heirs upon every gift grant and alienation tho' no word were spoken of them It appeareth by the Feodal-law from whence all that part of our Common-law that concerneth Tee and Tenures hath original and which our Common-law also affirmeth that there was always due ..... Those that thus receiv'd their Territories from the King were said to hold them in Capite for that the King is Caput Regni and were thereupon call'd Capitanei Regis and Capitanei Regni otherwise Barones Regis the King's men Tenants or Vassals who having all the land divided amongst them saving that which the King reserv'd to himself as Sacrum Patrimonium were also call'd Pares Regni and were always upon commandment about the person of the King to defend him and his Territories in war and to counsel and advise him in peace either Judicially in matters of Law brought before the King in his Palace which in those days was the only place of Royal justice or Politically in the great affairs of the Kingdom Hereupon they were not only call'd Praetorianum consilium as belonging to the King's Palace but Magnum concilium Regis and Magnum concilium Regni For that in those times it belonged only to them to consult with the King on State-matters and matters of the Kingdom insomuch as no other in the Kingdom possessed any thing but under them And therefore as in Despotical Government the agreement or disagreement of the Master of the Family concluded the menial and the whole Family so the agreement and disagreement of the chief Lord or him that held in Capite concluded all that depended on him or claimed under him in any matter touching his Fee or Tenure To this purpose seemeth that in the Laws of Edward the Confessor ratified by the Conqueror Debet etiam Rex omnia ritè facere in regno per judicium procâ—rum regni These great Lords according to this Archetype of Government set them by the King divided their lands in like manner among their Tenants and followers First they assign'd a portion ad victum vestitum suum which they committed over to their Socmen and Husbandmen to furnish them with Corn Victuals and Provision for Hospitality and briefly all things necessary to their domestical and civil part of life The residue they divided into as many shares or portions as might well maintain so many Military men whom then they call'd their Knights and thereupon the shares themselves Knights-fees i. e. stipendia militaria And these Fees they granted over to each of their principal followers furnishing them with so many Knights for the wars These Grantees that receiv'd their Estates from the Barons or Capitanei and not from the King were called Valvasores a degree above Knights and were unto their Lords the Capitanei or Barones Regis as they the Capitanei were unto the King and did in like manner subdivide their lands among their Socmen and Military followers who in old time were call'd Valvasini whom I take to be the same at this day that are the Lords of every Mannour if not those themselves that we call Knights as owners of a Knights-Fee For in this the Feodal-law it self is doubtful and various as of a thing lost by Antiquity or made uncertain by the differing manners of several Nations Insomuch that Valvasores and Valvasini grew to be confounded and both of them at last to be out of use and no other Military Tenures to be known amongst us than tenere pâ—r Baroniam and tenere per feodum militare But in a Charter of Henr. I. it is said Si exurgat Placitum de divisione Terrarum si interest Barones meos Dominicos tractetur in Curia mea si inter Vavassores duorum Dominorum tractetur in Comitatu c. Where the Valvasores were also and the Barons themselves Suitors and Attendants Bracton mentioneth them in Henry III's time to be Viri magnae dignitatis Nor was their memory clean gone in Richard II's days as appeareth by Chaucer Yet do I not find in any of our ancient Laws or Monuments that they stood in any classick kind of Tenure other than that we may account the Baron Vavasor and Knight to be as our Lawyers at this day term them the Chief Lord Mesne and Tenant But herein the Feodal-law of our Country differ'd from that of Milan and other parts For there the Valvasini could invest which we call infeosse none under them in fee that is to hold of them by Knights-service And with us every Tenant Par aval might in infinitum till the Statute of Quia Emptores Terrarum enfeoffe another by Knight-service and to do all the services unto him that he did to his Mesne Lord. So that by this means a line of Knights-services might be created of a dozen yea twenty Mean-Lords and Tenants wherein every of them might have his prochine Tenant obliged unto him in the duties and services that his Lord Paramont which held of the King was to do and yeild unto the King himself for the same lands viz. Honour Ward Sustenance   Safety Marriage  give keep  Attendance Relief Counsel to Aid Defence of his Person Tribute Fidelity  Defence of his Patrimony     All which in ancient time while the Feodal-law flourished were well understood to be comprehended under the profession of Homage and the oath of Fidelity which every Feodal Tenant or as others call him Vassal usually did unto his Lord. Honour promis'd by the Tenant upon his knees in doing Homage which tho' it be the greatest and most submiss service that a Freeman can do unto his Lord yet the profession of it to the meanest subject is as ample and submiss yea in the very same words that to the King himself Attendance to follow and attend him in the war at his own charge and in peace with suite of Court Therefore Tacitus calleth them Comites Defence of his person for if he forsook his Lord being in danger it was forfeiture of life land and all he had Defence of his Signiory that nothing of his lands rents or services were withholden or withdrawn Profit by Ward Marriage and Relief as they fell Tribute by way of Aid to make his eldest son a Knight to marry his eldest daughter ransom himself being taken prisoner yea in some places to be an hostage for his Lord. Sustenance that being faln into poverty according to that in the Canon law spoken of a Patron Alatur egenus Counsel and Advice in which respect the Tenant was bound ordinarily once in every three weeks to come to his Lord's Court and there as a Judge with other of his Peers to censure the causes of his Signiory and to direct his Lord as the cause occurrent did require and always to keep his counsel This to the meanest Lord was in the nature of the King 's Great Court or Counsel call'd afterward a Parlyment Fidelity for
to all these was the Tenant by Knights-service ty'd by his oath of Fealty swearing to be feal and leal As the oath was at those times interpreted as well by Divines and Canonists as by Feodists and Lawyers And as these were inherent to this Tenure of Common right so was there many other grievous exactions impos'd by the Lords upon their Tenants some by custom of the Mannour some by Composition upon granting the Fee and many by Signioral Authority as tho' the Lord besides his Legal Power might do some things like the King by Prerogative By Custom when the Lord or Lady came into the Mannour the Bailiff was to present them 18 oras denar and every of their servants 10s. with some summs of mony as gratuities ut essent laeti animo That the Tenants should pay 32d. for every daughter they married It was an ordinary custom that Lords might take not only of their Tenants but of all the Country thereabout Victuals and all other necessaries for furnishing their Castles which how grievous it was may well enough be conceiv'd tho' the Statute that restrain'd it did not testifie it So other Lords took provision for their houshold and hospitality within their Mannours By Composition as to have their Tenants attend them with horse and man in their journies whom they call'd Road-knights To present them yearly at times Horses Hawks and other things of profit and pleasure By Signioral Authority as to lye and feast themselves and followers call'd Coshering at their Tenants houses and when any matter of extraordinary charge fell upon them then to extort the same amongst their Tenants which the Irish about fourty years since of my own knowledge still continu'd calling it Cuttings according to our old word Tallagium But among us it was taken away by the Magna Charta of King John I speak not of the innumerable Carriages Angaries and Vexations with which they otherwise harrowed if not plagued their Tenants Yet must I not let that pass which every where was then in use for Lords of Castles to imprison men at pleasure to hold and keep distresses there against common justice and to do many outrages all about them Wherein the Lords of Mannours imitating them would also imprison their Tenants and followers which Custom I saw also yet not laid down in Ireland fourty years since For a Meane-Lord would ordinarily say upon offence taken against a Churle c. Take him and put him in bolts But let Matthew Paris who liv'd long after many of these oppressions were abolish'd tell you the fashions of those times Every Lord having this authority over his Tenant the Superiour as comprehending them all and holding in Capite was tyed to the King to see all under his tenure to be of good Government good behaviour and forth-coming whensoever they should be demanded to answer any misdemeanour This appeareth by the Laws of Edward the Confessor where it is said Archiepiscopi Episcopi Comites Barones omnes qui habuerint Sacam Socam c. milites proprios servientes sc dapiferos pincernas c. sub suo friburgo habeant That is sub sua fide-jussione de se bene gerendo By reason whereof whatsoever those their Lords agreed or disagreed unto in matters of the State and Common-wealth it did bind every of them their inferiors Unto whom they themselves might then also appoint Laws and Ordinances in their own Courts And this is that which Tacitus affirmeth to have been the ancient manner of the Germans our Ancestors Agricolis suis jus dicere where under the word Agricolis he intendeth all them whom we call Tenants Hence then it comes to pass that in making Laws of the Kingdom the common people were not consulted with but only the Barons and those which held in Capite who then were call'd Consilium Regni And the common people being as I said by way of tenure under one or other of them did then by him that was their chief Lord as by their Tribune or Procurator and as now by the Knights of the Shire consent or dissent in Law-making and are not therefore nam'd in the title of any ancient Law Look Doomsday-book and there ye shall see the whole Kingdom divided only among the Barons and great Persons and the whole Commons of the Kingdom distributed and plac'd under some of them tho' not by name yet by number in their several qualities Let us then see how the practice of those ancient ages agreed with this Theoreme King Ina made his Laws by the advice of Kenred his father and as he saith himself Heddis Erkenwaldi Episcoporum meorum omnium Aldermannorum i. e. Procerum meorum seniorum sapientum Regni mei multa aggregatione servorum Dei which is of Church-men as I take it Alured briefly Consilio sapientum meorum Edward the Elder proposeth his Laws not as Senatus-consultum but as Edictum Principis viz. Ego Edouardus Rex iis omnibus qui Reipub. praesunt etiam atque etiam mando ut c. And after by the absolute words Praecipio Statuimus Volo Yet those wherein he and Guthrun the Dane joyned are call'd Senatus-consulta Ethelstane made his Ex prudenti Vlfhelmae Archiepiscopi aliorumque Episcoporum suorum consilio nec-non omnium Optimatum sapientum mandato suo congregatorum Edmund in a great Assembly Tam Ecclesiasticorum quà m Laicorum cui interfuerunt Oda Wulstanus Archiep. plurimique alii Episcopi Edgar In frequenti sapientum Senatu Ethelred In sapientum Concilio Canuius saith Sapientum adhibito Consilio per omnem Angliam observari praecipio As for Edward the Confessor his Laws come not to us as they were composed by himself but as the Paragraphs of them were collected by the Conqueror and augmented afterward In which collection there is no mention made of the manner of their Institution But reciting of a passage of St. Austens touching Tithes it is spoken as of former time that Haec concessa sunt à Rege Baronibus populo meaning the several kinds of Tithes there mention'd But whether these words extend to a concession of them by Parlament as we now call it or by a voluntary contribution of them yeilded unto by the King the Barons and the people according to the Canons of the Church I leave to others to determine To come to times of the Conquerour wherein Novus seclorum nascitur ordo and from whence as from a new period we must now take all our projections The great establishment of his own and of Edward the Confessor's Laws is said in the title to be that which Gulielmus Rex Anglorum cum Principibus suis constituit post conquisitionem Angliae Other Authors instead of Principibus have Barones And tho' all his Laws for the most part were ordain'd by his Charter in his own name only yet they seem to be made by the
For which purpose Conradus Salicus a French Emperour but of German descent going to Rome about fourty five years before the time of our King Edgar viz. sub An. Dom. 915. to fetch his Crown from Pope John X. made a Constitution upon the petition of his Souldiers That filii or aviatici the sons or if no Sons were living the Nephews or Grandsons as they call them of some of them should succeed in the Feud of their Father See the Constitution in the beginning of the fifth book of Feuds But Gerardus noteth that this law settled not the Feud upon the eldest Son or any other Son of the Feudatarie particularly but left it in the Lord's election to please himself with which of them he would After this Feuds were continued in divers places by several increments to the third fourth fifth sixth and seventh generation and sometime for want of lineal issue collaterally to the brother as Gerardus testifieth but whether by some positive law or by the munificence of the Lords he doth not tell us nor when or by whom they were made perpetual and hereditary tho' he confesseth that at last they grew to be extended in infinitum and then they began to be settled upon the eldest Son who formerly had no preheminence above a younger brother But while they stood sometimes produced in this manner by the indulgence of Princes to the third fourth or fifth generation c. some men of learning have concluded them to be hereditary as tho' there were no medium between a limitation how far so ever extended and infinitum To pass by that let us now go on in examination when and how Feuds became Hereditary Some suggest a shew of such a matter under the two Othones German Emperours who succeeded one the other about the year 973. But to rest upon the common and received opinion which we shall hereafter more at large declare the truth is that when Hugh Capet usurped the Kingdom of France againgst the Carolinges he to fortifie himself and to draw all the Nobility of France to support his Faction about the year 987. granted to them in the year 988. that whereas till then they enjoyed their Feuds and Honors but for life or at pleasure of their Princes they should from thenceforth for ever hold them to them and their heirs in Feudal manner by the Ceremony of Homage and oath of Fealty And that he would accordingly maintain them therein as they supported him and his heirs in the Crown of France which they joyfully accepted This was a fair direction for William of Normandy whom we call the Conquerour how to secure himself of this his new acquired Kingdom of England and he pretermitted not to take the advantage of it For with as great diligence as providence he presently transfer'd his Country-customs into England as the Black book of the Chequer witnesseth and amongst them as after shall be made perspicuous this new French custom of making Feuds hereditary not regarding the former use of our Saxon Ancestors who like all other Nations save the French continued till that time their Feuds and Tenures either arbitrary or in some definite limitation according to the ancient manner of the Germans receiv'd generally throughout Europe For by the multitude of their Colonies and transmigrations into all the chiefest parts thereof they carried with them such Feodal rights as were then in use amongst them and planting those rites and customs in those several Countries where they settled themselves did by that means make all those several Countries to hold a general conformitie in their Feuds and Military customs So by the Longobards they were carried into Italy by the Saliques into the Eastern parts of France by the Franks into the West part thereof by the Saxons into this our Britain by their neighbours the Western Goths who communicated with the Germans in manners laws and customs into Spain and by the Eastern Goths into Greece it self and the Eastern parts of Europe c. These I say carried with them into the parts of Europe where they settled such ancient Feudal customs as at the time of their transmigration were in use among them But the more prevalent and more generally receiv'd customs were those that were in use or taken up in the time of Conradus the Emperour and when Feuds became hereditary for on them especially is the Feudal Law grounded and composed tho' enlarg'd oftentimes by Constitutions of the Emperours and spread abroad into divers Nations by their example countenance or authority Wherein the Court of Milan was chiefly followed in rebus judicatis as appeareth by Duarenus and Merula but reserving unto every Nation their peculiar rights and customs For it was generally received into every Kingdom and then conceived to be the most absolute law for supporting the Royal estate preserving union confirming peace and suppressing robberies incendiaries and rebellions I conclude with Cujacius who upon the above-cited passages of Gerardus Niger saith Quam aliam Feudorum originem quaerimus His veluti incrementis paulatim feuda constituta sunt quae post Conradum usus recepit ut transirent ad liberos mares in infinitum c. The Military and Lay-Feuds being thus advanced from an arbitrary condition to become perpetual and hereditary did now in ordinary account leave their former name of Beneficia which were only temporary for years or life unto the Livings of the Clergy and retained to themselves the proper name of Feuds whereby they were produced to be perpetual and hereditary Cujacius therefore speaking of them both saith Feudum differt a beneficio quod hoc temporaneum fuit illud perpetuum And treating in another place of these beneficiarii and temporarii possessores he saith further Iisdem postea câ—pit concedi feudum in perpetuum quod est verum proprium Feudum Concluding in a third place that Propria Feudi natura haec est ut sit perpetua So that Cassineus in the Feuds of Burgundy saith that Omne Feudum quocunque modo acquisitum fit haereditarium cum successione sit redactum ad instar Allodialium That all Feuds by what means soever they be acquired are made hereditary in so much as by the continual succession of the children into the Feuds of their Fathers the Feuds are now brought to be like Allodial or patrimonial inheritances Thus Feudum which at first was but a tottering possession ad voluntatem Domini growing at length to be an irrevocable estate descending by many successions from son to son became at last to be an absolute inheritance and thereupon the words themselves Feudum and Haereditas in common use of speech Quem penes arbitrium est jus norma loquendi to be voces convertibiles and by a fair metonymia each to signifie other For as Horace further saith Verborum vetus interit aetas Et juvenum ritu florent modo nata vigentque Aptly
seqq a name not well agreeing with Feodal servitudes But it seemeth by divers Abby-books that some Estates for life which we call Frank tenements were also put in writing especially among the latter Saxons Yet were not these accounted bocland for they were laden commonly with many feodal and ministerial services whereas bocland as I said was free from all services not holden of any Lord the very same that Allodium descendable according to the common course of Nations and of Nature unto all the sons and therefore called Gavelkind not restrain'd to the eldest son as feodal lands were not at first but devisable also by will and thereupon called Terrae testamentales as the Thane that possessed them was said to be testamento dignus Folcland was terra vulgi the land of the vulgar people who had no estate therein but held the same under such rents and services as were accustomed or agreed of at the will only of their Lord the Thane and it was therefore not put in writing but accounted proedium rusticum ignobile But both the greater and the lesser Thanes which possessed Bocland or hereditary lands divided them according to the proportion of their estates into two sorts i. e. into Inland and Outland The Inland was that which lay next or most convenient for the Lord's Mansion-house as within the view thereof and therefore they kept that part in their own hands for supportation of their family and Hospitality The Normans afterwards called these lands terras dominicales the Demains or Lord's lands The Germans terras indominicatas lands in the Lord 's own use The Feudists terras curtiles or intra curtem lands appropriate to the Court or House of the Lord. Outland was that which lay beyond or out from among the Inlands or Demeans and was not granted out to any Tenant hereditarily but like our Copy-holds of ancient time having their original from thence meerly at the pleasure of the Lord. Cujacius speaking of this kind of land calleth it proprium feudum that is to say such land as was properly assigned for Feodal lands Proprium feudum est saith he extra curtem consistit in praediis As if he should say That land properly is a Feud or Feudal land which lyeth without the Demains of the Mannour and consisteth in land not in houses We now call this Outland the Tenants land or the Tenancy and so it is translated out of Biritrick's will in the Saxon tongue This Outland they subdivided into two parts whereof one part they disposed among such as attended on their persons either in war or peace called Theodens or lesser Thanes after the manner of Knights Fees but much differing from them of our time as by that which followeth shall appear The other part they allotted to their Husbandmen whom they termed Ceorls that is Carles or Churles And of them we shall speak farther by and by when we consider all the degrees aforesaid beginning with the Earl CHAP. VI. Of Earls among our Saxons AN Earl in the signification of Comes was not originally a degree of dignity as it is with us at this day but of Office and Judicature in some City or portion of the Country circumscribed anciently with the bounds of the Bishoprick of that Diocess for that the Bishop and the Earl then sat together in one Court and heard jointly the causes of Church and Common-wealth as they yet do in Parliament But in process of time the Earl grew to have the government commonly of the chief City and Castle of his Territory and withal a third part of the King's profits arising by the Courts of Justice Fines Forfeitures Escheats c. annexed to the office of his Earldom Yet all this not otherwise than at the pleasure of the King which commonly was upon good behaviour and but during life at most This is apparent by the severe injunction of King Alfred the Great labouring to plant literature and knowledge amongst the ignorant Earls and Sheriffs of his Kingdom imposed upon them That they should forthwith in all diligence apply themselves to the study of wisdom and knowledge or else forgoe their Office Herewith saith Asser Menevensis who lived at that time and was great with the King the Earls and Sheriffs were so affrighted that they rather choose insuetam disciplinam quam laboriose discere quam potestatum ministeria dimittere that is To go at last to the School of knowledge how painful soever rather than to lose their offices of Authority and degrees of Honour which Alfred there also declareth that they had not by Inheritance but by God's gift and his Dei saith he dono meo sapientium ministeria gradus usurpatis This is manifest by divers other authorities and examples in my Glossary in verbo Comes as the Reader if he please may there see Some conjecture that Deira and Bernicia in Northumberland and Mercia in the midst of England were Feudal and hereditary Earldoms in the Saxon times Those of Northumberland presently after their first arrival under Hengistus about the year 447. that of Mercia by the gift of Alfred the Great about the year 900. to Ethelredus a man of power in way of marriage with his daughter Ethelfleda but for ought I see it is neither proved by the succession of those Earldoms nor our Authors of Antiquity For my own part I think it not strange that there was not at the entry of the Saxons a Feudal and Hereditary Earldom in all Christendom As for this our Britain the misery of it then was such as it rather seemed an Anarchy and Chaos than in any form of Government Little better even in Alfred's days through the fury of the Danes tho' he at last subdued them for his time How soever three or four examples in five hundred years before the Conquest differing from the common use is no inference to overthrow it especially in times unsettled and tumultuous The noble Earldom of Arundel in our days of peace differeth in constitution from all the other Earldoms of England yet that impeacheth not their common manner of succession Loyseau and Pasquier learned Frenchmen speaking of the Dukes and Earls of France which England ordinarily followeth and sometimes too near the heels justifie at large what I have said shewing the Dukes and Earls in the Roman Empire from whose example others every where were derived were like the Proconsuls and Presidents of Provinces simple Officers who for their entertainment had nothing else but certain rights and customs raised from the people which we in England called Tertium denarium And that the Dukes and Earls of France were Officers in like manner but had the Seigneurie of their territory annexed to their Office so that they were Officers and Vassals both at once that is to say Officers by way of Judicature and Vassals whom we call Feodal tenants for their Seignories of Dukedoms and
of any other For at Ebsa in Suthry under the title of Ric. fil Comitis Gisleberti it saith Hanc terram tenuerunt novem Teigni cum ea poterant utere quo volebant Plain Latin but the sense is That nine Thanes held this land of Ebsam in the time of Edward the Confessor and might do with it what they would So at Est-Burnham in Buckinghamshire under the title of Milo Crispin Duo Teigni homines Brictrici hanc terram tenuerunt vendere potuere and here it seemeth that these Thanes were not the Kings Thanes but of the lesser sort for that he calleth them homines Brictrici So in the same Shire under the title of S. Petr. Westmon it is said of the same Town of Est-Burnham Hoc manerium tres Treigni Tempore Regis Edwardi tenuerunt vendere potuerunt It there also appeareth that the Thane-land might be charg'd with a rent issuing out of it for it immediately followeth tamen ipsi tres reddiderunt quinque oras de consuetudine And it might be restrain'd from alienation as where it is said in Doomsday De ea viz. Lega Pelton sunt in dominio duae hidae una ex hiis fuit Tainland non tamen poterat ab Ecclesia separari Where the word tamen implyeth that altho' Thane-lands might otherwise be alienated yet this particularly could not So likewise might it be entailed upon a Family as appeareth in the laws of Alured Cap. 37. But thus Doomsday after the Conquest affirmeth the same that the Charters did before the Conquest And the words both in the one and the other which shew that the Thane might sell or use this land as he would do imply an estate of inheritance independant of any Lord either feodal or superior and was as even the Alodium mentioned in the Chapter of Thanes but whether it were descendable only upon the eldest son or dividable between all the sons as in Gavelkind I cannot say but the formula of Alodium join'd with Marculfus doth divide it between them all CHAP. XII The fruits of Feodal Tenures and that they were not sound among the Saxons or not after our manner HItherto we have sought our Tenures among the Saxons and have not found them tho' the Report telleth us It is most manifest that they were frequent and common in the times of the Saxons We will now follow the direction of our Saviour and see if by the fruit we can find the tree The Report saith by question and answer The fruits of the Tenure viz. in Capite and Knights-service what are they but the 1 Profits of the lands 2 Wardship 3 Livery 4 Primier seisin 5 Relief mistaken to be an Heriot 6 Fine for alienation and the rest Which rest it supplyeth shortly after to be 7 Homage 8 Fealty 9 Escuage Adding again Relief and Wardship instead whereof I out of a third passage do place 10 Escheats And it concludeth that As all these tenures were common in those times so were all the fruits of them c. Which if it be true the question is determined nay I yield it if any one of them agreeing directly with our Tenures be found amongst them some shew of Fealty and Licence to alien lands granted for a certain time only excepted for avoiding captious disputation Their very names pretend no Saxon antiquity but as the Ephramites bewrayed their Tribe by their Language so by their names these fruits discover themselves to be of Norman progeny And the Report doth not give us one instance or example of any of them in all the Saxon times If it did the words before mention'd in the Charters to the Thanes declaring that their land must be libera ab omni seculari gravedine c. sweep all away at once as the West-wind did the Grashoppers in Egypt and do make the Thane-lands to have the priviledge of Alodium here before mention'd to belong unto them that is to be free from all tenure and service It is true notwithstanding that both the greater and lesser-Thanes might have and had other lands besides these that were hereditary of feudal nature and holden by military service as in the Charter of Oswald the Bishop shall after appear but they holding them like Folcland only at the will of the Lord whether King or other or for certain years or at most for life or lives their Tenure and Feuds determin'd with the will of the Lord the term of years or estate for life And then could not any of the fruits before spoken of accrue unto the Lord that granted the land for that it forthwith reverted intirely into his own hands and was to be kept and dispos'd a-new as pleas'd him It is apparent therefore by this general demonstration that the fruits we speak of could not arise out of either of the Thane-lands were they temporary or hereditary if not haply fealty or some gratuity to the Lord for licence that the temporary Tenant might assign his interest or have it enlarg'd things proper as well to Socage and Folcland as to Feudal But let us examine all these fruits particularly and see whether and how we find any of them among the Saxons and give me leave herein to produce them in such order tho' not logical as the Report presenteth them to the Reader in their several places CHAP. XIII No profit of Land by Wardship in the Saxons time AS for the profits of the land which the King hath now during the minority of a Ward it is manifest that the Kings then had no such of the Thane-lands for that the Thane had this particular priviledge that when he dy'd he might make his Will of his own lands as it formerly appeareth and give them unto whom he would which was never lawful after the coming of the Normans for any Baron or Tenant by Knight-service to do till the statute 32. Hen. VIII Cap. 1. gave free liberty to all men to devise all Socage-land by their last Will in writing and no more than two parts only of land holden in Capite or by Knight-service least it should hinder the Lords too much of their Feodal profits And Socage-lands were therefore long before devisable in many Burroughs for that thereby the Lord sustain'd no such prejudice But to conclude this point in one word it shall I hope be made manifest in the next Chapter that there were no Wardships amongst the Saxons and thereupon it will follow invincibly there could be then no profits of lands arising to the King or Lords by title of Wardship CHAP. XIV No Wardship in England amongst the Saxons Objections answered IN following the Report I must now speak de causa post causatum of Wardship after the Profits of land growing by it This being the chiefest fruit of all feodal servitudes and the root from whence many branches of like grievances take their original the Report laboureth more to prove it to
text of customs And to clear the doubt in the elder Edition publish'd by Tottill 12. June 1556. no such thing is mention'd but if it were there are such other differences in their copies as both their authorities may be question'd and I in the mean time well delivered from this objection Let us see what followeth Fourthly For the antiquity of Wardships in England and Scotland See also says the Report Hector Boet. lib. 2. Buchanan rerum Scot. lib. 6. and the laws of Malcome II. which prove the antiquity of Wardships in Scotland and in England before the Conquest For in those times it is probable the laws of both Nations did not much differ as for the times after it appears they did not by comparing their Regiam Majestatem with our Glanvil Neither is the bare conjecture of Sir Henry Spelman sufficient to take away the force of those laws Vid. Spelman's Glossary verbo Feudum Upon all this saith the Report they the Justices of Ireland did conclude and proceed to sentence With the sentence as a sacred thing I will not meddle But as touching that part of this argument which In nostros fabricata est machina muros I 'm tyed either to answer or to submit For Hector Boethius therefore I confess the place to be truly alledg'd and that hitherto hath seldom happened but for the credit of that Author I wish Leland were alive to deliver the censure he hath left upon him with his own mouth I forbear it True it is he relateth that Malcolm II. gave all his lands well nigh unto his Nobility in reward of their service and that they in thankfulness to support his dignity regranted unto him Vardam Desponsationem releviam al. relevatam Wardship and Marriage of their Heirs within age and Relief of those of full age The Paragraph there is long but to the effect we spoke of It is also true that Buchanan doth report the like and since him Cameraris and a little before them all Johannes Major but all their harping is from the sound of one string which in the Report is not left unstrain'd i. e. the laws of Malcolme before mention'd where it is said that ad montem placiti in Villa de Scona omnes Barones concesserunt sibi Wardam Releviam de Haerede cujuscunque Baronis defuncti ad sustentationem Domini Regis Which because they concern a noble Kindom and have been receiv'd as authentical by an ancient Parliament I will not presume to contradict it But I humbly offer to the consideration of the Learned of that Kingdom and to those of ours and theirs that are conversant in Antiquities these particulars following First It being agreed which the Scots affirm that Malcolm II. began his reign in the year 1004. i. e. above 60. years before the Normans Conquer'd England how it cometh to pass that Malcolm useth so many Norman words in his Scottish Laws and whether those words be found in any other monument there before for in England it was not so Secondly Whether their Kings then had not only a Seal but magnum sigillum in the custody of the Chancellor and set-fees appointed for the use of it for in England it was not so tho Edward the Confessour had a Seal after Malcolm's time Thirdly Whether they had brevia clausa in cera and other ordinary instruments seal'd cum magno sigillo and fees appointed for it for in England it was not so Fourthly Whether they had solemn presentations to Churches and Hospitals under Seals in that manner for this was long before the Council of Lateran Fifthly Whether they had then the names of Barons Seneschallus Constabularius Mareschallus not in use in England in the time of the Confessour as appeareth for the two latter by the Appendix to the Confessours laws and for their Seneschallus called their Steward Buchanan says he was brought in by Malcolm III. into Scotland Sixthly Whether the Norman Officers of Justiciarius Vicecomes Coronator Ballivus c. were then in use by any other proof than by or from these laws sic de caeteris Many other things I pretermit and take no exception to the frequent mention of Pounds and Shillings tho' I know they were scarce with them in Scotland as not abundant then in England but paid in Truck and Cattel But I admit that which the Report saith that in those times it is probable the laws of both Nations did not much differ As for the times after it appeareth they did not by comparing their Regiam Majestatem with our Glanvil They run much I confess paribus vestigiis and oftentimes totidem verbis iisdem paragraphis Whether of them leads or follows the other I dare not define and am loath to dispute The Preface to the Regia Majestas sheweth it to be written at the command of King David whom Skeneus in his Annotations calleth the first and saith he began to reign Anno 1124. i. e. 24. or 25. of Hen. I. And 't is certain that our Glanvil was not written till the time of Hen. II. who began not to reign till 1154. so that if this be true it must needs follow that we took a great part of the modell of our laws or at least the expression of them from the Scots which our Ancestors never yet acknowledg'd It may perhaps fall out upon better examination that David I. may be mistaken for David II. But for the part of Malcolm II's laws which speak of Wardship Marriage and Relief in Scotland at that time to have risen from their own Nobility Buchanan himself recedeth from that opinion and concludes Hunâ— morem ab Anglis Danis potius acceptum credo quod in tota Anglia parte Normanniae adhuc perseveret And Demster himself their greatest Antiquary ingeniously consesseth that there were no Barons in Scotland till Malcolm III. created them And he might well take his precedent from the Conquerour for he liv'd all the time of the Conquerour and about seven years after so that if there were no Barons in Scotland in the time of Malcolm II. as Demster affirmeth or the precedent taken out of England for Wardship as Buchanan believeth then could not this law be made in Malcolm II's time but seemeth rather by both their opinions to be ascrib'd to Malcolm III. and that the error hath risen as easily it may in writing II. for III. But in the mean time all this makes no proof against me CHAP. XV. No Marriage of Wards AS for Marriage it is here and in some other places mention'd by the Report but not a word any where to prove that it belonged to the Lord in the Saxon time I will help them with what I meet in the old MS. Book of Ramsey Sect. 120. where it is said that one Edwine son of Othulf gave five hides of land to Archbishop Odo Pro eo quod Regem Edredum inflexerat ut ei liceret
of a Fine as was common in all cases of Feodal Tenures This hath some shew of our Escuage and might well have taken that name from the manner of summons used in the Empire which was by erecting a post or pillar and hanging a Shield at the top thereof an Herald proclaiming that all who held in this manner should at such a day attend the Emperour in his voyage to Rome for taking the Crown of Italy or King of Romans which the Ligurine Poet thus expresseth Ligno suspenditur alte Erecto Clypeus tunc Praeco regius omnes Convocat a dominis feudalia jura tenentes c. as we have shew'd in our Glossary verbo Feudum He useth Clypeus for a Shield instead of Scutum and from this shield I say it might well be called Scutagium as also from the service performed in it cum hasta scuto Yet this summons was not called Schiltbannum but Heribannum that is indictio exercitus not indictio sâ—uti But to keep nearer the matter First our Saxons neither used the name nor the rules of the Norman Escuage for they called their going to war upon legal summons firdfare and utfare in Latin Expeditionem and Profectionem Secondly they were not tyed to any definite time of abode as for fourty days or more or less but as the law saith sÆ¿a a ðon ðearf sy for gemeneâ—â—â—re neode so as need shall require for common necessity Thirdly the mulct or forfeiture that the Tenant in Escuage incurred for not going forth upon that summons was uncertain among the Normans and us 'till the Parliament assign'd it but among the Saxons he that offended in Ferdwite that is in not going forth in the Expedition was certainly fin'd at 120 Fourthly whereas every Lord among us had the fine assess'd by Parliament of his own Tenant for the Lands holden of himself the King among the Saxons had the fine aforesaid of every delinquent whose Tenant or follower soever he were by all the Laws of the kingdom that is to say by the West-Saxon Law by the Mercian and by the Dane Law tho' otherwise they differ'd in their Heriots and many particular customs So that to talk of Escuage among the Saxons is without all colour or probability as I take it CHAP. XXIII No Feodal Escheate of Hereditary Lands among the Saxons EScheats of Eschoeir in French signifieth things coming accidentally as on the by or by chance The Fâ—odists therefore call them Caduca a cadendo and excadentias the black book of the Exchequer Escaetas excidentia and excadentia but among our Saxons I find no word to express them either properly or paraphrastically In our Law they be of two sorts Regal Escheats and Feodal Regal are those obventions and forfeitures which belong generally to Kings by the ancient right of their Crowns and supreme dignity Thus King David gave the lands of Mephibosheth accused of Treason unto Ziba tho' too hastily Feodal are those which accrue to every Feodal Lord as well as to the King by reason of his Seignory and of all the fruits of Tenure none so great as this if we may call it a fruit where the feud or tree it self resulteth back unto the Lord. Let us see therefore if we find any of these Feodal Escheats among the Saxons There is a shrewd text I confess in Canutus his Laws Qui fugiet à domino suo vel socio pro timiditate in expeditione navali vel terrestri perdat omne quod suum est suam ipsius vitam manus mittat dominus ad terram quam ei dederat si terram haereditariam habeat ipsa in manum Regis transeat Here is the appearance of a Tenure of a Feud of a Forfeiture and of an Escheat The Tenure lyeth between the Lord and his fugitive Vassal whom the Saxons and Germans called his Man we his Tenant The Feud in the Land quam dâ—mâ—nus â—i dederat The forfeiture in fugiendo in the Vassals running away And the Esâ—heat in the Lord 's seizing of the land manus mittat dominus in terram quam ei dederat Let the Lord take back the estate which he gave in the temporary feud But for the hereditary land he saith transeat non redeat in manum Regis All this is nothing in our case for I declared in the beginning that our question was fix'd upon such feuds as the Law of England taketh notice of at this day that is of feuds after they were become hereditary and perpetual not of those mention'd by Gerardus Niger which were temporary as at will of the Lord or for years or for life like them here intended by Canutus This very Law observeth the difference and discovereth also that feuds were not hereditary in his time and therefore giveth the feodal land being but a temporary estate back unto the Lord in whom the Reversion was by inheritance as a feodal right but giveth the hereditary Lands unto the King as a Regal Escheat for that there was no mean or intervenient Lord to claim them by any feodal tenure for that the hereditary lands among the Saxons otherwise called Bocland were holden of no body nor subject to any feodal service as we have often declared and could not therefore Escheat unto any feodal Lord. The Kentish custom of the father to the Bough and the son to the Plough suggesteth as much and sheweth also to have been the general use of England till the Conquerour introducing hereditary feuds put upon us therewith these greater feodal servitudes of Wardship Marriage Escheats c. So that the hereditary lands not being feodal in the Saxon's time nor the feodal lands hereditary there could then be no feodal Escheats among them And I take it to be considerable whether the land resumed by the Lord upon his Vassal's running away be properly an Escheat by the Law of Canutus or rather a penalty only impos'd in this particular case CHAP. XXIV Thaneland and Reveland what no marks of Tenure but distinctions of Land-holders THere is yet another assertion rather shewed than proved That the Thani majores or King's Thanes held by personal service of the King's person by Grand Serjanty or Knights-service in Capite And the reason following is that the land so held was in those times called Thane-land as land holden in Socage was called Reveland so frequently in Doomsday Haec terra fuit terra Regis Edwardi Thainland sed postea conversa est in Reveland Coke's Instit § 117. Thus the Report dischargeth it self upon my Lord Coke whose words be these It is to be observ'd that in the book of Doomsday land holden by Knights-service was called Thainland and land holden by Socage was called Reveland I reverence the opinion of that famous Lawyer with admiration but I suppose he speaketh not this ex tripode juridico For it is impossible that it and that which is before deliver'd out of the
times and that they were not made otherwise than for life or three lives for so I find them in the Abby-books And I also suppose that they to whom these lands were granted were the Thani Episcopi Thani Ecclesiae spoken of in Doomsday-book and that the lands themselves were such as in the same book are usually called Thain-lands Ecclesiae Episcopi and Abbatis But I see they were laden with many services which the lands of the King's Thane in respect of his dignity and person were free from Therefore when this very Bishop by another Charter granted tres cassatas three hydes of land in Cungle cuidam Ministro Regis to one of the King's Thanes nam'd Alfwold and to his Mother if she surviv'd during their lives he put no service upon the King's Thane but saith plena glorietur libertate excepta expeditione rata Pontis arcisve constructione the common exception in grants unto the Kings Thanes as before appeareth and yet the services thereby excepted belonged not either to the Bishop or the King himself otherwise than pro bono publico and common necessity After all this I beat still upon the old string that here yet is nothing to prove Wardship or Marriage or as the law then stood a Tenure by Knights-service for we have made it manifest that Expedition and building of Castles and Bridges were no Feodal services nor grew by Tenure And as for these that were tyed to ride and go up and down with their Lord Baraterius an old Feudist saith that a Knights fee may be given so ut Vassallus in diebus Festivis cum uxore Domini ad Ecclesiam vadat and the feudal law it self inferreth as much Lib. 2. Tit. 3. But our Bracton speaking of our Law here in England de Invest feud in his time touching such Tenants calleth them Rodknights alias Radknights Lib. 2. Cap. 35. nu 6. ut siquis debeat equitare cum Domino suo de Manerio in Manerium and saith not that it is Knight-service but that it is a Serjantie and that although such sometimes do Homage yet the Lord shall not have Ward and Marriage Admit notwithstanding that it were Knight-service and that the lands thus holden were Knights Fees during the life of the Tenant yet where is the Wardship Marriage and Releif Who shall undergo these servitudes since the Tenure and all the services are determin'd with the life of the Tenant CHAP. XXVII Inducements to the Conclusion SEeing then that neither the greater Thanes nor the lesser Thanes among the Saxons were subject to the rules of our Knight-service upon whom then if it were in use among them did it lye For as touching the Clergy it is said in the Laws of Edw. the Confessor cap. 11. that the King and the people magis in Ecclesiae confidebant Orationibus quam in Armorum defensionibus And the Report it self confesseth pag. 3. in pede That the possessions of Bishops and Abbots were first made subject to Knight-service in Capite by William the Conqueror in the fourth year of his reign for their lands were held in the times of the Saxons In pura libera eleemosyna free ab omni servitio seculari c. Though this be not true in the latter part being strictly taken for no doubt their lands were subject to the Trinodi necessitati viz. Expeditioni pontis arcisque constructioni as before appeareth yet cometh it very fitly to my purpose for hereby it is evident that if the Trinodis necessitas made no Tenure by Knight-service or in Capite in the Church Lands then neither did it in the Thane-lands as before we have shew'd and then much less in the land of Churles and Husbandmen commonly call'd the Socmanni for it is agreed on all hands that their lands were holden no otherwise than by Socage Therefore if all Kent in the Saxon's time were Gavelkind then could there be no Tenures by Knight-service in all that County For Glanvil Lib. 7. c. 3. telleth us That where the inheritance is divideable among the sons it is Socage And his reason is because that where 't is holden by Knight-service the Primogenitus succedit in toto This Kentish custom was ab initio the general Law of England and of all Nations Jews Greeks Romans and the rest and so continueth even till this day where the Feodal Law hath not altered it which first happen'd here in England when the Normans introducing their Feuds settled the whole inheritance of them upon the eldest son which the ancient Feodal Law it self did not as we before have noted till Feuds were grown perpetual The reason as I take it that begat this alteration was for that while the Feud did descend in Gavelkind to the Sons and Nephews of the Feodatorie the services were suspended till the Lord had chosen which of the Sons he would have for his Tenant and then it was uncertain whether the party chosen would accept of the Feud or not for sometimes there might be reasons to refuse it To return where I left it makes to the proof of all this that has been said and for conclusion seems to be unanswerable that the old inheritance which in the Saxons time belong'd to the Crown called in Doomsday Terra Regis and in the Law books Antient Demesne containing a great part of every County had not any Lands within it or within any Mannor thereof holden by Knight-service For Fitz-Herbert saith that Nul terres sont antient demesne forsque terres tenus en Socage And therefore if the Tenant in ancient Demesne will claim to hold of the Lord by Knights-service it is good cause to remove the Plea because that no Lands holden of a Mannor which is antient Demesne are holden by other services of the Lord than by Socage for the Tenants in antient Demesne are call'd Socmanni that is to say Tenants del carve Angl. le plough Thus far Fitz-Herbert Now if in the Mannors of the King himself there were then no Lands holden by Knight-service throughout all England it will then in all probability follow that there were none likewise among his Subjects in the Saxons time and consequently that our Feudal Law was not introduc'd before the Conquest Mr. Cambden by their own confession is of the same opinion and Mr. Selden himself whom they alledge against me is clearly with me as before I have shew'd If these our three opinions avail nothing we have yet a fourth to strengthen us great Bracton the most learned in our ancient Laws and Customs that hath been in this Kingdom who speaking of Forinsecum servitium as the Genus to these Tenures saith Lib. 2. cap. 16. Nu. 7. fol. 36. a. that it was call'd regale servitium quia spectat ad Dominum Regem non ad alium secundum quod in Conquestu fuit adinventum Here Bracton also refers the Invention to the Conquest but the Report waveth his opinion as well as ours notwithstanding
Richard Tribunus Regis or Marshal to King Henry II. 166. Hundradors 51. Hundreds their original 50. Hundred Courts 51. Hunting forbidden to Clergy-men 109 112 113 114 115. Hydes what 17. When disus'd 4â— I Ibreneys Rad. de 190. Iceni 135. Eorum nomina derivatio ibid. Icenia 135. Ejusdem termini ibid. Coelum solum 13â— Ina King of the West Saxons adjusted the quantity of Rent for every Plough-land 15. By whose advice he made his Laws 61. Made a strict Law against working on Sundays 57. Ingolsthorp 146. Inland what 12. Intwood 157. K. John's Magna Charta 63. John Marshal to King Henry I. 165. Irregularity of Clergy-men wherein it consists 109 112. I se fluvius unde dictus 135. Ejusdem aestus 139. Islepe Sim Arch-bishop of Canterbury 90. Jury taken out of several Hundreds in a County 53. Jurours prohibited to have meat c. till agreed of their Verdict 89. Jus Gentium 2. Justices of Evre when instituted 27. Justinian the Emperor when he flourish'd 129. He prohibited Clergy-men to take cognizance of Wills ibid. Justitium what 72. K Keninghall 158. Kent the custom of Gavelkind in that County 43. Kettringham 15â— The King the fountain of all Feuds and Tenures 1â— The King to have his Tenants lands till the heir has done homage 3â— The King universal Lord of his whole Territories 37. Anciently granted Churches to Lay-men 115 Knight what among the Saxons 51 58. Why there are but two Knights of the Shire for a County 64. Knight's-fees 3 4 51 58. When introduc'd 45. The number of them ibid. The value of a Knights-fee ibid. Knight-service 2 7. Kymberley 158. S Sacha Soca what in the Saxon tongue 51. Saliques bring the German feodal Rights into France 5. Sall in Norfolk 151. Sandringham 146. Sanhadrim when and where the Judges of it sate 75. Satrapies among the Saxons 50. Saxons the first planters of the German Rites in Great Britain 5. Their Charters translated 7. The manner of making their conveyances 8 Distinction of persons among them 11. How many degrees of Honour they had 16. How they held their lands 40. What oblig'd 'em to so many kinds of services ibid. Saxons very much given to drunkenness 89. When they took possession of England 100. They swept away the Roman Laws there 101 Yet took somewhat from them 102. Why their Laws were not at first put in writing ibid. When they had written Laws ibid. The use of wills unknown to the ancient Saxons 127. Our Saxons observ'd the Civil Law in their wills 128. Scutagium 36 37. Sedgeford 146. Segrave Nicholas Marshal of England 167. Seignory wherein it consists 2. Services how many sorts of 'em upon lands 17. Personal services 40. Praedial ibid. Alodial ibid. Beneficiary ibid. Colonical ibid. Servitia militaria what 46. The difference between them and Servitutes militares ibid Seymour Edward Duke of Somerset Nephew of King Edw. VI. 169. Made Lord Treasurer and Earl Marshal of England ibid. Shardlow Joh Justice of Oyer had a licence to hear causes on a Festival 95 96. Sharnburn 146. History of the Family 189 c. Shelton 156. Shouldham 142. Shyre gemot what 53. Signioral authority what 6â— Snetsham 146 189 190 c. Socage 3 7 33 43. Socmen 1â— 15 57. Sprowston 153. Stanchow 146 19â— Star chamber Court 94 95. Stigand Arch-bishop of Canterbury depos'd 119. Stock-Chappel 146. Stow-Bardolfe 140. Strangbow Gilb Earl of Pembroke and Marshal of the King's Palace 165. Suiters of the Hundred 51. When and by whom call'd at this day ibid. Summons the manner of it in the Empire 36. Sunday how exempted from Law Suits 76. Sustenance what 59. Swasham 141. Swainmote-Courts 85. Syndici who 63 64. Synod of Eanham when held 78. T Talbot George Earl of Shrewsbury 171. Executed the Office of Lord High Steward of England ibid. Tallagium 60. Tasburg 156. Tassilo Duke of Bavaria did homage to King Pipin 34. Tenant lands of how many sorts 4. Tenants by Knight-service 4. Tenant in capite 10. Tenant in menalty ibid. Tenant Paraval ibid. Tenant's land or the Tenancy 12. Tenants what they were in ancient time 51. Tenants in Socage 57. Tenants forc'd to pay a fine upon the marriage of a Daughter 60. To furnish their Lords with provisions ibid. To present them with gratuities ibid. Tenure in capite 2. By Knight-service 4 7. The Original of Tenures 4. Tenure in Socage 4 7. Tenures for Life ibid. What tenures were in use among the Saxons 7. When first us'd ibid. No tenures in capite among the Saxons 10. Tenure in capite of two sorts ibid. The fruits of feodal tenures 24. The name of tenures not us'd by the Saxons 40. Terminus what it signifies 71. When the word became frequent ibid. Terms their definition and etymology 71. Several acceptations of the word 70. Full term and Puisne term ibid. The Original of Terms 73 77. Two Terms among the Welch 74. The Terms laid out according to the ancient Laws 82. The ancient bounds of Hilary-Term 82 83. Of Easter-Term 83. Of Trinity-Term 84 85. Of Michaelmass-Term 85 86. How Trinity Term was alter'd 87. Michaelmass-Term how abbreviated 88. Why the Terms are sometime extended into the Vacation 95. Terra Regis 57. Terrae testamentales 12. Terrington 138. Tertium denarium 14. Testaments and last wills not in use among the ancient Hebrews 127. Not found in Scripture before Christ's time ibid. Expresly mention'd by St. Paul ibid. Not us'd by the Saxons or Normans ibid. The custom of making wills from whom taken up ibid. How many witnesses to a will requir'd by the Civil Law 128. Thane or Theoden who 10 11. Their several kinds 16. Not properly a title of Dignity ibid. The Etymology of their name ibid. The quality of their Persons ibid. The nature of their Land 17. The word Thane has no relation to war 21. A Thane's Heriot 31. Thane-lands not subject to feodal service 18. Charters of Thane-lands granted by Saxon Kings 19 20. The occasion of granting them 21. Thane-lands alienated ibid. Devised by will 22. Granted to women ibid. No service upon 'em but what was express'd ibid. Dispos d of at the pleasure of the owner 23. Charged with a Rent ibid. Might be restrain'd from alienation ibid. Thane-lands and Reveland what 38. Thani majores minores 16. Thani Regis ibid. Theinge 50. His jurisdiction ibid. Theowes and Esnes who 11. Thetford 158. Thokus Dominus de Sharnburn 189. Thola the widow of Ore had a grant of certain lands of K. Edw. the Confessour 20. Obtain'd a Licence to devise her Lands and Goods 34. Thrimsa what 15. Thrithingreves or Leidgerevâ—s their Office and Authority 52. What causes were usually brought before ' em ibid. Tribunus militum rei militaris aut exercitus 165. Tribute 59. Trimarcesia what 3. Trinity-term its ancient bounds 84 85. How it was alter'd and shortned 87. Trinodis necessitas 17 43. Trithings or Lathes 50. Why so call'd 52. Turfs why so call'd 139 140. Tydd