1. Tim. 6 15. Mat. 28 18 1. Cor 15 25 26 27. Philip. 2 8 9 10 11 Heb 2 7 8 9 10 17 18. Reuela 1.5 19.16 the greatest glory and dignitie in heauen is the Kingly and the highest title or stile that is giuen to God in the old Testament or to our Sauiour Christ in the new is to be called a King a King of glory a King for euer a great King aboue all Gods the King almightie a king of Gods the Prince of the Kings of the earth the Lord of Lords the king of Saints and King of Kings and thus is he called foure times in the booke of the diuine Reuelation which is questionles the greatest and highest stile that Christ hath and by many degrees greater and higher then his priestly stile of high priest after the order of Melchisedech for this stile hee had on earth in the state of his humility wheras he was not an actual king vntill he rose ascended into heauen and receiued all power in heauen and earth as the Soueraigne King of both at the hands of his Father according as both Gospell and Epistle do testifie Wherefore also the kingly dignitie is the greatest on earth and such as do represent Christ in his kingly dignitie as Christian kings doe are greater and more eminent then those that represent him in his Priestly dignitie Mat. 22 23 Dan 2 34 45. 1. Pet. 2.17 that is then Priests Bishops Archbishops or Patriarkes Eightly and lastly the honour of the king is commanded next vnto the honour of Godin holy Scripture Giue vnto God the things which are Gods and giue vnto Caesar the things which are Casurs saith our great Caesar who as Daniel speaketh is the Stone that was without hand cut of the mountaine of the blessed Virgine Mary and euen the corner stone of the Church Feare God honour the King saith Saint Peter another stone yea Ioh. 1.42 Galat. 2 9. Psal 118 22 Isay 28 16. Mat. 21.42 Mark 12 10. Luk. 20.17 Act. 4.11 Rom. 9.33 1. Pet. 2 7. Ioh. 1.42 Galat. 2.9 a pillar and chiefe stone of the Church whome I wish the Pope may immitate in this and all other Christian duties To be briefe for in our royal controuersies and disputations wee doe handle this question more accurately and employe besides Scriptures the fathers Greeks and Latines the Schoolemen Philosophers Polititians Poets and Historians both sacred and prophane to prooue the truth of this point against the ilearned Iesuit Iames Gretser in the creation of Salomon â—t is said that the people bowed downe their heads and worshipped the Lord and the King So that it is more then manifest that the King is the person next vnto God in power dignitie honour and authoritie 1. Chron 29 20. and thersore greater and higher then the greatest and highest priest of them all Sect. 11. The third lesson that we learne hence to wit That kings are not lay-men but of a mixt condition in that kings are called Gods is that Kings are called of God to be nursing Fathers vnto the Church and haue a special power about the things of God and consequently that they are not meere lay-men as both Iesuits and Geneuians Papists and Puritans doe holde but of a mixt condition partly Ecclesiasticall and partly ciuill or secular as in our latine workbefore named shal be largely proued both by Theology by Philosophy history For the present I say that the truth her of is apparent in Scripture by precept made vnto Kings by the practise of kings vnder the law and by Prophesie of Kings to be fulfilled vnder the Gospell And first it doth appeare by precept in that Kings are enioyned in the Scripture to make themselues able for the mannaging of the things of God Deut. 17 18 19. Psal 2 10 Wise 6 1. Ioh. 10 34. for they are enioyned to study Gods word diligently to reade in his Law continually to bee wise and learned exceedingly and therefore our Sauiour teacheth vs that Kings are called Gods because the word of God was giuen vnto them meaning Principally and to the end that they might gouerne Church and commonwealth according to God and for God as his vicares or deputies on earth Secondly it doth appeare by the practise of Kings vnder the law Exod. 39 43. Iosh 3 6 22 1.6 2. Sam. 5 6 21 6 12. 1. Kings 2 27 35 5 5. 8.14 15 10 22. 2. King 18 4 23 4.5 24 21 22 23 24 25. 1. Chron. 13 1 2 3. 15 1 2 3.4 11 16. 2. Chron 15 8 9 10 16 17 6 7 8 9 10 19 8. 20 3 24 4.5 6 7 8 29 4 5 11 15 18 21 25 27 30 31 31 2.10 11. 1. King 2.27 35 2. Chron. 19 11. Isay 49 22 23. and not onely of those that were both Princes and Prophets as were Moses Dauid and Salomen but also of those that were meere Princes without the Propheticall gift such as were Ioshnah Asa Ichosaphat Ioash Ezekiah Iosias Manasses they haue coÌ„man ded the Priests yea euen the chiefe priests to doe the parts of their office and appointed them to their courses and charges they haue placed and displaced the high Priests themselues they haue suppressed Idolatrie remoued and deposed yea put to death Idolatrous Priests broken downe the Idols restored religion to her purity assembled both the priests to bring vp the arke of the Lord and the people to celebrate the passeouer and to serue God haue read the law publikely in the audience of the people proclaimed fasts prayed for them and blessed them likewise in the house of the Lord. Thirdly the Ecclesiasticall power of Princes doth appeare by prophesie for the Euangelicall Prophet Isay when hee foretolde the conuersion of the Kings of the gentiles to the Christian faith he likewise prophesied of their Ecclesiasticall place and power of being Nursing Fathers vnto the Church saying Thus saith the Lord God beholde I will lift vp mine hand to the Gentiles and set vp my standard to the people and they shall bring thy sonnes meaning the Churches children in their armes and thy Daughters shall bee carried vpon their shoulders and Kings shall bee thy nursing Fathers and Queenes shall be thy nurses And in our Latine worke of royall Controuersies we shall show how this Prophesie hath beene accomplished in the person of Christian Princes Kings and Emperours and how they haue exercised that part of the Ecclesiasticall power which standeth in the supreame gouernment of the Church To wit that they haue made lawes of ecclesiasticall matters and for the confirmation of faith haue tried matters of heresie punished heretickes rooted out suppressed I dolatry exhorted and conuerted nations to the Christian faith instituted Bishops and sent them to preach placed pastours in the Church called councells and presided in the same Sect. 12 The fourth thing that wee learne of this stile
name Thou shalt be to Aaron as God said the Lord to Moses whom he had made a soueraigne Prince ouer his people And againe I haue made thee a God to Pharaoh and Moses calleth the soueraigne Iudges by the name of Gods saying thou shalt not rayle vpon the Gods for so it is in the originall and the Psalmist to the same purpose speakes thus God stādeth in the assembly of Gods he iudgeth among Gods and againe he brings in the great God speaking thus of his little Gods I haue said ye are Gods yee are all children of the most high Sect. 9. In that Kings are called Gods That the Kingly dignitie is immediately from God wee learne sixe notable lessons hereafter following The first that the kingly power is immediately of and from God and not of man as both Geneuians and Romanes most erroniously doe hold for none can make of a man a God on earth but God in heauen neither is it in the power of man to make one Gods seruant or minister but we must leaue it vnto God himselfe to choose and ordaine his owne seruants And truely if the King were ordained of man as he is for the good of man and therefore is by Saint Peter called an ordinance of man the Apostle Paul would neuer haue named him Gods seruant and minister but mans 1. Pet. 2.13 Rom. 13.4.1 Chron 29.23 The King sitteth in the Lords throne saith the holy Chronicler now it belongeth not vnto man to set another man in Gods seate but must let this alone for God himselfe to doe The throne is Gods and not mans Psal 21.3.1 Sam. 9.15 16 17 10 1 24 13 13 14 16 1 2. 1. King 3.7 10.9 1 Chr 29 29 2 Chro 2.11 Nehe 13 26. Dan. 4.14.23 Prouerbs 8.15.16 Wisd 6.1 2.3 Rom. 13.1 4. and he that sitteth in it is Gods minister and not mans yea he is of God called God for man cannot make a man God and therefore Kings are immediately from God and not from man an argument that all the Geneuians and Romanes in the world shall neuer be able to answer And therefore to shut vp this first lesson for in our worke of kingly controuersies we disputeit more largely and accurately three Kings Dauid Salomor Hiram one Queene of Sheba one Prince Nehemiah one high Priest Samuel one chiefe Prophet Daniel one principall Apostle Paul yea Gods Angel and God himselfe doe all of them anouch that kings are chosen of God nominated sent crowned created and set in Gods throne by God himselfe and not by man Sect. 9. The second lesson that wee learne here is that the kingly dignitie is of all other dignities absolutely the greatest and the diuinest That the kingly dignity is the diuinest and greatest of all other Reuel 2. 3. Psal 82.6 Dan. 3.26 6.20 Ioh. 15.14 15. and not the priestly as both Romane Geneuians do erroniously suppose For first as none can be greater in heauen then the God of heauen or so great so none in earth can be greater then he who is called of God to be a God on earth nor none can beso great Secondly as the highest stile that can bee giuen to any is giuen to Kings so a lower stile is giuen to Prelates and Priests for they are in the Scripture no where called Gods but well are they named Angels so that as the Angels in heauen are inferiour to the God of heauen so are the Angels on earth to wit the chiefe Priests and Prelates inferiour vnto the Gods on earth which are Soueraigne Princes thirdly Princes are called the children of the most high where as Church-men are instiled onely the seruants and friends of the most high Psal 21.3 1. Chron. 29.23 Fourthly God putteth a crowne of golde vpon the Kings head and he setteth him in his owne throne to sit there for God as God so that as the Apostle speaking of the inferioritie of the Angels of heauen beeing compared with Christ the annointed of the Lord saith vnto which of the Angels said he at any time Heb. 1.13.14 sit at my right hand till I make thine enemies thy footstoole are they not all ministring Spirits sent forth to minister for their sakes which shall be heires of saluation In like manner may it be said in this matter touching the inferioritie of the Angels on earth that is prelates beeing compared with the Lords Christ and annointed one the Soueraigne Prince vnto which of the Angels on earth for Prelates are called Angels in the Reuelation seauen or eight times said the Lord euer sit in my throne Reuel 1.20 2.1.8 12 18 3 1 7 14. as hee saith vnto Kings yea I haue sought much in reading and could neuer finde in old Testament or new in Scripture or Father Greeke or Latine that euer the Lord said immediately or mediately vnto the great Archangel himselfe that sitteth in S. Angel sit thou in my throne for no man taketh or at least should take this honor vnto himselfe but he that is called of God as was Dauid or Salomon What are the angels on earth else then but as ministring spirits sent forth by the Gods on earth 2. Chro. 17 7 8 9. Exod 32.21.22 Numb 12 11 1. King 1.33 34. 2 Chton 29 11. Exod. 5.1 4 20 1 6.8 20. 10 20. 9 8 10 3 11 10 12 1. Psal 77 20. 2 Chron 24 12 13 14 31 13. the Christian Ichosophats to teach in Iuda through al the Cities of their kingdomes to minister the holy Sacraments to them that shal be heires of Saluation to gouerne the Church Fiftly the high priest Aaron calleth the Soueraigne Prince Moses his Lord and Salomon a king is called Zadoks the high Priest Lord Ezekiah a king calleth the priests his sons which doth argue the superioritie and maiestie of kings for the Lord is superior to his seruant and the Sonne inferiour to his father Sixtly the Spirit of God euery where placeth Kings before the chiefe Priests Moses and Aaron the King and Iehoiada Ezekiab the King and Azariah the chiefe of the house of God and preferreth the Princely dignitie before the priestly where they meete in one and the same person Moses in Genesis Gen. 14 18 Heb. 7 1 Exod 19.6 1. Pet. 2.9 Reuel 1.6 4.10 and Saint Paul to the Hebrewes doe obserue this order in Melchisedech whome they name a King and a Priest The same Moses or rather the Lord himselfe calleth his people a kingdome of Priests or a royall Priesthoode as speaketh Saint Peter and Saint Iohn in the Reauelation hath these words and made vs Kings and Priests vnto God and the same words are vsed of the foure and twenty Elders Seuenth ly Psal 2 6 20 9 24 7 8 9 10 29 10 95 3 98 6 Esther 13 9 15 14 3 12. Reuel 1.5 15 3 17 14 19 16
supreame Gouernour thereof vpon earth which is the King whom God himselfe hath called by the name of God as hee that hath his royall power immediately from God and not from man contrary to the opinion of Romanes and Geneuians and whose dignity is absolutely the greatest and diuinest of all other and much more eminent then the Priestly contrary to the opinion of the same and whose person and power is mixt of ecclesiasticall and ciuill as he that is not a meere lay-man contrary to the opinion of them likewise and whose Maiestie and dignitie is inuiolable and not liable to any kinde of censure or punishment at the hands of man spirituall or temporall otherwise then both Romanes and Geneuians would make vs beleeue in all which points for all their iumping together they erre most grossely and the Church of England holdeth or thodoxally Now in the next place wee shall prooue the perfection of the same Church by shewing how that she is more Angelicall or Angel-like in respect of the secondary Gouernours of the Church and consequently liker vnto Gods Church in heauen then any Geneuian Church is For like as in the Church of God in heauen God himselfe gouerneth soueraignely and supreamely as Monarch and King and the Archangells doe gouerne the inferiour Angels secondarily as Senatours and the twenty foure crowned Elders which are of the blessed Spirits of men doe gouerne the inferiour spirits as we may learne by some ten chapters of the Reuelation and as all ancient Diuines doe deliuer so in the Church of England the Soueraigne Prince as God and for God doth gouerne it supreamely vpon earth and secondarily the Archbishops Colloss 1.16 1. Thess 4.16 as Archangels doe preside aboue the Bishops which againe as Angels and so are they called in the same Diuine Reuelation seuen times in two chapters doe gouerne the inferiour Ministers of the Word and Sacraments and these againe like vnto those more perfit spirits or soules of men Reuela 45 7 8 9 12 14 15 16 19. cap. Reuel 2.1 8 12 18 3 1 7 14 doe gouerne the lay multitude of men and women So that the Anglicane or English Church is more Angelicall or Angel-like then the Geneuian is which admitteth no such Angelicall distinction and order of Ministers for there they are equall and neither like the Angels in heauen which haue their chiefe Princes Dan. 10.13 12.1 Juâ—e vers 9. Reuel 12.7 Colos 1.16 Reuel 9.11 12.7 and their inferiours as namely Michael the Archangel and his Angels euen Thrones Domimons Principalities Powers as the Apostle speaketh nor like the Diuels in hell which are better ordered as hauing a distinction of degrees for the Angel-king of the bottomlesse pit otherwise called the Dragon hath many blacke Angels vnder him whence it followeth that the Anglicane Church as being the more Angelicall or Angel-like is perfiter then the Geneuian by farre And truly I can not wonder inough of this paritie of theirs from whence they had it for it is more then manifest that they had it not from heauen nor yet from hell as hath beene before shewed belike they haue learned it of the Grashoppers that leape about the banks of the Lemannian lake for they haue no King yet goe they forth all by bands saith Salomon From the Church of God vnder the law they had it not for they had their high Priests their principall or chiefe Priests and their inferiour Priests Exod. 28. Leuit. 8. Numb 3. 4 8 18 1. Chron. 9. 15 16 24 25 26 2. King 23. Nehem. 12. Heb. 5 5 6 10 Mat. 10 1 2 28 16 Mark 3.14 6 7 Luk. 6 13 9 1 Act. 1.22 16 2 14 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 5 6 14 15 16 17 19 1 2 3 4 5 7 Cor. 12.28 29. Ephes 4.11.12 and likewise among the Leuites some were superiours and some inferiours some were as Lords and chiefe Fathers and other some as sonnes and followers Nor had they their paritie and equalitie of Church Ministers from the Church of God vnder the Gospell such as it was in the daies of Christ and his Apostles for our Sauiour himselfe was as the high Priest the Apostles as the chiefe Priests the seuenty Disciples as the inferiour Priests and the Deacons as the Leuites and no man that hath his right wittes will say that the Apostles Prophets Euangelists and Pastours mentioned by the Apostle Paul as ordained of God in the Church were all equall in dignitie and office Neither had they their paritie of pastours from the Church such as it was after the Apostles daies for within the first fiue hundreth yeares we read in the Ecclesiasticall histories how that the Church was gouerned by Patriarkes and Arch bishops representing the twelue Apostles and by Bishops representing the Euangelists Yea in the very Apostles daies there were Bishops which had vnder them inferiour Pastours as S. Iames Bishop of lerusalem S. Peter Bishop of Antioch S. Paul Bishop of Rome S. Marke Bishop of Alexandria and if we will not beleeue the Ecclesiasticall historie of the Primitiue Church yet let vs beleeue the Epistles of the Apostle Paul who enstileth Timothie the Euangelist 2. Tim. 4. Tit. 3. 1. Tim. 5.22 Tit. 1 5 the first Bishop of the Church of Ephesus and Titus another Euangelist first Bishop of the Church of the Cretians and testifieth that by vertue of their function they did ordaine presbyters or inferiour pastours in those Churches for ordination argueth demonstratiuely the superioritie of the ordainer and the inferioritie of the ordained Act. 20 17 18 1. Tim. 3.1 2 5.17 19 Tit. 1 5.6 7 and without such inequalitie their can bee neither ordination nor order And though it be true that in the Scripture the names of Bishop and Presbyter or Pastour be taken indifferently for one and the same office yet that doth argue only that euery Pastor or Presbyter is and may bee called a Bishop in respect of his people or parish ouer which hee is placed so that he may bee called a Bishop aboue the Laitie but it doth not argue that their were no superiour Bishops aboue those Bishops of the Laitie to ordaine order and direct them which were Bishops of a more eminent degree and distinct from the other these Bishops Presbyters and Pastours aboue the Clergie and those Bishops Presbyters and Pastours aboue the Laitie and consequently inferiour vnto the former wherefore I could wish that learned men would not leane so much as they doe to that argument taken from the indifferencie of those two words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 seeing the question and controuersie is not verball but reall for the question is not if all the Ministers of the Church may be called by the common name of Pastor Presbyter and Bishop but if all those that are called by the common name ought to bee
making confession of their faith at the rehearsall of the Creed and at the reading of the Gospell The which gestures are to bee vsed both for reuerence and for signification for reuerence because their is no man so ignorant or blockish but vnderstandeth that kneeling and standing vp are much more reuerent humble and respectfull gestures then sitting and therefore in the doing of such religious duties to God wards are to bee vsed And for signification because that as by kneeling at the rehearsing of the law wee doe professe and confesse our miserie and wretchednesse occasioned by the fall in the first Adam and doe humbly aske God mercie for transgressing his commandements so by our standing vp at the reading of the Gospel or rehearsing of the Creede or articles of faith we professe and acknowledge that our rising after the fall and our standing by Grace were caused by the second Adam Christ So that by these reuerent and significant gestures wee doe put our selues in minde of the chiefe matters that concerne saluation we show how that we stand in Gods fauour by faith as also we declare and notifie how that we ought to be alwaies ready to defend the faith And truly the man that will not doe so much as stand vp reuerently vpon his feete when the Minister maketh a publike confession of faith in the name of the people doth argue that his faith wanteth the feete of deuout affections and ten to one but it wanteth likewise the hands of charitable actions He himselfe loueth sitting and I feare me least his faith loue too much creeping or lying along vpon the ground whereunto it is as it were tyed by the taile so that hee can not minde heauenly matters Moreouer in the Church of England they vse reuerently to vncouer their heads and bowe or kneele at the naming of Iesus in resemblance of the holy Elders in heauen which vncouer their heads and bow before the Lambe Christ Iesus as said is and that both in imitation of the first Christians within the first fiue hundreth yeares and because the holy Apostle doth ioyne the bodily obeisance of bowing or kneeling at the name of Iesus with the dutie of the tongues Confessing of his name for writing to the Philippians thus he saith Christ humbled himselfe and became obedient vnto the death of the crosse Philip. 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 11. Wherefore God hath also highly exalted him and giuen him a name aboue euery name that at the name of Iesus should euery knee bow and that euery tongue should confesse that Iesus Christ is the Lord vnto the glorie of God the Father Christ this only Sonne of God had humbled himselfe as man for mans sake below all men and therefore God the father exalted him as man aboue all men Heb. 2 5 6 7 8 9 1. Cor. 15 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. Tim. 6.15 Reuel 17.14 19 16 1 5. and made him the head and Monarch both of men and Angels the King of kings and Lord of lords blessed for euer as the same Apostle otherwhere teacheth And this his royal exaltation all Christians are bound to acknowledge by Confession of Tongue and by the obeisance or bowing of the body and the vncouering of the head And that it is a Christian and a commendable custome I prooue it thus All action or gesture that declareth the subiection of the creature to Iesus Christ as the King of all mankinde must needs be a Christian and commendable gesture or action But the bowing of the body or knee and the vncouering of the head at the pronouncing of the name of Iesus are gestures and actions declaring our subiection to Iesus as the King of mankinde especially of his Church and therefore they are Christian and commendable Againe it becommeth good Christians to take all occasions they can of performing Christian duties now it is a Christian dutie and one of the chiefest to thanke God for the worke of our saluation for louing vs so deerely as that hee would giue his only begotten Son to bee our Sauiour and to expresse our thankfulnesse by some religious and reuerent gesture Now what better occasion can there bee offered of doing this duty then when we heare that name pronounced which signifieth a Sauiour and putteth vs in minde of our Saluation as the ringing of the bell putteth vs in minde of comming to Church and which is both his proper name his royall name and therefore to be ciuilly honoured his diuinest name and therefore to be religiously worshipped and of all his other names the most comfortable to miserable mankinde In a word all Christians are bound to honour magnifie and blesse Gods name at all times in all places and vpon all occasions but especially and principally in the publike congregation when we heare his principall and most maiesticall name pronounced which is Iesus vnder the Gospel to Christians as Iehouah was vnder the law to lewes Lastly to conclude this point of the English Churches Reuerence I say that it appeareth yet more in their religious gesture vsed in receiuing the holy Sacrament which they doe not standing as at some hunters breakfast with the French nor sitting as an ordinary supper with the Scottish but humbly kneeling and bowing vpon their knee as Gods humble guests acknowledging themselues vnworthy to stand or sit downe at his Table so long as we are in this life loaden with sin and doe want the wedding garment of such perfit and inherent righteousnesse as wee shall haue in the kingdome of heauen where wee shall haue the honour to sit downe with the Lambe at Gods board for then wee shall bee made his glorified guests when wee shall bee fully freed from sinne Reuel 19.7 8 9. Mat. 15.22 23 24 25 26 27 22 11 12 and arraied in the white robes of inherent righteousnesse as it is in the Reuelation Whereas so long as wee are here vpon earth we cannot for our life quite cast off old Adams skinnecoate of origin all corruption nor yet put off perfitly the rotten ragges of actuall vnrighteousnesse which makes vs with the Cananite to creepe as it were vnder Christs Table and to be content for the time of this sinfull life to gather vp the crummes But because that our Geneuits for all that are disposed to be as bold homely at the Board of heauen as they are in their owne houses do condemne this reuerent gesture of kneeling therefore I must intreat my deere Countrey-men to giue me leaue to aske them a few questions And first if it be not only lawfull but also conuenient and necessary to receiue the Sacrament with the greatest reuerence and humilitie that can be and I thinke it will not bee denied Secondly if it bee not lawfull yea conuenient and necessarie to vse some one externall gesture or other in receiuing the Sacrament which I take will also be graunted Thirdly if it be not onely lawfull but also conuenient