Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
lord_n	david_n	young_a	youth_n	221	3	8.5941	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A49781	The right of primogeniture, in succession to the kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland as declared by the statutes of 24 E.3 cap 2. De Proditionibus, King of England, and of Kenneth the third, and Malcolm Mackenneth the second, Kings of Scotland : as likewise of 10 H.7 made by a Parliament of Ireland : with all objections answered, and clear probation made : that to compass or imagine the death, exile, or disinheriting of the King's eldest son, is high treason : to which is added, an answer to all objections against declaring him a Protestant successor, with reasons shewing the fatal dangers of neglecting the same.	Lawrence, William, 1613 or 14-1681 or 2.	1681 (1681)	Wing L691; ESTC R1575	180,199	230

Eldest Son the only Heir intended 4. 'T is manifest this Statute intended no kind of Heir but the eldest Son and Heir First Because the Natural affection of the Father directs his intention irresistably to his eldest Son Secondly Because his Wisdom and Self-Preservation leads to the eldest Son who as is before shewn is above all other Children the chiefest Defence of the Father Thirdly Because the Black Prince who was intended to have the benefit of this Statute was the eldest Son and Heir of Edward the Third the maker of this Statute Haeres Sanguinis non Haereditatis intended 5. 'T is manifest this Statute intended Haeres Sanguinis and not Haeres haereditatis Heir of Blood and not Heir of Goods and Haeres viventis and not Haeres Defun●ti Except before he is Born and not after And though John-an-Oaks who hath been so long the Parret of Littleton and Coke's Law will stomach it very much to be taught a new Lesson yet under his favour his Tutors in these matters of Marriage Filiation and Succession were very much Mistaken or Partial in this as other Matters and many of them in the two former Books have been already shewn And I shall as to the two particulars here mention'd further shew first therefore That Haeres Sanguinis is intended in this Statute and not Hares Haereditatis 1. Because Haeres Sanguinis is Haeres designans Haeres Haereditatis Haeres designatus to be known by the other 2. Because the words of the Statute are our Lord the King the Lady his Companion or their Eldest Son and Heir Now the Heir of the Inheritance of a Kingdom cannot be intended Because he derives his Title to the same only from the King and not from the Lady Companion unless a Queen Regnant therefore he cannot be the Heir of both of them as he is Haeres Hereditatis but as he is Haeres Sanguinis he is Heir of the Blood of both of them which is the only Heir intended by this Statute Secondly seeing the Heir of Blood is in the Express words of the Statute And no words at all of the Heir of the Inheritance therefore the Heir of Inheritance ought not to be put in the intention otherwise than as Haeres designatus marked to be known by the first knowing who is Haeres Sanguinis because then a Penal Statute would be extended by Equity And as to the other Particular It is manifest That Haeres viventis is intended in this Statute and not Haeres defuncti except before he is born and not after First because the eldest Son who is Haeres Sanguinis most times happens to be born in the life-time of his Father and not to be a Rosthume and ad ea quae frequentius accidunt Jura adaptantur Therefore Posthumes which do rarely happen to be eldest Sons shall not be only intended to be within the Statute and the eldest Son on whom the Royal Blood descended en ventre sa mere And he was Heir to the same before he was born be therefore excluded because he is Haeres viventis to the same after he is born and his Father died not before his Birth Secondly The words of the Statute Restrain not the Heir to be Haeres defuncti before he is born or after he is born therefore to restrain by the intention of either is to extend a Penal Statute by Equity which ought not to be done Thirdly my Lord Coke himself 3 part fol. 9. in his Exposition on this Statute says That Heir is here taken for Heir apparent for he cannot be Heir in the life of the Father Haeres viventis intended Haeres Sanguinis and not Haeres Haereditatis It is a clear mistake for first an Heir apparent can only be of the King but the Statute makes him Heir both to King and Lady and the catch which they have got of Haeres non est viventis was never intended to be any other than Haeres Haereditatis which kind of Heir is before unanswerably Proved not to be intended within this Statute And if it had the Statute had served to little purpose to ascertain the Heir of the Crown so many sorts of Laws and Customs pretending to be the Rule of Judgment of Haeres Haereditatis but the eldest Son who is Haeres Sanguinis as is already shewn can be but one in the Three Kingdoms and that the King 's eldest Son who is Haeres Sanguinis the Chief Heir of his Blood by the Law of Nature and not him who is made Haeres Haereditatis by Papal and Episcopal Laws When Theseus had occasioned the Death of his Vertuous Valiant and eldest Son Hippolitus by the false Calumnies of Phaedra his Stepmother he crys out O nimium Potens Quanto Parentes Sanguinis vinclo tenes Natura quam te colimus inviti quoque Occidere volui noxium amissum fleo Seneca in Hippol. I cannot oh too potent Nature shun The Bonds of blood 'twixt Father and a Son His blood his blood I in my anger shed For whom I now shed Tears when he is dead And did not David fall into a greater Passion of Love for Absolon though the most Unnatural Ingrateful and Traiterous Son that ever was 2 Sam. 18.32 And the King said unto Cushi Is the young man Absolon safe and Cushi answered The enemies of my Lord the King and all that Rise against thee to do the hurt be as that young man is And the King was much moved and went up to the Chamber over the Gate and wept and as he wept thus he said Oh my Son Absolon would God I had died for thee oh Absolon my Son my Son But what would David have done if Absolon had been a Loyal and Obedient Son Oh! where he now only wished he had died once he would then have cryed out and wished he had died twice for him 7. All Heirs are either Lineal or Collateral unless therefore one of these Kinds are intended the Statute can intend none at all Collateral Heirs of the Crown not within this Statute now that Collateral Heirs are not intended is expresly delivered by Coke 3 Part. fol. 9. where he saith if the Heir apparent to the Crown be a Collateral Heir apparent he is not within this Statute as he saith Roger Mortimer Earl of March was Anno Dom. 1487. 11. R. Proclaimed Heir apparent Anno 39. H. 6. Richard Duke of York was likewise Proclaimed Heir apparent so was John de la Poole Earl of Lincoln by R. 3. and Henry Marquess of Exceter by King Henry the Eight but none of these or of the like are within this Statute if only Lineal Heirs are within the Statute there can be none but the eldest Son can be Heir intended the eldest being expresly named Heir and none besides named at all That to compass the Exile or Disinheriting of the King 's eldest Son is High Treason To Exile or Disinherit the King 's eldest Son High Treason

it be said of all the Kings and Queens which succeeded concerning whom any Question of Legitimation was raised as for Example John of Gaunt the fourth Son of Edward the Third because he was a great favourer of the Wicklenites who were in those days most Zealous Protestants was so hated by the Bishops to whom the Doctrine of Wickliff was then terrible that the then Bishop of Winchester John of Gaunt for favouring Protestants falsly slandred by the Bishop of Winchester to be Illegitimate Confessor to his Mother Queen Phillippa falsly slander'd him to make him Illegitimate That he was the Son of a Flemming and not of King Edward though his Mother Queen Phillippa was the most virtuous Wife of a King that was then in the World and to Illegitimate his Posterity by the Lady Katherine Swinford who was a virtuous Lady and not Prohibited by the Law of God to be Married But yet never was Married to him by the Ceremony of a Priest or Temple and by whom he had Issue John Duke of Somerset Thomas Duke of Exceter Henry Bishop of Winchester and Cardinal and Joan a Daughter which Daughter and all her Brethren were sirnamed Beaufort from Beaufort a Castle which he had in France where they were all Born and in regard thereof bare the Portcullis of a Castle for the Cognizance of the Family and these four Children though they were Legitimated by Act of Parliament in the Twentieth year of King Richard the Second and made capable of all Dignities yet by Episcopal Power there was inserted Excepta dignitate Regali which did as much as lay in an Exception so much Illegitimate them to the Crown that Coke says Part 4. fol. 37. Henry the 7th d●riveth ●imsel● from Katherine Swinford 〈◊〉 Ma●…d by a Priest in a Temple The best Title of Henry the Seventh who derived himself from John de Beaufort Duke of Somerset Son of John of Gaunt by the Lady Katherine Swinford was by Elizabeth his Wife eldest Daughter of Edward the Fourth which Episcopal Opinion of his would not have been taken for Law if he had lived in the time of H. 7. himself who notwithstanding this Episcopal Illegitimation assumed the Title of the House of Lanc●ster as Legitimate by the Law of God Both York and Lancaster derive the Lines from Persons slander'd to be Illegitimate by Laws of Men but made Legitimate by the Law of God and descending from a Lady not Prohibited to have been Married to John of Gaunt by the Law of God In like manner the Lady Elizabeth eldest Daughter to King Edward the Fourth by the Lady Elizabeth Gray from the House of York claims was declared Illegitimate by Richard the Third because as was all●adged E. 4. was praecontracted to the Lady Lucy which Lady Elizabeth was her s●lf likewise first promised in Marriage to the Daulphin of France before she was Married to H. 7. yet was she Legitimate and her Issue Legitimate by the Law of God and succeeded United to the House of Lancaster to the Kingdom according to the same Law The same hath been before mentioned of the Lady Elizabeth More her Children by Robert the Second King of Scotland were Born before any Ceremonial Marriage of a Priest in a Temple yet were they all Legitimate by the Moral Law of God Edward the Sixth Illigitimated by Papal Laws but Legitimated by the Law of God the eldest succeeded to the Crown In like manner King Edward the Sixth was declared Illegitimate by the Pope and the pretended Ecclesiastical Laws but he was Legitimate by the Moral Law of God and succeeded to the Crown accordingly Lastly Queen Elizabeth was not only declared Illegitimate by the Pope but by the Acts of Parliament of her own Father H. 8. which is above any Declaration or Proclamation of a Privy Council Queen Elizabeth Illegitimated by Papal Laws and Act of Parliament but Legitimated by the Law of God yet no true Protestant doubts but she was Legitimate by Moral Law of God which is above all Laws and happily succeeded to the Crown according to the Law of God to the Comfort of all Protestants From which Examples and Reasons appears the truth of the Thesis before laid down 1. That the Legitimation and Succession of Kings eldest Sons born of Women not Prohibited by the Moral Law of God was never questioned by any Laws except that of Popes and Bishops 2. That Legitimate and lawful Heirs may be Born of unlawful Marriages 3. That the Moral Law of God hath always been and still is the greatest Security of Legitimation and Succession to the Crown of Great Britain and ought to be prefer'd above all Ceremonial Laws of Men. 4. Next to the Moral Law of God the greatest Humane Security of Legitimation and Succession to the Crown is either a general Act of Parliament as this is constituting and ascertaining the Heir by a General or Special Distinction or Description or when any doubt or danger ariseth by Act of Parliament Declaratory of the Particular Successor or Name That 't is High Treason by this Statute for any Subject to slander the King 's eldest Son with Illegitimacy Though Papal and Episcopal Canons have made their ordinary work to Illegitimate the most Sacred Persons of Protestant Princes who disdain to buy their Mercenary Dispensations Faculties Licences and Pardons of Popes or Bishops and particularly the most Pious King Edward the Sixth and Queen Elizabeth And as is said Jude 8. Defile the flesh despise Dominions speak evil of Dignities yet let them know there is this Statute above all their Canons and Synods will punish their wickedness if they presume to Illegitimate any King of England or his eldest Son it seems on these Reasons 1. Because this compasseth the Death of the King himself his Father for who destroys the Kings Armies or Fleets which should defend him compasses his Death but Non legiones non classes aeque firma imperii Munimenta ac numeros Liberorum Not Legions nor Fleets equally defend a Kingdom as Children And above all Children the eldest Son All which is more authentically expressed by a great King and Souldier Psa 127.3 Lo Children are an heritage of the Lord and the fruit of the womb is his reward as arrows are in the hand of a mighty man so are the Children of the youth happy is the man who hath his quiver full of them they shall not be ashamed but they shall speak with the Enemies in the Gate And likewise as to the eldest Son the Scripture it self magnifies him as an high defence to the Father as Jacob expresseth of his Gen. 49.3 My first-born my might and the beginning of my strength the excellency of Dignity and the excellency of Power And who hath Vindicated His Majestie 's Honour and Safety in Wars abroad and against Popish Plots Assassinations Pistols Poniards and Poisons at home with such Fidelity Affection Zeal Constancy Vigillancy and Valour as his eldest Son And

doth he not then who compasseth his Death compass the Death of the King himself And doth not he who slanders him to be Illegitimate compass his Death 2. Because this exposeth Majesty and the eldest Son likewise to contempt by depriving both of the hopes of a Lincal Successor And this is complained of by no less a Prince than Alexander the Great who chargeth his Army as related in Curtius p. 6. Orbitas mea quod sine Liberis sum spernitur my being childless causeth your contempt of me which want of Children inheritable put him in the same condition of being despised as was he who said Isa 56.3 I am a dry Tree And the want of a Son capable to succeed him was the Ruine of so great a Monarch his Mother House and Empire his Enemies Poisoning him in the flower of his Age securely as knowing he could leave no Son of himself to revenge his Death 3. Because who affirms the eldest Son Illegitimate doth it to the intention to seize on his Inheritance and who intend to seize on his Inheritance will compass his Death as Matth. 21.38 They said amongst themselves This is the heir come let us kill him and let us seize on his Inheritance And they caught him and cast him out of the vineyard and slew him A Comparison of the Popish Slanders of Illegitimation against Queen Elizabeth and the King 's eldest Son Queen Elizabeth was not only declared and proclaimed Illegitimate by the Pope's Divinity but the Popish Party so far misinformed her own Father H. 8. in Matters of Law and over-wrought on the King as they compell'd him by weariness to rest on Implicit Faith in them and to declare his own Daughter Illegitimate an Error which not only he but many other Princes have been the more easily drawn into in regard by the Subtlety of Ecclesiastical and Temporal Lawyers the Laws of Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession and the Comments on them have been increased to so huge heaps and confused Volumes and so many Writers of contrary Religions and contrary Jurisdictions have had their Power and Profit concerned in them as is impossible for Princes who have so many Affairs of State to look after besides to Read them over as long as they live and such faithful Protestant Subjects as have indeavoured humbly to represent the truth as to the Law of God and of the Land have been by the same Popish Party not only intercepted and Prohibited to Write or Publish any thing against but so much as to dispute the Romish as well as Turkish Alcoran of their Laws One great Example of which appears in these two great Descendents of the Blood Royal the Famous and Pious Queen Elizabeth and the Valiant and Virtuous eldest Son of the King To go on therefore in their Comparison of Suffering wrongfully 1. It may be observed that Queen Elizabeth was a Protestant and so is the Kings eldest Son a Protestant 2. Her Prosecutors were Papists so are the Prosecutors of the King 's eldest Son Papists 3. Papists laid Plots to Assassinate and Poison Queen Elizabeth so have Papists laid Plots to Assassinate and Poison the King 's eldest Son 4. The final Cause why Papists would have destroyed Queen Elizabeth was to seize on her Inheritance so the final Cause why Papists would destroy the King's eldest Son is to seize on his Inheritance 5. Queen Elizabeth was Innocent so is the King 's eldest Son Innocent 6. Queen Elizabeth was deprived of the help of a Mother by her Death so is the King 's eldest Son deprived of the help of a Mother by her Death 7. Queen Elizabeth was deprived of the help of a Father by the unjust Prosecution of Papists as appears 28 H. 8. cap. 7. by which Act she is declared Illegitimate to all intents and purposes and utterly foreclosed excluded and barred to Claim Challenge or Demand any Inheritance as lawful Heir to the King her Father And it is further Enacted That it shall be High Treason so much as to call the said Lady Elizabeth Legitimate yea the Act of Parliament is so furious against the poor Innocent Lady as if they desired to Destroy and Damn the Conscience of all good Protestants at once with hers and her They Enact further That it shall be High Treason to believe Oh miserable Thought it self is made High Treason the Marriage of the Lady Ann with the King her Father to be good lawful or not void Let it be left to Supreme Authority to consider how far the Papists have endeavour'd to proceed in the same Nature against the King's eldest Son 8. Queen Elizabeth might say as David saith Psal 27.10 When my Father and my Mother forsake me then the Lord will take me up So may the King 's eldest Son say the same 9. Queen Elizabeth notwithstanding all this was Legitimate and lawful Heir of Blood by the Moral Law of God and the Protestant Religion and so is Recognized and acknowledged by Parliament 1 Eliz. cap. 3. and accordingly God gave her the happy Succession to the Kingdom So the King 's eldest Son by the Moral Law of God and the Protestant Religion is Legitimate and the next Lineal and Lawful Heres Sanguinis Heir of Blood for Jus Sanguinis is the Law of God and Nature and Jura Sanguinis as hath already been said Nullo Jure Civili divini possunt 10. It was the Interest of Queen Elizabeth when she obtained the Lawful Power to Maintain and Defend the Moral Law of God and the Protestant Religion So will it be the Interest of the King 's eldest Son to use what lawful Power God gives him to Maintain and Defend the Moral Law of God and the Protestant Religion against Popish Ceremonial Laws and Superstitious Religions A Comparison of the Popish Slanders of Illegitimation against King Edward the Sixth Queen Elizabeth and the King 's eldest Son And the Sons and Daughters of the whole Protestant Clergy This Slander against the Sons and Daughters of the Clergy could not have been raised without another Slander first raised against the Marriages of the Mothers Both which are taken notice of by the Statute 5. 6. E. 6. cap. 12. which Statute making first a recital of the Stat. 2. 3. E. 6.21 of Repeal of all Laws of Man against the Marriage of the Clergy proceeds in these words viz. Yet since the making of the said Act divers evil-disposed Persons taking occasion of certain words and Sentences in the said Act comprized have and do untruly and very Slanderously report of Priests Matrimony saying That the same Statute is but a Permission of Priests Matrimony as Usury and other unlawful things be now permitted for the eschewing of greater inconvenience and Evils so that thereby the lawful Matrimony of Priests in the opinion of many and the Children Procreate and Born in such lawful Matrimony rather be of the greater number of the King's Subjects accounted as Bastards than Lawfully Born to the

Israel may be Obedient And he shall stand before Eleazer the Priest who shall ask counsel for him after the Judgment of Vrim before the Lord at his word shall they go out and at his word shall they come in both he and all the Children of Israel with him even all the Congregation And Moses did as the Lord commanded him he took Joshua and set him before Eleazer the Priest and before all the Congregation and he laid his hands on him and gave him a Charge as the Lord commanded by the hand of Moses Here appears that Joshua is declared Successor by Counsel from God by Moses and the Priest and the Assent of the People and it 's very likely if a Successor had not been declared the People would have fallen together by the Ears as soon as Moses had been Dead And as is usual in all Armies divided the Government by Military Elections and recourse to the Sword to be Judge whereby they had never Conquered the Cananites but the Cananites them David Declares a Successor King David likewise to leave his House and Kingdom in Peace and to prevent Civil Wars declares Solomon his Successor and Inaugurates him while he was yet alive 1 Kings 1.32 And King David said Call me Zadock the Priest and Nathan the Prophet and Benaiah the Son of Jehoiedah and they came before the King and the King said unto them Take with you the servants of your Lord and cause Solomon my Son to ride upon my own Mule and bring him down to Gihon and let Zadock the Priest and Nathan the Prophet anoint him there King over Israel and blow ye the Trumpet and say God save King Solomon Then ye shall come up after him that he may come and sit upon my Throne for he shall be King in my stead And I have appointed him to be Ruler over Israel and over Judah And Benaiah the Son of Jehoiedah answered the King and said Amen The Lord God of my Lord the King say so too As the Lord hath been with my Lord the King even so be he with Solomon and make his Throne greater than the Throne of my Lord King David So Zadock the Priest and Nathan the Prophet and Benaiah the Son of Jehoiedah and the Cherethites and the Pelethites went down and caused Solomon to ride on King David's Mule and brought him to Gihon And Zadock the Priest took an horn of oyl out of the Tabernacle and annointed Solomon and all the People came up after him and the People piped with Pipes and rejoyced with great Joy so that the Earth rent with the sound of them FINIS Errata's in Verse LIb. 1. p. 131. line 5. for Moon read Morn p. 135. l. 36. for lease r. cease p. 223. l. 28. for I see r. is with me p. 224. l. 9. for all r. such p. 225. 3. 8. for thanks r. there and in the same line after for there r. and l. 39. for lightnings r. lightning p. 228. l. 5. add the word next before the word expel p. 392. l. 11. for who burn would not r. who burn would Lib. 2. p. 239. l. 31. for Mariners r. Mariner l. 36. for why r. who Lib. 3. p. 89. l. 8 for their r. them l. 16. for not babling r. no babling Errata's in Prose COntents to the First Book relating to p. 88. for in vitam r. invitam non diserturum Lib. 1. p. 88. l. 8. add invitam before deserturum p. 90. l. 42. for invitum r. invitam deserturum p. 1. l. 11. for or any Subject r. on any Subject p. 4. l. 28. for Harecloth r. Hayrcloth p. 17. l. 36. for women were divorced r. women did divorce p. 23. l. 21. for Affinity r. Consanguinity p. 43. l. 11. for Canon Law r. Common Law p. 93. l. 27. for Common Law r. Canon Law p. 106. l. 31. for pitty relieve him r. pitty to relieve him p. 110. l. 40. for invitum fore Matrimonium r. Irritum fore Matrimonium p. 132. l. 36. add and shall cleave to his wife p. 180. l. 11. for established r. abolished p. 180. l. 42. for Chancellors of State r. Councellors of State p. 210. l. 20. for Sacrament r. Sacrifice p. 215. l. 28. for Tyrant r. Pyrat p. 282. l. 23. for there were Judges r. and Judges p. 120. l. 1. leave out no l. for Secreta Fori r. Secreta Thori p. 121. l. 25. for false r. and the false p. 121. l. 43. for take off Exequenda officia Matrimonialia r. talk of Exequenda officia Matrimonialia p. 257. l. 30. for thinks r. think l. 27. for that binds r. binds p. 265. l. 17. for Obligatio libelli r. Oblatio libelli Lib. 3. Preface p. 10. l. 1. for Algine r. Algive In the Contents relating to p. 160. for Successor or Male r. Successor Male leaving out or p. 2. l. 16. for ever that be r. Over that be p. 13. l. 10. for wages r. ways p. 188. l. 25. for Basiel r. Baliol. In the Index see Bail in line 36. for Canon-Law r. Common-Law