said late Queen after the beginning of her Reign was or then after should be intituled by any Attainder Escheat Conveiance or Assurance whatsoever and in which Letters Patents Grants or Writings no Estate Tail then before made or supposed to be made was recited or from henceforth should be and the Reversion or Remainder thereof expectant in the said Letters Patents Grants or Writings granted or mentioned to be granted or any defect of certainty or ill computing mistaking rating or setting forth of the yeerly value or rate of the premises or yeerly Rents reserved of and for the premises or any parcel thereof mentioned or conteined in the same Letters Patents aforesaid or other Writings or for that that the premises then were or any part thereof valued at a greater or lesser value in the said Letters Patents or Writings than the said Manors Lands Tenements and other premises then were or were in yeerly value or any misnaming or not true naming of Town Hamblet Parish or County where the said Honors Manors Lands Tenements Rents Hereditaments and other the premises and every part thereof or any parcel thereof lay or were or any defect of true naming of the Lands Tenements or Hereditaments or any parcel thereof or of the Nature Kind Quality or Quantity of the aforesaid Possessions or Hereditaments or of any parcel thereof or any default of true naming of any Corporation or any default of Attornment Livery or Seisin or any ill naming of any the late Tenants of the aforesaid Honors Manors lands Tenements and Hereditaments or of any part thereof so sold granted or given or any ill naming of any person or persons Bodies Politick or Corporate who any time before the making of such Letters Patents were or then after should be proprietors of the premises or any any part thereof to the contrary notwithstanding as by the said Act amongst other things it more fully appearh And the said John Hele and Warwick further say That the said late Queen Elizabeth never had any Son And that the aforesaid Gellio Merick and Henry Liâ—dley were at and before the time of the making of the said Leters Patents so as before is said made Subjects of the said late Queen Elizabeth and born at Westminster aforesaid All and singular which The said John Hele and Warwick are ready to aver Whereupon they demand Judgement if the said Letters Patens of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the Manors aforesaid with the Appurtenances so as before is said made ought to be revoked and annulled or the Manors aforesaid with the Appurtenances or any of them ought to be seized into the Hands of the Lord the King that now is c. And the aforesaid Henry Hobert Knight Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is who c. present in Court in his proper person As to the aforesaid Plea of the said Henry Lindley above in form aforesaid pleaded for the said Lord the King saith That the said Henry Lindley ought not be admitted to plead That there is not any such Record of any such Act of Parliament of the aforesaid Lord King Edward the 3d. made Nor that there is any such Record of the aforesaid Charter of the said late King Edward the 3d. by Authority of Parliament made as in the aforesaid Writ of Scire Facias thereof is recited and specified Because he saith That the said Lord King JAMES now King of England saw the Inrollment of the aforesaid Act of Parliament of the said late King Edward the 3d. and of the aforesaid Charter of the said late King Edward the 3d. in the Rolls of the Chancery of the King that now is within his Tower of London in the yeer of the Reign of the aforesaid late King Edward the 3d. the 11th inrolled upon Record there remaining The Tenor of Inrollment of which Act of Parliament and Charter aforesaid the said JAMES now King of England by his Letters Patents under the Great Seal of England sealed here in Court by the aforesaid Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is for the said Lord the King that now is now brings in Court bearing date at Westminster aforesaid the 5th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is of England France and Ireland the 3d. and of Scotland the 39th Exemplified amongst other things Which Exemplification as to the Inrollment of the aforesaid Act of Parliament and Charter aforesaid followeth in these words JAMES by the Grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. To All to whom these present Letters shall come greeting We have seen the Inrollment of a certain Charter bearing date the 17th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord Edward late King of England the 11th To his well-Beloved and Faithful Edward Earl of Chester his Eldest Son granted in the Rolls of our Chancery within the Tower of London remaining of Record in these words Edward by the Grace of God King of England Lord of Ireland and Duke of Aquitain To the Arch-Bishops Bishops Abbots Priors Earls Barons Justices Sheriffs Provosts Ministers and all Bayliffs and his faithful People Greeting Amongst other the tokens of Honour of our Kingdom we esteemed it the chiefest that the Order of Dignities and Offices of our Kingdom be fortified with the best and strongest Counsels Therefore there being many degrees of Inheritance in our Kingdom where by descent the Inheritance according to the Law of this Kingdom to Co-heirs and Parciners and for want of such issue and such like events the same came to our Hands We therefore desiring to beautifie our Kingdom and in best manner to defend our Kingdom and the holy Church thereof and our Subjects and Kingdoms against the endeavors and Adversaries thereof and considering and looking that Peace between us and Subjects be maintained and to dignifie the Places of honour of our Kingdom And taking into our consideration the person of our well-Beloved and Faithful Edward Earl of Chester our Eldest Son and taken to Honour the same our Son the name and Honour of Duke of Cornwall with the common consent and counsel of the Prelates Earls Barons and others of our Counsel in this present Parliament at Westminster upon Monday next after the Feast of Saint Mathew the Apostle last past being assembled we have given and made him Duke of Cornwall and girt him with a Sword as behoveth And that there may be no doubt hereafter what or how much the same Duke or other Dukes of the same place who for the time shall be in the name of the said Dutchy ought to have Our Will is that all in specialty which to the said Dutchy doth beloug be inserted in this our Charter Therefore for us and our Heirs we have given and granted and by this our Charter confirmed to the same our Son under the name and Honour of Duke of the said Place The
is aforesaid and that it shall and may be Lawfull to and for the said Master Preacher School-master Usher Poor men and Poor Children and Officers of the Hospital to remain assemble be and Cohabit together in the said House Buildings and Hospital And that it may be further enacted by the authority aforesaid and Be it enacted by the authority aforesaid that your said supplyant during his life and that the said Governors and their successors for the time being or the most part of them after his decease shall and may have full power and authority under the said common Seal to make ordayn set down and prescribe such Rules Statues and Ordinances for the Order Rule and Government of the said Hospital and of the said Master Preacher School-Master Usher Poor men Poor Children and Officers and their successors and for their and every of their stipends and allowances as to your said supplyant during his life and the said Governors and their successors for the time being or the most part of them after his decease shall seem meet and convenient And that the same Orders Rules Statutes and Ordinances so by him them or any of them made set down or prescribed as aforesaid shall be and stand in full force and strength in Law the same not being repugnant nor contrary to your Majesties Prerogative royal nor to the Laws or Statures of this your Majesties Realm of England nor to any Ecclesiastical Canons of the Church of England then in force and use And that your said supplyant during his life and the said Governours and their successors for the time being or the most part of them and such of them as your said supplyant shall thereto nominate and appoint shall and may after the decease of your said suppliant have power and authority to visit the said Hospital and to Order reform and redress all disorders and abuses in and touching the Government and disposing of the same And further to censure suspend and deprive the said Master Preacher School-master Usher Poor men Poor Children and Officers for the time being and every or any of them as to him and them shall seem Just fit and convenient so alwaies as no Visitation Act or thing in or touching the same be had made or done other than by your supplyant during his life or the said Governours and their successors for the time being or the most part of them after his decease or by such of them as your supplyant shall hereunto nominate and appoint And also that it may be farther enacted by the authority aforesaid and be it enacted by the authority aforesaid that that the said Preacher and Minister of the Word of God which shall be placed in the said Hospital to and for the uses and purposes aforesaid from time to time hereafter shall and may enter into have hold and enjoy the Rectory and Parsonage of Hallingbury aforesaid in and to his own proper use behoof for during so long time as he shall be Preacher Minister there without any other Presentation or Admission Jnstruction or Induction And that no Lease shall hereafter be made of the said Parsonage or of any part or portion thereof other than such as shall determine end when as soon as any such person shall be the Preacher or Minister of and in the said Hospital when the same Lease shall be made shall cease and resign leave or be put out and removed from his said place of Preacher or Minister of the said Hospital Saving alwayes and reserving to your Majesty your Heirs and Successors and to every other person or persons Bodies Politick or Corporate their Heirs and Successors other than your suppliant and his Heirs and the person and persons from whom the same were purchased and their Heirs claiming only as Heirs all such Estate Right Title Condition Claim Possession Rents Services Commons Demands Actions Remedies Recoveries Terms Interests Forfeits Comodities Advantages and Hereditaments whatsoever which they or any of them shall and may have or of Right ought to have of in to or out of the premises or any of them or any part thereof as if this Act had never been had or made Other than Fine or Fines of or for any Alienation of the premises or any part or parcel thereof And other their Respits of Homage or Fines for not payment of Respits of Homage at any time hereafter to be demanded And other than Title and Right of Liberty or Liberties to enter into the same or any one of them for or by reason of any Statute hitherto made for concerning or against any Alienation in Mortmain as by the said Act amongst other things it appeareth And further the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That Thomas then and now Earl of Suffolk Lord Chamberlain of the Kings Houshold before the aforesaid time in which c. was seized of and in a certain Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called or known by the name of Howard House otherwise called The late dissolved Charter-House besides Smithfield situate lying and being in the County of Middlesex with all and singular Rights Members and Appurtenances to the same belonging and appertaining And all that Orchard and Garden with the Appurtenances thereunto likewise belonging and appertaining and of and in all that parcel of Land with the Appurtenances commonly called Pardon Church-yard and of all those two Messuages or Tenements and two Closes of Land with the Appurtenances thereunto belonging commonly called Welbech situate lying and being in the said County of Middlesex whereof the aforesaid Capital Messuage with the Appurtenances in the Declaration aforesaid mentioned is and the aforesaid time in which it is supposed the Trespass aforesaid above to be done as also time whereof the Memory of Men is not to the contrary was parcel in his Demesn as of Fee And so thereof being seized The said now Earl of Suffolk before the time in which c. That is to say at Westminster in the County of Middlesex By his certain Indenture between him the said now Earl by the name of the Right Honourable Thomas Earl of Suffolk Lord Chamberlain of the most Honourable Houshold of the Lord the King and Theophilus Lord Howard Son and Heir apparant of the said Earl of Suffolk and Thomas Earl of Arundel and Surrey and William Lord Howard of Naward in the County of Cumberland of the one part and the aforesaid Thomas Sutton of Balsham in the County of Cambridge Esquire on the other part made and within 6. Moneths then next following in the Court of the said Lord the King of Common-Pleas at VVestminster aforesaid then being in due manner of Record Inrolled according to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided one part of which as well with the Seal of the aforesaid Thomas now Earl of Suffolk as with the Seals of the aforesaid Theophilus Lord Howard Thomas Earl of Arundel and Surrey William Lord Howard sealed to the
Jurors aforesaid in Evidence shewed bearing date the same day and year For and in consideration of 13000. pound of good and lawful Mony of England by the said Thomas Sutton to the aforesaid Thomas Earl of Suffolk in Hand payed Bargained and Sold All and singular the premises with the Appurtenances being called The late dissolved Charter-House besides Smithfield in the said County of Middlesex whereof c. to the said Thomas Sutton To have and to hold to him and his Heirs for ever to the only use and behoof of the said Thomas his Heirs and Assigns for ever The Tenor of which Indenture followeth in these words This Indenture made the 9th day of May in the 9th year of the Reign of our Soveraign Lord JAMES by the Grace of God King of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. and of Scotland the 44th Between the Right Honourable Thomas Earl of Suffolk Lord Chamberlain of the Kings Majesties most Honourable Houshold The Right Honourable Theophilus Lord Howard Son and Heir apparant of the said Earl of Suffolk The Right Honourable Thomas Earl of Arundel and Surrey and the Right Honourable William Lord Howard of Naward in the County of Cumberland of the one part and Thomas Sutton of Balsham in the County of Cambridge Esquire on the other part Witnesseth That the said Right Right Honourable Thomas Earl of Suffolk Theophilus Lord Howard Thomas Earl of Arundel and Surrey and William Lord Howard for and in consideration of the sum of 13000. p. of good and lawful Mony of England to the said Thomas Earl of Suffolk in Hand paid before the ensealing and delivery of these presents by the said Thomas Sutton well and truly satisfied contented and paid whereof and wherewith they and every of them acknowledge themselves fully satisfied contented and paid and thereof and every part and parcel thereof do clearly acquit exonerate and discharge the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs Executors and Administators and every of them by these presents Have granted Aliened Bargained Sold Conveied and Confirmed And by these presents do for them and their Heirs fully clearly and absolutely grant alien bargain fell convey and confirm unto the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs and Assigns for ever All that Capital Messuage or Mansion-house commonly called or known by the name of Howard House otherwise called The late dissolved Charter-Houso besides Smithfied situate and being within the County of Middles with all and singular the Rights Members and Appurtenances thereunto belonging and appertaining And all that Orchard and Garden with the Appurtenances thereunto likewise belonging and appertaining and all that parcel of Land and Ground with the Appurtenances commonly called Pardon Church yard And all those two Messuages or Tenement and two Closes of Land and Ground with the Appurtenances thereunto adjoyning commonly called Welbech situate lying and being in the said County of Middlesex And also all and singular Messuages Houses Edifices Buildings Barns Stables Dove-houses Courts Folds Curtilags Yards Orchards Gardens Shops Sellars Sollers Closes Inclosures Waste Grounds Tithes Oblations Obventions Fruits Profits Alterages Wayes Waters Rents Reversions Services Waises Strayes Goods of Felons Outlaws and Fugitives and all other Franchises Liberties Priviledges Jurisdictions Profits Emoluments Commodities Hereditaments and Appurtenances whatsoever by what name or names soever they be called or known to the said Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called Howard House or the late dissolved Charter-House besides Smith-field and other the before mentioned premises and in every or any of them lying belonging or in any wise appertaining or to or with the same every or any of them usually held occupied or enjoyed or accepted or reputed taken known demised used or letten as part parcel or Member of them or any of them and also the Reversion and Reversions Remainder and Remainders whatsoever of all and singular the premises with the Appurtenances And all Rents and yeerly Profits whatsoever reserved upon any Demise Lease Estate or Grant Demises Leases Estates or Grants heretofore made or granted of the before mentioned premises or any part or parcel thereof And also all the Estate Right Title Interest Use Possession Reversion Remainder Claim and Demand whatsoever of them the said Thomas Earl of Suffolk Theophilus Lord Howard Thomas earl of Arundel and Surrey and of William Lord Howard and of every of them of in or into the said Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called Howard House or the late dissolved Charter-House besides Smith-field and other the before mentioned premises or of in or to every or any part or parcel hereof And further the said Right Honourable Thomas Earl of Suffolk Theophilus Lord Howard Thomas Earl of Arundel and Surrey and VVilliam Lord Howard for the considerations aforesaid Have Granted Bargained Sold and by these presents do grant bargain and sell unto the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs and Assigns for ever All and every the Deeds Charters Evidences Writings Counterpains of Lease and Leases Indentures Exemplifications Letters Patents Transcrips of Fines and Recoveries Terrers Court Rolls Surveis Presentments Boundaries Escripts and Minuments whatsoever touching or in any wise only concerning the said Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called Howard H. or the late dissolved Charter-H besides Smith-f To have to hold the said Houses Buildings Orchards Gardens Closes Inclosures Tenements Hereditaments and all other the premises before or in or by these presents bargained and sold or mentioned intended or meant to be bargained and sold and every part and parcel thereof with their Appurtenances unto the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs and Assigns for ever to the sole only and proper use and behoof of him the said Thomas his Heirs and Assigns for ever more absolutely without any manner of Condition Redemption or Revovation in any wise And the said Thomas Earl of Suffolk his Heirs and the said Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called Howard House or the Charter-House and all and singular other the before mentioned premises with all their and every of their Appurtenances and every part and parcel thereof unto the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs and Assigns for ever in manner and form aforesaid against him the said Thomas Earl of Suffolk and his Heirs and all and every other person or persons claiming by from or under him shall and will warrant and for ever more defend by these presents And the said Theophilus Lord Howard his Heirs the said Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called Howard House or the Charter-House and all and singular other the before mentioned premises and every part thereof with the apputenances unto the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs and Assigns for ever in manner and form aforesaid against him the said Theophilus Lord Howard and his Heirs and all and every other person and persons lawfully claiming by from or under him shall and will warrant and for evermore defend by these presents And the said Thomas Earl of Arundel and Surrey and his Heirs the said Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called Howard House
year of our Lord 1595 above said in the University aforesaid at Cambridge aforesaid in the County of Cambridge was duly and lawfully ordained and made a Graduate of â—â—e University aforesaid that is to say Doctor in Physick according to the Lawes Statutes Constitutions and ordinances of the said University of Cambridge aforesaid and that he the said Thomas Bonham then and there had accomplished all things concerning his Degree aforesaid by his form without grace from time to time according to the Lawes Statutes Constitutions and Ordinances of the said University of Cambridge aforesaid By colour whereof the same Thomas Bonham a Graduate of the University of Cambridge aforesaid that is to say being Doctor in Physick in the form aforesaid who had accomplished all things concerning his Degree aforesaid for his form without any grace The said faculty of Physick from time to time in the said City of London that is to say in the aforesaid Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap aforesaid did exercise as it was lawful for him to do until the aforesaid Henry Atkins George Turner Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden together with c. the aforesaid 10th day of November in the 4th yeer abovesaid with force and Arms him the said Thomas Bonham at London aforesaid in the aforesaid Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap took and imprisoned and him there in Prison long that is to say by the space of 7. dayes against the Law and Custom of this Kingdom of England did detain as the aforesaid Thomas Bonham above against them complaineth and this he is ready to averr Whereupon in as much as the aforesaid Henry Atkins George Turner Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden the Trespasse and Imprisonment aforesaid above have acknowledged The said Thomas Bonham demandeth Judgement and his damages by reason of the Trespasse and Imprisonment aforesaid to be adjudged unto him c. And the aforesaid Henry Atkins George Turner Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden say That the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid Thomas Bonham above by Replication pleaded is not sufficient in Law to the Action of the aforesaid Thomas Bonham against them the said Henry Atkins George Turner Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden to maintain and that they to that Plea in manner and form aforesaid by Replication pleaded need not nor by the Law of the Land are bound to answer and this they are ready to averr whereupon they demand Judgement and that the said Thomas Bonham from having his Action aforesaid against them to be barred And the aforesaid Thomas Bonham for as much as he sufficient matter in Law to maintain his Action aforesaid against the said Henry Atkins George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden above hath alleged which he is ready to aver which matter the aforesaid Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden do not deny nor to the same any wayes answer but the same averment altogether to admit do refuse as at first he demands Judgement and his damages by occasion of the Trespasse and Imprisonment aforesaid to be adjudged to him c. And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises aforesaid whereof the parties have put themselves to the Judgement of the Court aforesaid before that they give their Judgement thereof Day is given to the parties here until in 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here are not yet c. Formedon Michaelmass Term Anno 37. 38. Eliz. Rot. 82. in the COMMON PLEAS Lincoln College Case C. 3. part fol. 53. a. Robert Chamberlain Esq by Apollo Plain his Attorny demandeth against the Warden or Rector and Scholars of the Blessed Lady Mary and All Saints of Lincoln in the University of Oxford the Mannors of Pettesho and Eckney with the appurtenances Except 120. Acres of Pasture in Pettesho aforesaid and 30. Acres of Pasture in Eckney aforesaid which Alured Cornburgh Esq Richard Danvers Esq Nicholas Statham and William Callow gave to Richard Chamberlain Esq and Sibil Fowler and the Heirs Males of the Body of the said Richard Chamberlain begotten And which after the death of the aforesaid Richard and Sibil and of Edward Son and Heir of the said Edward Chamberlain and of Leonard Son and Heir of the said Edward and of Francis Son and Heir of the said Leonard to the aforesaid Robert Son and Heir of the aforesaid Francis ought to descend by the form of the gift aforesaid c. Whereupon he saith That the aforesaid Alured Connâ—burgh Richard Danâ—â—rs Nicholas and William gave the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain and Sibil and to the Heirs Males of the Body of the said Richard Chamberlain begotten in form aforesaid c. By which gift the said Richard and Sibil were seised of the said Mannors with the appurtenances that is to say the said Richard in his Demesn as of Fee and Right and the said Sibil in her Demesn as of Free hold by the form c. in the time of peace in the time of the Lord Ed. late King of England the 4th after the Conquest taking thereof the profits to the yeerly value c. And from him the said Richard the Right descended by the form to one Edward as Son and Heir c. And from him the said Edward the Right descended by the form c. to one Leonard as Son and Heir c. And from him the said Leonard the Right descended by the form c. to one Francis as Son and Heir c. And from the said Fran. Son of the said Leonard the Right descended by the form c. to this Robert who now demandeth as Son and Heir c. And which after the death c. And thereof bringeth Sute c. And the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars by William Pain their Attorny come and defend their Right when c. And say That the aforesaid Robert Chamberlain his Action aforesaid against them ought not to have By protestation taking it That the aforesaid Alured Cornburgh Richard Danvers Nicholas Stathum and William Collow did not give the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain and Sibil Fowler in manner and form as in the Declaration aforesaid is alleged For Plea say That long after the time in which the gift aforesaid is supposed to be made Richard Lyster Gent. Martin Linsey John Cotesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor Clerks were seised of the Mannors aforesaid with th appurtenances in their Demesn as of Fee and so being thereof seised The aforesaid Sibil Great-Grandmother of the said Robert Chamberlain whose Heir the same Robert is The 5th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord Henry late King of England
the said Edward then being Tenant of the Freehold of the said Mannors with the appurtenances By which Writ the said late King commanded the said Sherif That the said Sherif should command the said Edward Chamberlain by the name of Edward Chamberlain Esquire that justly and without delay he render to the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop Clerk The Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other by the names of the Mannors of Pettesho and Eckney with the appurtenances and of 6. Messuages 200. Acres of Land 20. Acres of Meadow 200. Acres of Pasture and 100. shillings of Rent with the appurtenances in Pettesho Eckney and Emberton which the said Nicholas and Thomas then claimed to be their Right and Inheritance and into which the said Edward Chamberlain had not entry but after the disseisin which Hugh Hunt thereof unjustly and without Judgement did to the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop after the first passage of the Lord King Henry Son of King John into Gascoign as they said and whereupon they complained the said Edward Chamberlain did them disseise And if the aforesaid Nicholas and Thomas Hartop secure him the said Sherif to prosecute their Claim Then he summon by good summoners the aforesaid Edward Chamberlain that he should be before the Justices of the said late King Henry the 8th here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid in the Morrow of St. John the Baptist then next following to shew why he did not do it And that he have then here the summons and that Writ At which Morrow of St. John the Baptist before Robert Read Kt. and his Companions then Justices of the said late King Henry the 8th of the Bench here that is to say at VVestminster aforesaid came aswell the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop by John Cowper then their Attorny as the aforesaid Edward Chamberlain by Thomas Palmer then his Attorny And the Sherif that is to say Ralph Verney Esq then returned here the Writ aforesaid in all things served and executed that is to say that the aforesaid Nicholas and Thomas found to the then Sherif sureties to prosecute his Sute aforesaid that is to say John Doo and Richard Roo And that the aforesaid Edward Chamberlain was summoned by John Den and Richard Fen And upon this the said Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop by declaring against the said Edward Chamberlain upon the Writ aforesaid Demanded against the said Edward Chamberlain The Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances as their Right and Inheritance and in which the said Edward Chamberlain had not Entry but after the first passage of the Lord King Henry Son of King John into Gascoign c. And whereupon then they said that they themselves were seised of the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid in their Demesn as of Fee and Right in the time of Peace in the time of the said late King Henry the 8th taking thereof the Profits to the value c. And unto which c. And thereof then they brought sute c. And the aforesaid Edward Chamberlain by the aforesaid Thomas Palmer his Attorny then defended his right when c. And then vouched thereof to warranty Thomas Fish who was then present in Court in his proper person and willingly the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid to him did warrant and thereupon the said Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop demanded against him the said Thomas Fish then Tenant by his Warranty The Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in form aforesaid c. And whereupon they then said That they were sâ—ised of the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other things in their Demesn as of Fee and Right in the time of Peace in the time of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th taking the profits thereof to the value c. And the aforesaid Thomas Fish Tenant by his Warranty aforesaid then defended his Right when c. And then prayed licence thereof to imparl and had it c. And afterwards the very same Term the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop returned back here into the Court aforesaid of the said late King Henry the 8th by their Attorny aforesaid and the aforesaid Thomas Fish Tenant by his warranty aforesaid did not come back but in despite of Court departed and made default Therefore then it was granted by the aforesaid Court here That the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop should recover their seisin against the said Edward Chamberlain of the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances and that the said Edward should have of the Lands of the aforesaid Thomas Fish to the value and that the said Thomas Fish should be in mercy c. as by the Record and Processe thereof here in Court remaining more fully appeareth Which Recovery in form aforesaid had was had to the use and to the intent That the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop of the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances should enfeoff the aforesaid Richard Lyster Martiâ— John Cottesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor To have and to hold to them and their Heirs for ever By Colour of which Recovery The aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop into the Mannors aforesaid with their appurtenances entred and were thereof seised in their Demesn as Fee and so being thereof seised The said Nicholas and Thomas Hartop of the said Mannors with the appurtenances did 〈…〉 off the aforesaid Richard Lyster Martin Liâ—sâ—y John Cottesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor To have and to hold to them and their Heirs for ever By virtue of which Fâ—â—ffment the said Richard Lyster Martin John Cottesford John Clayton VVilliam Hogeson and Robert Taylor were seised of the same Mannors with the appurtenances in their Demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seised The aforesaid Sibil in the life of the said Edw. for the better security of the said Richard Lyster Martin John Cottesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor in the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances according to Agreement between the same Edward and Sibil first before the aforesaid Recovery had by her Writing aforesaid of Release Remised and Released to the aforesaid Richard Lyster Martin John Cottesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor all her Right Claim Title State Use Interest and demand of and in the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances in 〈…〉 ner and form as they above have alleged And this they are ready to aver Whereupon they demand Judgement And that the said Robert Chamberlain from having his Action aforesaid against them â—e baâ—â—ed And the aforesaid Robert Chamberlain â—y Protestation taking it That the Recovery aforesaid was not had to the use and intent That the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop should infeoff the said Richard Lyster Martin John Cottesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor of the Mannors aforesaid with the Appurtenances By Protestation also that
is to say to him and the Heirs Males of his Body issuing the Reversion thereof to the aforesaid Countess sometimes Wife of the aforesaid Richard Earl of Warwick and the Heirs of the said Countess expectant And the said late King so thereof being seized and the Reveâ—sion thereof to the said Countess in form aforesaid expectant The said Countess afterwards and before the time aforesaid in which c. At Abbotâ—sley othewise Abberly in the aforesaid County of Worcester dyed so as before is said of the Reversion aforesaid seized After whose death the Reversion aforesaid with the appurtenances descended to one Edward Earl of Warwick as Cousin and Heir of the said Countess that is to say Son and Heir of Isabel Daughter of the said Countess By which the said Earl was seized of the Reversion of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. as of Fee and Right And the said Edward Earl of Warwick so thereof being seized By an Act in Parliament of the said late King holden at Westminster the aforesaid 25th Day of January in the Yeer of his Reign the 19th amongst other things It was Enacted by him the said late King by the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in the said Parliament assembled and by the Authority thereof That whereas Peter Warbeck with others of the aforesaid late Kings Rebellious Enemies and Traytors in a great multitude and number to him associated entred and arrived in this Kingdom in a certain place called VVhitessonbay in the Parish of St. Bercie in the County of Cornwall the 7th day of September in the Yeer of the Reign of the said late King the 13th and levied Warr against the aforesaid late King Notwithstanding the aforesaid Peter in his Journey and issue to the said false and malicious purpose was overthrown and was taken and by the same late King committed to the Prison of the Tower of London where and in which place the aforesaid Edward Earl of Warwick confederated with the aforesaid Peter imagining and intending falsely and trayterously the death and destruction of the said late King and the overthrowing of this Kingdom of England intending to make the aforesaid Peter King of the same Kingdom by divers devises amongst them conceived and inspired endeavoured with divers his Adherents speedily by diverse false Messages and Notes to set him at liberty and at large to the intent to Execute his false and Trayterous purpose to aid and assist him to his utmost endeavour for which the aforesaid Edward Earl of VVarwick by due course of Law of the said late King out of his own Confession was convicted and attainted of High Treason as his deserts in that behalf required That the said Earl for his offences aforesaid by Authority of Parliament aforesaid should be convicted adjudged and attainted of High Treason And that he should forfeit to the aforesaid late King and his Heirs All his Honours Castles Mannors Lordships Hundreds Franchises Liberties Privileges Advowsons Nominations Presentations Rights Fees Tenements Rents Services Reversions Remainders Portions Annuities Pensions Rights Possessions Hereditaments Goods Chattels and Debts whereof the said Earl or any other to his use was seized or possessed of the day of the Treason either committed or done or at any time after within the Kingdom of England Ireland VVales Calice or the Counties thereof in Fee simple Fee tail for Term of life or lives Or in which the said Earl then or at any time after had lawful cause of Entry within England Ireland Wales Calis or the Counties of them And further that the aforesaid Edward Earl of VVarwick should forfeit to the said late King and his Heirs All Honours Castles Mannors Lordships Hundreds Franchises Liberties Privileges Advowsons Nominations Presentations Rights Fees Lands Tenements Rents Services Reversions Remainders Portions Annuities Pensions Rights Possessions Hereditaments Goods Chattels and Debts whereof the said Earl or any other person seized to his use or was possessed of the second day of August in the Yeer of the Reign of the aforesaid late King the 14th or at any time then after as by the said Act amongst other things more fully appeareth And the said Richard saith That the aforesaid Edward Earl of VVarwick Cousin and Heir of the said Ann Countess of VVarwick in the Fine aforesaid named and the aforesaid Edward Earl of VVarwick in form aforesaid attainted and in the Act aforesaid named are one and the same person and not other or diverse By colour of which Conviction and Attainder and by force of the aforesaid Act of Parliament The aforesaid late King Henry the 7th was seized of the Reversion of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. as of Fee and of Right in the Right of his Crown of England And so thereof being seized and of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee tail in form aforesaid being seized The said late Lord the King afterwards and before the aforesaid time in which c. At VVestminster aforesaid dyed of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. And of the Reversion aforesaid in form aforesaid seized After whose death the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. and the Reversion aforesaid discended to the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th as Son and Heir of the aforesaid late King Henry the 7th By which the said late King Henry the 8th was seized of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in his demesn as of Fee tail that is to say to him and the Heirs Males of his Body issuing and of the Reversion of the said Mannor with the appurtenaÌ„ces as of fee right And the said late King Hen. the 8th so being thereof seized By a certain Inquisition taken at the Castle â—â— VVorcester in the aforesaid County of VVorcester the 5th day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th the 23th before Roger VVinter Esquire then Escheator of the said late King the same County by virtue of his Office by the Oathes of Richard Frier Gent. Richard â—helton Gent. VVilliam Andrewes Gent. Richard Dedick Gent. Richard Hill of Leigh Edward Enolt Henry Dison Roger â—bud Henry VVoodward John Porter of Claynes John Brodford VValter Solli Roger Aldern of Martley and Richard VValter taken It was found amongst other things That the aforesaid Ann Countess of VVarwick in the Fine aforesaid named was seized of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in her Demesn as of Fee and that she being thereof so seized the Fine aforesaid in form aforesaid was levied By which the aforesaid King Henry the 7th was seized of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in his Demesn as of Fee tail that is to say to him and the Heirs Males of his Body issuing And that the said Countess was seised of the Reversion of the said Mannor as of Fee and
Westminster aforesaid dyed of such his Estate thereof seised After whose death The Reversion of the aforesaid Manor of Abbottesley with the Appurtenances whereof c. descended to the Lord Edward late King of England the 6th as Son and Heir of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8 th By which The said late King Edward the 6 th was seised of the Reversion of the said Manor with the Appurtenances as of Fee and right and so thereof being seised The said late King Edward the 6 th afterwards and before the time in which c. at Westminster afores dyed of such his estate therof seised with out issue of his body issuing After whose death the Reversion of the aforesaid Manor of Abbottesly with the appurtenances descended to the Lady Mary late Queen of England as Sister and Heir of the said late King Edward the 6 th By which the said late Queen Mary was seised of the said Reversion as of Fee and right and so thereof being seised the said late Queen Mary afterwards and before the time in which c. at Westminster aforesaid dyed of such her Estate thereof seised without issue of her body issuing After whose death the said Reversion did descend to the said Lady the Queen that now is as Sister and Heir of the aforesaid late Queen Mary By which the said Queen that now is was seised of the said Reversion as of Fee and right and the said Lady the Queen that now is so thereof being seised and the aforesaid Walter Walsh the Son of the aforesaid Manor of Abbottesley whereof c. in his demesn as of Fee tail in form aforesaid being seised The said Walter afterwards and before the time in which c. at Abbottesley aforesaid dyed of such his Estate thereof seised After whose death The said Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. did descend to one William Walsh his Son as Son and Heir of the body of the aforesaid Walter VValsh the Son issuing By which the said William afterwards and before the time in which into the said Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Fee tail that is to say to him and the Heirs Males of his body issuing and so thereof being seised The said William afterwards that is to say the third day of July in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30 th at Abbottesley aforesaid by his Indenture of Bargain and Sale between Robert then Earl of Leicester By the name of the Right Honourable Robert Earl of Leicester Baron of Denbigh of the both most Noble Orders of the Garter and Saint Michael Knight Lord High Steward of her Majesties Houshold Lord Chief Justice of Oyer and Terminer of all the Forests of her Majestie and Chaces by South Trent and one of her Majesties most Honourable Privy Councel of the one Part And the afores Willi. Walsh by the name of Will. Wash of Witley in the County of Worcester Esq of the other party made afterwards the 8 th day of the said Month of July according to the form of the Statute in that Case made and provided in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster aforesaid in the said County of Middlesex then being in due manner of Record Inrolled One part of which Sealed with the Seal of the said William Walsh the said Richard Bushopp here in Court sheweth forth whose Date is the same third day of July in the 30th year aforesaid For and in consideration of a certain sum of Money to the said VVilliam by the aforesaid Earl of Leicester then and there before had paid bargained and sold to the said Earl of Leicester The Wood aforesaid with the Appurtenances in which c. To have and to hold to the said Earl of Leicester his Heirs and Assigns for ever By colour of which aforesaid Bargain and Sale and Inrolment thereof The said Earl of Leicester into the Wood aforesaid with the Appurtenances entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seised The said Earl of Leicester afterwards that is to say the 5 th day of Septemb. in the year of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th aforesaid at Abbottesley aforesaid dyed of such his Estate thereof seised without issue of his body issuing After whose death the Wood aforesaid with the appurtenances descended to Ambrose then Earl of Warwick as Brother and Heir of the aforesaid late Earl of Warwick By which The said Ambrose Earl of Warwick into the Wood aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Fee and so thereoâ— being seised The said Ambrose Earl of Warwick afterwards that is to say the 24th day of January in the year of the Reign of the â—â—d Lady the Queen that now is the 32th at Abbottesley aforesaid By his Indenture between him the said Ambrose Earl of Warwick by the name of the Right Honourable Ambrose Earl of Warwick of the most Noble Order of the Garter Knight of the one part and Edward then Earl of Bedford and William Russel Knight Charles Morrison Knight Ambrose Copinger Esquire by the names of the Right Honourable Edward Earl of Bedford William Russell Knight Charles Morri on Knight Ambrose Copinger Esq one part of wch sealed with the Seal of the said Aâ—brose Earl of Warwick the said Richard Eushop here in Court brings whoâ—e date is the same day and year For and in consideration of the natural entire and cordial love and affection which the aforesaid Ambrose Earl of Warwick then had and bore to his most dear and beloved then wife the said Ann Countess of â—arwick in the Information aforesaid above named Daughter of the Right Honourable Francis Earl of Bedford deceased Grandfather of the said Edward then Earl of Bedford and Father of the said William Russel as for and in consideration of a Mariage before that time had between the aforesaid Ambrose then Earl of Warwick and the aforesaid Lady Ann now Countess of Warwick then his wiâ—e and for and in consideration of the encrease of the Joynture of the said Ann before that time made in the respect of the aforesaid Mariage in consideration also of the better advancing of the said Ann after the death of the said Ambrose then Earl of Warwick if shee the said her beloved husband should survive to support and sustein her Honourable Estate and to pay such debts which the said Earl owed at the time of his death and also such Legacies as the said Earl by his last Will in writing should bequeath The said Earl Covenanted and agreed for him his Heirs Executors and Administrators to and with the aforesaid Edward Earl of Bedford William Russell Charles Morrison and Ambrose Copinger their Heirs and Assignes and every of them That immediatly from and after the Sealing and delivery of the
use thereof in the abovesaid Fine in form abovesaid to be levyed and acknowleged before by this Indenture not limited or appointed the Rent of 10 quarters of Barley only except to be to the only use and behoof of the said Christopher Digges his Heirs and Assignes for ever and to no other use or uses purpose or intent and that the said Fine or use and execution thereof as to the abovesaid 10 Quarters of Bâ—rley to be to the only use and behoof of the abovesaid Richard Gaunt and his Heirs for ever In witness whereof the parties abovesaid to these present Indentures their Seals enterchangeably have set dated the day and yeer first above wriâ—ten And the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father so as afore is said of the Manors Messuages Lands Tenements and Hereditaments aforesaid with the appurtenances in the Monstrans de droiâ— within written specified as the Law requireth being seised Afterwards and before the bringing of the Monstrans de droit within written that is to say from the day of Saint Martin within writen in 15 dayes in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 14th abovesaid A Fine was levyed in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster in the County of Middleâ—ex before James Dyer Richard Weston John Welsh and Richard Harper then Justices and afterwards in 8 dayes of Saint Hillary in the yeer of the same Lady the Queen that now is the 14th abovesaid there then granted and recorded before the said Justices and oâ—hers of the Queens faithfull people then and there present between the aforesaid Richard Gaunt Gentleman and Lawrence Applegate plaintiâ—s and the aforesaid Christopher Digges and Martha his Wife deforceants of the Manors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments in the Monstrans de droit within written with the appurtenances amongst other by the names of the Manors of Owtelmestone Mayton Nackington and Yokes Court with the appurtenances and 40 Messuages 20 Tofts one Mil 3 Dovehouses 20 Gardens 12 Orchards 1000 Acres of Land 100 Acres of Meadow 700 Acres of Pasture 600 Acres of Wood 100 Acres of Furze and Heath and 100 shillings of Rent and the Rent of 10 Quarters of Barley with the appurtenances in Barham Kingstone Bishopsborn Bridge Patricksborne Littleborne Wellborne Sturrey Saint Stephens Nackington Netherherds Lenham Harisham Frinsted Sutton Ripple and Shalden whereupon a plea of Covenant then was summoned between them in the said Court That the aforesaid Christopher Digges and Martha do acknowlege the aforesaid Manors and Rents with the appurtenances to be the Right of the said Richard and those which the said Richard and Lawrence then had of the gift of the aforesaid Christopher and Martha and these then remised and quit claimed from them the said Christopher and Martha their Heirs to the aforesaid Richard and Lawrence and the Heirs of the the said Richard for ever and moreover the said Christopher and Martha then had granted for them Heirs the of the said Christopher that they warrant to the aforesaid Richard and Lawrence and the Heirs of the said Richard the aforesaid Manors Tenements and Rents with the appurtenances against all men for ever and for this Recognition Release Quit claim warranty Fine and Concord the said Richard and Lawrence gave to the aforesaid Christopher and Martha 8 pound Sterling which Fine was levied with proclamations according to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided And further the Jurors say upon their oath aforesaid that the aforesaid Fine in form aforesaid levyed was had and levyed to the uses and intents in the Indenture aforesaid bearing date the 26th day of October in yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 14th as abovesaid above specified By colour of which Fine Indenture and Statute aforesaid the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father was seised of the Manors Tenements and Hereditaments aforesaid with the appurtenances as the Law requireth And the Jurors aforesaid further say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father so as before is said of the Manors and Tenements above written as the Law requireth being seised the said Christopher Digges the Father and the aforesaid John Brook Richard Brook and Richard Horewood afterwards that is to say the 7th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 14th came into the Court of the said Lady the Queen of her Chancery and then and there acknowleged the Indenture aforesaid bearing date the 20th day of September in the 13th yeer aforesaid to be their deed and upon that the said Indenture afterwards that is to say the 7th day of November in the 14 yeer aforesaid in the said Court of Chancery in due Maner of Record was Inrolled By virtue of which and force of the Statute aforesaid the said Christopher Digges the Father was of the Manors Lands and Tenements within written seised as the same Law requireth and so thereof being seised the said Christo Digges the Father afterwards and before the day of the bringing of the shewing of right within written that is to say the first day of February in the yeer of our Lord 1576 and in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 19th made his Testament and last Will in writing of which said Testament and last Will the Tenor amongst other followeth in these Words In the Name of God Amen The first day of February in the yeer of our Lord God 1576 and in the 19th yeer of the Reign of our Sovereign Lady Elizabeth by the grace of God Queen of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. I Christopher Digges of Saint Gregories without the Walls of the City of Canterbury Esquire Son and Heir of William Digges late of Barham in the County of Kent deceased being sick in body but of good and perfect remembrance thanked be the Almighty God Revoking and making void all other my former wills ordayn and make this my present Testament and last Will in manner and form following That is to say this is the last Will of me the abovesaid Christopher Digges made the day and yeer abovesaid touching the disposition of all my Lands Tenements and Hereditaments in the County of Kent and Canterbury or elsewhere in the Realm of England First touching the thirds and third part of my Land to be due unto the Queens Majesty or any other for Wardship Primer seisin Livery or otherwise my Will and meaning is to leave to descend to Thomas Digges my Son to have and to hold to him and his Heirs for ever All these my Lands and Tenements called or known by the name of Eastendown containing by estimation 10 Acres of Land and all these Lands Tenements Hereditaments which I had by descent after the death of Thomas Digges of Newington next Sittingborn Esquire deceased and if the
from the day of Easter in 15. dayes under his Seal c. And the Seals c. At which day here cometh the aforesaid Iohn Hunt by his Attorney aforesaid And upon this The same Iohn Hunt acknowledgeth here in the Court here that he would not further prosecute the same Thomas Gateley for any damages to him for the occasion of the taking and unjustly deteining of the Cattel aforesaid to be adjudged but all the said damages to him so to be adjudged willingly here in Court to the said Thomas Gateley doth remise and release Therefore the said Thomas Gateley of those damages be acquitted c. REPLEVIN Trinity Term Anno 36. Eliz. Rot. 1676. in the Common Pleas C. 1. part Archers Case Fol. 65. IOhn Smith Gent. was summoned to Answer to William Baldwin of a Plea wherefore he took the Cattel of the said William and them unjustly detained Essex against Gages and Pledges c. And whereupon The said William by Isaac Hamond his Attorney complaineth That the aforesaid John the 9th of January in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 36th at Bocking in a certain place called the Meadow abutting upon the Common High-way leading from Braintree unto Pantforld in the County aforesaid against the North-East and upon the Lands of John Mott towards the South West took Cattel that is to say 26. Sheep of him the said William and them unjustly deteined against Gages and Pledges untill c. Whereupon he saith he is the worse and hath loss to the value of 40. pound and thereof he bringeth sute c. And the aforesaid John by Tho. Reynolds his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and Injury when c. And as Bayliff of Joh. Kent gent. Son of Joh. Kent gent. deceased well acknowledgeth the taking of the Cattel aforesa in the place aforesa in which c. and justly c. Because he saith That the same place in which it is supposed the taking the Cattel aforesaid above to be done conteineth in it self 4. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in Bocking aforesaid which 4. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances at the time aforesaid in which c. Was the Soil and Freehold of the said John Kent the Son and because the Cattel aforesaid the time aforesaid in which c. were in the same then eating the grass and doing damage there The said John Smith as Bayliff of the aforesaid John Kent the Son doth well acknowledge the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the place aforesaid in which c. and justly there so damage feisant c. And the aforesaid William Baldwin saith That the said John Smith as Bayliff of the said Iohn Kent the Son for the reason before alleged ought not to make Conusance of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid to be just Because he saith That long before the said taking aforesaid had One Iohn Archer Gent. was seised of the aforesaid 4. Acres of Pasture with their appurtenances in which c. in his demesn as of Fee and he the said Iohn being thereof so seised before the aforesaid time of the taking aforesaid done that is to say the 8th day of January in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 36th aforesaid gave license unto the said William to put his Cattel aforesaid into the aforesaid place in which c. to eat the grass there growing By vertue of which license the said William afterwards that is to say the said aforesaid 9th day of Ianuary in the 36th year aforesaid put his Cattel aforesaid in the place in which c. to eat the grass there growing which Cattel were in the said place in which c. eating the grass then growing in the same untill the said Iohn Smith the aforesaid 9th day of Ianuary in the year of the Lady the Queen that now is the 36th aforesaid at Bocking aforesaid in the aforesaid place called the Meadow took the Cattel aforesaid of him the said William and them unjustly deteined against Gages and Pledges untill c. As he above him complaineth without that that the aforesaid 4. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. the time of the taking aforesaid done was the Soil and Freehold of the said John Kent the Son as the said William above hath alleged And this he is ready to aver Wherefore in as much as the said John Smith acknowlegeth the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which The said William demands Judgement and his damages for the occasion of the taking and unjustly detaining of the same Cattel to be adjudged to him c. And the aforesaid John Smith as at first saith That the aforesaid 4. Acres of Pasture with their appurtenances in which c the time aforesaid in which c. were the Soil Freehold of the said J. Kent the Son as he before hath alleged And of this puts himself upon the Country and the said VVilliam Baldwin likewise And therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he cause to come here from the day of Holy Trinity in 3. Weeks 12. c. by whom c. and who neither c. to Recognize c. Because as well c. And afterwards the Process was continued between the aforesaid parties of the aforesaid Plea by juries put between them in respite here until this day that is to say from Easter-day in three Weeks in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 37th And now here at this day cometh as well the aforesaid William as the aforesaid John Smith by their Attornies aforesaid and the Jurors thereof impannelled being called likewise come who to say the truth of the premises chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That one Francis Archer was seized of the said 4. Acres of Pasture with their appurtenances in which c. in his demesn as of Fee and held the same of one Thomas Wilson as his Manor of in the County aforesaid in Free Socage and that the said Francis Archer had issue one Robert Archer which Robert had then issue the aforesaid John Archer the Son and his Right and next Heir apparant Which aforesaid Francis Archer so of the aforesaid 4. acres of Pasture with the appurtenances being seized before the time in which c. that is to say the 25th day of November in the yeer of our Lord 1578. made his last Will and Testament in Writing and by the same his last Will Willed and Bequeathed the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other things as followeth Item I give and bequeath to Robert Archer my Son All that my Messuage or Tenement with the appurtenances called the Grey-hound with all and singular the Lands and Grounds which and whatsoever I had purchased and bought of one John Palmer as they are set lying and being in Bocking aforesaid To have and to hold the said
the proper Hands of diverse of the Lords of his Privy Council sealed That none nor any person w 〈…〉 soever should kill or put to sale any Flesh for Victuals in the time of Lent then next following contrary to the Lawes and Statutes of this Realm And that all Mayors and other Head Officers in Burroughs and Towns Corporate within this Kingdom of England in the beginning of the time of Lent then next coming or before should cause all Victualers Inn Keepers Keepers of Ordinary Tables and Alehouse-keepers within the precinct of their Jurisdiction to be bounden to the Lord the King by Bond that they should not dâ—esse any Flesh for Vâ—ctuals all the said time of Lent then next following And whereas afterwards that is to say the 20th day of February in the 12th yeer aforesaid One John Clement then and yet Mayor of the Burrough of Plymouth aforesaid according to the duty of his Place and in Obedience of the said Ordinance and Command of the said Lord the King sent to all the Victualers Inn-Keepers Keepers of Ordinary Tables and Alehouse-keepers aforesaid within the precinct of the Burough aforesaid that they become bound by their Writing to the use of the said Lord the King according to the Tenor and Exigency of the aforesaid Ordinance and Command of the saâ—d Lord the King the due Execution of the Ordinance aforesaid in that behalf required and endeavored within the Burrough aforesaid The aforesaid James Bagg well knowing the premises and continuing his evil disposition and intent aforesaid At Plymouth aforesaid endeavoured and attempted to hinder and make void the due Execution of the aforesaid Ordinance and Command of the said Lord the King And to that purpose the same 20th day of February at Plymouth aforesaid to diverse Inhabitants of the Burrough aforesaid and other of the Kings leige People then being and having then and there speech with the aforesaid James Bagg of and upon the businesse aforesaid openly and publickly spake and uttered these words following that is to say Master Mayor meaning the said John Clement doth more herein than he need and more than he can well Answer Meaning that the said John Clement in requiring the aforesaid Victualers Inn-Keepers Keepers of Ordinary Tables and Alehouse-Keepers to become bounden to the use of the said Lord the King according to the aforesaid Ordinance and Command of the said Lord the King had done more than was needful and more than he could well Answer By reason of which speech diverse Victualers Inn Keepers Keepers of Ordinary Tables and Alehouse Keepers dwelling within the aforesaid Burrough utterly refused to be bounden to the said Lord the King according to the aforesaid Ordinance and Command of the said Lord the King and farther we certifie that the aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty of the Burrough of Plymouth and their predecessors time whereof the memory of men is not to the contrary had and used to have within the Burrough aforesaid a certain Custom of Wine called Wine-weight otherwise Wine Wite payable by every Taverner selling Wine within the Burrough afores of which Custom of Wine aforesaid the Mayor and Comminalty from the whole time aforesaid quietly and peaceably were possessed of until the aforesaid Ja. Bagg the 29th day of Nov. in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 4th at â—lym afores perfidiously maliciously practised with William Benâ—ly and Thomas Lyde being Taverners and Sellers of Wine within the Burrough aforesaid to them revealing divers secret counsels concerning the common profit of the Burrough aforesaid and them the said William and Thomas then and there perswaded that they no more should pay the aforesaid custom of wine called Wine-weight otherwise Wine-wite nor any summ of money for the same to the aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty which very day the 29th day of November in the 4th yeer aforesaid the aforesaid James Bagg being then one of the 12. Chief Burgesses of common Council of the Burrough aforesaid at Plymouth aforesaid perfidiously and maliciously spake to the said William Bently and Thomas Lyde these words that is to say you need not pay the Money meaning a certain Farm by them the said William and Thomas for the Custom aforesaid before then to â—he aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty payable for the Wine-weight any longer except you list for it is not due unto them By reason of which perfidious and malicious words the aforesaid William Bently and Thomas Lyde utterly refused to pay and yet do refuse and by reason thereof diverse Strifes and Controversies are risen and hereafter are like to arise betwixt the aforesaid William Bently and Thomas Lyde and the aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty for the Custome of Wine aforesaid and the Farm aforesaid to the great damage and prejudice of the aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty And further to the said Lord the King we Certifie that the aforesad James Bagg the first day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 12th and diverse other days and times then before at Plymouth aforesaid persidiously said to diverse Inhabitants of the Burrough aforesaid and to other the leige people of the said Lord the King upon Communication between them and the aforesaid James Bagg then before had of and concerning the liberties and Privileges of the Burrough aforesaid that he the said James Bagg would overthrow and make void the Charter of the Town aforesaid meaning the Charter aforesaid by the aforesaid Late Queen Elizabeth to the aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty as before is said granted And that he the said James the liberties privileges of the Burrough aforesaid would call in question and the same Privileges and Liberties overthrow And further to the Lord the King we Certifie that afterwards that is to say the 17th day of April now last past the aforesaid James Bagg in the said Writ named for the Causes aforesaid by the Mayor and Comminalty of the Burrough aforesaid from the Office of one of the Chief Burgesseâ— and Magistrates of the Burrough aforesaid was amoved c. John â—lement Mayor SCIRE FACIAS Pleas before the Lord the King that now is in his Chancery at Westminster in the County of Middlesex Hillary Term in the yeer of the Lord King JAMES by the Grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland King the 3d. and of Scotland the 39th fol. 1. The PRINCES Case THE Lord the King that now is sent his Close Writ to the Sheriff of Cornwall directed in these words JAMES by the Grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland King defender of the Faith c. To the Sheriff of Cornwall greeting Whereas in the Statute in the Parliament of the Lord Edward late King of England the 3d. in the yeer of his Reign the 11th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex holden made amongst other things it was Enacted by Authority of the said Parliament That the Eldest Son of the King
said Honour of Wallingford And that the like process sutes and pleas should be for ever holden received and should be used in the said Honour of Newline otherwise Eweline as at the first day of the same Parliament were used or exercised in the said Honour of Wallingford And that the said late King Henry the 8th should have to him his Heirs and Successors for ever the said Honour and Castle of Wallingford and all Lordships Mannors Lands Tenements and other Hereditaments whatsoever appertaining to the said Honour or Castle or reputed or taken to be any part of the possessions or parcel or member of the said Honour and Castle from thence for ever to be severed and divided from the aforesaid Dutchy And that the said Honour and Castle of Wallingford from thence for ever should be named and called the Castle and Mannor of Wallingford And also that the said Castle and Mannor of Wallingford and all Lordships Mannors Lands Tenements and other Hereditaments whatsoever which then should be belonging or appertaining to the said Mannor or reputed or taken to be any part parcel or member thereof and all manner of Liberties Franchises Privileges Royalties and Jurisdictions before that used within the said Honour of Wallingford from thence for ever should be united annexed knit adjudged deemed accepted reputed and called part parcel and member of the said Honour of Newelm otherwise Ewelm in the aforesaid County of Oxford And further it was enacted by Authority of the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th That all and singular person and persons who then held any Mannors Lands Tenements or Hereditaments of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th and of the most excellent and undoubted Prince Edward the Son and Heir apparent of the said late King Henry the 8th as of the said Honour of Wallingford or of any other Lordships or Mannors being parcel or member of the said Honour of Wallingford from thence for ever after should hold their said Mannors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments of the said late King Henry the 8th his Heirs and Successors as of the aforesaid Mannor and Castle of Wallingford or of the said Lordships or Mannors being parcel and members of the said Honour of Wallingford parcel of the said Honour of Newelm otherwise Ewelm by the said Rents Sutes Customs and Services as they and every of them held payed or did before the making of the said Act of Parliament and not by more or other Rents Sutes Customs or Services Saving to every person and persons Bodies Corporate Politick their Heirs and Successors and to every of them other than the most excellent and undoubted Lord Prince Edward which then was and his Heirs and to any other who from thence for ever should happen to be the Kings Eldest Son and new Heir of the Crown of this Kingdom of England All such Right Title Interest Possession Fees Offices Annuities Rents Commons and all other Commodities and Hereditaments whatsoever which they or any other of them lawfully held had could or ought to have had if the said Act of Parliament had never been made And further It was Enacted by the Authority of the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th That the aforesaid Excellent and undoubted Prince Edward which then was and every other who from henceforth for ever should happen to be Eldest Son of the King and next Heir of the Crown of this Kingdom should have hold and enjoy for ever annexed united and knit to the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwall for and in full Recompence of the aforesaid Honor Castle of Wallingford and other the premises in the said Act before mentioned to the said Honor of Wallingford then before belonging as part and parcel of the said Dutchy of Cornwall The Manor of VVest Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances in the County of Cornwall amongst other things in such manner and form and of such like Estate as the sayd Excellent and undoubted Prince before the making of the same Act of Parliament had held or enjoyed the aforesaid Honour and Castle of Wallingford and all the premises parcel of the said Honour And that all and singular the aforesaid Manors with all and singular their Appurtenances then amongst other limitted and assigned by the said Act in the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th to the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwall and every of them from thence for ever should be reputed deemed adjudged accepted and taken by authory of the same Parliament as part parcel and member of the said Dutchy of Cornwall in such and the like manner and form to all purposes and intents as the said Honour and Castle of Wallingford and the members and parcels of the same were before the making of the same Act any Act Law Custom or use to the contrary notwithstanding As by the said Act in the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late K. Hen. the 8th made amongst other things it more fully appeareth And whereas before until the time of the making of the aforesaid Act of Parliament made in the afores Parliament of the afores late K. H. the 8th The aforesaid Honour Castle of Wallingford members parcel thereof were part parcel and members of the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwall according to the form and effect of the aforesaid Charter and Grant by the aforesaid late King Edward the third with the common assent aforesaid and Authority of his Parliament aforesaid as before is said made and as in the aforesaid Charter are mentioned and above recited and the aforesaid excellent and undoubted Prince Edward in the aforesaid Act made in the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th before the time of making of the aforesaid Act made in the Parliament aforesaid of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th had and enjoyed in the aforesaid Honour and Castle of Wallingford and other the premises parcel of the same Honour in such manner and form and of such estate as is enacted and limited in the aforesaid Charter and Grant aforesaid of the aforesaid late King Edward the third in the year of his Reign the 11th aforesaid by the Authority of Parliament made as before is said And the aforesaid Castle of Wallingford with the Hamlets and Members thereof And the aforesaid Honour of Wallingford with the Appurtenances in the aforesaid Charter and Grant by the aforesaid late King Edward the third as before is said made specified are one and the same and not others or divers By vertue of which the said late Prince Edward eldest Son of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th and Duke of Cornwal was seised of the aforesaid Manors of West Tannton Trelowia Landalph with the Appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee as parcel of his Dutchy of Cornwal aforesaid according to the form and effect of the aforesaid Act of Parliament and he thereof so being seized the aforesaid late