Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
lord_n earl_n john_n robert_n 47,013 5 9.2711 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A47376 An answer to such objections as were made by some commoners of Lincoln-shire and presented to both houses at the first sitting of this Parliament against Robert, Earle of Lindesey, and his participants concerning the draining of those fenns which lye between Lincolne, Berne, & Boston / set forth by Sir Will. Killigrew, Knight. Killigrew, William, Sir, 1606-1695. 1647 (1647) Wing K454; ESTC R6406 7,814 18

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

AN ANSVVER TO Such Objections as were made by some COMMONERS of Lincoln-Shire AND Presented to both Houses at the first sitting of this PARLIAMENT AGAINST ROBERT Earle of LINDESEY and his Participants Concerning the Draining of those Fenns which lye between Lincolne Berne Boston Set forth by Sir Will Killigrew Knight LONDON Printed for the Author 1647. The OBJECTIONS 1. THat these said Fennes did not need to be Drained 2. That the Commissioners did proceed by view and not by Iury 3. That the Commissioners were Parties interessed with the Earle 4. That the Countrey was defrauded by giving the Earle too much Land for his Contract 5. That the Earle did give some of those Lands unto Great men for gratuities 6. That the Earle hath taken more Land from the Country then his proportion 7. That the Earle hath taken the best of the Fenns for himselfe and left the worst for the Commoners 8. That the Earle hath not performed his Contract by draining those Fennes sufficiently 9. That the Earle did fetch up some of the Commoners by Pursevants and by Warrants from the Councell-Table and did imprison others An Answer to such Objections as were made by some Commoners of Lincolnshire c. 1. Obj. THat these Fennes did not need to be drained Answ. 1. It appeares upon Record the Commissioners of Sewers of those parts with the Countrey did intend and did endeavour in the 34 of Henry the 8th and in the 17th of Elizabeth to draine the same Fennes which the Earle hath now drained and did proceed therein as the Earle hath now done 2. It appeares by a letter signed by Sir Anthony Earbye and M. Serjeant Gallis with divers other Commissioners of Sewers and Justices of Peace in those parts that the said Fennes did need to be drained For by their Letter they informe His Majesty that the Fennes of those parts were annoyed with waters which for the good of the Countrey they desire His Majesty might be drained to which end they are suitors that the King would recommend some Person who should undertake the draining thereof as a worke honourable and profitable for the Common-wealth 3. The KING recommends ROBERT Earle of LINDESEY unto the Commissioners who was accepted for undertaker at a publique Session of Sewers at Sleford in the face of the whole Countrey where Argument was what quantity of Land they should contract with the Earle for and on what termes but no question was ever made whether those Fennes did need to be drained The whole Assembly seemed as eager to have the Fennes drained as the Earle was to undertake the worke and after some debate at severall meetings about the proportion the Earle demanding 30000 Acres at last the Commissioners proffer him 24000 Acres which he accepts with the generall approb●tion of every Commissioner p●●se●t and acclamations of joy from the Commoners who did wait on the Earle to his lodging from the Church with loud pray●rs for the good successe of his work● By this it appeares th●t the said Fennes did need to be drained This contract was made between the Earle and the Countrey by thirty two Commissioners who would not have made this contract if the draining had not been necessary 2. Obj. That the Commissioners which laid the Taxes and did adjudge the Lands to the Earle were Parties interessed with him Answ. That when the contract with the Countrey was made no Commissioners were interessed nor could be because the Earle had then no interest himselfe but after the worke was begun three or foure of the Commissioners did become Adventurers with the Earle and did put in their monies for their owne Fennes They paid forty shillings per Acre at which rate the Earle offered to admit all that would of the Countrey to adventure with him which was done by publique Proclamation But those Fennes were then so drowned and of so little worth and the worke so ha●●rdous that none would purchase any of the Lands allotted to the Earle at forty shillings the Acre besides Sir Edward Heron and Sir Iohn Brooke since Lord Cobham who are the Commissioners excepted against where as the Commoners might well wish that more Commissioners had been of their mind who no doubt would be carefull to see that the Earle should performe his worke according to his contract for their owne sakes 3. Obj. That the Commissioners did proceed to Taxe and to adjudge the Lands by view which they should have done by Iury Answ. That Juries are in this Case only to informe the Commissioners and that the Commissioners being themselves sworne may by their owne view be better informed then by the eyes of others as has been usually done in former times and no doubt the integrity of such men of such quality as are trusted to be Judges may be trusted to judge upon their owne view as well as on the view of meane and ignorant men for of such are most Juries made I have here inserted the Names of the Commissioners that laid the first Taxe of 13s 4d an Acre upon the Earles Fennes Many of them being those that did view the Fennes without a Jury because in a businesse of such consequence they would trust no eyes before their owne The Earle of Lindsey Earle of Lincolne Lord Willoughby Sir Henry Fines Sir Rob. Killigrew Sir William Armyn Sir Edw. Heron Sir Iohn Munson Sir Iohn Brooke Sir Ham Whichcott Sir Iohn Browne Sir Christop. Wray Sir Ralph Maddison Sir Will Quadring Sir Iervace Scroop Serjeant Callis Doct. Farmery Wil Langton Esq. William Dallison Robert Long Edw. Skipwith Iohn Brownelowe Iohn Burrell Robert Cawdron Robert Tredway Iohn Bassett Robert Marshall Maior of Lincolne Rich. Westland Maior of Boston Iohn Hobson Robert Boswell Tho. Haughton George Thorold Iosua Whichcott Rich Barefott George Smith The Question now is whether these Commissioners may make Decrees upon their owne view as well as on the report of a Common Jury Which we leave to the judgement of the Parliament 4 Object That the Country was defrauded by giving the Earle too much Land for his Contract Answ. That the 24000 Acres passed and Decreed unto the Earle can be justly valued but at the price the said Lands bore at that day which was forty Shillings an Acre to be sold So that 48000 li was then the value of the 24000 Acres decreed to the Earle then which the Earle hath expended a much greater Summe in his workes and therefore the Country was not defrauded as is objected But some men do looke on the Earles Land now he has made it worth twelve Pounds an Acre and wil not consider his hazard that has brought to passe what many before him have been ruined by attempting nor consider his monies taken up at use or on harder termes to do his whole worke but in mercy to the poore Commoners will thinke them abused and not once consider that their Commons now remaining to them are worth at this day ten Shillings the Acre which never did
yeild twelve Pence the Acre before the draining Another kind of men there are too that would repay the Earles charges and resume the Lands but when those men shall examine his charges they will be of another mind and find that those Lands have been purchased by the Earle and his Participants at too deere a rate to be re-purchased Methinkes such men may with the same justice purchased all the East India Ships at their returne for the same money Merchants set them forth 't will be a good course to encourage Trade and much for the publique good to destroy all activity in ingenious Men to give the reward of their industry and hazard unto idle Drones such an example of injustice I conceive will in some kind concerne every mans estate that by providence and industry is better then when 't was first purchased Now I have argued against this injurious project I will be glad to relinquish all my interest in the Fennes for the money which these Fennes have cost me all things being justly considered 5. Object That the Earle hath given great part of his Fenne-Lands unto great men for gratuities Answ. That the Earle might dispose of his Lands as he pleased whether he gave them or sold them concernes not the draining nor those adventured with Earle if any injustice were done let it appeare and let them answer it that it particularly concernes 6. Object That the Earle hath taken more Land from the Commoners then his proportion Answ. That the Lands were laid out by sworne Surveyers and that the Drainers are desirous to have the Lands a new surveyed and have often made proffer to be●●e the charge and to make restitution in case they have erred the Commoners will do the like in case it appeare they have complained without a cause but the Commoners have hitherto rejected it and only desire to cl●mour well knowing that the Lands are justly measured and allotted unto the Earle 7. Object That the Earle hath taken the best of the Fennes to himselfe and left the worst unto the Commoners Answ. This Objection made a great noise in the eares of all honest men and did procure the Commoners many favours And about this there has been 100 Witnesses sworne pro con and at severall hearings in the Lords house with Counsell on both sides this businesse hath been debated as also before a Committee of the House of Commons it hath been divers daies heard After much trouble and charge at a full hearing in the Lords House the Earl and his Participants did proffer to exchange all the Lands allotted unto them and to accept of their proportion in some other place where the Commoners should like best thinking this would give satisfaction But those that complained refused to accept what they so violently sought by which the Lords saw that they only sought occasion of clamour and had no just cause to complaine their Petition was therefore cast out of the Lords House and the possession setled unto the Earle And if yet the Commoners do like the Drainers Land better then their owne 't is still at their choise so they will observe the contract to make the Earles proportion part of every Fenne and the whole lying in a straight tract according to contract that the Draines may not be crooked which will not then do the worke of draining if they shall refuse this exchang 't is cleere that the Ear●es Land is not the best of the Fennes and the Country not injured The truth is all juditious men of those parts do know the Commoners will as soone eate their Land as make this exchange with the Earle and his Participants whose alotment was the very sinke and pan of all the Fennes and ever most drowned and besides lying in the midst of all the Fens farthest from all their Towns so leaving all their Commons as most commodious for them next unto their houses which doth avoid all trespasses that must dayly happen if their Commons and the Earles severalls were intermingled It will appeare upon the Mapp that the wit of man cannot lay out the Earles Lands more advantagiously for the Country then now it is Againe I say themselves now an exchange is offered dare not accept it 8. Object That the Earle hath not performed his contract by draining the said Fennes sufficiently Answ. If this were true they might have laid by all their unnecessary clamours for the Earle by his contract is to have no Land unlesse he performe his worke according to his Contract To justifie which the Earles workes were severall daies viewed by the Commissioners themselves who rod with divers of the Commoners in publique from place to place to heare all objections could be made against the said workes and after a due consideration they did judge the Lands drained and the workes done according to the Earles Contract Now the question is whether this judgement and decree of the Commissioners shall be of force or the opinions of the Plaintiffes in their owne case But lest some men may thinke that Commissioners may be perjur'd or mistaken the Drainers have cleere arguments to justifie this judgement of the Commissioners and to dash the scandalls of their accusers 1. That these Fenne-Lands alotted to the Earle doe beare Coole Seed Rape Seed and all kind of winter Corne which could not be unlesse those Lands were sufficiently drained 2. The Commons which belong unto the Country by the Earles contract ought to be made either Meddow Arrable or Pasture and accordingly are as good pasture and as dry as Commons can be and if they were inclosed in severals as the Earles Lands are they would beare as good winter Corne as his Lands do but it is their owne worke to inclose their Commons and no part of the Earles contract 3. It hath been proved at a Committee of the House of Commons by sufficient Witnesses on Oath and also in the Lords House at severall hearings that the said Fennes in generall were communibus Annis worth but twelve pence the Acre before the draining and that now by the dr●ining they are so much improved that the Earle did the offer the Commoners at the Lords Barre to become T●●ant to all the common Fennes to them remaining at t●n Shillings the Acre per annum and to take a Le●se for 100 yeares giving them security in the City of London for their Rent which they refused and by refusing shewed they valued their Fennes to be more worth So that the Common Fennes improved from one shilling to ten will prove to have needed draining and to be sufficiently drained 4. The Drainers have ever desired to have a Committee sent from the Parliament to view their workes and to judge if the Earle have performed his contract and deserved his reward but the Commoners have ever by their power hindred it 'T is now hoped that judicious men will not hearken unto their clamour and noise but looke on them as ungratefull men
that would ruine those that have so much enriched them as men that do refuse to accept what they seeme to desire as men that can prove nothing that they accuse the Drainers of and a● men not worthy of favour or countenance that have put both Houses of Parliament to so much trouble upon unjust complaints 9. Object That the Earle did fetch up many poore men by Pursevants and did imprison them by warrants of the Councell-Board Answ. That in those daies the whole Kingdome did submit unto the Councell-Board warrants and that when it shall be shewed upon what cause that proceeding was used it is hoped that those complaints will prove no great crimes for if any fault were in the Earle 't will not be such as ought to forfeit his Lands nor to ruine all those that have adventured with him if by any such mistaken course any man have just cause to complaine Neither will this excuse the Riot for which he was so punished though it may now be a fault in those that punished him that way It clearly appeares that no wilfull acts has been by the Drainers done to the prejudice of any man and then 't is hoped that if any accidentall errour have been committed it may be remitted or dispensed with upon a moderate satisfaction rather than to destroy so many innocent persons as have interest with the Earle because those that managed the Earles businesse did mistake in the way of punishing such Rioters To conclude It appeares that the draining of Fennes is beneficiall to the Common wealth by the Antiquity and Authority of the Commission of Sewers and by several Statutes incouraging men to undertake such works and granting immunities to such as should adventure therein it appeares also that works of the same nature with this of the Earle of Lindesies as that of Lovels and that of Tindals have been approved and confirmed by former Parliaments which did incourage the Earle and his Participants in their worke And left any man may not clearely see the state of the case in equity between the Earl of Lindesey and the complaining Commoners I have thought sit to shew it here There is a common Fenne containing twelve hundred Acres worth per annum twelve pence the Acre before the draining The Earle hath 300 Acres of this Fenne as a fourth part allotted him for draining the whole And he by draining the said Fenne brings the Land from twelve pence an Acre to be worth ten Shillings an Acre So then the question is whether the nine hundred Acres remaining to the Commoners now worth ten Shillings an Acre be better for them then the twelve hundred Acres was at twelve pence the Acre before draining That is whether 450 li. be more than 60 li. and thus cleare is the benefit which these complaining Commoners doe receive by the Earles draining besides what the Common-wealth gains by the Earles 4th part allotted him which is cleare profit Though 't is no wonder to find malitious and envious spirits ever ready to defame the best proceedings of the best men 't is very strange to see such injustice and so high ingratitude countenanced by any man of worth It may now be time for the Drainers and all that are interessed with the said Robert Earle of Lindesey to shew the hard measure they have received from these Commoners and from their Abettors 1. WHen the Earles workes were working some men that maligned the Earles undertaking did set on poore men to cut the bankes in the night which did much hinder the worke and much encrease the charge 2. When the Earle had one yeare possessed 14000 Acres of the Lands decreed unto him and that his Participants had built great houses and planted and plowed much Land some of the poorer sort of men were againe set on to breake the Sluces in the night and to cut the bankes by which the Drainers Corne then growing was destroyed to the value of ten thousand pounds and for these men did the Pursevants formerly mentioned in the ninth Objection come downe 3. About two yeares after the Earle had possession a great multitude of the poorest Commoners of other remote Fennes were brought and incouraged and did pull drowne all the Drainers houses throw out all their Tenants some into the Rivers others were wounded and beaten and driven away And thus they did destroy all their Plantations their Seed and Corne to the value of twenty thousand Pounds sterling and by force tooke possession of all the Earles Lands 4. The Commoners adjacent did joyne with these Rioters and have now sixe yeares enjoyed the said 14000 Acres belonging to the Drainers which at ten shillings an Acre amounts unto neere forty thousand Pounds sterling to which Land they have no right Thus the whole dammages done by the Commoners to the Earle and his Participants doth amount unto neere seventy thousand pounds sterling 5. 'T is hoped that the Parliament will take notice that all these Riots were committed the Parliament sitting and before the War began and that most of this was done in disobedience to many Orders from the Lords House before whom all the disputes had been often heard and also in contempt of an Order to the Lord Willougby Lord Lieutenant of that County who was with the Sheriffe and the Justices to quiet the Possession unto the Earle and his Participants untill the Parliament should further determine of the matter and also in contempt of the directions from the House of Commons by their Speakers Letter and above all in scorne to the Committee of the House of Commons which was granted upon the Commoners Petition and before whom the businesse was divers daies heard and debated by Counsell on both sides and a hundred witnesses sworne but while this sute depended the Commoners waved the judgement of the Committee sitting and of the Parliament also and became their owne judges in their owne case to a very evill ex●mple And now I have said all these things by way of justification of the Drainers proceedings and recrimination of the Country People 't is not without good ground beleeved by us that are interested that if the whole businesse were brought to a due hearing and examination it would appeare all these complaints of the Commoners the notorious Riots that they have committed and the Losses which the Drainers have sustained have neith●r proceeded from any injustice done to the people nor yet from any dislike in them arising from any other groun● but meerely from the malice of some rich ones and the unjust desire of gaine in others instigating the Commoners to it For there are Grasiers of the high Countries men of great substance who have no right of common in these Fennes yet doe under colour of some poore Commoners Title put in great heards of Cattle eatingt up the Pasture from the Poore and these men fearing by the Drainers re-possession they must bee put by this profit have set on the Commoners to make these clamours And how can it be thought that the Commoners should oppose the draining by which they have so great benefit and which was at first so pleasing to them that many thousands of the Commoners did worke two yeares in the draines and thousands of them did since gaine very well by helping in the Drainers first Harvests as also by plowing and Renting of the Earles Lands If therefore a hearing were granted in Parliament no doubt but it would appeare who did set on these ignorant poore people to make this destruction but we suspect a hearing is cryed downe for no other cause but for feare left the Commoners should peach those that set them on these Riots The Drainers therefore cannot choose but earnestly solicite a hearing with their opposers assuring themselves they shall not only be acquitted by all just Judges of those imputations of being Court Projectors and Opposers of Common People but be re-instated in their Lands with some publique acknowledgement and thanks for their good service done their Country after the custome of other Nations who were wont to decree Statues and Honorary Inscriptions to well deserving Subjects A Remuneration which their enemies themselves owe them the Drainers having performed all contracts to them I say not according to the strictest Law but the strictest rule of Equity Conscience as if they had bin ambitious rather to set out a Pious Act to the world for an example then to performe a civill Compact only according to the Obligation of justice FINIS