THIS BOOK Makes appear the Claim Pedigree and Proceedings OF JAMES PERCY Now CLAIMANT to the EARLDOM OF Northumberland Humbly presented to both Houses of Parliament Printed in the Year 16â—â— THis Preface is only to tell the Readers that all new matters are still placed in the Front of this Book which seems Irregular but read this with Patience and in time it may be Regulated and put into a due Form In short I cannot nor must not forget Truth and Justice nor the Actions of just Men. For Sir Thomas Percy K nt was courted to take upon him the Title and Earldom of Northumberland but he refus'd it because he knew himself to be Descended from Sir Thomas Percy K nt Lord Egermond 2d Brother to Henry Percy 3d. Earl of Northumberland Captain Percy of Beverly did look after the Earldom of Northumberland and to preserve the name of Percy but he left off his Claim by reason he sound himself to be Descended from one of the Brothers of Henry Percy 5th Earl of Northumberland c. Now Sir Ingelram Percy K nt was the 3d. Son of Henry Percy 5th Earl of Northumberland who had 2 Sons viz. 1. Henry had Issue 3. Sons James William Henry James Claimant 2. Robert had Issue 3 Sons Robert Thomas one more Alexander Roger Francis God hath not set the Half-moon in vain upon the Claimant but the World may look upon it to be the Almighties Candle to find out the true Heir-Male James Percy Now for Alexander Percy Gent. of Ireland that rides in the Life-guard and Mr. Roger Percy Shoe-maker at Charing-cross and Mr. Francis Percy Stone-cutter in Cambridge and his Brother a Taylor I acknowledg them to be Cousins and Descended from the Sons of Robert Percy my Great Vnkle And by reason I know not which is the Eldest and nearest of Kin of thâ— Collateral Line Thereforâ—â— most humbly pray That the Heralds may take notice and help them to find out the truth of Seniority For my Cordial Endeavours are to preserve the Moon from being Misted or Eclipsed any more HENRY PERCY 5th Earl of Northumberland Married and had Issue 3 Sons viz. I. Henry Percy 6th Earl of Northumberland Married and dyed without Issue II. Thomas Percy Married and had Issue But when Josceline Percy the 11th Earl dyed the Heirs Males of this Line were Extinct also III. Sir Ingelram Percy Married and had Issue 2 Sons viz. Henry and Robert Henry Percy Eldest Son Married and had Issue 3 Sons viz. James William and Henry But the 2 elder Brothers dyed without Issue-male Henry Percy Third Son Married and had Issue 3 Sons viz. Henry James and Henry But the two Henries dyed young James Percy the now Claimant Married and hath 3 Sons viz. Anthony Henry and John Anthony Percy is Married and hath Issue Henry Percy Grandson of James Percy the now Claimant The following Account makes out this Pedigree fully and at large down from Henry Percy 5th Earl of Northumberland to the Claimant James Percy his Sons and Grand-son Henry Percy A True Pedegree to prove the Claymant James Percy to be the second Son of Henry Percy of Horton in the County of Northampton who was third Son of Henry Percy of Parvenham in the County of Bedford who was the eldest Son of Sir Ingelram Percy K nt who was the third Son of Henry Lord Percy 5 th Earl of Northumberland By which Descent the Claymant is Cousin and next Heir-male to Joscelin Percy the late and 11 th Earl of Northumberland Deceased HENRY Lord PERCY Fifth Earl of Northumberland Lord of the Honours of Cockermouth and Petworth Lord Percy Lucy Poynings Fitz-payne and Bryan and Knight of the most Noble Order of the Garter Who married Katherine one of the Daughters and Co-heirs of Sir Robert Spencer Knight by whom he had Issue 1st Henry Lord Percy 6th Earl of Northumberland who Dyed without Issue 2d Thomas Percy Knight who was Executed had to Wife Eleanor one of the Daughters and Co-heirs of Sir Gwichard Harbottle Knight by whom he had Issue Thomas the 7th Earl of Northumberland who was beheaded at York and dyed without Issue-male And Henry the 8th Earl of Northumberland whose Issue is incerted hereafter 3d. Sir Ingelram Percy Knight who was married as by the Oath of Mr. Henry Champion who kept the Books and Records of the Percies Henry Lord Percy 6th Earl of Northumberland Lord of the Honours of Cockermouth and Petworth Lord Percy Lucy Poynings Fitz-payne and Bryan Knight of the most Noble Order of the Garter who Dyed at Hackny near London the day before the Calends of July 1537. leaving no Children behind him The Dignity of the Earl of Northumberland was vacant till the time of Edward VI. John Dudly Earl of Warwick Viscount Lisie Lord Basset and Tyes was intituled Duke of Northumberland the 5th year of King Edward VI. But when he was Dead Thomas Percy Nephew to this Henry by Thomas his Brother who was Executed In the Reign of Qu. Mary was restor'd to all the Honours of that Family Thomas Percy Nephew to Henry 6th Earl of Northumberland by his Brother Thomas when the stock of the Percies were fading to their Relief was invested to the Earldom of Northumberland which the Earl of Warwick held before and thereby was the 7th Earl of Northumberland of that Family Lord of the Honours of Cockermouth Petworth Lord Percy Lucy Poynings Fitz-payne and Bryan Queen Mary bestowing those Honours upon him and his Heirs Male and for want of such Issue Then to Henry his Brother and his Heirs Male by her Letters Patents dated the first day of May 1557 and whatsoever else of the Antient Patrimonies of the Earls remained Seised or Forfeited But if He should die without Issue Male Then it should go to his Brother Henry and his Issue Male. And although to Honour him the more Queen Elizabeth made him Knight of the most Noble Order of the Garter Yet He unmindful of all these Benefits Conspir'd with Charles Earl of Westmerland to Depose by Force Qu. Elizabeth So by Authority of Parliament he was Condemned for High Treason and as Chief in the Conspiracy was beheaded at York 14th year of Queen Elizabeth Who married Anne the Daughter of Henry Somerset Earl of Worcester and had Issue Male Thomas that dyed young and 4 Daughters Heirs Males Extinct And Henry Percy 8th Earl of Northumberland Lord of the Honours of Cockermouth Petworth Lord Percy Lucy Poynings Fitz-payne and Bryan all which Honours he enjoy'd by virtue of the Letters Patents given by Queen Mary to his Brother Thomas and was Created Anno 1574. He was after accused of Treason and being in the Tower of London slew himself with a Dag charg'd with Two Bullets before his Cause was heard or that he was Arraigned in the Month of July 1585. ARMS Quarter'd as before Who married Katherine one of the Daughters and Co-heirs of John Nevel Lord Latimer by whom he had Issue 1. Henry the 9th Earl 2. Thomas
Tryal which is good Cause of Error As the Claymant hath laboured to find out the Truth even so he doth most humbly pray That all Wise Learned and Conscientious men may take Courage like the Lord Chief Justice Hayls and his Brethren and strictly inquire into the very bottom of the matter and to set aside all mistakes and set up Truth and maintain and speak cordially to and for Justice this being the only way to clear the Innocent and put a stop to Oppression And the Relieved as in Duty bound shall ever pray for his Majesties long Life and the Prosperity of Him His Realms and Kingdoms The above Claymant had two Petitions read in Council 21 July 1680. and rejected It seems it was objected that the Man whom the Claymant claimed under must be a Grandfather at eight years old It is hoped the account aforesaid will justly satisfie and procure a right understanding at the second hearing before the Lords in Parliament And there being no president as the Claymant is informed that the Orders of this House do perpetually bar where the party hath not been fully heard For Henry 5th Earl had Sir Ingelram who had Henry and he had Henry who had James the Claymant This Truth is as clear as the Sun at Noon-day and blows over the misty mistake of Claiming nnder Sir Richard Percy It was the putting down of the Court of Wards and setting up of Priviledges on all sides against the true Heir-male and the general neglect of the Heralds in the Collateral Line and the treacherous Actings of his Solicitor did obstruct and delay all this time Moreover the Lord Ogle that married the Lady Elizabeth Percy hath endeavoured to change his Name from Cavendish to Percy and also to have obtained an Act of Parliament to settle and confirm upon him the aforesaid Lord Ogle all those Lands which are annexed to the Title and Earldom of Northumberland which Lands formerly were firmly settled upon the Heir-males of the Percies for ever See the Records and the Verdict exemplified and pray a stop may be put to the Lord Ogle's Act of Parliament by reason the Lands are begg'd bought sold and scattered The undoubted Right and next Heir-male of the Percies in Bloud and so proved at Law and therefore he most humbly and earnestly prays That an Act of Parliament may be had to restore him to his Birth-right Title Estate Preheminence Priviledges Place and Seat of his Ancestors As it hath been done heretofore to several of the Percies the Earl of Kent and others This being the 11th Year of the Claim of JAMES PERCY Who humbly Beggs Prays and Cries for speedy Justice To the Kings Most Excellent Majesty The Humble Petition of JAMES PERCY Son of Henry Percy Grand-Son of Henry Percy Great Grand-son of Sir Ingleram Percy Great great Grandson of Henry Percy Fifth Earl and Couzen and next Heir-Male to Jocelin Percy the late and Eleventh Earl of NORTHUMBERLAND Deceased SHEWETH THat Your Petitioner hath near upon Ten Years prosecuted his Birth-right and still continues his Claim to the Title Honours Manors Lands Preheminencies and Priviledges that the Rights belonging to the Heirs-male of the Percies Family as they are annexed to the Earldom of Northumberland That upon the first Address Your Petitioner humbly made to your Majesty in order to obtain his Right Your Majesty was Graciously pleased to return for Answer God forbid Your Majesty should hinder an Heir but that He should have the Benefit of the Law That upon his Application to the House of Lords after some short pleadings his Councel moved thar the Cause might be left to the Law for his Legitimation that he might more Regularly come before their Lordships which was accordingly done That he hath pursuant to their Lordships order obtained a Verdict exemplified under the Seal of your Majesties Court of Kings-Bench That He is truly and legitimately descended of the Blood and Family of the Percies of Northumberland That upon Your Petitioners Humble Application by way of Petition to Your Mamesty praying your Royal Writ of Summons to call Your Petitioner to Sit in the House of Lords Your Majesties Gracious Answer was That You thought it not Convenient until the Petitioners Cause was Determined by the Lords That the Parliament being by your Majesties Royal Prerogative again Prorogued it much encourageth your Petitioners Opponents and weakens your Petitioner in his Dependencies having been Published in the Gazet formerly for an Impostor whereupon by the contrivance of his Solicitor the Lands were begg'd in the Name of the Duke of Monmouth and others That during the time Your Petitioner was prosecuting his Right at Law the potent Defendants put him off so long by Priviledge of Parliament till George Fitz-Roy was Created Earl of Northumberland And now it is divulged in Print that the Lord Ogle hath changed his Name from Cavendish to Percy All which forces your Petitioner to flie to Your Sacred Majesty for Relief Protection and Justice That it is the Opinion of your Petitioners Councel That your Majesty of your own Princely Prerogative without any Declaration of the Lords may Restore your Petitioner to his Birth-Right Title Honors and Estate that depends thereon Your Petitioner therefore most humbly prays your Majesty in whom solely lies the Creation and preservation of Honour and Nobility to Declare your Royal pleasure for his Ascending the Sphere and Dignity of his Ancestors Or to graut unto your Petitioner that hath groaned under Ten Years Oppression without decision of his Claim such Yearly Pension as may support him until his Cause come to a final Determination And Your Petitioner shall Pray c. JAMES PERCY THis Petition was presented into your Majesties Sacred Hand the 18. of December 1679. and Sir William Glascow Master in waiting order'd the Petitioner to call for an Answer the 22th Instant which the Petitioner accordingly did but then found no opportunity to speak with him The Petitioner attended the 23. instant and then Sir William returned this Answer by his Maid-Servant That he was buisie with some Friends and that the King would hear nothing until after Christmas-Eolidays That the Petitioner went to the Secretaries Office to get this following Advertisement to be entred into the Gazet but it would not be allowed which did much dissatisfie your Majesties Loyal Subject to think that the True Heir looking after his Birth-right should be put into the Gazet for an Impostor when as he hath proved himself at the Court of Kings Bench by Twelve honest Jury-men to be the true Percy and the only Heir-male to the House of Northumberland It is very sad when a lost Dog shall find Entrance into the Gazet and a Just Man be kept out The Advertisement refused is as follows Advertisement WHereas the Lord Ogle is published in print to have changed his Name from Cavendish to Percy upon his Marriage with the Lady Elizabeth Percy James Percy Esq the true Heir-Male of the Blood of the House
this Court When Mr. Blackeston was asked Whether he went to London to look after Percy 's Tryal he said It concerns me not for the Countess of Northumberland is to bear me Harmless Upon the Fourteenth of May 1678. there was a Tryal had at the King 's Bench-Bar Westminster for Scandalizing the Petitioner's Right and Title where-on a Verdict was given for Three Hundred Pound Dammages to the Petitioner and Judgment obtained thereon As by the said Judgment exemplifyed under the Seal of the Court appears Lastly That your Petitioner hath been all a-long perplexed and troubled by many Suits at Law unjustly Commenced against him by the Agents of the Defendants or some of them on purpose to Tire him out and Ruin him by Chargeable Defences For it is now almost Eight Years since he began his Claim And therefore Humbly prayes this most High and Honourable Court to open some way for the Hearing and Determination of this his Just Claim as it shall in your Mature Wisdoms seem meet and convenient for the Preserving Property and Right This further Complaint since the Late PARLIAMENT was Prorogued and Dissolved Percy is Plaintiff Blackeston the Defendant In Banco Regis Mich. Term. MR. Blackeston being Steward to the Lady Elizabeth Percy and the Countess Dowager of Northumberland being her Guardian the said Blackeston stood upon the Countesses Priviledge until upon another Occasion the Duke of Monmouth by an Order of the House of LORDS took off the Countesses Priviledges as to the Guardian-ship Then Mr. Blackeston sheltered himself under the Earl of Essexes Priviledge until the Plaintiff put his Petition into the House of LORDS that Mr. Blackeston might not be Priviledged by the said Earl Upon which the Earl agreed with the Plaintiff's Counsel That if the Ninety Pound Costs that was unpaid upon the Non-suit between Percy Plaintiff and Clarke Defendant were paid that then Mr. Blackeston should not stand upon Priviledge but go to a Tryal which he accordingly did in his Majestie 's Court of King's Bench. Before which time in the said Term the Plaintiff's Councel informed the Court what the Earl had agreed unto Then the Lord Chief Justice stood up and said to the Plaintiff That the Earl of Essex did promise upon his Honor to set aside his Priviledge and that the Plaintiff should have a Tryal against Mr. Blackeston this Term if the Plaintiff paid Mr. Clarke's Costs first And we do promise the Plaintiff shall have a fair Tryal The Plaintiff thereupon paid the said Ninety Pound Costs into the Court accordingly Monday the Eleventh of November the Plaintiff brought on his Tryal The Declaration being read Counsellor Scroggs opened the Cause and upon a Word in the Declaration there was some Debate But it was waved the Declaration allowed and the Scandalous VVords in the Declaration proved Mr. Atturney General moved that the VVitnesses might be heard to prove the Pedigree upward it being the better way to Satisfy the Court and to Inform the Jury And withal said That his Clyant had no better way to prove his Pedigree but by his Action of Slander For he hath delivered Declarations in Ejectment in several Countries and the Lands are all in great Persons Hands which still delay him by Priviledges Then was the Pedigrees delivered to the Judges But the Lord Chief Justice said What need we trouble the Court to Examine all these Witnesses if there be no Lands Therefore let us see first what Lands there are to make good the Declaration The Plaintiff produced Records out of the Tower and other Places which made out That the Lady Lucies Lands in Cumberland and other Countries were settled upon the Heirs-Males of the Percies for ever upon the Payment of Three Hundred Pound to the KING c. and Quartering the said Lucies Coat of Arms with the Percies Here the Defendant's Counsel started up an Attainder which the Plaintiff's Counsel was not ready to Answer the Plaintiff's Sollicitor having made no Provision against the said Attainder being confident that Attainder could not Hurt nor Prejudice the Tryal And this caused the Jury to be with-drawn The Jury appeared three several Times in this Cause which was occasioned by the Delayes and Priviledges which the Defendant sheltred himself under The Plaintiff payd all the Jury and the Ninety Pound was to be continued in Court till there had been a Fair Tryal But upon a Motion of the Defendant's Counsel there was a Peremptory Rule granted to take the Mony out of Court which was accordingly paid to the Defendant The Second Part of the Tryal should have been had in Michaelmass-Term 1678. while the Witnesses were in Town But the Tryal of Mr. Stayley prevented it So that the Plaintiff's Tryal was put off till Hillary-Term following viz. 27th January 1678. The Defendant's Counsel moved the Court the first Day of Hillary-Term for a New Jury and a longer Time pretending they had but Seven dayes Notice When in Truth the Defendant's Atturney had a Months Notice by the Plaintiff and Twelve dayes Notice by the Plaintiff's Atturneys Clark Upon which the Court gave a Rule for Seven dayes longer and for a New Jury which was Appointed accordingly Then the Defendant's Counsel afterwards moved the Court for a longer Day by reason that their Writings were mis-placed by the Fire in the Temple which further Day was granted till Thursday the Sixth of February and no Costs considered to the Plaintiff for keeping his Witnesses in Town all that Time notwithstanding the Plaintiff's Counsel moved for Costs Note The Lord Chief Justice Hales in the Case of Percy Plaintiff and Clarke Defendant The Defendant's Counsel moved the Court for Seven Dayes time pretending they were not Prepared And the Rule of Court was to pay Thirty-Five Pound to the Plaintiff to maintain his Witnesses in Town for that time which was paid Now on the Sixth of February 1678. the Tryal came on again The New Jury did appear the Declaration was read and Councellor Scroggs opened the Cause as he did before And one of the Witnesses was called to prove the Words And when he appeared the Court acknowledged he had proved the VVords sufficiently before And the Defendant's Counsel made no Objection against the Declaration So the Tryal was to go on where it broake off The Records of the Patents in Queen Maries time one for the Barony and the other for the Earldom produced And he that was the Clark that Examined them appeared but was not suffered to prove them upon Oath Note The afore-said Clark of the Rolls not appearing upon the last Tryal was the Cause of with-drawing the Jury Then when the Court saw the Plaintiff was ready to Answer to their Objections declared That the Plaintiff was Descended Paramount the Attainders And did own the Attaint could not hurt the Plaintiff Then Mr. Atturney General moved as at the first Part of the Tryal That the VVitnesses might be Examined to prove the Pedigree VVhereupon the Defendant's Counsel started up an Act
his Expectations fail'd there 6. Then he Applyed himself to the LORDS Spiritual and Temporal Assembled in Parliament and they likewise upon the Motion of Sir Francis pemberton Serjeant at Law Counsellor for the Plaintiff dismist his Petitions and so he was left to the Law 7. Then his Sollicitor advised the Claymant by reason the Court of Wards was Dissolved by an Act of Parliament 12. Car. 2. c. 24. to Sue by way of Quo Warranto and Presented it to the then Attorney General but was not allowed Whereupon no Inquisition post mortem was or could be obtained after the Deaths of the Two last Earls of Northumberland viz. Algernoone and Josceline which if it might have been had this Claymant without doubt or question would have been found by the Jury to have been the Cousin and next Heir-Male to Josceline the late Deceased-Earl of Northumberland 8. Then the Claymant applyed himself to Sir Edward Walker the KING's Herald at Arms who was very Rough at first but at last was more Complyant and did direct the Claymant in his Pedigree And on the Day that the Pedigree was Finished the Claymant went to shew it him and found him so ill that he Died the next Day And therefore was prevented of his further Assistance 9. The Claymant's Sollicitor abused him and caused several Lands to be beg'd by several Persons in the Name of the Duke of Monmouth when he was in France At his Return the Claymant went to Windfor to tender his Respects to him and to prevent Differences being loath to contend against a Person of his High Quality And he most Graciously Complyed and told the Complaynant That he should have a Fair Tryal at Law And if the Claymant proved himself Heir-Male God forbid he should hinder him Upon which the Plaintiff returned with great Joy posted away into Northumberland and delivered Declarations in Ejectment upon those Lands the Duke had Recovered of the Countess upon pretence there was no Heir-Male of the Family of the Percies Living But when the Claymant was bringing the Tryal on Priviledge was fet up Whereupon the Claymant went to Mr. Rosse the Duke's Secretary to know why it was so when the Duke did promise He would not stand upon Priviledges but a Fair Tryal should be had Mr. Rosse Replyed The Duke could not set aside his Priviledge To declare how many Persons and how oft the Claymant hath been put off by Priviledges would be too tedious for the Reader 10. When the Guardianship came to the Senior Countess Dowager the Claymant writ to her and Craved her Answer and sent his Servant with the Letter to Sion-House And her Answer was That she would not return any Answer in Writing The Claymant writ also to the Junior Countess and sent Friends to Intercede He likewise writ to Mr. Champion and to Mr. Gee and Mr. Clarke several times And at one time before the Tryal with Mr. Clarke they would have owned the Plaintiff to set him up but broke off upon Terms Although the Plaintiff was forced to suffer a Non-suit yet that Tryal and the Opinion of the Lord Chief Justice Hales convinced Sir Edward Walker and the World And this Clause is put in meerly to satisfy the World Because some say The Countess hath reported what she would do for an Heir-Male of a true Percy Others report That the Claymant is so Stout that he scorned to Apply himself to them The Claymant hath Submitted beyond Reason Law and Equity God himself is the Claymant's Witness For he hath set to his Seal a Cressant a Badge which belongs to the Percies Family which he was Born into the World with and is Descended of a Family of near Thirty Generations For William Lord Percy was the Fifth Generation and came in with William the Conqueror into England And consequently the Claymant is by Matches from Henry the Fourth Emperor and of the Royal Blood of England Legitimate by Father and Mother Grand-Father and Grand-Mother great Grand-Father and great Grand-Mother as by the Oath of Mr. Henry Champion in open Court Whose great Grand-Father Sir Ingleram Percy was the Third Son of Henry Percy Fifth Earl of Northumberland 11. It is to be observed That at that very Tryal the Judgment and Verdict was Exemplified under the Seal of his Majesties Court of King's Bench When the Plaintiff James Percy had proved his Father Henry Percy Marryed Lydia Cope his Mother at Horton in Northampton-shire and that they had two Children Henry and Elizabeth both Elder than the Plaintiff This did abate the Scandal of Bastard and Imposture And my Lord Chief Justice Rainsford stood up and said Gentlemen of the Jury This is enough to prove the Claymant Legitimate We know his Pedigree and that it must be heard before others It is humbly suppos'd he meant before the KING 's most Excellent Majesty and the Right Honorable the LORDS and COMMONS Assembled in Parliament Therefore the Complaynant after almost Nine years Prosecution of his Right is forced in order to satisfy all Impartial Readers to present this his Case to the Publick View If by any means for the Honor of Justice which Establisheth the Throne and every Free-born Subject in his Right he may be Restored to the Place and Seat of his Ancestors there being many Presidents in his own Family that of the Earls of Kent and others of the like Nature The PEDIGREE HEnry Percy First Earl of Northumberland Created by King Richard the Second Had Issue Henry called Hotspur Both Father and Son Attainted Left Issue Male. Henry Percy Grand-Son was Restored by King Henry the Fifth and made the Second Earl of Northumberland Left Issue-Male Henry Percy Third Earl of Northumberland taking Part with King Henry the Sixth was Slain Left Issue-Male Henry Percy Fourth Earl of Northumberland after the Surrender of John Nevel Lord Mountague was Restored and was Slain in Performing his Duty for King Henry the Seventh Left Issue-Male Henry Percy Fifth Earl of Northumberland left Issue Three Sons viz. 1. Henry Percy 6 Earl Dyed without Issue 2. Sir Thomas Percy 2. Son was Attainted and Executed in his Brother's Life-time Left Issue-Males Sir Thomas Percy First Son Created Seventh Earl of Northumberland by Queen Mary after John Duke of Northumberland was Beheaded And left no Issue-Male Sir Henry Percy Second Son of Sir Thomas Percy that was Attainted as above-said in King Henry the Eighth's Time and was the Eighth Earl of Northamberland and left Issue-Males Note the Mistake Sir Richard Percy was this Henry Percy 's Son So that Sir Richard is found too Young by the Great Pedigree to be the Clavmant's great Grand-Father Henry Percy 9 Earl of Northumberland left Issue-Male Algernoon Percy 10 Earl of Northumberland left Issue-Male Josceline Percy 11 Earl of Northumberland Dyed and left no Issue-Male 3. Sir Ingleram Percy Third Son left Issue-Males Henry Percy Eldest Son Heir left Issue-Males James Percy First Son Dyed without Issue-Male Henry Percy Second Son left
lived and that William was his Son So Mr. Bushell and Mr. Fleetwood would often tell me the Claymant James Percy that they were fellow-servants with my Father Henry Percy and have often heard Joscelin Percy and the rest of those Eight brethren call Henry the Father of James Cozen and were wondrous familier when they met at my Lord Bacons Had that Lord continued in prosperity Henry Percy his servant had not known so much misery nor James Percy Henry's Son had not run through the Gantlets of extremities Mr. Champion could have done Justice at that meeting at Doctor Lamplues if he had pleased but he rather takes advantage at the Claymants weakness We shall say no more of him but he that blowes out his Neighbors Candle willfully may want light justly before he dies Furthermore it is well known that Henry Percy the Father of James and William took his wife Lydia and her Children and carryed them to Dunington in Lincolnshire and there left them and then took Mary Varnun the Servant of Dame Cope and carry's her to London at which old Henry the Nineth Earl was Angry if things had been right he would have scorned to have seen William to have been brought up by the Parish Had Justice Scroggs suffered the Witnesses to speak at the Tryal it would have been sufficiently prov'd that James Percy and Henry Percy were brothers and the Son 's of Henry Percy that was sent out of the North in Hampiers and was so owned by Henry the Nine Earl and his seven brethren and did oft visit each other Furthermore Algernoon the Tenth Earl did own James the Unkle in Ireland to be the next Heir if his Brother Henry Lord Percy died without Issue Male of his Body Note Josceline was not then Born and sent James Percy the Unckle of James the Claymant 100 l. into Ireland and likewise did often own James Percy the Trunckmaker and give him money and acknowledged That he was the next Heir-male if his Son should dye and leave no Heire-males of his Body Moreover Henry Lord Percy brother to Algernoon the tenth Earl did declare on his Death-bed that James Percy a Trunckmaker was the next Heir if his Brothers Son should die And also Joscelin the eleventh Earl beyond Sea did declare upon his death-bed That James Percy the Trunck-maker in Ireland was the next Heir-Male if he were living and Cryed out Oh that he were here now And as for William Percy alias Varnun he was never owned by any but Mr. Champion who endeavour'd to act the part of Jacobs Mother Had Henry Percy the Father of James the Claymant lived in these times he needed not to have Fled for his Crime Could James Percy have had a fair Tryal he would have printed no more But when you came first to me I shewed you a Mold like a half-Moon upon my Body born into the World with it as hath been the like on some of the Percy 's formerly now search William Percy and see if God hath marked him so surely God did foresee the troubles although the Law takes no notice But God makes a true decision even as he was pleased to make Esau hairy and Jacob smooth if I like old Father Isaack could not See through the mist of Ignorance and misguidements of Politicians the right road of my Pedigree yet now by Providence I can like old Tobias see perfectly the Rebeccaical Actions that hath been practis'd against me and how they endeavour to steal away my Birth-right and my Blessing too And since it is your desire to be satisfi'd be pleas'd patiently to hear a little of my Solicitors Treacherous Practises as Mr. Champion was pleas'd to say to me in the Temple-Walks Mr. Percy who helpt you to your Solicitor I repli'd I believe your self or the Devil sent him to me This Solicitor Mr. Tho. Swayne perswades me into Articles then carryes me down to Pimborne in Dorset-shire to his own House pretending to carry me to old Mr. Roger 's of Canington in Somerset-shire saying He did not doubt but upon reasonable termes to prevail with the old man to put me in possession of the Estate in his life time But when he had put me to so vast Charges then he pretended he might get his Brains beat out for he was informed he was an Old Cross Fellow and therefore he would not go The next Project he had was That I had great Persons to deal withal and I must get Courtiers that were in the Kings Favour and he was well acquainted with them but he would apply himself first to the Lord Newport and propound a Match for one of his Daughters to my Eldest Son but instead of the Match the Lord Newport had begg'd the Lands for the Duke of Monmouth when in truth the Duke was in France and Cannington Lands was begg'd by other Courtiers by the Contrivance of the Solicitor unknown and altogether against the Opinion or Consent of James Percy the Claimant and when the Solicitor saw the Clyant so enraged saith he The Lord of Newport can do what he pleases with the Duke of Monmouth so that the Duke upon the Match should return the Lands again But when Percy would not be satisfyed then Swayne would meet with him at my Lord Newport's Lodgings at Whitehal Percy met at the Hour appointed Swayne being then with the Lord but Percy was denyed The next day Swayne gave Percy a Letter to the Lord to satisfy himself The Lord answered him Mr. Percy You must believe your Solicitor But being earnest with my Lord he replyed Mr. Percy If you will trust to me I will be your Faithful Friend But the Truth is I dare not appear publickly for you I am so near related to that Family Whereupon Percy replyed Nay my Lord if you dare not appear publickly for me I dare not trust you privatly So pray'd God to Bless him and took Leave to depart Then Swayne the Solicitor contrived three Suits at Law against Percy his Clyant which lasted Three Years and Percy cast Swayne in all the three Actions but could not catch him for his Costs And now the Duke of Monmouth hath Sold those Lands that was beg'd and was worth Nine or Ten Thousand Pound per annum for Twelve Thousand Pound But Six Thousand for the Duke's part and the Lord Newport and others had the Remainder as the Claymant is informed Note In that Act of Parliament which Henry Percy Sixth Earl was so profuse in Letting long Leases to his Servants Tenants and others and Exchanging those Lands which of right he ought not to do Yet there was many Savings in that Act which was settled upon the Heir-Males of the Percies for ever which would not be suffered to be read at the Tryals But Learned Counsels were of opinion That his settling the Lands in the Crown was to ingratiate himself in the King's Favour questioning not but that the King would Restore all the Lands again to the Sons of Thomas
of Right belong And therefore prays his Bill may be be made an Act to settle the Title and Estate together again that Property and Right may be had according to Justice That at his first coming to Claim your Petitioner petitioned the Kings most Excellent Majesty who was graciously pleased to say God forbid We should hinder an Heir but that he should have the benefit of the Law That your Petitioner applyed himself to the Lords in Parliament where he then could not prove his Great Grandfather which forc'd his Councel to tell their Lordships That the Claimants Cause lay not before them but ought to be Tryed at the Common Law first and when the Cause had went through the Inferiour Courts to prove his Pedigree and if the Law could not end it then the Cause ought to come before their Lordships again to Hear Debate and to Determine And at that time his potent Adversaries did publish in the Gazette that your Petitioner was an Impostor and at their Courts did declare to all the Tenants that the Claimants name was not Percy but that he was a Bastard and that Henry Percy whom he declared was his Father they could prove was never Married Yet they have made all the Waste imaginable cutting down Woods pulling down Castles over-working of Lead-Mines and Coal-Mines and not only so but it cast the Petitioner out of Favour in the World that His most Excellent Majesty was pleased to give the Title one way and the Land several ways which hath not only multiplied Enemies but by their Power Policy and Priviledge hath put off your Petitioner near Eleven Years Therefore your Petitioner renders this following Account that his Just Cause may be known what hard usage he hath found at Law That the first Tryal was in the year 1674. against Mr. John Clerke the chief Agent for scandalous words who shelter'd under Priviledge a long time and before the Tryal they offer'd to Own him and to assist the Claimant James Percy with their Books Pedigree and Records but would not be bound to perform Then the Plaintiff perceived it to be a baffle for a longer delay and there were no good Faith in them then said the Plaintiff Currat Lex I will have the Tryal if it be but to wash the dirt off which the Gazette and your evil practices have thrown upon me And at the Tryal the Attorney would suffer a Non-suit without the consent of his Client at which the Lord Chief Justice Hales seemed not to be satisfied but stood up and said That James Percy the Claimant and Plaintiff had proved himself a true Percy legitimate by Father and Mother Grandfather and Grandmother and of the Bloud and Family of the Percies of Northumberland and did verily believe that the Plaintiff was Cozen and next Heir-Male to Joscelin the late and 11th Earl of Northumberland only he was afraid he had taken his Descent a little too low And the Jury at a Treat which Mr. Clerke the Defendant gave them said to Mr. Clerke You are beholden to Mr. Percy for suffering a Non-suit for truly we must have given a Verdict for the Plaintiff his Cause was proved so clear and the Damages was laid in the Declaration 10000 l. The second Tryal was upon an Ejectment for Cunnington and Rodoway Lands in Somersetshire which Lands of right fell to the Heirs-Males of the Percies after the Heirs-Males of the Rogers was extinct Doubtless it was by mis-information his Majesty was mistaken in his Gifts And at that Tryal the Pedigree was fully proved up to the Plaintiffs Great-Grandfather Sir Ingleram Percy youngest Son of Henry Percy 5 th Earl of Northumberland by the Oath of Mr. Henry Champion who was Steward to the Earls of Northumberland and declared at that Tryal that he found in the Books and Records of the Percies that Sir Ingleram Percy was married and had Sons and Daughters so that a Verdict ought to have been had for the Plaintiffs Pedigree at that Tryal also And Sir John Coppleston did not only shelter under Priviledge but when the Writs of Error were put into the House of Lords he then sued the Plaintiff in the Court of Kings-Bench and got Cost and broke the Priviledge of Parliament The third Tryal was against one Mr. Wright for the like scandalous words where your Petitioner proved his Legitimacy again and not the Tythe of his Witnesses were examined for the Lord Chief Justice Rainsford stood up and said Gentlemen of the Jury we need not trouble the Court to examine more of the Plaintiffs Witnesses by reason his Pedigree was fully proved before at a former Tryal at the Bar of this Court And when the Jury brought in but 300 l. Damages the Lord Chief Justice was angry and told them they had undervalued the Plaintiffs Cause the Judgment exemplified under the Seal of the Court makes appear the same That the fourth Tryal against John Blakeston Esq who was likewise an Agent for the Lady Elizabeth Percy and kept her Courts and did declare the like scandalous words and gave it in all his Charges to the Jury and Tenants to take special notice thereof And at the Tryal on Monday the 11th of November 1678. the words were proved The Declaration was allowed after some debate upon a nice word which was amended But the Councel for the Defendant started up an Attainder in the Case which the Plaintiffs Councel was not prepared at that time to remove that Objection but the Tryal was put by at that time and the Jury was withdrawn as the Plaintiffs printed Book declares more at large But the second part of that Tryal was upon the 6th of February 1678. a new Jury upon the motion of the Defendants Councel did appear and the Plaintiffs Councel did clear that point concerning the Attainder by reason the Plaintiffs Councel made appear to the Court that James Percy was descended from the Body of Henry Percy 5 th Earl of Northumberland of Sir Ingleram Percy his youngest Son and that the Collateral Line was never Attainted and therefore ought to enjoy the Title and Estate of his Ancestors Earls of Northumberland Then the Defendants Councel and the Court did own the Plaintiffs Title and Pedigree but said there was no Lands to support the Title then the Plaintiff prayed that the Court would confirm what they owned by a Rule in Court whereupon the Lord Chief Justice Scrogs stood up and said Confirm or not confirm the Declaration is naught discharge Blakeston from the Suit of Percy notwithstanding the vast Charge the Plaintiff had been put to by the Defendants sheltering under the senior Countess of Northumberlands Priviledges And when the Duke of Monmouth had set aside her Priviledges then he shelter'd himself under the Lord of Essex his Priviledge And when the Plaintiff had made his complaint to the House of Lords the Lord of Essex did agree with the Plaintiffs Councel that if Mr. Clerk's Cost was laid down in Court for his security
Claimant's consent or knowledge Then the Duke replied Mr. Percy you shall have a fair Tryal at Law And moreover he did promise he would not stand upon Priviledge but when Percy was ready for a Tryal then Trumpt up Priviledge And Mr. Ross the Duke's Agent said the Duke could not set aside his Priviledge But the Duke said if Percy proves himself Heir I have no Right and forth with sold his Interest for an inconsiderable Sum of Money II. The Lord Ogle that married the Lady Elizabeth Percy would have assumed the name of Percy and put in a Bill to be made an Act to settle the Lands upon him by Act of Parliament III. And it is reported that the Lord of Essex desired that some of those Lands might be settled upon him by Act of Parliament By this account the Lands are yet unsettled Ergo then great reason it is that the true Heir-Male of the Percies Bill should be made an Act of Parliament to settle the Name Title and Estate together again according to the first settlement confirmed by his Ancestors Now your poor distressed and oppressed Petitioner humbly and freely offers for the obtaining of Justice and for the full satisfaction to the Kings most Excellent Majesty and the Right Honourable Lords Spiritual and Temporal and those Honourable and Worthy Members of the House of Commons in Parliament assembled if it be required and thought convenient he being very unwilling to offer any thing that might give the least offence but rather submit to their grave and mature Wisdoms these Proposals following James Percy the Claimant and Plaintiff will pay into the hands of any Trustees that shall be appointed to receive the Money in Trust for Mr. John Blakeston's Costs provided he likewise lay down the 90 l. taken by surprize out of Court before the Tryal was ended And Mr. Vtting's Cost likewise shall be paid for what Sir John Coppleston claims provided likewise that Sir John Coppleston pay the 10 l. down which he got when he ventured the Breach of Priviledge of Parliament provided the whole Merits of the Cause may have a fair Hearing and Determination before the Lords And if the Plaintiff and Claimant James Percy doth not prove himself to be the right true and next Heir-Male in Bloud of the Percies of Northumberland then let them take all the Money and the Plaintiff will freely acquit his Claim for ever and remain till death a Loyal Subject and James Percy Although his Witnesses be dispers'd a Weeks time will bring them to Town again upon the sight of an Order For the Claimant James Percy by Birth ought to enjoy the Place Seat and Priviledge of his Ancestors Earls of Northumberland but now he dares not appear till an Order be had Therefore he most humbly prays That a fair Hearing may be had and that a true decision of his just Cause and Claim may be made according to Justice so that the Innocent may be preserved and that the fraudulent practices not just may march off with shame For Heroick Actions glorifies God Honours the King and makes all the people shout for joy God hath been pleased to make a true decision himself which may be a president for he sent the Claimant from his Mothers Womb with a Crescent into the World which is Gods Ensign of Truth and the very Badge belonging to the Percies Earls of Northumberland In witness to this Truth I have set to my Hand and Seal this 3d. of January 1680 1. JAMES PERCY To the KINGS most Excellent Majesty The Humble Petition of JAMES PERCY SHEWETH THat it is a great grief to your Petitioner's Soul to trouble your Sacred Majesty so often in looking after his Just Right yet cannot help it by reason his Opponents are of so great Power Policy and Force That notwithstanding his Petition to the Right Honourable House of Lords presented the day after his Hearing should have been had the Opponents got that Writ of Error dismiss'd the House well knowing the Errors would have been confirmed against them That thereby they have an opportunity to take out Execution against your Petitioner and so to stop his further publick appearing That if that Writ be not recall'd into the Lords House again your Petitioner can in no wise expect a fair Hearing nor a just decision of his Cause Therefore your oppressed Petitioner most humbly prays That your Majesty would be graciously pleased to see Justice done herein and that a new Day may be appointed according to the Prayer of that Petition that is now before the House of Lords or that your Sacred Majesty will be graciously pleased to call your Loyal Subject by your Royal Writ of Summons to take the Place and Seat of his Ancestors Earls of Northumberland he having proved his legitimate Descent and Pedigree at several Tryals at Law This Petition was presented into his Sacred Majesties hand Jan. 3. 1681. All great and dubious matters the Children of Israel presented and laid open before Moses Even so the Claimant hath done to his Majesty all along knowing that in the King solely lyes the creation and preservation of Honour and Nobility But the King referred the Cause to the Lords to hear and determine and now the two Writs of Error are dismiss'd the Lords House without hearing the said Cause Now the Claimant James Percy finding himself over-powered is forc'd to Appeal and humbly prays for Justice As Prerogative belongs to the King so Property and Right belongs to his People FINIS To the KING' 's Most Excellent Majesty The Humble Petition of JAMES PERCY SHEWETH THat Your Petitioner most Humbly Beseecheth and Earnestly Prayeth Your Majesties Pardon for that Omission on the Ninth of December last which was in truth altogether the Neglect of his Attorny as his Printed Petition sets forth That Your Petitioner Humbly presents these two Books that your Most Excellant Majesty may see the real endeavours of Your Petitioner and the first Book was Prepared for the Right Honourable Lords Spiritual and Temporal to inform their Lordships And the second Book is prepared to make his Complaints known to the House of Commons 〈◊〉 that They â—ay intercede in his Just Cause with Your Royal Majesty and the Right â—onourable Lords in Parliament Therefore Your Majesties Loyal Subject and Petitioner most Humbly Prays That Your Royal Majesty will be Graciously pleased Patiently to Read and Seriously consider the Printed Complaints and do Your Poor distressed Petitioner Justice in restoring him by Your own Princely Power Prerogative and Clemency He having at Law fully proved his Pedigree And therefore hath prepared a Bill that it may be made an Act of Parliament and most Humbly Prays Your Majesties Royal Assent thereunto And that Your Majesties Royal Writ of Summons may forthwith call Your Loyal Subject from the House of Prison to the House of Peers And there to take the Place and Seat of his Ancestors Earls of Northumberland When King Pharao took Joseph out of