Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
lord_n	die_v	king_n	year_n	11,611	5	4.9248	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A19951	An oration made on the part of the Lordes spirituall in the chamber of the Third Estate (or communality) of France, vpon the oath (pretended of allegiance) exhibited in the late Generall Assembly of the three Estates of that kingdome: by the Lord Cardinall of Peron, arch-bishop of Sens, primate of Gaule and Germany, Great Almenour of France &c. Translated into English, according to the French copy, lately printed at Paris, by Antoine Estiene. Whereunto is adioyned a preface, by the translatour.; Harangue faicte de la part de la chambre ecclésiastique en celle du Tiers-estat sur l'article du serment. English.	Du Perron, Jacques Davy, 1556-1618.	1616 (1616)	STC 6384; ESTC S116663	77,855	154

besides the possession without interruption continued and the perpetuall tradition of the Prouince there were writinges made that very houre the date accordinge to the account of the yeare of our Lord falling to be the same with the yeare 536. Which I alleadge not as I haue before made protestation therehence to inferre any particuler consequence from fact to right but to shew in generall how great reuerence our first kinges did beare to the censures of ancient Popes The Pope sayes du Haillā (b) Du Haillan en Phist de France l. 1. incensed with this cruell acte sent word to the King that he should make amendes for this fact otherwise that his realme should be interdicted Then Clotharius feeling remorse of conscience for his crime did ordeine for amendes thereof that from that time forward the Lords of Yuetot and their heires should be quit from all homage seruice and obedience due to the King for the territory of Yuetot c. And thereupon were the euidences drawne and sealed by the foresaid Clotharius And Gaguin (a) Gaguinus hist ●ranc l. 2. I find as an infallible truth that this was done the yeare of our Lord 536. For the English hauing long time after dominion in Normandy there fell out a suite betweene Iohn of Holland Englishman and the Lord of Yuetot as if his territory had beene tributary to the King of England The Lieuetenant of (b) The word which the translator of Gaguin vseth is Caletz which signifieth as well the towne as the coast of Callis the people wherof in old time were cal'd Caletes and wherof one part is euen to this day called le Pais de Caults Callis after he had throughly in the yeare of our Lord 1428. informed himself of the case by order of iustice did determine that he had found iust as I haue noted before And when Queene Brune childe and King Theodorike desirours to haue a confirmation of the priuiledges of the hospitall of Autun which the said Queene had founded and to haue the insuing Kinges bound by the authority of the Sea Apostolike to conserue them inuiolable without the least tuch of any sacriledge the Pope S. Gregory the great at their instance wrote these wordes in an Epistle to Senator which is the tenth in the eleauenth booke of his Epistles (c) An absurd Author hath as fondly made answere that this decree is not found in S Gregory as it was absurdly answered that the Excommunication of the Emperour Theodosius by S. Ambrose was not to be found in the Ecclesiasticall History We grant and confirme ordeyning that no Kings Prelates nor any other of what degree soeuer may in part diminish or take away any thing bestowed on the said hospital by the foresaid most excellent Kings our sonnes And a litle after And if any one of the Kings Prelates Iudges or other secular persons after information giuen of this our constitution do go about to contradict it let him be depriued of his power and dignity For I wil not serue my self of those Buls of the Abbey of Soisson for that they were not inserted within the Register of S. Gregories Epistles but were taken out of the Coffers of the Monkes of S. Medard and put after the work at the end of the Register as appeares both by ancient impressions of the same Register and by the citation of Pope Gregory VII (a) Gregor 7. lib. 8. ep 21. who liued more then 500. yeares since made of the Epistle to Senator without speaking of that of Soisson And when the Emperour Iustinian the 2. sent his Constable to take Pope Sergius and transport him from Rome to Constantinople for that he would not approue the Councel falsely called the Sixt the Imperiall souldiers of Italy opposed themselues droue back the Emperours Cōstable with iniuries reproaches Iustinian the 2. sayes Beda (b) Bed de sex aetat mundi an Author of the same age being offended for that Sergius of happy memory Bishop of the Church of Rome would not signe and fauour the erroneous Synod which he caused to be held at Constantinople sent his Constable Zachary commaunding him to take the Pope and bring him to Constantinople But the Souldiers of Rauenna with the Prouinces adioyning did resist the impious commaundement of the Prince and repelled the said Zachary with contumelies reproaches from the Citty of Rome It is true indeed that afterwardes the same Iustinian did wash away this cryme togeather with other his impieties when as hauing gotten Pope Constantine into the East He threw himselfe prostrate on the earth (c) Bed ib. before him saith Beda and praying him to make intercession for his sinnes he did renew all the priuiledges of the Church And when the Emperour Philippicus successour to Iustinian 2. came to the Empire and according to the custome of the Emperours presently after their comming to the state of sending the profession of their faith to the Pope had addressed vnto him a profession of an hereticall faith the Pope reiected it in Synode and vpon the refusal of it the people of Rome abrogated the Emperour Philippicus his Imperiall titles Philippicus sayth (a) Beda de sex aetat mundi Bede and after him Paulus (b) Paulus Diacon de gestis Longob lib. 6 cap. 4. Diaconus sent vnto Pope Constantine letters of peruerse doctrine which the Pope togeather with the Councell of the Sea Apostolique reiected c. And the people of Rome ordeyned that neither the name nor the edictes nor the money that had the image of the heretical Emperour vpon it should be admitted or receaued And at what time the Emperour Leo Isauricus fell into the heresy of the Iconclastes or Image-breakers and began to persecute the Catholikes in the East Pope Gregory the second after many dilations assembled a Councell of the Bishops of the West at Rome by which he depriued the Emperour of all his rightes tributes iurisdiction and power Imperiall that he had in Italy and all this with the aduise assistance of the French And though some Authors be silent herein yet Theophanes Cedrenus Zonarus Greeke historians affirme it and none of them deny it The most holy Gregory sayth Theophanes (c) Theop. in hi●● miscel lib. 21. withdrew Rome Italy and al the rights as well of the Republique as of the Church into the west partes from the obedience of Leo and of his Empire Zonaras saith (d) Zon. tom 3 Annal in Leon. Isaterico Pope Gregory seeing the persecutions of the Emperour Leo against the Catholikes did cut off from communion with him the Bishop of Constantinople and those who imbraced the same impiety and exposed them together with the Emperour to an Anathema Synodique forbad the tributs which til then had beene paid to the Empire and adioyned himselfe with the French whereupon they might take an occasion to make themselues maisters of Rome And when the French were resolued to abandon and

forme of his appellation saith (b) Act. inter Bonif Phil. Pulch. Wee appeale to the said Generall Councell which we most hartily craue may be assembled and to the true and lawfull supreme Bishop that shal be and to others to which or to whome it shal be meete to appeale For the King and his maynteyned that Boniface was not the true Pope but was intruded and thrust into the Popedome by fraud simony (c) Ibidem Celestine his predecessour the true lawfull Pope still liuing And they further added that he was an (d) Ibidem Heretique and consequently not Pope for as much as said they (e) Ibid. in appell fact per reg regni col art 18. he had reuealed a confession and more then that he pretended that he beleeued not in the presence of Christes body in the Holy Sacrament And for this the Coūt of Artois caused his Buls to be burnt not as of the true Pope but as of a false one intruded heretical symoniacal and for this cause the King appealed not frō the Pope but from the person of Boniface to the Councel to the Sea Apostolique when it should haue a true Pope he sent two Knights to signify his appeale the one an Italian named Schiarra and the other a Frenchman named Nogaret who surprized by intelligence the Cittie of Anagnia wherin Pope Boniface was whence being deliuered vp and sent to Rome he dyed within awhile of sorrow In place of Boniface was chosen Benedictus to whome presētly after his creation the King gaue sufficiently to vnderstand that what he had done against Boniface was done but against his person and not against the Sea Apostolique For he wrote vnto him with this superscription (a) Act. inter Bonif Phil Pulch. fol. 94. To the most holy Father in our Lord Benedict by the diuine prouidence Supreme Bishop of the sacred holy Church Roman and vniuersall Philip by the grace of God King of France deuoutly kisseth his blessed seete And further with this cōgratulatiō (b) Ibid. f. 95. The Order of the Preachers do glorie to see sitting in the supreme throne of iustice such a father of the Vniuerse and of the faith such a successour of S. Peter and such a vicar of Christ And together with this concludeth (c) Ibid. f. 96. We recommend confidently the Realme in the gouernement whereof we doe by the grace of God sit and withall we recommend the Church of France to the fauours of your Holines And to Benedict who continued in the Sea but eight monethes succeeded Clement the fifth vnder whome the affaires of reconciliation were in such sort accorded and brought to an end as the temporall rightes of the Realme continued in their integrity And Clement himselfe came to Lions where the King to honour in him the spiritual power of Christ put himselfe on foot togeather with his brethren to receaue him Our Chronicles saith du Haillan (d) Du Haillan en la vie de Philip le Belle. doe affirme that the King of France and his two brethren were on foote by the Popes side holding his horses bridle To the second instance which is of the complaint of Lewis the 12. the defendors of the exception make the very same answere That the source and origen of that difference was not matter of religion but cases meerely temporall that is of the league and association that Pope Iulius and King Lewis the 12. at that time Duke of Millane had made and entred into against the Venetians For the Pope seeing how the King grew as great as he could desire in Italy fel of from that alliance with him and reconciled himselfe with the Venetians The King incensed with this separation and the Popes deportement and bad carriage towardes him thereon following caused a Councell to be held at Pisa and after againe at Millan by the Cardinals and other Prelates of his side where the Pope was declared susspēded frō the administration of the vniuersal Church The Pope sore moued at this attaint caused another to be held at Rome where to requite the King he declared him and his adherents deposed from the administration of their temporall Estates But the French both Ecclesiastike and Laike knowing that the first source beginning of that discord proceded from passion of matter of State not of religion interteyned vnion in such sort with the King as nothing could separate them from him For as touching the losse that happened vnto Iohn de Albret of the Kingdome of Nauarre the Continuer of Paulus Aemiltus though he was a sore enemy of the memory of Pope Iulius confesseth not that the sentence of the Pope was the true cause on the contrary he maynteineth that the cause for which Iohn de Albret lost the Kingdome of Nauarre was for breaking of from the alliance he had with Ferdinand King of Aragon which alliance Ferdinand affirmed was ratified vpon condition that if the Kinges of Nauarre did violate the same then the Kingdome of Nauarre should returne to the Spaniardes and he did put himselfe into that alliance of King Lewis the 12. vnder promise that he should procure the soueraignity of Berne to be restored vnto him This then the Continuer of Paulus Aemilius auerreth to be the true cause of the losse of the Kingdome of Nauarre And the other neither to haue beene the true cause nor true pretext but only a help of a pretext of which Ferdinand not hauing taken his aduantage did not yet leaue to pretend that the Kingdome of Nauarre appertained vnto him and so to take possession of it The King of Nauarre saith he (a) Ferrō Continuat Pauli Aemil. in Lud. 12. denied in the beginning that he could refuse to giue passage to the King of Aragon to passe into France saying first that he was hindred to declare himself enemy to Ferdinand by the alliance he had with him and Ferdinand himselfe vaunted that when the Kingdome of Nauarre was by the Spaniardes rendred vp into the handes of the race of Albret it was by caution written and prouided That in case their successors should breake their alliance the Kingdome should returne to the Spaniardes And a litle after (b) Ibid. Whereupon Ferdinand hauing vnderstood that the King of Nauarre was entred into amity with the King of France turned against him the forces which he had prepared for his iourney into France And this was the cause for which Ferdinand did thrust his neighbour next bordering King out of his Kingdome And more then this he added the pretext of another matter namely that the Pope had declared the King and his adherentes excomunicate their Kingdomes exposed To the Third Instance which is taken from the Arrest or Decree of Parlamēt which Mousieur Chancelour of the Hospitall caused to be made against Tanquerell there needeth no other answere then the Answers going before For the Arrest toucheth not in any sort

or bowed their necks to Christes yoke as we read that S. Greg. Turon in Clodoueo Remigius said to our first Christian King Mitis depone colla Sicamber they were not yet by a mutuall and reciprocall oath bound to their subiects to liue dye in the religion obedience of him who carieth written vpon his thigh Apocal. 19 Psal 105. Kinge of Kinges and Lord of Lordes And those wordes of the Psalme The Kinges nations shall be gathered togeather to serue our Lord Esa 49. were not yet at that tyme fullfilled Nor those of the Prophet Esay The Kinges shall adore thee prostrate vpon the earth and shall lick vp the dust of thy feete By meanes whereof they not hauing beeue declared vassalls tributaries of Christ nor hauing made to him any oath of homage fidelity nor hauing beene receaued by their subiects with that condition they should liue vnder the Empire and Ensigne of Christ and not beeing bound to their subiects by contract and mutuall oath when they began to proclayme warre against Christ they fell not by their owne proper Profession into any manifest cryme of felony neither declared they themselues by their owne iudgment vnworthy and to haue lost the Fee which they held of him they violated not the reciprocall and mutual oath that was betweene them their people But at this day the Christian Princes who haue for so many ages since made profession to be vassals and tributaries of Christes Kingdome and to subiect their Scepters their Diadems Crownes vnto his Empire who haue raysed seated and placed his Crosse vpon their Ensignes and in their standardes carried it vpon the forefront of their Diadems haue set it vpon the top of their Crownes haue stamped it vpon their monies and coynes that it might appeare whose tribute-coyne it was haue made these Inscriptions Christus vincit Christus regnat Christus imperat haue bound themselues after so long a tyme by oath at their Consecrations both to God and to their people to maynteyne the faith of Christ and with that cōdition receaued the Scepter at the handes of their Peeres and the reciprocall oath of the people These I say when they come to proclaime warre against Christ to breake the oath they haue made to him and to their Estates not by a simple act of contrariety nor by a simple declaration and fact of repugnāce but by a profession and protestation of a will alwaies bent to contradict and to oppose against him not by a simple violating and breaking of an oath but by a vow and oath of a mind resolued for euer to violate and break their oath not by simple default of faith but by the yealding of their faith and promise to the enemy of him to whome they had by a former promise and faith bound themselues that is to say by abiuring and persecuting the Catholike Religion and by publike profession of Arianisme or of Mahometanisme or of Paganisme Then they fall into a contumacy of perfidiousnes against God and make themselues incapable of the tenures they hold of their Soueraigne vnworthy to be acknowledged for Lieutenantes of their Subiectes and of those that be vnder their charge And from this derogateth not that which others object that Kinges cease not to be Kinges before their cōsecratiō therfore the oathes which they take at their Consecratiō are not essentiall conditions of their Royalty For they answer that Kinges before they be consecrated be presumed to haue taken their Oath made it to their people in the person of their predecessors as the people are also reputed held to haue takē their Oathes of Allegiance vnto their Kinges in that which they haue made to their predecessours In so much as when there happeneth any impediment of Consecration they are alwayes thought to haue made and taken their Oath in desire and will and implicitè as the Schoole Deuines say by a couered relation that the condition vnder which they raigne is pretended to haue to the oathes of their predecessors and namely to the first Kinges of the races and lynes They who are not only content to bind theyr Successors by their example to take the like oath to their subiectes but also to assure vnto them the Crowne with the more strong bandes they would oft see them consecrated in their owne life tyme teaching them by the oath that they caused them in such a case to take and make to their people with what a lawe and condition they passed the Crowne ouer vnto them 4. Cor. ● And to this they further add that where S. Paul sayth That it was ashame to Christians that they were iudged in causes that they had amongst themselues Cedr in com hist in Iust. ad lib. 1. tit 5.6.11 by the Infidells a thing which the Emperour Iustinian conuerted into a law when he ordeyned that neither Pagan nor Heretike should be admitted to the administration or gouernement of the Common wealth he seemed to insinuate that the commandement which the same Apostle gaue the Christians who liued vnder Pagan Emperours to obey them was a commaundement made by prouision and for the time namely vntill the Church were so multiplied and increased by the vniuersall conuersion of the Pagans to Christian Religion as it were or should be within the power of Christians to be able without perill and wrack of state to hinder the admitting receauing of any other Princes but Christians and to obserue this Law of Deuteronomy Thou shalt make one a King among the number of thy brethren Deut. 17. The second difference that is betweene the one the other Princes is taken frō the diuers condition of Christian people For in the time of the anciēt Pagan Emperours which is the tyme sayth S. Augustine meant by the first part of Daniels Prophecy Aug. epist 60. the Christian had not yet attayned the temporall Tribunall of Christ nor as yet apperteyned they to Christs temporall Kingdome For as much as Christ did not at that tyme exercise or manage any temporall Kingdome on earth neither had as yet any temporall Ministers of his Lawes but only exercised a spirituall Kingdome by his spirituall Ministers which were the Bishops and Pastours But after that the second part of the Prophecy was fulfilled that is to say after the conuersion of Kings and Countries to the Christian Religion and that Kings serued our Lord in feare and apprehended discipline or according to the Hebrew text did homage to the Sonne Psal 2. he then gayned and added the Christians not only to his spirituall Kingdome which he exerciseth by his spirituall Ministers which be the Bishops and Pastors but also to his temporall Kingdome which he exerciseth by his temporall Ministers and Substitutes which be the Kings and Princes who serue him sayth S. Augustine not simply as men in obseruing his Laws but as Princes in causing them to be obserued And therefore since the

forsake Childerike and to substitute Pipine in his place though the cause that moued them to remooue and make away Childerike was his impertinency and his stupidity yet in as much as it touched Religion by occasion because Childerike his imbecillity weaknes did put France in danger of falling from Christianity (a) Orat. legat Pipini apud Paul Aemilium in Child 3. through the inuasion of the Sarazens who were become possessed of all Affrike and Spaine and had already many times ouerrun and wasted France and that otherwise it rested vpon the absolution of an oath in matter of conscience They would not in any wise yeild to do homage to Pipin vntill the Pope had absolued them in the spirituall Tribunall from their precedent and former oath they had made to Childerike Pipin saith Paulus Aemilius (b) Paul Aemil. de reb gestis Franc. in Child 3. after infinite other authors sent Burchard Bishop of Wirtzburg to Pope Zachary for the abrogating taking away of the obligatio of the oath by which the French were bound to Childerike And againe The Pope absolued the French frō the Oath they had made to Childerike and they assembling the States did homage to Pipin in quality of King (c) du Tillet en la vie du Child 3. And the Lord of Tillet in his Memorialls sayth To take a way the note of periury and infidelity it was thought best to send vnto Pope Zachary Vegard Bishop of Wirtzburg Fulrad chaplayne of the said Pipine for the obteyning of absolution vnto the said subiects from the oath made vnto the said King Childerike and of approbation of the election by them made of the said Pipin for their King And this was accorded by the said Pope And when as againe after the heresy of the Emperour Constantine Copronymus and of Leo his Sonne and the persecution that Constantine Sonne of Leo raysed against the Catholikes for his false marriage Charlemaine became beloued and potent in the West and that it came to be vnderstood that by the inconstancy of the Emperours of Greece there was no more certainty at all for stability of religion in those prats of the East Pope Leo the third absolued with effect all their subiectes of the West from their fidelity declaring Charlemaine Emperour of the West in their place The French sayth Zonaras (a) Zonar tom 3. Annal. in Iren Constant made themselues Lords of Rome Pope Leo hauing crowned Charles and called him Emperour of the Romans And Theophanes (b) In hist nuscell 22. The Pope to requite Charles crowned him Emperour And Eginard Chancelor to Charlemain saith (c) Eginard in vita Caroli magni our Charles in the beginning had such an horrour at the title of Augustus as he affirmed if he had vnderstood the Popes intention he would not that day haue come to the Church notwithstanding it were a solemne festiuity And the Lord of Tillet in his Memorials sayth thus (d) du Tillet enla vie de Charlemaine Charlemayne was King of all France by the half wellneere augmented and increased by him and after that by Pope Leo crowned the first Emperour of the West And when King Charles the Simple meant to vse the help of the Infidells and to bring in the Normanes who were Pagans Idolaters into the Christian Countries of the French to make warres against his enemies Fouques Arch. bishop of Rhemes threatned him that he would renounce the fidelity he ought vnto him (e) Frodoard hist Eccles Rhemens Who is he quoth he who being faithfull vnto you as he is bound hath not an horrour that you desire the amity and friendship of Gods enemies and haue a will to the detriment and ruine of the name of Christ to receaue and admit the armes of the Infidells and detestable aliances with them And a litle after It were better you had neuer beene borne then to haue a will to raigne by the protection of the Diuell and for you to be assistant vnto them whome you should most eagerly oppugne Wherfore know you that if you so do and condescend to such counsells you shall neuer haue me loyall and faithfull to you and I will further withdrawe from your fidelity all that I shal be able and I togeather with my fellow Bishops will excommunicate you and your complices and adherentes and condemne you with a perpetuall curse in place of the fidelity I beare vnto you And when King Philip the first in the beginning of the last race forsooke Bertha his wife daughter to the Count of Holland and tooke in place of her Bertrude wife of Fouques Count of Anjou yet liuing matter that concerned the violating of a Sacrament and not of the breach of one Sacrament by simple adultery which had beene a crime of manners but by the superinduction of another Sacrament and by a publique profession of making it a matter lawful in keeping euen in the sight of his whole realme the wife of another man still liuing in his Royall bed and in title of Queene and his Spouse in place of his owne wife yet also aliue when as the precedent mariages had not by the Church been declared to be of no validity which was a cryme acompanied with heresie Pope Vrbane notwithstāding he was to contend with an Antipope reprehended the King and after many admonitions perceauing his pertinacy and obstinacy excōmunicated him in a Councell of almost 300. Berthold ad ann 1095. Bishops assembled at Clermont in Auuergne and interdicted his Realme And Pope Paschal after him did the same At the Councell of Clermont sayth Malmesbury (a) Guil. Malmesb lib. 4. c. 2. in Guil. 2. the Pope excommunicated Philip King of France and all them who called him King and obeyed him or spake vnto him if it were not to correct him And Iuo (b) Iuo Carnot ad Vrban Epist 46. of Charters writing vnto the same Vrbane sayth They will menace and threaten you that the King and his Realme will depart from your obedience that is will passe to the obedience of the Antipope if you restore not the Crowne to the King and absolue him from the excommunication And the Lord of Tillet sayth (c) Du Tillet en la vie de Philip. 1. In the yeare 1100. Iohn and Benedict Cardinalls and Legates of Pope Paschal the second sent into France assembled the Prelates at Autun at Valence and at Poictiers and after hauing admonished the King to take the said Queene Bertha agayne and to leaue Bertrude excommunicated them and interdicted the Realme Wherupon the said King was moued to iudignation But in conclusion he obeyed And when the Emperour Henry the fourth who liued at the same tyme with Philip the first complayned a while before Pope Gregory the seauenth for hauing absolued and discharged his subiectes from the Oath of fidelity he reproached him that he could not doe it for that he had not committed any errour in faith