Congregation met together on a Religious account for the Service of God But let it be called if he please a Religious Discourse of the Holy Apostle to a Congregation of Christians met together for such a purpose He would then have it thought a favour or condescention to admit this breaking of bread to be meant of the Lords Supper and not barely a Common eating But since he doth not deny it we will accept the favour and take it so to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Disciples being congregated or assembled to break Bread 'T is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Disciples not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 some of them and they were perhaps not every one but the generality of them as at other meetings 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 congregated or assembled and it seems to be a good full Congregation by Eutychus's being mounted to the third loft whatever he meant by that third loft though but the third scaffold so high that by a fall from thence he was in great danger of being killed Now it is not likely that such a Congregation of Christians were thus assembled for common eating He says Paul was to go away on the Morrow True But it is not said they came together to take leave of Paul but came together to Break Bread Paul's going away on the Morrow might be the reason and I believe was why they continued there so long but the End for which they came together was to Break Bread and the occasion of their so coming because it was the first day of the Week On which it should seem they were wont so to do for that end And if he candidly consider it methinks it should seem so to him Paul came to them at Troas in five days where he abode seven days And on the first day of the week when the Disciples came together to break Bread Paul preachea to them Doth not the fair prospect of the place import thus much that they were then met to break Bread as being the first day of the week What other occasion was there of mentioning what day of the Week it was It had been otherwise a fairer transition to have said He staid there Seven days and on the Seventh day or the last of those Seven the Disciples came together to take leave of Paul and Sup with him over night who was to depart on the morrow Now if it had been said on the Seventh day though meaning but the last of those Seven it would no doubt have been urged as a great argument of Paul's keeping a Seventh day Sabbath and the Disciples with him not as a Iewish but as a Christiam Assembly for breaking of bread which was a Christian not a Iewish Service For then breaking of bread would certainly have been the Lords Supper But because it was on the first day of the Week it must now be but common eating to take leave of Paul and to Sup with him as he tells us p. 57. Friends commonly do when a Minister or any other special Acquaintance intends to take a Iourney in the morning to sup with him over night But if he thinks this to be all which is there meant by the Disciples coming together on the first day of the Week to Break Bread he must excuse me if I cannot be of his Opinion But because he is content to admit upon some terms their meeting might be upon a Religious account for the Lords Supper as no doubt it was I shall press him no further therein but accept of his condescension When he tells us that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is Greek for one and therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may as well be rendered One day of the Week as the First day of the Week Surely he is not in earnest Such trifling doth more hurt than help his cause No doubt but when ever they met it was one day of the Week we need not be told it nor need the word Week be added he might as well have said one day nor need he have said so much But this Author cannot think nor doth he that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth any where signify other than the first day of the Week In the whole story of Christs Resurrection and what followed on that day in all the Four Evangelists we have no other word for it but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nor have we any other word for it that I know of there or any where else I do not know that it is any where called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Such shifting doth not look well 'T is somewhat like the Story of a man who bought a Horse for Five Pounds to be paid the next day And accordingly on the next day he sent Five Pounds of Candles Perhaps in the Bargain it was not said expresly in words at length Five Pounds of Lawful Money of England But by common intendment it must be so understood And an honest English Iury upon a Tryal would so Find it The Latin word Pridie is a Derivative or Compound rather from prae prior and Postridie from post posterior and accordingly in Latin pridie Calendarum and postridie Calendarum must signify a day before and a day after the Calends But can any man think it is meant of any day No but the next day before and the next day after So if we say Christ was Crucified one day before the Sabbath and Rose again one day after the Sabbath This one day is the next day And so any man who hath not a mind to Cavil will understand it And so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one day after the Sabbath must needs be understood of the next day after the Sabbath Nor is it ever used in any other sense If it were to be understood of any indefinitely it should be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 some day after the Sabbath not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one day after But the most pleasant shift of all is when he would have us think that this Evening which is called the first day of the Week was the Evening after the Seventh day that is Saturday night and the next morning when Paul was to go away was Sunday morning and he to travel that Sunday And that the Evening of Saturday was the beginning of Sunday and was therefore called the First day of the Week Because it is said Gen. 1. the evening and the morning was the First day and so of the rest and therefore the evening was the beginning of every day See what shift a man will make rather than quit an Opinion he hath once taken up We are taught that on the Fourteenth day of the first month at even the Pass-over was to be killed Doth he think that this Fourteenth day at even was the end of the Thirteenth day the Fourteenth day then beginning I think every body else takes it to be the evening at the end of the fourteenth day and the Fifteenth day on the morrow was the first day of
will say some what to it Whether 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be good Greek or no as to the common analogy of that Tongue or what is the reason of that Syntax I need not trouble my self to enquire because it is nothing to the purpose for we are not inquiring whether it be good Greek but what it here signifies There are I presume in all Languages by negligence or corruption some harsh expressions as to the analogy of the Language which yet are allowable by common usage and well enough understood He would think it perhaps a little harsh to say in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in Latine tres decimum quatuor decimum for what we say in English thirteenth fourteenth yet so they speak And somewhat harsh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rev. 2. 26. Rev. 3. 21. and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rev. 3. 12. instead of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yet so it is And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yet so we find it Rev. 1. 4. And many such may be shewed In Latine idcirco quocirca posthac quapropter controvertor paterfamilias omne genus homines Aethiops albus dentes pridie catendas and many more are scarce to be accounted for as regular save that they are so used but because they are so used they are accounted elegant enough In English Methinks for I think three pound ten shillings for three pounds c. three foot nine inches many a one a few Pottage and the like are scarce regular yet are so used When a Merchant marks his Parcels and so calls them number one number two c. he means first and second So in the Year of our Lord one thousand six hundred and ninety one One thousand six hundred ninety two is commonly said when yet we mean ninety first ninety second so one a clock two a clock for the first and second hour after Twelve And other the like cases where the Cardinal number is put for the Ordinal As it is also in Gen. 1. The evening and morning were jom echad day one which the Septuagint renders 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth there signify 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Yet no wise man will cavil as to the sense of such expressions what ever they may do as to the Grammatical construction when we know what is meant by them So here 't is true 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth properly signify one in common construction but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth never signify other than the first of the week either in the New Testament or any where else not any day of the week any more than one a clock doth signify any other hour than the first after twelve When a thing is said to be done at one a clock he that shall object this may be any hour for every hour is one would be laugh'd at And when a Merchant bids his Prentice bring him number one if he bring him what else he pleases because every number is number one or one number he deserves to be knockt Now when every one knows who understands any thing of this nature that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is the proper name of that day which is next after the Iewish Sabbath as much as one a clock is the proper name of that hour which is next after Twelve it must either be great ignorance or somewhat worse so to object I appeal to himself whether ever he met with that name in any Author in any other sense He seems to take it very unkindly pag. 66. of those who should think that by son of man should be meant an ordinary Man in Mar. 2. 27 28. The Sabbath was made for Man and not Man for the Sabbath Therefore the Son of Man is Lord also of the Sabbath Where I think it is plain that in the former verse the Sabbath was made for Man c. it is manifestly spoken of ordinary Men. And though in the latter verse the Son of Man is Lord also of the Sabbath by Son of Man I suppose is meant Christ yet is that Title given also to ordinary Men elsewhere very often As Iob 25. 6. How much less Man who is a Worm and the Son of Man which is a Worm And Isai. 51. 12. Who art thou that shouldst be afraid of a Man that shall dy and of the Son of Man which shall be made as Grass So Ps. 8. 4. What is Man that thou art mindful of him and the Son of Man that thou visitest him And to the same purpose Ps. 144. 3. And to name no more in the Book of Ezekiel the Prophet Ezekiel is in that one Book called Son of Man oftener than Christ is so called in the whole Bible And if we would argue as he doth we might plausiby object It might be so meant here though I think it is not But he cannot shew that ever the Iewish Sabbath was called the Lords day however he thinks it might have been nor though 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be Greek for One that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is ever used for other than the first day of the week or the next after the Jewish Sabbath Nor doth he think it Such trifling to give it no harder name may do well enough in Drollery or Burlesque but not in a plain honest Enquiry But if he would be curious as to the Phrase 't is plain enough that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not properly the Genitive case governed of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For then it should have been 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is of the Neuter Gender And 't is a mistake therefore when p. 58. he renders it by One of the Sabbaths as if it had been 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But 't is governed rather of some Praeposition or Particle understood as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the like and then as in Latin pridie calendas that is pâ—ioâ— dies ante calendas is the next day before the Calends so is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the next day after the Sabbath The full construction is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being understood in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 understood in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is one day after the Sabbath which being the proper Name of a day cannot be meant of any other but the Next day after 'T is certain therefore that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the first day of the Week or the first day after the Iewish Sabbath was from the Resurrection of Christ and after eminently signalized as a day of special Observation 'T was honoured with Christs Resurrection on that day with his first appearance to Mary Magdalen and the other Women then to the Two Disciples going to Emmaus and his Religious Assembling with them there after that to the Disciples at Ierusalem and assembling with them the same day and
the whole time of those Assemblings employed in Religious Exercises Preaching Celebrating the Sacrament Instructing and Blessing his Disciples and giving them Commission for Preaching the Gospel and Planting the Christian Church And again with the same Disciples on that day sen-night assembled with them and in like manner employed It was specially signalized also by the Miraculous Effusion of the Holy Ghost on that day in a great assembly of Iews and Gentiles on the day of Pentecost and the day employed in Preaching and other Religious exercises It was observed in like manner at Troas in preaching the Word Celebrating the Sacrament and other Religious Communion as things there usual on that day It was observed at Corinth not once onely but as a thing of course and so presumed by the Apostle when he gives particular Instructions concerning a Collection for the Saints to be made weekly on that day And in like manner in the Churches of Galatia with a like direction to them And we have no reason to suspect but that in other Churches also there was a like custome of observing that day And it is the onely day of the week unless the Seventh-day in order to the Iewish Sabbath that is so much as Mentioned by name after the Resurrection of Christ. At least I do not at present remember the Second Third Fourth Fifth or Sixth day of the week by name so mentioned Now what we have reason to believe was so generally observed after the Resurrection by Christ himself more than once by his Apostles and by the Christian Churches in their days we have reason to believe was according to Christs direction For we know very well that Christ did after his resurrection give commandments to the Apostles about things pertaining to the kingdome of God and â—â—â—â—ling the Christian Church What those Commandments were in particular we cannot tell but are to presume that what they did therein was pursuant of those commands and this in particular about observing the first day of the week which we call the Christian Sabbath And which in contradistinction to the Iewish Sabbath is called the Lords day Rev. 1. 10. And hath accordingly been so called and so observed ever since Which being so practised by the Apostles and so continued ever since I take to be a good warrant for us to continue it as a thing agreeable to the Will of God As to what he so often objects that there is no express command thereof recorded that is not such a command as our Author demands We are not to prescribe to God in what terms he shall make known his Will any more than the Pharisees Mat. 16. 4. were to prescribe to Christ what kind of signs he was to shew to testify his authority 't is sufficient if God do in his own way intimate what is his Will though it be it not with the formality of Be it Enacted And those who are willing to be taught of God will be content so to understand his meaning An approved Practise in the Worship of God frequently Repeated attested by Miracles encouraged by Christs own Example and that of the Apostles and the Christian Churches then and continued in the Christian Church ever since Is to me great evidence of the will of God and that there was a command for it though it be not recorded Like as I believe that there was very early a command from God to worship him by Sacrifice though that Command be not recorded But to that of its being so observed ever since he objects we have nothing but Tradition either that the Christian Sabbath hath been so observed or that it is called the Lords-day And Tradition is what he takes great pleasure to exclaim against If that be admitted saith he where shall we stop Very well I am not over fond of laying too great a weight upon Traditions at least not on all things that are pretended so to be But I pray How can he tell otherwise than by Tradition whether our Saturday or our Sunday be the Seventh day in course from the Creation Or if that be too hard a question whether of the two is the Seventh day of the Iewish week I know nothing but Tradition for it I cannot remember so long Nor have I so long kept so strict account of days as to be sure of it I trust to the common Computation of the world that our Sabbath is a continuation of that Sabbath which the Apostles kept And if so I am safe If not I cannot help it And because I think the Apostles Sabbath was on the first day of the Jewish week therefore I think ours to be so But if theirs was not neither is ours He would not have that of St. Iohn Revel 1. 10. I was in the spirit on the Lords-day to be understood of our Sabbath And why not He tells us 1. Some think it to be Christmass-day 2. Some think it to be Easter-day and 3. Some think it to be the Day of Iudgment And long Discourses we have upon all these Well! But doth he think it to be meant of any of these No. Then to what purpose are these alleged in disparagement of the Christian Sabbath But he seems to have so great displeasure against the Christian Sabbath that whatever he can think of to be Objected though he do not think it to be true he will be sure to Object that he may disparage the Day or perplex the Argument as if he were more concerned to beat down the Christian Sabbath than to set up the Iewish Not considering that by all this he is doing their Work who would have none at all For they know well that the Iewish Sabbath hath been long since laid aside without any great fear of returning and if they can but throw off the Christian Sabbath also 't is what they would have And 't is of a like import what he argues p. 84 for coming to the publick but once a day not twice as our manner is For those who care not to come at all if he dispense with them as to the One they will dispense with themselves as to the Other meeting I should rather think that the whole day being due to the Service of God publick and private it is to be parcelled out as to the number and times of publick meeting as might according to Christian Prudence be judged most conducing in this or that place to those ends and to common Edification and that to make such little Circumstances otherwise than as they conduce to those general ends a matter of Religious Observation or Divine Institution is a like extravagance as that of the Pharisees in laying like weight on their Traditions and that of the Papists on their numerous Superstitious Ceremonies And is as properly superstition as these I do not know this Author who thus argues against observing the Christian Sabbath and against publick meeting on that day more than once And therefore am not willing to
judge hardly But the natural result of what he argues is as I told you He doth not think that Iohn was on the Lords day Rev. 1. 10. keeping the Anniversary of Christs Incarnation nor of his Resurrection No more do I. But why not Because saith he he may say as in the case of Moses's dead body No man knows of his Sepulchre to this day Now as to the Incarnation I am apt to think that no man doth At this day know certainly either on what day of the Year or what day of the Week Christ was born nor is it any matter whether we do or no. But I should rather say no man knows At this day than as he no man knoweth To this day as if no man hitherto had known it for certainly there have been those who knew it heretofore while he was alive though it be now forgotten and at this day no man knows it But will he say so as to the Resurrection I think it is plain that Christ was Crucified on the fourteenth day lay in the Grave the fifteenth and rose again the sixteenth day of the first month And that he rose on the first day of the week no man doubts He should rather have put it thus As no man knows To this day where is the Body of Moses that it might not be worshiped So no man knows At this day which is the Seventh in course from the Creation that we might not contend about it However I am contented to admit if that will please him that the Lords day there mentioned was neither meant of christmass-Christmass-day nor easter-Easter-day nor Whit-sunday nor the day of Iudgment but think it to be meant of the first day of the week which is the Christian Sabbath Not of any of those other days mentioned nor of the Iewish Sabbath as he would have it 'T is I think a new notion of his own at least I know none other of his mind that it should be meant of the Iewish Sabbath He grants there is nothing from the Circumstances of the place to determine it to this day Nor doth he pretend to shew that the Jewish Sabbath was ever so called But he thinks it might have been so called For he says God blessed and sanctified the seventh day that is the Seventh day after Six days of Labour therefore it might have been called the Lords day and so may as well the Christian Sabbath as the Iews Sabbath That the Son of Man is Lord also of the Sabbath day And so he is of every day in the Week and of the Christian Sabbath when that is the Sabbath as well as of the Iewish That the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord our God that is the Seventh day after Six days of Labour but whether the Seventh day in course from the Creation is no where said That Isai. 58. 13. The Sabbath is called my holy day True on what ever day the Sabbath be First or Seventh of the Week or whatever day God appoints to be kept Holy As for instance the first and seventh day of the Feast of Unleavened bread Ex. 12. 16. The First day shall be a Holy Convocation and the Seventh day shall be a Holy Convocation and each of them was the Lords Holy day on what ever day of the week they happened And the like for other days So Levit. 23. 2 4 7 8 21 24 25 27 28 30 32 35 36 39. and Num. 28. 18 25 26. Num. 29. 1 7 12 35. All the days here mentioned are the Lords Holy days yet I do not take any of them to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And all he can pretend to from these or whatever he produceth is no more but that the Iewish Sabbath while it was the Sabbath might have been so called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords day he doth not pretend to shew that ever it was so called Now I would desire this Gentleman if he can but a little while lay aside his prejudice to consider first that the Lords day was the proper name of a day whereby it might be known as distinguished from other days else to what purpose is it said I was in the spirit on the Lords day whereas the proper name of the Iewish Sabbath and of that onely as he would have us think p. 64. was the Sabbath day and there is no appearance of reason why if he meant that day he should not rather have said I was in the spirit on the Sabbath day or the seventh day This therefore must needs be meant of some other day known by another name 2. I would have him next consider that the Lord in the Old Testament is the usual name of God indefinitely without particularizing this or that of the Three persons and the Sabbath of the Lord thy God doth not appropriate it to the second Person more than to the first and third And though I do not deny that our Christ was the God who gave the Ten Commandments for all the three Persons are the same God yet I do not think it to be Christ onely as contradistinguished to the other two And when it is said I am the Lord thy God thou shall have no other God but me the meaning is not I the second Person am so the Lord thy God that thou shalt own no other Person for thy God beside me the second Person But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lord in the New Testament is for the most part applied peculiarly to our Lord Christ God and Man and is understood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of him As he is called elsewhere 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Son of Man And accordingly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 must be a day peculiarly appropriate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to our Lord Christ which the Jewish Sabbath was not nor that of the Fourth Commandment which is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God that is of God indefinitely for 't is in that notion that God speaks in the Ten Commandments not as one person contradistinct to the other two It is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords day in a like sense as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords Supper 1 Cor. 11. 20. and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Cup of the Lord the Table of the Lord 1 Cor. 10. 21 22. 1 Cor. 11. 27. In all which by the Lord is meant the Lord Christ God and Man And because there being a double Sabbath then in use the Iewish Sabbath and the Christian Sabbath and the word Sabbath indefinitely having been a long time applied to the Iewish Sabbath and would be apt to be understood of it therefore by way of distinction that of the Christians though a Sabbath also within the sense of the Fourth Commandment was called the Lords day as being the Day or Sabbath appropriate to our Lord Iesus Christ. And therefore when he tells us so often the World was made by our Lord Iesus Christ and the Law given on Mount Sinai by our Lord
Iesus Christ upon which Notions he seems to lay great stress though it be nothing to the purpose I think it is a mistake For our Lord Iesus Christ is God and Man but he was not God and Man when the World was made or the Law given but onely God 'T is true Christ as God according to his Divine Nature is the same God who made the World and gave the Law for we have no other God but one but not as God and Man For Man he was not at that time but in the fulness of time became Man The Sabbath of the Lord our God in the fourth Commandment with equal respect to all the Three Persons doth not signify the same as The Sabbath of our Lord Iesus Christ God and Man The Lord our God there not the same with our Lord Iesus Christ in the New Testament But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords Supper is the Supper of our Lord Iesus Christ God and Man the Founder of our Christian Religion And accordingly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords day is the day of our Lord Iesus Christ a day appointed by him 3. I would have him consider further that the Lords day dominica or dies dominicus hath been all along in all ages of the Christian Church used as the proper name of what we otherwise call the Christian Sabbath and not for the proper name of any other day and therefore till somewhat do appear to the contrary I shall take it to be the same with what is called the Lords day in Scripture There is in the New Testament a place called Rome and there is at this day a place in Italy called Rome and which hath been so called all along ever since neither do I know of any other eminent place of called Therefore till somewhat do appear to the contrary I shall presume our Rome to be the same place with that which in the New Testament is called Rome We find in scripture there is an Island of the Mediterranean Sea called Melita or Malta where St. Paul suffered Ship-wrack not far from another Island called Crete Now we know also there is in the Mediterranean Sea an Island called Malta at this day and another not far from thence called Crete or Candy and we do not know of any other Islands so called then or at any time since and therefore we may safely presume till somewhat do appear to the contrary that those Islands now so called are the same Islands with those which were then so called And in like manner that Day which hath been ever since called the Lords-day as by its proper name we may and ought to presume to be the same day which was by St. Iohn so called as by its proper name in Rev. 1. 10. when he wrote the Book of the Revelation till it can be shewed that he did by that name mean some other day And we have the more reason so to presume because we find it so called by others very soon after St. Iohn's time and by those whom we have great reason to believe to have been well acquainted with St. Iohn's meaning and his manner of speech The first I shall name is St. Ignatius who was not onely Contemporary with St. Iohn but was a Disciple or Scholar of St. Iohn Now St. Iohn according to the best account we can have from Chronology wrote his Revelation in Patmos whither he was banished by Domitian in or about the year of our Lord 96 after which he wrote his Gospel upon his return from Patmos to Ephesus And Died in the Year 98 or 99 under Trajanus And Ignatius died a Martyr under the same Emperour Trajan in the Year of our Lord 107. So that there is no great distance in time And if we should miss a year or two it is not material How long before his death Ignatius wrote his Epistle to the Magnesians we are not sure nor is it material Now in that his Epistle to the Magnesians even according to the genuine Edition published by Bishop Usher out of an ancient Manuscript not that which is justly suspected to be interpolated he doth earnestly exhort them not to Iudaize but to live as Christians Si enim usque nunc secundum Iudaismum vivimus confitemur gratiam non recepisse And as to the Sabbath in particular Non amplius Sabbatizantes sed secundum Dominicam viventes in qua vita nostra orta est Not any longer observing the Iewish Sabbath but the Lords Day on which Christ our Life 〈…〉 is manifest therefore that within 8 or 10 years after 〈…〉 writing the Lords day did not signify the Jewish Sabbath but the first day of the week on which our Saviour Rose again and that it was then observed in contradistinction to the Jewish Sabbath I forbear to mention his Epistle ad Trallianos where again we have 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 applied to the first day of the week on which Christ rose again because it is in that Edition which is suspected to be Interpolated I might to this add the Testimony of Polycarp who was also a Disciple of St. Iohn and collected and published these Epistles of Ignatius and may be presumed to understand what St. Iohn meant by the Lords day But I shall add in the next place that of Iustin Martyr whom though I cannot call a Disciple of St. Iohn because he was not converted to the Christian Religion till about the Year of our Lord 129 about Thirty years after St. Iohn's Death yet he lived so soon after that he could not be ignorant of the Christians Practise and what they understood St. Iohn to mean by the Lords Day And how that day was observed in Iustin's time he tells us in what is called his Second Apology 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and a little after 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 On that day commonly called Sunday there is held a Congregation or a general Meeting together of all Inhabitants whether of City or Country and there are publickly read the Memorials or Monuments of the Apostles or the Writings of the Prophets c. And again The day called Sunday we do all in common make 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Meeting-day for that the First-day is it on which God from Darkness and Matter made the World and our Saviour Iesus Christ did on the same day rise from the dead In which places though it be not called dominica but dies solis yet how it was then solemnly observed in memory of our Lord Christs Resurrection is evident 'T is manifest therefore that the Lords day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dominica or Dies Dominicus was the known name of a day so called when St. Iohn wrote his Revelation That it was a day of Religious Worship contradistinguished to that of the Iewish Sabbath so observed and so called by St. Iohn's Disciple Ignatius within 8 or 10 years at most after St. Iohn's writing that Book Which he would not have done if he
had not thought it to be so meant by his Master St. Iohn 〈…〉 manner it was observed in their solemn religious assemblies Iustin Martyr tells us within â—0 years after that and that it was otherwise called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sunday And that Dominica or Dies Dominicus hath been so used not onely by the Ancient Christian Writers Ignatius Clemens Irenaeus Origen Tertullian c. but by the Councils and Church History all along hath been so often shewed by divers and is to be seen by any who please to consult them as is not to be doubted by any unless we would under the notion of Tradition deny all History which in a plain matter of Fact were very unreasonable Nor can he shew that the name of the Lords day ever was however it might have been as he thinks attributed to the Iewish Sabbath And therefore to tell us that this name is stollen from the Iewish Sabbath to be applied to ours is such a Fansy as may be laughed at but doth not deserve a serious Answer Sure we are that the Christian Sabbath hath been long in possession of that Name but that ever the Iewish Sabbath was so there is no evidence Therefore the Theft must be on his side who steals it from us to give it to the Jewish Sabbath But he tells us that our Saviour himself observed the Jewish Sabbath And I suppose he did so And that he was Circumcised also and did observe the Ceremonial Law But it was before his Death and Resurrection I do not find that he observed it afterward But he says after Christs Death when he had said It is finished he kept the Sabbath in the Grave Be it so if that were keeping a Sabbath And the good Women rested on that day according to the Commandment And why not Since Christ was not yet risen nor was the day yet changed or pretended so to be This therefore is but Whimsey and nothing to the purpose We all agree that till the Resurrection of Christ the Jews observed the Jewish Sabbath on what they called the Seventh-day of their Week But whether or no it were a Seventh from the Creation we cannot tell 'T is more to the purpose what he tells us that Paul and other Christians did after Christs Resurrection seem to observe the Jewish Sabbath Going to the Temple and to the Synagogues on the Sabbath-day meaning thereby the Iewish Sabbath And it is true They did so go But I answer 1. So they did on other days as well as on the Sabbath and in other places as well as in the Synagogue and the Temple Act 5. 42. Dayly in the Temple and in every house or from house to house 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈…〉 they ceased not to preach Iesus Christ. And Act. 2. 46. they continued dayly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with one accord in the Temple 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and breaking bread at home or from house to house As to such duties of Worship as were common to them with the Jews they took the opportunity of joining therein with them whether on their Sabbath or on any other day but as to what was peculiarly Christian this they performed in separate meetings from them breaking their Bread at home 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or from house to house The Sacrament of the Lords Supper being peculiarly a Christian service they did celebrate in their houses or separate places of meeting And so we find it at Troas and on the first day of the week Act. 20. 7. on the first day of the week when the Disciples were met to break bread Paul preached c. Their meeting for this Christian service was in a separate place and on another day from that of the Iewish service And Paul at Athens Act. 17. 17. he disputed in the Synagogue with the Jews and with the devout persons and in the Market Dayly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He took the opportunity of publick meetings whether in the Synagogues or elsewhere whether on the Sabbath or any other day to preach Christ to them whether Jews or Greeks Which doth not prove that they did then take the seventh day to be the Christian Sabbath any more than our going to Hear or Preach a Week-day Lecture suppose on Thursday would prove that we take Thursday to be our Sabbath or Paul's Preaching on Mars-hill or in the Market-place would prove that he took these places to be the Temple or Synagogue He knew these to be Times and Places of concourse and therefore took the opportunity of Preaching Then and There and would so have done at any other time and place as there was occasion In season or out of season as he adviseth Timothy 2 Tim. 4. 2. He doth not deny p. 122. but that Paul did keep the Feast of the Pass-over after the Resurrection of Christ Because of what we have Act. 18. 21. He bids them farewel at Ephesus saying I must by all means keep this Feast that cometh at Jerusalem but I will return again unto you if God will Which Feast he thinks to be that of the Pass-over though it be not named But whether that or whatever Feast of the Jews it be it is all one as to our business How great a proof would this have been for the Seventh-day-Sabbath if it had been said I must by all means keep the Sabbath 'T is said indeed he did on the Sabbath-day go into the Synagogue but so he did on other days but not that he kept the Sabbath-day much less that he must by all means Keep it Or that he must by all means take a journey from Ephesus to Ierusalem rather than not keep it though he were to return thither again Yet this Author doth not for all this think the Law for the Iewish Pass-over to be then in force But onely that Paul took occasion to be there at that publick great concourse of People to preach Christ to the multitude For that the Apostles were under no obligation to keep that feast of the Pass-over after the death of Christ is to him he says past doubt And why may not we say the same of his going into the Synagogue on the Sabbath day rather than miss such an oportunity of a publick concourse which was a less journey than from Ephesus to Ierusalem though under no obligation to keep the Iewish Sabbath more than to keep the Iews Pass-over 2. But I answer further The Jews who were not Christians did yet continue to observe the Jewish Sabbath as a matter of duty And there was no reason why they should not For while they did not acknowledge our Christ to be the Messiah nor the Mosaick Law to be at an end but Circumcision and the Jewish Oeconomy yet in force there was no reason why they should not think themselves obliged to the Jewish Sabbath And many of the Christian Jews who were not yet satisfied of the Abolition of the Mosaick Law did comply with them therein
to Us Now as it did Then to Israel I cannot assent to it For it cannot be said of all Us who are under that Law that God hath Brought us out of the land of Egypt out of the house of Bondage or that We are to expect long life in the land of Canaan which he Gave Them If he say that our deliverance from spiritual bondage is equivalent to theirs from Egypt and our land the same to us as Canaan was to them I grant it But so is our Lords Day equivalent to their seventh-day-Seventh-day-sabbath and Christ the true Manna more than equivalent to that of theirs from the raining of which they reckoned their Iewish Sabbaths As to what he says of Mat. 24. 20. Pray that your flight be not in the Winter nor on the Sabbath-day which he thinks to be understood of the Iewish Sabbath 38 years after Christs Resurrection Perhaps it may For the obstinate Jews who would not in their day understand the things that belonged to their peace but rejected Christ did no doubt continue to observe their Jewish Sabbath and thought themselves obliged so to do And it would then be as great an Affliction to them as if their Sabbath were yet in force But no more a sin to fly on that day than to fly in the Winter It would be so to the Christians if put to flight on the Christian Sabbath for the case would be the like of both and they might as well Pray against it That is Against their Flight on the Christian Sabbath as the Iews on the Iewish Sabbath This therefore makes nothing at all to his purpose He might as well argue from hence that it were a sin to labour in Winter as on the Iewish Sabbath He hath many other little excursions as little to the purpose with which I shall not trouble my self or you having fully answered what seems to me to have any appearance of Argument But he takes great pleasure to expose the Name of Sunday Yet I do not find any more fond of using it than he Not that he would be thought to like the Word but because he thinks it a Reproach If he do not like that name he may call it as we do the Lords Day the Christian Sabbath or if he think these too good names for it he may call it the First day of the Week But why not as angry with the Monday or other of the Week days If on Monday the Heathens as he would have us think did worship the Moon as the Sun on Sunday why is he not as angry with that It is as much Idolatry to worship the Moon on Monday as the Sun on Sunday True But that doth not concern the Christians Sabbath which is what he hath a mind to reproach and therefore he speaks little of the other and but seldome But Sunday is to be snubbed upon every occasion He would not have a Sabbath upon Sunday because he says on that day they worshiped the Sun But why upon Saturday if on that day as he would have us think they worshiped Saturn Now 't is true that some of the Heathen did worship the Sun and the Moon and the Host of Heaven But that they did worship the Sun more upon Sunday than they did upon Monday or Tuesday is more than I know or he can prove He tells us Verstegan says that the Heathen Saxons did so But Verstegan is too young an Author to settle this upon his own Authority unless he can bring Vouchers for it more ancient than himself It was I suppose a Fansy of Verstegan Then as it is of our Author Now But I do not remember that he cites any Author ancienter than himself And though some others may say the like Yet I look upon it but as a plausible conjecture without any good foundation in History And even the Heathen Suxons are too late for his purpose He tells us p. 88. The Heathen Nations long before Christs Birth did offer Sacrifice to the Sun and worship it as a God upon Sunday His proof is from Iob 31. 26 27 28. If I beheld the Sun when it shined or the Moon walking in brightness and my heart hath been secretly enticed or my mouth hath kissed my hand this were an iniquity to be punished by the Iudges for I should have denied the Lord above But what is all this to Sunday It may perhaps be a disclaimer of worshiping the Sun but says nothing of Sunday Doth our Author think the name of Sunday to be as old as Iob's times If Iob had said If I have worshiped the Sun upon Sunday or the Moon upon Monday and not the Lord upon Saturday it had been to his purpose But here is nothing of that Not a word of what day it was on which they worshiped the Sun But I would not have him lay too great a load upon Sunday For Hesiod tells us as was said before that in his time one of the oldest of the Heathen Writers though younger than Iob the Seventh day was Sun-day not the First And he hath nothing to shew more than the bare Name of Sunday to make us believe that those of the Heathen who worshiped the Sun did confine that worship to this day of the Week or Did more worship it on this day than on others I do not certainly know how Ancient those Names are of Saturday Sunday Monday c. nor upon what occasion they were first taken up nor is it much to our purpose The most ancient Heathen Writer whom I know to have mentioned them is Dio Cassius who lived about the Year of our Lord 230. Who speaking of the Destruction of Ierusalem and the Temple tells us that the Iews had such a reverence for Saturn's day as that they would not Labour on that day for their Defense which the Romans understanding did on that day assault them and prevailed Against their Temple and Sabbath both at once Not as if the Iews did then call it Saturn's day nor am I sure that any other did then so call it for they called it their Sabbath-day But it was that day of the Week which in Dio's time was called Saturday But Dio speaks of it as a new Thing so to call the Days of the Week and which the Ancient Greeks he tells us knew not 'T was therefore not very Ancient And therefore he supposeth the Romans to have taken it up from the Egyptians Not the Old Egyptians of Moses's time but rather from those about the time of Ptolomy not of King Ptolomy but of Claudius Ptolomaeus the Astronomer or perhaps somewhat earlier when Astronomy there flourished and from whom the Romans had it In a Christian Writer I find it earlier than Dio in Iustin Martyr's Apology written about the Year of Christ 150. who mentions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Day of the Sun as the Christian Sabbath And Tertullian in his Apology mentions Saturday and Sunday And it may perhaps be found in Writers
them with Bread from Heaven I do presume also that they did from this first raining of Manna continue a circulation of Weeks for a long time and perhaps till the time of our Saviour Yet we are not sure but that it might be intermitted in the seventy years of the Babylonish Captivity and the day forgotten and then restored a-new by Nehemiah from a new beginning Neh. 13. as he restored the Feast of Tabernacles Chap. 8. which had been intermitted from the days of Ioshua the son of Nun to that day But I rather think the memory was preserved by Tradition during those seventy years I agree also that the Church of the Jews was the most visible Church of God but I am loth to say with him p. 79. it was the whole visible Church For I presume there might be many Good men of other Nations who worshiped the true God of whom we have no History though not joined to the Jewish Church nor were that I know of obliged so to be Such was Melchizedek whoever he were not of the seed of Abraham much less of Israel And such was Iob and his Friends from divers Countries of whom were it not for the story of Iob we should have had no knowledge nor are we to think these were the onely persons of those Countries who worshiped the true God And how many such were in other Nations we cannot tell Who might if they had opportunity join as Proselites with the Iewish Church when established But I do not think they were necessarily obliged so to do or to keep the same Sabbath with them For I take it to be true even before Christs coming that God is no respecter of persons but in every nation he that feareth him and worketh righteousness is accepted with him Act. 10. 34 35. Whether Iew or Greek Rom. 2. 10 11. 1 Pet. 1. 17. Which are but Quotations from Deut. 10. 19. Nor do I find that any Nation except the Iews did observe the Iewish Sabbath But I rather take it to be a distinctive sign of them from other Nations Ex. 31. 13 17. as Circumcision and the Pass-over were which when the wall of partition was taken away ceased also Yet as to what was Moral in them the Circumcision of the heart being pointed at by that of the Flesh and the old leaven of malice and wickedness to be put away instead of that of Bread and a rest from Sin of more respect with God than that from Labour we have instead thereof Baptism in the room of Circumcision the Lords Supper in the room of the Pass-over and the Lords Day or Christian Sabbath instead of the Iewish And as that took date from the raining of Manna after their deliverance from Egypt so ours from the Resurrection of Christ the true Manna I agree also that the Apostle and other Christians even after Christs Resurrection did go to the Temple and the Jewish Synagogues on their Sabbath days and did there assist at Prayers and Reading the Law and other services common to Jews and Christians on a like account as when we now meet to hear a Sermon or keep a Fast or Thanksgiving on a Week-day But so they did as to Circumcision and other Iewish Rites As when Paul circumcised Timothy and joined in the Jewish Rites of Purification Act. 21. on account of those believing Iews who were yet zealous of the Law To testify to them that he had been misrepresented by those who said he did teach the Iews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses and that they ought not to circumcise their Children nor to walk after the Customs Whereas indeed he taught that Gentiles ought so to forbear as being a new yoke to which before they were not subject but as to the Iews which were amongst the Gentiles he did allow them if not yet satisfied of their Christian Liberty so to practise For he puts a great difference between the Gentiles and the Iews among the Gentiles of which I doubt our Author doth not take notice else he would not tell us p. 39. of Paul's writing one thing and practising another He preached and wrote against Circumcision as to the Gentiles but allowed it to the Iews and himself practised it As to Timothy a Jew but not as to Titus who was no Iew. And the like we may say as to the Iewish Sabbath on their Seventh day As to what Services were peculiarly Christian as breaking of Bread they did it not at the Temple or Synagogues but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 at home or from house to house Act. 2. 46. and on another day the first day of the Week Act. 20. 7. Now this is all that he hath to urge for the Iewish Sabbath in particular which he cannot shew to be commanded to all the World but rather to them in particular in contradistinction to the rest of the World nor that it was a Seventh day from the Creation but from the first raining of Manna For the Fourth Commandment saith nothing of this Sabbath in particular but onely of the seventh day after six days of labour As to that Imperious demand p. 40 48 64. Where is there any such Power recorded in Scripture to be given to any Man or Men whatsoever after Christ had said It is finished to alter the seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath instituted by our Lord Iesus Christ I doubt he hath forgotten that the same God who gave the Law of the Ten Commandments gave also the Ceremonial Law and if it were the Lord Iesus Christ who gave the one it was he that gave the other also And will he then ask Where is there any power recorded in scripture to be given to any man or number of men to abolish Circumcision and the rest of the Mosaick Rites instituted by the Lord Iesus Christ I know no such power recorded in Scripture to be given as to Circumcision and the rest more than as to the Iewish Sabbath And we find them both put together Col. 2. 11 16. Or will he say Where is any Power recorded in Scripture to be given to any Man or Men after Christ had said It is finished to appoint Elders and Deacons and other Officers in the Christian Church and give Orders concerning it which Christ before he so said had not given Yet we know Circumcision was abolished and such Officers and Orders given So that all this is but Flourish As to that of Christ having said It is finished whatever be meant by that we know that the whole Order and Constitution of the Christian Church was settled after that time And whatever else be signified by it it is not meant that there was nothing to be done further concerning it For if so to what purpose did Christ give Commandments to his Apostles of things pertaining to the Kingdome of God after his Resurrection if nothing were to be further done And if we consider the Apostles deportment We do not find them any where insist Authoritatively upon
a Power given them from Christ to Abrogate Circumcision or the like and thereupon to proceed pro imperio But they Argue it from the nature of the thing That what was Typical of Christ was at an end now Christ is come That what was Distinctive of the Jews from other Nations was now to cease when the partition wall was broken down That what were but shadows as to the Substantials of Religion were now to pass away as beggarly Rudiments Christ regarding the Body or Substance not the Shadows 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 these are but shadows in comparison of what Christ came to settle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 't is the Body the Substance that Christ respects Col. 2. 17. They do not Command but Argue They do no where pretend that God or Christ had given them Authority to Abrogate a Law which God had made But Argue from the nature of the thing that the Law was ceased and was not intended to Oblige longer That the Law was now Antiquated or Expired when the End for which it was made was attained That the Types were at an End when the Thing Typified was Exhibited That the Distinctive Marks were now no more of Use when Jews and Gentiles were United That the Elements or Rudiments 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which God for reasons best known to himself thought fit for the Training-up of his Church while as in a State of Minority wherein a Child though Heir of All doth little differ from a Servant should now cease when it comes to full Age Gal. 4. And to the same purpose Heb. 8. He argues that the Old Covenant was at an end when a Better Covenant was come in the room citing that of Ier. 31. Behold the days come saith the Lord when I will make a New Covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Iudah Not according to the Covenant which I made with their Fathers when I led them out of the land of Egypt For this is the Covenant that I will make That I will put my laws into their Mind and write them in their Hearts Meaning instead of an outward Ceremonial Service he would establish a service more Spiritual From whence he concludes the Antiquation of the Former In that he saith a New Covenant he hath made the first Old Now that which Decayeth and waxeth Old is ready to Vanish away They do not claim a Power to Abolish a Law of Gods making But prove by Argument that these Laws are Antiquated or Expired as not being intended by the Law-maker to bind longer than till such a time As Rom. 7. The Woman is bound by the Law to her Husband as long as he lives But if the husband be Dead she is free from the Law Not that the Law is Abolished but the Case is Altered And it is from these Considerations that he Argues against Circumcision Col. 2. 11. and the Iewish Sabbath ver 16. For as to the Substantials of the Service provided a Sabbath be duly kept it is much one whether on the Seventh or the First day Now these Substantials are he tells us p. 83. a lively spiritual Converse with the Father Son and Holy-Ghost in private Duties and publick Ordinances where they can be had and in a Holy Rest all that day saving emergent cases of Necessity and Mercy Which may be equally done on either day But as to those who were not satisfied with these Arguments if they were such as were before under those Commands he doth not urge his Authority He leaves them to practise according to their own judgment but without censuring others till they shall be better satisfied as in Rom. 14. But as to the Gentiles who had never been under these Laws the case was otherwise Which makes him argue otherwise with the Gentile Galatians Ephesians and Colossians than with the Christian Iews at Rome And as to his Question p. 47. When where and by whom it was taken away I say Then there and by the same who took away Circumcision and the other Mosaick Rites That is Fundamentally by Christ at his death who nailed them to his Cross after which they ceased to be Obligatory But Executively and Practically by his Apostles and the Christian Church according as they did leisurably and in time come to understand their Liberty All which we are to presume they did according to such directions as Christ gave them For as this Author observes p. 80. Paul in those Primitive times when the Ceremonial Law was fresh in memory and the Gospel newly preached had much a do tâ—â—e move the first converted Iews from Circumcision and other Ceremonials and so from their Iewish Sabbath therefore these things were to wear off by degrees and not to be torn from them all at once And this I think is enough to a person not prejudiced as to the Removal of the then Iewish Sabbath appointed by Moses after their coming out of Egypt on the seventh day from the first raining of Manna and not given to all the world but to be a distinctive sign of them from other Nations Now as to the other Point in Question the Observation of the Lords day I would ground that originally on the Fourth Commandment which doth appoint a Seventh day of Holy Rest after Six days of Ordinary Labour Which doth directly concern the Substantials of Worship that a Sabbath be kept and God thus served but whether on this or that day of the Seven is meerly Circumstantial and as Paul calls it a Shadow in comparison of the Body or Substance which is he tells us what Christ respects But then as to that Why the First day rather than another I answer First Here was a much more memorable Accident of Christs Resurrection than was that of Raining Manna from whence the Jewish Sabbath takes its date as the Seventh day from it not from the Creation or that of the Quails the Night before the first day that God fed them by Miracle from Heaven And therefore stands as fair for beginning such a Circulation of Weeks and Sabbaths We are told Ier. 16. 14 15. and Ier. 23 7 8. Behold the days come saith the Lord that it shall no more be said The Lord liveth that brought up the Children of Israel out of the land of Egypt But The Lordliveth that brought up the Children of Israel out of the North Country Not that the former deliverance was to be forgotten but a greater than it did make it comparatively to disappear as when the light of the Sun doth obscure that of the Moon and Stars And so here the Resurrection of Christ to be commemorated paramount to that of former Mercies Next in pursuance of this Occasion we find our Saviour did on that day of his Resurrection appear to Mary Magdalen and the other Women declaring to them the Doctrine of the Resurrection then to the two Disciples going to Emmaus Preaching to them at large the same Doctrine and Celebrating with
them the Lords Supper and afterward the same day to those assembled at Ierusalem with other Sabbatical works and solemnly Blessing that Convention And if our Author by blessing the Seventh day Gen. 2. would have us understand an Institution or Command to observe it We have as much here Christ joined in this Assembly and Blessed it For so much is intimated in that his solemn Benediction a first and second time Ioh. 20. 19 21. Peace be unto you and he Breathed on them saying Receive ye the Holy Ghost He did so a second time on the same day the next Week he Assembled with them in Religious Services and Blessed them He did according to his Promise made on that First day of his Resurrection send on them that miraculous Effusion of the Holy Ghost on the day of Pentecost which being the Fiftieth day from his Resurrection was therefore the first day of the week as was that of the Resurrection On which day of Pentecost we find them also otherwise exercised in Religious Employments and attested further by a miraculous conversion of three thousand souls We find St. Paul at Troas Act. 20. Preaching to the Disciples assembled as it seems their manner was on the first day of the week to break bread that is to celebrate the Lords Supper That such Assemblies were wont to be at Corinth on the first day of the Week the Apostle presumes or takes for granted and gives direction for a Collection to be then made 1 Cor. 16. And he had so done before as he there signifies to the Churches of Galatia presuming or taking for granted that they also did so use to meet on the first day of the Week And we have no reason to doubt but that such Meetings were wont to be in other Churches We cannot doubt but that other of the Apostles did disperse themselves in other parts of the World though we have not a like account of their Travels as we have of Paul's recorded by St. Luke But we are to presume though it be not recorded that their Doctrine and Practise was consonant to his and that accordingly they had such weekly meetings on the Lords Day as these Churches had of whom we have the History Hence that day had the name given of the Lords day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as we find it called Rev. 1. 10. as that of the Sacrament is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords Supper 1 Cor. 11. 20. which name it retaineth to this day and for such purpose And all this I think is sufficient for us to continue our Observation of the same day I am sure 't is much more than he can shew for his seventh-day Sabbath for more than two thousand five hundred years from the first Creation It is not necessary that we have express words of Command Recorded We have no Record in Scripture of such express words of Command for the Seventh-day Sabbath till after Israels coming out of Egypt nor for the Worshiping of God by Sacrifice nor for other things which yet were Duties before any Record of such express words of Command It is enough if we can otherwise Collect it to be Gods Will according to the best light we have If this Gentleman think himself obliged to keep the Jewish Sabbath also this doth not hurt us This I think was the case of the Christian Iews at first I do not much question but that they did as other Christians observe the Lords Day The doubt was whether they were not to observe also the Jewish Sabbath as before they did And these Believers who were yet zealous of the Law and thought themselves obliged together with Christianity to observe the Law of Moses did no doubt think themselves equally obliged to the Iewish Sabbath Those who thought themselves obliged to be Baptized and to be Circumcised also thought themselves in like manner obliged to observe the Lords day and also the Iewish Sabbath And till they should be better satified the Apostles permit the Iews so to do If this do not satisfy him I have yet two Expedients for him 1. Let him begin his Week on Monday and then Sunday will be the Seventh day Whether the Seventh in course from the Creation I cannot tell nor can any Man living inform me But it will at least be the Seventh day of His Week 2. If he be not satisfied with this My next Expedient is thus Let him take a Voyage round the World as Sir Francis Drake did Going out of the Atlantick Ocean West-ward by the Streights of Magellan to the East-Indies and then from the East returning by the Cape of Good Hope the usual way homeward And take with him as many as please of those who are of his mind And let them keep their Saturday-Sabbath all the way When they come home to England they will find their Saturday to fall upon our Sunday and they may thenceforth continue to observe their Saturday-Sabbath on the same day with us Which is the second Expedient If you ask How this can be I will make it very plain that so it will be and so it must be For Supposing the Earth to be Round and the Sun moving from East to West you must allow that it comes sooner to the Eastern parts than to the Western It will sooner be Noon in Holland than in England and sooner here than in Ireland If you ask How much sooner We say that Fifteen Degrees of Longitude West-ward makes it an Hour later As if he Embark about Dover Yarmouth or other Port on the East-side of England and Sail as far West-ward as the West of Ireland or a little farther it will be an Hour later and not be Noon there till it be One a Clock at the place where he Embarked And so in proportion an Hour for every Fifteen degrees And accordingly when he hath gone round the whole Circle of Three hundred and Sixty Degrees that is Four and twenty times Fifteen it will be later by Four and twenty hours That is it will be but Saturday-noon with him when it is Sundaynoon with those who staid here That is His Saturday will be Our Sunday And thenceforth his Saturday-Sabbath will be the same day with our Sunday-Sabbath ever after And this I think should fully satisfy him For he tells us p. 39. The variety of the time of the Sun-rising or setting in different Climates doth no way disturb for that a day longer or shorter is still a day and but a day Most certain it is he who shall have thus Sailed round the World will have had one day fewer than those who staid here So it was with Sir Francis Drake and his Company And so it hath been with all who have taken such a Voyage as many have done for it is not a rare case and so will be to any who shall so do What he would resolve upon this case or what he thinks Sir Francis Drake was to do when this happened I cannot
A DEFENSE OF THE Christian Sabbath In Answer to A TREATISE of Mr. Tho. Bampfield Pleading for SATURDAY-SABBATH BY IOHN WALLIS D. D. And Professor of Geometry in the University of OXFORD OXFORD Printed by L. Lichfield and are to be Sold by Chr. Coningsby at the Golden Turks-Head over against St. Dunstan's Church in Fleet-street LONDON 1692. Imprimatur IONATH EDWARDS Vice-Can OXON Sep. 17 t. 1692. A DISCOURSE Concerning The Christian Sabbath SIR Iune 12. 1692. I Had a while since a Book sent me by the Carrier I know not well from whom of Mr. Thomas Bampfield which in the Title-Page is said to be Printed for the Author 1692. It is Concerning the Sabbath Which he thinks should rather be Observed on what we call Saturday than on what we call Sunday I should not on this Account give any Disturbance to the Peace or Practise of the Church where I live so that a Sabbath be duly Observed as to the Substantials of it though perhaps not upon what day I should chuse For I do not know and I believe no man living can tell me whether what we now call Sunday be a First a Second a Third or a Seventh day in a continued Circulation of Weeks from the Creation And what it is impossible for me to know I think will be no Crime to be Ignorant of Nor hath this Author any other way than common Tradition on which he is not willing that we should lay weight whereby to guess which is the First or which is the Seventh day in such a Circulation of Weeks either from the Creation or even from Christ's Time I am sufficiently satisfied that we ought to keep a Sabbath that is a day of Holy Rest after Six days of ordinary Labour according to the Fourth Commandment and this in a continued Course or Circulation But I am not certain nor can I be which is a First or a Seventh day in such a Circulation of Weeks from the Creation And therefore shall content my self to observe that day which I find observed in the Church where I live In Old England I observe the Sabbath which here I find And if I were in New-England I would observe the Sabbath which I find observed there Though I think it may be disputable whether they and we may be said to observe the same day the First Meridian passing between them and us And yet I would not advise to have it changed in either Now I can hardly think that God hath laid the great stress of so weighty a Point as whereon the main of Gods publick Worship doth much depend on such a Circumstance as is impossible for us to know and of which we may be modestly ignorant I should rather think that what Christ says of the Place Ioh. 4. 21 23 The hour cometh when ye shall neither in this Mountain nor in Ierusalem worship the Father but the true worshipers shall worship the Father in Spirit and in Truth is in good measure true of the Time also And as it is not so material whether in this or that Place God be Worshiped so he be Worshiped Aright so neither is it so material whether on this or that day as that a Sabbath or day of Holy Rest be duly kept The publick Worship of God was then in great measure confined to the Temple not indifferently in any place within thy Gates but in the place which the Lord thy God shall chuse to put his name there Deut. 16. 6 11 15 16. For which any other place may now be as well assigned that men pray every where lifting up holy hands c. 1 Tim. 2. 8. Privately in private places and Publickly in places appointed for the publick And I do not think we are now more confined to the Iewish Sabbath than to the Iewish Temple This premised I can agree with this Author in many things by him discussed I agree that Our Lord Iesus Christ according to his Divinity was God and is so the true God the God that made Heaven and Earth the God who delivered the Law upon Mount Sinai For though we do acknowledge in the Godhead a Trinity of Persons Father Son and Holy Ghost whereof Christ according to his Divinity is called the Second Person the Son of God or God the Son yet those Three Persons are but One God Nor do I know any other true God but One The God that made Heaven and Earth The Lord Iehovah The God of Abraham Isaac and Iacob The Lord God of Israel The Lord their God who brought them out of the Land of Egypt out of the House of Bondage and besides whom we are to have no Other God The God who delivered the Law to them on Mount Sinai And I do agree that Our Lord Iesus Christ is as to his Divinity this God the True God the onely true God and that he was so before his Incarnation How far each of those Actions are to be ascribed to this or that Person of the Trinity we need not be over solicitous What in the New Testament is more peculiarly ascribed to this or that of the Three Persons is in the Old Testament wont to be ascribed to God indefinitely without such particular application the doctrine of the Trinity being then not so distinctly discovered But I cannot agree that Christ as God and Man in contradistinction to the Father and Holy Ghost did all those things for he was not then Man I agree with him also that God who made the World in Six days Rested the Seventh day Gen. 2. 23. Exod. 20. 11. And that he Blessed the Sabbath day and Hallowed it And that accordingly he hath appointed after Six days of ordinary Labour Man should observe a Seventh day of Holy Rest and this in a continued succession But I should rather say that our Lord Iesus Christ is according to his Divinity that God who Blessed the Seventh day Gen. 2. than that the God who Blessed the Sabbath day is the Lord Iesus Christ as he doth p. 64. and elsewhere very often seeming to lay great stress upon it For he was not then the Lord Christ God and Man nor did he bless it as Christ but as God in Union with the Father and Holy Ghost not as contradistinguished from them I agree also that the Law of the Sabbath is one of the Decalogue or Ten Commandments delivered to Israel on Mount Sinai Ex. 20. But I am willing to think it was a Law before Not only because we find it observed Exod. 16. before the giving of the Law on Mount Sinai Ex. 20. but especially because of that in Gen. 2. 3. God blessed the Seventh day and Sanctified it because in it he rested from all his Work And those who are most averse to the Morality as it is wont to be called or the Perpetuity of the Sabbath or Day of Holy Rest and are yet very zealous for the Holiness of Places would be very fond of it if they could find so clear
nearer to him He may perhaps tell us though I do not find he doth that the Jews did certainly keep their Weekly Sabbath at the time of our Saviours death on what they called the Seventh day If not on the Seventh day of the Week from the Creation of which we can have no certainty at lest on the Seventh day of the Week as the Weeks were then reckoned which I readily grant him and that they had so done for a long time before and perhaps from the time of giving the Law on Mount Sinai And it may be so for ought I know but we cannot be certain And what was then called the First day of the Week was another day from what they called the Seventh which I admit also And that what they called the Seventh day is now what we call Saturday and what they called the First day is what we now call Sunday But this I say is more than he or I know He may think so and so do I but I am not sure of it The reason why I think so is because I think that Christ or his Apostles according to Christs direction did remove the observation of the Sabbath from the Seventh to the First day of the Week and that we have ever since kept the Sabbath as they did for I do not know that it hath been since altered and as we now keep it on Sunday so I believe they did and therefore think that our Sunday is what they called the First day And if the Apostles did then remove it from their Seventh day to their First day I presume they had direction from Christ so to do who after his Resurrection shewed himself to them for Fourty days giving Commandments to his Apostles speaking to them of things pertaining to the Kingdom of God Acts 1. 2 3. And therefore what they did afterwards in settling the Christian Church they did we are to presume according to such Directions and Commandments of Christ and this in particular of so removing the Observation of the Sabbath day if they did remove it as I think was done by his Authority who was Lord of the Sabbath day Matth. 12. 8. Luk. 6. 5. But if they did not so remove it I do not know that it hath since been changed For I think we keep the same Sabbath which they did and that the Christian Church hath ever since so done and doth pretend so to have done by a constant Tradition ever since And we therefore think our Sunday to be their First day of the Week because we think their Sabbath so to have been But if we mistake in that Tradition we are For ought I know accordingly mistaken in thinking Sunday to be their First day For we have nothing but Tradition for either And then for ought he can shew by better than Tradition to the Contrary our Sunday may be their Seventh day And then he hath no pretense to quarel with it If he say the Jews do at this day keep Saturday as their Seventh day I confess they do But they do no more know which is the Seventh day than we which is the First day And because they find that Christians generally take Sunday to be what was before called the First day they do accordingly take Saturday to be their Seventh day But their Tradition is of no greater Authority than ours All depending upon this that our Sunday being that Sabbath which we think Christ or his Appostles did appoint we take it to be the First day because Christ or his Apostles by Christs directions did remove the observation of the Sabbath to that day He 'l say perhaps I do not my self think our Sunday to be their Seventh day And then why should not our Sabbath be on Saturday as theirs was 'T is true I do not think our Sunday to be their Seventh day And I have told you the reason why I do not think it Because I think Christ or his Apostles did change the day and for that reason only And for the same reason I think our Sabbath should be as now it is and as I think it hath been ever since But if I be mistaken in it I may be mistaken in the other also But either way Sunday is yet to be our Sabbath He says It is no where expresly said in Scripture that the Apostles did thus change it True and 't is no where said in Scripture that our Sunday is not their Seventh day It may be the same for ought I know and for ought he knows if it were not then changed Though because I think the day was then changed I do therefore think it is not the same And if it were not changed then all the difference is that what they called the Seventh day of their Week we call the First day of our Week Which if the Author do not like he may call Monday the First day and then Sunday will be the Seventh as it was before But I say further There be many things even as to the Worship of God which we may reasonably think to have been done though it be not expresly said so but only to be collected by consequence from what is said 'T is no where said expresly that after the First Sabbath of God himself Gen. 2. 2. any other Sabbath was ever kept before that in Exod. 16. which was above Two Thousand and Five Hundred Years after Yet this Author would have us think it was observed all that while and that it was commanded so to be which yet is no where said expresly But a slight presumption it seems may serve his turn but not ours 'T is known that God was Worshiped by Sacrifices very early at least as early as that of Cain and Abel and that this Worship was accepted of God at least that of Abel And therefore I suppose this Author would have us think it was Commanded not a meer Will-worship without any Direction or Institution from God Yet we are no where told of any such Command or Institution We may say the like of Iacob's consecrating a Pillar by pouring Oyl upon it Gen. 28. 18. though we do not find mention before that time of any direction for any such Consecration of things or persons by Anointing or Pouring on of Oyl We have also reason to think there was some Command from God that the Fire for Incense should be taken from the Altar or somewhat of like nature else Nadab and Abihu would not have been destroyed for Offering strange Fire Yet we are no where told expresly of any such Command We have no particular Command that I know of for Baptizing of Infants nor any particular mention in Scripture of any such Baptized Yet I do not know that this Author would have us thence infer that none such were baptized or that they ought not so to be Nor have we any express mention of Womens receiving the other Sacrament nor any express Command for their so doing any more than for Females
Convocation no manner of Work shall be done in them save that which every man shall eat that is they are to be kept as a Sabbath or day of Holy Rest ver 15 16. From the Fourteenth day at evening till the One and Twentieth day at evening ver 18. that is from the Fourteenth day at Midnight till the One and Twentieth at Mid-night And in like manner Lev. 23. 32. from Even to Even or Night to Night that is from Mid-night to Mid-night or from the end of one Evening to the end of the next Evening So in Levit. 23. 5. and Numb 28. 16 17. In the Fourteenth day of the First month is the Pass-over of the Lord and in the fifteenth day of this month is the feast Seven days shall unleavened bread be eaten c. Where it is manifest that the fourteenth day which is the Lords Pass-over is another day from the fifteenth which is the first day of the Feast For I will pass through the land of Egypt saith God this night that is the night of the Fourteenth day and will smite all the first born in the land of Egypt Ex. 12. 12. And what time of the night it was we are told ver 28. And it came to pass at Midnight the Lord smote all the first born of the land of Egypt And to the same purpose Moses tells Pharaoh chap. 11. 4 5 6 7 Thus saith the Lord About Mid-night will I go out into the midst of Egypt And the first born of the land of Egypt shall dy from the first born of Pharaoh c. that ye may know that the Lord hath put a difference between the Egyptians and Israel So that the fourteenth day which was the Lords Pass-over continued till the Mid-night of that day and then began the fifteenth day which was the first day of the Feast Than which I think nothing can be more clear And Num. 33. 3. The fifteenth day of the first month is the morrow after the Pass-over In like manner Deut. 16. 6. Thou shalt Sacrifice the Pass-over at even at the going down of the Sun that is after the going down of the Sun or when the Sun is gone down at the season that thou camest forth out of Egypt which was about Mid-night Ex. 12. 21. Ex. 11. 4. What he offers from Gen. 1. 5. is easily answered The evening and the morning were the first day and so of the other days Whence he would have it thought that the day is to begin at the begining of the Evening Or as the Margin tells us it is in the Hebrew the evening was and the morning was the first day Or there was evening and there was morning day one for in such order the words stand in the Hebrew Or and was evening and was morning day one That is there was in the first day and so in the rest evening and morning or darkness and light And the Dark is put first because beginning the day from Midnight the dark is before the Light And by day one is meant the first day And it was moreover very agreable so to reckon For supposing Paradise the principal seat of Action the Sun may reasonably be supposed to be Created in the middle of the Fourth day Gen. 1. 16. in the Meridian of that place as in its greatest Splendor or if not in the Meridian of that place it must needs be in the Meridian of some place and wherever that be the day of 24 hours being there half past it must have begun at Mid-night foregoing And I doubt not but a Child born on Saturday night at Ten a Clock was to be Circumcised the next Saturday as being the Eighth day not on the Sunday after I have insisted the longer on this because I find him afterward moving another question about what time the Sabbath is to begin and end and lays great stress upon it as we shall see anon Of which I think we need not be further solicitous than to begin and end this day according as other days are accounted to begin and end in the places where we live I do not think the Fourth Commandment to descend to these Punctilio's But if he think it necessary to be more curious in it I take it to be very plain from what I have said that at the time of Christs Death and Resurrection it was accounted to begin very early in the morning while it was dark and continue till very late at night according as we now account our days from Midnight to Mid-night But I go on We have now found our Saviours Example as to the two First Sundays from his Resurrection if at least their first day of the Week be our Sunday imploying the day in Religious Exercises and Sabbatical Affairs with his Disciples How many more Sundays he so spent with them we cannot tell Which Examples of his Two first with their Imitation of him in others after of which we are to speak by and by and the Churches practise ever since looks so like the Celebration and Institution of a Christian Sabbath or day of Holy Rest and Religious Exercise as that we may warrantably do the like I am sure it is more than he can shew for the Saturday Sabbath in Gen. 2. 3. Save that men are apt to think a small thing an Institution and Ius Divinum for what they fansy but as to what they do not nothing will serve but Full Express Words We have next clear Evidence of a like Practise consonant to this Example in Act. 20. 7. On the first day of the Week when the Disciples came together to break bread Paul Preached unto them ready to depart on the morrow and continued his Speech until Mid-night Which is so plain that he is much put to his shifts to avoid it That here is a Religious Assembly of the Disciples he doth not deny Paul was Preaching very late even till Mid-night and they met to break bread which I think is generally agreed by Interpreters to signify the Celebration of the Lords Supper and I know not well what clearer Character we need demand of a Religious meeting for Worship sutable to the Work of a Sabbath or Holy Rest. And it was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which I think he will not deny though he seem to cavil at it to signify on the first day of the Week But he excepts that the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here translated Preached is elsewhere render'd Reasoned or Discoursed Be it so and if that word will please him better let it be so here he reasoned discoursed treated or did hold forth that I think will not alter the case and he continued or held on 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this Discourse this Speech this Sermon 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sermonem till Mid-night he held on this holding forth till Mid-night which I take to be the same with what we now call Preaching or very like it 't was a long continued discourse to a
the Feast of Unleavened Bread For though it were the fourteenth day at evening yet it was the fourteenth day not the fifteenth And Luke 23. 54. the evening after our Saviours Crucifixion on the sixth day when it was late at night as was shewed before and must be according to the story of what had been done before that time was yet but the preparation not the Sabbath the Seventh day being not yet begun For so we have it it was the preparation and the Sabbath drew on And the Women were then preparing their Spices and Oyntments yet rested the Sabbath day according to the Commandment So that the Sabbath day was not yet begun nor was it ended when the evening of the next day began but on the morning of the day following as was shewed above And as we shewed at large before the first day of the Week on which Christ rose began very early in the morning while it was dark and continued the same day till very late at night And this is the constant Language of the New Testament every where So that when the Congregation of Christians Acts 20. 7. did on the first day of the week assemble to break Bread and Paul Preached to them continuing his Sermon till Mid-night this must needs be on what we call Sunday and the morning following was Munday morning not Sunday morning as this Author would have it 'T is manifest therefore that there was a Religious Assembly of the Christian Congregation at Troas on the First day of the Week for celebration of the Lords Supper and Preaching and Paul with them Which I take to be the celebration of a Christian Sabbath However this he says is but One Instance True this is but one But we have heard of more before and shall hear of more by and by But this one is more than he can shew for more than Two Thousand Five Hundred Years from God's resting on the Seventh day Gen. 2. 3. till after Israel was come out of Egypt Ex. 16. during which time he would have us think the Seventh-day Sabbath was constantly observed And if he could shew any one such instance of Enoch Noah Abraham or other where such a Religious Assembly for the Worship of God was held on the seventh day in course from the Creation he would think his point well proved though no more were said of it than is of this Whereas now as to the time from thence to the Floud he brings no other proof but that Abel and Enoch and Noah were good men as no doubt they were and therefore it is to be presumed they kept a Sabbath and that upon the seventh day Which is to beg the question not to prove it From thence till Israels going into Egypt all that he brings to prove this matter of fact is but that of Gen. 13. 6. where speaking of Abram and Lot with the multitude of their Cattel it is said the land was not able to bear them that they might Dwell together for their substance was great so that they could not Dwell together and there was a strife between the Herd-men of Abrams Cattle and the Herd-men of Lots Cattle c. They could not Dwell together that is saith he they could not Rest together that is they could not keep a Sabbath together therefore he concludes they did use to keep a sabbath and that Sabbath was the seventh day in course from the Creation And is not this a goodly proof I should think if he would put a stress on the word Rest it should rather signify they could not live quietly together without their herd-mens quarrelling about their Pasture for so it follows in the next words there was a strife between their herds-men From thence till after their coming out of Egypt he brings no other proof but that of Ex. 5. 4 5. Where when Moses and Aaron had been pressing Pharaoh to let Israel go three days Iourney into the Wilderness to keep a Feast and Sacrifice to the Lord their God Pharaoh replies Wherefore do ye Lett or hinder the People from their Work you make them rest from their Burdens or you take them off from their Work that is says he you make them keep a Sabbath For the Word or Verb there Translated you make them Rest is he tells us a derivative from another Verb which signifies to Rest from which Verb the word Sabbath is also derived They did therefore Rest saith he that is keep a Sabbath and that Sabbath was every Week and it was on the seventh day in course from the Creation Alas how little do either or both of these places prove of what he would have to be granted him thence He tells us sometimes there were other Sabbaths besides that of the seventh day I am sure there were other Restings If Moses and Aaron had desired Pharaoh to excuse them from their Work one day in seven that on such day they might serve the Lord their God it would have looked like an Argument But when it is to go three days into the Wilderness to keep a Feast to the Lord what is this to a Weekly Sabbath This Seventh-day sabbath so runs in the mind of this Author that if any where he can lay hold of the word Rest it must presently prove a Seventh-day-sabbath Else who would have thought that because Abram and Lot could not dwell quietly together therefore they must needs keep a Sabbath and that upon the seventh day and in course from the Creation And the like of the Israelites in Egypt because Moses and Aaron are said to hinder them from their work Therefore they did constantly keep a weekly Sabbath and that upon the seventh day in course from the Creation He might have to better purpose alleged Pharaoh's seven fat kine and seven lean ones and the seven full Ears of Corn and seven empty for here we have the number seven signalized only these were Seven Years not Seven Days and the like of Nebuchadnezzar's being seven years turned out to the Beasts of the field Dan. 4. 25 32 33. Or that of the Clean Beasts and Fowls coming into the Ark by sevens Gen. 7. 2 3. But what is more to his purpose and which he should not have missed is that of Gen. 7. 4. and Gen. 8. 10 12. where we have the interval of seven days particularly mentioned For yet seven days and I will cause it to rain upon the Earth c. Chap. 7. 4. where God gives to Noah just a Weeks warning of the time when the Floud should begin during which interval if those days were Sabbath days he might remove himself and what was necessary into the Ark before the next Sabbath And toward the end of the Floud Noah sends out the Dove Chap. 8. 8. And he staid seven days and again sent forth the Dove ver 10. And he staid yet other seven days and sent forth the Dove c. ver 12. Where we have the Dove sent out three
And if it had been on the seventh day how great a proof would this have been with him for a Seventh-day Sabbath This I take to be a Christian Sabbath and within the prospect of the Fourth Commandment And though it be not expresly called a Sabbath to avoid confusion or ambiguity because the word Sabbath in common speech was then appropriated to the Jewish Sabbath yet it is the same thing And if he doubt whether the Feast of Pentecost were on the First day of the Week as was that of the Resurrection he may be satisfied from Levit. 23. 15. where that Feast is appointed After mention made of the Pass-over ver 5. c. Moses proceeds to that of the Wave-offering v. 10 11. When ye be come into the land which I give unto you and shall reap the harvest thereof then shall ye bring a sheaf of the first-fruits of your harvest unto the Priest and he shall Wave the sheaf before the Lord to be accepted for you on the morrow after the Sabbath the Priest shall wave it Whether by the Sabbath here mentioned be meant the Weekly Sabbath or the first day of the Feast of Unleavened-Bread is not material because in that year whereof we are speaking this first day of the Feast was on the Weekly Sabbath as is manifest from the story of Christs Crucifixion which was on the Sixth day of the Week and the next day being the Seventh day was the Feast of the Pass-over and the morrow after this Sabbath was the day of Christ's Resurrection as well as of the Wave-offering And then he proceeds ver 15 16 to the Feast of Pentecost or the Feast of Weeks Ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the Sabbath from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the Wave-offering seven Sabbaths shall be compleat even unto the morrow after the seventh Sabbath shall ye number Fifty days inclusively taken as the manner is in Scripture reckoning and must needs be so here It was called the Feast of Pentecost or the Feast of Weeks as Deut. 16. 9 10. which Feast of Pentecost was the morrow after the Sabbath on a first day of the Week And on this first day of the Week the morrow after the seventh day Sabbath here was a solemn Assembly for Religious Worship and a very large one both of Jews and Gentiles out of every nation under Heaven Parthians Medes Elamites c. And this solemnized by a Miraculous Effusion of the Holy Ghost in the gift of Tongues For we all hear say those of that great assembly every one in our own Tongue where in we were born the wonderful Works of God ver 6 7 8 9 10 11 12. With a long Sermon of Peter's on that occasion Which I take to be another celebration of the First day Sabbath and a very eminent one We are to observe also that in some of the places alleged to this purpose though but single instances there is an intimation of a frequent usage As in that Act. 20. ◠On the first day of the week the disciples being assembled to break bread Paul preached c. Is a fair intimation that on the first day they did use so to assemble If it were said amongst us About six a clock when they were come together in the College-Hall to supper such a thing happened Any unprejudiced person would take it for a fair intimation that they used to suppe about six a clock And if this Author could any where find in the book of Iob that On the seventh day of the week from the Creation when Iob and his friends were assembled for the joint service of God Bildad spake thus c. He would take this for a strong proof that the seventh-day Sabbath was then wont to be observed Much stronger than what he allegeth to that purpose Abram and Lot had each of them so many Cattel that they could not dwell or rest together without quarrellings amongst their servants And that of what Pharaoh said to Moses and Aaron Why do you Hinder their work you make the people Rest from their burthens A like place is that of 1 Cor. 16. 1 2. Nov concerning the Collection for the Saints as I have given order to the Churches of Galatia even so do ye and what that was we are told in the next words Upon the first day of the week let every one of you lay by him in store as God hath prospered him that there be no gatherings when I come If it had been so said to 〈◊〉 to 〈◊〉 or to Iob Upon the Seventh day of the week do this or thus what a strong proof would this have been for the Observation of a seventh day Sabbath I think it is plain from hence that the First day of the week was weekly observed and was wont to be so observed both by the Church of Corinth and by the Churches of Galatia For So Paul doth not here advise it but suppose it or take it for granted What that order was to the Churches of Galatia our Author says he cannot tell 〈◊〉 thought it had been plain enough he bids the Corinthians do as he had bid the Galatians that is on the First day of the Week c. What further order he had given the Galatians it is not as to this point necessary for us to know But saith he if they must on that day lay by as God hath blessed them then they must on that day cast up their accounts tell their mony reckon their stock compute their Expenses c. which are not Sabbath-day Works A wise objection As though all this could not as well be done before so far as is necessary and on Sunday put so much into the poor mans box or give to the Deacons or Collectors as upon such account they should have found fit like as is now done in our Churches when there is occasion for such Collections Why doth he not make the same exception to that of Deut. 16. 10. concerning the Feast of Pentecost where they are to bring a tribute of a free-will-offering which says he thou shalt give unto the Lord thy God c. according as the Lord thy God hath blessed thee Doth he think that on the day of Pentecost which was to be strictly observed as a Sabbath a holy Convocation and no servile work to be done Lev. 23 1. they must cast up their accounts tell their money c. because they were to offer according as the Lord hath blessed them I think not But here comes in again his former trifling objection of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whether it signify the first day of the Week Yet I am very confident himself doth really believe it doth here so signify and as to his own thoughts doth not doubt of it But perhaps thinks it a piece of wit or skill in Greek thus to object against his own judgment Yet since he will have it so and we must come again to Childs play I
For knowing this to have been a law once and not yet being fully satisfied that it was expired they were content still to observe it And if our Gentleman be of that mind I would not hinder him if a Jew from so doing but neither would I incourage him And I find the Apostles willing to connive at it and even to countenance it Not as a thing necessary but at least allowable And though they did not think fit to bring a new Yoke upon the Gentiles who had not before been obliged to the Jewish Law and therefore would not allow the Gentiles to be Circumcised as appears by S. Paul's Epistle to the Galatians and the Decrees of the Synod at Ierusalem Act. 15. yet he allowed the Iews to practise it to whom it had once been a Law and accordingly Circumcised Timothy Act. 16. because though his Father were a Greek yet his Mother was a Jew but he did not Circumcise Titus Gal. 2. 3. for whom there was not the same reason And he did himself comply with the Iewish ceremonies As Act. 18. 18. Having shorn his head in Canchrea For he had a vow And those of Purification Act. 21. Not that he thought those Laws now obliging but because many of the believing Iews were yet zealous of the Law and thought themselves obliged by it he would not give offense to them For he was satisfied as to himself that Circumcision availeth nothing nor Uncircumcision 1 Cor. 7. 19. Gal. 6. 15. But was content till by time and further instruction they should be better satisfied that each one should be gratified as to their own practise according to their own sentiments as to things yet disputable And accordingly as to eating or not eating things forbidden by Moses's Law his advise was to the Romans many of whom were Jews Rom. 14. 17. Let not him that eateth not judge him that eateth as breaking a Law which he thinks to be yet in force nor let him that eateth despise him that eateth not as a fool that doth not understand his own liberty for the kingdom of God is not meat and drink c. And in like manner those at Ierusalem Act. 15. though they did not think fit to bring a new Yoke of Circumcision upon the Gentiles to whom before it had not been a Law yet do advise them to forbear things strangled and bloud because this had once been a Law to all the Sons of Noah Gen. 9. 4. Not but that this was even now antiquated but to avoid offense because it had once been a Law For I take even those things to fall under these Generals The kingdom of God is not meat and drink but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Ghost Rom. 14. 17. and every creature of God is good 1 Tim. 4. 4. I know and am perswaded that there is nothing unclean of it self But All things indeed are pure Rom. 14. 14 20. Tit. 1. 15. Meat commendeth us not to God for neither if we eat are we the better as making use of our lawful liberty neither if we eat not in compliance with those who be unsatisfied are we the worse 2 Cor. 8. 8. So that the Practise of the Apostles or of the Church at that time in compliance with the Jews as to what had before been a Law but now was not is no argument that the thing was then obligatory as before it had been but onely an argument of their condescension in things of a middle nature rather than to give offense to those who were therein unsatisfied according to that principle of his All things are lawful for me but all things are not expedient 1 Cor. 10. 23. To give no offense either to Iew or Gentile or to the Church of God ver 32 33. To the Iews I became as a Iew To the weak I became as weak I am made all things to all men 1. Cor. 9. 19. In so much that even in those things which he knew to be lawful yet rather than give offense to a weak brother he would forbear If meat make my brother to offend or be an offense to a brother I will eat no flesh while the world standeth left I maâ—â— my Brother to offend And the like I suppose as to the Iewish Sabbath He that regardeth a day regardeth it to the Lord and he that regardeth not the day to the Lord he doth not regard it He that eateth eateth to the Lord for he giveth God thanks and he that eateth not to the Lord he eateth not and giveth God thanks Rom 14. 6. Where 't is manifest that he doth parallel the observing or not observing a day than questionable with the abstaining from meats disputable that is from such as before were unlawful but now ceased so to be though all were not yet therein satisfied And though it be not expresly said what was the Day thus in question yet it is most likely to be that of the Iewish Sabbath For that the first day of the Week or Christian Sabbath was now observed seems very plain and whether the Iewish Sabbath should be observed also was the question And those who were for continuing Circumcision and the Mosaick Ceremonies were doubtless for that also And the Apostles Rule was for a mutual condescension as to the Jews for each to follow their own sentiments therein without censuring one another But as to the Gentiles he seems to be of another mind And therefore to the Galatians who were most of their Gentile-Christians he would not so much as allow the practise of Circumcision which to the Jews he did and tells them that if they be Circumcised Christ profiteth them nothing and he that is Circumcised is debtor to the whole Law Gal. 5. 2 3. For it was a renouncing Christ who had made them Free putting themselves under the Jewish Yoke to which even before they were not subject And therefore to these he speaks more warmly Gal. 1. 6 7. I marvel that you are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another Gospel Which is not another or there being no other Gospel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where as there is not any other Gospel onely there be some that trouble you and would pervert the Gospel of Christ. And such are those who would bring on them a new Yoke by making that a Duty which God had not made so Where he presseth them to keep close to the Gospel of Christ as by him delivered without any connexion of Moses's Law there being indeed no other Gospel but that and they who teach them otherwise do pervert the Gospel the true Gospel of Christ including no obligation to the Jewish Law either as to Circumcision or the difference of meats or other particulars of that Law as he argues in the second third and fourth Chapters shewing that even those who were before under it are now freed from it and they much more who were never under it And thereupon
Chap. 4. 9 10 11. he rebukes them severely that after they had known God or rather were known of God they should turn again to the weak and beggarly rudiments or elements Ye observe saith he days and months and times and years I am afraid of you lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain 'T is not indeed here said in particular what those days were that are here meant yet it is most likely and scarce to be doubted to be meant of the Iewish Sabbath For though other Observation of Times be here reckoned up there being the same reason of all yet there was no occasion for the others in Galatia For the Jews themselves did not think themselves obliged nor do the Jews at this day to the observation of their other Feasts or Fasts out of their own land But to that of Circumcision and of the Iewish Sabbath and the distinction of Meats they thought themselves obliged even out of their own land And of such we must understand this to the Galatians These being the things there in question not those other which were confined to the land of Canaan But he objects here that though Days be mentioned yet not Sabbath days and fansies it might be meant of some other days not of Sabbaths To gratify him therefore in this also I will proceed to that of Colos. 2. 16. Where Sabbaths are expresly named To the Colossians who were also Christian Gentiles he pursues the same notions Least any one should beguile them with inticing words Col. 2. 4. thereby to bring them under the Mosaick Law He bids them Beware lest any spoil them through Philosophy and vain deceit Whereby I suppose he means the Mosaick doctrines or Philosophy of the Jews which Clemens Alexandrinus doth all along call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in contradistinction to that of the Greeks after the traditions of men after the rudiments or elements of the world and not after Christ ver 8. and that particularly of Circumcision ver 11. in the room of which Baptism is come ver 12. Christ by his Death having blotted out the hand-writing of ordinances meaning the Jewish Law and took it out af the way nailing it to his Cross ver 14. and amongst other things Let no man therefore judge you in meat or in drink as if some were now clean others unclean as under the Mosaick Law or in respect of an holy day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Festival or of the new Moon or of the Sabbath days 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ver 16. Where by Sabbath must be meant the Iewish Sabbath the day which in common speech was understood by the word Sabbath For this he hath two or three evasions He doth commonly press hard in other places that by Sabbath is to be understood the Jews Seventh-day-Sabbath and no other day The holy Spirit doth call the Seventh-day the Sabbath and no other day of the week both in the Old and in the New Testament throughout p. 46. And I think he is not much out therein that it doth usually so signify where it doth not come with some intimation to direct us to some other sense And why it should not be thought so to signify here I see no reason For though I take our Christian Sabbath to fall as properly under the word Sabbath in the Fourth Commandment as that of the Iews yet the word in common use having by this time become the proper name of that Day which the Jews so called it was necessary to avoid confusion to give the Christian Sabbath another name as that of the Lords Day or the first day of the week And consequently that the Sabbaths here mentioned are to be understood according to the then use of the word of those Sabbaths Not as if all days of Holy Rest where hereby forbidden but onely the nicety of confining it particularly to that day which was then in common speech so called But he would not have it here understood of the Seventh-day Sabbath as every where else but some other Ceremonial Sabbaths but what those are he doth not tell us That there were some other Feasts observed by the Jews which in the Old Testament are sometimes called Sabbaths but very seldome I do not deny nor that those come under the general Words in this place But those do not seem to be here principally intended because it is manifest to be understood of the Sabbath there in dispute Now there was no occasion of a dispute concerning the observance of those other Sabbaths amongst the Gentiles out of the Holy-land These observations being not thought obligatory even to the Jews but in their own Land onely And it is expresly provided Deut. 16. that these were not to be kept in any place promiscuously not within any of the Gates which the Lord thy God giveth thee But in the place which the Lord thy God shall chuse to place his name there So of the Pass-over ver 5 6. So of the Feast of Pentecost ver 11. So of the Feast of Tabernacles ver 15. And of altogether ver 16. And therefore not out of their own Land I do not deny but that they might in private houses eat the Paschal Lamb as Christ did with his Disciples but not Sacrifice the Pass-over For it was to be sacrificed in the Temple onely and the Feast of the Pass-over to be there solemnly kept Not in private houses and much less out of their own Land Nor do I remember that any where in all the New Testament the word Sabbath is used for any such Sabbaths Nor can reasonably be supposed to be here meant of those Feasts because it is put in contradistinction to them Let no man judge you in respect of a Feast of the New-moon or of the Sabbaths Which yet I do not understand as if no Sabbath might now be kept but that the Obligation to that Sabbath was now at an end Another evasion is this He would have 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sabbata in the plural number to signify Weeks not Sabbath-days The Sabbath-day being called in the singular number 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sabbatum For he will rather play at small game than stand out If we should allow him this it would not advance his purpose at all For if the business of Weeks be at an end that we are no longer to distribute our time into Weeks than that of the Sabbath much more which he would have to be the seventh day of the Week But suppose we do allow that one Sabbath is to be called Sabbatum what are we to call two or more Sabbaths Must not they be Sabbata And if this be his meaning then are we not to observe such Sabbaths any longer But what must we then say to Mat. 28. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we render In the end of the Sabbath meaning thereby the Seventh day Sabbath then past 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as it began to draw towards the first day of the
Week must we read it at the end the Sabbaths because 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is in the plural number when the Sabbaths meaning the Seventh-day Sabbaths were now at an end and the First-day Sabbath coming on in their place If that reading please him it will serve us as well But he is mistaken in his criticism 'T is true that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the plural number seems to be sometime put for a Week but not Weeks that I know of as he would have it And so it is commonly taken to be where we find 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the first day of the Week but may as well be rendered the first day after the Sabbath And so is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the singular as Luke 18. 12. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I fast twice in the week I suppose he would not have us render it I fast twice on the Sabbath day though it be in the singular number as if he did fast twice upon one day But thus rather I keep two Fasts to one Sabbath which is the same in sense with I fast twice in the Week In like manner as the Olympiad may be taken sometime for that particular year on which were the Olympick Games which were wont to return every fifth year inclusively that is as we use to speak the fourth year after the last Olympick sometime for the interval of four years from the end of one Olympick to the end of the next following So here Sabbatum may be sometime taken strictly for the Sabbath-day and sometime for the whole septiduum or week from Sabbath to Sabbath And so is Sabbata in the plural number taken also for a Sabbath-day Thus I take it to be here Mat. 28. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 when the Sabbath-day was ended in the same sense with that of Mark 16. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 speaking of the very same time when the Sabbath was past And in like manner Matth. 12. 1. At that time Iesus went on the Sabbath day through the Corn 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sabbatis in the plural number And so it is in Mark 2. 23. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Yet it is meant but of one day as appears by the parallel place where the same is again related Luk. 6. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And so Mat. 12. 5 10 12. Mar. 3. 4. Luk. 4. 31. Luk. 6. 2 9. And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Septuagint is commonly put for the Sabbath-day I will not say Allways because I have not examined it but in all the places which I consulted And even in the body of the Ten Commandments Exod. 20. 8. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Remember the day of the Sabbaths in the plural number And again ver 10. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but the seventh day Sabbaths to the Lord thy God So Ex. 16. 13. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Sabbaths a holy Rest unto the Lord to morrow And Levit. 23. 3. six days shall work be done but the seventh is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Sabbaths of Rest ye shall do no work therein 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it is the Sabbaths of the Lord. Which are the signal places wherein the Sabbath is commanded And the like very often if not always in the Septuagint whose language the New Testament doth usually follow So that his criticism comes to nothing but only to shew how careless he is of what he says if at least he may seem to say somewhat Such is that when he tells us p. 136. that God who hath reserved a Tenth of our Substance hath reserved But a Seventh of Time As though he thought a tenth part to be more than a seventh part And many such negligences which I spare to mention But whether we render it Sabbath-day or Sabbath-days the sense is still the same And the Apostles design in all these places seems to be this that though to the Iews to whom it had once been a Law he doth allow a liberty till they should be better satisfied for each to follow his own judgment without censuring others as well in this of the Iewish Sabbath as in the business of Circumcision and the abstinence from Meats and their other Rites yet he would by no means suffer these to be brought upon the Gentiles as a new Yoke to which before they had not been subject I say as a new Yoke to which they had not been subject For though I do admit that by natural light or the Law of Nature man ought to allow a competent time for the solemn service of God and by a positive Law that it should be at least one day in seven that is after six days of Labour the seventh to be a day of Rest and so much to be intended in the Fourth Commandment Yet I do not think it to be so determined to this day in order as to be unchangable to after Ages We can be no ways sure that the seventh day in order from the first raining of Manna Ex. 16. was the seventh in order from the Creation And as they did observe it then in order from thence so when Christ or his Apostles by direction from him did put it into a new order this new order doth as well sute the words of the Fourth Commandment as that former I do the rather say that this to the Gentiles is a new Yoke because I find this to be given as a sign a covenant or distinctive mark given to the Jews as Gods peculiar People in contradistinction to other Nations just as Circumcision was So Exod. 31. 13. My Sabbaths ye shall keep for it is a Sign between me and you throughout your generations and ver 16. The Children of Israel shall keep the Sabbath to observe the Sabbath throughout their generations for a perpetual Covenant and ver 17. It is a Sign between me and the Children of Israel for ever So Ezek. 20. 12. I gave them my Sabbaths to be a Sign between me and them and ver 20. They shall be a Sign between me and you that ye may know that I am the Lord your God Just as it is said of Circumcision Gen. 17. 7. I will establish my Covenant between me and thee saith God to Abraham and thy seed after thee for an Everlasting Covenant to be a God unto thee and thy seed after thee and ver 10 11. This is my Covenant which ye shall keep between me and you and thy seed after thee every male-child among you shall be Circumcised and it shall be a Token of the Covenant between me and you and ver 13. My Covenant shall be in your flesh an everlasting Covenant not as if Circumcision were to be for ever obligatory but rebus sic stantibus so long as things continued in that estate And so it is called Rom. 4. 11. He received the Sign of Circumcision a Seal of the Righteousness of Faith And such was the Bloud of the Paschal Lamb on the Door-posts
of the house Ex. 12. 7. to be a distinctive mark between the Israelites and the Egyptians as ver 13. The bloud shall be to you for a Token upon the houses where you are and when I see the bloud I will pass over you And so Ex. 11. 5 6 7. That ye may know how that the Lord doth put a Distinction between the Egyptians and Israel And our Author himself pag. 26. doth press the same and puts great weight upon it that this seventh-day-Seventh-day-sabbath is often called a Sign for ever between him and them and a perpetual Covenant to Distinguish his people from others that is the people of the Jews from other Nations And so to be a Sign for Ever as Circumcision is an Everlasting Covenant Now whatsoever was a Distinctive Mark of the People of Israel from other Nations as was that of Circumcision the Pass-over and the Seventh-day-sabbath was at an end and to cease when the partition-wall was broken down between Jew and Gentile when Christ had made both one and abolished in his flesh the Enmity even the law of Commandments contained in Ordinances to make of twain One new man to reconcile both in One body by the Cross having slain the Enmity thereby Eph. 2. 14 15 16. Or as it is Col. 2. 14. Having blotted out the hand-writing of Ordinances which was against us and was contrary to us as separating us Gentiles from the Jews and so excluding us out of Gods Visible Church and nailing it to his Cross. From whence he there infers ver 16. Let no man Therefore judge you in meat or drink or in respect of a holy-day a Festival or of Sabbaths the proper name at that time of the Seventh-day Sabbath which things are a shadow of things to come but the body is of Christ these being but shadows or empty things whereas it is the body the Substance that Christ regards 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 those are but shadow but 't is the Body that Christ looks at That is in our language those are only Circumstantials but 't is substance or the Substantials of Religion that Christ and Christianity respects And as it is meerly Circumstantial and doth not at all influence Religion whether in the Temple or other place God be worshiped Ioh. 4. 21. So whether on this or another day a Sabbath be kept If therefore those Sabbaths as is shewed were distinctive Marks or Signs of Gods peculiar Covenant or Contract with the Church of Israel as their peculiar God in contradistinction to other Nations then 't is manifest that those other Nations did not at all keep a Sabbath or not on that Day else how could this be a distinctive Mark and therefore to bring this now upon the Gentiles was to bring upon them a new Yoke I add further that this Iewish Sabbath as is shewed before seems to be not a Continuation of a former Sabbath from the Creation which I doubt was either not observed at all or had long before this time been forgot but rather a New Institution or Restitution after their coming out of Egypt from a new Epocha at Marah where God is said to have made a Statute and an Ordinance Exod. 15. 25. to which Commandment and Statute if they would hearken diligently and give Ear he would not bring upon them the Diseases which he had brought upon Egypt For saith he I am the Lord that healeth thee ver 26. Whereupon follows in the next Chapter a sabbath to be observed on the seventh-day from the first raining of Manna not from the first Creation And with reference to their Rest or Refreshing after their Labour or Bondage in Egypt as was that of the Pass-over to their being passed-over when the first-born of the Egyptians were slain For so he saith Exod. 31. 13. My Sabbath shall ye keep for it is a Sign between me and you that ye may know that I am the Lord that doth sanctifiy you or separate you to my self as a peculiar people a holy people and ver 16 17. The Children of Israel shall keep my Sabbaths 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for a perpetual Covenant It is a Sign between Me and the Children of Israel for ever for in six days the Lord made Heaven and Earth and on the Seventh Day he Rested and was Refreshed Not that God was Wearied with his Work and needed Refreshment but he doth parallel his Rest after his Work of Creation with their Refreshment after their Labour in Egypt And that God had a particular respect to their Rest and Refreshment from their Labour and Bondage in Egypt is farther evident not onely from the General Preface to all the Commandments I am the Lord thy God which brought thee out of the Land of Egypt out of the house of Bondage but from the Close of this Fourth Commandment as it is repeated in Deut. 5. 12 13 14 15. somewhat different from what is in Exod. 20. where instead of For in six days the Lord made Heaven and Earth c. Exod. 20. 11. we have Deut. 5. 15. And remember that thou wast a servant in the land of Egypt and that the Lord thy God brought thee out thence through a mighty hand and a stretched out arm therefore the Lord thy God commanded thee to keep the Sabbath-day Which shews that this Sabbath had a particular respect to that deliverance Now as God by Moses did upon a New occasion of their Rest from their Labour in Egypt give a New Epocha or Beginning to a Circulation of Sabbaths to be reckoned from thence in imitation of his own Resting from the Work of Creation Not by the Fourth Commandment for that speaks indifferently as to any Circulation but by this Ordinance at Marah or at Elim for 't is this determines the Circulation to the seventh day after the raining of Manna So might Christ as well by himself or his Apostles six another Epocha from his Resurrection as we have reason to think he did and this Equally within the prospect of the Fourth Commandment This Rest from the Egyptian Bondage being as much a shadow of what Christ regards as the substance as was the escaping of the Egyptian Destruction of which the Pass-over was the Memorial And accordingly this Circulation equally to cease with that of the Pass-over at the coming of Christ notwithstanding the continuance of the Fourth Commandment in a New Circulation from another Epocha It is not indeed expresly said that Christ Bid his Apostles so to do But as Moses is presumed to do what he did by Gods direction so the Apostles by Christs direction to whom he gave Commandments for that purpose Act. 1. 2 3. As to what he says so often that not one Iott or Tittle of the Law meaning that of the Decalogue is destroyed but doth still continue in force This as to the substance of the Duty I grant But if his meaning be that there is not a Word or Letter therein which doth not as literally belong
tell If he would go on to reckon the days according as they had happened to him in his Voyage then this Expedient must fully satisfy him For then he keeps his Saturday-Sabbath on our Sunday If he thinks the account should be rectified when or before he comes home and call the days thenceforth as he finds those to do that staid here what shall be come of that day he hath lost and which day of the Week shall he reckon that to be And When must he rectify that account when he comes home or somewhere by the way For it would be just the same if before he come at England he should have landed in France or Spain or on the Coast of Africk or even at the East-Indies and all the way from thence he would still be a day behind them And so he would be with every Ship that in his way he should meet with If he and such other Ship meet at the Isle of St. Helens to take fresh water his Saturday will be their Sunday and on which of the two days are they to keep their Sabbath or must they keep it one on the one day and the other on the other If he say that the account is to be rectified by the way before he comes home then Where or When and by What rule For when ever he doth so rectify it he must then begin to call Sunday what just before he was to call Saturday If he say This must be left to Discretion when and where Then must it be matter of discretion and not determin'd by the Fourth Commandment on which of the two days in question the Sabbath shall be kept But then here will again come in our amazing demand as p. 48 86 87. What man or men without an high Usurpation of the Divine Authority contrary to the First Commandment shall with pretended good intentions assume an authority of their own heads to appoint for this or that place suppose the Streights of Magellan what day shall be the Lords holy Sabbath Who but our Lord Iesus Christ that is Lord of the Sabbath hath power to institute a Sabbath day If the Church or any part thereof be once admitted to have such Power what Bolts or Locks will be strong enough for such a Door to keep it from letting in upon the Churches of Christ what soever pleaseth those in Power I shall not much trouble my self to answer all this Warmth But when that is over if at or near the Streights of Magellan a place I think not inhabited or not by Christian a Colony be planted by some from hence and some from the East-Indies those who come thither from hence will according to their account call that Saturday which those who come thither from the other side will according to their account call Sunday Must they have no Sabbath at all that 's against the Fourth Commandment Or must they by consent agree upon the day this I should think if he would give me leave Or must they keep it some upon one day some on the other This I would by no means advise if it may be avoided Because it would be a manifest confusion and disorder And they would not both if either be the Seventh-day in course from the Creation And which of them is so is not possible for any man to know And it would be more for common Edification that they do agree upon a common day And not much matter whether of the Two This Gentleman if he can consider of it calmly I am apt to think will be of the same mind and think it better to have such a Sabbath than none at all and that the little circumstance whether on this or that day should be disregarded in comparison of the Substantials of the Duty There be many things which the Word of God or the Divine Law doth determine in Thesi which when in Hypothesi they come in practise will require the intervention of Prudentials or Humane Laws The Eighth Commandment says I must not Steal or take unduly from my Neighbour what is His But What is Mine and what is my Neighbours will depend much upon Humane Laws and what shall be reputed a Trespass on my Neighbours land or a forfeiture of his right The Seventh Commandment says Thou shalt not commit Adultery But it will depend much upon Humane Law what shall be reputed a Good Marriage The Sixth Commandment says Thou shalt not Kill But it will much depend upon Humane Law what shall be reputed Self-defense or a Just War or a Forfeiture of Life The Fifth Commandment requires us to Honour and Obey our Parents But in many cases 't is Humane Law that is to determine who is to be reputed the Father If a Widow be left whith Child by a former Husband and marry another before that Child be born which sometime happens 't will be a point in Law not in Divinity to whether of the Two Fathers this Son shall be Heir And if my Father require me to part with what Estate is my own 't will be a point in Law how far I am required to obey such a Command And the like as to other Superiours as well as Natural Parents And those Laws which seem Absolute as Thou shalt not Kill Thou shalt not Steal c. Have yet their Tacite Limitations implied For no man doubts but there are cases wherein to Kill may be lawful as in Self-defense in a just War and for Capital Crimes And in such cases to take from our Neighbour what was His. And notwithstanding the Command of Honour thy Father and Mother or that of Children obey your Parents in all things there may things happen wherein we are not obliged to do what they bid us And in all such cases there is room for Prudence to interpose Not to Abrogate or Repeal a Law of God But to judge what is the true Intent of that Law So not withstanding that Command of the Sabbath In it thou shall do no manner of work yet our Saviour tells us The Priests in the Temple profane the Sabbath and are blameless and against the Pharisees superstitious rigour he argues not onely from his own Authority The Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath-day But from the Reason of the Law The Sabbath was made for Man and not Man for the Sabbath and consequently is so to be understood as may be for the Good of Man spiritual and bodily not for his Hurt And our Author allows the emergent cases of Necessity and Mercy And no man doubts but that if a House be on Fire we may Labour to quench it In all which cases Prudence may be used but must not upon that pretense be Abused Not as if it were left to our Prudence whether or no the Law of God shall be Obeyed But what is in such cases the true Intendment of the Law of God And there needs no other Locks or Bolts as our Author speaks to confine Prudence in such
a Testimony and so ancient for the holiness of Place as here is for that of Time I agree also that the Law of the Decalogue or Ten Commandments though then given peculiarly to Israel is Obligatory to Us also For though some Clauses therein do peculiarly respect them as that who brought thee out of the land of Egypt out of the house of bondage and that thy days may be long in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee which I think is there said with a particular respect to the land of Canaan which God gave to Israel not to us yet the Body of that Law and the preceptive part of it I take to be Obligatory to others also and to Us in particular the Decalogue being Declarative of what was I think a Law before however neglected or forgotten and is by Christ and his Apostles frequently cited as such even to Gentiles as well as Jews Nor will I dispute it with him whether the Sabbath were observed from the Creation to the Floud For I am willing to think that if it were not it should have been though in the short History that Moses gives us of that time there be no mention made of such Observation But I doubt it was not universally so observed if at all For when all flesh had corrupted their ways I doubt the Sabbath day and the worship of that day were by them not much regarded Nor do I find Gen. 2. 3. any express Command such as he demands for the First days Sabbath that it should be observed thenceforth by Men every Seventh day of the Week for ever How far the words he blessed and sanctified it may extend I will not dispute It may be a strong Intimation and I think it is But it is not expresly said that All Mankind must for ever after observe every Seventh day in every Week of days reckoned continually from the first Creation Nor do I think it necessary to have been so recorded by Moses any more than the Law for Sacrifices if it did otherwise appear to have been the Will of God And therefore I would not have him lay too great a stress on what he saith that there is no express Commandment Recorded in the New Testament for observing the First day It is enough if we there find sufficient Intimation for us to judge that God was pleased to have it observed I say the like as to the time from the Floud to that of Abraham and from thence to the coming of Israel out of Egypt For I do not find any mention of their observing a Sabbath either in the Writings of Moses or the Book of Iob earlier than that of Exod. 16. after Israels coming out of Egypt and after the time that God is said to have made a statute and ordinance for them at Marah Ex. 15. 25. What that Statute and Ordinance was we cannot tell The Jewish Writers think or some of them that it was that of the Sabbath and perhaps it might or this be some part of it It was perhaps a Revival of what had been before disused Nor is it likely that their Task-Masters in Egypt would suffer them to be Idle and neglect their Work one whole day in Seven Nor do I find any foot-steps in History that any other Nation but the Jews did for many Ages after this time so much as measure out their time by Weeks I know that many Learned and Pious men have been searching to that purpose and willing to lay hold on any thing that might seem to look that way And I should be well enough pleased to see it made out But I have not seen any thing convictive to give me satisfaction therein I have consulted Clemens Alexandrinus and what he cites in the Fifth Book of his Stromata who hath I believe made the best search of any into Heathen Writers for that purpose His design in that Book is to shew that the Heathens had stollen or borrowed much of their Philosophy from what he calls Philosophia Barbara or Barbarorum meaning thereby the Iewish Learning for with the Greeks all but themselves were Barbarians And amongst many other things he takes notice of the number Seven sometimes mentioned in Heathen Writers as with some veneration which he thinks to be occasioned from that number oft mentioned in the Sacred Writers and particularly from that of their Sabbath and measuring their time by Weeks But he doth not at all intimate as if himself did think the Heathens so to have divided their time or to keep that Sabbath but only that they were acquainted with the Jewish Learning and borrowed much of theirs from thence That which therein seemed to me the most promising and by others also is oft alledged was that Cited from Hesiod 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Seventh a Sacred day But when I consulted the place in Hesiod in his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the latter part of which he treats of Days I find nothing there of Weeks or days of the Week but only days of the Month. For 't is this he there proposeth to speak of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Thirty days of the Month on which he makes divers Remarks as which of them were to be accounted Good days and which Bad days and for what purposes And begins with these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Begin we with the First and the Fourth and the Seventh a Sacred day Because that on this day Apollo who hath the Golden Sword was born of Latona So that it seems the Seventh day not the First was then Sunday For Apollo with his Gold Sword is but another name for the Sun But it was the Seventh day of the Month not the Seventh day of the Week for of Weeks he there says nothing And he then goes on to speak of the Eighth and Ninth days then of the Eleventh and Twelfth next of the Thirteenth and so of other days of the Month shewing which of them were accounted Lucky days and which Unlucky and for what Affairs But nothing of Weeks at all However Hesiod himself though one of the Oldest of the Heathen Writers is but young as to the times we speak of who is reckoned to have lived about the time of King Uzziah Seven Hundred years after the time we are now considering upon the coming of Israel out of Egypt Nor doth Clemens Alexandrinus think when they name Seven it was from any Old Tradition from Adam or Noah but from what acquaintance they then had with the Jewish Writers of later time Nor do I find any thing that is more to the purpose in all there Cited by Clemens Alexandrinus than this of Hesiod But if any where he could have found that the Heathens divided their Time by Weeks no doubt but he would have mentioned this as borrowed from the Iewish Learning which was the thing he was there inquiring after And when he saith nothing of it we may be sure he could not find it I find indeed
Commandment and other Writers about the Sabbath That this Commandment begins with Remember to keep Holy the Sabbath-day or the day of Rest not the Seventh day much less the Seventh day of the Week from the first Creation And what is that day of Rest the next Words tell us Six days shalt thou labour but the Seventh is the Sabbath c. That is after Six days of Labour the Seventh shall be a day of Rest. And in the close of that Commandment Ex. 20. 11. our Bibles have it wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath-Sabbath-day not as we commonly repeat it the Seventh day and hallowed it The Reason given to inforce it is For in Six days the Lord made Heaven and Earth c. and rested the Seventh day and accordingly should we after Six days of Work have a Seventh day of Rest and so onward If he thinks that to make a difference that we now reckon our Weeks to begin with the day of Rest and after that Six Working days which in a continued Circulation comes all to one I will allow that Gentleman if that will please him better to begin the Week on Monday and then Sunday will be the Seventh The Commandment says nothing of the Seventh day of the Week in a continued Succession from the Creation but the Seventh day after Six days of Labour And whereas he observes and would lay great weight upon it that it is hashebigni the Seventh the article ha answering to our the not a Seventh 'T is very true and very proper so to be For the meaning is not that after Six days of Labour there should be a Seventh for Rest no matter when but the Seventh day that is the next day after those Six But it is not said the Seventh in Course from the Creation Just as when it is said a Male-Child is to be Circumcised the Eighth day it is not meant of an Eighth day in Course from the Creation but the Eighth day from the Birth And in like manner Ex. 12. 16. In the Seventh day there shall be a Holy Convocation it is not meant of the Seventh day of the Week from the Creation but on the Seventh day of the Feast of unleavened Bread what ever day of the Week that happen to be And Exod. 16. 5 25. The Sixth and Seventh day there mentioned seem plainly to be not the Sixth and Seventh in course from the Creation which I doubt was not then known but from the first raining of Manna ver 4 5. He 'll say perhaps The Jews observed such Seventh day from the Creation and that was their Sabbath But that is more than he or I know or any man living They had I grant a Circulation of Seven days but from what Epocha we cannot tell And when Moses tells them on the Sixth day Ex. 16. 23. Tomorrow is the Rest of the Holy Sabbath It seems to be the fixing of a new Epocha from the first raining of Manna and then all his Arguments from the continual Observation of the Seventh day from the Creation till that time are at an end Whether this from the first raining of Manna be the same with that from the Creation no man can tell And there is Six to One odds that it is not Now that there is a new Course of Sabbath from a new beginning whereof this Seventh day from the first raining of Manna is the First and not a continuation of a former Course hitherto observed without interruption seems farther evident from this consideration Because if this were but a continuation of that uninterrupted Course of Sabbaths then the next Seventh day before it would have been a Sabbath also and to have been in like manner observed that is the next day before the first raining of Manna But on that day we find Exod. 16. 12 13. the Quails came up and covered the Camp without any Prohibition to gather them If therefore they might not now gather Manna because it was the Sabbath but might before gather Quails it should seem that was not a Sabbath And if it be not allowed upon occasion to fix a new Epocha then if the Circulation of Weeks from the beginning of the World which was then about 2500 years old did ever chance to have been interrupted and the day forgotten as in all likelyhood it might be in Egypt if not long before or if ever after it should chance so to be as in the days of Iosiah when the Book of the Law was lost and the Pass-over forgotten men must never keep a Sabbath thenceforth For then all his own Arguments return upon him No other day is Commanded 't is Will-worship no Promise to the Observance no Threatning for the Neglect I should rather think if that day were unknown as I believe it is Any day were better than None at all For Gods Commands do more respect the Substance of the Duty than the Circumstance of Time especially if they cannot both be had Circumcision was to be Administred on the Eighth day according to the Institution I do not mean the Eighth day of the Week but the Eighth day of the Childs Age and therefore on the same day of the Week on which the Child was Born But if by Accident or Default it were omitted it might be done any day after rather than not at all Abraham we know was 99 years old and Ismael 13 when they were Circumcised and what was the Age of other Males in Abraham's Family we cannot tell and a Proselyte at any Age was to be Circumcised though perhaps it were not remembred on what day of the Week he was Born and those who were born in the Wilderness for Forty years together were all Circumcised at once Iosh. 5. 4 5 9. though not all born on the same day of the Week The Pass-over was appointed to be eaten standing with their Loyns girt their Shoes on their feet and their Staffs in their hand as in hast to be gone Ex. 12. Yet our Saviour seemeth to have Eaten it Sitting or rather Lying And none of them were to stir out of doors till morning Ex. 12. 22. Yet Christ and his Disciples went out the same night to the mount of Olives and thence to Gethsemane Mat. 26. 30 36. The Shew-bread was to be eaten by the Priests only yet our Saviour observes that David did eat of it on a special occasion without blaming him for so doing The Rechabites are commended Ier. 31. for obeying the Command of Ionathan their Father not to drink Wine nor build Houses but to dwell in Tents c. Yet did they upon Nebuchadnezzar's Invasion quit their Tents and repair to Ierusalem nor is it reputed a Disobedience The Paschal Lamb was to be kill'd the Fourteenth day of the First Month at Evening Yet if we consider how little knowledge they had in those days of the Sun and Moons motions and if we consider what the Jewish Writers tell us of their very uncertain Method of judging which
being Circumcised yet I know not any who doth therefore think they ought not We know that Children were reputed Members of the Church of God before Christ's coming and we have no reason to think that Christ did put them out and make them in a worse condition than they were before but rather would have them continue so to be and seems to favour it by that of suffer little Children to come to me and forbid them not for of such is the Kingdom of Heaven Mar. 10. 14. and did accordingly embrace them as such And therefore as before they were Circumcised which was then the Sacrament of Admission So they should now be Baptized which is our Sacrament of Admission And when we find whole Families to be Baptized we cannot think but that there might be little Children in some of them and more likely so than otherwise And we are in such cases to practise according to what we may judge by what we find We find also that Women were Baptized though not Circumcised in the Jewish Church yet we have no Command for so doing And because there seems to be the same reason for Womens receiving the other Sacrament as for Men and we find nothing to the contrary therefore we do now practise it as the most likely to be God's Will according to the Light we now have though we find in Scripture neither express Precept nor Example for it In like manner it is no Argument that Christ or his Apostles did not make such a change because in Scripture it is not expresly said so 'T is enough if we there find so much as that we may thence reasonably Judge they did so and more likely so than not Now I meet with so much there to that purpose as makes 〈◊〉 judge they did And so much as I believe would make this Gentleman so to think if he were not otherwise prepossessed with prejudice and with a great fondness to find out somewhat wherewith to find fault I find that Christ on the very day of his Resurrection which was the First day of their Week did not only appear to the good Women at the Sepulchre who sought him there and declare to them the Resurrection which was then to Preach a new Doctrine of which they were not before aware and bid them tell it to his Disciples But did also the same day himself declare it to Two of them going to Emmaus Luk. 24. Preaching to them from Moses and the Prophets ver 25 26 27 the Doctrine of his Death and Resurrection which was to them a new Doctrine which till then they did not understand or as the Phrase there is did Expound to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself ver 27. which I think was Preaching and did open to them the Scriptures ver 31. concerning those points which was a sabbath-Sabbath-days exercise though perhaps they did not at first so apprehend it and did I take it celebrate with them the Sacrament of the Lords Supper and perhaps the first time after the first Institution for so much seems to be implyed in those words ver 30. he took bread and blessed it and brake and gave to them and ver 35. he was known to them by breaking of Bread for that Sacrament used to be designed by breaking of Bread And if our Author could but shew so much as this once done in the first 2500 years from the Creation on the Seventh day it would be a better proof for the Celebration of the Seventh-day Sabbath in that time than all that he offers at to that purpose And the Effect of this Preaching was on them so much that their eyes were opened and their heart did burn within them while he talked with them by the way and opened to them the Scriptures ver 31 32. and they returned presently the same hour to Ierusalem to acquaint the Disciples who were there assembled with this good news If he tell us that this Journey from Ierusalem to Emmaus being about Threescore Furlongs near Eight of our Miles and back again was more than a Sabbath-days Iourney I confess it was unless upon an urgent occasion if they had known it to be a Sabbath-day when they undertook the Iourney but this then they knew not nor was it therefore on this occasion a breach of the Sabbath so to do If he say Christ knew it though they did not if it were now a Sabbath 'T is true he did so But Christ I presume in that estate after his Resurrection could Travel without Pain and therefore without breaking the Sabbath Or if it were painful he tells us Mat. 12. 5 that the Priests in the Temple profane the Sabbath and are blameless that is they take as much pains or labour in killing dressing and offering the Sacrifices as a Butcher would do in killing and dressing his meat which would in the Butcher be a culpable Profanation of the Sabbath but is not so in the Priests because theirs is Religious Service Nor doth this Author think that in Preaching though it be a Labour the Minister doth thereby break the Sabbath And such was Christs imployment here And then whether he Preach Standing or Preach Walking 't is all one And if he say farther that the Disciples at Ierusalem not then knowing this could not be thought then to have met upon a Sabbatical account I grant this also that their then meeting was Providential as was that of the Two other meeting Christ in their Journey yet they might before they parted as did those others know more of it than at their first coming together And Christ knew before what he meant to do though they did not and did accordingly so order it by his Providence And though they did not know that it was thenceforth to be kept as a Sabbath yet may they well be supposed to be imployed on Religious Work upon what Tidings the Women had before brought them of Christs being Risen waiting for what directions they should farther receive from Christ. To this purpose let us consider what was further done at this meeting While these Two were telling the rest what had happened to them As they thus spake ver 36. Iesus himself stood in the midst of them and said Peace be unto you And did by shewing them his hands and feet and their handling of them and seeing him eat before them convince them that he was indeed Risen from the Dead and that it was not only a Spirit that appeared to them ver 37 38 39 40 41 42. And did again to them Preach the same Doctrine which he had before preached to the Two That it was what he had told them while he was yet with them though they did not understand it That this was but what was written in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms concerning him and opened their understanding that they might understand the Scriptures That it was thus written that it behoved Christ to suffer
shewed to the High-Priests the things which were done who calling a Councel gave the Souldiers Money to say His Disciples came and stole him away while they were asleep undertaking to secure them in case the Governour should come to hear it Upon this news being brought by the Women to the Disciples Two of them from the rest went to the Sepulchre to enquire into the business and brought an account of it to the rest who were Astonished at it And all this happened before the Two Disciples began their Journey to Emmaus for they discoursed of it by the way and told it to Iesus who fell into their Company Luk 24. 19 20 21 22 23 24. Now their Journey from Ierusalem to Emmaus was about Threescore Furlongs ver 13. which our Author rightly computes to be about Seven miles and an half of our miles which they Travelled on foot for 't is said they walked Mark 16. 12. and Iesus in their company Preaching to them out of Moses and the Prophets the Doctrine of Christ's Death and Resurrection When they came near to Emmaus it was towards Evening and the day far spent Luk. 24. 29. they did there abide for some time and Iesus with them continuing to Preach on the same Subject and was at length known to them by breaking of Bread ver 30. 35. After which they returned to Ierusalem and told these things to the Disciples then gathered together ver 33. By which time having now walked another Seven miles and an half we may reasonably suppose it to be pretty late at night For when they first approached to Emmaus it was then so late as that it was not thought convenient unless upon some such great occasion to Travel further ver 28. Yet after they were come back to Ierusalem Christ then appeared himself to the Disciples blessing them reproaching their unbelief confirming their Faith giving them Instructions and Commission for Preaching the Gospel and Planting the Christian Church And it was yet but the same day at evening being the First day of the Week Joh. 20. 19. on which he rose but now late at night when the doors were shut that is if I mistake not so late as that it was time to shut up doors as men use to do towards bed-time Not as if Christ came in through the Key-hole any more than did the Two Disciples that came from Emmaus or did Penetrate the doors as the Papists would have us think in favour of their Transubstantiation For they were not so shut but that they could be opened again upon occasion to let him in as they had been to let in those Two that came from Emmaus as well as to let in Peter late at night Act. 12. 16. So that from very early in the Morning while it was dark till very late night and about Mid-night was the same day the first day of the Week 'T is manifest therefore that about our Saviours time according to the Computation of the New Testament both the Jews and the Four Evangelists did reckon their days from mid-night to mid-night And if they did not so reckon Christ could not be said Mat. 12. 40. to be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth For it was Evening when Ioseph begged the Body of Iesus and later yet before he had buried it and yet this must be reckoned part of the Sixth day olse he had not been three days in the Grave or heart of the earth And I think they were so reckoned in the times of the Old Testament also Which though it be not so much to the present purpose yet if you will pardon this digression I will tell you why I think so It is I know an Opinion taken up by some and I find it is grown pretty current even amongst Learned men that the Jews in the time of the Old Testament did reckon their days from Evening to Evening whether they mean from Sun-set to Sun-set or from Six a Clock to Six a Clock I cannot tell nor perhaps are they all agreed as to that point But I take it to be a mistake which being at first taken up without sufficient ground hath since passed without further examination from hand to hand We find Exod. 12. 6. the Pass-over was to be killed in the First month on the Fourteenth day in the Evening which I think is agreed by all to be the Evening at the end of the Fourteenth day not that at the end of the Thirteenth for the next morning was the Fifteenth day which evening therefore belonged to the Fourteenth day But it is noted in the Margin of our Bibles that it is in the Hebrew between the two Evening s. You 'l ask perhaps what are those two Evenings I 'le tell you what I think they are The word Day you know is taken in a double sense Sometimes for what we call the Natural day as it is contradistinguished to night from Sun-rising to Sun-setting sometimes for what we call the Artificial day or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so as to take in both day and night Our Saviour tells us there are Twelve hours in the day meaning the Natural day But in the Artificial day of which we are now speaking there be Four and Twenty hours Some please to call that the Natural day which I call the Artificial for all do not use the words in the same sense But that matters not so long as we understand one another Now by the word Evening is understood the end of the day Which as to the Natural day is at Sun-set but as to the Artificial day it is I think at Mid-night And consequently between the two Evenings is as much as to say after Sun-set and before Mid-night And this is what in our Language we commonly call the Evening which is in the Hebrew between the two Evenings that is between the end of the Natural day and the end of the Artificial day and within this time was the Passover to be Killed Rosted and Eaten Nothing of it was to remain till the Morning that is not after Mid-night for as soon as Mid-night is past Morning begins And within this time all Leaven was to be put away that is before the Mid-night of the Fourteenth day Which is so fair an account of it as that we need not scruple to embrace it And it was the Fifteenth day that was the first day of the Feast of Unlevened bread all Leven being put away before Mid-night and this Fifteenth day was to be kept as a Sabbath and a Holy Feast to the Lord ver 14. on what ever day of the Week it chanced to fall And so was the One and Twentieth day which was the last of those Seven days Seven days shall ye eat Unleavened bread even the first day ye shall put away or shall have put away leaven out of your house And in the First day there shall be an Holy Convocation and in the Seventh day there shall be an Holy
times just at seven days distance And how do we know but that these three days were three Sabbath days Which though it be not a conclusive Argument is better than any that he brings For here we have three Intervals of seven days in these two Chapters But if a Weekly Sabbath were then kept 't is very strange that we should have no intimation of any such thing in the books of Moses before Israel's coming out of Egypt And much more that there is nothing of it in the Book of Iob. And that none of his friends amongst the many charges they bring against him should never object his Neglect of the Sabbath or want of due observance thereof Which being so plausible an objection it seems more likely that a Sabbath was not then wont to be observed for which he hath so very little to shew And by what we have Iob 1. 4. It should seem that Iob's Seven Sons kept Feasting each in his own day for Seven days together without any mention of a Sabbath intervening Nor was it a Religious Feast but a Feast of mirth and jollity such as made Iob suspicious lest they might sin and curse God in their heart v. 5. And therefore he offer'd propitiatory Sacrifices for them continually or as the Margin tells us it is in the Hebrew all the days that is every of these Seven days As little a matter will serve his turn to prove p. 43. that Christs Ascension was and his coming to Iudgment is to be on a Saturday or Seventh-day-Sabbath Because it is said Acts 1. 12. that Mount Olivet whence he ascended is from Ierusalem a Sabbath-days Iourney But he tells us that by no account that he can make can he assign the Ascension on the First day No more can I. But what then Well! But why upon a Saturday rather than a Sunday Because he observes that after Christ's Ascension from Mount Olivet it is said Then they returned to Ierusalem from Mount Olivet which is from Ierusalem a Sabbath-days Iourney Well! what of this He cannot see why it was expresly said that it was but a Sabbath-days Iourney from Ierusalem but because it was the Sabbath-day Perhaps I may shew him another reason as likely as it If the word then do not there signify the same day but only at large after his Ascension this is nothing to the purpose But admitting that by then be meant the same day the connexion runs fairly thus After his Ascension they returned from thence to Ierusalem the same day for it was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but a little way off about a Sabbath days Iourney Which I think is a fair account of the place Especially since we know otherwise that it was not upon 〈…〉 Account as he speaks will serve as well for the one as for the other But indeed for neither But how doth this concern his Coming to Iudgment Yes Because it is there said ver 11. He shall come in like manner 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as ye have seen him go into Heaven And because this Author fansies he did Ascend on a Sabbath day therefore he fansies also he shall on a Sabbath day come again I see a Weak Argument with a strong Fansy will go far But to prove his Ascension to be on the Sabbath besides this of a Sabbath-days Journey he adds further That Christ and his Disciples were then Assembled and that Christ Preached Well! And why may we not as well conclude that the day of his Resurrection was also a Sabbath For Christ and his Disciples were then assembled first at Emmaus and then at Ierusalem and Christ did then also at both places Preach to them and the substance of his Preaching was much the same as will appear by comparing Luk 24. with Acts 1. and did then also Celebrate the Lords Supper And eight days after Christ was again Assembled with the Disciples and Preached to them on the same day of the Week If Christs Presence and Preaching will prove the Ascension day to be a Sabbath why should it not as well prove the Resurrection day to be a Sabbath the onely difference is That he thinks serves his turn But this makes against him And why should it not also be thought a Sabbath Acts 20. For Paul and the Disciples were then Assembled and they were assembled to break Bread and Paul there Preached to them And all these Assemblies were on the first day of the Week And they seem to me a much stronger proof of the First day the day of his Resurrection being a Sabbath than that the Ascension day was so And the Preaching which our Author here mentions as on the day of Ascension seems to me rather to have been on that of the Resurrection For St. Luke in the beginning of this Chapter of Acts 1. seems to give a short repetition of what himself had delivered more at large Luk. 24. And gives an account not only of what happened on the day of Ascension though he close with it but of what happened during the forty days from his Resurrection to that time And this Preaching I take to be that mentioned Luke 24. on the day of his Resurrection But after all this is but a Whimsey what he tells us of Christs Ascension on a Seventh-day-Sabbath For 't is very plain that his Ascension was neither on a seventh day nor on a first but on a fifth day of the Week For 't is plainly said Acts 1. 3. That he shewed himself alive after his Passion being seen of them Forty days that is he was seen of them at times not constantly for the space of Fourty days whereof that of his Resurrection was the first and that of his Ascension was the last And if that were Sunday this must be Thursday He may tell it upon his fingers as he speaks p. 5. if he please But though our Saviours Ascension was not on the seventh day of the Week in observance of the Seventh-day Sabbath or in confirmation thereof Yet the mission of the Holy Ghost according as on the First day of the Week the day of his Resurrection he had promised Luk 24. 49. was on the first day of the Week fulfilled also as appears Acts 2. When the day of Pentecost was fully come that is the Fiftieth day for so Pentecost signifieth in Greek they were all with one accord in one place that is they were unanimously assembled and suddenly there came a sound from Heaven as of a rushing mighty Wind and filled the house where they were sitting And there appeared to them cloven tongues like as of fire and it sat upon each of them that is at least upon each of the Apostles and they were all filled with the Holy Ghost and began to speak with other Tongues as the Spirit gave them utterance Which I take to be a further instance if our Author will not allow it to be called a Sabbath at lest of a Religious Assembly for the Worship of God