but onely that they were dull and slow of heart to consider of sundry dispensations of God towards them for as much is said of the disciples of Christ Mar. 8. 17 18. when doubtlesse they were not meere carnall or naturall persons This people Deut. 29. could not become the Lords people by entring into solâ—mne Covenant with God for they were the Lords Church and people already before this 1. If they were yet that was by entring into solemne Covenant with God on Mount Sinai when the Lord had brought them up out of the Land of Aegypt for then they entred into solemne Covenant with God and God with them and so they became the Lords peculiar people Exod. 19 4 5 6 8. c. If they were his people before that yet that also was by Covenant made with them in the loynes of Abraham when God tooke him and his seede to be his Church and people yet separating Ishmael from Isaac and Esau from Iacob that the inheritance of the Covenant of God and of being the Church of God might rest in the house of Iacob 2. Yet it was not without great reason that the Lord should now establish them by solemne Covenant to be a people to himselfe because the Nation had been much degenerated from the spirit and wayes of Abraham in Aegypt and had broken that Covenant by their Idolatries there Ezâ—k. 20. 7 8. And the Covenant made in Sinai or Horeb when they were come out of Aegypt they had also broken by their Idolatries in the Wildernesse Ezâ—k 20. 13 16. for which causes and the like the Lord consumed that generation that they never entred into the Land Iosh. 5. 4 6. And therefore now when their posteritie and children were ready to enter in the Lord entred into Covenant with them and thereby established them to be his people their Fathers being cut off for breaking the Covenant But still it was by Covenant that both Fathers first and children afterward became a Church and people unto God and when this generation were entred into the Land their Covenant made before between God and them was confirmed by Circumcision Iosh. 5. 3 7. they being not Circumcised before But this Covenant was of the whole Church with God and therefore not like our Chuâ—ch-Covenants whiâ—h are between the Church and the members concerning watchfulnesse over one another and the like Our Church Covenants are with the Lord himselfe as was shewed before in the description thereof For watchfuâ—nesse and duties of edification one towards another are but branches of the Lords Covenant being duties commanded by the Law and so it was with that people of Israel who when they promised and Covenanted to walke in all the wayes of God in all his statutes and commandements and judgements they promised these duâ—ies of love and watchâ—ulnesse and eâ—ification one towards another because these were duties commanded and required oâ— God Lev. 19. 17 Deut. 29 â—8 the neglect whereof in the matter of Achan was the sinne of alâ— the Coâ—gregation and brought judgement upon them all Iosh 7. 11 12. Yea by this Covenant they were bound to duties towards them that were not then present but children afterward to beborne and proselyâ—es that afterward should be added to them ver. 14 15. Like as our Church-Covenants are with them that now are and that hereafter shall become members of the same Church When Iehojada made a Covenant between the King and the people 2 King 11. 17. that Covenant was but a branch of the Lords Covenant with them all both King and people for the King promised but to Rule the people righteously according to the will of God and the people to be subject to the King so Ruling Now these duties of the King to them and of them to the King were such as God required in his Covenant both of him and them and so it is in Church-Covenant the duties of the Church to the members and the members to the Church and one another are no other but such as the Gospel and the Covenant of grace requireth both of the Church and the members of it in their severall places But this place of Deut. 29. is not sufficient to prove a Church-Covenant in these dayes because it is in the Scriptures of the old Testament for whatsoever must be used in the dayes of the New Tâ—stament must be proved from the Scriptures of the New Testament or else it is to be layd aside 1. The Church-Covenant may be proved from the New Testament also as will afterwards appeare 2. But suppose there were not pregnant places for it in the New Testament yet it is not enough to prove the same unlawfull for whatsoever Ordinance of the old Testament is not repealed in the New Testament as peculiar to the Jewish Paedagogie but was of morall and perpetuall equitie the same bindes us in these dayes and is to be accounted the revealed will of God in all ages though it be not particularly and expressely mentioned in the writings of the New Testament else how shall we prove it unlawfull for a man to marry his Sister or his Aunt How shall we prove it warrantable and necessary for Magistrates to punish Sabbath-breaking blasphemy and Idolatry How shall we prove it lawfull to apply the seale of Gods Covenant unto Infants or to admit women to eate of the holy things for the Scriptures of the New Testament doe speake little in these cases onely the Scriptures of the Old Testament doe give direction and light about them Lev. 18. 19. Neh. 13. 15. c. 2 Chron. 15. 16. 2 King 23. Gen. 17. 2. Exod. 12. 4. 6. And the New Testament hath nothing to the contrary and they are all according to morall equitie and reason and therefore they are to be observed from the Scriptures of the Old Testament as the revealed will of God though there were nothing expressely for them in the New And the same we say of the particular in hand For that a company should be combined together into one body in way of Government and subjection by way of mutuall free Covenant as men doe when they enter into Church Estate nothing is more naturall or agrâ—eable to morall equitie nay it implyeth a contradiction in the very name of libertie or freedome that free-men should take upon them authoritie or power over free men without their free consent and voluntary and mutuall Covenant or Engagement And therefore seeing this Covenant is not repealed in the Scriptures of the New Testament the Scriptures of the Old are sufficient warrant for it Another Scripture to prove the same is Deut. 26. 16 17 18. with Deut. 27. 9. This day the Lord hath commanded thee to doe these Statutes and Iudgements thou shalt therefore keepe and doe them c. Thou hast avouched the Lord this day to be thy God and to walke in his wayes and to keepe his Statutes c. And the Lord
professing thereof outwardly would not have been sufficient for the admitting of them unto Baptiâ—me Now this Word which they received was an exhortation to Repentance for sinne and to Faith in the promise ver. 38. 39. and to obedience in severing themselves from others and saving themselves from that untoward generation ver. 40. And therefore when they openly professed that they gladly received this word there was an open professing of their Repentance for sinne ver. 40. of their Faith in the promise and of obedience to the Commandement which is nothing else but the very summe of Church-Covenant yea and further their very preparation to this repentance faith and obedience in that true compunction and sorrow of soul was also openly made manifest ver. 37. But yet there would not be such long narrations of every one severally as now are used when men do enter into Church-Covenant when each one makes a good long speech in the profession of his Faith and Repentance When the thing is certaine as was shewed before that they did openly professe repentance faith and obedience it is not difference in the length or largenesse of their speâ—ches in expressing of themselves that can make any difference in the thing Majus minus non diversisicant speciem And we denie not but they might be briefer because there was not such need they should be long in regard of some difference betweene them and us their time and ours First there were the Apostles present to heare their confessions and to judge thereof who were men of very good discerning and therefore briefer expressing of mens selves might suffice whereas the best Christians yea the best Ministers amongst us are not to be compared to the Apostles and therefore as we need more time for study and for preparation for our Sermons then they did so likewise we need more time to heare and try the soundnesse of mens repentance towards God and faith towards our Lord Jesus Christ Yet this we may adde withall that if the Apostles and those primative Christians men of such excellent discerning were sometimes deceived and could not alwayes so discern but that some Hypocrites would creep into the Church as the example of Ananias and Saphira doth witnesse how much more need is there that the Churches of God in these dayes being far inferiour to them should be very watchfull and circumspect in trying the spirituall estates of them that offer to come into the Church Secondly their times also differed from ours for their Christianitie was a matter of reproach and danger of excommunication Ioh. 9. 22. of imprisonment Act. 4. 3. and 5. 18. and the like And therefore to see men now to make open profession of their faith in Christ Jesus whose servants and disciples were so hated and who himselfe but a while before was crucified this was not an ordinarie matter and therefore in words men might be the briefer when they came to be received into the Church But our times in New England do not persecute Christ and Christians and Christian Churches but countenance them and protect them and therefore there is more need now to be more studious in examination of mens estates when they offer themselves for Church members when the Jews were in favour many of the people of the Land became Jews Esth. 8. 17. But why is there so little proofe of this Church-Covenant in the New Testament 1. Suppose the New Testament said nothing of it yet it might have ground sufficient from the Scriptures of the old Testament for if it was Gods revealed will in those dayes that a companie should become a Church and particular persons become members of that Church by way of Covenant we may be sure it is so now likewise unlesse covenanting were peculiar to the Jewish Paedigogie indeed if it had never been used in those times but were some new ordinance peculiar to the dayes of the New Testament in such cases also a ground from the Scriptures of the New Testament were necessarie as there is in all such things wherein there is any change or variation from what was used in those times afore Christ as that there should not be Nationall Churches but congregationall and not one visible Church but many that there should be baptisme and the Lords Supper these are matters that are not found in the old Testament nor were appointed to be used in those dayes and therefore we must have warrant for them in the New and so we have But for the Covenant it is otherwise it is no new ordinance peculiar to the dayes of the Gospel nor any Leviticall ordinance peculiar to the Jewish Pedigogie and therefore the Scriptures of the Old Testament that give warrant for it may be sufficient as hath been shewed afore 2. And yet there is not wanting good warrant for it that it ought to be used in the dayes of the New Testament For 1. the Prophets do foretell it Isa 56 6 7 and 44 5. and Ier. 50. 5. Ezâ—k 20. 37. and in sundrie other places to omit the rest at this time because some of them have been spoken of before Onely let those words of Isa. 44. 5. be well considered and see if they do not plainly hold forth that in the dayes of the New Testament men should openly professe their faith and solemnly bind themselves by Covenâ—nt to be the Lords people one shall say I am the Lords and another shall call himself by the name of Iacob and another shall subscribe with his hand and sirname himself by the name of Israel These words are so plaine for open professing of faith in the Lord and open binding of mens selves by Covenant unto him as we conceive nothing need be more 2. The Apostâ—es do sufficiently testifie that such a thing was practised in heir dayes 〈◊〉 how should we understand that fellowship in the Gospel in its full latitude and breadth Phil. 1. 5. if this combining into Church fellowship be no part thereof yea when it is said they continued stedfastly or as the word {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} may well be translated they strongly did cleave together or hold together in such a Fellowship which was not preaching and hearing the doctrine of the Apostles nor Sacraments noâ— Prayer but a thing distinct from all these If this combining themselves into a spirituall fellowship and societie of Church-state be no part thereof we know not how to understand it nor what that fellowship should meane If Doctrine and Sacraments and Prayer had not been particularly mentioned in the same place it might have been thought that the Fellowship in which they so steadfastly clave together had been no more but their coming together to observe these said ordinances and their communion therein But when all these are particularly mentioned and Fellowship mentioned among them as a thing distinct from the rest we may not confound it with the rest We might as well say that by
AN APOLOGIE OF THE CHVRCHES IN NEW-ENGLAND FOR CHVRCH-COVENANT OR A Discourse touching the Covenant between God and men and especially concerning Church-Covenant that is to say The Covenant which a Company doe enter into when they become a Church and which a particular person enters into when he becomes a member of a Church Sent over in Answer to Master BERNARD in the Yeare 1639. And now published for the satisfaction of all who desire resolution in this point LONDON Printed by T. P. and M. S. for Benjamin Allen 1643. A DISCOVRSE TOVCHING THE Covenant between God and Men and especially concerning Church-Covenant that is to say the Covenant which a Company do enter into when they become a Church and which a particular person enters into when he becomes a member of a Church 1639. JER. 50. 5. Come let us joyne our selves to the Lord in a perpetuall Covenant that shall not be forgotten ALthough that which is foretold in these two Chapters and namely in the fourth and fifth verses of this Chapter was in part fulfilled when the people of God returned from Captivitie in Babylon at the end of seventie yeares yet we must not limit the place to that time onely but may extend it further to the dayes of the Gospel and the spirituall return not of the Jews onely but of the Gentiles also when men shall be converted from Pagan Antichristian Babylonish or Jewish bondage and captivitie or from slavery to sinne and self-righteousnesse and shall be joyned to God in the fellowship of his Church in the dayes of the New Testament For as some passages in this Scripture were never fully accomplished at the returne from the captivitie of the seventie yeares and namely this that the children of Israel and Iudah should returne both together for the ten tribes returned not at all so many things that literally concerned the Jewes were types and figures signifying the like things concerning the people of God in these latter dayes In which respect sincere converts are called Jewes Rom. 2. 29. and Israelites Gal. 6. 16. Ioh. 1. 47. and our Sacraments are made 〈◊〉 of theirs a Con 10. 1 2 3. and Rome is called Babylon Rev. 17. 5 and Papists are called Gentiles Rev. 11. 2. and therefore the captivitie of Babylon might well be a Type of the spirituall captivitie of Gods people to Antichristian bondage and tâ—eir returne from Babylon to Sion a type of the returne of Christians from Romish slavery to the true Sion the Christian Church And this may be added further that this place seemes not onely to be meant of the private or personall conversion of this or that particular Christian but also further of the open and joynt calling of a company because it is said they shall come the children of Israel and the children of Iudah together and that their saying shall not be Let me joyne c. but in the Plurall number 〈◊〉 us joyne our selves unto the Lord so noting the joyning of a company togethâ—r in holy Covenant with God Concerning which Covenant with God it will not be amisse for the better understanding of that which followes first briefly to shew how diversly Covenant is taken in the Scripture which sometimes iâ—ports generally any firme appointment or promise of God when man doth not promise unto God any thing backe againe Thus the preserving of Noah in the Arke and of the woâ—ld from being drowned any more by a floud the interchangeable succession of day and night the giving of the Priesthood unto Phinâ—as the setting forth of the Shew-bread every Sabbath before the Lord and the giving of the heave-offering unto the Priests are said to be done by a Covenant or an everlasting Covenant of God Gen. 6. 18. 9. 9. 10. 11. Ier. 33. 20. Num. 25. 12 13 〈◊〉 24. 8. Num. 18. 19. But sometimes Covenant is taken more strictly and properly for an agreement which God doth make with men when he promiseth some blessing unto men and binâ—es them to performe some dutie backe againe to him Taken thus it hath two parts first a promise or stipulation of some blessing on Gods part secondly Restipulation or promise or bindâ—â—g oâ— man unto dutie back againe on his part both these are in those words of the Covenant I will be to thee a God thou shalt be to me a people and so Gen. 17. 1. v. 7 8 9 10. The Covenant taken thus is either the Covenant of workes or the Covenant of grace And againe the Covenant may be considered first as it is personall private and particular between God and one particular soule making Covenant with God and God with him either at his first conversion or at other times of which we reade 2 Sam. 23. 5. Psal. 119. 106. 66. 13 14. 27. 8. Psal. 119. 7 8 Secondly it is generall and publick of a company joyntly together of which this Text Ier. 50. 5. seemes most properly to speake as also that Deut. 29. 9 10 c. and that Exod. 19. 5 6 and many others A Covenant taken thus generally when it respects spirituall blessings and spirituall duties in the Communion of Saints is that which is called Church-covenant which Church-Covenant differs not in substance of the things promised from that which is between the Lord and every particular soule but onely in some other respects as first the one is of one Christian in particular the other of a company joyntly together Secondly if right Order be observed a man ought not to enter into Church-Covenant till he be in Covenant with God before in respect of his personall estate Thirdly The one is usually done in private as in a mans Closet between the Lord and his soule and the other in some publick assembly Fourthly The one in these dayes is of such duties as the Gospel requires of every Christian as a Christian the other of such duties as the Gospel requires of every Church and the members thereof Now concerning Church-Covenant two things are to be noted for the better understanding thereof first the description of it secondly the use of it and the benefit and fruit thereof For the former it may be thus described viz. A solemne and publick promise before the Lord whereby a company of Christians called by the power and mercy of God to fellowship with Christ and by his providence to live together and by his grace to cleave together in the unitie of faith and brotherly love and defirous to partake together in all the holy Ordinances of God doe in confidence of his gracious acceptance in Christ binde themselves to the Lord and one to another to walke together by the assistance of his Spirit in all such wayes of holy worship in him and of edification one towards another as the Gospel of Christ requireth of every Christian Church and the members thereof In this description there are comprâ—â—ed six things First the generall name of the thing a solemne and publick
promise a promise it is and therefore it is called a joyning in Covenant here an entring into Covenant Deut. 29. 10. Solemne and publick and therefore it is by the children of Israel and the children of Iudah together and they say let us joyne Secondly The object the Lord and one another joyne our selves to the Lord it is not a promise onely to man but to the Lord himselfe and likewise to one another for come let us joyne implyes mutuall consent together Thirdly The Agents or the qualification of the persons Christians not Turkes Indians c. Saints Psal. 50. 5. 16 17. called to fellowship with Christ so 1 Cor. 1. 9. else if they be not united to Christ by faith they are not fit materialls for such a building as a Church of God which is the house of the living God Ephes. 1. 1. 1 Cor. 1. 2. Phil. 1. 1. Rev. 21. 27. By his providence to live together else they cannot partake in the Lords Ordinances together as Churches ought to doe 1 Cor. 14. 23. Act. 14. 27. the whole Church comes together in one place cleaving together in faith and love so Act. 4. 32. If they differ namely in opinion or in their affection and should joyne in this Covenant breaches factions rents and schismes would be like to be the issue of such joyning things so unlike would not close nor long hold together Dan. 2. 43 Desirous to partake in all Ordinances this should be the ground of their joyning in Covenant together Psal. 110. 3. willing and not pride nor gaine nor the like Fourthly The Act binde themselves that now they are bound by their owne word and promise that they may say now as Psal. 56. 12. Thy vowes are upon me or as Num. 30. 2. if he binde his soule with a vow Fiftly The matter promised To walke together in all such wayes of worship and mutuall edification as the Gospel requireth of Churches and Church-members they binde not themselves to observe any devises of their owne nor inventions of men but such things as the word of God requireth neither is it perfect obedience to the Law for that were impossible to performe and presumption to promise nor is it onely in generall the duties of the Gospel but specially such duties of worship to God edification of one another as concerne Church-State which now they enter into Sixtly The manner of performing Confidence of Gods gracious acceptance and assistance through Christ for in all our wayes God must be acknowledged Pro. 3. 6. and much more in such speciall matters of weight If men in entring into this Covenant looke for acceptance through any worth of their owne or promise dutie in their own strength they shew themselves like to the Pharisees Luk. 18. 10 11. and turne the Church-Covenant into a Covenant of workes and as many as are of the workes of the Law are under the curse Gal. 3. 10. The use and benefit of this Church-Covenant and the fruit thereof may be seene in two particulars first That this is that whereby a company of Christians doe become a Church It is the Constituting forme of a Church Secondly This is that by taking hold whereof a particular person becomes a member of a Church which was constituted afore For the former of these every Christian Church must have in it both matter and forme and as the matter by Gods appointment are visible Saints or visible beleevers Ephes. 1. 1. 1 Cor. 1. 2. and in the New Testament onely so many as may meete together in one Congregation So the forme is a uniting or combining or knitting of those Saints together into one visible body by the band of this holy Covenant Some union or band there must be amongst them whereby they come to stand in a new relation to God and one towards another other then they were in before or els they are not yet a Church though they be fit materialls for a Church even as soule and body are not a man unlesse they be united nor stones and timber an house till they be compacted and conjoyned Now that a company becomes a Church by joyning in Covenant may be made good sundry wayes first By plaine Texts of Scripture as from Deut. 29. 1 10 11 12 13. Yee stand this day all you before the Lord your God your Captaines of your Tribes your Elders your Officers with all the men of Israel ver. 10. That thou shouldest enter into Covenant with the Lord thy God ver. 12. and he may establish thee for a people unto himselfe ver. 13. So that here is plainâ—y shewed that here was a company ver. 10. and this company were to be established to be a people unto the Lord that is to say a Church ver. 13. And this is done by the peoples entring into solemne Covenant with God ver. 12. And therefore a company of people doe become a Church by entring into Covenant with God This Covenant was not like our Church-Covenants for it was of all the Nation together whereas the Church-Covenant with us is of some select persons leaving out others 1. This Objection concerns the matter of a Church but the Covenant is not the materiall cause of a Church but the formall cause thereof and for this the Text is plaine and expresse that by entring into Covenant with God a people come to be the Lords people that is to say his Church 2. If it was of all the people together the reason was because that Church was a nationall Church now if a nationall Church becomes a Church by entring into solemne Covenant with God then a Congregationall Church becomes a Church by the same means for there is no difference between them in this point 3. Though it was of all the people we may not say it proves that when we looke at the materiall cause of a Church there may be a promiscuous taking in of all Commers without distinction or separation of the precious from the vile for first when God took in this Nation to be his people he separated them from all the Nations of the earth besides so that there was a distinction and separation of some from others Secondly this generation was generally a generation of beleevers for it was they that were to enter into the land within a while after for they were fortie yeares in the Wildernesse this Covenant was made in the last moneth save one of the last of those fortie yeares Deut. 1. 3. And their carkasses fell not in the Wildernesse through unbeliefe as their Fathers did Num. 14. Heb. 3. but entred by faith and when they were entred subdued Kingdomes by their faith Heb. 11. 33. and served the Lord all the dayes of Ioshua and of the Elders that outlived Ioshua Josh. 24. 31. As for that which is said of them ver. 4 5. of this Chap. that the Lord had not given them eyes to see c. that proves not that they were wholly hardned in a carnall estate
hath avouched thee this day to be his peculiar people Take heed and hearken O Israel this day thou art become the pâ—ople of the Lord thy God This Scripture plainly shewes these things 1. That here was the making of a Covenant between God and man for that avouching of God to them and them to God was the making of Covenant ver. 17. 18. 2. This was not of one person but of a company together the whole people of Israel 26. 18. 27. 9. 3 Here is the effect of this Covenant that thereby they become the Lords people ver. 9. So that when a company doe enter into holy Covenant with God they become thereby the Lords people that is to say his Church So Ezech. 16. 8. proves the same likewise I entâ—ed into Covenant with thee saith the Lord and thou becamâ—st mine Here also is the making of Covenant between the Lord and men and this Covenant was not personall but of a company for it was with Hierusalem ver. 2. which was a whole Citie it was with them that were multiplied as the bud of the seild ver. 7. and it was with them that did prosper into a kingdome ver. 13. and therefore not meant onely of any one particular person And by this Covenant they became the Lords that is the Lords Church and people for it is expresly said I entred into Covenant with thee and thou becamest mine So that when a company enter into Covenant with God and God with them they become thereby the Lords Church and people Likewise Ezek. 20. 37. I will cause you to passe under the rod and I will bring you into the bond of the Covenant In which place there is first mention of an holy Covenant Secondly This was not of one person but of a company the whole house of Israel ver. 30. 39. Thirdly And this Covenant is called a Bond because it is by Covenant that a people are bound and tyed and knit together as one Chuâ—ch all of them unto the Lord and one unto another So that the Covenant is the bond of union by which a company are so combined and united as that they become a Church It is also obsâ—rvable how the Lord before he would bring them into this bond of the Covenant he would cause them to passe under the rod by which phrase as Iunius upon the place well observes is meant tryall and probation drawne from the manner of Shepheards or owners of Cattell who went among their sheepe or other cattell with a rod and therewith pointed out such as were for the Lords holy use as Lev. 27. 32. And so hereby is noted that God would not â—n the dayes of the Gospel have men to be brought into his Church hand over head but he would first cause them to passe under the rod of due tryall and probation and then such as upon tryall were found to be holy for God or meete matter for his Church should solemnly enter into Covenant with God and that Covenant should be the bond that should combine them and knit them together into one that so they that were many particular persons should all become one body that is to say a Church And so much of the first Argument drawne from plaine Texts of Scripture A second Argument may be taken from the Titles that are given to the Church as first that the Church is said to be married or espoused unto Christ Ier. 2. 2. 3. 14. 2 Cor. 11. 2. From whence the Argument may be formed thus If every Church becomes a Church by being married or espoused unto Christ then a company becomes a Church by way of Covenant But the former is true therefore the latter 〈◊〉 true also The Assumption that a Church becomes a Church by being married unto Christ is plaiâ—e from the former Scriptures where the â—hurcâ— of Israel and the Church of Corinth in regard of their eâ—tring into Church Estate are said to be espoused and married unto Christ as a loving and chast Virgine to one husband Which spirituall marriage between Christ and his Church is also taught in the type of the marriage between King Salomon and Pharoahs daughter Psal. 45. The Consequence of the Proposition is plaine in reason for there is no marriage but by way of Covenant no woman becomes a mans wife but by way of bestowing her selfe in Covenant upon such a man neither doth a man become an husband but by the same means and therefore the Scripture speaking of the violation of marriage calls it a violation of Covenant Prov. 2. 17. Christ hath but one wife or Spouse Cant. 6 9. The Catholique Church indeed is but one viz the whole company of Gods Elect in heaven in earth dead now living and not yet borne But as there is the Church-Catholique which is but one so there are particular and visible Churches which are in number many and therefore the Scripture speakes of Churches 2 Cor. 8. 1. 19. Gal. 1. 2. Of the Churches of the Gentiles Rom. 16. 4. Of seven Churches Rev. 1. 4. Of all Churches 1 Cor. 14 33. 7. 17. Rev. 2. 23. But if every particular Church be the wife of Christ how many hundred wives should he have 1. If the Church of Israel Ier. 2. 2. the Church of Corinth 2 Cor. 11. 2. The Jewish Church Rev. 19. 7. be the Spouse and wife of Christ there is no reason but others should be the same also especially seeing there is no particular Church but in respect of their Church estate they may decline and goe a whoring from Christ and that shews that they were first espoused to him for no woman can be said to got a whoring from a man if shee were never married nor espoused to him at all 2. This that seemes an absurditie and were a sinfull practise among men in respect of Christ is a certaine truth and no dishonour unto him at all to have more Spouses then one upon earth many spirituall Spouses Men cannot give themselves wholly and intirely to many as Christ can Every faithfull soule is espoused and married unto Christ and in that respect he hath not onely many hundred but many thousand yea many millions of spirituall Spouses But this spirituall marriage is between Christ and the Church But the Church Covenant is between the Church and the members and therefore this marriage doth not prove the Church-Covenant 1. In some sort there may be said to be a marriage between the Church and the members viz. in respect of that deare love and affection that ought to be between them and therefore it is said As a young man marrieth a Virgine so shall the children of the Church be married to the Church Isa. 62. 5. 2. But properly the marriage is between Christ the Church and so is the Covenant also so farre as therein they give up themselvâ—s to Christ as unto an head and Lord as a woman in the Covenant of mâ—rriage doth give up
another because these are common to them all then how can Covenant distinguish them sith all Churches are joyned by Covenant one as well as another It is not a Covenant simply or a Covenant in generall that doth constitute a Church or distinguish one Church from another but a Covenant with application and appropriation to these persons Even as it is in marriage though all married couples be united by Covenant and a Covenant wherein one couple promiseth the same duties that another couple doth yet a Covenant with application and appropriation of the duties covenanted to this man and this woman in particular such a Covenant is the very thing that make a couple man and wife together and gives them mutuall power over each other as husband and wife and puts a distinction between them and all other men and women in the world And so it is in this case a Covenant to performe Church-duties with application and appropriation to such persons is the very thing that constitutes a Church and distinguisheth one Church from another And thus much concerning the former of the two particulars to shew the use of Church-Covenant viz. that it is that whereby a company doe become a Church The second particular is this taking hold of the Covenant or joyning in it is that which makes a particular person a member of a Church And this followes upon the former and that may be the first Argument to prove it If joyning in Covenant be that which makes a company to become a Church then taking hold of that Covenant is requisite to make a particular person become a member of the Church But the first is true as hath been shewed before Therefore the second is true also If compacting and conjoyning of stones and pieces of Timber be that that makes an house then a particular stone cannot become a part of that house till it be compacted and conjoyned to the rest But the former is true even in the Church of God which is the spirituall Spouse and Citie of God living stones Christians beleevers must be compacted together and builded up together Ephes. 2. 21. 22. Psal. 122. 3. and therefore the latter is true also that a particular Christian becomes a member of the Church a part of that building by being combined with the rest A second Argument may be drawne from the Scripture Isa. 56. 3 6 7. Let not the sonne of the stranger that hath joyned himselfe to the Lord speake saying the Lord hath utterly separated me from his people c. The sonnes of the strangers that joyne themselves to the Lord to serve him c. and take hold of my Covenant even them will I bring to my holy mountaine and make them joyfull in my house of Prayer c. Concerning which Scripture note three things to the present purpose First That these strangers were members of Christ true beleevers joyned to God by Faith for it is said they have joyned themselves to the Lord v. 3 v. 6. that they loved the name of the Lord served him and kept his Sabbaths v. 6. and yet for all this they were not as yet joyned as members of the visible Church for if they had been ioyned there would have been no cause for such a complaint the Lord hath separated me from his people v. 3. Besides bringing them into the Church as members and granting them the priviledge of members is promised as a reward and blessing upon this their joyning to the Lord by faith and obedience v. 7. And therefore it is not the same but a distiâ—ct thing from it the one being promised as a reward and blessing upon the other Secondly The Lord promiseth that he will make them members of his Church Them will I bring to my holy mountaine and make them joyfull in my house of Prayer Thirdly That among other things requisite to make them members this was one viz. the taking hold of that Covenant which was between the Church of Israel and God v. 6. So that hence we may gather that men may be members of Christ joyned to the Lord by faith and love and yet for the present not be members of the visible Church And that when God is so gracious to true beleevers as to make them members of his visible Church it is requisite that they joyne in Covenant before But might not faith in Christ beleeving in heart on the God of Israel be all the taking hold of the Covenant that is here meant Not so but over and above that here is also meant their open profession of their Faith in the God of Israel and open binding of themselves by Covenant to all such duties of faith and obedience as God required of the Church of Israel and the members thereof Now distinctly take the Answer to this Objection in three or foure particular Propositions First There was a Covenant between the Church of Israel and God Exod. 19. 5 6 7 8. Ezek 16. 8. Deut. 29. 10. c. Secondly This Covenant was mutuall not onely a promise on Gods part to be their God and to take them for his people but also reciprocally on their part to give up themselves unto God to be his people and to doe the dutie of people to their God The Covenant is not meerely to receive from God and promise nothing back againe to him nor doth God binde himselfe therein and leave men at libertie but it is mutuall on both parts as these Scriptures declare Gen. 17. 1. Exod. 19. 7. 8. Deut. 5. 27. 6. 16 17. Hos. 2. 23. Zach. 13. 9. Thirdly Hereupon it followes that if men had not promised and also performed in some measure of truth the duties of Faith and obedience unto God they had not taken hold of the Covenant but had discovenanted themselves notwithstanding all the promises of God unto their Fathers or others Thus though God promised Abraham to be a God to him and to his seede in their generations Gen. 17. 7. yet the Ishmaâ—lites and Edomites descending from Abraham were discovenanted by not promising nor performing those duties of Faith and obedience which God required on the peoples part when a Covenant containes promises on Gods part and duties also on mans he doth not take hold of the Covenant that takes one part and leaves another Fourthly To beleeve what God promised in the Covenant for his part and to promise in a private way the duties of obedience on mans part was not sufficient to make these strangers members of the Church but they must doe it openly and in the view of the Church else the Church could have had no warrant to have admitted such into their Fellowship if their faith and obedience had not been visibly professed Exod. 12. 43. 48 2 Chron. 23. 19. And in as much as the Covenant was mutuall when these strangers did manifest their taking hold of the Covenant they manifested and professed both Faith and obedience
man can say that entring into the same the second time or a third or a fourth doth disanull the first or cast dispaâ—agement upon the same The covenant of works given to Adam was not blamed or saulted because it was renewed in Sinai The Covenant of Grace was first given to Adam in Paradise after his fall afterward to Abraham then to the people of Israel under types and shadows And againe after the coming of Christ in the flesh yet none of these doth disanull the former or argue the same to be â—aulty and the reason is because it is still the same Covenant though renewed upon new occasions and in some particulars in some other manner And the like we say concerning Church-Covenant or the Covenant which a man makes when he enters into the Church viz. that it is not another Covenant contrary to the Covenant of Grace which every beleever is brought into at his first conversion but an open profession of a mans subjection to that very Covenant specially in the things which concerne Church estate into which estate the man is now entring It is not lawfull to make such a Covenant as the Church-Covenant because it is not in our power to keep it and we do not know whether God will give us power This ground is very true that no man hath power of himselfe to any thing that good is but all a mans power and abilitie must come of God through Châ—ist 2. Cor. 3. 5. Phil. 2. 13. Ioh. 15. 5. But the inâ—erence is not good that therefore it should be unlawfull to ento into Church-Covenant for 1. By the same reason all promises are unlawfull and all covenants whatsoever as the covenant of marriage the covenant of service yea and the personall covenant oâ— Grace when a particular soule promiseth faith and new obedience for there is none of these no not the covenant of Marriage which a man is able of himself to keep as the adultery of David and Bathsheba among others doth plainly prove 2. God hath promised to give power to them that in self-deniall seek it of him and trust to his promise for it Ezek. 36. 27. Ier. 31. 33. Rom. 6. 14. Ier. 32. 40. The true inference therefore from this ground from mans disabilitie to performe were this that therefore a man should not enter into Church Covenant in his owne strength for that was Peters fault in promising not to deny Christ but to die with him rather but Church-Covenant as also all other promises should be entred into in an humble looking up to Christ Jesus for help and assistance to performe Thou therefore my sonne be strong in the grace that is in Christ Iesus 2. Tim. 2. 1. God disalloweth covenants of mans making and so our Church-Covenant in those words But not by thy Covenant Ezek. 16. 61. God doth not reprove them there for making Covenant for then he were contrary to himselfe who elsewhere called them to do it Exod. 29. Deut. 29. and commended them for it Psal. 50. 5. Yea and in that very place of Ezek. 16. acknowledgeth a Covenant betweene him and them Ver. 60. 62. But the meaning is he would do them good but not for their good keeping the Covenant of works for they had very sinfully broken it ver. 59. but even as he saith elsewhere not for their sakes or for their righteousnesse Ezek. 36. 32. Deut. 9. 4 5 6. But what force is there in this arguing viz. If God will do us good but not for our good keeping the covenant of works then it is not lawfull to promise obedience to the covenant of Grace in such things as concerne Church estate All men may easily see that here is a plaine non sequitur This entring into Covenant may keep out many good men from joyning to the Churches because they are not satisfied about it and therefore it is better laid aside It is not impossible but good men may for a time be unsatisfied about it till they understand the nature and use of it and yet the thing be warrantable enough for all that in the sight of God the Tribes were troubled at the Altar set up upon the banks of Jordan by the two Tribes and an halfe till they understood the intent and use of it and for what purpose it was erected and then they were satisfied Iosh. 22. And the same may be said of Peters eating with the Gentiles which at the first was very offensive to them of the circumcision till they understood what Peter had to say for his defence therein and then they rested well satisfied Act. 11. But if men understand what the Church-Covenant is there is no reason that good men should be troubled at it it being nothing else but a promise of obedience unto the Gospel of Christ or of such duties as the Gospel requireth of all Christians in Church-estate For will good men refuse to obey the Gospel or submit to the ordinances of Christ or will they refuse to professe and promise so much If a man understand what it is and what we meane by it and yet refuse to enter into it when he hath opportunitie thereto such refusing is no part of his goodnesse but is to be reckoned amongst his corruptions It is ignorance at the best and if not so then it may be perversenesse of will or some want of will to performe obedience to the Gospel And surely there is smal hope that such would yeeld subjection and obedience to the Gospel who do refuse to professe or promise it But the Scripture Act. 2. 41. tels of joyning to the Church without any Covenant For it was not possible that 3000. should enter into covenant in one day Two things may be said in Answer to this Objection First that 3000. were not so many but that joyning in Covenant might easily be done by them all in one day For 1. it was at Penticost at which time of the yeer the dayes were at the longest And 2. the Scripture tels us that David made a Covenant with all the Tribes of Israel in one day 2. Sam. 5 1 2 3. The Articles of the covenant betweene David and the Tribes and so betweene this 3000. and the Lord might be openly declared and they both the one and the other might by some signe or other expresse their consent thereunto in one day Secondly as joyning in Covenant is a thing that might be done so it is more then probable that indeed it was done by those 3000. soules For it is said ver. 41 that they gladly received the word that is they openly professed that they did with all their hearts receive it for this receiving of the Word is noted as a condition upon which they were admitted to baptisme and therefore it was not onely an inward receiving of it in their hearts but also an open professing that they did receive it for an inward receiving of it in their hearts without an open
Gospel through obstinacy which we perswade our selves they are not come unto and consequently the Covenant remaines which hath preserved the essence of Churches to this day though the mixture of manifold corruptions have made the Covenant more implicite then were meeâ—e Secondly Because there want no good Records as may be seene in Seldens History of Tithes to prove that in former times in England it was free for men to pay their Tithes and Oblations where themselves pleased Now this paying of Tithes was accounted as a dutie of people to their Minister or sheepe to their Pastour and therefore seeing this was by their owne voluntary agreement and consent their joyning to the Church as members thereof to the Ministery thereof as sheepe of such a mans flock was also by their owne voluntary agreement and consent and this doth imply a Covenant It was not the precincts of Parishes that did limit men in those dayes but their owne choice Thirdly Those Questions and Answers ministred at Baptisme spoken of before viz. Do st thou renounce I doe renounce doest thou beleeve I doe beleseve doest thou promise I doe promise as they were used in other places so were they also in England and are unto this day though not without the mixture of sundry corruptions Now this doth imply a Covenant And when the children came to age they were not to be admitted to the Lords Supper before they had made personall Confession of their owne Faith and ratified the Covenant which was made at their Baptisme by their Parents which course indeed afterward did grow into a Sacrament of Confirmation but that was an abuse of a good Order If here it be said that the Members of the Parishionall Assemblies are not brought in by their owne voluntary profession but by the Authority and Proclamation of the Prince and therefore they have no such Covenant The Answer is that the Christian Prince doth but his dutie when he doth not tollerate within his Dominions any open Idolatry or the open worship of false Gods by baptized persons but suppresseth the same and likewise when he gives free libertie to the exercise of all the Ordinances of true religion according to the minde of Christ with countenance also and encouragement unto all those whose hearts are willingly bent thereunto Ezra 1. 13 7 13. And therefore this practise of his cannot overthrow the â—reenesse of mens joyning in Church-Communion because one dutâ—e cannot oppose nor contradict another And suppose that this course of the Magistrate shouâ—d seeme to be a forcing of some to come in for members who were unfit in which case it were not justifiable yet this doth not hinder the voluntary subjection of others who with all their hearts desired it When the Israelites departed out of Aegypt there went a mixed multitude with them many going with them that were not Israelites indeed Exod. 12. And in the dayes of Mordeâ—ay and Hesthâ—r many of the people of the lands became Iewes when the Iewes were in favour and respect Est. 8. 17. and so joyned to them not of their owne voluntary minde nor of any sincere heart towards God but meerely for the favour or feare of men yet this forced or feined joyning of some could not hinder those that were Israelites indeed from being Israelites nor make the Iewes to be no Iewes no Church-members And the same may be said in this case Suppose the Magistrates Proclamation should be a cause or an occasion rather of bringing some into the Church who came not of their owne voluntary minde but for feare or for obteining favour yet this cannot hinder but others might voluntarily and freely Covenant to be subject to the Gospel of Christ Such subjection and the promise of it being the thing which themselves did heartily desire though the Magistrate should have said nothing in it If any shall hereupon inferre that if the Parishionall Assemblies be Churches then the members of them may be admitted to Church priviledges in New England before they joyne to our Churches Such one may finde his Answer in the Answer to the tenth of the thirty-two Questions Whereunto we doe referre the Reader for this point Onely adding this that this were contrary to the judgement and practise of the Reformed Churches who doe not admit a man for member without personall profession of his Faith and joyning in Covenant though he had formerly been a member of a Church in another place as was shewed before out of Master Parker Lastly If any say that if these reasons prove the English Congregations to have such a Covenant as proves them to be Churches then why may not Rome and the Assemblies of Papists goe for true Churches also For some man may thinke that the same things may be said for them that here in Answer to this eleventh Objection are said for the Parishes in England Such one must remember two things first that we doe not say simply a Covenant makes a company a true Church but as was said before a Covenant to walke in such wayes of worship to God and edification of one another as the Gospel of Christ requireth For who doubts but there may be an agreement among theeves Pro. 1. A confederation among Gods enemies Psal. 83. A conspiracy among the Arabians the Ammonites and Ashdodites to hinder the building of Hierusalem Neh. 4. 7 8. And yet none of these are made true Churches by such kind of confederacies or agreements And so wee may say of the Assemblies of Papists especially since the Counsell of Trent If there be any agreement or confederacy among them it is not to walke in the wayes of the Gospell but in wayes contrary to the fundamentall truths of the Gospel as Idolatâ—y in worship Heresie in doctrine and other Antichristian pollutions and corruptions and therefore if they combined in these things such combinations will never prove them true Churches The Church is the Pillar and ground of truth 1 Tim. 3. 15. But the Religion of Papists is so farre from truth that whosoever liveth and beleeveth according to it without repentance cannot be saved Witnesse their doctrine in the point of vilifying the Scriptures and in point of free-will and of Justification by works of the Popes Supremacy of the Sacrifice of the Masse of worshipping of Images c. In regard of which and such like the Holy Ghost saith that their Religion is a Sea become as the bloud of a dead man and every soule in that Sea dyeth Rev. 16. 3. And therefore agreement in such a Religion will never prove them to be true Churches nor any Assemblies of Arrians Antitrinitaries Anabaptists or Famelists supposing them also to be combined by Covenant among themselves But now for the Assemblies in England the case is farre otherwise for the Doctrine of the Articles of Religion which they professe and which they promise to hold and observe though some things are amisse in some of those Articles and though many persons live contrary