Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
lord_n	damnation_n	drink_v	eat_v	10,899	5	8.2264	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A33224	The summ of a conference on Feb. 21, 1686, between Dr. Clagett, and Father Gooden, about the point of transubstantiation	Clagett, William, 1646-1688.; Gooden, Peter, d. 1695.	1689 (1689)	Wing C4401; ESTC R7092	13,374	33

give_v to_o say_v that_o the_o nature_n of_o bread_n be_v not_o there_o and_o consequent_o can_v not_o be_v break_v for_o the_o bread_n there_o speak_v of_o be_v not_o mean_v of_o natural_a bread_n but_o of_o bread_n which_o come_v down_o from_o heaven_n and_o which_o be_v the_o flesh_n of_o christ_n john_n 6.41_o i_o be_o the_o bread_n which_o come_v down_o from_o heaven_n john_n 6.48_o i_o be_o the_o bread_n of_o life_n ver._n 50_o 51_o 52_o 53_o 54_o 55_o 56_o 58._o from_o whence_o i_o infer_v my_o answer_n to_o be_v good_a that_o though_o the_o h._n eucharist_n be_v call_v bread_n and_o break_v as_o to_o the_o species_n of_o bread_n yet_o it_o be_v not_o natural_a bread_n but_o only_o in_o appearance_n of_o which_o st._n paul_n speak_v for_o the_o same_o st._n paul_n 1_o cor._n 11._o speak_v of_o the_o same_o bread_n say_v he_o that_o eat_v and_o drink_v unworthy_o eat_v and_o drink_v damnation_n to_o himself_o not_o discern_v the_o body_n of_o our_o lord_n christ_n also_o speak_v of_o the_o same_o bread_n say_v take_v eat_v this_o be_v my_o body_n matt._n 26.26_o also_o luk._n 22.19_o speak_v of_o the_o same_o eucharist_n this_o be_v my_o body_n which_o be_v give_v for_o you_o dr._n the_o answerer_n forget_v the_o part_n of_o a_o disputant_n have_v pretend_v to_o prove_v large_o by_o the_o six_o chap._n of_o st._n john_n and_o other_o place_n of_o scripture_n that_o st._n paul_n in_o the_o aforementioned_a place_n do_v not_o speak_v of_o bread_n proper_o so_o call_v although_o he_o speak_v of_o bread_n that_o be_v to_o be_v break_v all_o which_o place_n when_o it_o be_v my_o turn_n to_o answer_n i_o will_v consider_v particular_o but_o if_o that_o which_o be_v here_o say_v be_v to_o go_v for_o a_o answer_n the_o force_n of_o it_o lie_v in_o this_o that_o by_o the_o bread_n which_o st._n paul_n speak_v of_o we_o be_v to_o understand_v the_o bread_n which_o st._n john_n speak_v of_o namely_o the_o bread_n which_o come_v down_o from_o heaven_n by_o which_o the_o answerer_n understand_v the_o natural_a and_o ●roper_a flesh_n of_o christ_n but_o that_o the_o bread_n which_o st._n paul●peaks_v ●peaks_z of_o can_v be_v the_o natural_a flesh_n of_o christ_n i_o prove_v thus_o the_o bread_n which_o st._n paul_n speak_v of_o be_v break_v but_o the_o natural_a body_n of_o christ_n can_v be_v break_v ergo._n the_o bread_n which_o st._n paul_n speak_v of_o can_v be_v the_o natural_a body_n of_o christ_n fath._n as_o to_o the_o species_n and_o appearance_n of_o bread_n it_o be_v break_v i_o grant_v it_o as_o to_o any_o nature_n contain_v under_o those_o species_n of_o bread_n i_o deny_v it_o dr._n this_o distinction_n do_v not_o avoid_v the_o argument_n because_o if_o the_o bread_n in_o st._n paul_n and_o the_o bread_n in_o st._n john_n be_v real_o and_o proper_o the_o same_o and_o the_o bread_n in_o st._n john_n be_v real_o and_o proper_o the_o flesh_n of_o christ_n than_o what_o be_v affirm_v of_o the_o one_o must_v be_v true_a of_o the_o other_o and_o therefore_o if_o the_o bread_n be_v break_v in_o st._n paul_n than_o the_o natural_a body_n of_o christ_n must_v be_v break_v too_o which_o can_v be_v i_o add_v further_o that_o if_o by_o break_v of_o bread_n st._n paul_n mean_v break_v the_o accident_n of_o bread_n only_o and_o if_o the_o bread_n that_o be_v break_v be_v real_o that_o which_o be_v speak_v of_o in_o st._n john_n as_o aforesaid_a it_o follow_v also_o that_o the_o accident_n of_o bread_n be_v proper_o the_o body_n of_o christ_n fath._n that_o which_o st._n paul_n call_v bread_n have_v in_o it_o both_o the_o accident_n of_o bread_n and_o the_o substance_n of_o christ_n body_n as_o to_o the_o accident_n of_o bread_n it_o may_v be_v break_v as_o to_o the_o substance_n of_o christ_n body_n which_o be_v mention_v in_o st._n john_n it_o be_v not_o break_v unless_o you_o mean_v as_o christ_n body_n be_v break_v upon_o the_o cross_n and_o if_o the_o bread_n which_o be_v break_v be_v real_o that_o which_o be_v speak_v of_o in_o st._n john_n as_o aforesaid_a both_o as_o to_o the_o accident_n and_o nature_n of_o bread_n i_o grant_v that_o the_o accident_n of_o bread_n will_v be_v the_o body_n of_o christ_n and_o if_o it_o be_v not_o the_o same_o both_o as_o to_o the_o nature_n and_o accident_n i_o deny_v it_o this_o i_o profess_v not_o to_o understand_v fath._n as_o to_o the_o doctor_n be_v argument_n it_o include_v a_o sophism_n as_o will_v appear_v when_o bring_v into_o form_n because_o it_o involve_v 4_o term_n because_o he_o suppose_v in_o one_o proposition_n for_o the_o accident_n of_o bread_n and_o in_o the_o other_o for_o the_o nature_n dr._n in_o the_o argument_n i_o use_v i_o go_v upon_o this_o supposition_n that_o the_o accident_n of_o bread_n be_v only_o to_o be_v understand_v as_o the_o answerer_n suppose_v and_o therefore_o i_o have_v not_o confound_v the_o nature_n and_o the_o accident_n of_o bread_n together_o beside_o the_o distinction_n between_o the_o nature_n of_o bread_n and_o the_o accident_n of_o bread_n be_v not_o to_o be_v remember_v any_o more_o by_o the_o answerer_n because_o i_o proceed_v upon_o his_o supposition_n that_o the_o accident_n only_o be_v break_v now_o if_o st._n paul_n speak_v of_o nothing_o but_o what_o be_v break_v and_o accident_n only_o be_v break_v and_o yet_o if_o he_o speak_v of_o the_o very_a flesh_n of_o christ_n too_o than_o the_o accident_n of_o the_o bread_n be_v the_o very_a flesh_n of_o christ_n and_o whereas_o the_o answerer_n by_o his_o last_o answer_n mean_v the_o nature_n of_o christ_n body_n as_o he_o say_v i_o understand_v he_o of_o the_o nature_n of_o bread._n and_o now_o once_o more_o i_o desire_v he_o to_o show_v i_o where_o the_o four_o term_n be_v fath._n the_o text_n of_o st._n paul_n the_o dr._n take_v for_o his_o medium_fw-la and_o argue_v from_o a_o double_a supposition_n as_o first_o take_v it_o for_o the_o accident_n of_o bread_n which_o be_v break_v and_o afterward_o for_o the_o substance_n of_o christ_n body_n under_o the_o accident_n in_o which_o latter_a sense_n it_o signify_v the_o same_o that_o be_v mean_v by_o our_o saviour_n in_o st._n john._n dr._n i_o observe_v the_o answerer_n will_v allow_v nothing_o to_o be_v break_v but_o accident_n i_o observe_v also_o that_o nothing_o be_v say_v to_o be_v the_o body_n of_o christ_n or_o the_o communion_n of_o the_o body_n of_o christ_n but_o what_o be_v break_v if_o therefore_o nothing_o be_v break_v but_o accident_n than_o accident_n be_v either_o according_a to_o the_o answerer_n long_a proof_n the_o very_a body_n of_o christ_n or_o according_a to_o the_o apostle_n the_o communion_n of_o the_o body_n of_o christ_n but_o neither_o be_v the_o accident_n of_o bread_n the_o body_n of_o christ_n nor_o the_o communion_n of_o the_o body_n of_o christ_n and_o this_o i_o say_v be_v not_o answer_v and_o believe_v will_v not_o be_v answer_v by_o any_o man_n that_o maintain_v that_o st._n paul_n do_v not_o here_o speak_v proper_o of_o bread._n fath._n all_o along_o in_o my_o discourse_n i_o have_v suppose_v that_o when_o st._n paul_n speak_v of_o this_o bread_n he_o speak_v of_o the_o h._n eucharist_n in_o which_o be_v contain_v both_o the_o accident_n of_o bread_n and_o the_o true_a body_n of_o christ_n how_o the_o dr._n have_v disprove_v this_o doctrine_n so_o clear_o as_o to_o justify_v the_o reformation_n i_o understand_v not_o because_o i_o conceive_v no_o private_a person_n or_o particular_a church_n aught_o to_o pretend_v a_o reformation_n without_o clear_a evidence_n whether_o the_o dr._n have_v give_v such_o i_o leave_v to_o the_o consideration_n of_o the_o reader_n and_o whither_o have_v break_v off_o from_o the_o great_a body_n of_o the_o universal_a church_n and_o its_o testimony_n he_o can_v possible_o have_v any_o certain_a rule_n to_o arrive_v at_o christian_a faith_n if_o scripture_n be_v pretend_v interpret_v by_o a_o fallible_a authority_n how_o certainty_n can_v be_v obtain_v or_o why_o a_o socinian_n follow_v scripture_n for_o his_o rule_n of_o faith_n be_v not_o to_o be_v believe_v as_o well_o as_o any_o other_o reformer_n follow_v the_o same_o rule_n i_o see_v not_o signed_n w._n clagett_n peter_n gooden_o dr._n clagett_n answer_n to_o a_o paper_n deliver_v to_o he_o by_o father_n gooden_o the_o paper_n article_n of_o christian_a faith_n be_v truth_n truth_n be_v impossible_a to_o be_v false_a therefore_o article_n of_o christian_a faith_n be_v impossible_a to_o be_v false_a therefore_o those_o who_o obtain_v article_n of_o the_o christian_a faith_n must_v have_v some_o rule_n to_o acquire_v they_o by_o which_o can_v deceive_v they_o to_o a_o parliamentary_a protestant_n the_o ancient_a father_n can_v be_v such_o a_o rule_n because_o they_o