p. 2. whereby Hugh de Burga was made Earle of Kent in the time of H. 3. which was Habend sibi haered suis de corpore Margaret uxoris suae sororis Alexandri Regis Scociae procreat pro defectu talis exitus reman Ricīs haered dicti Hugonis c. The manner of the Solemnitie used in the Creation of Barons by Patent The forme of Creation of a Baron is much after this forme The Baron newly to be Created is presented unto the Queenes Majestie sitting in her Chaire of state After this order he is apparelled In his Surcote with the hood a Baron bearing the mantle before him and two Barons in their Parliament robes on each hand one leading him The principall King at Armes bearing the Patent and the Officers at armes proceeding on before him when they come in presence of her Majestie they make their solemne obeysance three times And the Baron to be Created kneeleth downe before the Chaire of Estate the said King at Armes delivereth the Patent of Creation to the Lord Chamberlaine who humbly presents the same to her Majestie who delivereth the same to the principall Secretary to bee read who reading the same with a loud voyce at the word Creavimus the Baron which carrieth the Mantle presenteth the same to her Majestie who puts it on the new Baron whereby he is Created and then is the Patent read out to the end and delivered to the Queene who delivereth it to the Baron so Created who after most humble thankes given to her Majesty hee riseth up and they depart in like solemne order as they came with the Trumpets sounding before them The particular more full knowledge of these Solemnities I doe referre to the Colledge and Corporation of Heraulds to whom the knowledge of these things doth most specially appertaine For the better explanation of this kind of Dignitie the resolution also of certaine questions shall bee very requisite Quest 1 First if a Nobleman and his Progenitors have for a long time beene called to the Parliament and he a Baron either by tenure or by Writ And have had in regard thereof a place certaine in Parliament if afterwards the same Noble man shall be created a Baron of that Barony and by the same name by Letters Patents whether shall he and his heires retaine his old place in Parliament which he had according to the former dignitie or whether shall he lose his old place and take a new place according to the time of his creation onely The case of the Lord De la Ware received a resolution some what answerable to this Question De laware 11. Rep. Looke fol 1. E. 3 6. The Lord De la Ware 3. E. 6. being in sore displeasure which William West his Nephew and heire who was father to Tho. now Lord De la Ware procured an act of Parliament by the which the said William West was during his naturall life onely cleerely disabled to claime demand or have any manner of right Title or interest by descent remainder or otherwise in or to the Mannors Lands tenents or hereditaments title or dignitie of Tho. Lo. de la Ware his vncle And after the said Tho. Lo. De la Ware died and the said William West in the time of Qu. Mary was attainted of treason by verdict 2. 3 Ph. Mary 5. Eliz. and afterwards pardoned by Q. Mary and after by Parliament in the time of the O. Marestie that now is And after in 8. Eliz. was created Lo. De la Ware by Patent and had place in the Parliament according to his creation For that by the said act of Parliament in the time of E. 6. hee was excluded to challenge the sormer auntient Barony and after died whether the now Lo. De la Ware should take his place according to the Baron by Writ or according to his creation was the question The opinions of the Qu. Councell being her Maiesties Attorny generall and Solliciter were that the acceptance of the new creation by the said William West could not extinguish the antient dignity for he had not that antient Dignitie in him at the time of his Creation but that Dignitie was at the time of his Creation by the Act of E. 6. in abbeyance suspence or consideration of law and he thereby utterly dis-inabled to have the same during his life onely so as his acceptance could not extinguish that dignitie which he then had not nor could conclude his heire who was not disabled by the said act of 3. E. 6. to claime the antient Barony which opinion of theirs was soone allowed by the resolutions of the Lo. cheife Iustice of Engl. and Lord cheife Baron and so signified to the Lord Keeper But this to be noted by the reasons made for the said resolution That if the said Sir William West had beene Baron and intitled Nota. or in possession of the antient dignitie when he accepted the creation the law perchance might have beene otherwise but that remaineth as yet unresolved Quest 2 Secondly it may be questioned whether a Baron called by Patent ought to be named by the name of his dignitie in every Writ to be sued by him or against him The bookes of law doe make difference herein betweene Duke Marquesse 8. H. 6.10 30 H. 8.30 Earle Viscount c. which are allowed names of Dignitie and the Baron for they affirme that such Baron needeth not to be named Lord or Baron by his Writ but the Duke Marquesse Earle or Viscount ought to be named by their Names or Dignities Neverthelesse I doe take these bookes to be understood of the Barony by tenure or Barons by Writ onely for the title of a Baron by Patent in his Letters Patents under Seale adorned and named by the name of Status gradus dignitas and therefore is requisite to be named and such dignities are a parcell of the name of the possessor as well as the Title and Stile of Duke Marquesse Earle Viscount c. And although there may be conceived this difference last mentioned betweene the Baron by tenure or Writ and the Baron by Patent yet they being all members of the higher house of the Parliament they are thereby equally made Noble Honourable and Peeres of the Realme as they are Barons onely without any other distinction that I have observed And thus much concerning the three degrees of Barons within this Realme may suffice to be said in generall upon this occasion for the better understanding and resolution of the controversie in hand The priviledge of Barons There resteth last of all in this Treatise of Baronage that I would expresse some certaine of the sundry priviledges that the Lawes doe allow unto Barons and the Nobilitie of the Realm ingenerall in regard of that favour which all good policy in every wel-governed Common-wealth doth bestow and yeeld to the Noble and Honourable wherein I shall content my selfe onely with certaine of those
Likewise the said first rule touching the Nobilitie of Women married unto persons ignoable doth faile where they inherit those dignities For if a Dukedome Earldome or Barony descend unto any woman who taketh an ignoble man to husband that husband shall not debase the wife having such Dignities descended but rather he in her right shall beare the title of such dignities especially if he be intituled by the Courtesie Object 3 A third Object is this It is said that by the law of Chivalry exercised within the Realme if a Baron be created an Earle c. that the heire apparent of such Earle c. shall after such Creation of his Father beare the title of the Barony c. but this is not usuall by the course of the Common law therefore the descent of such Dignities not to be guided by the Common Law The common law doth not disallow any such usage Resolu for it being the custome of the Realme is the law of the Realme Howbeit the Common Law doth put a difference betweene such Heires apparent as carry those Titles lawfully in respect of the usage and such others as have them by Creation or otherwise for such Heire apparent is no Peere of the Realme as those by Creation or such as have the Earldome c upon descent after the death of his Auncestor and therefore as when the Lord Hen. Howard Earle of Surry Son Heire apparent to Thomas Duke of Norfolke An Earle by Nativity was attainted his Triall was by Iury of Knights and Gentlemen not by Barons c. for that hee was an Earle by Nativity which in respect of tryall the Law doth not allow The like tryal chanced to the Lord Gray who 33. H. 8. was in B. K. arraigned of treason and appointed to bee tried by a Jury of Knights and Gentlemen and not by Peeres Causa qua supra but he confessed the Indictment and the Jury were dismissed yet such shall hold precedency of place at Court and in the presence of their Soveraigne as is usuall in that behalfe Obje 4 It is objected fourthly that by the Common law a man may not bee called Lord of that he hath not But by the law of Chivalry a man may bee created Earle of a County having no land therein therefore differ Resol 1 It is true that some particulars of ordinary proceedings in the law doth differ from other proceedings concerning Chivalry and yet their difference is no other then as one hand doth differ from another both are hands and both of one body That part of the law which concemeth purporty doth not allow a man to bee called Lord of that wherein he is no way owner in demesne or seignory but when you draw the law to the consideration of dignity the whole resolution must rest upon the Patent of creation Earle pur autre vie 31. H 6.29 pur Danby wherein the name is appointed at the pleasure of the Soveraigne for one may be Earle during the life of another if the Creation be so But I answer further that it is not true that every Earle must be Earle of a place nor every Earle of a place Earle of a County nor that every Earle of a County hath nothing in that County whereby he is Earle For the better manifestation consider that originally within this Realme Earldome of Counties in the antient English Saxon Governours were not onely dignities of honour but also offices of Justice Vea leg Edgar regis de Consil Lamb. 80. n. 5. for that they did further the administration of Justice in the County whereof they were Earles or Aldermen they likewise had their Deputies under them the Sheriffe an Officer yet containing the name of his substitution in Latine Vicecomes Camden 107. These Earles in recompence of their travailes received a Salary name by the third penny of the profits of the said County which continued long after the Conquest and was inserted as a princely benevolence in the Patent of Creation as by divers antient Charters may appeare which afterward were turned into Pensions H 3. dedit Haberâ—o de burgo 40 pro 3. deno Com. Cant. de quoeund creavit comit habeÌ„d sibi haered de corpore Marger uaeor Alexand. reg Scotiae 13. H 3. in turr Lond. 33 H. 6.29.6 H. 8. Dy. 2. for the better maintenace of that honour and as appeareth by a booke case upon the pleading of the Patent whereby H. 6. Created that worthy Knight Sir John Talbot Earle of Shrewsbury which Pension is so annexed unto their Dignitie as that by any meanes of alienation it cannot be severed and therefore in respect of such Pensions which were the third part of the profits of the County or other summe in lieu thereof some have not without probabilitie imagined Quod Comites nominabant capiend fisco Regis socij Comites fido participes essent Lamberd c. Of the single Ear. and not Palentine with Engl there have beene principally two kinds but every one of them againe subdivided into severall branches for either they take their names of a place or hold their Title without any place Those that take their names of a place are of two kinds for either the same place is a County which is most usuall or else some other place and no County as a Towne Castle or honour c. of which later sort some are more antient having their originall even from the Conquest or shortly after as the Earledome of Richmond in Yorkshire Clarence in Suff. Arundell in Essex all which had their originall in the time of the Conquerours by donation of those Castles c. The Earledomes of Bath temp H. 7. H. 8. erected in the family where now it remaineth and the Earledome of Bridgewater whereof Sir Giles Dawbeney was Created Earle temp H. 7. Earledomes which have their titles without any place are likewise of two kinds either in respect of office as is the Earle Marshall for it is granted in this or the like manner Officium Comit. Marescal ' Angl ' with further words vizt A.B. c. Comit. Marescallum Angl. creamus ordinamus c. by which it appeares that the very office is an Earledome Earle by birth The second sort are Earles by birth and so are all the Sons of the Kings of England if they have none other dignitie bestowed upon them and therefore it is said that John afterwards King of England in the life-time of his Father H. 2. was called Counte sans terre before he was affied unto Alice the Daughter of the Earle of Morton in France Object 5 A fifth Object is this The law of Chivalry proceedeth not in the accomplishment of a combate in such manner as is performed by the course of the Common law either in the Writ of right by Champion or in the Appeale by person therefore the managing of the causes in Chivalry is not in the common law especially 37. H.
priviledges which I find mentioned in the Lawes of this Realme purposely omitting such as either the Civill Common or the lawes of forraigne Countries doe afford referring them to a fit place in an intended Treatise of Nobilitie Priviledge First therefore it is a priviledge that the Peeres and Nobilitie of the Parliament doe enjoy namely to bee tried in the cases of Treason Felony Mag. Char. 29 10. E. 4.6.20 H. 6. cap. 9 and such like by their Peeres The antiquitie and originall of this kind of triall hath as some men doe thinke his ground from the Statute of Magna Charta cap. 29. beginning that Nullus liber homo in these words Nec super eum ibimus nec super eum mittimus nisi per legale judicium Parium suorum But I take it to be more antient Triall by Peeres Where allowable De consuet feudorum as brought into this Realme with the Conquerour being answerable to the Norman and French lawes and agreeable with the customes severall where almost all controversies arising betweene the Soveraigne and his Peeres are tried per judicium Parium suorum This Triall in antient time was very oft had in Parliament as may bee collected by the Statute of 15. E. 3. cap. 6. 15. E. 3. cap. 6. 1. H. 4.1 13 H. 8.11 But neverthelesse the same may as well be performed by Commission under the Lord Steward of Eng. the forme manner and Solemnitie wherof is expressed in the bookes of Law This priviledge hath some restraint as well in regard of the person The restraint of the praviledge as in the manner of proceedings As touching the person First the Archbishops of this Realme although they bee Lords of the Parliament if they bee impeached of such assent as aforesaid shall not be tried by the Peeres of this Realme but by a Jury of other substantiall persons upon their oathes the reason thereof as I can conceive as before remembred 27. H. 8. Br. Inquest 100 Triall 142. Fine 2. Stamf. 153 namely for as much as the Archbishops and Bishops cannot passe in the like cases upon the tryall of any other of the Peeres for that they are prohibited by the Ecclesiasticall lawes to bee judges of life and blood reason would that the other Peeres should not trie them for this triall should be mutuall forasmuch as it is performed upon their Honour without any oath taken Secondly as touching the person 38. H. 6. Br. Treason none but Lords of the Laytie being Lords of the Parliament 38. H 8. Case Leo. Grey en leâ— Con. shall have this kind of Triall And therefore hereout are excluded the eldest Sonne and heire apparent of a Duke in the life of his Father though he be called Earle beare that title Likewise the eldest Sonne and Heire apparent of an Earle though he be onely a Lord or Baron or beare such Title Those that are Barons and of the Nobility of Ireland 19 20. Eliz 36.6 if upon the like offence committed in Engl. if they chance to be apprehended in Engl. they shall not be tried herein by their Peeres For the Lords of the Parliament of England are not their Peeres but the Lords of the Parliament in Ireland And thus much concerning the Restraints of the said priviledges in respect of the person As touching the manner of Proceeding the Nobilitie of this Realme doe injoy the priviledge of triall by their Peeres in Course of Inditement onely 33. H 8. Br. Iurors 48. Triall 142. 10 E. 3.6 Stam 152. which is a kind of proceeding ex officio between the Qu. highnesse and them But in any case of Appeale of felony which is in the suite of the subject they shall not have the same but shall be tried by a Jury of 12. men upon their oathes And thus much concerning this priviledge at this place and upon this occasion may suffice Likewise this priviledge the Nobility of this Realme doe enjoy PrivilegiuÌ„ secundum 48. E. 3.30 48. Assis 6. 35 H. 6.46 22. H. 8.22 Reg. 1 79. 15 Eliz. 315. That they are not so to be inpannelled in any Jury or inquest to make triall or inquiry upon their corporall oathes between partie and partie And if they be impannelled contrary thereunto they may have a writ out of the Chancery repeating this priviledge directed to the Iustices before whom such noble personages are impannelled commanding them to dissmisse him or them that were so impannelled out of the said Pannell This priviledge hath restraint in two cases Restraint 1. first if he inquire concerning the King and CoÌ„mon-wealth in any necessary and important Decrees as businesse of this Realme then this priviledge is not allowed nor taketh place And therefore divers Barons of the Marches of Wales were impaÌ„nelled before the Bishop of Ely and other Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer to inquire of notable outrage committed by Gilbeâ—t de Clare Earle of Gloucester against Humfrey de Bohun Earle of Pereford and Essex and his suits in Wales in the 20. yeere of E. 1. where Iohn de Hastings Edmond de Mortimer Theobald de Verdune and other of the Barons of the Marchâ—s of Wales challenged their priviledges aforesaid and much insisted upon the same but it was afterwards answered by the Court as by the words of the appeareth 20 E. 1. Rel. 14. Camera Scar. Eo quod res ist a dominum Regem coronam dignitatem suos tangit deinde fuit ex parte domini Regis IohaÌ„nt Hastings omnibus alijs magnat supranominat quod pro statu jure regnt Pro conservatione dignitatis Coronae pacis suae opponant manum ad librum ad faciend c. quod eis ex parte Domini Regis injungentur c. The Barons aforesaid neverthelesse did persist in their Challenge and in the end both the said Earle betweene whom the said outrage had heene perpetrated submitted themselves to the Kings grace and made their Fines Secondly Restraint 2 this priviledge hath no place in case of necessitie where the truth can no otherwise come to light for the Writ is Regist 179. Quia Barones in Assissis jurat c. poni non consuêrunt ut dicunt nisi eorum Sacrament adeo sit necessarium quod sine illis verit as in qua non possit tibi praecepimus c. In many Cases the Protestation of honour shall satisfie in Noblemen Privileg 3. Bract. l. 5. cap. 9. fol. 352.8.3.1 H. 4.1.13 H. 8.1 3 H. 6.48 Cooke 6.53 as in triall of their Peeres they proceed upon their honour not upon their oath And if a Nobleman on an action of debt upon an Accompt in case where the Plaintife is to be examined upon oath upon the Statute of 5. H. 4. cap. 8. it shall suffice to examine his Attorney and not himselfe upon his oath Yet if a Nobleman will give evidence to a Jury reason would that he should bee sworne
upon paine of forfeiture of all their goods except Lo. and other great men and true and notable Merchants and the Kings souldiers and all others shall forfeit c. But because the Statute is abrogated by 4. Iacobi c. 2. I do not set this down for one of the priviledges at this day But Philip Earle of Arundell Son of Thomas Duke of Norfolke Cromptons Iurisd 31. was taken upon the Sea passing into France about 30. Eliz. and was fined in the Starre chamber because he tooke not shâ—pping at one of the Ports mentioned in that Statute In the Priviledge before mentioned of his Clergie it shall be allowed him for breaking a house by day or night for robbing upon the high-way and in all other cases excepted in the Stat. of 1. E. 6.12 saving in wilfull murder and poysoning But in all other cases wherein Clergie is taken away he is in the same degree with a common person but the Court will not give him the benefit of this Statute if he requireth not the same If a Lord doth confesse his offence upon arraignment or abjure or is outlawed for felony in these cases it seemeth he may have the benefit of this Statute viz. his Clergie for that by the Statute of 18. Eliz. cap. 81. hee nor any other need to make purgation Stat. 18. Eliz. cap. 18. but shall bee forthwith delivered out of prison by the Justice Sed quaere Bolton 202. by the Imperiall constitution Nobiles non torquentur in casibus in quibus plebei torquentur nec suspenduntur sed decapitantur Which forme by favour of the Prince is allowed in England Iurisd Br. 48. Yet Thomas Fines Lord Dacres of the South in the 37. H. 8. and the Lord Sturton 4. Mar. were hanged By the Staute of 1. Eliz. cap. 1. for uniformitie of Common prayer 1. Eliz cap. 1. there is a proviso that the Baron shall bee tried per Pares and not by any Ecclesiasticall Courts read the Statute at large At the Common law it was lawfull for any to retaine as many Chaplains as he would but by the Statute of 21. H. 8 13. a restraint was made viz. to every Archbishop and Duke sixe Chaplains with dispensation to keepe two Benefices with Cure to every Marquesse or Earle five with the like priviledge To the Lord Chancellour every Baron and Knight of the Garter three with the same priviledge If a Bishop bee made an Archbishop or a Baron an Earle yet can they have but Chaplains as Archbishop or Earle because though there be divers Dignities yet the service is to be done but to one person so if he be removed from his Office in this case he cannot be Non-resident without he procure a non obstante So if a Baron retaine a Chaplaine and before he is advanced his Lord is attainted Cooke rep 4.117 Actons Case as the Earle of Westmerland was hee cannot accept a second Benefice Those that are first retained shall onely have priviledge in case c. By the Statute of 2. H. 5.8 that gives authoritie to the Sheriffe to raise Posse Comitat. Neverthelesse may he not command the person of a Nobleman to attend that service but if the Sheriff upon a supplicavit against him returne that he is so puissant that he dare not arrest him the Sheriffe shall be grievously amerced for such returne for the Writ is to all Archbishops Bishops Dukes Earles c. and to all liege men of the County to to be ayding to him therefore by intendment none will resist the execution The words of Charta de forest cap. 11. are every Archbishop Bishop Earle or Baron comming to us at our commandment and passing by our forrests may take one beast or two by the view of the forester if he be present or else he shall cause one to blow an horne that he seeme not to steale our Deare In this Stat. though a Duke Marquesse or Viscount being Lord of the Parliament being commanded c. shall have the same priviledge so if the King send for him letters missive Messenger or Sergeant at arms or by writ of Sub-paena to appear in Chanc. they shall have the benefit of this Statute because they came at the Kings commandement so in case of Scire facias out of the Chancery or D. R. But if such Processe goe out of the C. B. to appeare before the Iustices or the Barons of the Exchequer he shall not have the benefit of the Statute because the Statute is Veniens ad nos and in those Courts they are Quod coram nobis c. So of the Starre-chamber Also Lords that come to visit the new King though not sent for shall have the priviledge and so note this Statute is a Warrant dormant and is to be vnderstood of their returning homeward Manwood cap. 13. Crompton Iuris Nota. D. 167. note the Statute doth give licence to kill or hunt in the Kings Parkes though the Letter bee Transiens per forrestam nostram Note that in certaine Cases the Law doth give priviledge to the sonnes or brethren of Noblemen though they bee not of that degree Stat. 21. H. 8.13 c. 7. E. 6. cap. 5. Certaine Cases wherein he hath no Priviledges IF the King commit a Baron to prison Durante bene placito he cannot be discharged by Bayle or mainprise or by the common Writ De homine replegiando And by the same power it is if a noble person bee committed by the Kings Councell for they are incorporated to his Highnesse and doe command as with the Kings mouth and the same law is if a Nobleman be committed to prison by the absolute Commandment of the Kings Judges sitting in their place of Judicature Stam. lib 2. cap 18. fol. 72. Stamf. lib. 2. cap. 18. fol. 72. as you have before when the Prince himselfe by the chiefe Justice sitting in the Kings Bench and was not bay leable Also a Capias and an Exigent may be awarded upon an Indictment of a felony This Statute of Praemunire cap. 1.16 R 2. cap. 1. upon which Statute an Abbot which was Lord of the Parliament being impleaded did pray priviledge to appeare by attorney Et per Curiam could not for a Cessavit lyeth against him Upon contempt of Peeres a Capias may bee awarded 1. H. 5. ult 27. H. 8.22 If he depart the Realme as Embassadour c. and returne not at the Kings commandement the King may seize his lands and goods Dyer 108.176 The Dutches of Suffolkes case if he imprison any man in his house whereupon there is a writ De homine replegiando if he convey him from the Sheriffe the Court will award a Withernam to arrest 11. H. 4.15 and imprison him till he deliver the prisoner All Lords are compellable to take the oath mentioned in the Statute 3. Iacobi and see the Statute of 7. Iacobi 3. Iac. ca. 4. 7 Ia. cap. 6. who hav eauthoritie to administer it unto them
Being arraigned of felony in an Appeale he shall not be tried by his Peeres as in case of Inditement in which case he may not challenge any of the Triers either peremptorily or upon causes which is permitted to all other common persons The Iudgment is the vsuall Iudgement given against common persons and though the King pardon all but the losse of his head that is of speciall grace not ex debito By Attainder the blood is corrupted and he and his posterity made ignoble Stam. lib. 3. cap. 34. and cannot be restored by the Kings pardon but onely by authoritie of Parliament And note that Nobility is not a thing substantiall but meerely accidentall present or absent without corruption of his subject for experience shewes that honourable titles are restrained by exorbitant crimes when the nature in the meane while cannot be thrust out with a forke wherefore though we tearme extinguishment of Nobility in cases of Attainder yet this phrase is not vsed as though Nobility were essentially in the homour of the blood more then any other hereditary faculty But because the right of inheritance which descends by communication of blood is by that meanes determined and also in regard of the detestation of the crime it is called corruption of blood 16. Eliz. Dyer 332. The Lord Charles Flowards case if one be made a Knight by a forraign King he is so to be stiled in all legall proceedings in this Realme But if he be created by the Emperour an Earle it is other wise Coke 7.16 If the King Create the son a Duke c. and the father dies he within age shal be in ward but if he had bin made a Knight in his fâ—â—hers life he should not be in ward neither for the lands descended nor marriage Coke 74. Drueries Case though he be within age Nobilitie and Lords in reputation onely THere be other Lords in reputation and appellation who neverthelesse are not Iure neither can they enjoy the priviledges of those of the Nobilitie of the Parliament viz. The Sonne and heire of a Duke during the life of his father is onely by curtesie called an Earle and the eldest sonne of an Ea. a Baron but not in legall proceedings Br. Treason 2. Coke 8-16 But the King may create them in the life of their Auncestors Lords of the Parliament A Duke or other of the Nobilitie of a forraign Nation being named Duke in Letters of safe conduct that makes him not Duke to be sued by that name in England but a forraigne King ought so to be stiled though he hath not merum imperium out of his owne Kingdome Cok 7.15 c All the younger Sonnes of the King of England are Earles by birth without other creation and onely Lords by reputation A Lord of Ireland or Scotland though he be post-natus is but onely Lord in reputation Noble Women ALthough Noble Women may not sit in Parliament in respect of their Sexes yet are they in Law Peeres of the Realme and may challenge all Coke 8.53 or most of the former Priviledges But the opinions of some have been Crompt Iust de peace 85. that they cannot maintaine any Action upon the Statute of 2. R. 2. cap. 2. de Scand Magnat because the Statute speakes onely of other Sexes If any of the Kings servants within in the Checkroll conspire the death of any Noble woman that is not felony within the Statute of 3. H. 7.13 Honourable women of three sorts By Creation Descent Marriage H. 8. Created Anne Bullen Marchionesse of Pembrooke King James Created the Lady Compton Wife to Sir Thomas Compton Countesse of Buckingham in the life of her said Husband without any addition of honour to him And formerly by Patents openly read in Parliament without any other investure did Create Mary sole Daughter and heire of the late Baron of Aburgauen Camden 63.6 Baronesse de le Spenser Noble Women by Descent are those to whom lands holden by such Dignitie doe descend or whose Ancestors were seized of an estate descendable in their Titles of Dukedomes c. or those whose Ancestors were summoned to the Parliament by this an Inheritance doth accrue to their posteritie They who take to Husband any Peere of the Realme though they themselves were not noble Fortescue fol. 100. Question hath bin made whether the Dignitie of one suÌ„moned to the Parliament dying without issue male may descend to the female but this may appeare by the former Treatise Concerning the title of Honour descendable to the Heire female it is cleere that such offices being of estate of inheritance doe descend as the office of the high Constableship of England challenged tempore H. 3. by the Duke of Buckingham was adjudged to descend to the Daughter of Humfrey Bohun Earle of Hereford So the office of Earle Marshall descended to the house of Norfolke all which offices are as unfit to be exercised by their sexes as unfit for them to be summoned to the Parliament And if such Title come in competition the issue shall bee tried by record and certified by the Kings Writ and not by Jury Coke 6.5 3.7 part 15. Though all Daughters be Coperceners and make but one Heire yet in descent of Dignities it is otherwise for they bee things entire participating of superioritie therefore descendable onely to the eldest And so is the Civill Law yet there was a Judgement tempore H. 3. touching the descent of the Earledome of Chester Obijt 17. H. 3. the Earle dying without issue leaving his Sisters his Heires The Judgement was that it should be divided equally among Coperceners But this Judgement was held erroneous in that very age Vide Bract. li. 2. cap. 34 fol. 76. hoc fuit injustum c. His reasons are because the honour of Chivalrie chiefly consisting in the Nobilitie may not be divided for by multitude of partitions the reputation of Honours in such succession must bee impaired and the strength of the Realme being drawne into many hands by such partition much infeebled In which resolution Britton by commandment and in the name of E. 1. accorded fol. 187. The former Judgement was given about 17. H. 3. And the Writers of that time testifie that it came holy unto Iohn Scot Son of David Earle of Huntington and Anguish and Maude the eldest Sister of the said Randolph if it were given upon the death of John Scot who died without issue about 24. H. 3. yet it stood in force because the King assumed the Earledome to himselfe upon other satisfaction to the coperceners Mat. Par. 366. tamen vide Mills 75. Guillem 28. Hugh Lupus the first Earle of Chester was by the Conquerour his vncle created into that dignitie Mills 74.75 Coke 35.7 part 15. habend fibi c. adeo libere per gladium sicut Rex ipse tenuit Angliam per Coronam c. he died without issue and the Earldome divided among his 4. sisters If she be noble
erit consuetudo regionis observanda ubi haereditas est quae petitur personae nascuntur quae petunt Et unde si dicatur quod in regno Angl. aliquando facta fuit partitio hoc fuit injustum Vermon liver d'antiquities à placitio 290 ad placiumt 301. It is therefore evident that Baronies c. doe by the lawes of the Realme descend unto the eldest Copercener and Judgement given once to the contrary Thereof Bracton doth rightly accompt to be unjust his reason is notable For in as much as the Honour and Chivalty of the Realme doth chiefly consist in the Nobilitie reason will not that such dignities should be divided among Coperceners whereby through multitude the reputation of honour in such succession Pet. Greg. de repub lib. 7. cap. 5. and so divided might bee impaired as the strength of the Realme being drawne into many hands with decrease of livelihood by such partition should be infeebled In which resolution Britton the Baroned Bishop of Hereford Britton 187. de herit devis who compiled this Booke in the name and by the commandment of Ed. 1. accordeth who delivered this as a speciall Caveat En tous cases sont les droits des espees that which Braecton calleth Ius gladij gardes de sole misse dismembres he calleth it Ius gladij because Dukes Earles be at the time of their creation Cinguntur gladijs gladius autem significat defensione reginae patriae But howsoever that judgement was given or whensoever it was neverthelesse very evident that it was soone redressed for if it were given upon the death of Ranulph the last of the name E. of Chester who died about 17. H. 3. the Writers about that time doe testifie that the Earledome of Chester came wholly to Iohn Scot the sonne of David Earle of Huntington and Anguish and of Maude the eldest Sister of the said Ranulph If it were given upon the death of the said Iohn Scot who died without issue about 24. H. 3. for in the reports of the Law the difference of a yeare is no great matter yet notwithstanding the said Judgement stood not in force Math. Paris Monast Sancti Albani Chron. 36. for that the said King assumed the said Earledome into his owne hands upon other satisfaction made to the Sisters Coparceners of the said Iohn Scot ne tanta haered tas inter Colos deduceretur M. 6. H. 8. That the descent of Dignities and Offices of Honour are determinable by the Common law is made manifest by the great cause concerning the office of the Lo. high Constable of England challenged tempore H. 8. by the Duke of Buckingham and determined by the resolution of the Judges as by a note of that Case extant Dyer 285. whereof my Lord Dyer in his Reports hath a memoriall is most evident where the Case ws that Humph de Bohun Earle of Hertford and Essex held the Manor of Hatfield Newnham and Whiting hurst in com' Glouc ' du roy pur service de eant hault Constable d' Anglque mor ' tyent issue 2 files que font particion de mesme les Maners part le office eant servic ' pur reason de tenureque descent ' al ambu files deÌ„e exercise pur lour sufficient deputie dum sole ' vixerint mez aprez lour mariage fuit deÌ„e exercise solement pur le Baron el'eigne Mes quia Hen. de Bullingb Ca'ps H. 4. que ad espouse le puisne a que le man ' de Whittenhurst de eant part ' de terr' iss ' ten ' fuit allot ' pur sa pur port Another Querie was moved whether by the unitie of parcell of the tenancy in the King the said Office were not determined or whether this were in the other Sister which the Justices resolved that the Office had its continuance in the eldest Sister and her heires of whom the said Duke was discended but because the exercise of the said Office was a service in respect of tenure the said Judges further resolved that the King might refuse to have the said office exercised as any Lord may refuse the homage of his Tenant All which resolutions the two chiefe Justices did signifie unto the King according to the names of themselves and the rest Object 2 Second Objection that by the law of Chivalry if the Widow of a Duke Earle Baron c. doe marry with a Knight Esquire or Gentleman then neverthelesse shee retaineth her name of honour whereas the Common Law doth otherwise determine thereof and therefore they conclude that the common Law doth not determine this kind of controversie concerning the title names and dignities Noble There must be made a dis-Junction betweene the strictnesse of Law Resolu and courtesie of Ladyes at the Court 14 H. 6.2 8. a. for it is a rule in Law as it is the same law of Chivalry and in that point so is and should be knowne among the Heraulds for asmuch as a report of law in that case doth acknowledge it to be taken out of the bookes of Heraulds 5. Mar. bre Br. 546. nosme 69. Fortescue 100. that Quando mulier nobilis nupserit igncb c. Of the which Fortescue sometime chiefe Justice of England yeeldeth a notable reason Cod lib. 10. de incolis leg sinal Mulieres honore maritorum c. sin autem minoris ordinis verum For if shee be honoured with any title in respect of her Husband it is reason that after his death she marrying with an inferiour sub cujus potestate vivet that she should bee of like qualitie and reputation as is her said Husband For as she was inabled by the one so must she be content to leave that Nobilitie by strict course of law for liue of the other so that in this point the law is one way and the honour and courtesie of Ladyes another And as the Civilian saith in the like case 6. E. 3.7 E 6.79 3 Eliz 23.69 Aliud est jus aliud Privilegium Neverthelesse the books of our law do make mention of that Courtesie and allow of it as a Courterie though not as the Law With these doe agree the law of Nation with which concordeth also the Civill law Foeminae nuptae clarissimis personis clariss personarum appellatione continuentur But of the other side clariss â—oeminarum nomine senator Filiae nisi quae viros claeriss sortitae sunt non habentur Foeminis enim dignitat clariss mariti tribuunt Parentes verò donec plebeis nuptijs fuerint copulaetae Cod de dignit leg 12. tamdiu igitur clariss foemina erat quaemdiu Senatori nupt est vos clariss aut separat ab eo alij inferioris dign non nupserit Neverthelesse Iacob Rebuff indâ—ct leg 1. lib. 12. Cod de dignitat in Kingdomes this holdeth not place in the blood Royall for Si filia Regis nubat alicui Duci vel Comiti dicitur tamen semper Regalis
by birth though she marry vnder her degree she remaines noble but those innobled by marriage and after marry with a man of meaner degree utterly lose her former dignitie Fortescue 100. Cooke 6.33.4.118 It was the case of Ra. Howard Esquire husband of the widow of the Lord Powes against the Dutches of Suffolke the Writ naming her Ladie Anne Powes Dyer 79. so also in Qu. Maryes times when the Dutches of Suffolke married Stokes bre Bro. 146. digest lib. 1. Tit. 9. for the dignity accruing by marriage is but in fait and not by any record Coke 6.53 Coke 4.117 Cawells instit lib. 1. Tit. 10.15 So long shall a Dukes wife be called Dutches and an Earles Countesse and enjoy all honours appertaining to that estate with tasting kneeling serving c. And a Baronesse and Knights wife saluted Lady Quamdiu matrimonium aut viduitas vxoris durant except she elope for as then every woman shall lose her dower so being advanced by titles of dignitie by that husband by such elopement loseth them If a Ladie which is married come through the forrest shee hath no priviledge by the Statute but a Dutchesse or Countesse during the time she is vnmarried may Crompt Juris dict 167. Such Ladies whether they be married or sole upon Indictment shall be tried per Peeres by the Statute of 20. H. 6. cap. 9. it being a declaration of the common law Coke 6.52 By the Civill Law Si filia Regis nubat alicui Domino vel Comit. dicetur tamen semper Regalis Among Noble women there is difference of degrees and according to their qualities the law gives speciall priviledges as followeth by the Stat. of 25. of E. 3 2. it is high Treason to compasse or imagine the death of the Queene or to violate the Kings companion The Kings Spouse is a sole person in law to purchase c. plead and be impleaded Coke 4.23.6 Theboal lib. 1. cap. 4 24 E. 3.3.8 Bract. 363. And of such acts of Parliament as concerne her the Iudges ought to take notice Coment 231. a Coke 8.28 In some cases she shall have Prerogative as the King himselfe See the case of Wardship 5. E. 3.4 Stamf. prerog cap. 2. The Qu. Wife to the King or widow shall not be amerced if she be non-suited whereas all other subjects shall for she shall participate with the Kings prerogative Coke 8.62 but not in all cases for the subject shall not sue to her by Petition as to the King 11. H. 4 67. Stamf. prerog cap. 22. Against the King Nullum tempus occurrit otherwise of the Queene 18. E. 3.2 Philippa Regina Angl. Ibid. fol. 1. 13. Stam. prerog 18. In 21. E. 3.6 A Protection was allowed against the Queene In a Writ of dower against Isabel Qu. of England mother to the then King the Iudges were of opinion that shee was not to answer to any Writ but said they to the plaintife it behoveth you to go to her by Petition to whom the Demandant Dixit graits and prayed the court for a continuance of the action vntill shee might speake with the Queene But they nor the Queenes Councell would agree that the Qu. should be accepted as answerable 10. E 3.379 The Wife of the Kings eldest Son hath some prerogative not communicable to the Wives of other Noblemen for by the Statute of 25. E. 3. It is high Treason to violate her Dutchesses also and Countesses have speciall honour appertaining to their estates as kneeling and tasting which things I leave to the Heraulds The Statute of 7. Iac. cap. 6. intituled an Act for the administring the oath of Allegiance requireth those of 18. yeares or above to take the said oath The title is for administration of the Oath c. and reformation of married women Recusants Ladyes in Reputation THe Wife or Widow of the sonne and heire of a Duke or Earle in the life of his Father is a Lady by Curtesie and taketh place according to the antient time as they have beene permitted by their Soveraigne Prince and allowance of the Herauld But in legall proceedings they are not to have such Priviledge If a Noblewoman of Spaine come into England by a safe conduct or c. And so stiled in the said Letters yet is shee but a Lady in reputation And English woman borne taketh to Husband a Spanish or French Duke though hee be made Denizen yet shall she not beare the title of Dignitie in legall proceedings A German woman is married to the Marquesse of Northampton or c. unlesse she be made Denizen shee cannot claime the priviledge or title of her Husband no more then shee can claime Dower or Joynture An English woman doth take the Earle of Kildare in Ireland to her Husband or if a Lord in Scotland though hee be post natus c. their wives shall not aprticipate their Husbands Dignities But if the King Create one of his Subjects naturalized by Parliament to be Viscount Rochester within England and after summon him to the Parliament by Writ and assigne him place there by this is he made Peere of the Realme and partakes with them of all Priviledges and by consequence his Wife Widow and Children after him E. of Angus in Scotland 34. E. 3.35 Gilbert Humfrevils case But if an English man be made by the Emperour Earle of the Empire his Wife shall not beare that title either according to law or reputation All Daughters of Dukes Marquesses and Earles are by custome long used in the Kings Palace to be named Ladies and to have precedencie according to the degrees of their parents and of this custome the Law taketh notice But neverthelesse in the Kings Courts of Justice they beare not this title of Honour no more then the Sons of such noble personages Brothers to such Ladyes may doe The Hypothesis or particular Question WHether the Dignitie of Aburgavenny Sit conjuncta feodo and such as ought to descend to the speciall Heire male seized of the Castle bearing the head of that Barony and of the lands that make that Honour Or whether the Dignitie Name and Stile to be Baron of Aburgaven ought to descend to the generall Heire male who is not interessed in the said Castle or honour For the more orderly proceeding herein to avoid confusion and that every thing appeare concerning his question in his proper person There shall be shewed First that the Barony is a Barony by by tenure a very antient Honour and no Barony by Writ onely whereof will ensue by the former Declaration in the treatise of Barony That the dignitie and name de jure ought to go and descend with the Castle and Honour so holden as long as the same shall or may continue in the name blood and line of such as are nobly descended and may support the same There shall be Proved Secondly That the said Barony of Aburgav and the name title and dignitie of Lord and Barony of Aburg de facto