Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
lord_n daughter_n father_n son_n 10,765 5 4.8829 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A65716 Three sermons preach'd at Salisbury the first, A.D. 1680, and again before the militia, at their going against the late Duke of Monmouth ... the second preach'd before the Right Reverend Father in God, Seth, Lord Bishop of Sarum, A.D. 1681 ... the third, preach'd A.D. 1683, at the election of the mayor ... / by Daniel Whitby. Whitby, Daniel, 1638-1726. 1685 (1685) Wing W1737; ESTC R28389 88,809 79

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Jeroboam according to the Sentence of his Prophet Hoc crimen poenam à deo merebatur cum nullo dei jussu idfecisset Grot. yet was not this his action acceptable in the sight of God because he here resolves to punish him 1 Kings 16.7 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because he slew him Again the instances of the Idolatrous King of Judah from the days of Rehoboam till the time of their Captivity afford a further confutation of this new Apology for Treason and Rebellion For First it cannot be denied but that the Law of Moses and the Religion prescribed by it was the Religion established in the Kingdom of Judah Secondly The Scripture notwithstanding doth inform us that when Rehoboam had established his Kingdom 2 Chr. 12.1 1 Kings 15.3 he forsook the Law of the Lord and all Israel with him That Abiiah who succeeded him walked in all the sins of his Father which he had done before him 2 Chr. 21.11 That Jehoram made High Places in the Mountains of Judah 2 Chr. 24.16 17. and caused the Inhabitants of Judah to commit Fornication and compelled Judah thereto That Jehojada and the Princes of Judah left the House of the Lord God of their Fathers and served Groves and Idols 2 Chron. 28.24 25. That Ahaz did shut up the doors of the House of the Lord and he made him Altars in every Corner of Jerusalem 2 Chron. 33.5 6. and in every several City of Judah he made High places to burn Incense unto other Gods That Manasseh built Altars in the house of the Lord whereof the Lord had said in Jerusalem shall my name be for ever and he built Altars for all the Host of Heaven in the two Courts of the house of the Lord That Hezekiah with relation to some of these Enormities confessed after this manner Our Fathers have trespassed 2 Chron. 29.6 7. and done that which was evil in the Sight of the Lord and have forsaken him and have turned away their faces from the Habitation of the Lord and turned their Backs also they have shut up the Doors of the Porch and put out the Lamps and have not burnt Incense nor offered burnt Offerings in the Holy place unto the God of Israel by all which sayings it is evident that the exercise of the established Religion wholly was obstructed and the people were compelled not only to neglect but act in opposition to it Thirdly 2 Kings 17.13 2 Kings 14.25 26. 2 Chron. 12.4 8 9. 'T is further evident that God testified against these Abominations done in Judah by all his Prophets and his Seers that he chastised them for it 1. by Shisak King of Egypt who in the days of Rehoboam took the fenced Cities of Judah and came up against Jerusalem and took away the Treasures of the house of the Lord and of the King's house and the Shields of Gold which Solomon had made and caused Judah to be tributaries to him because they had transgressed against the Lord. 2. By the revolt of Edom and of Libnah because Jehoram had forsaken the Lord God of his Fathers And 3. 2 Chron. 21.10 Vers 16 17. by stirring up against Jehoram the Spirit of the Philistins and of the Arabiams that were near the Aethiopians who came up into Judah and brake into it and carried away all the Substance that was found in the King's house and his Sons also and his Wives 4. By the Host of Syria which came to Judah and Jerusalem and destroyed all the Princes of the People from among the People and sent all the Spoyl of them to the King of Damascus 2 Chron. 24.24 25. Zach. 14.5 Joel 1.2 3. a Great Host of Judah being delivered into the hands of their small Company because they had forsaken the Lord God of their Fathers 5. By a terrible Earth-quake in the days of Vzziah 6 By the dreadful plague of Locusts Caterpillars and Canker-worms 7. By sending against Judah Rezin the King of Syria 2 Chron. 28.6 and Pekah Son of Remaliah who slew in Judah 120000 valiant men in one day because they had for saken the Lord God of their Fathers and the King of Israel who carried away captive two hundred thousand Women Sons and Daughters Verse 8. And yet we read not of any Prophet stirring up these People to Rebel on the account of the Religion by Law established or on the account of all the miseries they suffered by the neglect of God's true Worship and by the introduction of Idolatry whence it is evident that private Persons or Subjects were then thought to have done their Duty when they had sighed and mourned for these abominations and kept themselves from any fellowship with these iniquities We find indeed 2 Chron 25.27 that after the time that Amaziah turned away from following the Lord they made a conspiracy against him in Jerusalem and he fled to Lachish but they sent to Lachish after him and slew him there But who made this Conspiracy the Text doth not inform us 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Antiq. Jud. lib. 9. c. 10. Josephus saith that some of his own Friends were the Contrivers of it the Syriack and Arabick Version that his Servants thus conspired against him as did the Servants of his Father Joash against him 2 Chr. 25.3 and as the Servants of Ammon did afterwards against their Lord and if so no doubt these Servants of Amaziah deserved the same punishment those other Murtherers received 2 Chron. 33.25 though by reason of the infancy of Vzziah who was then but four years old as good Interpreters conjecture and by reason of the interregnum of eleven years they scaped their condign punishment Moreover the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which imports Conspiracy and Treason being generally used in an ill sense gives us just reason to believe the Holy Ghost did not approve this Treachery and much less the ensuing Murther Fifthly Argument 5 According to this Principle Christians might lawfully rebel against those Arian Emperors who succeeded Constantine the Great viz. against Constantius and Valens for evident it is 1. That the Nicene Faith was fully established by Constantine the Great (a) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Euseb de vit Const l. 3. c. 23. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lib. 2. c. 32. Eusebius informs us that He confirmed the Doctrine of the Nicene Synod and made Laws against Arius and those of his Perswasion (b) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 1. c. 8. p. 31. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. 9. Socrates saith the same and (c) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Soz. Hist Eccl. l. 1. c. 20. Sozomen adds that he condemn'd to banishment those who did contradict the Suffrage of the Nicene Council and that He made a Law against all Heresies not suffering them to Assemble any where but in the Catholick Church and declaring that the (d) Privilegia quae contemplatione Religionis indulta sunt Catholicae
his Subjects that therefore Subjects may do the like to their Superiours That because Jeroboam might do this by an especial and particular Grant and Commission from the God of Heaven That therefore others may do the like tho they have no Commission of like nature from God is as absurd as it would be for us to rob and spoil our Neighbours and keep what we have borrowed of them without Restitution because upon a special and particular Commission from the great Lord of all things the Israelites did innocently deal so with the Aegyptians or salvagely to butcher or to cut off all Papists that do dwell among us because they were commanded to do thus to the Idolaters in the Land of Canaan 2. I answer 1 Kings 12.19 It is not said in Scripture that Jeroboam rebelled against the House of David but that Israel did so their Action plainly seemeth to have been Rebellion because it was an actual renouncing of their lawful Sovereign without God's Warrant to them so to do for they do with one Voice cry out What Portion have we in David and what Inheritance have we in the Son of Jesse and thereupon depart from Rehoboam and appoint Jeroboam to be their King without any Commission from God to do so Moreover they do this not out of any pretence of God's rejecting Rehoboam but only for this Cause That he refused to make their Yoke easie and to remove the pretended Burthens which his Father had laid upon them and therefore they revolted upon Rebellious Principles For as a Father doth not forfeit his Authority over his Children nor are they freed from that Obedience which they owe unto him by virtue of the Fifth Commandment because he deals severely with them and is not to indulgent to or careful of them as he ought to be so neither can the King i. e. the Father of his Country lose his Authority over his Subjects because he governs them severely or lays afflicting Burthens on them nor can their Subjects be disobliged from that Obedience which they owe unto them upon those Accounts for if Servants as St. Peter saith are to obey such Masters who are froward and perverse i. e. severe in their Commands 1 Pet. 2.18 19. and cruel in chastising them if they with Patience were to endure Grief and suffer wrongfully for Conscience towards God if the Angel commanded Hagar even when her Mistress afflicted her Gen. 16.6 9. and dealt hardly with her to return and submit her self unto her Hands much more are Subjects to obey and to continue in Obedience to their Sovereign tho they be never so severely dealt with by them But as for Jeroboam he only took what God had promised to give him by rending of ten Tribes out of the hands of Rehoboam and in that very method in which it pleased God to make good his Promise for the Text doth expresly say this matter was from God that he might perform the Saying which the Lord spake by Ah●jah the Shilonite unto Jeroboam the Son of Nebat 1 Kings 12.15 and when the Subjects of Rehoboam assembled to fight with the Children of Israel God by his Prophet doth forbid them saying v. 24. Ye shall not go up nor fight against your Brethren the Children of Israel for this thing is from me I therefore think of this whole matter thus That Jeroboam was not guilty of any Usurpation which might render him a Rebel against Rehoboam that the People were Rebellious in the Principle which moved them to revolt and in revolting without Commission from God but that upon this Declaration made by God's Prophet it became their Duty to own and to submit to Jeroboam as their King Now seeing Christ came not to take away or to diminish any of the Rights of Princes but rather to establish and confirm them Hence I infer That the Resistance whether in Word or Deed which was forbidden in the Old cannot be rationally thought to be approved in the New Testament but rather we may rationally judge that as our Saviour came to advance the other Duties of the Moral Law so much more by his suffering Religion to advance this moral Precept of Honour and Submission to our Superiours To which effect it is excellently observed by a very Learned Prelate The Lord Bishop of Sarum That we find Christ and his Apostles frequently labouring to settle in the Consciences of men their Obligations to Obedience and patient suffering where they cannot actively obey but no where restraining limiting or particularly regulating the Office of Sovereign Powers much less permitting or giving Power to their Subjects to limit or restrain their Power but leaving them to those general Rules which concern the Account and Duty of all Men in their several Stations and to the terms whereupon the Providence of God was wont to settle the Princes and Governours of the World Let the Rights of Caesar be what they will in reference to Tribute Christ will not determine them this he will Those things which belong to Caesar according to Jus gentium must be reudred to him He doth not examine Pilate 's Power in case of Blasphemy and Treasen but acknowledges it to be of God and submits And so likewise the Apostles seem to be unconcerned as it were in the governing part of Civil Policy No word is found in all their Writings enquiring into the Rights of the Roman Emperours who were Sovereign or limiting the exercise of their Power only thus much they take for certain such as they were they were ordain'd of God and they spend all their labour in founding deeply and firmly establishing that other part which concerns Obedience For the Scriptures of the New Testament do most expresly call for our Subjection to and as expresly do forbid resistance of the Higher Powers Rom. 13.1 2. Let every Soul be subject to them saith St. Paul so let him yield Subjection to them as never to resist on any Provocation Temptation or specious Pretence whatsoever for Whosoever doth resist the Power resists the Ordinance of God and they that resist his Ordinance shall receive to themselves Damnation 1 Pet. 2.13 14 15 16. Be subject to every Ordinance of Man saith Peter i. e. to every Power daily ordained among men for the Lord's sake or for the sake of him whose Ordinance they are whether it be to the King as Supreme or unto them that are sent by him for this is the Will of God this is well-doing this is acting as the Servants of God And though their Government should be unjust and they should punish you only for keeping a good Conscience do you bear it patiently for this is thank worthy v. 19. if a Man for Conscience toward God endure Grief suffering wrongfully v. 20. If when we do well and suffer for it we take it patiently this is acceptable with God this is to act according to our Christian Calling v. 21. and the
Bethel were set up to be worshipped 2 Kings 17.16 that they left all the Commandments of the Lord their God and made them molten Images even two Calves That Jereboam cast out the Priests of the Lord 2 Chron. 13.9 the S●ns of Aaron and the Levites and made them Priests after the manner of the Nations of other Lands That he drove Israel from serving the Lord 2 Kings 17.21 2 Chr. XI 14 16. 1 Kings 15.17 and made them sin a Great Sin and caused all those who set their hearts to seek the Lord God of Israel to desert their Habitation That Beasha King of Israel built Ramah that he might not suffer any to go out or to come in to Asa King of Judah to worship God according to the Law of Moses Secondly We know that all these things were done in opposition to the Law of the Land i.e. the Law of Moses established not only by consent and Covenant of all the Tribes of Israel and Judah but also by the Prescript and Authority of the Great God of Heaven God having made a Covenant with them which never could be disannulled by any Law of man and charged them saying Ye shall not fear other Gods 2 Kings 17.35 nor bow your selves to them nor serve them yet the ten Tribes continued this Idolatrous Worship till they were carried Captive 2 Kings 18.11 12. For the King of Assyria did carry away Israel into Assyria because they obeyed not the Voice of the Lord their God but transgressed his Covenant and all that Moses the Servant of the Lord commanded and would not hear them nor do them Thirdly Observe that God sent many Prophets to warn both Jeroboam 1 Kings 13.14.7 and his people of this great defection from him and to denounce his heavy Judgments against him and his Successors in that Kingdom for it For the Lord testifyed against Israel and against Judah by all the Prophets 2 Kings 17.13 and by all the Seers saying turn you from your evil ways and keep my Commandments and my Statutes according to all the Law that I commanded your Fathers That in his Providence he frequently chastised them for it 1. 2 Chr. 13.17 1 Kings 15.27 29.17.2 By Abijah King of Judah who slew 500000 of Jeroboam's men 2 By Baasha the Son of Ahijah who conspired against Nadab the Son of Jeroboam and smote all the House of Jeroboam 3. By the Dearth foretold by Elijah 4. By the very bitter Affliction which befel them in the days of Jehu 2 Kings 10.32 For in those days the Lord began to cut Israel short and Hazael smote them in all the Coasts of Israel and in the days of Jeroboam the Son of Joash when they were few 2 Kings 14.26 Vide 70 Interp 2 Kings 15.29.17.6 shut up and had no Helper And Lastly by delivering them up into the hands of Tiglath Pileser and Shalmaneser Kings of Assyria But all this while we never find that any of Gods Prophets uttered the least word for the encouragement of any of their Subjects to rebel against them upon this account or to engage them to sight for the Religion established in their Kingdoms and made the National Religion by the unalterable Laws of God or to rise up in Arms because they were not suffered to go up to Jerusalem to worship as God had commanded and as they had Covenanted they never minded them that Jeroboam when he came unto the Crown Jul. p. 69. found them in full and quiet possession of their Religion which was a blessing so inestimable that they should plainly undervalue it if they did not do their utmost to keep it That he seduced them from it in an Illegal Way against a Precept of their Decalogue and did it only by a Pretence that the two Calves he had set up in Dan and Bethel 1 Kings 12.24 were the Gods that brought them up out of the Land of Aegypt And yet it is not to be doubted but that these Prophets were truly jealous for the Lord of Hosts for the purity of his Worship and for the observation of the Law of Moses what therefore could have hindred them from calling on the People as our Phanatick Preachers did to help the Lord against the Mighty and sight for the Defence or for the Reformation of their Religion but their dislike of such Proceedings and the Conviction of their Consciences that such miscarriages in Princes would never warrant the Insurrection of their Subjects upon pretence of violation of the Religion established by Law or to cut off Idolatrous and Persecuting Princes without Express Commission and Authority from that God who removeth Kings Dan. 2.21 2 Kings 9.6 7. and setteth up Kings as it was in the case of Jehu who by Gods Prophet was anointed actual King over Israel 2 Kings 10.30 and was commanded by him to smite the house of Ahab his Master and of whom God declared that he had done well in executing Vengeance on the House of Ahab And this may very probably be gathered from the deportment of Elijah under that King who had none like him in iniquity 1 Kings 21.25 Ahabsent and gathered them 1 Kings 18.20 Deut. 13.5.17.2 1 Kings 18.13 v. 18. For having once obtained the Kings Authority to convene the Priests of Baal he in his presence and donotless with his permission slew them all according to the tenor of the Law of Moses He also shut up Heaven that there was no Rain until these Baalites were destroyed But although his accursed Wife at least by his connivance and the abuse of his Authority had slain the Prophets of the Lord and though the Prophet tells him to his Face that he and his Fathers house had troubled Israel in that they had forsaken the Lord and followed Baalim and lastly though Elijah had the people at his Devotion at Mount Carmel yet notwithstanding all his jealousie for God he gives them no encouragment to attempt any thing against their King he setteth up no person to oppose him till by express Command from God he had been authorized to anoint Jehu King over Israel 1 Kings 19.16 Moreover when Baasha conspired against Nadab and slew him tho he did only that which the Lord had spoken by his Servant Ahijah the Shilonite 1 Kings 14.14 as the just punishment of the revolt of Jeroboam from his Law and though God doth acknowledge that he exalted Baasha from the dust 1 Kings 16.2 and made him Prince over his people Israel yet came the word of the Lord against Baasha and against his house because he killed him whence we may rationally conclude Quod ille dominum suum Nadab interfecisset ut imperium assequeretun Munst Vatab. clarius in locum that though Gods Providence permitted Baasha to conspire against the Son of Jeroboam and though he ordered matters so as that he was Gods Instrument in doing execution on the house of