Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
lord_n earl_n king_n viscount_n 14,472 5 11.3612 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A42483 Hiera dakrya, Ecclesiae anglicanae suspiria, The tears, sighs, complaints, and prayers of the Church of England setting forth her former constitution, compared with her present condition : also the visible causes and probable cures of her distempers : in IV books / by John Gauden ... Gauden, John, 1605-1662. 1659 (1659) Wing G359; ESTC R7566 766,590 810

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

1247 6 Thomas Vipont A. D. 1255 7 Robert Chanse A. D. 1258 8 Ralph de Ireton A. D. 1280 9 John de Halton A. D. 1288 10 John de Rosse A. D. 1318 11 John de Kirkby A. D. 1332 12 Gilbert de Welton A. D. 1353 13 Tho de Appleby A. D. 1363 14 Robert Reade A. D. 1396 15 Thom Merkes A. D. 1397 16 William Strickland A. D. 1400 17 Rog Whelpdale A. D. 1419 18 Will Barrow A. D. 1423 19 Marmaduke Lumley A. D. 1430 20 Nicholas Close A. D. 1450 21 William Percy A. D. 1452 22 John ●ingscot A. D. 1462 23 Richard Scroop A. D. 1464 24 Edward Storey A. D. 1468 25 Richard Dunelmensis or of Durham A. D. 1478 26 William Sever. A. D. 1496 27 Roger Leibourn A. D. 1503 28 John Penny A. D. 1504 29 John Kite A. D. 1520 30 Rob Aldrich A. D. 1537 31 Owen Oglethorp A. D. 1556 32 John Best A. D. 1561 33 Richard Barnes A. D. 1570 34 John Mey A. D. 1577 35 Hen Robinson A. D. 1598 36 Rob Snowdon A. D. 1616 37 Rich Milborn A. D. 1620 38 Rich Senhouse A. D. 1624 39 Francis White A. D. 1628 40 Barnaby Potter A. D. 1629 CHESTER This is one of the 6. Bishopricks erected by K. Hen. 8. upon the Dissolution of Religious Houses 1 John Bird. A. D. 1541 2 John Cotes A. D. 1556 3 Cuthbert Scot. A. D. 1556 4 Will Downham A. D. 1561 5 Wil Chadderton A. D. 1579 6 Hugh Billett A. D. 1595 7 Rich Vaughan A. D. 1597 8 George LLoyd A. D. 1604 9 Thomas Morton A. D. 1616 10 John Bridgman A. D. 1618 DURHAM This Bishoprick of Durham was erected there by Aldwin Bishop of Lindisfarn or Holy Island A. D. 990. That ancient Bishoprick being destroyed by the Danes about An. Christi 800. and till that year 990. wandring up and down unsetled which Bishop of Lindisfarn was first erected by Oswald King of Northumberland A. Christi 637 Bishops of Lindisfarn or Holy Island 1 St. Aidanus A. D. 637 2 St. Finanus A. D. 651 3 Colmannus A. D. 661 4 Tuda A. D. 664 5 St. Eata A. D. 665 6 St. Cuthbertus A. D. 684 7 St. Eadbertus A. D. 687 8 Egbertus I. A. D. 698 9 Ethelwold A. D. 721 10 Kenulph A. D. 738 11 Higbald A. D. 781 12 Egbert II. A. D. 802 13 Egfrid A. D. 819 14 Eanbert A. D. 845 15 Eardulf A. D. 854 16 Cuthard 17 Tilred A. D. 915 18 Witherd A. D. 927 19 Uhtred A. D. 944 20 Sexhelm 21 Aldred dyed A. D. 968 22 Alfius A. D. 968 23 Aldwin A. D. 990 This Aldwin first setled the See at Durham where it hath ever since continued Bishops of Durham after Aldwin last Bishop of Lindisfarn 1 Eadmund A. D. 1020 2 Eadred A. D. 1048 3 Egelricus A. D. 1049 4 Egelwinus 5 Walcher Earl of Northumberland A. D. 1071 6 William de Carilefe alias Cairliph A. D. 1080 The See void 4. yeares 7 Randall Flambard A. D. 1099 8 Geffrey Rufus A. D. 1128 9 William de S. Barbara A. D. 1143 10 Hugh Pudsey Earl of Northumberland A. D. 1154 11 Philip de Pictavia A. D. 1197 12 Rich de Marisco A. D. 1217 13 Rich the Poor A. D. 1228 14 Nic de Fernham A. D. 1241 15 Walter de Kirkham A. D. 1250 16 Rob Stichell A. D. 1260 17 Rob de Insula A. D. 1274 18 Anthony Beck Patriarch of Jerusalem A. D. 1283 19 Richard Kellow A. D. 1311 20 Ludovicus Beaumont A. D. 1317 21 Rich de Bury A. D. 1333 22 Tho Hatfeild A. D. 1345 23 John Fordham A. D. 1381 24 Walter Skirlaw A. D. 1388 25 Tho Langley Card. A. D. 1406 26 Robert Nevill A. D. 1438 27 Laurence Booth A. D. 1457 28 Willi Dudley A. D. 1476 29 John Sherwood A. D. 1483 30 Richard Fox A. D. 1494 31 VVill Sevier A. D. 1502 32 Christopher Bambridg A. D. 1507 33 Tho Ruthall A. D. 1508 34 Tho Wolsey A. D. 1523 35 Cutbert Tunstall A. D. 1530 36 Ja Pilkington A. D. 1560 37 Rich Barnes A. D. 1577 The See void 2. yeares 38 Matth Hutton A. D. 1587 39 Toby Matthew A. D. 1594 40 Will James A. D. 1606 41 Richard Neile A. D. 1617 42 George Mountain A. D. 1628 43 John Howson A. D. 1628 44 Tho Moorton A. D. 1632 Of the Bishops of the ISLE of MAN This Bishoprick of the Isle of Man was first erected by Pope Gregory 4. The Bishops See is in Russin or Castle-Town and the Bishops are termed in Latine Episcopi Sodorenses The VVestern Islands now belonging to Scotland who have now a Bishop of their own did anciently belong to this Bishoprick The new Bishop upon a vacancy is nominated by the Lords of the Isle who have been the Stanleys Earles of Darby and presented to the King and then consecrated by the Archbishop of York And this seemeth to be the cause why the Bishop of Man is no Lord of the Parlament because it is not at the Kings disposing none having Suffrage in Parlament but those who hold immediately from the King The Names of the Bishops of this See are not exactly known having as yet no meanes to procure a Catalogue thereof such as are extant are these 1 Machilla A. D. 518 2 Michael 3 Nicholas A. D. 1203 4 Reginald A. D. 1217 5 Richard A. D. 1257 6 Robert Walby A. D. 1396 7 Henry A. D. 1556 8 John Merick 9 George LLoyd A. D. 1604 10 Forster 11 Richard Parry A. D. 1641 In the Catalogue of the Bishops of Bristol p. 695. adde 12 Tho Westfield 1642. 13 Tho Howel 1644. ADDENDA In the Marginall Notes PAge 321. Propter Ecclesiae bona ubique bellatur Romanenses ut retineant Reformati ut obtineant Grotius Pacific Pag. 326. Sir H. Spelman values the L. Cromwel's estate in K. Hen. 8s dayes worth 20000 l. sterling MS. of Sacriledge Pag. 329. Piaculum olim nunc lusus Principum profanorum sacra profanare adhuc quaerimus cur bellis tam atrocibus vastamur Christiani Grot. Pacif. Pag. 337. Procopius in vita Justiniani tells of the vessels of the Jews Temple which at last were sent by that Emperour to the Church at Jerusalem ERRATA PAg. 16. l. 4. read growing up p. 92. l. 13. r. flagrancy p. 132. l. 39. r. Proteustant p. 244. in the title for descending r. deserving p. 282. l. 29. for sand r. saw p. 326. l. 20. r. 20000. p. 418. l. 39. r. abated p. 419. l. 4. dele next p. 449. l 17. r. evident by l. 27. r. unsubordinate p. 643. l 25. for them read those p. 682. l. 16. for part r. park p 684. l. 14. for as him r. in him In the Catalogue of Books written by the Author p. 692. adde A Treatise of Christian Marriages to be solemnly blessed by Ministers in Quarto THE END The Preface or Addresse Isa 58.12 Tunc severissimè punit Deus quum poenalis nutritur impunitas Aug. Hos 4.17 Isa 1.5 Mat.
excluded Do we not read in one Melchizedek the Type of Christ both Prince and Priest joyned together Afterward were not Aaron and Moses the one as King the other as Chief-priest appointed by God as the leaders of the Church of God From this example Abiathar the Priest also Gad and Nathan the Prophets were Counsellours as well as Confessors to King David so was Azariah the son of Zadok the Priest a chief Prince and Counsellor to King Solomon so Jehojadah the Priest was a Father a Protector and a chief Director to King Joash who ceased to prosper when he wanted such a Counsellor 2. When no men may be presumed or indeed generally are and in all times have been so able in managing and advising of matters religious as eminent Bishops and well-chosen Church men certainly none were so fit as they to give account to the Prince and State of the true estate of the Church and Religion which are miserably mis-represented by other ignorant or envious Informers none so much layes to heart the true concerns of Religion or the interests of mens souls none will so much take care that these suffer no prejudice and detriment by any Lay-mens disorderly insolency or covetous encrochments 3. As for the preaching part of a Bishop or his residence and inspection to his particular Diocese it can be no hinderance as some men have pittifully pretended sometime to attend the general good of their own and all others Dioceses they may not be thought to neglect their own Cabin who are sometime imployed for the reparation or conservation of the whole Ship as my Lord Viscount Newark very honourably learnedly and eloquently expressed himself in the House of Peers where it was briefly disputed touching Bishops sitting as Peers in the House which they had done ever since there was an House of Christian Peers in England So that the pretended damage as to their particular care of their Diocese is abundantly compensated by the good they may do to the publick which may easily be as much as that was of the English and Scotch Presbyters who were dispensed with for many moneths Non-residency as to their particular Livings and charges when they were to attend the Assemblies great service of making a Catechize a Directory and helping to extirpate Bishops out of this Church and State 4. The retortion upon these Ministers especially who were so much enemies to Bishops being in any Council Civil or Ecclesiastick must needs be a most smart and severe conviction of their Partiality when we have daily seen so many petty Presbyterian and Independent Preachers as busie as Bees and every where eager Sticklers in all secular Councils and Affairs How did some of them haunt some Lords and Commons in the long Parlament How did they ply all Committees specially that for Religion which had swallowed up the Convocation How prone are they still uncalled to croud or insinuate into all publick yea into Cabinet-Counsels both military and civil What of concern in Church or State for these last eighteen years can move or pass without their suggestions whisperings and agitations Many publick Declarations savour much of their strain and form both for fancy and phrase especially if they regard any religious businesse of State as Fastings Humiliations Thanksgivings and the like which heretofore were managed by the counsel of great Bishops as able I believe as any of our new and little ones But it is not strange that some men should think themselves fit to be at both ends of all publick Counsels either laying or hatching them and yet be so eager against all Bishops who were full as honest and in all respects as able and worthy as the best of these Sticklers for nothing makes men more presumptuous of themselves or more envious against others than want of true knowledge of eithers dimensions 5. And lastly the very light of Nature makes it seem very preposterous and impolitick to exclude all Church-men of which Bishops were ever the chief Fathers out of all publick Counsels for all Nations have taught us that they did so far venerate their Gods and honour their Religion as never to carry on their chief Counsels publick Affairs of War or Peace for Religion or Civility without taking some of their Holy men and Priests into their Councils so King Balak cals for Balaam in his greatest exigencies so were the Pontifs or Flamens ever among the chief Roman Counsellors and Senators so were the Druids ever among the British and Gallick Parlaments so were the Magi among the Persian Princes so at this day are the Mufties among the Turks chief Counsel All Mankind knowing this that the best counsels are those which rise nearest to Jupiters Throne and are drawn from the clearest fountains of Divine Wisdom If the true God and the Son of God the Christians Saviour have justly the Titles of the All and Onely wise yea the wonderful Counsellors how I beseech you can it stand with any Christian sense or reason of State and true Religion to exclude those men beyond any from all publick Councils of Church and State who are most in Gods and Christs stead best studied and acquainted with the Divine Will Wisdom and Counsel in Gods Word I am sure so far as I am versed in any Histories neither this Church or State nor any other did ever flourish without Bishops among the prime Counsellors both in Parlament and other-where nor did they ever more flourish in Piety Peace and Plenty than when these had as great an influence as any other Men of Learning Worth and Wisdom How things may hereafter thrive where the Clergy are so nipt and frost-bitten time and success will best inform the survivers yet it is no very promising omen when neither Clergy-men are encouraged to be fit and able nor if fit and able are at any hand to be admitted to such publick use and honour when any others may whatever extraction rise and education they have had for they are not alwayes noble Rivers and ancient Springs of Vertue Wisdom and Honour but many times small Brooks and very inconsiderable Rivolets which aspire to this honour of contributing their small drops of Counsel into the great publick Cistern of Government And such were they as far as I understood men for the most part who with least patience could bear any Bishops to sit in counsel with them lest they should be miserably outshined and eclipsed by the others improved parts and well-known learning which vastly exceeded the small shreds and short ends which many other men were so highly conceited of in themselves whose Estates laid the greatest foundation of their Honour But I here crave the Readers pardon for this digression no way impertinent to my designe which is to demonstrate the merit and so far to recover the publick esteem and honor of good Bishops and all the Clergy such as they ever enjoyed in this and all other Christian States till these darker daies in