as a free Denizon of it who doth so little know how to value such a priviledge Go thy way therefore and be a slave again since thou knowest not how to carry it as becomes one that is free Now I say if God should deal thus with any of you would it not be sad true he will never wholly reverse what he hath done in you and for you but thus far he may go he may let corruption at some times and in some acts prevail over you and he may wholly deprive you of the sense and comfort of your spiritual liberty and would not these be bad enough To walk suitably to it Let me under this Head press another thing upon you viz. to walk suitably to this your freedom wherein doth that consist why in this in being holy and very holy If you so be this will suit with the deliverance from the Law of Sin which you have upon regeneration and which you must therefore be because 't is one great end of God in doing that for you Luk. 1.74 75. That we being delivered out of the hands of our enemies might serve him without fear in holiness and righteousness before him all the days of our life 'T is observable how God ushers in the Ten Commandements with his delivering the people of Israel out of the Egyptian bondage thereby to lay the greater obligation upon them to obey and keep those Commandements Exod. 20.2 I am the Lord thy God which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt out of the house of bondage then the several Commandements follow And as to that particular Command of keeping the Sabbath you find God enforcing of it with this Argument only Deut. 5.15 Remember that thou wast a servant in the land of Egypt c. O how holy how obedient should they be whom God hath brought out of the state of spiritual bondage the obligation rising higher from this deliverance than from the former Christians you should be very holy partly from a principle of gratitude partly because now the life of holiness is made more easie and facil if you be not so now the power of Sin is broken in you it must be from your sloth or something worse * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Oec Some observe upon the latter-Clause of the preceding Verse who walk not after the flesh c. that now under the Gospel 't is much more easie to live the heavenly life than it was formerly under the Law so that say they if men do not live that Life it must be charg'd meerly upon their own negligence so here I say persons being delivered from the Reign of Sin to them now 't is much more possible nay easie to be holy in their walkings than sometimes it was and therefore if they do not so walk 't is meerly from their idleness and sinful neglects Sirs now the holy Life is made practicable to you what an engagement doth this lay upon you to live it The Apostle here according to that Connexion of the Words which some pitch upon brings in freedom from the Law of Sin as the ground of not walking c. therefore they who are in Christ do not follow the sinful and carnal but the holy and spiritual course because they are freed from Sins power I 'm sure as to the thing 't is the duty of such so to walk upon this account Let me add a third Consideration regenerate persons upon this must be very holy that there may be some proportion 'twixt Nature as renewed in the way of Holiness and Nature as depraved in the way of Sin 'pray observe it so long as depraved Nature was upon the throne you were very sinful therefore now when renewed Nature is upon the throne you should be very holy I do not from hence plead for an equality that I very well know is not possible and the reason is because corrupt nature before Conversion was entire not broken or weakened by any contrary habit or principle but 't is not so with the renewed Nature after Conversion for that hath Sin mingled with it striving against it making opposition to it therefore men cannot be so entirely good after grace as they were entirely evil before grace yet I may and I do plead from hence for some proportion whilst Sin ruled you you were very sinful therefore now Christ and Grace rule you you should be very holy So the Apostle argues Rom. 6.19 20. As you have yielded your members servants to uncleanness and to iniquity unto iniquity even so now yield your members servants to righteousness unto holiness For when ye were servants to sin ye were free from righteousness therefore which though it be not express'd yet 't is imply'd proportionably now when you are the servants of righteousness you should be free from sin Upon this threefold Consideration such as are made free from the Law of Sin should be holy Against Sins actual and partial dominion Now that I may be somewhat more particular about this Sin being that which is opposite to Holiness and much of the nature of holiness lying in refraining from sin and also the dominion of any particular sin very ill agreeing with deliverance from the Law thereof therefore in both of these respects I would caution all regenerate persons against it but 't is the latter only that I shall speak a few words unto Where I would be very earnest with you who have passed under the regenerating work of the Spirit to take heed even of the actual and partial dominion of Sin and there is great need of this admonition for though upon regeneration you are secur'd from its Habitual and Vniversal dominion yet as to some particular Sin and some particular evil acts it may have that which looks too much like dominion though strictly and properly it be not so Here therefore I desire you to be very careful that you do not suffer any one sin to reign in you for how would this consist with your being made free from the Law of Sin since as hath been said the power of any one sin and subjection thereunto if it be full and free plenary and voluntary doth as certainly prove its dominion as the power of many nay of all ô take heed that this and that sin do not rule or be too high in you 'T was Davids prayer Psal 19.13 Keep back thy servant also from presumptuous sins let them not have dominion over me then shall I be upright and I shall be innocent from the great transgression he goes further and takes in all Psal 119.133 Order my steps in thy word and let not any iniquity have dominion over me Saints are not so freed from the Law of Sin by the Spirit but that there is need of daily prayer and that there be all endeavours and care on their part against it and their care must reach even to this that not any single iniquity may have dominion over them
did perfectly obey the Law and as that his perfect obedience is imputed and reckoned to them upon which 't is theirs to â—â—l intents as if they had so obeyed in their own persons But there being many difficulties about this and it leading me to the main Truth which the words hold forth I must endeavour further to open it Which I shall do in the discussing of these three Propositions Three Propositions to clear up the third Interpretation and the main Truth 1. That our Lord Christ was made under the Law 2. That being made under the Law he fulfilled it 3. That his fulfilling of the Law is imputed to Believers so as that in him they fulfilled the Law also 1. Proposition Christ was made under the Law 1. Christ was made under the Law The Apostle is express in this When the fulness of the time was come God sent forth his Son made of a woman made under the Law Gal. 4.4 made under the Law that is made subject to the Law so as that he was under the obligation thereof and bound in all things to conform to its righteousness And this subjection of Christ to the Law did result partly from his Nature partly from his Office From his Nature as he was Man and so a Creature for his Manhood was a created thing now every creature as such is indispensably subject to the Law of God a Creature necessarily must be under the Law of his Creator and Soveraign so far therefore as Christ was such he was indispensably obliged to the Law so far his subjection was natural and thereupon necessary From his Office or that oeconomy and dispensation which he had submitted unto as Mediator Redeemer Surety c. with respect to this he was to be subject too yet in it his subjection was purely free and voluntary 'T is a * See Bodius on Eph. c. 5. p. 812. c. nice Question which some discuss Whether Christ's subjection to the Law did arise from the natural necessity of his being as he was Man and a Creature or whether it did arise only from that mediatory Office which he had submitted to I think things being rightly stated both may be taken in both Nature and Office did require that Christ should be subject to the Law though * This opened in Turret in de Sat. Christi p. 277 278. in different ways For the better understanding of Christ's being made under the Law I desire you to take notice of four or five things Five things to open the Proposition 1. Christ subject to the Law as Man 1. This must be understood of him with respect to his humane Nature This was the Nature which only was capable of subjection Christ as man only could be obedient As to his divine Nature he made the Law so he was the Law-giver and so he was in all acts of power and authority equal with the Father 't was solely in respect of his humane Nature that he was made under the Law which was part of that form of a Servant which he took upon him Phil. 2.7 As he was God 't was proper to him to command as he was Man only 't was proper to him to obey in the former notion he was Lord of the Sabbath Matth. 12.8 in the latter he was bound to keep the Sabbath Christ as man and because man was subject but then 't was only as such 2. As Man in the state of his humiliation 2. Christ as being made under the Law is to be considered not meerly as a Creature upon which he was subject to it but as a Creature in the state of his humiliation and suretyship during which state only his subjection to the Law was to continue For his humane Nature now in Heaven is a Creature and yet there 't is not if we speak strictly under the Law for though Christ there doth materially the things which the Law requires as to be holy to love God c. yet he doth not do them formerly as acts of obedience to the Law but as things which spring from the perfection of his nature and state therefore I say when we are speaking of Christ's being subject to the Law we must not consider him only as Man but as Man in such a way or state in the carrying on of such an undertaking which when he had effected his subjection was to cease Some say that though the subjection which Christ was under in reference to his Office as Mediator be at an end yet his subjection to the Law which was natural and did arise from his being a Creature that yet remains I answer if by this natural subjection they mean only that which results from his Being or that obligation which results from the intrinsick goodness of things so we grant him even in Heaven to be under it but if they mean that subjection or that obligation which relates to and results from an external Law so we deny Christ there to be under it in his glorified state he doth the things which the Law commands but not as or because they are commanded by the Law 3. He was principally subject to the Moral Law 3. The principal Law that Christ was made under and which he was principally obliged to fulfil was the * Vide Bradsh de Justif c. 18. Moral Law This was the Law which at first was made to Adam which he brake and so entayl'd the curse upon all his posterity therefore Christ the serond Adam was also made under this Law that he might fulfil it and so restore man to his primitive happiness This was the Law which was the rule and standard of righteousness wherefore if Christ will convey a righteousness to the creature he must be made under and fulfil this Law He is said to be a curse for us now that curse doth mainly refer to the Moral Law though 't is very true by way of allusion 't is set forth by that which was proper to the judicial Law Gal. 3.13 And he is also said to redeem us from the Law that is from the curse of the Law now 't is the curse annexed to the moral Law that he redeemed us from therefore that was the Law which he was made under This was the Law most excellent if Christ would submit to put himself under the obligation of a Law less exeellent surely he would not refuse to submit to put himself under the obligation of this which was the most excellent Law Especially considering how necessary this was for the good of Sinners for since God stood upon the performance of this Law as the way wherein he would justifie it was most necessary that Christ should be subject to it and perform it or else there would have been no justification Had he been made only under the Ceremonial Law than the benefits of his Obedience would have reached no further than that people who were concerned in that Law and so the Jews
God dreads it for the Hell that is in it me thinks all should dread it for the Hell that is procured by it Now therefore what 's your Course every mans Sentence shall be according to his Course where 't is an holy course it shall be the Sentence of Life where 't is the opposite course it shall be the Sentence of Death Bring it down to your selves do not you live in sin may be you are not Drunkards Swearers c. but is there not some other some secret way of wickedness in which you walk some bosom Lust hid and cherished do you endeavour after Vniversal Holiness these things must be enquired into for the No-Condemnation depends upon them Mistake me not I do not say if No Sin then No Condemnation as if to be Sinless was the condition of or way to the future blessedness God forbid I should go so high for then I should condemn every man in the World but this I say no allowed sin no reigning sin no presumptuous sin no course in sin and then 't is No-Condemnation That God who is just to punish for known and presumptuous sins is gracious also to pardon sins of infirmity So that upon the whole as ever you desire to see the Face of God with comfort to lift up your heads before your Judge at the Great day with joy to be freed from the Sentence of Condemnation I say as ever you desire these blessed things be holy live a godly life keep sin at a great distance do not allow your selves in it but rather condemn it that it may not condemn you If any think that the present good of sin preponderates the future evil of Condemnation or that they may live in sin and yet relye upon Gods mercy as if he would not condemn them for it I heartily beg of God that he will convince them of these soul-destroying mistakes that they may not persist in them till Condemnation it self will be a sad confutation to them Secondly 2. Dir. Condemn your selves and God will not condemn you Self-condemnation prevents Gods Condemnation There is a Self-condemnation which is judicial and penal which pains and torments but yet doth no good such was that of Cain and Judas O there is in some that condemnation from their own Consciences which is but a Prolepsis to the condemnation of God at the great day But then there is gracious and penitential self-condemnation such as that of David upon his numbring of the people and also upon his commission of other sins now this is that which I would urge upon you Where the Sinner upon the sense of the hainousness of sin condemns himself God will not condemn him too * 1 Cor. 11.31 If we would judge our selves we should not be judged of the Lord and so here as to Condemnation The penitent self judger is safe the * Luk. 18.14 self condemning Publican went away justified when the Sinner justifies God condemns but when he condemns then God justifies This signifies but little in the Courts of Men let the criminal person repent and judge himself never so much that 's nothing for all this the Law must be executed upon him but this always carries it in the Court of God O saith God there 's a Sinner but he is a penitent Sinner he hath sinned but he is angry with himself for it he arraigns and condemns himself for it well upon this I 'le acquit him he condemns below and therefore I 'le absolve above Thirdly 3 Dir. As you desire No-Condemnation speedily get your peace made with God through Christ Jesus A pacified God is never a condemning God First our Apostle saith * Rom. 5.1 Being justified by faith we have peace with God and then he infers There is now no Condemnation c. Your first work is to look after the atoning of God through the blood of Christ if it be not reconciliation it will be Condemnation Are God and you reconcil'd is your peace made with him you have a reprieve for some time but have you sued out your pardon is the breach which sin hath made healed and made up betwixt God and you O as Christ speaks * Math. 5.25 26. Agree with thine adversary quickly whilst thou art in the way with him lest at any time thy adversary deliver thee to the Judge c. this is a thing which admits of no procrastination Fourthly 4 Dir. Pray that it may be to you exemption from Condemnation You would have Others your Selves delivered from it but are you often with God and earnest with God about this matter Of all evils deprecate this as the greatest evil tell God you are willing he should do any thing with you burn cut lance modò in aeternum parcat if he will but save you from eternal misery This is the thing you should every day with the greatest ardency be begging of God Ah Lord do with us what thou pleasest but for thy mercy sake do not condemn us You are to pray daily that you may not * Luk. 22.40 enter into temptation surely much more that you may not enter into condemnation O be often upon your knees pleading with God and saying Lord Psal 30.9 what profit will there be in our blood why should such souls be lost forever what will follow upon our Condemnation but cursing and blaspheming of thy sacred name whereas if thou wilt pardon and save we shall bless adore and magnifie thy name forever If God give you an heart thus to pray for this mercy the mercy of mercies 't is to be hop'd he will not with-hold if from your 'T is good to pray now whilst prayer will do you good when the Sentence is once pass'd it will then do you no good at all Is it not much to be lamented that there are so few who go to God to plead with him about the everlasting concerns of their immortal souls many go from day to day from week to week nay from year to year without prayer let it be Salvation or Damnation 't is all one to them O this dreadful How seldom are the most of men at the throne of Grace beseeching the Lord for Christ Jesus his sake to deliver them from wrath will be very sad the end of the prayerless cannot be good Nay I have too just occasion to go higher there is a sort of persons amongst us who instead of humble serious calling upon God to free them from condemnation in their hellish imprecations they dare to call God to damn them O prodigious amazing astonishing profaneness I tremble to speak of it but O that it was not too common in our ears What do men defie God and even bid him do his worst is damnation a thing to be desired or wished for do they know what they say what if God should take them at their word and do that in his greatest wrath which they seem to wish for with the greatest
one do the imagination of his evil heart or as 't is Jer. 6.16 Stand ye in the ways and see and ask for the old paths where is the good way the way of the Spirit and walk therein and ye shall find rest for your souls but they said we will not walk therein Do you walk after the Flesh and resolve to do so still then 't is sad indeed but I would fain hope better of you 'Pray be intreated to read the Motives again which have been set before you and in your most calm thoughts to pause and dwell upon the things which have been spoken Shall I need to add any thing further in telling you that all your walkings yea every step you take is known to God Job 21.4 Job 34.21 Psal 139.3 Psal 119.168 that God judges of every man here and hereafter will judge every man at the Great Day according to his walking Eccles 11.9 2 Cor. 5.10 Eccles 12.14 that Death will come with a dreadful aspect where the life hath been carual and sinful that in the way of the Flesh you are in danger of treading upon Serpents Vipers Adders Scorpions every â—â—â—p you take that by this Course you * Psa 16.11 forsake the path of life and for a little flesh-pleasing put your selves into the broad way to everlasting damnation how much might I yet say upon this account but enough and enough hath been already said if God will but set it home upon the Conscience The Lord hedge up your ways with thorns and make a wall that you may not find the paths of the Flesh and thereupon may resolve to get into the paths of the Spirit for surely it will be better then than now it is I allude to Hos 2.6 7 VSE 4. To those that do walk after the Spirit Three things urged upon them There is one Vse more and that shall be directed to them who do walk after the Spirit Three things to such 1. First I would with the greatest earnestness stir up such to be highly thankful to God Are any of you through grace made spiritual and do you live the spiritual life have you received the Spirit and do you also walk after the Spirit what cause have you to bless God! yea what thankfulness can be high enough to him who hath brought you to this Why do you not walk just as others do why is not the Flesh as powerful as predominant in you as 't is in others why does not the very worst of the Flesh prevail over you why are not you Atheists Scoffers at Religion Drunkards Adulterers open and notorious Sinners surely all must be resolved into the discriminating grace of God that and that onely hath made the difference Time was when your walking was bad enough when you were as carnal as any and very tamely lacquey'd it after every base lust is not God to be admir'd upon that blessed change which he hath wrought in you Eph. 2.1 2 3. You hath he quickened who were dead in trespasses and sins wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world c. Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind and were by nature the children of wrath even as others But God who is rich in mercy for his great love wherewith he loved us when we were dead in Sins hath quickened us together with Christ Tit. 3.3 For we our selves also were sometimes foolish disobedient deceived serving divers lusts and pleasures See also Col. 3.7 1 Pet. 4.3 O what a sad course do the best follow before conversion and as to your selves if God by his distinguishing and almighty grace had not seized upon you as you began with that course so you had continued in it to this very day O let the Lord be forever magnified who hath delivered you from fleshly walking and brought you over to that which is spiritual and heavenly And this must the rather be done because you now have so clear so convincing an evidence of your being in Christ is not that a great thing The blessedness of this Vnion with Christ hath been fully set before you 't is all yours you not walking after the Flesh but after the Spirit Surely though you cannot in your praises reach so great mercy yet you should go as far as ever you can 2. Secondly such are to be exhorted to walk yet less and less after the Flesh and yet more and more after the Spirit For this walking admits of degrees there are none in the present state so freed from the Flesh and the fleshly conversation but that yet they may be more freed from it and so too there are none who have so much of the Spirit and walk so much after the Spirit but that yet they may be more spiritual in their walking 'T is mercy that 't is so well as to the main but surely it may yet be better Saints are you so universally acted by the Spirit of God and the sanctified Nature as you might be O do you so constantly live under the guidance and conduct of the Spirit as you might and should is he your guide no sooner to show you the right way but presently and * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Arrian Epict. lib. 2. cap. 7. p. 186. readily you engage therein are all your affections so pure and heavenly as God requires are there not many strong inclinations to evil yet remaining in you are your Ends in all things so sublime and spiritual as the Gospel commands Ah! something is yet wanting there is yet room for growth you have not yet arrived at perfection as the Apostle speaks of himself Not as though I had already attained c Phil. 3.11 O that every day you might rise higher and higher in heavenly walking that the Flesh might decrease and the Spirit increase the carnal part like the house of Saul might still be going down and the spiritual part like the house of David might still be getting up that Heart and Life might be refin'd and spiritualiz'd yet more and more I beseech you do not stay where you are but still be * Phil. 3.14 pressing forward Walking 'tis motus progressivus so it should be in your walking after the Spirit as there is a going from strength to strength Psal 84.7 from faith to faith Rom. 1.17 so there should be also from spiritualness to spiritualness And Walking 't is motus uniformis are you so steady so eaven and uniform in your walkings as you ought In a * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Socrat. statue or piece of Art all the several parts are uniform and proportionable or else it loses in its exactness and curiosity and should it not be so too in the Spiritual Life but I 'le onely keep to the Metaphor of the cavenness of the Christians Walking O the many crooked wandring extravagant stops which you
is fond of his vassalage and loves Sins government better than Christs ô the Commands of it suit better with him than the Commands of an holy God so that upon the whole matter he is peremptorily resolved to adhere to it against whatever shall oppose it 5. Sins strength is not only very great in it self but it hath also those additional advantages which render it as to any finite power invincible therefore 't is set forth by the strong man and by the strong man armed too Luk. 11.21 't is ingarrison'd in the heart which of all places is the most inaccessible it hath its 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 strong holds in which 't is fortified 2 Cor. 10.4 6. Sin is very resolute for and in the maintaining of what it hath it hath a power and 't will keep it 't will fight it out to the last and dye rather than yield all the persuasives in the world signifie nothing to it if the Spirit of God will gain the Soul he must gain it as Souldiers do strong Towns which refuse to surrender unciatim to borrow the Comedians word inch by inch 7. Sin and the Sinner are under a * Isa 28.15 Covenant they have engaged as it were to live and dye together now to dissolve and break this engagement is no easie matter 8. Satan sets in with it and upon all occasions gives it all the help he can as Allies and Confederates use to do he says to Sin what Joab once did to Abisha 2 Sam. 10.11 If the Syrians be too strong for me then thou shalt help me but if the Children of Ammon be too strong for thee then I will come and help thee if he can hinder it Sins kingdom shall never be demolish'd no not in any one Soul Now put all these things together and it will appear that the power of the Spirit is highly necessary to deliver from the power of Sin yea that nothing below the Almighty strength of this Almighty Spirit can free a Soul from its dominion who but he who is God could subdue and conquer such an enemy as this is Of the sufficiency of the Spirits power to make free from the Law of Sin 2. Secondly there 's the sufficiency of the Spirits power as he is every way able to produce the effect we are speaking of 'T is indeed a great thing to break the yoke of Sin to pull the Crown off from its head to conquer it notwithstanding all the things which have been alledged yet as great a thing as it is this great Spirit is able to do it if he once engage in the work 't is enough the power of an Almighty God must needs be above the power of what is but finite and limited as was said but now As Christ is able to save * Heb. 7.25 to the utmost from Sins guilt so the Spirit also is able to save to the utmost from Sins power let it be never so high and lofty if this Spirit take it in hand I 'le warrant you it shall be brought down God once said to Paul My grace is sufficient for thee 2 Cor. 12.9 't is meant chiefly of strengthening and supporting grace now as that grace is sufficient to bear up under the heaviest afflictions so this sanctifying sin-subduing sin-mortifying grace is sufficient to bring down the strongest corruptions All things considered we may stand and wonder at the rescuing of a Soul out of Sins thraldome ô the bringing of Sin under that but just now was so high is a strange and wonderful thing but if we consider the strength of that person who is employed about it the wonder is at an end as 't was said upon another account Zech. 8.6 If it be marvellous in the eyes of the remnant of this people in these days should it also be marvellous in mine eyes saith the Lord of Hosts Jer. 32.27 Behold I am the Lord the God of all flesh is there any thing too hard for me this is applicable to the Spirit in the personal consideration of God We alas must cry out as David once of the Sons of Zeruiah Sin is too hard for us we cannot get it down but 't is not too hard for God and his Spirit Though it hath its strong holds he takes them or batters them all down with ease it captivates the Sinner but the Spirit captivates it 2 Cor 10.4 5. The weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds Casting down imaginations and every high thing that exalteth it self against the knowledge of God and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ ô the boundless infinite power of the Spirit nothing no not Sin it self even when 't is at the highest can stand before him that which all the Creatures in heaven and in earth cannot do that he can do omnipotentissimâ facilitate as * Epist 107. ad Vitalem Austine phrases it Who is sufficient for these things why he and none but he who hath illimited and infinite power Of the efficacious workings of the Spirit in this Effect 3. Thirdly There 's the efficacy of the Spirits power or the effectual working of the Spirit in the freeing of a person from the Law of Sin When this great Agent comes to bring about this freedom how doth he act Answ efficaciously and irresistibly I mean he puts forth such a power as that the work is certainly done He doth not onely in a Moral way advise counsel * Vid. Twiss Vind. Grat. l. 1. par 2. sect 16. p. 160. c. Digress 6. p. 163 c. With many others who every where write upon this Argument persuade the Sinner to cast off Sins bondage but he in order thereunto puts forth an insuperable and irresistible strength upon him and so goes thorough with the work he conquers all opposition both from without and from within so as that it shall not be victorious and in spite of all makes the Soul free he works herein omnipotentèr indeclinabilitèr insuperabilitèr as that great Champion of Effectual Grace expresses it Further when he comes about this or any other saving act he doth not leave the Sinners Will in suspense pendulous in aequilibrio hanging like a pair of Scales even and not going down on either side but in a way congruous to its liberty he overcomes and determins it for God against Sin so as that it shall neither hesitate nor make any successful * Deo volenti salvum facere nul um humanum resistit arbitrium Aug. de Corrept Grat. c. 14. Vide Jansen August t. 3. l. 2 c. 2◠Habertus de Grat. l. 2. c. 16. Vid. etiam celeberrimum Doct. Ward de Grat disct p. 24 c. resistance to his Grace I am be ore I was well aware of it fallen upon a nice and much controverted Point viz. the efficacy of Divine Grace in its special operations a thing
convertere At vero simile aequaleque auxilium condiscipulo Judae contulisti sed ego superaddidi quod tu mihi supernaturaliter non dedisti viz velle convertere cumque non amplius receperim quam ille tamen ego amplius fcci quam ille cum jam justificatus evadam ille in peccato permaneat itaque non amplius tibi tuaeque gratiae dâ—beo quam iste Judas qui non est conversus Hoc autem Christianae aures audire exhorrescunt Bannez in D. Ward de Grat. discrim p. 40. have whereof to glory he himself having done that which was the highest and the hardest thing in Conversion And herein lies the mysterious operation of the Spirit in that though he acts thus efficaciously and victorioâ—sly upon the Will yet he doth not at all violate infringe or intrench upon its (b) Ne arbitreris istam asperam molestamque violentiam dulâ—is est suavis est ipsa suavitas te trahit Aug. Gratiâ Dei humanum arbitrium non aufertur sed sanatur c. Fulgent l. 2. de verit Praed Divina haec actio non laedit voluntatis liberatem sed roborat neque tamen extirpat radicitus vitiosam resistendi possibilitatem sed efficacitèr suavitèr dat homm firmam obediendi voluntatem Theol Mag. Brit. in Acta Syn. part 1. p. 679 Deus ita utitur voluntate vt ipsa voluntas sese elective vitalitèr ex practico rationis judicio agat Rhaetorf de Grâ—t Exerc. 3. cap. 3. Vide Norton's Orthod Evangel p 114. Natural liberty which is yet secured because the Spirit exerts all this power in such a way as doth very well agree with that liberty for he carries on the work suavitèr as well as fortitèr with efficacy but without any coaction or violence all being done by him in an accommodation and congruous attemperature of things to the Wills native and ingenit liberty and he working per certam scientiam victricem delectationem as (c) De Peccat Mer. Rom. lib. 2. cap. 19. tom 7. Austine speaks Therefore 't is said Psal 110.3 Thy people shall be willing in the day of thy power mark what a sweet harmony and consistency there is betwixt the efficacy of Grace and the Wills liberty Cant. 1.4 Draw me we will run after thee draw me there 's efficacious grace we 'll run there 's free and voluntary obedience and see how well they agree draw me and we will run what more forceable than the former what more free than the latter Let us but fix upon the right notion of Liberty viz spontaneity not indifferency and that which I have said will be clear enough But to come to what is easie the converting Spirit so puts forth his power upon the Will that he makes it willing to close with what is good he removes that averseness obstinateness reluctancy that is in it against what is holy and spiritual whereupon it most readily complies therewith And in reference to the casting off the yoke of Sin and the taking up of the yoke of Christ he never gives the Will off till he hath brought the Sinner to say Sin from this day forward I break of all my allegiance to thee I 'le be ruled by thee no longer I resolve now to change my Master Lord Jesus I am thine I have been a traytor and rebel against thee too long but now I fully surrender up my self to thy Government thy Laws only I 'le be subject unto do thou rule command order dispose me as thou pleasest put thy yoke upon me I willingly stoop to it thus his Will is subdued and now he 's made free from the Law of Sin So much of the power of the Spirit and of its way of working upon the Will in order to this effect 3. I might go on the shew the way of the Spirits agency upon the affections as he doth disengage and disentangle them from Sin nay set them directly against it and so freeing the Sinner from the Law of Sin But this being necessarily consequential upon the two former I will not at all stay upon it So much for the Spirits workings at the first Conversion Of the Spirits subsequent workings after Conversion for the keeping down of the power of Sin 2. Secondly I am to consider the exertings of his power in his subsequent workings after Conversion during the whole life by which he keeps free from the Law of Sin and secures from its actual dominion this being not so proper to the Text I 'le dispatch it very briefly The good Spirit doth not put forth his power only in his first regenerating Sin-subduing acts but he continues so to do to the end of the Believers life having brought Sin under he 'le keep it so it will be endeavouring to regain what it hath lost but this gracious Spirit will not suffer it Having made the conquest he will parta tueri make good the conquest having gained the throne in the heart for God and Christ he 'le order it so that that shall be secured for them that Sin shall never ascend it any more And truly there is much power in this as well as in that which went before ô this corrupt nature will be stirring making head upon all occasions to get up again it must be a mighty strength which must suppress and break it in all its attempts therefore here too 't is the Law of the Spirit But how is this done by him Answ by his constant and continued agency in and regency over the renewed Soul The Law of the Spirit may have reference to these also that look as Sin is a standing Law in the Unregenerate it having in their whole course the command of them and it being the constant active principle in them efficaciously urging and exciting them to what is evil so the Spirit is standing Law in the Regenerate it too in their whole course having the command of them and it being the constant abiding lively principle in them efficaciously urging and exciting them to what is good by which continued actings he keeps Sin under forever For if it shall offer at any time by its sollicitations promises threatnings to recover its former dominion the Spirit is ready at hand to set in with other commands promises threatnings thereby to obviate and countermine Sin in its interposures he watches Sin in all its motions and assaults and accordingly applies himself in his guiding governing strengthening grace so that Sin can make but little on 't in all its endeavours You read here in this Chapter Ver. 14. of the leading of this Spirit As many as are led by the Spirit of God they are the Sons of God and 't was Davids prayer Psal 51.12 that God would uphold him with his free Spirit so we read it but * De Sp. Sanct. l. 6. p. 213. Chysostome renders it by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the leading governing commanding Spirit which he saith is so called because
am well pleased and then at his Transfiguration Matth. 17.5 Behold a voice out of the cloud which said This is my beloved Son The Apostle 1 Joh. 5.7 8. speaks of the Witness of Heaven and of Earth There are three that bear record in heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Ghost and these three are one And there are three that bear witness in earth the Spirit and the Water and the Blood and these three agree in one Now what is the thing which they bear witness to 't is Christ's Sonship for that is instanc'd in as to the First and Supream Witness Vers 9. If we receive the witness of men the witness of God is greater For this is the witness of God which he hath testified af his Son You see how fully this Truth is attested and how abundantly God was pleas'd to clear it up in the first promulgation of the Gospel it being the great thing necessary to be known and believed Indeed the Jews as to the Body of them had a vail before their eyes so that they could not discern this near relation of Christ to God they saw the Son of man but they did not see the Son of God they went no higher than * Matth. 13.55 56. Is not this the Carpenters Son is not his mother called Mary and his brethren James and Joses and Simon and Judas and his sisters are they not all with us * Joh. 6.42 Is not this Jesus the Son of Joseph whose Father and Mother we know how is it then that he saith I came down from heaven Nay when Christ plainly and boldly told them that he was the Son of God they could not bear it Joh. 10.33 For a good work we stone thee not but for blasphemy and because that thou being a man makest thy self God you may know what they meant by this by Christ's reply Vers 36. Say ye of him whom the Father hath sanctified and sent into the world Thou blasphemest because I said I am the Son of God Nay they were so offended at it that for this very thing they took away his life Joh. 19.7 The Jews answered him we have a Law and by our Law he ought to die because he made himself the Son of God You have a full account of it Mark 14.61 to 65. Again the High Priest asked him and said unto him Art thou the Christ the Son of the Blessed And Jesus said I am c. Then the High Priest rent his cloaths and said What need we any further witnesses Ye have heard the blasphemy what think ye and they all condemned him to be guilty of death Thus the eyes of that people were then and O that they were not so still so blinded that they could not perceive Christ to be the Son of God but the Lord hath given sufficient evidence thereof to all who do not willfully shut their eyes upon the light 'T is a Truth out of all question to us who are called Christians yet about the Nature and Manner of Christ's Sonship there are some unhappy Controversies rais'd amongst us 2. Secondly Christ was God's own Son so 't is here signanter God sending hîs own Son I have told you in the Original 't is * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Son of himself or his ‖ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 proper Son as 't is Vers 32. God is Christ's proper Father 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Joh. 5.18 and Christ here is God's proper Son 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He is not barely a Son but a Son in a special and peculiar manner God's own Son This being a Truth of very high import a most Fundamental Point I will endeavour first to explain and prove it and then to vindicate and make good its true and genuine Notion against Opposers Our Lord Jesus Christ is God's own Son whether you consider him comparatively and relatively I mean How Christ is God's own Son in reference to other Sons or absolutely as he is in Himself abstractly considered from all Other Sons God hath three sorts of Sons By Creation by Grace by Nature 1. Consider him Comparatively And so he is thus stiled to difference or distinguish him from all Other Sons For God hath three sorts of Sons 1. Some are so by Creation or in respect of their immediate Creation by God so the Angels are the Sons of God of whom Divines commonly interpret those passages in Job Chap. 1.6 There was a day when the Sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord Chap. 38.7 When the morning Stars sang together and all the Sons of God shouted for joy So Adam upon this account he being immediately made by God is called the Son of God Luke 3.38 2. Some are the Sons of God by Grace viz. the Grace of Regeneration and Adoption thus Believers are the Sons of God as they are spiritually begotten of him and adopted by him Joh. 1.12 13. As many as received him to them gave he power to become the Sons of God c. which were born not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man but of God Jam. 1.18 Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth c. Gal. 4.3 To redeem them that were under the Law that we might receive the adoption of Sons Eph. 1.5 Having predestinated us unto the adoption of Chrildren by Jesus Christ to himself according to the good pleasure of his will Rom. 8.14 As many as are led by the Spirit of God they are the Sons of God Gal. 3.26 Ye are all the Children of God by Faith in Christ Jesus 1 Joh. 5.1 Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God and every one that loveth him that begat loveth him also that is begotten of him Then 3. in contradistinction to these there is God's own Son or his Son by Nature one that is a Son of another rank and Order than the former in this respect God hath but One Son namely Christ True Believers are his Sons which speaks the exuberancy of Divine Love towards them * 1 Joh. 3.1 â—â— Behold what manner of Love the Father hath bestowed upon us that we should be called the Sons of God! therefore Christ owns them for his Brethren Heb. 2.11 Both he that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified are all of one for which cause he is not ashamed to call them brethren and Vers 17. In all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren But yet they are not Sons as Christ is his Sonship and theirs are of a very different nature differing no less than specifically Upon which account he sometimes appropriates the paternal relation in God unto himself Luke 10.22 All things are delivered to me of my Father c. Joh. 14.2 In my Fathers house are many mansions And elsewhere he distinguishes 'twixt God as being his Father and as being the Father of Believers Joh. 20.17 Go to
greater and more perfect Tabernacle not made with hands that is to say not of this building c. by this Tabernacle of the Lord 's pitching and not made with hands he means the body or flesh of Christ which was the true Tabernacle and of which the common Tabernacle was but a type and indeed there was so great a resemblance betwixt these two as that the one might very well prefigure and typify the other For 1. the Outside of that Tabernacle was but mean it was made without of very ordinary and common things within 't was rich and glorious it being beautified with Gold Silver Precious Stones c. but without all was plain it being covered only with Ram-skins and Goat-skins and such materials Exod. 25.1 c. and 26.14 c. So here Christ's outside was especially to some but very mean Isa 53.2 He hath no form nor comliness and when we shall see him there is no beauty that we should desire him but yet he was exceeding glorious within as 't is said of the Church Psal 45.13 such as had a discerning eye they could see the inward glory of his Godhead shining through the cloud of his Manhood And the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us and we beheld his glory the glory as of the only begotten of the Father full of grace and truth Joh. 1.14 2. God's special presence was in the Tabernacle there was the Shechinah or habitation of God wherein at first by an extraordinary Cloud he signified his glorious presence to be as afterwards he did in the Temple too By which therefore Christ sets forth his Body Joh. 2.19 21. Jesus answered and said unto them Destroy this Temple and in three dayes I will raise it up but he spake of the Temple of his Body Both Tabernacle and Temple were * Dr. Cudworth true Notion of the Lord's Supper p. 62. types and apt resemblances of his Flesh or Manhood in respect of the special presence and inhabitation of the Divine Nature in it Hence †Dr. Jackson on the Creed 7th Book sect 3. ch 20. Some make all those great Promises made to the people of Israel concerning God's presence with them in special in the Tabernacle and Temple to point to Christ's Incarnation and in that to receive their accomplishment you may read them Exod. 25.8 Exod. 29.44 45 46. Levit. 26.11 12 13. Ezek. 37.26 27 28. 3. The Tabernacle was a * Josephus calls it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 templum portatile Antiq. Jud. lib. 3. cap. 5. And Austine Templum deambulatorium moveable thing whilst Israel was in the Wilderness in an itinerary posture as they moved the Tabernacle moved with them it was not fixed all that time as afterwards it was So it was with Christ he was here on earth with his Body for some time but neither he nor it were here long to abide he ascended up to heaven and thither he carried his Body with him and there t is fixed this the Evangelist alludes unto Joh. 1.14 The Word was made Flesh and dwelt amongst us c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he tented or tabernacled it for a time amongst us in respect of his short abode here in reference to which our Bodies too are set forth by Tabernacles 2 Cor. 5.1 4. 2 Pet. 1.13 14. I might also instance in Melchisedech as a personal Type of Christ he was without Father and Mother c. Heb. 7.3 which is very applicable to Christ for he as the * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Najanz P. 375. tom 1. Son of God was without Mother and as the Son of man without Father Well then that all these Prophesies Promises Types might be fulfill'd it was necessary that Christ should assume Flesh there 's the first Ground of it The 2d Reason why Christ was incarnate and sent in Flesh that he might be the better qualify'd for his Office and Work 2. This was necessary in regard of Christ's Office and Work 1. As to his Office He was to be the Mediatour betwixt God and Man and that was to be his great and standing Office now in order to his administration thereof it was requisite that he should be Man and take our Nature for he who will be a Mediator 'twixt God and Man must himself be both God and Man He must be God that he may be fit to transact treat negotiate with God and he must be Man that he may be fit to do the same with Man God alone was too high to deal with Man and Man alone was too low to deal with God and therefore Christ was a middle Person 'twixt both that he might deal with both He could not have been fit to be the Mediator in respect of Office if he had not first been a middle Person in respect of his Natures for saith the Apostle Gal. 3.20 A Mediator is not of one but God is one Not of one that is 1. not of one Person for mediation supposes more persons than one was there none besides God himself Christ's mediatory work would be at end that necessarily implying different parties betwixt whom he doth mediate 2. Not of one Nature the Mediator must necessarily have more Natures than one Observe it God saith the Text is one viz. as he is essentially considered and therefore as so he cannot be the Mediator but Christ as personally considered he is not of one that is not of one Nature for he is God and Man too whereupon hee 's the Person who is qualify'd to be the Mediator And therefore when he is spoken of as Mediator his Manhood is brought in that Nature being so necessary to that Office 1 Tim. 2.5 For there is one God and one Mediator between God and Man the Man Christ Jesus 2. Christ's Incarnation and Manhood was necessary in respect of that Work which he was willing to undertake I mean the Work of Redemption If he will engage to redeem and save lost Sinners he must be so qualify'd as that he may first make * Vide Anselm cur Deus Homo Lib. 1. Cap. 11 12 19 20. satisfaction to an injur'd and offended God for that God stood upon and would not recede from he had decreed as appears by the event to save man that way and what he decrees must accordingly be accomplished he had threatned death to the Sinner which threatning therefore must be inflicted either upon the Offender himself or his Surety and God as Rector mundi will vindicate the honour of his Government and therefore will punish the transgression of his Laws upon such Considerations as these there must be Satisfaction Now in order to that there must be suffering yea Christ himself must suffer partly because he was pleas'd to substitute himself in the Sinners stead and partly because his sufferings only could be satisfactory but unless he be Man how can he suffer So that the chain or link lies thus without satisfaction no redemption without suffering
of conformity and likeness to it so we may God may become very man but man cannot become very God he may be like to God by grace and holiness but that 's all thus we are to understand some passages of the * Factus est Deus Homo ut Homo fieret Deus Aug. de Nativ Divinitas Verbi aequalis Patri facta est particeps mortalitatis nostrae non de suo sed de nostro ut nos efficeremur participes Deitatis ejus non de nostro sed de ipsuis Aug. tom 3. p. 1051. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Athan. de Incarn Verb. p. 108. l. 1. Antients which seem to be very high Now this is that which I would have you to labour after that as Christ hath taken of yours so you may receive of his as he was made like to you in what is proper to Man so you according to your capacity may be made like to him in what is proper to God Be thankful both for the thing it self and also for the revelation of it 7. Be thankful not in a common ordinary formal manner but in the most lively enlarged raised manner that is possible Where the mercy is high and great the thankfulness must bear some proportion to it Did Christ condescend to take your flesh for such gracious ends O where is your praising and magnifying of God should not the whole Soul be summon'd in to give its most united acknowledgement of so signal a mercy The Angels never reaped that advantage by his Incarnation which we do and yet as soon as ever that took place they were at praising-work Luk. 2.13 14. Suddenly there was with the Angels a multitude of the heavenly Host praising God and saying Glory to God in the highest c. Good old Zachary began his Prophesie with thanksgiving Luk. 1.68 69. Blessed be the Lord God of Israel for he hath visited and redeemed his people c. and Simeon upon the sight of Christ in the Flesh was transported with joy Luk. 2.29 c. Then took he him up in his arms and blessed God and said Lord now lettest thou thy Servant depart in peace according to thy word For mine eyes have seen thy Salvation Which thou hast prepared before the face of all people a light to lighten the Gentiles and the glory of thy people Israel To move you to this thankfulness I can say no more than what I have already said let but that be consider'd and you will daily heartily with the most raised affections bless God for a Christ incarnate And as you should do this for the thing it self so also for the revelation of it in the Gospel where the mystery which was kept secret since the world began is now made manifest as the Apostle speaks Rom. 16.25 26. This we had never known if God had not there revealed it and the deeper is the mystery the higher is his mercy in the disclosing of it * Matth. 13.11 To you 't is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of Heaven to others 't is not so how little doth the greatest part of the world know of a God in Flesh Nature may discover a God but 't is Scripture only which discovers God-man now why is that revealed to you which is hid to so many Even so Father for so it seemed good in thy sight Matth. 11.26 Nay further you have the clear revelation of this what was hid in darker Prophesies and Types to the Fathers under the Old-Testament is how under the New made as evident to you as the light of the noon-day you do with * 2 Cor. 3 18◠open face behold the truth and glory of Christ's Manhood you live under the dayes of the Son of Man that which others expected and waited for and saw but †Heb. 11.13 afar off is now accomplished and made good to you Under the Law believers looked for the Son of God in flesh you under the Gospel look on the Son of God in flesh their language was I shall see him but not now I shall behold him but not nigh as Balaam prophesied Numb 24.17 but under the Gospel the language is That which was from the beginning which we have heard which we have seen with our eyes which we have looked upon and our hands have handled of the word of life For the life was manifested and we have seen it c. 1 Joh. 1.1 2. I may say to you what Christ once did to his Disciples Luk. 10.23 24. Blessed are the eyes which see the things which ye see For I tell you that many Prophets and Kings have desir'd to see those things which ye see and have not seen them and to hear those things which ye hear and have not heard them O put the thing and the revelation thereof together how should God for both be magnified by us had we as many tongues as members was the whole body turn'd into this one member yet we should not be able for this high and glorious mercy sufficiently to speak out and celebrate the praises of the most high God as * Si certè omnia membra nostra verterentur in linguas ad rependendum tibi debitas laudes nequaquam sufficeret exiguitas nostra Aug. medit cap. 15. Austine pathetically expresses it So much for this Second Vse by way of Exhortation The third and last is for Comfort 3. Use The point in hand is every way as fruitful for Consolation as for Exhortation For Comfort◠to Believers Christ sent in flesh made flesh what abundance of matter is wrap'd up in this for the heightning of the true believers joy I have brought you to the very spring-head of divine Consolation O that you might feel it flowing forth and running into your Souls Abraham rejoyced to see Christ's day the day of his Incarnation he saw it and was glad Joh. 8.56 let me tell you you see that about it which he never saw will not you rejoyce and be glad Fear not said the Angel to the Shepherds for behold I bring you good tydings of great joy which shall be to all people what were these good tydings why Vnto you is born this day in the City of David a Saviour which is Christ the Lord. Luk. 2.10 11. Christ born the Son of God incarnate good tydings indeed blessed be God that they were ever brought to our ears surely such tydings call for great joy If God would please to open your eyes to let you see what there is in a Christ sent in flesh to fix your thoughts upon it to help you to make the best improvement of it I cannot but assure my self that your hearts would be brimful of Comfort that your fears would vanish like the dark cloud before the bright-shining Sun that instead of your sad despondencies of Spirit you would triumph in Christ and lift up your heads with joy O how injurious are they to the Saints in their heavenly
appease or assuage the anger of one that is incens'd so it s taken Gen. 32.20 I will saith Jacob concerning his brother Esau appease him with the present that goeth before me so 2 Sam. 21.3 it signifies also to †Psal 32.1 cover to ‖ Psal 49.7 8. redeem c. but this of atoning or pacifying is most usual Now in order to this atoning God appointed Sacrifices the shedding of whose blood was to make an atonement saith the Lord here and he goes over it again for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the Soul All along in the several kinds of Sacrifices it runs it shall be accepted for him to make atonement for him the Priest shall make an atonement for them c. this alwayes comes in as the great end or effect of the Law-Sacrifices Whence they are said to be of a sweet savour unto the Lord not only because of their pleasingness to God but also because they made him propitious to and well-pleased with such as had offended him so Levit. 1.9 13 17. 'T is the same word but sometimes 't is rendred by reconciling as Levit. 6.30 No Sin-offering_ to reconcile withal in the holy place Levit. 8.15 to make reconciliation upon it We find when at any time in some particular judgments the anger of God did break forth either against the people or against particular persons presently they betook themselves to Sacrifices thereby to atone and propitiate him Numb 16.46 And Moses said unto Aaron take a Censer and put fire therein from off the Altar and put on incense and go quickly unto the Congregation and make an atonement for them for there is wrath gone out from the Lord the plague is begun 2 Sam. 24 25. And David built there an Altar unto the Lord and offered Burnt-offerings and Peace-offerings so the Lord was intreated for the Land and the plague was staid from Israel As to the other End or Effect viz. Expiation that also belong'd to Sacrifices they had a power or virtue in them to cleanse and purifie from Sins guilt to procure pardon and remission whence they were called Expiatory and had it not been for this effect they could not have passed under that denomination A full proof of it you have in that one Sacrifice the Heifer which was to be offered for the cleansing of the people when murder had been committed but the acter of it was conceal'd Deut. 21.7 8. And they shall answer and say Our hands have not shed this blood neither have our eyes seen it Be merciful O Lord unto thy people Israel and lay not innocent blood unto thy people of Israels charge and the blood shall be forgiven them So shalt thou put away the guilt of innocent blood from amongst you c. was not here expiation and wherein did that lie but in the putting away of the guilt of innocent blood and in the obtaining of pardon for 't is said and the blood shall be forgiven them This is that which is set forth by cleansing from sin Levit. 16.30 For on that day shall the Priest make an atonement for you to cleanse you that you may be clean from all your sin before the Lord Numb 3.5 for blood defileth the band and the land cannot be cleansed of the blood that is shed therein but by the blood of him that shed it The Apostle sets it forth by purifying of the flesh Heb. 9.13 by which he means the taking away of that ceremonial ritual or civil guilt which any did lie under And he puts it out of all doubt that expiation in the old Sacrifices did not point to the abolition of Sins power but to the ablation of Sins guilt for having said that * Heb. 9.22 almost all things are by the Law purged with blood he tells you what he meant by that purging adding without shedding of blood is no remission or expiation of sins guilt and this is the notion which alwayes he drives at in that Epistle in those several words which he there uses viz. sanctifying purifying purging c. Indeed this was the * Vide Essen Tri. Crucis l. 1. sect 4. c. 8. p. 6. chief and most proper effect of Sacrifices other things might be done by them but this was the main therefore it so often comes in upon this account And the Priest shall make an atonement for them and it shall be forgiven them Levit. 4.20 so Vers 26. 31 35. * Causa cur noluerit Deus alteri Sacrificari quam sibi ea potissimum videtur quod Sacrificia imprimis fierent ad expiandâ peccata solus verò Deus jus habeat ea condonandi Vossius de Idol l. 1. p. 977. And this might be one Reason why God prohibited the offering of Sacrifices to any but to himself because the end of them being the forgiveness of sin and none being able to reach that end but himself therefore none should be sacrific'd unto but himself Four things laid down concerning Atonement and Expiation by Sacrifices For the better understanding of this double Effect of the Law-Sacrifices I desire four things may be considered 1. That the atonement and expiation effected by those Sacrifices must be conceived of as done by them in that notion which was proper to them as Sacrifices None can deny but that they did atone and expiate but how did they so do there 's the question I answer this was done by them as they were substituted in the place of Offenders and were slain in their stead and for their sake other accounts I know by some are given of this but that now set down is the true as appears by what hath been already spoken under the two foregoing Heads 2. That this atoning and expiating virtue was not limited only to the Sacrifices us'd at the anniversary great Expiation but it belong'd to the other Sacrifices For instance to Burnt-offerings I take in those that were made use of before the giving of the Law about Sacrifices see Job 1.5 42.8 after the giving of the Law to Free-will-offerings Levit. 1.3 4 c. to the Meat-offering and Drink-offering Levit. 2. per tot Levit. 23.13 Numb 15.7 10 13 14. to the Peace-offering Levit. 3.15 16. to the Sin-offering and Trespass-offering Levit. 4.6 to the Ram which was therefore call'd the Ram of atonement Numb 5.8 there 's no end of such instances 3. That yet the atonement and expiation proper to those Sacrifices is to be limited according to the bounds which God himself was pleas'd to set for 't was but in such cases and for such sins wherein he did admit of them in order to these effects of which more by and by 4. That these effects were not produc'd by any inherent or innate virtue in the Sacrifices themselves but only as they were instituted by God and as they derived efficacy from the Sacrifice to come Christ himself Take away these two things and what could these Sacrifices have done
of ignorance committed through incogitancy inadvertency humane infirmity but for great and grievous sins such as were committed against knowledge or willingly and willfully they did not free from their guilt the * Vid. Calov Socin proflig p. 625. Lubbert contra Socin Hoorneb Socin confut p. 602. Turretin de Sat. Christi p. 226. Stegm Photin p. 282. O. against B. p. 474. p 469. latter assert and defend the contrary And not without very good and weighty reasons for if we look into the annual expiatory Sacrifice we find that all sins were expiated by it Levit. 16.21 Aaron shall lay his hands upon the head of the live Goat and confess over him all the iniquities of the children of Israel and all their transgressions in all their sins putting them upon the head of the Goat c. And the Goat shall bear upon him all their iniquities unto a land not inhabited 30. On that day shall the Priest make and atonement for you to cleanse you that ye may be clean from all your sin before the Lord. 34. And this shall be an everlasting statute unto you to make an atonement for the children of Israel for all their sins once a year And as it was thus in the publick Sacrifices for all the people so also in the private Sacrifices for particular persons therefore as you reade of the * Of the difference of these two Chataath and Asham much is written Fagius makes the one to refer to sins of Omission the other to sins of Commission In Levit. 4 2 Others make the Asham to point to sins particularly enumerated Chataath to sins in the general See Dr. O. Exerc. 24. on the Heb. p. 317. Dr. Stillingst against Crellius p. 474. But the most distinguish them as one was for Sins of Ignorance the other for Sins knowingly and willingly committed Vid. Petit. Var. Lect. l. 2. c. 8. Saubert de Sacrif c. 3. p. 65. Chataath the Sin-offering which was appointed for Sins of Ignorance Levit. 4.2 13. 22. 27. so of the Asham the Trespass-offering which was appointed for sins committed knowingly and willingly such as were of a more high and hainous nature as falshood in the detaining of what was deposited lying violence perjury c. Levit. 6.2 3 c. were not these great and horrid sins and yet God appointed Sacrifices for the expiation of them Numb 5.6 When a man or woman shall commit any sin that men commit to do a trespass against the Lord and that person be guilty Then they shall confess their sin c. The Priest is said Heb. 5.1 to be ordained in things pertaining to God that he may offer both gifts and Sacrifices for sins 't is set down without any exception or limitation so Heb. 7.27 'T is true which the Adversaries make great use of the Apostle sets it forth by the errors of the people Heb. 9.7 Into the Second went the High Priest alone once every year not without blood which be offered for himself and for the errors of the people But then you must know that by these errors he means not only smaller sins but all whatsoever even such as were of a very crimson die And the Greek word * Acts 3.17 13.27 1 Tim. 1 13. 2 Pet. 2.12 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here rendred by errors with the Hebrew word †1 Sam. 26.21 Job 6.24 Psal 119.21 See Franz Schol. Sacrif Disp 6. th 60. Scagag do often point to great and grievous sins therefore why should we limit it to sins of a lower size and stature especially if we consider that in that Sacrifice to which the Apostle here plainly refers the expiation was general of all sins as you heard but now out of Levit. 16. And 't is very true too that for Sins which were committed with an high hand contumaciously in open defiance of God c. there he would not admit of a Sacrifice for the expiating of sins so circumstantiated Numb 15.27 c. If any Soul sin through ignorance then he shall bring a She-goat And the Priest shall make an atonement for the Soul that sinneth ignorantly when he sinneth by ignorance before the Lord to make an atonement for him c. But the Soul that doth ought presumptuously the same reproacheth the Lord and that soul shall be cut off from among his people because he hath despised the Word of the Lord that Soul shall utterly be cut off his iniquity shall be upon him Heb. 10.26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth there remaineth no more Sacrifice for sins But a certain fearful looking for of Judgment c. But this doth not weaken the truth of what I have said viz. that even great offences were expiated by Sacrifices because they might be such and yet not come up to this sinning with an high hand and wilfully against the Lord and thereupon might be expiable Were there no sins of a middle nature 'twixt such as were of meer infirmity and such as were committed perversly and obstinately out of open contempt and defiance of God surely there were you have had instances of such and was there no expiation for such the contrary hath been prov'd To clear up this whole matter I would lay down three things 1. When we say that the Law-Sacrifices did take off the guilt of all sins yea of great sins we alwayes except such as God himself did except where he was pleas'd to make a limitation there we must do the same but not otherwise 2. 'T is evident that as to some sins God did make an exception For the case stood thus * See Grotius de Sat. Christi p. 122. it pleased the Lord to give excellent Laws to the people of Israel those Laws he back'd with a severe penalty that penalty was death which was due upon every violation of the Law it being so yet out of his great compassion he who being the Law-giver might therefore relax and alter his Laws and the penalties annexed to them as seem'd good to him would not proceed in the utmost rigour but he would graciously moderate and mitigate his threatnings And therefore though death was incur'd by every sin yet it shall not accordingly be inflicted but a substitution shall be admitted of the Beast shall die but the Sinner himself shall live Upon this God appointed Sacrifices wherein the punishment due to the Offender should be laid upon the thing sacrific'd and thereby his Sin expiated Well! but though he will be so gracious as thus to admit of the expiation of sin yet partly out of respect to his own honour and partly out of respect to the Jewish politie Civil and Ecclesiastical he will do this with some kind of restriction that is he will admit of Sacrifices for the expiating of some sins but not of all The Murderer was to die and no Sacrifice to be accepted of on his behalf Numb 35.30 31 32. with reference to
would have had all and the poor Gentiles nothing If Christ will redeem and save both he must make good that Law which did equally oblige both now that was the moral Law Gal. 4.4 c. God sent forth his Son made of a woman made under the Law to redeem them that were under the Law that we Gentiles as well as Jews might receive the adoption of Sons Christ came not to save this or that nation or people but mankind wherefore he must be subject unto and fulfil that Law in order thereunto in which not any particular people but all mankind were concern'd which I say was the Moral Law 4. Over and above the Moral Law Christ was subject to other Laws 4. Yet besides this general Law which concern'd all mankind which therefore the Saviour of mankind subjected himself unto there were other * Bradsh of Justif c. 19. particular and special Laws to whose obligation he submitted and unto which he was obedient As he was a man he was subject to the Moral Law as he was of the seed of Abraham of the stock of Israel so he was subject to the Ceremonial Law as he was Mediator there were some particular and positive Laws laid upon him to which he was subject also In obedience to the Ceremonial Law he was circumcised Luk. 2.21 presented in the Temple with the usual offering of the poor and mean Luk. 2.22 kept the Passeover Matth. 26.17 and the like In obedience to the special Laws laid upon him as Mediator the chiefest of which was that he should so and so suffer yea lay down his life he did according to the Will of his Father therefore he 's said to be obedient to death even the death of the cross Phil. 2.8 and to learn obedience by the things be suffered Heb. 5.7 and Joh. 10.18 No man taketh it his life he speaks of from me but I lay it down of my self I have power to lay it down and I have power to take it again this commandme have I received of the Father so Joh. 14.31 We commonly distinguish between the Moral Law under which as being general Christ was and that special Law which was laid upon him as Mediator but * Burg. of Justif p. 2. p. 396. c. Bodius on the Ephes p. 386 387. some I find do not very well approve of this distinction their reason is because it seems to assert that something was impos'd upon Christ by the latter Law unto which he was not oblig'd by the former which say they was not so For there was nothing enjoyn'd in the mediatory and positive Law unto which Christ was not oblig'd by the Moral Law there was indeed in it a more particular application and determination of Christ's duty in his circumstances but the thing it self was pre-enjoyn'd and he pre-engag'd thereunto from the Moral Law but this I will not concern my self about He that would see a particular draught of Christ's obedience to the several Laws which he was made under and the several capacities in which he all-along obey'd may find it done to his hand by others largely and distinctly as particularly by Zanchy on Phil. 2.8 p. 114. c. 5. His Obedience imputable to us and meritorious for us 5. Though Christ was thus made under the Law and so obliged to keep it yet this notwithstanding his obedience thereunto was meritorious for us and imputable to us For this is usually objected by the SOCINIAN * Quo circa nec pro aliis magis quam quilibet alius homo legem divinam conservando satisfacere potuit quippe qui ipse eam servare omnino deberet Socin de Servat p. 3. c. 5. Against him see Calov Socin proflig Sect. 5. Controv. 1. pag. 642. Opposers of the imputation and merit of his Obedience for if Christ say they was subject to the Law as he was and so bound for himself to do what he did how can his obedience be made over to others or merit for others for debitum tollit meritum For answer to this several things are said but I 'le instance only in three 1. In the business before us Christ is not to be considered only as Man but as God-man Had he obey'd as meer Man his Obedience could not have been meritorious for so all would have been but a due debt and for himself but he obeying who was * Obediens factus fuit ad mortem Patri non necessum id habuit natura sed oeconomia nostrae redemptionis Ut etiam meriti vis non naturae humanae quà natura sed quà Deo unita ost adscribenda Stegman Disp 23. p. 266. God-man so it became meritorious for others His obedience and subjection was indeed terminated in his Humane Nature but that must not be abstracted from his Divine both being now united in one person which Vnion though it did not make Christ incapable of obeying yet it did put a singular virtue and worth and merit into his obeying And as to his obeying for himself take the explication of that in the words of a †Mr. Perkins on Gal. 4 4. p. 274. Reverend Divine It is saith he alledged that Christ as Man fulfill'd the Law for himself and therefore not for us Answ The flesh or manhood of Christ considered by it-self apart from the Godhead of the Son is a creature that owes homage unto God yet if it be considered as it is received into the unity of the second person and is become a part thereof it is exempted from the common condition of all other men and is not bound to perform subjection as all men are for if the Son of Man be Lord of the Sabbath then also is he Lord of the whole Law * Quicunque prose suo loco vel Adae vel Abrahae factus est filius is quoque pro se suo nomine ad Legem implendam tenebatur qui vero non pro se sed pro aliis vel homo fieri vel Isrâelita nasci voluit is quoque non pro se sed pro aliis ad legem quamlibet implendam obligatus est At Christus c. Turret de Sat. p. 276. Vide Polanum in Dan. 9. p. 196. Bodium on Ephes p. 811 812. Hoorneb Socin confut l. 3. p. 627. Quamvis humana natura ut creatura quaevis Deo sublex observantiam debuit attamen quia nec eam assumere tenebatur neque simplicis creaturae obedientia fuit sed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ideo pro quibus hoc istud factum quidni pro iisdem satisfecisse dicatur 2. Though Christ when he had submitted to assume mans Nature was bound to keep the Law yet his keeping thereof was in effect free and voluntary and so imputable and meritorious inasmuch as he for the sake of man freely consented to the taking of that Nature without which he had not been under any obligation to the Law When he was
as ever you can you should endeavour after perfect obedience though you cannot arrive at it Our Saviours perfect obedience may encourage us in our lamented defects but we must not thereupon stint or limit our selves in our obedience A gracious mans will is alwayes above his power he can do but little but he would do all 'T was an high commendation given to Caleb saith God of him * Numb 14.24 he followed me fully or as 't is in the Hebrew vajemalle achari he fulfilled after me and thus it is with every Caleb one that is after God's own heart as the word signifies hee 's for fulfilling after God The Apostle speaks of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the fulness or fulfilling of obedience 2 Cor. 10.6 Epaphras pray'd for the Colossians Chap. 4.12 that they might be compleat in all the will of God and 't is said of Zechary and Elizabeth Luk. 1.6 they were righteous in all the commandments and ordinances of God O that it might be thus with you If streight bodies be put together there is an universal contiguity betwixt them they 'l meet and touch each the other throughout and so where the heart is sincere it will close with every part of God's Law Christians pray rejoyce in Christ's fulfilling the Laws righteousness and rest upon that only but yet in the way of duty and obedience aspire in your selves at the highest fulfilling of the Law which here you are capable of 3. Thirdly the Law-righteousness Christ hath fulfilled for you but the Gospel-righteousness you must perform your selves The Moral Law as 't was strictly and properly the Covenant of works Christ hath satisfied in his doing of what it required but the Evangelical Law requiring Faith and Repentance you your selves must satisfie Christ's obedienee to the former is made yours by imputation but as to the latter there must be your own personal and inherent obedience We reade of Christ's being made under the Law and of his fulfilling the Law but we never reade of his being made under the Gospel or fulfilling the conditions thereof no you must repent your selves believe your selves or else all that Christ hath done upon the account of the Law will not profit you I would not be mistaken in this therefore 1. I do not mean that you are to perform the Gospel conditions in your own strength was it so you might as well do what the Law as what the Gospel requires it being as easie in your own strength to obey the one as the other You your selves are to repent and believe but 't is not of your selves these are the gift of God Nor 2. do I mean that the performing of the Gospel-conditions is left to the lubricity of your Wills so as that it should be uncertain and undetermin'd whether you should perform them or not for upon the Election of God and the purchase of Christ all that do belong to him shall certainly believe and repent Nor 3. do I mean that upon the fulfilling of the Gospâ—â—-Law you should have another formal righteousness before God distinct from that which results from Chaist's obeying the Moral Law which is imputed to you but only that upon your performing of the Gospel-conditions way may be made for the application of Christ's legal obedience to you as the only thing wherein stands your righteousness these are things which might be very much enlarg'd upon but I am now in hast All therefore that I drive at is this Christ fulfilled the Moral Law for you but he never fulfilled the Gospel-Law for you you must repent and believe your selves or else you cannot rely upon the imputation of Christ's Obedience to the Law if you be impenitent and unbelieving both Law and Gospel are unfulfilled and in full force against you 'T will be an insignificant plea at the great day when the Laws righteousness shall plead against you for you to say Lord Christ fulfilled that righteousness true will God say he did so but the Gospel-righteousness was not fulfilled by you therefore what my Son did as to the other is nothing to you 4. One thing more you that are Believers take a further view of the great love of God and Christ and let the sense of it work up your hearts to the highest thankfulness Was God pleas'd to send his own Son in flesh for this very end that he might fulfil the Law and when his Son had so done doth he reckon that obedience to you as if you had done it your selves O incomprehensible infinite amazing love Was Christ willing to submit to this on these terms to take flesh O the transcendent superlative love of Christ He who made the Law to be made under the Law he who was the Lord and Soveraign to be willing to become a Subject he to undertake to do that which you could never have done and without the doing of which you must have eternally perished he to condescend to do what the Law demanded to suffer what the Law threatned what shall we say to this love surely we can never enough adore it or sufficiently bless God for it Saints did you but consider what humiliation this was in the Son of God what a dreadful enemy this Law would have been had not its righteousness been fulfilled into what a blessed state things are now brought it would certainly highly affect you with the love of Christ and engage you to love serve praise him eternally The third Vse is Comfort to the people of God Vse 3 and indeed to such here is not a little matter of rejoycing The righteousness of the Law fulfilled in us great and blessed words Did God imploy such a person in such a way for such an end that end must needs then be attained and if so what shall hurt them for whom it was attained You who believe do often fear that the Laws righteousness is ready to rise up against you you tremble at the thoughts of it when you consider how short you come of it but fear it not for in Christ 't is exactly perfectly fulfilled and that for you too in your stead that 't is as well as if you had obey'd it fully in your own persons is not here ground of Comfort You eye the imperfection of your own obedience and you do well but pray eye too the perfect obedience of the Lord Jesus which is yours by imputation There is now no condemnation to them who are in Christ why now no condemnation because now Christ hath fulfilled the Laws righteousness for such and thereupon who or what shall condemn them You are troubled because of the Law of Sin but that the Spirit hath freed you from you are troubled because of the Law of God inasmuch as you come so much short of its righteousness but that by Christ is fulfilled for you You desire a righteousness such an one as will bear you out before God here 't is for you Christ's own righteousness is yours O you may say
several other Texts in order to the more undeniable proving of the Proposition before us as also to answer the various replyes evasions misinterpretations about them by such who dissent and yet I could most willingly engage therein did I think such an undertaking would be proper in such a Discourse as this or tend to the advantage of any but the truth is I fear I should but perplex private Christians with things that possibly would be too high for them and I 'm sure I should do that which is needless for Others who know where this is * Arnold Catech. Racov. major p. 27◠Galov Socin proflig p. 285. Cocceius against Socin in cap. 1. Joh. cap. 15. Bisterf against Crellius p. 564. Jacob. ad Portum against Ostorod p. 166. Owen against Biddle ch 13. p. 289. c. done already And indeed the whole matter in this Controversie is by Crellius himself brought into a narrow compass wherein we are very willing to joyn issue with him for he grants if Christ did praeexist before he was incarnate that then his incarnation must needs be believ'd and own'd according to our stating of it but I have * See p. 284. c. already proved and Others do it much more fully that he did so praeexist therefore upon that Concession the thing is clear and I need say no more upon it Only let me leave this one word with our Opposers their Homo Deus factus is the greatest falshood but our Deus Homo factus is the greatest truth 2. Prop. Christ the Second Person only was incarnate The second Proposition is this that Christ the Son of God the second Person in the ineffable Trinity he only was incarnate 'T is here said God sending his own Son in the likeness c. the taking then of flesh was that personal act which was proper to the Son alone and in that so often alledged Text 't is said * Joh. 1.14 the Word was made flesh which Title the Word is never attributed to the Father or to the Spirit but alwayes to the Son and you see he 's the person who was made flesh 'T is true Incarnation was the act of the whole Trinity approbativè but 't was only the Son's act terminativè all the Persons approved of it and * Sola persona Filii incarnata est operante tamen eandem incarnationem totâ Sanctâ Trinitate cujus opera sunt inseparabilia August Quest de Trinit tom 3. p. 1040. Vid. Anselm de Incam Verbi cap. 3. 4. concurred to it but it was terminated only in Christ the second Person The Schoolmen compare Christ's Flesh to a garment made by three Virgin-sisters which yet but One of them only wears A †See Lombard lib. 3. Dist 1. Dr. Jackson on the Creed 7th Book p. 255. Question is commonly here started why the second Person rather than the first or the third was thus incarnate which Some do venture to answer by assigning the Reasons of it I humbly conceive there is too much of curiosity in the Question and too much of boldness in the Answer why Christ was incarnate I can give several Reasons but why he rather than the other Persons there I must be silent 'T is also query'd * Of this see Zanchy de tribus Elohim l. 5. c. 6. p. 546. c. Tilen de Incarn Filii Dei Disp 1. Sect. 20. Aug. Serm. 3. de Temp. there being such an oneness betwixt all the Persons how the Son can be said to assume the Humane Nature and yet the Father and Spirit not assume it to which the Answer is obvious this difference might very well be upon that personal distinction which is betwixt them for this assumption of flesh being not the act of the Nature which is common but of the Person which is limited the second Person might so assume and yet the other Persons not 3. Prop. Christ not incarnate till the fulness of time Thirdly Christ's incarnation was in time and not till the fulness of time He was alwayes God for he that is not alwayes God is never God the Divine Essence admitting neither of beginning nor end but he was not * Neque enim Caro issa quae ex came Virginis nata est semper fuit sea Deus qui semper fuit ex carne Virginis in carne Hominis advenit Cassian de Incar Dom. Lib. 6. alwayes man there never was a time in which he was not God but there was a time in which he was not Man His Generation as the Son of God was eternal but his Generation as the Son of Man was but temporal In the fulness of time God sent his Son made of a woman c. Gal. 4.4 The Evangelist sets him forth in his two Natures Joh. 1. with respect to his Divine Nature he shews that he was from everlasting In the beginning was the Word c. the same was in the beginning with God c. then he comes to his Humane Nature and that he shews was in time the Word was made Flesh he was not so ab aeterno but he was made so in time In such a sense Christ may be said to be incarnate from all eternity viz. in regard of God's eternal parpose and decree as in reference to that he is said to be the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world Rev. 13.8 but as to the actuality of his Incarnation that was but 1600 and odd years ago A double enquiry here will be made As 1. if this was deferr'd so long what then became of those who lib'd and dy'd before Christ was inearnate The efficacy and benefit of Christ's Incarnation to those who lived before it if that was so necessary as hath been shown what became of the Patriarchs of all who liv'd under the Law before that was in being I answer they had the merit virine benefit of the thing though they had not the thing it self for God having decreed it and Christ having covenanted and ingaged to the Father that in the fulness of time he would take flesh the Father all-along look'd upon it as actually done and accordingly dealt with Believers under the Law as though it had been actually done insomuch that they had the same benefit by a Christ in Flesh which we now have Therefore 't is said Rom. 3.25 Whom God set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past through the forbearance of God Heb. 9.15 For this cause he is the Mediatour of the New Testament that by means of death for the redemption of the trrnsgressions that were under the first Testament they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance Whatever our Lord is now since the actual exhibition of him he was the same before effectively and virtually for 't is Jesus Christ the same yesterday and to day and for ever Heb. 13.8
We read Mark 11.9 They that went before and they that followed cryed saying Hosanna blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord Believers who liv'd before Christ's incarnation and they who follow since both are equally obliged to magnifie God for him both receiving the same benefit by him 2. It may be enquired Why Christ was incarnate just when he was why at this very Epocha or period of time rather than at any other was Christ incarnate why not either before or after but just then Answ why because it was that very time which God had set therefore called the fulness of time Gal. 4.4 He that is pleas'd to set the time for other things as for the Churches deliverances Thou shalt arise and have mercy upon Zion for the time to favour her yea the set time is come Psal 102.13 and so in several Other cases surely he was pleas'd to set the time for so great a thing as the coming of his own Son in Flesh he in his eternal decree had determin'd the precise time for this which therefore when it was come then Christ came now I say all must be resolv'd into this True there were some more immediate Reasons why he came just when he did he was to come before the Scepter was wholly departed from Judah Gen. 49.10 whilst the Second Temple was standing Hag. 2.6 7 8 9. during the Fourth Monarchy Dan. 2.44 Daniel's 70 weeks were almost expired Dan. 9.24 there was a general expectation raised in the world of the coming of the Messias as might easily be made out Now with respect to these things the Lord Jesus came at that very period of time whereat he did but they all falling out but in compliance with and subordination to the Decree of God therefore the determination of the time of Christ's Coming and Incarnation must ultimately be resolv'd into that O he came just when he did neither sooner nor later because the Father had appointed that very time Prop. 'T was not the Divine Essence absolutely considered which assumed Flesh but that Essence considered as subsisting in the Second Person 4. 'T was not the Divine Nature or Essence simply and absolutely considered which assumed Flesh but it was that * Tota igitur Natura Divina fuit incarnata sed non quatenus absolutè in se consideratur ut omnibus Personis communis sed quatenus personalibus proprietatibus seu 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Personâ Filii determinata coâ—sideratur Davenant in Col. 2.9 p. 240. Solus Filius suscepit humanitatem in singularitatem Personae non in unitatem Naturae Divinae Concil Tolet. Neque enim Divina Natura si propriè accuratè loqui velimus sed Persona Divina assumsit Naturam Humanam Divina quidem Natura unitur Humanae sed eam nòn assumsit assumere enim non est Naturae sed Suppositi Bisterf contra Crell p. 565. Vide Alting Theol. Problem p. 562. 577. Nature considered as subsisting in the Second Person If this restriction and stating of the Point be not admitted we cannot avoid our holding the Incarnation was common to all the Persons contrary to what the Church hath ever held and to what was asserted but even now therefore when 't is said †1 Tim. 3.16 God manifested in the Flesh you are to understand God in the Personal not in the Essential notion Prop. The Nature assuming was the Divine Nature 5. The Nature assuming was the Divine Nature that being considered as was laid down in the forgoing Proposition The Manhood did not assume the Godhead but the Godhead it * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Damasc de Orthod Fide lib. 3. cap. 2. p. 167. Man did not become God but God became Man 't is not said that †〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Athan. de Inc. Christi t. 1. p. 612. the Flesh was made the Word but the Word was made Flesh this is a thing so unquestionable that the very naming of it is enough Prop. That the Humane Nature was so assum'd as to subsist in the Divine that both Natures make butâ— one Person 6. The Lord Jesus the eternal Son of God God blessed for ever did so assume the Humane Nature as in a most mysterious and unconceivable manner to unite it upon the first framing or forming of it to his Divine Nature and to give that a subsistence in this so as that both do make but one Person the Essence Properties Operations of both Natures yet remaining the same without either conversion or confusion Here the Hypostatical Vnion is both asserted and and also described for wherein doth the nature of that Vnion consist but in that which is here laid down Of the Hypostatical Vnion Of it you read Col. 2.9 In him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily i. e. Personally and Hypostatically Rom. 9.5 Whose are the Fathers and of whom as concerning the Flesh Christ came who is over all God blessed for ever here 's both the Natures of Christ and both in him making but one Person upon the personal conjunction of which he 's call'd Emmanuel God with us Matth. 1.23 But not to insist upon the Proof of this Vnion which all but INFIDELS and SOCINIANS do believe The mysteriousness thereof I will endeavour as well as I can rather to explain and open it an undertaking which I enter upon the Lord knows with great fear and dread because of the loftiness and mysteriousness of the thing to be opened O 't is a thing so sublime and mysterious as that it transcends the capacity of Angels and Men how then shall I be able to speak of it or to it Take whom you will single out a Person of the sharpest wit the profoundest judgment the most elevated reason let all the most raised abilities concur in him and then set the Hypostatical Vnion before this person alas poor man how will he be puzzl'd nonplus'd unable to fathom so great a depth as this is And well he may since 't is the mystery of mysteries one of the first magnitude than which by a narrow intellect none more hard to be conceiv'd of or understood 'T is indeed sure and certain to Faith which believes it because God reveals it which readily answers all Objections and * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Justin Martyr solves all difficulties about it by resting on divine revelation but if Reason beyond its proper bounds will be prying into and judging of a thing so abstruse its blindness as well as its boldness will soon appear its bucket will not go to the bottom of a Well so deep its line is too short to measure such heights breadths lengths depths as are here to be found I do not in the least wonder that they who make Reason to be the supream Judge of matters of Faith do throw off the belief of this mystery for though it be not at all contrary to reason