Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
lord_n day_n sabbath_n sunday_n 11,265 5 11.9324 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A61830 Eight cases of conscience occasionally determined by the late Reverend Father in God, Robert Sanderson, Lord Bishop of Lincoln. Sanderson, Robert, 1587-1663. 1674 (1674) Wing S598; ESTC R37202 62,486 160

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

have therefore now sent you but a naked summary of my thoughts concerning the three Questions abstracted from all those Explanations Reasons Testimonies of Authors removals of Objections and other such Enlargements as might have given further both lustre and strength thereunto Howsoever by what I presently send you may sufficiently see what my opinion is which I shall be ready to clear so far as my understanding will serve in any particular wherein you shall remain doubtful and as ready to alter when any man shall instruct me better if he bring good evidence either of Reason or of Scripture-Text for what he affirmeth The Questions are 1. Which is the fittest Name whereby to call the day of our Christian weekly-rest whether the Sabbath the lord's-Lord's-day or Sunday 2. What is the meaning of that Prayer appointed to be used in our Church Lord have Mercy upon us and encline c. as it is repeated after and applied to the words of the fourth Commandment 3. Whether it be lawful to use any bodily recreation upon the lord's-Lord's-day and if so then what kind of Recreations may be used I. Concerning the Name Sabbatum or Sabbath I thus conceive 1. That in Scripture Antiquity and all Ecclesiastical Writers it is constantly appropriated to the day of the Jews Sabbath or Saturday and not at all till of late years used to signifie our Lord's-day or Sunday 2. That to call Sunday by the name of the Sabbath-day rebus sic stantibus may for sundry respects be allowed in the Christian Church without any great inconveniency and that therefore men otherwise sober and moderate ought not to be censured with too much severity neither charged with Judaism if sometimes they so speak 3. That yet for sundry other respects it were perhaps much more expedient if the word Sabbath in that notion were either not all or else more sparingly used II. Concerning the name Dominica or the lord's-Lord's-day 1. That it was taken up in memory of our Lord Christ's Resurrection and the great work of our Redemption accomplished therein 2. That it hath warrant from the Scripture Apoc. 1.10 and hath been of long continued use in the Christian Church to signifie the first day of the week or Sunday III. Concerning the name Dies Solis or Sunday 1. That it is taken from the courses of the Planets as the names of the other daies are the reason whereof is to be learned from Astronomers 2. That it hath been used generally and of long time in most parts of the World 3. That it is not justly chargeable with Heathenism and that it proceedeth from much weakness at the least if not rather superstition that some men condemn the use of it as prophane heathenish or unlawful IV. Of the fitness of the aforesaid three names compared one with another 1. That according to the several matter or occasions of speech each of the three may be fitter in some respect and more proper to be used than either of the other two As viz. 1. The Name Sabbath when we speak of a time of rest indeterminatè and in general without reference to any particular day and the other two when we speak determinately of that day which is observed in the Christian Church Of which two again 2. That of the Lord's-day is fitter in the Theological and Ecclesiastical and 3. That of Sunday in the civil popular and common use 2. Yet so as that none of the three be condemned as utterly unlawful whatsoever the matter or occasion be but that every man be left to his Christian liberty herein so long as so long as superior Authority doth not restrain it Provided ever that what he doth herein he do it without vanity or affectation in himself or without uncharitably judging or despising his Brother that doth otherwise than himself doth To the second Question V. The words of that Prayer Lord have mercy c. repeated after the fourth Commandment do evidently import as they do in each of the other ten 1. An acknowledgment of three things viz. 1. That the words of that particular Commandment contain in them a Law whereunto we are subject 2. That it is our bounden duty to endeavour with our uttermost power to keep the said Law 3. That our naughty hearts have of themselves no inclination to keep it until God by the work of his Grace shall encline them thereunto 2. A double supplication viz. 1. For mercy in respect of the time past because we have failed of our bounden duty heretofore 2. For Grace in respect of the time to come that we may perform our duties better hereafter VI. But how far forth the words of the fourth Commandment are to be taken as a Law binding Christians and by what authority they have that binding power is the main difficulty For the resolution whereof it may suffice every sober minded Christian to understand the Prayer appointed by the Church in that meaning which the words do immediately import and without over-curious inquiry into those things that are more disputable to believe these few points following which ought to be taken as certain and granted amongst Christians viz. 1. That no part of the Law delivered by Moses to the Jews doth bind Christians under the Gospel as by vertue of that delivery no not the ten Commandments thems●lves but least of all the fourth which all confess to be at least in some part Ceremonial 2. That the particular determination of the time to the seventh day of the week was Ceremonial And so the obligation of the fourth Commandment in that respect although it were Iuris divini positivi to the Jew yet is ceased together with other legal Ceremonies since the publishing of the Gospel and bindeth not Christian Consciences 3. That the substance of the fourth Commandment in the general viz. that some certain time should be set apart from secular imployments to be sanctified to an holy rest for the better attending upon God's publick and solemn worship is moral and perpetual and of Divine right as a branch of the Law of Nature whereunto Christians under the Gospel are still bound 4. That de facto the Lord's-day or Sunday is the time appointed to us for that purpose by such sufficient Authority as we stand bound in Conscience to obey absque hoc whether that Authority be immediately Divine or but mediately through the power of the Church This is sufficient to regulate the judgment and Conscience of every ordinary Christian yet is it not unlawful for Scholars soberly and fairly to argue and debate a little farther matte●s which are questionable for the better finding out of the Truth And the points in this Argument that are most in controversy are these two viz. 1. Concerning the observation of a weekly Sabbath whether it be of necessity to keep one day of every seven And by what right we are tied so to do 2. Concerning the change of the Jewish Sabbath into the Lord's-day and by what Authority