retourne to the line of Francis the Elder who maried Lady Mary of Luxembourg daughter to Sir Lewes Constable of France who brought great goods to that Famely in Picardy Artoys Flanders and other places Of these two issued diuers children namely Charles Frances Lewes Antoinet Loyse of Bourbon Charles the Eldest succeded in the Countie of Vendosme and procured it to be erected into a Dutchy and Pairry Francis had the Countie of Saint Paule and maried Lady Adriane of Touteuille daughter and heire of a great famely They had issue a daughter Lewes was a Cardinall Anthoinet was maried to the Lord of Guyze of whoÌ„ is discended the house of Guise now liuing Loise was abbesse of Fronteuault Now the said Charlâ—s the eldest maried Lady Francis of Alencon sister to the deceased sir Charles Duke of Alencon last deceased without children in the yere 1524. of this mariage issued Antonie Francis Charles Lewes Iohn Antony the Eldest and Heire of this family maried Iane of Albret Queene of Nauarre of whom came Henry of Bourbon now king of Nauarre who hath married Margaret of France Sister to the most Christian King Francis was named Lord of Anguien who gat the victory at the iorney of Serizoles died without issue Charles the third is Cardinal of Baurbon and Archbishop of Rouen Lewes was Lord Prince Conde who when he died left fower sonnes Henry Prince of Conde Francis Prince of Contie Charles Cardinall of Vendosme and Charles Countie of Soissons Iohn who after the decease of Francis was entituled Lord of Anguyen died also without Issue There were also some daughters of whom here we haue nothing to say as hauing in this argument to treate onely of the Succession of the house of FraÌ„ce which can not discend but to y â— Males of this famely The onely controuersie therefore and different that might through the Counsaile of the mischiuous be mooued resteth betweene Henry of Bourbon King of Nauarre sonne of Anthony the eldest of that famely and Charles Cardinall of Bourbon and Archbishop of Rouen his vncle by the father The end of the first part ⧠THE CONTENTS OF THE SEcond part of this Booke 1. Obiections moued against the King of Nauarre 2. The mariage betweene Lady Iane of Albret Princesse of Nauarre with the Duke of Cleue dissolued by the Ecclesiastical sentence the Popes dispensation auctorized in Parliament Also the marriage of the sayd Lady with Anthony Duke of Vendosme the eldest of the house of Bourbon from whom is discended the King of Nauarre 3. Marriage is by the Ciuill lawe voyde being contracted before age 4. The holy decrees haue inhibited the blessing of mariage of maidens before twelue yeeres of age of men before foretene the East Church haue proroged the Matrimonie of the man to fifteene and of the woman to thirteene 5. The honestie of Ciuill pollice forbiddeth mariage before age 6. Examples of mariages disanulled by reason of the noneage of the contracted 7 The explication of humaine pollicie wherefore hereticks are vncapable of successions 8. The right of Realmes is houlden immediatly of God by the continuation of the successiue lawes of the same Neither can the Estates depose a King vncapable or otherwise disabled Or the people transferre the right of their Lord vnto the person of any other to whom it ought not to be giuen 9. The office and duetie of the Clergie towarde Kings and Princes King Henry the second protested against the Counsell of Trent 10. Why those of the League would not take the Catholicke Princes of the blood therinto Those of the league haue sought to suborne those of the pretended reformed Religion 11. Kings are Stewardes of the Church goods The Church is in the Commonwealth not repugnant thereto Pollicie Iurisdiction and collation of Ecclesiasticall functions apperteineth to soueraigne Princes The Kings of Fraunce haue euermore preserued the state of the persons and goodes of the Clergie in their Crowne The Clergie were in olde tyme not capable to distribute Church goodes 12. The King neuer dyeth in France because of the successiue law thereof To what ende the Coronation of Kings was instituted The auncient maner of the Coronations of heathen Kings How long it is since anoynting was instituted and wherfore It is not necessary to annoynt or crowne Kings in one only place 13. Antiquitie is no necessary argument to auctorize common custome 14. The Church neuer disturbed the succession of Kings no not for heresie 15. Whether it be likely the K. of Na. wil force the conscience of his subiect 16. The estate of Bearne and Nauarre 17. The cause of the protestatioÌ„ that the King of Nauarre made the last yere at Montauban 18. The King cannot infringe the successiue law of the Realme The successor commeth not to the Crowne in the qualitie of heire to the deceased 19. The Popes reasons whereby he pretendeth aucthoritie to transferre Kingdomes The Popes haue euer exempted France out of their wonderfull power Gods lawe without polliticke confirmation is no sanction vpon earth Priestes haue no imperiall Iurisdiction Bishops and Popes haue acknowledged Kings and Emperors for their Lords The punishment of heretickes is executed by the seculer Magistrate 20. The opening of sundry places of Scripture concerning Ecclesiastical iurisdictioÌ„ Wicked Emperors were neuer deposed The Pope cannot excommunicate any body politick or Towne subiect to the King of France Appeales in cause of abuse from the Pope and other Clergie men obserued in France 21. The Church cannot excommunicate a Prince that is an euill liuer Subiects after the excommunication of their Lorde are not discharged of their dueties toward him 22. The sentence of the excommunication of a Prince cannot conteine any clause of depriuation from his Lordly rights 23. A Prince may lawfully arme himselfe against the Popes wrongful excommunication and appeale therefore as in abuse 24. The K. of Nauarres reason to proue him no Hereticke 25. The vsurpations of the Counsell of Trent ouer the Crowne of France 26. Most dauÌ„gerous drifts of y â— Leagued in the reformation of the Realme 27. The wicked entent of the Leagued Also what enuy they beare to the Duke of Espernon and others 28. The remembrances of Aduocate Dauid now put in execution by the Leagued The Kings duetie in matter of Religion 29. Forraine rule and gouernement is wretched FINIS THE SECOND PART OF the Cath. Apologie 1 SVch as mislike the king of Nauarres cause doe obiect against hym in this libell fonre principall points wherof three doe perticularly touche the qualitie of his owne personâ— the fourth concerneth the auncient controuersie betweene the Vncle and the sonne of the elder brother But we will endeâ—our to shewe that in all and throughout all they haue but a weake foundation Concerning the first they aleadge that the said Lorde King of Nauarre is not borne in lawfull matrimony of Anthony of Bourbon eldest sonne of the house of Bourbon because Ladie Iane of Albret mother to
to the Lady Loise married into the house of Roch-sur-you the Countie of Montpensier and landes of Combrailles which in so doing he rected into a Dutchy meete for the heires of the sayde Lady who at this day do beare the same name of Bourbon and are extract out of the second principall braunch of this house which we left of aboue vntill we had ended the first braunch of the elder And now to returne to the sayde Sir Charles in him dyed the ligne male of the principall stock of the house of Bourbon As for his two Sisters the one called Claude was wife to good Duke Antony of Lorrain whose stocke yet remaineth The other Loise was maried into the other principall braunch of Bourbon who hath left issue of the name of this house 13 Now let vs take the seconde braunch the first chiefe partition of this race which is the stocke of the latter yonger borne and yet remaineth to this day in the roume of the eldest and beareth the Name and full armes thereof as remayning alone after the default and ending of the elder Concerning y â— males this ligne beginneth againe in Iames of Bourbon the yonger Sonne of Lewes first Duke of Bourbon of whom we haue spoken before This Iames was Constable of FraÌ„ce after Charles of Spaine who flew Charles King of Nauarre in the time of King Iohn He had to wife Iehane of Saint Paule and was and so named himself Earle of Marche Of him came one onely sonne named Iohn who succeeded hym and married Catherin Countesse of Vendosme and Castres who brought into this house those two Counties togither with the landes of Carcuecy Lupe Conde Espernon MoÌ„doubleau and others Of these two issued three children Male Iames Lewes and Iohn also three daughters Anne wife to y e Duke of Bauiere Charlot maried to the King of Ciprus and Mary to Robert of the Crosses who tooke his saide wife by force and therfore fled and it was said he was drowned In his tyme hee gouerned King Charles the seuenth Now to retourne to the issue male Iames had to his protion the Counties of March and Castres Lewes the CouÌ„tie of Vendosme As for Iohn he had the Lordship of Carcuecy and maried a gossip of his called Margaret a Vandosmois by whom hee had some Children and got a dispensation to haue her to Wife notwithstanding the said children were not aduowed into this famely neither succeded in his goods but by sentence were declared illegitimate and which is more the said Iohn of Bourbon the Father in his Testament willed great giftes and substitutions to the behoofe of his other two sonnes Iames Lewes in whose persons he planted him selfe and raised the first after bough and vnder twigge of this second principall branch 14 This Iames of Bourbon eldest sonne to Iohn liued in the time of Charles the sixt and had two wiues the first Beatrix of Nauarre the yoÌ„ger daughter of the house of Nauarre which was the first alliaÌ„ce of those two houses They two had issue a daughter named Leonor After the decease of the saide Beatrix the said Iames of Bourbon allyed him selfe by marriage as it is pretended with Iane Queene of Naples who had before as the speech went promised marriage to the King of Arragon and deceiued them both So as the sayde Iames of Bourbon beeing gone into the Realme of Naples was in the ende forced to leaue the sayd Iane and to retire into Fraunce where after his returne he still bare the title and name of King of Naples notwithstanding the sayd Iane had afterward giuen it to others and finally deceased leauing for his onely heire the sayd Leonor his Daughter who succeeded him in the sayd Counties of Marche and Castres She maried Bernard of Armanack Earle of Pardiar a yonger sonne of the house of Armanack These two had issue two sonnes Iohn Bishop of Castres and Iames who succâ—eded in the sayd Counties of his father mother and besides in the right of his sayd mother Beatrix of Nauarre layd claime to the land of Nemours which he procured to be erected into a Dutchy tooke possession thereof and enioyed it He married the Daughter of Charles of Anieow Earle of Mayn and of Isabell of Luxembourg his wife This Iames of Armanack at the beginning was in fauour but afterward fall into suspition with Lewes the eleuenth and was executed at the Halles in Paris the 24. of August 1147. he left fower Children two Sonnes and two Daughters Iames Duke of Nemours and Lewes Earle of Guyze the two Daughters Margaret Charlot married into the house of Rohan who deceased without issue of their bodies so as in them failed this vnder twigg both male and female 15 Now remaineth to bee spoken of the ligne of Lewes brother to Iames. He for his part had the Countie of Vendosme and was taken at the battell of Agincourt in the tyme of Charles y e sixt He maried first Lady Iane of Roussy secondly Lady Iane of Lauall of whom discended one only sonne called Iohn of Bourbon who maried Lady Isabell of Beaumount of these two were borne two sonnes the one called Francis the other Lewes They had also sixe Daughters Iane wife to the Lord of Ioyâ—use the scond Iane first maried to Iohn Duke of Bourbon who was of the line of the elder of this house and secoÌ„dly to Iohn of the Tower Earle of Bologne of whome is issued Lady Katherine of Medecis Queene mother to the king Kitherin wife to Sir Gilbert of Chabaues in Limosin Charlot maried to Gilbert of Cleue of whoÌ„ came the last Lord Duke of Neuers Rene Abbesse of Fronteuout Isabell Abesse of Caen as for the two Sonnes Francis the Eldest succeeded in the Countie of Vendosme Mondoublean Espernon and other Lands houlden of that famely wherto was added the Lordshippe of Saint Calais Lewes the yonger was made Lord of Rochsur-yan and of the landes of Lupe and Conde in Henault 16 Now because concerning the question now to be delt in wee are to argue of the succession of the elder we will seeke out the farthest and will first speake of the Branche of Lewes the yonger sonne Prince of Roch suryen He maried Loise of bourbon who was of the elder liue and sister to Sir Charles of Bâ—urboun the last Of this mariage proceeded two Sonnes and a Daughter the elder sonne was Lewes who died but lately bearing the title of Duke of MontpeÌ„sier by the coÌ„position made in the time of the late Francis the first after the decease of Sir Charles of Bourbon Hee left one heire Male named Francis of Bourbon nowe Duke of Montpensier and sundrie daughters This Francis hath of his mariage with the daughter of the Marquize of Mezieres one onely sonne called Henry Prince of Dombes The other sonne of Lewes Prince of Roch-sur-you and of Lady Loyse of Bourbon was Prince of Roch sur-you who died within these fewe yeres without issue Wee must now then
the said lord King was married to the Duke of Cleue when she ioyned with the said Lord Anthony and so consequently the King of Nauare discended of the said Anthonie of Bourbon and Iane of Albret is illegitimate and vncapable to succede in the Crowne of France wherin Basterds did neuer succeede 2 This point is easie to bee answered by the trueth of the matter which is that the late King Francis the first desirous to drawe to himselfe and to disunite from the Emperour Charles the fifth the Duke of Cleue vrged forced his sister Lady Margaret of FraÌ„ce and Henry of Albret King of Nauarre father and mother to the sayd Iane who then was a yong Princesse of eight or nine yeres of age at the most to marry her to the sayd Duke of Cleue with whom the solemnitie was accoÌ„plished and the maiden conducted to the nuptiall bed in the Towne of Chastelerauld but before the time of mariage was lawfully perfect and accomplished in the said Lady Iane she complayned of this pretended marriage crauing the dissolution thereof which by the sentence of the Church and the Popes dispeÌ„sation afterward in the yeere 1541. enrowled in the Court of Parliament was broken After all which acts the said Anthony of Bourbon father to the sayd Lord King of Nauarre maried the sayd Princesse 3 It followeth therfore that the pretended mariage betweene the sayde Duke of Cleue and the sayd Iane of Albret was voyde and of no force or effect as well by the Ciuill lawe of the Romaines which ordinarily we do vse as by the holie decrees of the Catholicke Church Antistius Labeo and after him Papinian Vlpian gaue sentence against Saluius Ialianus A maideÌ„ vnder twelue yeres of age brought into her husbands house is not so much as espoused if the affâ—ancing weÌ„t not before In an other place Papinian arguing whether the promise of dowrie eonteineth in it a condition if the marriage doe ensue setteth downe for an assured resolution That if a maiden vnder twelue yeeres of age be brought into her husbands dwelling house hauing there accomplished her lawful age she may as of age require her dowrie Labeo vpon the propoâ—itioÌ„ of donations by the husband made vnto his wife which in lawe are prohibited maintaineth that whatsoeuer the husband giueth to the pupill his pretended wife is in Romaine pollicie good and of force In an other place he saith Whatsoeuer is bequeathed to a pupill at her day of mariage if she coÌ„tract matrimonie before her perfect age the gift is deemed vnprofitable and the condition iudged not to be performed which Vlpian doth expressely confirme In an other place the same Author repeateth the rescript of the Emperour Seuerus whereby the husband is forbidden in the qualitie of a husband to accuse his wife of adulterie coÌ„mitted during her noneage Pomponius hath left vs the generall rule of this question in writing conteining A maiden vnder twelue yeeres of age shalbe a lawfull wife when in her husbands company she hath atteyned the sayd age of twelue yeeres Which likewise Vlpian and Paulus doe repeate in their discourses vpon the priuiledges graunted to the wife for the redemand of her dowrie 4 The holy decrees of the Cath. Church are full of such decisions Pope Euaristus who held the Sea of Rome about the yere of Iesus Christ 110. confesseth that he had learned of y e fathers his predecessors that the inequalitie and insufficiencie of age doe make the wife vnlawfull Wee reade a decre of the Counsaile of Foruile holden vnder Charlemagne and Pepin his eldest Sonne concerning this question Moreouer saith the text For the remedying of all we forbid all persons to ioyne in matrimony before their ripe age also all such as are of vnequall yeeres in any wise to match together but only those who in respect of equall birth beare like minde and consent Pope Nicholas the first who sat about the yeere 858. to the same effect writeth That where consent wanteth it is no mariage Such therfore as doe make alliances of their children being yet in their cradles do no whit bind theÌ„ vnlesse the coÌ„ioyned hauing atteyned the yeres of discretion doe allowe thereof notwithstanding their parents would marrie them Vpon this text also Iohn Andrewe teacheth vs that wee must enquire the willes of the pupilles when they are of ripe age therein following that which Pope Marcel coÌ„curring with the seconde decree of the Counsaile of Toledo hath written of those who before the tyme appoynted doe make and promise the vowe of Religion for although according to Isidore Puberes doe take that name of Pube that ripe age appeareth in such as are able to engender yet must wee not iudge this habilitie by the onely naturall power in the act of generation but by the iudgemeÌ„t counsaile and discretion of the will because marriage is an act of discretion pollicie and housholdrye euen as the making of a Will Which was the cause why Pope Alexander the third declareth that such as before the age of discretion are married both may and ought by the censure of the Church to be seperated considering they haue not consented if when and after they haue atteined ripenesse of iudgement they doe not ratefie the same or that there haue beene no carnall knowledge betweene them in which case Malice is sayd to supplye age This the sayd Alexander decreed by the authoritie of the Connsaile of Lateran holden in the yeere 1180. in the assembly of 280. Bishops Vrban the third writing to the Bishop of Mans declareth that these constitutions ought to bee obserued yea notwithstanding the two conioyned had done their endeuours to corrupt each others virginitie Innocent the third also doth iudge such a pretended marriage to bee rather a simple promesse to contract in tyme to come then any certaine or firme obligation for the tyme present Vpon which reason also the aforesaid Pope Nicholas expressely forbiddeth the ceremonies institued by the Church as the blessing and others before the age prescribed and ordeined for lawful mariage leasâ— they should be ministred in vaine then could not easely be reuoked This haue not bene obserued in the West church only but also y e Emperours of the East haue caused their Subiects religiously to keepe the same as a matter most holy and Catholicke As wee reade in their nouel CoÌ„stitutions wherein they haue moreouer proroged the tyme of mariage vnto 13. yeeres in the maiden and to 15. in the man expressely decreeing that the blessing giuen before that age in such coniunctions shall bee of no effect or force to make the marriage indissoluble but bee accoumpted as a simple promesse or ciuill couenant Furthermore to proue that the East Churches haue allowed of these constitutions Balsamen Patriarck of Constantinople doth to the same purpose repeate some decrées of Nicholas Patriarck of Constantinople and of Simon Metropolitan of
Constantinople about the the tyme whereof he thereupon declared his will as is to bee gathered by the dates of the sayde Counsaile and the Emperours decree inserted into his last Code and afterwarde confirmed by sundry the nouell constitutions of the sayd Prince whereby hereticks are debarred all right of â—uccession Assuredly this obiection at the first blush beareth a great shewe but we must therein of necessitie resolue two poyntes the one of the lawe the other of the deede In the first wee are to dispute whether an heretick may be depriued of that Realme that falleth to him by succession as this doth to the King of Nauarre In the other whether in this present action the King of Nauarre may bee termed an Hereticke and as such a one bee depriued of his succession 8 For the first I saye and maintaine that those Ordenances of Emperors and Canonicall decrees which doe depriue hereticks of successions are written and speake onely of particuler Christians whose goodes and successions are subiect to the politicke lawes of the Magistrates of the land but it is otherwise in cace of Empires and Realmes which may not bee wrested out of their handes that are the true Lordes of the same either for heresie or other cause whatsoeuer because they be holden immediatly of the hand of almightie God and not of meÌ„ as it was argued and concluded in the Counsaile of Paris holden vnder Lewes the meeke Lothair his sonne Kings of France and Emperours about the yeere 829. which was ratefied vpon the saying of the Wise man Counsaile equitie wisedome knowledge are myne by me do Kings raigne and Counsailors publish their decrees in righteousnesse of me are Empires holden The like is to be read in the prophesie of Daniell The sentence is according to the decree of the watch men and according to the worde of the holy one to the ende the liuing may knowe that the most high hath power ouer the kingdome of men and giueth it to whomsoeuer he will and appointeth ouer it the most abiect among men The same Prophet soone after saith as much to Balthazar King of Babylon in representing to him the force of Nabuchodonozer the Monarke of Assiria The Prophet Ieremie in his speech of the King of Kings teacheth vs also I haue made the earth and man and beast vppon the face of the earth through my force and with my outstretched arme haue giuen it to whom it hath pleased me So that â—ubiects are not to search into their Kings neither are borne but to obey and serue whatsoeuer their Princes be without any further enquirie of their righteousnesse Feare the King and knowe that his election is of God saith the Apostle And when any of them doe commaunde or wield the Scepter royall it commeth of the fauour goodnesse and grace that God purposeth to extende to his people in graunting them a good King endued with pietie iustice and Christian Religion the others also are the scourges and roddes of his wrath and iustice whereof the Prophet Ozee saith In my wrath wil I giue thee a King And Iob Who maketh the hypocrite to raigne for the sinnes of the people for Gods wrath being kindled against vs he will sende vs a King such a one as our offences shall deserue because as it is written in the same booke of Iob If wee haue a wicked King wee are yet worse then he The place of Isidore is very fit to this purpose It is saith he a hard matter to make the Prince amend if he be giuen to vice for the people stand in awe of the Magistrate but Kings if they be not withholden by the onely feare of God and dred of the torments of hell doe abandon themselues to all libertie and runne headlong into the bottomlesse pit of sinne I say therefore that it is not for the people otherwise then with humilitie and obedience to controule the actions and qualities of their King but their duetie is onely to cast vp their eyes to heauen and to consider with themselues that by the wil of God the Scepter is fallen into his handes and power that beareth the Crowne whether he bee good or bad especially being there to called by lawful succession such as is in our France wherein by the Monarchiall lawe the people haue not onely referred al their power into the Kings hand and might but which is more haue also tyed their owne hands so as they can haue no redresse so long as any male of the bloud royall doe remaine according to the lawe of the Realme being the neerest male in agnation to the deceased after the generall custome of France yea notwithstanding he bee vnable vncapable and do want discretion to gouerne the Estate in all which causes they may only appoynt him a tutor and administrator of the publicke affayres the order wherof haue bene practized in our Fraunce vpon Charles the Simple and Charles the sixt For notwithstanding the Realme especially ours be not properly hereditary patrimoniall or fâ—udall yet it is successiue and falleth to the neerest not in qualitie of heire to the deceased but as to the next in bloud in masculin ligne so that consequeÌ„tly what euer he be he is called and whatsoeuer default be in his person either of age iudgement or what els soeuer yet may the Estates and Peeres of the Crowne do no more but appoint a tutor to gouerne him and by counsaile to supply whatsoeuer his imperfections because he was elected in heauen so soone as he came into the world All such also as shal resist him who by succession is lawfull King shall encurre the wrath and displeasure of almightie God because we are not to staÌ„d in argument or murmure against the deuine wisedome who for the afflicting of his chosen people and the house of SioÌ„ did many times suffer them to be gouerned by yong wicked franticke and vnfaithfull Kings yea meere Tyrants such as in Iuda were Roboam Ioram Ochozias Amasias Achas Ozias and others who were either Idolaters or misbeleeuers in the true God of Abraham Likewise in Israell Nadab Baaza Achab with his wife Iezabell Manasses and the most part of the rest of their Kings who raigned with more Idolatrie and tyrannie against the fauoured of God then in mans opinion was requisite With the like scourges also God hath visited his Church since y â— time of grace wherin it pleased him to send his deare sonne into the world with his most precious bloud to redeeme vs from our sinnes permitting to sit therein not onely many vnfaithful Emperours and Kings conspired enemies to our faith and heretickes but also particuler Pastors ordeyned for the feeding of the soules of Christians euill liuers and of pernicious example Constantine sonne to great Constantine Valens brother to Valentinian the first and Zeno sonne in lawe to Leo the first Emperours were Arriens Anastase and Iustinian the first of that name were
behaued our selues toward them we shall surely find that we haue left no more to doe but either to destroy our selues and perish all togither whereby the one shall not scorne the other either els to let them liue among vs one with an other in peace and libertie of conscience and neuer be so desirous to driue them into heauen with the edge of the Sword But will you haue me tell you the trueth your pompe your pride your ambition and the ignorance of yours is cause of al this mischiefe Notwithstanding you see the the Church on a flame who is there among you I will except some small number that endeuoureth to amend his life and to distribute y â— Church goods in such sort as he ought See wee not still the Kinges Courtes the Townes and Country full of superfluitie of our Bishops and other Clergie men such a number of Abbots called Commendatories who are of no professed order of Religion but doe neuerthelesse deuour the reuenues that belong to the poore so many beneficed persons with diuers Bishoprickes Abbayes Priories and Cures some in title others in commendam of the which they neuer see so much as one vnlesse it were to the ende to farme the same foorth You may see their Churches fall in decay and the Priestes whoÌ„ themselues haue annoynted begge their foode the rest of the poore dye for hunger at their gates And in one word to say all these Maisters haue no money to doe their dueties w tall no not so much as to procure preaching which themselues can not doe or for performing the deuine seruice either to instruct the youth For euery one doth sufficiently know that the late King Charles the nineth whom God pardon and King Henry the third now raigning visiting and comming to those Townes wherein the principal Vniuersities of their Realme are planted did ordeine that the Clergie of certaine Dioceses should contribute some small portion toward the salaries of the Doctors and RegeÌ„ts of the same yet was it neuer possible for these poore people who are the seedes of iustice and vertue to reape any one penny Our Maisters haue nowe money enough to helpe to maintaine warre against the King vnder an imaginary and false preteÌ„ce of defending the Catholicke Religion You deceiue your selues if you hope to conuert others before ye make cleane your selues no neuer looke for it for it will still be obiected vnto you that you can see a mote in other mens eyes but cannot take away the whole blocke that blindeth your selues Why follow you not the example of Moses who when he beheld and sawe Gods people offende the deuine Maiestie with Idolatrie did not take the sworde to put them to death but began to crye O Lorde this people haue sinned forgiue them or els blot mee out of thy booke which thou hast written Let vs liue well let vs reforme our selues and let vs not be so careful for the wealth of the world We haue so long cryed out against those of the pretended Religion concerning this poynt that now they can say of vs The Doctor is to blame who reproaueth other for the fault that himself hath Yea they will saye worse for still they stand vpon the defensiue you are the assailants They haue euermore acknowledged the Kings Maiestie for their soueraigne Lord and neuer contemned the Princes of his bloud as the King himselfe in his Edicts hath not sticked to confesse but you endeuour to enstale Straungers against the estate and dignitie of his Maiestie who both before he was King and since hath prodigally ventred his life and hazarded his Crowne for the glutting of your desires and putting of your ouer rude counsailes in executioÌ„ What reason therefore haue you now to match your selues with the meere enemies to the peace of the Church enemies to your Common-wealth enemies to your King and the Princes of his bloud I saye to your most Christian and Catholicke King one that feareth God and one who hath peraduenture done more then he ought for the getting by armes that contention which you do wish for I am moued so to say because in trueth I beleeue and experience hath taught vs that the more we stirre vp this euill the more it encreaseth wherefore herein the best counsaile that wise men haue left vs were to resolue our selues that if this pretended reformed Religion bee not by the decree and establishment of Gods worde it will without any warres perish and vanish of it self as haue done so many former heresies but contrariwise if it be according to the wil of the holy Ghost we may crye out at our pleasures but it will fulfill his worke 10 But my Maisters if you be not led by malice are you so blinde as to thinke that the authors of this conspiracie which they terme a holy League bee ledde by any zeale of Catholicke Religion If that were their drift wherefore haue not they also called into the same such Lords Princes of the bloud as stil continuing Catholickes and liuing according to the Romish Church were neuer so much as suspected to bee of the pretended reformed Religion We know very well that the Lord Cardinal of Bourbon whose yeres they haue seduced and whom vnder a vaine hope of smoke they make to weare the knife wherewith to embrue his hands in his owne bloud hauing wrested from him the fayrest and most of his Benefices whereof by their suggestion hee hath depriued his owne Nenewes before he altogether became vnnaturall when they bounde him to this peeuishnesse offering vnto him their fayned League to signe requested that his Neuewes the Lordes Cardinall of Vandosme Prince of Conty and Earle of Soissons might bee included in y â— same wherto these our Maisters could not intend Whereof doe they suspect the Lord Duke of MontpeÌ„sier and the Lord Prince of DoÌ„bes his sonne both being most Catholicke Princes onely that they bee of the house of Bourbon which they seeke to roote out and so doe make accoumpt to transferre the Crowne into their owne handes trying themselues onely vpon the sayd Lord Cardinall a man worne and of small continuance so contenting themselues to make him the standerd whereby to establish their armes neither would they auctorize the rest amoÌ„g their troupes fearing least they should haue better eyes then the sayd Lorde Cardinall to discouer their wicked entents besides that if it shoulde so fall out that they shoulde come to the drawing of lâ—ttes for the beane in the cake the people would rather haue recourse to these Princes as to the braunches and sprigges of their Kings and those who onely in their degrees and order are capable of the Crowne of France either els least the FreÌ„ch Nobilitie should blush for shame at the preferring of the tirannous dominion of straÌ„gers before their French Princes and lawfull Lordes This is not the first day that the house of Bourbon haue bene subiect to the enuie and malice of these Espaniolized
friuolous causes and of no importaÌ„ce whose sentence neuerthelesse was confirmed and againe published by Innocent the fourth successor to the sayd Gregorie and after by Boniface the eight inserted into his sixt booke of Decretals in which place he vseth these wordes of the Scripture Quodcúnque ligaueris c. as an authoritie wherein to ground the execution of his will Bald also and Iohn Andrew very Catholicke Glozers doe confesse that in deede he seemed rather a partie then a Iudge Niâ—holas the 3. who followed soone after seeking to take the whole gouernement of the Towne from all but the Pope forbad y t neither King Duke Earle or Marquize should be established or accept the authoritie of Senator or Gouernour therein declaring that the Iurisdiction thereof belonged priuatly to the holy Sea before all other not in respect of Constantines donation but through these wordes In omnem terram exiuit sonus eorum and such other which hee interpreteth as hee thincketh good Which in effect are the very reasons whereupon Boniface the eight excommunicated King Phillip the Faire of France and gaue his Realme for a praye to the first that could seaze vpon it as we reade in his constitution in deede extrauagant in the which he exempteth neither Emperour nor King from his subiection euen in Temporall causes as he saith Also by vertue of that great power Clement the fifth disanulled the sentence giuen by the Emperour Henry the seauenth of LuxeÌ„bourg against Robert King of Sicille after hee had procured the proysoning of the same Emperour by a Muncke in ministring to him the Eucharist Which Balde confesseth to haue bene a presumpteous and wrongfull deede Finally by those Tragedies that Iohn the 22. Benedict the 12. and Clement the 6. stirred vp throughout Christiandome against the Emperour Lewes of Bauiere as also in our daies Alexander the sixt and Iulius the second did no lesse neither had any other ground We may see the causes whereby the Popes do pretend authoritie to depose Kings subuert Realmes and giue them in pray to whomsoeuer they thinke good True it is that such of them as haue most dissembled haue euer exeÌ„pted the Realm of FraÌ„ce Innocent the third writing to the Prelates and French Nobilitie for Iohn without land King of England declareth that he will enterprize nothing against the Maiestie of the French King But Hostiensis who knewe the Storie doth in this place write that the Protestation was contrary to the effect because the sayd Innocent went about to hinder King Phillip Auguste from vsing his feudall right ouer the Dutches of Normandie Guyenne and other the Lands holden by the English and falleÌ„ into the lapse through the murder committed vpon Arthur his elder brothers sonne In an other decretal Epistle the same Pope confesseth that the French King in Temporall causes and gouernment of his Realme acknowledgeth no superiour Clement the fifth in his extrauagant for appeasing King Phillip the Faire who was stirred vp by the insolencie of Boniface the eight disanulled reuoked his declarations against the Realme of France and aduowed the same not to be subiect to his Sea by vertue of the sayd constitution The same Pope also protested that the power which his Officers vsed against the said Kings subiects during his being in the Realm was by the permission of the sayd Lord King as appeareth by the protestation the same time enrouled in the Court of ParliameÌ„t for in trueth it hath euer more bene resolued and is a cace most certaine that the King of France doth vpon earth acknowledge no superiour in whatsoeuer coÌ„cerneth the pollicie gouernement of his Crowne neither was euer subiect to the Romain Empire from the which he wrested the Gaules with the point of the sworde And although the French Kings were sometimes Emperours them selues yet did they neuer submit this Crowne to the Diadem Imperiall whereupon the Kings Atorney general would not suffer the Emperour Charles the fourth beeing in the Parliament there to make a Knight without king Charles the 5. his expresse permission As also the Emperor Charles the fifth passing through Fraunce obteyned the good will of King Frances the first to pardon sundry offenders because no other then his Maiestie hath power or authoritie ouer the temporall causes of his Realm among which is vndoubtedly the punishing of transgressions yea euen of heresie of the which wee now speake the notice and Iurisdiction whereof haue euer more bene left and with good reason belongeth to the seculer Magistrate because we ought to consider the lawe of God first in this world whereto the politicke and temporall Magistrate preseruer of the societie of men and earthly policie for the auoyding of confusion and trouble forceth euery one to obeye Secondly in the worlde to come wherein God onely iudgeth and punisheth not leauing in this worlde in respect of himselfe any Magistrate to be the auenger of the iniurie to him done in y â— transgression of his ordinances For the Priestes who are the guardians and Schoolemasters of Gods lawe are not coÌ„stituted Iudges but easie Phisitions to the soule and Gods commaundements are no such Sanctions as importe punishment but most louing doctrine and admonitious otherwise if by the sworde we should be forced to the obseruing of Gods lawe the desert were small Vppon which poynt the Apostle sayd Not that wee rulee ouer your faith but are helpers to your ioye And in an other place All Scripture is inspired froÌ„ aboue and is profitable to teach to conuince to correct and to instruct to righteousnesse Hee saith not to force or to punish Chrisostome very carefully deuideth the royall power from the ministerie of the Gospell saying that the ministerie is a function committed by God to the ende to teach without weapons also that it is no power to giue or take awaye Realmes neither to make lawes for politick gouernment Our French Bishop S. Hilarie writeth as much to the Emperour Constantius also against Auxentius Bishop of Millan And this the good Fathers learned at the mouth of the Sonne of God our Lord Iesus Christ when he sayd to his Apostles The Kings of the nations haue dominion ouer them but it shall not be so with you In an other place hee promiseth them that they shall sit with the Sonne of God wheÌ„ he shal come in Maiestie to iudge mankinde but that contrariwise so long as they remaine in y e world exercizing their Ministerie they shall bee brought before Kings and politicke Magistrates for his sake so farre shall they be from being Kings and Iudges themselues The head of the Church euen Iesus Christ fled when they sought to make him King declaring y â— his Kingdome was not of this worlde wherfore he would not be iudge among those that were at controuersie yea he submitted himself to the Kings of the earth paying vnto them the tribute which was vnto
the same spoken of To conclude therefore I will now coÌ„tent my self with warning euery one to mark and consider the meanes which such alwaies as haue gotten the vpper hand of a Lordship whereto they had no other right but habilitie haue houlden and then I hope they will thincke that the gouernment of a naturall Prince is gracious louing and fauourable in respect of y e mistrustfull suspicious and tyrannous straunger vnto whom not onely the deedes and wordes but also the gesture behauiour yea the goodes and welth of his Citizens are suspected because he feareth his owne shadowe Remember the auncient Fable of the Pigeons who when they had elected the Ringdoue to rule them were soone wearie of her courteous and gentle gouernment which they termed soft and delicate and in her roume chose the Kite who in liew of wel entreating of theÌ„ did eate beate and dayly teare some one among them in sunder with her beake and wings whereat these miserable fooles being offended could haue bene coÌ„tent to haue returned vnder the yoke of their first election but the Kites tyrannie could neuer brooke it whose successors do yet to this day practize their roine vpon them Once it fell out that the Frenchmen through wicked counsaile in liew and place of their naturall Prince whom they bare somewhat heauy were suborned to elect one Giles a Romaine of whom they were soone wearie after they had casted what it was to liue vnder one whose humour and birth did not agree with his subiects and it fell our well for them that their King was of power sufficient to resume them againe into his protection The ende of the third part ⧠THE CONTENTS OF THE FOVRTH part of this Booke 1 The authorities of Doctors for the preferment of the Neuewe before the Vnckle 2 Examples of the preferment of the Neuewe before the Vnckle 3 Reasons in law for the Neuew against the Vnkle The Neuewe succeedeth in the eldership of his father in proper person as being substituted to his late father 4 The right of eldership is transmissible perfect wanting but execution 5 The right of eldership is legall or custumary 6 The Lord Cardinall of Bourbons acknowledgemeÌ„t in the fauour of his neuew the K. of Nauarres mariage 7 Answere to the examples of the Vnckle alleadged against the neuewe 8 Answer to the Vnkles reasons against the neuewe Substitutions and continuatioÌ„ froÌ„ the father to the sonne in collaterall ligne by Iustinian 9 Successiou once roored in a ligne neuer departeth the same vntill it be finished or worne out 10 The order of Tutorship and the succession of free borne Libertines is vnlike 11 The Kings youth neuer debarreth theÌ„ from the Crowne The opening of the saying that personall right is not transmissible 12 Successions made by ciuill lawe and custome confessing the right of eldership are farre vnlike THE FOVRTH PART OF the Cath. Apologie IN the fourth Obiection the King of Nauarres aduersaries doe oppose against him the Lord Cardinall of Bourbon his Vncle as neerer by one degrée and nowe by the decease of the late Anthonie of Bourbon Father to the sayd Lorde King of Nauarre the eldest of the house of Bourbon 1 This question is one of the most tossed of all others and can not be decided by the arrestes of the Salicke Lawe that wee haue in these words De terra verò Salica in mulierem nulla portio haereditatis transit sed hoc virilis sexus acquirit hoc est filij in ipsa haereditate succedunt sed vbi inter nepotes pronepotes post longum tempus de Allode terrae contentio suscitatur non per stirpes sed per capita diuidantur But the decision hereof we must séeke in the Commentaries of our Doctors which Accurtius Odofrede Pope Innocent the fourth Durand Ric. de Malumbris Iohn Andrew Alberick de Rosatis Barth Balde Paule de Casiro Angel Aret. Martin de Lande Iohn Faber Pet. de Ancar Barbat Felin Ausrerius Wil. Benedict Cassanee Lewes Bolognine Matth. de Afflictis Andreas Sicul. Abbas Panormitanus Bartholomeus Sosinus Iason Alciatus Tiraquel Lewes Charond Choppinus and many other haue concluded in fauour of the Neuewe against the Vncle who termeth himselfe eldest by his brothers decease either indirect or collaterall lyne in successions indeuided as Realmes Empires Duchies CouÌ„ties and Marquisates Yea Decius imitating Socinus doth write that amoÌ„g the Interpreters of Ciuill Canon law hi qui pondere numero mensura praeualent haue alwayes consulted and determined against the Vnkle so that by the authoritie of so many skilfull persons the sayd Lorde King of Nauarre hath the better cause of the Cardinall his Vnkle Secondly the foreiudgements must be alledged for the decision of this controuersie Balde hoâ—ldeth that euermore it hath so bene obserued and decided in all contradictorie iudgements of France and England And Paul maketh mention of the Spanish law in this respect solemnly sworne vnto by the states of the same lande in deede we reade goodly examples both of these and many others 2 First in France for the same house of Bourbon in the time of Lewes the Fat king of France about the yeere 1110. Hanno had expulsed his Neuewe Arcembault a young child sonne to his elder brother pretending that the Lordship perteined to him as being entred into the Lawe of the eldership by the decease of his elder brother But the French Nobility forced the vnkle to giue place to the Neuew whom they substituted in the roume and place of his brother reseruing to Hanno onely some portion of the goods as to one of the Children of the same house An other example we haue in the posteritie of Henry the second K. of England who had three sonnes Richard Cordelion Secondly Geffrey who had maried Constance the Heyre of Brittaine and dyed in his Fathers time leauing his Wife great of Arthure afterward Duke of Britaine and Iohn surnamed without land Soone after the fathers death dyed Richard also without issue whereupon Phil. Augustus King of Fraunce who raigned about the yere 1141. adiudged the Dutchy of Normandy with other the Landes that the said Richard held in Fraunce vnto Arthure sonne to Gâ—ffrey his elder brother but afterward the sayde Iohn made peace with Augustus through the mariage of his sonne Lewes vnto Blanch. Neece to the sayd Iohn by his Sister wife to the King of Castile togither with some Lands that the saide Iohn habandoned to the sayd Phillip So that Arthure still prosecuting his right was slaine by his vnkle Iohn wherevpon the King of Fraunce tooke occasion for that fellony to confiscate all those landes as hauing alwayes fauoured and aucthorised the cause of the sayd Arthur The third iudgement passed in the tyme of Charles the Fayre King of Fraunce about the yeere 1331. for the Earle of Flaunders for Lewes of Neuers was by the Peeres of the Realme declared Earle of Flaunders and preferred before his
Vnckle after the decease of Earle Robert because he was sonne to the elder who dyed afore his father True it is that for entering vpon the sayd Countie and taking vpon him the title of Earle before he had taken his oath done homadge to his Maiestie he was arrested at Paris and imprisoned in the Castle of Louure from whence he was soone after deliuered againe An other solemne arrest passed in the tyme of Phil. of Valois about the yeere 1328. for the Dutchie of Brittain by reason of the decease of Duke Iohn who dyed without issue leauing behind him his third brother Ih. Earle of Montfort and the daughter of his second brother Guy Vicountie of Limoges then wife to Charles Earle of Blois vnto whom by sentence of the Court the sayd Dutchie in the yerre 1341. was adiudged because Charles of Blois shewed y â— by the custumes of Brittaine the succession belonged to the eldest theÌ„ to the second and lastly to the third thereupon inferring that his wife daughter to the second did represent the same person But where the house of Montfort did afterward enioye the same Dutchie that came by vertue of a certaine agreement afterwarde made at the entrie of Charles the fifth in the yeere 1364. An other sentence passed in the tyme of Frances the 1. in the yeere 1517. for the Countie of Foix and other the landes belonging to the same famely betweene Odet of Foix Lord of Lautrect and Villemur and Henry of Albret King of Nauarre Grandfather to the King of Nauarre now raigning for Gaston of Foix and Eleanor of Nauarre had two sonnes Gaston the eldest and Iohn Vicountie of Narbonne the yonger Gaston dyed before both father and mother leauing suruiuours by his wife Lady Magdalem of Fraunce daughter to Charles the seauenth two children Philip Phebus and Ratherine whereupon their Vnckle Iohn Vicountie of Narbonne hauing maried the sister of King Lewes the 12. made suite against the sayde Phebus his neuewe pretending eldership by the decease of his brother Gaston The cause pleaded in the Court of Parliament was by the Counsaile compounded in the yere 1488 but soone after began againe by Gaston of Foix Duke of Nemours sonne to the sayde Iohn being in great fauour with his Vnkle King Lewes the 12. but because hee dyed at the battaile of Rauenna without issue it seemed this processe might haue ended but it fell out otherwise for Odet of Foix his Cossen and pretended heire tooke the same cause in hand against Katherin sister to the sayd Phebus deceased and proceeded so farre that by arrest of the Court in the yeere 1517. he was put by the sayd CouÌ„tie together with other the Lordships of the same famelic adiudged vnto Henry of Albret sonne to the sayde Katherine and his posteritie of whom as is aforesayd is discended the now Lorde King of Nauarre In England after the decease of Edward the third in the yeere 1378. Richard sonne to Edw. Prince of Wales was without contradiction crowned and preferred before his Vnckles the Dukes of Lancaster of Clarence of Glocester and Yorke but aboue twentie yeeres after for his euill behauiour and misgouernment he was deposed and his Cossen Henry sonne to Iohn Duke of Lancaster set vp in his place In Portugall King Alphons the fifth had two children Fernand and Henry who beeing the elder deceased before his father leauing a sonne named Iohn after the decease of the said Alphons the said Iohn commonly called Iohn the second whoÌ„ the common Histories doe falsly terme sonne to the sayd Alphons did peaceable enioye the Crowne from the yeere 1482. vnto the yeere 1495. when he dyed without issue and then his Cossen Emanuell sonne to Ferdinand succeeded him The sayd Emanuell hauing raigned 22. yeres among other children left his sonne Iohn the third who was crowned after him and Henry the Cardinal Iohn the 3. during his raigne had a sonne of the same name who dyed before his father leauing his wife with childe of Sebastien who after his Grandfather Iohn the 3. was preferred before his great Vnckle Henry brother to the sayd Iohn the 3. notwithstanding the sayde Sebastiens father was neuer King and that the said Henry might haue obiected the same but he raigned not vntill the sayd Sebastien dyed and left no issue which question sayth Tiraquell doth so resemble ours as one Bee may an other In Castile King Alphons the 10. had two sonnes the elder Ferdinand who maried Blanch daughter to S. Lewes and of her begat Ferdinand and Alphons The younger called Sanxi who seeing his elder brother dead and waying his neuewes right to the Realme could not tary the decease of his father the sayde Alphons but during his life time raised warres to the ende to procure himselfe to bee declared heire whereat this good olde man was so wrath that he accursed him Besides that the French King Phillip the third Vnckle by the mother to the sayde yong Princes after he had therevpon asked aduise of the wise men of his Realme led an armie vnto the frontiers of Spayne and had gone forward had not the Popes Legat lingered him with wordes together with the assurance which the sayde Alphons made him viz. that he would vpholde the right and cause of his sayd neuewes which neuerthelesse he soone after he forgat and sent out his Letter sealed with gold and his owne Image therein grauen to his subiects repugnant to the former and by meanes of the same by forcâ—establishâ—d Sanxi his seconde sonne so as the orphelins were not ouercome but with the sworâ— without any shewe of reason as the historie doe import In Sicill the like quarell being moued betweene the sonne and the neuewe of Agathocles in the extremitie of his sicknesse the neuewe by the will and iudgement of God ouerthrew his sayd Vnkle and remayning victor was King ouer the whole Land In Germany vpon the like controuersie vnder Henry the 3. after vnder Ottho the Great the histories doe report that the States of the Empire met and agreed that this debate should as the custome of that time required be ended by a coÌ„bat wherein the defendants of the cause of y â— neuew sonne to his brother y t would haue had his fathers roume were conquerors and thereupon the sayd Estates did so conclude and adiudge it More solemne also is the sentence which Licurgus the true Oracle of humaine wisedome gaue in his owne cause about the 17. Olimpiade in the time of Numa King of the Romaines for wee reade that his father Enomus King of the Lacedemonians had two sonnes Polidectes and Licurgus the first dyed before his father leauing his wife with childe Enomus dead Licurgus tooke the royall Diadem and kept it a fewe moneths vntill at a banquet among his friendes his neuewe the after borne was offered vnto him whome hee named Charilaus withall set the Crowne vpon his head To
viscerum patris primo geniti excludet secundò genitum The fifth consideration is taken ab exemplo patroni qui vni ex liberis assignauit libertum to whom and to his he is due illis extantibus alteri non est locus So then the law custome and publick ordenāce hauing called the eldest and to him assigned y t right of the Realm it cānot belōg to any other but him or his being sufficiēt so long as they shall remaine in the worlde to take vp that succession which the right of eldership hath giuen him The sixt reason shall be that the same lawes and customes that are obserued in siefes and vasselag are considerable in Realmes and 〈◊〉 ruling And it is certaine that in beneficio quod feudum appellant nepos ex filio solus succedit and in default of him onely the Vnckle is called to the sayde succession notwithstanding our writer dare falsly mainteyne the contrary and alleadge the textes that make ad literā as they terme it against him Why then should wee not say as much of the Realme and Crowne which is the rule and gouernment of the said stefes Finally without doubt the right of eldership is a qualitie that passeth to euery of the children from the first to the second from the second to the third and so consequently as doe the heades of succession ordeyned by the pretors edict de liberis ad agnatos de his ad cognatos at verò certum est successionem quae fit de gradu in gradum potiorem esse illa quae fieri solet de capite in caput so as post omnes liberorum gradus vocantur agnati post vniuersos agnatos cognati Thus are the first borne the first head whose degrees are to bee considered in their issue The other head is of the second borne whose degrees are to be obserued in his children c. 6 Yet is there in this cause one especiall reason for the sayde Lorde King of Nauarre which cannot bee aunswered that is that his sayd Vnckle the Lorde Cardinall of Bourbon at the mariage of his neuewe the King of Nauarre to Lady Margaret of Fraunce acquited demissed yeelded and transferred to the sayd Lord King all and euery the rightes tles voyces and actions present to come that any waye might to him apperteyne as comming of the house of Bourbon expressely acknowledging his sayde neuewe the Lorde King of Nauarre for the true sonne heire successor and in all and by all representer of the senioritie of the sayde house To thincke therefore now to goe against the sayd renunciation made vnder a vaine hope of successiō in this Realme comprized vnder this general eldership of his late brother the Lord King of Nauarre there is no apparance sith spes fidei commissi conditionis in certum remitti poterit yea that iusiurandum reuunciationi interpositum tale est vt obseruari possit sine salutis aeternae dispendio also that by the Cannon lawes a renunciation cōfirmed with an oath can not be broken Besides that the renunciation was a part of the donation in the cōtract of Matrimonie whereby the mariage of the sayd Lord King of Nauarre to the sayd Lady of Frāce was more easily accomplished and by the restoring of the same the childrē of the said Matrimony might be endamaged which may not be permitted especially because the sayd Lorde Cardinall can alleadge no likelihood of hurt through his minoritie force or other causes of restitution against the sayde Lorde King of Nauarre his neuewe who at that tyme was yong and vnder the sayd Lord Cardinalles authoritie On the other side the learned do for the said Lord Cardinall bring in the example of Siluius King of the Latins who was preferred before Iulus his elder brother Ascanius sonne but in this matter the argument is not alike for Ascanius dyed not in his father Aeneas tyme but had worne the Crowne 38. yeeres or there about after his decease and when hee dyed the succession thereof was restored to Siluius to whom it rightly did apperteyne as being the true enheritance of his mother Lauinia For it is euident that Aeneas after the destruction of Troy landed in Italy with his sonne Ascanius and so well ordered his affayres that hee married Lauinia daughter to Latinus King of Alba Longa whom hee afterwarde succeeded of that mariage begat Siluius so that Ascanius raigne ouer the Latins in Italy was by tyrannie and without any vailable or more apparant title then the sworde for the Realme belonged to Siluius in the right of his mother Lauinia Secondly they alleadge a iudgement of the Senat of Sparta betweene Agesilaus and his nenewe Leotichides sonne to his elder brother Agis whereby the Vnckle was preferred and the Diadē royall to him adiudged But herein I would also desire thē to haue recourse to y ◠reason that Pausanias yeeldeth for y ◠saide iudgement which was because he was by his father Agis denounced a bastard whom in such cases the Ephores commonly beleeued as appeareth by a fore iudgement long before by them giuen in the person of Demaratus who was driuen out of the Realme which hee did enioye because of the like speech vsed by his father Ariston in his place as vnsufficient was substituted his Cossen Leotichides Their third example hath yet lesse apparence and is of Gontran King of Orleans of the sonnes of Clotaire the first who was preferred before Childebert sonne to his brother Sigisbert King of Metz in the succession of Cherebert King of Paris for they saye not that it was by force either that the Realme of the sayd Cherebert was deuided euen in the life tyme of the sayd Sigisbert father to the sayd Childebert among all his brethren and yet that afterwarde the weapons of the sayde Gontran were the stronger whē Fredegond had procured the death of Sigisbert which soone after Gontran repented and hauing no children adopted his neuewe Childebert who in the ende enioyed all his possessions The fourth is of Honoricus sonne to Gisericus King of the Wandales who was preferred before Gondabundus sonne to Genson the said Gizericus eldest but to this purpose they should withall haue set downe the words of the sayde Gesericus the fathers last will and testamēt importing as saith Procopius that he would haue the eldest of his children to succeede him which peraduenture he had learned of the auncient Nomades among whō sayth Strabo the prerogatiue of yeres was relligiously obserued in consideration whereof sentence passed for Corbis the eldest against Orsna his Cossen and sonne to the last King whose controuersie was decided by a Combat But in France we regard not the age but onely the order of senioritie wherein the neuewe continueth by substitution of him in the roume and place of his father the prerogatiue of the sonne The like was obserued in Barnarde sonne to Pepin Charles the Great
eldest sonne before whom was preferred to the Empire Lewes the Mecke second sonne to the sayd Charles But this example may most easily be aunswered because it was the same Charles their common father that had deuided his Dominions among his children and had giuen Italy to Pepin his eldest sonne which also was reserued to the sayde Bernard his sonne and therefore after the pertition made by the sayd Charles he could pretend no further in y e succession that might come in question besides that at that time the Empire was not properly successiue for notwithstanding the neerest in bloud to the deceased Emperour did succeede yet durst hee not so intitle himselfe vntill by the consent of the Romaines he had bene publickly annoynted and crowned Much lesse also was the Imperiall dignitie successiue after the creation of the Princes electors of the same in the tyme of Ottho the 3. of the house of Saxony or by the opinion of the skilfullest of our worlde in the tyme of Fredericke the 2. so as there is no likelihoode to drawe an electiue Empire into consequence with hereditarie and patrimoniall Kingdomes The 5. indgement is of the Coūtie of Arthois which was in strife in the time of Philip the Faire King of France betweene Maude wife to Ottho Earle of Bourgondie daughter to Robert Earle of Arthois slaine at the battaile of Courtray and Robert the sonne of Phillip who likewise was sonne to the sayd deceased Earle Robert in which case the aforesayde Countie of Arthois was by the sayd French King adiudged to Maud who was preferred before her neuewe Robert being yet in infancie And in troth the historie setteth downe no other perticuler occasion of this iudgement but y t it was giuen by the mere motion of the sayd King Phillip Lord of the fief Neither is it sayd that his Maiestie tooke any other aduice but of his owne will the neede that then he had of Ottho the sayd Maudes husband together with the small seruice that of long time he might attend of the said Robert a yong childe and at that tyme there needed a good warrier to be opposed against the Flemings to the ende to suppresse their boldnesse and customary rebellions So as in respect of the sayd Roberts very youth the sayd King Phillip thought it meete to infringe the law and custome vsually obserued in like causes But God be praised in whatsoeuer may happen betweene the said Lords the King of Nauarre and his Vnkle the Cardinall of Bourbon we cannot incurre that daunger but rather were to be feared the great yeeres of the sayd Lord Cardinall already olde worne and by reason of his order estraunged from al vse of armes in respect of the flouring tyme of the King of Nauarre a Prince brought vp in the same and in gonernment of Estates The sixt is for the Countie of Champagne betweene Henry the seconde sonne of Earle Thibault the daughter of the sayd Earles eldest sonne wife to Erard of Breno in which case by arrest of the Court of Parliament of the Peeres of France in the yeere 1216. the sayde Countie was adiudged to Henry the Vnckle against his neuewe daughter to his elder brother But it may easely be answered the eldest sonne of the sayde Thibault going into the holy Land had expressely ordeyned that in case he dyed in the sayd expedition or otherwise without issue male then that his brother should succeede in the sayd Countie with endowing his daughter wife to the said Breno with a competēt summe The seuenth happened betweene the children of Charles the second King of Sicil sonne to the brother of King S. Lewes who married the heire of Hūgary and of that mariage begat Charles Martel and Robert The father gaue and appointed to the sayde Martell the Realme of Hungary and in his life tyme caused him to be thereof crowned whereby he did a while enioye it and then dyed leauing his sonne Charles to whom Charles the Grandfather confirmed the donation of the sayd Realme made to his father Martell and to his second sonne Robert he gaue the Realm of Naples So that by the truth of this historie it appeareth that this was a pertition by the saide Charles the second made betweene his children which they could not resist and whereof neither y e sayd Martel nor his sonne Charles had cause to complaine for the Realme of Hungary was farre greater more rich and wealthy then that of Naples which was already rent and dismembred by the Arragōs as it is euident by al histories of those times Our Interpretors doe yet more briefly aunswere this preferment of Robert the second before the sonne of Martel his elder brother aleadging that Pope Clement the 5. pretending authoritie ouer the Realme of Naples which hee aduowed to bee of the fiefe of the Church pronounced this sentence lightly enough therein doing the office of a partie rather then of a Iudge besides that of the sayd Realme in respect it was subiect to Sainct Peters chaire was not properly successiue The last example that they alleadge is of Lewes Sforce who was preferred to the Dutchie of Milan before the sonne of Iohn Galeas but thei might rather say that he preferred himselfe by force and through execrable tyrannie which the sayd Lewes exercised against this poore orphan vnder pretence of gouerning and defending him Besides it is so farre from being our case that it is certain that the young childe enioyed his fathers Estate when this Tyrant his Vnckle seazed thereon and put him to death as vniustly as in the ende God did iustly punish him in causing him to ende his daies in miserie and captiuitie Hauing thus aunswered such examples as they may alleadge let vs now consider whether the reasons that they propounde be sufficient to cause vs to alter our aduice 8 First in all Successions it is a generall rule to call thereto the neerest to hym whose state is in question so that it is by priuiledge and extraordinarie licence that we admit the the Children of the deceased brother to share with their vnkle in such goods onely as will baare deuision Which is the cause that our Doctor alleadgeth Butr. in his Tree of the succession of the Realme of Fraunce in these words Succssit ergo illi Carolo in regno Franc. Philippus filius alterius Caroli qui erat ei in 4. gradu nec successit Robertus pronepos Roberti Comitis Atrebatensis quendam quia ille erat in 8. gradu nec successit Robertus nepos Caroli Regis Siciliae Ierusalem quia ille erat in 7. gradu nec successit Ludouicus nepos Beati Ludouici quia ille erat dicto Carolo decedenti in quarto gradu Therefore sith otherwise the Vncle retaineth still the chiefe degree the especiall regard that Iustinian had to the posteritie of the deceased brother to make them equall with their Vncles can not serue them in vndeuided
to his cause and goods like as we say that it is the reason why restitutiones in integruÌ„ adolescentibus concessae haeredibus illorum competunt quia laesionis occasione minoribus indulgentur eademque ratione S. C. Vellâ—iani exceptio succcessoribê° quique prodest Item actionis funerariae priuilegiuÌ„ haeredi ac caeteris successoribus non denegatur tempus iudicatis datum haeredibus proficit so that sith this qualitie of eldership hath perfected and obteyned this right and cause of succeeding the deceased father he shall seeme to haue transferred the right that hee had in his goods to his sonne Who also shall be capable of a more personall priuiledge of his father for in trueth by the order of lawe if any thing resteth in actions petitions prosecutions or lawe it shall bee numbred with the goodes So that in this argument sith the right and cause was in the father perfect and absolute wanting no more but execution it will not bee amisse to say that the same right may be said to be comen to him as in lege Julia that worde peruenit Vlpian taketh for accipiendum For notwithstanding succession should neuer fall or take effect in the person of the eldest yet hath the lawe made him during his life possessor of successiue possibilitie and qualitie so that he hath obteyned that right to himself both vnweting and vnawares which proceeding of the authoritie and vertue of the lawe is transmissible and as depending of the cause and matter is to the sonne transferred who is part and portion of his fathers bowels as we haue sufficiently shewed and thereof it ensueth that the elder had not this in his owne person onely but rather illud idem in persona ipsius residebat ab ea tameÌ„ diuersum seperatum illudque idem est acsi non filio id est certae personae lex ipsa detulerit sed liberis i. genero cognato primogenito datuâ—â— fuerit which may stand for an aunswer to the text before alleadged to the contrary of him qui filio tutorem dederat vt nepoti dedisse non videatur 12 The last reason is taken out of the text of the custumary of the towne of Paris the head Cittie of the Realme whereby the vniuersall Estate thereof should be ruled Now by the same it is expressely inferred that the representation can take no place in collateral ligne except betweene the brother and the brothers sonne in the pertition of their deceased brother and vnckles goodes neither hath our writer forgotten to say that it is the order of the Romaines lawe conteyned in the auncient decrees of the Emperours before the which in the olde decemuirall law there was no representation in collaterall ligne Herevpon wee maye alleadge reason of double difference first in respect of the Ciuill law which hath had no consideration at all of enheritaunce vndeuided and not subiect to pertition amoÌ„g successors as also it hath not respected senioritie or innioritie of the heires of the deceased but being in like degree hath equally acknowledged them in the succession to them fallen whereupon it followeth that sith contrary to our pollicie moribus ferè iure gentium omnium instituta require these two qualities in the obteyning of a Realme that is that onely one and he the neerest but among those of equall degree the first borne bee preferred The same lawe and obseruation of birthright might and ought therein to haue perpetuall place of representation which it hath as is largely before discoursed so that to argue betwene the qualities of ciuill and Romaine enheritances and ours both politicall and quite altered there is vnder correction no purpose reason or apparance The other reason shal concerne the article of the customary of Paris which cannot bee vnderstoode of the succession of the Realme because therein the neerest successor to the Crowne is not therefore called heire of the King last deceased to cause in this controuersie the coÌ„mon rules of successors are to be obserued but the Realm belongeth to him in vertue of the common lawe thereof whereby the next male of the bloud Royall must succeede not in qualitie as owner of the goods of the last enioyer of the Crowne but by his birthright although in troth in whatsoeuer concerneth Commonwealth and commoditie he bee bound to keepe and obserue the couenants and agreements of his predecessor and therein onely may he be accompted heire to the King whom he hath succeeded These bee the strongest reasons that those of the contrary opinion can alleadge which also I haue further augmented then our writer least it should seeme to the learned Lawyers to whome onely in this last article I meane to speak that I would omit or dissemble any thing that thei could imagine against the trueth which by this meanes I thincke to haue layd so open for that euery one may perceiue it an easie matter to aunswer all their friuolous allegations by the grounds of the knowledge of the lawes which both the one and the other would vse Wherefore there is no more for the Frenchmen to doe but when occasion shall fall out to resolue vpon the most certaine and reasonable opinion for the sayd Lorde King of Nauarre sonne to the elder brother allowed by a great number of Doctors both Canon and Ciuill euen by the two notable lights of the Lawe Innocent for the Canon lawe and Barthole for the Romaine pollicie who make no difficultie thereof neither is the doubt dispersed ouer the Land to any other ende but to destroye both the one and the other and so to giue opportunitie to a third to become Lord of the Realme vnder whom this Estate will neuer florish and the tyrant the instrument of the deuill who durst enterprize the same shall perish miserably with all such instruments as to that effect he may haue vsed Let therefore the perturbers of the peace of this Realme if they be I say not Christians but euen men capable of naturall reason ponder not the politick Iustice of the societie of this ciuill life but onely the hazard wherin they shal at once plunge their memorie honor wealth life and soule and they shall see vnlesse they will wilfully bee blind those men that shal most employe them selues in fauour of the detestable conspiracie now discouered by all good Frenchmen remaine also ouerwhelmed in the greatest miserie and ruine which shall leaue vnto them more affliction without comparison then to the veriest clownes and poorest pesants in the countrey ouer whose bellies they shall so often haue marched because at y e least the life peace of conscience and diuine vengeaunce shall staye in fauour of these when the others may assure themselues of the losse of the loue of God the light of the worlde and their good fame with y e posteritie for hauing tainted their hands in the bloud of their Kinges Princes and fellow countrymen and for euil entreating them and assisting
auncient or mightie soeuer as beeing aboue 1200. yeeres since vnder one forme and with one kind of lawes it was gouerned vnder the maiestie and authoritie of Kings of whom this last race hath continewed 600. yeres But among the chiefest and most perfect ordinances of this Crowne that is most commendable whereby the realme doth by succession belong by vertue of the Salick law to the next Male of the deceased King discending of the Masculine ligne For in trueth our Kings knowing that those of their owne blood are to succeede them haue the greater cause to keepe housband and preserue the estate and demains of their Realme as their owne and certaine Patrimonie besides that the successors of the Crowne that are nourished and brought vp in this greatnesse doe neuer become tyrants because euen from their mothers wombes they are vsed to command and ordinarily doe become the better more iust valeant hardy and couragious by representing to their owne view the greatnesse commendation and maiestie of their predecessors On the otherside the subiects of the Realme that haue sâ—â—e the birth nourishing and bringing vp of their Princes do the better know their humors and willes and doe more freely obey such as are borne to rule their estate theÌ„ others that are newly elected whom they remember to haue knowen in the like calling as them selues without either preeminence authoritie or gouernment so as there is nothing so perfect as that which neerest doth imitate nature and which seemeth to be altogether immortall aud infinite by Succession from the Father to the Sonne Besides that thereby the Kings subiects howe wealthy or mightie so euer doe conteine themselues in duetie humilitie and obedience to their soueraigne Prince when they remember that so long as any of the royall blood doe suruiue the same be capaple to attaine to that marke and that purposing to attempt any bad matter against the Estate and person of the King there remaine as many reuengers of the iniurie offered to his Maiestie as there be Princes of his bloud Herevpon doe I presume y t in our France wherein this royall succession hath time out of minde bene strictly obserued it was neuer found neither doe we reade that the French men did at any time enterprize or practize aught against the person of their King whether in respect of that naturall affection that alwaies they haue borne him and whereof they beare the bell among all other Nations in Europe or els because God neuer permitted the royall bloud of Fraunce to rest onely in one whereby the presumpteous conspirators might after the trespasse committed escape without punishment This royall succession therefore resting without doubt or coÌ„tradiction in this Realme the subiects thereof doe well knowe euen naturally and presumptiuely who is most likely to become their King so as now to call in question this succession is the only direct way to cause the King y t holdeth the Scepter ouer vs to think and with himselfe to imagine that in his Realme there are some who for the satisfying of their ambitioÌ„ could willingly wish to haue his place and for the same purpose do harken after his ende But sith the bolde impudencie of men is so great that they blush not neither are ashamed to disclose themselues to giue all men to vnderstande of their bad entents besides that necessarily the Commune must bee satisfied who otherwise might sooner beleeue the false then the true before wee proceede any further in aunswering the chiefe poynts of the Lybelles that they scatter abroade to the end to say that after the decease of the most Christian King without issue male it is not the nowe King of Nauarre but his Vnckle the Lord Cardinall of Bourbon that lawfully should be King or the better to expresse their entents that it is neither the one ne the other but that they must proceede to a newe election and nomination of a Prince I will here protest that I neuer desire to see the aduenture of that substitution which they pretende but hartely doe wish to the King my soueraigne Lorde a most long and happie life with as great number of issue capable of this Crowne as there be Starres in the Firmament 9 After which protestation to come to the purpose and succession of the house of FraÌ„ce I will first speake to those y t are not brought vp in the state of this Realme but onely haue learned of their Fathers that the Famely of Bourvon hath the honor to be issued from our Kinges therefore that the Princes thereof may succeede when God shall permit to the Crowne by the Lawe of succession of the realme Turning my selfe then to these commons I say that it is well knowen that King Lawes the ninth canonized and called saint Lewes had two sonnes the elder Phillip the bould of whome are come our Kings yet raigning who also had two sonnes the eldest Phillip the fayer who succeeded him and after him his three sonnes Lewes Phil. the long Charles the fayer the yoÌ„ger Charles County of Valois who begat Phillip of Valois who succeeded in the Realme after his Cousen Charles the fayer After Phillip succeeded his soune Iohn after him Charles the fifth called the wise sonne to Iohn This Charles had two sonnes the eldest Charles the sixth King of Fraunce vnto whome succeeded Charles the seuenth Lewes the eleuenth and Charles the eight his sonne petie sonne and petie Neuew The yonger Lewes Duke of Orleance who by Lady Valentine of Millan had two sonnes Charles the elder father to Lewes the twelfth King of France after his Cousen Charles the eight was deceased without issue and Iohn Earle of Angoulesme who was Father of Charles also Earle of the same lande and Grandfather to king Francis the first who succeeded his cossen Lewes the twelfth of which King Francis came Henrie his second sonne and father to Henry now raigning Hetherto therefore the branch of Phillip the bould eldest Sonne to Saint Lewes neuer failed so must that fable needes be false which the enimies of the house of BourboÌ„ haue sought to root in mens mindes namely that the discontentation of the late King FraÌ„cis the first against Charles of Bourbon that dyed at Rome was for his pretence to the Crowne of France which since haue continued in al the Princes of this house and from whence should be deriued the troubles and Ciuill Warres of this realme during the minoritie of the Kings Francis the second and Charles the ninth brothers to the King nowe raigning A matter vtterly false and falsely inueÌ„ted to the ende more and more to bring into the hatred of the people the Princes of Bourbon who neuer accompted more deerely of any thing or had greater delight in ought then to acknowledge obey and faithfully serue the Maiesties of our Kings as their true and souereigne Lordes hauing the honor so neerely to be to them allyed that they are of the same House and Armes without
difference except that our Kings are extract from the elder sonne of Saint Lewes and the Princes of Bourbon frō the yonger 10 The second sonne of said saint Lewes was Saint Robert of France to whom his father gaue for his maintenance y e Coūtie of Clermont in Beauuoys This Robert married Beatrix daughter and Heire of Archembault of Bourbon and they two had issue a sonne named Lewes who succeeded his said father in the Countie of Clermount and so was also Earle of March besides that in the right of his Mother hee enioyed the goods of the sayd Archembault of Bourbon namely the Lordship of Bourbō which in respect of the appertenaunces thereto was of such accompt that King Phillip of Valois in the beginning of his raigne which was about the yeere 1327. erected the said Landes into a Dutchie wherby the said Lewes tooke vpon him the name and state of Duke of Bourbon which since hath continued in his posteritie This Lewes had two sonnes by whom this stock was first deuided into two brāches the one was named Peter the other Iames Peter is now quite worne out as concerning the Masculine ligne neuerthelesse wee will briefly rehearse his issue and then retourne to the posteritie of Iames who was the yonger of whom is discended the house of Vandosme from whom the Princes of Bourbon now liuing doe fetch their originall Peter of Bourbou being the elder of this house as is aforesaid was of great credit and authoritie in the time of King Iohn and had many daughters among whom was one very fayre whome Charles the fifth couered to marry rather then Margaret of Flanders who had three goodly Counties to her marriage Flanders Artois and Henault whom he caused his brother Phillip the bould Duke of Bourgondy to marry An other named Blanch was maried to the King of Castile a third to the Duke of Sauoy a fourth named Catherin to the Earle of Harcourt He had also a Sonne called Lewes who was of great fame as well toward y e end of Charles the fifth as in the beginning of Charles the sixth to whom he was appointed tuter as also to his brother Lewes Duke of Orleance togither with the Duke of Burgondy their vnckle by their father The saide Lewes of Bourbon was Capteine and Leader of the armie against the Turke in Affrike in the time of Charles the sixth and had to wife Lady Anne Daulphine who brought into that house the Countie Dauphine of Auuergne and the lands of Cōbrailles with the Lordship of Mercure in the said land of Auuergne and by her he had a Sonne called Iohn who maried Mary daughter to y e Duke of Berry To this man was giuen the Dutchy of Auuergne with the Dutchy of Bourbo and Countie of Clermount 11 At Iohn the sayde principall braunch bearing away the eldership the Famelie began to bee deuided for he had two Sonnes Charles and Lewes Charles succeeded his father in Bourbon Clermont and Aunergne and Lewes had Montpensier which in y e end returned to his posteritie Charles marryed Agnes of Burgondy sister to Duke Phillip of Burg. and they had issue principall two sonnes Iohn and Peter It is sayd they also had two more of one name viz. Lewes of whom the one dyed yong the other was Bishop of Liedge and Abbot of Sainct Vaast Others doe saye that they had two Sonnes Charles who was Cardinal and Archbishop of Lyōs Iohn who was Bishop of Liedge They had also sundry Daughters as Iane married to the Prince of Orange Isabell to the Duke of Burgondie and Margeret to the Duke of Sauoy of whom are discended Philibert Duke of Sauoy deceased without issue and Lady Loise of Sauoy married to the Duke of Angolesme of whom came the late King Frances the first But to returne to the said Iohn and Peter sonnes of the said Charles of Bourbon and Agnes of Burgondie Iohn the eldest had his fathers goodes and married Iane of Fraunce Daughter to King Charles the seuenth sister to Lewes the eleuenth who neuerthelesse in the warre for the Commonwealth reposed no cōfidence in the sayd Iohn of Bourbon aswell because he was come of a Daughter of Bourgondie as for that he had not bene payd his mariage money The sayd Iohn had no children by either Lady Iane of Fraunce or Lady Iane of Bourgondie his Cousen whom he tooke for his seconde wife and so his whole succession fel to his brother Peter who was called Lord of Beauuiew This Peter maried Anne of France daughter to Lewes the eleuenth He was in great credite during Lewes raigne but in greater during Charles the eight so as in the voyage to Naples the sayde King left the sayd Peter Regent of Fraunce The sayde Peter also left no issue Male but one Daughter called Susan who might haue great controuersies for the goodes of that famelie for the preuēting wherof it was wisely aduised to marrie her to a male of this house which was brought to passe as hereafter shall be shewed 12 To Lewes of Bourbon of whom wee spake before fell the Countie of Montpensier and so continued the name and title so long as the ligne of the sayd Charles his elder brother lasted He married Gabriel of the Tower of whom came Gilbert of Montpensier Viceroy of Naples after that Charles the eight had gotten it He married Clare of Bousaigne of whom issued fiue children thrée sonnes and two daughters Charles Lewes and Frances of whom the two last died without issue Charles succeeded his father and with the consent of King Lewes the eleuenth maried the aforenamed Susan of Bourbon his Cousen whereby all the auncient goodes of this house were left to them and confirmed in their persons whereby also was exting uished a quarrell already framed for the sayde goods which neuerthelesse soone after brake out againe more fiercely then before because y ◠sayd Susan of Bourbō wife to her Cousen Charles and heire of the elder house of Bourbon dyed before her sayde Husband Charles without leauing any issue of her bodie and therefore Lady Lewes of Sauoy mother to King Frances the first and Regēt of France entituled and bare her self for heire to her said Cousen Susan and in deede was in degree neerer to succeede her then the sayd Charles her Husband wherevpon the processe controuersie began whereat it was sayd that the syd Charles tooke such displeasure that he withdrew himself out of the Kings obediēce therfore his Maiestie had a decrée of iudgement of his goodes and rightes by confiscation Also since that tyme was a composition made betwene the King and his sayd mother vpon condition that if hee deceased without heires male then the sayd goodes should returne into Lorraine But his Maiestie not willing so rigorously to vse his rightes and coueting to deale fauourably with the sisters of the said Charles he left to them part oft he sayd goodes as to the Lady Dutches of Lorraine the Baronage of Mercure