Sacrifice of the Mass that which is said Gen. 14.18 that Melchisedeck sacrificed Bread and Wine A. If it were so in this passage as it is alledged there could nothing be gathered from it but that the Priests according to the Order of Melchisedeck should offer Bread and Wine and not the Body of Jesus Christ But this passage is not well translated for in the Hebrew it is not that Melchisedeck sacrificed but that he brought forth or presented Bread and Wine and that to Abraham for to refresh him and his people and not to God in Sacrifice Q. They prove likewise the Sacrifice of the Mass by Mal. 1.11 From the rising of the Sun even unto the going down of the same my Name shall be great among the Gentiles and in every place Incense shall be offered unto my Name and a Pure-Offering A. In all this passage there is nothing spoke of the Sacrifice of the body of Christ but the Prophet speaking of the Calling of the Gentiles foretels that every where a pure Offering should be offered unto God for so the Word of God calls the preaching of the Gospel Prayers and Alms and such like good works which are spiritual Sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ 1 Pet. 2.5 Q. What answer you to that which the Apostle says H. 13.10 We have an Altar whereof they have no right to eat which serve the Tabernacle A. That by this Altar is meant the Sacrifice that is spoken of in all the Epistle viz. the death of Jesus Christ and not the Sacrifice of Mass of which there is no mention made Q. Of what Sacrifice then speaks the Apostle besides the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ when he says Heb. 9.23 That it was necessary that the Heavenly things should be purified with better Sacrifices than those naming more than one A. He speaks only of the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ more excellent than all the Sacrifices of the Law names it Sacrifices putting it in the Plural 1. Because of his opposing it to the ancient Sacrifices of the Law 2. Because of its Excellency so David calls Repentance Psal 51.17 The Sacrifices of God and The most Holy Place in Greek is called Holy Places The Right Hand of God is called Right Hands Q. May not the Lord's Supper be called a Sacrifice A. Yes in the same sense that Alms and good Works are called Sacrifices not Propitiatory but Congratulatory or a Thanksgiving Sacrifice It may also be called a Sacrifice because it represents the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ's death even as the Sacraments take the name of the things they represent SECT XLVIII Of Baptism Quest WHat doth Baptism represent to you A. Two Washings 1. The Washing of our Justification which consists in the Forgiveness of our Sins 2. The Washing of Regeneration which consists in our being renewed spiritually by the Holy Ghost Q. Are those Graces communicated by Baptism Ex opere operato as they speak in the Schools by the thing done that is to say by the bare Action of the Sacrament wiihout the disposition of him that receives contributing thereunto A. No But by the power of the Holy Ghost in them who have Faith and Repentance for as it was not the blood of the Heifer that purified the Conscience neither is it the Water of Baptism but the Blood of Jesus Christ that cleanses from Sin and therefore Baptism is called 1 Pet. 3.21 A figure which saves us not the putting away the filth of the flesh says the Apostle but the answer of a good Conscience towards God by the Resurrection of Jesus Christ Q. Why then are Children baptized which are not capable of Faith and Repentance A. Because having an interest in the Covenant they ought also to receive the Sign thereof Acts 2.38 39. Be ye baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the Remission of sins for the promise is unto you and to your children But these Children when they come to Age must apply to themselves the Promise made to them in Baptism or else the Sacrament will serve only to aggravate their Condemnation SECT XLIX If Original Sin continues after Baptism Quest HAth Baptism that efficacy wholly to efface or abolish Original Sin so that after Baptism there remains in Man no sinful Corruption A. No For Experience shews that Children have perverse inclinations and are sinners after Baptism and if they were not sinners they would not die for says the Apostle The wages of sin is death Rom. 6.23 And St. Paul who was circumcised and after that baptized grants that sin dwelt in him and that he was sold under sin Rom. 7.14 17. The Romanists themselves confess in the Council of Trent that Lust continueth after Baptism Now if we believe St. Paul Lust is Sin Rom. 7.7 I had not known Lust except the Law had said Thou shalt not covet Q. But how often doth the Scripture tell us that We are baptised to the Remission of Sins and that We are therein washed from our Sins Act. 22.16 A. We do receive Forgiveness of Sins therein and to those that believe in Jesus Christ their sin shall not be imputed but that doth not hinder but after Baptism our Corruption doth continue more or less even till death SECT L. Of the Necessity of Baptism Quest IS Baptism so necessary to Salvation that without it we cannot be saved A. Baptism is necessary to Salvation when it may be had and this holy Sacrament ought not to be neglected but to exclude from Salvation a person who could neither have the time nor the opportunity to be baptised or a Child whose sudden death hath prevented Baptism is a cruel Doctrine and contrary to the goodness of God who tieth not his Grace to exterior Elements and maketh not the Salvation of Children to depend upon the negligence of their Parents Q. Nevertheless Jesus Christ says to Nicodemus John 3.5 Except a man be born of Water and of the Spirit he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God A. Jesus Christ doth not mean the material Water of Baptism but the Grace of the Holy Ghost which is often both in the Old New Testament called water Is 44.3 I will pour water upon him that is thirsty and floods upon the dry ground I will pour my spirit upon thy seed And Jesus Christ promised to give them that believe on him a well of water springing up into Everlasting Life John 4.14 By those words Jesus Christ doth not shew Nicodemus the Necessity of being Baptised since he was already Circumcised but the Necessity of being Regenerated that he might enter into the Kingdom of Heaven SECT LI. Of the Lords Supper Quest FOR what End did Jesus Christ institute the Sacrament of the Lords Supper A. That it might be a memorial of his death as Saint Paul teacheth us 1 Cor. 11.26 As often as you Eat this Bread and Drink this Cup ye do shew the Lords Death till he come And himself when he
dwell in us by the same reason Jesus Christ should eat us and we should enter into his body that we might dwell in him Q. How is it then that Jesus Christ dwelleth in us and we in him A. Jesus Christ dwelleth in us by his Spirit and we receive him by faith Ephes 3 17. That Christ may dwell in your hearts by faith and John 1.12 As many as received him to them gave he power to become the sons of God even to them that believe in his Name To believe in Jesus Christ then is to receive him and 1 Joh. 3.24 And hereby we know that he abideth in us by the Spirit which he hath given us Q. If you take only the figure and not the true body of Jesus Christ in the Lord's Supper what advantage have you more than the wicked and prophane who often take the figure as well as you A. Very much for the wicked only eat the exterior part of the Sacrament with their bodily mouth but Believers together with the Sacrament and Sign eat the thing signified by faith which is the mouth of the Soul viz. the body of Jesus Christ which was crucified for us and drink his blood which was shed for the Redemption of our Souls Q. This eating with the mouth of the Soul seems to be an imaginary thing A. Not at all for as the Soul is as real a thing as the Body so the Operations thereof are as certain and real as those of the Body or rather more certain and if the Body is really nourished by Bread and Wine in the Sacrament the soul is not less nourished and strengthned by imbracing by Faith Jesus Christ our Saviour who died for our sins and rose again for our justification Q. Do you not believe that the eating of the Sacrament of Christs Body doth put into the Body a Seed of immortality as Jesus Christ says John 6.54 Whoso cateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath eternal life and I will raise him up at the last day A. This saving effect doth not accompany the corporal eating of the Sacrament but the effectual working of the Holy Ghost which by Faith produceth a new life in the Elect giveth them an assurance and even beginning of a glorious immortality as we are taught by St. Paul Rom. 8.11 If the spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his spirit that dwelleth in you SECT LII Of Communion under both Kinds Quest MAY one lawfully partake of the Sacrament under the sign of Bread only as it is practised in the Church of Rome at this time A. No For Jesus Christ hath said Matth. 26.27 Drink ye all of it Q. But he speaks to his Disciples who were Priests and not to others A. The Apostles did not appear there as Pastors but as the Lords Disciples obliged to obey his Commands and if this Command Drink ye all of it oblige none but Pastours no more doth the other take eat both commands being made to the same persons and consequently then the people must be deprived of the whole Sacrament Q. Have ye no other passage where the people are commanded expresly to partake of the Cup A. St. Paul 1 Cor. 11.28 commandeth all without exception to examine themselves and so Eat of that Bread and Drink of that Cup whoever then are obliged to examine themselves are also obliged to drink of this Cup and since they of the Church of Rome understand the words of Jesus Christ John 6. to be spoken of the Sacrament of the Lords Supper what can they answer to words so express verse 53. Verily verily I say unto you except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood ye have no life in you Q. But what need is there of drinking since under the Species of Bread or of Wine Jesus Christ is wh lly contained A. This evasion comes from a false Supposition that Jesus Christ is corporally and wholly contained in each Crum of Bread even as it is usual for one error to produce more whereas we should mark this that since Jesus Christ hath commanded the Cup to be taken as well as Bread he would not have us believe this pretended Concomitance and Real Corporal substantial presence of his Body but would have us believe that the participation of the Cup is as necessary as the the partaking of the Bread Q. Notwithstanding there are examples of Believers in the Scripture who have taken Bread only in this Sacrament Acts 2.46 It is said that the Lords Disciples continued in the breaking of Bread A. The consequence is most absurd that the Disciples broke Bread therefore consequently they did not partake of the Cup as if we should say there they have eaten consequently they have not drunk but were not the Lords Disciples Priests and Pastours They were certainly obliged then to drink the Cup as well as to break the Bread according to the Opinion of these of the Roman Church that it was to Pastors that Jesus Christ gave this command Drink ye all of it THE END
a Sacrament of the New Testament since it was practised under the Old Num. 27.23 Deut. 34.9 Q. Do you believe that the conferring of Orders upon a man imprints such an indelible Character upon his Soul that the flames of Hell cannot efface it or raze it out A. I believe this Character is a vain imagination and I know no other Character that is printed upon the Soul but that of the Spirit of God whereby the Elect are sealed to the day of Redemption Ephes 1.13 and 4.30 SECT XLVI Of the Order of Priesthood Quest WHat think you of the Order of Priests A. If the name of Priest from Presbyter be taken as it was in the time of the Apostles for an Elder or Pastor whose Office is to instruct and lead the Flock of Jesus Christ as S. Peter exhorts the Elders in his first Epistle Chap. 5.1 This Order is very lawful and instituted by Jesus Christ But if by Priest they understand a Sacrificer of the Body of Jesus Christ I hold that Order to be unlawful and an invention of men Q. Why do ye esteem it such A. Because no man taketh this honour of Priesthood unto himself but he that was called of God as was Aaron Heb 5.4 It is rashness then to look on themselves as Priests without producing any Authority from the Word of God for the institution of this Order St. Paul Ephes 4. and 1 Cor. 12.28 Rom. 12. where he reckons the Offices of the Church says not a word of this And to the Hebrews in all his Epistle in which he treats expresly and at length of the Priesthood of the Christian Church speaks not of any other Priest of the Body of Christ but Christ himself who offered himself to God by his Eternal Spirit Hebr. 19.14 It is also to be considered that the Apostle Hebr. 7. gives two reasons for abolishing the Priesthood of the Law which destroys also that which is now Established the one is that the Priests were subject to death the other that they were obliged to Sacrifice first for their own sins and then for the sins of the people Priests being then still Mortals and Sinners ought to be abolished Besides the Sacrificer being more excellent than the Sacrificed and he who Sacrifices more powerful and more excellent than the Victims it is too bold an enterprise to pretend to Sacrifice Jesus Christ for it is to make themselves greater and more excellent than Jesus Christ himself Q. They pretend notwithstanding to prove their Priesthood by these words of Jesus Christ Do this in remembrance of me A. But they do it without ground for First Since Jesus Christ by these words Instituted the Sacrament of the Lords Supper what appearance is there that by the same words he should Institute another Sacrament Secondly Jesus Christ in these words commands his Disciples to do afterwards that which he had ordered them to do then viz. to take and eat now to take and eat is not to sacrifice Thirdly Moreover he commands to do this in remembrance of him Now it is absurd to take and sacrifice a person in remembrance of him for we remember things absent Q. Yet the holy Scripture speaks of other Priests under the New Testament than Jesus Christ for St. John says Rev. 1.6 that Jesus Christ hath made us Kings and Priests unto God and his Father And in 1 Pet. 2.9 St. Peter calls us a Royal Priesthood A. It is greatly to be observed that this Title is given indifferently to all Believers and never particularly to Priests and Believers are called Priests because as we are taught in 1 Pet. 2.5 They are an holy Priestood to offer up spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God by Jesus Christ Q. And what are these Sacrifices A. Good Works Prayers Praises and Thanksgivings Heb. 13.15 Alms and Repentance Psal 51.19 And Rom. 12.1 Present your bodies a living sacrifice holy acceptable unto God which is your reasonable Service SECT XLVII Of the Sacrifice of the Mass Quest DDo you believe that in the Mass the Priests offer the Body of Jesus Christ a Propiciatory Sacrifice for the Living and the Dead A. As I acknowledge no other Priest in the Church but Jesus Christ who is a Priest for ever after the Order of Melchisedech Psal 110.4 Also I acknowledge no other Propitiatory Sacrifice for Sin but the death of Jesus Christ who hath loved us and hath given himself for us an Offering and Sacrifice to God for a sweet smelling savour Ephes 5.2 Q. Why do you not acknowledge any other A. Because the Word of God makes no mention of any other under the Gospel And the Apostle to the Hebrews who writes an Epistle expresly to teach us by what Sacrifice Sins are truly expiated and the Sacrifices of the Law fulfilled mentions no other but the Blood of Jesus Christ who by his Eternal Spirit offered himself to God to purchase for us an Eternal Redemption yea he tells us expresly that Jesus Christ offess not himself often Heb. 9.25 26. And that as It is appointed for men once to die and after this the judgment so Christ was once offered to bear the Sins of Man Heb. 9.27 28. That by one Offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified through the Offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all Heb. 10.10 14. Q. It is true he offered himself but once a bloody Sacrifice but he offers himself an unbloody Sacrifice every day at the Mass A. This distinction is not found in the Word of God neither is there any propitiatory Sacrifice without shedding of Blood Heb. 9.22 Without shedding of blood is no Remission Q. It is only by the death of Jesus Christ that Forgiveness of Sins is purchased for us but by the Mass as by an Applicatory Sacrifice of the former is applied to us the Propitiation of Sins A. I answer to that That as it is not needful that Jesus Christ die again that his death may be applied to us neither is it needful that he be sacrificed again that his Sacrifice may be applied to us God hath appointed other means than the Mass to apply the death and Sacrifice of Jesus Christ unto us viz. the preaching of the Gospel Sacraments and Faith Q. But if Jesus Christ is not offered every day wherein consists his everlasting Priesthood after the Order of Melchisedeck A. The Apostle to the Hebrews makes it to consist in two things 1. In the perpetual Efficacy of his Blood once offered on the Cross and therefore it is said Heb. 12.24 that His blood speaketh better things than that of Abel 2. In that being entred into the holy Place according to the Office of the High Priest he interceeds continually for us Heb. 7.24.25 This Man because he continueth ever hath an unchangeable Priesthood wherefore he is able also to save them to the utmost that come unto God by him seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them Q. They alledge for the
Instituted this Sacrament saith This is my Body which is broken for you this do in Remembrance of me 1 Cor. 11.24 Q. Do you believe that Jesus Christ when he says This is my Body changed the Bread substantially into his true Body and was pleased that as often as the Pastors should pronounce these words they should Transubstantiate the Bread and Wine into his Body A. No for since Reason and Faith teaches me that there is no change of substance in those signs sight tast touch and smell assure me that it is true bread and wine reason tells me that a human body cannot be inclosed in breads accidents and that accidents cannot subsist without their subject and when it is destroyed that it implies a contradiction that one body can be in heaven and in earth at the same time and not in the middle space that it can have all its parts and dimensions in one small point and be more spiritual than a spirit Briefly faith which teaches me that Jesus Christ hath an human nature like to ours in all things Sin only excepted permits me not to believe that Jesus Christ hath a body invisible impalpable without dimensions without voice or motion faith persuades me that Jesus Christ is in Glory at the Fathers right hand permits me not to believe that his body is on earth subject to be trodden under foot by Infidels taken away by Thieves eaten by mice and suffer now he is in Glory more Reproach than ever he suffer'd during his humiliation here below in a word faith which teaches me that the heaven must receive him untill the restitution of all things Acts 3.21 And that we have the Poor always with us but that we have not him always Matth. 26.11 That he hath left the World that he is gone to his Father John 13.1 and 16.17 and 14.3 hinders me from believing that he is here again on the Earth shut up in a Pix Matth. 24.26 If any shall say Behold he is in the secret Chambers believe them not the Greek word signifies Ciboires i. e. the Boxes wherein the Sacrament is kept Q. But yet he hath said himself of the Bread This is my Body and of the Cup This is my Blood Matth. 26.26 A. Yes but he said likewise that it was Bread He took bread and said this is my Body and he said of the Cup that it was the Fruit of the Vine Matth. 26.29 And St. Paul 1 Cor. 11.26 27 28. says that we break and eat Bread I am then obliged to believe that it is Bread and the Body of Jesus Christ Q. How can one and the same thing be Bread and the Body of Christ which are two Natures so different A. It is Bread in substance but the Body of Jesus Christ in figure and signification according to the nature of Sacraments which take the name of the things signified as likewise the things signified take the names of their figures even as the Rock in the Desert is called Christ the Paschal Lamb a Passover Circumcision the Covenant of God Jesus Christ the Bread which came down from Heaven the Vine the Door the light c. Q. How know you that these words This is my Body ought to be taken Figuratively A. First Since Jesus Christ by these words instituted a Sacrament they must be understood Sacramentally and Jesus Christ instituting this Sacrament instead of the Passover in which a Lamb is called a passage it was reasonable that in the Sacrament of the New Covenant the sign should take the name of the thing signified even as the other did Secondly Jesus Christ himself would have us to understand it figuratively for he commands us to do this in remembrance of him he would not then have us to Eat his Body really and corporally for we are said to remember only things corporal when absent Thirdly Besides our Saviour gives us this Body as broken and delivered for us now he is not really broken in the Sacrament but only in Figure Fourthly The bread is the Body of Jesus Christ as the Cup is the New Testament of his Blood now a Cup cannot be a New Testament but figuratively neither can the Bread be Christs Body any other way Q. What can you answer to these words of our Saviour where he so plainly says That his flesh is meat indeed and his blood drink indeed John 6.55 A. I say First That in this sixth Chapter of St. John Jesus Christ speaks not of the Lords Supper for it was not then instituted Secondly That the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ is truly the meat and drink of our Souls but not of our Bodies that his Body is spiritual meat and not material and by these words Jesus Christ teacheth us that as truly as Bread and Drink nourishes our Body his Body crucified for us his Blood shed for our Redemption nourishes comforts and fortifies our Souls for what Nourishment is to the Body that Consolation and instruction is to the Soul Q. But this word indeed seems to exclude all Figure A. Not at all but only all doubt or untruth for doth not Jesus Christ say that he is the true Vine John 15.1 and yet he is so only Figuratively Q. How know ye that Jesus Christ speaks of a Spiritual meat and drink in the sixth of St. John A. Because his disciples murmuring at the the hardness of that saying concerning eating his Flesh and drinking his Blood he tells them what if you shall see the Son of Man ascending up where he was before verse 62. insinuating to them that when they should see him ascend into Heaven they should not have such gross apprehensions as to imagine they could corporally eat him on the earth And that they might understand those words spiritually he adds It is the spirit that quickneth the flesh profiteth nothing the words that I speak unto you they are spirit and they are life vers 63. Q. How then can you eat Christ's flesh and drink his blood as he commands us in this Chapter A. Spiritually and by faith which is the mouth of the Soul according to Christ's exhortation in this Chapter vers 35. He that cometh to me shall never hunger and he that believeth on me shall never thirst And it appears that he speaks not of a corporal eating of the Sacrament of Christ's body in this Chapter since he says vers 54. that Whosoever eateth his flesh and drinketh his blood hath life eternal And on the contrary Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood ye have no life in you vers 53. Now it is certain that many of the Elect are dead and could not have this Sacrament And vers 56. he says that He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood dwelleth in me and I in him Then the Manducation of Jesus Christ and his dwelling in us must be understood spiritually for if it be necessary that we eat Jesus Christ corporally that he may
No Popery OR A CATECHISM AGAINST POPERY WHEREIN The Heretical Doctrins Idolatrous Worship and Superstitious Practices of the ROMAN CHVRCH ARE Briefly yet Plainly Refuted and the Protestant Principles Proved by Testimonies of Holy Scripture and Evidence of Reason By a Minister of the Gospell Little Children keep your selves from Idols 1 Joh. 5.21 LONDON Printed for the Author and Sold by Tho. Parkhurst at the Bible and Three Crowns in Cheapside near Mercers Chappel 1682. TO THE READER AMongst the various Methods of Instructing such as are weak and ignorant none hath been found more useful than that by way of Question and Answer And as Christianity did at first diffuse it self by this way of Teaching so the Truth and Purity of it have been best preserved when Pastors have effectually applyed themselves to Conscientious Catechising of those under their Care and inspection By this means did the Waldenses and Albigenses maintain the Doctrine and Worship of the Gospel among them when Error Superstition and Idolatry had overspread the face of the Western Churches Nor was any thing more useful to the promoting the Reformation than the Catechisms of several Eminent Persons whom God employed in that Blessed Work For tho' Preaching be a very good way of pressing known principles upon the Consciences of men yet Catechising doth much excell it in conveying Light and Knowledge into their minds And through the woeful and universal neglect of this does Ignorance come so much to abound even where Sermons are most frequent as well as plain and practical For through want of Acquaintance with the points and subjects concerning which Ministers treat in those continued Discourses they are incompetent Auditors of what is delivered and so lose much of the benefit of it And as the present decays in Religion are to be ascribed to no one thing more than a faileur of Catechising so the Ignorance which thereupon ensues is that which betrays multitudes to be imposed upon and perverted by such as lye in wait to deceive For next to the being strangers to the power of that Religion which we do profess the want of being well grounded in the Doctrines of it is that into which the revolt of so many to Popery is to be issued and resolved And as the apprehension of our security from the Re-introduction and Establishment of the Romish Religion in these Nations hath occasioned our sloth and negligence in unmasking and detecting the folly of the Tridentine Faith so the just fears we are brought under of its obtrudeing its self once more upon these Kingdoms do bespeak all who desire to approve themselves faithful to God and the Souls of Men to concern themselves more in discovering the falshood of all the Articles of the Romish Creed And as the difference betwixt the Professors in Britain and those that profess the Reformed Religion in France is to be admired with respect to that Ability which appears in them beyond what is in us to refute and expose the Papal Tenents so their present stedfastness in the Doctrines of the Gospel when they are called to suffer the Loss of all things for them is much owing to their having been instructed before hand in all the Principles that lye in Controversie between them and the Papists For tho' the Transcript of Gospel Truth upon our Hearts will be our best Preservative in a day of Trial yet the being able to give an account of the reason of our Belief is needful as well for the honour of our Religion as the prevention of our Apostacy when we come not only to be accosted with Arguments against it but threatned with Fire and Faggot unless we renounce and abandon it And tho' there be many Discourses wrote with great Strength and Learning both to inform and fortifie our minds in the Belief of the Doctrines which we profess yet there are but few Discourses in Print either of that brevity or accommodated for manner and plainness to the Capacity of the weak as is necessary The want whereof as it recommends the seasonableness of this Catechism and familiar Treatise so if People will but consult their own Souls they will have reason for being thankful to God for the provision which is here vouchsafed them In which as they will find the Errors of the Romish Church truly represented so they will find them as nervously confuted and overthrown The Order of Sections Sect. 1. OF the Scripture pag. 1 2. How the Scripture may be known to be Divine 4 3. Of the Authority of the Scripture 7 4. Of the Perfection of the Scripture 10 5. Of the Reading of the Holy Scripture 14 6. Of the Church 17 7. If the Church can Err. 20 8. Of the Marks of the true Church 24 9. Of our Separation from the Roman Church 30 10. Of the head of the Church 32 11 Of Invocation of Saints 36 12. Of the Intercession of Saints 42 Sect. 13. Of Images 45 14. Concerning Prayers for the Dead 47 15. Of Purgatory 48 16. Of human satisfactions 52 17. If the Sufferings of Christ were accomplished in the Cross 56 18. Of Pilgrimages 58 19. Of Monkish Vows 1. of that of single life 59 20. Of Vowing Poverty 61 21. Of Vowing obedience 62 22. Of Lawful Vows 63 23. Concerning Fasts 64 24. Of Holy Days 68 25 Of the Providence of God 69 26. Of man's free will in the state of Sin 72 27. Of man's free will in the state of Grace 74 Sect. 28. Of Justification 77 29. Of Merits 81 30. Of Predestination 84 31. of Perseverance 86 32. Of the certainty of perseverance and Salvation 88 33. Of Sin and if all men are Sinners 92 34. Of venial and mortal Sins 95 35. Of the Works of Supererogation 97 36. Of Repentance 100 37. Of Auricular Confession 101 38. Of Absolution 103 39. Of Satisfactions and Indulgences 105 40. Of the Sacraments 106 41. Of Confirmation 107 42. Of the Sacrament of Penitence 109 43. Of Marriage 110 44. Of Extream Vnction 112 45. Of the Sacrament of Orders 113 46. Of the Order of Priesthood 115 47. Of the Sacrifice of the Mass 118 48. of Baptism 122 49. If original sin continues after Baptism 124 50. Of the Necessity of Baptism 125 51. Of the Lords Supper 126 52. of the Communion under both kinds 134 ERRATA PAge 3. line 22. read imaginations pag. 9. l. 26. r. have p. 22. l. 9. 10. for interted r. interrupted p. 25. l. 24. for in r. ing pag. 31. l. 13. r. Schisme p. 38. l. 15. r. God's p. 59. l. 21. after resolution r. in p. 66. l. 8. r. Tim. p. 69. l. 1. r. of signal p. 72. l. 21. for freely r. spiritually p. 74. l. 5. r. calling ibid. l. 24. r. John 8. p. 80. l. 27. r. justifies p. 82. l. 4. r. cannot p. 88. l. 18. blot out the i. p. 99. l. 5. r. young ibid. l. 9. for hath r. hast p. 109. l. 8. r. you p. 113. l. 1. r. being p.
Bondage Gal. 5.1 And Secondly in that passage of St. Paul 1 Tim. 4. where he calls them seducing spirits that teach to abstain from meats that God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe the Truth he speaketh in the general without any restriction and Colos 2.22 23. He condemns them that say Touch not Tast not Handle not though such things had a shew of Wisdom in Will-worship and Humility and neglecting of the Body not in any honour to satisfying of the flesh Now the forbidding to eat flesh upon certain days must be of these kind of Ordinances Q. Do you blame then all manner of Fasts A. No for though Fasting of it self be an indifferent thing yet it becomes profitable and good when Superstition and the opinion of Merit is separated from it and when it is employed to subdue the flesh and humble the mind to help forward Repentance and to excite Zeal in Prayer and therefore the Scripture ordinarily joyns Prayer and Fasting together Matth. 17.21 Jesus Christ saith that There is a kind of Devils that goeth not out hut by prayer and fasting And 1 Cor. 7.5 St. Paul would would have the Husband and the Wife to separate themselves for a time to give themselves to Fasting and Prayers Q. When is Fasting requisite A. First In time of Affliction either publick or private for extraordinary Humiliation before God in such a time is needful as in Joel 2.15 when the Church was in distress they were commanded to Blow the Trumpet in Sion sanctifie a Fast call a solemn Assembly Secondly When it is necessary to make Request by Prayer to obtain something of importance for the Church and to obtain a Blessing upon their Ministry Acts 14.23 And besides these publick Fasts every one ought to fast and to implore the Mercy of God for their Falls and for his assistance in dangers for to prepare them better for the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper SECT XXIV Of Holy Days Quest WHat do you blame in the Church of Romes Holy Days or Feasts A. First That it is a departing from the Liberty that God hath given us in the fourth Commandment Six days shalt thou labour Secondly By them the Yoke is again put upon the Christians which Jesus Christ delivered us from by his death as heavy or heavier than it was upon the Jews Whereas S. Paul commands Colos 2.16 17. Let no man judge you in meat or in drink or in respect of an Holy Day or of the New Moon or of the Sabbath days which are a shadow of things to come but the Body is of Christ Thirdly That they are dedicated to the Saints Fifthly That the Observation is required as a thing as necessary as the Observation of the Lords Day Sixthly That they think they merit Salvation by the Observation of them Q. Are you then against all Holy Days except the Sabbath day A. Believers may profitably assemble themselves together on other days as well as on the Sabbath day to celebrate the Memory of signal Deliverances that we have received from God by Jesus Christ by Prayers and Thanksgiving and Meditation on the Word to give thanks for extraordinary deliverance or for publick humiliation provided that these days be celebrated without Superstition and without Scruple of Conscience and without an Opinion of any particular Holiness in that day or Merit in its Celebration SECT XXV Of the Providence of God Quest DOth any thing happen in the World that is not ordered by the wise Providence of God A. No For A Sparrow falleth not to the ground without the Will of your Father which is in heaven and the very hairs of your head are all numbred Matth. 10.29 Q. Do Evils come to pass by His Will and Permission A. Yes For if he would not have them to come he is Almighty and could hinder them Amos 3.6 Shall there be Evil in the City and the Lord hath not done it Doth not Evil and Good proceed from the Most High Lam. 3.38 Q. These places speak of Afflictions and Calamities which happen to men by the Providence and Permission of God for the manifestation of his Justice in the punishment of the wicked and of his Goodness in trying of his own people But do you believe that the sins and actions of the wicked are ordered by the Providence of God A. Yes For the Word of God shews us that the selling of Joseph by his Brethren came to pass by the Providence of God for the preservation of Jacob's Family Gen. 50.20 As for you ye thought evil against me but God meanâ— it unto good to bring to pass to save much people alive Likewise the taking away Joh's Goods was an effect of God's Providence for his trial and therefore he says The Lord hath given and the Lord hath taken away blessed be the Name of the Lord Job 1.21 And S. Peter saith Act. 2.23 that Jesus Christ was delivered by the determinate Counsel and Fore-knowledge of God And Act. 4.27 28. he speaks thus Of a truth against thy holy Child Jesus whom thou hast annointed both Herod and Pontius Pilate with the Gentiles and the people of Israel were gathered together to do whatsoever thy Hand and thy Council determined before to be done Q. Can this be and God not be the Author of sin nor Partaker of the sins of the wicked A. Yes Even as a Physician gives not to Leeches their bloody Nature but doth fitly himself with the inclination of this Animal to draw blood of his Patient for his health and comfort so God doth not give to the wicked their wickedness nor incite them to evil against his Children but doth wisely employ their wicked inclinations for their Consolation and Salvation knowing how to make all their evil designs serve by his admirable Providence the end that he hath determined and tend to the accomplishment of his wise and holy Will Q. Doth not that excuse the wicked since they only execute the Will of God A. No For they do it without their knowledge and contrary to their intentions for we are not to rule our Actions by God's Decree which is unknown to us but by his Commands which are revealed to us Deut. 29.29 Secret things belong unto the Lord our God but these things which are revealed belong unto us and to our Children SECT XXVI Of Man's Free Will in the State of Sin Quest IS Not this Doctrine of Providence contrary to that of Man's Free Will A. Not at all For God so governs the things of the World that he lets them act according to their nature and inclination necessary things necessarily and the Free as Men and Angels freely Q. Wherein consâ—sts the Free Will and Liberty of Man in the State of Sin before Regeneration A. In four things 1. in Natural Actions as Eating and Drinking 2. In Civil Actions as Buying and Selling. 3. In external good and vertuous Actions as frequenting the Assemblies of God's People giving
the Church by some great sins to confess and testifie their Repentance before the assembly of Pastors and Elders 2. That a sinner who finds his conscience burdened with some great sin should confess it to his Pastour to ease his oppression and by this seek consolation and assurance of the forgiveness of his sins after this manner they came to John Baptist Matt. 3.6 confessing their sins Q. What do you blame then in the private Confession of the Church of Rome A. 1. That it is tyrannical and a torture to the consciences of the People obliging them upon pain of damnation to pour forth all their thoughts in the ear of a man and to discover unto him not only all their sins but likewise all the circumstances which vary the nature of sin of which if they omit any thing knowingly their Confession is without fruits and their Absolution void which obliges man to a thing impossible and which the word of God obliges him not to 2. That they Confess their sins to Saints 3. That by their Confession they pretend to merit Salvation Q. But S. James obliges us thereunto James 5.16 Confess your faults one to another and pray one for another A. He says Confess one to another and not to the Priest he speaks of a mutual Confession that Believers should make one to another of their reciprocal offences even as they ought to pray unto God one for another SECT XXXVIII Of Absolution Quest HAve Priests power to absolve from and to pardon Sins A. Priests being criminal themselves have no Authority to remit Crimes and to exempt those that are Criminals with them from punishment There is none but God to speak properly that can forgive sins for he only is the Party offended as David says Psal 51.4 Against thee only have I sinned It is God alone that is the Soveraign Law-giver to save or to kill according to his good pleasure and to inflict punishments upon the Transgressors of his Laws there being none but he only that knows the sincerity of the Sinner's Repentance so none but he can absolve the Penitent It is I says the Lord Isa 43.25 even I am he that blotteth out thy Transgressions for mine own sake and will not remember thy Sins Therefore the Pharisees were in the right to conclude when Jesus Christ forgave the Sins of him that was sick of the Palsie Mark 2.7 That he did attribute to himself a Divine Power Q. Nevertheless Jesus Christ promised to his Apostles and in them to all Pastors that whosoever sins they remitted they should be remitted Joh. 20.23 A. Pastors remit and retain tie or untie not by Princely Authority of Jurisdiction but by Ministerial Declarative Authority as Heraulds and Ambassadors for Christ declaring from him forgiveness of sins to those that Repent and Believe in Jesus Christ 2 Cor. 5.20 And declaring on the contrary the wrath of God against the Unbelieving and Impenitent besides they pardon and remit sin with respect to Ecclesiastick Censure that they impose or mitigate as they find expedient for the humiliation or consolation of the sinner Q. When Jesus Christ says whose sins ye remit they are remitted doth he not give Pastors authority without limitation insomuch that God obliges himself to ratifie all kind of absolution or condemnation that they pronounce to sinners A. No for God obliges not himself to ratifie all sorts of Sentences and Judgments of Pastors which are very often rash and contrary to Justice and Charity but this general sentence must be understood with the same restriction that the general promise that Jesus Christ made us Joh. 16.23 That whatsoever ye shall ask the father in my name he will give it you to wit when the things we ask are necessary to salvation and according to his will so God promises to ratifie the Absolution and Pardon that Pastors pronounce when it is done according to his word and when they assure penitent souls of the forgiveness of their sins SECT XXXIX Of Satisfactions and Indulgences Quest HAth a Pastor power when he giveth absolution to a sinner to impose any pennance upon him as Alms Deeds Fasting and such like things to make sarisfaction for his sins for which he hath received Absolution upon his Confession A. No for the word of God teaches us on the contrary that God pardons us all our sins only for Christs sake Colos 2.13 And our Saviour when he pardoned the Woman taken in Adultery did not inflict any punishment upon her but only said to her Go and sin no more Joh. 8.11 Besides it is a great abuse to impose alms praying and fasting as a punishment which are good works and ought to be done with pleasure and delight Q. What do you believe concerning the Indulgences of the Church of Rome and of the treasure of the Church from whence the Popes draw the superabundant Satisfactions of Jesus Christ and of the Saints for the comfort of Sinners in this life and the Dead in Purgatory A. That this Doctrine is nothing but a chimera and an invention of the covetousness and ambition of the Pope to rule over the Consciences and Purses of Christians those pretended favours not being communicated but to those that stretch forth their helping hand as they speak and I acknowledge no other satisfaction but the free Redemption of my Saviour nor any other Indulgences but the Mercy of God which pardons all our Offences freely for Jesus Christ's sake SECT XL. Of the Sacraments Quest WHat is a Sacrament in the Christian Church A. It is a visible Sign instituted by Jesus Christ in his Church for to represent his Person his Death and his Graces that he hath purchased for us by his death Q. How many such Sacraments do you acknowledge A. Two Baptism and the Lord's Supper Q. Why do you acknowledge no more A. Because that in reading of the Gospel I see only these two instituted in the Church Q. Yet the Church of Rome besides these two believes five others Confirmation Pennance Marriage Extream Vnction and the Sacrament of Orders A. I cannot acknowledge them for Sacraments because they have not the Conditions necessary to the lawful Sacraments of the Christian Church Q. What are the Conditions of a lawful Sacrament A. 1. That it be instituted by Jesus Christ 2. That it be a visible sign of an invisible Grace 3. That it represent Jesus Christ and his Graces 4. That they be common to all Believers 5. That it be conferred by a lawful Pastor SECT XLI Of Confirmation Quest WHat is the Sacrament of Confirmation A. It is a Sacrament of the Church of Rome which cannot be reiterated and is done by a Bishop which Bishop greases the face of a Child in form of a Cross saying in Latin I mark thee with the mark of the Cross and confirm thee with the Crisme of Salvation in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost And the End of this Sacrament is
as they say that the Christian may be confirmed in the Faith and be made a compleat Christian and they would even have this Sacrament observed with greater veneration than Baptism as being done by a more worthy person to wit a Bishop and which hath a greater vertue than Baptism Q. Why do you not acknowledge this to be a Lawful Sacrament A. Because Jesus Christ hath not instituted it and I see no ground for it in the Word of God and it is an extream rash impiety to forge in the Church a Sacrament to which they attribute more vertue and give more Reverence than to Baptism Q. We see though that Jesus Christ put his hands upon Children Matth. 19.13 and the Apostles laid their hands on persons Baptised before that they might receive the Holy Ghost Act. 8.16.17 and 19.6 A. This laying on of hands is no Sacrament of the Christian Church but a Ceremony always used to those that were blessed or received to any Office in the Church So Jacob laid his hands upon Ephraim and Manasse when he blessed them Gen. 48.14 Moses upon Josuah Numb 27.23 The Apostles upon those for whom they implored Grace from God and the assistance of the Holy Ghost but in that there was nothing done like what is done in Confirmation neither as to the sign nor as to the words In the Reformed Churches the laying on of the hands is still observed at the Ordination of Ministers to the end to implore the Grace of the Holy Ghost for them but it is not for that a Sacrament of the Church SECT XLII Of the Sacrament of Penitence Quest WHy do yot not acknowledge Penitence for a Sacrament of the Christian Church A. Because 1. Jesus Christ hath not instituted it for Repentance hath always been necessary since sin and as agreeable to God before Christ came into the World as since 2. It is an absurd thing to make a Christian vertue a Sacrament and exteriour sign 3. In Confession Contrition and Satisfaction there is no material sign visible to represent to us any invisible Grace in Jesus Christ 4. These three parts of their Penitence are not conferred by the Pastour but are the exercise of the person Repenting 5. This pretended Sacrament is not coferred in the Church as other Sacraments but it is practised by the Sinner privately Q. They will tell you that in absolution there is a visible sign of an invisible Grace That in the Priests absolution there is a certain sign of the interior absolution that God granteth to a Sinner A. I say to that 1. That if the sign be only in absolution 't is not in Penitence for absolution is no part of Penitence for Penitence is in the Sinner and absolution is given by the Pastour 2. That in Absolution there is no visible Sign 3. If words may be called visible signs then all the clauses of the Gospels Sermon may be called Sacraments SECT XLIII Of Marriage Quest WHY do you not acknowledge Marriage for a Sacrament A. 1. Because it was not instituted by Jesus Christ for Marriage was Lawful before his coming and was Instituted even before Sin 2. It cannot be a Sacrament of the Christian Church since Marriage is Lawful even amongst Pagans 3. There is not in Marriage any material visible sign nor any word added to the Element the consent of parties being that which makes Marriage for it is not properly the Minister that Marries he only stipulates publickly the mutual obligations and consent of the parties 4. It is not according to the opinion of the Roman Church common to all Believers since Priests ought not as they say to partake thereof And it is an absurd thing that it should be a Sacrament to the People and a Pollution and Sacriledge to the Priest Q. Yet St. Paul calls Marriage a Sacrament Eph. 5.32 This Sacrament is great A. These words are so in the vulgar Latin version but in the Greek it is This Mystery is great and he speaks not there of Marriage but of the Union between Christ and his Church for the Apostle adds But I speak concerning Christ and his Church Likewise it is to be observed That the Latin version usually turns the word Mystery into that of Sacrament and calls the Mystery of Godliness God manifested in flesh a great Sacrament of Godliness 1 Tim. 3.16 And the Mystery of the Woman the Sacrament of the Woman Rev. 17.7 Q. Yet in this passage St. Paul teaches us that Marriage is a Figure of the Spiritual Marriage between Christ and his Church A. It is true but every Figure and Comparison that the Scripture uses to represent to us the Spiritual Graces of God and the union of Jesus Christ and his Church are not Sacraments otherwise a Vine the Light a Door a Shepherd and such like comparisons that Jesus Christ did use should be Sacraments of the Christian Church SECT XLIV Of Extream Vnction Quest WHy do not you acknowledg the anointing of the sick for a Sacrament of the Church since St. James 5.14 15. recommends it Is any sick among you let him call for the Elders of the Church and let them pray over him anointing him with oyl in the name of the Lord and Mark 6.13 We read that the Apostles anointed the sick with oyl and healed them A. This anointing was not an ordinary Sacrament and ought not to be continued in the Church because it was done to be a sign of miraculous healing as appeareth by these two passages in which health followed this anointing since the gift of healing is ceased it is necessary that the Sign and Sacrament cease likewise therefore anointing now is nothing but an unprofitable Ceremony not beinp practised for the healing of the Sick but on the contrary when the Sick is near to death and therefore they call it Extream Unction SECT XLV Of the Sacrament of Orders Quest WHy do you not acknowledge Orders for a Sacrament A. 1. Because according to their account there are seven different sorts of Orders there must then be thirteen Sacraments instead of seven 2. Because it is not common to all Believers but particular to Ecclesiastical Persons only 3. Because there is no material sign in it 4. It doth not represent to us the death of Jesus Christ and his Benefits 5. The greatest part of these Orders was not instituted by Jesus Christ as Porters Exorcists Acolyts Under-Deacons 6. It is a great absurdity to make a Sacrament of the ordinary Offices in the Church Q. May not the Imposition of Hands upon a Pastor to establish him in his Office be called a Sacrament since it is a visible Sign of an invisible Grace to wit the Grace of the Holy Ghost A. It may be called a Sacrament but not in the same sense that Baptism and the Lord's Supper are for this Imposition of Hands is not a sacred Sign of the Covenant of God in Jesus Christ it is not common to all Believers and it cannot be