 167 b. Wheras it is contained in the great Charter amongâ—â— other things in the Form which followeth no Freemaâ— shall be taken or imprisoned or deseised of his Free-hoâ—â— or his Liberties or Free-customs or shall be outlawed oâ— banished or in any wise destroyed nor go upon him bâ—â— by the lawfull judgment of his Peers or by the Law oâ— the Land In which statute is no mention made how women Ladies of great estate because of their Husbands Peers of the Land married or sole that is to say Duchesse Countesse or Barronesse shall be put to answer oâ— before what Iudges they shall be judged upon an Inditement of Treason or Fellonyes by them committed oâ— done because wherof it is an Ambiguity in the Law oâ— England before whom and by whom such Ladies so endicted shall be put to answer and be judged by our said Soveraign Lord the King willing to put out such Ambiguities and Doubts hath declared by Authority aforesaid that such Ladies so endicted or hereafter to be endicted whether they be married or sole therof shall bee brought in answer and put to answer and judged before such Iudges and Peers of the Realm as Peers of the Realm should be if they were endicted of any Treasons or Fellonyes done or hereafter to be done and in like manner and Form and in none otherwise Anno 2. H. 6. Cap. 9. Which statute was but a Confirmation or Declaration of the common Law vide Cooks 6 part 52. b. This is a Rule in the civill law si filia R. nubat alicui dom vel Comiti dicetur semp Regalis As amongst Noble women there is a difference of degrees so according to their distinct excellentnesse the law doth give speciall Priviledges as followeth By the statute of 25. E. 3. cap. 2. It is High Treason to compose or imagine the death of the Queen or to violate the Kings Companion The Kings Espouse is a sole person exempted by the common law and she may purchase by Fee-simple or Make leases or Grants without the King she may plead and be impleaded which no other married woman can do without her husband Cook 4 part 23. B. Theol. lib. 1 a. cap. 4.24 E. 3.63 vide Bracton 363. a. All Acts of Parliaments for any cause which any way may concern the Queen and her Capacity are such statutes wherof the Judges ought to take recognisance as of generall statutes for though the matter do only concern the Capacity of the Queen yet it doth also concern all the subjects of the Realm for every subject hath interest in the King and none of his Subjects who are within hiâ— Lawes is divided from the King being his head and Soveraigne so that his businesse and things do touch all the Realme and as all the Realme hath interest in the King so and for the same Reason in the Queene being his wife Plouden 23.1 a. Cookes 8. Repl. 28. A man seised of divers Lands in Fee holden by Knights service some by Prioritie that is by ancient Feofment holden of others and some
for as unto the Lord he that is greater is as the lesser and he that doth govern as the servant but with men there is a difference of persons viz. The King and under him Dukes Counts Barons Vavasors and Knights Counts so called because they take their name from the County or from the word society who may also be tearmed Confull of Counselling For Kings do associate such men unto them to govern the people of God ordaining them into great honour power and name when they do gird them with swords that is to say ringis gladiorum with the Belts of their swords ringis so called * quasi renes girans circundans for that they compasse the Reins of such that they may keep them from incest and luxury because luxurious and incestuous persons are abominable unto God upon this cause were the stations and encamping of Arms called in the ancient language of Rome castra even of the word Castrare to geld since that they ought to be castrata vel castra In that place ought a good Generall to foresee that Venus delights be as it were gelded and cut off from the Army vide Sir John Ferne his Book intituled The glory of generosity The sword also doth signifie the defence of the Kingdome and Countrey There be other Potents under the King which are called Barons that is to say robor belli the strength of Warre There be others which are called Vavasors viri magnae dignitatis men of great dignity for Vavasor cannot better be said to be any thing than Vas sortitum ad valetudinem a vessel chosen for valour or as men standing with their Generall ad valuas Regni and this is enough if not too much in generall spoken of the Nobility of England now follow I a more particular discourse of them according to their severall degrees The Prince THe Kings eldest Sonne and Heir apparant is stiled Prince Quasi primum locum capiens post Regem the first next the King To him it was permitted by the Statute of 24. Hen. 8. cap. 13. To wear Silk of the colour of Purple and Cloth of Gold of Tissue in his apparell or upon his horse but by another Statute made in the fourth yeer of King James Chap. 25. all Laws and Statutes concerning apparell are taken away And by the Statute of 34. Hen. 3. cap. 2. Taking shall not be from henceforth made by others then by the Purveyors of the King of the Queen and of the Prince their eldest Sonne and that if any other mans Purveyor make such taking it shall be done of them as those which do without warrant and the deed judged as a thing done against the peace and the Law of the Land and such as do not in manner aforesaid shall be duly punished To eschew maintenance and nourish peace and amity in all parts of the Realm many Statutes have been made in the Raign of Hen. 4. prohibiting the giving of signes or Liveries to any but to their menialls Neverthelesse by the Statute of 2. Hen. 4. cap. 21. It is provided that the Prince may give his honourable Liveries of signes to the Lords or to his meniall Gentlemen and that the said Lords may wear the same as they wear the Kings Livery and that the menialls of the Prince may also wear the same as the Kings menialls But afterwards by occasion of divers other Statutes of latter times made by sundry other Kings for the suppressing of that enormity of maintenance and of the generall words in them that priviledge of the Prince was abridged or rather taken away therefore the Statute of 12. Ed. 4. was made as followeth Item Our Soveraign Lord the King considering that the Prince the first begotten Sonne to the King of England hath been at their liberties to give their Liveries and signes at their pleasure and that divers Statutes against givers and takers of Liveries and signes as well in the time of his noble raign as in the time of his progenitors and predecessors hath been made and that by force of the said Statutes his dear beloved first begotten sonne Edward Prince of Wales Duke of Cornwall and Earl of Chester is as well as any other person restrained to give any such Liveries and signes as our Soveraign Lord the King willing that his first begotten sonne the Prince be at his liberty in receiving any person and giving his signes and Liveries in as large form as any Prince first begotten sonne of any of his Noble Progenitors and predecessors in time past have been hath ordained and established by authority of the said Parliament that the Prince shall be at his liberty to retain and give his honourable Livery and signe at his pleasure and that the persons so retained or to whom such Liveries or signes be or shall be given may be retained and received and wear the same Livery and sign without trouble impediment or impeachment pain contempt or forfeiture or any penalty contained in any of the said Statutes or in any thing in them comprised notwithstanding Nor that the said Statutes in any manner shall extend to any retaining to be made by the said Prince in giving taking or retaining of any Livery or signe of the Prince By the Statute 21. Hen. 8. cap. 13. The Prince may retain as many Chaplains as he will though all others of the Nobility other then those of the Kings bloud be restrained to a certain number and they or any of them may purchase licence or dispensation and take receive and keep personages or benefices with cure of souls By order of the common Law a King might have a reasonable ayde of all his Tenents as well of those that did hold of his highnesse by Knights service as of those that did hold their Land in soccage That is to make his eldest Sonne Knight But first note that the ayde is not to be recovered before the Sonne be of the age of 15. yeers or before the Daughter accomplish the age of 7. yeers Fitz Harbert Nat. brevium and for the Marriage of his eldest Daughter and the summe of money was not in certainty but at the Kings pleasure till by the Statute made in the 25. of Ed. 3. cap. 11. by which is enacted as followeth Item It is assented that reasonable aid to make the Kings first Sonne Knight and to marry his eldest Daughter shall be demanded and levied after the forme of the Statute thereof made and not in other manner that is to say of every Knights Fee holden of the King without mean rate 20s and no more and of every 20l of Land holden of the King without mean in soccage 20s and no more and so rata pro rata of the Lands in soccage And for Lands of the tenure of Chevalry according to the quantity of the Fee By another Statute made in the said 25. yeer of Ed. 3. cap. 2. amongst other things it is declared that to compasse or imagine the death
then may proceed upon any thing there moved lawfully as lawfull persons for it is not convenient that they who are attainted should be in places of lawfull Judges And then another question was moved What shall be said of the King himself for he also was attainted by his Predecessour Rich. 3. and after communication had amongst themselves all did agree that the King was a person able and discharged of any former attainder ipso facto That he took upon him to raign and to be King by which it manifestly appeareth that by the Laws of England there can be no inter regnum within the same that presently by descent the next heir in blood is coÌ„pleatly and absolutely King without any essentiall Ceremony or act to be done ex post facto And that Coronation is but a royall ornament and outward solemnization of the descent and of this last matter Read Cooks 7 part fol. 10.6 and that there followeth Of Dukes THe form of the Patent of Duke of York that now is Rex c. To all Archbishops Bishops Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts Barons Justices Governours Knights Ministers And to all Bailiffs and faithfull Subjects greeting Whereas We often times call to minde how many and innumerable gifts and what excellent benefits that great worker of all goodnesse of his only benignity and clemencie hath abundantly bestowed upon Us who by his power hath consociated divers and mighty Lyons in firm peace without any strife but also hath amplified and exalted the bounds and limits of our Government by his unspeakable providence above our progenitors with an indissolvible conjunction of the ancient and famous Kingdoms in the right of blood under our Imperiall Diadem in regard whereof we cannot but most willingly acknowledge our fruitfulnesse and issue plentifully adorned with the gift of Nature which he hath vouchsafed upon us because in truth in the succession of children a mortall man is made as it were immortall Neither unto any mortall men at leastwise unto Princes not acknowledging superiours can any thing happen in worldly cases more pleasant and acceptable then that their children should become notable in all vertues gooodnesse manners and increase of dignity so as they which excell others in noblenesse of bloud and indowments of Nature might not be thought of others to be exceeded Hence it is that that great goodnesse of God which is shewed unto us in our fertility to passe in silence or to be thought not to satisfie the Law of Nature whereby we are chiefly provoked to be well affected and liberall to those in whom we behold our blood to begin to florish coveting with great and fatherly affection that the perpetuall memory of our blood with honours and increase of dignity and all praise may be affected Our well-beloved Son Charls Duke of Albany Marquesse of Ormond Count of Rosse and Lord of Ardmannoth Our sâ—cond begotten son in whom the Royall form and beauty worthy honour and other gifts of vertue do now in the best hopes shine in his tender graces We erect create make and ordain and to him the name stile state title dignity authority and honour of the Duke of York do give and him of that Name with the title state stile honour authority and dignity with other honors to the same belonging and annexed by the girding of the sword cap circlet of gold put upon his head and the delivery of a golden Virge we do really invest to have and to hold the same name and stile state and dignity authority and honour of the Duke of York unto the aforesaid Charles our second begotten son and to his heirs males of his body lawfully begotten for ever And that the aforesaid Charles our second begotten son according to the decencie and state of the said name of Duke of York may more honorably carry himself we have given and granted and by this our present Charter we confirm for us and our heirs unto the aforesaid Duke forty pounds to have and yeerly to receive to the foresaid Duke and his heirs for ever out of the Farms issues profits and other commodities whatsoever comming out of the foresaid County of York by the hands of the Sheriffe of the same County for the time being at the Terms of Easter and Michael the Arch-angel by even portions for that expresse mention of other gifts and grants by us unto the same Duke before time made in these presents made doth not appear notwithstanding These be witnesses the most excellent and most beloved Henry Prince our first begotten son Vlrick Duke of Holst brother of the queen our beloved wife and the Reverend Father in Christ Richard Archbishop of Canterbury Primate and Metropolitan of all England and also our welbeloved and faithfull Councellour the Lord Elesmore and Chancellour of England Thomas Earl of Suffolk Chamberlain of our houshold and also our dear cousin Thomas-Earl of Arundel and our well-beloved cousin and Councellour Henry Earl of Northumberland Edward Earl of Worcester Master of our horse George Earl of Cumberland and also our well-beloved cousin Henry Earl of Southampton William Earl of Pembroke and also our well-beloved cousins Charles Earl of Devon Master of our Ordinance Henry Earl of Northampton Warden of the Cinque-Ports John Earl of Marr Robert Viscount Eranborne our principall Secretary and our well-beloved and faithfull Councellour Edward Lord Zuch President of our Councell in the Principality and Marches of Wales and also ouâ— wel-beloved and trusty Robert Lord Willoughby of Earsby William Lord Mounteagle Gray Lord Chandois William Lord Compton Francis Lord Norris Robert Lord Sidney our well-beloved and faithfull Councellours William Lord Knowles Treasurer of our houshold Edward Lord Wotton Comptroller of out houshold and our well-beloved and faithfull Councellour Alexander Lord and also our wel-beloved and faithfull Councellors George Dunbarr Lord of Barwick Chancellour of our Exchequer Edward Lord Bruse of Kinlose Master of the Rolls of our Chancery and also our faithfull and well-beloved Thomas Lord Eskine of Bielton Lord Balmermoth and others given by our hand at our Pallace of Westminster the sixth day of January in the second yeer of the Raign of K. James K. Edw. 3. in the 11 year of his Raign by his Charter in Parliament and by authority of Parliament did create Edw. his eldest son the Black-Prince D. of Cornwall not onely in title but cum feodo with the Dutchy of Cornwall as by the tenour of the said Letters Patents exemplified may appear Cooks 8 part in the pleading Habend ' et tenend ' eidem duci et ipsius et heraed ' suorum Regum Angliae siliis primogenitis et dicti loci ducibus in Regno Augliae hereditatoria successoris To have and to bold to the same Duke and his heirs Kings of England the first begotten sons and Dukes of the same place in the kingdom of England and to hereditary succession so that he that is hereditable must be heir apparant of the King of England
peradventure he after is willing or dareth to do in an age The Menacer layeth open his Name and his grief and standeth in the face of his enemy and discovereth the corrasive of his and doth thereby give a forewarning to his adversary to provide for and defend himself Note That if a man do write unto another scandalous words and reports touching a Nobleman and this Letter be signed with his Seal and subscribed with his name yet upon this Letter shewed upon evidence the Nobleman may recover dammages in an action de scanlis magnatum whereof you may see two Presidents in Cromptons Iustice of Peace 85. But this secret Canker the Libeller concealeth his name hideth himself in a corner and privily stingeth him in fame reputation and credit who then neither knoweth from whom or for what cause he receiveth his blows nor yet hath means therein to defend himself and whether his libelling secret slandering or defaming be against a publike Magistrate or private Person Yet it may tend to the breach of the peace to the raising of quarrels and effusion of bloud But if a man do write any matter of defamation to the party himself that is thereby traduced and subscribe and seal the same without other publication done by himself Quaere and so may be a speciall impediment which all good policy endevoureth to maintain for if it be against a publike Magistrate it is a great scandall and offence to the King his chief Magistrates and the whole Government of the Realm to assign such an Officer to rule and govern others who himself is voyd of government and shall deserve to be impeached with such crimes as he shall be taxed with or shall be imputed unto him by such an infamous Libell and if it be but against a private person yet seeing that a Libell or other note of infamy is intended to defame him to tread his honour and estimation in the dust and root out his reputation and credit from the face of the earth to make him a scorn to his enemies and to be derided and despised of his neighbours it doth greatly kindle the wroth of him and of such as be of his kindred and allies and true friendship and urge them to revenge whereupon do often times ensue grudges quarrels frayes combats and man-slaughter Sometimes the malicious defamer powreth out his venome in writing by a scandalous Book Epigram or Rime either in Meeter or Prose Some other times by songs scoffs jests and taunts and divers times by hanging of pictures of reproach signes of shame or tokens of disgrace neer the place the party thereby traduced doth most converse as the picture of the gallows pillory cucking-stool horns or other such like In which cases the Law hath provided that the party delinquent when he is found out and discovered shall be sharply punished For he may be either indicted for the same offence by the ordinary course of the Common-law or else a Bill may be exhibited against him in the Starre-chamber where he shall be punished according to the quality of his demerits by sine and imprisonment and if it be an exorbitant offence then by pillory losse of his ears whipping c. Or the party grieved may have an action of the case against the offender and recover his dammages And in this case it is not materiall whether the Libel be true or false or the parties scandalized thereby be living or dead or be of good name or evill for though the party be defamed and the Libell true be evill yet our good Laws be provided to punish him and such like evill men by due course of Justice after his offence is presented inquired of tryed and proved to his face before lawfull Magistrats thereunto assigned and he is not to be carped accused and condemned in a corner behinde his back by any other private person who in trudeth himself without warrant to be a Censurer of manners and rather seeketh the discredit of the party then then the reformation of his faults for his secret searching into and sifting into other mens conditions diving into their offences and divulging them to their discredits doth convince the offender to be a man of a lewd disposition to have made shipwrack of his conscience and doth brand him during his life with the name of an infamous Libeller or scandalous backbiter Fardinando Pulton Fol. 16. Cooks 5. part 125. And to conclude this matter concerning the wrong done to the name and dignity of a Nobleman this may be added That it is unlawfull for any person to usurpe the Arms of another Cook to the Reader before his third Book Fol. 8. to A. Yea if a Noblemans Coat Armour or Sword or other Gentlemans bearing Arms at the solemnizing of their Funeralls set up in the Church Chappel or Chancell for the honour of the body defunct be taken down by the covetousnesse of the incumbent there pretending them as offerings due to him or if they be defaced by any other such are to be punished grievously as malefactors and in that case the action shall not be given to the Widdow though she be Executrix or Administratix of her husbands goods for such things as serve for the honour of the party deceased are not to be accompted inter bona Testatoris as the goods of the Testator but the heirs shall have the action as the defender of his Ancestors honour Nam cui injuria ei avervat jus to whom the wrong is done right doth belong but the wrong is offered to the house and bloud and therein especially to the heir qui est totius geniturae splendor of the whole kindred and therefore to him attaineth the right of action in the case Viscounts NExt unto Earls or Counts in order followeth the Vicount this is an ancient name of Offiee but a new title of honour and by Henry the first brought in who conferred that title upon John Lord Beamont Barons A Mongst the Nobles and Honourable Barons have the next place and the last of the Rank It now followeth somewhat to speak in generall of the dignity and degree of a Baron First the definition or description of a Baron Secondly The Etymologie of the name Thirdly The antiquity thereof and the divers uses of the name in former ages Fourthly The divisions and considerations of the severall kindes of Barons And lastly A declaration of the divers and sundry priviledges allowed by the Laws of this Realm unto the Barons and Nobility of the same wherein the vulgar and common person hath no participation The Definition or Description of a Baron IT is a rule in Law that definitions in Jure sunt periculosissimae rarium est enim ur non subverti possunt And therefore I do not often finde any definition or a description of a Baron delivered by writers Neverthelesse in this our Common-wealth of England me thinks that a Baron may be described in a generalty answerable to every kinde thereof in
or thoâ—â— whose Ancestors time out of minde have been called to the Parliament by Writ for otherwise there are hardly such to be sound as are Barons by prescription only BARONS by Tenure BArons by tenure are those which doe hold any Honour Castle or Mannour as the head of their Barony per Baroniam which is Grand Serjeanty And these Barons by tenure are of two sorts Barons spirituall by tenure and Barons temporall by tenure Of Barons spirituall by tenure sufficient is said before in the first leafe of this Treatise whereunto this may be added That it appeareth by all ancient Writers of our Lawes as Britton Glanvile Bracton and the rest that the Archbishops and Bishops of the Realme in the ancient Saxons dayes as well during the time that this Realme was divided into divers Kingdomes as also after the uniting of them into one Monarchy were called to the Parliament or Assembly of States or wise men not so much in respect of their tenure for in those dayes all their tenures were by franck almoigne but especially for that the lawes and counsels of men are then most currant and commendable and have a more blessed issue and successe when they are grounded upon the feare of God the root and beginning of all true wisdome and therefore our wise and religious Ancestors called to their generall Councell or Witten Agmore or Court of Wisdome as they called it those chiefe and principall persons of the Clergy which by their place and profession by their gravities learning and wisdome might best advise what was the law of Gods acceptable will and pleasure that they might frame their humane lawes answerable or at least noâ— contrary and repugnant thereunto As touching the temporall Barons by the tenure mention is made of them in the Books of the Law Records and ancient Monuments of the Realme these are the words of Glanvile Mortuo enim aliquo capitals Barâ—ne suo statim Baroniam in manusua retinet Rex donec haeres garantum suum fecerit de relivio licet haeres ipse plenam habuerit atatem Which reliefe of Barons for the Barony by tenure was at that time uncertain and rentable at the pleasure of the King Of which also he writeth thus Dicitur autem rationabile relivium alicujus juxta consuetudinem regni de feodo unius Militis centum solidos de socenglo verò quantum valet census illiut saccagii per unum annum De Baronis verò nihil certum statutum est quia juxta voluntatem misericordiam Domini Regis solent Baronli capitâ—â—es de reliviis suis Domino Regi satisfacere lib. 9. cap. 4. But such uncertainty was brought to certainty by the statute of Magna Charta cap. 2. so here we have speech of the Barony Temporall by tenure and of the reliefe due for the same In tertio H. 3. there was argued an ancient Prerogative belonging to the Crowne and usuall even from the Conquest unto these times authentickly written in these words and so reported by Fitzherbert Quod si aliquis Baro Domini Regis tenent de Rege obiisset non haberet haeredes nisi filias primogenitae filiae maritatae sunt in vita Patris Dominus Rex daret postnatam siliam quae remaneret in haereditate patris alicui milit ' suor ' cum tota haereditate Patris sui de qua obiissâ—t seisitus ita quòd alia filiae nihil recuperent versus postnatam filiam in vita sua Et omnes Reges habuerunt hanc dignitatem à conquestu Also Bracton lib. 5. fol. 351. fol. 357. doth make expresse mention of Barons temporall by tenure It shall be needlesse here againe to remember the former alledged assertion of Bracton that the head of a Barony descending unto daughters should not be divided by partition which argueth likewise the tenure by Barony But let us descend to other authorities that is to say to the Book-case in 48. E. 3. fol. 30. Sir Ralph Everden his case by which case of law is most evidently proved that there are Barons by tenure and in regard of such their tenure ought to bâ— summoned to Parliament And to this purpose you may read a private statute in the eleventh yeere of Henry the sixth mentioned also in Cambden concerning the Earldome of Arundell and also another statute to the same purpose made 27. H. 6. for the finall determination of a controversie between William Earl of Arundell and Thomas Earl of Devonshire for place and preheminence in Parliament I would wish that those who deny that there were or are any Barons by tenure should consider advisedly the statute of Westminster the 2d. cap. 41. where the Fees of the Eatle Marshall and Lord Chamberlain are expressed which are to be taken by them upon the homage done of every Baron by tenure whether the Baron holdeth by whole Barony or by lesse But ere I proceed further there ariseth a question here to be considered the resolution whereof may give great light and in a manner determine the matter in hand The Question therefore is this Question If a Baron by tenure alien and grant away the Honour Castle and Mannour holden by Barony whether shall such alience or grantee take upon him the state title and dignity of a Baron or no and what shall become of such a dignity of Baronage after such alienation or grant made They which do deny that there are any such Baronies by tenure do use these as their chief and principall motives and reasons First if there be any Baronies by tenure then the alience or grantee of such Honour Castle or Mannour so holden must hold by the same tenure that his feoffor or grantor before held But that was by Barony Therefore such alience or grantee must hold by Barony And if such grant or alienation be made to persons base vulgar or ignoble they then should by such tenure be made noble which were marvellous absurd and full of inconveniency for Non Dominus domo sed domus Domino honestatur see Tho. Mills Peroration fol 3. Secondly it is very evident and manifest that many ancient Mannours which in old time were holden per Baroniam and were the Head of Baronies are now in the tenures of mean Gentlemen and others who neither doe or may challenge unto themselves in any respect thereof any Nobility without the great and high displeasure of the Kings most excellent Majesty who is the fountain of all Nobility within his Dominions Thirdly some ancient Barons there are which have aliened and sold away those Castles and Mannours of the which they have and beare the name and dignity of Baronage and yet themselves doe still retain and lawfully keep their estate dignity and degree of Baron and have been and usually are such alienation notwithstanding summoned neverthelesse to the Parliament and they do take and hold their ancient place according The Answer For the better answere to be made to these objections being of all
Bewdesert was seised in his demesn as of fee of the Baronies of Langden and Hawood and of and in the Mannours of Bewdesert Landen c. And being so seised by fine quinto Mariae entailed the Baronies and Mannours aforesaid to him and his heires males of his body issuing And afterward Anno 5. Eliz. died leaving Henry his sonne next heire male Which Henry entred into the Baronies and land aforesaid by vertue of the foresaid fine and died thereof seised 11. Eliz. leaving Elizabeth his onely daughter and heire After whose death Thomas Paget brother and heire male of the said Henry entred into the Baronies and Mannours aforesaid and was summoned to the Parliament by virtue of the aforesaid fine William Lord Paget of Bewdesert deed anno 5. Eliz. Henry Lord Paget died An. 11. Eliz. Elizabeth his daughter and heire Thomas Lord Paget by force of the entailes after the death of his brother Robert Lord Ogle entred into the Barony of Bothal and Ogle with divers other Mannors and Lands in the County of Northumberland by conveiance which was to himselfe for terme of his life the remainder to the heires males of his body begotten and he took to his wife Dorothy Witherington by whom he had issue Robert Ogle his eldest sonne and Margery his daughter married Gregory Ogle of Chippington And the said Robert the father after the death of the said Dorothy his wife took to his second wife Ioane Ratcliffe by whom he had issue Cutbert his second sonne and after died After whose death Robert the sonne was Lord Ogle from whom the same descended to Cutbert being brother of the halfe blood by vertue of the said entaile and not to the said Margery nor unto her heires being of the whole blood unto the said Robert the sonne Robert Ogle Lord Ogle Dorothy daughter of Henry Withrington first wife Robert Ogle L. Ogle died without issue Margery maried to Ogle of Chippington Cutbert Ogle of Chippington Cutbert Ogle L. Ogle died Margery Ogle married Robert Witherington Thomas Ogle Joan the daughter of Cuthbort Ratcliff Kni. the second wife Moreover concerning the second objection it is very true that many ancient Mannours which were anciently holden by Barony as the head or parcell of a Barony are now in the hands of Gentlemen meane and un-noble by blood who neither doe nor may claime any Nobility or honour thereby But the reason that some former gifts made by the Kings Majesties progenitours the supreme Soveraignes of this Realme to such as they honoured in augmentation and support of their honour and by honourable services should thus come to the hands of mean persâ—nages are twofold First for that such Mannours have been aliened by licence unto such persons before spoken whom such possessions alone cannot make noble Secondly and that was usually such Mannours as were holden by Barony have upon divers encheasons and occasions come to the Crowne by way of revertor or eschete or forfeit by meanes whereof the ancient tenures derived from the Crowne by reason of those lands so comming again to the Crown were extinct and after the said lands were given or conveyed to others reserving other services than those which at the first were due for the same so that it was no marvaile to see that some Mannours anciently holden by Barony or other honourable service should now bee holden in soccage or by other triviall or meane tenure As to that which was thirdly objected that some ancient Barons there are which have aliened and sold away those Castle and Mannours of the which they have and doe beare the name and dignity and yet neverthelesse themselves doe still retaine and keep lawfully their estate dignity and degree of a Baron and have been and are called to the Parliament such alienation notwithstanding To this I answer That it is true but it proveth nothing against the former resolution And therefore for better satisfaction of this observation it is to be considered that such Barons either be originally Barons by writ or Barons by tenure Barons by writ in this respect now in hand are of two kindes For either in such writ whereby they or their Ancestors were at first summoned they were named onely by their owne names or else there was addition given them of the principall place of their aboad which was done either for distinction sake to sever them from some honourable person of the same surname or else to give them such honourable title by addition of the place which place notwithstanding was not holden by Barony And therefore if such a Baron doe alien away that place which anciently was his seat he may neverthelesse retain his honourable title in respect had of such a place But if a Baron by tenure doe alien away the honourarable Castle or Mannour holden by Barony unto a mean person not capable of honour and that by sufficient licence so to doe and after the alienour which made such alienation be called by writ to the Parliament under the title or as Baron of such Honour Castle or Mannour so aliened he is not any more a Baron by tenure in respect of that place for that he hath aliened that away which he held by Barony but thenceforth after such writ of summons he is become a Baron by writ and may retaine the name of Baron by title of the place as Baron by writ such alienation notwithstanding forasmuch as the writ directed at the pleasure of the Prince doth give unto him that addition of name and dignity And thus much touching the resolution of the said question and satisfaction of the said objections and of Barons by tenure BARONS by writ which is the second kind of Barons mentioned in the former Divisions of BARONS A Baron by writ is he unto whom a writ of summons in the name of the King is directed to come to the Parliament appoinâ—ed at a certaine time and place to be holden and there with his Highnesse the Prelates Nobility and Peeres to treat and advise touching the waighty affairs of the Realme The forme of which writ is much to the effect of the writ before mentioned in the title of Earle which kind of writ is as well directed to the Barons by tenure as Barons by creation Patent or otherwise But those which are not Barons by tenure nor by Patent and have onely such writs are therefore called Barons by writ and upon receipt of such writ and place taken accordingly in Parliament ought to enjoy the name dignity and honour of a Baron Touching the antiquity of Barons by writ onely and their first institution I finde little or no mention before the time of H. 3. And therefore I conceive that either the first of all or at least that the first frequent use of such Barons was had and devised 49. H. 3. in case of necessity and upon a lamentable occasion For in the discord between the King and his Nobility in those troublesome warres seditions and rebellions which they moved
to answere without feare 〈◊〉 then hee shall cause the Clarke of the Crowne to reâ—â— his endictment unto him and aske him if hee 〈◊〉 guilty or not whereunto when hee hath answerâ— not guilty the Clarke of the Crowne shall aske hâ—â— how he will be tryed and then hee will say by Gâ—â— and his Peeres and then the Kings Sergeants 〈◊〉 Atturney will give evidence against him whereunto when the Prisoner hath made answere thâ— Constable shall bee commanded to retire the Prisonâ— from the Barre to some other place while the Lorâ— doe secretly conferre in the Court together and theâ— the Lords shall rise out of their places and consuâ—â— amongst themselves and what they affirme shall bee done upon their Honour without any oath to be ministred unto them and when they all or the greatest part of them bee agreed they shall returne to their places and sit downe and then the High Steward shall aske of the youngest Lord by himselfe if he that is arraigned bee guilty or not of the offence whereof hee is arraigned and then of the youngeâ—â— next him and so of the residue one by one untill hee have asked them all and every Lord shall answer by himselfe and then the High Steward shall send for the Prisoner againe who shall bee led to the Barre to whom the High Steward shall reherse the verdict of the Peeres and give iudgement accordingly 〈◊〉 Stamford Pleas dol Corona lib. 3. cap. 1. Poulton 188. The antiquity of this kind of triall by the opinion of the last recited Authours is grounded from the Statute of Magna charta so called not in regard of the quantity but in regard of the weight thereof Cooke Epistle to the 8. part fol. 2. c. 29. beginning thus Nullus liber homo c. nec super eum ibimus neâ— super eum mittimus nisi per legale judicium parvu ' â—â—orum But I take it to be more ancient then the â—â—me of Hen. 3. as brought into the Realme with the Conquerour being answerable to the Norman and French Lawes and agreeable with the Customes Fewdall where almost all the controversies arising betweene the Soveraigne and his vassall are tried per judicium Parvu ' suorum And if a Peere of the Realme upon his arraignement of treason doe stand mute or will not answer directly iudgement shall bee given against him as a Traytour convicted and he shall not bee pressed to death and thereby save the forfeiture of his lands for treason is out of the Statute of Westminster the first c. 12 15. E. 4.33 Dyer 205 and 300. But if hee bee arraigned upon an indictement of fellony he may bee mute It appeareth by this Statute of Magna charta that a Peere of the Realme shall be tried by his Peeres onely in case where he is indicted at the Kings suite of treason or fellony for the words of the Statute be We will not passe or sit in judgement upon him but by his Peeres But if an appeale of murder or other fellony be sued by any Common person against a Peere of the Realme hee shall bee tried by Common persons and not by his Peeres Stam. Pleas del Coron lib. 3. cap. 1. Brooke triall 14â— Poulton 188 6. This priviledge hath some restrainâ— as well in regard of the person as in the manner of proceedings As touching the person First the Archbishops and Bishops of this Realme though they bee Lords of the Parliament if they bee impeached of such an offence they shall not be tryed by the Peeres of the Realme but by a jury of Knights and other substantialâ— persons upon their oaths the reasons thereof alleadged is for as much as Archbishops and Bishops cannot passe in like cases upon the triall of any other of the Peeres for that they are prohibited by the Common and Ecclesiasticall Lawes to bee Iudges of life and death and reason would that the other Peeres should not trie them for this triall should bee mutuall for as much as is performed upon their Honours without any oath taken And so by the way you may see the great regard the Law hath to the word of a Peere of the Realme when he speaketh upon his Honour even in a case concerning the life of a man and that of a Peere and therefore ought they much more to keepe their words and promises in smaller matters when they engage their Honours for any fast cause or consideration Crompton Courts 13. Secondly as touching the Persons no temporall Lords but they that are Lords of the Parliament shall have this kind of triall and therefore hereout are excluded the eldest Sonne and Heire apparant of 〈◊〉 Duke in the life of his Father though he be called an Earle and it was the case of Henry Howard Earle of Surrey Sonne and Heir apparant of Thomas Duke of Suffolke in 38. H. 8. which is in Brooks abridgement treason likewise the Son and Heir apparant of an Earl though he be called Lord or Baron And all the younger Sonnes of the Kings are Earles by birth though they have no other creation but shall not be partakers of this or other priviledges incident to the Lords of the Parliament Thirdly those that are Barons of the Nobility of Ireland or of Scotland if upon the like offence committed in England they be apprehended in England they shall not have their triall by Peeres no though they were borne within England for they received their dignity from a King of their Nations But if the King of England at this day do create one of his subjects of Scotland to be Viscount Rochester within England or by ordinary summons under his great Seale doe call him to his upper House of Parliament do assign him a place and to have a voice there in his great Councell amongst the Lords and Peeres of the Realme he shall thereby also be a Peere of the Realme and be partaker with them in all priviledges and thus much concerning the restraint of the said priviledges in respect of the person as touching the manner of proceeding it appeareth by the said statute of Magna charta c. 29. that a Peere of the Realme shall be tried by his Peeres only in case where he is indicted at the Kings suite of treason or fellony for the words of the statute be Nec super cum ibimus But if an appeale of murder or other fellony be sued by any Common person by a Peere of the Realme he shall be tried by Common persons and not by his Peeres Stam. Pleas del Corone lib. 3. cap. 1. Poulton 118. and so was Fines Lord Dacres tried in appeale of murder 33. H. 8. Brooke Abridgement trials 142. The Nobility of this Realme enjoy that priviledge that they are not to be impanelled in any Iury or Inquests to make tryall or Enquiry upon their corporall oathes betweene party and party for they may have their writ for their discharge to the Sheriffe Rex Vic ' Com c. quia barones regni
Nobiles non torquentur in quibus plebeij torquerentur nobiles non suspenlantur sed decapitantur and so it is almost growne into a Custome in England by the favour of the Prince for rare is it to have a Nobleman executed in other forme yet Thomas Fines Lord Dacres of the South in 33. H. 8. and Lord Sturton 4. Mar. were hanged Brooke Iury 48. Jn the first yeare of the late Queene Eliz cap. 1. in the Acts of Parliament for the uniformity of Common Prayer c. there is contained this proviso and be it enacted and ordained that all the Lords of Parliament for the third offence above mentioned shall bee tryed by their Peeres and not by any Ecclesiasticall Courts reade the Statute at large At the Common Law it was lawfull for any Nobleman or ignoble to retaine as many Chaplaines as hee would for their Instruction in Religion but by a Statute made 21. Hen. 8. cap. 13. A restraint was made and a certaine number onely allowed to the Nobility and such Chaplaines for their attendance have Immunities as by the Statute at large may appeare viz Every Archbishop and Duke may have sixe Chaplaines whereof every one shall or may purchase Lycence or dispensation and take receive and keepe two Personages or Benefices with cure of Soules and that every Marquesse or Earle may have five Chaplaines whereof every one may purchase Lycence or Dispensation and take receive and keepe two Parsonages or Benefices with cure of Soules and that every Viscount and other Bishop may have foure Chaplaines whereof every one may purchase Lycence and receive have and keepe two Parsonages or Benefices with cure of Soules as aforesaid And that the Chancellour of England for the time being and every Baron and Knight of the Garter may have three Chaplaines whereof every one shall now purchase Lycence and Dispensation and receive have and keepe two Benefices with cure of Soules read the Statute at large And forasmuch as retaining of Chaplaines by Lords of great estates is ordinary and neverthelesse some questions in Law have beene concerning the true understanding of the said Statute J thinke it not impertinent to set downe some subsequent resolutions of the Judges touching such matters If a Bishop be translated to an Archbishop or a Baron to be created to an Earle c. yet within this Act they can have but onely so many Chaplaines as an Archbishop or Earle might have for although he have divers dignities yet he is still but one selfe-same person to whom the Attendance and service â—ould be done so if a Baron be made a Knight of the â—arter or Lord Warden of the Cinque-Ports hee â—all have but three Chaplaines in all sic de simiâ—â—us Also if such an Officer allowed by the Statute to â—â—ve one two or more Chaplaines doe retaine accorâ—ingly and after he is removed from his Office in this â—â—se he cannot be now non-resident or accept of a seâ—ond Benefice if his Compliment were not full â—efore his remaining and yet in that case it behoveth â—â—e Chaplaine to procure a non obstante otherwise â—e may be punished for his non-residency So if an Earle or Baron doe retaine a Chaplaine â—nd before his advancement his Lord is attainted of Treason as it was in the Case of the Earle of â—estmerland after the said Attainder such a Chapâ—aine cannot accept a second Benefice for though his Lord be still living according to nature yet after the Attainder he is a dead Person in the Law and therefore out of the case to have Priviledge for himselfe or for his Chaplaines If a Baron have three Chaplaines and every one of them have two Benifices and after the Baron dyeth yet they shall enjoy those benefices with cure which were lawfully setled in them before but in this case though the said Chaplaine be resident upon one of his Benifices yet now he is become unpunishable for being non-resident upon the other for cessante causa cesâ— effectus the same Law is if a Baron be attainted of treâ—son or Fellony or if any Officer be removed from 〈◊〉 Office Et sic de similibus vide Actons Case Cooke 〈◊〉 part Fol. 117. for all those matters A Baron or others of degree of Honour doe retainâ— such number of Chaplains as are allowed by the Statute and after upon suite and request the said noble persoâ— doth retaine more Chaplaines In this Case they that are first retayned shall onely have priviledge nam qui prior est tempore potior est Iureâ— so if a Lord doe at any time retayne more Chaplaiâ—â— then are allowed by the Common Law the lawfull number onely shall have priviledge and in this case which of them first promoted shall have priviledge and the rest are excluded for in equali Iure inelior est condiâ—â—â— possidentes Jf a Nobleman doe retayne Chaplaines above the number at severall times if any of his first Chaplaiâ—â— die the next that was then retayned shall not succeed for his first retayner was void and therefore in thiâ— Case it doth behove him to have a new retayning after the death of the predecessour and before his advancement nam quod initio non valet in tractu temporis non coâ—valescit If a noble person retaine such a number of Chaplains as is by the Law allowed him but afterward upon some dislike or other cause doe discharge some of them from their attendance or service the Lord in this case cannot retaine others thereby to give them priviledge during the life of them so retained and discharged and the reason thereof is because the first Chaplaines were lawfully retained and by virtue thereof during their lives might purchase dispensations to have advantage according to the statute and therefore if the discharge of their service and attendance might give a liberty to the Lord to retaine others by such meanes the Lords might advance Chaplains without number by which the statute should be defrauded and the said statute must be construed strictly against non-Residents and Pluralities as a thing prejudiciall to the service of God and the ordinary instruction of the people of God These premises are to be read in Cooks 4 part fol. 90. Druries case By the statute of 3. H. 7. cap. 14. it is enacted as followeth viz. Forasmuch as by quarrels made to such as have been in great authority office and of counsell with the King of this Realme hath ensued the destruction of the King and thereby the undoing of this Realme so that it hath appeared evidently when the compassing of the death of such as were the Kings true subjects was laid the destruction of the Prince was imagined thereby and for the most part it hath growne and been occasioned by envie and malice of the Kings owne houshold servants and for that by the lawes of this land if actuall deeds were not there was no remedy for such false compassing imaginations and confederacies had against any Lord or any of the Kings
Councell or any of the Kings great Officers in his houshold as Steward Treasurer Controller and so great inconveniences did ensue because such ungodly demeanours were not straightly punished before that an actuall deed was done For remedy whereof it was by the same statute ordained that the Steward Treasurer or Controller of the Kings house for the time being shall have full authority and power to enquire by twelve sad men and discreet persons of the Check-roll of the Kings honourable houshold if any servant admitted to be his servant sworne and his name put into the Check-roll of the houshold whatsoever he be serving in any manner office or roome reputed had and taken under the estate of a Lord make any confederacies compassings conspiracies imaginations with any person or persons to destroy or murder the King or any Lord of this Realme or any other person sworne to the King Councell Steward Treasurer or Controller of the Kings house that if it be found before the said Steward for the time being by the said-twelve men that any such of the Kings servants as is aforesaid hath confederated compassed conspired or imagined as abovesaid that he so found by the enquiry be put thereupon to answer and the Steward Treasurer or Controller or two of them have power to determine the same matter according to the law and if hee be put in tryall that then he be tryed by other twelve sad men and discreet men of the same houshold and that such misdoers have no challenge but for malice and if such misdoers be found guilty by confession or otherwise that the said offence be adjudged felony and they to have judgment and execution as felons attainted ought to have by the Common law In the statute made in the second yeare of H. 5. cap. 10. authority is given to the Sheriffe and other the Kings Justices for the better suppressing of Riots and Routs c. to raise Posse Comitatus the power of the County and the same liberty doth the Common law give in many other cases Neverthelesse may not the Sheriffe upon such authority command the person of any Nobleman to attend that service but if the Sheriffe upon a Supplicavit against any Nobleman in that case doe returne that he is so puissant that he cannot or dare not arrest him the Sheriffe shall be grievously amerced for such his returne For by the writ under the Great Seale of the King commandement is to all Archbishops Bishops Dukes Earles Vicounts and Barons and to all liege men of the County to be ayding unto him in that which to his office appertaineth And therefore by intendment no person whatsoever can resist the execution of the said writ of the King Also the Sheriffe may by his discretion levie three hundred men if need be to aid him in that behalfe Cromptons Justice 134.3 H. 7.1 Cookes 5. part 71. b. The words of the great Charter of the Forrest in the eleventh Chapter are as followeth Every Archbishop Bishop Earle or Baron comming to us at our commandement and passing by our Forrest it shaâ—â— be lawfull for hini to take one beast or two by the view of the Forrester if he be present or else he shall cause one to blow a Horne for him that he seeme not to steale our Deere This statute doth speake but of Archbishops Bishops Earles and Barons yet if a Duke Marquesse or Viscount which be Lords of Parliament be comming towards the King by his commandement they also shall have the benefit of this article So if the King send to any of the Lords aforesaid to come to his Parliament or send to him by writ of Subpoena to appeare in the Chancery before his Councell or send for him by his missive or by Messenger or Serjeant at Armes in all these cases he shall have the benefit of this statute because they came at the Kings commandement The same Law is if a Scire facias goe out of the Chancery or Kings Bench to a Lord of the Parliament but if such processe goe forth for a Lord to appeare before the Justices of the Common Pleas or before the Barons of the Exchequer and he commeth upon that he shall not have the benefit of the statute for he doth not come unto the King and the words be veniens ad nos and all the processe which are made out of the Chancery and Kings Bench are quòd sit coram nobis and so are the Processe out of the Star-chamber Also Lords which come to visite the new King after the death of his Father though not sent for shall have the priviledge and so note this statute is a warrant dormant to such Lords which is also to be understood as well of their returning homewards as of their comming towards the King Manwood Forrest Lawes cap. 181. Cromp. Courts 167. b. Note this statute doth give licence to kill or hunt in the Kings Parks though the letter of the statute be transientes per forrestam nostram Passing by our Forrest Cromptons Court 168. Note in certain cases the Law doth give priviledge to the Sons or Brethren of Noblemen though themselves be not of that degree Vide 21. H. 8 cap. 13.7 E. 6. cap. 5. CERTAINE CASES WHEREIN A LORD of the Parliament hath no PRIVILEDGE THe King may by his absolute power commit a Nobleman to prison durante beneplacito suo from whence he cannot be discharged by bail or mainprise or by the common writ de homine replegiando And by the same power it is if a Noble person bee committed to prison by the Kings Councell for they are incorporate to his Highnesse and do command as with the Kings mouth And the same law is if a Noble be committed to prison by the absolute commandement of the Kings Judges sitting in their places of Judicature Stamf. lib. 2. cap. 18. fol. 72.1 as you have before when the Prince himself was committed by the chiefe Justice sitting in the Kings Bench and hee was not baileable Also if a Capias and an Exigent may bee awarded by the Iustices out of their ordinary Jurisdiction against such persons upon an Indirement for Felony or Treason as common experience she weth The statutes of Praemunire are 27. E. 3. cap. 1.16 R. 2. cap. 5. upon which statutes an Abbot which was a Lord of the Parliament was impleaded and he did pray priviledge to appeate by an Atrurney and by the rule of the Court he could not because the statute is generall and against it but by speciall writ out of the Chancery he might And so in case where he doth pray to be received For if a Lord of the Parliament holding lands of another in Fee simple doth forbeare or with-hold to doe and pay his services due to his Land lord and that by the space of two yeares whereupon he doth bring a writ of Cessavit which is his remedy given him by the Law thereby to recover the inheritance of the land but the said Lord
or for his marriage though he be within age Cooks 6. part 74. in Druries case Nobility and Lords in reputation onely THere are other Lords in reputation and appellation who neverthelesse are not de jure neither can they enjoy the priviledge of those of the Nobility that are Lords of the Parliament The sonne and heire of a Duke during his fathers life is onely by curtesie of speech and honour called an Earle and the eldest sonne of an Earle a Baron but not so in legall proceedings or in the Kings Courts of Iustice Brook Treason 2. But the King may at his pleasure create them in the life of their Ancestors into any degree of Lords of the Parliament Cook 8. part 16. b. A Duke or other of the Nobilitie of a forraigne Nation doth come into this Realme by the Kings safe conduct in which the Kings said Letters of Conduct he is named Duke according to his Creation yet that appellation maketh him not a Duke c. to sue or to be sued by that name within England but is onely so reputed But if the King of Denmark or other Soveraigne King come into England under safe conduct he during his aboad in England ought to bee stiled by the name of King though hee have not merum imperium out of his owne Kingdome yet he shall retaine honoris titulos Cook 7. part 15. b. sequentia All the younger sonnes of the Kings of England are of the Nobility of England and Earles by their birth without any other Creation and onely Lords in reputation And if an English man be created Earle of the Empire or of other title of honour by the Emperour he shall not beare the title in England and therefore is an Earle onely in reputation A Lord of Ireland and Scotland though he be a Postnatus is not a Lord in England in legall Courts of Iustice though he be commonly called and reputed a Lord. NOBLE VVOMEN ALthough Noble women may not sit in Parliament in respect of their sexe yet they are in the law Peeres of the Realm and all or most of the Prerogatives before mentioned which to Noblemen are belonging doe also appertaine to them Cook 8. part 53. But the opinion of some men hath been that a Countesse Baronesse or other woman of great estate cannot maintaine an action upon the statute de scandalis Magnatum because the statute of 2. R. 2. cap. 5. speaketh but of Prelates Dukes Earles Barons or other Nobles and other great men of the Realme and of the Chancellour Treasurer Clarke of the Privie Seale Steward of the Kings house Iustice of the one Bench or of the other great officers of the Realm by which words they conceive the meaning of the makers of that statute was onely to provide in that case for Lords and not for women of honour Crompton Justice of Peace 45. b. Also if any of the Kings servants within his Check-roll doe conspire the death of any Noble man it is not felony within the compasse of the statute 3. H. 7. cap. 13. Honourable women are of three sorts By creation by Descent or by Marriage King Henry the eighth created Anne Bullen Marchionesse of Pembrook and so may the King create any woman into any title of honour as to his Highnesse shall seem good As the King by by his Letters Patents openly read in the Parliament did create _____ Widow the sole daughter of _____ late Baron of Abergavenny Baronesse De le Spencer Cambden 63.6 Noble women by descent are those to whom either the lands holden by such dignity do descend as heir and they are said to be honourable by tenure or those whose Ancestors to whom they are heires were seised of an estate descendable unto them in their titles of Dukedomes Earldomes or Baronies or those whose Ancestors were summoned to the Kings Parliament for thereby also an inheritance doth accrue to their posterities Noble women also are those who do take to their husbands any Lord or Peere of the Realme although they of themselves were not of any degree of Nobility Fortescue de laudibus legum Anglia fol. 100. Question and doubt hath been made whether if a man be summoned to the Parliament and afterwards die without issue male the dignity and title of honour may descend to the heire female and many arguments have beene made pro contra in that which at this time I doe purposely omit because I have before discoursed thereof in the title of Barons in this Treatise Concerning the title of honour descendable to the heire female by reason of a tenure in her Ancestor there need no more doubt to be made than of offices of honour the which doe much import the publike wealth and being of estate of inheritance doe descend to the heire female if there be no heire male as the office of high-Constableship of England challenged in the time of H. 8. by the Duke of Buckingham and judged by the advice and resolution of the Judges as by a note of that case extant whereof my Lord Dyer in his Reports hath a memoriall is most evident Dyer 283. b. Kellaway 6. H. 8.170 b. which descended to the daughters of Humphrey de Bohun Earle of Hereford and Essex as afore is declared the office of a Lord Steward descended to Blanch daughter of Henry Earle of Lancaster in whose right John of Gaunt her husband enjoyed the same The like may be said of the office of Earle Marshall which descended by an heire female unto the house of Norfolk all which offices are as unfit to be exercised by a woman as it is unfit for a woman to be summoned to the Parliament as Baronesse by writ as before is written And when the title of honour doth descend to a woman if question in Law doe arise betweene the noble woman and any other person whether she be of that degree of noblenesse or no the issue shall be tried by the Record thereof and by the Kings writ it shall be certified and not by a Jury of twelve men even as it should be in case her Ancestors had beene party Cooks 6. part 53. 7. part 15. Although the Lawes of this Realme regularly doe make all the daughters where there are no sonnes equally to inherit Lands and Tenements and to be but one heire to their Ancestor yet it is not so in the descent of dignities and titles of honour for inheritances concerning matters of honour being things in their nature entire paticipating of superiority and eminency are not partable amongst many and therefore must of necessity descend unto one and that is to the eldest daughter sister aunt or cosin female inheritable where there is no heires males that may lawfully challenge the same and so in this point is the civill Law Neverthelesse there was a Judgment in the time of H. 3. touching the descent of the Earldome of Chester after the death of the Earle who dyed without issue his sisters being his
heires which Judgement was that the said Earldome should bee divided amongst the said copartners as other lands and that the eldest should not have it alone 23. H. 3. Fitz. partic 18. But this judgement was holden erroneous even in those times wherein it was given For Bracton a learned Judge who lived in that age thus writeth thereof treating of Partition among Copartners lib. 2. cap. 34 fol. 76. b. De hoc autem quod dicitur quod de feodo militare veniunt in divisione capitalia messuagia inter cohaeredes dividuntur hoc verum est nisi capitale messuagium illud sit caput comitatus propter jus gladis quod dividi non potest vel caput Baroniae castrum vel aliud aedificium hoc ideo ne sit caput per plures particulas dividetur plura jura Comitat ' Baroniarum deveniant ad nihilum per quod deficiat regnum quod ex Comitatibus Baroniis dicitur esse constitutum Si autem plura sunt aedisicia quae sunt capita Baronia dividi possunt inter cohaeredes facta electione salvo jure essentiae quia cùm plura sunt ibi jura quodlibet per se poterit integrè observare quod quidem non est in uno ut praedictum est licèt à quibusdam dicatur quòd in aliis regionibus aliquando de consuetudine dividatur sed quod nunquam divids debeat in Anglia videtur nec visum fuit contrarium erit consuetudo regionis observanda ubi haereditas quae petitur personae nascuntur quae petunt unde sic dicatur quòd in regno Anglia aliquando facta fuit partitio hoc fuit injustum It is therefore evident that Baronies and dignities of Honour do by the Lawes of this Realm descend unto the eldest Coapercener and the Iudgement given once to the contrary thereof Bracton doth rightly account to be unjust his reason is notable for in as much as the honour of the Chivalry of the Realme doth chiefly consist in the Nobility reason would not that such dignitie should be divided amongst Coaparceners whereby through multitude of partitions the reputation of Honour in such succession and so divided might be impaired or the strength of the Realme being drawne into many hands with the decrease of livelihood by partition should be enfeebled in which Resolution Britton the learned Bishop of Hereford who compiled his Booke of the Lawes of the Realme by the commandement and in the name of E. 1. according Britton 187. and therefore howsoever that Judgement was given or whensoever it is neverthelesse very evident that it was soone redressed for if it were given upon the death of Renulph the last of that name the Earle of Chester who dyed about 17. H. 3. without issue the Writers of that time doe testifie that the Earledome of Chester came wholly unto Iohn Scot the sonne of David Earle of Huntington and Anguish and of Maud the eldest sister of the said Renulph if it were given upon the death of the said Iohn Scot who dyed without issue about 14. H. 7. yet notwithstanding the said Judgement stood not in force for that the said King assumed the said Earledome into his owne hands upon other satisfaction made to the sisters Coparceners of the said Iohn Scot. Ne tanta hereditas colos deduceretur Matth. Paris Monast S. Albani in Arr. fol. 3.66 B. tamen vido Vill. fol. 75. et Ioh. Guill 78. For this it is to be observed out of Presidents and to be acknowledged of every dutiful Subject that the King is at liberty to call and advance to honour whom his Highnesse shall in his Princely wisdome thinke most meet and therfore whereas Ralph Lord Cromwell being a Baron by Writ dyed without issue having two sisters and co-heires Elizabeth the eldest married unto Sir Thomas Nevill Knight and Ioane the younger married unto Sir Hunt Burther hee who married the younger sister was called unto the Parliament as Lord Cromwell and not the said Sir Thomas Nevill who had married the eldest sister and Hugh Lupus the first and great Earle of Chester was by the Conquerour his Uncle creared Earle of Chester Habemus sibi heredibus adeo libere per gladium sicut ipse Rex tenuit Angliam per Corenam Hugh dyed without issue and the inheritance of his Earledome was divided amongst his foure sisters and the eldest had not the Seigniory entire unto her selfe Reade Mills 74 75. Cookes b. part 53. 7. part 15. If a Woman be Noble by birth or by discent with whomsoever she doth marry though her Husband bee under her degree yet she doth remaine Noble for her Birthright Est Character in delibilis Cook 4. part 118. b. 6. part 53. b. Other Women are enobled by Marriage and the text saith thus viz. Women with the honour of their Husbands and with the kindred of their Husbands we worship them in the Court we decree matters to passe in the name of their Husbands and into the house and sirname of their Husbands wee doe translate them but if afterwards a woman doe marry with a man of baser degree then loseth she her former Dignitie and followeth the condition of her latter Husband Fortescue de laudibus legum Angl. 100. And as concerning the second disparaged Marriage as aforesaid many other bookes of the law doe agree for these bee rules received in those Cases Si mulier nobilis nupserit ignobili desit esse nobilis eadem modo quo quidem Constitut dissolvitur Cookes 6. part 53. B. 4. part 118. It was the Case of Ralph Hayward Esquire who tooke to his wife Anne the widdow of the Lord Powes they brought an Action against the Duke of Suffolke by the name of Ralph Hayward Esquire and the Lady Anne Powes his wife and exception was taken for misnaming her because shee ought to have beene named by the Husbands Name and not otherwise and the exception was by the Court allowed For said they by the Law of God shee is Sub potestate viri and by our Law her Name of Dignitie shall bee changed according to the degree of her Husband notwithstanding the curresies of the Ladies of Honour and Court Dyer 79. And the like was also in Queene Maries Raigne when the Dutchesse of Suffolke tooke to her Husband Adrian Stoakes Prob. 4 5 6. and many other presidents have beene of latter time and herewith agreeth the Civill Law punctually Digest lib. 1. Tit. 9. Lege 8. Eodem de Dignitate Liber 12. Lege 2. In this case of acquired Nobility by Marriage of Question in Law be whereupon an issue is taken betweene the parties that is to say Dutchesse or not Dutchesse Countesse or not Countesse Baronesse or not Baronesse the tryall hereof shall not be by Record as in the former case but by a Jury of 12. men and the reason of the diversity is because in this case the Dignity is accrewed unto her by marriage which the
other parts holden by the same tenure of the King by posteritie the King granteth his Seigniory to the Queene and afterwards the Tenant dyeth the sonne within age in this case the King shall have the Wardship of the Body and have the Prerogative even as the King himselfe should have had 3. E. 3 4. vide etiam Stamford Prerog Reg. cap. 2. The Queene wife unto the King or widdow shall not be amerced if she be non-suited in any Action or otherwise in which cases any other subject of what degree soever shall be amerced for in this case the Queen shall participate the Kings Prerogative Cookes 6. Report 62. But the Queene shall not in all cases have the same Prerogatives that the King shall have in the same case as for Example Petition is all the remedy the Subject hath when the King seizeth his Lands or taketh away his Goods from him having no title by order of Law so to doe contrary to the opinion of some ancient Bookes as you may see Stamfords Prerog cap. 19. But in such suit shall be made to the Queene but actions against other Leiges of the King according as the case shall require for by the same reason that the Queene may be Plaintiffe and Demandant in actions without the King by the same reason that the Queene may be Plaintiffe and Demandant in actions without the King by the same reason he shall be Defendant or Tenant without pertaking such Prerogatives as doe appertaine to the King 11. H. 4.64 B. Stamford Prerog cap. 22. â—n fine Against the King by his Prerogative Nullum temâ—us occurit Regi but time shall runne against the Queen H. 18. E. 3.2 a. and aplenarty by sixe mouthes is a good plea in a Quare Imp. brought by Philippa Regina Angliae ibid. fol. 1. et 13. b. Stamford Prerog cap. 18. trope finem In 21. E. 3.13 b. It is thus to be read note that a protection was sued forth against the Queen in a Writ which she brought and it was allowed though shee be a person exempt Neverthelesse by this short case following may bee observed that the Justices doe not easily suffer any proceedings in Law against the Queene wife or widdow but will hold with their Inmities as much as they may by Law A Writ of dower was brought against Isabel Queene of England mother of the King that then was and the Court said to the Plaintiffe the Queene is a person of dignitie and excellencie and we are of opinion that she shall not answer to the Writ but it behooveth you to sue to her by Petition and thereupon the Demandant dixit grat and shee prayed the Court to grant a continuance of her Action untill another day so that in the meane time she might sue to speake with the Queen but the Court would not agree to make a Continuance but said that upon her request they might give dâ—â— precepart and so it was done for the Queenes Councel would not agree to a continuance for thereby thâ— Queene should bee accepted as answerable 10. 〈◊〉 3.379 The wife of the Kings eldest sonne also hath somâ— Prerogative in regard of the excellencie of her Husband which the wives of other Noblemen have not foâ— by the Statute of 25. E. 3. it is high Treason to violate the wife of the Kings eldest sonne and heire Dutchesses also and Countesses have speciall Honour appertaining to their Estates as kneeling and tasting and such like which things as appertaining more properly to the Heraulds then to this legall discourse I leave unto them By the Statute made 7. Iac. cap. 6. intituled And Act for the Administring the oath of Allegiance and Reformation of Women recusants if any person or persons of or above the age of 18. yeeres and degrees aforesaid must and hereafter shal stand and be presented indicted or convicted for not comming to Church or not receiving the holy Communion or Sacraments of the Lords Supper according to the Lawes and Statutes of this Realme before the Ordinary or other having lawful power to take such presentment or indictment then 3. of the Privie Counsell of the King his Highnesse his Heires or Successours and no other whereof the Lord Treasurer the Lord Chancellour Lord Privie Seale or principall Secretary to be one upon knowledge shall require such person or persons to take the said Oath but it shall be lawfull to and for every Bishop within his Diocesse to require any Baron or Barons of the age of 18. or above to take the said Oath Also in cases of indictment of Felony or Treason a Baronesse shall have the same tryall by Peeres as doth appeare by the Statute of 20. H. 6. cap. 9. which any other Noble woman of higher degree shall have which priviledge is denyed to all of a lower degree then a Baronesse Ladies in Reputation The wife and widdow and widdow of the sonne and heire of a Duke or Earle in the life of his Father is a Lady by courtesie of speech and honour and taketh place according as in ancient time hath been permitted by the Soveraign Prince and allowance of the Herauld but in legall proceedings they are not to have priviledges nor to be named according to such sirnames of dignity but the King may at his pleasure create such men in the life time of their Ancestors into degrees of Lords of his Parliament and then the Law is otherwise If a Noblewoman of Spaine come into the Realme by safe conduct or otherwise by the King shee be stiled by such her forraign stile of dignity yet in the Kings Courts of Justice she shall not be named by such title though by common speech she be a Lady in reputation An English woman borne doth take to her Husband a Spanish or French Duke though he be made a Denizen yet he shall not beare his title of dignity in legall proceedings A German woman is married to the Earl of Northam or to other the Nobility of England unlesse she be made a Denizen she cannot lawfully claim the priviledges or title of her husband no more then she can to have dower or any jointure from him An English Woman doth take to Husband the Earle of Kildare in Ireland or if a Lord of Scotland though he be a post natus take an English woman to his wife their wives shall not participate their husbands Titles of Dignitie But if the King do create one of his Subjects of Scotland naturalized here by Act of Parliament to be Viscount Rochester within England and after by his Writ of Summons under his Great Seale doe call him to his uper House of his Parliaments and assigne him a place there in his great Councell amongst the Lords and Peeres of the Realme hee is now also a Peere of this Realme and shall be partaker with them in all Priviledges and by consequence his wife widdow and children after him 32. E. 3.35 in le case de Gilbert Humfrevill But if an Englishman by the
where the originall was made and at last it was resolved by all the Court that the Record should be amended by the Cursitor and made according to the Note or Title delivered unto him by the Plaintiffes Attorney Cook 8. part fol. 15. b. It appeareth in our Book of Law that the highest and lowest Dignity are uniuersall For as if a King of a Forreign Nation come into England by leave of the King of this Realm as it ought to be in this case he shall â—â—e and be sued in the name of a King 11. Ed. 3. Test Breccon 473. So shall he sue or be sued by the Name of a Knight whersoever he received that degree of Dignity â—o Ed. 4.6 H. 6.14 but otherwise it is as â—f a Duke Marquesse Earl or other Title of Honour given by any Forreign King yea though the King by Letters Pattents of â—ife conduct do name him Duke or by any other his forâ—eign Title of Dignity For experience sheweth that Kings joyned in league together by a certain mutuall â—nd as it were a Naturall power of Monarchs according â—o the Law of Nations have denized one anothers subâ—ects and Ambassadors graced with this title of Honour Therefore though a Knight receive his Dignitie of Forraigne Prince he is so to be stiled in all Legall proceedings within England Vide Cooke 7. part fol. 16. b. And Kings were wont to send their sonnes to theâ—â— Neighbour Princes to receive Knighthood at theiâ— hands Vide Selden fol. 331. 308. thinking that iâ— was more honourable to take Armes of some other leâ—â— affection might seeme to prevent judgement when thâ— father gave them that honour Thus was our King H. 2. sent unto David King oâ— Scots and Malcombe also king there sent unto our H 2. and our king to the king of Castile to take of them Military or Civill Armes for the tearmes and phraseâ— they used in that age for the making of a knight Vidâ— Camden 174.8 vide Selden fol. 315. And knights in all forraigne Countries have eveâ— place and precedencie according as they are ancient knights which priviledge is deemed to Noblemen for be they never so ancient in forraigce Countries they shall goe before as Puesneys The degree of knighthood is not onely a Dignitie and honour to the party for so it is termed in Brooke title Additions fol. 44. but honourable for the kingdome and therefore it hath been an ancient Prerogative of the kings of this Realm at their pleasure to compell men of worth to take upon them this degree upon the payment of a Fine as appeareth in Ann. 7. H. 6.15 Pitzh Abridg. tit Im. 12. and by the Statute a. 1. Ed. 2. de militibus But we see by experience in these daies that none are compelled thereunto and that is the reason wherefore if the Plaintiffe be made knight hanging the Writ it shall abate because he hath changed his name and that by his owne act Vide Cooke 7. part f. 27. b. part 10. b. 1 Ed. 6. cap. 7. contrary And for that cause also by the common Law not only the king but every Lord of a Manor ought to have of every of his tenants a reasonable fine to make his eldest son knight Vide Bracton fol. 36. b. and all lands are subject to these aides except onely ancient Demeasnes and grand and petty serjeantly tenures as the Law hath been anciently delivered Vide Fiszh Nat. bre f. 83. a. and Selden f. 13. where it is also said one that wrote a little after the statute of West the first allowes as a good barre to the avowry for the tenant to plead that the father himself is no knight so that one not knighted cannot claime the aide of his own Tenants Briton de Prises de Avers And it was not at the liberty of the Lord to make more or lesse of his Tenants by the common Law in this case but by the statute at Westminster 1. cap. 35. it is put into certainty viz. forasmuch as before this time reasonable and to make one son knight or to marry his daughter was never put into certainty nor how much should be taken at that time whereby some levyed unreasonable aide and more often then seemed necessary whereby the people were sore grieved And it is therefore provided that from henceforth a whole knights see be taken but 20. s. and of more more and of lesse lesse after that rate and that none shall levie such aide to make his son knight untill the sonne be 15. yeares of age nor to marry his daughter untill she be of the age of 7. yeares and of that there shall be mention made in the kings Writs formed on the same if any one will demand it and if it happen that the Father after he had leavied any such aid of his Tenants did before he hath marryed his Daughter the Executors of thâ— Father shall be bound to the daughter for so much as thâ— Father received for the Aid And if the Fathers goods bâ— not sufficient his heir shall be charged therwith unto thâ— daughter and this Heir is so incident that although thâ— Lord do confirm unto the Tenant to hold by fealty anâ— certain Rent and release unto him all other services anâ— demands yet he shall have the aid to make his eldeâ—â— Son Knight Anno 40. E. 3. f. 22. Finches book 24. but the King was not bound by the statute beforementioned because the King was not named in that statute and therforâ— by the statute 25. E. 3. cap. 11. The Kings aids were brought to a like value Selden fol. 3.30 The intention of the Law is that an heir within the age of 21. years is not able to do Knight-service till his full age of 21. years Littleton lib. 2. cap 4. f. 22. But such a presumption of Law doth give place to 〈◊〉 judgment and proof to the contrary as Bracton saith Saâ—â—litur presumptioni donec probetur in contrarium And therfore the King who is the Sovereign and Supream Judge of Chivalty hath dubbed him Knight he by this hath judged him able to do him Knight-service and all men concluded not to say to the contrary therfore such an heir being made Knight either in the life of his Father or afterwards during his minority shall be out of ward and custody both for Lands and for his body or marriage by the ancient common Law by reason also that the Honour of Knight-hood is so great that it is not to be holden under by any yet if the King do create any such an Heir within Age a Duke or Marquesse Earl Count Viscount or Baron by this he shall be out of ward â—nd custody both for his Land and for his body vide â—ook 6 part 74 a. And therfore it is provided by the statute of Magâ—â—â—harta Cap. 3. Ita tamen quod si ipse dum infra aetatem fueâ—â—t fiat miles nihil ominus terra remaneat in custodia doâ—inorum suorum So that although
such an heir within age 〈◊〉 made a Knight and therby to this purpose is esteeâ—ed of full age yet the Laws shall remain in the custoâ—â—â— of the Lord till his age of 21. years by the provision 〈◊〉 the said Act. Quere if the son and heir of the Tenant 〈◊〉 the King by Knight-service c. be made Knight in â—aris by the King of France whether he shall be out of â—ardship after the death of his Father or no for therby â—e is a Knight in England Cook 7. par a. 2. E. 4. fo b. tamen â—ide Cooks 6. par 74. b. Mention is only made of Knights â—ade by the King himself or by his Lieutenants in Ireâ—â—nd But when the King doth make an heir apparent withâ—â— age of a Tenant by Knights service a Knight in the â—se time of his Ancestor and after the death of his Anâ—estor the said heir being within age shall in this case be 〈◊〉 of ward and shall pay no value for his marriage neiâ—her shall the Lord have the custody of the Land for in â—hat case by the making of him Knight in the life of his Ancestor he is made of ful age so that when his Ancestor â—yeth no Interest in the body nor in the Land shall inâ—est but the Knight may tender his livery as if he were 〈◊〉 full age and in this case the King shall have primer â—â—ism as if he had bin 21. years old at the time of the deâ—ease of his Ancestor and not otherwise Cooks 8. part fol. 〈◊〉 71. a. for the statute of Magna Charta doth not extend â—nto it For the purpose of it doth extend only when the Heir is in ward infra etatem is made Knight then rema neat torra in Custodia But when the Heir is in ward being Knight in the life of his Ancestor then the Custodâ— cannot remain or continue which had never any inception or essence Also when the Heir after the death of his Ancestouâ— within age is made a Knight if after tender made untâ— him he within Age doth marry else-where yet he shalâ— not pay the Forfeiture of his Marriage For by the making of him Kâ—ight he is out of ward and custody of hiâ— Lord for then he ought to be sui juris and may imploy himself in Feats of Arms for defence of ths Realm and therfore may not be within the Custody or keeping of another but none shall pay any Forfeiture but when after refusall he doth marry himself during the time when he is under the Custody or keeping of his Lord. And this doth appear by the statute of Merton cap. 6. Si maritaverit sine licentia Domini sui ut ei auferat Maritagium suum c. Which Words cannot be understood when he is out of Ward and Custody no more then when he is married after his age of one and twenty years Note hereby may appear that the King may preâ—ent his Grant or other Lords of the double value by Knighthood yet in such a Câ—se presently after the Heir is made Knight after the Death of his Ancestour the Lord may have a Writ de valore Marigii for the single Cooks 6. part 74. and 75. and note Plowden f. 267. Also by the ancient Common-law of this Realm if a Villain be be made a Knight he is immediatly enfranâ—ranchized Olanvile lib. 5. cap. 5. f. 27. and Bracton lib. 4. â—ap 198. b. Or if a Ribauld or man of base Birth and Condition had â—trucken a Knight he should by the ancient Laws have â—ost his hand wherwith he offended Britton 19. in his â—ppeales But in France it was judged antiently that when a â—ord of a villain had Knighted his villain being a Gentleman he became Free and had the Honor lawfully â—ut if another Lord had Knighted him nothing had bin â—rought by it For none could mannue him but the Lord and till Mannumission or till Knighthood had ciâ—ill Freedome for his ground he was not capable of it â—xcept by the King only vide Seldens Titles of Honour fol. 318. It was enacted in Parliament Anno 6. Ioh. Regis in â—ec verba Rex vicecom c. Sciatis quod consensum est cum assensu Archieporum Comit. Baronium omnium fidelium urum Angl. quod Novem milites per totam Angl. invenient decimum militem bene paratum equis Armis â—d defensionem Regni nostri vide Cook before his ninth Book b. There hath ever bin and still is great use of the service of Knights even in civil affairs and concerning matters of Iustice as in a Writ of right which is the highest writ in the law for the trials of titles touching the inheritance of lands the Tenant is at election to have his tryall by a grand assize or else by battle if by the great assize then 〈◊〉 de magna assiza Elegenda shâ—ll be taken out And upon the return of that Writ those four Knights nominated must appear Gladiis cinctis Dyer 79. f. 103. If the Tenant make his election by Battle each parties are to choose their Champions and the Court shall award the Battle and the Champions shall be a mainprise and sworn to perform the Battle at a certain day in the Term and idem dies shall be given to the parties at which day and place a List shall be made in an even and plain ground their Squadrant that is to say every square 60. foot East West North and South and the place or Court for the Justices of the Common Pleas without and upon the Lists furnished with the same Cloths which belong to their Court at Westminster and a Barre there shall be made for the Sergeants at Law and the Robes of the Justices and Sergeants shall be of Scarlet with their Coifes as it was Anno 13. Eliz. and then was made Proclamation with three O. yes c. and the Demandant was first solemnly demanded and did not appear Wherupon the Mainprise of the Champion was demanded to bring forth the Champion of the Demandant who came to the place apparelled with red Sandalls upon his black Armour bare legged from the knee downwards and bare headed and bare Arms to the Elbowes being brought in by a Knight namely by Sir Ierome Bowes who carryed a Red Baston of an Ell long typt with horn and a Yeoman carrying the Target made of double Leather and they were brought in at the North side of the Lists and went about the sides of the Lists and then came towards the Bar before the Justices with their solemn Congies and there was he made to stay on the Southside of the place being the right side of the Court. And after that the other Champion was brought in like manner at the South-side of the lists with like congies by the hands of Sir Henry Cheney Knight and was placed on the Northside of the Barre and two Serjeants being of the counsell of each party in the midst betweene them this done the Demandant was solemnly called