condemneth those that speake euill of men as too precise too nise too pure for their profession because they run not into the same excesse of ryot with others These are not too precise but such as scoffe at al profession are too prophane It is good to be earnest in the matters of god prouided that our zeale be tempered with discretion and all Newtets be odious to God as it is said to the Church of the Laodiceans I knowe thy workes that thou art neither cold nor hot I woulde thou werest colde or hotte therefore because thou art Luke warme and neither colde nor hot it shall come to passe that I shall spew thee out of my mouth Wherefore let vs not be discouraged in wel-doing but walking through good report and euill report let vs remember that as christ is our Lord and master so our profession and the sacraments are our badges Lastly we see what our estate and condition is that we are not our owne but are subiect to Christ to serue him For we do beare his badge then he is our maister If he bee our Maister where is the feare and reuerence due vnto him Is it not meet we shoulde shewe our selues thankefull for so great mercies and gifts Were it not intollerable vnthankefulnes and vnsufferable pride for any man to wear the cognizance of another and yet to scorne his seruice and deny him duty Might not one worthily check and controul him as Christ did the 〈◊〉 who vnwillingly paid such taxes and tributes as were laid vpon them Hee called for a penny said unto them Whose image and superscription is this They said vnto him Caesars He ansuered Giue therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesars and giue to God the thinges that are Gods So likewise might one say fitly whose badge wearest thou whose Armes bearest thou on thysleeue Doth not this put thee in mind of thy state and condition and of the seruice and honor thou owest thy Maister In like manner may it be said to vs whose badge bearest thou Is it not Christes we are not therefore our owne men as the Apostle reasoneth and concludeth 1. Cor. 6. Know yee not that your bodie is the temple of the Holy-ghost which is in you whome ye haue of God and ye are not your owne For you are bought with a price therfore glorifie God in your body in your spirit for they are Gods So many therefore as come without knowledge and true repentance break their faith giuen to Christ and betray the body of christ as much as in them lyeth Wherefore to the right vse and partaking of the sacraments there is required the knowledge of god in three persons especialy of the persō of christ perfect God and perfect man and of his three offices to saue his people to be their Priest perfectly by his sacrifice to reconcile and iustifie them to be their king by the gouernement of his church to kill sin in them to sanctifie them to be their teacher to instruct them in the wil of his heauēly father After these is required true faith and earnest repentance otherwise we cannot receiue christ in the sacraments Put food into the mouth of a dead man it cannot nourish him so if one that is vnworthy and vnfit lying dead rotting in his sin do come to the sacramēts certainly they do not giue him life and worthines but such a one doth lade himselfe with a greater burden of sin and punishment Whosoeuer shall eat this bread and drinke the cup of the Lord vnworthily shall be guiltie of the bodie and blood of the Lorde he eateth and drinketh his 〈◊〉 iudgement because he discerneth not the Lords bodie Chap 16. Of the number of Sacraments HItherto we haue spoken of the chiefe vses of the sacraments now we are come to speake of the number of sacraments according as we take the name and haue declared the nature of them Let vs see then howe manie such visible signes and seales of spirituall grace in the new testament were iustituted of God to set forth the benefits of christ for the continuall vse of the church Many liue in the bosom of the church hear the word come to publick praier take themselus to be goodly christians offer themselues to the lordes table and are made partakers of the Sacrament who yet are ignorant how many sacraments ther are what they are None almost so simple but can number his sheep and cattel he knoweth their marks he knoweth their differences but aske him how many commaundements of the law how many Articles of faith how many petitions of the Lords prayer or how many Sacraments of the New Testament he can answere nothing Such haue their wits wholly exercised on the world and on wordly things which iustle out religion the knoledge of heauenly things If we haue eares to heare let vs heare what is the faith os the Church in this point grounded vpon the infallible rule and rocke of the word of God The sacraments of the church ordained by Christ to assure our communion with him are onely two baptisme whereby we are receiued into the couenant of God in steed of circumcision and the Lordes supper whereby we are nourished maintained and retained therein insteed of the Passeouer For albeit the couenant be but one yet the seales there of are two to assure vs that by vnion with Christ we are regenerated and shall be nourished to eternall life He hath deliuered vs a few sacraments insteade of many he coulde haue instituted moe if he had thought it good for the benefit of the Church These are as it were the two eies wherby we see and behold the promises of God These are as the two hands whereby we after a sort do handle Christ crucified and lay hold on the graces of saluation Christ hath appointed no mo sacraments he hath laide on vs an easie yoke and a light burden That these two are the onely sacraments of the new testament may appear by these few reasons following First christ taught no more to his Apostles the Apostles deliuered no mo to the churches the churches embraced no moe for many yeares When the Lord Iesus liued on the earth he instituted baptisme by the ministery of Iohn baptist who as he was sent to prepare the harts of the people so he preached the baptisme of repentance Afterward the Lord Iesus established it with his owne mouth in the commission giuen to his disciples he appointed and himself first administred his last supper in remembrance of his deth vntil his 2. comming againe with power and great glory These two true sacraments of the church to wit baptisme and the lords supper were instituted and warranted by the mouth of christ himselfe and none other beside these These we receiue because christ ordained them other we receiue not because he ordained them not Secondly the Apostle Paule admonisheth the
are oftentims in gendred Eucharist and so consume it whether the shewes of bread be the body without the blood and the shews of wine the blood without the body It were infinite to note out all their contentions and contradictions these may suffice to shew how the enimies of God fight one against another and all of them with their own shadwoes And thus much of the late doting deuise of transubstantiation which is the soule and life of their popish religion the deniers or doubters wherof they pursue with fire and sword more eagerly then such as are enemies to the blessed trinity The last generall vse is this if christ deliuered both these signes not onely the bread but the wine also to his disciples then both kinds by the minister are to be deliuered and both kinds by the people are to be receiued not bread alone nor wine alone but bread and wine the bread in token of his body giuen for vs and the wine in token of his blood shed for vs. This is the ordinance of Christ this is a greeable to the scripture Notwithstanding the Church of Rome hath decreed that it is not necessary for the people to cómunicate in both kinds and holdeth them accursed that hold it necessary for the people to receiue the cup cósecraced by the priest Thus it appeareth they labor nothing more then to take from the faithful the sweete comfort of the Lords supper This is a sacrilegious corruption of christs institution deuised by sathan broached by Antichrist published by his adherentes in the corrupt times of most palpable darknesse as may appeare by these reasons Frist if none may drinke of the consecrate wine but the priest then none should eat of the bread but priests so that they must either exclude the people from both which I trust they dare not or admit them to both which as yet they do not For to whom Christ said Take and eate to those gaue he the cup and said Drinke ye Wherefore the signes being both equal all communicants must drinke of the one as wel as eate of the other there being the same warrant for the one that there is for the other and the let that would barre the one will hinder the other so as the thinges which God in his goodnesse hath ioyned together man without sinne cannot separate Secondly when Christ instituted this sacrament he said Drinke ye all of this and by all he vnderstood of the Communicants And the Euangelist Marke addeth They al drank of it to wit all that were present at his last supper who had before eaten of the bread of the Lord. This also appeareth by the Apostle 1 Cor. 12. They haue beene all made to drinke into one spirit This commaundement of Christ being generall imposeth a necessity vpon the people when he saith Take ye eate ye drinke ye do ye this These commaundements are perpetuall vnchangable and alwaies in force not arbitrary not temporall not repealed but bind the conscience to the end of the world against which no limitation or dispensation can be alowed being the commaundementes of God not of man Thirdly the cup is a part of Christes will and testament Now touching the nature of a testament or will the saying of the Apostle is knowne If it be but a mans testament when it is confirmed no man doth abrogate it or addeth any thing therto where he sheweth that the dead mans wil may not be changed nothing can be put to nothing taken out without forgery and salsehood This is the law of nature and Nations But the Lordes Supper is a sacrament proper to the new testament as Christ saith this cup is the new testament in my blood which is shed for you This testament the Lord Iesus made the night before he was betrayed he sealed it by shedding his most precious blood he hath giuen Legacies not of earthly and temporall but of heauenly and eternall goods And seeing he hath appointed the cup of this his testament to be deliuered and drunke of all those for whom his blood was shed it is intollerable boldnes and presumption to take away the vse thereof from the greater part of the Church and an infallible token of an vnshamefast and shamelesse harlot to alter her husbands will to defraud and defeat his children of that worthy portion which their father alotted 〈◊〉 and so to keepe backe part of their inhetitance and 〈◊〉 Fourthly the blood of Christ shed vpon the Crosse belongeth not onely to the pastors and teachers but to all the faithfull that come to the table of the Lord as appeareth by the wordes of Christ This is my blood which is shed for you and for many why then should the blood of Christ be denyed or the cup of the Lord be barred from them If then the blood of Christ were shed for the people as well as for the ministers surely the cup belongeth to one as wel as to the other If the people haue the greater who shall keepe them from the lesse If they haue their part in the thing signified who shall deny them of the outward signe For as the fruite and effect of the blood of Christ is common to the people with the pastor so should the cup also which is the communion of his blood shed for the redemptionof the peoples sinnes be diuided indifferently betweene the pastor and the people Fiftly the Apostle deliuered that to the Church which he had receiued from the Lord Iesus Now the Church ought diligently to obserue the written traditions and verities of the Apostles which are committed to posterity to be kept inuiolably But he hath deliuered how the Lord after taking blessing breaking and distributing of the bread likewise tooke the cuppe blessed and distributed it among them so saith the Apostle must the Churches do If then he receiued this from the Lorde to deliuer both kinds to the people let the Church of Rome consider with her selfe from whence she hath receiued the contrarye to withhold one of the kinds from the people for both cannot proceed from one and the same spirit of truth which is neuer contrary to it selfe Sixtly if all the faithfull that come to the Lordes Table must shew forth the Lords death vntill he come and this be done by them as wel by drinking of the cup as by eating of the bread then all the communicants must receiue the sacrament vnder both kinds vntill the second comming of christ But the faithfull must shew forth the lordes death by eating of that bread and drinking of that cup as the Apostle teacheth As often as ye shall eate this bread and drinke of this cup ye shew the Lordes death vntill he come Therefore all communicants must partake the sacrament vnder both kinds Seuenthly the Apostle giueth an expresse commaundemēt to 〈◊〉 whole church which al must obey that come worthily to this holy table Let a man examine himselfe and so let him eate of this bread and drinke of
strong hot fiery and fuming was wont to allay it with water that it might be mild and temporate least that which was taken 〈◊〉 helpe and further the soule should 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 the body This began for conueniency not for 〈◊〉 for fitnesse not for signification for sobriety not for any mistery But the water is no part of Christs institution neither can it be proued that Christ or his Apostles vsed water with their wine or commaunded others to mingle wine and water in this mistery or that Christs apostles euer receiued it as a matter of faith or taught it to be a necessary parte of this sacrament For Alexander the 5. Byshop of Rome was the first that mingled water 〈◊〉 wine at consecration and ordained that the oblation should be of vnleauened bread and not of leauened as till that time had beene vsed Wherefore let vs retaine and maintaine the plaine and simple institution of Christ who in his last Supper gaue wine not water to be drunk for he calleth it the fruit of the vine which is wine and not water Againe they may be pressed and hampered with their own dreames and deuises For whereas they hold that the wine must be mingled with water and that the elementes after the words of consecration are transubstantiated and remaine in their owne nature no more I would aske this question of these Watermen rowing in the troubled Sea of their owne decrees who are neere of kinne to the old hereticks called Aquarij whether the water mixed with the wine be turned into blood If they say it is not then they deny transubstantiation of all that is within the cup and so shake the vertue of their consecration in pieces if they say it is then will they make Christ a watery body and elementall besides it cannot be by vertue os Christes institution where water is neither expresled nor included So then their best defence is to answer with the Pharisies We cannot tell To conclude let vs not seeke to be wiser then Christ nor to mingle together more mysteries then we haue learned of him as Paule saith of his own practise That which I receiued of the Lord I haue deliuered vnto you Neither prophet nor Apostle nor Angell from heauen is to teach otherwise then Christ himselfe hath taught as he charged his disiples Teach them to obserue all things whatsoeuer I haue commaunded you He hath supreme authority in the Church his doctrine alone should be heard as the father himselfe witnesseth from heauen This is my beloued sonne in whom I haue delight heare him We are not to regard what other before vs haue thought meete to doe but what Christ did who is before all other and called himselfe the truth and not custome Thus much of the third outward part of the Lordes Supper to wit the two signes of bread and wine Chap. 6. Of the fourth outward part of the Lords Supper THe last outward part remaineth which are the communicantes whose actions are outward to take the bread and wine into their hands then to eate the bread and drinke the wine to the nourishment of their bodies as is directly proued by the institution of this sacrament where christ gaue the bread and cup into their hands the Disciples receiued the one and the other they did eate the bread and all dranke of the cup. These being the necessary actions of euery receiuer to take to eate to drinke it beateth down many falfe doctrines of the Church of Rome as their reseruation ostentation eleuation adoration circumgestation procession and pryuate communion it teacheth also many necessary truths to direct our knowledge and increase our obedience which we will consider in order First of all did Christ commaund his Disciples to eat and. drinke that he deliuered and posted them not ouer to eate thereof when they were departed neither willed them to defer their eating vntill afterward then all keeping and reseruing of bread in boxes pixes and other vessels of the church for daies weekes and months all shewing it to the people lifting it ouer the priests head and going with it in procession is vtterly vnlawfull For it is no sacrament vnlesse it be vsed according to Christs institution and cómandement but to the institution it belongeth as one the behalfe of the minister to take to blesse to poure out and to distribute so on the behalfe of the communicants to take to eate and to drink in them al to shew thereby the Lords death and to do it in remembrance of him which cannot be performed but by obseruing the whole action For how can they shew the Lords death or do it in remembrance of christ vnlesse they take and eate And as the paschallambe was not that passeouer vnlesse it were killed and eaten no more is the bread and wine a sacrament except they be receiued and digested The passeouer was the same in effect with the Lords supper who was the lambe slaine from the beginning of the world Now god commaunded that none of it should remaine vnto the morning but the remnant should be consumed with fire The like may be said of Manne the same in substance with this sacrament it was not to be kept caried about Let no man reserue thereof til morning Besids there is the same reason of the cup and of the bread but they reserue not the wine they carry it not about to shew the people why then should they keepe the other part Likewise when christ said to his Apostles Go baptize the nations it was no baptisme by the confession of the aduersaries themselues vnlesse there were some person baptized so when christ said Take and eat there is no sacrament vnlesse there be a receiuing and eating For as the one standeth in washing so doth the other in eating and drinking not in keeping and reseruing not in carying in procession on a white horse not in hanging it vp vnder a Canopy nor in bearing it to the sicke with bell and candle Christ tooke bread and gaue it to his Disciples saying Eate ye he tooke the cup and when he had giuen thanks he said drinke ye all of this do this in remembrance of me as often as ye shall eate this bread and drinke of this cup ye shew the Lordes death till hee come But they hang in it the pixe beare it in boxes and carry it about in publike tryumphes and in common calamities when any iudgement and war plague pestilence and famine and like visitation is among them then Iack in the boxe goeth abroad in solemne processions to be seene which is the way to increase not to slack to kindle not to quench to prouoke not to reuoke the iudgementes of God gone out against them Besides they shew this sacrament to the simple people to fall downe to it as to a God they put it vpon the breastes of the dead and sometimes lay it in
the graue with them I thinke to declare it to all the world they wish Christ dead buried and forgotten for euer that the byshop of Rome might with his shauelings rule and raign as a God vpon the earth Can light and darkenesse can heauen and earth fire and water sweete and sower be more contrary then these vaine things to the institution of Christ Who neuer said keep it in vessels hang it vnder Canopies carry it in processions giue it to the dead lay it vp in their tombes bring it abroad in common iudgements but take ye eat ye drinke ye and by receiving eating and drinking shew yee forth the Lordes death vntill hee come to iudgement to iudge the quicke and the dead This Sacrament is an holy feast an heauenly banket and therefore not to be hidden in a box as a light put vnder a bushell but to be set on the lords table for all his ghuests to feede thereon Againe if the substance and essence of this sacrament stād in the lawful vse of eating and drinking then al eleuation holding vp of the sacrament ouer the priests head all adoration falling downe honoring it with diuine worship and calling the sacrament their lord and God as it is destitute of all antiquity so it is full of grosse and palpable idolatry For wheras it was accustomed to hold vp the almes offerings consecrated to God for the poore thereby imitating the heaue-offering of the Iewes and stirring vp the people to the like charity and deuotion degenerated to the lifting vp of the host and bread in the sacrament So that where Christ saith take ye eate ye these bread-worshippers haue changed it into looke ye gaze ye worship ye giuing his glory to dumbe and senselesse creatures True it is we confesse that the Sacramentes as mysteries sanctified to an holy vse as vessels of gods grace and as instrumentes fitted to worke great things are not to be contemned or refused but to be receiued with due regard and to be vsed with all sobriety 〈◊〉 yea we confesse that christ God man is to be worshipped euery where we honor his word we reuerence his sacraments Notwithstanding we put a difference between God and the sacrament of God the same honor is not due to the one that is due to other and therefore we cannot adore the elemēts with diuine worship for many reasons First because christ in the institution of his supper said take eate drink he said not worship fal down bow the knees before the Sacra and call vpon it in time of need We heard before in the case of vnleuened bread they appealed to the institutiō of cstrist why do they now fly from it turning eating and drinking into worshipping and adoring Wherefore is it not a great iniquity and wickednes to omit what christ commaundeth and do what he commaundeth not Secondly God only is to be worshipped with diuine honor as Math. 4 Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him only thou shalt serue And Exod. 20. Thou shalt not bow down to them nor worship them Now the sacrament is not christ it is an institution of christ it is not god but an ordinance of God for god is not visible but the sacra is visible that al may know it and see it with their eies the sacrament is eaten but God cannot be eaten and swallowed vp of vs whom the heauens and the heauens of heauens cannot contain or cōprehend Thirdly christ reproueth the Samaritans because They worshipped that they knew not but the Papistes know not the body of Christ to be contained vnder the accidentes ofbread and Wine for the scriptures haue not taught it CHRIST hath not deliuered it the Apostles haue not shewed it Besides they knew not the priests intent whereon they say the essence of the Sacrament dependeth so as if he had no purpose of consecration they cannot deny themselues to be idolaters and bread-worshippers Fourthly the true worshippers must worship God in spirit and in truth as Christ setteth downe Ioh. 4 24 that is not according to our owne imaginations and diuises but as God hath prescribed but to fall downe to the sacrament is a bodily sernice a new-forged worship and an humane inuention Fistly without faith no man can please God but saith commeth by hearing and hearing by the word of God which yet they could neuer shew vnto vs therefore they can haue no assurance of pleasing God in their wil-worship Sixtly if this sacrament be to be worshipped then it is vnited personally to Christ because adoration should not be due to Christ as man except God and man in the vnion of person were one Christ but there is no personall vnion betweene 〈◊〉 and the sacrament of Christ therefore not to be worshipped Seuenthly no man in his wits and right mind wil honor that with diuine worship which himselfe may take in his hand and eate with his mouth and which may be deuouied by Mise Rattes dogs Wormes or other venime for how shall that be adored as God that cannot defend it selfe from the teeth of men and beastes As Ioash answeared Will ye plead Baals cause If he be God let him plead for himselfe against him that hath cast downe his altar Lastly seeing they adore Christ in the pixe where the bread is and in the chalyce wher the wine is why do they not likewise worship him in the priest and in the faithfull people and euery man in his brother when they haue created and eaten him vp The same Christ that was surely inclosed in the pixe is by their doctrine really contained in the body of priest and people when they haue eaten and drunken their supposed sacrifice Why then adore they not the flesh of christ after that it is entred into the mouth of man as well as in the golden boxe or in the gilden chalice Nay why may he not be adored in the bodies of mise and vermin by them if it fall out that they eate vp their God Shall he be any where without honor Or wil they worship him wher they list and ouerskip him where they please Howsoeuer therefore Christ is to be worshipped yet we must take heed we worship not a piece of bread in stead of christ which is most grosse and 〈◊〉 Idolatry Moreouer if christ command the bread to be eaten and the wine to be drunk then they are not to be offered vp to God the father as is vsually wont to be done in the pageant of the Masse This is a deep dungeō of iniquity and a monster of many heads turning the holy sacrament into an vnbloody sacrifice for the quicke and the dead abolishing the fruite and remembrance of the death of christ disanulling his priesthood giuing him to his father wheras the father hath giuen him to vs and imagining thereby to pay a price to god which he should receiue as a fatisfaction for our sins True
to praise him fo giuing his onely begotten Sonne to bee our redeemer and humbly to pray vnto him that our vnworthynesse hinder not the effectuall working of his Sacrametnes but that through his goodnesse and mercy they may haue their full force in our heartes for the pardoning of our sinnes for the increase of his graces for the confirming of our faith for the quickning of our obedience and for the preseruing of body and soule to eternall life Thus wee blesse God when we praise him and giue him the honour due vnto his name We blesse the meates we eate the drinkes we drinke the thinges wee receiue as Paule saith The cup of blessing which wee blesse when prayer is made to God that they may be healthfull to vs and we thankefull for them Lastly if in the Sacrament there bee a consecration and separation of the outward elementes to so holy an end it warneth vs to be carefull to vse and receiue oftentimes this Sacrament of the Lordes Supper For heere are not bare signes bare tokens bare figures without fiuite and without grace they are consecrated signes and hallowed elements effectually sealing vppe remission of sinnes And what is more plaine then that which the Apostle teacheth 1 Cor. 11. As often as ye shall eate of this bread and drinke of this cup ye shew the Lordes death till he come Thus the Lord Iesus speaketh Doe this as oft as ye shall drinks it in remembrance of me And haue we not many worthy and effectuall considerations to moue such as professe the same doctrine to resorte oftentimes to the same Table of the Lorde It is the commaundement of Christ so that we ought to make some conscience of this duty as of other commaundementes prescribed vnto vs. It is a commaundement of God Thou shalt not steale Few but to make some conscience thereof because it is Gods commaundement So is this heere often to come to the Lordes Table yet what little account is made heereof all the yeare long euery one seeth and the faithfull soule agreeueth The high God possessor of heauen and earth hath required and commaunded it yet who regardeth The Lorde hath spoken and yet who obeyeth If a father should command a duty of his son or a maister of his seruant he could not patiently endure to be disobeyed and shal we not thinke that God will require his lawes at our hands Againe to his commaundement he hath annexed a promise which maketh our sin and vnthankfulnes the greater if we shew not our selues ready in yeelding to this duty Besides seeing this sacra is a speciall prop to stay vp our faith and geth with it Christ and all his merits and heauenly treasurs we are vtter enemies to our owne selues to our own souls and to our owne saluation if we neglect â—o great mercy offeâ—eâ— vnto vs. Wherefore it is not left free vnto vs and committed to our discretion to receiue or not receiue this were no lawfull liberty but vnlawfull lycentiousnesse Heere in the faithfull find very great comfort and an effectuall meanes to strengthen their faith Euen as the sicke man that feeleth his sickenes and knoweth his own weaknes shoulde haue a speciall care to looke to his stomacke that therby he may receiue norishment gather strength so we are all spiritually diseased assaulted of Satan tempted of the flesh ouercome afterâ—imes of sin and must seeke strength of saith from this heauenly nourishment God of his compassion hath set vp his Sacrament as a signe vpon an high hill whence it may be seene farre and neere on euery side to raise vp such as are fallen to strengthen such as stand to comfort such as are weak and to call vnto him such as run away from him whereby hee gathereth them vnder his winges It is as the brazen Sepent that comming vnto it with a faith to be healed we might liue and not perish It is a banner displayed that euery Châ—â—stian souldiâ—r should resort vnto it as vnto his owne comfortable Supper to be had in often vse and continuall remembrance to put vs in mind of his continuall mercy laid vp for vs in the blood of Christ and to ratifie and seale vp the same farre more liuely then the baâ—e word onely When the words of Christs institution are spoken This is my body which is broken for you this is my blood which was shed for you When these words I say are reade vnto vs our of the scriptures they confirme our faith but much more when the Sacrament is seene with our eyes that we behold the bred broken and looke vpon the wine poured out but most of all when we tast and handle when we eate and drinke the outwarde signes We see when one maketh a bare promise to another with wordes onely betweene themselues he beginneth to doubt to whome the promise is made of the performance thereof if he adde an oath for confirmation the promise is more assuredly ratified but if he giue his hande writing and seale it to the party the matter is made out of doubt Thus we doe reason and helpe our faith We haue the promises of God wee haue the oath of God we haue the wordes and writinges of God we haue the seales and Sacramentes of God these are not reserued in the Lords keeping but are put into our owne handes to see them to keepe them to vse them for our comfort and assurance I speake after the manner of men if wee haue a free promise from an honest man penned fairely in writing ratified vnder his owne hand and seale and all giuen vnto vs to locke and lay vp we doubt not of the possession Now let vs consider the Lords doing and see what hee hath done for vs who is not as man that he shoulde lie nor as the sonne of man that he should deceiue God sent his sonne into the world to take our nature vpon him to be like vs euen in his infirmities hee named himselfe Iesus that is a Sauiour because he shoulde saue his people from their sinnes after his death he sent his Apostles to preach the glad tidings of remission of sinnes and euerlasting saluation he ordained his last supper immediately before his death to testifie and assure them vnto vs not onely by sounding them in our eares but by beholding tasting smelling feeling and feeding to seale them in our hearts and also daily to be repeated and ministred vnto vs. Seeing then we haue both his promises and oath his worde and writings his seales and Sacramentes in our keeping what would we haue more He would not make halfe so much adoin assuring his promises if he loued vs not he would not set such authentike seals to his deede and obligations vnlesse he ment good earnest His bare worde and naked promise is verie good paiment but he respecteth our weakenes whose mercifull kindnesse must not be neglected through our vnthankefulnes
in examining ourselues before we come No great thing can bee done well without good care and endeuour In all humane things of any importance nothing is attempted or atchiued without some preparation more or lesse going before according to the nature of the matter Before men sit downe to eat or drinke their ordinary food before they sleepe before they wash before they walke before they work some preparation goeth before Before the ground is tilled it is prpared Before the law was deliuered before the Saboth was sanctified before the sacrifice was offered before the Passeouer was killed before the worde was receiued before prayers were vttered the heart was in some sort prepard One of the greatest duties required of vs is to dy well whereunto all our life should be a preparation and euery day should be a meditation of death that we may not be found vnready and vnprepared when the bridegroome shall come So the Supper of the Lord being an excellent misterie and the food of our soules whereby we receiue Christs body and blood there is required of euery one a trying prouing and examining themselues least seeking comfort by their comming they bring vpon themselues iudgement through want of preparing This trueth deliuered hath the witnesse and consent of many Scriptures for the confirmation thereof The Prophet 2. Chron. 35. saith Kill the passeouer and sanctifie your selues and prepare your Brethren that they may do according to the word of the Lord by the hand of Moses And the holy man Iob when the daies of the banketting of his children were gone about sent and sanctified them and rose vp earely in the morning and offered burnt offerings according to the number of them all Also the wiseman 〈◊〉 4. Take heede to thy foote when thou enterest into the house of God and be more neare to heare then to giue the sacrifice of fooles for they know not that they do euill Likewise the prophet Ieremy Lament 3. Wherefore is the liuing man sorrowfull Man suffereth for his sinne let vs search and try our waies and turne againe to the Lord. To the same purpose the prophet Dauid saith Psal. 4. Tremble and sinne not examine your owne heart vpon your bed and be still and Psal. 119. I haue considered my waies and turned my feete into thy testimonies The Apostle Paule is very direct in this point as Gal. 6. 4. Let euery man proue his owne worke and then shall he haue reioycing in himselfe onely and not in any other Also 1 Cor 11. Let a man examine himselfe and so let him eate of this bread and drinke of this cup where he speaketh of purpose of the Lordes Supper So then it is a duty required of all persons that come to the Lordes Table or any other exercise of religion to search their owne heartes and consciences narrowly how they bee affected and disposed touching the discharge of this duty And if wee would farther consider the necessity of this examination we fhould finde it standeth vpon many sufficient reasons and causes as vpon certaine foundations that cannot be remoued Doe we not see men when they come into the presence of some honourable and Noble person to addresse themselues to doe it with all renerence Ioseph being sent for to come before Pharaoh King of Egypt shaued his hed and changed his raiment and pro 23. When thou sittest downe with a ruler at meate consider diligently what is before thee Therefore when wee sit at the Lordes table to sup with him and are admitted to be his welcome ghuests we ought much more to be caresul to sanctifie our soules with al solemnity Consider with me a little our own practise We will not put our ordinary meates in a dish vnwashed nor our common drinks into a cup vnclensed and shall we put the signes of bread and Wine which are chosen instruments to conueigh Christ vnto vs into vnsanctisied soules vnprepared heartes and 〈◊〉 consciences Doth not our sauiour Christ reproue such hy pocrisie when he saith Ye can discerne the face of the skie and 〈◊〉 you not discerne the signes of the times And if that vpper chamber wher the supper was first administred were trimmed and garnished should not our hearts be prepared into the which it is receiued Shall Christ himselfe offer to come into our houses and shal not we sanctifie our harts to entertain such a ghest This were to great carelesnesse and contempt Moreouer waigh with me the profit that commeth to our selues to moue vs to this examination The comfort is great the fruite is excellent the benifit is vnspeakeable to those that partake the mystery of the Supper worthily they receiue christ they receiue remission of sinnes they receiue saluation they receiue assurance of eternall life For if the woman diseased with an yssue of blood loe twelue yeare comming behind Christ and touched onely the hemme of his garment was made whole then assuredly the spirituall receiuing of the body and blood of christ shal not bring lesse profit if the faith be equall which notwithstanding is wholly lost without preparation Ponder with me also how by neglect of this triall of our selues not onely this profit is lost but the Sacrament it selfe is after a sort defiled For howsoeuer it be in it selfe by the ordinance of God an holy and heauenly banket yet to the vngodly vnregenerate and vnsanctified it becommeth vnholy and wholly earthly as the prophet Haggai teacheth Chapter 2. If a polluted person touch an holy thing it shall be vncleane The person must be holy that will haue sound profit by the holy thinges of God the man that is vnholy defileth every thing he toucheth the polluted Person polluteth all thinges For as to the pure all thinges are pure but vnto them that are defiled and vnbeleeuing is nothing pure but euen their mindes and consciences are corrupted so the prophane Person defileth all thinges and turneth wholesome meate into noysome poyson We must therefore vse sanctifyed thinges with sanctfyed hearts and for spirituall meate we haue spirituall vessels Furthermore marke the great danger punishment that is procured and purchased by this want of preparation For the vn worthie receiuer is guilty of the body and blood of Christ as the Apostle specifieth 1 cor xi Whosoeuer shall eate this bread and drinke the cup of the lord vnworthily shall be guiltie of the body and blood of the Lord. And againe He that eateth and drinketh vnworthily eateth and drinketh his own iudgement because he 〈◊〉 not the lords body for this cause many are sick and weak among you and manie sleepe Where he teacheth that such as come vnworthily vnreuerently and otherwise then such misteries should be handled doe despise and treade vnder their feet Iesus Christ himselfe prouoke the Lords 〈◊〉 and bring on themselues swift damnation Not that he is carnally and bodily present but because the reproache which is vsed in the signes
declare the couenaut of God to pray for his blessing promised vpon his owne ordinance to giue thankes for the blessed worke of our redemption to offer giue and deliuer a right the creatures so sanctified in baptisme to sprinkle with water and washe the body to be baptized and in the Lords Supper to deliuer the bread to be eaten and the wine to be drunke to the spirituall nourishment of the Church So then the minister ought not to refuse to baptize such as are brought vnto him Shall the seruant refuse to do the worke of his maister Or if the Lord keeper of the kings broad seale should proudly and presumpteously disdame to set the seale to the Princes letters patents were he not well worthy to be displaced and remoued So if the minister through enuy or hatred or any other sinister affection shall refuse to put the seale to the Lords Couenant and hinder little children from comming to Christ he deserueth iustly to be displaced and to beare office no longer in the citty of God but to be remoued for his contempt as Salomon put downe Abiathar Secondly is it a necessary point of the Sacrament that it be ministred by a minister Then it condemneth 〈◊〉 those that put these seales into a wrong hand and all 〈◊〉 persons that violently rush vpon this calling and take vp on them to meddle with the administration of the Sacraments with vnwashen hands seeing the dispensation of the word and Sacraments is so linked annexed and ioyned together by God that a deniall of licence to do the one is a deniall to do the other and contrary wise the license to one is license to the other Christ neuer gaue to priuate persons any such commaundement he neuer committed to them any such ossice hee neuer commended to their care these holy actions he neuer called them to this honor he neuer laid vpon them this charge and therefore they haue no parte nor fellowship in this businesse If notwithstanding these restrainings of authority from them they wil runne and rush forward where they should hang backward their sinne lieth at the doore their punishment hastneth and their iudgement sleepeth not Lastly if the minister be an outward part of the Sacrament we must beware and take heed we ascribe not to the minister that which is proper to Christ and so rob him of the honour due vnto his name The minister may offer the signe he cannot bestow the thing signified he may baptize the body he cannot clense the soule he may deliuer the bread and wine he cannot giue the body and blood of Christ Iohn may wash with water he cannot giue the spirit Man indeede pronounceth the word but God sealeth vp his grace in the heart man sprinkleth the body with water but God maketh cleane the soule by the blood of Christ man may take away the filth of the flesh but Christ must purge the conscience from dead workes who is that blessed lambe of God that taketh away the sinnes of the world For as Paule planteth and Apollos watereth but God 〈◊〉 the increase so the minister offereth the element and outward signe but God giueth the heauenly grace It belongeth to the minister to handle the external part it belongeth as a peculiar dignity to Christ to bestow grace to giue saith regeneration and forgiuenesse of sinnes and to baptize with the Holy-ghost This truth Iohn 〈◊〉 I baptize with water but one commeth after me who is mightier then I he shall baptize you with the Holy-ghost Where we see he maketh a flat opposition betweene himselfe and Christ betweene his baptisme and the baptisme of Christ. As on the one side we must take heede of the contempt of him that teacheth and ministreth the Sacramentes because the contempt of the word and Sacraments doth necessarily follow the contempt of his person so we must beware we attribute or giue not to him more then his right least the power of the word and force of the Sacramentes be attributed to his person wherby men spoile themselues of the fruite of them both This was it wherein the Corinthians offended when they said I am Pauls I am Apollos I am Cephas I am Christs Wherefore to keepe a golden meane between too much and too little we must do as if a prince should send vs some present by one of the meanest messengers of his house we would receiue him fauorably and entertaine him honorably for the gifts sake which he bringeth vnto vs but the guift it selfe we would receiue for the kings sake from whom it was sent So it becommeth euery one of vs to do God hath committed to his messengers and ministers the word of reconciliation we must haue them in singular loue for their workes sake that labour among vs but the word and Sacramentes we must receiue for the Lords sake from whom they come Thus much of the first outward part to wit theminister Chap. 5. Of the second outward part of a sacrament THe second outward part of a Sacrament is the word necessarily required to the substance of a Sacrament for the word is added and ioyned to the element and there is made a Sacrament This sacramentall word is the word of institution which God in each Sacrament hath after a speciall manner set downe consisting partly of a commaundement by which Christ appointeth the administration of Sacramēts and partly of a promise annexed whereby God ordaineth that the outward elements shal be instruments and seales of his graces As for example when Christ saith Go teach al nations baptize them there is a commaundement to warrant the vse and practise of Baptisme the promise likewise is in the next words Into the name of the father and of the sonne and of the holy-ghost So touching the other Sacrament of his supper when he saith Take ye eate ye drinke ye do this in remembrance of me Ioe there is the commaundement cōmaunding the continual vse therof vntil the second comming of christ the promise is this is my body which is giuē for you this is my blood of the new Testament shed for you for many for remission of sins Whatsoeuer signs of holy things god gaue to strengthen the faith of his childrē we may see and descern that god alwaies added the worde to the seale the voice to the signe and doctrine to the sight so that when the signe was seene the word was heard When one of the Seraphims beating an hot coale in his hand which he had taken from the alter touched the mouth of the prophet he said Lo this hath touched thy lips and thine iniquity shall be taken away and thy sinnes shall be purged Now we know a coale hath not power and force to take away sinne but the word vttered by the Angell did assure him that he should be purged by the holy ghost which was signified by the 〈◊〉 Againe when Christ gaue to his disciples
are present to communicate and receiue this were to commit sacriledge not to deliuer a Sacrament Wherefore vnlesse there be a body to be washed except there be communicants to partake the Supper there can be no Sacrament This appeareth by the words of God to Abraham giuing vnto him circumcision saying Euery male-child of eight daies old shall be circumcised This also appeareth in the words of Christ speaking of baptisme and charging the Apostles to baptize the nations in the name of the father and of the son of the Holy-ghost Where he teacheth that it is not sufficient to take water but there must be a washing So. when he speaketh of his supper he saith Take ye eate ye drinke ye so that there must not only be bread but giuing taking and eating there must not onely bee wine but giuing taking and drinking thereof This truth being euidently deliuered let vs see how it may be profitably applied First of all must the Sacraments necessarily be receiued Then it teacheth that the Sacraments without their lawfull vse are no sacraments at all they are no signes of grace if they be not vsed This condemneth the keeping reseruing holding vp and carying about with pompe and ostentation the Lords supper offering vp kneeling downe vnto and adoring a piece of bread all which are horrible prophanations of that comfortable Sacrament whereby the people isrobbed and depriued of a precious part of their peace in Christ. The bread feedeth not the body reuiueth not the spirits strengthneth not the heart by looking and gazing vpon it by touching and handling it but by eating digesting and feeding vpon it so doth the sacrament strengthen faith not by reseruing and keeping it but by vsing and receiuing of it For sacramentes are actions not dumbe shewes Christ saide not Heare ye see ye gaze re on but baptize ye eate ye drinke ye doe ye this in remembrance of me Secondly are the receiuers an outward part of the Sacrament Then the persons that are to receiue must know that diuers duties are to bee done and performed of them The persons then that are to receiue must ioyne with the Minister in prayer in quickning their faith in the couenant and promises ofGod beholding the former works of the Minister blessing breaking pouring out and distributing ratifieng them in their harts and lastly by receiuing and applying to themselues the visible signes For as we haue shewed if the words of baptisme should be rehearsed ouer the water and no person to be present to be baptized it is no baptisme so if the words of institution in the supper should be spoken and repeated without eating without drinking without receiuing it were no Sacrament Wherefore we must all learne to detest the absurd opinion of Bellarmine and other procters of the Romish religion which teache that the breade and Wine being once consecrate whither they be receiued or reserued whither they bee distributed to be eaten and drunke or whether they be kept in boxes and vessels of the Church for daies moneths and long times and carried solemnly in procession are notwithstanding still the Sacrament of the body and bloode of Christ. Against which dotage wee spake in the former vse and shall speake more in the third booke following Lastly if the receiuing be an outward part then we are not to rest in the outward participation for so farre went Iudas in the Passeouer so farre went Simon that sorcerer in baptisme and so farre went the Israelites as the Apostle sheweth They were all baptized vnto Moses in the cloud and in the sea they did all eat the same spirituall meat and did al drink the same spirituall drinke c yet with many of them was not god pleased but they were ouerthrowne in the Wildernesse And therefore Iohn Baptist said to the Pharisees and Saduces when he saw them come to his baptisme O generation of vipers who hath forewarned you to flee from the anger to come bring foorthe therefore fruit worthy amendment of life Now our righteousnes must exceede the righteousnes of the Scribes and Pharisees if wee woulde enter into the kingdome of heauen Let vs all therefore haue this profitable meditatiō so often as we deale with the Sacraments and come vnto them we must looke further then to the outward sight we must consider more then the externall signe otherwise as we approch without preparation so we depart without edification And thus much of the foure outward parts of a Sacrament to wit the minister the word the signe and the receiuer Chap. 8. Of consecration BEfore we proceede to the inward parts of a Sacrament answerable to the outward by a fit proportition it shall not be amisse in this place to speake somewhat of the Consecration of a sacrament First wee must consider what it is for the truth being knowne it will cast downe errour as the light scattereth the darknesse To consecrate then is to take a thing from the ordinary and common vse and to appoint it to some holy vse This therefore is Consecration sanctification and dedication of the outward signes to apply them to an holy purpose This is done partly by the minister partly by the people and partly by them both The minister taketh the water in Baptisme which signifieth the blood of Christ and he poureth it on the person of the baptized he taketh the bread in the Lords supper and breaketh it he taketh the wine and poureth it out he deliuereth them both the people take and receiue they eate and drinke in remembrance of Christ and both minister and people ioynein praier and thanksgiuing vnto God the father for the mistery of our redemption accomplished by Christ our sauiour so that the sacrament is consecrated by the whole action of the minister and people together This maketh the difference betweene common water and the water in Baptisme this maketh the difference betweene that bread and wine of the Supper and the bread and wine which is vsed for ordinary meate and drinke True it is in nature in essence in substance there is none but in the ende and vse Common water we vse for the washing of our bodies but the water in Baptisme is sanctified by prayer to an other vse to be a signe of the clonsing of the soule Bread and wine at mens tables in their houses are set before them for the nourishment of their bodies but at the Lords l'able they are ordained of God to an higher and holier vse euen to be signes of the bodye and blood of Christ. This is noted by the Euangelistes and by the Apostle Paule that the Lord Iesus before he brake the bread and gaue it he blessed and gaue thankes to his father that he had appointed him to be the redeemer of the world and giuen him authority to institute this Sacrament in remembrance of his death and passion For wheras the Euangelist Mathew saith he blessed the other by way
and Sapphira his wife being in the number of Disciples wer no doubt baptized of the Apostles and had also receiued ofttimes the Lordes supper yet they continued in their wickednes lyinge and hypocrisie the sacrament did not take away their wickednes nor giue them a iustifying and sauing faithe which purifieth the hart by repentance and woorketh newe obedience in the soule The like we haue said of Simon the sorcerer who albeit he were baptized yet remained in the gall of bitternes and in the bond of iniquity Wherefore the Apostle teacheth that the worde profited not because it was not mingled with faith in those that heard it If the signes be receiued without faith they hurt not that Gods giftes and ordinances hurt of themselues but not being receiued aright they hurt through our sin and default As the worde not receiued by faith is an empty sound without force so the sacrament is an vnprofitable and a naked shew without substance Wherefore the Sacraments in regard of the vnbeleeuers and vngodly are no Sacraments to them because to them they are not seales of the righteousnesse of faith True it is they remaine Sacraments in respect of God who offereth his owne sonne but they lose their strength and force toward the vnfaithfull that do abuse and contemne them as the Apostle expresly teacheth Circumcision verilyts profitable if thou keepe the law but if thou be a transgressor of the law thy circumcision is become vncircumcision the same Apostle speaketh of such as vsed the Lords Supper without true godlinesse and due preparation saith This is not to eate the Lords Supper denying that to be which was not done as it ought to be Wherefore seeing the right vse of the Sacraments is when such as are truely conuerted vse them aright we learne diuerse instructions that flow follow from hence First that the reprobate though God offer the whole Sacrament to them doe receiue the signes alone without the things signified they haue the bare title without the thing the vanishing shadow without the body the outward letter without the spirit the empty box without the oyntment and the creature without the creator They are washed with the element of water but not with the grace of regeneration They eate the bread and drink the wine but they are not partakers of the body and blood of Christ Iesus to saluation They eate the bread of the Lord but they eate not the bread and the Lord because the signe without the right and holy vse thereof is not an auailable Sacrament to the receiuer of it Wee see therefore the wicked partake not CHRIST although they partake the signes of Christ as they that found his clothes but missed his body Secondly we see heereby that the elect ordained to eternall life but not yet called and conuerted to the Lord to the obedience of his will though they come often to the sacraments yet do in like manner receiue the bare signes without the things signified because as yet they want faith and repentance What then Do they nothing differ from the reprobates In this they differ not for the present time from the reprobate Not with standing that receiuing of the Sacrament which for the time present was vnfruitfull and vnprofitable shall after in them haue his good effect as the corne that lieth long couered in the earth at the length doth come vp and florish For the Sacrament receiued before a mans conuersion is afterward to the beleeuer and penitent sinner ratified and so becommeth profitable wherby the vse of the Sacrament which before was vtterly voide and vnlawfull doth then become lawfull and comfortable as we see in the word heard without fruit faith by an vnbeleeuer is made a word of saluation afterward when he is conuerted Lastly the elect already conuerted and sanctified by the spirit of God do to their profit comfort and saluation receiue both the signe and the thing signified together yet so as that for their vnworthy receiuing thereof which hapneth through their manifold infirmities and often relapses into sin they are subiect to temporall punishments for the destruction of the flesh that the spirit may be saued in the day of the Lord Iesus For this cause many are licke and weak among you and many sleeps for if we would iudge our selues we should not be iudged of the Lord. Where the Apostle teacheth that God brought a iudgement vpon his owne house and punished this church with weakenes sicknesse and death it selfe for their vnreuerent vnworthy and disordered receiuing of the Lords Supper Although many among them no doubt were elected and all of them professed the Gospel of the kingdome yet god visited their want of preparation reuerence with diuerse diseases and great mortality according to the threatning annexed to the law If ye will not obey me nor do all these comcaundements if ye shall dispise mine ordinances or your soule abhor my lawes then wil I do this vnto you I wil appoint ouer youfearfulnes a consumption and the burning ague to consume the eies and to make the heart heauy And if ye walke stubbornly against me and will not obey me I wil then bring seauen times moe plagues vpon you according to your sinnes Wherefore when we haue receiued grace to beleeue and haue tasted the first-fruites of the spirit to the comfort of our soules we must not be puffed vp in our knowledge we must not grow secure but stir vp the giftes of God in vs when they begin to wax faint let vs seek to preuent his iudgments before they com which we may do by iudging our selus by making inquiry into our own waies and by searching the reines of our hartes with purpose to condemne all ignorance error security and vngodlinesse and as it were to take punishment of our selues then this would follow thereupon we should not be iudged and punished of the Lord. This then is the remedy to avoid the sin of vnworthy receiuing A man thus visited with sicknes weakenesse and diuerse kinds of diseases and smitten with the stroke of Gods own hand cannot possibly be restored by any creature in heauen or earth yet behold the Lord hath not left vs without meanes to remoue them and take them away to wit by taking away the cause that we may remoue the effects The cause of these punishmentes is taken away by iudging our selues Now a man in iudging of himselfe must performe foure things 1. he must examine himselfe of his sinnes 2. he must confesse them and himselfe to be guilty as the poore prisoner that standeth at the bar No denying of the fact no defending of the fault no hiding of the offence no iustifieng of our person can procure our pardon the way to haue for giuenes is to acknowledge our own wickednes 3. he must condemn himselfe and giue sentence against himself without partiality 4. he must plead pardon for
the father of the sonne and of the Holy ghost the inward clensing of the sonle by the blood of Christ is represented This description of baptisme is to be opened and farther expounded vnto vs wherein fiue pointes are to be considered of vs. First it is called the first Sacrament both in respect of the other Sacrament of the Lords supper and because when the nations were conuerted to the saith and beleeued in the name of Christ they were immediatly baptized as we see the practise of the church Act. 2. 4. and Chap. 10. 47. and Ch 8 12. Where after embracing the faith we see the partaking of baptisme and the sealing vp of their conuersion Againe it is said there must be an outward washing of the body with water because the Apostle declareth therby the nature of a sacrament of baptism Eph 5. Calling it the washing of water through the Word and it hath a iust proportion or relation to the spirituall washing of our newe birth Tit. 3 5. being also called the baptisme of repentance and amendment of life for remission of sins Dipping into the water is not necessary to the being of a sacrament sprinkling of water is not necessary to the being of a Sacrament but wetting and washing with water is necessary to the being of a Sacrament Now whether the whole body should be washed or the face only and whether it should be done once or thrice is not greatly materiall but left indifferent to the church to decree and determine what shal be thought fittest to be receiued and practised Thirdly it is added in the former description that baptisme is once onely to be administred For as in naturall generation man is once onely borne so it is in spirituall regeneration And as circumcision was once only receiued in the flesh whereby the fore-skin was circumcised so is Baptisme once onely to be administred not oftentimes to be repeated Wherefore the Apostle Eph. 4. saith There is one baptisme one faith Againe Christ willed the Apostles to minister Baptisme not Baptismes Lastly in baptisme the death of Christ is represented and he died but once so that as his death was not to be repeated no more is baptisme to be reiterated Fourthly the forme and manner of doing is said to be Into the name of the father and of the sonne and of the Holy-ghost Wherby is ment that we haue fellowship with God in three persons as a wife hath with her husband who passeth into her husbands name to be subiect to him to obey him to acknowledge and call vpon him to worship no other god but the true Iehoua This therfore is not to be vnderstood onely of vsing the name of the Trinity in baptizing but by it also is ment that the persons baptized are receiued into the grace and fellowship of God to become his people and to be pertakers of his couenant to their spirituall comfort Lastly in the description before remembred it is affirmed that the outward washing of the body Representeth the inward clensing of the soule by the blood of Iesus Christ. This appeareth expresly Gal. 3. All that are baptized into Christ haue put on Christ. And Titus 3. 5. 6. According to his mercy he saued vs by the washing of the new birth and the renewing of the Holy-ghost which he shed on vs aboundaintly through Iesus Christ our sauiour So also the same Apostle We are 〈◊〉 with him by baptisme into his death These testimonies out of the word of truth do euidently teach that this is the principall scope and end of Baptisme to assure our consciences by externall washing of the inward clensing of our soules by the blood of Christ for remission of sins This being the discription of baptisme let vs see what good vses may be made therof and euery part in order as they haue beene laid before vs. And first touching the first point mentioned before in the description that Baptisme is the first Sacrament This teacheth that such as are gained to the faith children of such as are in the profession are immediately to he baptized So was the Eunuch when he was instructed so was Paule when he was conuerted so were the Iewes when they repented And indeede this is a true saying that men cannot be incorporate into any religion whether it be true or false vnlesse they be combined together by some communion and fellowship of visible Sacraments Again Is baptisme the first Sacrament of the new Testament Then it followeth that he which is not baptized is not to be admitted to the Lords table he that hath not receiued the first Sacrament is not to bee made partaker of the second As in the old testament circumcision was the Sacrament of entrance and admission and none was admitted to eate the Passouer but such as wer circumcised as we see Exod. so none hath this right and priuiledge to come to the supper of the Lord vnlesse first they be entred and the doore opened to them by baptisme For a man must be knowne to belong to our family and houshold before he presume to eat of the childrens bread that belongeth not to strangers Touching the vse of the 2. point to wit that there must be washing with waters we learne that washing with water is of the necessity of baptisme Indeed ther may be a washing without baptisme but ther can be no baptisme without washing The washing of water through the word So that this washing is necessary because of the fit similitude that is between it and our regeneration or new-birth The water is apt to clense vs leaueth no silah behind so is our iustification 〈◊〉 sanctification repressented by the blood of christ as shal be cōsidered Therfore such as vsed sand or blood or such like matter not fit for washing did not indeed baptize but horribly prophane the Sacra of baptisme The third point in the description is that baptisme is once onely to be administred which affordeth vnto vs these three vses First it sheweth a difference between it and the Lords supper The Apostle Paule speaking of the supper of the Lord saith As oft as ye shal eat this bread and drinke of this cup and Christ our sauiour Do this as oft as ye drink it in remembrance of me therfore it must be often receiued of the church But baptisme once ministred is not againe to be repeated As we are once onely borne into the world but after our birth are dayly nourished so we are but once baptized but there is continuall vse of the Lords supper where at we are fed to eternall life Secondly this teacheth that all rebaptizing is vnlawful as we see by the examples of the Apostles who baptized not the beleeuers and members of the church the second time For Act. 2. it is noted that such as beleeued the gospel continued in the apostles doctrine in fellowship in breaking of bread prayer but not
of Christ. Neither must this be accounted and accepted an as indifferent ceremony to be admitted or omitted at our own choise and pleasure seeing Christ Iesus the Lorde of this sacrament commaunded the scripture hath commended the Apostles haue practised and the Ministers afterward obserued the same as the Apostle witnesseth The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the body of Christ speaking of himselfe and the rest of the Ministers of the church Besides it is an essentiall expressing and tepresentation of the passion and crucifieng of Christ as also the pouring out of the wine into the cup of the Lorde Wherefore they are to be accused and conuinced as heynous breakers of the high ordinance of Christ as we see in the church of Rome who omit this breaking of the breade as impertinent and vnnecessary and as not significant For Christ Iesus commaunded his disciples to eat that breade which he had broken and this breaking pertaineth to the end of the sacrament so that it cannot be passed ouer without neglect of the institution of Christ and of the essence of the supper The next title giuen to this Sacrament is the table of the Lord and it is rightly so called as by a verye fit name For seeing it is a Supper and a most heauenly banket it is requisite there should be a table answereable vnto it that as it is the supper of the lord so there may be a table for the administration of it From hence we conclude diuers good vses for our further instruction First of al it she weth that Christ and his Apostles in the celebration of the supper vsed a table not an altar For albeit the Apostle paule speaketh vnproperly of the table and thereby vnderstand the heauenly meat and drinke which was set vpon the table for all the lords ghuests yet withal he insinuateth and signifieth the place where on they were put to wit vpon a table In like manner our fauiour Christ at the sirst institution of this sacra sate downe at the table with his Disciples he stood not with them at the altar Now according to the example of Christ and his disciples must be the practise of al churches inasmuch as christ shedding his blood on the crosse had abolished al altars and therefore the Infidels did oftentimes reprooue and reproach the Christians because they had no Altars who on the other side desended themselues that their Altars are the congregations of such as bow themselues in prayers and the spirites of iust men which smell as sweet incense in the nostrils of God other Altars then these they acknowledge none Furthermore inasmuch as the sacrament of the body blood of Christ was accustomably administred on a Table not an Altar of woode not of stone made mouable not immouable We learne from hence that it is a sacrament not a sacrifice An altar doth inferre and presuppose a sacrifice and a sacrifice is referred to the Altar whereon it is offered But we haue not now properly and sacrifice for that were to account the al-sufficient sacrifice of christ as vnsufficient and vnperfect therefore wee are not to bring Altars againe into the church There is no vse of altars in the new testament seeing the making of them togither with other types and ceremonies of the olde testament through the death of Christ is abolished as the Apostles teacheth 1 cor 9. Do ye not know that they which Minister about holy things eat of the things of the Temple and they which wait at the Altar are partakers of the altars And to like purpose Heb xiii x. We haue an altar wher of they haue no right to eat which serue in the tabernacle that is such as retain the necessary vse of the ceremonies begerly rudiments of the Iews are fallen frō Christ. Whereby we see plainly and apparently that sacrifices and Altars stood togither and sell togither and therefore whereas they would conclude the sacrifice of Masse from the vse of the 〈◊〉 wee may inuert the reason and make it serue to eueit and ouerthrowe the sacrifice of their Masse seeing it is certaine there were no Altars Lastly we must obsorue that it is not barely called a table but the table of the LORD to teach vs to draw neare vnto it with all reuerence and regard If we measure and mark our affection in earthly things we see what care and curiosity is ofttimes vsed when men come to the table and presence of Noble men howe much greater care and conscience should bee vsed of euery one of vs when wee come to this table where the King of kings and the Lord of heauen and earth is present Wherefore to stirre vs vppe to this duty and deuotion let euery one consider and meditate thus with himselfe I am this day to be the lords ghuest I am inuited to his table I am to eate of his bread and to drinke of his cuppe I haue not in this businesse to do with man whose breath is in his Nostrils but to deale with God in whose presence I do abide who is both a beholder and iudge of all my actions to whom I shall either stand or fall If I come in hypocrisie he will find me out before whom all things are naked and open if I come fitted by faith and sanctified by repentance I shall receiue Christ and all his merits to my endlesse comfort Thus much sufficeth to bee considered touching this title of the Lords table The last title of this Sacrament remaineth to be handled being called the new testament or will of Christ from whence wee may gather diuerse vses as good conclusions from this doctrine For first it teacheth that there is a double testament and couenant of God made to his people one of workes the other of grace one of the law the other of the Gospell as Ioh. 1 17 The law was giuen by Moyses but grace and truth by Iesus Christ. And Ier 31 31 32 I will make a new couenant with the house of Israell and the house of Iudah not according to the new couenant that I made with their fathers when I tooke them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt the which my couenant they brake although I was an husband vnto them But this shall be the couenant that I will make with the house of Israell after those dates saith the Lord I will put my law in their inward partes and write it in their heartes and will be their God and they shall be my people The couenant of the law is a couenant where in God hath promised to his people all blessings corporall and spirituall temporall and eternall vnder the condition of perfect obedience Leuit. 26. Deut. 28. And hath threatned all curses and death it selfe to all that continue not in all parts and points of the law to do them The couenant of grace ratisied by the death and blood of
and the wine to be poured out to be distributed among sundry communicantes The last action of the minister is to distribute the bread and wine and giue them into the handes of the people 〈◊〉 CHRIST did not offer them vp to God 〈◊〉 deliuered them to his Discipies All these being workes to bee done and performed by the Minister in the administration of this Sacrament do note out the actions of GOD the Father sealing vppe his sonne vnto vs as wee shall see afterwarde when wee come to the inward parts Now let vs enter into the consideration of the vses of this parte Are these the actions commaunded in the word executed by CHRIST and to be performed by the Minister Then we see that such as are set apart to deliuer this sacrament are not consecrated and appointed priestes of the new testament to offer vp an vnbloody sactifice for the quicke and dead as the church of Rome teacheth and practiseth They are commaunded as ministers of God to deliuer the outward signes to the people not as priestes to offer them to God the father they are appointed preachers of the gospell not priests of the law which were to abolish the priesthood of Christ. Wherefore we must detest the blasphemy of these shamelesse shauelings that teach the priest to bee the maker of his maker and that he which made them gaue them power and authority to make him 〈◊〉 so after a sort preser themselues being the sacrificers before christ who is the sacrifice thēselues being the creators before Christ the creature themselues the makers before christ being made of them Thus these sacrificing priests are not ashamed to speake and to bray aloud Secondly if the minister be an outward part of this sacrament then it belongeth not to priuate persons to deliuer it to others nor to take it to themselues and deliuer it to themselues when or where there is no Minister They may indeede apply to themselues the outward signes they may eat the bread and drinke the wine and in respect of the sacramentall rites doe as the Minister doth yet for that they do it without a calling it is not a due administration but a true prophanation of this sacrament of the supper For let vs a little insist vpon the similitude beforestood vpon if the keeper of the Princes broad seale be not in the way or for the present bee not to bee gotten shall any man presume to take it where it lyeth without direction and without commaundement sucha one woorthily beareth his punishment whosoeuer he be In like manner 〈◊〉 one should earnestly desire the sacrament of the body and blood of Christ and euen faint in soul for the fruition of it finding himselfe in his longing affection able to take it himselfe 〈◊〉 the assistance of another yet euery one must consider his gifts his standing his calling and place wherin God hath set him he hath not committed to priuate persons the administration of the sacraments they may not baptize their children they may not meddle with the Lordes supper no more then common subiects may take the 〈◊〉 seale if the keeper be not in the way Against this 〈◊〉 truth two thinges of importance may be obiected which I purpose to preuent before I proceed any farther For first this doctrine seemeth not to agree with that maxime and principle which 〈◊〉 we haue resolued vpon namely Accedat verbum ad elementum fit 〈◊〉 that is Ioyne the word of institution to the outward signe and there is made a sacrament Secondly it seemeth to leaue sicke persous without comfort in their harts and peace to themselues if for want of a publicke minister themselues may not supply that want and giue vnto themselues this Supper These are the two obiections pretending and intending that priuate persons may at some times vpon some occasions haue some right and interest in despensation of the Sacraments Touching the former poynt being a ruled case of Saint Augustine that if the signe be 〈◊〉 to the word a Sacrament is ordained we doubt not to 〈◊〉 the rule vndoubtedly to be true being truely and rightly vnderstoode For the meaning is if there be an outwarde signe which is the matter and a worde of institution which is the forme of the sacraments the essence of them is fully finished as if there bee the matter and forme of an house we conclude rightly there is an house Howbeit we presuppose ther was a builder of the house to prepare the matter and to order the forme So the former principle doth presuppose a minister to deliuer and a receiuer to receiue the sacrament otherwise we shall also warre vnder the ensigne of our enimies vnawares who hold it to be the supper of the Lord albeit there be no eating no drinking no receiuing thereof If therefore in the constitution of a sacrament the institution of Christ touching taking eating and drinking must be obserued then wee see that more is required then the signe and the word in the work of the sacrament Againe touching the obiection of the sicke who seeme to be wholy left in distresse and discomfort if they may not lawfully administer the Supper to themselues I answere it was an auncient practise of the Church to carry the sacrament vnto the sick besides albeit in extremity of sicknes the minister be wanting we leaue not the sick without counsell and comfort For this we teach this we are readye to maintaine this we would haue all beleeuers in health and in sicknesse to recall and remember that if they 〈◊〉 beleeue that the Lord Iesus had suffered death vpon the crosse for them if they 〈◊〉 apply vnto themselues his precious merits for their redemption if they 〈◊〉 remember the benefits of his 〈◊〉 passion with all thanksgiuing and if they truely repent them from the bottome of their harts of all their sins they do eat and drinke effectually and to their soules health profitably the body and blood of Christ our sauiour although they doe not receiue the sacrament with their mouth This serueth to comfort the weak and to keep them within the lifts and limits of their proper calling Lastly seeing the former actions of the minister are done plainely in the sight of all it is the duty of euery one to giue diligent heede and to haue weighty consideration of these outward ceremonies by the meditation thereof to confirme their faith and to make the outward workes to further the inward graces For they are offered to our sences not that we shoulde rest in them but that our weaknes by them shoulde be helped and we by them lift vp in our harts to thinke vpon greater things Chap 4 Of the second outward part of the Lords Supper HItherto of the first outward part of the Lords supper to wit the minister now we come to the word of institution and promise annexed or contained therin which are the second
couenant it self but a sign and token of the couenant as also it is afterward expounded It shall be a signe of the couenant betweene me and you The aduersaries cannot denie a figure in this speech Now what difference is there betweene these two speeches This is my couenant and this is my body are they not alike and in like manner to be vnderstood So Exodus 12. 11 It is the Lordes passeouer properly the lambe was not the passeouer but serued to put them in remembrance of that benefit and it is expounded aster the blood shall be a token for you vpon the houses where ye are this day shall be vnto vou a remembrance Likewise the Apostle sayeth 1 Cor. 10. That rocke was Christ whereas properly the rocke was not Christ but the water flowing from it did represent him Thus then we must vnderstand the words plainely truely and briefely as if Christ had saide in this manner This bread which ye haue seene me take breake deliuer and distribute and which I bid you take and cate is a signe or sacrament of my true body signifying and sealing vp vnto you that my body shal be broken crushed and crucified for you to purchase to you eternal life let these sacramental rites and actions now performed by me and you be heerafter put in practise by you and all faithfull ministers and professors for the strengthning of your faith by the remembrance of my death and by the applying of the benefit thereof euery one to your owne selues Likewise hauing finished his supper when he did eate the passeouer with his Disciples hauing taken the cup and giuen thanks he gaue it being filied with wine to his Disciples and saide drinke ye al of this for this wine in this cup is a signe and sacrament of my blood by the shedding whereof togither with my death following the full forgiuenes of sins and perfect saluation which I by my vnchangable wil decree do giue vnto you and al that beleeue in me are assured to you and all beleeuers Thus hauing opened and cleared the interpretation of the words we shal heerafter need to spend the lesse time in confuting the contrary doctrin darkenes shal flie before the light error before truth cloudy mists before the sun-shine of the day Again seeing the words of institution are variably and diuersly set down by the Euangelists and the Apostle Paul we learne that euery change of the words where the sence is nothing altered or diminished is not to be condemned as 〈◊〉 or vnlawfull so that the alteration being in the forme and frame of words not in the substance and sence of the matter the sacrament is not destroyed For if it had bene an heinous sinne to haue made any change or alteration or to haue missed of the tearmes or sillables of the institution no doubt the Euangelists would haue consented in the words and not haue swarued one from another as we see they haue done We see how the Apostles in the allegation of sundry places of Scripture borrowed out of the olde Testament do not euermore strictly binde themselues to the very wordes as Mathew 26. Hebrewes 10. 5. and in sundry other but onely to the sence and therefore sometimes they adde as Mathew 4 10. sometimes they leaue out as occasion serueth True it is to alter any substantiall part or to wrest the wordes to a wrong and contrary meaning or not at all to expresse the sence of the wordes maketh the Sacrament voide but an alteration onely of certaine circumstaunces as of number or person of Letters or sillables cannot make frustrate the whole sacrament albeit we allow not any priuate and particular man to make any chaunge of his owne heade in such circumstaunces or to bring in a new frame of wordes So in baptisme the Greeke church saith Let the seruant of CHRIST be baptized in this Water c. and heereby nothing is detracted from the truth of the sacrament because Christ Iesus hath not precisely appointed how many wordes the Apostles and pastours of the Church shoulde vse in the execution of their Ministry Not withstanding the obseruation of the words I baptize thee obserued in our churches seemeth to drawe neerer to the commaundement of Christ and to confirme more fitly and fully the faith of the baptized and to answere vnto the words of Iohn the baptist I baptize with Water Likewise in the Lordes supper whereas Christ saide Take ye eate ye doe ye this as speaking to many the sacrament is not destroyed when the words are particularly rehearsed and specially applyed in our churches saying take thou eat thou drinke thou Lastly seeing the wordes of institution are an outwarde part of the Sacrament necessary to be knowne read marked and vnderstood wherein the substance and comfortatable vse of the Lordes Supper consisteth it followeth that they are to be published and pronounced openly distinctly plainely not in a strange language but in a knowne tongue that the church of 〈◊〉 and people of God may be edified For wherefore serueth the commaundement and promise set foorth in the supper if they be not vnderstood Whether we doe read the Scriptures sing Psalmes poure out supplications receiue the sacraments or whatsoeuer 〈◊〉 we performe to God that he may be 〈◊〉 and the congregation instructed we must doe all in a knowne tongue to be vnderstood This God commandeth this the Apostle prescribeth this the true church of God practiseth this reason teacheth this the Heathen acknowledgeth 〈◊〉 the sinagogue of Rome that it might take away all fruit and comfort from the faithfull and that it might broch horrible errors 〈◊〉 and securely and not be 〈◊〉 hath not onely commanded to pronounce the words of consecration closely and 〈◊〉 but forbidden to vse the common mother tongue of all the people The people of God must not be like Parrots or 〈◊〉 or Rauens or such birds that chatter with voice record mens words and sounde a sentence but vnderstande not the meaning thereof As Plmy maketh mention of a certaine 〈◊〉 that had learnd to say Aue Caesar imperator All haile or good morrow Emperor Caesar saluting 〈◊〉 and the two young princes 〈◊〉 and Drusus And Celius Rhodiginus writeth that Cardinall Ascanius had a Popiniay that coulde pronounce distinctly and 〈◊〉 all the Articles of the Creede Such birds or rather beasts woulde they haue Christian men to be that would haue them 〈◊〉 and not vnderstand what they pray 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the reading of the scriptures but not know what is reade 〈◊〉 the sacraments but not know the meaning of the institution Things without life which giue a sounde whether pipe or 〈◊〉 except they make a distinction in the soundes howe shall it bee knowne what is piped or harped Or if the 〈◊〉 pet giue an 〈◊〉 sound who shall prepare himselfe to battell All things in the church must tend to the instruct on 〈◊〉 edification
of all the partes and people but reading and praying in a strange tongue doe not edifie and profit the hearers as 1 Cor. 14 26 Let allthings be done to edisieng and verse 14. I speake languages more then ye all yet had I rather in the Church to speake fiue words with mine vnderstanding that I might also instruct others then ten thousand words in a strange tongue for how then should he that occupieth the roome of the vnlearned say Amen at thy giuing of thankes seeing he knoweth not what thou sayest Wherfore except we know the meaning of the words we shall be to him that speaketh Barbarians and 〈◊〉 that speaketh shall be a Barbarian vnto vs. Euen the learned languages of Greeke and Latine not in themselues but in regard of the hearers that vnderstand them not are barbarous For the Apostle doth not heere like an Orator distinguish the tongues and shew which are 〈◊〉 and rhetoricall in themselues and which rude but holdeth euery tongue barbarous 〈◊〉 Syriack Caldy Arabick 〈◊〉 and Latine to him that knoweth not the force and signification thereof And this to be most true the Scriptures teath the fathers auouch the 〈◊〉 writers warrant the very Poets declare yea their owne doctors do determine Wherfore to conclude it is the ordinance of God it is the doctrine of the Apostles it is the duty of all christians when the word is red or preached when supplycations are offered when the sacramentes are administred to vse a knowne tongue vnderstood of all and without this the scriptures are vaine the prayers are barbarous the sacraments are fruitlesse to such as know not what is read what is asked what is promised what is receiued And 〈◊〉 far of the second outward part of the Lordes Supper to wit the worde of institution for a Sacrament without the word is as a picture without sence or an image without life Chap. 5 Of the third outward part of the Lords Supper THe third outward part of the Lords supper followeth which are the elementes of bread and wine fittest signes for this purpose to signifie the spirituall nourishment of the soule by eating the body and drinking the blood of christ That these are appoynted as the substance and matter of the supper it appeareth by the wordes of Christ and his Apostles deliuering this sacrament For the Euangelists expresse that Christ tooke bread gaue it and said Takeye and eate ye So like wise it is said of the church newly planted by the Apostles that such as gladly receiued the word and were baptized Continued in the Apostles doctrine and fellowship and breaking of bread And chap. 20 it is recorded That the first day of the weeke the Disciples came together to breake bread And Paule saith 1 Cor. 10. the bread which we breake is it not the communion of the body of Christ And in the chapter following the same Apostle often mentioneth and remembreth the bread of this sacrament In like manner Christ tooke the cup wherein was the fruite of the vine By these Christ is truely exhibited vnto vs he is truely offered vnto all he is effectually giuen to the faithfull as hath beene oftentimes remembred vnto vs. This being the plaine and euident truth let vs see the vses first such as concerne both the signes ioyntly and in generall then such as belong to each of them in seueral and in particular To begin we learne from hence to acknowledge a difference between baptisme and the Lords supper in baptisme we haue one signe as the materiall part in the supper we haue two signes partly to note out our whole ful and perfect nourishment in Christ hauing whatsocuer is requisite for our saluation and partly to shew a fuller remembrance of his death for the wine which is a figure of his blood doth as it were present it and represent it before our eyes So then albeit the same participation of Christ and the same washing away of sinnes by his blood are sealed vp in baptisme and in the supper yet the manner of sealing them in each is diuerse Againe baptisme is a signe of our entrance into Gods Couenant the Supper is a signe of our abiding and continuing in that couenant Touching baptisme it is sufficient for infants if they bee borne in the church in the supper the condicion of examȳning our selues and remembring the Lords death is required They differ also in often celebration of them baptisme is to be receiued but once onely in all our life because the promise once made is alwaies firme and forcible to such as beleeue and repent but the supper is oftentimes to be receiued because an often renewing of that Couenant and calling it to our remembrance is necessary to increase and strengthen faith They differ also in the order which is to be obserued in the vse of them for baptisme is to be giuen before the Supper and the supper may not be giuen to any except to such as haue beene first baptized or reputed so to be As first a child is borne before he bee fed so must Baptisme go before whereby our new-birth is sealed then the supper must follow after whereby our dayly nourishment is declared and confirmed Lastly they differ in the signes there is onely one signe in baptisme which is the Water but there are two signes in the Lords Supper to wit the bread and the wine The second general vse is that if Christ tooke gaue and deliuered the substance of bread and wine then they must needes retain their former nature their proper substance as well as their qualities as fight tast smell bignesse whitenesse sweetenesse rednesle roundnesse and such like properties But the Papistes turne all thinges vpside downe matter into forme substance into accidents creatures into shewes and subiects into things adioyned they bring in new shifts and fables against all diuinity phylosophy reason sense and experience setting vp their own inuentions and building castles in the aire Let them proue the annihilation and remouing of the substance of bread wine away and the consisting of accidents without subiect which they are neuer able to doe For as the water in baptisme remaineth in his nature and substance so do the bread wine in the Lords supper And albeit in both the sacraments the signs be chāged to a special vse yet are they corrupted into shewes and turned into shadowes The heauens shal be changed at the end of the world yet hence it followeth not that they shall bee cleane abolished and consumed to nothing All young schollers are taught in the schooles that an accident hath no being without a subiect yet heere these sophisters against all the rules of Logick and groundes of reason 〈◊〉 haue accidents and shewes of bread and wine to be in no subiect Thus whereas in all places of learning we are taught that accidents may 〈◊〉 not the
all sides that without consecration and sanctification there can be no Sacrament for without this halowing the matter in 〈◊〉 is bare water the bread in the Supper is bare bread the Wine is Common Wine Now euery creature is sanctified by the word of God and by prayer as the Apostle teacheth 1 Tim. 4. and therefore we cannot assure our hearts that god wil blesse any other creatures as fish or flesh in stead of bread water or beere in stead of Wine seeing the word hath not sanctified these elementes for this purpose They are sanctified by the worde for the ordinary nourishment of our bodyes but they are not by any speciall worde sanctified for the vse of the Sacramentes If then it be simply vnlawfull to change any thing in the matter of the 〈◊〉 no pretence or necessity can 〈◊〉 make it lawsull And as when a lawfull Minister is wanting a pryuate person may not be taken so when the matter appoynted for the administration of this sacrament is missing an other may not bee assumed For as well may wee change the minister of the Sacrament into a pryuate man as the bread and Wine being the signes into another matter If the Sacraments cannot be had according to the precise and pure institution of Christ they may lawfully be deferred or omitted for the danger standeth not in the want as wee haue declared before so long as we are free from the contempt of them The fourth generall vse arising ioyntly from both the signes is if Christ deliuered and the Disciples receiued bread and wine as the outwarde signes of this Sacrament then we learne that the doctrine of transubstantiation is a dotage of mans inuention Though this deuise be now receiued in the Roman church as a matter of saluation as an Article of faith and a maine point of religion that by vertue of these words This is my body this is the cup of the new Testament the substaunce of breade and wine is gone and nothing remaineth but onely the shewes likenes and appearance of them yet if we examine the matter by the words of institucion by the nature of a sacrament by the proportion of faith by the true properties of a true humain body by force of reason by iudgement of the sences by confession of the aduersaries themselues and by the manifold contradictions among themselues we shall find it to be a late deuise inuention of the Papists first decreed and determined in the counsel of Laterane vnder pope Innocentius the 3. in the raigne of King Iohn of England not yet 400. years ago There it was hatched at that time and made a main matter of faith aproued in the church of Rome but yet not then receiud ouer al the world This error is a spice of the error of Marcus who went about to make his fellows and followers beleeue that he did trāsubstantiate wine into blood in the sacrament Thus do the church of Rome at this day he was he noted for an heretick by the fathers I wil not for shortnes sake bring all the reasons that might be broght to ouerthrow and ouerturn the turning of the bread into the body of Christ and the wine into his blood but alleage some few among many wherunto we require them to answer if they can Neither let thē pretend that they haue bin answerd already inasmuch as no sound and certain answer can be brought vnto them to satisfie vs or themselues Our reasons for the present shal be these First that which Christ took in his hands he brake that which he brake he gaue that which he gaue his Disciples he commanded them to eat that which hee commaunded them to eate hee calleth his bodye This appeareth by the testimony of the Euangelistes and coherence of the words But he tooke bread and brake it therefore he gaue bread he commanded to eat bread he saide of the bread This is my body Now if he tooke bread but brake it not or if he brake bread but gaue it not or if he gaue bread to his Disciples to eat but told them not this which he gaue them but some other thing beside that was his body the latter part of the 〈◊〉 starteth from the beginning and the middle swarueth from them both Secondly the Apostle after the words of consecration doth oftentimes call it bread as 1 Cor. 11. As often as ye shall eat this bread and drinke this cup ye shew the lords doath til he come And againe Whosoeuer shall eat this bread and drinke the cup of the Lord vnworthily shall be guiltie of the bodie and blood of the Lord. And againe Let a man examme himselfe and so let him eat of this bread and drinke of this cup. These men say it is not bread the Apostle saith it is bread whether of these we shall beleeue iudge you So in the former chapter hee saith the bread which we breake is it not the commanion of the body of Christ Likewise touching the other signe our sauiour expressely calleth it wine after the thanks giuing Mat. 26. I will not drinke hencefoorth of this fruit of the vine vntill that day when I shall drinke it new with you in my fathers kingdome This fruit of the vine is wine therfore the substance of it remaineth Now if the bread had bene turned into the body or the wine into the blood of Christ and if the Apostle would haue spoken properly he should haue said As often as ye shall eat not this bread but this body of Christ vnder the forme of breade the blood of Christ vnder the forme of Wine And againe he that eateth the body and drinketh the blood of Christ vnworthily And againe let a man examine himselfe and so let him eat and take in his mouth the very body of Christ his creator But thus the Apostle hath not spoken neither could he so speake truely properly and fitly therefore we do truely properly and fitly conclude that there is no 〈◊〉 Thirdly Christ speaking of the cup saith Take diuide it among you and of the bread he saith he tooke it and brake it But if the substance of bread be abolished or changed into the body of Christ and likewise the nature of the wine turned into the blood of Christ there could be no true distributing or breaking for the blood of Christ is not deuided into parts neither is his body broken Fourthly if the strength or force of transubstantiation depend vpon these words of institution This is my body This is my blood then there can be no reall change before these words be fully finished and pronounced to the end I herefore when they begin to say 〈◊〉 is What is it What mean they I say it is Is it any other then bread and wine by their owne confession till the wordes bee ended So then these sentences shall not be true when they say 〈◊〉 is my body this is my blood
quality not circumscribed not visible nor any way sensible that being in heauē he is really and corporally on earth though not in the distance betweene heauen and earth nor in those places where the host is not which is to assigne innumerable bodies to our sauiour Christ and consequently to make him no body which is in esfect as much as to deny he is come in the flesh which is the very doctrine of Antichrist himselfe as Iohn speaketh Euery spirit that confesseth not that Iesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God but this is the spirit of Antichrist of whom we haue 〈◊〉 And in his 2. Epistle Many 〈◊〉 are entred into this world which confesse not that Iesus Christ is come in the flesh he that is such a one is a deceiuer and an Antichrist But Orcam propoundeth this as the doctrine of the schooles that The body of Christ is euery where as God is euery where and that if there were an host that filled all the world the body of christ might be with euery part thereof when it should be consecrated And Holcot treading in the same stepes of the schooles not of the scriptures saith If there had beene a thousand hostes in a thousand places at the same time that christ did hang vpon the crosse christ had beene crucified in a thousand places But it is an vnseparable property of bodies to be locall and contained in place take away space of place and true dimensions from bodies and they are no where as Augustine teacheth Besides hence the fathers concluded the truth of Christs body becavse he might be seene and handled and because he had flesh and bones according to the 〈◊〉 Behold my hāds and my feete for it is I my selfe handle me and see for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me haue But if he be neither seene nor handled in the sacrament nor discerned to haue flesh and bones how shall his humanity be 〈◊〉 and maintained against heretikes impugning the same The 22. reason it taketh away iudgement from the senses and maketh the sacrament of truth to be a sacrament of forgery and falsehood for the senses of seeing of tasting of touching of handling and smelling do iudge bread and wine to be in the sacrament and not mans flesh truely and properly neither can all the senses be 〈◊〉 in their proper obiects as euen the phylosophers themselues do teach and that truely The 23. reason it is an horible act and vnnaturall cruelty for man to eate mans flesh and for man to drinke mans blood and therefore the papists are as humane as the Cyclops Canibals and other barbarous people It is more brutish and barbarous to eate mans flesh then to kill a man and to drink mans blood then to shed it Thus they make christian people eaters of mans flesh and bloode suckers which is beastly and horrible wickednesse The 24. reason the Apostle maketh an opposition between the table of the Lord and the table of deuils saying Ye cannot drinke the cup of the Lord and the cup of deuils ye cannot be partakers of the Lords table and of the table of deuils where he sheweth that to eate the flesh offered to idols is to bee partakers of the idols as the bread which we breake is the participation and communion of the body of the Lord. Hence he concludeth that they should not eate of those thinges which the Gentiles sacrifice to idols because they haue fellowship with the diuils that eate of them euen as they are vnited to Christ which partake of the bread in the supper If then the flesh offered to idols be not transubstantiated why fhold the sacramental bread be turned into the body of christ seeing it sufficeth to make vs partakers of the Lords body to eat of the bread as it was sufficient to make them partakers of the idols to eate of the thinges offered vnto them The 25. reason if the institution of Christ be a sufficient direction vnto the church what to hold in this questiō we shal easily giue this transubstantiation a fall We see in the cases of matrimony that did befall our sauiour bringeth them to the first institution and therby dissolueth the doubts and difficulties that arose saying Frō the beginning it was not so So when any controuersie ariseth about the Lords supper the ordinance of Christ is able to take it vp how great or grieuous soeuer it grow Now there is no sentence no word no sillable no iot no title in the discription of the supper that fauoreth or sauoreth of transubstantiation or signifieth and insinuateth any such matter True it is christ saith This is my body but to be doth not signifie to transubstantiate for then when he saith I am the true vine I am the dore the way and such like he shall be turned and transubstantiated into a natural vine into a materal doore into an high way from whence would follow infinite abuses and absurdities Besides if the word is in the institution fignifie is transubstantiated that is changed from one substance into an 〈◊〉 from bread into flesh from wine into blood then the change shold be made before all the words be vttered so that hence it would follow that it cannot be done by vertue of the words which goeth before the pronouncing of the words Last of al the maintainers of transubstantiation as the builders of babel haue their tongs diuided and their languages confounded they cannot accord together but vary and dissent one from another like the false witnesses that arose against christ First they knew not certainely whether the bread bee turned into his body or come in place thereof the substance departing Secondly some alow not these speaches bread is Christes body or bread is made christs body but wil haue it said christs body is made of bread others condemne this speach also that bread is made christs body Thirdly they know not what is broken whether bread or accidents or nothing others say the true body of christ is broken Fourthly they agree not whether their water in the chalyce mingled with wine be transubstantiated some say it is other say it is not some more sober then the rest are afraid what to say and aske who is able to decide the questiō Others say it is turned into the humors of his body others virknit the knot thus that the water is turned into the wine and then the wine into his blood and therefore are circumspect to giue this cautel that a litle water be mingled being afraid least if more water were put in then the wine the wine should be transubstantiated into water Fiftly they cannot agree with what words their consecratiō is wrought whether accidents be without their subiect whether the accidents norish no lesse then the substance of bread wine likwise what the rats mise do eat how srō whence the worms
this cup. Where he giueth a double commaundement first to appeare reuerently then to receiue worthily Now al that must proue and try themselues are commaunded not only to eate bread but to drink of the cup but al must try and examine themselues therfore al are commanded both to eat and drink at the lords table If this be a commaundement to examine then the wordes following of eating and drinking are likewise commandements There is no halting in these let them admit both or let them deny both Eightly if the faithfull take not the cup in the supper of the lord the condicion of Christians vnder the Gospel shal be worse then of the Isralites vnder the law For the people of Israell in the wildernesse hauing the same sacrament in effect with vs Did all drinke of the spiritual rock that followed them and that rock was Christ as the Apostle affirmeth But out condicion is not worser and weaker then theirs therefore all the faithful are to drink of the cup of the lord Bellarmine the Souldan of the Romish Synagogue answereth thus They drunke not water out of the rock when they did eate of the spirituall meate but in another place and at an other time But this is an answearlesse answer which cannot satisfie For albeit the sacraments of the Isralites as figures and types did represent the same graces that our Sacraments do yet it is not necessary they should in all pointes answer each other and in all respectes agree together Besides the Church of Rome at no time aloweth the people to drinke of the Wine a seale of the blood of Christ they keepe them from the cup of the Lord both when they giue them the bread and at all other times and thereby make their estate worse then the estate of the Iewes Indeed if they did at any time permit al the people to drink of the cup they might pretend this example of the Israelites but inasmuch as they vtterly deny them this part of the cup they ouerthrow themselues in their malice and yet in their blindnes they do not see it Lastly many of the fathers did both eate Manna and 〈◊〉 water out of the rock if not in the same place yet at one the same time inasmuch as they gathered thereof euery morning and it ceased not vntill they entred the frontiers and confines of the land of promise But they neuer alow without a toleration and dispensation the people in any place at any time vpon any occasion and in any respect to tast of the cup in the Lords supper Ninthly if the cup of the new testament may be taken from the Lordes people in like manner the water in baptisme may be taken away froÌ„ them For the blood of christ whereby remission of sins is purchased and procured is represented by the wine of the Lordes Supper as well as by the water in baptisme But the water in baptisme without great sacriledge cannot be omitted or neglected wherefore then should the cup be taken away Lastly if any part of the supper might be taken away from the people then like wise the word of God may be taken from them for in this point there is the same reason and respect of them both A Sacrament is nothing else but a visible word and a sealing vp of the word and the offence semeth to be the same whether a man break the seale or rent the writing But the word cannot be withdrawen froÌ„ Christian people it being the instrument of faith and the life of the Church Wherefore it is the greatest wrong and iniury done to the people of God to take from them the cup of saluation The answer to this reason must be to confesse the parts and yeeld the conclusion forasmuch as by forbidding the people the reading of the Scriptures they haue robbed them of the word of God and taken from them the key of knowledge neither entring themselues into the kingdom of heauen nor suffering those that would enter No marueile then if they take the cup of blessing from the people who haue taken from them the free vse of the word of God To conclude these reasons it is Antichrist who contrary to the doctrine of christ contrary to the institution of the supper contrary to the practise of the Apostles and contrary to the vse of the former churches hath excluded the people languishing and thâ—â—sting after the blood of christ as the dry earth for the sweete shewers of raine from taking the cup of the lord and left them a dry coÌ„munion to eat the bread of the sacrament alone Hauing considered the truth of God by sundry reasons grounded in the scripture that the people haue good interest and title in the cup denied vnto them let vs answer the obiections of the aduersaries made against the former doctrine First they pretend that christ administred it to the apostles only and not to any of the people consequently the institution for taking the cup can be no general coÌ„maundement for al men thus the Rhemistes reason I answer first it may be doubted and disputed whether onely the Apostles were present at his last Supper For seeing diuerse were added vnto the church and professed the faith of christ seeing he had other disciples beside the twelue seeing many Godly men and women followed him to see his miracles and to hear the gracious words that proceeded out of his mouth why should we think that none of them were admiâ—ted to his table who had often heard his preaching and depended vpon him in their liuing Again the passeouer was celebrated in that house of a faithful man as may be collected by sundry circumstances now theÌ„ either the lord Iesus annexed that famely vnto his as the law in one case appointed or else we shall haue two passe-ouers at one time in one house which hath no warrant of scripture no colour of truth no probability of reason We read in the institution celebration of the passe-ouer of ioyning house to house and taking his neighbor next vnto him in case of the insufficiency of one houshold to eate the lambe but we neuer read of killing two lambes and keeping two passeouers vnder one roofe Besides the smal remnant of the faithful among the Iewes would no-doubt rightly and religiously obserue the passe-ouer after the example of their lord and maister rather according to the precept of Moses ' then aceording to the practise of the Iewes in imitation of christ rather then according to the tradition of the elders Furthermore we are to consider that in eating the passeouer they sorted theÌ„selues together according to the number of the persons able to eate vp the lambe for they commanded to take A lambe without blemish a male of a yeare old if the houshold be to little for the lambe he shal take his neighbour which is next vnto
his house Now christ with his twelue disciples alone were not sufficient to eat vp this lambe of a yeare old being great large according to the sirian kind as may be supposed by the discription of Aristotle Pliny others Neither doth it appeare that any remained or was burned with fire according to the institution of God because the Euangelists declare that so soone as the supper was administred and a psalme sung of thanksgiuing they went out into the Mount of Oliues Why then should we not thinke that christ added and annexed other to his family seing his own disciples sufficed not especially the blessed virgin his mother who was not long from him whom afterward after his departure he commended and committed to Iohn to be protected and prouided for who from that time took her home to his house as his own mother But to leaue these consideratiōs as coniectures we answer the former obiection that in asmuch as christ deliuered both signs to the same persons they might bar the people frō the bread as wel as from the cup. For I would know why the bread is necessary but because it was instituted by christ and retained by his Apostles Wherefore the institution maketh the one as requisite as the other Besids if other heretiks should arise as great enemies to the peoples partaking of the bread as the church of Rome is to their cōmunicating of the cup of the Lord how might they better be repressed and refelled then by alleaging the first institution of christ and shewing the practise of the Apostles so that the reasons brought to confute the one wil serue directly to ouerthrow the other Moreouer the disciples at the first ministration of the supper performed not the office of the minister nor any part of his duty but of the people Christ was the minister therof he took the bread he blessed he brake he gaue the bread saiing This is my body Likewise he tooke the cup blessed gaue the same saying This cup is the new testament in my blood On the other side the disciples took it did eat and drinke which are the proper duties of all the people Lastly the Apostle saith not in the first person we ate and drink as speaking of himselfe other teachers of the church but directing his speach to all that are called and sanctified in Christ in euery place according to the inscription of the epistle he saith As often as ye shal eate this bread drinke this cup ye shew the Lords death til he come Now these Corinthians to whō he specially wrote could not liue vntill the second comming of christ to iudgement therefore this eating and this drinking belongeth to al that cal vpon the name of god to the end of the world Secondly they object against the former truth this out of Act. 2 They continued in the apostles doctrine and in breaking of bread and Ch. 20 they came together to break bread It is not said to deliuer the cup vnto the people but to breake bread wherby they gather it was ministred vnto the people in one kind onely and not in both I answer by a cōmon Synecdoche one part is put for the whole For among the Hebrewes this phrase in scripture to eate bread is to receiue whole nourishment ful refreshing by eating and drinking as appeareth by many places wher mentioning only bread for food it were madnes to imagine and gather that they drunk not Besides the Apostle putteth the other part to wit drinking of the cup for the whole celebration of the supper when he saith By one spirit we are al baptized into one body and haue been al made to drink into one spirit where we see as our sauiour added the vniuersal note drink ye al of this and as the Euangelist Mark accordeth saying they al dranke of it so the Apostle doth not pretermit it but saith al were made to drink as if the Lord Iesus the Euangelists and the Apostles would preuent before hād the corruption followed in the church of Rome Wherfore seeing drinking of the cup doth not properly note out the whole action because no man was euer so grosly blinded to suppose that the cup might be alone administred it followeth that by this member expressed we must vnderstand the other and by one part the whole Furthermore it is a ruled case among themselues that it is flat sacriledge if a priest consecrate not this sacrament in both kindes but do it in bread onely If then the former scriptures Act. 2. and ch 20. proue the receiuing vnder one kind because bread onely is expressed so the cup to be excluded it wil likewise follow they consecrated in one kinde because the wine is not expressed and therefore by these places neither priest nor people should take the cup if they will not admit a trope or figure Neither can they say that Luke discribeth not what the Apostles consecrated or receiued but what they deliuered to the people for the Euangelist declareth Act. 20. 11. not onely that the Apostle brake the bread but did eate thereof himselfe so that they must confesse that Paule also receiued in one kind and consecrated in one kind or else necessarily grant one part put for the whole as likewise we say 1 Cor. 11 where he doth expresly touch and teach both kindes to the eating of the bread ioyning the drinking of this cup yet sometimes he expresseth onely the one signe for shortnes sake the church had receiued this vsual manner of speaking to call the Lordes Supperthe breaking of bread as verse 20. When ye come together into one place this is not to eate the Lords Supper and verse 33. When ye come together to eate tary one for another likewise verse 29. He discerneth not the Lords body and yet in the sentence going before hee saith that such as eate and drinke vnworthily do eate and drinke their owne iudgement Wherefore as the Apostles alwaies celebrated the supper by conseeration both of the bread and of the cup so the people alwaies receiued in both these kinds to their great comfort and consolation Thirdly they alleage that there is an vnion and coniunction of each signe that the body is in the blood and the blood in the body that christ is wholly and perfectly vnder each kind because now in his glorious body there is no separation of the body from the blood or blood from the body I answer surely if this were so it were a fault and friuolous thing to do that by more which may be c done by fewer to vse two kindes which may as well be done and is done vnder one as a wise Philosopher teacheth Besides if one may reason in that soit the whole supper might be abrogated for we are made partakers of christ in baptisme and he dwelleth in our hearts by faith which commeth by
taught nothing they vnderstand nothing they heare nothing they receiue nothing and a few childish apish foolish and vnseemely gestures excepted they see nothing they tast nothing they partake nothing neither comfort of heart nor memory of Christ nor benefit of his passion But Christ in his last Supper did not eate vp all alone but after the Disciples hadde supped as Mathew setteth it downe he tooke bread and blessed he brake and gaue it to them saying take ye eate ye neither did he drinke alone of the fruite of the vine but taking the cup he gaue thanks and gaue to them all saying Drink ye all of this So then albeit a certain number of communicants are not limited and determined yet Christ in these wordes apoin 〈◊〉 eth a company to be present as apeareth by the number take ye eate ye drinke ye all deuide ye it among your selues doe ye this in my remembrance ye set foorth the Lordes death when yee come together to eat tarrie ye one for another as often as ye shal eat this bread These words cannot be vnderstood of one perticular man but necessarily import a greater number of men nay the Philosopher teacheth that the word all must be verified at the least of the number of three which is the least and lowest number that would be admitted to this supper Neither do we read that so soon as one was gained to the faith that the Apostles administred this Sacrament to him much lesse would they minister to themselues alone when none were conuerted in a nation or cittie Secondly Christ expressely commandeth vs to doe as himselfe did when he left this fare-well token and pledge of his 〈◊〉 to his Disciples saying Do this in remembrance of me But he after the wordes of consecration did not offer a sacrifice to his father vnder shewes of bread and wine but gaue the bread and cup to his Disciples and left his owne example as a direction for vs to followe so that the distribution and deliuerance of the signes is of the substance of the Sacrament as well as the breaking of the bread or pouring out of the wine and it is not lawfull in any sort to change the testament of Christ or to corrupt the meaning of the testator Thirdly the Apostle teacheth how he receiued from the Lorde that which he deliuered to the churches that the people should eate of this bread and drinke of this cup and proueth that the faithfull are made partakers of the Lords table not by gazing or looking on while others eat but by eating not by standing still while others drinke but by drinking as 1 Cor. x. Wee that are l many are one breade and one body because we are all partakers of one bread Fourthly the same Apostle reprooueth the Corinthians which presumed to the Supper of the Lorde besore others and did not tarry for their brethren when they came togither to be partakers of the sacrament as we see 1 Cor 11. Euery man a hen they should eate taketh his owne supper afore this is not to eat the Lords snpper And afterward Wherefore my brethren when ye come together to eate tarry one for another Now because the Corinthians brake this order and ordinance he chargeth them to come vnreuerently to receiue vnworthily to eat and drink iudgment vnto themselues Shall they then that are faithfull christians patiently beare the iniury done them by these sacrificing Masse-mungers who neuer bid the Lordes ghuestes nor call them to his table nor tarry for them till they come to this heauenly banket but like the priests of Bell do eate and drinke vp all themselues Fistly the same Apostle willeth and warneth all persons which come to this communion diligently to proue and examine themselues and then to come to this supper as we see 1 cor 12. Let a man examine himselfe and so let him eat of this bread and drinke of this cup so that he would not haue any excluded from receiuing which haue tryed their harts by examining and are thereby rightly propared to this great worke Lastly the names giuen to this Sacrament noting the nature thereof doe affoord vs a good consideration to strike through the heart of this priuate Masse being called sometimes the supper of the Lord and sometimes a communion among our selues If it be an holy supper and spirituall banket why are none bidden and called thereunto If it be a communion why doth the Priest vncharitably swallow all alone whereby they make it a communion but without company a supper but without ghuests meat but without eating drinke but without drinking a table but without sitting downe a participation but without any that are partakers a banket but without seeding thereat the people departing as hungery and thirsty as they came Wherefore as no man celebrated the Passeouer aright or receiued profit thereby but such as did eat the flesh thereof so can none come to the supper of the Lord as he ought though he looke vpon others except he eate of the bread and drinke of the cup according to the commaundement of Christ the author thereof And thus much of the sole communions and priuate Masses brought into the church against the example of Christ against the vse of the Apostles and against the name and nature of the sacrament it selfe Hitherto we haue pulled downe the Heresies of the Church of Rome and haue raked in the dirt and dungh ill of their deuises the sauour whereof hath annoyed heauen and earth now let us obserue out of this last outward part of the sacrament how we are directed and instructed therby to further our knowledge and obedience Did Christ commaunde the faithfull of his family to eate and drinke that which he deliuereth without laying any furder burthen or bondage vpon them then we must vnderstand it is no precept of Christ to receiue the Lordes supper fasting before any other meats and drinkes True it is the people whose zeale goeth beyond their knowledge make a great scruple of conscience in this point to come fasting which custom we do not condemn but commend so it be without superstition in themselues and iudging of others But howsoeuer many make as great a matter to communicate fasting as to come in faith yet this is no necessary rule or commaundement binding the conscience to the obseruation thereof For the Worde of God and institution of the sacrament are perfect directions to the church teaching all matters of faith and obedience yet they teach no such practise And our blessed sauiour teacheth his disciples what they should do the Euangelists deliuer what they did and among all their doctrine we find not this precept of fasting Againe Christ administred it not fasting the Apostles receiued it not fasting not that we are bounde to celebrate the supper at that time but to shew that Christ would neuer haue chosen to do it after Supper if that time had bin simply vnlawful Besides
the shewes of wine he is not personally locally carnally corporally naturally really substantially and sensually present in the Sacrament The question is not whether the wordes of christ be true for they are knowne confessed and beleeued so that as he is the truth so all his wordes are wordes of truth neither is the question whether the Sacrament bee a bare signe or bare figure we say Christ is truely represented sealed and exhibited neither is the question whether God'bo omnipotent and almighty this is a part of our faith and an Article of christian beleefe neither is the question simplye of the presence of Christ whether he be truely and vndoubtedly present in the Sacrament of his last supper we acknowledge and receiue as much But the whole question is of the meaning and vnderstanding of the words of institution and of the manner of his presence Wee confesse and teach the people committed vnto vs that christs body and blood are truely verilie and indeede giuen vnto vs that we truely eat and drinke them that we are releeued and liue by them that we are made bone of his bone that Christ dwelleth in vs and we in him yet we say not that the substance of bread and wine is abolished or that christs bodie discendeth from heauen or is groslie and corporally present in the sacrament we are taught to lift vp out hearts to heauen where christ sitteth at the right hand of God the father and there to feede vpon him But he ere is the state of the question and controuersie betweene vs. The church of Rome teacheth that after the wordes of consecration the bread and wine are abolished and the body and blood of christ come in place so that they make them corporally 〈◊〉 not onely in the sacrament to bee eaten with the mouth but in the pixe in the Masse and in their solemne processions where is neither eating nor drinking Yet Berengarius in his recantation was taught to saie and forced to subscribe that Christ is in the sacrament sensible or sensually is touched with the singers diuided broken rent with the teeth and not onely the accidents More ouer they make it to be eaten not onely of euill men but of beasts and to fill vp the measure of blasphemy to be cast out into the draught as some of them haue taught and affirmed Thus then the difference standeth betweene vs they hold that christs body and blood are carnally eaten of wicked men without faith of brute Beastes without reason but wee denye that CHRIST is thus present in the Sacrament for his body cannot bee vnder so little a quantity of bread and Wine besides it is impietie to 〈◊〉 that the person of CHRIST or his bodye and bloode can bee truelie receiued of Dogges 〈◊〉 and Mise be chewed with the teeth swallowed downe the throat digested in the stomacke and be cast out into vncleane places This we deny this we doe not beleeue this wee abhorre and detest from the bottom of our hearts What is it then we teach and professe We deny that the body and blood of Christ are carnally contained vnder the shews and shadowes of bread and wine we deny them to be eaten and drunken ofwicked men or vnreasonable creatures we deny that they are truely and properly both in heauen and on the earth in pixes and on the 〈◊〉 These are meate for the mind not for the mouth for faith not for the teeth for our beleefe not for the belly This carnall eating of Christ is confuted and conuinced by many reasons First Christ sate downe at the Table and the Disciples with him afterward he tooke bread gaue thankes brake it gaue it and said This is my body likewise he tooke and gaue the cup and sayd Drinke ye all of this whereby we see when the Apostles receiued the Sacrament Christ sate at the table with his true body but the body which they tooke sate not at the table therefore they tooke the signe of his body Likewise the blood which they receiued was not in the body which sate at the table therefore it vvas not properly Christes blood vvhich was not as yet really and actually shed The same body could not sit at the table not sit at the table the same body could not be in their handes and out of their handes the blood of Christ could not be out of his veines in the cup and in his vines within his body hee could not sit visible at the table and bee inuisible in the mouthes and bellies of the 〈◊〉 Wherefore the reall presence bringeth with it real contradictions which cannot stand together Secondly the end of the Lords supper is to call his death to a continuall remembrance as Luk. 22. Do this in remembrance of me and the Apostle 1 Cor. 11. Ye shew the Lords death vntill he come Now to what end should we neede the remembrance of Christ if he were corporally present in the sacrament if he were taken in the hands if he were holden in the mouth if he were eaten with the 〈◊〉 And to to what purpose should we shevv the Lordes death till he come if he come 〈◊〉 and be present bodily in the sacrament Besides the wisest a nong the Phylosophers teach vs that sence is of thinges present but remembrance is of such thinges as are absent as hope is of such thinges as are to come not seene and this the Apostle teacheth Thirdly Christ receiued a true body withall the naturall properties of an 〈◊〉 body like to vs in all thinges sinne onely exc pted and is therefore called the sonne of 〈◊〉 the sonne of 〈◊〉 the sonne of man our brother partaker of flesh and blood hee is said to haue taken vpon him the seede of Abraham and not the Angels nature to be visible Luk. 24 39 Behold my hands and my feete for it is I my selfe 〈◊〉 me and see for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me haue For if he may be in many places together in some place visible and in some inuisible in some to be handled in others nor to be handled hee can haue no true body of a true man And if this were not a strong reason It is not felt and seene therefore no humaine body the Disciples might haue answered vnto Christ why doest thou bid vs behold thy hands and see thy feete and handle thy body and thereby to try thy humanity seeing thou hast a body which cannot be seene touched or handled Fourthly christ hath left the earth with his bodily presence and is 〈◊〉 vp into he 〈◊〉 farre aboue all principalities and powers and is sit do vne on the right hand of his father as Act. 1. While they beheld he was taken vp And Mar. 16. After the Lord had spoken vnto them he was receiued into heauen and sate at the right hand of God So Act. 3. Whom the heauens must containe vntil
messe of pottage before the blessing and as the Gadarens who preferred theirswine before christ therfore besought him to depart out of their coastes But let vs learne better thinges for all these shall vanish and come to nothing And what shall it profit a man if he win the whole world and lose his owne soule Let vs not labour for the meate that perisheth but for the meate that endureth to euerlasting life which the Sonne of man shall giue vnto vs. Therefore let vs remember whensoeuer we come to his table to be partakers of this Supper to come with a great longing after life and saluation from him as we desire bodily meate when we are hungry and drinke when we are thirsty then shall we by him be satisfied and saued otherwise we cannot lay hold on him we may receiue the outward signe but we cannot receiue the graces of christ offered vnto vs. Thus much of the third inward part of this Sacrament Chap. II. Of the fourth inward part of the Lords Supper THe last inward part of this sacrament of the supper remaineth which is the faithfull and christian receiuer As euery communicant sensibly and outwardly taketh the bread and wine giuen vnto him eating the bread and drinking the Wine for the nourishment of his body so the faithful receiuer apprehendeth and layeth hold on christ by the hand of faith and applyeth him particulally that the feeling of his true vnion with christ may daily be increased according to that saying Ioh. 1. As many as receiued him to them he gaue prerogatiue to be the sonnes of God euen to them that beleeue in his name And 1 Cor. 10. The cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the communion of the blood of Christ The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the body of Christ Wherefore when we do faithfully and worthily take the bread and the cup into our hands we must consider that withall we take and receiue Iesus christ himselfe offered vnto vs. When we eate the bread and drinke of the cup and so apply them to our bodily vses we must consider that we apply christ Iesus to our selues euen to our soules particularly that he is meate indeede and that he is drink indeed vnto vs if we bring with vs the hand of saith For faith is like the mouth of a vessell if you poure Lyquor vppon it all the daye longe vnlesse the mouth of the vessell bee open to receiue it the Water is spilt on the ground the vesselremaineth empty so may a man come to the lords table euery month receiuing the bread wine that represent whole christ yet except he bring with him faith which is the mouth of the soule hee receiueth not Christ vnto a spirituall life to be his righteousnes and sanctification And this is the reason why we receiue a little portion and a small quantity as well of bread as wine because the end of our eating and drinking serueth for the sanctification of the spirit not for the silling of the body Now let vs see what vses are offred to our consideration in the meditation of this truth First seeing onely the faithfull are partakers of the things signifyed in this Sacrament we see all doe not receiue alike there is a difference to be made among receiuers But as you snatch after the leaues of the tree and let go the fruit want the profit of their labour so is it among many men in this worlde who take the signe of Christ but let goe Christ. Nowe as Moses intreating of thinges cleane and vncleane noteth out foure sorts of beasts some onely chew the cud and some onely diuide the hoofe some neither chew the cudde nor diuide the hoofe and some both chew the cud diuide the hoofe or as in the dayes of the Gospell some were circumcised in heart not in flesh as Titus some were circumcised in the flesh not in the hart as Iudas some were circumcised neither in flesh nor in the spirit as the gentiles and some were circumcised both in the flesh and in the spirit as Timothy so is there a difference among receiuers some receiue Christ onely spiritually not sacramentally some onely sacramentally not spiritually some neither receiue him spiritually nor Sacramentally and some receiue him both spiritually and Sacramentally Of these we will speake 〈◊〉 and in order as they haue bin propounded The spirituall eating is by faith whereby we are made one with Christ and partakers of his benefits without the Sacramentes where of Christ speaketh He that eateth my 〈◊〉 and drinketh my blood dwelleth in me and I in him Thus to eat him is to beleeue in him and therfore he vseth these words as being of one force to beleeue in him and to eat him to drinke him and to come vnto him This is the 〈◊〉 of God that ye beleeue in him vvhom he hath sent I am that bread of life hee that commeth to mee shall not hunger and he that beleeueth in me shall neuer thrist Againe Christ attributeth the same fruit and effect to them that beleeue in him that hee doth to them which eat his body drink his blood therefore by eating and drinking hee meaneth nothing but beleeuing He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath eternal life And in the 40. verse of the same chapter he saith This is the will of my father that euerie one that beleeueth in the sonne should haue cternall life and I vvill raise him vp at the last day Heerby we may see that Christ attributeth the same to beleeuing which in the other place hee did to eating and 〈◊〉 so that the meaning of Christ is that to beleeue in him is to eat him And thus many receiue Christ eating and drinking his body and bloode that neuer came to the Sacramentes Heere 〈◊〉 some will obiect If this doctrine be true then are the Sacraments needlesse For if we may 〈◊〉 christ by faith spiritually without any vse or comming to the Lordes supper to what ende serueth the Supper It seemeth by this to be made void and superfluous God forbid for the sacraments are the holy ordinances of Christ by his blessing appointed for our help and benefitte so that the most perfect christians of the strongest faith haue need to seeke the strength ofsaith against weaknes and wauering in the promises of God Notwithstanding we must confesse to the glorie of god and the great comfort of manie persons that the faithfull soule maie and doth often feed vpon christ to saluation beside the vse of the sacrament For the spirituall grace is not of necessitie tied to the outward signes as if without them God cannot or doth not sometimes bestow the same We see in the acts of the Apostles Cornelius and his company was sealed with the spirit of God before the receiuing of the outwarde sacrament Abraham beleeued the
like the bitter and cursed waters making tryall of the suspected wife wherupon the counsell of wormes determineth that If any monasterie be suspected of theft let him bee purged by the taking of the sacrament Thus Sybicon Byshop of Spire in the counsell of Mentz did by it purge himselfe of adultery about the yeare 1100 an vse neuer intended by the spirite of God nor practised by anie of the Apostles to institute it to discouer secretes Likewise somtimes it is taken to be good against inchanters and inchantments sometimes to bee good for the remedy and recouery of sickenes to deliuer soules out of purgatory to preserue from the plague to saue cattell to cure the feuer to recouer again things lost to take away tooth-ache to cleere the eyes and what not All these fancies and supposed ends of this Sacrament agree not with the institution of christ nor with the former vses set down which now we come to handle and to proue out of the doctrine of the Apostles themselues Touching the first and principall end that is the remembrance meditation and shewing forth the death of christ with all thanksgiuing this he commaunded to vs at his last 〈◊〉 from vs which ought much to stick in our minds because the last words of a deare friend ready to part from vs do often times leaue behind both deepe impressions and deuout affections in vs. Indeede when we read of the passion and death of christ it doth not much moue vs to heare it opened and expounded it moueth in a farther degree but more then these to haue before our eies a visible representation of the crucifieng of christ in his last supper doth moue vs most of all The institution of this Sacrament hee did in wisedome reserue till the approaching of his death that we might not forget him when he is gone from vs. So god the father after the vniuersal flood drawning the whole world for a remembrance of his mercy in deliuering Noah and his family from the waters and of his promise made neuer to destroy it so againe left to them and al posterity the 〈◊〉 bow When he had iustly smitten the first borne of the Egyptians and gratiously saued the first borne of Israel he commaunded Moses to sanctifie to 〈◊〉 al the first born that first openeth the womb to remember the day in which they came out of the land of Egypt When he had miraculously fed the Israelites with Manna from heauen that men did eate Angels food he would haue a golden pot ful of it to be reserued in the Arke of remembrance for the better remembrance of so great a work So likewise being deliuered by the precious bloode of christ from the floods of sin 〈◊〉 haue gone ouer our heads and eased of the heauy burthen that pressed downe our hearts we haue receiued baptisme to keepe vs in remembrance thereof that wee are ciensed from the filthynes of sin Again being nourished with christs body crucyfied his blood shed for vs we are coÌ„manded to vse this mistery to continue an holy remembrance of his death and passion to our endlesse comfort This end to wit to be to vs a remembrance of Christes sacrifice on the crosse is taught by the Apostle So often as ye shall eate of this bread and drinke of this cup ye shew the lords death till he come In like manner the Euangelist Luk of the bread he saith Do this in remembrance of me and of the cup Do this as oft as ye shall drinke it in remembrance of me by declaring his death And we declare the Lords death when we publikely confesse with our mouth and beleeue with the heart that our whole hope and affiance for life and saluation is surely set in the Lords death that we may glorifie him by our confession and exhort others by our example to glorifie him because his death is our life his passion is our saluation his suffering is our reioycing We our selues are the principall and proper causes that he was torne and tormented our sinnes wounded him we our selues crucified him we euen we were the causes for he was chastised for vs that by death he might deliuer vs from death and from him that had the power of death Our euill motions our vile thoughtes our corrupt wordes and our sinfull works did set on worke Pontius Pilate Herod Annas Caiphas Iudas the Gentiles and the Iewes who were but instruments as the crosse nailes the hammer and spear these were as our seruants and workemen in the euill action of his crucifieng Wherefore to speake the truth not Sathan the tempter not Iudas the Traytor not Caiphas the highpriest not Pilate the chiefe iudge not the Iewes that conspired against him not the false witnesses that accused him not the band of men that scorned him not the passengers that nodded their heads at him not the souldier that pierced him not the executioners that railed and nailed him on the Crosse are so much to be accused and reproued for his sufferings as we we I say our selues and our owne sinnes Not that we can excuse those cursed instrumentes that crucified the Lorde of glory who shall receiue according to their workes when they shall see him whom they haue pierced but to teach vs chifely to accuse and condemne our selues We bound him with cords we beate him with rods we buffeted him with fistes we crowned him with thornes wee reuiled him with our mouthes we railed at him with reproches we nodded at him with our heads we thrust him through with 〈◊〉 we berraied him with a kisse we pierced his hands and feet with nailes we crucified him betweene two theeues wee condemned him through false witnesses we poured shame and contempt vpon his person we iudged him as plagued and smitten of God For inasmuch as our fâ—lts and offences procured these things to be done vnto him we were the doers of them and the dea'ers in them And surely then we are profitably grounded in the doctrine of the passion of Christ when our haits cease to sinne and we are pricked with an inward griefe of those great and grieuous transgressions whereby as with speares we pierced the side and wounded the very soule of the immaculate lambe of God as Ioh 3 Who so sinneth neither hath seene him nor knowne him And the prophet 〈◊〉 teacheth chap. 53. He was wounded for our transgressions he was broken for our iniquities the chastssement of our peace was vpon him and with his stripes 〈◊〉 are healed the Lord haih layd vpon him the iniquity of vs all Seeing then christ was slaine for our sins let vs kill sin in our selues seeing he dyed for vs let vs labour that sin may be dead in vs seeing he was crucified for vs and our saluation let vs crucifie our owne Instes that they raigne not in our mortall bodies seeing his hart was pierced with a speare let vs haue our hearts thrust through pierced
and pricked with vnfained sorrow for all our iniquities This is the right vse the true end and the sound comfort following and flowing from the death of christ To conclude we must learne and hold for euer that we haue the beg nning and chiefe cause in our selues which did crucifie christ and crush him with most bitter sorrows let vs then be reuenged of our sins and do al despite we can vnto them let vs endite them arraigne them accuse them condemne them and naile them to his crosse let vs kil thē mortifie them and bury them in his graue for euer This is the first end of the supper which is sanctified by the breaking of the bread and pouring out of the wine declaring vnto vs that as the body of our lord was broken and by violent meanes afflicted so his blood gushed out and flowed plentifully out of his gaping and bleeding wounds This must be our meditation whensoeuer we come to the lords table Chap. 13. Of the second vse of the lords supper THe second vse of the lords supper is our spirituall vnion and communion with christ This the Apostle declareth The cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the communion of the blood of christ The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the body of christ Whereby he meaneth that the faithfull which come conscionably worthily to the lords table are ioyned and vnited to whole Christ by the bread Sacramentally by faith instrumentally by the holy ghost spiritually and by them all most effectually For we take the bread into our hands and likewise we take the cup into our hands as christ commaunded saying Take ye eate ye drinke ye diuide ye Neither do we lay them apart or hide them aside or reserue them in a boxe or abstaiue from them but when we haue taken them we eate we digest them we are nourished by them and they are turned into our substance So christ being eaten of the Godly by faith is vnited to them by his spirit as we haue shewed before whereby they are made one with christ and he one with them And as meate plentifully prepared daintily dressed and only seene vpon the table doth not nourish the body or take away hunger so if the gospell be preached and the sacraments administred except we apply the promises of the gospel and beleeue that christ withal his gifts is ours they prosit nothing towards our saluation Such therefore as lawfully and worthily come to the lords supper as to a table richly furnished and to a banket liberally prouided must not onely generally beleeue that Christ suffered in the flesh and dyed for sinners but particularly for themselus yea communicateth himselfe and al his gifts to them aboundantly as certainly as themselues eate of the bread and drinke of the cup. This vnion and communion is neere and wonderfull great and therefore the apostle fitly calleth it a mistery euen a great mistery speaking of christ and of the church For what vnion can bee greater then that which is betweene the thing nourishing and the thing ' nourished We haue nothing in Adam but that which conueyeth death vnto vs so that is is needefull to be ioyned to one which maie giue life to vs that as we die in Adam so wee may liue in him This vnion cannot by reason be expressed or fully vnderstood As Christ in the daies of his flesh had a dubble kindred one earthly and carnal kindred the other spirituall that by faith receiued his worde and beleeued in his name of whom he said Behold my mother and my Brethren for whosoeuer shall do my fathers will which is in heauen the same is my brother sister and mother so is it in this vnió and felloship with him one is outward and bodily which al mankinde hath with him in that he is partaker of our flesh and blood the other inward and spirituall whereby we are made partakers of him and of al his sauing graces to euerlasting life As Christ was borne of the Virgin Mary and vnited our nature to him taking vpon him not the Angels nature but the seed of Abraham euery reprobate hath this vnion with him in that he tooke vpon him the shape of a man but there is a mysticall and marueilous vnion whereby he dwelleth in vs by faith whereby we are truely coupled to him made partakers of him deliuered from sin and made heires of euerlasting life quickning and sustaining vs as food which preserueth the life of the bodie If the arme ioined to the body haue no life no sence no benefit of vitall spirits it is no part of the bodie though it be vnited to it so the wicked liuing without faith are as it were sencelesse they haue no forgiuenes of sinnes no sanctification no saluation and therefore are no true members of Christ. If he poure not life and grace into them they are not his members if he kill not sinne in them they are not vnited spirituallie vnto him The bodily vnion with him shall profit nothing it is the spirit that giueth life Seeing then the receiuing of the bread and wine which turne into our substaunce teacheth the misticall vnion between Christ and his members we learne first from hence that all the faithfull and godly are truly made partakers of Christ and his graces as the members receiue life from the head and the tree moisture from the root For euen as the wife ioyned to her husband in marriage is thereby made partaker of his body and goods hath interrest with him in the commodities of this life and loketh for norishment food fellowship protection and gouernement from him so being made one with christ we are indued with his he auenly gifts and blessings This must be our comfort in all dangers and tentations in all tryals and assaults to consider that we are one with christ we are not only dear vnto him but nearely ioyned with him as members to the head as the wife to the husband and as the braunches to the vine and therefore can neuer be seperated from him in life or death Secondly this streight vniting of the faithfull to Christ sheweth that the vngodly haue no part nor fellowship in him and with his graces though they be ioyned to a communion of the same nature and haue many common gifts of knowledge and vnderstanding yet Christ neuer dwelleth in them with his sauing graces and with his spirite of sanctification he possesseth not their harts he worketh not in them a particular perswasion of their reconciltation to God neither an hungring desire aboue all things to bee at vnity and peace with him neyther a distaste and dislike of sinne neyther the comfortable spirite of grace and prayer all which are in some measure in all the saithful Wherfore although they may bee cloathed with the flesh of Christ they cannot be said to be couered with the grace of Christ although they be
externall and visible which are bread and wine and besides the heauenly internal and inuisible the true body and blood of Iesus Christ together with al his gifts benefits and treasures according to the doctrine of Ireneus Thirdly we agree that in the supper of the lord we are made partakers not onely of the vertue and operation of christ but of the very essence and substance of his true body and blood which was giuen for vs to death vpon the crosse and was shed for vs so that we are most cōfortably nourished with the same vnto eternal life Fourthly we beleeue that the bread wine are not changed or transubstantiated into the flesh and blood of christ but remaine true and natural bread and wine in substance as before so that the bread is called his body and the wine his blood not only because his body and blood are signified by these and set before vs but because so often as we eate and drinke them worthily christ himselfe giueth vs his body blood truely to euerlasting life Lastly we al hold the vse of the supper in both kinds and that without the right vse of the outward signes it is no sacrament vnlesse the bread be eaten and 〈◊〉 wine drunk and therefore we condemne al 〈◊〉 and adoration of the bread al carying it about and lifting it vp by the priest to the people vsed in the Church of Rome The disagreements and diuersities in opinion among vs are in certaine adioynts and in the manner of receiuing for seeing we all reach and confesse the true communication of the true body and the true blood of our Lord Iesus christ the controuersie must needes stand in the manner of communicating and therefore the vnity of the churches is not therby plucked 〈◊〉 The difference standeth in these particulars First one part contendeth that these wordes of christ this is my body must be vnderstood literally and as the words found which yet that side doth not so vnderstand the other part holdeth that they are to be vnderstood sacramentally and figuratiuely according to the declaration of christ the interpretation of Paule and the infallible rules of our christian faith Secondly one part wil haue the body blood of christ essentially and bodily in with and vnder the bread and wine and so to be eaten as that together with the bread and wine they enter into the mouth and body of the receiuers but the other part holdeth that the body of christ which at the first supper sat at table with his disciples doth not now continue with vs vpon the earth but abideth in the heauens and shal remaine there vntil he break the heauens and discend thence to iudgement Lastly one part will haue al communicants that come to the lords table and partake the outward signs whether they come worthily or vnworthily whether they be beleeuers or insidels whether godly or vngodly tó eat the body and drinke the blood of christ corporally and with the mouth of the body so as the beleeuers doe eate him to life and saluation the vnbeleeuers to death and damnation the other side holdeth that the vnbe leeuers abuse the outward signs of bread and wine to their destruction and that only the faithful can eat the body and drinke the blood of christ by a true faith by the working of the holy ghost wherby they are made flesh of his flesh and bone of his bone being more neerely and firmely knit vnto him then the members of our body are vnited to our head and thereby drawing from him life euerlasting These are briefely the pointes of difference faithfuly not partially particularly not confusedly set downe in discussing the truth wherof howsoeuer great bitternes hath 〈◊〉 broken out betweene bretheren as likewise did betweene Paule and Barnabas yet setting the 〈◊〉 of disputation aside they were worthy members of the church zealous defenders of the faith learned teachers of the truth earnest destroiers of heresie and rare examples of golines notwithstanding the infirmities imperfections and intemperate stile of th one part And howsoere this odious mak-bate N. D. boldly auoucheth pag. 46. that these men neuer met 〈◊〉 to compound their controuersies but they haue alwaies departed more disagreeing more enimies theu euer they were before their meeting yet al men know he doth either ignorantly or maliciously conceale the seueral points of their vnion and agreement concluded and subscribed at Marpurge anno 1529. cha 15. which was in this sort credimns 〈◊〉 omnes c. we all beleeue and professe concerning the supper of the Lord Iesus Christ that the vse there of in both kinds according to the inctitution of christ is to be obserued And that the masse is not any such worke wherby one man may obtaine grace for another whether he be dead or aliue Also that the sacrament of the altar is the sacrament of the true body and blood of Iesus Christ. And that the spirituall eating of the same his body and blood is very necessary for euerie christian man Moreouer that the vse of this sacrament euen as the word it selfe is instituted of almighty God to stir vp vnto faith the weake consciences of men by his holy spirit And although it could not hither to be altogether agreed amòg vs whether the true body blood of ch be in the bread and wine corporallie yet neuertheles both parties ought to declare christian charity one toward the other so far as conscience can beare And both parts shal diligently pray vnto god that he by his spirit may vouchsafe to establish vnto vs the true vnderstà ding of that matter A men In this act which was subscribed with the hands of Luther Melanthou Brentius 〈◊〉 Oecolampadius Bucer and others we see they professe christian charity and promise earnestly to pray vnto God to reueile his truth vnto them bring them to be of one hart in the truth and confirme them to discerne of things that differ so 〈◊〉 the enimies of our church haue cause rather to enuy our agreement then to in ueigh against our disagreement It is not the custome of the true church tò delight in contention it is the fashion of the church of Rome to command to compel to enforce to presse to oppresse to ban to throw out cursings and to thunder out excommunations against those that dissent frō thē but our churches not withstanding this variance haue not so proceeded one against another as enemies we curse not but blesse we hate not but loue we parsecure not but pray one for another keeping the groūdwork of faith 〈◊〉 ioyning harts and hands we seeke to repaire the ruine of Syon and pull down the fortresses of the enemies therof Moreouer albeit it were to be presumed in men of iudgment and discretion that such as haue leysure with delight and pleasure to paint out the iars and quarels abroad either are or doubtlesse shoulde be in league and loue at home yet
the signe for the thing nor the thing for the signe seeing the parts are distinguished in nature though ioyned in the person Againe albeit by gods ordinance these parts be so vnited that by taking of the signe the faithfull are made partakers of the thing signified no lesse truely then the outward signes are receiued of our bodily senses yet we must conceiue consider that these outward and inward parts remaine distinct and vnconfounded and therefore wee must take heede we take not one for another we must not ascribe to much to the outward parts and so take them for the inward which hath beene the occasion of sundry errors from time to time Some attribut too little to the outward sign and some ascribe too much both waies the Sacrament is abused and the partes are misapplied Hence sprang as a ranke weed in the Lords corne the doctrine of transubstantiation or carnall turning of the substance of bread into the body whereby the signe is swallowed vp and the outward substance with them quite abolished for their fained Christ hath consumed the outward signe as the rich deuoureth and eateth the poore Thus the signe is consumed to little regarded Others on the other side cleaue to much too the outward signe and rest in the externall worke placing holinesse and remission of sinnes in the deed done and thus the thing signified is little regarded and wholly abolished as the euill fauored and lean-fleshed kine did eat vp the fat and wel-fauored this was 〈◊〉 dreame and the other is mans deuise For these men giue all to the outward receiuing placing holynesse and remission of sinnes therein and thinking themselues sure and secure when the bread and wine is taken at the Lords table Thus all hypocrites libertines and carnall Gospellers do for all the religion deuotion and godlinesse of these idle and ignorant professors standeth in outward resorting to the Church and in an outward taking of the communion of the body and blood of Christ which is to make an Idol of the signe and to flatter themselues in their euils to their own destruction For albeit a man haue been baptized and haue receiued the Lords supper yet if he liue wickedly and walke after his owne lusts the Sacramentes shall auaile and aduantage him nothing at all but further his condemnation Lastly hath the Sacrament some parts outward and some inward some seene and some not seene with bodily eies Then it giueth occasion both to parents to teach their children the meaning of these misteries and to declare vnto them the ordinances of God as likewise to children and the younger sort to aske and inquire of their parents to heare and learne of them the doctrine of the Sacraments thereby to know the mercifull promises that God hath made to his people This appeareth directly where the the fathers are forewarned ro teach their childrē the hidden mistery of the Passeouer When your children aske you what seruice is this ye keepe then ye shal say It is the sacrifice of the Lords passeouer which passed ouer the houses of the children of Israell in Egypt when he smote the Egyptians and preserued our houses So likewise Ch. 13. 14. speaking of separating sanctifiing the firste borne for the seruice of God he chargeth parents to whet this doctrine on their children and to instruct them how God with a mighty hand and outstretched arme brought them out of Egypt out of the house of bondage Againe we see when the Lord had parted the waters of Iordan that the people might passe hee commaunded Ioshua to set vppe 12. stones in memoriall of the mighty and miraculous worke of God for his people against their enemies and when their children should aske them in time to come what was 〈◊〉 by those stones they should answer that the waters of Iordan were cut off before the Arke of the Couenant of the Lord. He would not onely haue themselues to profit by 〈◊〉 wonderfull workes but to retaine the remembrance of them he wold haue their posterity to know the cause and 〈◊〉 thereof and so g'orifie 〈◊〉 name for euer Heereunto we may fitly ioyne what the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I will open my mouth in a parable I will declare high sentences of old which we haue heard and knowne and our fathers haue told us we will not hide them from their children but to the generation to come we will shew the praises of the Lord his power also and his wonderfull workes that he hath done that the posterity might know it and the children which should be borne should stand vp and declare it to their children that they might set their hope on God and not forget the workes of God but keepe his commaundements All these things serue to this purpose to shew that it is a duty and burden laid on the shoulders of all parents to acquaint their children 〈◊〉 the works of God especially with the benefits of our redemption wrought by Christ for our saluation If they aske the question why infants are baptized and washed with water into the name of the holy Trinity we must make plaine vnto them the meaning of that mistery We must say vnto them My children this is a signe of the Couenant of Gods mercy to vs and our 〈◊〉 to God it is a mistery of our saluation and teacheth that being in our selues vncleane vnrighteous 〈◊〉 y and sinful our soules are washed by the blood of Christ euen as the water in Baptisme washeth our bodyes 〈◊〉 in the mercy of God is so much the more marueilous in our cies insomuch as the 〈◊〉 were entred into the couenant by cutting lancing and effusion of blood in circumcision Againe before they come to yeares to receiue the holy Supper of the Lord we must informe them at home and declare the institution of that Sacrament and the comfortable vses therof to them so they may afterward come to this Communion with better warrant of their worke with greater comfort to themselues with lesse danger to their souls We must teach them that as the bread is broken and the Wine poured out so the body of Christ was crucified and his blood shed for the remission of our sins and that if we beleeue in the Lord Iesus we are nourished in our souls to eternal life by the passion of Christ our Sauior as certainly as our bodies are norished with the creaturs of bred 〈◊〉 wine Notwithstanding there is a generall defect of this duty in many parents neither are children readye to enquire and learne at home neither are parentes able to answere anye thing in these matters of God way wardnesse in the one and wordlines in the other and ignoraunce in them both hath taken away all care and conscience from them touching these holy duties and heauenly misteries so that neither the one teacheth nor the other learneth neyther the child enquireth nor the father answereth CHAP. 4. Of the first outward part of
the Holy-ghost he breathed on them and said Receiue the Holy-ghost The corporal blast and breathing was not the Holy-ghost but he added his word and promise with the outward signe to assure them that with the breathing he bestowed a blessing Thus wee see that the Sacramentes haue the word alwaies ioyned with them and without the word whereby their institution and vse is declared they are as a dead body without life as a dumbe shew without voice as an empty cloud without water and as a barren tree without fruit Let vs apply this doctrine to our selues First it teacheth that they partake not the Sacraments aright that haue not the knowledge of the word that are ignorant both of the ordinance and institution of God and of the promise annexed to the institution of god of which sort there are many in the world that neuer labour to know what he hath appointed and commaunded them to do If they do as others of the church do therein they rest and seeke no further to be able to warrant their owne worke If they heare the word spoken if they see the body washed the bread broken and the wine poured out and receiue the outward signes they regatd no more they go no higher they imagine they haue done enough they neuer desire to vnderstand the meaning of the words which are necessary to be knowne comfortable to be vnderstood and profitable to be marked If a man haue goods befallen or legacies bequeathed vnto him by any wil or Testament wil he not resort to his learned counsel to be careful to vnderstand the Testament and know the meaning of the Testator Christ Iesus before his death made his wil he hath made his children heires of his promise he promiseth to them forgiuenesse of sinnes in this life and eternall life in the world to come Doth it not now behooue euery faithfull Christian to search into it and know what is promised and bequeathed vnto him Men of this world for the most part make their eldest and first borne heire of all and leaue little to the other but euery child of God is as the eldest and as the first borne most deare to him he shal receiue his double portion the second shal haue no lesse then the first nor the third lesse then the second nor the younger then the elder the first shall be as the last and the last as the first for he may do with his owne as he list Againe if a man doe leaue all his sonnes heyres and rich inheritors for the most part lesse is 〈◊〉 on the daughters but all the childrē of God both his sonnes and daughters shal be heyres euen the Heires of God and heyres annexed with Christ Iesus their share shal be as great as the portion of sonnes Moreouer when a man hath passed all the daies of his life in carke and care what can he giue to his pofterity but earthly riches transitory possession a fading inheritance leauing them inheritours as well of his sorrow as of his substance It is not so with the children of God Christ by his last wil and Testament hath promised to make his people sound in faith rich in hope blessed in the pardon of their sinnes and heires of the kingdome which hee hath promised to them that loue him This is a great and vnspeakable comfort to al Gods children whether high or low whether rich or poore So then we ought to be much more careful and earnest to know throughly and vnderstand perfectly the will of Christ then any naturall child is to search the meaning of the will of his naturall father And if men were not wholly carnall they would be thus farre fpiritually minded Againe is the word an outward part of the Sacrament Then the Sacraments must neuer be separated and set a part from the word They are not dombe shewes and idle signes but haue alwaies the doctrine of God adioyning vnto them to shew the end vse profit of them and the purpose of God in them This appeareth in all places wher God gaue signes to confirme and assure the truth of his promises When he gaue in mercy to Noah and all his posterity the Rain-bow imediately after the flood as a signe of his couenant he addeth his word vnto the signe My couenant will I establish with you that from hencefoorth all flesh shall not bee rooted out by the waters of the flood neither shall there be a floode to destroy the earth any more This is it the Apostle meaneth 1. cor 11. Ye shew the Lords death till he come Where he teacheth that the Lordes Supper cannot be truely deliuered and rightly administred vnlesse there be a declaration shewing forth of the death of christ Wherefore it is no sacrament except the word and doctrine be ioyned vnto it by way of explication and exposition of the outward signe Lastly those Sacraments are proued heereby to bee no Sacraments which are foisted and brought in without the warrant of the word For take away the word and what is the outward Element but a bare signe What is the water in baptisme but common water What is the bread in the Lords Supper but common bred What is the wine but common wine such as men vse and all men may take at their ordinary tables Seeing therfore such signs Sacraments as haue not Gods commandement for their institution nor promise of grace and saluation annexed vnto the vsing of them are voide and nothing worth heerby the imagined deuised Sacraments of the church of Rome are condemned which deliuereth that it hath not receiued of the Lord and imposeth that to be beleeued which it neuer learned in the word Heereby the last anoyling or extream vnction is excluded wanting the word to warrant the continuall practise of it Also their confirmation hath neither word to institut the practise nor elemēt to assure any grace nor promise to approue any vse True it is they haue words to administer it but they are words of men not of God vnwriten not written of tradition not of scripture The like might be saide of mariage though we confesse and acknowledge it to be an holy ordinance and honourable institution of God yet was it made no Sacrament hauing no word of institution no promise of sanctification and saluation annexed vnto all the faithfull vsers thereof neither is it an instrument whereby God applyeth Christ and his sauing benefits to the comfort and consolation of his children Wherefore to conclude this point we affirme that neither the sonnes of Romulus at Rome nor of Remus at Rhemes shall euer be able to shew and proue that they are to be acknowledged and receiued as Sacraments of the church which haue no warrant of the word to commaund them nor promise annexed to assure the sauing graces of Christ to the worthy receiuers But such are their fiue pretended Sacraments of confirmation penance orders
the remission of his sins and neuer rest vntil he giue him peace of conscience and restore him to the ioyof his saluation Chap 13. Of the fir st v se ofa Sacrament HItherto of the parts of a Sacra both outward and inward now we come to the vses therof For vnlesse we know the vse and vnderstand the end why they were ordained it shal not profit vs to know the parts Every thing must be referred to his right vses and propper endes so must the Sacramentes be The endes are especially these three First to strengthen faith Secondly to seale the Couenant betweene God and vs. Thirdly to bee a badge of our profession Touching the first end the Sacraments serue for the better confirmation of our faith as appeareth Where the Apostle hauing set down the drowning of the world and the preseruing of Noah by the Arke he saith our baptisme directly answereth that tipe which is a taking to witnesse of a good conscience and sauing vs by the resurrection of Christ. So then by faith confirmed in Baptisme we haue an infallible assurance in the death of Christ of our saluation Many indeed come to the sacraments are present at Baptisme are partakers of the Lords supper that feele no strength of faith no increase of Gods graces no spiritual groth in the body of christ so that they worke not saluation in them but further their condemnation For the sacramentes as we haue shewed giue not grace but more firmely surely and comfortably confirme faith they apply and seale vp Christ crucified The sacraments cannot giue faith to the faithlesse neither were they instituted to the end men should beleeue but because they do beleeue as meat was not giuen that men should learne to eate but that the eating might be nourished Faith indeede receiueth them and then they serue to nourish it And they confirme not faith by any inherent power included in them but the holy spirit applyeth Christ to vs and frameth this comfortable conclusion in our hearts All such as are conuerted and do rightly vse the sacraments shal receiue Christ and al his sauing graces But I am conuerted do rightly vse the sacraments Therfore I shal receiue christ his graces Thus doth the cōforter comfort al those that come rightly religiously to the Lords table Now if we would enquire and search after the reasons of this first end we should find that one cause why they confirme faith is because god is true in his promises he confirmeth and maketh good that which is gone out of his mouth All the promises of God in Christ are yea and are in him Amen vnto the glory of God through vs. For 〈◊〉 Princes seales confirme their charters assure their grantes and make certaine their pardons so do gods sacraments witnesse to our hearts and consciences that his words and promises are true and are established to continue for euer For as he declareth his mercies by his word so he sealeth and assureth them by his sacraments Againe this appeareth by the example of Abraham who first beleeued the promise and it was imputed to him for righteousnes being yet vncircumcised and afterward receiued the signe of circumcision as the seale of the righteousnes of faith as the Apostle teacheth We say that faith was imputed vnto Abraham for righteousnes How was it then imputed when he was circumcised or vncircumcised Not when he was circumcised but when hee was vncircumcised c. Where he sheweth that Abraham was iustified in vncircumcision but yet was afterwarde circumcised that the gifte of righteousnes might be confirmed in him The Eunuche likewise beleeued before hee receiued baptisme and therefore it sealed vp the increase of his faith and of Gods graces And Act 2. They that gladlie receiued the wordes of Peter were baptized And. as Peter preached to Cornelius and others of the Gentlies The Holy-ghost fel on them all which heard the word and he said Can any forbid water that these shoulde not bee baptized which haue receiued the Holy-ghost as wel as we So he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Wherefore when the minister washeth with water it representeth our buriall with Christ into his death and our rising again with him into newnes of life As bread norisheth and strengthneth man so the body of christ taken by faith feedeth the soule We take the bread and cup into our hands we eat we drink we are refreshed so we feed on Christ whose flesh is meat indeed and whose bloud is drink indeed and we are comforted Let vs nowe come to the vses as we haue seene the reasons And first of all do the sacraments serue to strengthen our faith then let vs all acknowledge our failings and infirmities Let vs labor more and more to feele the weakenes and wantes of our owne faith True it is if our faith were perfect and entire lacking nothing we should not neede the sacraments We must not therefore abstaine from them for the weakenes of our faith but for that cause come to God and to the Sacramēts of God praying for strength and confirmation thereof as that father did whose sonne was possessed with a dumbe spirit when Christ saide to him If thou canst beleeue all things are possible to him that beleeueth he answered crying with teares Lord I beleeue help mine vnbeleese And Luk. 17. the Apostles say to the Lord Increase our faith Vndoubtedly he that neuer doubted neuer beleeued For whosoeuer in truth beleeueth feeleth sometimes doubrings and wauerings of his faith Even as the sound body feeleth oftentimes the grudginges of a feuer and distemperature of the body which if he had not health he could neuer finde and feele so the faithfull soule findeth sundry doubtings which if his faith were not sound he covld not diseerne For we feele not corruption by corruption nor sinne by finne because when the strong man possesseth the house all things are in peace but we feele sinne and perceiue corruption in vs by a contrary grace of gods spirit The lesser and smaller measure of grace we haue the lesser is our feeling and the more grace we haue the more quick we are in feeling of corruption What is the reason that many haue no light of sinne no feeling of their corruption no tentations no trembling no terror no feare of gods wrath but wholly liue lie and dye in their lustes Surely because they are without grace without gods spirit and without his inward worke in them But the faithfull who are not led by the slesh but liue by the spirit are often tempted assailed tormoyled tryed and prouoked to many euils according to the words of our blessed sauiour Simon Simon behold Satan hath desired to winnow you as wheat but I haue prayed for thee that thy faith faile not therefore when thou art conuerted strengthen thy bretheren Asa man carried vp and set vpon an high to wer or on
the pinicle of a temple and ther fast bound in chaines of Iron that he cannot fall although he would when he looketh down feareth and al his ioynts tremble because he is not acquainted and accustomed to mount vp so high in the aire and to behold the earth so farre beneath but when he remembreth himselfe and perceiueth himselfe fast bound and out of all danger then he conceiueth constant hope of continuing and casteth away all feare of falling So when we looke down-ward vpō our selues and our owne waies we haue doubtings wauerings astomshments horrors terrors tremblings and feares but when we looke vpwards to be hold the sweet consolation which god hath promised Christ hath purchased the word hath published the Holy-ghost hath sealed and euery beleeuer hath tasted wee feele our selues sure and cease to doubt any more For faith though assaulted with doub tings may be certain The Sunne alwaies shineth in the firmament though the clouds haue couered it and the light appeare not The tree hath life in it though it be not in winter discerned So faith hath his assurance and perswasion though it bee shaken with doubtings and assaulted with tentations Wherfore so often as we feele these doubtings and imperfections let vs set against them the certainty of gods truth let vs set before vs the vnchangablenes of his promises let vs draw neere to the holy Sacraments and therby seeke strength and increase offaith Moreouer was this one end of the Sacramentes to strengthen faith Then god refuseth and 〈◊〉 none for weakenes of faith For a weak 〈◊〉 his a true faith as well as a strong faith A Leprous hand can hold that which is offered vnto it as wel as a sound and strong hand albe it not so strongly so is it with faith though it be feeble as a grain of mustard seed yet if it be vnfained it wil aply christ effectually which weaknes leaueth God in vs as a meanes to stir vs vp to go to the sacraments We read that Dauid called lame 〈◊〉 to his table therby honoring the son for the fathers sake so doth god receiue vs al deformed and defiled to his heauenly supper And as Mephibosheth professed himselfe vnworthy to eat bread at the kings table saying What is thy seruant that thou shouldst looke on such a dead dog as I am So must we confes our vnworthines and be contented with the crums of his grace that fal from his heauenly table And thus acknowledging our selues to be blind he will restore vs to bee poor he wil inrich vs to be wounded he wil cure vs to be captiues he wil deliuer vs to besick he wil heale vs to be weake he will strengthen vs to be lost he will saue vs to be hungry and thirsty he will resresh vs to be broken-hearted he wil binde vs vp to be sold vnder sinne he wil ransome and 〈◊〉 vs. Thirdly it reacheth vs to abhor the absurdity of Bellarmine a factour and at turney of the church of Rome who denieth that the Sactamentes are seales of the promises or serue to 〈◊〉 and confirme our faith and to assure vs of free remission of sinnes by the death of Christ. Contrary to that we heard before in the example of Abraham who receiued circumcision to seale vp assure his iustification by faith whose example is set forth to shew how all men are 〈◊〉 before God and what is the vse of the Sacraments in all that are partakers of them So doth Baptisme seale vp to vs Gods promises in Christ and assureth the remission of sinnes as Peter teacheth Lastly if the chiefe end of the Sacramentes and of the ordinance of God in the institution of them be to confirme faith and to assure vs of regeneration mortification sanctification iustification remission and saluation then how say so me we cannot be assured in this life of our standing in the estate of grace of the forgiunesse of sinnes and of our adoption in Christ Doth not the holy ghost testifie vnto vs particularly the adoption of children the remission of sinnes and saluation of our soules As Rom. 8. We haue not receiued the spirit of bondage to feare but the spirit of adoption whereby we cry Abba father the spirit beareth witnesse with our spirits that we are the children of God In these words gods sanctifieng spirit and our sanctified spirit are made the two witnesses of our adoption This we must certainly beleeue by faith And this made the Apostle most confident in the end of the same Ch. saying I am perswaded that neither death nor life nor Angels nor principalities nor powers nor things present nor things to come nor height nor depth nor any other creature shal be able to separate us from the loue of God which is Christ Iesus our Lord. If any obiect we may hope well for forgiuenesse of sinnes but we cannot beleeue the same I answer faith and hope cannot be separated they do 〈◊〉 as louing frends accompany each other they are neuer sundered and diuided so that if we may be assured of our saluation by hope it followeth we may be certainely perswaded True hope followeth true faith as the effect doth the cause and no man can truely hope that is not truely assured Besides this is the property of hope it neuer maketh any ashamed they shall not be confounded and disappointed they shall attaine vnto the thing hoped for according to the doctrine of the Apostle Experience bringeth forth hope and hope maketh not ashamed because the loue of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy-ghost which is giuen vnto us Hitherto of the first end of a Sacrament Chap. 14. Of the second vse of a Sacrament THe second end of a Sacrament is this It serueth to be a seale of the Couenant betweene God and vs that he will be our God and we will be his people as Gen. 17. I am God all susficient walke before me and be vpright The Sacramentes are assured testimonies and confirmations of the fauour and goodwil of god who is wel pleased toward vs in christ his sonne By them as by certaine pledges giuen and receiued God of great mercy doth as it were binde himselfe to vs and we binde our selues to him to remaine his people to walke in obedience before him 〈◊〉 was a seale of gods promise to Abraham a seale of Abrahams faith and obedience toward God But let vs see what this couenant is what are the Articles of agreement betweene God and vs and what things each part interchangably couenanteth and contracteth each toward other The couenant of God in respect of himselse hath 3. parts He promiseth first of all forgiuenesse of our sinnes The deliuerer shall come out of Sion and shal turne away the vngodlinesse from Iacob and this is my couenant to them when I shall take away their sinnes Secondly the adoption of sonnes and
hath my mother conceiued mee And psal 38. There is nothing sound in my flesh because of thine anger neither is there rest in my bones because of my sinne for mine iniquities are gone ouer mine head and as a weighty burden they are too heauy for me This practise we see also in Daniell in Nehemia in Ezra in Manasses and in many others We mooue them to labour to be at one with God to be reconciled to their brethren and to remember the poore Especially we stirre them vp to prayer in regard of their present necessities and of the mercifull promises of God resting themselues on the perfect and all-sufficient sacrifice of Christ. Gratious and precious are the promises that God hath made to al that come to the throne of his mercy as p. al. 145. The Lorde is neere to all that call vpon him yea to all that call vpon him in truth he will fulfill the desire of them that feare him he will also heare their cry and wil saue them And psal 50. Call vpon me in the daye of trouble so wil I deliuer thee and thou shalt glorifie me And our sauiour Math 7. Aske and it shall be giuen you seeke and ye shall find knocke and it shal be opened vnto you for whosoeuer asketh receiueth and he that seeketh findeth and to him that knocketh it shal be opened So the Apo. Iames. The praier of faith shal saue the sicke and the Lorde shall raise him vp and if he haue committed sinnes they shall bee forgiuen him acknowledge your faults one to another that ye may be healed for the praier of a righteous man auaileth much if it be feruent Now when they are sufficiently humbled for their sinnes wee moue them to hunger and thirst after the merits of Christ who of God is made vnto vs wisedome righteousnes sanctification and redemption We alledge vnto them these and such like comfortable places of Scripture Come vnto me all ye that are wearie and heauie laden and I will ease yon This is a a true saying and by all meanes woorthy to be receiued that Christ Iesus came into the world to saue sinners of whom I am chiefe These things write I vnto you that ye sinne not if any man sinne we haue an aduocate with the father Iesus Christ the iust whose blood clenseth vs from all sinne he is the 〈◊〉 for our sinnes and not for ours onely but also for the sinnes of the whole world He is euermore about those that are his he maketh their bed in all their sicknesse his left hand vnder their heads and with his right hand he doth imbrace them so that whether they liue they liue vnto the Lord or whether they die they dye vnto the Lord whether they liue or dye they are the Lords This is true happines Furthermore we raise them vp with sweet comforts and consolations of the word of god against alterror and feare of death Death is swallowed vp in victory ô death where is thy sting ô graue where is thy victory The sting of death is sinne and the strength of sinne is the law but thankes be vnto God which hath giuen vs victory through our Lord Iesus Christ. And Rom. 8. Ther is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Iesus which walke not after the flesh but after the spirit I am perswaded that neither death nor life nor Angels principalities powers nor things present nor things to come neither any creature shall be able to separate vs from the loue of God which is in Christ Iesus our Lord. Christ is to vs aduantage whether in life or in death Such as beleeue in him yea though they were dead shall liue Death is to vs as a sleepe and the graue as a bed of rest A crowne of righteousnesse is laid vp for vs which the righteous iudge shall giue vnto vs so that an euill death can neuer follow where a good life hath gone before forasmuch as he cannot possible die ill who hath liued wel Death indeede is a Scorpion or serpent but his sting is pulled out he may wel hisse but he cannot hurt he may wel threaten but he cannot destroy for Christ hath quelled and conquered him Now to put away the griefe and tediousnes of sicknes we wil and wish them to meditate on the things they haue heard and learned by the ministry of the word from time to time in their health to consider with themselues how God sometimes suffereth the wicked to prosper for a time and florish like a greene bay tree and how he punisheth them in the 〈◊〉 wrath and iudgement for them how he blesseth or correcteth his children in this life how he hath prepared eternall torments for the wicked and vnspeakeable glory for the Godly but aboue all the workes of God we teach them deepely to thinke vpon the glorious and gratious work of our redemption wherein the infinite mercy and iustice of God do meete together and kisse each other taking delight and comfort therein withall thanksgiuing Wherefore we perswade them to beare the paines and griefes of sicknes with patience constant perseuerance because all sicknes is Gods hand who being the god of the spirits of al flesh killeth maketh aliue bringeth down to the graue and raiseth vp again There by we are indeed chastened for our sins but they are nothing in comparison of that anguish and agony which Christ suffered for vs neither are they worthy of the exceeding glory which shal be shewed vnto vs. God hath predestinated vs to be like the image of his son so that the deeper we sinke downe in sorrowes the more perfectly we resemble christ it is the great mercy of God we are not vtterly consumed and that his louing kindnes is not at an end toward vs. The sicknes of the body is physick for the soule for the striking of the one is the healing of the other by the Crosse wee must enter the kingdome of heauen and learne to loath the pleasures and profits of this present life If they fall to dispaire and doubting of Gods fauour and loue toward them in Christ we labour to strengthen the weake and bind vp the broken hearted we are ready to leaue ninety and nine in the wildernes and seeke that lost one We bring them to God that hath striken them and made the wound considering that the sonne of man is come To seeke and to saue that which is lost God is mercifull and his mercy endureth for euer hee desireth not the death of a sinner but that hee turne vnto him His mercy is ouer all the workes of his hands it is like the Ocean-sea wher no bottom can be found or founded It is the expresse commaundement of God that we should beleeue in Christ who hath tryumphed gloriously against sinne against Satan against hel against death against damnation against desperation The promises of the
circumcised He had dwelt int h land of Midian an Idolatrous country 40. years he began to sauour of the manners thereof but hauing called him to be a gouernor of people would not be appeased toward him vntill he had reformed his owne house For if any cannot rule 〈◊〉 owne house how shall he care for the church of God Nowe whereas he had two sonnes borne vnto him in Midian the elder no doubt was circumcised the eight day according to the order and ordinance of God why then did he deferre the circumcising of the younger No doubt he was scorned and derided among them for circumcising his first borne and his enemies were those of his owne house euen the wife that lay in his bosome yea he being then weake in faith loued the praise of men more then the praise of God and therefore the Lord would haue slaine him Albeit the signe of circumcision seemed base and contemptible in outward shew and to sauour of great cruelty toward little children yet God woulde not suffer the deferring and neglecting thereof to goe without punishment Although grace be not tyed to the sacraments and that we may bee saued without them yet it is not left to the disposition of men whether they will come to them or not God will not haue the outward signes contemned of vs for if we will be in the couenant we must not despise the seal of the couenāt Furthermore are the outward parts vnited to the inward then this serueth as a speciall meanes to comfort the verie lowest estate of men and the poorest degree in the church that they doubt not of the fatherly fauor of God towarde them but bee assured of their acceptation with God who will make them partakers of his eternall blessinges in his kingdome as well as other whose condition is greater and higher in the world When god gaue circumcision to Abraham he commaunded him circumcise all his seruants bond or free as well borne in his house as bought with his money thereby signifying that he adopted them for his children and that albert they were Abrahams bond-men yet they were the Lords free men So vnto baptisme wee admit and receiue the poore as well as the rich the seruant as well as the maister the low as well as the high without respect of persons When the lord instituted the passeouer the lambe was eaten of all the congregation So touching the Lords supper it is an holy banket for all degrees and conditions whatsoeuer and therefore the Apostle checketh the Corinthians for this abuse that wheras the poorest soule eating of the bread and drinking of the cup is as welcome to christ the gouernor of the seast as the richest they did despise the poore and shamed them that had not All these things duly considered serue to assure the very meanest lowest and simplest in the church that they are made heires of eternall life as well as other as they are partakers of the signe with other if they beleeue with faithfull Abraham This the Apostle teacheth There is netther Iew nor Graecian there is neither bond nor free there is neither male nor female for ye are al one in Christ. And Col. 3. There is neither Graecian nor Iew circumcision nor vncircumcision Barbarian Scithian bond free but Christ is all and in all things Fourthly are there outward rites signes and persons as externall parts of baptisme And are their likewise inward parts whereby we are consecrated to God teaching that we haue vowed to renounce the lusts of the world and to forsake the workes of the deuill Then this condemneth those that depart out of the church before this holy and publike action be taken in hand Baptisme belongeth not onely to the wittnesses and parties that bring the child but to all the members of the church that we may learne by our presence therat to renew our faith and repentance vnto God These men do too much disgrace and deface the dignity of this sacrament not vouchsafing to remain at the administration therof as if it were not worthy to be solemnized before thē wheras they should quicken their faith in the couenant of god by beholding the works of the minister and ratifieng them in their harts as we read Luk. 1. wher they are said to circumcise because they were al present at the work consenting to prayers and thanks giuings of the Church as also the Apostle saith Women pray and prophesie in the church when they sit stil and are partakers of the praiers and preaching vsed in the publike assemblies And as no member is cut off by excommunication but in presence of al to be witnesses therof to ratifie their grief for the losse of a member of their body so in Baptisme it is required to witnesse and approoue the publike worke by their presence and to 〈◊〉 themselues thereby 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and comfort hata fellow-heire is made partaker with them in the communion of Saintes Moreouer the excellency of this Sacrament is as great as of the other they are of like worthynes in themselues and to be had equal and indifferently in like price and estimation they are both commaunded and instituted by the 〈◊〉 authoritye of Christ there is the same matter and substance of both to wit Christ with all his benifits there is 〈◊〉 one and the same end of both the increase and strengthning of our faith therfore why should one Sacrament be so much extolled aboue the other and preferred before the other So that whereas many come to the Lords Supper few remaine and abide in the Church at the administration of baptisme The whole assembly heareth the word preached and deliuered by the minister the Sacramentes are instruments of our iustification by faith as well as the worde preached sauing that the word worketh by hearing only the Sacraments serue by the senses of seeing handling and tasting as well as hearing to strengthen and encrease faith in our hearts and therefore it is requisite that we ioyne in the one as well as in the other Furthermore the excellency and worthynesse of baptisme appeareth heerein in that it was instituted of God sealing vp his gratious couenant in that it was sanctified by Christ being baptized of Iohn and in that it was beautified by the heauenly reuelation of the blessed Trinity appearing thereat so great honour so great dignity and preheminence was neuer giuen to any Ceremony Did God institute it and shall we contemne it Did Iesus Christ come to Iohns baptisme and shal we disdaine to be at the baptisme of Christ Was the holy Trinity present will we be absent True it is som of the sacrifices and burnt offerings were miraculously consumed by fire from heauen but what is this to the glorious presence of the maiesty of God the blessed Trinity declaring to vs thereby that God the father God the son and God the Holy-ghost are alwaies present at
inhritances how carefull and circumspect men are to passe them where they ought to be passed and in such courts and vnder such officers as are authorised for such purpose that there may be no error committed in the conueiance For whatsoeuer is done and passed before him that hath not his patent to warrant his practise is held to be void and frustrate by maisters of that profession In like manner it standeth vs all vppon when a matter of an higher nature and of greater importance is in hand then the sealing and assuring of temporall possessions to looke carefully to the diligent performance of this speciall duty that the signing of our infants and sealing them in the couenant be made by the hands of such officers as are appointed by God for that purpose and by no other Thirdly this condemneth the abuse and prophanation of the Sactament of baptisme in the church of Rome where women midwiues and priuate persons without any commaundement of God nay contrary to his word take vpon them this part of the ministers office to baptize children which they haue receiued from the 〈◊〉 Marcion who gaue women power to baptize which Epiphanius teacheth the holy mother of Christ was not permitted to do Such then as vsurp this calling and approue thereof neuer knew the force of our adoption in Christ nor the strength of the couenant nor that the elect are saued by the good pleasure and will of God Therfore there is not that absolute necessity of baptisme to saluation which many suppose that for this supposed necessity the ordinance of God should be broken and prophaned And a man may maruell why at such times they did not rather commit the mater to priuate men to baptize then to woman whose sexe is surther remoued from execution of this office not onely because they be vncalled and priuate men but euen because they' are women and thereby are wholly vncapable though otherwise qualified of any publike charge or function in the church they are commaunded to sit stil and to be quiet Besides if in time of this extreamety and necessity which is imagened it be permitted them to minister baptisme why should it not be suffered in like necessity and danger of death that they minister the Lords Supper and preach the Gospell in case they be able and men vnable or vnwilling the dignity of the one Sacrament being no lesse then the other and the excellency of the word being as great as of them both If then women may iustly be condemned when they shal presume to sit down in the chaire of Moses or to minister the Supper of the Lord they cannot be iustified if they vsurp to minister baptisme For shall we make a shamefull and double diuorcement of those things that God hath coupled betweene the word and sacraments and likewise betweene the one Sacrament and the other This is to great contumely and contempt offered to baptisme to allow it in those that may neither publikely preach nor lawfully minister the Lords Supper seeing their warrant to practise the one is no greater then to do the other Wherefore let all priuate persous and midwiues consider with the mselues the fearefull examples recorded in the Scipture of such as haue rashly presumed to prophane the holy offices of the church and how God hath often visited this great sin with grieuous iudgments sometimes with fire from heauen sometimes the earth opening her mouth sometimes with suddaine death and sometimes with the most filthy disease of the Leprosie whereby as by his voice from heauen he thundered downe vpon mens disobedience and so ratifieth this law of the necessity of a vocation 〈◊〉 calling for euer Corah Dathan and Abiram taking vpon them the priest-hood without a calling fire from heauen came downe consuming Corah and his company the earth also opened and couered Dathan and Abiram that they were swallowed vp aliue none of them died the common visitation of other men but God wroght a strange worke vpon them and altered the course of nature which ought to be a parpetuall instruction and direction vnto vs to teach vs not to peruert or euert that order which God hath established to continue in his church Hitherto belongeth that which is writen of Vzzah who was smitten with suddaine and vnexpected death only for that beyond the bounds of his calling he put forth his hand to hold vp the Arke which did shake and was ready to fal which was lawfull for the Leuites onely to meddle withal although his intent and purpose wer neuer so good so that if the vnlawful intruders vpon baptisme pretend cases of necessity heere seemed as great a necessity yea his mind and meaning was as good as theirs yet it displeased god because it was done without his word and warrant So Azariah was striken with Leprosie that he was a Leaper to the day of his death for that not being content with his kingly office he would take vpon him the priests office to burn incense vnto the Lord. These worthy examples of gods most feuere iudgements executed vpon the breakers of this ordinance ought to strike such a fear into our harts that we suffer not the sacred functions and offices of the church to be prophaned and to teach vs that euery one meddle only with the approued duties of his own calling And although God do not now thus execute iudgement from heauen and work strange things in the earth in extraordinary manner when his ordinances are broken yet the sin is not therby lessened nor the punishmēt mitagated nor the hand of God shortned but stretched out still though iudgement according to desert be deferred my rather the greater wrath is reserued for his aduersaries to the great day of account when al flesh shal appear before the throne of his glorious presence For if the prophaners of the sign 〈◊〉 sacraments of the old testament did not escape but were thus sharpely and seuerely punished our sacraments established by the lord Iesus are not of lesse value 〈◊〉 worthines so that the contempt of thē shal be visited with sorer iudgments And if god did strike with his reuenging hand priuatemen when they sinned in a abusing the sacramentes and spared not kings in the pride of their hearts how should women standing a degree 〈◊〉 off and barred from the office by a stronger bolt enter into the house at a window and not be accounted as theeues and robbers So that we conclude that the necessity of a calling is as great as the necessity of baptisme And thus much of the first outward part of baptisme namely the minister Chap. 4. Of the second outward part of baptisme THe second outward part of baptisme is the word of institution which is as the forme of the Sacrament as Eph. 2 26. Christ loued the church and gaue himselfe for it that he might sanctifie it and clense it by the washing of water through the word
confession of the aduersaries which is strong against themselues to whome we may say as Christ sometimes did to that sloathfull person Thou euill seruaunt out of thine own mouth wil I iudge thee These make three sorts of baptisme of water of blood of the spirit whereby they consesle that the want of baptising with water is not damnable in all seeing that want may be supplyed either with shedding of their blood for the testimony of the truth or by spiritual regeneration and ingrafting into the body of christ To conclude do we desire the custome and practise of the church It is well knowne that in Thessalia the sacrament of baptisme was celebrated but once in the yeare namely at Easter In other places thrice in the yeare and sometimes not vntill the houre of their death when they were going the way of al slesh Constantine the great was the first christian Emperour yet was he not baptised till the time of his death And Valentinianus a christian Emperor died without baptism yet doth Ambrose giue him his due commendation and doubted nothing of his saluation Shal we do these good men these worthy Emperors these godly christians this wronge as to thinke they were damned who were the chiefe pillers and protectors of the Catholick religion Or if the churches aboue mentioned had holden this hard opinion that the want of baptisme was a signe of reprobation would they haue deferred it in the houre of death whereby sometimes they were 〈◊〉 or administred it at certaine times onely of the yeare True it is that custome is not to be followed neither the negligence of those byshops to be allowed but it teacheth thus much that in de ferring baptism they differed in iudgement from the new church of Rome and concurred in opinion with the reformed churches for which causes their practise is aledged The reasons vsed to maintain the absolute necessity of this sacrament to saluation are weak and not worth the answering First they obiect the threatning annexed to circumcision The vncircumcised male shall be cut off from his people To this I answere first God commandeth infants to be circumcised the eight day before which time they were forbidden to circumcise Wherfore infants that dy before the 8. day were not bound and obliged by this law And seeing there can be no transgression where there is no law they are not damnd because they are vncircumcifed seeing god calleth many out of this life before they were capable of this sacrament Againe the commination and threatning is not to be vnderstoode generally of all but of such as are growne vp not of children but of men as appeareth by the reason For he hath broke my couenant This cannot be applied to infantes who albeit they haue not actuall faith yet cannot be said to contemne grace to refuse the couenant to reiect the promises or to lie in infidelity hardnes of hart Wherfore it belongeth vnto those onely that being grown vp and come to yeares shall approue the negligence of their parents and will not suffer themselues to be circumcised Now as to Peter saiyng Thou shalt neuer wash my feet Christ answered If I wash thee not thou hast no part in me so to the Israelite that should haue said I will neuer be circumcised this threatning might fitly be applyed If thou wilt not be circumcised thou hast no part in God no portion in his blessing no assurance of his promises in this life or of his kingdome in the life to come Lastly to be cut off from the people doth not signifie to be condemned for euen the negligence and contempt of the Sacrament is pardonable wher repentance followeth as we see of such as cam vnuerently and vnworthily to the Lordes supper among the Corinthians who were punished with diseases and death it selfe yet the soule no doubt was saued in the day of the Lord. Sometime therefore that phrase of speaking signifieth temporall iudgements of God on men and their families for their wickednes Sometimes it signifieth the magistrates iustice inflicted on malefactors who beareth not the sword in vain which is expounded afterward Thou shalt surely kill him Sometimes it signifyeth to bee cut off from the bosome of the church which is done by the high and dreadfull censure or excommunication Whosoeuer eateth leauened bread from the first day vntill the seuenth day that person shal be out off from Israell the interpretation of which wordes is added verse 19. That person shall be cut off from the congregation of Israell So the Apostle speaketh 1 Cor. 5. Hee which hath done this thing should be put from among you that is from your company and fellowship as verse 13. Put away from among your selues that wicked man Thus we are to vnderstande the threatning in this place that such as contemne circumcision either themselues or allow the same contempt and negligence of others shall no longer be reckoned and reputed among the people of God but be seperated from them Againe they obiect Iohn 3. Vnlesse a man be borne of water and the spirit he cannot enter into the kingdome of God therefore say they it is necessary to saluation to be baptized This is the reason of Bellarmine and of others I answere first it is not necessary in this place by water to vnderstande materiall water but the grace of Christ purging and clensinge as water doth which interpretation may be gathred by conference of a like place Math 3 11. He shall baptise with the holy-ghost and with fire that is by the spirit of God which is as it were fire lightning our hearts with the knowledge of God inflaming them with his loue and purging them from euill affections So when we are said to be borne againe by water and the spirit he meaneth by the spirit shewing forth in vs the force power and property of Water as if hee should say we are borne of water which is the spirit as Ioh. 7 38 39. Again if it were ment of water in baptisme it must be vnderstood according to alike sentence Ioh. 6. Vnlesse you eate the flesh of the sonne of man and drinke his blood ye shall not haue life in you which must be vnderstood of such as are of yeares and growne in age And thus Innocentius the 3. in the decrees expoundeth it so doth Peter Lumbard maister of the 〈◊〉 So then if they will be tryed either by their owne Pope which is their holy father or by Peter Lumbard which is their grand-maister this place cannot be enforced against infants that die before they bee baptised but must be referred to men of greater yeares We reason not thus farre to iustifie and alow the sluggishnesse and neglect of carelesse parents vnder colour and pretence of this that the saluation of the child dependeth not vpon the participation of the Sacrament but to shew that if it cannot be obtained
partakers of the sacrament with the faithfull seeing they are enrolled in the fellowship of the faithfull And who shall depriue them of the seale of the couenant seeing they are partakers of regeneration and remission of sinnes Heereupon thus we reason whosoeuer are in the couenant and Church of GOD to them belongeth baptisme which is the seale of the couenant but infants are in the couenant and of the Church therefore to them belongeth baptisme which is the seale of the couenant Againe to whome the promise appertaineth they may and ought to bee baptized but the promise was made euen to infants therefore they may and ought to be baptised Furthermore to whome forgiuenes of sinnes and the Holy-ghost are promised and giuen they ought by no meanes to bee denied the outwarde signe but forgiuenesse of sinnes and the Holy-ghost are promised to infantes and giuen vnto them therefore infantes ought not to bee kept from the element of Water no more then such as are of yeares of discretion Thus much of the first point putting children into the right and possession of Baptisme as if it were the right heires into their inheritance from which they haue bene wrongfully and vniuftly dispossessed Hauing now sufficiently prooued by the scripture that children are to bee baptized it remaineth that wee shoulde maintaine this assertion against the cauils of the Anabaptists For as the former reasons grounded vppon the euident demonstration of the worde as vppon a pillar that cannot be shaken may perswade vs to embrace the truth so the weakenes and sophistry which appeareth in the Obiections of the aduersaries ferueth to confirme vs in this perswasion But let vs examine what is the strength of them First they obiect it was neuer cōmanded that infants shold be baptized I answer vnblamable examples and practises not contradicted are in the nature of precepts Againe the will of God approuing and appointing childrens baptisme appeareth in that it came in place of vncircumcision Baptisme is our circumcision Besides we haue a generall commaundement Go teach all nations and baptize them And the Apostle saith all were baptized in the cloud and in the sea Christ saith al nations the Apostles saith all the Israelites let them shew where infants are excepted and exempted for wee hold this as a certaine principle that a generall commaundement includeth the particular and comprehendeth the same vnder it as well as if it were by name expresled Secondly they obiect if infants may be baptised then they may be admitted to the Lords supper for why should not the supper be giuen to the whole church as well as baptisine I answere there is not the like reason and respect of both There is great difference betweene these two sacraments For baptisme is a signe of our entrance and receiuing into the church so that the Supper is to be granted to none but to such as are baptised and are fit to beare strong meat being instituted for our confirmation and sealing vnto vs that God hauing once receiued vs into the church will also euermore preserue vs in it that we neuer fall from it nor forsake it and will nourish and cherish vs by the body and blood of Christ. Wherefore the Lord Iesus to shew that his Supper was not for children but for men would not administer it in the element of milke which is for infants and for new borne Babes but in bread and wine which are for stronge men that are of age Againe sundry conditions and considerations are required in the supper which debar young infants that although they are to be baptized yet they ought not to be admitted to the Lords supper seeing by their young yeares they are excluded For it is required of all those that come to this supper to shew foorth the Lords death to discerne the body and blood of Christ and try themselues whether they haue faith and repentance But infants cannot doe these thinges they cannot shew foorth the Lordes death they are not apt to discerne his body and blood they are not able to examine themselues and therefore infants for good causes are excluded from this Supper Thirdly they obiect that it is said Teach and baptize and again He that shall beleeue and be baptized shall be saued where vpon they conclude that such as beleeue not are not to be baptized inasmuch as Christ before baptisme commaundeth teaching and afterward ioyneth baptizing with beleeuing But infants are not capable of doctrine neither do they actually beleeue therefore they are not to be baptized Again if repentance be necessarily ioyned as Act. 2 Amend your liues and be baptized then infants must be separated and secluded who cannot repent But repentance is necessarily required therefore infants are to be barred from the sacrament of baptisme I answere first those sentences are not generall to all but belong onely to men of sufficient yeares and discretion to discerne betweene good and euill By this fraud of extending stretching and falsely applying generall sentences of Scripture a man might reare and raise many monstrous conclusions If a mā would go about to proue that children are not to be nourished and sed with coporall foode because the Aposte would haue none to eate but such as labour were he not worthy to be spitted at or hissed out of the schools because he carrieth that indifferently to all ages which is limited and restrained to a certaine age So must we not rack and rent asunder the generall sentences of scripture Except ye repent ye shall al perish faith commeth by hearing hearing by the word of God he that beleeueth and is baptized shal be saued These belong onely to men of discretion and are not to be applyed to infants whom they do not concerne Againe Christ in those words instructeth his Apostles what order they should obserue in the conuersion of the Gentiles first they must instruct them in faith then baptize them being instrued and lastly guide them in true obedience being instructed when he addeth Teaching them to obserue what soeuer I haue commaunded you Besides if they strictly vrge and stifly stand vpon the wordes as they literally lye in order why may we not first baptize them before wee teach them because it is said baptizing them in the name of the Trinity and teaching them to obserue what I commannd But hee intreateth in this place of such as are growne vppe which must first haue knowledge in the gospell faith in Christ and repentance from dead workes before they bee baptized but infants are baptized by reason of the promise made to their parentes Moreouer we might oppose vnto these the example of circumcision which we know and they are not ignorant was giuen to infantes who could not yet beleeue so that such as bar them from baptisme because they are not capable of faith and repentance might in like manner exclude the infants of the Isralites from circumcision Baptisme
at the doore life and saluation are absent so that we are neuer partakers of his graces except webe as neerly coupled to his humanity as meat and drink are coupled with our body which of al other is a most neer vnion and inward coniunction Thus we see we are seuered from the world to haue fellowshippe with CHRIST and are set once in him for euer because he that commeth to CHRIST once he casteth him not away hee shall neuer hunger he shall neuer thirst he shall not be lost but hue for euer as the Apostle saith If they had been of vs doubtles they had continued with vs And paule to this purpose saith Rom. 8 Who shal lay any thing to the charg of GODS chosen it is GOD that instifieth who shall condemne Who shal seperate vs from the loue of CHRIST shal tribulation or anguish or persecution or famine or nakednes or perill or sword in all the se we are more then conquerours through him that loued vs for I am perswaded that neither death nor life nor Angels nor principalities nor powers nor things present nor thinges to come nor height nor depth nor any other creature shall be able to seperate vs from the loue of GOD which is in CHRIST IESVS our LORDE If once wee bee ioyned to him in spirituall Marriage notwithstanding the difference and disparagement between him and vs nothing shall bee able to worke our deuorcement from him True it is God 〈◊〉 vs wallowing in our owne filthines polluted in our owne bloode defiled by our owne vncleannes he hath made an eternall couenant with vs he hath spoken peace vnto oursoules saying Thou shalt liue euen when wee were sunke downe in sinne to death hee saide vnto vs Thou shalt liue so that he will neuer turne from vs to do vs good but we shall be his people and he will be our God he will giue vs one hart and one way that wee may feare him for euer and that it may be well with vs and with our children This made the Apostle to write Ephe. 5. 30. 32. Wee are members of his bodie of his flesh and of his bones this is a great misterie but I speake concerning christ and concerning the church Where he seemeth to allude to the first creation of the Woman made of one of the ribs of the man shadowing and 〈◊〉 our knitting and coniunction with Christe which we haue by faith not by nature by vertue of the spirit not of the flesh Now as we haue shewed that this coniunction made by Gods spirit and by our faith which he hath giuen so the meanes and instruments to worke it are the word and sacraments This is a dignity peculiar and proper to the elect to haue perpetuall fellowshippe with Christ and to growe vp into one body with him as he teacheth Iohn 17 20. 21. I pray for all them which shall beleeue in me through theyr word that they all may be one as thou O father art in me and I in thee euen that they may be one with vs that the world may beleeue that thou hast sent me If then there be not an vnion betweene Christ and vs we haue no accesse to God the father being quite cutte off from all hope of life and sa'uation As then all the substaunce and nourishment of the tree commeth from the roote and all the vitall powers of a true naturall body come from the head so it is betweene the sonne of God and vs we haue not so much as one drop of the heauenly life in vs of our selves CHRIST is the waye the truth and the life no man commeth vnto the father but by him To conclude this first vse seeing such as come to this sacrament must be christians before it appeareth to be a very corrupt custome of the people when they require Baptisme of the pastor for their children to say God hath giuen me a Pagan I desire you to make him a Christian. For Baptisme cannot make a Christian but signifie the Sacraments cannot make that which is not but assure that which is already made as seales do not giue the right but confirme it Thus much of the first vse of Baptisme the second followeth Chap. 13. Of the second vse of baptisme BEing made one with Christ we are partakers of the 〈◊〉 of his death to wit of forgiuenes of sinnes and of regeneration or new birth So then the second vse of Baptisme is to assure vs of the remission and pardon of our sinnes that we may be vnblamable and acceptable to god This is signified by the outward ceremony of washing and sprinkling to wit the sprinkling of our soules with the blood of Christ for the forgiuenes of all sinnes as appeareth Act. 2 38 Then Peter said vnto them Amend your liues and be baptized euerie one of you in the name of Iesus Christ for remission of sins And Act. 22 Ananias said vnto Paul immediately after his conuersion Arise and be baptized and wash away thy sinnes in calling on the name of the Lorde So the Euangelist witnesses Marke 1 4. that Iohn did baptize in the wildernesse and preach the Baptisme of amendment of life for the remission of sinnes And the Apostle maketh this vse col 2 12 13. Ye are buried with him through Baptisme in whome ye are also raised vppe together through the faith of the operation of GOD which raised him vp from the dead and you which are deade in sinnes and in the vncircumcision of your flesh hath hee quickned together with him forgiuing you all your trespasses The meaning of these places is not that baptisme bestoweth or giueth forgiuenesse but onely signeth sealeth and assureth our pardon euen as remistion of sins and the righte ousnesse of faith were not in the old Testament by circumcision conferred but confirmed vnto the faithfull The grace of pardon and forgiuenesse of sinnes is not attained but by faith in Christ so that the worke of baptisme will not effect it Moreouer we haue proued that it is not lawfull to baptize such as are in yeares vnlesse they make open profession of their faith in Christ and repentance from the workes of the olde man wherefore they obtaine them not by the outward washing with water in baptisme So then we are no lesse assuredly washed by the blood of Christ from the spots of our soules then outwardly we are washed with water from the filth of the body For the force of his death hath that effectuall working in clensing our soules from the corruption and filthines of sinne which naturall water hath in washing our bodies By the merit of his death we haue full forgiueneste of all our sinnes not onely originall but actuall not onely past but present and to come whose blood is neuer drawne dry but is euer fresh and full of efficacy Therefore the wordes deliuered by the minister in baptisme at the commaundement of christ namely I baptize thee in the
hath brought vs into his Church by baptisme and made vs as it were of his houshold seruants then as a good father of the family he feedeth vs spiritually with the flesh of his sonne applying vnto vs the merit of his death and passion This sacrament of the body and blood of Christ is declared in the scripture by diuerse names to deliuer the nature thereof vnto vs. Sometimes it is called the communion as 1 Cor 10. The cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the communion of the blood of Christ The bread which wee breake is it not the communion of the body of Christ Sometimes it is called the Lords supper as 1 Cor. 11 20. When ye come together into one place this is not to eate the Lords supper Thirdly sometimes it is called the breaking of bread as Act. 2. 42. They continued in the Apostles doctrine and fellowship and breaking of bread and prayers and Chap. 20 7. The first day of the weeke the disciples being come together to breake bread Paule preached vnto them ready to depart on the morrow Fourthly sometimes it is called the table of the Lord as we see 1 Cor. 10 21. Ye cannot drinke the cup of the Lord and the cup of diuels ye cannot be partakers of the Lords table and of the table of deuils Moreouer we shall nothing offend if we cal it the testament or will of Christ This cup is the new testament in my blood this do as oft as ye drinke it in remembrance of me and our sauiour thus speaketh Math. 26 This is my blood of the new testament that is shed for many for the remission of sinnes These are the chiefe and principal names giuen to this Sacrament in the Scriptures I am not ignorant that the ancient fathers and times succeeding haue giuen vnto it other names and not vnfitly but my purpose being not so much to alle age the councels or doctors of the church as to instruct the simple and vnlearned I wil content my selfe with expounding such termes and titles as are penned in the word of God and pointed out by the spirit of God Now then let vs render the reasons of such names as this Sacrament is entituled withall It is called the communion because we haue a communion fellowship with Christ and he with vs both which are sealed vp the in this Sacrament It is called the Lords supper both because it was instituted by the Lord Iesus at is last supper which circumstance of time the church hath changed because therin is offered to vs a spiritual banket in which the faithful are spiritually fed and nourished It is called the breaking of bread both because this is a necessary action vsed of Christ not to be omitted and because it representeth the crucifieng of christ and tormenting of his body so that we should neuer be present at this significant ceremony but wee must call to remembrance the sorrowes and sufferings of CHRIST now if Christ were thus tormented for vs surely wee ought greatly to bee griped and grieued for our owne sinnes which was also shewed by the sower herbes of the Passeouer Exod. 12 8. It is called the table of the Lord because he doth feede vs at it as this we know is the end and vse of Tables in our houses to set our meates and drinkes vpon them prepared for our nourishment and this is the scope and end of the Lords table onely heere lyeth a plaine and maine difference our Tables serue for bodily nourishment but the Lordes is prepared for the spirituall nourishment of our soules Lastly it may be called the testament or will of Christ because it setteth forth vnto vs asolemne couenant betweene God and vs touching forgiuenesse of sinnes and eternall life which couenant is racified established by the death of the son of god so that heerin we find all things belonging to a full and perfect testament as we shall see after ward Out of these seuerall names and titles thus interpreted arise most aptly and fitly sundry vses which in order as they haue beene propounded wee will consider The first title is the Communion from whence wee deduct these necessary conclusions First of all is the Sacrament of the body and blood of Christ called a communion And so called of our communicating together Then hereby all the faithfull openly testifie that they be all one body coupled together in Christ Iesus we professe him and all his benefits we receiue him we enioy him we reioyce in him God the father doth giue him the holy-ghost doth assure him faith doth receiue him by this hand we are ioyned to him and haue spirituall fellowship with him Wherefore al beleeuers are made one by Christ and this is not an vnion in imagination but in truth and in deed neither by transsusion of the properties of the God-head or manhood into vs but by one and the same spirit dwelling in christ and in all the members of Christ as 1 Cor. 6 He that 〈◊〉 to the Lord is one spirit And the Apostle Iohn testifieth that Christ dwelleth in vs and we in christ by the spirit He that keepeth his commaundements dwelleth in him and he in him and heereby we know that he abideth in vs euen by the spirit which he hath giuen vs so that the spirits of iust and perfect men in heauen and all beleeuers vpon the earth how farre socuer sundred in place hauing one and the same spirit of christ dwelling in them are al one in Christ their head God hath giuen his owne sonne vnto vs freely and fully our faith receiueth CHRIST by beleeuing him and all his gratious benefits to be ours as Ioh. 1 12 As many as receiued him to them he gaue prerogatiue to be the soxnes of God euen to them that beleeue in his name Thus we see we are one with Christ and christ with vs. Secondly as this sacrament being a communion admonisheth that we are all one in Christ so it teaeheth that it is to be receiued of many together in the church not of one alone and therefore it ouerthroweth the priuate Masses of the church of Rome where one partaketh all and the rest of the Church nothing at all There is a flat opposition betweene these two so that the communion cannot be a priuate Masse and priuate masse cannot be a communion That which is ordained and prepared for many deliuered vnto many and receiued of many cannot stand with the Masse where the priest prepareth for himselfe not for the people hee speaketh to himselfe not to the church hee receiueth himselfe alone not with his bretheren all which are directly contrary to the Apostles rule Tary one for another Lastly if it be a communion it teacheth that this is a sacrament of vnity and concord and wee are there by put in mind to avoid discord and dislention For christ neuer communicateth himselfe to
christ is a couenaunt wherin god promiseth his loue and 〈◊〉 for euer to come vpon all that beleeue in his son assuring them of remission of sinnes and eternall life requiring of them onely faith in him as Iohn 3. God so loued the worlde that be gaue his onely begotten sonne that such as beleeue in him should not perish but liue for euer Againe if this sacrament sealing vppe the new couenant between God and man haue the name and nature of a wil or testament then it serueth to condemne the church of Rome that adde and alter mingle and mangle this sacrament at their owne pleasure For the Apostle teacheth Gal 3 15 Though it be but a mans couenant yet when it is confirmed no man doth abrogate it or addeth any thing thereto And Heb 9. 14 Hee is the mediatour of the new Testament that through his death they which are called might receiue the promise of eternall inheritaunce for where a testament is there must be the death of the testator for the testament is cōfirmed when men are dead for it is yet of no force as long as he that made it is aliue If then the Testament of man may not be abrogated or altered much lesse the testament of God confirmed by the death of the mediator Notwithstanding such is the sacriledge and presumption of that Antichristian church that the idolatrous 〈◊〉 as a bottomlesse gulfe hath ouerturned and swallowed vp the Lordes Supper turning the Sacrament into a Sacrifice administring it in a strange tongue taking away the cup from the people of God making prayers for the deade bringing in their carnall presence 〈◊〉 a monstrous 〈◊〉 setting vp a new Priest-hood a new sacrifice a newe Altar and lastly feigning vses and ends thereof which CHRIST neuer appointed the Apostles neuer acknowledged the churches succeeding neuer confessed or practised Now Masses are mumbled in memory of the Saintes they are helde auaileable not onely for the liuing but for the deade they are iudged profitable against stormes and tempests they are thought a soueraigne remedy against euery sore and sicknes of the body heathfull and helpefull for such as are going to warre to couer their heades in the day of battell as a shielde of brasse and to preserue them from the sword of the enimy good against 〈◊〉 and sorceries and fit to be applied to make tryal and proof whether a man be guilty of the crime and accusation laide to his charge But what are all these strange vses but strange abuses yea strong fancies and delusions of the man of sin burying in perpetuall forgetfulnes the true endes for the which Christ Iesus ordained his last supper All these being pestilent corruptions of the sacrament of the supper and fraudulent additions to the last wil and testament of christ do lay open to the full the 〈◊〉 abhominations of the Church of Rome the mother of 〈◊〉 Lastly the name of Christs last will and testament giuen to this sacrament serueth for the great comfort of Gods 〈◊〉 For heerin we shal find al things belonging to a ful and perfect testament For Christ Iesus is the testator all faithfull christians are appointed heires the angels are as the ouerseers the Apostles are the witnesses the legacies bequeathed are not lands and possessions or great summes of mony for the sonne of man had not where to lay his heade nor the kingdomes and gouernementes of this world for his kindome is not of this world but the forgiuenes of sinnes and euerlasting life obtained by the body of Christ giuen and his blood shed for vs and our 〈◊〉 Wherefore if God haue so loued vs if christ haue not spared his owne life to giue vs life and saluation how bitter ought our sinnes to be vnto vs and how ought we to striue against them If we will hate enimies heere are enimies for vs to hate if we will 〈◊〉 reuenge against enimies let vs fight against them that seeke our ouerthrowe and the destruction of our soule and body There is no reconciliation and attonment to be made with these enimies if thou kill not them they will kill and condemne thee for euer Hitherto of the names giuen to this Sacrament Chap 2 What the Lords Supper 〈◊〉 AS we haue in the former Chapt. considred the names and titles attributed to this Sacrament so now wee will see what the Lordes supper is For we shall neuer vnderstand the nature thereof except wee be able to define or describe it Therefore the Lords supper is the second sacrament wherein by visible receiuing of bread and wine our spirituall communion with the body and blood of Christ is represented This description is plainly proued by the institution of Christ by the first celebration of it and by other apparent testimonies of holy scripture First I say it is the seconde sacrament because such as haue interest in the Lordes supper must be first partakers of the other Sacrament for Christ and his Apostles ministred it to those that were before 〈◊〉 And howe shoulde they be continually 〈◊〉 and fed at his table who are not knowne to be of his house nor admitted members of his family We must be receiued into his protection and lurisdiction before we sit downe at his table for our refection They then that are in the house must be 〈◊〉 and fostered in the house the seuerall partes of the family haue the priuiledges of the family it is not lawfull to take the childrens bread and giue it vnto strangers Now baptisme is the true bath of our soules to clense our sores and an honourable badge whereby we are dedicated to the seruice of Christ and haue interest in the priuiledges of the church sealed vppe being partakers heereof wee come with comfort to the Lords supper Vnder the Lawe none 〈◊〉 were admitted to the passeouer If astraunger will obserue the 〈◊〉 let him circumcise all the males that belong vnto him If then the vncircumsed had bene admitted the passeouer had bin prophaned Wherfore it is not enough for vs once to be baptized and admitted into the number of the people of God we must also be partakers of Christs supper When as by baptisme we are brought into the church of God we are afterwarde nourished by this heauenly banquet to eternall life Again I say in the former description that by the bred and Wine the bodie and blood of Christ are represented Heerein consisteth the substance of this Sacrament he was 〈◊〉 giuen for vs and his blood was shed for the remission of sinnes least our faith should wander least our hope should wauer Therefore he saith to his Disciples This is my bodie which was giuen for you this is the cup of the new testament which was shedde for you and for many for the remission of sinnes Now that the description of the lords supper is prooued let the vses there of in the next place be declared Heereby
discontented Who would not thinke hee had wrong and iniury done vnto him Wherefore let vs take heed least by with-holding and withdrawing our selues wee prouoke gods wrath and indignation When he calleth are ye not ashamed to say ye will not come When he saith Eate of my meate and drinke the wine that I haue drawne wilt thou desperately and dispitefully answere thou wilt not eate thou wilt not drinke thou wilt not doe it Or wilt thou saye thou 〈◊〉 a greeuous sinner thou 〈◊〉 vnworthye I would aske thee when thou wilt be worthy Wilt thou lye still in thy sinne as a man in a deepe pit and neuer striue to come forth Why doest thou not returne to God and amend thy waies Why doest thou continue in thy hordnesse and heart that cannot repent and so heapest vppe as a treasure to thy selfe wrath against the daye of wrath and of the declaration of the iust iudgement of God Moreouer if thou bee vnfit and vnworthy to receiue this supper thou art vnworthy to pray thou art vnworthy to heare vnlesse thou pray as a parrat and heare as an hypocrite Consider therefore seriously and weigh earnestlye with your selues how little such fond fained and friuolous excuses shall preuaile with God When Moyses called Corah and his company to come vppe vnto the Lord they answered presumpteously We will not come When the King in the Gospell had inuited his ghuests they began all with one minde to excuse themselues and some refused saying I cannot come So in these daies of sinne albeit the supper be prepared the ghuests called and the table couered many men make light account of it and what with some that reply carelesly we cannot come and what with others that answer desperately we will not come the feast is vnfurnished God is dishonored the people are vnprepared and all the exercises of religion are lightly and slightly regarded I say vnto you that none of these men which were bidden shall tast of his Supper Againe another sort are as prophane as these which stand by as gazers and lookers on vpon them that do communicate yet communicate not themselues What is this else then a further contempt of God Truely it is great vnthankfulnes to depart away for these depart away from the Lords table they depart from their bretheren they depart from the heauenly 〈◊〉 of their soules but their fault is much greater when they stand by in contempt and wil not be partakers of this Communion What can this bee else but to haue the minister of christ in derision It is saide to all that are present Take ye eate ye drinke ye doe this in remembrance of mee With what face then with what countenance or rather conscience can ye heare these words sound in your eares and not bee touched Let vs therefore bee drawne and perswaded to this duty by the benefit that redoundeth to the worthy receiuers and fruitefull partakers thereof and on the other side feare to offend by staying and standing 〈◊〉 while the faithfull are partakers of this sacrament of the Lords supper Chap 3. Of the first outward part of the Lords Supper HItherto we haue shewed what the Lordes supper is and how to apply it to our instruction now we are to consider in this Sacrament two things his 〈◊〉 and his vses as we haue shewed in the former bookes The parts are partly outwarde and partly inwarde The outward part is one thing the inward parte is another thing the outward is taken in at the mouth the inward by the inward man the outward is turned into the nourishment of the body the inward worketh in vs to eternall life the outward is taken by some to their destruction but the inward alwaies to saluation This appeareth euidently by the wordes of the Apostle deliuering to the church what hee had receiued of the Lord and declaring howe the same night he was betrayed He tooke bread and when he had giuen thankes he brake it and said Take ye eate ye this is my body which is broken for you this do ye in remembrance of me After the same manner also He tooke the cup when he had 〈◊〉 saying This cup is the new testament in my blood this do as oft as ye drinke it in remembrance of me In these wordes wee see both the outward partes propounded and the number of them defined and determined For heere are foure outward parts handled to wit the minister the wordes of institution the 〈◊〉 and Wine and the Communicants The first minister thereof was Christ the wordes of institution are This is my body giuen for you this is the cuppe of the new testament in my blood the signes are bread and Wine the first communicants were the Apostles So then the Ministers must doe that which CHRIST did and the people that which the Disciples did the actions of CHRIST are directions to the Minister the actions of the Apostles are directions to the people Let vs then see the actions of Christ. He tooke bread he blessed he brake the bread he poured out the Wine he distributed and deliuered them both Wherefore the actions and workes of the minister are foure-fould First to take the bread and wine into his hands after the example of christ who did it to shewe that himselfe willingly giueth himselfe for his church which serueth to strengthen our faith and perswasion of his loue toward vs in whose imitation the minister dothit to represent the action of God the father giuing his son vnto vs for our full redemption The second action is blessing and giuing of thankes that is by prayer by thankes giuing and by rehearsal of the promises of God together with the institution of christ actually to separate the bread and wine so taken from their common vse to an holy vse Whereby we are giuen to vnderstand that the outward creatures are reuerently to be vsed calling vpon the name of God and crauing his assistance to vse his ordinance as we ought to do and that we should ioyfully praise God for the gratious worke of our redemption by Christ. The third action is breaking the bread pouring out the wine which are necessary rites to be obserued hauing respect and and relation to the vnspeakable torments of christ for vs who was pierced crucified and made a curse for vs vpon the Crosse as the prophet teacheth He was wounded for our transgressions he was broken for our iniquities the chastisement of our peace was vpon him and with his stripes we are healed Wherefore these Sacramental rites of breaking pouring out are no to be reiected omitted being vsed by christ practised by his Apostles and retained by the churches Not as in the church of Rome where they breake not to distribute to the people neither poure out the Wine to giue vnto them So then we see that whole bread is not to be deliuered but that the bread is to be broken
the word ofGod Again were not Christ and his Apostles as wise as they Were they ignorant of this vnion Did they not knowe this accompanying of the body with the blood and blood with the body Is the present church of Rome wiser then he in whom al the treasures of wisedom and knowledge are hid If they thinke so let them tell vs plainly if not let them lay their hands vpon their mouth and submit themselues vnto him who administred it in both kinds and commaunded his Apostles to do the like Moreouer Christ would haue vs in his supper consider his blood separated from his body and set his death before our eies and his precious blood shed out of his side so that deliuering the cup he said Drinke ye all of this for this is my blood of the new testament which is shed for many without which sheading there is no forgiuenesse of sins as the Apostle teacheth Wherefore seeing these two are contrary one to the other and cannot stand together to wit the blood to be in the body and to be out of the body to be shed sor vs and not to be shed and that the sacrament leadeth vs to the consideration of the death and especially of the piercing and pouring out of the blood of Christ we may conclude that this vnion of the body with the blood and blood with the body flatly crosseth and ouerthroweth the institution of Christ. And why I pray you do their sacrificing priests receiue the blood twice and the body twice drinking first the blood in the body and againe eating the body in the blood Nay doth not this vnion deuised alter the 〈◊〉 of Christ and confound the seuerall parts of it making him to speake otherwise then the euangelistes expresse For when he said This is my body they will haue him meane this is my body and blood Againe when he said this is my blood they will haue him meane this is my blood and my body Last of all this late inuention turneth and ouerturneth the nature of the partes distinguished one from the other while we eate the flesh they make vs drink the blood and while we drinke the blood they imagine we eat the body Thus to eat and to drinke shall be all one with them for wee shal eate liquid and moift thinges and we shall drinke dry and hard things And is not this drinking of flesh and eating of blood and inuerting euerting of the nature of things But thus God striketh his enemies with giddines of spirit For after they haue broken the pure institution of christ and brought in a carnal presence of his body one absurdity being granted a thousand follow infinite abuses haue ensued vpon heapes the flood-gats being set open wherof there is no end or measure Let thē therfore repent themselues of this sacriledge against god and iniury against his people restoring vnto thē the cōmunion vnder both kinds according ro the ordinance of christ and directō of the Apostles And thus much of the general vses arising from both the signs ioyntly considered Now let vs come to the particular vses offered vnto vs in each of the signes And first touching the bread Is bread simply considered the first signe in the lords supper Then it is not necessarily required that it be administred in vnleauened bread For bread is oftentimes named and repeated but the word vnleauened is neuer added Wherfore as it is in selfe indifferent whether the wine be red or white whatsoeuer the kind or colour be if it be wine so is it not greatly materiall whether the bread be leauened or vnleauened so it bee bread Which ouerthroweth the error of the church of Rome her fauorites who hold it neeessary that the bread vsed in the Sacra be vnleauened They pretend the institution of Christ who say they made the Sacra of vnleauened bread instituting it after he had eaten the passeouer which was to be eaten with vnleauened bread according to the law of Moses neither was there any leauen to be found in Israel 7. daies together Thus they charge vs to breake the institution of Christ. But see heere the 〈◊〉 and partiality of these proud spirits who fly to the institution and sticke precisely to circumstances of 〈◊〉 when it serueth any way to their purpose but when the question is of matters of substance not of circumstance as touching communicating vnder both kinds touching the necessity of eating drinking and of many receiuing together against their halfe communions priuate masses and reseruations they cannot abide to be tyed and yoked to the institution Indeed we deny not but christ might vse vnleauened bread at his last supper hauing immediately before eaten the paschal lambe This peraduenture is truely coniectured yet no such thing is expressed in the gospell nor prescribed as a rule necessarily to bee followed The Euangelists teach he tooke bread but make no mētion or distinction what bread he took nor determine what bread we should take no more then limit what wine we shal vse but leaue it at liberty to take leauened bread or vnleuened as occasion of time place persons and other circumstances serue so we take bread as their own prophets haue confessed 〈◊〉 their own coūsels haue concluded Wherfore to consecrate in vnleuened bread is not of the substance of the supper no more then to eat it at night or after supper as christ administred and the apostles first receiued it For if any would bring in a 〈◊〉 of that time as wel as of that bread which christ vsed we see as faire a warrant for the one as for the other nay we haue a more certain direction for the time which is expressed then for the kind of bread which is not defined Besides if Christ on this occasion vsed vnleuened bread it was because it was vsual common and ordinary bread at that time as we also should vse that bread which is vsual and common So the Apostle speaketh of that bread which was daily vsed among the Gentiles saying The bread which we breake he addeth neither leuened nor vnleuened but vnderstandeth that in common and continuall vse Thus then we conclude it is no breach of christs ordinance nor a transgression of the first originall institution of the Lords supper to eate either the one or the other Againe touching the other signe which is the Wine the church of Rome may iustly be charged with transgressing the ordinance of christ who by her sole authority would type vs to mingle water with wine for Great mistery signification especially for that water gushed with blood out of our Lords side So they condemne all those Churches as doing impudently and damnably that do not mixe 〈◊〉 with wine in the sacrament and say it cannot be omitted without 〈◊〉 sinne True it is the Church in former times where the wine prouided for the Lordes Table was of it selfe heady
it is the Lords supper may after a sorte be called a sacrifice not as the church of Rome meaneth but bycause therin we offer vp praises thanks giuings to god for that sacrifice of attonement once made vpon the crosse which is most acceptable to god and because such as come aright thereunto offer vp themselues wholly to god a reasonable holy and liuing sacrifice and lastly because thereby we cal to our remembrance 〈◊〉 bloody sacrifice of christ withal 〈◊〉 circumstances therof the shame of the crosse the darkenes of the heauen the shaking of the earth the renting of the aire the cleauing of the rocks the reproches of the Iewes the taunts of the soldiers the opening of the graues the conquering of the deuil For the christians in former times perceiuing that many both Iewes and gentiles refused to embrace the faith of christ and to ioyne themselues to the church because they pretend the want of sacrifices among them and nature engrafted in all nations this principle that we haue no free accesse to God no true peace to our selus without a sacrifice the fathers to win such as were without affirmed that the church had also a sacrifice and thereupon entituled the sacrament of the supper with the name of a sacrifice for the causes before remembred But for a mortall man whose breath is in his nostrils to presume in the prid of his hart vnder the formes of bread and wine to offer vp christ the son of God in the sacrifice to his father and to dare to desire the father fauourably to behold and accept his owne sonne is idolatry blasphemy and horrible impiety to be detested of all true hearted Christians Touching the originall of the word Masse it seemeth to come from an ancient custome of the church sending away such as communicated not For the deacon was accustomed to bid them depart that were nouices in the faith and such as by Church-discipline were remoued from the communion This dimission of them was noted by the word Missa signifieng a sending away and licensing to depart and thus some of the heathen vsed it The name then being in it selfe not euill is turned into an euill practise and therfore as it is vsed and vnderstood of our aduersaries we reiect both the name and thing it selfe for these causes First no angell no man no creature is of that dignity and worthinesse that he may offer vp and sacrifice the sonne of God for the priest is aboue the sacrifice they therefore that will be the priests to offer christ aduance and lift vp themselues aboue christ Secondly if christ be really offered in the Masse then he is killed truely and indeed for a reall sacrifice proueth a reall death and when christ was sacrificed really he dyed really as when the beasts were sacrificed they wer killed And Holcot one of the schoolemen saith If there had been a thousand hostes in a thousand places at the same time that Christ did hang vpon the crosse christ had beene crucified in a thousand places Wherfore they that really sacrificed our Sauiour Christ did in that act really and wickedly kill him so that the prieste s of Baal if they wil be sacrificers of Christ must acknowledge themselues therein the reall murtherers of Christ. Thirdly new sacrifices are not to bee instituted by men without commaundement of god as Moses teacheth Deut. 12. we must not do h what seemeth good in our owne eyes but take heede and heare all these words which he commaundeth vs. Now Christ neuer saide Sacrifice ye my bodie and blood to God Fourthly Christ tooke the bread and gaue it to his disciples he did not offer it vp to God the father he tooke the cup and bad them all drinke of it he did not turne himfelfe to God and desire him then to accept the sacrifice of his body and blood Fiftly if the bread and Wine remaine in their former substance in the Lords supper then bread and wine onely are offered not the body and blood of Christ but they remaine for christ deliuered bread to his Disciples and Paule teacheth that it is the bread which is broken that as ofren asthe 〈◊〉 eat this bread and drinke of this cup they shew the Lords death therefore their reall Sacrifice is reall idolatry Sixtly it appeareth in the institution of the Supper that Christ consecrated the Bread apart and the wine 〈◊〉 and afterwarde deliuered them both apart but the bodye of Christ was neuer sacrificed without the blood nor the blood without the flesh for Christ offered vppon the Altar of the crosse the sacrifice of his bodie and blood together this is the cause that he saide Take ye eat ye drinke ye not take ye to offer and to Sacrifice Seuenthly the Scripture teacheth vs one offering and Sacrifice for sin once performed and offered Heb. 10. Wee are sanctified by the offering of Iesus Christ k once made and ver 12. This man after he had offered one saerifice for sinnes sitteth at the right hnnd of God And the Apostle 1 Tim. 2. There is one mediator betweene God and man the man Iesus Christ who gaue himselfe a ransome for all men So 1 Iohn 2. If any man sinne we haue an aduocate with the father Iesus Christ the righteous and hee is the propitiation for our sinnes Likewise Heb 9. By his owne blood he entred in once vnto the holy place and obtained eternall redemption for vs not that he should offer himselfe l often as the high Priest entered into the holy place euerie yeare with other blood for then must he haue often suffered since the foundation of the worlde but now in the end of the worlde hath he bene made manifest once to put away sinne by the sacrifice of himselfe We haue plentifull testimonies of this truth in this Epistle as chap. x. Where remission of these things is there is no more offering for sinne If then we haue remission by the sacrifice of Christ all other sacrifices are superfluous and abrogat his al-sufficient sacrifice So Rom 6. In that he died he died for sinne once And 1. Pet. 3. Christ also hath once suffered for sinnes the iust for the vninst If then this perfect offering were once onely to be offered then he is not offered neither can be offered againe in the Masse And if the onely oblation of Christ once offered by himselfe be sufficient all other oblations and Sacrifices are vaine and superfluous For how is that perfect which is often repeated Eightly to make a lawfull sacrifice there is required necessarily a fit minister lawfully called of God for no man taketh his honor to himselfe but he that is called of God as was Aaron so likewise Christ took not to himselfe this honour to be made the high-priest but he that saide to him Thou art my sonne this day I begat thee gaue it him But Christ is the onely priest
part his sonne to his office the minsters deliuering of the bread the fathers giuing of his sonne If then wee drawe neere to the Lords table with faith reuerence and repentance nothing can be more sure certain to vs then the taking receiuing of Christ for when we receiue the bred from the minister we with all receiue the body of christ offered by the hand of God the father Lastly the breaking of the breade pouring out of the wine and deliuering of them both into the handes of the communicants 〈◊〉 these actions of God his chastising of his sonne and breaking him with sorrowes vppon the crosse for our redemption offering him vnto all euen vnto hypocrites and giuing him truely to the faithfull with all the benefits of his passion Indeed the minister giueth the outwarde signes to all receiuers but God giueth and applyeth onely to the faithfull the shedding of Christes blood for their daily increase of their faith and repentance But heere it may be obiected that not a bone of him was broken as it was figured by the passeouer and performed at his passion the verifieng and accomplishment whereof we read Iohn 19. 36. I answere there is a dubble breaking of Christ one corporall whereof the places before do speak the other figuratiuely wherby is vnderstood he was tormented and euen torne with paines as Esa. 53. He was wounded for our transgressions and broken for our iniquities the chastisement of our peace was vppon him and with his stripes we are healed Lo what is ment by the breaking of the bread his soule was tormented his spirit was crushed his hands and feet were pierced he sweat drops of Water and blood and cryed out aloud vpon the crosse My God my god why hast thou for saken me Wherefore let these rights be rightly marked and obserued of vs for our comfort and consolation Let vs when we see the breade broken and wine poured out meditat on the passion of christ howe hee was wounded and torne for our transgressions Although not a bone of his body was broken in pieces yet he was broken with afflictions brused with sorrowes and tormented with bitter anguish of his soule by whose stripes we are healed by whose condemnation we are iustified by whose agonies we are comforted by whose death we are quickned Whosoeuer resteth in the outward works done before his eies neuer attaineth to the substāce of the sacrament Thus much of the first inward part Chap. 9. Of the second inward part of the Lords supper THe second inward part is the holy spirit who assureth vs of the truth of Gods promises As we haue in the word of truth the forgiuenes of sins increase of faith groweth in sanctification a great measure of dying to sin and a greater care to liue in newnes of life promised 〈◊〉 vs so doth the spirit worke these things in the hearts of all the 〈◊〉 This appeareth in many places Rom. 8. rehaue receiued the spirit of adoption whereby we cry Abba father the same spirit beareth witnesse with our spirit that we are the children of God To one is giuen by the spirit the word of wisdome and to 〈◊〉 the word of knowledge by the same spirit to another is giuen faith by the same spirit all these thinges woorketh one and the selfe same spirite distributing to euery man seuerally as hee will So then as wee are weake in faith and slowe to beleeue so we haue the spirit giuen vnto vs to helpe our infirmities and to open our heartes to receiue the promises This truth being cleared the vses offer themselues to be considered And first of all inasmuch as the spirite worketh these things in the harts of all the faithfull from hence we gather that such as neuer finde any chaunge or renewing of the mind or reformation of life after the receiuing of the Sacramentes may iustly suspect themselues whether euer they had faith or not and whether ever they repented or not and therefore ought to vse the means to come by faith and repentance For the worke of the spirit accompanieth the outward worke in the elect of God as also we see in the hearing of faith preached hee must open the hart that is closed vppe before wee can receiue with meekenes the worde that is grafted in vs which is able to saue our soules Indeed euery person present may heare the wordes of institution may see the Wine poured out may eate of that bread and drinke of that cuppe as they may also hear the sound of the voice that commeth vnto them but the whole force effect and power resteth onely in the Spirite of GOD sealinge vppe the truth and substance of those things in the harts of all the children of God Againe seeing these thinges are done and performed by the working of the spirit they are confuted and cōuinced that thinke they cannot be made partakers of the bodye and blood of Christ and be vnited to his flesh vnlesse his body be shut vp vnder the accidentes of bread and shewes of wine and so his flesh be giuen vnto vs carnally that we may eate him with our mouthes and conuey him into our stomackes But we see heere the Holy-ghost is the bonde of this vnion hee worketh in vs faith which pierceth the heauens and layeth hold on Christ. It is saide of Abraham the Father of the faithfull that he reioiced to see the day of Christ he sawe it and was gladde For as we cannot see him with our bodily eies nor hear him with our bodily ears nor touch him with our bodily hands no more can we tast or eat him with our bodily mouths By the hand of faith we reach and apply him by the mouth of faith we receiue and eate him Let vs beleeue in Christ and we haue eaten Christ let vs not prepare our teeth and our belly but a liuely faith working by loue Wherefore albeit the humane nature of Christ goe not out of the highest heauens yet we that liue vpon the earth are partakers of his bodye contained in the heauens and his flesh and blood are communicated to vs as truely and effectually as if he were there on the present with vs. If any say How can this bee can that which is absent from vs be present with vs can heauen be in earth or earth bee in heauen He ere vnto I may moste iustlye aunsweare although this bee a great mistery and marueilous in our eyes yet we must confesse and consider that the Holy-ghost is the author of this vnion and as it were the conduit-pipe of this coniunction who by his diuine power ioyneth togither things that are seuered in place and begetteth faith in vs which is the instrumenr and hande whereby we receiue and applye Christ with all his gifts vnto our selues as Iohn 17. Father I pray thee for such as shall beleeue in mee that they may be one as thou
bridegroome shall be taken from them and then they shal fast But if he were remainning on the earth and contained in the pixe the bridegroome could not nor would not be taken away And the same Euangehst chap. 26. saith Ye haue the poore alwaies with you but me ye shal not haue alwaies Like wise Iohn 13. When Iesus knew that hie houre was come that he should depart out of this world vnto the father heeriseth from supper and chap. 14. I goe to prepare a place for you but I wil come againe if I go away to prepare a place for you I will receiue you vnto my selfe that where I am there may ye be also and verse 28 ye haue heard how I said vnto you I go awaie and will come vnto you And chap. 17. Now I am no more in the world but these are in the world and I come to thee Againe act 1. ye men of Galile why stand re gazing into heauen this Iesus which is taken vp from you into heauen shal so come as ye haue seene him go into heauen If then Christ according to his humane nature be not on earth how can his 〈◊〉 body be on euerie altar how can they eat him with their 〈◊〉 how can they swallow him downe their throat Ninthlie such an eating and 〈◊〉 of the bodie and blood of christ must be holden as is profitable and comfortable to the receiuers for nothing is more 〈◊〉 and fruitfull then these being rightlie receiued 〈◊〉 thereby remission of sinnes assured and eternall glory sealed vp vnto vs. But no fruite to our faith can come vnto vs by this kind of bodilie eating the bodie carnall drinking the blood of christ for wicked men haue as great a portion in this as the godly Nay by their owne doctrin it may be eaten of birds of beasts of Mice of Dogs of hogs of vermine to whom no profit no comfort no benefit can come whereas God woulde haue the flesh of the sonne of man to be eaten of those to whom it shal be auailable to life and saluation I am the liuing bread which came downe from heauen if any man eat of this bread he shall liue for euer and the bread that I will giue is my flesh which I wil giue for the life of the world Tenthly nothing can be more grosse barbarous or inhumane then to deuour mans flesh and to drinke mans blood What doth more transforme men into sauage and 〈◊〉 beasts Nay worse then beastes which deuour not their owne kind what is more contrarie to the purenes holines of Gods law then this The words of the Lord are pure words as the siluer tryed in a furnace of earth fined seuen fold The feare of the Lord is clean the law of God is spirituall holy iust and good And the gospell bringeth saluation to all degrees and teacheth vs that we should deny all vngodlines and worldly Iustes and that we should liue soberly righteously and godly in this present world But what can be more repugnant to godlines sobernes and righteousnes then to teare wirh the teeth and iawes mans flesh and to drink his blood from which the Capernaits abhorred what more crosseth the Religion of Christ the law of god and the light of nature then mā to deuour man and the bowels of one to be in the bowels of another And are not their stomackes strong to digest this meat did not god in the law command to abstain frō eating the blood of beasts and from strangled did not the Apostles for a time renue it amōg the christiās in respect of the weaknes of the Iews because Moses was read in their sinagogue euer saboth day to what 〈◊〉 should this be done if the church had tasted the blood of ch with their mouth or swallowed his body in their bellies And do not the Scythians and al the gentiles that are not vtterly voide of 〈◊〉 abstain from mans blood and 〈◊〉 deuouring his flesh wherefore these men are worse then the Scithians barbariās and Gentiles yea worse then the Canibals Indies that eat their enimies but these deuour ch whom they cal their L. and maist like Actcons houndes to compare one fable with another onely heer ly the differences they deuourd their Lord vnder the shape of a stag or Hart they eat their maist vnder the formes of bread and wine these fastned their mouth vpon their maister because they thoght him absent and not present vnder that shape they openly confesse their maister to be present and yet 〈◊〉 professe to deuour him with their iawes and swallow him in their stomacks wherefore these men are more cruell Eleuenthly if Christ be present in the Sacramant bodily and carnally in what body shall he be present Whether in his glorified body as he is in the heauens or in his mortall body as he was vpon the earth In one of these he must be present necessarily if he be present fleshly Whatsoeuer they answer they are taken onboth hands are stroken downe as with a sword that hath two edges Dare they saie he is thus present in his mortall bodie This cannot be For it is certaine he hath not now a mortall bodie but a glorified bodie this corruptible hath put on in corruption this mortall hath put on immortality and death is swallowed vp in victory This the Apostle confirmeth this the Scripture teacheth this Christian faith beleeueh Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more death hath no more dominion ouer him For in that he dyed he dyed once to sinne but in that he liueth he liueth to God Like wise Heb. 7. 25 This man because he endureth euer hath a priesthood which cannot passe from one to another seeing he euer hueth to make intercession for them And chapter 9. of the same Epistle he is entred into heauen not that he should offer himselfe often but he was once offered to take away the sins of many These testimonies duly considered he cannot be present in a mortal body What then will they be helped to say he is present in his glorified body Then he cannot nowe be present in the sacrament of the supper as he was present to the Apostles sitting at the table with them and preaching vnto them of his death he cannot be present in the same body that he did deliuer to his Disciples in the institution of his last supper For the body of Christ was then mortall and not glorified then he had not suffered death vpon the Crosle he was not risen and ascended into the heauens to sit at the right hand of his father so that they must seeke another place then these wordes of Christ This is my body this is my blood to build their reall presence and transubstantiation for they pointed out his mortall body because his body was not yet glorified when the sacrament was instituted Besides what a uniserable glorified body should this be to be
of Christ and make a mocke of him to their owne destruction Wherefore such as are open Wicked persons are not without open repentance to bee admitted to the Sacrament of the supper but to be seperated from the Church as dead members from the body and as rotten sheep from the flocke that the rest may be preserued in sound doctrine and in innocency of life and conuersation Moreouer if onely the faithfull receiue christ let euery one prepare a true and liuely faith in his heart It is not enough to haue the bodily hand to receiue the mouth to tast and stomack to digest but we must bring with vs the hand of faith For this holy supper albeit by Gods ordinance it be a spirituall thing yet throgh the vnworthines of the receiuers it becometh a meer corporal earthlything The passeouer was a liuely figure of Christ representing the lambe slaine from the beginning of the worlde but such as did eate thereof vnworthily it was to them an instrument of destruction and as the messenger of death Iudu was one of the twelue and did eate the paschall lambe with the rest but he did not eat christ with the rest he did receiue damnation to himselfe Satan entering into him and procuring the confusion of soule and body It seemeth he receiued the supper of the Lord forasmuch as Ioh. 13 the Euangelist noteth that as soone as he had receiued the soppe he went immediately out Wherefore that which Luke affirmeth cha 22. Behold the hand of him that betraieth me is with me at the table albeit it be set downe after the supper yet was vttered before the supper according to the vsuall manner of the scripture And this is the iudgement of sundry writers both old and new But inasmuch as he was present at the Passeouer which was a figure of the passion of Christ God by this one fearful example teacheth that he neuer suffereth the abuse of his Sacramentes to goe vnpunished The Apostle saith 1 cor 11. He that eateth and drinketh vnworthily eateth and drinketh his own iudgment for this cause many are sick and weake among you and many sleepe Vngodly persons that he and liue in sinne togither with all impenitent persons attribute to much to the outward signe and rest therein as in the comfort of their soules Adam thought after his fal if he could reach out his hand take the fruit of the tree of life and eat thereof he should liue for euer For these words vsed in that place Least he put forth his hand to the tree of life eat and liue for euer do respect the purpose and intent of the man not the euent and yssue of the matter inasmuch as the eating of that fruit al the daies of his life could not giue grace or restore him to that life he had lost and to that high estate from whence hee was fallen Now as he imagind if he could but tast of the tree of life again it should go wel with him so his posterity in al ages dream of a secret power inherent in the sacraments wheras by taking the same vnworthily and by iudging of them corruptly sin is increased god is offended and the punishment is dubled The ark was a testimony of gods presence a witnes of his loue and leag with man and an assured sign that God woulde make his dwelling place among them that he would abide with them that he would walk before them that he would be their gratious God and that they should be his people but the Priests elders and people attributed ouermuch vnto it and far greater things thē they ought They said Wherefore hath the lord smitten vs this day before the Philistims Let vs bring the arke of the couenant of the lord ovt of shiloh vnto vs that when it commeth among us it may saue us out of the hanàs of our enemies Euē as the church of Rome whē any iudgement or calamity is vpon them carry forth their breaden-god on procession hold him vp to be seen and adored and thereby think to haue themselues deliuerd and Gods wrath to be appeased These neuer thoght of turning to God with all their harts and of changing their liues but ascribe saluation and deliuerance to the Arke it selfe and attribute power to the outward signe which of it selfe and in it selfe was no better then a few boards ioyned togither and therefore through their vaine confidence they were destroyed the Arke was taken the two sonnes of Eli were slaine and the whole hoast was discomfited Thus is it with the sacrament with such as come without faith to the Sacrament The sacrament indeed is holy the sacramental rites are holy the bread and wine are holy but let them be receiued of persons that are prophane and vnholy they make the sacramentes to themselues vnholy so farre are they from conferring grace and holines to all receiuers of them For can the Sacraments make him holy that is vnholy Or a godly man that is vngodly Or make him to fear an oth that is a blasphemer They cannot nay to such the Sacraments become vnholy and the receiuers grow more vnholy as Iudas did after the partaking of the passeouer Wherefore God as a iust iudge would driue Adam out of the garden of Eden least putting forth his hand to the tree of life he should take and receiue it vnworthily thereby prophaning the sacrament and so eat to himselfe iudgement The Sacrifices were holie ordinances of God yet when men that liued vngodly came vnto them they turned to bee sinne to them so is it with all those that come without faith and feeling to the Supper of the Lorde let vs not therefore be faithlesse but faithfull Lastly if the faithfull onelie receiue with profit then such as are Hypocrites and wicked liuers cannot be partakers of the bodie and blood of Christ no more then God and Satan can be ioined together True it is such maie receiue the bare signes but they receiue them to their condemnation because through want of faith and repentaunce they offend God repell Christ from them and all his benefites and drawe vnto themselues temporall and eternall punishments For no man can eat christ and withall eat his own damnation Againe whosoeuer eateth the flesh of christ and drinketh his blood shall liue for euer and hath christ d welling in him to saluation for christ can neuer be seperated from his sauing graces but the vngodly shall not liue for euer by christ with God For christ is not eaten with the teeth or mouth as the gospell directly determineth Iohn 6. Whosoeuer eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath eternal life my flesh is meat indeed my blood is drink indeede he that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood dwelleth in me and I in him But infidels and wicked persons haue not eternall life neither abide in christ therefore by the doctrine of
christ our sauiour they neither eate his flesh nor drinke his blood Wee must open the eyes of our faith to beholde him and the mouth of our soule to receiue him for by faith onely we are made partakers of him which the vngodly want he that drinketh of the blood of christ shal neuer be more a thirst Thirdly we know that satan the prince of darknes ruleth in all the harts of the children of disobedience sitteth in their consciences as the God of this worlde and filleth them full of iniquity as wee see in the example of Iudas Now if these receive the body of Christ then christ and the deuill shoulde dwell in one subiect togither and bee ioynt-possessors of one and the same house but this cannot be these cannot be at one these can neuer be friends reconciled there is no fellowship between righteousnes and vnrighteousnes ther is no communion between light and darkenesse there is no concord betweene Christ and Beliall Fourthly the Apostle teacheth that where christ is he worketh mortification and dying to sinne Rom. 8 If any haue not the spirit of Christ the same is not his and if Christ be in you the body is dead because of sin but the spirit is life for righteousnes sake But the wicked are not dead to sin they are dead in their sinnes and trespasses and they haue sinne not onelie remaining but raigning in them therfore christ cannot be in them Fiftly where christ is there are all things necessary to saluation and to whom God giueth his sonne to him he giueth iustification sanctification redemption repentance remission of sinnes and eternall life as Rom. 8. If God be on our side who shall be against vs Who spared not his owne sonne but gaue him for vs all to death how should he not with him giue vs all things also But the wicked haue not these gifts accompaning saluation they are not iustified they are not sanctified they are not regenerated therefore they cannot haue christ from whom these flow Sixtly we are charged to try and proue our owne hartes whether Christ be in vs or not that thereby we may discerne of our estate and standing in the faith 2 Cor. 〈◊〉 Proue your selues whether ye are in faith examine your selues know ye not your owne selues how that Iesus Christ is in you except ye be reprobates To what purpose serueth this tryall and examination if christ may bee in vs and yet remaine reiected Wherefore Christ cannot be in vs if we bee not approued but refused of God Lastly the Apostle chargeth the Church of the Corinthians not to eate things sacrificed to idols in the idols temple because they cannot be partakers of christ and the Dinels nor drinke of the cvp of Christ and of the cup of Dyuels 1 Cor. 10. 20. 21. These thinges which the Gentiles sacrifice they sacrifice them to Diuels and not vnto god and I would not that ye should haue fellowship with the Diuels ye cannot be partakers of the Lords Table and of the table of Diuels Where hee sheweth that a man may come polluted with idoll sacrifices to the Lords Supper but then he cannot be partaker of Christ indeede and in truth Thus we see the doctrine of the church of Rome striken to the ground which hold it as a principle of their faith and teach it to others that wicked men do receiue and eate christ himselfe in the supper making christ indeede to be no Christ. For whereas wee haue shewed that this sacrament consisteth of the outward signs which are bread and wine and the inward truth represented by them which is Christes body and blood according to the doctrine of the holy scripture and the common consent of all antiquity the Romanists haue turned this trueth topsie turuie and haue laid a new plat-forme of the 〈◊〉 of the Supper Hence it is that they haue abolished the signes of bread and wine and make Christ Iesus an outward parte as it were thrusting him out of the dores to be receiued of all both good and bad and the grace of Christ to be the inward part taken only of the faithfull Thus they make a deuorcement and a separation between Christ and his sauing graces which can neuer be parted and deuided For whosoeuer receiueth Christ pertaketh the merits and graces of christe and whosoeuer enioyeth the graces of christ imbraceth withall christ himselfe Besides if christ be the signe and the sanctifying graces of Christ the thing fignified according to the rule of the church of Rome what shall we say of the accidents and shewes of bread and wine whereunto shall they be reduced what parte shall they act and play in this comedy wherefore we hold it as a strong trueth which we haue euinced by sundrie reasons that wicked men are not made partakers of christ Chap. 12. Of the first vse of the Lords supper HItherto we haue spoken of all the partes of this sacrament as well outwatde as inwarde which is the first 〈◊〉 to be considered in the doctrine of them as we shewed before now we are to handle the vses or endes of the Lordes Supper which are principally these three first to shew forth with thanksgiuing the death crosse and sufferings of christ Secondly to teach vs our communion and growth with and in christ thirdly to declare our communion and growth in and with our brethren In these three standeth the knowledge of those rich and greate benifites which are bestowed vponall worthy communicants which haue sactified and prepared their heartes for this holy action These thinges being duely considered doe directly condemne the church of Rome who burying these true ends of the Lords Supper the commemoration of his passion the merit of his crosse our communion with Christ and our fellowship one with another haue altered it like the ship-mans hose into all forms and fashions and make it profitable for all purposes for peace and war for tempestes and calme weather for the fruites of the earth and distemperature of the ayre for the whole and sick for men and beasts for the liuing and for the dead And to begin with the last as none of the least corruptions of this Sacrament it was concluded in a Counsel that as a prayer therin is made for the liuing so the remembrance of the dead is to be made in all Masses It is adiudged an excellent remedy against storms and tempests of the sea and therefore al sea-men are warned in times of danger to call to their mindes and remember to sing the Masses d which are accustomed to be sung for tēpests And as they make it good in storms so they make it serue turn in the day of battell to saue them from the sword of the enemy for the Priests are charged to say the Masses vsed for them that go to wars Besides these abuses they make it auaileable to purge and cleer offendors suspected of any crime
present or things to come recouering in him the possession of those thinges which wee lost in Adam being the beloued sonne of the father hee maketh vs acceptable and wel pleasing vnto him leading captiuity captiue and giuing gifts to men hauing Dominion ouer the Deuil sin hell the world the flesh and all our enemies hee protecteth vs that they cannot ouerthrow vs and hath made vs kings and Priests to god euen his father in that he is happy and immortal he maketh vs partakers of his blessednes and immortality When we shall seuerally and particularly apply al the actions and benefits of Christ our lorde vnto our selues we may boldely come to the lordes table where wee shall fiude christ and enioy him to our endlesse comfort Neither are we to abstaine and hang backe from comming to the Supper nor to dispaire of our selues nor to be to much cast downe when wee feele sundry defectes and wantes in our faith For there is a weake and feeble faith which is yet a true faith as well as the stronge faith There are two degrees offaith profitable to be knowne and comfortable to be considered The weake faith is an earnest and vnfained desire to be reconciled vnto GOD in christ which willing desire in vs GOD accepteth as the deede it selfe hee accounteth the defire of faith as faith it selfe the desire of reconciliation and forgiuenesse of sinnes by the death of CHRIST shall be auaileable to worke out our attonement and redemption The stronge faith is a full perswasion and assurance of the mercyes of GOD when the faithful can truely say with the Apostle Rom. 8 38. 39. I am perswaded that neither life nor death nor thinges present nor thinges to come neither Angels nor principalities nor powers neither height nor depth nor any other creature shall separate vs from the loue of GOD which is in Christ Iesus our Lord. This is the greatest measure and highest degree of faith this is the top strength and full ripenesse of faith heereunto wee are to striue and indeuour and neuer to giue rest vnto our soules vntill wee bee resouled and setled in our consciences that all our sinnes are assuredly pardoned and wee accepted to euerlasting life This greatenesse of faith was in Abraham who was not weak but strengthened in faith being fully perswaded He that had promised was also able to doe it All that liue in the bosome of the Church doe not attaine to this full measure of a perfect faith but euen as it is in the estate of the body we are babes before we come to be men of ripe yeares first we be weake before we be strong first we are fed with milke before we can digest strong meat We see corne first is in the grasse then in the blade before it come to the stalke and to haue ripe corne in the eare There must be in all thinges a beginning before there can be a proceeding to perfection The tree sendeth forth his tender braunches and putteth forth his leaues before the fruit commeth So is it with euery christian Man and Woman first they are babes in Christ and haue certaine seedes and beginnings of faith springing in them to eternall life afterward they grow from strength to strength from grace to grace from degree to degree and from faith to faith vntill they come to a full perswasion and assurance without wauering which ariseth after many experiences of Gods ' manifold mercies and fauours in the course of our liues as we see Psal. 23. Doubtlesse kindnesse and mercy shall follow me all the daies of my life and I shall remaine a long season in the house of the Lord. Wherefore let vs not be 〈◊〉 ed and discouraged when our faith is feeble for a feeble faith wil apply Christ as well as a strong faith it wil draw Christ home to dwell in our hartes through whom we shall not perish but haue euerlasting life Hee that had but a weake eie and a dimme sight to behold the brasen Serpent in the wildernesse was healed from the deadly stinging of the fiery Serpents as wel as he that saw cleerly and perfectly a farre off He that hath but a Leprous and sickly hand is able to hold that which is offered vnto it as well as a sound and strong hand So hee that hath a little faith in the Sonne of God shall neuer haue his saluation denied nor forgiuenesse of his sinnes kept from him if with an humble heart he pray to God to haue them pardoned The Apostles beleeued that Christ was the Sauiour of the world yet they were ignorant of his death and resurrection which are the chiefe meanes of saluation and they are saide to be men of little faith So our sauiour when the Disciples had asked increase of their faith declareth that if our faith be in quantity but as a graine of mustard-seede it should be powerfull and effectuall seeing he will not quench the smooking flaxe nor breake the bruised reede but cherish the least sparke and measure of grace giuen vnto vs from aboue This likewise was the faith of that father whose child was possessed with a dumbe and deafe spirit when christ said to him If thou canst beleau all things are possible to him that beleeueth straight way he cryed with teares saying Lord I beleeue help mine vnbeleefe Christ doth not reiect him for his weaknes of knowledge and faith to teach that we should not dispaire or be dismaid when we finde wauering wantes distrust and imperfection in our selues but rather confessing our frailty with that father in this place pray to be strengthned and to haue our faith increased For whosoeuer vnfainedly desireth any grace of God tending to saluation shal receiue it if he continue knocking at the gate of his mercy it shall bee opened and his prayer shal be granted as Christ hath promised I wilgiue to him that is a thirst of the wel of the water of life Thus if wee long after the graces wanting vnto vs as the earth after a great drouth for the comfortable shewers of refreshing rain vsing the meanes appointed of God to attaine them as earnest praier reuerent attending on the continuall hearing of his word diligent receiung of the sacraments being carefull to giue honor and glory to him for his gifts we haue already of his onely mercy obtained and enioyed wee shall be satisfied and replenished for then He that hath 〈◊〉 his good worke in vs will perfect the same in our harts vntill the day of Iesus Christ. Thus much of faith the sec. part of true examination which is the instrument whereby wee lay hold vpon Christ and are made liuely members of him withont which whosoeuer come to the Lords Supper depart away without fruit and comfort Chap. 18. Of Repentance the third part of examination THe next thing in this tryall to be considered is repētance which is a
promise the partakers of the same hope the members of the same bodye and the professors of the same faith to contend and striue one against another to delight in brauling fighting quarrelling and to norish hatred malice rancour spite enuy biting and backbiting one of another If Ephraim be set against Manasses and Manasses against Ephraim if Brother be diuided against brother if we bite one at another let vs take heed least we be consumed one of another The sonnes of God are renewed into the image ofGod to resemble their heauenly father in true holines and doe all weare the same cognizance and liuery For the Sacraments are the marks of Ch. sheepe whereby they are knowne and discerned so that all our discentions diuisions railings reuilings disgracings and defacings one of another tend to the reproch and dishonour of our common father and do giue an heauy testimony against our souls with God and his elect Angels For how do we approach vnto God how do we come into his presence With what harts do we pray before him and vnto him Are we not taught to aske forgiuenes of our sins as we forgiue the trespasses done vnto vs It then we be malicious and enuious and carry the fresh remembrance of wronges in our hearts to pursue them with reuenge do we not pray against our selues Do we not beseech God to poure out vengance vpon vs Do we not open our mouths to our owne destruction For when wee vse our tongues to say Lord forgiue vs for euen we forgiue is it not asmuch as if we should pray forgiue vs not Lord for we do not we will not forgiue others Therefore after the forme of prayer giuen to the Disciples Christ addeth If ye do forgiue men their trespasses your heauenly father will also forgiue you but if ye do not forgiue men their trepasses no more will your father forgiue you your trespasses And as he exhorteth that when they stand and appeare before the Altar they must forgiue so when we appeare at the Lords table we must forgiue if we haue any thing against any man that our father also which is in heauen may forgiue vs our trespasses Now if we woulde be directed to knowe whether this loue be is vs or not wee may try our owne hearts by these holy properties and blessed effectes described by the Apostle 1 cor xiii Loue saith he suffereth long it is bountifull loue enuieth not loue doth not boast itselfe it is not puffed vp it disdaineth not it seeketh not her owne things it is not prouoked to anger it thinketh not euill it reioyceth not in iniquity but reioyceth in the truth it suffereth all things it beleeueth al thinges it hopeth al things it endureth al things Heere we may see what manner of loue ought to be in vs. Euery one of vs must indeuour that all the parts of this description may rightly agree to euery one of vs and truely be found in vs toward all men euen our enimies as we see Iesus Christ hath left vs an example of his loue when he praied for his enimies that crucified and cruelly entreated him father forgiue them for they know what they do and this did stephen to those that stoned him Lord lay not this sin to their charge This is the way let vs walke in it this was their practise let vs follow it Thus we haue shewed the necessity of examination of ourselues before we come to the Lordes supper and declared the parts wherein it standeth and the manner how it is to be performed If we come furnished with these things with sauing knoledg with iustifieng faith with vnfained repentance with a louing and longing reconciliation towarde our brethren among whom we liue hauing as much as is possible Peace with all men yea euen our enimies let vs not abstaine from the Lordes table by reason of some frailties and infirmities in vs for God couereth them and will not bring them into remembrance as we see 2. Chron 30. A multitude of people had not clensed themselues yet did eate the passeouer but not as it was writen wherfore Hezekiah praied for them saying The good God be merciful toward him that prepareth his whole hart to seeke the Lord god the god of his fathers though he be not clensed according to the purification of the sanctuarie and the Lord heard Hezekiah and healed the people Where we see that because their hart was vpright and sincere their wants and imperfections were not imputed vnto them For God respecteth the truth of the inward partes and pard oneth their sinnes that thus prepare their harts to seeke him So then they were greatly deceiued that thoght they honoured the Sacrament by abstaining from it it is not honoured but dishonoured not hallowed but prophaned not regarded reuerently but reproched greeuously by our wilfull abstinence as the Apostle teacheth 1 cor 11. let a man examin himself and so let him eat of this bread and drink of this cup. He doth not say let him proue himselfe and so let him abstaine For the Sacrament is abused as well by forbearing hauing examined our selues as by not examining our selues and receiuing vnworthily And thus much of examination and the manner to be obserued therein Chap. 20. The conclusion containing an abridgement of the whole treatise THe effect of that which hath bene deliuered hitherto in these Books may thus be gathred into a short sum and abridgement We haue declared that God in al times and ages of the church from the first being of our first parents hath to his word and promises anexed sacraments as seales of assurance for the confirmation of them therby magnifieng his owne mercy toward his people shewing our weaknes and vnworthines and condemning such as oftentimes desire to come to the Lordes table but esteeme little of the preaching of the word whereas the word and Sacraments haue one and the same author they are instruments of the same grace their whole force and effect dependeth on God they require faith to be mingled with them they profit not alway at the very moment of hearing and receiuing Notwithstanding some differences wee find betweene them as namely in the greater necessity of the worde then of the Sacramentes Infidels were neuer barred from hearing the word when they would become hearers thereof and whereas the word affecteth one only of the sences to wit the hearing the Sacraments 〈◊〉 offered to the eies as well as to the eares and so in some sort become more effectuall then the word Touching the worde Sacrament it is drawne from martiall discipline and properly signifieth the Souldiers othe whereby hee bindeth himselfe to his Captaine which worde being vsed by the olde Latine interpreter is now become ordinary and common in the Church which is not mentioned in so many sillables in the Scriptures And howsoeuer the word be often taken in a large and generall signification yet
testament and the new they had sundry significant signes and Ceremonies whose interpretation was not easily knowne vnto them Thirdly seeing God hath giuen vnto vs two signes and added two seals to his word and writings we ought to haue the stronger faith in his mircyfull promises For wherefore hath he doubled the signes but that wee should encrease in faith and as it were double our assurance of his graces Lastly this number of two ouerthroweth the number of seauen sacramentes maintained in the church of Rome which iust number was first broched by Peter Lumbard afterwarde ratysied in the Counsell of Florence and lastlye established in the Counsell of Trent and is now become the common doctrine of that counterfect church For besides baptisme and the Lords supper which wee receiue they haue instaled into the number of sacraments Confirmation Penance Matrimony Orders and extreame Vnction contrary to the doctrine of the scriptures contrary to the nature of Sacramentes and contrary to the euidence of sundry reasons And firist of all confirmation cannot bee lifted vppe into the seate of the Sacramentes or sit downe in this Chaire of honour because it wanteth the institution of Christ it wanteth an outward signe it hath no word to warrant it or promise of blessing for howsoeuer the Apostles by imposition of hands gaue the holy ghost those miraculous gifts are now withdrawne from the church of God Lastly they haue aduanced it aboue baptisme they administer it in a strange tongue and halow the greazy oyle to purifie soule and body Secondly their popish penance instituted by bodily chastisements to make satisfaction for sinne to God is no sacrament of the new testament nor any sacred thing being thus vnderstood For we acknowledge no other satifaction for sinne wherein God delighteth and the conscience of man 〈◊〉 but only the death and obedience of christ Besides true repentance hath beene preached and practised from the beginning of the world after that sinne entred into the world Furthermore their penance hath no visible signe as baptisme and the supper of the Lord haue Thirdly matrimony albeit it be a diuine ordinance honourable among all estates yet can be no Sacrament of the church of christ because it was instituted before the law it is ratified among the infidels which are no members of the church it hath no promise of grace and saluation ioyned to it and albeit it be honorable in all yet it is not necessary in all Lastly the Roman church esteemeth it as an vnclean thing a prophanation of holy orders a liuing in the flesh so that as with one hand they aduance it to a great dignity with the other hand they cast it downe with great disgrace and contempt as vnworthy of the high and holy priesthood Fourthly orders come in the next place which are the offices and ministry of the church but no sacrament or sacraments of the church For then according to the number of orders we should multiply the number of sacraments Neither haue they any outward element and visible signe Lastly we are come to extream vnction which we suffer not to maske vnder the name of sacraments but pul off the vizard thereof because the church had the vse of anoynting so long as it retained the miraculous gift of healing Besides it hath no word ofinstitution to warrant the continual practise of it vntill the second comming of christ Wherefore seeing the word of God teacheth the number of two sacraments onely and the church of Rome instructeth her children in the number of 7. sacraments neither moe nor lesse they must pardon vs if we harken rather to the scriptures then to their traditions rather to God then to man rather to the truth then to the spirit of error Hitherto we haue spoken of the Sacramentes in generall of their parts their vses their number now we come to speake of them in particular first of baptisme then of the Lords supper And howsoeuer baptisme hath sundry significations yet as it signifieth that washing with water which serueth to seale the couenant of the new testament it is the first sacrament wherein by the outward washing of the body with water once in the name of the father of the son and of the holy ghost the inward clensing of the soule by the blood of christ is represented This descrption teacheth that such as are not yet baptized are not to be admitted to the lords table that albeit dipping be not necessary to the being of baptisme yet washing with water is of the essence of this sacrament that such as are once baptized are not to be rebaptized albeit they haue beene baptized by heretickes and that whosoeuer is baptized hath made a solemne couenant to professe the Christian religion Now q wee are to consider in Baptisme as wee did before generally in a Sacrament these two thinges his partes and his vses The partes of baptisme are outward and inward The outward partes are these foure The first outward part is the Minister as the Messenger of God For baptisme is a part of the Minystry and God hath ioyned the ministry of the word sacraments togither Wherfore the minister must be carefull and not carelesse in the execution of his osfice who is to sanctifie the Water and to wash the party Moreouer the people are directed to whom to resort when they haue children to be baptized Lastly the Church of Rome prophane baptisme when they appoint mid-wiues and priuate persons to baptize children The second outward part is the word of institution which is as the forme of this sacrament The third part is the element of water which is the matter whereof baptisme consisteth Whosoeuer therefore baptiseth with any other liquorthen with water as with blood with sand with snow with milk or such like matter doth frustrate Baptisme and maketh it an idell ceremony Againe all Popish corruptions added and annexed to this sacrament contrary to the simplicity of the gospel as creame crosses censors tapers spettle salt and such like vnsauory trumpery are 〈◊〉 hauing also a superstitious opinion of holinesse and worship ioyned with them Also if water be an outward part the want of washing with water cannot hinder the saluation of such as dye without baptisme All perished not vnder the law that died without circumcision God is not more rigorous vnder the Gospell This therefore is a bloody and discomfortable doctrine to be abandoned and abiured of all parents of all childeren of all Christians The fourth outward parte of baptisme is the body that is washed Novv such as are to be baptized must be within the Couenant these are eyther men and Women of riper yeares or else the infantes of such vvho haue interest in Baptisme as vvell as their parentes This condemneth the Romyshe practise of baptizing bels and serueth to set forth the great loue of God to all
the draught because the eares of well disposed persons woulde abhorre that and if we should defend it the Haeretickes and Infidels woulde 〈◊〉 at vs and laugh vs to scorne Againe hee saith euidently The mouse cannot eate it God forbidde we should euer come to that Neuertheles Alexander as bold as blind Bayard in despight of all Heretickes and Infidels aduentureth vpon that opinion If a hogge or a Dogge should eat the whole consecrated hoast I see no cause but the Lords body should go 〈◊〉 into the body of that hog or dog And that we may see the blaspemous school diuinity or 〈◊〉 villany of those 〈◊〉 men hearken once more to Antoninus that beastly Byshop of Florence If a mouse or any other creature or beaste happen to eate the sacrament through negligence of keeping let the keeper be inioyned penance 40. daies and if it be possible let the mouse be taken and burnt and let his ashes be buried neere the altar Heereunto another addeth that the Mouses entrals must be drawne out and the portion of the sacrament that there remaineth if the priest be 〈◊〉 to receiue it must 〈◊〉 belaid vp vntill it may naturally be consumed But the hoast so found in the mouses bowels may in no wise be thrown into the water as a certaine priest sometimes vsed a fly that he sound in the chalice after consecration But if a man had such a feruent zeale saith he that his stomake would serue him to eat the same without horror this were the best course of all as God 〈◊〉 did who is much commended for swallowing and receiuing the host which a leaper had vomited and cast vp And heereunto the goodly and ghostly Canons of the counsell holden at Colen vnder the 〈◊〉 Radulph If there fall any small thing of the bodye or blood vpon the pall of the altar let the stone be cut and burned and the ashes put into the holy place or cast into the fish-poole If any fall vppon the stone or vppon the grounde let the priest licke it vp if a Spider or fly be fallen into it let them be taken out warily and burnt ouer the fish-poole If a man shall vomit it vp again let the peeces be gathered vp and be giuen to a faithfull man to take and eate and let the rest of the vomit be burnt and set neere vnto the altar Can any religious hart repeate or any christian eares abide this loathsome diuinity We will therefore cease to stirre this dunghill any farther for the due reuerence which wee ought to bear to the glorious body of christ Iesus our blessed sauiour But to return back to the former question what shall we say that the beasts eate Bread it cannot be for that they say is gone by consecration Some not so grosse as the former hold they eat the shewes of bread Others say the bread returneth again and thus God must wnrke myracles to feed mise So likewise Innocentius more subtiliy then soundly saith The bread passeth away myraculously when the body commeth and the body passeth and getteth it selfe away when the mouse draweth 〈◊〉 and the bread commeth into his place again so that he holdeth that it 〈◊〉 to be a sacrament so soone as any mouse or beast toucheth it But Guidmundus and Thomas Walden affirme that when mise gnaw the Sacrament there is deceptio visus that is an errour in our fight We simply iudge they be eating and nibling but our sight is deceiued the mise be otherwise occupied And might they not as well say our eie-sight faileth in thinking them to be mise or birds whereas they may peraduenture be angels in their shapes Other hold some new matter is created in place of christs body but I would gladly knowe whether it be by vertue of these words this is my body And touching the Wormes that are ingendred in the 〈◊〉 a 〈◊〉 diuersity is among them Some say they are ingendred of the aire others of the substance of bread and 〈◊〉 of the quality and shewes thereof and so we shall haue substance made of accidentes in despight of all 〈◊〉 and reason Thus they are carried hither and thither vppe and downe too and fro to reconcile matters they knowe not howe and to beleeue thinges they know not what For how shall the people haue a direction and path-way what to followe when their teachers are not setled and perswaded what is the truth Against al these confusions vncertainties contrarieties blasphemies and crossing one another we teach the people what to hold and instruct them to make a diffe between ch body the sacrament of his body The sacrament is corruptible christs body is glorious and free from all corruption the sacrament is beneath christes body is aboue the sacrament is on earth vpon the table the body is in heauen the Sacrament feedeth the body and outwarde man the body of christ feedeth the soule and inward man the sacrament is eaten as well of the wicked as of the godly the body is only eaten of the faithful the sacrament may be eaten to death but the body of christ is euer eaten to saluation Wherefore howsoeuer beastes may touch or eate the substance of the bread which is the outwarde and corruptible element of the sacrament they cannot eat the body of christ which is in heauen and sitteth at the right hande of God the Father which is receiued onely by a liuely faith Fiftly they argue the case whether the shew of breade be a signe of the bodie without the bloode or whether it include the soule humours spirits and the blood it selfe Scotus saith Nonest certum that is It is vncertaine both may be defended but neither can be proued Notwithstanding Thomas of Aquin auoucheth that the blood is in the body the body in the blood by a connecting of them togither which they cal concomit antia or accompanying each other So then whereas Christ said this is my body they vnderstand him to say this is my bodie and my blood Againe when Christ said this is my blood they make his meaning to be this is my bloode and my body This is a new fancie well agreeing and answering to their newe doctrine whereby they are constrained to build vp one idle conceit with another This is a very wonderfull shiste and a marueylous sigure passing all figures whereby one thing is made two and two are made one Lastly to draw to an end where almost no end is they eagerly contend with what wordes their consecration or rather coniuration is wrought Some say christ consecrated when hee blessed Others denying this dispute how many words are precisely required to the forme of consecration Scotus shrowdeth himself vnder his own ignorāce flyeth to it as to a place of refuge saying It is a lawfull ignorance not to know how many wordes are necessarily required in the forme of consecration therefore he which thinketh he knoweth
misrable people led by such blind guids O miserable guides of such blind people What a wofull condition is this that a man shal liue al the daies of his life in the bosom of their holy mother the church yet her sons and daughters can neuer assure themselus to haue bin baptized thogh they make the want therof a mark of reprobation or euer to haue receiued the Lords supper or euer to haue bin 〈◊〉 or absolued seeing al hangeth vpō the priests intention obseruation ordination This is the lamen table condition of all those that liue vnder the heauy yoake and greeuous bondage of superstition Ther is no peace no comfort no ioy of hart in such a doubtful and doleful religion Wherfore as the Holy ghost saith Go out of her my people that ye be not partakers of her sinnes and that ye receiue not of her plagues Now among all other abuses of the church of Rome and prophanations of the blessed sacrament of the bodye and blood of Christ none is more notable and notorious then that great Idoll of the Masse being indeede a masse of many abominations And howsoeuer it be greatly liked of those that are enamored of it as the things that are not faire yet seeme faire to them that are in loue it is knowne to the true church to be an heape of errors a lumpe of confusions a bottomlesse gulfe of all blasphemies and an engine that ouerturneth the foundatiō of religion They make the Lordes Supper to bee a sacrifice not a sacrifice of praise and thansgiuing but propitiatory to be offered by a masse-priest for the quicke and the dead to saue man and not onely to saue man but sometimes their Pigs and their Swine from diseases For they haue a masse commonly called the Masse of Saint Antony Yea if a poore womans hen be sicke and ready to be lost shee may procure a Masse to be said for it And heereby although no good redounde to the party yet some gaine shall returne to the Priest who if he see no money wil say no Masse And are not these more beastly and vncleane then swine yea more mad then mad men thus to abuse the holy ordinance of Christ and to turne that to their owne profit which was instituted for the peoples comfort Do they not by this means make the death of Christ of none effect while they offer vp a new that only sacrifice which being once offered hath sanctified vs for euer and yet behold more abhominations then these The right ends of the institution are basely esteemed they make it of speclall force against tempests against sicknes against Warres auaileable to saue cattell to cure the feauer to restore lost things yea profitable for the deade and that Ex opere operato sine bono motu vtentis that is onely being present at the worke done though there be neuer a good motion brought thereunto by him that is present Thus they make the Masse deuised by Antichrist more precious then the holy supper instituted by Christ. Touching the word Masse we must vnderstand that neither the name nor thing ment by the name by the Church of Rome is found in the Scripture nor in any 〈◊〉 and approued Writer for foure hundered yeares after Christ to call the Sacrament or sacrifice by that name Tertullian Cyprian Ierome Augustine Lactantius knew it not these Lataine fathers vsed it not Againe the fathers of the Greeke Church Chrisostome Basill Nazianzene Gregory Nissene and other were neuer acquainted with it they passe by it as a stranger vnto them But as there go many forged and 〈◊〉 Writings vnder the names of the fathers so I deny not but the word Masse may be found in such base and bastard bookes as in Augustines Sermons de tempore Ierom on the Prouerbs which books were neuer made by them but are of another style and of a later stampe And howsoeuer some would deriue it from the Haebrew word Missath which signifieth an oblation yet it seemeth rather to be all one with Missio which importeth a sending away and a licensing to depart and therefore Saint Cyprian saith remissa peccatorum in stead of remssio For this was the order and custome of the Church in former times Nouices and such as were newly planted in the Church being conuerted srom paganisme to Christianity and from infidelity to the faith of Christ and not yet baptized till they were able to giue an answere to such as asked of them a reason of their profession were not suffered to come to the Lords table Likewise such as denying the faith by sinking and shrinking vnder the heate of persecution or committing some other heinous offence were enjoyned to make satisfaction to the church whom they had greeuously offended no withstanding they might be present at the publike praiers the church and at the preaching of the word yet might not be present at the administration of baptism nor receiue the sacrament of the lords supper Wherefore after the prayers were finished and the sermon ended the deaconsaid to such as wer barred either by age or want of susficient knowledge or their owne offence from the sacraments Ite missa est that is Go ye hence ye may depart Moreouer such as would not communicate with their bretheren were willed to depart not to trouble the rest of the church that staied to communicate Of this dismissing and sending away al nouices 〈◊〉 and carelesse persons which either might not or 〈◊〉 not communicate and of this proclamation of the deacon the whole action of the holy communion in processe of time was called the Masse that is a dismissing of all such persons as wer not to communicate But whē through negligence of the people or couetousnes of the priests this order was altered yet the name was retained and now it is vsed for another thing to wit for that solemne action whereby the sacrament is made a sacrifice and offered vp to god to take away the sins of the quick and dead And in this sense we haue iustly abolished both the name and the nature of the Masse inasmuch as it hath frustrated the death of CHRIST and taken from vs the comforte of the Lordes Supper And albeit we deny not but the Lords Supper may truely be called a sacrifice being a memoriall of the real sacrifice of christ offered vpon the crosse being a thaks-giuing to god for the worke of our redemption being a presenting and giuing vppe our selues our soules and bodies to God a liuing holy and acceptable sacrifice and being ioyned with almes and releefe to the poore according to euery mans ability which is a testimony of our thankfulnesse to God yet as they vnderstād it to be a real external bodily and vnbloody sacrifice in the natiue and proper signification and themselues to be truely and propely priests according to the order of Melchisedech to offer