concessis al 2. pro vitis in reversione Co. Entr. 184. Paying Fine and renewing Leases The Custom was That the Land was demiseable for twenty one years paying the treble value of the Rent and if he dyed within the Term that the Term should be to his Heir paying a Fine certain of one years Rent and if he Assigned the Term the Assignee should have it paying for a Fine one years value of the Rent and he who had it might by the Custom renew it for twenty one years paying three years value and this was admitted to be a good Custom by the Court Croke Jac. p. 671. Page's Case To assign one to take the Profits of a Copy-holder Infant The Custom was The Lord of a Manor might assign one to take the Profits of a Copy-hold descended to an Infant during his non-Age to the use of the Assignee without rendring an account it was held to be a good Custom as a Rent granted to one and his Heirs to cease during the non-Age of every Heir and admitting the Custom were void yet an Action of Account lyes not Prochein Amy. for the Defendant hath not entred and taken the Profits as Prochein Amy in which case although he was not Prochien Amy he is chargable as Prochein Amy according to his Claim but here he claimeth by the Custom and Grant of the Lord and not in the Right of the Heir 1 Leon. p. 266. Case 357. Anonymus The Custom was The Lord to dispose the Estate when the Tenant leaves it in incertainty That if any one surrender to the use of another without expressing any Estate that the Lord may grant it in Fee to him to whose use the surrender was made it s a good Custom for he is a Chancellor in his own Court to dispose thereof when the Tenant leaves it uncertain Crok El. 392. Brown and Foster Custom in the Manor of Sedgly in Com. Staff was Lease to be void if Copy-holder dye within the year If a Copy-holder make a Lease without Licence of the Lord for one year and dyes within the term it shall be void against the Heir Per Cur. it s a good Custom for then the Lord may know his Tenant and the Tenant may have the Estate and pay his Fine It s void by the act of God but had the Custom been That if a Copy-holder within the year surrender his Copy-hold that the Lease shall be void this is an unreasonable Custom Lit. Rep. 233. Hutton 126 127. Turner and Hodges Custom To Lease without Licence That five Copy-holders without License they being seized in Fee may make any Lease for one year or many years and when they dye the term shall cease and the Heir may enter it s a good Custom Hutton p. 101. Custom To hold after the term ended That a Lessee for years may hold the Land for half an year after the term ended it s no good Custom More n. 27. Not to alien without Licence Custom That a Copy-holder shall not alien without Licence is good for it may have a lawful commencement by agreement To Lease without Licence A Custom That on payment of a years Rent the Lord should Licence to let for 99 years and if he refused the Tenant might do it without Licence adjudged a good and reasonable Custom Grove and Bridges cited in Porphyry and Legingham's Case 2 Keb. 344. For Lessee pur vie to let for another mans Life A Custom That Lessee for Life may let for another man's Life is no good Custom but the Lord may by Custom Lease the same for Life and forty years after More n. 27. To commit a forfeiture and so to bar the Intayl A Custom for a Copy-holder tenant in tayl to make a Lease for years without Licence to commit a Forfeiture on purpose to bar the Intayl and to transfer the Lands over to any other person is a good Custom and is but in the nature of a Surrender or Common Recovery 2 Saunders 422. Grantham and Coples And the Lord in such cases may not admit any other but him to whom it is appointed by the Tenant making such Forfeiture and when such Cesty que use is admitted he shall avoid all mean acts or dispositions made by the Lord as well as upon a Surrender and this though he was not admitted in the life of the Tenant so forfeiting Vide infra Tit. Intayling Copy-holders In respect of Discents The Manor of Wadhurst in Com. Sussex consisted of two sorts of Copy-hold viz. Sookland and Bondland and by several Customs in several Manors as if a man be first admitted to Sookland and afterwards to Bondland and dyes seized of both his Heir shall inherit both but if he be first admitted to Bondland and afterwards to Sookland and of them dye seized his youngest Son shall Inherit 1 Leon. p. 36. Kemp and Carter A. Seized of Copy-hold in Fee Copy-hold Burrough English in the nature of Burrough-English surrenders this into the Hands of the Lord ea intentione That he shall re-grant this to him and his Wife and to the Heirs of himself and the Lord re-grants this accordingly And there is a Custom That if any person seised in Fee of such customary Lands and dyes so seized that the Land shall descend filio juniori c. And A. having Issue three Sons and ten years after his death the youngest Son dyes in the Life of his Mother without Issue Per Jones and Crook The elder Brother shall have this as Heir to the youngest and not the middle Brother Custom not to extend to Collateral Descents for the Custom may not extend to a collateral Descent viz. to direct the Descent amongst the Brothers for this is out of the Custom and the Custom was once satisfied by Descent to the youngest and there is an end of the Custom and where Custom fails Common Law shall guide the Descent Where Custom fails Common Law guides the Descent And by this special Custom he which is youngest Son at the death of the Father shall have the Land and not he which comes to be youngest afterwards but Bramston and Berkly contra 1 Rolls Abr. 624. Reeve and Malster Vide Maxims of Copy-holds supra CAP. VI. Customs of a Manor as to Wives and Widows of Copy-holders What are good and what not As also of Tenancy per le Curtesie And where the Severance of the customary Tenants from the Manor shall not prejudice CUstom of Manors That Husbands shall be Tenant per le Curtesie and the Pleading More 171. Custom of a Manor is That the Wife shall have it during her Life and on Evidence it appears the Custom was she should have it durante viduitate this Evidence doth not maintain the Custom because it is a less Estate Cok. 4. Rep. 30. That the Wife of a Copy-holder for Life may hold it durante viduitate was agreed to be a good Custom
of his last Will how the Estate stands in the Surrenderer Copy-holder surrenders to the Use of himself for Life and after to the Use of R. his Son for Life and after to the Use of his last Will. R. dyes the Father afterwards surrenders it to the Use of J. S. in Fee and dyes without making any Will It s a good Surrender for a Copy-holder may surrender parcel of the Estate and the residue shall be in himself and the Fee Simple of the Copy-hold being limited to the Use of his Will remains in the Copy-holder and not in the Lord Cro. El. 441. Co. 4 Rep. 23. Finch and Hockly and that the Fee lyes not in the Lord is Bullen and Grants Case 1 Leon. p. 174. When one surrenders to the Use of his last Will and thereby deviseth Copy-hold Lands to his middle Son and the Heirs of his Body who dyes without Issue and the Lord grants it to the youngest the eldest Son may enter and Admittance is not necessary Copy-hold devised to pay Debis J. S. seized in Fee of Copy-hold Lands devised it to his Wife for Life and that she should sell the Reversion for the payment of his Debts and after in Court did Surrender the Lands to the Use of his Wife for Life according to the Will and Deed she may sell the Land he surrendered and referred to the Will and she surrendred upon Condition to pay 12. l. this was held to be a good Sale according to the Will Cro. El. 68. Bright and Hubbard If there be two Joynt-Tenants By Joynt-Tenants and the one Surrenders into the Hands of two Tenants to the Use of his last Will and makes a Will of the Land and dyes the Surrender is afterwards presented Per Cur. It s a severance of the Joynture and shall bind the Survivor for being presented it shall relate to the first time of the Surrender Cro. Jac. 800. Porter's Case 1 Brownl Rep. 127. Allen and Nash Pleadings Quod tenens custumar in feodo possit devisare in feodo pro termino vitae vel annorum Coke Ent. 124. Surrender upon Condition or Contingency Copy-holder may Surrender to the Use of another on Condition if the Copy-holder pay to the Surrendree c. ad Domum suam Mansionalem c. that then the Surrender shall be void 5 Rep. 114. Wade's Case A Copy-holder may Surrender to the Use of another reserving Rent Condition Re entry for non-payment of Rent with Condition of re-entry for non-payment and for default of payment he may re-enter 4 H. 6.11.21 H. 6.37 A Copy-holder surrenders upon Condition and afterwards by his Deed releaseth the Condition its good without surrender for properly a Right or Condition cannot be given or determined by Surrender but by Release Cro. Jac. 36. Hull and Shardbrook 4 Rep. Kite and Quinton Surrender to the Use of one in Fee upon Condition to pay 100 l. to a Stranger it was a Question if the tender of 100 l. to a Stranger and he refusing the Condition is saved By Beaumont it is saved aliter in Case of an Obligation where he takes upon him to do it Cro. El. p. 361. Paulter's Case K. L. Father of the Defendant Copyholder in Fee surrendred to the Use of the Defendant in Fee upon Condition he should perform the Covenants in such an Indenture the Defendant was admitted and after surrenders the Land to the Use of the Plaintiff in Fee upon Condition if the Defendant paid 10 l. the Surrender to be void The Defendant neither paid the 10 l. nor performed the Covenant in the Indentures The Father enters and dyes seized and it descends to the Defendant Additional Surrenders defeated by Entry and he enters upon whom the Plaintiff enters The Question was if this Entry were lawful and adjudged it was not for by the Entry of the Father both the Surrenders are defeated So the Defendant may confess and avoid what was done to the Plaintiff Judgment pro Defendente Cro. Eliz. 239. Simonds and Lawnd Trin. 33. Eliz. One cannot pass a Copy-hold Estate to begin at a day to come no not upon a Contingency A Copy-holder saith he surrenders his Copy-hold Estate and if his Child which shall be Born dyes before his Age of 21 years that then his Brother shall have it it s not good This Case falls upon a Rule in Law That one cannot pass a Copy-hold Estate to begin from a day to come nor yet upon a Contingency no more than a Free-hold at Common Law 2 Bulstr 274. Simpson and Southern If a Copy-holder surrenders his Copy-hold of Inheritance into the hands of the Lord Use vests presently the Condition to take effect in futuro to the Use of J. S. paying of an 100 l. to his Executors within such a time after his death he to whose Use this Surrender is made takes by force of this presently Per Dodridge 2 Bulst p. 275. idem Case Surrender upon Condition or Contingency Copy-holder may surrender to the Use of another on condition if the Copy-holder pay 250 l. ad domum suam mansionalem c. that then the Surrender shall be void 5 Rep. 114. Wade's Case A Copy-holder may surrender to the Use of another reserving Rent Condition of re-entry for non-payment of Rent with condition of re-entry for non-payment and for default of payment he may re-enter 4 H. 6.11.21 H. 6.37 A Copy-holder surrenders upon condition and afterwards by his Deed releaseth the condition its good without surrender for properly a right or condition cannot be given or determined by Surrender but by Release Cro. Jac. 36. Hull and Sharebrook 4 Rep. Kite and Quinton Surrender to the Use of one in Fee upon condition to pay 100 l. to a Stranger it was a Question if the tender of the 100 l. to the Stranger and he refusing the condition is saved By Beaumont it is saved aliter in Case of an Obligation where he takes upon him to do it Cro. El. p. 361. Poulter's Case The Form of a Surrender of Copy-hold Land upon Condition Vide Conveyancers Light p. 827. Vide infra Presidents Of Surrender before Admittance whether it shall be good or not Purchaser hath nothing before Admittance neither can he Surrender A Surrender to J. S. J. S. Surrenders to a Stranger who is Admitted The Stranger takes nothing for J. S. had no Estate before Admittance and the right and possession still remains in him who surrendred and this shall descend to his Heir But the diversity is an Heir to whom a Copy-hold descends or comes in remainder he may surrender before Admittance because he is in by course of Law for he Custom which makes him Heir to the Estate casts the Possession upon him from his Ancestors But a Stranger to whom the Copy-hold is surrendred had nothing before Admittance because he is a Purchaser and the Copy made to him upon his Admittance is his Evidence by the Custom and before
enter upon the Land before Admittance he may take the Profits punish any Trespass done upon the Land 4 Rep. 21. Brown's Case and 23 Fitch and Huckly He may before Admittance surrender to whose Use he pleaseth paying the Lord his Fine The Lord may avow upon him before Admittance for arrears of Rents or other Services If Baron and Feme Copy-holders to them and to the Heirs of the Husband are and the Husband dyes the Heir of the Husband may surrender his Reversion into the hands of two Tenants of the Manor out of Court before any Admittance during the Life of the Wife and this is a good Surrender for the Reversion was cast upon him before any Admittance Calchin's Case 1 Rolls Abr. 499. Possessio Fratris before Admittance There shall be a possessio fratris before Admittance for if a Copy-holder in Fee have Issue a Son and a Daughter by one Venter and a Son by another Venter What makes a Possession or not for that purpose and his Son by the first Venter enter into the Land and dyeth before Admittance the Daughter shall Inherit as Heir to her Brother and not the Son by the second Venter as Heir to his Father And sometimes the Possession of a Termor without any actual Entry or Claim made by the Heir will make a possessio fratris as if the Copy-holder by Licence of the Lord maketh a Lease for years and dyeth and the Son of the first Venter dyeth before the expiration of the Term being neither admitted nor having made any actual Entry or Claim yet this Possession of the Lessee is sufficient and the Reversion shall descend to the Daughter of the first Venter and not to the Son of the second Venter but if the Lease had determined the Son living by the first Venter and afterwards he had dyed before any actual Entry made the Law would have fallen out otherwise because there was a time when he might have lawfully entred The same Law was as to the possession of a Guardian Heir before Admittance is not a compleat Tenant to all purposes But yet the Heir before Admittance is not a compleat Tenant to all intents and purposes for before that he cannot be sworn of the Homage and he cannot maintain a Pleint in the nature of an Assise in the Lords Court till he is admitted Co. Cop. As there may be possessio fratris c. before the Heirs Admittance so there may be a Tenant by the Curtesie Dyer f. 292. before Admittance of the Feme More n. 425. By Hales in the Case of Blackburn and Greaves Modern Rep. 120. If a Surrender be to the Use of A. for Life the Remainder to his eldest Son c. or to the Use of A. and his Heirs and then A. dyes the Estate is in the Son without Admittance whether he takes by Purchase or Descent One seized of a Copy-hold Tenement in right of his Wife in his Demesn as of Fee surrenders this Copy-hold Tenement without his Wife to the Use of a Stranger in Fee who was admitted by the Lord accordingly Husband dyes and Wife dyes the Heir of the Wife without Admittance enters on the Stranger and made a Lease and good Popham 39. Bullock and Dibler This is no such discontinuance against the Heir as to put the Heir to a Plaint in the nature of a cui in vita it s no more than a Grant which passeth no more than his own Estate and the Heir may intermeddle with the Possession before Admittance Upon a Custom to surrender to two Copy-holders out of Court Surrender to the Heir as a Copy-hold Tenant is good before Admittance Heir may enter and have Trespass before Admittance a Surrender to the Heir of a Copy-holder before Admittance is good 1 Keb. 25. Munifas and Baker Copy-holder dyes the Lord admits a Stranger the Heir may enter and upon re-entry maintain a Trespass without Admittance Noy p. 172. Simpson and Gillion He shall have Trespass and this before his Admittance upon Descent 2 H. 4.12 Pl. 49. 4 Rep. 23. b. Cro. El. 349. Berry and Green When the Heir shall be in by Purchase and not by descent If a Copy-holder of Inheritance surrender this to the Use of another and his Heirs and he to whom the Surrender is made dyes before Admittance and after the Lord admits his Heir he shall be in by Purchase and not by Descent for he is in by the Lord for nothing was in his Father by the Surrender before Admittance 1 Rolls Abr. 827. More 's Case Where there needs no Admittance In the Cases of the Heir per Descent Vide supra When one comes in as of an old Estate A. surrenders Copy-hold into the hands of the Lord and the Lord de novo re-grants the same to A. for Life and afterwards to J. his Wife during the non-age of the Son and Heir of A. and after to the Son and Heir in Tayl. A. dyes the Child being 5 years old Now the Wife is to have the said Lands for 16 years by force of the said Surrender and Admittance The Wife took another Husband and dyed Per Cur. The Husband shall have the Land during the non-age of the Infant and that without any Admittance for that he is not in of any new Estate but in the Estate of his Wife as Assignee 3 Leon. p. 9. Dedicot's Case If a Copy-holder be for years and maketh his Executors Executors and dyeth the Executors shall have the Term without any Admittance Sed Quaere for Weston in this point was against Dyer and Brown Joynt-Tenants Release One Joynt-Copy-holder released to his Companion and it was resolved That the Release was good without Surrender or Admittance for the first Admittance is of them and every of them and the ability to Release was from the first Conveyance and Admittance Winch p. 3. Wase and Pretty In what Cases and to what purposes the Copy-hold Estate shall be in the Tenant before Admittance and to what purposes not and what Leases made by them shall be good Upon Surrender nothing is vested in the Grantee before Admittance Vide supra The Copy-holder upon Surrender if the Lord refuse to admit him He who makes the Surrender continues in possession till Admittance cannot enter without Admittance nor have an Action unless there be a special Custom to warrant it for he who makes the Surrender continues in possession till Admittance and not the Lord or Cesty que use and he shall have Trespass against any that enters Cro. El. 349. Berry and Green If by the Custom of the Manor the Copy-hold ought to descend to the youngest Son and the Copy-holder in Fee surrender this to the Use of himself and his Heirs and dyes before any Admittance upon the Surrender and the youngest Son first enters the eldest may not justifie his entrance upon him before Admittance 1 Rolls Abr. 502. If a Copy-holder surrendreth to the Use
and Judgment pro Quer for that the Replication doth not confess or avoid nor deny the bar to the Avowry Winch Entur p 997 998 999. Foster and Woodcock Eject Bar que W. seisitus de Manor grants custumar terÌ„es in Reversion al Def. auters pur vies Repl que W. demised ceo Manor al C. R. determinable pur vie del M. ilsÌ„ assigne al M. qui grant Reversion de terÌ„es al H. pur vie Rej. que D. fuit prius seisitus de Manor que descend al 3 Coheirs quas W. disseise c. Surrej ê‘ maintenance de Replic Traverse le disseisin Demur inde Co. Ent. 184. Replev Quod Reg. Eliz. seisita de manerio unde c. concessit terÌ„as custumar R. M. Vxori ejus hered Vxoris qui sursum reddider ad usum Def. Bar quod W. prius seisitus de maner concessit terras al J. de quo descend al P. qut sursum reddidit al A. qui sursum reddidit al M. pur vie qui dimisit quer Repl quod W. ante concession al J. concessit terÌ„as al B. de quo discend al M. qui sursum reddidit Def. travers grant al J. issue inde Co. Ent. 575. Quod J. seisitus de maner unde c. concessit Def. pro vita in Reversion terÌ„as custumar dimissibil pro 2 vitis tam in Possessione quam in Reversione Hern 724. TrnsÌ„ quod C. seisitus de manerio concessit terÌ„as customar in feod al B. de quo descend Def. Repl C. fuit sisitus de manerio unde c. quod discend quer traverse quod terÌ„e sunt custum U. B. 153. TrnsÌ„ Def. justif sub tenentur custum monstroit le Estate de Copyhold durante viduitate Tomps 395. TrnÌ„s novel assignmtur Def. dicit quod pmissa tempore c. parcel custmaria dimissibilia ê‘ cop cuicunque ê‘sone ill capere volent in Talliatur seu pro vita Et quod F. G. pd fuit seisitus ad cur tentur 26 Martij dimisit cuidam W. in feodo qui dimisit Def. pro Anno virtute cujus c. done Colour Repl quod pmissa sunt liberum tenementum quer sic manutenet narÌ„ationem traverse que pmisse fuer parcel manerij de L. Rej. exitus sur traverse Keb. 465 467. In Repl Copyhold in Reversion ê‘ copiam tenentur in possessione advocat captionem pur Damage fesant custom del Manor granter Estates en possession ou reversion Hern 777. CAP. XXXIII Evidence Tryal Issue What shall be a good Evidence to prove the Custom alledged or not Presumptive Evidence Where Copy of a Lease is good Evidence What shall be tryed by the Jury and what by the Court-Rolls Substance found in special Verdict Who may be admitted to give Evidence When Issue is taken upon a Surrender where to be Tryed Venue What shall be a good Evidence to prove the Custom or not THE Custom of a Manor was laid to be That if a Copy-holder hath two Sons and a Wife and dyes and the eldest Son hath Issue and dies in the Life of the Wife that the younger Son shall have the Land the Issue being upon the Custom the Jury found the Custom to be That the younger Son shall have the Land unless the eldest was admitted in his Life and paid the Lords Fine Per Curiam the Verdict is not sufficient to prove the Issue Moor n. 566. In Replevin If the Defendant justifies the taking as Damage fesant The Plaintiff in bar pleads by reason of a Common to such a Copy-hold for all Beasts Levant and Couchant and avers that these Beasts were Levant and Couchant c. upon which the Parties were at Issue and it is found that part of the Beasts were Levant and Couchant Part found for the whole and part not this is found for the Defendant for the Issue is upon the whole and the contrary to it is found Trin. 17 Jac. B. Sloper and Allen. The Issue was in Kemp and Carters Case 1 Leon Case 70. p. 55. If the Lord of the Manor granted the Lands in question Per copiam rotulorum curiae Manerij praed secundum consuetud Manerij praed It was given in Evidence That within the said Manor were divers custumary Lands and that the Lord now of late at the Court of the said Manor granted the Land per Copiam Rotulorum curiae where it was never granted by Copy before Per Cur. the Jury are bound to find Dominus non concessit for notwithstanding de facto Dominus concessit per Copiam Rotulorum curiae Non concessit yet non concessit secundum consuetudinem manerij predict for the said Land was not custumary nor had the Custom taken hold of it Several Customs within several limits ought to be specially shewed It was shewed then That within the said Manor some customary Lands are demisable for Life only and some in Fee By Anderson Chief Justice He who will give in Evidence these several Customs ought to shew the several Limits wherein the several Customs are severally running as that the Manor extends into two Towns and that the Lands in one of the said Towns are grantable for Lives only and the Lands in the other in Fee and he ought not to shew the several Customs promiscue valere through the whole Manor In an Action brought The Defendant alledgeth a Custom of a Copy-hold to be demised in Fee Tayl or for Life and made Title by a demise in Fee to himself The Plaintiff traversed the Custom and the Custom was found to be Substance found to demise in Fee or for Life but not in Tayl Per Cur. the Issue was found for the Defendant because the substance was found for him and the Tayl was but inducement Moor n. 490. Dorley and Wood. Wadsworth's Case before Judge Crawley at York Assises was upon an Intail of a Copy-hold within the Manor of W. and several antient Intails shewed in Evidence in Edward III. time and remainders limited over upon such Intails and Plaints in nature of Formedons brought there for such Remainders and Recoveries thereupon and several Issues after had taken their Admittances as of Fee simple Land as Heirs in Fee and for this cause Purchasers look at the Copies Presumptive Evidence and seeing Fee-simple in Admittances are secure the Estate is so and apply their Assurances accordingly the Jury found for the Plaintiff against this Intail and it shall be presumed the Intail hath been cut off some way when many Admittances have been in Fee simple The Custom of a Manor is Less Estate than the Custom That the Wife shall have it during her Life and on Evidence it appears that she shall have it durante viduitate this Evidence doth not maintain the Custom 4 Rep. 30. If the Parties be at Issue upon the time of the Surrender made or the Court holden The time of the Surrender or of the
Life of Tenant in Tayl yet his Interest being determined by the death of Tenant in Tayl Grants made by whom shall be avoided the continuance of the Possession is a Tort to the Heir and upon his rcovery in a Formedon in the Descender he shall avoid these Grants So in cases of alienee of a Manor whereof a man was seized in jure Uxoris making Grants may be avoided after his death by the Feme So Lessee for years of Tenant for Life of a Manor So by a Tenant at sufferance as Tenant pur auter vie who continues in after the death of Cesty que vie Vide supra Rous and Artois Case 4 Rep. 24. mesme Case By Lessee of a Manor Lessee for years of a Manor grants a Copy-hold in Reversion and before the Reversion happen the Term is expired the Grant is void So if such Lessee surrenders his Term and then before his Lease should have ended in point of Limitation the Reversion falleth yet the Grantee shall not have it Infant One that hath in present a Lawful Estate or Interest in a Manor defeasable upon breach of Condition Enters he may make Grant by Copy before such Entry and it shall be good If Infant infeoff me of a Manor though he may enter upon me at his pleasure yet Grants made before his Entry shall not be avoided by any subsequent Entry vide supra Guardian in Socage may hold Courts and grant Copies not the Bayliff of a Manor A Guardian in Socage may hold Courts in his own name and may grant Copies for he is Dominus pro tempore and hath interest in the Land but a Bayliff of a Manor hath no interest therefore he cannot make Grants and Copies but the Guardian hath interest Provisione Legis but so as to be accountable for Fines Owen p. 115. Shopland and Radlen Grants of Copies in Reversion The Lord of a Manor for Life or a particular Tenant having interest in the Manor might grant Copies in Reversion although they were not executed in the Life of the Grantor More n. 292. Sir Peter Carew's Case 236. contra So a Tenant in Dower of a Manor may grant Copy-hold parcel of that which she hath assigned in Dower in Reversion Habend post mortem A. P. though it was doubted in the Earl of Arundel's Case and the reason is the Custom For it is said in Gay's Case Cro. El. p. 661. There is a Custom alledged That Dominus pro tempore may demise for one two or three Lives Copy-hold not to be granted by parcels in Possession or Reversion But one who hath a particular Estate in a Manor cannot grant a Copy-hold by parcel or demise part and retain the residue himself If a Feme be indowed of several Copy-hold Tenements she cannot grant part of them by Copy in possession or Reversion per Popham ibid. Vide mesme Case 1 Rolls Abr. 499. In some special Case an Estate may be granted by Copy Where a Grant may be good by one who is not Dominus pro tempore by one that is not Dominus pro tempore nor that hath any thing in the Manor as if the Lord of a Manor by his Will in writing deviseth That his Executors shall grant the customary Tenements of the Manor according to the Custom of the Manor for the payment of his Debts and dyeth the Executor though he hath nothing in the Manor may make Grants according to the Custom of the Manor Co. Lit. 58. b. At what place the Lord may Grant The Lord of a Copy-hold Manor may himself grant a Copy-hold at any place out of the Manor 4 Rep. 26. b. Melwich's Case What amounts to a Grant The admittance of the Lord amounts to a Grant to him who had a Title Aliter if it is to him who was in by wrong as by disseisin 4 Rep. 22. Winch Rep. 67. Hasset and Hanson Grant by the Copy-holder to the Lord. Though a Copy-holder may not convey his Copy-hold to a Stranger without Surrender and Admittance yet he may grant his Estate out of Court to the Lord of the Manor by Bargain and Sale for the Custom is not between the Lord and his Tenant but between themselves only Winch Rep. p. 57. Hasset and Hanson A Copy-holders Release to the Lord is a good Release 1 Keb. 808. CAP. XII Exposition of Grants By what words in Grants Copy-hold shall pass or not What things shall pass by Grant of another thing as Appurtenant or Incident A Copy-holder of a Manor which had Common by Prescription in sixty Acres parcel of the Demesns of the Manor Escheated and the Lord by Deed granted it to another in Tayl Per nomina c. communiarum quarumcunque dicto Messuagio sive tenemento spectan sive in aliquo modo pertinen vel cum eodem Messuagio dimisso usitat Though the ancient Common is determined by unity of possession in the Lord upon Escheat yet revived by a new Grant and by what words The Question was whether by these words the Grantee shall have Common in those sixty Acres Per Cur. The Donee in Tayl shall have such Common as the Copy-holder had But the ancient Common which was by Prescription is determined by unity of possession in the Lord but the Grant enures as a new Grant of the same Common As a Grant to Islington of the like Liberties which London hath is a new Grant of the like Liberties Cro. Eliz. p. 794. M. 42 Eliz. B. R. Worledge and Kingswel If the Lord of a Manor be seized of a Copy-hold Estate and grants this to another Nothing passeth to one named in the Hab. that is not named in the Premisses Hab. to him and his Wife and to the Heirs of their Bodies the Wife shall take nothing by this Grant because she was not mentioned in the Premisses and here is not any Surrender precedent to direct the Grant Where a Grant shall be expounded as a Grant at Common Law but it passeth only by the Grant and so it ought to be expounded as a Conveyance at Common Law So if a Copy-hold Tenant Surrender to the Use of himself Habend to him and his Wife and to the Heirs of their Bodies it seems that this is void for it is in nature of a Grant at Common Law 2 Rolls Abr. 67. Brooks and Brooks But in Surrender aliter Vide infra Tit. Surrender Copy-holder in Fee Surrenders to the Lord ad intentionem That the Lord shall grant this again to him for Life the remainder to his Wife until his Son shall come at full Age and after to his Son the Copy-holder dyes and after the Lord executes it to the Woman Per Cur. This Interest to the Wife is a Term Dyer 251 259. By cum pertin what passeth Copy-holder had Common of Estovers in the Lords Woods appurtenant to his Copy-hold and he purchased the Free-hold of Inheritance in the Copy-hold and had words in his
the Goods in such Case it is good because it is as a Pledge 2 Leon. p. 725. Parker's Case Where Harriot shall be apportionable or not By the Act of the Lord. Tenant Lord and Tenant by Fealty and Harriot Service and the Lord purchaseth part of the Land the Harriot Service is extinct because it is intire valuable Aliter of Harriot Custom for if the Custom of a Manor be That upon the death of every Tenant of the Manor that dyes seized of any Land holden of the said Manor the Lord shall have an Harriot although the Lord purchase parcel of the Tenancy yet the Lord shall have an Harriot by the Custom of the Manor for the residue for he remains Tenant to the Lord and the Custom extends to every Tenant Co. Lit. 149. b. 6. Rep. 1.2 Bruerton's Case 8 Rep. 105. Talbot's Case 106. Feme by Custom is to have a moiety by Survivor and if Harriot be to be paid for the whole if it be part surrendred both shall pay Harriots 1 Keb. 356. Muniface and Baker Act of the Tenant If Tenant alien parcel of the Tenancy entire Services as Homage Fealty Harriot c. shall be multiplied Solida a singulis praestantur If my Tenant who holds of me by an Harriot aliens parcel of his Land to another each of them is chargable to me with an Harriot because it is entire and though the Tenant purchase the Land back again I shall have of him for every portion an Harriot 6 Rep. 1. Bruerton's Case 8 Rep. 105. Talbot's Case 34 Edw. 3.1 Copy-hold was held by Rent and Harriot upon Alienation and Surrender Copy-holder aliens parts of his Copyhold to one and part to another and retains part in his Hands and surrenders to the Use of the Alienees Per Cur. the Lord shall have an Harriot upon every alienation in case of a Copy-holder as well as a Tenant at Common Law If they should not be multiplied it would be in the power of the Tenant to defraud the Lord by Alienation of parcels and in this case the Alienor pays the Harriot because he continues Tenant and upon every Alienation after by the Alienees they shall pay it Palmer's Rep. 342. Sir Francis Snag against Fox 1 Keb. 357. If a Copy-holder being sick in his Bed doth surrender into the Hands of two Tenants c. to the Use of his eldest Son in Fee and dyeth before the Surrender is presented in Court the Lord must have an Harriot If Surrender had been presented in Court and Admission before the Father's death Aliter If an Harriot is due to the Lord upon every descent only and a Surrender is made by a Copy-holder unto the Use of his Heirs in full Court and to his Heirs and the eldest Son is admitted Tenant accordingly and the Father dyeth the Lord shall have no Harriot Who shall pay an Harriot and when or not Where many Purchase Land joyntly an Harriot shall not be paid till after the death of the Survivor 8 Rep. 105. If by Custom a Copy-holder dyes seized he shall pay an Harriot to the Lord and after the Copy-holder is disseised and dyes during the disseisin yet he shall pay an Harriot within this Custom for he was Tenant in right notwithstanding this disseisin 2 Rolls Abr. 72. Norris's Case Lease is made to A. for 99 years if B. C. and D. or any of them so long shall live to commence after the determination of a former Lease rendring Rent after the commencement of the term ac etiam post mortem B. C. D. respective for an Harriot 3 l. B. dyes before determination of the first term and Lessor brings det for 3 l. for an Harriot Per Cur. no Harriot is due because coupled with a Rent and no Rent is due during the interesse termini but both begin together Siderfin p. 437. Hangon and Carve Lease is made for 99 years if I. and S. live so long to commence after the determination of a former Lease to Sibel if Sibel lived so long reddendo 40 s. per annum and 3 l. in the name of an Harriot post mortem of each Cesty que vie Per Cur. the Harriot ought not to be paid till the Lease come in possession which is not till Sibel dye at which time the second Lease takes effect and this shall follow the nature of the Rent being in company with such Rents and Services as are to be only done when the Lease comes in possession and the Lease to Lessee for 99 years is but a future Interest where the Lessor hath no Reversion nor the Lessee any term and reddendo is a reservation and therefore cannot take effect till there is a Reversion but Keeling contra this being a sum in gross and here is an express agreement to pay after the death of either of the Parties and agreements may reach payments as well on contingency as where the Party hath Interest 1 Keb. 677. Lemal against Cara. Who shall have an Harriot A. is Copy-holder for Life of Lands Harriotable by the Custom if he dye seized and the Lord grants the Freehold of the Copy-hold to B. for 99 years if A. the Copy-holder so long live the Remainder to A. for 1000 years and afterwards A. assigns over his Lease of 1000 years to C. and afterwards A. makes F. his Executor and dyes seized Per. Cur. C. the Assignee of 1000 years shall not have an Harriot because at the time of the death of A. when the Harriot became due he was not Lord but had only a future Interest and if any Harriot be to be paid the Executor of A. or the Lord in Fee shall have it P. 15 Jac. B. R. Norris and Norris 2 Rolls Abr. 72. This Case in March p. 23. is Reported thus The Lord granted the Seigniory for 99 years if the Tenant should so long live and after he made a Lease for 4000 years Tenant for Life is disseized or more properly ousted and dyed Two points resolved 1. An Harriot was to be paid notwithstanding the Tenant did not dye seized because he had the Estate in right and might have entred 2. He in the remainder for years should not have it their reason was because the Tenant for Life was not the Tenant of him who had the future Interest of 4000 years but of him who had the Interest for 99 years but the Court was not agreed that the Grantee for 99 years should have the Harriot the reason of the doubt was because that eo instante the Tenant died eodem instante the Estate of the Grantee for 99 years determined A Bishop is seized of the Manor of D. and he lets twenty Acres of it to A. and B. during the iives of their three Children rendring 21 s. Rent per Annum and also paying and delivering to the Bishop and his Successors two of the best Beasts upon the death of every Cesty que vie The Bishop after lets all the Manor to W. rendring the ancient
Rent one of the Cesty que vies dies The Question was whether the Harriot belongs to the Bishop or to W. Per Cur. 1. The Rent issues out of the intire Manor 2. That the Harriot reserved shall go with the Reversion Winch p. 46 57. Bishop of Gloucester against Wood. Pleadings What shall be a good Avowry or Conizance for an Harriot in Replevin or a good Justification in Trespass or not and how to be pleaded If the Lord avow generally for an Harriot without shewing what the Harriot should be whether Beast or other thing its sufficient Hobart p. 176. Shaw and Taylor Exception to an Avowry was for that in it he sets forth That if any Tenant dye seized the Lord is to have an Harriot and shews not of what Estate he should dye seized for in one case it may be an Harriot Custom may be due in another case an Harriot Service But Per Curiam it shews he took them nomine Heriotorum which is good enough 1 Bulstr 101. Sylliard's Case Defendant saith That all the Tenants for Term of Life c. after their deaths have used to pay to him an Harriot the Avowry is insufficient That Tenants should pay after their deaths its repugnant But if he had said That he and all those whose Estate he hath c. have had an Harriot it had been good this is Harriot Custom for Harriot Service is of Tenants in Fee 21 H. 7.13 15. 8 H. 7.10 Avowry by Harriot Service he need not shew what was the Beast he demanded nor the kind or price thereof Cro. Car. 260. Mayor and Brandwood Bar to the Avowry nulla habuit Animalia Quaere Hobart 176. Avowry for three Oxon Separatim pro separalibus Harriot ' Cust tunc 3 Br. 313 333. Prescription for Harriot sur Alienation 8 H. 7.10 Avowry for Harriot Custom hors son Fee is no Plea Vide supra Bend. p. 18. for Harriot Service hors son Fee is a good Plea Up. B. 110. Plowd 96. a. Avowry and Distress for Harriot Service bar by Harriot Custom Plowd 94. Woodland and Mantel Bar for Harriot reserved upon a Demise Tomps f. 257. Custom Pleaded Quod Dominus habeat Harriot Custumar post mortem cujusllibet tenentis Co. Entr. 39.3 Brownl 313 403. Simile si fuerint elongat tunc optimum animal levan cuban super terras Co. Ent. 666. Dier 199. Moor 16. Traverse Traverse tenure by Services alledged Co. Lit. 598 599. Traverse le seisin Quod Pater non fuit seisitus Coke Ent. 613. Plowd 94 95. Traverse le tenure protestando quod non fuit seisitus pro placito dicit quod non tenet c. 3 Brownl 329 349 313. Traverse del Custome 3 Brownl 313. Justification in Trespass Bar. quod Defend Dom. manerij habuit Harriot custom de omnibus tenentibus alienan sine Licentia Ra. Ent. 650. Up. B. 182. Bar by Harriot Custom Post mortem tenentis Co. Ent. 39. The like after the death of Tenant pur vie 3 Brownl 402. Repl. quoad 1 mes hors son fee quoad 2 Mes non est talis consuetudo Up. B. 222. Harriot pleaded in Bar al Trespass 1 Brown 383. CAP. XXVI What Statutes extend to Copy-hold Lands and within what Statutes Copy-hold Lands shall be contained by construction of Law without express words and what not HOW the Statute De donis extends to Copy-hold Lands or not Vide sub Tit. West 2. c. De donis Of Copy-holds Intayled It is expresly provided 1 R. 3. c. 4. Of Juries That a Copy-holder having Copy-hold Land to the yearly value of 26 s. 6 d. above all Charges may be impannelled upon a Jury as well as he that hath 20 s. Free-hold But now this is altered by latter Statutes Copy-hold Lands are within the words and intention of the Statute 4 Hen. 7.24 4 H. 7. c. â—4 Of Fines and non-Claim of Fines with Proclamations and five years non-claim and shall be barred as a Lessee for years and his Lessor shall be barred so the Copy-holder and his Lord Covin But if a Copy-holder by assent and covin to bar the Lord of his Inheritance makes a Feoffment and levies a Fine with Proclamations such Fine shall not bar the Lord no more than it shall the Lessor if it be levied by Lessee for the reason in Fermor's Case 3 Rep. f. 77. If a Copy-holder for Life or in Fee be ousted and the Lord be disseised Disseisin and the Disseisor levy a Fine with Proclamations and five years pass as well the Lord as the Copy-holder is barred and the Lord shall not in such case have five years after the death of Tenant pur vie for the Lord may presently have remedy by Action viz. Assise c. and recover the Land and the Lord may without consent or commandment precedent or assent subsequent enter in the name of the Tenant by Copy and his own Right to save their particular Interests as his own Freehold and Inheritance for the Lord is no Stranger but is privy in Estate But not if a Stranger who hath no Right enter c. 9 Rep. 105 106. Margaret Podgers Case The Case was A Copy-hold is granted to A. B. and C. for their Lives suecessive the Lord by Deed Inrolled bargains the Copy-hold to A. in Fee and levies a Fine to him with Proclamations A. dies seized this discends to M. his Son and Heir who levies a Fine to Uses Fine when it shall bar or not after ten years B. enters the Fine is no bar for no Fine or Warranty shall bar any Estate in Possession Reversion or Remainder which is not devested and put to a Right and the Lords Bargain and Sale doth not devest the Estates of them in Remainder for the Lord doth that which he may do by Law and A. was in by force of the Statute of 27 H. 8. And an Act of Parliament shall do no wrong Bicknal and Tucker's Case Trin. 9 Jac. Rot. 3648. was Whether a Fine with five years will bind the Copy-holder in Remainder There was a Copy-hold granted to three for Lives to have and to hold successively the first accepts a Bargain and Sale of the Freehold Whether a Fine and non-Claim shall bar a Copy-holder in Remainder by the Lord of the Manor and then he levied a Fine with Proclamations and five years pass Whether he in Remainder is barred or not Those whose Estates are turned to Rights either present or future are meant by the Statute to be barred If a Copy-holder for years be put out of Possession and a Fine levied and no entry by him he is barred by the Statute By the Bargain and Sale he in Remainder is not put out of Possession If a man makes a Lease to begin at Easter next and before Easter a Fine is levied and five years pass this Fine will not bar because at the levying of the Fine he could not enter for then his his Right was future If the
c. is but a Conveyance to his Title and for that it was found that it was demisable in Fee and that it was demised unto him in Fee this is the substance of his Title and so sufficient Cro. Eliz. p. 431. Doyle and Wood. In Eject Fir. If the Jury find a special Verdict That J. S. was seized of the Manor of D. in his Demesn as of Fee in which Manor was a Copy-holder of the place where c. and commits Waste by cutting down an Oak and that after J. S. dies and the Lessor of the Plaintiff being his Cousin and Heir enters in the Manor in the place where c. for the said Forfeiture and was of this seized in his Demesn as of Fee and concludes si super totam materiam c. This is not a good Verdict because it is not found that J. S. died seized of the Manor and that this descends to the Lessor Seisin and descent as Cousin and Heir as his Cousin and Heir for it may be that J. S. aliened the Land and that the Father of the Lessor or the Lessor himself re-purchased this and that he was also Cousin and Heir to J. S. and although it be in a Verdict it shall not be intended that the Fee continued in J. S. at the time of his death and that he died thereof seized without finding it 2 Rolls Abr. 699. Cornwallis and Hammond Part found the Issue upon the whole not good In Replevin The Defendant justifies by reason of Common to such a Copy-hold for all Beasts Levant and Couchant and avers that these Beasts were Levant and Couchant c. upon which the Parties are at issue and it is found that part of the Beasts were Levant and Couchant and part not this is found for the Defendant for the whole for the issue was upon the whole and the contrary is found 2 Rolls Abr. 707. Sloper and Allen. Presidents in Special Verdicts Quod Tenementa sunt custumaria dimissibilia per Copiam dimissio per Dominum ex traditione propria 1 Rep. 117. Chudleigh 's Case Sursum redditio admissio in feodo Co. Entr. 207. Simile in Tallio communis recuperatio inde Co. Entr. 206. Tenementa concessa per copiam la A. B. super vixit Co. Ent. 273. Consuetudo infra manerium de devisatione devisatio in haec verba Co. Ent. 124. Littera Attornat ' ad sursum reddend ' tenementa custumaria sursum redditio admissio superinde Coke Entr. 576 577. Et si sit sufficiens in Lege Manerium Tenementa ab antiquo discendebant 2 percenariis qui fecer ' partitionem de terris dominicalibus ac Tenementa Custumaria servitia remanser ' in communi Coke Entr. 711. Officium Seneschalli manerij execut ' per deput ' contentio inter 2 Seneschallos de Cur. Baron Tenend 9 Rep. 45. In Ejectment Jury find that the Lands are demisable by Lives in possession or reversion and that the Widow in possession held the Lands so long as she remained sole and chaste and that M. C. Widow was seized for Life durante viduitate the Lord grants the Reversion of the said Lands by Copy to R. C. the Son of M. for Life to commence after the death forfeiture or surrender of M. M. surrenders one moiety of the Premisses to R. The Lord dies discent of the Manor to C. S. his Cousin and Heir R. Tenant for Life of one moiety and M. Tenant in Free-Bench of the other moiety the Lord by Indenture demiseth to the Lessor of the Plaintiff for 99 years if he and J. and B. his Sons shall so long live to commence after the death and determination of the Estates of the said M. and R. and of the viduity of such person as shall be his Wife at the time of his death M. surrenders her moiety to R. R. dies seized of both moieties P. C. the Defendant his Wife is admitted she commits Fornication and had a Bastard Jury find the entry of the Lessor If the Lease shall commence before P. dies was the Question Winch Ent. 455. Jury found that the Messuage and Lands tempore quo c. tempore hors memory were custumary part of the Manor of B. a Prebend of S. demisable by Copy of Court Roll for one two or three Lives and that by the Custom of the Manor every Tenant for Life sole seized of any customary Estate for Life in possession may nominate one to succeed him to be Tenant to the Lord for Life and that the party nominated used to require his Admittance and pay such Fines as were taxed by the Homage Another Custom was That every customary Tenant sole seized in possession may cut Timber Trees c. and that Mason the Defendant being Copy-holder for Life 1 May 40 Eliz. named R. P. to be his succeeding Tenant They also find that Robert P. being Prebendary of the said Prebend and seized in Fee of the said Manor 20 March 40 Eliz. demised by Indenture the Manor of B. to Peter Hoskins for three Lives and by the said Indenture Bargains and Sells to him all the Timber Trees c. by which Indenture is a Letter of Attorny to make Livery and they find the Indorsement on the Indenture to this effect Midd. That J. B. one of the Attornies entred into part and made Livery Midd. That J. G. the other Attorny entred into part and made Livery The Livery made in the House of the Lord was Endorsed but it is not mentioned to be part of the Manor The Jury find the entry of Peter Hoskins and seisin for three Lives according to the Lease which aids the other Imperfections Verdict aided 1 Jan. 43 Eliz. Peter Hoskins demiseth to J. Hoskins Masons Tenement and Lands for 99 years March 3 Jac. Mason continuing customary Tenant for Life after his nomination aforesaid cut down 20 Trees off his Copy-hold upon which J. Hoskins 6 Jac. entred upon the Land and demised to the Plaintiff who enters upon Mason who re-enters and if his re-entry be lawful they find for Mason After non-suit one of the Defendants was dead this suggestion must be entred on the Roll. and if not lawful they find for the Defendant Winch Ent. 440. Rowls and Mason In Ejectment to try the Custom of E. of Copies for three Lives the Plaintiff was non-suit and one of the Defendants being dead Hales Chief Justice advised to enter a Suggestion on the Roll That one was dead or else the Judgment for the Defendant on the non-suit will be erroneous as to all 2 Keb. 832. Hawthorn versus Bawden CAP. XXXV Copy-holders relieved in Chancery or what things in respect of Copy-hold Estates are relievable in Chancery or not NOW I conceive it will not be impertinent but rather a thing well approved of to cite some Cases Resolutions and Decrees wherein Copy-holders have been relieved and what remedy the Chancellor will give in respect of Lords
4. Rep. 29. Bunting and Lepingwel 5. Copy-hold ought to be dimissa dimissibilis as it is in Murrels Case 4 Rep. vide infra Tit. Custom Yet this Rule is not Infallible For if a Copy-hold Land be in the hand of a Subject who is after preferred to Dignity Royal the Copy-hold is extinct for it is below the Majesty of a King to perform servile Services and yet after his Decease the next who hath right shall be admitted and the Tenure shall be revived in him 2 Siderfin 82. CAP. III. Priviledges of Copy-hold Estates 1. Priviledges of the Lord. 2. Of the Tenant 3. Priviledges of Infants Copy-holders 4. Of Copy-holds in respect of the Kings Prerogative and Priviledge BEfore I come to Treat farther of Copy-holds I thought it might not be amiss to set down the Priviledges of Copy-holders and Lords and Prerogative of the King that so the Student being well setled in these they need not be mentioned or explicated hereafter though they may lye here and there scattered in the following Cases Priviledges of the Lord. The Lord may upon Seizure of a Copy-hold maintain an Ejectment till the Heir come to be admitted 1 Keb. 287. Pateson and Danges The King shall not have the custody of the Land that the Ideot holds by Copy The Lord to have the custody of an Ideot for this is no more than an Estate at Will at Common Law and if the King should have the custody of the Land he would much prejudice the Lord. Yet alienation made of it by the Ideot after Office found shall be avoided Coke 4 Rep. 126. Beverly's Case Copy-hold Lands granted to three for the Lives of two if the Tenants pur auter vie dye Living cesty que vie the Lord shall have it for there shall no be Occupancy 1 Rolls Abridg. 511. Ven and Howel's Case No Occupancy The Lord shall have the custody and not the Prochein Amy. The Copy-holder is surdus mutus the Lord shall have the Custody and not the Prochein Amy for otherwise he should be prejudiced in his Rents and Services Cro. Jac. 105. Evers and Skinner The Lord is Chancellor in his own Court to dispose of the Estate when the Tenant leaves it uncertain Vide infra sub Tit. Customs in reference to Estates sparsim per tout If a Copy-holder surrender to the use of one and the Lord refuseth to admit him no Action of the Case lyeth against him so if such Copy-holder prays the Lord to hold a Court and he refuseth Where a Surrender is to be made to a Tenant of the Manor if he will not take such Surrender yet no Action of the Case lyes against him 1 Rolls Abr. 108. In what capacity the Lord stands in reference to the Copy-holder's Estate He is an Instrument of Conveyance upon Surrenders and a Conveyer himself upon voluntary Grants He is Chancellor in his own Court and may proceed by Bill vide infra Of the Priviledges of Copy-holders In this Chapter I shall sum up some general Priviledges of Copy-holders which lye scattered in the several Customs hereafter treated of A Copy-holder may make a Lease for a year without Licence of the Lord vide Lease Lease Copy-holders of a Manor may have Solam separalem pasturam in the Soyl of the Lord Sola separalis pastura and exclude him 2 Sanders 326 327 328. If a man be obliged in a Statute Staple Stat. Staple Elegit his Copy-hold Land is not extendible but aliter upon a Statute of Bankrupts vide Tit. Grant It s not extendible upon Elegit If a Copy-holder Lease for years by Licence of the Lord this is not extendible in the Hands of the Lessee Rolls Abr. 888. Picto's Case Copy-holder of Inheritance may dig for Mines in his Land So the Parson in his Glebe as it seems Siderfin p. 152. The Lord of Rutland against Gee per Hobart and Warburton Copy-holder may dig for Marle without any danger of Forfeiture Digging for Marle but he ought to lay the said Marle upon the same Copy-hold Land Winch p. 8. A Custom is that the Lord of a Manor may dig for Coals and open Mines in the Land of his Copy-holder Coals It was made a doubt in Goodrick and Gascoin's Case if Lessee of the Manor may have this liberty and whether such liberty can pass by Grant of the Manor without special words Latch p. 189. A Copy-holder may hedge and enclose but not where it was never enclosed before Winch p. 8. Note a difference between Priviledges which are annexed to the Seigniory and Priviledges annexed to the Tenancy The first the Lord may destroy but not the last Therefore If Tenant at Will be Out-lawed his Estate is determined Outlawry but a Copy-hold is not forfeited or determined by Outlawry Lit. Rep. 234. cited to be adjudged in 44 Eliz. Yet vide 1 Leon. p. 99. Where a Copy-holder is Outlawed the King shall have the Profits of his Copy-hold Lands and the Lord hath not any remedy for the Rent If the King grants a Manor in which are Copy-holders in Fee-farm Fee-Farm Rent the Lands or Goods of the Copy-holders are not liable to the Fee-farm Rent although the Free-hold is for the Copy-holders are elder than the Rent being by Prescription So Rent by Prescription If the King had a Rent by Prescription out of the Manor in which there are Copy-holders if the King had not used to Levy this upon the Copy-holds it seems he cannot charge them forasmuch as they are in by Prescription also M. 12 Jac. B. 2 Rolls Abr. 157. Assets Copy-hold Inheritance shall not be Assets to charge the Heir Popham 188. Copy-holder makes a Lease for years by Licence and dyes this shall not be Assets in the Hands of his Executors Popham 188. Copy-holder shall have Ayd of the Lord where the right of the Seigniory comes in question upon the Issue taken Ayd 21 H. 6.37 But where he hath Ayd of a Bishop and after the King hath the Temporalties he shall not have Ayd of the King for so the Plaintiff may be perpetually delay'd 21 H. 6.37.39 Priviledge of Infants Copy-holders Or Resolutions concerning Infants in respect of Fines Admittances barring Estates and being bound by Customs or not Custom of a Manor is That if a Copy-hold descends to any man that Proclamation shall be made at three several Courts that he shall come in to be admitted Infant not comprehended within the Custom of coming in after three Proclamations and if he come not in it shall be a forfeiture to the Lord yet an Infant shall not be comprehended within this Custom for he by intendment of Law is not at discretion to make his Claim 8 Rep. 100. Letchford's Case It seems to be a Rule in Law An Infant cannot be protected by the Law by his non-age in any Case but where his Right which he had while an Infant and descended
the Son to the Plow So the Custom that the Wife shall have the whole for her free Bench is against the Maxim of Common Law for Dower These Customs might have a reasonable beginning where they are not prejudicial to the Common-wealth nor to the present Interest of any particular person yet a Custom may be prejudicial to the Interest of a particular person and reasonable also where it is for the benefit of the Common-wealth in general as to make Bulwarks upon another mans Land in time of War c. But Custom which is contrary to the publick Good or injurious to a Multitude and beneficial only to some particular Person such Custom is repugnant to the Law of Reason and void ab initio and no Prescription can make it good therefore the Custom of a Manor was That no Commoner should put in his Beasts till the Lord had put in his and it was adjudged void 2 H. 4.24 For if the Lord would never put in his Beast the Commoners should lose their Common As to Customs being reasonable or unreasonable vide several more instances in the Argument of Rolls and Mason's Case 2 Brownl 86 88. Customs may be reasonable ratione loci Custom is Several particular Customs in several places where Copy-holder had Issue only Daughters the eldest shall have this for Life and after her death it shall go to the next Heir Male of the Father to him and his Heirs and if no such Heir then it shall Escheat to the Lord. Copy-holder dyes Borderers on Scotland his Wife hath it durante viduitate leaving two Daughters and during this time the eldest dyes The Question was if the second Daughter or the Lord by Escheat had the better Title Per Cur. 1. The Custom is good and the Estate which the Daughter had is an excrescent Estate and not properly a descent 2. She that was eldest at the time of the death of the Mother shall have it and not only Primogenita filia Siderfin p. 267. Newton and Shafto This Custom was good ratione loci for such Manor is bordering on Scotland where were frequent Invasions And Feme sole Merchant is good ratione loci Feme Sole Merchant London The Custom of the Isle of Man That one shall be hanged for stealing a Capon Isle Man but not for stealing an Ox is good In the Manor of Bemister in Dorset Bemister is this Custom That a Copy-holder ought to nominate his Successor otherwise the Land shall Escheat and it has been allowed to be a good Custom So the Manor of Taunton Taunton Dean That the Wife of the Copy-holder shall have the Inheritance of her Husband Siderfin p. 267. id Case The Custom of Millan in Norfolk is Millan in Norfolk If any Copy-holder will sell his Land and agree upon the Price at the next Court the next of his Blood and if he refuse any other of his Blood may have the Land And such like Custom there is at Ham in Middlesex Ham in Middlesex The next Clivener which is he that dwelleth next to him shall have the refusal giving as much as another will and he which inhabits on the East the first and then the South c. 2 Brownl 177. As for the other Rules of the validities of Customs as that they ought to be on good Considerations and beneficial to the Prescriber as Calthrop and Cokes Copyholder treat of they may be referred to the forgoing Rules Now you see there are three supporters of a Copy-hold Custom 1. Time and that must be out of the memory of Man so that Copy-hold cannot begin at this day 2. That the Tenements be parcel of the Manor or within the Manor 3. That it hath been demised and demisible by Copy of Court Roll Demised and demisible how understood for it need not be demised time out of mind by Copy of Court Roll but if it be demisible it is sufficient For Example If a Copy-hold Tenement Escheat to the Lord and the Lord keeps it in his hands many years during this time it is not demised but demisible for the Lord hath power to demise it again Coke Lit. 58. b. Customs of Manors are Disabling Enabling Disabling is That the Tenant by a particular Custom shall not be allowed to do that which he might by the general Custom of Manors As a man may sell Land to whom he will by the general Custom of Manors yet in some Manors by special Custom he must make an offer to the next of Blood Vide supra Customs ratione loci Enabling is where the Tenant by a particular Custom shall be enabled to do that from which he is restrained by the general Custom of Manors By the general Custom of Manors the granting of Copy-hold Land for more than one year without Licence is a Forfeiture yet in some Manors they may do it and it shall not be a Forfeiture Coke Copy-hold 79. Sect. 33. You will find Prescription mentioned in the ensuing Cases therefore it will be of good use a little to open the nature of Custom and Prescription and to shew how and wherein they agree and wherein they differ and also the difference as to Pleadings Custom Prescription and Usage are of great Affinity yet they differ thus Custom is where by continuance of time a Right is obtained concerning divers persons in Common Prescription is where by continuance of time one particular person obtaineth Right against another either a Person or Body Politick Usage is by continuance of time and an efficient cause of both Limitation is where a Right may be obtained by reason of Non-claim by the space of a certain number of years Calthrops Reading 1. Prescription is made in the Person and so the Pleading is That he and all his Ancestors c. Or he and all those whose Estate he hath time out of mind used to have Common of Pasture in such a place c. being the Land of some other c. as pertaining to the said Manor Custom is a Copy-holder of the Manor of D. doth plead That within the same Manor there is and hath been such a Custom timeout of mind used that all the Copy-holders of the said Manor have and used to have Common c. Coke Lit. 113. b. So Custom lyes upon the Land As infra manerium talis habetur consuetudo c. 8 Rep. Swain's Case And such Custom binds the Land as Gavel-kind Borough English c. Prescription ought to have a Lawful beginning not so of Custom So is Coke 6 Rep. Gateward's Case Prescription is alledged in the Person and a Custom ought always to be alledged upon the Land for every Prescription by common intendment ought to have a lawful beginning but it is otherwise of a Custom for this ought to be reasonable and Ex certa rationabili causa usitata but it need not to have an intendment of a lawful commencement as Custom to have Land devisable
after the death of the Lord he should pay a Fine it had been good This was resolved by the Judges in Serjeants-Inn in a Case of one Armstrong referred out of Chancery Lord cannot grant a Copy-hold in Reversion The Lord of a Manor cannot grant a Copy-hold in Reversion without a special Custom March Rep. 8. Whether the Lord of a Manor might grant Copies in the remainder only with the assent of the Tenants was a question if it was a good Custom but not resolved 3 Leon. 226. The Copy-holder is surdus mutus the Lord shall have the custody for otherwise he shall be prejudiced in his Rents and Services and not the Prochein Amy Cro. Jac. 105. Eavers and Skinner To seize the Estate of a Convict Felon Custom was if a Copy-holder be convict of Felony the Lord shall seize the Copy-hold Estate it is a good Custom 1 Leon. p. 1. Bornford and Packington 2 Brownl 217. Hitchins and Cooper Custom was that if the Tenant did not repair and it was presented by the Homage To repair or be presented The Tenant shall be amerced and the Lord shall distrain the Beasts of the Tenant and under-Tenant a good Custom March p. 161. Thorn and Tyler For the Custom which gives the distress knits it to the Land and so it is not meerly personal otherwise the Lord by such a devise as this viz. by making the Lease for one year by the Tenant should be defeated of his Services and though a Custom cannot extend to a Stranger Custom cannot extend to a Stranger Under-Tenant not a meer Stranger yet the under-Tenant is not a meer Stranger but as a customary Tenant for he shall have the Priviledges of a customary Tenant qui sentit commodum c. And transit terra cum onere He that shall have the Land ought to undergo the charge By all the Judges in that Case Customs as to Surrenders vide Surrenders Customs as to Forfeitures vide sub titulo Forfeitures Customs as to Admittances Fines vide Fines Admittances Custom The Lord not compellable to make a Grant but he is to make an Admittance That after the death of Tenant for Life of a Copy-hold the Lord is compellable to make the Estate to the eldest Son for Life and if he hath no Son to the Daughter and so imperpetuum this is not a good Custom but against Law because the Lord by this Custom is compellable to make a Grant Aliter if it be to make an Admittance More n. 1088. The Lord Grey's Case Customs in respect of the Tenants As to Forfeitures vide sub titulo Forfeitures As to Surrenders vide Surrenders As to Fines vide Fines c. Sparsim per tout That the Lord shall have the Estate of a Felon The Custom was if any Copy-holder of a Manor commit any Felony that he shall forfeit to the Lord his Copy-hold Estate and that the Lord upon presentment of this by the Homage may enter and seize the same it s a good Custom But the Case went farther H. a Copy-holder had killed one P. and the same was presented by the Homage If he be acquitted and they find that H. was Indicted for the same and Acquitted after this acquittal the Lord did enter and seize the Estate as forfeited But as to that point the Court gave not any Opinion 2 Brownl Rep. Gittins and Cooper By-Laws Custom was That the Steward of a Manor might make Laws and Ordinances for the well ordering of the Common and to assess a Penalty on those who broke those By-Laws also to prescrribe to Distrain for the Penalty Per Cur. The Custom is reasonable and the difference is where the Law or Ordinance takes away the whole profit of the Commoners and where it abridgeth it only And the Commoners are bound to take notice of these Ordinances March p. 28. James and Titney Custom to make By-Laws And this Law was made That no Tenant of the said Manor should put into such a Common any Steer being a year old or more upon pain of 6 d. for every such Offence and that it should be lawful to distrein the same It s avoided by Law for it s against common Right where a man hath Common for all his Cattel commonable to restrain him to one kind of Cattel and had it been that none should put in his Cattel before such a day that had been good for this doth not take away but order the Inheritance 1 Leon. 190. Erbery and Latton Custom was A Copy-holder for Life may nominate his Successor to have it for Life To compound for the Fine and the person nominated to compound with the Lord for the Fine and if he could not compound then he should give such a Fine as the Homage should Assess and should be admitted and hold for his Life it s a good Custom Cro. Jac. 368. Ford's Case 1 Rolls Rep. 125.195 More n. 1071. mesme Case 2 Brownl 85. Rolls and Mason Noy Rep. 2. Yestmester Custom In this he hath a greater Estate than a Sole Tenant for Life In Replevin and Avowry for not doing Suit To tender 8 d. for doing suit in a Court-Baron the Plaintiff sets forth a Custom That if any Tenant live at a distance and comes at Michaelmas and pays eight pence to the Lord and a penny to the Steward he shall be excused for not attending and then he said he tendred eight pence and the Lord refused Tender and refusal all one with payment if he avers That there are sufficient Copy-holders that live near the Manor its good and tender and refusal by Hales is all one with payment Modern Rep. p. 77. Legingham and Porphiry It s a good Custom this not being a customary Court but a Court-Baron where the free Suitors are Judges Siderfin p. 361. mesme Case 2 Keb. 344 380 851 mesme Case The Custom was Lord not compellable to make a Surrender That after the death of Tenant for Life of a Copy-hold the Lord is compellable to make an Estate to the eldest Son for Life and if he hath no Son to a Daughter and so in perpetuum The Justices were of Opinion that this was against Law More n. 1088. Lord Grey's Case Vide prius Of Customs in respect of the Estate Here I shall recite some few Cases of Customs about Leasing and Limitation of Estates when good or not As to the Custom concerning Leases Vide Leases and Licenses As to the Custom of Intailing Copy-holds and barring them Vide sub titulo Entails As to the Ceremony of Presentment vide Presentment Pled quod si terre sunt concesse habend sibi suis grantee habet in feodo Ra. Entries 627 116 155. Pled quod si terrae sunt concessae al. 2 pro vitis ille qui primo nominatus in copia habeat terras solus pro vita 3 Br. 475. Hern 73 83 124 654 712. Simile de terris
and so the Custom of Taunton-Dean That if a Copy-holder in Fee marries a Wife If the Wife survives she shall have the Fee if the Wife survives she shall have the Fee sic e converso agreed to be good Noy Rep. p. 2. There can be no Dower nor Tenancy by the Curtesie of the Copy-hold unless by special Custom 1 Anderson 292. Lease made before admittance A man may be Tenant by the Curtesie by Custom Though the Husband enter into the Land in the right of the Wife before admittance and the Wife dyes before admittance his Lease shall be good 1 Anderson 192. Ewer and Astwick It was admitted by the Court to be a good Custom That an Executor or Administrator shall have an year in the Land of the Copy-holder Custom that the Executor shall have an year in the Copy-hold against the Wife that claims her Free-Bench Noy p. 29. Remington and Cole If a Woman be Dowable of Copy-hold by Custom if the Husband after the marriage makes a Lease for years good by the Custom Tenant in Dower shall not avoid a Lease made by the Husband the Tenant in Dower shall not avoid it but it shall precede the Dower More n. 147. Holder and Fairly For he comes under the Custom as well as the Feme The Custom of a Manor was Quod quilibet tenens per Copiam poterit dimittere terras suas pur vie or in Fee or in Tayl Custom that the Wife Feme covert may Devise and that a Woman cooperta viro poterit devisare her Copy-hold Land to her Husband or to any other by the assent of her Husband Per Cur. The Custom is not unreasonable But because it was poterit devisare which is a word of justification and it should have been usi sunt devisare by way of excuse it was adjudged against the Plaintiff More n. 268. And so was one Welsh's Case in C. B. 41 El. 3 Leon. p. 81. Skipwith's Case The Custom was That Widows should enjoy during their Widow-hood Where the severance of the customary Tenants from the Manor shall not prejudice the Widow in her customary Estate The Lord Grants a customary Tenement of the Manor unto J. B. for Life by Copy and after conveys the whole Manor to W. who conveyed the Inheritance and Free-hold of B's Tenement for mony paid by B. to J. S. and others and their Heirs during the Life of J. B. the remainder to Ellen then Wife of J. B. the remainder to J. B. in Fee J. B. Grants his remainder in Fee to his Son and his Heirs The Son having Issue a Son dyed and then Ellen dyed J. B. marries Frances and dyes seized of his customary Estate Frances shall enter and enjoy her Widows Estate for it is clear That the customary Estate of J. B. remained as it was during his Life not extinct nor altered by the purchase of the Fee-simple which during his Life was in others not in him and then it follows by consequence That all customary Incidents to such a customary Estate remain whereof this is one which by Custom and Law grows of it self out of that Estate as a Descent should have done if J. B. had been a Copy-holder in Fee and the Freehold had been granted to another in Fee Hobart p. 181. Howard and Bartlet It is not in the power of the Lord to destroy Widows Estates By the severance Incidents to the Tenancy are not destroyed but Incidents to the Seigniory are The Law vests the Estate in a Woman that is to hold durante viduitate before admittance The Custom is That a Woman shall hold durante viduitate she shall make a Lease before admittance for in that case there is no Fine due to the Lord and the Law vests the Estate in her Noy 29. Remington and Cole Hobart 181. Vide Admittance The Lord Enfeoffs the Copy-holder this destroys Free-Bench A Custom of a Manor was found to be That if a Copy-holder in Fee dyes seized his Wife should hold it during her Life as Free-Bench the Lord Enfeoffs the Copy-holder who dyed seized Per Cur. she shall not hold her Free-Bench aliter if the Lord had enfeoffed a Stranger of that Land yet the Land remained Copy-hold and the Custom is not taken away Crok Jac. 126. Lashmer and Avery Damages recovered in Dower A Woman recovered Dower in the Lords Court and 40 l. because her Husband dyed seized and she brought Debt for the Damages in the Kings-Bench Per Cur. The Action lyes not because the Court-Baron could not hold Plea nor award Execution of 40 l. Damages although the Damages were there well assessed More n. 559. If a Feme Copy-holder holds the Land durante viduitate and then takes Husband the Lord shall have the Corn Oland's Case Vide Emblements The Widows customary Estate is due to her Divorce though there was a Divorce a mensa thoro Hobart p. 181. Howard and Bartlet Tenant of a Copy-hold for Life Whether the Widow attaint for Felony shall have her Estate of viduity in which the Custom was That the Wife should have her Widows Estate and the Husband was attaint of Felony and Executed The Question was whether she should have it Winch not without a special Custom Winch Rep. 27. Allen and Branch That the Wife shall not have her Dower The Wife to claim her Dower within a year and day except she claim it within a year and a day it s said to be a good Custom 3 Leon. p. 226. Pleadings Custom Quod Uxores habeant Tenementa custumaria durante viduitate sua Dyer 192. 3 Br. 403 476. Hern 73. Quod Uxores Tenen custumar in feodo habeant pro vita Tenementa unde viri obierunt seisita Et si viri dimiser tunc revers reddit Cok. Ent. 123. CAP. VII Custom as to Timber Woods and Vnder-Woods and what Prescription by a Copy-holder to cut Trees shall be good or not TEnant by Copy of Court Roll cannot by the Common Law take Trees for House-bote Hedge-bote and Cart-bote c. as Tenant for Life or Years may do who have an Estate certain but a Copy-holder by special Custom may do it Cro. El. p. 5. Lord Mountague against Sheppard Where a Custom was alledged to be That every Copy holder may cut down Trees at his pleasure this Custom is against Common Law Winch p. 1. If a Custom be That a Copy-holder may not cut down Trees it is good or not good with this difference If he be a Copy-holde of Inheritance such a Custom is good but if he be a Copy-holder for Life its noâ— good 1 Bulstr 150. Earl of Northumberlanâ— against Wheeler The Tenant prescribes to câ—â— and dispose all the Trees upon his Tenancy its an ill Prescription Aliter of a Copy-holde of Inheritance Noy p. 2. So it is adjudged it 1 Rolls Abr. 650. Glascock and Peche It s a good Custom Copy-holder in Fee
Manor after the Grant made hath stablish'd and fixed this firm to the Grantee So if the Copy-holders for Life used to have Common in the Lords Wastes or Woods and the Lord aliens the Wastes or Woods to another in Fee and after grants certain Copy-hold Lands or Houses for Lives such Grantees shall have Common of Pasture or Estovers notwithstanding the Severance for the Title of Copy-holder is paramount the Severance and the Custom unites the Common or Estovers which are but accessories and incidents so long as the House and Land being the principal is maintained by the Custom which customary Appurtenants are not pertaining to the Estate of the Lord for he is Owner of the Free-hold and Inheritance of the whole Manor but they are appertaining to the customary Estate of the Copy-holder after the Grant made 8 Rep. 63. Swain's Case Voluntary Grants made by Feoffee of Manor on Condition good Feoffee of a Manor upon Condition grants Land by Copy and afterwards the Manor becomes forfeited and the Feoffor entreth yet the Copy-hold Estate remains untouched so if Feoffee of a Manor on Condition to Enfeoff a Stranger and the next day makes a voluntary Grant by Copy this shall bind Coke Cop. Voluntary Estates granted during the time of the Lords Interest shall be good though the Lords Estate be avoided ab initio Nay though the Estate of the Lord in the Manor by Relation happen to be void ab initio yet if he grant by Copy during the continuance of his Interest it is good So Copy-holders Estates granted before a Divorce causa praecontractus shall be good So if a man espouseth the Lady of a Manor under the Age of consent and after she disagreeeth though the Marriage by relation was void ab initio yet Copy-holds granted before disagreement shall never be avoided So by Popham in Rowse's Case Owen 28. If a Manor be devised to one and the Devisee enters and makes Copies and then the Devise is found to be void yet such Copies of Surrenders are good Aliter where such Devisee makes new or voluntary Copies If the Lord of a Manor commits Felony or Murder and Process of Outlawry is awarded against him after the Exigent he granteth Copyhold Estates according to the Custom and then is Attainted these Grants are good though by relation the Manor was forfeited from the time of the Exigent awarded So if the Lord had been Attainted by Verdict or Confession If the Lord of a Manor acknowledgeth a Statute and then granteth Lands by Copy Grant after Stat. acknowledged and the Manor extended yet shall be good and after the Manor is delivered to the Conusee in Extent the Grant cannot by this be impeached Lease for years is made of a Manor and to be void upon breach of a Condition Condition is broken and Lessee before entry of the Lessor grants Estates by Copy these Grants shall never exclude the Lessor for upon breach of the Condition the Lease is void But in case of a Lease for Life or Grant in Tayl or Fee of the Manor on such Condition the granting Estates by Copy before Entry of the Lessor c. may be good for before his Title be executed by Entry the Tenant c. hath a lawful Interest to grant by Copy Coke Cop. p. 100 101. Sect. 34. But if a Parson before Induction grant Lands by Copy being parcel of a Manor which is Glebe Land this admitting binds not though he be afterwards Inducted Ibid. Tenant in Dower shall not avoid such Grant If the Lord of a Manor taketh a Wife and after that granteth Copy-hold Estates according to the Custom and dyeth and the Feme hath this Manor assigned to her in Dower yet she cannot avoid these Copy-hold Estates because the Copy-holders are in by a Title paramount to the Feme viz. by Custom Coke 8 Rep. 63. b. Swain's Case But if the Lords Heir make such assignment of Dower she may avoid them But in all these Cases before put observe these three Rules 1. These Grants must be according to the Custom of the Manor and Rents and Services customary must be reserved 2. Though it is not material what Estate or Interest the Lord hath Tenant at sufferance Grants c. shall not bind yet it must be an Estate or Interest and therefore Tenant Pur auer vie of a Manor is Cesty que vie dyes the Tenant continued possession of the Manor and held Courts and made voluntary Grants by Copy Per Cur. This shall not bind the Lord for he was but Tenant at sufferance who had not any Interest and so he was a Disseisor of the Manor More n. 369. Rouse and Artois 3. As to the Lords Grant of the Copy-hold Estate in respect of his Estate in the Copy-hold there the quantity of the Lords Estate is to be regarded for if a Copy-holder in Fee surrender to the use of the Lord for Life the remainder over to a Stranger or reserving the reversion to himself if the Lord will grant this by Copy in Fee whatsoever Estate the Lord hath in the Manor yet having but an Estate for Life in the Copy-hold no larger Estate shall pass than he himself hath Coke Cop. 96. What acts of the Lord in granting Copy-holds are not confirmed by Custom but only strengthned by the Power Interest and Authority of the Lord have no longer continuance than the Lords Estate continueth Therefore if a Tenant for Life of a Manor granteth a Licence to a Copy-holder to alien and dyeth the Licence is destroyed and the power of Alienation ceaseth Now as to the Quality of the Lords Estate he must be Legitimus Dominus he must have a lawful Estate in the Manor The Rule in Cokes 4 Rep. Clark and Pennyfeather's Case is universally true Grant by one that hath a tortious Title not Good If a Disseisor or Feoffee of a Disseisor or any other who had a tortious or defeazable Estate or Interest subject to the Action or Entry of another hold Court and make any voluntary Grant upon Escheat or Forfeiture of a Copy-hold such voluntary Grant shall not bind him that hath right when he hath re-continued the Manor by Action or Entry for to this intent the said Custom shall be understood of a Lord who hath a lawful Estate or Interest A Grant upon an usurped Title shall never bind the right Owner but that by Action or Entry he may avoid them for the Law will not support a Custom which shall work or tend to the disherison of the right owner If the Heir of a Disseisor who comes in by descent Grants any Copy-hold Estate it may be avoided by the Disseisee So of a Feoffee of a Disseisor who comes in by Title If Tenant in Tayl of a Manor discontinueth the Tayl and after the discontinuance granteth Copy-hold Estates and dyeth now the Discontinuee comes in under a just Title and shall enjoy against all the World during the
therefore where Surrenderer is Infant and dyes his Heir shall enter Cro. El. 90. Knights's Case It must be an actual Surrender in Court and not a Surrender in Law If a Copy-holder in Fee take the same Land of the Lord by other Copy for Life this is not any Surrender or Determination of his Copy-hold Inheritance for a Copy-hold may not be surrendred but by actual Surrender in Court sursum reddens this into the hands of the Lord and not by Surrender in Law 1 Rolls Abr. 501. Shepard and Adams In grant of a Reversion Attornment why not needful Attornment is not necessary for a Copy-holder because there is no time when the Termor should Attorn for before the Surrender he cannot Attorn and after the Surrender and Admittance it is too late The Copy-hold Estate is like an Estate raised by Uses or Devise in which an Attornment is not necessary 1 Brownl 179. Swinnerton and Miller The Surrender and Admittance are in the nature of an Inrolment and so amount to an Attornment or at least supply the want of it 1 Leon. 297. General Rules and Maxims 1. Implication is not good in a Surrender though it be in a Will A Surrender of Copy-hold Land was to the Use of the second Son for Life after the Death of the Tenant and his Heirs it was adjudged not good 1 Brownl Rep. 127. Allen and Nash Noy 152. 2. In Copy-hold Cases a Surrender to the Use c. This is no Use properly but an Explication shewing how the Land shall go 1 Brownl 127. 3. It is the general Custom of the Realm That every Copy-holder may Surrender in Court and need not to alledge any Custom therefore so if out of Court he Surrender to the Lord himself he need not in Pleading alledge any Custom but if he Surrender out of Court into the Hands of the Lord by the Hands of two or three Copy-holders or by the Hands of the Bayliff c. or by the Hands of any other these Customs are particular and therefore he must plead them Co. Lit. 59. a. The Estate of Cesty que use shall ensue the Limitation in the Surrender and not in the Admittance of the Lord Co. Lit. 659. b. If two Joynt-Tenants be of Copy-hold Lands in Fee and the one out of Court according to the Custom surrender his part to the Lords Hands to the use of his Will and by his Will deviseth his part to a Stranger in Fee and dyes and at next Court the Surrender is presented by the Surrender and Presentment the Joynture is severed and the Devisee ought to be admitted to the moiety of the Lands for now by relation the state of the Land was bound by the Surrender and the Lord cannot grant a larger Estate than is exprest by the limitation of the Use 1 Rolâ— Rep. 438. In Grant of a Reversion Attornment is not necessary for a Copy-holder Vide supra 5. Copy-hold may not be surrendred but by actual Surrender in Court and not by a Surrender in Law Vide infra 6. A Copy-holder cannot Surrender an Estate to another and leave a particular Estate in himself no more than a Freeholder Vide apres Before I come directly to treat of Surrenders one of the most useful pieces of Learning as to Copy-hold Estates I shall premise some general Considerations as to the Alienation of Copy-hold Estates or of a Transferring of Copy-hold Interest from one to another and more particularly of the Selling and Aliening of the Copy-hold Lands of a Bankrupt the knowledge whereof is very necessary and not very common The Assurance of Copy-hold Land from one man to another who is not Lord must be made by Copy of Court Roll according to the Custom and this must be by Surrender and for the perfecting thereof must be Presentment and Admittance generally For If I would have my Estate pass according to my Will I cannot devise this Copy-hold by Will but must surrender it to the use of my last Will and in my Will I must declare my intention But for the manner of doing it and the operation in Law Vide postea sub Titulo Surrender to the Use of a mans last Will. And If I would Exchange Copy-hold Land with another I cannot do it by Deed of Exchange but we may Surrender it each to other and the Lord shall admit us accordingly But Copy-hold Estates in some Cases may pass and be transferred from one to another without Surrender and that by Release Copy-hold in some Cases may pass otherwise than by Surrender But then we must observe this difference between a Release that enures by way of extinguishment or by way of an enlargement of an Estate By Release sometimes a Copy-hold may be transferred when it enures by way of extinguishment As by Release and so may serve to drown a Copy-hold Right As for the purpose A man is admitted upon a void Presentment and where the Presentment and Admittance is not according to the Surrender as where the Presentment is absolute and the Surrender conditional and so void It was resolved that the Admmittee had a customary Estate by Possession and is in by Title and is capable of a Release from him who had the right and here is a customary Estate upon which the Release may well be grounded besides the Lord is not prejudiced he being satisfied his Fine upon the Admittance So if I am ousted of a Copy-hold and the Lord admit the Disseisor according to the Custom a Release made by me will extinguish my right But if one be disseised of a Copy-hold Estate a Release by the Disseisee to the Disseisor is void for this is a prejudice to the Lord in losing his Admittance Fine if it should be good and there is no customary Right upon which a Release should enure there never having been Admittance as was in the other Case So is Mortimer's Case Hetly p. 150. But a man cannot pass a Copy-hold Estate by way of Lease and Release because this Release enures by way of enlargement of Estate and to transfer an Interest but this must be by a Lease for a Year which is warranted c. and by Surrender of the Reversion into the hands of the Lord and he to grant it over to the Lessee One Joynt-Tenant releaseth to his Companion One Joynt-Copy holder released to his Companion and it was resolved in the Case of Wase and Pretty Winch Rep. p. 3. That the Release was good without Surrender or Admittance for the first Admittance is of them and every of them and the ability to Release was from the first Conveyance and Admittance In some Cases Copy-holds cannot pass by Surrender Release Admittance or otherwise As for the purpose The Lord grants an ancient Copy-hold to S. in Fee and after he grants the Inheritance of that Copy-hold to a Stranger in Fee S. makes his Will and demiseth it to M. which was surrendred at next Court now by the
severance of the Copyhold from the Manor the Copy-hold is not destroyed but it is not parcel of the Manor now if one would alien this he cannot do it by Surrender for it s not parcel of the Manor neither can the Feoffee make Admittance for he is not Dominus but if such Copy-holder will alien there is no way but to have a Decree against him and his Heirs in Chancery and so to bind his person but by it the Interest of the Land is not bound 4 Rep. 24 25. By the Statute of 13 El. Cap. 7. Copy-hold Lands are to be sold by Deed Indented and Inrolled in any of his Majesties Courts of Record as other the Bankrupts Land but by the same Statute it is provided That all Persons to whom any such Sale shall be made shall before such time as they shall enter and take the Profit of the same agree and compound with the Lord of the Manor of whom the same shall be holden for such Fines or Incomes as heretofore hath been usual and accustomed to be yielded or paid therefore and upon every such Composition the Lord for the time being at the next Court to be holden at and for the said Manor shall not only grant to such Vendee upon request the same Copy or customary Lands or Tenements by Copy of Court Roll of the said Manors for such Estate or Interest as to them shall be sold and reserving the ancient Rents Customs and Services but also in the same Court admit them Tenants of the same Copy or customary Lands as other Copy-holders of the same Manor have been wont to be admitted as also to receive their Fealty accordingly Note Copy-hold Lands are within all the Statutes of Bankrupt Cro. Car. 550. Crisp and Plat. Title to a Copy-hold cannot be made by the Commissioners without Surrender or Admittance 1 Keb. 24. How and to what purpose such Estate Vests before Admittance Cro. Car. 569. In Parker and Bleke's Case it is adjudged That by Bargain and Sale made by the Commissioners of Bankrupts the Estate of the Copy-holder is vested in the Bargainee before Admittance though he may not enter and take the Profits till Admittance The Bargain and Sale binds the Copy-holder and bars his Estate and he is no Copy-holder after the Bargain and Sale enrolled And where the Bargainee is admitted by the Lord it shall have relation to the Bargain and Sale And where the Custom was That the Wife of a Copy-holder dying Tenant shall have a Life Estate it was adjudged the Copy-holder dying after the Bargain and Sale his Wife shall be barr'd of her Widows Estate A Bankrupt purchaseth a Copy-hold and the Tenant Surrenders into two Tenants Hands to the use of the Bankrupt and now he will not be admitted This may be sold by the Commissioners and the Vendee may pay the Admittance Of Surrender Now I shall treat of Surrenders then of Presentment and Admittance for that they make up but one Copy-hold Title First of Surrenders We have seen in the last Chapter how that in some Cases Copy-hold Lands may pass without Surrender Now In some few Cases a Surrender is sufficient without Admittance or Presentment Where Surrenders is sufficient without Admittance as if the Copy-holder Surrender to the Lords use there needs no Admittance And In some Cases Admittance will do without a Surrender Where Admittance is sufficient without a Surrender as if the Lord make a voluntary Grant of the Copy-hold in his hands no Surrender is needful but Admittance only But regularly Estates of Copy-hold must pass by Surrender and Admittance and if the Surrender be out of Court there must be a Presentment Of a Surrender in Court By what words a Surrender will pass It cannot well pass by any other word then sursum reddidit Surrender if it pass in the Court by the words Give Grant Bargain Sell this will not so pass it but the Heirs of the Copy-holder shall avoid it It is vocabulum artis as Warrantizare and some other Law words are What will amount to a Surrender in Court or not By Hobart in Hutton Rep. p. 81. What Words If a Copy-holder comes into Court and saith That he is weary of his Copy-hold and requests the Lord to take it that is a Surrender And by some if he come into the Court and desire the Lord to admit his Son into the Copy-hold this is a good Surrender to the use of the Son But if a Copy-holder comes into Court and saith He renounceth his Copy this is not any Surrender and if the Copy-holder say in the presence of any other Copy-holders He is content to Surrender to the use of J. S. This is not a good Surrender Any words in the Court that declare his intention of surrendring into the Lords Hands is good 3 Rep. 80. in Belfield's Case What Acts. It was agreed between the Lord of a Manor and J. S. That in Consideration of 5 l. paid to the Lord J. S. should enjoy the customary Lands for his Life and also of Alice his Wife durante viduitate and that J. S. should have election whether the said Lands should be assured to him and his Wife by Copy or by Bill c. and he chose by Bill which was made accordingly Per Cur. Here is a good Surrender of the said Lands and that for Life only 1 Leon. p. 191. Collman and Sir H. Portman's Case Cannot be surrendred but by actual Surrender If a Copy-holder in Fee takes the same Lands of the Lord by other Copy for Life this is not any Surrender or Determination of his Copy-hold Inheritance for a Copy-hold may not be surrendred but by actual Surrender in Court and not by a Surrender in Law 1 Rolls Abr. 501. Shepard and Adams But in 3 Bulst p. 80. Belfield and Adams its Reported thus Copy-holder in Fee comes into the Lord's Court and there takes a new Estate of his Copy-hold from the Lord to himself for his Life after to his Wife for Life and after to his Son for Life this was admitted a Surrender and so was the other Case in 1 Roll 501. In whom the Reversion after a particular Estate remains Postea 13 Jac. But the Reversion is in the Surrenderor no disposition having been made of it So in this Case this is not a giving up his Estate of Inheritance but only it shall enure by way of Surrender to the use of himself for Life after to the use of his Wife for Life and after to the use of his Son for Life But if a Copy-holder of Inheritance takes a Lease by Indenture for years by this his Copy-hold Estate is gone and this is a Surrender of his Inheritance in the other Case the Inheritance remains in him and is thus Reported by Rolls If a Copy-holder in Fee comes into Court Copy-holder by accepting of an Estate is not Estopt from claiming another Estate and accepts by Copy an
in curia manus Senel Ra. Ent. 645. Simil. per 1 vel 2 Tenentes ut Attornatus Co. Ent. 657. CAP. XIV What shall pass and by what words in a Surrender Of Attornment The Construction and Exposition of a Surrender Where no Vse or Estate is immediately limited in whole or in part And where an Vse is limited how far the Construction shall go according to the Rules of the Common Law or not Of Surrender to Vse upon Vse To the Vse of one's Wife Where a Surrender is void for the uncertainty Of a Surrender to the Vse of a person not in esse And of a Surrender to take effect in futuro What shall pass and by what words in a Surrender B. Covenants to assure all his Copy-hold Lands to A. after he Surrenders out of Court according to Custom diverse parcels by particular Names the Surrender is enrolled accordingly with this Conclusion By the name of all his Copy-hold Lands there yet no more shall pass than what was named in the Surrender Dyer 8 El 251. Harvy Justice said he knew it to be adjudged That a Surrender cum pertinentijs will pass Land Hetly p. 2. And that a Surrender of a Messuage and three Acres would pass more Acres if divers Copies successive have been so I suppose he means if the words cum pertinentijs be in What Ceremony c. is requisite or not to make good a Surrender Attornment A Copy-holder with Licence leased for Years rendring Rent and afterwards surrendred the Reversion with the Rent to the use of a Stranger who is admitted Here needs no Attornment either to settle the Reversion or create a privity for the Surrender and Admittance are in the nature of an Inrollment and amount to an Attornment or at least supply the want of it 1 Leon. 297. But there must be an Admittance by the Lord but in such case there shall be no Entry for Condition broken without Attornment Hobart 177. Swinnerton and Miller 1 Rolls Abr. 235. mesme Case Vide sparsim de Attornment The Construction and Operation of Surrenders Where no Use or Estate is immediately limited in whole or part Surrender to the Lord without expressing what use If a Surrender be made to the Lord in general without expressing to what use it shall be taken to the Lords use Kitch 81. And therefore in Bunting's Case cited in Brown and Foster's Case A Custom was That if any surrendred to the use of another without expressing any Estate that the Lord may grant it to him to whose use the Surrender was made It was adjudged a good Custom and the Lord shall ascertain the Estate A Copy-holder sold his Copy-hold Estate but shews not what Estate Or what Estate but surrendred it the use of the Bargainee and the Lord granted it in Fee to the Bargainee and it was adjudged good Cro. El. 392. Copy-holder in Fee surrendred his Lands into the hands of the Lord without saying to whose use the Surrender should be and at the next Court the said Copy-holder was admitted Habend to him and his Wife in Tayl And then admittance is to uses this subsequent act explains a Surrender remainder to his right Heirs Per Cur. The subsequent Act shall explain the Surrender and when the Copy-holder accepted a new Admittance the Law intends the Surrender was made to such an use as is specified in the Admittance Quando ab est provisio partis adest provisio Legis Popham p. 125 126. Brook's Case Cro. Jac. 434. mesme Case Copy-holder Surrenders to the use of M. and R. without limitation of any Estate they shall only have it for their Lives and in such case A Surrender to one for Life without limiting the Fee the Fee is in the Surrenderor if the Lord make Admittance and deliver Seisin to M. and R. and the Heirs of R. this was only an Admittance to them for term of their Lives the Reversion over to R. who made the Surrender for the Lord is but an Instrument and when he hath made Admittance according to the effect of the Surrender nothing remains in him but the Reversion is in the Surrenderer 4 Rep. 29. Bunting and Lepingwel But it is otherwise in the case of a Copy-holder for Life as if a Copy-holder for Life Surrender to the use of J. S. for Life and J. S. dyes this shall not revert to the first Copy-holder for Life Mich. 7. Car. 1. Diversity King and Loder's Case And therefore in Dyer 9 Eliz. f. 264. The Husband seized in the right of his Wife Reversion to B. Reversion to C. for their Lives the Husband surrrenders to the use of B. for his Life to whom the Lord grants it for his Life and is admitted and after dyes the Husband shall not have it again during his Wives Life for he had dismist himself of it Lord as Occupant and C. shall not have it during the Wives Life but the Lord as Occupant Where an Use is limited how far the Construction shall be according to the Rules of Common Law or not Some lay it down for a Rule That the same Construction which the Law makes upon words in a Deed it will make upon a Copy is not always true though regularly it is so As if Copy-hold be granted to a Corporation where no Estate is named it s a Fee-simple So if Surrender to one and his Heirs and he reciting this Surrender doth Surrender it to my use in the same manner as I surrendred it to him this is a Fee-simple So if I Surrender to J. S. as large an Estate as he hath in the Manor of Dale he hath a Fee-simple in that Manor Co. Cop. 132. The Wife shall take by the Admittance tho not named in the Premisses in the Surrender But a person may take by the Hab. in the Admittance who was not named in the Premisses as to Copy-hold therefore in Brook's Case above cited Copy-holder Surrenders his Lands without saying to whose use and at the next Court the said Copy-holder was Admitted Habend to him and to his Wife in Tayl the Remainder over Per Cur. the Wife shall take by this Admittance though she was not named in the Premisses But this Case of a Copy-hold is like to the Case of a Will or to the Case of a Frank-Marriage in which it is sufficient to pass an Estate albeit the Parties be only named in the Habendum aliter where the Surrender is to Uses and she is not named in the Premisses And the like Rule is laid down in Bunting and Lepingwel's Case 4 Rep. 29. As well Estates as Descents to be directed by the Rules of Law That as well Estates as Descents shall be directed by the Rules of Law as necessary consequents upon the Custom unless there be a special Custom to the contrary as a Surrender sibi suis by the Custom may make an Estate of Inheritance but a Surrender to one
tribus assignatis suis by his death the Estate in the Copy-hold is determined Yelverton p. 16. Arnold's Case Though we have observed Surrender passeth not by implication That the passing of Estates of Copy-hold is much resembled to Devises yet an Use shall not pass in a Surrender by implication and therefore in Seagood and Hone's Case Cro. Car. 366. A Copy-hold is surrendred to the use of F. K. and J. R. Son of the said F. and of the longest liver of them both and for want of Issue of J. the Son of his Body lawfully begotten the Lands to remain to the youngest Son of M. S. Per Cur. J. had but an Estate for Life and being an Estate for Life limited by express limitation it shall not be a greater Estate by implication Of Surrender to a Use upon Use Surrender by A. to the Use of B. and his Heirs to the use of such person as A. should name by his Will Per Twisden in Leaper and Wroth's Case it is ill no Use can be raised upon an Use although it being Copy-hold it is not executed by the Statute But H. nominated by the last Will of A. had surrendred to B. the Court conceived no doubt in that Case 1 Keb. 627. Contingent Remainder Surrender is to the Use of one in Fee upon Condition to pay 100 l. to a Stranger and if he failed it should be to the Use of a Stranger in Fee The Question was whether that should be a good Limitation to the Stranger being a Fee upon a Fee Beaumont conceived it to be well enough being as an Use limited on a Feoffment but it was found specially Cro. El. 361. Paulter and Cornhil vide infra To the Use of ones Wife Is good though he which is admitted is in by him who makes the Surrender yet a man may Surrender to the Use of his Wife because the Husband doth not do this immediately to the Wife but by two means 1. By Surrender of the Husband to the Lord to the Use of the Wife And 2. By Admittance of the Lord to the Wife according to the Surrender 4 Rep. 29. Bunting and Lepingwel Where a Surrender is void for the uncertainty Averment A Copy-hold was granted to a Father and to his Son and Heirs who at the time of the Grant had but one Son it was adjudged a good Limitation to that Son Cro. Jac. 374. Cobb and Betterson But in Winkmore's Case cited there where a Copy was granted to S. the Father and to his Son and he doth not demonstrate which of his Sons shall have it it was adjudged to be a void Grant for the uncertainty he having many Sons at that time But that which is wholly uncertain no subsequent manifestation of my intention can help it as a Surrender to the Use of my Cosin or my Friend or to the Use of J. S. or J. N. Surrender to the Use of a Person not in esse And in this point Limitations of Estates are not directed according to the Rules of Law In this Estates are not directed according to Law For at Common Law if the Grantee immediate and be not in rerum natura and able to take by vertue of the Grant its void presently But though at the time of the Surrender the Grantee is not in esse or not capable of a Surrender yet if he be in esse and capable at the time of Admittance that is sufficient as a Surrender to him that shall be Heir to J. S. or to the Use of the next Child of J. S. or to the next Wife of J. S. though at the time of the Surrender J. S. had no Child Heir or Wife yet if he afterwards hath his Heir Wife or Child may come into Court and compel the Lord to admit according to the Surrender the reason of this Construction seems to be the Surrender is a thing executory and is executed by the subsequent Admittance and nothing vests in the Grantee before Admittance and therefore if at the time of the Admittance he be capable to take it s enough Co. Copy Put the Case at Common Law J. S. bargains and Sells to the Use of the next Son of J. D. and he hath no Son then but after he hath a Son before the Deed is enrolled yet this shall not be good and yet it s as an executory Grant i. e. not perfected till enrollment and nothing passeth till enrollment or vesteth in the Bargainee till then no more than by Surrender I will put this Case A Surrender is to the Use of A. B. for Life and after to the next Child that J. S. shall have A. B. forfeits his Estate J. S. having no Child at that time but afterwards he hath a Child shall this Child compel the Lord to admit him Q. for such a Remainder at Common Law would be destroyed But a Surrender to the Use of the right Heirs of J. S. he being alive is void because it cannot take effect according to the intent of the Grantor which is to be executed presently To one in 〈◊〉 mere Surrender Habend after his death to the Use of his Child then in ventre sa mere his or her Heirs and Assigns and if it dye before full Age or Marriage then to the Use of another in Fee Copy-holder dyes Infant was born but dyes before Age or Marriage this is not good he cannot make such a conditional Surrender to operate in futuro But whether the Surrender to an Infant in ventre sa mere be good hath been much much questioned Cro. Jac. 376. 1 Rolls Rep. 109 131. 2 Rolls Abr. 415 416. 2 Bulstr 274 275. Simson and Sothern Some are for it and some against it I conceive it is allowed to be good as well as a Devise to an Infant in ventre entre sa mere Surrender to the Use of J. S. for Life remainder to the Use of an Infant in ventre sa mere is good Of a Surrender to take effect in futuro A Surrender of a Copy-hold in Fee a tempore mortis is void 1 Sanders 151. Or a Surrender at a day to come is void Copy-holder in Fee Surrenders out of Court into the hands of two Tenants in Writing as follows Memorandum Such a day and year A. S. the Copy-holder Surrenders the Land c. to the Use of B. and C. c. This Surrender not to stand and be of force till after the decease of A. S. Per Cur. If this Memorandum should be good then this had been a Surrender at a day to come and consequently void and therefore the Surrender being perfect before by the first part of the Instrument this Memorandum shall not make it void but the Memorandum shall be void 2 Rolls Abr. 61. Seagood and Hone. And the Reason is given in Simpson and Southern's Case Cro. Jac. p. 376. A Copy-holder cannot Surrender an Estate to another and leave a particular Estate himself no more than a Free-holder for so
mortem sursum redditionem vel forisfacturam of the Feme and after the Husband Surrenders to the Use of B. for Life and so he is Admitted Tenant and after dyes In this Case C. shall not have this because his Estate is not to commence till after the Death Surrender or Forfeiture of the Feme and the Feme here is in Life and had not made any Surrender or Forfeiture and the Wife had right in this in the nature of a plaint de cui in vita But the Lord in this Case may retain it in his own proper hands or disposition Occupant during the Life of the Husband quasi an Occupant Dyer 9 El. 264. Sect. 38. Surrender to whom To the Wife By the Husband to the Use of the Wife is good vide supra and 4 Rep. 29. Bunting's Case for it is done by Surrender to the Lord and Admittance To the Steward A Surrender made to the Steward to the Use of the Steward is good for the Entry is quod sursum reddidit in manus Domini and the Steward is but the Lords Servant and the surrender is to the Lord and not to him Cro. El. p. 717. Erish and Rives So Infant Vide supra Of Countermand of a Surrender Where the Surrender of a Copy-hold may be Countermanded by the Party himself and what collateral Act without the assent and privity of the Party shall be a countermand and where and what not Grant by Baron and Feme shall bind the Feme notwithstanding the Coverture so Grant by non compos mentis Infant Vide supra Vide supra Where and what Grants by Lords of Manors shall be good or defeasible in respect of the Estate they had therein Surrender is not Countermanded by the death of Surrenderor before Presentment 4 Rep. 29 Bunting's Case VVhere the Customs are not pursued the surrenders are void Vide sparsim and 5 Rep. 84. Peryman's Case Surrender by Steward or Deputy Steward and of persuing their Warrants vide Steward supra What remedy to force a Trustee to Surrender A Copy-holder doth surrender to the Use of one A. in Trust In the Lord's Court. that he shall hold the Land until he hath levied certain Monies and that afterwards he shall surrender to the Use of B. The Monies are levied A. is required to make surrender to the Use of B. he refuseth B. exhibits a Bill to the Lord of the Manor against A. who upon hearing of the Cause Decrees against A. That he shall Surrender he refuseth Now the Lord may seize and admit B. to the Copy-hold for he in such case is Chancellor in his own Court Per totam Curiam 1 Leon. 2. Or relief may be had in Chancery CAP. XVI Of Presentment How and when to be made How to be pursuant to the Surrender What the Law is if Surrenderor or Cesty que use or the customary Tenants into whose Hands the Surrender was made dye before Presentment or Admittance VVhere two Surrenders are and the second Surrender is presented first Presentment No good Surrender till presented IF the Surrender be made out of Court into the Hands of the Lord himself which the general Custom will warrant or into the Hands of the Bayliff or of two Tenants of the Manor which is warrantable only by special Custom there must be a true Presentment of the Surrender in Court by the same Persons into whose Hands the Surrender was made and the Admittance of the Lord must be according to the effect and tenor of both the Surrender and Presentment It is not an effectual Surrender till it be presented in Court And therefore in an Action on the Case on Assumpsit in Consideration that the Plaintiff would surrender to the Defendant and his Heirs a Copyhold according to the Custom of the Manor Defendant assumed to pay 500 l. and for breach of this promise the Plaintiff brings the Action and had a Verdict but Judgment was arrested because the Consideration on the Plaintiffs part was not performed for the Consideration was That he should surrender the Copy-hold to the Defendant and his Heirs and he hath alledged the surrender to be into the Hands of a Copy-hold Tenant of the Manor to Use of the Defendant which is no surrender untill it be presented at the next Court and so it is uncertain whether it shall take effect or not Stiles p. 256. Shaan and Shaan The Presentment by the general Custom of Manors is to be made at the next Court day When to be be made immediately after the surrender but by special Custom at the second or third day afterwards and by Rolls in Jay's Case Stiles 275. there is no certain time but as the Custom is so that it be within the Life of the Tenant it is to be made by the same persons that took the Surrender and in points material according to the true tenor of the Surrender But if the Surrender be conditional Presentment must pursue the Surrender and the Presentment absolute the Surrender Presentment and Admittance are void except the Steward in the entry of it omits the Condition and upon sufficient proof made in Court of that the Surrender shall not be avoided but the Roll amended and this shall be no conclusion to the Party to plead or give in Evidence the truth of the matter 4 Rep. 25. Kite and Quinton But in May's Case Norf. Summer Assises 1663. The Custom of a Manor was for a Copy-holder in extremis to surrender into one Tenants Hands in the presence of credible Witnesses and a Surrender was made accordingly but presented to be done to another Tenant yet being proved to be done to a Tenant of the Manor It was holden by Wadham Windham Justice to be good Of Presentment where the Surrenderor or Surrendree Cesty que use or customary Tenants dye before Presentment or Admittance Surrenderor dyes If one Surrender out of Court and dye before Presentment if Presentment be made after his death this is good 4 Rep. 29. Bunting's Case Cesty que use dyes If Cesty que use he to whose Use the Surrender is made dyeth before Presentment yet upon Presentment made after his death his Heir shall be admitted Stiles p. 145. Barker and Denhan Surrenderor and Cesty que use both dye If one Surrender out of Court to the Use of one for Life the Surrenderor and the Lessee for Life both dye before the Presentment yet upon Presentment made he in Remainder shall be Admitted Surrendree dyes Surrendree dyes before Admittance his Heir may be Admitted and if it be Burrough-English the youngest Son 2 Siderfin 38 61. The Tenants into whose hands the Surrender was made dye If the Tenant into whose Hands the Surrender was made dye before Presentment yet upon sufficient proof made in Court That such a Surrender was made the Lord shall be compelled to admit Co. Lit. 62. Nothing passeth till presentment But nothing passeth till Presentment
Admittance it being entred thus Compertum est per homagium c. and not as its usual dat Domino de fine fecit fidelitatem admissus est inde tenens at the end of Popham p. 127 128. Rawlinson and Green Of Admittances upon Surrender The nature of it will be Explained by two or three Rules I. The surrender of a Copy-hold to J. S. hath no effect till J. S. be admitted Tenant Till admission the Tenant hath no Estate therefore if J. S. before he is admitted surrenders to J. B. who is admitted this avails nothing to J. B. for J. S. himself had nothing and so can pass nothing and the Admittance of his Grantee shall not be taken by implication as Admittance to himself for the Admittance ought to be of a Tenant certainly known to the Steward and entred in a Roll by it self and in such case the Right and Possession remains still in him who surrendered and descends to his Heir he to whom the Copy-hold is surrendred comes in as a Purchaser and his Copy is his Evidence by the Custom and till he is admitted he can be no customary Tenant and therefore can transfer no right to another Yelverton 145. Wilson and Weddel 1 Brownlow 143. Aliter in Case of Descent Vide infra The Admittance of a Copy-holder is compared to the Induction to a Benefice which gives Possession At the end of Popham p. 127 121. Rawlinson and Green That Case was Copy-holder surrendred his Copy-hold Estate to the Use of another which was presented at next Court and found by the Homage and he to whose Use the Surrender was made was there in Court accepted by the Steward and a Copy by him granted unto him afterwards he to whose Use this Surrender was made surrenders the same again to the Use of another which was presented and a Copy granted to him and he accepted as a Copy-hold Tenant but no Admittance Entred as Cepit de Dom. admissus est inde tenens c. Per Cur. He to whom the first Surrender was made had no Estate in him before Admittance and whether and how far he might transfer this Interest Curia dubitav and whether what was done to the second Surrendree is not an assent by the Lord to the first Surrenderer It was granted That if the Steward accepted a Fine as of a Copy-holder it amounted to an Admittance 3 Bulstr 237. mesme Case II. Surrenders of Copy-holds are not to be likened to Surrenders at Common Law for if a Copy-holder in Fee surrenders to the Use of another for Life nothing more passeth out of him than shall serve the Estate limited to the Use and he which made the Surrender shall not pay any Fine for re-Admittance to the Reversion for this continues always in him 9 Rep. 107. Margaret Podgers Case III. The Lord hath a bare customary power to admit secundum formam effectum sursum reddit Therefore if there be any variance between the Admittance and Surrender either in the Person or the Estate or in the Tenure its void c. The Lord doth only transfer an Estate according to the Surrender Where the Lords Admittance of a Copy-holder in other manner than agrees to the Surrender shall be good and how it shall be construed and enure Admittances as to Limitations alter not the Estate for he is in by force of the Surrender If J. surrender to the Use of J. S. and the Lord admits J. N. this Admittance is wholly void and yet the Lord may afterwards admit J. S. according to his Authority but had he admitted J. S. and J. N. joyntly then the Admittance had been void for the one and good for the other Co. Cop. 127. If a man surrender to the Use of J. S. and J. D. for their Lives the Remainder over to another and J. S. and J. D. are admitted in Fee yet this doth not alter their Estate but they shall be seised according to the Surrender 1 Rolls Rep. 317. Lane and Pannel Surrender is upon Condition the Presentment is absolute and the Admittance is absolute the Presentment was void But the Surrenderors Release to Cesty que use shall make his Estate good Vide supra 4 Rep. Keit and Quinton If the Lord after Surrender grants to Cesty que use and to Stranger all shall enure to Cesty que use or if he admit the Cesty que use upon a Condition the Condition is void for after Admittance he is in by him that made the Surrender So if a Copy-holder surrender to the use of another pur vie and the Lord admit him to hold to him and his Heirs yet Cesty que use had but an Estate for Life for he is in after Admittance by force of the Surrender 4 Rep. Westwick and Wier Note A Copy-hold Estate cannot be surrendred to another by an Attorny without Deed but one may be admitted to a Copy-hold Estate by Attorny without Deed Stiles Pract. Reg. 74. By whom Admittance upon Surrender may be made and shall bind By those that have defeasible Titles Admittances made by Disseisors Abators Intruders Tenant at sufferance or others who have defeizable Titles are good against them who have Right because these are lawful Acts and they were compellable to do the same Co. Lit. 58. b. If Disseisor of a Manor accept a Surrender of a Copy-hold of Inheritance to the Use of another and his Heirs and he admits Cesty que use accordingly this is good and shall bind the Disseisee p. 40 Eliz. B. R. Martin and Rieve 4 Rep. 24. If A. Copy-holder for Life surrender to the Disseisor of a Manor to the Use of another for the Life of A. and the Disseisor admits him accordingly this shall bind the Disseisee ibid. Martin's Case But without Admittance it shall not bind Surrender by Dom. pro tempore and his Estate determines before Admittance If the Lord pro tempore of a Copy-hold Manor be Lessee for Life or for Years Guardian or any who had particular Interest or Tenant at will of a Manor accept a Surrender and after before Admittance the Lessee for Life dyes or the Years Interest or Custody or the Will is determined although the next Lord comes in paramount the Lease for Life or for years the Custody or the particular Interest or Tenancy at Will yet he shall be compelled to make Admittance according to the Surrender 17 Jac. Lord Arundel's Case Co. Lit. 59. b. Trin. 1 Jac. Rot. 854. Shopland and Ridler By the Deputies Servant admitting no Judicial Act. The Deputy of a Steward commands H. his Servant to keep Court and grant Land and Admit Per Cur. it is good for the taking a Surrender granting Lands by Copy admitting a Copy-holder is not any judicial Act for there need not be any Suitors there who are Judges 1 Leon. 288. Lord Dacres's Case What amounts to an Admittance If a Copy-holder in Fee surrender to the Use of another
Cesty que use surrenders to another and after at another Court he to whose Use the Surrender was surrenders the Land to the Use of another this shall enure as an Admittance upon the first Surrender and after a Surrender for by the acceptance of the Surrender he is admitted Tenant Acceptance of a Surrender 1 Rolls Abr. 505. Calchin's Case 3 Bulst 230. mesme Case If a Copy-holder surrender to the Use of another Acceptance of Rent and after the Lord having knowledge of this accepts the Rent of Cesty que use out of Court this is an Admittance in Law Rolls 1 Abr. 505. Freswel and Welch If the two Tenants into whose Hands the Surrender was pay the Rent to the Lord yet his acceptance shall not amount to an Admittance but if he had alledged the payment of the Rent and acceptance of it by the Lord as of his Copy-holder this would have amounted to a good Admittance of him 3 Bulstr 215. mesme Case Any act to imply the consent of the Lord to the Surrender What acts or words by the Lord amount to an Admittance it shall be a good Admittance the Presentment by the Homage doth not make an Admittance the acceptance by the Steward of the Presentment is no Admittance Bridgman Rep. 82. Robinson and Groves Copy-holder surrenders his Estate to the Use of J. S. who again surrenders the same to the Use of J. N. this is good vide supra Or in such case if the Lord meet J. N. and saith to him Such a Surrender is made to your Use to which I agree or am content this saying amounts to a good Admittance 3 Bulstr 230. Elken's Case 215 216. If the Steward accept a Fine as of a Copy-holder it amounts to an Admittance granted in Rawlinson and Green's Case 3 Bulstr 237. In what Cases the Admittance of one shall be the Admittance of another If a Copy-holder surrender to the Use of one for Life the Remainder to another the Admittance of Tenant for Life is Admittance for him in Remainder also for that they are but one Estate and but one Fine is due for both 4 Rep. 22 23. Fither's Case Aliter of him in Reversion More n. 488. Dell and Higden He in Remainder after a Tenant for Life who was admitted surrenders to the Use of a Stranger in the Life-time of Tenant pur vie and good Cro. Jac. 31. Auncelm's Case But such Admittance of Tenant for Life shall not prejudice the Lord of his Fee due by the Custom 4 Rep. Brown's Case 22 23. Foxton and Colston But in Hippin and Bunner's Case Popham thought only one Fine to be due upon such surrender which the Tenant for Life shall pay before his Admittance except there be especial Custom that two Fines shall be due Cro. Eliz. 504. The Admittance of Tenant for Life or Years shall be an Admission of all in Remainder Per Hales and there is no inconvenience in it for Fines are to be paid by the particular Remainder except a Fine be assessed for the whole Estate and then there is an end of the Business The Estate is bound by the Surrender and shall go to them in Remainder Mod. Rep. and 3 Keb. 29. Blackburn and Greves A Copy-holder Surrenders to the Use of several Persons for years successive the Remainder in Fee to J. S. an Admittance of a particular Tenant is an Admittance of all the Remainders to all purposes but only the Lords Fine and the Possession of Lessee for years is the Possession of him in Remainder ibid so as to make a Possessio Fratris and the Sister of the whole Blood shall have it before a Brother of the second Venter Admittance by Attorny The Lord may refuse to admit by Attorny him to whose Use a Surrender was made for that he ought to do Fealty which he cannot do by Attorny 9 Rep. 76. Comb's Case Yet if the Lord will admit him by Attorny its good ibid. A Copy-holder surrendred to the Use of his last Will and devised the Lands to his youngest Son in Fee The youngest Son being in Prison makes a Letter of Attorny to one to be admitted to the Land in the Lords Court in his room and also after Admittance to surrender the same to the Use of B. and his Heirs to whom he had sold it for the payment of his Debts by two Judges it s not a good Surrender Admittance of an Heir is good by Prochein Amy By Prochein Amy. for by such Admittance he is to do corporal Service which cannot be done but in person and yet it hath been adjudged good the Heir consenting but otherwise 2 Siderfin 37 61 Blunt and Clark 4 Rep. Brown and Clerk's Case The Case was Copy-holder surrenders to the Use of J. S. and his Heirs Proviso That if the Copy-holder pay eight hundred pounds at such a day the Surrender shall be void J. S. dyes before the day not being admitted and his Heir beyond Sea A Neighbour comes and is admitted in the name of the Heir the Heir comes back and brings Ejectment Per Cur. It s a good Admittance for a Consent subsequent is as strong as an Authority precedent in this Case and the Heir affirms his Admission And if a Surrender Per Glyn be to the Use of J. S. and J. N. is admitted and J. S. consents it s a good Admittance Admittance where to be made The Lord of the Manor may make Admittance out of the Manor also Co. Lit. 61. b. The Steward of the Manor may admit upon a Surrender out of Court as well as in Court 4 Rep. 26 27. Freswel and Welch Admittances upon Descent The diversity between Admittance upon Surrender and Admittance upon Descent lyes In Admittance upon Surrender nothing is vested in the Grantee before Admittance no more than in voluntary Grants but in Admittance upon Descents the Heir is Tenant by Copy immediately upon the death of his Ancestor The time of Admittance There is thirty years between the death of the Father Excuse and the Heirs not being admitted who made a Lease Per Cur. this is supina negligentia and shall disable his Person to make any Demise but the Lessor at the time of the death of his Ancestor was two years of age and that after his full age no Court had been holden for a long time and that at the first Court lately he prayed to be admitted and the Steward refused him And Per Cur. this is a good excuse 1 Leon. 100. Rumny and Eves If a Copy-holder dyeth When the Heir must pray to be admitted his Heir within age he is not bound to come at any Court during his non-age to pray Admission or to tender his Fine also if the death of the Ancestor is not Presented nor Proclamations made he is not at any mischief although he be of full Age ibid. What things the Heir way do or not before Admittance Upon the death of the Ancestor he may
of one for Life who is admitted and dyeth He in Reversion he in the Reversion may enter without a new Admittance and therefore H. B. being seized of Copy-hold Land in Fee and having Issue three Sons G. H. and J. he surrenders it to the Use of his last Will and thereby devised it to his Wife for Life the Remainder to H. and the Heirs of his Body the Wife dyed after Admittance Henry dyes without Issue G. may enter and Admittance for him is not necessary 1 Leon. p. 174. Bullen and Grant If customary Lands do descend to the youngest Son by Custom and he enters and leaseth to another who takes the Profits and after is Ejected He shall have an Ejectione Firmae without any Admittance of his Lessor or Presentment that he is Heir 1 Leon. p. 100. Rumny and Eves Feme to her Free-Bench the Freehold of the Copy-hold being granted over The Custom of Free Bench was durante viduitate si tam diu casta vixerit the Wife after the death of her Husband comes into Court and challenged her Right of Free Bench and prayed to be admitted and the Steward refused and she made a Lease for one year to the Plaintiff and if he might bring an Action by reason the Woman was not admitted was the Question for it was agreed no Fine was due to the Lord. Per Cur. If the Freehold of the Copy-hold be granted over and the Husband dyes Admittance in Law there cannot be Admittance in that Case and yet she may enter And in this case she hath done all she could for Admittance and it is an Admittance in Law to an Estate created by Custom and by act of God and Law Continual Claim amounts to an Entry Hutton p. 18. Jordan and Stone In this Case after the death of the Husband the Law casts the Estate upon the Wife before Admittance and she may make a Lease for years as any other Copy-Holder may mesme Case 1 Rolls Abr. 592. Steward will not admit Cesty que use He enters and takes the Profits Lord brings Ejectment the Defendant shall plead not Guilty If a Copy-holder Surrender to a Stranger and the Steward will not admit him and the Stranger enters and occupies the Land if the Lord Lease to a Stranger to try the Title he to whom the Surrender was made although he be not admitted may well plead not Guilty and it shall be found for him against the Lord. In the Case of Arnold and George Yelv. p. 16. agreed by the four Judges Yet Quaere for how can the Stranger make a Title to the Profits without Admittance But perhaps the reason was That the Lord seemed to be particeps criminis for it may be intended he would not suffer the Steward to admit the Defendant She who hath a Widows Estate shall make a Lease before Admittance for the Law vested the Estate in her and there is no Fine due to the Lord Noy p. _____ Remington and Cole Husband enters into the Lands in right of the Wife before Admittance Entry of the Husband in Right of the Wife and Lease by him before Admittance and the Wife dyes before Admittance yet his Lease shall be good 1 Anderson 192. Ewer and Astwick in More n. 425. mesme Case If by the Entry of the Husband without Admittance of the Wife he should be Tenant by the Curtesie and resolved he shall In what Cases the Lord shall be compelled to make Admittances and how and in what not If the Lord of the Manor for the time being be Lessee for Life or Years Guardian or any that hath any particular Interest or Tenant at Will of a Manor all which are accounted in Law Domini pro tempore do take a Surrender into his hands and before Admittance the Lessee for Life dieth or the Years Interest or Custody do end or determine or the Will is determined though the Lord cometh in above the Lease for Life or years or other the particular Tenancies yet shall he be compelled to make Admittances according to the Surrender Co. Lit. 59. b. Earl of Arundel's Case Action on Case by the Surrenderor but not by Cesty que use It was resolved in Gallaway's Case 26 El. The Party that made the Surrender may have Action on the Case against the Lord for not holding his Court and admitting him to whose Use the Surrender was made but Cesty que use cannot Chancery Chancery will compel the Lord to admit a Tenant Tothil p. 65. Custom was That a Copy-holder for Life should name his Successor for Life and to compound with the Lord if he cannot compound then the Homage to assess the Fine he tenders it the Lord refuseth to admit Action on the Case lies not against the Lord and he that is nominated hath not any Interest therein but he may compel him in Chancery Cro. Jac. 368. He that hath no Interest as a Nominee shall have no Action sur Case Ford and Hoskins 1 Rolls Rep. 125 195. ibid. 2 Bulstr 236. mesme Case The Nominee hath neither jus in re nor jus ad rem he hath a nomination only which is matter meerly in Equity he hath neither damnum nor injuriam here because he hath no Interest Littera Attornatu ad sursum reddend tenmenta Custumaria sursum redditio admissio Co. Ent. 576. CAP. XVIII Of Fines Fines certain Vncertain Vpon Descent and Purchase Of Fine Excessive What Customs are good as to payment of Fines Of Fines as to Admittances to Reversions or Remainders What refusal to pay a Fine shall be a Forfeiture or not How the Lord shall recover his Fine Fines FInes due to the Lord upon Admittance are not to be paid till Admittance either upon a Surrender or Descent for Admittance is the cause of the Fine and the Parties being Admitted intitles the Lord to the Fine 4 Rep. 28. Sand's Case and Bacon's Case Though sometimes they are certain and by some Customs uncertain yet they ought to be reasonable Of Fines certain It was the Opinion of Richardson Chief Justice There is scarce a Copy-holder in England but the Fines are uncertain for saith he If the Rolls make it appear that at any time a greater and lesser sum was paid for a Fine this makes the Fine uncertain the ordinary course to search it is by Bill in Chancery Lit. Rep. 252. It was but his private Opinion for Fines are certain in great numbers of Manors And I suppose he means as to Evidence for in the Case of Allen and Abraham 2 Bulst 32. there is diversity between proof in case of Descents and Purchase The Case was this Upon not Guilty in Ejectment the matter upon the issue was about the Custom of a Copy-hold Manor whether the Copy-holders upon their Admittances have used to pay Fines uncertain at the will of the Lord or certain i. e. the value of two years Rent To prove the Fines uncertain Evidence to prove uncertainty
Lord recover his Fine Debt Debt lyes for a Fine against the Copy-holder by the Lord Siderfin p. 58. agreed in the Case of Wheeler and Honor. Copy-holder Heir waves the possession If Copy-holder in Fee dyes where the Fine is certain and the Heir waves the possession and refuseth to be admitted it seems the Lord shall not have an Action of Debt against him and yet some hold he may not wave the possession because being Inheritance Interest descends and for this reason praecipe quod reddat lyes against the Heir at Common Law before his Entry Siderfin p. 58. Wheeler and Honor. Pled Vide Presidents infra Custome quod Dominus habeat rationabilem finem pro admissione Co. Ent. 646. 13 Rep. 1. CAP. XIX Of the Entayling of Copy-hold Estates The different Opinion of the Judges with an Abstract of the Reasons and Arguments how Copy-holds are or may be Entayled and the Law setled as to that Point How such Copy-hold Entayls may be barred or dock'd And what acts of Tenant Copy-holder in Tayl c. shall amount to a Discontinuance or not Of Copy-hold Estates being Entayled AS to Copy-hold Lands being Entayled whether there be any such Estate Tayl by any particular Custom to be allowed and how such Entayls arose it hath been vexatio quaestio This Question hath been curiously debated in our Books and therefore I shall be the larger upon it It is clear That the Statute de donis per se doth not create an Estate Tayl in a Copy-hold 9 Rep. 105. the Case of Thornton and Lucas there cited for the Statute de donis doth not extend to such base Estates at will The Question is if the Statute may co-opperate with the Custom as to make an Estate Tayl. Coke in the Case of Warn and Sawyer 1 Rolls Rep. 48. cited one Haslerick and Grays Case to be so adjudged and in one Hills Case a Custom was pleaded that a Copy-hold might be granted to one and the Heirs of his Body with remainder over but saith he we of the other side durst not hazard the matter upon this but we devised a Plea That there was another Custom there that if a Tenant in Tayl alien this shall be a bar to the Remainder and upon issue that Custom was found for it was agreed Per totam Curiam That if an Estate Tayl may be of a Copy-hold by Custom that by a Custom it may be dock'd and destroyed It hath been often moved in our Books When a Copy-holder in Fee surrenders to the Use of one in Tayl there being no Custom to warrant such an Entayl whether it be an Estate Tayl by the Statute of De donis conditionalibus or a Fee-simple conditional at the Common Law This point is well argued and setled in Rowden and Malster's Case Cro. Car. p. 42. Copy-hold cannot be Entayled within the Statute de donis Yelverton held That it was an Estate Tayl by the Equity and intent of the Statute de donis but Hutton Harvy and Croke That it was not an Entayl but a Fee-simple conditional at Common Law 1. Because it would be prejudicial to Lords for by this means the tenure would be altered for the Donee in Tayl without a special reservation ought to hold of the Donor by the same Services that the Donor holdeth over and he who comes in by Surrender and the Admittance of the Lord to hold to him and the Heirs of his Body cannot hold of him who surrendred but shall hold of the Lord and is Tenant at will unto him and shall do the Services unto him as Lord. 2. In respect of the baseness of their Estate the Statute never intended to provide remedy for them nor their Alienations for the words of the Statute are Quod voluntas donatoris in Charta sua manifeste expressa de caetero observetur which proveth that the intent of the makers of the Statute was That no Hereditament should be intayled within this Statute but such as either was or might be given by Charter or Deed and other Reasons out of the words of the Statute Carters Rep. 8. But Copy-holds are no such Hereditaments and therefore not within the meaning of the Act. 3. If Copy-holds might be Entayled then the perpetuity of such Estates might be maintained for a Fine cannot be levied of Copy-hold Lands to bar the Entayl nor can a Recovery in value be intended of such an Estate where warranty cannot be annexed to it Ceo reason come jeo pense ne vault rien pas Car est agree per touts que poet estre dock't per recovery en curia del Baron Vide apres They held also That neither Estate Tayl nor Estate after possibility of issue extinct which had a necessary dependance upon an Estate Tayl can by any particular Custom be allowed Cave Lecteur for it s agreed by all That a Custom co-operating with the Statute may create an Estate Tayl. Observe Plowden in Manxel's Case is no Law 2 Rolls Rep. 383. mesme Case Co. Lit. 60. As there may be an Estate Tayl by Custom with the co-operation of the Statute of W. 2. Cap. 1. So may he have a Formedon in discender i. e. a Writing in the nature of a Formedon in Descender in the Lords Court But as the Statute without a Custom extendeth not to Copy-holds so a Custom without the Statute cannot create an Estate Tayl. Now it is not a sufficient proof that Lands have been granted in Tayl for albeit Lands have anciently and usually been granted by Copy to many men and to the Heirs of their Bodies that may be a Fee-simple conditional as it was at the Common Law but if a Remainder hath been limited over such Estates and enjoyed or if the Issues in Tayl have avoided the alienation of the Ancestor or if they have recovered the same in Writs of Formedon in the Discender these and such like are proofs of an Estate Tayl But if by Custom Copy-hold may be Entayled the same by like Custom may be cut off Plow Com. 240. This was the first Opinion and by Clench and Gaudy agreed to in Grovener's Case Popham 32. The other Opinion is That an Estate is wrought out by the Equity of the Statute de donis for otherwise it cannot be that there should be any Estate Tayl of Copy-hold Land for by Usage it cannot be maintained because that no Estate Tayl was known in Law before this Statute and after this Statute it cannot be by Usage because this is within the time of limitation aftet which an Usage cannot make a Prescription for a Custom cannot be made after the Statute de donis And it appeareth by Littleton and Brook That a Plaint lyes of Copy-hold Land in the nature of a Formedon in Discender at Common Law and therefore the Statue helps them for their remedy for Entayled Lands which is but customary by Equity and if the Action shall be given by Equity for this Land why shall not the
the Lease spent the Inheritance takes place and severs the Copy-hold from being granted by Copy after during the Lease but when that is spent it is well again Sir George Sand's Case cited in 3 Keb. p. 91. in Cholmly and Cooper's Case A. being a Copy-holder by Licence of the Lord leased his Copy-hold to Smith for years rendring Rent and afterwards by Deed granted the Rent to another Habend during the term c. to which grant the Lessee did Attorn and paid the Rent to the Grantee Per Gaudy the Grant is good but now it is but a Rent-seek Rent-seek the Grantee cannot have an Action of Debt for it for he is not party nor privy to the Contract nor hath the Reversion 1 Leon. 315. Austin and Smith Copy-holder makes a Lease for years How a Lease not warranted is good not according to the Custom of the Manor yet this Lease is good so as the Lessee may maintain an Ejectione firmae for between the Lessor and Lessee and all others except the Lord of the Manor the Lease is good Owen 17. Downingham's Case Of Leases made by those in Remainder or Reversion Tenant for Life By one in remainder by Parol the Remainder in Fee of a Copy-hold he in the Remainder makes a Lease by Parol Tenant for Life and he in Remainder joyn in a Surrender to the Use of him in the Remainder in Fee This is a good Lease and shall take effect in the life of Tenant for Life and it shall be good against him in Remainder for the Estate of Tenant for Life is extinct and cannot hinder the Lease to have operation like as he in Remainder grants a Rent-charge and after the Tenant pur vie surrenders the Rent shall commence presently Cro. El. p. 160. Dove and Williot A Lease for Life made in Reversion A Lease for Life may be made in Reversion of a Copy-holder according to Custom but whether such a Lease be void if made by Dean and Chapter per the Statute of 37 H. 8. which extends to all Colledges c. Quaere 1 Rolls Rep. 202. Long and Baker As to Remedy for Rents by Entry or Action Vide infra titulo What Statutes extends to Copy-hold Lands and sub titulo Actions and Suits What things are demisable by Copy Underwoods may be demised by Copy to one and his Heirs for this Underwood is a thing of Inheritance for after every cutting down they will grow again from the Stubbs Cro. El. 413. Hoe's Case Tythes may be demisable by Copy of Court Roll according to the Custom of the Manor for they may be parcel of a Manor as well as a Rent-charge Com. p. 43 Eliz. Sands and Drury Tonsura prati may be demisable by Copy of Court Roll according to the Custom of the Manor by Prescription per Gaudy Vide pluis supra Pleadings Custome quod tenens custumarius in feodo possit dimittere terras pro aliquo termino annorum sine Licentia Domini Cro. Entr. 123. Simile non excedens 21 annos Hern 81. CAP. XXI Of Licence What Licence shall be good By whom made shall bind or not Licence taken for a Confirmation When and where a Licence is to be pleaded specially and when and where not QUaere if Lessee for years may grant Licence to a Copy-holder to fell Timber To fell Timber The extent by Lessee how far good or not But though it be good against himself yet it is void against the Lessor because the Licence is derived out of the Interest and so can be of no greater extent than it and the Assignee of the Lessee may take advantage of it 1 Keb. 26. Muniface and Baker And by Twisden Where a Copy-holder hath Licence to fell though it were repealed by the Grant of the Lord of his Interest before the felling yet this is no Forfeiture though the Licence be determined by it ibid. Licence to make Leases Vide supra Leases The Lord Licenced his Copy-holder to make a Lease of his Copy-hold for 21 years Concurrent Lease to begin at Michaelmas following and he made a Lease accordingly by Indenture and also before Michaelmas by Deed made another Lease to another for 21 years to begin also at Michaelmas following Per Anderson The making of the second Lease was a Forfeiture the Licence is satisfied by the first Lease and so the second Lease is without Warrant and consequently a Forfeiture Lease void in Interest and good by Estoppel The second Lease is void in Interest and good by Estoppel If a Copy-holder make a Lease contrary to the Custom it is a forfeiture before the Entry of the Lessee Moor Case 329. Once a Licence to make a Lease and always If the Copy-holder make a Lease for years by Licence of the Lord the Lessee may assign this over or make an under-Lease without any new Licence for the Interest of the Lord was discharged by the first Licence 1 Rolls Rep. 509. Johnson and Smart What Licence shall be good and by whom by a Lord at will A Lord at Will of a Copy-hold Manor connot give Licence to a Copy-hold Tenant to make a Lease for years although that he may grant a Copy-hold for Life according to the Custom 1 Rolls Abr. 511. Petty and Debbans By Lord for Life Licence determinable If a Lord for Life of a Copy-hold Manor give Licence to a Tenant to make a Lease for years this Lease shall not continue longer than the Life of the Lord ibid. 2 Brownl p. 40. mesme Case Licence to make a Lease upon condition void Aliter upon a Limitation The Lord licenceth a Tenant to make a Lease upon Condition the Condition is void for the Lord giveth nothing by the Licence but doth only dispense with the forfeiture A Licence gives not a Right but only executes it but a Limitation to such a Licence is good as a Licence to let for two years he cannot Lease for three years Owen p. 73. Haddon and Arrowsmith If a Copy-holder makes a Lease for years by Licence of the Lord Copy-holder leaseth for years and dyes sans Heir if determined Licence taken for a confirfmation and dyes without Heir the year not expired Some say the Lord may enter for the Estate out of which this Lease was derived is detemined Yelv. contra This Licence shall be taken as a confirmation of the Lord and the Lease shall be good against him Popham 188. Pleadings When and Where a Licence is to be pleaded specially and when and where not In Ejectione Firmae brought by the Lessee of a Copy-holder it is sufficient that the Count be general without mentioning of the Licence if the Defendant plead Not Guilty then the Plaintiff ought to shew the Licence in Evidence But if the Defendant plead specially then the Plaintiff ought to plead the Licence certainly in his Replication and the time and place when it was made and in this Case the
commits a Forfeiture he in the Remainder shall not enter but the Lord because the Remainder is to commence in possession after the death of the Lessee by the Custom Where the Lord shall take advantage before Presentment or not Presentment where material or not Presentment is not of necessity but for the Lords better Instruction of the Title and he may if he will take advantage of the Forfeiture before Presentment Cro. El. p. 499. in East and Harding's Case And therefore the distinction of Coke's Copy-holder is frivolous except the Custom is so though as for those Offences which by common presumption the Lord himself cannot have notice without notice given are usually presented as if a Copy-holder commit Felony or Treason or be Outlawed or excommunicate a Presentment seems necessary that the Lord may have the profits of his Copy-hold Land So if a Copy-holder alien by Deed or do a thing notorious as cutting down and selling of Trees of the Copy-hold Land by the Tenant it s not material whether it be presented by the homage or not 3 Keb. 641. Pascal and Wood's Case The presentment is to give notice to the Lord and not to intitle him and he may take notice if he will Lach. p. 227. Where and in what Cases the Forfeiture of one Copy-hold is the Forfeiture of another and where and in what Cases not as to Estate or persons Divers Copy-holds were granted by one Copy and several Habendums and several Reddendums for every of them What Forfeiture of part shall be of the whole or not and they all began at one time and were to end at one time the Copy-holder commits waste in one of the Copy-holds The Question was Whether that should be a Forfeiture of them all Per Cur. they are as several Grants and several Copies and the Forfeiture of the one is not the Forfeiture of the other Cro. El. p. 353. Tavernor and Cromwel 24 Rep. 14. mesme Case It s not material if the Copy-hold be in one or several Copies but if the Tenure be one or several If a Copy-holder make a Feoffment of one Acre of Land parcel of his Copy-hold all the Copy-hold is not forfeited by this but only this Acre p. 41. El. B. R. Fuller and Terry But if a Copy-holder cuts down a Tree which grows upon one Acre of Land parcel of his Copy-hold this is a Forfeiture of all his Copy-hold for that the Trees are to be employed in Buildings and Reparation of the Houses and Copy-hold and therefore by the making of waste all the Copy-hold is empaired So 3 Keb. 641. Pascal and Wood. If divers Copy-holds Escheat to the Lord and he re-grants them to another Tenendum per Antiqua Servitia c. they shall be severally held as they were before the Escheat 4 Rep. 27. And the Fines shall be several as Hubart and Hamond's Case 4 Rep. 28. and consequently the Forfeitures Tenant for Life Where the Forfeiture of one person shall be the Forfeiture of another persons Estate and where not Remainder in Fee of a Copy-hold Tenant for Life commits a Forfeiture by waste and the Lord enters this shall not bind him in Remainder Trin. 39 El. B. R Rastal and Turner But the Lord shall hold it during the Life of Tenant for Life So Custom is upon Surrender made to one and his Heirs if three Proclamations pass and he doth not come in to be Admitted that the Estate shall be forfeit Remainder not forfeit by the act of Tenant for Life Surrender is made to A. for Life the Remainder to B. in Fee A. comes not in this shall not forfeit the Remainder Yel p. 1. Baspool and Lond. For the Estates of A. and B. are divided Estates and the Custom shall be intended of an entire Fee-simple given to one person and the Custom being to bar an Estate shall be taken strictly It is made a Quaery in that Case of Yelverton If such a Surrender be made to A. and B. and their Heirs and A. comes within the time of the Proclamations and B. not if A. shall have all or that a moiety shall be forfeit I conceive a moiety shall be forfeit to the Lord as being Joynt-Tenants But Quaere farther of Co-partners in such case who are but one Heir Cro. El. 879. mesme Case Lessee forfeits his own Estate and not the Estate of his Copy-holder If a Copy-holder let for years by Licence of the Lord and after the Lessee makes a Feoffment this shall forfeit only his Estate and not the Estate of the Copy-holder 1 Rolls Abr. 509. White and Hunt If a Woman Copy-holder takes Husband and the Husband makes a Lease for years although the Lord enters for the Forfeiture yet after the death of the Husband this is no Forfeiture to the Wife but that she may well enter Where the Wife shall suffer for the Forfeiture of her Husband or not for this act was a wrong to the Wife as well as to the Lord and where it is a wrong to the Wife there is no reason it should be a Forfeiture 1 Rolls Abr. 509. Cro. Car. 7. Savern and Smith's Case But if the Husband seized of a Copy-hold in right of the Wife do waste this Forfeiture shall bind the Wife after the death of the Husband for this act was not any wrong to the Wife but lawful as to her and only a wrong to the Lord 4 Rep. 27. Note the difference Copy-hold is demised to two for Life successive Cutting of Trees by Tenant pur vit is a Forfeiture of the Remainder for Life where the Custom is they may not cut Trees the first Tenant cuts it s a Forfeiture of him in Remainder as well as of his own Estate if a Stranger cuts Trees or another who occupies at their sufferance this is a Forfeiture of the Copy-hold Moor 149. but Quaery of the last What is a dispensation of a Forfeiture or what acceptance or act shall purge a Forfeiture or not The admittance of an Heir of a Copy-holder by a Dominus pro tempore Admittance is a dispensation with a precedent Forfeiture 1 Keb. 26. Muniface and Baker Admission by the Lord dispenseth with a former Forfeiture Tothil 107. Clerk and Wentworth Aliter had the Lord seized an Herriot And yet if the Father commits a Ferfeiture and dyeth and the Son is admitted as Heir by descent this purgeth not the Forfeiture because the Father dying seized of no Estate the Son cannot be admitted to any Tothil p. 107. If the Tenant be amerced Amerciament the amerciament dispenseth with the Forfeiture though the amerciament be not estreated or levied 1 Leon. 104. Sir John Braunches's Case If a man comes into a Copy-hold tortiously Disseisor is admitted by the Lord and he makes a Lease not warranted a Release from the Disseisee purgeth and is admitted by the Lord and afterwards he makes a Lease for three Lives which is a Forfeiture
yet if he that hath the pure right to the Copy-hold Release to the wrong doer before the Lord enters that is good for until the Lord enter he is Tenant in fait 4 Rep. 15. I Brownl 149. in Odingsal and Jackson's Case Quaere Acceptance Copy-holder sold Timber off the Land Lord enters Copy-holder dyes Lord seises a Beast the Heir brought Trespass the Plaintiff justified the seizure for an Harriot Per Cur. in Ejectment this being the Defendants Evidence Justification for Harriot Service or Seisin of Ancestor is an acceptance of Heir as Tenant and purgeth the Forfeiture contra on Acceptance Justication or Avowry for Harriot Custom but now there being an actual Entry in the Life-time of the Ancestor by the Lord for the Forfeiture no acceptance after will purge it 3 Keb. 641. Pascal and Wood. Repairs of waste If a Tenant permit Waste and after repair yet it seems this doth not purge the Forfeiture Lach. 227. But Moor n. 508. is contra If a Copy-holder cut down Trees without a Custom it is a Forfeiture unless it be for Reparation Note The Repairing with Timber though after five years cut and after Action brought is a dispensation of the Forfeiture Affirmance or confirmation by the Lord Feoffment or Lease of the Freehold If a Copy-holder makes a Lease for years which is a Forfeiture at common Law and afterwards the Lord makes a Feoffment or a Lease for years of the Freehold of this Copy-hold to another the Feoffee or Lessee shall not take advantage of it for the Lease of the Freehold made by the Lord before Entry is an assent that the Lessee of the Copy-holder shall continue his Estate and so is in nature of an affirmance or a confirmation of the Lease Owen p. 63. Pen and Merival So the difference is when the Lord enters or not and also whether the Forfeiture be committed before the Lords feoffment c. or after Whether Forfeiteres in the time of the Ancestors of the Lord shall descend to the Heir Copy-holder doth waste the Lord dyes Where the Heir shall not take advantage of a Forfeiture the waste is presented in the Court and the Lords Heir enters the better Opinion is he cannot enter Per Dodderidge Actions ancestrel shall descend to the Heir but not Forfeitures which is in the Will of the Lord to take advantage or not Palmers Rep. 416. Cornwallis and Hammond 18 Eliz. in Harpers Rep. cited by Lach. p. 227. in Cornwallis's Case The Case was Lord and two Co-partners Copy-holders the one makes a Feoffment and the Lord makes a Lease of the Manor the Lessee shall not take advantage of this Forfeiture because he is not privy to the Title but if the Lessor dyes it was agreed the Heir should take advantage of it Ideo Quaere It s a mischievous Case if the Lord should be suffered to rake up old Forfeitures a long time past and yet on the other side there is no reason that the Lords should be abridged of their Rights And it s adjudged 2 Siderfin p. 8. Chamberlain and Drake's Case That the succeeding Lord shall not take advantage of waste made in the time of the preceeding Lord. Upon Entry for a Forfeiture who shall have the Emblements Upon Entry by the Lord for a Forfeiture he shall have the Emblements then growing as if a Feme Copy-holder durante viduitate sows the Land and before severance takes a Husband the Lord shall have the Emblements for her own act is the cause of the determination of the Estate If such Woman let for years and the Lessee sows the Land and after the Widow takes Husband the Lessee shall not have the Emblements for although his Estate is determined by the act of a Stranger yet as to the first Lessor he shall not be in better case than his Lessor was 5 Rep. Oland's Case Vide Emblements The Lords Remedy for a Forfeiture For Forfeitures presented by the homage the Lord may distrain or seize 1 Keb. 287. Pateson and Danges By Entry the Lord shall have the Emblements CAP. XXIII Of extinguishment of Copy-holds How they are destroyed by the act of the Lord or of the Copy-holder VVhere and how a Right to a Copy-hold shall be Estopped or Extinguished by Acceptance or Release VVhere a Copy-hold shall be suspended and where it may be regranted Where and by what acts a Copy-hold shall grow extinct and destroyed for ever and where not and to what purposes and to what not By the act of the Lord Copy-holder BY the act of the Lord. And here observe two Rules By the severance of the Inheritance of the Copy-hold from the Manor the Copy-hold is not destroyed for though the Copy-hold must be parcel of the Manor yet severance made by the Lord shall not destroy the Estate of the Copy-holder Custom has so fixt and established his Estate In all cases where the Copy-hold is gone by the Grant of the Reversion it is not so gone but that the Tenant shall hold his Estate still and subject to Forfeiture as before To Illustrate this I shall cite two or three Cases That the Lords act shall not prejudice the Copy-holders Estate If the Lord makes a Lease for an hundred years the Lands are not so severed from the Manor as that the Copy-hold is extinct and the customary Interest is not determined but the Lord himself hath destroyed the Custom as to the Services for the Services reserved upon the Copy Copy-hold extinct as to Services but remains as to the Customary Estate and the advantage of waste and other Forfeitures are extinct But by Anderson the Rents and Services remain and waste shall be a Forfeiture though such waste cannot be found by an ordinary Presentment and that the Lord shall have the Rents and Services and not the Lessee quod mirum saith the Reporter against his own Lease 2 Leon. 208. Beal and Langley But this point is well setled in Murrel and Smith's Case 4 Rep. 25. though the Reversion of the Copy-hold be granted and so severed from the Manor yet the Copy-holder shall hold his Estate and subject to Forfeiture as before and shall perform the same Services suit of Court excepted as before and the Custom incident to the Land as Burrough English Gavel-kind continue still but Fine upon Alienations and Suit of Court and Admittances are gone The Lord Grants an ancient Copy-hold to S. in Fee and after he grants the Inheritance of that Copy-hold to a Stranger in Fee S. makes his Will and deviseth it to M. in Fee which was surrendred at next Court Per Cur. 1. Copy-hold though severed from the Manor not destroyed by the Lords act By the severance of the Inheritance of the Copy-hold from the Manor the Copy-hold is not destroyed being the Lords act 2. The Surrender after the Severance of the said Copy-hold was void and so was the Will for the Lands were not parcel of the Manor at the time of
the Surrender and the devise only cannot transfer for such customary Estate 3. After the severance the Copy-holder shall pay his Rent to the Feoffee and other Services which are due without Admittance as Harriot c. But not Fine or Suit of Court After severance Forfeitures continue But such Forfeitures as were Forfeitures before the Severance as Feoffment Lease Waste are Forfeitures after 4 Rep. 24 25. In Lee and Boothby's Case Cro. Car. 521. The Question was If a Copy-holder in Fee surrender to the Lord of the Manor his Copy-hold Estate and the Lord makes a Lease for years of the Manor and of the said Copy-hold by the name of his Tenement called H. whether it was a determination of his Copy-hold Per Curiam it is not because when he lets the Manor it is included as parcel of the Manor the Manor being demised includes the Copy-hold as parcel of the Manor and the naming of the Copy-hold is surplusage But if he though he had been but Dominus pro tempore or for half a year though by parol had made a Lease for years of the Copy-hold by it self that had destroyed the Copy-hold for it was then during that time severed from the Manor and so could never after be demised by Copy Lease for years of a particular Copy-hold by name together with the Manor by the King hath not so extinguished that the Copy-hold though by the surrender of it it is parcel of the Manor in the King but that after such Lease the Patentee of the Reversion may regrant it as Copy-hold 1 Keb. 720. Act of the Lord with consent of the Tenant where it destroys it or not But the act of the Lord with consent and acceptance of the Tenant will destroy the Copy-hold otherwise it shall not prejudice the Copy-holder But in some sense the Copy-holder may assent and yet not be prejudiced as in Howard and Bartlet's Case Hob. 181. The Custom was Copy hold Estate may remain to some purpose notwithstanding the severance from the Freehold if Copy-holders for Life dye seized their Wives shall have this during their Widowhood and A. being Copy-holder for Life the Lord conveys the Freehold and Inheritance of the Copy-hold of A. by the procurement of A. to J. S. a Stranger and his Heirs during the Life of A. Remainder to B. the Wife of A. for Life Remainder to A. and after A. grants the Remainder to W. his Son after this B. the Wife of A. dyes and A. marries C. and dyes seized now though here appears the Copy-holders privity and consent in that he takes the Remainder in Fee and grants it over to his Son that it should be destroyed and though this Copy-hold Estate was destroyed before her marriage yet the viduity of C. is not extinguished for the Freehold being in J. S. during the Life of A. the Estate of A. was not so extinct but the Custom shall continue quoad her The Copy-hold Estate here remains notwithstanding the severance from the Free-hold and though the Remainder was in him and he granted it over yet he lived and dyed a Copy-holder Hobart p. 181. Howard and Bartlet 1 Rolls Abr. 510. Cro. Jac. 573. the same Case by the name of Waldee and Bartlet Copy-holder in Tayl accepts a Feoffment from the Lord it destroys not the Copy-hold so as to conclude his Issue Carters Rep. 6 7. 2. By the act of the Copy-holder If a Copy-holder accept a Lease for years of his Copy-hold Acceptance of a Lease by this his Copy-hold is destroyed whether it be immediately from the Lord or mediately as was Lane's Case 2 Rep. 16. b. The King seized of a Manor in Fee grants Copy-hold Lands parcel of this Manor to another in Fee by Copy of Court Roll according to the Custom of the Manor And after the King by his Letters Patents under the Exchequer Seal makes a Lease for 21 years to another of these Lands the Lessee grants his Term to the Copy-holder afterwards Queen Elizabeth reciting the Lease for 21 years grants the Reversion in Fee the 21 years expire and the Patentee of the Reversion enters upon the Copy-holder his Entry adjudged good for Per Cur. by the acceptance of the Term by the Copy-holder the Copy-hold Estate was determined as well as if the Copy-holder had immediately accepted a Lease for years of his Copy-hold The reason of the Extinguishment the reason is the same in both Cases A Copy-hold Interest and an Estate for years of one and the same Land may not stand together in one and the same person at one time without confounding the lesser and if one of them ought to be determined it ought to be the Copy-hold Estate Also they are of divers natures and so cannot stand together in the same person the Estate at the Common-Law cannot drown it being the more worthy than the customary Estate and the customary must Vide mesme Case in Anderson 1 Rep. 191. and 1 Leon. 170. So it was resolved in Hide and Newport's Case A Copy-holder in Fee took a Lease for years of the Manor the Copy-hold is extinct for ever and not only during the Lease Moor Rep. n. 330. Acceptance to hold the Land by Bill and not by Copy Copy-holder accepts to hold his Land by Bill under the Lords Hand and not by Copy this determines the Copy-hold 1 Anderson 199. Colman and Bedil If a Copy-holder takes a Lease for years of the Manor by this his Copy-hold is destroyed 4 Rep. 21. French's Case But such Lessee may re-grant the Copy-hold to whom he will for the Land was always demised and demisable If the Lord make a Lease for Life to the Copy-holder by parol this shall confound the Copy-hold if Livery be made otherwise not Latch 213. If there be a Lease for years of the Manor and one of the Copy-holders doth purchase the Reversion in Fee by this the Copy-hold is destroyed and the Lessee of the Manor shall oust the Copy-holder and hold the Land for the time Calth p. 97. By the Tenants Release to the Lord. By the Copy-holders Release to the Lord. If a Copy-holder releaseth to his Lord that extinguisheth his Copy-hold although it be contrary to the nature of a Release to give possession Hutton p. 81. Or to a Purchasor The Lord sells the Freehold interest of a Copy-holder of Inheritance unto another so as it is divided from the Manor and afterwards the Copy-holder releaseth to the Purchaser by it the Copy-hold Interest is extinct but if the Lord be disseised and the Copy-holder releaseth to the Disseisor Nihil operatur 1 Leon. 102. Wakeford's Case Cro. Eliz. 21. For if a Copy-holder is ousted and so the Lord is disseised and the Copy-holder releaseth all his right to the disseisor and dyes his Heir Enters and brings an Action of Trespass against the disseisor who pleads his Frank-tenement Per Cur. the Release is void the disseisor not being admitted
Copy-holder It hath been a Question when a Copy-holder bargains and sells his Copy-hold to the Lord of a Manor in Lease for years whether the Copyhold Estate was extinguished But in Hutton p. 81. it is agreed that this Copy-hold is not extinguished but that the Lord who is Lessee for years is Dominus pro tempore and may grant it by Copy de novo The Lord of a Manor demised Copy-hold Lands to three Sisters Habend to them for their Lives successive the eldest Sister married one C. after which the Lord by Indenture leased the same Land to the eldest Sister the Remainder to the Husband Remainder to the second Sister and no Agreement was made thereunto by the second Sister by Deed before or after making the said Indenture but four days after the Lease made she agreed to it in pais and then married a Husband Agreement to an Indenture by one in Remainder for Life and they claim the Land The point is if by Agreement of the second Sister her Right to the Copy-hold were extinct The Interest of the eldest Sister is gone by her acceptance of the Estate by Indenture now if the second Sister may come and claim her customary Interest Per Cur. it s no extinguishment in the second Sister and yet Judgment was against her for Per Gaudy none can take advantage of the eldest Sister's Estate being determined the Lord against his Lease cannot enter or claim and the second Sister cannot enter during the Life of the eldest Sister for her Remainder takes effect in possession after the death of her said Sister 1 Leon. p. 73. Curtis and Cottell's Case 28 Eliz. Trin. B. R. By acceptance of a new Estate of Free-hold Baron and Feme Copy-holders to them and their Heirs the Baron in consideration of mony paid by him to the Lord obtaineth an Estate of the Freehold to him and his Wife and to the Heirs of their Bodies Baron dieth having Issue the Feme enters and suffers a Recovery and his Heir enters Per Statute 11 H. 7. Per Cur. the Entry is lawful for the Copy-hold by the Acceptance of the new Estate was extinguished Cro. El. 24. Stockbridge's Case Where and how Right to a Copy-hold shall be Extinguished by Release A man makes a Surrender of his Copy-hold Land to J. S. which is not good and after J. S. is admitted he which made the Surrender releaseth to him being in possession and after enters upon him The Question was if his Entry be congeable and if by the Release by Deed the customary Right of the Copy-holder was extinct And Per Cur. it is extinct by the Release for he to whom the Release was made was Copy-holder in possession and admitted to the Tenements and therefore the Release of a customary right may enure to him and the Lord hath no prejudice for he hath received his Fine for Admittance and he to whom the Release is made is in by Title viz. by Admittance of the Lord and so this Release enures by way of extinguishment And there is great difference between transferring of an Estate and an extinguishment of a Right Diversity between the transferring of an Estate and the extinguishment of a Right But if a Copy-holder be ousted per Tort there his Release to the disseisor or other wrong doer does not transfer his Right or Bar him 1. Because there is no customary Estate upon which a Release of any customary Right may enure and then 2. It would be a prejudice to the Lord who would lose his Fines and Services Co. 4 Rep. 25. b. Kite and Queinton In Replevin bar to the Conisance That K.D. was seized of the Manor of R. in Fee and that the Tenements in which c. were customary held of the said Manor and that at such a Court a Copy was granted to the Plaintiff whereby he entred and put in his Beasts The Defendant protesting the Premisses were not customary for Plea saith That before the Plaintiffs Title J. Abbot of the Monastery of B. was seized of the Manor of R. c. and one R. T. being seized of the customary Lands in which c. in Fee at the will of the Lord the said R. surrendred to the Abbot who was possessed and occupied the said Premisses for divers years and afterwards demised the said Manor for 40 years to W. M. and then surrendred the entire Manor and Abbathy to H. 8. who granted the entire Manor to the Duke of Norfolk in Fee and he with the assent of the Termor made a Feoffment to Drury of the Manor to whom the Termor surrendred his Lease Drury dyes and it descends to his Heir who granted the Land in which c. again by Copy to Tillot for his Life who entred and put in his Beasts Demurrer The Question was if the Custom is destroyed or if Drury the Defendant may avoid his Grant by Copy Note The custumary Land was never severed from the Manor but granted with the Manor as part of it and was demisable by Copy by all the Lords of the Manor and so it remained till the 15th of Eliz. when the Defendant granted the Copy to the Plaintiff Winch Ent. 991 992. Where a Copy-hold shall be perpetually extinct or where it shall after become a Copy-hold by regrant Forfeit Escheat If a Copy-hold Estate be forfeit or escheat to the Lord or otherwise come into the Hands of the Lord if the Lord make a Lease for years or for Life or other Estate by Deed or without Deed this Land shall never after be granted again by Copy for the Custom is destroyed for that during such Estates the Land was not demised nor demisable by Copy of Court Roll So if the Lord make a Feoffment and enter for the Condition broken it shall never be granted again by Copy But if the Lord keep it in his Hands a long time or let this at will then he may re-grant it Lach p. 213. 1 Rolls Abr. 498. Downcliff and Minors So if the interruption be tortious as if the Lord be disseised and the disseisor dye seized or the Land be recovered against the Lord by false Verdict or erroneous Judgment yet after the Land recovered or the judgment reversed this is grantable again by Copy Legal Interruptions But if the Land so Forfeited or Escheated before any new Grant be extended upon a Statute or Recognizance acknowledged by the Lord or the Lords Wife hath this assigned to her in a Writ of Dower though these are impediments by acts in Law yet the interruptions are lawful and the Lands may never again be granted by Copy 4 Rep. 31. Frenches Case If Copy-holder takes a Lease for years of the Manor by this his Copy-hold is destroyed but such Lessee may re-grant the Copy-hold again to whom he will for the Land was always demised or demisable If a Copy-hold be surrendred to the Lessor of a Manor or be Forfeited to him he his Executors or Assigns may well
re-grant it to him again If a Copy-hold Escheat to the Lord Escheat and he alien the Manor by Fine Feoffment c. his Alienee may re-grant this Land by Copy for it was always demised or demisable but if it be a particular Copy-hold Estate otherwise as was said in the beginning of this Case 4 Rep. 31. Frenches Case If a Copy-holder sue Execution of a Statute against the Lord of a Manor Not destroyed by execution of the Manor at the Copy-holders Suit and had the Manor in Execution and after the Debt is levied the Interest of the Copy-hold remains Per Manwood Heydon's Case Savills Rep. A Copy-holder in Fee marries a Woman Suspended Seignioress of the Manor and after they suffer a Common Recovery which was to the Use of themselves for Life Remainder over by some the Copy-hold is extinct for by the Recovery the Husband had gained an Estate of Freehold But Per Cur. by the inter-marriage it was only suspended Cro. El. p. 7. Anonymus If a Copy-holder accept of a Lease for years of the Manor or marry the Lords Wife by this the Copy-hold is not extinct but suspended If a Copy-hold be granted to three for Lives Suspended and the first of them take an Estate by Deed with livery from the Lord by this the Copy-hold for that Life is suspended Dyer 30. 4 Rep. 31. No prejudice to the Wife or to him in reversion Baron seized of a Manor in right of his Feme let Copy-hold Land parcel thereof for years by Indenture and dyed this doth not destroy the Custom as to the Wife but that after the death of her Husband she may demise by Copy as before So If Tenant pur vie of a Manor let a Copy-hold parcel of the Manor for years and dyes it shall not destroy the Custom as to him in Reversion Cro. El. P. 38 Eliz. Conesby and Rusketh for being Tenant pur vie he may not do wrong by destroying of Customs King H. 8. grants Lands being parcel of Copy-hold of a Manor without reciting this to be Copy-hold to Sir J. G. pur vie Sir J. G. morust Queen Mary grants the Manor to Susan Tenny in Fee who let the Manor for years to Lee. Lee before his years expired grants the Land in question to R. L. in Fee according to the Custom of the Manor Lee's years expire R. L. let to Field at will and the Defendant enters as Heir to Tenny Judgment pro Quer. Suspension and not Destruction of a Custom Kings Prerogative The Grant of the King is but a suspension and no destruction of the Custom And though the Maxim is It ought to be demised and demisable c. yet this holds not in the case of the King 2 Siderfin p. 142. Vide contra 1 Rolls Abr. 498. Downcliff and Minors Vide sub Tit. Grants by the Lord. As to the escheating of Copy-holds after escheating it cannot properly be called a Copy-hold Escheat except it be because there is power in him to re-grant it as Copy-hold Were it by Custom that the Wife shall be endowed of the intierty or moiety and such customary Copy-hold Lands Escheat and the Husband dyes The Wife not to be endowed after Escheat his Wife shall not be endowed of the intierty or moiety because the Custom as to her is extinct 2 Siderfin 19. A Copy-hold Escheated may be demised notwithstanding the Lords Continuance of it in his Hands above 20 years 2 Keb. 213. Pemble and Stern Note If the Copy-holder of a Manor hath had time out of memory Copy-hold extinct but not a Way over the Copy-hold Land a Way over the Land of another Copy-holder and he purchaseth the Inheritance of his Copy-hold by which the Copy-hold is extinct yet by this the Way is not extinct 1 Rolls Abr. 933. Empson and Williamson CAP. XXIV How and where Copy-holder shall hold his Lands charged or not by the Lord or Copy-holders as Dowers Rent-charges Statutes And how and where they shall be avoided THE Lord of a Manor in which were Copy-holders for Lives takes a Wife Dower of the Lords Wife and after a Copy-holder dyes the Lord after Coverture grants the Lands again according to the Custom of the Manor for Lives and dyes the Lords Widow shall not avoid these Grants in a Writ of Dower yet the Custom which is the Life of the Grant was long before 4 Rep. 24. If Feoffee of a Manor upon Condition make voluntary Grants of Copy-hold Estates according to Custom and after the Condition is broken By Feoffee a Manor upon condition and Feoffee re-enters yet the Grants by Copy shall stand Earl of Arundel's Case cited in Co. 4 Rep. 24. Copy-holder by voluntary grant not subject to the Lords Charges The Copy-holder which comes in by voluntary Grant shall not be subject to the Charges or Incumbrances of the Lord before the Grant 8 Rep. 63. Swain's Case Lord of a Manor where the Custom was of Land demisable for one two or three Lives that he that was first named in the Copy should enjoy it only for his Life and so the second The Remainder preserves the Estate from Charges c. grants it to J. P. and E. and M. his Daughters for their Lives if the Lord had charged the Inheritance of the Copy-hold J. P. shall not hold it charged during his Life for the mean Estates in Remainder preserve the Estate of J. P. by Copy from the Incumbrances of the Lord 9 Rep. 107. Margaret Podger's Case Rent charge Earl of W. seized of Manor by Copy grants a Rent-charge to Sir W. Cordel for the term of his Life and conveys the Manor to Sir W. Clifton in Tayl the Rent is behind Sir W. Cordrel dyes the Manor descends to Sir John Clifton who grants a Copy-hold to H. The Executors of Sir W. Cordel distrain for the Rent Per Cur. the Copy-holder shall hold the Land charged 2 Leon. p. 152. and 109. Cordel and Clifton But it hath been adjudged That the Wife of the Lord shall not be endowed against the Copy-holder for the Title of Dower is not consummated before the death of the Husband so as the Title of Copy-holder is compleated before the Title of Dower and in this Case the Seisin and possession continues in Sir John Clifton who claims only by Sir William Clifton who was the Tenant in Demesn who ought to pay the Rent Lord and Copy-holder for Life be the Lord grants a Rent-charge out of the Manor Rent charge by the Lord upon the Manor whereof the Copy-hold is parcel the Copy-holder surrenders to the Use of A. who is admitted accordingly he shall not hold it charged but if the Copy-holder dyeth so that his Estate is determined and the Lord granteth to a Stranger de novo to hold the said Land by Copy this new Tenant shall hold the Land charged 1 Leon. p. 4. Lord of a Manor where Lands were
dedemisable for one two or three Lives in which Manor was a Custom that the Lord for the time being might grant Copy-hold Estates for Life in Reversion the Lord granted such Lands for Life by Copy in possession took a Wife and granted the same Copy-hold to a Stranger in Reversion for Life and dyed the Copy-holder in possession dyed this Land inter alia is assigned to the Wife for her Dower Dower the Copy-holder shall hold the Land discharged of the Dower 1 Leon. p. 16. Cham and Dover's Case In Cham and Dover's Case is cited the Case of Slowman who being Lord of a Manor ut supra by his Will devised That his Executors should grant Estates by Copy and dyed having a Wife the Executors make Estates accordingly Dower the Wife in case of Dower shall avoid them Dyer 344. and 1 Leon. p. 16. Lord of such a Manor is bound by Recognizance Recognizance afterwards a Copy-holder for Life dyeth the Lord granteth his Copy-hold de novo the new Grantee shall hold the Land discharged of the Recognizance for the Copy-holder is in by the Custom which was paramount 1 Leon. p. 16. Granted upon an Escheat shall avoid Charges The Lord of a Copy-hold Manor where Copy-holders are for Life grants a Rent-charge out of all the Manor one Copy-hold Escheats the Lord grants that again by Copy the Grantee shall not hold it charged because he comes in above the Grant viz. by the Custom the same Law of Statutes Recognizances Dower and Dyer 270. is deemed for Law in Swain's Case Copyholders Beasts distrainable or not for a Rent charge If one is seized of Rent-charge by Prescription issuing out of the Manor of D. yet it seems he may not distrain the Beasts of the Copy-holders of the Manor unless they have been used to be distrained for that they are in by Prescription also and so as high as the owner of the Rent but it is clear That if the owner of the Rent had this by Grant or otherwise and not by Prescription that the Copy-holders Beasts cannot be distrained for this 1 Rolls Abr. 669 670. Cannon and Turner But by Coke Chief Justice If a Copy-holder be of 20 Acres and the Lord grants Rent out of those 20 Acres in the Tenure or occupation of the said Copy-holder and names him there if this Copy-hold Escheat and be granted again the Copy-holder shall hold it charged for this is now charged by express words Brownl 208. Sammer and Force Tenant by the Curtesie for Life or years of a Manor a Copy-hold comes to his Hands by Forfeiture or Determination and then he was bound in a Statute Statute by the Lord. and afterwards demised the Land again Per Cur. this Copy-hold shall be lyable to the Statute because it was once annexed to the Free-hold of the Lord and bound in his Hands But if a Copy-holder bind himself in a Statute Statute by the Copy holder Diversity it shall not be extended for he had not but an Estate at will and this diversity was agreed in Moor n. 233. Anonymus Lord of a Manor being summoned upon a Jury lose Issues Process for Loss of Issues Process shall issue out of the Exchequer to levy them upon the Lands of the Copyholders and Lessees for Life and years parcel of the Manor for the loss of Issues lies upon the Land as an inherent Servitude by the Law into whose Hands soever it comes and this is the common practice of the Exchequer CAP. XXV Of Harriots The Nature of Harriot Service and Harriot Custom and of their Differences What Custom for Harriots are good or not Where they shall be apportioned and by whose acts Who shall pay Harriot or not And the Pleadings Of Harriots HArriots being one of the ancient Services now most esteemed and kept up and many Copy-holds being Harriotable I shall Treat of Harriots chiefly intending Harriot Customs and so far of Harriot Services as to render the whole Intelligible The Normans upon parcelling out their Lands to inferior Tenants invented this Service and termed it Harriot Service and afterwards upon Infranchisement of their Villains Harriot Customs were given to the Lords for a future continued gratulation and so originally they were de gratia but now they are de jure It is the best Beast or other thing that the Tenant hath at the time of his death and this shall be paid before a Mortuary but the Lord if he will may seize the worst and that seizure gives him property Hob. p. 60.16 H. 7.5 Co. Lit. 185. b. Harriots may be by Tenure Custom or Reservation Plowd Com. Redsole and Mantel There are two sorts of Harriots Harriot Service Custom And the nature of them both will be best explained by these diversities Harriot Service is generally exprest in a mans Grant or Deed by which it is reserved and is in these words or to this effect ac etiam per servitium reddendi post mortem cujuslibet tenentis deceden seisit optimum animal c. 1 Anderson 298 299. Odiam and Smith But Harriot Custom is only due by Custom time out of mind and may be paid after the death of Tenant for Life Terms del Ley. Harriot Service is extinct by Purchase of parcel but not Harriot Custom Co. Lit. 149. b. It hath been made a question in our Books whether the Lord may seize for Harriot Service but it is agreed he must seize for Harriot Custom Plowd 96. a. In the Case of Woodland against Mantel it is said the Lord may seize for Harriot Service but Anderson 1. p. 298 299. in Odiham and Smith's Case saith he ought to distrain and not to seize so is Serjeant Benlows p. 18 39. But the Law is setled in Cro. Car. 260. Mayor versus Brandwood and that it is at the Lords election either to seize it or distrain it if he can find it though the pleading seem to justifie it for in Replevin if one justifie for Harriot Custom it s no Plea for the Plaintiff to say that the place where is hors de son Fee for that he claims this Harriot as his proper Gopds and may seize it wherever he finds it Bendl. p. 18 39. For the Lord may seize for an Harriot Custom in the High-way 2 Inst 132. What Custom for Harriots shall be good or not Custom was That if the best Beast be esloigned then the Lord had used to seize and take the best Beast of any other being Levant and Couchant upon the Land it s a void and unreasonable Custom So if it be the Goods of any Inhabitant or Dweller Dye 199. b. Paxton's Case Benl p. 39. bis Co. Ent. 666. The Custom of having an Harriot whether the man had Goods or not is a void Custom Carter's Rep. p. 86. A Custom That the Lord shall seize the Beasts of a Stranger for an Harriot it is not good because it alters the property but a Custom That he shall distrain
Lease had been in possession and the Lessee had never entred he had been barred 1 Brownl 181. This Fine shall not be a bar to the Copy-hold Estate in Remainder for Life for it is not turned to a right the Estate is given by Custom and is to have his beginning after the death of the first Tenant and if the first Tenant commit Forfeiture he in Remainder cannot enter and by Coke notwithstanding the acceptance of the Bargain and Sale the first Copy-hold Estate for Life remains in esse 2 Br. 153. mesme Case Custom that the Lord shall seize Copy-hold after three Proclamations and non-Claim by the Heir shall not bind the Heir that is beyond the Sea 8 Rep. Sir Richard Lechford's Case Statute 37 H. 8. Of Dissolutions 37 H. 8. Of Monasteries extends not to Copy-holds A Copy-holders Estate is not within the Statute of Monasteries and Chanteries to be avoided by any of the Statutes So by Statute 1 Ed. 6. Cap. 14. it is expresly provided That upon the dissolution of Abbies and Monasteries Copy-holds should continue as they did before the Statutes and should fall into the Kings Hands A Copy-holder dissolved by the Statute of Edw. 6. did between the Statute of 37 H. 8. and 1 Edw. 6. grant a Copy-hold Estate in Reversion but the Statute 37 H. 8. extends not to them 3 Bulstr p. 15. Long and Baker Vide 1 Leon. p. 4. mesme Case 31 H. 8. Eccles Leases Of making Leases of Copy-hold Lands belonging to Religious Houses for years after Leases for Lives or Years in being is within that Statute 8 Rep. 7. Heydon's Case 32 H. 8. Of Conditions Entries Assignee Copy-hold is not within the Statute of Entries for Conditions broken Surrendree of Reversion shall not enter for a Condition broken it s not within the Statute of Conditions Hob. p. 177 178. Swinnerton and Miller Copy-hold is not within the Statute of 32 H 8. Entries for Conditions Copy-holder by Licence makes a Lease for 60 Acres rendring Rent and condition of Re-entry Copy-holder Surrenders to J. S. and he demands Rent and enters for Non-payment J. S. is not such an Assignee as the Statute intends and Custom doth not trench to such collateral things such Assignee being in only by Custom is not privy to the Lease made by the first Copy-holder nor in by him but he may plead his Estate immediately under the Lord Yel 222. Brasier's Case But Assignee of a Copy-hold is within the Statute to have Action of Covenant 1 Keb. 356. Arrears of Rent Baker's Case Quaere if of Debt Cro. Car. 21. Platt and Plummer Executors brought Action for Arrears of Rent of Copy-hold of which Manor the Testator died seized Per Cur. Action doth not lye for Arrears of Copy-hold Rents but only of Rents of Free Land and Statute 32 H. 8. extends not to them Yelv. 135. Appleton and Doiley 1 Brownl 102. Tenant in Tayl of a Manor wherein Copy-holds are demisable for Life c. for a certain Rent Copy-holder for Life dyes and the Lord demiseth it for 21 years 38 H. 8. Rents of Leases in Tayl. rendring the ancient Rent c. it s good within the Statute 38 H. 8. for its not any prejudice to the Issue as to the Rent Noy p. 106. The Lord Norris's Case Vide infra hoc capite If the Lord of a Copy-holder for Life demisable by 10 s. Rent leaseth it by Indenture to the Copy-holder and two others for their Lives rendring 10 s. Rent by which it is within the Statute of 32 H. 8. and is not material though the Harriot be lost because it is meerly casual Noy p. 110. Banks and Brown Vide Montjoy's Case 5 Rep. Et supra Copy-hold is within the Statute 32 H. 8. 9. 32 H. 8. Cap. 9. Of maintenance Of Maintenance for the Word is Any Right or Title 4 Rep. 26. a. Vide infra hoc capite Copy-hold is grantable for three Lives 13 El. Cap. 10. Dean and Chapter of London grant this to H. G. for the Lives of J. R. and M. reserving the ancient Rent but no Harriot the Rent was payable at four Quarters and by this Lease its payable half yearly yet this is not void by the Statute 13 El. Cap. 10. For the Occupant shall be punish'd for Waste and the Harriot is not annual nor depends on the Rent and as to the Rent it s the accustomed yearly Rent but in Mountjoy's 5 Rep. yearly was wanting 6 Rep. 37 Dean and Chapter of Worcesters Case Copy-holds are within all the Statutes of Bankrupts by express words vide supra Statutes of Bankrupts 1 El. and Jac. A Copy-hold is not within the Statute of Limitations Debt for the Fine of a Copy-holder is not within the Statute of Limitations 2 Keb. 536. Statute of Limitations Hodsden and Harris Vide. It is laid down for a Rule in Rowden and Malster's Case Cro. Car. 44. When an Act of Parliament altereth the Service Custom Tenure and Interest of the Land Rules when Acts of Parliament extend to Copy-holds or not or other thing in prejudice of the Lord or Tenant there the general words of such an Act shall not extend to Copy-holds Therefore W. 2. Cap. 20. Elegit Statute W. 2. Cap. 20. which gives Elegit extends not to Copy-hold Lands because it would be prejudicial to the Lord and a breach of the Custom that any stranger should have Interest there without admittance and allowance of the Lord. 27 H. 8.10 Stat. of Uses Statute 27 H. 8.10 of Uses toucheth not Copy-holds because the transmutation of Possession by the sole Operation of the Statute without allowance of the Lord would be to the Lords prejudice 31 H. 8. and 32 H. 8. Of Partition The Statute 31 H. 8. Cap. 1. and 32 H. 8. Cap. 2. whereby Joynt-tenants and Tenants in common are compellable to make Prohibition extend not to Copy-holds And the 32 H. 8. Cap. 28. Leases by Tenant in Tayl or by Husband of the Wives Land Statute 32 H. 8. Cap. 28. Which confirms Leases for 21 years made by Tenants in Tayl or by the Husband and Wife of the Wives Land touch not Copy-holds for that Statute warrants only such Leases of Lands which are grantable by Deed such are not Copy-hold Lands though by the Lords Licence they may be granted by Indenture yet in their own nature they are only demisable by Copy So Statute 32 H. 8. Cap. 34. And for the same reason which gives an Entry to the Grantee of a Reversion upon the breach of a condition by the particular Tenant toucheth not Copy-hold In all Statutes made for the good of the Common-wealth and wherein no prejudice accrues to the Lord or Tenants by reason of the alteration of any Interest Service Tenure or Custom of the Manor there the general words of such acts of Parliament do extend to Copy-hold Lands as Statute of Merton Cap. 1.
Merton Cap. 1. Of Damages sur Recovery en Dower which gives Damages to a Feme Covert upon a Recovery in a Writ of Dower where the Baron dyed seized extends to Copy-holds And Stat. W. 2. C. 3. W. 2. Cap. 3. Cui in vita And the three several branches of that Stat. the one which gives a cui in vita upon a discontinuance made by the Husband The second which gives the Receit to the Wife upon her Husbands refusal to defend the Wifes Title Resceit And the third which gives a Quod ei deforceat to particular Tenants extends to Copy-holds Quod ei deforceat And The Statute 32 H. 8. Cap. 9. 32 H. 8. cap. 9. Champerty against Champerty and litigious Titles which gives an Entry in lieu of a Cui in vita extendeth to Copy-holds Cro. Car. 43. Rowden and Malster Vide Plowd f. 371. The Statute W. 2. which gives Elegits Elegit extends not to Copy-holds for that would be a prejudice and the Common Law would break the Custom Savil's Reports Heydon's Case vide supra Copy-hold Lands are liable to the Statutes of Recusants 13 El. cap. 4. Of Recusants and the King shall have the profits of the Lands only but no Estate and such Statute doth not make a Tenant to the Lord and though the King hath the Copy-hold Land yet the Lord shall have the Rent during the possession of the King 1 Leon. p. 98. Saliard and Everat's Case Owen p. 37. mesme Case Copy-hold Lands are not within the words of that Statute but by Anderson 34 H. 8.5 Of Wills the Equity of that Act doth extend to Copy-holds 1 Leon. 83. in Skipwith's Case 31 Eliz. cap. 7. Cottages Copy-hold is not within that Stat. 1 Bulstr 50. Brock's Case 11 H. 7. cap. 10. Joyntresses Copy-hold Lands are assured to the Wife for her Joynture and she aliens them it s no Forfeiture within Statute 11 H. 8. Cap. 10. Copy-hold Land is not within that Statute 2 Siderfin p. 41 73. Harrington and Smith CAP. XXVII Of Emblements who shall have them the Lord or the Copy-holder A Woman who had her Widows Estate of Copy-hold Land and before severance took Husband the Lord shall have the Corn because the Estate of the Woman determined by her own act otherwise if her Estate had ended by Death Divorce Determination of the Will c. Moor n. 512. Oland and Burdwick 5 Rep. 115. mesme Case If a Copy-holder Durante viduitate Lease for one year and the Lessee sows the Land and after the Copy-holder takes an Husband yet the Lessee shall have the Corn for her act shall not prejudice a third person Ibid. Oland's Case If the Husband seized of a Copy-hold in Fee sows the Land and after surrenders to the Use of his Wife who is admitted accordingly and after the Husband dyes before severance it seems the Wife shall have the Corn and not the Executors or Administrators of the Husband Annexed to the Land for that the Husband passed the Emblements with the Land to the Wife as annexed to the Land and by this the Priviledge which the Law gives to him who sows it is taken away by the Surrender and so it is all one as if the Wife had sowed it or purchased the Land sowed by a Stranger 1 Rolls Abr. 727. CAP. XXVIII What shall be said a Disseisin as to Copy-hold Estates or not IF a Copy-holder in Fee dyeth seized and the Lord admit a Stranger to the Land who entreth he is but a Tenant at will and not a Disseisor to the Copy-holder who hath the Land by Discent because he cometh in by the Assent of the Lord 3 Leon. 210. If a Copy-holder without Licence makes a Lease for years the Lessee who enters by colour of that is a Disseisor and a Disseisor cannot maintain an Ejectione Firmae 2. Brownl p. 40. Petty and Evans If a Copy-holder Lease for years by License of the Lord and after enters upon the Lessee and ousts him this is a Disseisin to the Lord of the Frank-Tenement 1 Rolls Abr. 662. by Coke Vide sparsim CAP. XXIX Actions and Suits What Action may be brought by the Lords What Actions brought by Copy-holders or their Executors in respect to their Copy-hold Estates shall be good or not either against their Lords or others What Actions may be brought by the Lords THE Lord upon seizure of Copy-holder may maintain Ejectment till the Heir comes to be admitted as in Harverights Case Latch 511. upon Entry of the Feoffor upon Rent reserved and Entry till satisfaction he may upon such Interest quousque maintain an Ejectment 1 Keb. 2â—7 Lord Salisbury's Case As to the Lords Action for Rent Distress Remedy for Forfeitures Vide supra sparsim per tout in Indice What Actions a Copy-holder may bring against his Lord and what not Trespass upon Ejectment by the Lord. Copy-holder doing and paying the Customs and Services if he be ejected by his Lord he shall have an Action of Trespass against him Co. Lit. 60. b. 61. a. 4 Rep. 22. a. For though he is Tenens ad voluntatem Domini yet it is Secundumconsuetudinem Manerij For cutting Trees He shall have Trespass against his Lord for cutting of Trees or breaking his House in the Case of Stebbing and Gosnel 1 Rolls Abr. 108. The Custom was That every Copy-holder in Fee shall have the Loppings of the Pollingers The Lord cuts down two Oaks and in his Plea to an Action sur Case saith he cut down two Oakes being Pollinger Timber Trees and left the Loppings there for the Plaintiff On Demurrer it was adjudged for the Plaintiff for a Copy-holder of Inheritance hath interest in the Loppings and Boughs as well as the Lord in the Timber And if the Lord shall cut down all the Timber Trees than the Copy-holder shall lose the Profit Cro. El. p. 629. Moor n. 727. mesme Case 1 Rolls Rep. Ford and Hoskin's Case Nay the Action of Trespass by a Copy-holder in Fee against his Lord for cutting down the Trees lyes at Common Law without any special Custom for the Copy-holder hath a special property therein and the Lord a general property the Lord may as well subvert the Houses as cut down the Trees for without them the Copy-holder hath no means to Repair it 2 Brownl 328. Heydon and Smith and in Doyle's Case Mich. 25. and 26 El. it was adjudged where it was a Custom that the Copy-holder might cut Maremium to Repair if the Lord carry it away an Action of Trespass lyes against him by the Tenant in Taylor 's Case Pasch 36. Eliz. A man was Tenant by Copy of Court Roll of Wood and the Soyl was excepted to the Lord and yet the Copy-holder maintained an Action of Trespass against the Lord for cutting his Wood Moor n. 480. If a Stranger cut a Tree Trespass by the Lord and the Copy-holder for cutting down Trees the
Lord shall have one Action and the Copy-holder another and each one shall recover Damages according to his Interest Vide Leon. 1. 272. Copy-holder dyes Lord admits a Stranger the Heir may enter and upon a re-entry maintain Trespass without Admittance Noy p. 172. Simpson and Gillion Vide Admittance For non-Admittance no Action by Surrendree Action on the Case against the Lord lyes not for non-Admittance A Copy-holder in the Eye of the Law is but Tenant at the Lords Will and if the Lord will not hold Court he hath no remedy to compel him but by order in Chancery Cro. Jac. p. 368. Ford and Hoskins No Action on the Case by a named Successor By Surrendror Surrendror may have an Action on the Case for not admitting but not the Surrendree 2 Keb. 357. Quaere Remedy in faux Judgment The Demandant in a Pleint in nature of a real Action recovereth the Land erroneously with remedy for the party grieved for he cannot have the Kings Writ of faux Judgment in respect of the baseness of the Estate and Tenure being in the Eye of the Law but a Tenant at Will and the Freehold being in another yet he shall have Petition to the Lord in nature of a Writ of faux Judgment and therein assign Errors and have remedy according to Law Co. Lit. 60. And if there be cause the Judgment may be reversed Assise Tenant by Copy shall not have Assise against his Lord as Tenant in ancient Demesn shall have because he hath no Frank-Tenement 4 Rep. 21. but he shall be relieved in Equity Tothil p. 108. The Copy-holders Actions and Remedies against Strangers and where A man grants all the Coals and Coal-Mines within a Manor and parcel was Copy-hold for Life to J. S. Where Copy-holder shall have Trover for Coals digged out of his Copy-hold Land Lessee enters into the Copy-hold and digs a new Pit in the Copy-hold Land during the Life of the Copy-holder and takes the Coals and converts them c. And Lessee of the Coal-Mine brought Trover against the Lessor Per Curiam he may do it for when the Lessor or Lessee of the Coals or a Stranger enters and digs the Coals out of the Pits these belong to the Lessee and if any one else take the Coals he shall have Trover Jones Rep. 243. Player and Roberts Lessee of a Copy-holder for a year Ejectment shall maintain an Ejectione Firmae for in as much as his Term is warranted by Law by force of the general Custom of the Realm it is but reason if he be ejected that he shall have Ejectione Firmae and it is a speedy course for a Copy-holder to have the possession of the Land against a Stranger 4 Rep. 26. As to the Declaration in Ejectment Vide Tit. Declaration In Cro. El. p. 224. It is said to be adjudged Ejectment Per tot Cur. That an Ejectione Firmae doth not lye of a Copy-hold Estate But it was agreed That an Ejectione Firmae doth lye of a Lease made by a Copy-holder but not of a Demise made by the Lord of a Copy-hold by Copy of Court Roll Cole and Wall 's Case A Copy-holder had Licence from his Lord to let his Land for 21 years he lets it to the Plaintiff for three years who entred and being Ejected brought Ejectione Firmae Ejectment by Lessee upon a Lease not warranted good against a Stranger Per Cur. he may maintain this Action at Common Law for it is a good Lease between the Paâ—â—â—s and against all others but the Lord and as this Case is it is good against him because it is done by his Licence and it is a good Lease and well warranted by the Licence Cro. El. 535. Goodwin and Longhurst A Copy-holder made a Lease for one year excepting one day which was warranted by the Custom Lessee being ousted by a Stranger brings Ejectione Firmae it well lyes and if there were not any Custom yet it shall be good against all but him who had the Inheritance and Freehold So if a Lessee for Will at the Common Law had made a Lease for years for the Tenant at Will is only a Disseisor and the Lease is good against him Cro. Trin. 41 El. p. 676. Spark's Case So 717. Erish's Case Moor n. 709. Stoner and Gibson Ejectment by the Heir without Admittance to presentment If customary Lands do descend to the younger Son by Custom and he enters and leaseth to another who takes the Profits and after is Ejected he shall have an Ejectione Firmae without any Admittance of his Lessor or Presentment that he is Heir 1 Leon. p. 100. Rumny and Eves n. 128. If a Copy-holder had Common by Prescription in the Waste of the Lord and the Lord stores the Waste with Conies every Copy-holder may have Action on the Case against the Lord averring That by this the Common is impaired 1 Rolls Abr. 106. Clayton and Sir Jerom Horsey Trespass for Beasts depasturing his Common by every Commoner Copy-holder prescribes to have Common in the Waste of the Lord and brings Trespass on the Case against a Stranger for his Beasts depasturing on the Common there The Question was whether this Action lyes for 15 H. 7.12 it s agreed a Commoner cannot maintain an Action of Trespass nor no other but the Owner of the Soyl 12 H. 8.2 And the Commoner hath no right till he hath taken it by the mouth of his Beasts and the Damage is to the Tenant of the Land and then every other Commoner may have Action of Trespass and so the Stranger shall be infinitely punishable Per Coke If a Commoner may distrain Damage feasant doing Damage which proves lie hath wrong then by the same reason if the Beasts are gone before his coming he may have Action on the Case otherwise one that hath many Beasts may destroy the Common in a night And it s not like a Nusance for that is Publick and may be punished in a Leet But the other is private to the Commoners and cannot be punished in another course he cited one Whitehand's Case Many Copy-holders prescribe to have the Loppings and Toppings of Pollards the Lord cuts them every Copy-holder may have his Action and also Hill 5. Jac. Rot. 1427. Geo. England's Case and Warburton of the same Opinion 2 Brownl p. 146. Crogate and Morris If a Copy-holder by the Custom of a Manor had used to have Common for all his Beasts Action on the Case for digging Turffs on the Common Levant and Couchant upon his customary Tenements in a certain parcel of the Manor and a Stranger digs Turffs there and takes them away by which his Common is impaired Action on the Case lyes declaring That the Defendant digged so many Turffs there and then with his Horses and Carts Herbam tunc ibid crescen ' predict ambulando conculcando Declaration from the place aforesaid minus rite ceperit abcarriavit
alledge this as a Grant How a Copy-holder shall plead in making Title to a Copy-hold and this the Law allows for avoiding an inconvenience which will otherwise happen for if the Copy-holder in Pleading shall be put to shew the full Grant either it was before the time of memory and then it is not pleadable or within time of memory and then the Custom fails Admittance pleaded as a Grant and for this cause the Law hath allowed the Copy-holder in Pleading to alledge any Admittance upon a Descent or upon a Surrender as a Grant and yet he may if he will alledge the Admittance of his Ancestor as a Grant and shew the Descent to himself and that he entred and good without any Admittance of him but the Heir cannot plead That his Father was seized in Fee at the Will of the Lord by Copy of Court Roll of such a Manor according to the Custom of the Manor and that he died seized and that it descended to him for in truth such an Interest is but a particular Interest at Will in judgment of Law although it is descendible by the Custom for he is Tenant at Will of the Lord according to the Custom of the Manor 4 Rep. 22. Brown's Case If one Surrender to the intent that the Lord shall grant it to another and he admitts him it was adjuded good yet he ought to plead it as a Grant Lit. Rep. 175. Tenant in Dower may Grant a Copy-hold in Reversion which shall be good Grant of Copy-hold Land in Reversion must be pleaded as a Grant in Reversion and not as a Grant in possession nor by a per nomen though not executed in the Life of Tenant in Dower But then it must be pleaded as a Grant in Reversion and not as a Grant in Possession therefore in Gray's Case Cro. El. p. 661 662. It was there pleaded That he granted Tenementa praedicta per nomen of a Messuage which A. P. held for Life and Per Cur. it s an uncurable Fault for it is not alledged that he granted the Tenement in Reversion and the per nomen will not help Averment del ' vâ—e Tenant by curtesie of Copy-hold brings Ejectment or Action it must appear that he is in Life or else he cannot have Judgment 1 Anderson p. 292. Ewer and Astwick Where in Pleading the Commencement of the. Estate must be shewn or by whom granted or not In matter of Conveyance to a Title need not shew the Conveyance Replevin the Plaintiff in bar to the Avowry shews that the Land was Copy-hold Land grantable in possession or reversion for Life or in Fee and that the Lord granted the Reversion to him after the death of W. who was Tenant pur vie and shews the death of W. whereby he entred And demurred because he did not shew the beginning of W. his Estate nor by whom W. had the Estate granted him Per. Cur. this is no cause of Demurrer because it is not the Plaintiffs Title but matter of Conveyance thereunto Cro. Jac. 52. Lodge and Fry Admittance of the last Heir to be shewed instead of an ancient Grant If one pleads Seisin of a Copy-holder in Fee and claims under him he ought to shew of whose Grant as he ought to shew of any other particular Estate but perhaps that is so ancient that it cannot be shewn who was the first Grantee yet it was held sufficient to shew the Admittance of the last Heir which is in nature of a Grant and may be pleaded by way of Grant Cro. Jac. 103. Pyster and Hembling In Trespass the Defendant justifies he confesseth the Close to be Copy-hold Land but pleads That long time before it was parcel of the Manor of c. and that long before the supposed Trespass one Pole and M. his Wife was Lord of the Manor in right of his Wife for Life remainder to Stephen in Tayl and he made a Lease of this Land to the Defendant it s an ill Plea because the Defendant hath not shewed as he ought how Pole and his Wife came to this Estate for Life the remainder over they ought to shew how this particular Estate hath its commencement they claiming a derivative Estate from Pole and his Wife for years 3 Bulstr 281. Sandford and Stephens None may entitle himself to any Copy-hold but he ought to shew a Grant thereof In Trespass the Plaintiff in his Rejoynder intitles himself because the place where is customary Land parcel of such a Manor whereof J. S. is seized in Fee and demisable by Copy at Will in Fee and that J. N. was seized in Fee by Copy c. and dyed seized so as it descended to two Daughters as Heirs of J. N. and that at such a Court Dominus concessit eis extra manus suas c. Habend tenend Tenementa praedicta to the said Daughters and their Heirs whereby they were seized in Fee and afterwards demised to the Plaintiff for years The Plaintiff hath not made a good Title and he shewing such an one was seized in Fee without shewing the Grant thereof Per Cur. it s not good Cro. Car. 190. Shepherd's Case yet it was but default of form and Issue for the Plaintiff being found it is a Jeofail Pleading Custom or Prescription A Copy-holder in Pleading need not alledge a Custom to make a Surrender for that is the Custom of all England A Copy-holder need not alledge a Custom to make a Lease for a year It must be pleaded that he used to do it It is not sufficient to alledge a Custom that one might do such an Act but that he used to do it as to alledge dimissibile and dimissum therefore in Brown and Foster's Case the Defendant avows in Replevin for Damage feasant the Plaintiff makes Title as Copy-holder and shews that within the Manor of A. time whereof c. Talis habebatur habetur consuetudo c. That any Copy-holder may surrender into the Hands of two Customary Tenants c. this is not well pleaded for it is pleaded by Usage and Custom but he doth not plead that ever it was put in ure in that manner which ought to be alledged as in Sir William Hatton's Case where it was pleaded Quod Talis habebatur consuetudo within a Manor Quod licebit Seneschallâ— to impose a Fine c. But in the principal Case the not naming the Steward made the Avowry ill and then Per Cur. the Avowry being ill although the bar to the Avowry were ill Not naming the Steward in the Avowry ill yet he cannot have return Cro. p. 37. El. 392. Brown and Foster Copy-holder pleads Quod infra Manerium praed talis habetur nec non a toto tempore cujus contrarij memoria hominum non existit habebatur consuetudo videl quod quilibet tenens custumar ' praedict tenementa c. hath used to have Common in such a place parcel of the Manor Question was if the
a descent of Inheritance at Common Law there the Defendant may plead a Feoffment made by the Ancestor absque hoc that he died seized because he may have an Estate by disseisin after the Feoffment Traverse of the descent and not of the dying seized is not good March p. 21. Anonymus Copy-hold Land was granted by the Lord of a Manor 10 May 3 Car. to the Wife of Tho. Kett and in the Replication the Defendant justifies as Bayliff to Tho. Kett the Plaintiff confesseth the Land is Copy-hold Land but that the Lord granted it 1 Jac. to N. S. in Fee who had two Daughters the Wife of the Plaintiff and the Wife of Tho. Kett and died seized and that the Lands descended to them upon which it was demurred By Berkley the Grant of the whole ought to be traversed Coparceners or confessed and avoided for the first Grant shews that the Defendant was in of all and the descent to the Wife is but for a moity Dyer 171. pl. 8. Per Cur. upon the whole matter disclosed Quaere if a Coparcener cannot distrain upon the Land of another Matter of Form damage fesant and the matter of form in the pleading ought not to be regarded by the Judges upon Statute 23 El. Cap. 5. Judgment was pro Quer. Hutton said The descent which was pleaded makes the second Grant void but by Richardson Though it be avoided yet it is not confessed Hetly p. 114. Port and Yates In Replevin the Defendant avows for damage fesant by reason of a Copy granted to him of the place where c. by the Lord of the Manor Cooper Bishop of Winchester The Plaintiff saith That before Cooper Horn was Bishop by whose death the Temporalties came into the Queens Hands and this Copy-hold during the time that the Temporalties were in the Queens Hands Escheated and the Queen granted it to the Plaintiff in Fee by force whereof he put in his Beasts If there is not confessing and avoiding there must be a Traverse and traverseth the Grant by Cooper Per. Cur. this Traverse is good and ought to be for there is not any confessing and avoiding because he doth not confess the Seisin and grant by Copy but if he had confessed That the Bishop had entred and granted it by Copy Where needs no Travers then there needed not any Traverse So where one justifies by Lease from J. S. the Plaintiff saith That J. S. enfeoffed himself it is not good without a Traverse Cro. El. p. 754. Covert's Case In Ejectment Ancient Demesn pleaded Replication That they are Copy-hold and Traverse The Defendant pleaded that the Lands were ancient Demesn and pleadable by a Writ of Right Close c. The Plaintiff shews That they were Copy-hold Lands and parcel of the Manor and entitles himself by Lease under the Copy-holder and traverseth That they were impleadable by a Writ of Right Close the Traverse is well enough taken Cro. Jac. 559. Pimmock and Helder The Avowant hath Election to Traverse any part of the Plea which goes to the end of the Action or justifies the Action Traverse the consequence In Ejectment the Defendant pleaded That the Lands were ancient Demesn and pleadable by a Writ of Right Close c. the Plaintiff shews they were Copy-hold Lands parcel of the Manor and intitles himself by Lease under the Copy-holder and traverseth that they are impleadable by a Writ of Right Close Demurrer because this Traverse that they were impleadable is but the consequence of ancient Demesn and therefore not traversable but Per Curiam that the Traverse is well enough taken Where a particular Custom is confessed in the Rejoynder he ought to Traverse the general Custom If the Plaintiff in his Rejoynder confesseth a particular Custom he ought to Traverse the general Custom alledged by the Defendant as in Replication the Defendant alledgeth a general Custom Quod quaelibet femina cooperta viro joyning with her Husband in a Surrender of Copy-hold Lands and being privately examined by the Steward that this by the Custom is a good Surrender the Plaintiff replies That there is a Custom in the Manor quod quaelibet c. who is of full Age may Surrender but the Wife who surrendred here was of full Age and doth not traverse the other Custom And Per Curiam it was ill Lit. Rep. 174. Anonymus Presidents and Forms of Pleading as to Copy-hold Estates The Form of Pleading that a Messuage is parcel of a Manor dimissibil dimiss per Copiam 1 Sanders 146. Wade and Batch That the Lands are Copy-hold Lands c. 2 Sanders 321. Pleading of a Surrender made in the Court of the Lord of the Manor to the Use of J. W. in Fee and of the Grant of the Lord to the said J. W. accordingly 1 Sanders 146. Pleading of the Surrender of a Remainder of a Copy-hold Estate to one for Life to another for Life to another in Fee and admission of them accordingly 1 Sanders 147. Pleading the Admittance of two Tenants in the Remainder for Life the Remainder in Fee 1 Sanders 147. Wade and Batch The Form of Pleading Copy-hold in Fee-simple in Tail for term of Life or Years In Fee-simple Hern p. 80. Co. Entr. 10. 647. Estate 3 Br. 463. Hern 227.607 In feod simplici Tail Life or Years Ra. Ent. 627. Co. Ent. 206. U. B. 128 157. Co. Ent. 657 123. Hern 679. Ad terminum vite vel vitarum Hern 653. Ad terminum 2 vitarum successive Hern 72. Ad terminum 1 2 vel 3 vitarum successive Hern 83 123. Simile in possessione Hern 711. Ad terminum vite vel vitarum tam in possessione quam in Reversione Co. Ent. 373 672. Ad terminum 1 vel 2 vitarum in possessione 1 vite in Reversione Hern 724. Ad Terminum 1 vite in possessione 1 vel 2 vitarum in Reversione Hern 254. Ad terminum 1 2 vel 3 vitarum in possessione vel 2 vitarum in reversione unius vite in possessione Coke Ent. p. 184 3 Br. 745. Pleading Surrender Surrender in Cur ad usum in feod Ra. Entr. 627. Co. Entr. 206. 3 Br. 465. Extra Curiam in manus 2 Tenentur ad usum in feod Co. Entr. 575 645. Usi Extra Curiam ad usum W. pur vie Remainder al Baron Feme Heires de Feme Co. Entr. 207. In manus Dom Co. Entr. 575. Per Tenant pur vie de moiety al use des Fitz Hern 255. Per 2 Tenants pur vie al intent de regrant Hern 656. Per Feme Covert secretur examinatur Co. Entr. 576. 3 Br. 465. Per Attorn secundum consuetudinem Manerij Co. Entr. 657. Per literam Attoruatur Co. Entr. 576. Presentment per l' homage de surrender extra Curiam Co. Entr. 206. Simile per tenentur jacen in extremis Co. Ent. 206. Admissio secundum sursum redditionem Co. Entr. 207 575 bis 577 645 657. Admissio heredis super
Cap. Senesc del Manor al Court tenus 28 March grants al Plaintiff in Fee secundum consuetudinem le lieu in Question parcel del Manor Custom del Manor fuit pro chesun Tenant aver common en le lieu in Question per que le Plaintiff mit sa vache pur user sa common jesque c. Repl. per confession vel grant des custumarie Terres al Plaintiff mes ouster il replie que D. Cap. 7 May 8 Jac. demised al H. H. le dit Manor pur vies del A. sa feme H. son fitz J. sa file que un auter Close de Pasture nosme L. estreant custumarij terres 28 March 18 Jac. fuer grant per H. al Green in Fee Green 10 June fist Waste per succision de Timber Ash in le man 21 April 15 Jac. le Plaintiff ove auters del Homage fuit jure d'enquirer des choses enquirables deins le Manor le Plaintiff refuse a presenter le Waste pur que il forfeitur son Copy-hold le Seignior 12 July 15 Jac. enter le Def. come Bayliff a luy distreine pur damage fesant Rej. Quod protestand que Senescal ne done luy un charge de presenter le Waste que il nemy refuse a presenter ceo pro placito dic qd D. Cap. demise al H. prout devant que il grant al Green en Fee monstre Custome del Manor que chesun Ten poet crop lop arbores crescents sur leur customary Terres except Fruit Trees traverse le succision del Ash in le man la. Demur genÌ„al al Rejoynder Winch Entr. 931. al 934. Adjudged pro Quer sur gross default in Pleading the Forfeiture is alledged to be in May and the Court was holden in April before which was impossible Vide mesme Case Winch Rep. p. 63. Webb and Barlow Vide Winch Ent. 125. al 129. Custom that every Tenant had used to take Woods and Underwoods 2 Brown 350 251. 1 Brown 273 274. De Aquae cursu Prescriptur per seperales Dominos Manerii de aqua pro tenen custumariis Hern 255. De Chimin Way Pro domino Manerii habere viam c. ê‘ tenen custumariis trans diversa clausa c. Hern 72 711. 1 Brown 368. Prescription to have an Horse and Foot-way appertaining to a customary Messuage and Close over the Close newly assigned and the Lord of the Manor grants to Tenant for Life by Copy Defendant justifies as Servant to Tenant for Life for to use the way Replication de son Tort Demesn with a Traverse of the Prescription Rejoinder by maintainance of the Prescription and Issue upon this Winch 1093. Lock and Troublefield Bar in Trespass That every Copy-holder had an Horse and a Foot-way c. 2 Brown 248 249. De Inclosures Facere sepes fensuras clausi versus venellam ne averia tenen custumar ibidem evadant pasturam Hern p. 708. De Forisfacturis TrnsÌ„ Bar quod P. seisitus de maner grant custumar terres all Def. pur vie Repl Def. forisfecit terras per non residence per custom Rejoynd Def. fuit residens apud manerium non extra V. B. 157. TrnsÌ„ Bar per Franktenement Repl Terres sunt custumar grant al Def. in Fee Rejoynd quer forisfecit terras per succissonem arborum Sur maintenance de Replic Demur inde Co. Ent. 277 280. Similis Bar Replic Rej. quod quer forisfecit terras per decasum horrei Surrej Dominus expulsit quer dimisit aliis Horreum cecidit Quer reintravit Et travers quod quer fecit voluntarium vastum permittend horreu cadere Co. Entr. 280. Similes Bar Repl Rej. quer forisfecit terras per sectam Curie infactam Surrej Dominus expulit quer dimisit alij Cur tentur quer reintravit Et postea Curia tentur ad quam quer fecit defaltur Demur inde Co. Entr. 289. Des terres devises pur Cond broken Heir enter 1 Rep. 21. In Replevin the Defendant makes conizance as Bayliff to Sir Robert Chichester by Damage fesant Bar to the Conisance Sir Iohn Chichester Father to the said Sir Robert seized of the Manor of D. unde locus in quo est parcel and customary Lands in Fee granted by Copy to Geo. Allen in Reversion for Life Tenant in possession dyes Geo. Allen enters and the Manor descended to Sir Robert Geo. Allen espoused the Plaintiff and dyes The Custom of the Manor was That the Wife of every customary Tenant pur vie dying in possession shall have her Widows Estate by which her Husband being dead the Plaintiff enters and was seized for Life and put in her Beasts till the Defendant took them c. Replication the Defendant confesseth the bar as far as the entry of the Husband of the Plaintiff and the descent of the Manor to Sir R. But saith the Plaintiffs Husband such a day committed Felony by stealing a Mare and was Executed for this for which the Lord entred as forfeited Demur general and Joynder Winch Ent. 968. to to 970. Allen and Branch By Winch the Woman shall not have her Widows Estate without special Custom as in Gavelkind The Father to the Bough the Son to the Plough Similes Bar RepiÌ„ Rejoynd maintenance de franktenement traverse le grant per Copie Co. Entr. 280. Similes Bar Repl. Rej. quod quer forisfecit terras per Forgery del Roll de Customes Surrej Quer alij tenentes agreaverunt ponere consuetud manerij in scriptur traverse Forgery Co. Entr. 280. Forisfacttur pleaded pur fine insolutur Surrej quod finis non fuit rationabilis Demur ind Co. Entr. 645 647. Forfeiture de terme per tenant pur ans demise pur vie Plo. 188. Simile by Fine levied Co. Entr. 691. 1 Rep. 71. Hern 25. De terme pur felo de se Plo. 254. Rast Entr. 609. De Estate de tenant pur vie per alienation in Fee Ra. Ent. 65 208 398 647. 1 Rep. 107. Vet. Intr. 30 121. Per Recovery per fraud en Formedon Ra. Ent. 643. 1 Rep. 82. Bars per franktenement Repl. quod terre sunt cust bars que sunt customary terres c. TrnsÌ„ Bar quod C. seisitus de maner grant customar terres al D. de quo descend al Def. Repl quod maner descend quer qui fuit seisitus quousque transÌ„ travers quod terres sunt customar V.B. 153. Dower Dower Bar quod terres sunt Copy-hold grant per copie issint non-tenure Repl. Tenens est Tenens ut de libero tenemento Ra Ent. 231. Repl Bar quod F. seisitus in see prist al baron Def. qui est Tenant per le Curtesie Repl terres sunt customarie travers quod F. fuit seisitus in Fee Hern 681. TrnsÌ„ Bar quod terre sunt Liberum Tenementur Def. Rej. quod terre sunt custumar fuer dimiss quer per copiam Repl. per maintenance de frank-tenement traverse grant
surrendred all the three Lives and though it was not a Copy-hold in Fee yet it was decreed That the Agreement should be performed and that the Defendant do Surrender to the Plaintiffs Use and an Injunction for quiet enjoyment A Woman Copy-holder for Life took an Husband and the Reversion of the said Copy-hold was granted to three viz. A. B. C. cum acciderit by Surrender or Forfeiture for their Lives successive according to the Custom The Husband doth Surrender to the Use of A. for Life to whom the Lord doth grant a Copy accordingly A. and B. dye and the Opinion of the Court was That C. hath no right to be admitted by the Law nor in Conscience for that after the death of the Husband the Wife may enter and have a Plaint in nature of a Cui in vita contradicere non potest and during the Husbands Life the Lord may have it in the nature of an Occupancy But the Case did proceed farther viz. That the Husband and Wife were willing to release all the Right of the Wife to the surviving Reversioner The Lord Decreed to hold a Court. and the Lord would not receive it nor hold a Court But it was decreed That the Lord should hold his Court and accept their Conveyance or else avoid the Possession thereof Dyer 246. a. Copy-hold Estate in some cases not to be passed but by Decree Where the Lord grants the Reversion of the Copy-holds the Tenant cannot Surrender there being no Dominus servitiorum as the Custom will warrant and he cannot pass his Estate any way but by a Decree in Chancery and this will bind the person only 4 Rep. p. 25. in Murrel's Case vide supra Fines and Rents arrear not relieved after Sale of the Manor Copy-hold Tenant in Fee surrenders to the Use of one for Life Remainder to B. in Fee Tenant for Life dies and B. pays no Fine for his Admittance but after dies and this descends to his Son and after his Son surrenders to the Use of J. S. in Fee and no Fine paid for it and also the Rents for divers years are behind and after the Lord grants the Manor in Fee to J. B. and after sues in a Court of Equity for the Fines and Rents due before the Sale of the Manor and alledgeth in his Bill That the Copy-holder had Free Land intermixed with the Copy-hold Land so that he could not know where to Distrain for it yet he shall not be relieved in Equity for this for it is against a Maxim in Law for as much as by his own Act he had destroyed his Remedy P. 10 Car. B. R. Serjeant Hicham Plaintiff and Finch and Block Defendants and a Prohibition was granted to the Court of Requests where the Suit was Gold versus Dore Martis 23. Oct. 2 Jac. The Plaintiff delivered to the Defendant an 100 l. to buy a Copy-hold in the Defendants Name but to the Plaintiffs Use because there were differences between the Lord of the Manor and the Plaintiff so as the Plaintiff had no hopes to prevail for himself and when the Copy-hold should be obtained then the Trust was That the Defendant should Surrender the same to the Use of the Plaintiff The Defendant accordingly bought the Copy-hold Trustee refusing to surrender according to his Trust not relieved and took it in his own name and his Childrens but afterwards would not surrender it to the Use of the Plaintiff notwithstanding the same was bought with the Plaintiffs mony for this the Plaintiff Exhibited his Bill in Chancery and this appearing to be the true state of the Case my Lord would not relieve the Plaintiff because he said he would never ground a Decree upon a Lye a Falsity it appearing to him that this packing was used to thrust a Tenant upon the Lord whom he liked not and so dismist the Cause Tracy versus Noel M. 2 Jac. Copy-holder in Fee takes a Lease the Manor is sold Copy-holder not relieved though the Purchaser had notice A Copy-holder of Inheritance took a Lease for years of his Copy-hold from the Lord of the Manor the Lord sold his Manor to J. S. who had notice of this Copy-hold of Inheritance yet would not this Court relieve the Copy-holder his Lease being ended for by Law his Copy-hold Estate is determined Robes Purchased the Inheritance of a Copy-hold in the Name of B. and another in Trust B. surrendred his moiety to the Use of his own Son and the other died seized The Son of B. and the Heir of the other for mony sold the Copy-hold to C. for 50 l. being of the value of 80 l. Robes sued the Son of B. and the Heir of the other and C. in Chancery for the 80 l. It was decreed That A. should recover this 50 l. only from B. and the Heir of the other No Recompence for the over-value of an Estate because no Fraud and C. should be discharged of it and hold it in peace But if notice had been proved in C. Robes shall have the Land and no recompence for the over-value was given against the Vendors because no Fraud Moor Rep. n. 745. Kobes Bent and Cock's Case Copy-hold devised without Surrender executed by Decree in Chancery A Copy-hold devised without Surrender it cannot be executed in point of Interest but only by Decree in Chancery by a Concessum in 2 Keb. 837. Harrison's Case A Copy-hold granted out of a Manor confirmed Court Rolls produced A Copy-hold granted at a Court kept out of the Manor confirmed against the Lord who made it Tothil 107. Mark contra Suliard In Corbet and Peshal's Case 12 Jac. it was Ordered That Court Rolls should be brought and shewed to Councel to shew which is Copy-hold and which is Free-hold Composition Decreed Sterling's Case a Composition formerly made between Lords and Tenants Decreed to bind a Purchasor or an Heir 9 Car. Bill in Chancery to reverse a Faux Judgment in the Lords Court If an erroneous Judgment be given in a Copy-hold Court of a common Lord in a Formedon a Bill may be exhibited in Chancery in nature of a Faux Judgment to reverse it Pateshull's Case in Scaccario 1 Rolls Abridgment 373. Admission by Letter of Attorny Copy-holder ought not to be admitted to a Copy-hold Estate by Letter of Attorny for he ought to do Fealty at the time of his Admittance which must be done in person 21 Car. 2. Flyer and Hedgingham Fines certain or not having been tryed at Law no farther Relief here Smith contra Sallet 24 Car. 2. Fines of Copy-holders whether certain or arbitrary it having been tryed at Law and in two Tryals Verdict for Fines certain This Court would not relieve the Plaintiff other than for the preservation of Witnesses and so dismist the Plaintiffs Bill it being to have an Issue directed to try whether certain or not Morgan versus Scudamore 29 Car. 2. The Lord limitted to a
c. as by the particular appraisment sent to the said Commissioners it may appear the value whereof in the total amounts to the sum of c. Now this Indenture witnesseth That the said Commissioners parties to these presents by force and vertue of the said Commission and of the several Acts of Parliament therein mentioned and evpressed for and with the consent and at the request of the Creditors of the said E. F. that have sued forth and prosecuted the said Commission against the said E. F. for and in consideration of the sum of c. unto the said Commissioners by the said C. D. c. to the use benefit and behoof as well of themselves as also of all other the Creditors of the said E. F. that have sued forth and joyned and that shall hereafter in due time joyn in the prosecution of the said Commission according to the Statutes in that behalf made and provided well and truly contented and paid have by force and virtue of the said Commission as much as in them the said Commissioners lyeth and they lawfully may granted bargained and sold and by these presents do as much as in them lyeth and they lawfully may grant bargain and sell unto the said C. D. c. all the aforesaid Copy-hold or customary Messuage c. now in the occupation of c. holden by Copy of Court Roll of the aforesaid Manor of W. together with all Woods Under-woods Commons Pastures c. and Appurtenances whatsoever unto all and every the said Copy-hold or other customary Premisses thereby granted and every part and parcel thereof belonging or in any wise appertaining and all the Estate Right Title Interest Use Possession Reversion and Reversions Remainder and Remainders Claim and Demand whatsoever of the said E. F. of in and to all and singular the Premisses hereby granted and every part and parcel thereof To have and to hold all the said Copy-hold or customary Messuage or Tenement c. with their and every of their Appurtenances to their proper use and behoof for ever according to the Custom of the said Manor of L. Yeilding paying performing and doing unto the said Lord of the aforesaid Manor of whom the Copy-hold or customary Premisses hereby granted are holden all and every the Fines Rents Duties and Services of right used and accustomed to be yeilded paid performed and done for the same c. In Witness c. A Surrender in Trust and the Trust declared Trustees Covenant not to commit c. any thing that may amount to a Forfeiture Whereas the said A. B. hath with his own proper Monies bought and purchased of C. D. of c. Lord of the Manor of Belton in the County of c. amongst other Lands and Tenements in certain Articles indented and made between the said C. D. of the one part and the said A. B. of the other part and bearing date the c. the customary Messuage Lands Tenements and Hereditaments hereafter mentioned that is to say c.. And whereas also the said E. F. G. H. and I. K. customary Tenants of the said Manor of and in the customary Messuage Lands and Premisses did by Surrender bearing date c. according to the Custom of the said Manor surrender into the Hands of the said C. D. Lord of the Manor aforesaid all and singular the customary Messuage Lands Tenements and Hereditaments before mentioned to the use and behoof of them the said I. S. and P. S. their Heirs and Assigns to the intent and purpose that the said C. D. or other the Lord or Lords of the said Manor of c. or the Steward or Stewards of the said Manor for the time being at the next Court to be holden for the said Manor should admit or cause to be admitted them the said I. S. and P. S. Tenants of and to all and singular the said c. as by the said Surrender relation being thereto had may more at large appear Now this Indenture farther Witnesseth That the said I. S. and P. S. for the avoiding and clearing all doubts questions and ambiguities which may hereafter arise or grow touching or concerning the said Surrender taken in their Names as aforesaid do and either of them doth by these presents voluntarily and spontaneously acknowledge express and declare That the said Surrender so had and taken as aforesaid was had taken passed and done by the special direction and appointment of the said A. B. in trust to and for the only use benefit and behoof of him the said A. B. his Heirs and Assigns for ever and to and for none other use intent or purpose whatsoever And farther the said J. S. and P. S. do for themselves their Heirs and Assigns freely and absolutely disclaim any other Estate Right Title Interest Claim or Demand of in to or out of the said customary Messuage Lands and Tenements and Premisses or any part thereof but such only as they have by virtue of the Surrender aforesaid in and upon the Trust aforesaid And the said I. S. and P. S. for themselves their Heirs Executors and Assigns do covenant and grant to and with the said A. B. his Heirs Executors and Assigns that they the said I.S. and P. S. their Heirs or Assigns shall not and will not at any time or times hereafter act do permit or willingly or wittingly suffer any act matter or thing whatsoever that may amount to or cause a Forfeiture of the said Premisses or any part thereof or whereby the said Premisses or any part thereof may be destroyed extinguished impeached or incumbred In Witness c. An Infranchisement of Copy-hold Lands made by a Lord of a Manor to his Copy-holder This Indenture made c. Between A. B. of c. Esquire and E. B. of c. Gentleman Son and Heir apparent of the said A. B. Lord of the Manor of H. in the County of Norfolk of the one part and T. P. of c. R. S. of c. and T. P. of c. of the other part Witnesseth That the said A. B. and E. B. as well for and in consideration of the sum of c. of lawful mony to them the said A. B. and E. B. or one of them in hand paid by the said T. P. R. S. and T. P. at and before the ensealing and delivery of these presents the receipt whereof they the said A. B. and E. B. do by these presents acknowledge and thereof and of every part and parcel thereof do acquit exonerate and discharge the said T. P. R. S. and T. P. and every of them their and every of their Heirs Executors and Administrators for ever by these presents as also for divers other good Causes and Considerations them and either of them hereunto especially moving Have granted bargained sold enfeoffed delivered aliened and confirmed and by these presents do grant bargain sell enfeoff deliver alien and confirm unto the said T. P. R. S. and T. P. their Heirs
to two by Moieties 371 Admittance of a next Heir 372 A surrender by one in extremis by the Hands of two customary Tenants to the Use of his last Will which is recited to one for Life the Remainder over Tenant for Life surrenders to him in Remainder on condition in the Will 373 Licence to demise for Years not exceeding 31 375 Presentment that the customary Tenant died seised and that the Heir came not to take up the Land and Proclamation made ibid. Presentment that the mony mentioned in a Surrender was not paid at the time ideo proclamatio prima ibid. A Fine respiteed at last Court taxed at the next 376 Presentment That a Surrender precedent was chargable with the payment of 100 l. to M. when he should attain the Age of 21 years or day of Marriage which should first happen and with a like Sum to A. payable in the same manner M. upon receit of the 100 l. releaseth and the Surrendree secures the payment of the other 100 l. to A. by Lease 376 Presentment That several Copy-hold Lands were infranchised by the Lord 377 Surrender on condition 378 Surrender to the use of a youngest Son conditional for payment of mony at several days 379 A Surrender and Release in consideration of 400 l. 380 Surrender to the Use of ones last Will to which a Codicil is annexed and which is presented by the Jury and admittance to Tenant for Life 381 Second Proclamation for not coming in and taking up the said Estate 382 Acknowledgment by the Lord that the Copy-hold is infranchised 383 Admittance by the Gardian ibid. The third Proclamation because the Tenant came not in to take up the Estate and seisure by the Bayliff ibid. Licence to Demise and Fine pro Licentia 384 From Page 256 to 273. you are desired to amend the Folio's BOOKS lately Printed for and sold by John Walthoe at his Shop in Vine Court Middle Temple adjoyning to the Cloysters TRyals Per Pais Or The Laws of England concerning Juries by Nisi Prius c. Newly Revised and much Inlarged with an Addition of Precedents and Forms of Challenges Demurrers upon Evidence Bills of Exception Pleas Puis le Darrein Continuance c. The third Edition corrected and amended To which is now added A farther Treatise of Evidence Together with a new and exact Table to the whole matter Very useful and necessary for all Lawyers Attornies and other Practisers especially at the Assise By G. D. of the Inner-Temple Esq The Modern Conveyancer Or Conveyancing Improved being a choice Collection of PRESIDENTS on most Occasions Drawn after the manner of Conveyancing now in Use By the greatest Hands of the present Age of which some are still living Consisting of Settlements of Estates upon Marriages Mortgages Assignments c. With an Introduction concerning Conveyancing in General in large 8 vo The Practick part of the Law shewing the Office of an Attorny and a Guide for Solicitors in all the Courts of Westminster Viz. The Courts of Chancery Kings-Bench Common-Pleas and Exchequer with the manner of their Proceedings in any Action Real Personal and Mixt from the Original to the Execution As also the Practice of the Courts in the City of London Court of Admiralty Ecclesiastical Courts and other Inferior Courts in the Country An exact Abridgment of all the Statutes of King William and Queen Mary now in force and use By John Washington Esq A Compendious and Accurate Treatise of Fines upon Writs of Covenant and Recoveries upon Writs of Entry in the Post With ample and copious Instructions how to draw acknowledge and levy the same in all Cases Being a Work performed with great exactness and full of variety of Clerkship The third Edition Wherein the former are reviewed corrected and inlarged VVith an Addition of several Precedents and many Observations Rules and Cases concerning the Effect and Operation of Fines and Recoveries A Catalogue of the Common and Statute Law-Books of this Realm with some others relating thereunto Alphabettically digested under proper Heads VVith an Account of the best Editions Volumes and common Prices they are now sold at The third Edition with Additions The Law of Obligations and Conditions Or an accurate Treatise wherein is contained the whole Learning of the Law concerning Bills Bonds Conditions Statutes Recognizances and Defazances as also Declarations on special Conditions and the Pleadings thereon Issues Judgments and Executions with many other useful matters relating thereunto Digested under their proper Titles To which is added a Table of Declarations and Pleadings upon Bonds now Extant 8vo Observations Historical and Genealogical wherein the Originals of the Emperor Kings Electors and other Sovereign Princes of Europe with a Series of their Births Matches more Remarkable Actions and Deaths as also the Augmentations Decreasings and Pretensions of each Family are drawn down to the Year 1690. in 8vo Blunts Law Dictionary interpreting such difficult and obscure VVords and Terms as are found either in our Common or Statute Ancient or Modern Laws with References to the several Statutes Records Registers Law-Books Charters ancient Deeds and Manuscripts wherein the words are used and Etymologies where they properly occur The second Edition with the Addition of above 600 words Fol. 10 s. The Life of the Famous Cardinal Duke de Richlieu Principal Minister of State to Lewis the XIII King of France and Navar in 2 Vol. 8vo Price 10 s. A New Voyage to Italy with a Description of the chief Towns Churches Tombs Libraries Palaces Statutes and Antiquities of that Country Together with useful Instructions for those who shall Travel thither By Maximilian Misson Gent. Done into English and Adorned with Figures in 2 Vol. 8vo 10 s. The Life of the Famous John Baptist Colbert late Minister and Secretary of State to Lewis the XIV the present French King Done into English in 8vo 3 s. All the Statutes now in force and use concerning Bankrupts are here methodically digested Together with the Judges Resolutions thereupon To which are annexed the late Acts against Fraudulent Devises and Clandestine Mortgages in 12 ves Price 1 s. 6 d. Reports of Cases taken and adjudged in the Court of Chancery from the first year of the Reign of King Charles I. to the beginning of the Reign of his present Majesty King William the III. in 2 Vol. 8vo Price 10 s. FINIS