would abound more and more For yee know what commandements wee gaue you by the Lord Iesus For this is the will of God euen your sanctification that yee should abstaine from fornication The exhortation is very forcible and full of waight Hee presseth it by the authority of the Lord Iesus he mindeth them of it as one of those lessons he had deliuered formerly by word of mouth and they had receiued hee calls it a duty How yee ought to walke yea a duty to God How yee ought to walke and please God hee calls it a speciall commandement which hee gaue them by the Lord Iesus as which the Lord Iesus gaue him in charge to deliuer to them hee calls it the will of God he calls it their sanctification Now what is all this which the Apostle here aymeth at What but this That yee abstaine from fornication Whence I argue thus Proposition Abstinence from fornication is a part of keeping of the Morall Law Assumption But this abstinence from fornication is a duty acceptable to God is a doctrine to be taught by the Ministers of Christ to be receaued by the people of God is a commandement of the Lord Iesus it is the will of God it is our sanctification or a fruite and effect of it Conclusion Therefore the keeping of the Morall Law is commanded of God of Christ as a duty to all true beleeuers To what part of this Argument will the aduersary answere To the Proposition That hee dare not for the Law sayth Thou shalt not commit adultery To the Assumption That he cannot for that is the Apostles in the fore alledged place Therefore I will conclude with this conclusion That the keeping of the Morall law is commanded of God and of Christ as a duty to all true beleeuers When I vrged this argument or the * as rhis What soeuer is Gods will we should doe is our duty to doe But the doing of Gods Law is Gods will wee Should doe therefore it is our duety to doe Gods law so farre as we are able Now all this is plainely concluded by the Apostle This is the will of God euen your sanctification that ye should abstaine from fornication To abstaine froÌ„ fornication is a part of keeping the Moral Law and what is true of a part is true of the whole as Iam. 2.10 11. like in forme syelogisticall out of this very place of the Apostle to this our aduersarie occasionally face to face and had to satisfie his demande repeated it ouer twice or thrice hee could not giue a present answere but desired to haue it written downe But I expect not an answere because none can be giuen to this which is here written No can he not in all his budget finde an answere doth hee not as I heare hee was wont to doe at least carry his trunk-hose full farsed stuffed with Protestant Authors as Luther Zanchee Paraeus with sundry others of good note that with their graue authority and reuerend names he may the more easily impose vpon his credulous and ignorant Disciples who admire that most which they vnderstand least cannot he out of all these beate out an answere to these things For of these he braggs much in the conclusion of his letter But till hee can bring some I will content my selfe to bring his belweather Author euen Luther whose no lesse puissant then elegant and heauenly speech wherewith I will for this time conclude this short discourse shall run full butt vppon and push downe all that he hath sayd for his pretended counterfet false hereticall scandalous Anabaptisticall libertine fayth Luthers words are Admittimus quidem Mosen legendum audiendum a nobis vt predictorem testem Christi Deinde vt petamus ab eo exempla optimarum logum morum Cetaerùm dominium in conscientiam nullo modo concedimus ei ibi mortuus et sepultus esto nemoque sciat vbi sepulchrum eius sit we indeede admit of Moses to bee read heard of vs as a Prophet witnesse of Christ Againe that wee may fetch from him examples of good lawes and manners But dominion ouer the conscience to a man in the state of grace as Rom. 6.10 wee by no meanes yealde him there let him bee dead and buried and let no man know where his sepulchre is So Luther And in his argument vpon the Galatians Sum quidem peccator c. I am indeed a sinner according to this present life and the righteousnesse of it as the son of Adam where the Law accuseth me death raigneth and will deuoure mee but aboue this life I haue another righteousnesse another life which is the Sonne of God who knoweth not sin and death but is righteousnesse and life eternall for which also this dead body of mine shall be raysed vp againe and freed from the bondage of the Law and of sin and together with the spirit it shall bee sanctified So both these remaine while we liue here the flesh is accused exercised made sad and contrite with the actiue righteousnesse of the Law but the spirit raigneth reioyceth and is saued by passiue righteousnesse because it knoweth it hath the Lord sitting in heauen at the fathers right hand who hath abolished the Law Sin Death and hath tâ—ampled vnder feete all euill things hath led them captiue and tryumphed ouer them all So he Now God forbid that I should glory but in the crosse of our Lord Iesus Christ by whom the world is crucified vnto me Gal. 6.14 and I vnto the world For in Christ neyther Circumcision auayleth any thing nor vncircumcision but a new creature 15 And as many as walke according to this rule peace bee on them and mercy and vpon the Israel of God I thought here should haue bin an end But as the Prouerbe is 16 One absurdity begets a thousand as one of Lerna his 7 heads being cut off 3 grew in the place thereof Parua mâ—tu primo mox sese attollit in auras Ingred túrque solo et caput inter nubila condit Monstrum horrendum ingens c. Virgil. Aenead Such is the nature of heresie which of a small seede growes to be an hiddeous monster if it bee not strangled in the first conception Like Fame which for feare at first is small but finding entertainment with Dame Credulity and loquacity growes bold and big vpon it Or like a small leprous spot in the beginnig which quickly runneth ouer the whole body Or like a drop of sweet poyson which at first goes pleasantly downe but in a short time insinuateth it selfe to the infecting of the vitall spirits and ceasseth not till it hath wrought its mortall effect Or like a Gangreene or like a Canker as the Apostle compares it This Antinomian leprosie doth spread and get strength and boldnesse euery day euen vnto impudency madnes And the reason it finds so many disciples to imbrace it because cutting off sanctification denying
generally taught by the most sound learned and orthodox Diuines in England and so I may safely say in all the world then hee may well suspect a Pad in the straw and a serpent to lurke vnder the greene leaues and some thing more in it then at the first appeareth For touching the first position What one Protestant Diuine doth not hold and teach that sin is most detestable to God which his pure eyes cannot behold and that it makes a man odious in Gods sight Witnes the bitter and cursed death of the son of God himselfe which hee suffered for sin otherwise wee had all remained vnder the curse left to eternall perdition the iust punishment and reward of sin if it had not bin remoued by Christ So as herein the author hath no colour of accusation against his hoggs and doggs his aduersaries but this first Position serueth onely as an vsher to lead in the rest or as a harbinger to take vp the best rome in mens conceit for the rest of the traine by prepossessing the readers minde with an expectation of sutable doctrine in that which followeth Num 23.8 Wherein we shall finde that he playes but the cheater who showing one peece of good gold out of his purse would perswade his gull that his purse is full of such when all the rest is but counters or counterfet gold double guilt For the second position what Protestant Minister of the Church of England of what ranke soeuer bee he reckoned among his hoggs or among his doggs that holdeth not and teacheth not that the onely remedy to remooue mans misery by sin is Iesus Christ his death and passion his obedience actiue and passiue his whole righteousnesse freely imputed of God to euery true beleeuer What Protestant Diuine or other but holds iustification to be by fayth freely without workes And that those whom God iustifyeth hee so acquiteth them in abolishing their sin that hee remembreth it no more but casts it behinde his backe seeth it not any more in asmuch as he doth graciously for his sonnes sake not impute it to them So as what needes all that heaping vp of places of scripture as if none but the Author tooke notice of them or as if his doctrine were so vnknowne or doubted of as it needed such a cloud of proofes Yet some particulars in this position would bee a little talked with all As 1. where hee sayth That all sins in the beleeuers are vtterly abolished out of Gods sight by being not imputed This is most true Yet it puts mee in minde of that which I heard long agoe scattered abroad by this very Author that God seeth no sin in his children Which Aphorisme taken vp of the vulgar may breede in them that beleeue not presumptuous thoughts and resolutions voyd of the conscience of sin Therefore this poynt would be a little opened True it is God seeth no sin in his beleeuing children for which hee inflicteth the curse or any satisfactory penalty vpon them Thus when Balack would haue had Balaam to curse Gods people hee answered How shall I curse where God hath not cursed And v. 19. God is not as man that hee should lye or repent hath he sayd and shall hee not doe it Behold I haue receiued commandement to blesse and hee hath blessed and I cannot reuerse it And hee renders the reason He hath not beheld iniquity in Iacob neyther hath he seene preuersenesse in Israell the Lord his God is with him and the shout of a King is among them Surely there is no inchantment against Iacob nor diuination against Israell For Christ hath borne Israels sin in him hath God the Iudge fully punished it his iustice is fully satisfed for all Israels debts So that all being satisfied and discharged in our surety Christs righteousnesse and satisfaction made ours now God seeth not sin in his beleeuing children as a iudge to punish them yet he may be sayd to see as a father to chastise them Or when he chastiseth his childe hee seemeth to see his sin though done away in Christ and pardoned in Gods Court to the end his childe may come to see it and so haue the euidence of pardon sealed vnto him in the Court of his owne conscience And this is that which all sound Protestant Ministers teach and beleeue A second thing I note in his second position is if not an absurdity yet an obscure speech his words are All my sins both of my person and workes are truely abolished not out of me that there may be place for fayth Why Are sins abolished actually by imputation before fayth bee wrought that the abolishing of sin makes way to fayth True it is Christ hath taken away our sins and by death abolished death before we haue fayth to apply it for our fayth is from the merite and vertue of his death Otherwise I know not what sense to make of his words vnlesse hee meane that fayth alone takes place in the beleeuer working and doing all infallibly and freely as else where he expresseth himselfe without the Law of the ten Commandements 3 I note a falshood in it for he sayth All my workes are of vniust made iust before God What these works are I finde in other of his scatered pamphlets to wit all naturall ciuil religious sanctified actions which being in themselues as he sayth foule and filthy are made perfectly holy and righteous by free iustification Now this is a thing both imposible and were also vniust for God to doe it It is impossible for God to make a worke that is vniust to bee iust Indeed Antichrist arrogateth this omnipotent or rather impotent power as deriued from God to make ex iniustitia iustitiam righteousnesse of vnrighteousnesse but Gods omnipotency stretcheth not to make an vniust worke to be iust For then he might seeme to be both improuident and vniust in appointing his sonne to take away sin by the sacrifice of himselfe in case God could haue made of sin no sin by his meere omnipotency Indeede God can make a thing to cease to bee or hee can make a thing to bee which had not a being as hee did all the world but hee cannot so abolish a thing as to cause the former being of it not to haue bene a being after it hath once actually bene So of a wicked worke God is so powerfull so good so iust as that hee cannot make the wickednesse to bee good for that implies a contradiction but hee can and doth so abolish the wickednesse of our workes by Christ by not imputing of them as if it had neuer bin But to say our workes are of vniust made iust this as it is a phrase not vsed in scripture so in the Antinomians sense it tends to the bringing in of a heauenly state of perfection in this life For he would inferre herevpon that a man once in Christ iustified is altogether without sin in Gods sight abusing that place of Iohn 1 Ioh.
in the Morality oâ— it who can deny the keeping of the Sabbath to be Morall but he must withall procliame open enmity to Gods worship and mans saluation Ob. But the Sabbath day of the Iewes being wholy ceassed as being buried in Christs graue wherein hee rested all that day and so fully kept it of what force is it with christians any longer or what morality remaines of it to bee obserued by vs Answ As the Iewes Sabbath day was a precise seauenth day which no doubt was by successiue reuolution obserued by Adams generations from the seauenth day of the Creation sanctified by Gods owne rest for we reade of it in Exo. 16. which was before the giuing of the Law in Sinai but with all had an addition of a new relation to the typicall Redemption from Egypt as we noted before in which regard it was ceremoniall So as ceremoniall it was subiect to be abrogated and changed from a Legall into an Euangelicall Sabbath which the Scripture calleth the Lords day Although some are bold to deny that the Sabbath was at all obserued by the Old Church vntill Moses time and so till the Law was giuen in Sinai But this seemes to bee a groundlesse opinion if not also Godlesse For though the Scripture makes no mention of the keeping of the Sabbath vntil Exod. 16.5 c. yet both that mention goes before the solemne bidding of it in Mount Sinai and doth also sufficiently inferre that the Sabbath was in vse before that time as being fiist instituted in Paradise For elfs as a learned Diuine of our Church hath noted vpon this very occasion It is absurd for any man to prepare a thing 2000 yeares before the vse thereof And Exod 20.11 the very reason and ground of mans obseruation of the Sabbath is there giuen to bee Gods owne institution of it which was his actuall sanctifying and blessing of it by his owne resting on that day from the workes of Creation Though otherwise the fourth Commandement being a part of the Law written in Adams heart needed not any expresse Commandement more then the rest did sauing that this hath a Memento set vpon it as being most subiect to neglect and prophanation and that the Lord himselfe was pleased to assigne his owne seuenth day for rest and sanctification to those former ages But to proceed Here it may be demanded what is that morality of the fourth Commandement which yet is in force with christians For answere None will question but the Antinomian who altogether denyeth the whole Morall Law to be in force so much as a rule to beleeuers vnder the Gospell the morality of the Sabbath to bee yet of force and vse with Christians Onely some differ both about the manner of it how it is imposed and how exacted of christians and about the matter of it For first they denie that the fourth Commandement hath any thing to doe with the Lords day which is the christian Sabbath Againe they deny that the fourth Commandement reacheth further then to masters of families exempting seruants from imputation of sinne in case they worke at their masters command Thirdly they deny the Lords day is by any diuine institution humane onely and therefore not of the same force with the fourth Commandement Fourthly for the matter they deny that the vacation and abstinence from seruile labour or the ordinary workes of a mans worldly calling is any part of the morality of the fourth Commandement but a meere ceremony and so abrogated Yea they goe further and say that howsoeuer the generality of that Commandement to keepe a Sabbath wherein God might bee honoured was Morall Yet the speciality of it namely to keepe First one day of seauen Secondly the seauenth Thirdly one whole day Fourthly with precise vacancy from all worke was meerely ceremoniall and so the specialities of the Commandement are vanished though for the generality of it it is a law of nature and remaineth So they Here then be sundry things which offer themselues to bee scanned And to make way First where they call the bodily rest obserued once by the Iewes a poynt of exact and extreame vacation from euery kind of worke which christians haue nothing to doe with all This is but a buggbeare or scarcrow to fright Childish christians from so much as looking backe to the fourth Commandement in the keeping of the Lords day For first an extreame vacation was not exacted of the Church of the Iewes as in case of extreamity or vrgent necessity they might worke yea for the sauing of a poore Asses life by pulling him out of the pit on the Sabbath day as our Sauiour conuinceth the carping Iewes How much more in extremities of more importance as the quenching of a scath fire or defending of their City or Country by repelling the inuading or beleaguring enemy yea in such cases not to bestirre themselues and to vse their vtmost labour and skill not onely turned into superstition but many times proued their bane and ruine Among sundry instances in this kinde Iosephus Antiq. of the Ieases lib. 12. c. 8 soli 14. 8. this is one that the Iewes on the Sabbath being assailed by their enemyes would neyther make resistance nor yet so much as close vp their caues mouth to defend themselues and so their liues became a spoyle to their enemyes cruelty So superstitiously obseruant were they of the Sabbath as if God had made it to be a snare for them whensoeuer the crafty enemy should take that oppertunity to inuade them so as in case of extreme necessity as to saue life yea a beasts life the Commandement was not strictly obligatory much more in spirituall obseruance touching Gods worship as the Priests slaying of beasts for sacrifice and the like Extreame vacation then was not exacted of the Iewes in their keeping of their Sabbath Againe we shewed before how the prohibition to the Iewes of kindling a fire and dressing of meate on the Sabbath was peculiar to that Nation or rather Church and was a type and ceremony Nor was it extreame because they liued in an hot climate wherein their was no extreame necessity of fire for one day which they were to supply by their spirituall fire of holy zeale in a due obseruation of the Sabbath Though some are of opinion that this prohibition of kindling a fire reached onely to such fires as were vsed about seruile workes and not about their necessary food But I will not blowe the coales of this controuersie in this poynt at this time hauing shewed sufficient reason already of this restraint Onely this I adde if it were a burthen layed vpon the shoulders of that Pedagogy of Moses it was to teach them and vs to put a difference betweene that hard yoake of the Ceremoniall Law Acts. 15.10 and that sweete yoake and light burthen of Christ Matthew 11.30 In the next place where they say that one whole day for the Sabbath or one seauenth day or one day of
how the day of Christs Resurrection is made solemne and sacred not onely by Christ himselfe but by the Holy Ghost sent downe from heauen sanctifying this day for holy Conuocations or publicke assemblies of Gods people for his publique seruice and this to stand as a perpetuall statute to the end of the world hauing also euident and ample testimony from the Mosaicall Law and those Euangelicall types whence we conclude with M. Perkins his argument in his Cases of conscience pag. 113. That which is prefigured is prescribed But the Lords day was prefigured Leuit. 23.10 therefore it is prescribed and instituted of God A third place wee haue Psal 118.24 where the Prophet speaking v. 22.23 of Christs Resurrection he addeth This is the day which the Lord hath made we will reioyce and be glad in it This is a plane Propheticall institution of this day to bee solemnized vnder the new Testament For first the Lord hath made it that is appointed and set it a part by marking it out with a glorious worke And secondly it is so taken of the Church of God who saith We will reioyce and be glad in it which sheweth the festiuity gratefull solemnity of the Lords day And although many take this day for the whole time under the Gospell as 2. Cor. 6.2 yet none doe exclude or deny the particular acception of it for the Lords day St. Ambrose vnderstands this to be the Lords day the day of the Lords Resurrection which day saith hee on Psal 47 Titneus hath its holines from the Lords Resurrection What shall I say of Circumcision which was limited to the eighth day loking vpon Christs Resurrection which was the eighth day Circumcision being a singe of that hollines Christ brought vnto vs in the day of his Resurrection who rose againe for our Iustification But let this suffice Thus hath the Lords day not onely reall institution by Christ himselfe but also testimony from the Law and the Prophets And thus as Hugo saith The fathers of the old Testament obserued the septenary number or the seuenth of Dayes Wekes Moneths Yeares wee of the New the octonary number or the eight day to wit the Lords day for the reuerence of the Lords resurrection and of the sending of the Holy Ghost Hugo in Psal 1â—9 Ob. But here it is obiected that the Lords day hath noe diuine institution but meerely an hamane and Ecclesiasticall For else how came it to bee instituted by Constantine the Great who made a Law and prescribed limits for the keeping of it The like also did other Emperours Princes and States Councels and Synods in seuerall ages Answ This is no good argument that because pious Princes make Lawes for the keeping of the Lords day therfore it is not of diuine institution For so good Princes make Lawes against Adultery c. Therfore the forbidding of these sinnes is it not of diuine institution King Darius makes a decree that in euery Nation of his Kingdome men tremble before the God of Daniell c. therefore is not this Law of diuine institutioÌ„ Thou shalt worsbip the Lord thy God and him onely shalt thou serue And because Tyberius Caesar would haue the Romane Senate passe a Decree for the deifying of Christ or ranking him among their Gods therefor Christ was not God whereupon sayth Tertullian Ergo nisi homini placucurit Deus non erit Deus therefore if it doe not please man God shall not be God But it became Christian Princes when they saw how subiect the Lords day was to bee profaned with all licenciousnesse and how prone carnall men were to leape ouer all the bankes and bounds which God had set to keepe them in for to helpe to make vp the breaches againe and to strengthen the diuine ordinance by their humane and penall constitutions as wee see our noble Kings of England haue done by name our pious King Charles whose raigne hath bene honoured with a religious Law for the better keeping of the Lords day if lawes were as well kept as they haue bene wisely piously and iustly enacted by our Progenitors Yet because notwithstanding all Lawes diuine and humane this holy day of the Lord is for the generality of men little regarded as not requiring the like sanctification of vs which the Sabbath did of the Iewes let vs further shew what a reuerend esteeme the ancient holy men in former ages had and what pious rules they gaue concerning the religious keeping of this day Wee haue noted some of their excellent sayings a little before wee will adde a few more And first wee obserue that they euer did vse to call the Lords day by the name of the Sabbath Obseruamus sabbatum Aug Contra Adamantum c. 15 hoc est Dominicam in signum nempe aeterni sabbati We obserue the Sabbath that is the Lords day for a signe of the eternall Sabbath The same Augustine in his 95 sermon de Tempore sayth They which in the obseruation of the Sabbath doe not apply themselues to good works and prayer which is to sanctifie the Sabbath and sanctification is where the Holy Ghost is are like to the small flies bred of the mud which disquieted the Egyptians And elsewhere vpon those words Aug de Conseusu Euang. lib 1. c. 77. Math. 24.20 Pray that your slight be not in the winter nor on the Sabbath day hee sayth by winter is signified the cares of this life and by the Sabbath gluttony and drunkennesse which euil is therefore signifyed by the name of Sabbath because this was as now it is the wicked custome of the Iewes on that day to swimme in delicacies while they are ignorant of the spirituall Sabbath For the Iewes doe seruilely obserue the Sabbath day vnto ryotousnesse and drunkennesse How much better were it for their women to spin then on that day to daunce And thus while they carnally kept the Sabbath they knew it not sayth hee And Melius tota die foderent c. The men were better to digg all that day then to tread is out in daunces and measures Againe the Sabbath to wit the Lords day is more commaunded vs then the Iewes They celebrate the Sabbath seruilely but we spiritually And how spiritualy not in chambering wantonnesse not in gluttony druÌ„kennesse For these are forbidden Christians any day much more on the Lords day For it were better to plough harrow to spin card wooll which in themselues are lawfull then to doe those things on the Sabbath or Lords day which christians should blush at and be ashamed of to do at any time as to dance to reuell to heare playes to goe to masking and mumning and the like which are exercises fitter for heathen then christians for Bacchanalls then such as celebrate the Lords Festiuall How then is this day of the Lords to be kept Neyther as the Eneratites Aeriancs and Aerians who fasted all the Lords day but madly reueld on other festiuals These are
extreames and therefore to bee auoyded How then As the christians did in Iustin Martyrs dayes of old who sayth Die solis c. On the Sunday or Lords day Iustin Martyr Apol. 2. are the christians assemblies of Citizens and Countrmen where the writings of the Apostles and Prophets are first reade then when the Reader hath done the Master of the assembly the chiefe Minister vseth words of exortation his inuiting them to the imitation of things honest The richer sorte who are willing do contribute to the reliefe of the poorer euery man according to his mind and meanes and the Collecta or collections are deposited with the chiefe Minister he therewith succoureth the Orphans and poore c. This is that day wherein God created the world and Christ rose againe from the dead So hee And Saint Chrisostom vpon the Apostles words 1 Cor. 16.1 Behold sayth he How fitly the Apostle rayseth his exhortation from the consideration of this day of the weeke as being the fittest day wherin to exhort vnto almes as if the Apostle had sayd Remember what things yee haue obtained this day vnutterable good things yea the very roote and spring of our life stands in it Not that it is a fit day onely for giuing of almes but that it hath a rest and is free from worldly affaires and the mind being vacant from molestations is the apter more inclinable to mercy and it brings with it a great efficacy in the vse of the celestiall Ordinances And Saint Augustine Omni Die Dominico c. Euery Lords day come to the Church and spend not the day in pleading and brabbles and idle chat but with silence hearken to the word of God and pray for the peace of the Church and for the pardon of your sinnes c. And Bernard sayth out of Esay 58.13 He calleth the Sabbath sayth hee not onely a delight but he addeth holy and gloryous to the Lord. Nor let the Sabbath slipt away with sloth but in thy Sabbath worke the workes of God And in the Synodal Epistle of the second synod of Matiscon wee haue these words Custodite Diem Dominicum c. Keepe the Lords day which hath a new brought you forth and hath freed you from all sinnes as being that day wherein Christ rose for our iustification Let none of you bee vacant to minister fewell for suites in Law let none plead causes let none draw vpon himselfe such a necessity as to compell the cattell to beare the yoake .. Be all of you taken vp with hymmes in praysing of God being content in minde and body Let euery one hasten to the next Church their humble himselfe on the Lords day with prayers and teares Let your eyes and hands be all that day open to God For that is a perpetual day of rest that is made knowne in the law the Prophets being insinuated vnto vs by the shadow of the seauenth day Iust it is therefore that wee doe vnanimously celebrate this day by which wee are made that which before wee were not Let vs performe to the Lord a free seruice c. Not that the Lord requires of vs that wee should celebrate the Lords day with bodily abstinence but hee requireth our obedience by which trampling all terrene actions vnder our feete hee may mercifully lift vs vp euen vnto Heauen If therefore any of you shall slight or contemne this our wholesome exhortation let him know that for the quality of his demerit hee shall bee punished of the Lord and henceforth implacably vnder the sacerdotall indignation If hee bee a Lawyer hee shall bee dismissed of his pleading without recouery if a Country-man or seruant hee shall bee sore beaten with clubs if a Clearke or so hee shall bee suspended six months from his Fraternity c. And in the Councell of Dingelfing On the Lords day let men bee vacant for diuine rest and abstayne from worldly and profane businesse Hee that this day shall doe any worke about the Cart or otherwise let his oxen bee confiscate If he shall proceed on obstinately let him be made a bondslaue And Charles the great in his constitutions forbiddeth markets to be kept any where on the Lords day nor any seruile workes to be done therein We might bee infinite in such like instances of pious constitutions for the solemne and sacred keeping of the Lords day but let these suffice by the way Onely one thing remaines to bee resolued whether the fourth Commandement reach vnto seruants as well as vnto Masters of Families some would restraine the Commandement onely to Masters excluding seruants thus farr that in case a Master command his seruant any servill worke on the Sabbath or Lords day the seruant therein obeying his Master is not answerable to God as a trangressour of Gods Commandement but his Master onely is in the transgression for so commanding This is a strange piece of Logicke A Master in commanding his seruant transgresseth Gods Commandement and yet the seruant obeying his Master therein transgresseth not Doth not the case hold a like in other relations as betweene Prince and subiect spirituall Pastours and People yes say they But how Thus God say they hath commanded all men to honour their Parents the Parents of their Country stands in the first ranke-True who denies it But what followes there vpon This say they The Sonne of God hath commanded all Christians to heare the Church and vnder forfeiture of communion of Saints but they that deny the Canons of the Church or Edict of the Prince heare not the one honour not the other therefore they that transgresse eyther of these Constitutions transgresse also consequently though not immediately the commandements of God yet neyther of both are transgressed by seruants if they worke by their Masters commission and not of their owne electon for neyther doth the one Law or the other neyther the Canons of the Church nor Edicts of Princes giue liberty and warrant to seruants to bee rebellious to their Masters touching poynt of seruice that day more then others To this purpose they argue that deny the keeping of the Lords day to haue any dependance vpon the morality of the fourth Commandement Here be prege reasons which would not lightly be passed ouer Therefore a little to examine the mettle of these mens reasons first we must remember that not only on the Lords day seruants obying their Masters in deoing seruile worke therein are guiltles for so they haue euation for it by denying the Lords day to bee of diuine institution and rest therein to be any morall duty but they deny also that the fourth Commandement did binde any Iewes but onely Masters of familyes and not those vnder them For say they the Commandement was giuen onely to masters and not to seruants standing in relation to their masters in case they should impusote any seruile labour vpon them It is true the Commandement was giuen principally and immediately to masters that not onely
themselues should keepe it but they should looke their whole family kept it Yet in case the Master should neglect his duty herein and instead of commanding his family to keepe the Sabbath should inioyne them seruile worke doth not the Commandement take hold of the seruant What Is the seruant an Asse or sott to yeald blinde obedience to his master commanding against God Or is he such a slaue as hee hath not a soule to answere for to God as well as his master Or being his Masters seruant is hee thereby exempted from being Gods seruant sayth not the Apostle Hee that is called in the Lord being a seruant is the Lords freeman Likewise also hee that it called being free is Christs seruant Indeede the Masters sin is double not onely in permitting and communing but compelling or commanding his seruant to worke when God commands to rest but yet the seruant obeying his master herein vniustly commanding committes a single sin at least against God if not also double while he preferreth his earthly masters Commandement before his heauenly masters But this say they is Petitio Principij if Gods Commandement reach not to seruants But we shew it doth if seruants be not vnreasonable beasts or blinde Asses Nor ought the Masters Commandement to bee of force yea it hath a meere nullity if it bee contrary to Gods expresse Commandement So that in such a case for a seruant to obey his Master is against and aboue God to set vp an Idoll which is nothing in the world and such seruants slauishly obseruing Sabbatum Asinorum the Sabbath of Asses do iustly deserue the whip for the Asses backe or that censure forementioned in the second synod of Matiscon If a seruant or rusticke doe breake the Sabbath let him be soundly dry basted with clubs But say they the sonne of God hath commanded all christians to heare the Church not to despise hir Canons or Princes Edicts True But is Christs command absolute and without limitation namely to obey Superiours actiuely whatsoeuer they command right or wrong for or against God what if the Canons of the Church doe by mans Traditions disanull the Commandement of God as of old the Iewish Synagogue and of latter times the Romish Are such Canons to be obeyed against Gods expresse Commandement If the Pharisees and chiefe Priests make a Canon to punish with Excommunication or Suspention those that shall confesse Christ or professe or preach his truth and fayth frely faithfully is it not disobedience to God herein to obey them and through slauish feare rather to renounce Christ then not submit to such wicked Canons The Iewes Corban freed Children fom honouring their Parents and doe not they as well make voyd Gods Commandement who in binding seruants to obey their masters commanding against Gods Commandement doe thereby free them from Gods Commandement And for Princes Edicts we all reuerence and willingly imbrace and obey them But without limitation what if they command against God what if they shall forbid by publicke Edict the free preaching of the word of God in any part of it as such and such points of fayth and saluation not to bee handled such and such heresies not to bee medled with by way of confutation Are we not to answere in such a case as the Apostle did Whether it be meete in the sight of God to obey you rather than God iudge you for we cannot but speake the thinges wbich we haue seene and heard And Peter tels the Rulers boldly and plainely Wee ought rather to obey God then men What because Nebuchadnezzer erected his Image and commanded all to worship it and forbad to pray to any God but to the King onely for thirty dayes must this Edict therefore bee obeyed Noe surely And why Because it was against God and therefore it ought to haue beene of no force to exact obedience of any But what will you say Must we be rebels in disobeying our superiours No it is one thing not obey another to bee rebellious superiours ought not to bee obeyed if they command against God Yet this is no rebellion where men are ready to yeald passiue obedience to their vniust cruelty by not resisting it though they derect and deny actiue obedience to their vniust commands Thus Daniel thus the three Children did the one desires rather to bee cast into the Lyons denne the other into the hott fiery fornace then to dishonour God by bowing to the Kings Image Thus all Gods true bred children haue and will doe they neyther dare obey vniust command contrary to Gods word and a good conscience nor yet rebelliously resist vniust punnishments in both which they obey God But enough of this poynt at least in this place where we haue as it were by the way occasionally met with it not purposely minded throughly to handle it but onely as a branch of that morality of the Law of God the whole bulke and body whereof is hewed at by the Antinomians to cut it downe by the very rootes Onely let vs adde here a few reasons and motiues Reasons why the Lords day is to bee sanctfied the more to strengthen and prouoke vs to the more diligent obseruation of this great holy day of the Lord. One reason may bee taken from the comparison betweene christians vnder the new Testament and the Iewes vnder the Old How exactly were the Iewes bound to keepe the Sabbath as a memoriall of their deliuerance from Egypt in token of their perpetuall thankefulnesse How much more then are we thus bound to sanctifie the Lords day in a perpetuall thankefull remembrance of our spirituall deliuerance from the bondage of sin sathan and hell ouer which Christ triumphed manifestly in the day of his Resurrection Secondly Exod 31.16.17 as the Sabbath day was giuen to the Iewes as a signe and meanes of their sanctification So the Lords day in the due sanctifying of it in the vse of the meanes is a pregnant occasion of our sanctification and that not only in regard of the same Ordinances attending vpon it but as it is a perpetuall memoriall of Christs Resurrection and in the faith and fact whereof is begun here not onely our sanctification but also our glorification and eternall Sabbath Ob. But if the Eternall Sabbath began in Christs Resurrection then what further vse is there of a seauenth day weekely to keepe Sabbath in Euery day now yea our whole life time is a Sabbath vnto vs therefore to keepe a seauenth day still is against the nature of the eternall Sabbath hath begun in Christs Resurrection And thus to keepe a seauenth still is to goe backe to the Iewish ceremony againe which is abolished in Christs Resurrection Answ Though the Eternall Sabbath began in Christs Resurrection and is now eternally kept of Christ and of the Church triumphant yet during the time of this life which is measured by times and dayes and in regard of the many corporall necessitys of it must bee