Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
lord_n	daughter_n	elder_a	marry_v	10,918	5	9.6530	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A28585	The continuation of An historicall discourse of the government of England, untill the end of the reigne of Queene Elizabeth with a preface, being a vindication of the ancient way of parliaments in England / by Nath. Bacon of Grais-Inne, Esquire.	Bacon, Nathaniel, 1593-1660.; Bacon, Nathaniel, 1593-1660. Historicall and political discourse of the laws & government of England.	1651 (1651)	Wing B348; ESTC R10585	244,447	342

occasion of the Death of Pope Julio is to be seen Lastly she was no good Queen not onely because she gave up the Peoples Liberties in Ecclesiasticall matters to the forrain Jurisdiction of Rome but undertook too much therein by far upon her own account and in Civil Affairs though De jure She was not inferior to any of her Progenitors yet She would have it declared by the Parliament as if the consideration of her Sex or birth had made som hesitation in her minde and when she had made all clear she commending her self thereby to the Prince of Spain with her self indangered likewise that trust of the Nation which she had received and cast such a shadow upon her own Supremacy as in many things it is hard to be discerned Lastly In her whole course uneven sometimes appearing like the eldest Daughter of Henry the Eighth at other times like a Fem covert led by the will of her Lord and Husband that wanting Supremacy himself rendred her thereby beneath her self For First She married by Act of Parliament as if She were not at her own disposing professing as much in her speech to the Londoners upon the Kentish rebellion so a difference was made between the two Sisters the marriage of the one being by advice of Parliament and the abstinence of the other against the same Nor is the same altogether irrationall for by the one the Government of the Nation is indangered and by the other otherwise Secondly By her marriage She became doubly married one way relating to her Person unto her King the other relatintog her trust unto her Councell For where a Forraine mighty King is so nigh the Helme its dangerous to trust the same to his Wife without the joynt concurrence of the Lords The matter in fact declared no less for many times She had steered quite wide had not the Lords been more stiff to their principles then She. The first yeare of her marriage was Hony-moon with her She thought nothing too dear for the King and that her self was but meanly married unless her Husband were as compleat a King in her Nation as any of her Predecessors although contrarily the higher he was advanced the meaner She became Thirdly By her marriage She adventured her Title of Supremacy of jurisdiction For Phillip as King had the Honour stile and Kingly name and so had the precedency he had to do also with the jurisdiction for by the Articles of the marriage he was to aid the Queen in her administration of the Kingdome and maintenance of the Lawes Writs and Commissions passed under his name He also sate in Parliament voted therein and joyned in the Royall Assent Lastly Joyned in the publication and execution of all Lawes To him also was Allegiance due and therefore the Crime of Treason was equally against his as the Queens Crown and Dignity saving that it was reserved to be as against him onely during the time of Coverture and yet had the Queen left issue by him it would have been a hard adventure for the Lawers to have given their opinion in that case seeing the King had been Guardian to his Children during their minority Lastly The whole power and jurisdiction resting in them both joyntly could not inable them to make or dissolve Courts at will nor conclude orders and directions in cases of Plea and conveyance nor process concerning the same I shall sum up all in this on econclusion if neither of these three had an absolute Legislative power either in matters concerning the Church or Common-Wealth if no absolute jurisdiction in case either of Life Member or Estate If they neither can create unite or alter any Court either concerning the Triall and determining the Estates of the People or their own Revenue If not alter or make any new process in Courts of Law If not order common assurances of Lands or Estates And Lastly If they have no power in determining the last appeal and definitive sentence in matters of controversy but all must rest upon the sentence by Parliament there must certainly be found out a further sense of that grand Title of Supremacy of jurisdiction power superiority pre-eminence and Authority then by the common vogue hath bin made The Title of supremacy was first formed in the behalf of Henry the eighths Claime in matters Ecclesiasticall which by the Statute is explained under these words of power To visit correct repress redress Offences and Enormities This Power and no other did Queen Elizabeth claime witness the words of the Statute in her own time But in the framing of the Oath of Supremacy in her time not only in causes Ecclesiastical but temporal which never came within the Statutes and publique Acts in Henry the sevenths time are inserted and if any thing more was intended it must come under the word Things which also was inserted in the said Oath and yet if the words of the Statute of Queen Elizabeth formerly mentioned be credited the word Things ought to comprehend no more then the word Causes and then the Power of Queen Elizabeth in the Common-Wealth will be comprehended in these words of Supremacy to visit correct repress redress Offences and Enormities for the Supremacy in the Church and Common-Wealth is the same in Measure and what more then this I cannot understand out of any publique Act of this Nation Now in regard Offences and Enormities are properly against Lawes the power to visit and correct must also be regulated according to Laws either of War or Peace nor do these five words Jurisdiction Power Superiority Pre-eminence and Authority contain any more Supremacy or other sense for two of them speakes only the rank or degree of the Queen in government Viz. Superiority and Pre-eminence belongeth only to her and not to any other Forrain power And two other words do note her Right and Title thereto by Power and Authority committed to her And the other word denotates the thing wherein She hath Superiority and power Viz. In jurisdiction the nature of which word Vlpian speaking of the nature of a mixt government explaineth thus Quando servata dictione juris judiciorum fit animadversio so as this supreame Authority in jurisdiction is no other then supream power to visit correct redress Offences or determine matters in doubt by deputing fit persons to that end and purpose according to the Law and this is all the Supremacy that appeareth to me belonging to the Crown in these times CHAP. XXXVI Of the Power of the Parliament during these times WHen the Throne is full of a King and he as full of opinion of his own sufficiency and Power a Parliament is looked upon as an old fashion out of fashion and serve for little other then for present shift when Kings have run themselves over Head and Eares A condition that those of that high degree are extremly subject unto but where the Crown is too heavy for the wearer by reason of infirmity the