on such a day particularly that comes to pass by vertue of his positive Command the first cannot be altered the second by the Lord may but till he alter it the Authority lies still on all and it is equally sin to sin against any of them though without the positive Sanction there is no obligation naturaly requiring obedience in some of them 6. The sixth distinction is of the Moral Law in two Tables first and second The first contains our immediate worship and service and obedience to God himself and is comprehended in the first four Commandments the second contains our mediate obedience to God in all the duties we owe to other in the last six they were at first so divided by the Lord himself for there are Ten in all Dent. 4. 13 From this distinction take notice 1. That all the Commandments of the second Table are of like Authority with the first God spake all these words yea as it appears from Acts 7. 38. it was our Lord Jesus 2. The sins immediately against the first Table are greater then those against the second for this cause Matth. 22. 38. the first is called the First and Great Commandment Therefore 3. In Morals if they be things of the same nature the duties of the second Table cede and give place to the duties of the first Table when they cannot stand together as in the case of love to God and the exercise of love to our Father and Neighbour Luke 14. 26. Matth. â—0 37. when obedience to God and obedience to our superiours cannot consist we are to obey God rather then man Acts 4. 19. and we are to lore the Lord and hate Father and Mother Luke 14. 6. 4. Yet take notice that Ceremonials or positives of the first Table for a time cede and give place to Morals in the second as for relieving or preserving our Neighbours life in hazard we may travel on the Sabbath day according to that Scripture I will have Mercy and not Sacrifice and the Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath c. 7. The seventh distinction which is ordinary is of the Commandments into affirmative and negative as ye see all the Commandments in the first Table are negatively set down forbidding sin directly Thou shalt not have an other gods c. only the fourth is both negative and affirmative forbidding sin and commanding duty directly as also the fifth only which is the first of the second Table is affirmative all the rest are negative This distinction is not so to be understood as if nothing were commanded or injoyned in negative Precepts or as if nothing were forbidden in affirmative Precepts for what ever be expressed as forbidden the contrary is alwayes in plyed as commanded and whatsoever is expresly commanded the contrary is alwayes implyed as forbidden but the distinction is taken from the manner of setting them down concerning which take these Rules or general Observations for your better understanding many whereof are in the larger Catechism 1. However the Commandments be expressed affirmatively or negatively every one of them hath two parts one affirmative implyed in negative Precepts requiring the duties that are contray to the sins forbidden another negative implyed in the affirmative Precepts forbidding the sins that are contrary to the duties commanded as for example the third Commandment Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord thy God in vain it implies a Command reverently to use his Name So to remember to keep Holy the Satbbath day implies a Prohibition of prophaning it in which sense all the Commandments may in some respect be called negative and so a part of the fourth Commandment is negatively expressed Thou shalt dâ—no work or affirmative in which respect Christ comprehendeth all the negatives under these two great affirmative Commandments of love to God and our Neighbour for every Commandment doth both enjoyn and forbid the like may be said of promises and threatnings there being in every promise a threatning and in every threatning a promise conditionally implyed And this may be a reason why some Commandments are negatively expressed some positively to show us that both are compredended 2. Though the positive Commandment or the positive part of the Commandment be of alike force and Authority with the negative as to the obligation it layeth on us to duty yet it doth not tye us to all occasions and times as negatives do Hence is that common Maxime that affirmative Commands tye and oblige semper ever that is they never want their Authority and we are never absolved from their obedience but they do not oblige and tye ad semper that is in all differences of time we are not tyed to the exercise of the duties enjoyned negatives again oblige both somper and ad semper that is alwayes and in all differences of time For instance in the third Commandment the affirmative part is to use the Lords Name and Ordinances holily and reverently in prayer reading and hearing c. So in the fourth Commandment we are required to sanctifie the Sabbath by wating on Ordinances c. This makes these still duties so as to pray hear c. are still duties but we are not to be and should not be alwayes exercised in these duties for we must abound in other duties also of necessity and mercy we must eat and sleep c. and when we sleep we can neither act love nor sear Again the negative part is not to prophane the Lords Name in his Ordinances this may not be done at any time The reason of the difference is this because in affirmatives we are not alwayes tyed to the acts of Duties and Graces but to the Disposition and Habit. Habits are a Spiritual Quality a Vis or Power sitting and enabling for bringing forth these acts and for the bringing them forth in the due time and season when they shall be called for but in sinful things we are prohibited not only the habits but the acts also the one is alwayes and ever a sin but the other is not alwayes called for as duty If any desire Rules to know when a duty is called for as for instance when we are to pray hear c. it is hardly possible to be particular in this yet we may try it by these Generals 1 Any affirmative Precept binds to present practise when the duty required tends to Gods glory unto which every thing should be done as 1 Corinth 10. 31. and when the omission of the duty may dishonour him 2. When it tends to others edification and omitting will some way stumble and offend 3. When some special Providences meet and concur to give opportunity for such a duty as for instance the giving of Aims when we have it and some indigent person offers whose necessity calls for it Gal. 6. 10. So when secrecy for prayer is offered and no other more necessary duty at that time is called for which we are to watch unto
do not so effect them and yet even these know the reasons that are made use of against the sinfulness of it which maketh me think there is something directly against Conscience and Purity in these sinful actions or motions To conclude sure we are this Opinion is not unsuitable to the end of the Law and that absolute Purity and Angelical Holiness God calleth for in it namely that not only when we are awake we are to be still with him but that our sleep should not break our Communion with him And certainly it is most safe for man to humble himself under the sense of his sinful nature and the sad necessity of sinning both waking and sleeping he hath brought on himself that thereby he may the better press on himself the necessity of a Mediator for Righteousness which are the great ends and uses of the Law We come now more particurarly to the words which the Lord himself spok concerning the number of these Commandments and general scope of them as hath been said there is no question but there be four things we would speak a little to for further clearing of the Text before we come to speak particularly to the first Commandment The first is whether these words I am thâ— Lord thy God c. be a part of the first Commandment or a Preface to all the Ten Answ We think it is a ground laid down for pressing and drawing forth our obedience to all the Commandments yet it hath relation more especially to the first Commandment as the negative expression there cleareth which is Thâ—â— shalt have no other godâ— before 〈◊〉 that is no other then Me what Me even Me the Lord thy God that brought thee â—ut of the Land of Egypt So then there is a special relation betwixt this Commandment and the Preface as including the positive part of this negative Commandment and it doth especially clear these three things 1. What is the right object of worship it is Jehova Elohim the Lord that sheweth the Unity of the Divine Essence for so â—â—hovah being a word in the singular number is ordinarely look't on as pointing out this then Eloâ—im which is a word in the plural number speaketh the plurality of Persons in the God head so that the Lord commanding and requiring obedience here is one God and three Persous 2. It cleareth what is the right Channel in which our service should run it is in the Channel of the Covenant our obedience is to be directed not to God abstractly considered but to God as our God I am the Lord thy God saith he and thy God by Covenant so the expression is Deut. 28. 58. That thou mâ—â—st fear this glorious and fearful Name THE LORD THY GOD. This maketh our service and worship sweet and kindly and without this relation there can be no acceptable service performed by sinful man to God and that relation that by the Covenant of Works once stood betwixt them being broken it saith it must be made up again which only can be done in Christ and it saith also that this relation to God in him and obedience to the Law can consist well together 3. It cleareth what is the right and great motive of obedience to wit the benefit of Redemption love and thankfulness upon that account constraining to the performing of these duties that are commanded that they may be done willingly and in a chearful manner Secondly It may be asked why the second Commandment and the fourth Commandment have reasons pressing obedience annexed to them which none of the other hath at least expresly set down by the Lord Answ This may be a reason because all the other Commandments are by the Law of Nature determined in mens Consciences and the sins against them are by Natures Light seen to be evil but the substance of these two to wit what way he will be worshipped in externals and on what day as the solemn time of worship being determined by Gods positive Law they are not so impressed on mens Consciences as the duties required in the other Commandments are therefore the Lord addeth reasons to each of these to perswade to the obedience of them as to the second I am a jealous God and therefore will not admit of any the least appearance of declining from me even in externals and to the fourth keep the Sabbath day for I have put a difference betwixt it and other dayes though before there was none which is further amplified in the Text Now by this reason which is also given by the School-men it may appear that the second Commandment concerning outward worship according to our way of distinguishing them iâ— distinct from the first which requireth the inward worship due to God for the first Commandment is Moral-Natural and can never be altered and has as much impression on a Natural Conscience as any and therefore according to this ground needed no reason Thirdly It may be observed also that some Commandments have Promises added to them which others have not not that any Commandment wants implied incouragements but in some they are expressed as in the second He sheweth mercy to thousands c. and in the fifth That thy days may be long c. The reason given why Promises are particularly expressed in these two is that obedience to these two seemeth to bring most hurt to men and is most contrary to their corrupt wills and affections it seemeth not so prejucidial nor is it so obnoxious to the hatred of the World that men love God and fear him in their hearts c. as it is outwardly to confess him before men and that by adhering close to the true manner of worshipping him This maketh men obnoxious to persecutions crosses losses c. to be seriously taken up in the externals of godliness sometimes bringeth much prejudice with it and is to many troublesome and so to be obedient to Superiours and tender of Inferiourâ— is not easily condescended unto therefore God to counterbalance the difficulties that accompany the obedience of these two Commandments hath added Promises to them the more to incourage and stir up to the obedience of them The fourth thing we would take notice of is that some Commandments have threatnings expressed in them which others have not as the second and the third not that any Commandment wanteth implied threatnings but the reason is because men ordinarily count light of the breach of these two Commandments if they be as they think honest at the heart though they be very negligent and careless in many outward things and though in the manner of worship they be very slight and perfunctorious yet if it be to the true God they think the less of it And so also men are given to count very light of reverent using Gods Holy Name therefore he hath put a threatning to both these Commandments to make men know he will not so easily pass them as men oft-times imagine and that all these three
Officers School-masters and Teachers I charge you to endeavour to prevent this sin in your selves and others It is sad that the Children of many are brought up in it the most part live in it our Streets are more full of it then the Streets of Heathens Advert to this charge every soul Or 3. I charge you to appear before this great and dreadful God who will not accompt any such guiltless and to Answer to Him for it The Fourth Commandment Exod. 20. verse 8. 9. 10 11. Remember the Sabbath day to keep it Holy Six dayes shalt thou labour and do all thy Work but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God in it thou shalt not do any Work Thou not thy Son nor thy Daughter thy Man-servant nor thy Maid servant nor thy Cattel nor thy Stranger that is within thy Gates for in six dayes the Lord made Heaven and Earth the Sea and all that in them is and rested the seventh day Wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and Hallowed it THe Lord in his infinite Wisdome and goodness hath so far consulted mans infirmity as to sum up his Duty in these Ten Commands called Ten Words that thereby his darkness and dulness by sin might be helped by an easie abbreviation The first Command therefore containeth mans duty to God in immediate Worship requiring that the onely true God should be worship'd The second stinteth and limiteth men to that worship alone which he pâ—rscribeth The third Commandeth Reverencing of him in all his Ordinances and a reverent manner of going about them This Fourth pointeth out the Time which most solemnly the Lord will have set apart for his Worship that so He who is both Lord of us and of our time may shew what share he has reserved as a Tribute due to himself who hath liberally vouchsafed on us the rest which time is not to be understood exclusively as if he would have onely that spent in worship there being no exclusive determination of the frequency of the exercises of worship or duration of them in Scripture that is to say that they shall be so long and so often and no longer nor oftner but that he will precisely have this time as an acknowledgement from us even as when he gave Adam the use of all the Trees in the Garden he reserved one so when he giveth six dayes to us he keepeth a seventh for himself This Command is placed in a manner betwixt the two Tables because it is a transition as it were from the one to the other and containeth in it duties of immediate Service to God and of Charity towards men and so in some sort serveth to reconcile if we may speak so the two Tables and to knit them together that so their harmony may be the more clearly seen It is also more largely and fully set down for plurality and variety of expressions and words then any other in either of the Tables yet hath it notwithstanding been in all times in a special manner assaulted and set upon and endeavours used to overturn it Satan aiming sometimes to darken the meaning of it sometimes to loose from the strict tye of observing it and that not onely by old Sabbatarians Anti-sabbatarians and corrupt School men but even by those whom God hath made Orthodox in the main And especially by a Generation in these dayes who having a hatred at all Ordinances and at all the Commands of the Decalogue yet do especially vent it against this Command because in it is contained a main foundation of Godliness As it is wonderfully great presumption for men to assault and set upon Gods Authority even where he hath strengthned himself as it were most by more full explication and more large and particular pressing of duty and forbidding of the contrary sin as he hath done in this Command more then in any of all the rest So it will be necessary before we can speak to the practical part of piety comprehended in it concerning the sanctification of the Christian Sabbath or Lords day either in the negative or positive part of it to speak doctrinally for clearing of the precept to these three 1. Whether this Command be moral and do oblige us in its Letter as other Commands do 2. What is the particular morality of it and the literal meaning of the words 3. How our Lords day standeth in reference to this Command and whether thereby the same sanctification be required as to it though its institution arise from another ground then is required to the seventh-Seventh-day Sabbath Somewhat of all these must needs be spoken unto and we begin to speak first of its morality before we speak of its meaning because all dependeth on this both in respect of exposition and practise for if it be not moral and perpetually binding it 's not necessary either to explicate it or to study and press the practise of it but if it be found to be moral then no doubt it concerneth us and requireth the same moral sanctification of a day now as it did before Our Assertion then in reference to this is that The duty of setting apart and sanctifying of a portion of time as it is limited in the fourth Command for Gods service as it recurreth is moral and the Obligation thereunto perpetual even as in the duties of the other Commands the obligation to this being no more dissolved then to those though there may be difference in the degree of the obligation which they lay on in respect of the matter contained in them my meaning in a word is that a day oâ— one of seven is as necessary to be kept holy unto God now upon supposition of his determining the particular day as it is necessary to hold and keep up the worship prescribed by God neither without sin can another day be put in the room of it more then other worship can be substituted in the place of divinely prescribed worship for the time is set and fixt by the fourth Command pointing at a solemne and chief time as the woâ—ship it self is by the second For clearing of this consider 1. That we mean not here moral-natural as if without any positive Law such a thing had been binding no but moral-positive that is laid on by a Command which is standing unrepealed and so bindeth by vertue of the authority of the Law-giver as several other commands and precepts do as namely those concerning Sacraments belonging to the second Command and those concerning one Wife and forbidden degrees of Marriage belonging to the seventh which being so often broken by many Saints and dispensed with in some cases cannot be thought to be morally naturally since the Lord dispenseth not so in these nor can it be thought in reason that his Servants would have been ignorant of such a natural thing It is then moral-positive that we mean to wit that which is binding by a positive Law 2. Consider in this question that there is a
first or last day of the Feast and therefore if the Lords meaning were that they should pray that their flight might not be on any of the Jewish Holy dayes to mention the weekly Sabbath only would not be sufficient for that end To say that it was for fear of scandal that they should pray not to be put to flye will not remove the former reasons besides at that time the Apostles and other Christians had given up with the Jews and stood not on scandal in such things in reference to them on whom as the Apostle saith 1 Thâ—s 2. 16. Wrath had come to the uttermost and who were not infirm but malitious and so in respect of offence to be dealt with as the Lord did with the Pharisees and therefore all things being considered it appeareth from our Lords words that a Sabbath among Christians was to be sanctified 40. years or thereabout after his death which proveth that the Scripture mentioneth a Sabbath to be sanctified under the New Testament We come unto the second way of making out the Morality of this Command to wit by shewing how the Scripture speaketh of the whole Decalogue and thus we reason 1. If all the Commandments of the Decalogue be Moral then must this be so also for it is one of them and if it were not moral and binding there would not now be Ten words as they are called by the Lord Deut. 10. 4. but Nine onely which at first blush will and cannot but seem strange and absurd to those who have from Gods Word drunk in that number But all these are moral and binding as is granted by all except the Papists who deny the second and therefore score it out of their Catechisms And that they must be all alike moral and binding may be made out these two waves 1. All of them in the Old Testament had alike Authority Priviledges and Prerogatives which neither the Judicial nor Ceremonial Law had as 1. To be distinctly pronounced by God himself without adding more Deut. 5. 22. 2. To be written by his own finger in Tables of stone Exod. 29. 18. 3. To be laid up and kept in the Ark Exod. 25. 16. And if these and other Prerogatives did put a difference and shew a difference to be put betwixt the other nine Commands and all Judicial or Ceremonial Laws Why not betwixt them and this also 2. In the New Testâ—ment they are all alike confirmed when the Law in general is spoken of none of them is excepted and therefore this Command is necessarily included For which we would look first to that place Matth. 5. 17. Where our Lord in a special manner intendeth to vindicate the Moral Law of this fourth and to presâ— holiness in Moral Duties upon his Hearers even in another sort then the Phariseeâ— did Think not saith He That I am come to destroy the Law and the Prophets I 〈◊〉 not come to destroy but to fulfill Verily be that breaketh one of the least of these Commands and teacheth Men so shall be called least in the Kingdom of God c. Where by Law must necessarily be understood the Moral Law for he was thought to be â— transgressor of that and especially of this Command in it for that Sermon 〈◊〉 Nattâ—ew cometh in in order after his being challenged for breach of Sabbath John 5. 10. c. And his scope is to wipe off that imputation and how by shewing that He still presseth the Moral Law even beyond what the Pharisees did 2. It was the Moral Law especially which the Pharisees corrupted and whereof he undertaketh the Vindication and it is Holiness in Obedience to that which he presseth as necessary beyond what the Scribes and Pharisees did and indeed it was in that Law they failed mainly and not in the Ceremonial Law 3. The offence and mistake that Christ is to preoccupie and rectifie amongst his Hearers requireth this for many of them fancied that by the Messiah there should be a Relaxation from the duties of Holiness called for in the Moral Law and therefore saith he think not so now a Relaxation from some other Laws might have been thought of warrantably 4. It is such a Law whereof to teach the Abrogation at any time is sinful pernicious therefore it is certainly the Moral Law Secondly We reason thus when he speaketh of the Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or by way of eminency meaning no doubt the Decalogue He speaketh alike of all its Commandments even of the least of them and so of this 4. Also that he came not to destroy it which yet the Lord never did of Ceremonials but rather fore-told the Abolition of them as he did of the seeking and worshipping of God in the Temple at Jerusalem c. Yea when he cleareth the Doctrine of the Sabbath from the Pharisees corrupting Traditions he doth never weaken its former Obligation nor insinuate its weakness but sheweth the true meaning thereof which from the beginning made it not only consistent with the works of piety and mercy but exceedingly helpful to both A second place Confirming the whole Decalogue or rather asserting its Authority is in the Epistle of James Jam. 2. 10. He that offendeth in one is guilty of all Why Because he is the same God and Law-giver and no Servant nor Angel who spake them all one as well as another of them And it being clear there that he speaketh of the Decalogue called the Royal Law there being no Law instanced in nor any other that can be of a like authority in these Laws instanced but onely it nor that could be pleaded for by James on such grounds in such a time and it being also clear That he giveth to all those Laws which the Lord spake at that time alike Authority otherwise his reasoning would not be good if any one Law or Command could be instanced to him of the Ten which the Lord spake and was abrogated and not binding it necessarily followeth that this fourth Command being one of the Ten must be of equal Authority with the rest It may be noted also That James here doth not as neither doth our Lord nor any of his Apostles when they cite the Law give New Authority to the Laws he citeth but supposeth them to have it already and maketh use of them as Confirmations of the thing he pressed which could not be if their Authority depended on or slowed from the present Citation of them Thirdly we reason further thus Either there is some Moral duty contained in this Command and laid on by it which is not in any of the former or there is but some Ceremonial thing in it reducible to one of them For the Perfection of this Law requireth that all things needful to the Worship of God should be summed in it and the scope thereof which is briefly to compend all requireth there should be nothing in it that 's needless superfluous or that might have beeâ— left out Now if the
or tacite conditions in all promissory Oaths 84 Wâ— ther indefinite Oaths such as these imposed in Colledges in Corporations or such as Souldiers take to their Officers be lawful 85 What does not lose the Obligation of promissory Oaths 13. particulars instanced 87. 88 What Oaths are null and of no force 88 Four cases vvherein the Obligation of a lawfull Oath ceaseth 89 Why vvicked men keep their sinful Oaths much more strictly then they do lawful Oaths ibid. What an Oath super addeth to a promise ibid. Obedience The difference between obedience to the moral Law as it respects the Covenant of grace and as it respects the Covenant of vvorks 3 See Duties Command Law Omens and observations vvhen sinful and superstitious 112 How superstitious Observations may be made of a Word of Scripture 113 Oppression shewed to be a sort of rapine and against the 8. command 230 Obtestations vvhen lawful and binding and how vve may also sin in them 90 91 P. PErjury several sorts of it and several vvayes how one may become perjured 85 Whether one that necessitates another to swear vvhen he has a suspicion that other vvill forswear himself become Acessory to his perjury 86 See Oath Poligamy how a breach of the seventh Command 201 Poverty how men sinfully bring it upon themselves and so violate the eighth Command 247 Punishment of the iniquities of the Fathers upon the Children threatned in the second Command proved to mean spiritual and eternal punishment especially 73 74 Three considerations for clearing how the Lord does thâ—s punish Children for the Parents sin 75. Five ends for which the Lord threatens the Posterity of vvicked men ibid. How children become guilty of the Parents sin and vvhat special need some have to repent of the sins of their ancestors 76 Praising of God required in the 2. Command 53 Our ordinary failings before the going about this duty ibid. Many failings in the performances of this duty enumerated 53 54 Our failings after praising 54 Prayer required by the second Commandment 50 Many sins before Prayer instanced 51 Many ordinary sins in Prayer ibid. Many sins while joyning with others in Prayer enumerated 52 Many ordinary sins after Prayer instanced in 52 Preface I am the Lord thy God a preface to all the Commandments but more especially to the first command 16 Pride in what things it appear 107 â—08 See Humility Promises vvhy annexed to some Commandments rather then to others 17 Why the fifth Command is called the first Command with Promise 191 What comfort the Promise made in the second Command to the thousand generations c. affords to believing Parents and their children 76 What is the meaning of the Promise annexed to the 5 Commandment and how to be understood 202 What Advantage a Believer under the New Testament â—as by such temporal Promises 203 See Vows R. RApine what it is 239 Religion how concerned in the duties we oâ— to others 190 Riches ten prejudices that come by them 25â— Right vvhether a vvicked men has it to any thing here 202 203 S. SAbbath the observation of it a moral duty 119 120 Three considerations for clearing the morality of it 120 The morality of it proved from the Scriptures way of speaking of it in general 121 The Prophesies Ezekiel 43. 44 45 46. chap. Considered 122 123 Matth. 24. 20. considered 123 2. Proved that all the 10. Commandments are moral and consequently this 124 This cleared from Matth. 5. 19. Jam. 2. 10. 124 125 3. Several peculiar remarks upon the fourth Commandment confirming the morality of it 127 128 4. Four Arguments drawn from Scripture to prove this 128 129 Four notable Witnesses to this truth 129 130 Objections answered 130 131 Remembring of the Sabbath imports four things 144 145 How to reckon when the Sabbath begins and ends 145 146 What proportion of it should be bestowed on spiritual duties 146 Several Considerations tending to clear that the fourth Commandment intended not the seventh but a seventh day primarily 147 148 Six Arguments for Evincing this 148 to 151 Some objections answered 152 Several Considerations for clearing when the Sabbath begins 152 153 Divers arguments to prove that the Sabbath begins in the morning and continues till next morning 152. to 155. 1. That the Sabbath may be changed from the seventh day to the first proved not deregatory from the 4 Commandment 155 156 2. That it was convenient that the day should be changed proved â—56 3. That the change should be to the first day of the work proved most convenient 159 4. That the seventh-day Sabbath was actually changed to the first day proved 160 to 166 5. That this change is not by Humane but Divine Institution proved 166. to 168 6. That this change was made by Christ from the very day of his Resurrection proved to be probable 168 How the Lord did sanctifie the Sabbath and we â—ought to sanctifie it 169 What works are lawful â—n the Lords day 169 170 Eighth Caveats for preventing the Abuse of what liberty God allows on that day 171 172 What is meant by a Sabbath days journey 170 What resting on the Sabbath imports and from what we must rest 173 174 That we are equally oblidged to the sanctification of the Sabbath as they were of old 174. 175 An Objection answered 175 Wherein the peculiar holiness required on the Lords day consists 176 177 What preparation is necessary for the Sabbath 178 Particular directions for sanctifying the Lords day from morning to evening 178 179 What 's to he done vvhen the Sabbath is over 180 How the Lord Blesses the Sabbath 183 184 Why he has yet apart a day to himself 184 How Magistrates are by the letter of the fourth Commandment oblidged to take care that the Sabbath 〈…〉 all that are under them 182 183 Six aggravations of the sin of Sabbath breaking 185 In what sense Sabbath breaking iâ— a greater sin then the breath of any command in the second table 186 Several vvayes vvhereby â—â—e Sabbath is prophaned 186 187 Some directions for preventing this sin 187 Sacraments the right administration of them required in the second Command 55 Eighth observations concerning the Sacraments in general 55 56 Five ends and uses of the Sacraments 56 57 58 How the Sacraments seal the proposition of a practical Syllogisme how the assumption and how the conclusion 57 How we sin by saying too much weight on the Sacraments 〈◊〉 several failings instanced in 59 How vve sin undervaluing of them seventeen vvayes ennumerated 60 61 How vve sin in not receiving the Lords-Supper 62 Many ordinary sailings before the participation of this ordinance ennumerated 63 Many sins on the receiving of the Lords-Supper instanced 64 Many sins after partaking of this ordinance instanced 65 Whether the admission of scandalous persons does pollute the ordinance 65 to 69 Sins forbidden in the first Command 19. 25 26 How vve may find out the sins against the first Command 27 Sins forbidden
speak out something more then Temporary in this Duty of setting a Seventh day a part for God for we speak not yet of the particular day 3. Look to it in all times and states of the Church and ye will find it remarkably Characterized with a special Observation As 1. In innocency it 's instituted and set a part from others and blessed and Heb. 4. It is called the rest from the beginning of the World 2. Before the Law was given the Sanctification of iâ— was intimated as necessary 3. In the giving of the Law it is remembred a Command given to us for remembring it 4. After the Law it is urged by the Prophets Isaiah and Jeremiah and kept by the Godly Psal 92. 5. In the time or after the time of the Captivity the breach of it is reproved Ezek. 20. And its Observation restored by Godly Nehemiah Hitherto there is no difficulty the pinch will lye in this If the Scriptures speak of it as belonging to the days of the Gospel In which for making of it out 1. We have these hints Acts 20 7. 1. Cor. 16. 2. Where Christians going abouâ— the Moral Duties of the Sabbath is especially observed to be upon one day peculiarly 2. That Title of the direct appropriating of a Day to the Lord Rev. 1. 1â— Which places will fall in to be considered particularly when we come to the laâ—â— question Besides these we may produce three places to prove a Sabbath as belonging to the New Testament though not the very Day used or observed for the Sabbath in the Old and this will be enough to make out the Assertion two of them are Prophesies the third of them is in the Gospel The first prophesie is it the 66. Chap. of Isaiah verse 23. The second is in Ezekiels Description of the Neâ— Temple Chap. 43. 44 45 46 c. Where 1. It is clear that these places relate to the Dayes of the Gospel as none can deny but they do so eminently 2. It is clear that though they Prophesie of the Services of the Gospel under the names of Sacrifices c. proper to the Old Testament Administration and of the Sanctified and set a part time of the Gospel under the Name of Sabbath which theâ— was determined and whereto men were then bound by the fourth Command as they were to Sacrifices by the second yet these Prophesies infer not by vertue of the fourth Command the very same Day to be under the Gospel which was under the Law more then the same Services by vertue of the second which none wiâ—â— deny to be in force notwithstanding of the change of Services and there is as little reason to deny the fourth to be still in force as to its substance notwithstanding oâ— the change of the particular day Yet Thirdly it is clear that from the mentioning of these services this will follow that there should be set and fixed Ordinances and a way of worship in the New Testament as well as in the Old and that there should be a solemn chief set-time for the Sabbath which men ought to sanctifie and that they should no more admit any other times not so set apart into a parity with it then they were to admit any service or Worship not allowed by God or that was contrary to the second Command for if any thing be clear in them this is clear that they speak first of services then of solemn times and Sabbaths and of the one after the other which must certainly infer that both external services and a solemn chief time for them do belong to the New Testament Hence it is that many Divines from that Prophesie of Ezekiel do draw conclusions for sundry things out of those places as 1. Concerning the necessity and continuance of a standing Ministry and though Ministers now be neither Priests nor Levites yet say they it followeth clearly that there will be a Ministry because such are spoken of there 2. Concerning the necessity of and a Warrant for Church-Discipline and separating not only doctrinally but disciplinarily the precious from the vile and debarring of those who are Morally unclean from the Ordinances because these things say they are Typified in the substance by the Porters being set to keep the Doors and by the charge given to the Priests 3. Anent the continuance of a Church and of the Ordinances of Word Sacraments c. And the Congregating of Christians to attend these though there shall be no material or Typical Temple because of the Moâ—al things there being expressed and prophesied of under the names of the old Levitical services yet could not a warrant be inferr'd from them for these and that Jure Divine if the things were not Morally to bind which were so signiâ—â—â—d Hence I argue if the sanctifying of a Sabbath as a piece of worship to God be prophesied of to belong to the New Testament then are we bound to the sanctification of a Sabbath as a necessary duty but the continuance of sanctifying a Sabbath unto God is specially prophesied of and fore-told as a piece of worship under the New Testament Ergo c. The third place is Matth. 24. 20. Pray that your flight be not in the Winter neither on the Sabbath-day where the Lord insinuateth that as travelling is troublesome to the Body in Winter so would it be to the minds of the Godly for he is now speaking to his Disciples alone to Travel on that day specially and solemnly set â—part for Gods worship now if there were no Sabbath to continue after Christs Ascension or if it were not to be sanctified there would be no occasion of this grief and trouble that they behoved to Travel on the Sabbath and durst not tarry â—â—ll that day were by-past and so no cause to put up this Prayer which yet by our Lords Exhortation seemeth to infer that the Sabbath was to be as certain in its time as the Winter And doubtless this cannot be meaned of the Jewish-Sabbath For 1. That was to be abolished shortly 2. Travelling on the Jewish-Sabbath was to be no cause of grief unto them if indeed all dayes were alike neither would it be scrupled in such a case by the Apostles to whom he now speaketh 3. Besides if no Sabbath were to be it had been better and clearer to say Stand not and grieve not to Travel anâ— day but his words imply the just contrary that â—here was to be a solemn Sabbath 4. He mentioneth the Sabbath-day only and not the other Festivals of the Jews which were to be kept holy also and by this he distinguisheth the ordinary Sabbath from those other dayes and opposeth it to many as being now the only Holy-day on which they should eschew if possible to travel and would therefore pray to have it prevented for in the New Testament the Sabbath spoken of as the solemn time for worship is ever meaned of the weekly Sabbath and other Holy dayes are called the
the family which Persons in secret perform and so Family-worship will be a worshipping of God beside what is in publick and secret in a Domestick and family-relation jointly Thirdly That this Command requireth such a family-worship distinct from publick and secret and something to be performed in worshipping of God amongst persons of related which is not required of others may thus be made out 1. The thing called for in this Command is certainly worship yea immediate worship it being a Command of the first Table and such a thing as the sanctifying of the Sabbath 2. This Command taketh in all Domestick Relations Parents Children Sonâ— and Daughters Masters and Servants Men or VVomen yea and Strangers that may be for the time or on that day sojourning there these are all constituent Members of a Family 3. The thing required of them is not simply rest from labour for 1. That is commanded for the Beasts lest men should be hindered from or interrupted in their holy rest by their waiting on them and none will say we hope that there is no more required as to Children or Servants then as to the Beasts 2. Under the Negative Thou shalt do no work is included the Affirmative Thou shalt sanctifie that day to the Lord. 3. The same Duty is required of all alike in some respect thou Father and thou Son thou Master and thou Servant and if worship be called for from the Father and Master for the sanctifying of that day so it must be also from the Child and Servant 4. The manner of performing this Worship of sanctifying the Lords day in Holy duties is required not only to be in publick nor only in secret but by the Members of each Family joyntly and apart from other Families For 1. It cannot be understood to require worship only in publick together because 1. there may be in some cases no access to publick worship and yet the Command of sanctifying the Lords day lyeth still on and no doubt by Families 2. Waiting on publick worship is but one piece of sanctifying the Lords day and that but in apart of it therefore there must be some other thing included here 2. It cannot be understood of the Master of the Family his putting the Members of the Family separatly to seek and worship God and of his own going about Holy duties himself apart For 1. Though that be worship yet is it not worship from persons in such a Relation or Family worship more then if they were not in such a Relation or of such a Family and though it might be said that such and such persons sanctified the Sebbath yet could it not be said that the Family as such did it even as Families or persons seeking God in secret could not be exonered thereby as to their being in the Congregation nor their serving of God be so accepted as Congre gational service if they met not together when they might Just so it is here yea as it lyeth by this Command on a Congregation and a Minister to sanctifie the Lords day and to come together for that end so doth it lye on the Family and Master of it 2. By this Command there is more required then secret or solitary sanctifying of the Sabbath even a peculiar sanctification of it within one Family distinct from another I say 1. more then solitary worship because the Lords saying thou without repeating Son Daughter c. had been sufficient to have laid it on all separately for themselves the enumeration therefore of the whole Members of a Family must import some other thing for the former is implyed in all Commands as Thou shalt not kill that is as far as in thee lyeth thou nor thy Son c. There must I say be something more understood by the peculiar enumeration pressed in this fourth Command I say 2. Even a peculiar worship because it 's something laid on by this Command which is holden within Gates or doors and neither goeth to the Congregation nor to the persons of other Families at least ordinarily but reacheth the Members of such a Family who are within such a Mans Gates or Doors therefore it must be a distinct Family-worship mainly performed by that Family together 3. The thing required here is not only worship simply but worship as from a member of such a Family therefore it is not solitary worship for seeking of God and moral duties in secret still agree to persons in all places and Families alike but this draweth a line as it were betwixt Families and so divides one Family from another yet maketh the duty more obliging to these within such a Mans Gates or Doors then others without Doors therefore it must be joynt-worship for apart or as concerning secret worship all are every where alike obliged 4. If by this Command something more in the worship of this day be required of a person that is a member of a Family in reference to that Family then there is required of one who is not a member of such a Family or is required of that person in reference to another Family whereof he is not a member then it requireth a distinct Family-worship for no other thing can be understood but a joynt going about the sanctifying of that day in a stricter and nearer way of Communion amongst the members of that Family then with persons and Families in and to whom they are not so interested and related 5. If secret and publick worship were onely required in this Command then should we equally and alike sanctifie the Lords day with other Families and persons not of that Family whereof we are members for in these we joyn alike for them and with them but there is some peculiar thing required here which will not agree to be performed by all alike therefore it is Family-worship that must be here required 6. This Command requireth of Masters suppose them to be Ministers or Magistrates another way of sanctifying the Sabbath and worshipping of God in and with their Families then it doth in reference to other Families the Command being so particular to him and to all that are within his Gates or Doors and members of his Family speaketh this clearly But except it be joynt going about of duties with them there can be no other thing understood to be required for 1. One may exhort another 2. All come in publick together 3. By the Masters example after the publick they all withdraw or should at least to secret exercises 4. Magistrates and Ministers may Command other Families to sanctifie that day What is peculiar then as to their own Families but to joyn with them in duties of worship 7. If there were not Domestick-worship required on this day then except it were in publick Members of a Family could not converse together for they cannot converse together in doing their own works or in speaking their own words their fellowship therefore must be in exercises of worship and so that must needs be
cannot but take in Family-worship yet it is also clear that he meaneth not simply of inability to rule but mainly of defectiveness in the improving the ability which God hath given for Ruling therefore it is not said here He that cannot Rule his House though that be in part truth but he that doth not Rule and it is tanked with excessive drinking striking pride and other grosse ills it having that same effect that they had to wit to declare incapacity for such Offices Hence this is not to be the Rule of tryal if he can Rule his own house well as having gifts fitting him for it but supposing him to have these it 's to be inquired if he doth actually Rule it well which is the evidence of the right improving of his gifts therefore here Ruling in the mans own house and ruling in the Church or House of God are looked on as two degrees of one thing of the same nature because both taken in not only gifts fitting for the discharge of the duty of this respective ruling it but conscience and faithfulness in the improving of them We shall not here to this purpose insist on the frequent mention that is made in the Scripture of Churches being in Families But shall proceed to add to what we have said Six or Seven Reasons or grounds that will further prove and clear the thing The first is drawn from nature which teacheth not only that the true God should be alone served and worshipped but that according to the Stations God hath put 〈◊〉 in they should improve them with their gifts parts for a higher end then their own behooff or advantage to wit his glory And that as they have a peculiar fellowship given them by him as his gift so he should have answerable and peculiar acknowledgement from them and therefore seeing the appointment of Families is Gods Ordinance and that it s he that giveth to some Children and Servants which are with-held from others there ought in all reason a Tribute to be given to him resulting from that Society and the Family hence it was that before the Law the Patriarchs had their worship specially in their Families yea Heathens beside their publick idolatrous worship and idolatrous Temples had their peculiar Penates or Houshold-Gods on whom for their particular families delivery from enemies and protection they depended 2. A second is drawn from the nature of Christian Communion amongst Believers which as it requireth the performing of Christian duties according as we are in providence called to them so it requireth the making use of that tye of Family-interest or relation super-added to the former for furtherance and entertaining of that Communion because there is a special access ministred by such a relation to the attaining of that end Hence it is we conceive as is said that some Christian Families are called Churches because so many Christians casten together lived in a Christian discharge of all Family-Ordinances so to speak 3. The Lord by his Covenant doth especially though not alway derive mercies to Families taking them in together and making promises to them and conferring priviledges on them So Abrahams whole Family was taken in Covenant Genes 17. And in the New Testament whole Families were at once Baptized which certainly calleth them to a peculiar way of being answerable to such priviledges and ingagements And is not this one special and very proper way of being answerable to them that they worship God together and joyn in blessing him for such mercies and in prayer to him for grace to carry suitably to them 4. The mutual interest that usually is in the condition of members of the same Family calleth for joynt-seeking of God and worshipping of him as they are jointly concerned in the same dangers the same sins often the same stroaks the same duties the same mercies for what is so to one is ordinarily some way so to all therefore ought they to joyn in confessing of sins acknowledging mercies deprecating dangers and stroaks and discharging of duties 5. Private worship is profitable to all the ends of a family It s an acknowledging of God and honouring of him it helpeth the Master to keep his authority and maketh every one in their Family to walk the more respectively towards the rest and it keepeth from many out-breakings when they are to meet so often together to seek and worship God hence in experience we often see that these families where religious worship is are generally more civil at least then other families where it is not and that the children and servants of such families readily profit most are most countenanced by Gods blessing and are in greatest capacity to get good of the publick Ordinances 6. The Lord loveth to have a distinction betwixt these that serve him and these that serve him not Now as to a family relation what difference is there betwixt a professing Christian family where the joynt worship of God is not and a heathenish family Heathens live and eat and work together and when no more is seen they look very like the one to the other Even as in a Nation where no publick worship is though private Persons privately seek God yet there seemeth to be no publick national difference betwixt that Nation and a heathen Nation so in the former case a family difference will hardly be found if any should inquire of what sort of families these are Add that it will be hard to say that a man should take care of the outward Estate of his Family and neglect the spiritual and keep Communion with his Family in temporal things and none in spiritual duties yea doubtless he should be much more in these as being both more necessary and more excellent Having first shewed that this fourth Command holdeth forth a family worship and having secondly confirmed it more largely from other Scriptures and grounds of reason it followeth now according to the method proposed that we shew in the third place how particularly the Scripture describeth wherein it doth consist whereby it will further appear to be of God The Scripture describeth it four wayes 1. In general it is called in Abraham and Joshuas Case keeping the way of Lord serving the Lord very comprehensive expressions taking in much and here its sanctifying of the Sabbath that is performing of the duties which are to be discharged for the right sanctifying of that day we conceive it to be in short to do these things in a joynt family-way which a Servant of God may and ought to do alone that is to pray read sing Psalms c. or to do in a Domestick way what Christians in providence cast together may do as to pray read further one anothers edification by repeating of Sermons spiritual conference instruction exhortation admonition c. for they have their tye of Christianity and this of a Family-relation beside which doth not abrogate the former nor derogate from it but doth further corroborate and
it The next word is the day of the Sabbath By Sabbath here is meaned rest as it is exponed by the Apostle Hebr. 4. and that not every rest but a holy rest from our own works that there may be access to positive sanctifying of that day for the sanctifying of that day is the end and this is but a mean and necessary supposed help without which the day cannot be sanctifyed in holy duties holy duties and our own works being for the time inconsistent besides that rest on this day is not onely called for as ceasing from our ordinary affairs in the time of worship is called for on any other day but more especially and solemnly in respect of the day it self for at other times our duties require a time for them and therefore that time cannot be employed in another ordinary work and in worship also but here the Lord requireth time and rest to be sanctified and therefore we are to perform holy duties 〈◊〉 that time because it is to be sanctified other times and rests are drawn after worship this time and rest draweth worship necessarily after it hence it was that onely the Jews feasts were called Sabbaths I mean religious Sabbaths not civil or politick as their years were because they included a rest upon destination to an â—oly use That which is mainly questionable here is concerning the day expressed in this Command concerning which may be asked 1. What sort of day or the quamdiu â— How often or the quoties 3. What day of the seven or the quando 4. When we are to reckon its beginning For Answer to the first we say There are two sorts of dayes mentioned in the Scripture one is artificial of twelve hours so the Jews divided their day making â—heir hours longer or shorter as the day was long or short but they kept up the â—umber of their hours alway the other is a natural day which is a seventh part â—f the week and containeth twenty four hours taking in so much time as interâ—eneth betwixt the Suns beginning to ascend after midnight the nocturnal Solâ—ice till it pass the Meridional altitude which is the Suns Vertical point for that â—ay till it come to that same very point of Midnight again which is the Suns natuâ—al course every twenty four hours comprehending both the artificial day which 〈◊〉 from midnight to midday and the artificial night also which is from midday to â—idnight again The day mentioned here is the natural day because it 's a seventh day proportionable to each of the six dayes given unto us and they with the seventh making up the Week it must contain as many hours as any of the rest doth but the six dayes wherein God made Heaven and Earth c. are natural days therefore the seventh to wit the day of rest must be so also Let us only for further clearing and for directing our own Practise speak here a word or two more 1. We say it is a whole natural day that is as it 's usually employed by us on any of the six Dayes for our own Works that as we spend so much time in our ordinary Callings on other dayes so would we employ so much in Gods Worship secret private and publick on that day what proportion of time we use to give or may and should give ordinarily to our Callings on other dayes we would give as much to God and his Worship to our Souls and our spiritual state on the Lords day or Sabbath Therefore 2. there is not to be understood here a rigid pressing of all these hours to be spent in Duties of immediate Worship but our Working and Walking time having a respect to our infirmities and also to our Duties lest under pretext of infirmity we incroach upon Gods day and give him less then we give to our selves or should and may give him And so in Scripture they accompted what is betwixt rising and going to bed as still the Work of one day or one dayes Work for as God in conceding six dayes to us hath yet so done it as there may be a Reserve of particular times for Worship called for from us to him every day for keeping up our Communion with him so on the seventh day doth the Lord allow so much conveniency of sleep and other refreshing as may be subservient for the main end of the day these being Works of mercy and necessity which Christ allowed on the Sabbath which was made for man and not man for the Sabbath 3. Yet care would be had lest under pretext of these we exceed and apply too much of what is the Lords unnecessarily for our selves and on our lusts and if we will wake for ordinary business and keep up on such and such a Dyet other Dayes yea if we might do it or others no more strong then we do it the pretence of infirmity will not excuse us especially seeing hardly it can be often instanced that timeousness at Gods Work in that day or earnestness and continuance in it hath proved hurtful which we may account as a part of Gods blessing on the seventh day that less meat and sleep may be as refreshful as more at another time thus much for the quamdiu or the Continuance of the day Secondly it may be enquired how often by vertue of this command that day doth recur if it be one of seven or if it be the very seventh And so if this day be to be taken definitely for the very seventh day after the Creation or indefinitely for one day of seven as the Lord should otherwayes determine or had elsewhere determined a stricting then to a day but not any particular day by vertue of this command but to such a day as was formerly described or prescribed from the beginning during the Jewish State and to such another day as God should after Christs coming reveal unto them and pitch upon for his service for taking it for granted that a Seventh day as moral is commanded it followeth to be inquired whether it be the Seventh in number that is one of seven or the seventh in order that is the Seventh day For answering this we would permit 1 That there is a great difference betwixt these two the one to wit that there be a Seventh doth concern the matter and substance of piety the other to wit which of these Seven it be is more circumstantial and is alike if it be appointed by God and have the blessing 2. That it is usual for God in his commands concerning worship not at first to express a particular definitely but to deliver it in the bosome of a general indefinitely mediately and by clear consequence as it were several Species under one Genus As for instance 1 when Deut 12. 5. he commandeth his people to offer their Sacrifices in the place which he should choose here there is a stinting or astricting of them to the place which God should reveal unto them this before the
Temple was built tyed them to the Ark and sometimes to one place and sometimes to another as it was removed and placed till it was brought to Jerusalem but after the Temple was built and chosen for the place it astricted men to that yea when the Temple is destroyed and Christ come it a stricteth men to no place by another but it obligeth men to worship God every where in spirit and truth It 's true this is a Ceremonial precept and will not hold in all things especially as to its oblition yet while it stood by a positive Authority or Precept it sheweth that God may command a particular as one day of seven and yet not instantly so determine but that one and the same command may inforce to diverse dayes at diverse times upon supposition of Gods manifesting his mind even as by one command men were astricted successively to diverse places 2. See it instanced in the second Command wherein God requireth such a worship as he himself should prescribe which is the moral affirmative part of it and dischargeth all worship by Images that is the moral negative part thereof by vertue whereof Believers were then tyed to offer Sacrifices to Circumcise to keep the Passover c. but now Believers are tyed to Baptize to celebrate the Lords Supper c. yet by vertue of one and the same command so here that command which requires the Seventh day from the Jews may require the First day from us Christians for the Sabbath because these particulars are not expresly directly and immediately called for by these commands but indirectly and by consequence yet this second command tyed the Jews to abstain from blood and to circumcise before the ceremonial Law was added to them because these commands were formerly revealed to them but it tyed them to these accidentally to say so and by consequence only even so we say of the fourth command as to the Seventh day it being instituted before consider for this Exod. 16. 26. where six dayes for gathering of Manna a seventh for rest are spoken of A third Instance is in Tithes which was the Lords requiring apart of their Means or Substance as this was apart of their time he there required the tenth part of their increase as here he doth the seventh part of their time yet God in proportioning their estates did not particularly limit to any exact and precise order but as to this proportion of their estates whatever they were so we say here had not the day been determined other wayes then by this command it would not have implyed any particular definite day of the Seven 3. We premit that though the seventh day be called moral as is expressed in the Command or understood yet it is but moral positive and so alterable at the will of the Law-giver and therefore the question would not be much different if acknowledging the seventh day to be commanded to the Jews as well as one of seven we yet asserted the seventh to be discharged and one of seven to be still retained for so one of seven would be binding now and not the seventh 4. Yet lest we should seem to admit somewhat changeable in the very Command it self precisely considered we would put difference betwixt the commanding part of the Law and its explicatory part the command may be moral and indefinite although some things in reasons and motives were not so as in the preface which inforceth all the commands in the promise annexed to the fifth there was something peculiar to that people yet cannot we cast off all because of that suppose there had no more been in this fourth Command but remember in the day of rest to keep it holy that would not have inferred the seventh day though we think the Jews because of its former sanctification would have been obliged to keep that day by vertue of this Command And suppose that in the explications or reasons there may be something added peculiar to that people which cannot be a seventh day but at the most if any thing the seventh day yet that which is in the commanding part will still stand moral to wit that the day of rest should be remembred and if it can be made out that it was determined to the Jews to sanctifie the seventh day though it were in the reasons added and to us afterward to sanctifie the first day they will be both found to be a seventh day and a day of rest and therefore to be remembred and to be sanctified this would resolve into the same thing on the matter yet we conceive it safest to assert that in this Command God hath set apart a seventh day to himself which is to be sanctified by us by our application of it to holy uses but doth not by it expresly directly and primarily bind to the seventh day but secondarily and by consequence to wit as it was other wayes before declared by him and so it bindeth now that same way to the sanctifying of the first day of the week as being now revealed by God just as in the former instances or examples we touched upon That a seventh day whatever it be which is chosen of God and not the seventh day in order is to be sanctifyed by vertue of this Command as injoyning that as the substance and matter of it may be made out by these Arguments Arg. 1. That which is the substance of this Command is moral and bindeth perpetually as we have formerly proved for if its substance be not moral then it selâ— is not so either but that a seventh day should be sanctified hath been maintained in the Church by the Apostles in their retaining the first day of the week while the seventh hath been laid by and never used therefore it was not the seventh but aâ— seventh day which was primarily commanded in this Command so that no particular day is instituted here more then any positive service is prescribed in the second Command yet the observation of what was prescribed or should be prescribed was included Even so it is here in reference to that day and as we may inferr that the second Command injoyned not such and such Ordinances primarily because they are abolished and that such as were negative or prohibited aâ— not making of Images are moral because they are continued and Images are to be rejected just so may we conclude that a seventh day here was primarily commanded and is moral because it is continued and that the seventh was not so commanded because it is rejected and laid aside This Argument especially made out in the designation of the Lords day will prove this for if that seventh day was the substance of this Command then either it is to be continued as moral which were against the current of the New Testament wherein as Christ hath set forth different Ordinances so a different chief solemn time for worship or we must say that this fourth Command belongeth not to
us at all the contrary whereof we have made out It must then follow that it was not the seventh day but a seventh day which this Command respecteth which therefore belongeth to us as it did to the Jews as well as any other Command and particularly the second Command doth Arg. 2. If God hath put a difference some way betwixt the Sabbath commanded here and the day of his own rest the seventh day then it would seem its not that day which it commanded But he hath put a difference first in the mandatory part Remember what not the seventh day but the Sabbath day or day of rest 2. In the blessing it is not said he blessed the seventh day but the Sabbath therefore is that difference so palpable as being specially intended whereas if the scope of the Command were only the seventh day it had been much more clear to have set it down other wayes and no other probable reason of the difference can be given Arg. 3. Either a seventh day is commanded primarily and then the seventh but secondarily and consequentially or the seventh was commanded the Jews primarily and one of seven but consequentially for both were commanded to them and the first to wit the seventh as being in use before But it cannot be said that the seventh day was primarily commanded and one of seven consequentially only because the general is first commanded and then the particular as when God required Tithes of increase and Cattle by the Command of Tithes he first required the proportion and then what particular proportion as to order he himself should carve out to them and so consequently came in the tenth Beast which passed under the rod by a particular command Lev. 27. 32 33 because there God determined but if that tenth had not been set down the general command had but determined upon the tenth of Cattle as of Sheaves or bolls of Corn even so it is as to the day the Command requireth one of seven primarily but that it is this seventh followeth from another determination Arg. 4. If the moral grounds and reasons which press this Command do most directly respect a seventh day and not the seventh then it s not the seventh day but a seventh day which is primarily commanded in it for the reasons bear out especially what is moral in it and principally intended but the moral reasons pressing it plead more strongly and directly for a seventh day and but indirectly for the seventh day as it was then instituted Ergo c. That the reasons do directly press a seventh day and in a manner stick closely to it may thus be made out 1. If the reasons equally press on us the first day and the observation of it supposing it now to be observed according to Divine warrant then they do not primarily press the seventh but the reasons equally press on us the first day Ergo c. the major is clear for the same thing cannot press two different dayes primarily nor equally that the reasons concern us as well as them upon the supposition aforesaid may thus appear 1. They are universal and do not belong to that people more then any other for the concession of six dayes is to all and Gods example of resting concerneth all 2. If the breaking of that Command be equally sinful to us with them and strike against the equity of the Command and Gods example in us as well as in them then these reasons concern us also and us as well as them Now that they do so and agredge the sin of prophaning our Lords day as they did the sin of prophaning their Sabbath we must either grant or we must deny that they concern us at all Beside the weight of a challenge from the conscience by vertue of them will put a tender heart out of question of it seeing God giveth us six dayes to our selves as he did to them and his example proposed to us ought to be respected by us as well as by them and the same general equity is in both 3. If the reasons be a sufficient ground of allowance to us for six working dayes together even the last six of the week as they were to them for the first six then they determine not the seventh day to be the day of rest primarily but a seventh following these six of labour but they do allow us warrantably to work six dayes even the last six of the week Ergo they do not determine the seventh day primarily the connexion of the major seemeth to be very clear For first these must stand and fall together if the concession to call it so concern us in the six working dayes so must the reservation of a seventh 2. As the concession concerneth us in the six working dayes so must the prohibition of work on a seventh of rest for the one determineth the other if the concession be for six in number so must the prohibition be for a seventh in number but if the concession be of six in order then it is the seventh that is to be reserved and if the seventh be related to in the prohibition of work then the concession must look to the first six dayes which it doth not as we have shewed And therefore 3. seeing the six dayes concession looketh to six in number so many thou mayest or shalt work together and no more the prohibition must also respect the number to wit a seventh and not the seventh day the minor will be clear to the judicious considerer by a particular application of the reasons of the fourth Command Further if the concession respect not the number but the order as it must if the prohibition of work on the seventh respect the order and not the number then 1. what warrant have we for our six work dayes if it be not here where is it for sure we cannot take Gods time without his order and warrant 2. and more especially then could not we by vertue of this Command plead allowance for working six dayes different from the first six if so we would not be astricted by the Command to sanctifie one seeing the one inferreth and determineth the other and they must go together which were absurd Yet again it may be made out that the reasons press a seventh and not the seventh by considering the words and force of the consequence in both The first reason is Six dayes shalt thou labour but the seventh is the Lords 1. It sayeth not take the first six but of seven take six to labour and give the Lord the seventh for he has reserved it to himself 2. The same equity is in the inference for a seventh that is for the seventh if not more he has given thee six therefore give thou him a seventh will conclude more formally then give him the seventh a seventh is the seventh part of time as well as the seventh which is the equity the Command goeth on 3. Had the Command intended to inferr the
seventh primarily it would have been more clearly expressed thus he hath given thee the first six therefore give thou him the seventh The second reason from Gods example inferreth the same he wrought six and rested the seventh do thou so likewise and so these that work six and rest a seventh as we now do follow Gods example as well as they that wrought six and rested the seventh did Arg. 5. If the positive part of the Command must be expounded by the negative contra then it concerneth one of seven and not the seventh But the first is true 1. To positive part commandeth a day without respect to its order therefore the negative doth so 2. The negative is to be resolved thus ye shall not work above six not thus ye shall not work above the first six as the event cleareth 3. If it be not the first six but six that is in the concession then it is not the seventh but a seventh that is in the inhibition but the first is clear Ergo c. Arg 6. If this Command for the substance of it concern us as being moral and bind us to the first day and the sanctifying of it equally as it obliged the Jews to the seventh then it s one day of seven and not the seventh which is intended primarily by it But it bindeth us to the first Ergo That its moral and bindeth us now is cleared Thus 1. it either bindeth to this day or to nothing therefore it primarily granteth six and not the first six for labour and by clear conseqnence intendeth primarily a seventh and not the seventh for a day of rest 2. If it be a sin against this Command to break the Lords day or Christian Sabbath and prophane it then it obligeth us to it and that directly for indirectly and by consequence the breach of the Sabbath is a sin against any or all of the three former commands 3. If the prophaning of the Sabbath be forbidden on this ground because it is the Lords as it is in this Command then prophaning of the Lords day is equally forbidden in it because its the Lords and is now appropriated to him according to his own will 4. The Testimony of mens Consciences and the constant challenges of all when tender as being guilty of breaking this Command when ever they prophane the Lords day do convincingly hold forth that this Command concerneth and are as so many witnesses of it and consequently prove that it is not the seventh day but a seventh day whether instituted or to be instituted by God which is the substance of it and primarily commanded in it for its never counted a breach of this Command to neglect to sanctifie the seventh day neither do the Consciences of well informed Christians challenge for that though they do most bitterly for the other as is said In sum suppose now the first day being instituted that the Command were to sanctifie the Sabbath we would understand it of the first day because it s already instituted and the same reasons will inforce it even so the seventh day came in then because it was formerly instituted beside the Sabbatisme signifieth not this or that day but what day soever shall be by God solemnly set or is set apart for holy rest and the Command will run for our observing the Lords day supposing its institution as well as it did for that although it more directly tye them yet it doth so but as a reason even as the preface prefixed to all the Commands and the promise affixed to the fifth concern them literally yet are binding in so far as they are moral as appeareth by the Apostles applying the last Ephes 6. 2. without relation to that particular Land or People but as applicable and common to any Land or People making conscience of obedience to Gods commands But here it may be objected 1. The Jews kept the Seventh day Answ 1. Not by vertue of this command but by its prior institution even as they were obliged to Sacrifices and Circumcision by the second command though they were not particularly named in it 2. So we are obliged to the keeping of the First day of the week by this fourth Commandement yet it followeth not therefore this is expresly commanded in it there being indeed no particular day primarily at least instituted in it 2. It may be objected But God rested the Seventh day Answ Gods rest is not principally proposed as the reason of that Seventh day but that he rested one day after six imployed in the works of Creation I'ts to inferr the number not the order otherwaies it would not concern us 2. The Seventh relateth not to the order of the dayes of the week one two three c but it 's called the Seventh with respect to the former Six of work Thus much for the quoties and quamdiu how often the Sabbath recurreth and what is the day It remaineth here to be inquired what is the beginning of the sanctification of this day which belongeth to the quando or wherefrom we are to reckon it seeing it 's granted by all to be a natural day Now it is questioned mainly whether its begininning is to be reckoned from evening about Sun setting or darkness to Sun setting the next day or if it be to be reckoned from morning that is as we fix it when the Sun beginneth to ascend towards us after midnight which is morning largely taken as its evening largely taken when the Sun beginneth to decline after mid-day In this debate then we take morning and evening largely as they divide the whole natural day so the morning is from twelve at night to twelve in the day and the evening from twelve in the day to twelve at night And it must be so here for 1. Moses Gen. 1. divideth the natural day in morning and evening which two put together make up the whole day and these six dayes made up each of them of morning and evening are natural dayes the whole week being divided in seven of them and that reckoning from Gods example is no doubt proposed for our Imitation in this Hence the morning watch was before day and the morning sacrifice about nine of the clock so the evening sacrifice was about three in the afternoon and the evening watch about nine at night 2. It is granted by all and is clear from this command that as we account the six working dayes of the week so must we account the seventh for one must begin where another endeth and if one of them begin at the evening or morning all the rest must do so likewise 3. We suppose the sanctifying of the ordinary Sabbath was from morning to evening I say of the ordinary Sabbath because for extraordinary Sabbaths as of the Passover Exod. 12. and of the Atonement Levit. 23. there were special reasons and though otherwayes they were to be sanctified as Sabbaths yet that they were to begin in the evening before
worship they its beginning must be in the morning for if the latter or following evening belong to this natural day before sleeping time come on then the even before cannot belong to it for it cannot have both but by this Command a whole waking day or an artificial day is to be sanctified together and the even after it before waking time end as well as the morning Therefore it must begin in the morning and noâ— on the evening before Further if by vertue of the concession of six working dayes we may not worâ— the evening after then the day beginneth in the morning for the week day following must begin as the Sabbath did but the former is true Ergo c. Thesâ— things will make out the minor 1. It can hardly be thought consistent with thiâ— Command to work immediately when it groweth dark before folks rest 2. Iâ— said Luke 23. verse 56. and 24. verse 1. of the Women that stayed from the grave till the first day of the week that they rested according to the commandment on the Sabbath day and early in the morning came to the Sepulchre 3. Because Christ accounteth a whole natural day that which lasteth till men cannot work 4. Gods working dayes to say so were such he made not any thing in the evening before the First day 5. The ordinary phrase To morrow is the holy Sabbath Exod. 16. 23 c. sheweth that the day present will last till to morrow come and to morrow is ever by an intervening night So if on the forbidden day men may not work till to morrow then that evening belongeth to it by this Command and if on the sixth day the seventh be not come till to morrow that is after the night intervene then it doth not begin at even but so it is in these places and phrases Yet again its clear that in all the examples of ordinary Sabbaths keeping and sanctifying in Scripture they began in the morning For instance it is said Exod. 16. 27. Some of the people went out to gather on the seventh day no doubt in the morning for they knew well there was none of it to be found any day after the Suns waxing hot they might have dressed of it the night before and not been quarrelled with they being forbidden gathering on the Sabbath the proofs of the former Argument give light to this also There are yet two Arguments to be added which do especially belong to us Christians for clearing the beginning of our Lords day to be in the morning the first is taken from Christs Resurrection thus That day and that time of the day ought to be our Sabbath and the beginning of it when the Lord began to rest after finishing the work of Redemption and arose but that was the First day in the week in the morning Ergo c. This bindeth us strongly who take that day on which he arose to be our Christian Sabbath The second is taken from the History of Christs Passion and Resurrection together wherein these things to this purpose are observable 1. That he was laid in the Grave on Frydays night being the preparation to the great Sabbath which followed 2. That the Woman who rested and came not to the Grave till Sunday morning to use our known names are said to rest according to the Commandment as if coming sooner had not been resting according to it 3. That his lying in the Grave must be accounted to be some time before the Fryday ended other wayes he could not have been three dayes in the Grave and therefore a part of Frydays night is reckoned to the First day then the whole Sabbath or Saturday is the second and lastly a part of the night to wit from twelve a clock at night belonging to the First day or Sunday standeth for the third and so he arose that morning while it was yet dark at which time or thereabouts the Women came to the Grave as soon as they could for the Sabbath and therefore their Sabbath seventh-day ended then and the First day Sabbath began We now come to the third general question concerning the change to wit the change of the seventh day into the First day of the week where first we shall sum up what is moral in this Command and then secondly by some Propositions clear the change and its consistency with this Command To the first then this Command doth morally and perpetually oblige to these 1. That there be a solemn time set apart and observed for Worship 2. That this should be one day of seven 3. That it should be such a day the very day which God commandeth the Sabbath of his appointment whatever day it should be 4. That it be a whole natural day of twenty four hours yet having an Artificial day together undivided 5. That six and no more but six working dayes intervent and that these be together in a week and therefore 6. That the Sabbath be a bounding day dividing one working week from another if then six working dayes must be in one week and go together this will follow also that the Sabbath must be the first or last day of the seven As for the Propositions clearing the change and consistency of it with this command the first shall be this The Sabbath may be changed from the last or seventh day to the first day of the week without any derogation to this command or inconsistency with it for all that is moral in it to wit a day and one day of seven and a bounding seventh day leaving six for work together remain untouched by the change beside the seventh day not having its institution from this Command expresly and directly but only accidentally the particular day whether the Jews seventh day or the Christians first day of the week being supposed by the fourth Commandment as instituted or to be instituted elsewhere as is said and its first institution Gen. 2. being onely a positive and temporary Law may be therefore changed and yet the fourth Commandment keep intire we need not insist in further prosecution of this Proposition much being spoken to it on the matter already 2. Propos Not only may the seventh be altered from what it was under the Law to another seventh day under the Gospel but it is meet and convenient from good reasons even in the Command that it should be so For 1. If these two ages before Christ and after him be looked on as diverse Worlds and if the Redemption by Christ at his coming be accounted the making of the one as Gods Creation was of the other then its meet that when the World is renued by Redemption the Sabbath day should be changed for memory of that as well as it was instituted at first for the memory of the former there being the same reason for both But they are looked on as two distinct worlds and called so in the plural number Heb. 11. 2. and this last World distinguished from the
former Hebr. 2. 5. and the redeeming of the one is looked upon as the making of the other therefore from that day forth the day of rest is to be such as may relate to both now the day being changed to the first it remembreth us of Gods rest at the Creation by distinguishing six dayes from the seventh and it remembreth us of the new Creation by putting Christs Resurrection in the room of the former Arg. 2. If the new World be a work as much for the glory of God and as comfortable to men when it s begun and closed or finished by the work of Redemption as the making of the old World was then the day of rest of the new World is to be made to relate to that much more if the Redemption of the World be more for the glory of God and for the comfort of men then by the ground on which the seventh day was at first instituted it s also again to be changed to wit the memory of Gods great work but both the former are true Ergo or thus if the ground that made the seventh to be chosen for the Sabbath in the old World be changed in the new and thaâ— ground agree better to another then to it then it is to be changed But the ground whereupon the old seventh day was preferred is now changed there are grounds to prefer another day to it for the same ends therefore it is meet the day be changed also Or thus f the perfecting of the work of Redemption and the rest of the Mediator after it be as much to be remembred as the work of Creation and Gods resting after it then the day is to be changed but so it is Ergo. Arg. 3. If by Christ in the new World all the Levitical services be changed and the Ceremonial Worship of that day then it is meet that the day also should be changed 1. For shewing the expiration of that Worship and Law it being hard to keep that day and to distinguish it from the Jewish former Worship 2. To keep Christians more Judaizing and to abstract them even from former services of the Sabbath now abolished just as now no particular family hath the Priesthood as Levi had it before nor no particular Nation hath the Church confined in it as that of the Jews had though these were not typical properly yea it would be such a day as would point out the evanishing of former Ceremonies which the inbringing of the first day abundantly doth Arg. 4. If the Worship and Ordinances of the new Gospel-world be eminently to hold their Institution of Christ the Mediator and to be made some way relative to his Redemption past then it is meet for that end that the Sabbath-day be changed so as it may be dependant on him as all other worship is that is moral-positive or positive-moral and that cannot be done well if the former day be kept unchanged at least not so well as when it is changed but the former is true all Gospel-worship holdeth of him Sacraments Prayer Praise Ministry c. now Sacraments as they seal are not ceremonial for the Tree of Life was instituted to be a seal of the Covenant of works in the state of Innocency before the fall while there were no typical Institutions of a Saviour to come and so Sacraments as they are Seals may be continued as perpetual pieces of worship without hazard of typifying a Saviour to come therefore he instituted new ones and that with relation to his work of Redemption considered as past Hence also his Prayer or Pattern is called the Lords Prayer and his Sacrament of the Supper is called the Lords Supper because instituted by him and relating to him in this sence it is peculiarly said Hebr. 2. 5. That God put in subjection to him the World to come different from what was before and he is put as the Son in the New Testament in the place of Moses who was the Law-giver and faithful Servant in the Old Heb. 3. upon this ground we think that day is called Hebr. 1. 10. the Lords day to bring it in a dependance on Jesus Christ and to make it respect what is past of the work of Redemption Arg. 5. If the day of solemn publick worship be a piece of Gods worship capable of bearing a relation to Christ to come and falling out under the Mediators Kingdom properly then when he cometh in the new World it is meet it should be changed 1. To shew he is come 2. To shew he is absolute over the house and worship of God 3. Some way to preach his Grace and Redemption in the very change of it But it is a piece of Worship and Tribute of our time as is said before and a piece of worship capable of his Institution and Remembrance therefore called the Lords day which could not be were not a day of worship capable of that and it falleth under the power of Christ who Matth. 12. Even as the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath and why is that power pleaded in that particular of the day so often if it were not to shew that there is reason by his coming to look on the Sabbath as under him even as all other worship was which stood by Gods positive Command even as this did Arg. 6. If by this Command the day of rest from Gods most solemn work be to be our day of rest then after Christs coming not so before not the seventh but the first day is to be observed but by the command the former is true Again if that day be to be kept in reference to any solemn work of God which was the first day after his perfecting it then the First day is to be kept but by the command the former is true because our resting day is to be kept in reference to the work of Redemption and therefore must be on the First day which was the day after its closing and perfecting as to Christs suffering and labour though not as to its application even as the seventh was of Gods resting from the work of Creation though not from his works of Providence Arg. 7. If the seventh day which the Jews kept had any peculiar tye or motive unto them which by Christ is now taken away then it was meet that at Christs coming that day should be changed We would understand here that there might be somewhat peculiar or typical in their seventh day and yet nothing so in the fourth Command which commandeth one of seven but not the seventh And though we could not particularly pitch upon what is typical or peculiar in it yet may we conceive that something there is as in Tythes Offerings c. though the particular thing which is typified be hardly instructed As 1. If its beginning was on the evening to them as some think the reason of it was peculiar to wit their coming out of Egypt at evening Exod. 12. And in so far
purpose And as the practise of the Church holdeth out the change of the day so doth the Title given Rev. 1. 10 to the first day of the week to wit the Lords day confirm the same whence we argue If the Title which by the Lord and his people was given to the seventh-seventh-day Sabbath under the Old Testament and under which and by which he claimeth a seventh-seventh-day in this Command If I say that Title in the New Testament be not given unto the seventh but unto the First day of the week then is the day changed from the seventh day to the First and the First falleth now under this command as the seventh formerly did but the former is true the First is styled as the seventh was and as this Command styleth and claimeth the day to the Lord to be observed for him therefore now is the Sabbath changed from the seventh day to the First day of the Week The Titles whereby the Sabbath is distinguished from other dayes and peculiarly claimed and marked by God as his and that in this same Command must certainly evidence that day which he hath set apart and doth claim as he applyeth them And therefore if these Titles be given and applyed to the first day now it must needs shew a succeeding of that day unto the former seventh for during the Observation of the seventh day these Titles were not nay could not be applyed to the First no day being then the Lords but the seventh Now we find that the seventh-seventh-day Sabbath is in the Old Testament styled by the Lord under these Titles and so claimed by him 1. It s called here the Sabbath of the Lord or to the Lord that 's the Lords as contra distinguished from the six dayes he hath given unto us a day that he hath right to and not we therefore called the Lords Sabbath 2. Isaiah 58. 3. It s claimed by the Lord as his my holy day which is so called 1. to distinguish it from other days 2. To stamp it with the Lords mark in respect of its use for it is not to be applyed to our use but to his own it being his in a special manner But in the New Testament after Christs resurrection the seventh day is not so styled and claimed but the first day of the week is Rev. 1 10. I was saith John in the Spirit on the Lords day In which place these things are clear 1. That after Christs Ascension there was a peculiar day belonging to the Lord beside and beyond other days 2. That it was not the old Sabbath for 1. Johns scope being particularly to clear the time of the Vision by the Circumstance of the day the particular day as distinct from other dayes to call the Sabbath then used amongst the Jews the Lords day had more obscured it then cleared it yea 2. In that it s called the Lord according to the phrase of the New Testament it supposeth some relation to Christ the Mediator as being derived from him which cannot be said of the seventh day Sabbath 3. That it was not any indefinite day of the Lord For 1. there is great odds betwixt the Lords day and the day of the Lord the former looketh to a constant special right and peculiar interest that God hath in that day beside other dayes even as when the seventh day was called his Day before the Temple his Temple the prescribed Service his Service and the Sacrament of the Supper his Supper c. 2. That day would be still dark to the Church if it were indefinite contrary to Johns scope 4. That it is and must be such a day as was commonly set apart by Christians to God as his and that with respect to Christ the Mediator and such a day as was known to them And by the former practises it is clear that this day is the first day of the week being the Lord Christs day who now having conquered death and gotten the victory He doth therefore claim this day as a tribute to him This being clear that no other day can claim this title and that the First day hath good ground to claim it we may put it out of question that it is the First day or no day or if it were not the First that to no purpose were the designation of that day inserted seeing to no other day hath it been applyed nor can it be applyed This truth has been uncontroverted in all Antiquity and almost by all Writers till of late Gomarus beginneth to question it as Rivet cleareth on this Command against him Now supposing it as unquestionable that this is the very First day we are to inquire if the title applyed to this day be the same with that in the Command and which usually was given to the old seventh-day Sabbath or that then Lords day And it is clear 1. That this title claimeth this day to God as his Day it being possessively exprest as when we say the Lords Throne the Lords Altar the Lords Sabbath c. 2. It contra-distinguisheth that day from other dayes as if they were not so the Lords but ours like that in the Command Six dayes shalt thou labour c. but the seventh is the Lords so it s the Lords in a peculiar way we having lesser right to imploy that day for our own use then any other day and this claim of the First day to the Lords inferreth a condescension or dispensation whereby the last day becometh ours for had there been two dayes belonging to him one day could not have been peculiarly called his in which respect 1 Cor. 11. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords Supper is distinguished from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 their own Supper even so the Lords day is distinguished from other dayes 3. It layeth on a necessity of using it for the Lord and not for our selves because it s his and will infer the same moral duties and ends which the Command obligeth to 4. It will infer an appointment of Christs whereby he appropriateth that day to his service and claimeth it to himself why because he calleth it his even as in the fourth Command there is no express institution of the seventh day yet because the sev nth was called the Lords and in his former way and dispensations intimated as a day to be kept for him therefore it 's understood and taken for granted by the Jews to be instituted seeing he calleth it his so may we conclude here that there is an institution and appointment of the First day to be the Lords because it s claimed by him as his although no such plain express institution be of it as of other Ordinances it being clear that the institution of dayes is left more generally to be gathered From all which we may gather the couclusion to wit that the First day of the week is stiled by the same peculiar Titles claimed by the Lord expresly as his right and due and upon as valid grounds
separation from other dayes but all that is called the Lords is his after this manner Ergo Let the minor be confirmed these three wayes 1. By looking to what is called the Lords generally in the Old Testament as his House his Altar his Priests his Tithes c. are they not still his because by him separate for distinct uses in his worship 2. By looking more particularly how the seventh day was called his day or the Sabbath his is not this the reason because it was appointed by him for his worship beside other dayes And can any reason agree better to this 3. By looking how any thing is called the Lords in the New Testament there is no other or better phrase or designation to try by then that 1 Cor. 11. 20 21. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is opposed to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 even as this first day called the Lords day is opposed to our dayes or common days and that is called the Lords Supper because instituted by him for such and such spiritual ends and uses And therefore there can be no better ground gotten for shewing why this is called the Lords day beside others then by comparing it with other Scriptures and if in other things that phrase import a Divine institution why not in this I do not mean that this is an institution or that it will prove that there must be a clear and express institution shewn but I mean this that it will inferr there is one and that it is Divine seeing God is to choose and not we We might here again produce the four Witnesses already attested for the morality of this fourth Command to wit 1. the general practise of primitive Christians 2. their general opinion and judgement 3. mens Consciences 4. the dispensations of God which will also all clearly depone in this about the change of the day Propos 6. Although we know not the peremptory and precise time when this day was instituted and the very first day sanctified nor whether it was immediately by Christ or mediately from him by the Apostles instituted which is of no great concernment to the main of its institution yet we think it most probable that our Lord did from the very day of his Resurrection either himself institute it while as Acts 1. v. 3 he taught them what concerned the Kingdom of God or did inspire his Apostles to observe it from that time forth Because 1. If it was not then instituted the Church had for some time wanted a Sabbath the seventh-day Sabbath being expired by the Resurrection 2. The reason moving the change and preferring the first day before others as in a nearer capacity of sanctification for that end was from that time forth 3. The Apostles practise of meeting and Christs keeping with them hath been from the first change even on the first two first dayes of the week John 20. verse 19. 26. 4. All the practises and other grounds whereby the change is evidenced suppose still the institution to preceed which maketh it appear to be very ancient And so we resume and close these six propositions 1. The day may be changed from the last to the first 2. It s meet it should be so and there is good reason for it 3. It can onely be to one first 4. It s so changed actually 5. It s change is not by Humane but by Divine institution 6. It s institution seemeth to be from the rise of the Gospel Church and the very day of Christs Resurrection Hence we infer 1. good warrant even Gods warrant for imploying the seventh-day to our selves seeing God seeketh but one day in seven and now has chosen and claimeth the first 2. Gods warrant for sanctifying the first day Sabbath or the Lords day as his institution 3. That the Lords day is to be sanctified by us Christians and that by vertue of this Command as the seventh-day was by the Jews on its grounds We come now to speak of the sanctification of this day which is the main thing and for which all the rest is intended we shall first consider the precept and then 2. the reasons whereby it is inforced The precept is sanctify it or keep it holy sanctifying of it is twice mentioned in this Command 1. In the end it s said God hallowed or sanctified it that is by separation destination and appointment for holy uses and as a part of worship so he sanctified the Temple Altar c. not by infusing any holiness in them but by appointing them for holy uses Thus onely God can sanctifie a day or any other thing so as to make it a part of worship and no man or power on Earth whatsomever can do that 1. In the precept it self we are commanded to sanctifie it that is by the application of it unto the uses wherefore he hath set it apart thus we sanctify what he hath sanctified when we use it and imploy it according to his appointment And so we are to consider the sanctifying of this day in these duties called for from us on it This sanctification is two wayes set down 3. In its cessation and rest separating it from other uses and so keeping it from the common uses to which other dayes may and use to be applied 1. In its special application to and imployment in holy uses For clearness we shall consider this sanctification 1. In respect of its rest what we are to abstain from 2. Comparatively with that strictness called for from the Jews 3. Eminently what is required more as to holiness this day then on other dayes wherein also the Lords people should be holy and wherein this goeth beyond these 4. Positively in what duties it should be taken up 5. Complexly in respect of what is called for to the right sanctifying of that day before it come on in the time of it and after it is past and that in publick and private and by all relations Master Servant c. and throughout the whole man thoughts words and deeds and throughout the whole day 6 Oppositively or negatively what are the breaches of this Command and the aggravations of these sins which break it First then we consider it in its rest which is required and because there are extreams some giving it too little as the Jews did before the captivity some too much even to being superstitious as the Jews after the Captivity and the Scribes and Pharisees particularly in Christs time did streaching this rest too far We must therefore consider it more narrowly and particularly for quieting of our Consciences for the Jews are by the Prophets Ezek. 20. Jerem. 17. and by Christ Matth. 12. reproved for both extreams respectively We do then in this matter assert first That there is a rest required here which is extensive to a mans words thoughts and actions whereby many things lawful on other dayes become unlawful on this day Yet 2. we assert That by this rest all sort of actions are not
condemned but only such as are in consistent with the end and scope of this Command as by other Scriptures and the practise of Christ and the Saints is clear we conceive therefore these to be permitted 1. All duties of Piety as was sacrificing under the Old Testament or preaching hearing or going about the Sacraments under the New Testament In which sense Matth. 12 our Lord saith the Priests prophaned the Sabbath and were blameless not that formally they prophaned the Sabbath or did indeed break that Command but materially they wrought in killing beasts c. which had been unlawful had it not been in the exercises of piety 2. All things that have a tendency as necessary helps and means to the performance of the former works of piety are lawful as going to the Congregation to hear the Law calling the Assembly for worship by Trumpets or Bells or by a Voice journeying going or riding to Church c. because the duties of the Sabbath cannot well be done without some of these not at all without others of them If it should be asked here What that which is called a Sabbaths day journey Acts 1. 12. was among the Jews and whence it came and what way may it be stinted or limited among Christians Answ It was to them 2000. Cubits which according to the different measuring of that distance of ground consisting of these 2000 Cubits by a lesser or longer Cubit is reckoned to be more or less by learned Men but all agree says Goodwin in his Moses and Aaron in this that these 2000. Cubits was a Sabbath days journey It arose to be reckoned so from these grounds 1. From their expounding Exod. 16. 29. Let none go out of his place thus Let none go without the bounds of the City which with its Suburbs was 2000. Cubits or a mile about 2. That the Tabernacle of the Congregation was so far from the Tents of these who pitched about it in the Wilderness Numb 2. as they supposed and that the Priests kept that distance from the people in entering with the Ark into Iordan Jos 3. 4. whence they gathered that a man might still go to the Ark or place of worship as it was then in these cases at a distance from them and no further on the Sabbath day But we say whatever superstitiously or on custome they took up for that is but their Tradition we cannot stint a Sabbath dayes journey to so many miles fewer or more but it must be as the man is in providence cast to reside further from or nearer to the place where the Ordinances are dispensed for one may go many miles and not prophane the Sabbath if he cannot have the publick Ordinances nearer whereas another may break the Sabbath by going but to his Neighbours door yea by walking in his own house or to his door if either it be done idly or with respect to another civil or worldly end which agreeth not to that day it is not here remoteness or nearness but what sweyeth us and what is our end that we are to try by 3. All works of mercy are lawful on that day as laying beside us something to the poor 1 Corinth 16. verse 1. sending or dealing something to those who are in want Isai 58. verse 7. visiting others to comfort strengthen or otherwayes to edifie them christianly though idle and carnal visits albeit alace too rife are not permitted 4. Good Works as Christ saith Matth. 12. 12. It s lawful to do good or well on the Sabbath such are giving of Physick when it is necessary bringing of Physitians saving a mans life and taking pains for it c. Luke 13. these good Works may be classed either with Works of mercy before or with Works of necessity that follow both being good Works as they are Works of mercy or of necessity 5 Works of necessity such as feeding Beasts leading them to the water pulling them out of Ditches when they are fallen into them on that day and much more preparing honestly sober allowance for the susteining of the body as the Disciples pluckt the ears of Corn Matth. 12. and the Jews Exod. 16. 23. dressed the Manna on the Sabbath though they were not to gather it yet on the sixth day to bake and seethe a part and to keep a part till the morrow but not till the day following and therefore they behoved to dress it also yea Jesus Christ went himself to a Feast on the Sabbath Luke 14. that he might take that opportunity by his spiritual discourse to edifie the Company as he did notably which he would not have done had it been unlawful to dress any meat on the Sabbath yet his carriage was such at that Feast most remarkably that it would be followed as a pattern by such as may be invited by others to eat with them and shall be disposed to go on the Sabbath And if this were the design of the inviters and invited mens eating together on that day would not readily prejudice the sanctification of it as very often it doth Such is flying on the Lords day from a destroying enemy and in other warranted cases Matth. 24. defending our selves against unjust violence c 6. Works of comliness tending to honest or decent walking as putting on of clothes honestly making the house clean from any uncleanness that may fall in it throughout the Sabbath c. By all which Believers have allowance 1. for piety 2. for charity 3. for what is needful for their beasts 4. what is needful and convenient or comely for themselves and more is not necessary In these the Lord hath not streightned them neither hath he pinched and pinned them up to absolute necessity but hath left them to walk by Christian prudence yet so as they may not exceed for the Disciples possibly might have endured that hunger and not pluckt the ears of Corn or beasts may live a day without water and not be much the worse or some sort of Victuals may be provided to be set beside men on the Sabbath needing no dressing or preparing yea a man may live on little or nothing for one day but the Lord hath thought good not to streighten them so as to make his day and worship a weariness and burden unto them seeing he hath made the Sabbath for man to be refreshing to him and not man for the Sabbath nor will he have their Consciences to be fettered with inextricable scruples He leaveth it to men on other days how much to eat and drink by a Christian prudence yet alloweth them not to exceed even on these so here there is some latitude left to conscientious reason to walk by for some may do something at one time and not at another yea one man may take more pains in upholding his body then is called for from another who is stronger so that its impossible to set particular rules which will agree to all but men would look 1. to their end 2.
practise in plucking ears of Corn and rubbing them as it is Luke 6 1. which was a sort of preparing and dressing of that meat insinuate the contrary neither can any thing be gathered from that place Exod. 16. 23. against dressing of meat simply but rather the contrary for the Manna that remained over what was dressed on the sixth day was to be laid up till the seventh day or the Sabbath but not till the day after the Sabbath and will it not suppose that they behooved then to dress it on the Sabbath as on other dayes by boyling at least for as to grinding of it at Mills or other wayes there was no necessity for that on the Sabbath out of some extraordinary Case or else they had needlesly laid it up and so behoved to have fires to dress it with And therefore that of not dressing meat of not kindling fire c. must be of what is unnecessary and for servile works or making gain in mens ordinary particular callings But to the third way if any should inquire what more holiness is called for o◠can be win at on the Sabbath then a Believer is called unto on other dayes he being called to endeavour to be perfectly holy every day I Answer Although he be called to be perfectly holy yet not in the holiness of immediate Worship throughout every day He is to be perfectly holy on other dayes according to the duties and imployments of these dayes but on the Lords day he is called to be holy according to the imployments of that day and its duties The Lords people of old were indeed called to perfect holiness all the week over but singularly to sanctifie the Sabbath as a part of their universal holiness 2. Though all the parts of every day should be spent holily yet some parts more especially as what parts are spent in Prayer reading the Scripture c. and somewhat more is required of these who are called to it on a Fasting day then on other dayes even so on the Sabbath 3. There is a difference betwixt a person living holily in the general and a person who is holy in sanctifying the Lords day though a man should be holy every day yet is he not to sanctifie every day which is required on this day whereof we shall now speak This dayes sanctification then we conceive to consist in these 1. That there is more abstractedness not onely from sinful things but even from lawful temporal things required on that day then on other days a spiritual frame of heart separating and setting apart a man from ordinary thoughts Hence we may say that as the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifyeth unclean as well as common so a common or every day frame o◠Spirit will be found unclean for the Sabbath there must therefore be another frame of heart different from an ilk a day-frame and suited to that day 2. This day is to be sanctifyed in respect of the Exercises of it beyond other days and that necessarily whereas on some other dayes we may be taken up in some duties of worship arbitrarily but here necessarily And men may and ought to be holy on other dayes in their plowing and other works but there their Holiness is to be in immediate worship to God in some thing relating to that alway such as praying reading hearing conferring meditating c. 3. The sanctification of this day lyeth in this that it must be wholly sanctified but parts of other dayes are ordinarily used in religious Service but this whole day is to be used so a man should be this whole day throughout as in the time of praying on other dayes 4. Duties would be multiplyed that day more secret and private Prayer Reading c. and more publick Worship even as there were double Sacrifices that day under the Law though there were Sacrifices all dayes 5. There would be in the duties of this day more intenseness of Spirit and a further degree of spiritual affections then in these duties of other dayes because this day is purposely set apart for that end and by continuance in duties we may attain to more of a spiritual frame and because not onely the Exercises of Worship praying reading and hearing c. call to Holiness on this day as they do on other dayes but even the very day it self doth call to it even as on a solemn day of humiliation men ought to be more affected and deeply humbled then on other dayes though daily they should repent and be humbled because that day is solemnly set apart for it so ought our worship to be more intense and solemn this day suitable unto it wherein we are as it were dyeted for insisting and persisting in duties of worship where as these duties in this respect and in comparison are on other days but as starts worship is here some way the only work of that day 6. There would be more heavenliness and spiritual sence breathed after that day in the frame of the heart it would be near God and the work of the day would be delightsome and sweet the Sabbath would as it is Isaiah 58. be called a delight and we would endeavour as it is Heb. 4. to enter into his rest to pass through the outward rest into his to be within his chambers yea even in his arms as it were all that day 7. There would be that day more divineness in our Holiness to speak so a sort of Majesty by ordinary in our walk looking like the Sabbath and like the God of the Sabbath There would be an exulting in God that day we would endeavour to have our hearts in a special manner warm in the Exercise of love to him and to be much in praising of him our Whole worship would more absolutely and immediately be aimed and levelled at the honour and glory of God as the end of it then on other ordinary days wherein our prayers and other pieces of worship may more immediately respect our own Case and need but on this day Gods Honour as the end more immediately whatever our own Case be and that both in heart within and in the nature of our Exercises without this is to call the Sabbath of the Lord honourable to honour and glorifie him therein as it is Is 58. a special Majesty being in that days worship by levealling it with extraordinary singleness at Gods praise even as his name is hallowed or sanctified in Heaven by Angels and perfected Saints Hence It 's good to give thanks unto thy Name c. beginneth that Psalm of Praise for the Sabbath-day to wit the 92. These Duties then that further his praise are more especially for that day 8. All these reach both words and thoughts nothing to the hindrance of these is to be admitted neither there are none of our words and thoughts that day but they would in a special manner be Gods and in it we should be spent as his and endeavour to
be spiritually edifying and sutable watch over your eyes that carnal or wordly looks steal you not away nor distemper your hearts but especially over your hearts that they we are not out of a spiritual frame 8. When ye come to the place of publick worship if it be a while a beginning be still watchful and the nearer ye come to it the more watchful for temptations will be very ready to divert or discompose there would be a frequent intermixture of ejaculatory prayers in reference to every thing equisite for attaining and intertaining this composedness 9. When publick worship beginneth study to be as Cornelious was Acts 10 present to joyn in prayer and praise to hear what God will say to receive it to lay it up in your hearts to be sutably affected with it and to resolve through grace to practise it for blessed are they only who hear the word and do it and this would be with delight aming aright at the end of the Ordinances whatever they be whereof we spoke somewhat on the second Comandment 10. When the publick worship is as to it's first diet closed let not your minds turn carnal but depart reverently from it chearing your selves in God fixing the convictions exhortations directions instructions c. in your mind as ye have met with them and be ruminating rather on these then beginning to gaze oâ— discourse with others on subjects that are not spiritual and to edification 11. As soon as ye can win go in secret and seek to have these things fastned and riveted betwixt God and you and let that be your first work and let the little time that interveneth betwixt the diets of publick worship till you return be spent sutably to the day and the end of the duties thereof 12. When all the publick worship is ended then ye would do according to the preceding tenth Direction ye would withal retire a while in secret and reflect on your carriage in publick and also see what good may be gotten of the day and if there be any misses neglects or failings observed as if there be a diligent search there will no doubt be then be humbled seek pardon through Christ and resolve through grace to help these afterward consider what was said and like the noble Bereans Acts 17. put it to the tryal for your confirmation by your considering and examining the Scriptures cited or spoken of and endeavour yet more to have your hearts affected in secret with them 13. Then call your Families and come together after secret seeking of God and 1. be inquiring of one another what is remembred that all being put together ye may be helpful by your memories one to another 2. ye would do this not as if it were enough to tell over the words but that the Doctrines and their Uses may be fixed and ye affected with them Therefore 3. ye would do this with other duties of reading singing and spiritual conference as the occasion of it shal offer with prayer to God before and after being thus exercised â—ill ye go again in secret to close the day as ye began 14 Duties of Charity would be done contributions made liberally according to our ability and relief sent to others as we know their need which also would be inquired after 15. Indeavoure to have the heart in a right frame to close the day with reflecting on our carriage throughout it fearing to lye down with guilt unpardoned and without some special fruit of the duties of the day hast not to go to rest sooner that night then on other nights on design that you may be sooner at work the nixt day which smelleth strong of wearying of the Sabbath and of longing to have it at an end of which the Lord complained of old Amos 8. 5. study to lye down with thoughts as you arose leaving your selves in his arms with respect to the eternal Sabbath that is coming 3. When the Sabbath is past and the next day cometh cast not by all thoughts of it instantly but begin your work as having just now ended the Sabbath fearing to let the relish of it wear away and indeavouring in your carriage through the Week to retain the stamp and impression of it especially beware to go to your Callings with a Sabbath dayes guiltiness on you O indeavour by all means to have that removed hand all the Week through have one eye to the Sabbath past and another to the Sabbath coming having still that sounding in your ears remember the Sabbath or the Lord day to keep it holy dieting your souls as it were all along the Week for a course of communion with God in the duties of the next Sabbath It will be now easie to know when this command is transgressed which was the sixth way proposed of considering the sanctification of the Sabbath to wit oppositively or negatively which is done 1 by committing any thing contrary to the rest or sanctification of it 2. by omitting any of the things which are required for the right sanctifying of it 3. by an unsuitable frame of heart as to the due manner of performing any of these duties required We will find the weight of this command yet more fully by considering it's reasons how it'sexplicated and pressed This is done 1. by laying down the equity and extent of it v. 9. 10. 2. by pressing it from God's example As to the first v. 9. Six dayes shalt thou labour and do all thy work These words may be looked on 1. As an obliging concession which is indeed very liberal as if the Lord had said all dayes are mine yet I have given thee Six to do all thy work and labour that thou hast to do therefore give me the Seventh It is but a small retribution for Six to return a Seventh 2 As a restriction thou shalt do whatever work thou hast to do within the Six dayes but none of it on the Seventh 3. As a command whereby God distributeth our time and commandeth Six for our work and the Seventh for his And thus these words forbid idleness and command lawful diligence in these Six dayes which we conceive here to be implyed 1 Because God is not carving out what time we may be idle in but what time we should imploy in our own lawful works as well as in his for it cannot be thought that he giveth us Six to be idle on It must therefore be to work on seeing as our life should be taken up in doing either what more immediately concerneth our selves or what more immediatly concerneth God so the scope of this command being to proportion our time betwixt these two what is allowed for either of them must imply an improving of it for that very end 2 The opposition also will confirm this These Six dayes are to be applyed to our work as the Seventh is to be applyed to Gods which is more then a permission and if the negative part be imperative in it thou shalt
as well as to be an incouragement to them that do well and men are according to their places and parts to be forth-coming for God and the good of others And yet this cannot be called a constraining or forcing of Consciences for a Magistrate or Master thus to restrain these who are under them it 's but the using of that power which God hath committed to them to make men to do their duty and to abstain from dishonouring God and the punishing of them if they do other wayes in which respect he beareth not the Sword in vain The 2. and main reason followeth v. 11. wherein this command is three ways pressed also 1. By Gods example who during the space of six days wrought though he might as easily have made all in one day and rested the Seventh and not before the Seventh on which he wrought none even so it becometh men to do seeing he intended this for their imitation and for that end doth propose it here Gods rest on the Seventh is not absolute and in every respect for John 5. 17. he worketh hitherto that is in the works of Providence sustaining preserving and governing the Creatures made by him and their Actions but all things needful for the perfecting of the world were then made and finished Whence by the way we may gather that not only all Creatures were made Angels even these that since turned Devils c. but that they were made within the Six days of Creation when Heaven Earth Sea and all that was in them was made Therefore all our works that are necessary to be done in the six working days would be done and ended that we may rest on the Sabbath as he did The 2. way is by his blessing of it God blessed the Sabbath day which is to be understood not simply in respect of the day which is not properly capable of blessing but in respect of the true observers of it he blesseth it to them and he blesseth them in it which may be in these three 1. That the rest of that day shal not prejudge them in their weeks work but that their labour shal be therefore blessed so that they shal miss nothing by observing that day as the Lord blessed the Seventh year whereon they rested and yet notwithstanding they were as when they laboured Lev. 25. 20. 21. 22. and it 's like that if we will compare such as make Conscience to sanctifie the Sabbath with others who think and seem to gain by breaking of it this will be found at the years end to be verified 2. That the Lord hath set a part that day for a Spiritual blessing and the Communication of it to his people so the Bread and Wine are blessed in the Sacrament of the Lords Supper to be a mean of conveying Spiritual blessings to the worthy receivers Isa 56. and Psal 92. 3. That God will abundantly manifest his gracious presence and multiply his spiritual blessings that day upon it's due observers more then on other days wherein he is also sought as there is this day a double worship both in respect of the Duty and of the day whereon it 's done so there shall be a double blessing beyond what is on other days in which respect even prayers in and towards the Temple while it stood by divine appointment as a separate place from others had a blessing beyond prayers in other places and thus Christ blessed the loaves and the few small fishes John 6. when he made them by multiplication on the matter to feed far beyond their ordinary proportionableness so service on this day groweth in it's blessing hence we may see an usual connexion betwixt Universal thriving in Religion Grace and Piety and suitable obedience to this command in the tender sanctification of the Sabbath and withall a reason why so few make progress in godliness even little keeping holy the Sabbath as they ought The 3. way is by his hallowing it wherefore be hallowed it or sanctified it that is per â—odum â—â—stinandi or by way of appointing of it for holy uses and separating it from other days as is said The inference wherefore as to the hallowing pointeth at the reason or end wherefore God did it to wit that there might thereby be an excitement left to men to imitate God and that men might not only have Gods command but his example also to bind this duty on him If it be asked here why God will have a day set apart for holy Exercises beside other days It may be answered 1. It 's meet that God be acknowledged Lord of our time by this Tribut being reserved to himself 2. Because men having but a finite understanding beside the now corruption of it connot be intensely taken up with spiritual and heavenly things and with temporal and earthly things both at once or at the same instant for even Adam in innocency could not do that therefore the Lord hath graciously set apart a day for mans help in that 3. It 's to teach man that his chief end is to converse with God and to live with him and that he ought to cary in his own affairs along the week and order things so as the Sabbath may be duly sanctified when it shal come in that sweet soul reposing converse with him 4. To shew man wherein his happiness consisteth it 's even in this to walk and converse with God and to be in his worship this is his rest 5. To shew the excellency of Religion and of the Works of Piety or of Gods Worship above mens Employments in earthly and wordly things It was a Sabbath to Adam in innocency to be abstracted from his labour for the worship of God the one is mens toyl the other is mens spiritual rest and ease far contrary to that which men in the world ordinarily think and judge We see now how great and grievous a sin it is to break this command and with what care this day should be hallowed For 1. It 's a Command of the first Table and so the breach of it is in some respect more then murther Adultery Stealing c it 's included in the first and great Commandement 2. Amongst all the commands of the first Table yea all the commands this religious observance of the Sabbath is most forcibly pressed with more reasons and with more full and particular explication Because 1. All the commands hang some way on this and obedience is ordinarily given to them with the same readiness as this day is employed in Gods Service 2. It keepeth life as it were in all the rest and when men are cold in this so are they in all the rest 3. This tryeth men in theirlove to God best If indeed his company and service be more delighted in thenthe World And is a notable indication of the frame of the soul it maketh proof both of their state and frame as men are usually and habitually on the Sabbath so in effect are they
that if ye made conscience of these there would not be so much time to go abroad Take some other day for recreating your selves If ye say ye have then somewhat else to do And have ye nothing to do this day Or wil ye take more boldly from Gods day then from your own Is Sacriledge less then taking what is your own What if all did so gad abroad And it may be they have no less reason What a Sabbath day would we have There is a remarkable word Exod. 16. 29. that on the Sabbath none might go out of his place which though it be not to be understood as restraining exercises of piety or works of necessity and mercy as we shewed before yet it would seem to be the meaning of the words that on that which we call taking the air and on visiting there was a restraint thereby intended 6. Mens â—itting upon choice in the Church at such a distance that they can scarcely hear and that they may the more securely confer together on common purposes so that they do not so much as aim to profit of whom we may appositely say as Christ said of the Priests that they prophaned the Sabbath and were blameless That they some way keept it and are guilty many also sleep weary and wander in their thoughts and are as stones and statutes in the Church 7. Little ones and boyes going and running up and down playing and making a noise and servants gadding all which will be charged on Magistrates Ministers Elders Masters and Parents who are not conscionably aming and endeavouring in the diligent use of all sutable means to amend and prevent such abuses and to punish continuance in them Especially look to it when few plead or appear against such sins 8. Much idle loitering over of the Sabbath doing nothing and much sleeping it over Idleness is a sin any day much more on this day 9. Little care of sanctifying the Sabbath when men are from home or when they are not in their own Congregations when they are not in their own Houses or have not any to take oversight oâ— them There is much liberty taken this way and there are many complaints of it What my Brethren Doth not the Sabbath require as strict sanctification abroad as at home If any should ask remedies of all these and such like evils I know none better then these that are in the Command it self The first is remember what 1. Remember by-gone failings and repent of them 2. Remember coming to Judgment that ye may be found of it in peace as to this or any other guilt and endeavour to prevent it 3. Remember to be all the Week over in your worship and walk minding it A second is be well imployed throughout the Week and be not given to idleness or laziness in your particular Callings nor in spiritual Exercises there will be no sanctifying of this day without that be not therefore slothful in business but fervent in spirit serving the Lord Rom. 12. 11. 3 See that nothing unbecoming the rest of the day be admitted no manner not only of deeds but of words or thoughts 4. Let every one take inspection of others and seriously mind it in your several places as ye are called 5. Follow Gods example in other things as it 's proposed to you for your Imitation and ye will do it the better in this 6. Aim at the blessing as well as at the duty hang on himself for life and strength to discharge the duty and for the blessing since he is the Author and Bestoweâ— of both and do the duty delightsomly and with joy through the faith of his blessing and acknowledge his unspeakable goodness in priviledging you with his day and the worship thereof still waiting on him and trusting in him for whatever good may come to you in it The Fifth Command Exodus 20. 12. Honour thy Father and thy Mother that thy dayes may be long upon the Land which the Lord thy God giveth thee OUR Lord Jesus Christ Matth. 22. 37. sumeth up the whole Law in these two words which he calleth the two great Commandements Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart with all thy soul and with all thy mind and thy Neighbour as thy sef the two leggs that Piety in practise walketh upon the one comprehendeth our duty to God which runneth through all thee Ten Commands but doth more eminently exert it self in the first Four whereof we have spoken The other containeth our duty to our Neighbour which is set down more particularly in the last Six Commands whereof we are now to speak and how eye many do ignorantly and wickedly look on duty to man as somewhat extrinsick to Religion and duty to God yet both have the same authority both are put in ohe sum of the Law both are written on Tables of Stone with the Lords own finger and put within the Ark And therefore we ought with a proportionable eare to inquire what God requireth of us as duty to others as well as to himself And we should make no less conscience of obedience to the one then to the other Before we come particularly to the fifth Command we shal speak a little to these two 1. Why love to God is called the first and great command and love to our Neighbour the second and only like to the first Matth. 22. 38. 2. why hath the Lord carved out mens duty to others as well as to himself For the former of these consider in the first place that the commands of the second Table are equal to the commands of the first in respect of the authority that injoyneth them he that saith Thou shalt have no other Gods before me saith also Thou shalt not kill c. Jam. 2. 11. In which respect it is said Matth. 22. 39. the second is like unto this 2. If we compare the two Tables together as to the matter contained in them and the immediate object of each duty commanded the duties of the first Table are greater and the duties of the second Table lesser the one relating more immediately the other more mediately to Religion in which respect they express peculiarly our love to God which is called the first and great command for the first four commands require that which in its own nature is worship and is in an immediate way to be given to God but the duites required in the other six are not properly formally and immediately called for as parts of worship to God though as they are acknoweledgments of him they may be consequentially thereto referred As to the 2. Why the Lord hath in so short a sum particularly set down our duty to others as well as to himself and shewed how every one should carry towards another We would speak to it the rather that there are six commands in the second Table and but four in the first Table and the Lords commending the duties of the second Table hath
Acceptation For as other endeavours also are required in all them on whom it is incumbent to take care in their respective stations for the improvement of Holiness in the Church and the obstruction of the progreâ—s of Sinâ— what in them lyeth so for the reasons before-mentioned that in this particular way is peculiarly seasonable and useful And I am perswaded that every pious humble and unprejudiced Reader will judge that much benefit may be obtained by his performance Some may easily see how short that measure of Duties which they have prescribed unto themselves doth come of what is indispencibly required of them and others may take a plain prospect of that whole Scheme of Obedience in principles matter manner and end which they sincerely endeavour to come up unto And sundry things there are which appear to me with a notable degree of Excellency in the whole discourse 1. Plainness and perspicuity in teaching seems to have been designed by the Authour throughout the whole book Hereby it is accommodated unto the meanest Capacities which is the greatest excellency of Discourses of this nature as unto outward Forme and Order For whereas its only end is to direct the Practise of all sorts of Christians all Ornaments of Speech every thing that diverts from plainness sobriety and gravity is impertinent thereunto Wherefore as the things themselves treated of are such as the most wise knowing and learned among Believers ought to be exercised in continually So the way and manner of their Delivery or Declaration is accommodated unto the understanding and Capacity of the meanest of them that are so that benefit may redound unto all 2. In particular instances and cases relating to daily practise are so distinctly proposed stated and determined as that the whole is a compleat Christian directory in our walking before God in all duties of obedience let the pious Reader single out any one duty or head of duties to make his tryall upon and if I greatly mistake not he will discerne with what wisdome and from what deep experience his plain directions are managed and do proceed As to give a particular instance let him consider what he discovereth concerning publick Prayer and the Miscarriages therein which men are lyable unto pages 52. 53. or apply himself unto what he supposes himself more immediately concerned in unaffected plainness perspicuous brevity with solidity of judgment will every where represent themselves unto him 3. Adde hereunto that constant respect which is had in the whole discourse unto the heart and inward principles of Obedience with the contrary actings of the flesh and temptations of all sorts And thence it is that these Discourses though delivered with all plainness of speech will not be well understood by any but those who in some measure have their senses exercised to discern both good and â—vill In the whole a full testimony is given not onely against the profligate lives of many called Christians but that barren careless profession also which too many satisfie themselves withall who pretend more unto the truth and power of Religion And as these who are sincere in their obedience may in the examination of themselves by the rules here laid down discern the decays which possibly they have fallen under in this hour of temptation which is come on the face of the earth to try them that dwell therein so also may they be directed in their Christian course unto the glory of God and the Comfort of their own Souls Which that all may be is the hearty desire of Christian Reader Thy servant in the Work of the LORD IOHN OWEN TO THE CHRISTIAN READER THE excellent and usefull labors of this worthy Author have long since obtained the best Epistle of commendation even that which the great Apostle Paul accounted so compleat a Testimony as made all other commendatory Epistles in his esteem to appear superfluous that I mean mentioned by him 2 Corinth 3. where he tells the believing orinthians that they were his Epistle meaning that their Conversion and graces wrought in them by his ministry gave a sufficient witness to the worth and dignity thereof This Epistle of commendation I say God hath so eminently bestowed upon the ministerial endeavours of this holy man Mr. Durham both in Press and Pulpit that the prefixing my Epistle of commendation to this excellent Exposition of the Decalogue was judged by my self to be but an attempt to make the Sun appear more resplendent by the faint and feeble light of a Candle But since some are pleased to put an undeserved value upon my approbation of this worthy undertaking I could not but upon this occasion signifie that in my apprehension the ensuing Treatise its design and tendency so advanceth holiness of heart and life and withal is compiled with that strength and clearness of judgment and holy warmth of affection as that by Gods blessing it may preserve and reduce many in this sinful age from those impieties that so abound therein and may prove an excellent antidote against them as by the good providence of God it is brought forth in a time wherein't is coetameous with them In the hopefull expectation whereof I commit thee and this worthy work to the blessing of God in whom I am thy faithful Friend to serve thy Soul WIL JENKYN London Novemb. 1675. AN EXPOSITION OF THE TEN COMMANDMENTS Delivered in several LECTURES EXOD. 20. 1. 2. And God speake all these words saying I am the Lord thy God Which have brought thee out of the Land of Egypt out of the House of Bondage BEing through Gods strength resolved to Essay the opening of the Ten Commandments all that we shall say by way of Preface shal be to give you an account of the Motives which have engaged us in this Work The first is the Excellency of this Scripture it being by the Lord himself intended as a comprehensive sum of his peoples duty and commanded to us from this that though all the Scripture be his Word yet this in a singular manner is so for he spake all these words himself and by a Voice immediatly formed by himself he pronunced them first to his people and afterward twice by his Finger that is immediatly by himself without making use of any Pen-man as in other Scriptures he wrote them for his peoples behoof upon two Tables of Stone which were afterwards commanded in a singular manner to be kept in the Ark Deut. 10. v. 2. 5. and to be learned Deut. 5. 1. as also to be written on the Posts of their Doors and diligently pressed on their Children Deut. 67. 8. 9. 10. In opening of which Commandments not only the Prophets and Apostles but our blessed Lord in that Sermon of his upon the Mount Matth. 5. 6. 7. doth much insist The second is the usefulness of this Scripture and of the knowledge of it to all that would know what is pleasing to God that they may be fitted for duty to him and may know
Col. 4. 2. or when we meet with some special occasion or Dispensation pointing out to us this or that as a duty called for such a Providence invites us to the practise of that duty for though Providences will not make these things to become duties which are not duties yet they will serve to time and circumstantiate duties that lye on us by vertue of affirmative Precepts 4. Some special occasions and times are set down in the Word as for praying Morning and Evening for hearing the Word on Sabbath days and in these and other the like duties the examples of the Saints so recorded for imitation in Scripture would be observed as a Copy and patern 5. When they have not such inconveniences with them as cross and hinder other Moral duties of Edification love c. for if they do that they must yield and give place to these but if no other duty be called for then they ought to be done for we should be in some duty And though such dnties be in themselves Moral suppose praying hearing and such others which might be instanced yet the timing of them or going about them at such a time and in such a manner is not Moral simply but as these are by circumstances called for 6. When without sin such a duty cannot be omitted and although there be not any inward exercise of mind or frame of spirit sutable thereto yet the Conscience calls for it or there is some on special occasion or other that puts us to it 3. Observe that this Rule of Negatives tying ad semper or obliging in all circumstances of time is not to be understood but where the matter is Moral therefore we would distinguish again betwixt negative Morals and negative Positives for Positives whether negative or affirmative give still place to Morals As for instance that part of the fourth Commandment is negative In it that is one the seventh day â—â—ou shalt do no manner of work yet sometimes when necessity calls for it some manner of works is lawful on that day because it is only a negative Positive and not a negative Moral And so David's eating of Shew-bread was against a negative Command though not against a negative Moral but a negative Positive 4. Take this Rule that in all Commands joyntly and severally we would have special respect unto the scope God aims at by them all in general or by such a Command in particular now the general scope is 2 Cor. 7. 1. 1. Pet. 1. 15. 16 perfect and absolute holiness even as he is holy and therefore whatever he requires he requires that it be absolutely perfect in its kind as that our love to him be with the whole heart c. and so our love to others be as to our selves our Chastity and Purity all must be absolute see 1 Tim. 1. 5. This Rule will teach us what we are to aim and level at And whatever Exposition of the Commandments comes not up to this scope is no doubt defective and by this Rule only can we be helped to the right meaning of every Commandment for each of them has its peculiar scope both as to the duties it requires and sins it condemns And by this Rule it is that our Lord Christ whose Exposition with that of the Prophets is best draws in the least and smallest branches of filthiness to the seventh Commandment which dischargeth all things contrary to perfect and compleat Purity 5. The fifth Rule is that the Law is spiritual Rom. 7. 14. and that not only outward obedience to such duties or outward abstinence from such sinful acts is called for but the Law having a spiritual meaning calls for spiritual service and that in these three 1. As it requires spiritual duties such as Faith Fear Love to God and â—â— others right habits as well as right affections and outward actions and therefoâ—â— Paul to prove the spirituality of the Law instanceth in the habit of Lust Rom. 7. â—â— a thing thereby discharged 2. The Law is spiritual in that the obligation thereof reaches to the Spirite and very inwards of the Heart affections and thoughts as welâ— as to the outward man the love it requires is love with all the Soul Heart and Mind Hence there is Heart-Idolatry Murder and Adultery as well as outward therein condemned 3. It is spiritual in respect of the manner it requires as to all outward duties that they be done to a spiritual end from a spiritual principle and in a spirital way opposite to the carnal way to which the unrenewed heart of man is inclined in which sense we are commanded to walk in the spirit Gal. 5. 16. and so praying and praising which this Law calls for is praying and praising in the spirit 1 Corinth 14 vers 14 15 16. 6. A sixth Rule is that beside the duty expressed there is more implyed in the affirmative Commands and beside the sin pitched on there is more forbidden in the negative Precepts even all duties and sins of these kinds in whatsoever degree As for example in the affirmative Commands 1. Where the duty is commanded all the means that may further it are commanded likewise Hence under care to preserve our Brother Levit. 19. 17. 18. it is commanded that we should reprove him c. 2. Where any thing is commanded as a duty all duties of that kind are commanded as keeping holy the Lords Day is commanded in the fourth Commandment there hearing praying watchfulness all the Week over and all things belonging unto the Worship of God that day such as Tythes that is maintenance for a Ministry calling of fit Ministers bulding Churches c. are required though they be not all duties of that day 3. Where a duty is required the owning and suitable avowing of the duty is required also and so believing in God and the profession of Faith are required in the same Commandment Rom. 10. 10. 4. Where the duty of one Relation is repuired as of Childrens subjection there is required the duty of the other Relation as of Parents yea and also of all under that name Again in negative Precept observe 1. Where great sins are forbidden all the lesser of that sort are forbidden also as under Adultery Murder and Idolatry all light obscene Whorish words wanton looks unchaste thoughts revenge rash anger wordly affections c. are forbidden and they are comprehended and prohibited under the grossest terms to make them the more detestable odious and dreadfull 2. All means that may prevent these sins are commanded and all snares or occasions or incitements to them are prohibited 3. Where any sin is forbidden there the least scandal about it or the least appearance of the guilt of committing it is forbidden also for God will have his people holy and shining in holiness unspotted and without scandal and abstaining not only from all evil but from all appearance of it 1 Thess 5. 22. 4. We are not only forbidden the committing of such
what is forbidden in this Commandment and how we break it in our ordinary practise Then 3. Open the Reasons that are annexed Concerning Images two things are to be enquired 1 If no Image be lawful and if any be lawful what these be 2. If any use especially religious of Images be lawful and if adoration of any kind â—e to be given to them We say for Answer 1. That making of Pictures of Creatures which are visible or may be comprehended or historical phansies to speak so such as the senses and elements use to be holden forth by which are rather Hieroglyphicks then real Pictures these I say are not simply unlawful but are so when they are abused so Solomon made Images of Lions for his use and thus the gift of engraving and painting as well as others which God hath given to men may be made use of when as hath been said it is not abused As 1. When such Pictures are obscene and filthy and against Christian modesty to behold such break this Commandment but more especially the seventh because as filthy communication doth pollute the ears so do they the eyes 2. When men become prodigal in their bestowing either too much time or too much expence on them 3. When they dote too much on them by curiosity and many other wayes they may be abused but especially in the fourth place if they be abused to any religious use then they become unlawful as afterward shall be cleared 2. Though making of Images simply be not unlawful and discharged by this Commandment yet thereby every representation of God who is the Object to be worshipped and every Image religiously made use of in worship is condemned though civil and political Images and Statues which are used as ornaments or badges of honour or remembranceâ—s of some fact c. be not condemned 1. Because such Images cannot but beget carnal thoughts of God as Acts 6 29. contrary to this Commandment 2. Because God discovered himself Deut. 4 15 16 c. by no likeness but only by his Word that they might have no ground of likening him to any thing 3. Because it is impossible to get a bodily likeness to set him out by who is a Spirit and an infinite Spirit so then every such image must be derogatory to God as turning the Glory of the invisible God to the Shape of some visible and corruptible Creature which is condemned Rom. 1. 22 23. for every Image supposeth some likeness Now there can be no conceivable or imaginable likeness betwixt God and any thing that we can invent therefore it is said by the Lord Isai 40. 8. To whom will ye liken God or what likeness will ye compare unto him where it seemeth it was no Idol but God they aimed to represent by their Images which was the fault condemned vers 25. As also when we cannot conceive of God and of the Mysteries of the Trinity and Incarnation as we ought what presumption must it be to paint them Therefore upon these Grounds 1. We simply condemn any delineating of God or the Godhead or Trinity such as some have upon their buildings or books like â— Sun shining with beams and the Lords Name Jehova in it or any other way this is most abominable to see and a hainous wronging of Gods Majesty 2. All representing of the Persons as distinct as to set out the Father personally considered by the Image of an old man as if he were a creature the Son under the Image of a Lamb or young man the Holy Ghost under the Image of a Dove all which wrongeth the God head exceedingly and although the Son was and is Man having taken on him that nature and united it to his God head yet he is not a meer mâ—n therefore that image which only holdeth forth one nature and looketh like any man in the World cannot be the representation of that Person which iâ— God and man And if it â—e said mâ—ns soul cannot be painted but his body may and yet that picture representeth a man I answer it doth so because he has but one Nature and what representeth that representeth the person but it is not so with Christ his Godhead is not a distinct part of the humane Nature as the soul of man is which 〈◊〉 necessarily supposed in every living man but a distinct nature only united with the manhood in that one person Christ who has no fellow therefore what representetâ— him must not represent a man only but must represent Christ Immanuel God man otherwise it is not his Image beside there is no warrant for representing him in hiâ— Manhood nor any colourable possibility of it but as men fancy and shall that be called Christs portraiture would that be called any other mans portraiture whicâ— were drawn at mens pleasure without regard to the paâ—ern again there is no use oâ— it for either that Image behoved to have but common estimation with other Images and that would wrong Christ or a peculiar respect and reverence and so it sinneth against this Commandment that forbiddeth all religious reverence to Images but he being God and so the object of Worship we must either divide his Natures or say that Image or picture representeth not Christ Again as to what may be objected from the Lords appearing sometimes in the likeness of a man or the Spirits descending as a Dove or as cloven tongues of fire It iâ— answered 1. There is a great difference betwixt a sign of the Spirits presence and a representation of the Spirit 2. Betwixt what representeth the Spirit as he is one of the Persons of the blessed Trinity and what resembleth some gift of his The similitude oâ— a Dove descending upon Christ was to show his taking up his residence in him anâ— furnishing him with gifts and graces and particularly holy simplicity and meeknesâ— without measure and so his appearing in cloven tongues was to shew his communicating the gift of Tongues to the Apostles 3. Neither is there any warrant for drawing him in these shapes more then to look on every living Dove as representing him and the like may be said of Gods appearing sometimes in humane likeness it was but that men might have some visible help to discern something of Gods presence but not to give any representation of him and these bodies were but for a time assumed as a praeludie and fore-running evidence of the Sons being to become man From this ground also it would seem that painting of Angels might be condemned as a thing impossible they being Spirits which no corporal thing can represent besidâ— that the representing of them has some hazard with it and for those cherubims that were made by Gods direction under the Old Testament they were rather some Embleme of the nature and service of Angels as being full of zeal and alwayes as it were upon wing ready to obey Gods will then any likeness of themselves and it s hardly possible to fancy representations
of Spirits good or evil but thereby men will wrong themselves in the right description of them Though we grant Angels being but finite Spirits there is another kind of danger and impossibility of representing God who is an infinite Spirit also some say that these Cherubims mentioned did not represent the nature of Angels but Angels appearing under such a visible shape and we find Ezek. 1. There are divers shapes by which they are pointed out but it is as to their fitness and readiness for service and not as to their nature 3. We say that no Image whatsoever made use of for religious ends and without the bounds of civil and politick uses is allowable but is by this commandment condemned as unsuitable to the Lords nature and revealed will so by this Images otherwise lawful when abused to Idolatry become unlawfull and are not to be suffered but orderly to be removed we call that more then a civil or a common use when religious worship or reverence is purposely intended to them or â—here is by some one occasion or other danger least they may be so abused and of this sort viz. dangerous ones are 1. Images in places of Worship but it is not Idolatry to have dead mens Images on their Tombs or Monuments in Churches 2. Images of such Angels Saints c. which has been abused to Idolatry by being worshipped or most readily may be so abused 3. Images erected for hâ—lping our Prayers to be accepted and which have Altars Lights or Temples appointed for â—hem which will be clearer when we come to speak of religious worship and Bowing thus peregrinations and vows to Images touching of them with some apâ—rehension of fruit and advantage thereby especially when healing is expected from them and so are they abused also though help be expected not from the Image but from him whom it is said to represent and thus also when any Image once lawfull cometh to be abused it ought to be removed as the brazen Serpent was by Hâ—zeâ—iah and under this Prohibition come in the Images of false gods as Cupid Venus Apollo Jupiter c. which were once abused besides some of these Idols being nothing the pourtraying of them maketh them appear something and if it was the Lords way to command the breaking and destroying of all Idols and Images of false gods can it be suitable to retain them in memory that a generation following might have that occasion and help to Idolatry viz. the Images of old Idols from Christians and if it was Davids and the Saints way Psalm 16. 4. not so much as to mention their names but with detestation ought Gods people for sport or delight to look on these Images zeal for God would abhor these curiosities and what edification can be in them We are now to clear the second question If any worship may be given and what worship is due to Images of any sort and if it be not a breach of this command to give â—ny religious worship to any of them that we may answer 1. Consider there was a twofold worshipping of Images even amongst Heathens The first was more gross when the worship was given to the Image as being some Godhead of it self thus some think the images of Baal Ashâ—eroth c. and particular Images that have special names were worshipped thus are men said properly to worship the works of their hands this is against the first Commandment 2. There was a worshipping of Images as representing God and so the worship was gone about as a part of service done to the true God such was in conformity to the Heaâ—hens practise the worship given to the Calf Exod. 32. vers 1. to 7. and such were the Groves and Sacrificings in the high places 2 Chron. 32. 17. More particularly there is an immediate worshipping of Images as Idols when â—hey in themselves or for themselves are worshipped and secondly there is a mediate worshipping of images for that which they represent when men worship something in them or signified by them This again may be distinguished with respect to the object when the worship is directed either first to a false god or else secondly to the true God 2. Consider that there are divers sorts of worship given to the images of the true God or of Saints 1. Some religious worship which is more then civil yet not that which is due to God such Bellarmine giveth them for themselves properly and calleth it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. A divine worship due to what is typified such many give to the images of God and Christ this they call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this Bellarmine giveth them not properly â—ut per accidâ—ns propter aliud though the first he maketh properly to terminate on â—he Image yet Aquinas and his followers Part 3. q. 25. 3 4. giveth the images of Christ of Mary and of the Cross 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 properly so called 3. Consider what that is which is called religious worship it differeth from civil and politick worship such as is given to living men yea from that civil respect which one will give to the Image of a King or of one they love which is not properly worship even civil and consisteth in other circumstances of a religious consideration and it may be known to differ from what is Civil by these things 1. By the thing to which the worship is given that is if it be a thing which passeth not under a Civil but under a religious account as bowing to a living man is one thing to a Saints Image a Sacrament or such like which have nothing in them calling for civil honour is another thing and therefore if any honour be given them it must be on another account 2. By the actions wherein we give such worship as if it be in prayer or in worshipping of God or in sacrificing it is one thing to bow then to or before an Image or man and another thing to do it when occasionally or historically we are relating something or doing some civil business as tying the shoo or such like 3. By the sort of worship that has been given to Idols or used in religious service to God and not suitable for any civil respect to such an object as bowing the knee uncovering the head praying building Temples Altars making Vows unto them or before them swearing by them or before them carrying them about with us because of some religious influence they are supposed to have setting them up for reverence to be given to them setting up lights about them sacrificing burning incense to them c. or something of that kind used sometime in Gods service or in the service of Idols 4. Consider that what is said of Images may be said of all creatures and things to which divine honour or religious worship in the service of God is attributed for if the one fall all will by this Commandment be overturned such as 1. Worshipping of Angels
to us and ours First Thereby our Children have temporal mercies so far as is needful Psalm 37. 26. 2. They have spiritual and saving mercies amongst them 3. They have all Church-priviledges as being the Children of them that are within Gods Covenant 5. Children Be humâ—led under the sense of the Iniquity of your Parents when ye remember their wayes or possess what unjustly they have gotten ye become guilty of their sins without Repentance Especially you have need to take notice of this that are the Children of Parents that have opposed the purity of Gods Service and Worship and the work of its Reformation and have been Corrupters of it Children may be partakers of their Parents faults and so plagued for them several wayes and we think that this forfeiture is more then ordinary And therefore as amongst men there are special crimes beyond ordinary procuring such a sentence so is it here And 1. They be guilty by following their foot-steps in walking in their Parents sins as Jeroboams Children did 2. In approving their Fathers way praising their Fathers sayings or doings as it is Psalm 49. v. 13. 3. In winking at their Parents sins and wickedness 4. In boasting of their Oppressions Blood-shed c. as if they were were acts of valour and man-hood 5. In being content that their Fathers sinned if it gained any possession to them 6. In possessing and enjoying without Repentance what to their knowledge they sinfully purchased 7. In spending prodigally and riotously what the Parents covetously gathered the sin of the Parent here is the seed of the Sons sin 8. In professing sorrow for the want of occasion to live in Ignorance Prophanity or Looseness as their Fathers did as in Jerem. 44. 17 18 19. they said that things went well then In not being humbled before God for the sins of Predecessors nor confessing them to him as Levit. 26. 42. nor repairing the losses or injuries which we knew they did to any that were wronged or oppressed by them The third Commandment Exod. 20. v. 7. Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord thy God in vain for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his Name in vain THis Command the Lord presseth with a threatning that it may be known that he is in earnest and will reckon with men for the breaches of it The scope of it is To have the Name of the Lord sanctified hallowed and had in reverence by all his people and so every thing eschewed that may be dishonourable to that Holy Name and which may make him as it were contemptible this scope is clear from Levit. 22. verse 32 Where having forbidden the prophaning of his Name he addeth this positive precept as opposite thereto â—ut I will be hallowed among the Children of Israel So then its that he himself may be hallowed and had in reverence amongst them as Psalm 89 7. and 111. 9. And so this Command is much more extensive then at first view it appeareth the scope thereof being to keep the heart in a holy awe and reverence of God and so in a holy way of using and reverent way of going about every thing which concerneth Him For more clear handling of it let us consider First What is meant by the Name of God Secondly What is meant by taking that N me of God in vain 1. By the Name of God is often understood God himself for to call on Gods Name and on Himself are one 2. Properly hereby is understood his Titles attributed to him in Scripture as God Jehovah he Lord Holy Just c. or such Titles as signifie that excellent Being which we call God 3 More largely it is taken for whatsoever he maketh use of for making of himself known seeing other wayes he hath no name but what-ever Title He taketh to himself or what-ever thing he maketh use of thereby to make himself known that is his Name such are 1. His Attributes Mercy Justice Omnipotency c. which Exod. 34. 36 37. are called his Name 2. His Word or Gospel called his Name Acts 9. 15. 3. His Ordinances Sacraments Matth 28. 19. Discipline and Censures which are the exercise of his authority Matth. 18. 20. 1 Cor. 5. 4. 4. Prayer is a piece of his Name He is a God that heareth Prayer Psalm 63. 2. 5. His Works Rom. 1. 20 21. 6. All his worship Deut. 12. 5. Exod. 20. 24. 6. Lots Acts 1. 26. By these God maketh himself when he thinketh fit known in his Will as he doth by his Word 7. Profession of subjection to him so they that profess this are said to be at his Name and it should be reverently used as all actions which make himself or his Will and Decree which is himself known as Lots do Prov. 16. 33. By all these God is to be known and something of him may 〈…〉 and 〈◊〉 take under Name here all these to be comprehended The first because the scopâ— is to Hallow himself in Obedience to all that he Commandeth as appeareth 〈◊〉 22. 3â— 32. and the first Petition in the Lord's Prayer Hallowed â—e thy Name beâ—â—â— compared with the other two that follow cleareth it The second is propeth and primarily in the very letter here understood The third cometh in by natâ—â—â— consequence for attaining the scope of the Command so that there is neither word nor work of God but all relateth to this The Second thing to be cleared is What is meant by taking his Name in vâ—iâ— To take his Name as it 's Psal 50. 16. and 16. 4. is to mention any of those things before spoken of which are so many pieces of his Name or any way to meddle with them in thought word or deed as by writing or otherwise In vain dotâ— not only comprehend 1. False Swearing or Blaspheming Charming and whâ—â— is wrong as to the matter Nor 2. Only propane abusing of the Lords Name when the matter is right by rashness precipitancy frequency in Swearing Nor 3. Doth it only mean unnecessary Swearing when it may be forborn But 4. Iâ— vain is also when it 's not mentioned or made use of to good purpose that is tâ— God's hononr the edification of others and of our selves so when ever Gods name is any way medled with without fruit it s in vain The scope of this Command then we take to be To press the manifesting of reverence to God 1. In a high esteem of his holy Majesty 2. In a reverent use of all his Ordinances in the right way appointed by him 3. In a good Conversation adorning this doctrine of the Gospel and keeping his blessed Name thaâ— is named over us from being evil spoken of or contemned by others because oâ— us Rom 2. 24. 4. And more especially that God may be honoured in a right reverend and edifying using of his Name in thinking sPeaking praying reading writting swearing vowing c. and abstaining from all irreverence in these 〈◊〉 becoming the greatness of God and
before God and so may prove a good means through his blessing to make the man serious which sort of adjuratious may be distinguished thus 1. There are proper adjurations or charges authoritatively laid on in the Name of God or of Jesus Christ this is done by Magistrates or Ministers in their places as Paul chargeth Timothy 1 Tim. 6. 13. and giveth him charge to charge others â— 17. This being used in serious and weighty matters and not too frequently lest the Name of God become thereby contemptible is the most proper and the most weighty charge 2. There are Obtestations which are serious and weighty intreaties and bâ—â— seechings in the Name of God and for Christ's sake that one may do oâ— forbear such a thingâ— as when Paul beseecheth the Romans and Philippians by the mercies oâ— God Rom. 12. Phil. 2. 1 2. and Abigal interposeth seriously with David this 〈◊〉 most properly done by Inferiors Subjects Children c. to their Superiours and hath in it also a more implicite threatning if such a thing be slighted as iâ— Abigals words to David â— Sam 25. is clear 3. There are Attestations whereby one is seriously put to it to tell some truth or to bear witness of some truth asserted by another thus Joshua attested Aâ—â—an 4. We say These have a binding virtue in some cases and cannot without contempt of God who so chargeth them and before whom they are so attested be slighted and therefore if it be not properly Perjury for a man either not to speak at all being attested or to speak what is not truth yet sure it is more theâ— ordinary contempt and a greater sin them if no such adjurations attestations oâ— obtestations had been used because the Name of the Lord has been interposeâ— by others and if such attestations c. be lawful as we have proved them to bâ— in some cases then ought they to have weight or they are used in vain we seâ— our Lord Christ answered to such Matth. 26. after a whiles keeping silence And in reference to these ye fail 1. In giving little entertainment unto anâ— laying little weight upon the charges and obtestations of Ministers which come unto you by them from this Word and Gospel these charges of Ministers are 〈◊〉 if an Herauld gave a Charge in the Magistrates name which bindeth as from him and more then another message delivered in other terms in this then Ministerâ— â—re as Heraulds charging you in their Master's Name even in the Name of the great God and of Jesus Christ the Prince of the Kings of the Earth 2. When one of you putteth not another serionsly to it to forbeare and abandon fin or to practise such a duty charging them or rather obtesting them as they will answer to God to do so as often in the Canticles we find I charge you O Daughters of Jerusalem 3. In your overly rash and slight way of using obtestations and grave intreaties meerly or mostly for the fashion or by way of complement or in petty and trivial things as when ye say for God's sake for God's blessing do this or that only as acustomary by word this is no doubt more then on ordinary taking of God's Name in vain in common discourse because ye take on you to bind others in the Name of God not considering what ye are doing and in a matter not necessary and of no weight exposing the Name of the Lord to contempt and thereby tempting others to care but little for it this is a most horrid and crying sin amongst our ordinary Beggars whereof others also are guilty who are not sutably affected with it and do not in their places seriously endeavour to have it mended as also this is when we desire one another lightly irreverently to do such such a little thing in the Name of God as to sit down or rise up in God's Name c. which things are alasse too too frequent 2. For adjuring of Devils it is two ways lawful and two ways not 1. It is lawful to command Devils in the Name of God by those who are called to it and are gifted to cast them out 2. It is lawful for any by Prayer to God and the exercise of Faith on Him to endeavour to repel and resist them and to beg that he would rebuke them as thus The Lord rebuke thee Satan this way we neither command the Devil nor pray to him but pray unto the Lord to command him Again It is unlawful 1. when one adjureth him who is not called to it as those Sons of Sceva did Act. 19. 13 14. This certainly being a peculiar and extraordinary gift as those of prophecying foretelling of things to come speaking with Tongues and healing of the Sick with a word were ought not without special warrant to be usurped more then they 2. It is unlawful when it is done by exhorting or obtesting of or praying unto the Devil himself intreating him as we do God which way implyeth 1. Friendship with him when we intreat him as a Friend 2. Prayer or worship to him who is not the object of it 3. An obligation on us to him when he yieldeth to obey and he will not fail if by any means he can to put that complement or obligation on us and so Necromancers Witches Exorcists c. may cast out Devils by collusion though possibly not in a way so explicit whereby the Devil gaineth his point upon such as effectually as if there were a most expresly formed Covenant betwixt him and them and thus the Pharisees falsly and blasphemously charged on our blesed Lord Mat. 12. as if by Belezebub that is by Collusion with the Prince of Devils he had cast out Devils There are no doubt many Sins committed this way while some take on them confidently to Command the Devil as â—f with an Avoid Satan they could put him into Bonds And others seek Health from Devils or Witches especially when it is supposed to come from them and â—atreat them to do such and such things All which are Breaches of this Part of the Third Commandment 3. What is said of Adjuring Devils may be said Proportionally of Adjuring Unreasonable Creatures which is the same ways Lawful and unlawful Charming also and naming the Lords Name over Diseases as if some special worth and Efficacy were in some words is unlawfull and Condemned by this Command It followeth now that we say some-thing to Vows which are Bonds whereby a man bindeth himself and so they differ from Adjurations to God only as party and that in things belonging to God willingly and upon Deliberation And so they differ from Promissory Oaths wherein we bind our selves to others and in matters which are not of themselves Religious Under Vows we comprehend 1. Sacraments 2. Covenants solemnly ingaged into before others 3. Particular Vows to God 4. Promises and ingagements whether inward in the Heart onely or also outwardly expressed to or before the Lord For
matter be Moral not contained in any former Command then is the Command it self Moral seeing a Moral substance and Matter denominateth the Command so Yea it must be Moral otherwise something Morally necessary to Gods service such as the determination of its chief time should be omitted It may be assumed yet further It must be Moral be it what it will to eschew a Tautology in this short Compend of Duties and that of Moral Duties too Again If it be not Moral but contain some Ceremonial thing reducible to one of the three former Commands Then 1. It might have been put amongst other Ceremonials 2. Other Ceremonials might have been put in with it Or. 3. A Reason given Why all are not Reducible to some Moral Command 4. If the matter of this be Reducible to another Command then can it not be accounted a distinct Command neither ought it here to have been given as such but subjoyned to some other as the Servants and Beasts resting is sub-joyned to this 5. It would be â—hewn to what Command it 's Reducible as to the substance of it if it be Ceremonial 6. A Reason would be given Why amongst Ten One and onely One is set down so far different from all the rest And if all these Absurdities follow the Denyal of it's substance to be Moral then for eschewing of them we must conclude it to be Moral and so the fourth Command is Moral Fourthly we reason thus If it be not Moral it must either be Judicial or Ceremonial for the matter and substance of it but it is not Judicial that is it belongeth not to External Policy and Civil Society principally and especially in that one Nation because no such duties are comprehended at least Primarily in any Command of the first Table but in the second which teacheth Duties to others as this first doth to God Neither is it Ceremonial For All Ceremonies that are Typical have their rise since the fall and relate some way to Christ to come But this of sanctifying one Day of seven had it's rise in the state of innocency and was enjoyned to Adam in Paradise before he fell and therefore cannot be called Ceremonial properly more then the Command of a Man's leaving Father and Mother and cleaving to his Wife so that they two should be one flesh which the Apostle Ephes 5. maketh use of Besides if it were Ceremonial in the substance then were it Typical and significant of some thing to come which is hard to shew Then also had it not been Lawful to have retained it for Ceremonials now in their use are not only dead but deadly But this Morality in substance the same with the Command which we plead for was retained by the Apostles and primitive Church to sav no more Therefore it is not Ceremonial And so this Law must needs be Moral To say That the Command is partly Moral partly Ceremonial if we respect it's substance will not hold For 1. There is no such other Law 2. That were to make Confusion betwixt Ceremonials and Morals which it seemeth the Lord himself hath aimed and resolved to keep clearly distinct 3. What ever be Ceremonial That which was allowed and injoyned to Adam in Paradise and wherein we may agree with Him under the Gospel cannot be Ceremonial For neither of these States are capable of proper Ceremonies but both agree on a seventh Day Therefore it is not Ceremonial The third way we make out the Morality of this Command is By particular considering of it self and here we argue thus If it be not onely put into the Decalogue with the other Moral Commands but more singularly explicated and pressed even in it then they then it is certainly Moral that is perpetually Obligatory with the rest But so it is put and set down in the Decalogue and pressed even more then the rest of the Commands as on other accounts so possibly on this because it 's Ground is Positive and Men need the more Words about it Just as in the second Command Ergo c. Now that it is thus put and pressed appeareth these several wayes 1. It shareth of all common Priviledges with the rest of the Commands set down in the Decalogue that were all spoken yea Written by the Lord immediatly and laid up in the Ark. 2. It is proposed and set down in it's Form both Positively Remember the Sabbath to keep it Holy and Negatively in it thou shalt do no manner of work c. Whereas all the other Commands are but one of these wayes set down 3. It hath the Particularity in it that all the rest have to wit To be in the singular Number Thou shalt c. To shew That it speaketh to every one in particular Yea though all the Commands concern all Ranks yet onely here are Son Daughter Man-servant Maid-servant and Stranger expresly mentioned as comprehended in it 4. There is a special Equity holden out here in the proportioning of this time There are six dayes given us to Labour on and therefore it is all the Reason in the World that the Lord have the seventh And if this Concession of Gods of six dayes to work on be Moral For all the time is Gods and we cannot for our use take any part of iâ— but by his grant and there is no other grant But this dividing and proportioning of Time betwixt him and us in which Division too he hath given us by far the laâ—gest Share to wit Six parts of seven Then must the setting a part of a seventh Day be Moral also And so the Command it self wherein both are comprehended viz. The sixth given to us and the seventh reserved for him they must needs stand and fall together For they mutually put each other Thou shalt labour six dayes and rest on the seventh Thou shalt rest on the Sabbath day and Labour six 5. This Day is claimed by the Lord as a thing wherein he hath a special Propriety It s the Lords day for though he did give six yet he reserved a seventh And can or dare any say That he discharged that or dispensed it away from Himself to any other If not it must be His still and cannot without Sacriledge be other wayes applyed 6 Obedience to this Command is pressed by an exceeding weighty Reason drawn from Gods own Example which maketh it clearly Relative to its first Institution Genes 2. Where it is said That He rested after six dayes Work the seventh Day viz. the whole seventh day and so should we which is the more effectual for proving the Morality of this Command Because 1. Iâ—s a Reason that took place even in innocency and so respecteth no Type or Ceremony 2. It is Universal belonging to all Men who are God's Creatures And therefore since the Reason is perpetual so must the Command be like-wise 7. This Command alone and beside all others is expresly pressed in the observation of it not only on Masters and Rulers for
added for pressing the observation of it or for explaining its meaning The precept strictly is Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy It saith Remember the Sabbath or the Holy reâ—â— what-ever day it shall be on and so it is said in the close that He rested the seventh day but that He blessed the Sabbath Drawing it still from the seventh precisely to the Sabbath Even as in the second Command This is 1. commanded in special that no Image be made then 2. This in general that all Gods Commandment concerning his worship even such as were Ceremonial for the time should be observed with whatever others should be given So here this fourth commandeth expresly one of the seven because the Recurrency of that time is bounded and generally whatever seventh the Lord shall be pleased to pitch on We have said the more on this because it doth not only clear the true scope of the Command but sheweth the necessity of the observation of that time which the Lord hath sanctified for himself 3. We should put a difference also betwixt Ceremonial and Mutable All the Judicial Laws are Mutable and the Decalogue it self in respect of its Curse and as it was a Covenant giving life is actually changed and abolished Yet is not for that to be reputed Ceremonial and not Obligatory Though all Ceremonials be mutable yet all mutables are not Ceremonial Besides this change is not in the matter Why may not therefore the seventh day in order which was observed from the Creation to the Resurrection of Christ be changed to the first day of the week which is a seventh day in number still without abolishing the morality of the fourth Command Amongst other things in this Command there is more express mention of the whole Families joyning in this duty then is in other Commands Therefore it being a concerning-duty to us and a special thing included in the Command we shall speak to that Point concerning Family worship before we speak of the second general proposed about the particular morality of this Command and the meaning of the words of it that ye may see that it is no invention of Men when ye are called to it and when it is pressed upon you We shall here 1. shew you that This Command holdeth forth a Family or Domestick Worship 2. We shall confirm it more largely from other Scriptures and grounds of Reason 3. We shall shew wherein it consisteth in particular and on whom it mainly lyeth to be discharged 4. We shall shew the advantages of conscientious discharging of it and the Prejudices of neglecting it with the Aggravations of that sin That there is such a thing as Family-worship included in this Command will be clear by considering 1. What worship to God in general is 2. What Family-worship is 3. What this Command requireth 1. By worship is understood some Tribute payed by the reasonable Creature to God as the great and soveraign Lord Creator whether it be immediatly and directly payed and performed to him as prayer and praise or for him and at his Command and for his honour as preaching hearing and receiving of Sacraments which are worship when rightly gone about In a word we call that worship more strictly and properly which is a duty of the first Table and cometh in as commanded in it for the honour of God and not for our own or others external profit which though commanded in the second Table cannot be so properly called worship much less Immediate worship Thus Teaching others the Duties of Piety may be worship when teaching the Duties of any other ordinary calling is not 2. We call that Family-worship which is to be performed by such and such Relations or by all the constituent members of the Family jointly And so it differeth 1. From secret or solitary Worship which one performeth alone to and before God 2. From publick Worship which one performeth by joyning in a Congregation of many Families together 3. From that worship performed occasionally in mutual fellowship amongst Believers or professors of divers Families For 1. That may not be ordinary as this nor so frequent 2. That is free to this or that Believer as they shall choose or as occasions do cast them to be together This is not at choice but is necessary as to the same persons 3. This is performed by vertue of domestick relations and not of Christian only 4. This may have and should have an Authority-Domestick in its regulation For a Master of a family may authoritatively command the members of the family to pray keep the Sabbath c. and may suitably correct for the neglect of those duties whereas that other is by Christian Communion and Admonition onely Ye will see this Family-worship clear 1. By considering the Jews eating of the Pass-over Where there was 1. Secret worship no question apart 2. There was publick-worship a holy convocation the first day and the last But 3. There was peculiarly a Family-worship or if the family was little two joyned together for eating the pass-over within the House wherein all the members of that family or of those two little families that were circumcised were necessarily to be present and to be joyners this is Family-worship 2. By considering Psalm 101. compared with other Scriptures where ye have 1. David mentioning his private carriage and longing for God and walking in a perfect way 2. His publick carriage as a Magistrate in cutting off the wicked from the City of God as ye have 3. Elsewhere his publick-worship as Psalm 122. 1. and 2 Sam. 6. 4. His fellowship with all the Godly being a Companion to them that feared God Psalm 119. verse 63. Yet fifthly and lastly Ye have a walk within his House with a perfect heart mentioned there as contradistinct from all which must infer some religious performances of duties or exercise of worship in his House in reference to that station as well as in private or in publick yea a joynt-exercise because it is such an exercise as he performed onely at home in his House whereas had it been praying for them or any thing that otherwise he might have done apart he needed not go home to them for performing of it Yet 2 Sam. 6. verse 20. when the publick worship is done he goeth home to bless his House which manifestly sheweth a peculiar duty performed by him in his Family according as he resolved in that 101. Psalm 3. It will yet further appear that there is such a thing and some way what it is by considering Zach. 12. from verse 10. to the last where there is first A publick mourning of the whole Land 2. Of several families together Families shall mourn then 3. Families apart 4. Their Wifes apart and so every particular Person in secret In which place it is clear 1. That there is a worship of families besides publick and secret worship 2. That that worship includeth the same duties jointly performed by the members of
required in this Command 8. Some other thing is required by this Command of a member of a Family which seeketh God then of a person in an heathenish Family or some other thing is required from so many persons joyned together as members in one Family then from such persons suppose them to be scattered from one another amongst heathenish Families certainly where Husband Wife Children and Servants are Christians and Professors of the same true Religion there is some other thing required of them then where onely the Husband the Wife the Child or the Servant is so but if they were scattered and became parts or members of diverse families among Heathens they would be obliged to seek God apart therefore no less but much more is joint-seeking of God required of them when they are united together as members of one family 9. This Command when it mentioneth all within his Gates or Doors requireth some other thing of a Master when at home with his family then when he is withdrawn from them But a Master at a distance may command all in his family to worship God and pray to God for them and so may they all if they were scattered worship God secretly therefore when they are together there is some other thing required of them by this Command which is no doubt To worship God together 10. The duties that are to be performed on this day will require this such as instructing one another exhorting admonishing comforting strengthening one another and talking to or conferring with one another of the Word Deut. 6. verse 7. 8. Which cannot be denied to be duties called for on this day and yet they cannot be done but by joint concurring together in that work and therefore it concludeth strongly that family-worship at least on the Lords-day is commanded here and if families be called to worship God jointly on the Lords-day by the worship competent for that day then by proportion are they also called to worship him jointly on other dayes by the worship suitable to them there being the like ground for all 11. And lastly that which is required of families is such a worship as ought to be performed by them supposing there were no publick worship nor yet any other family worshipping him in the World So Joshua resoâ—veth Chap. 24. 15. I and my House will serve the Lord and sanctifie His Sabbath that being a special piece of His service what-ever ye will do but if there were no worshipping of God in all the World but in one family then ought that worship to be joint according to that same word of Joshua's I and my House otherwise we behooved to say that there might be a plurality of worshippers of God in the World and yet without any joyning together in worship which were in it self absurd and contrary to Joshua's Religious Resolution It being thus made out by this Command that there is such a worship as family-worship and that it is commanded we shall consider in the next place how the Scriptures do otherways hold it out 1. Then consider that where the Scriptures speak of eminently Godly men they speak of them as making conscience of this and take notice of their honouring of God in their families as a special part of their eminency So Abraham Genes 18. verse 19. Joshua 24. 15. Job in the first Chapter of his Book and David Psalm 101. are noted It must then be a commanded and commendable duty which is so particularly remarked in them 2. Ye will find it almost in all parts of Scripture as Genes 18. Exod. 12. Dout. 6. Joshua 24. Job 1. Psalm 101. and Psalm 30. At the Dedication of Davids House which was not sure without some peculiar worship and craving of Gods blessing even as in other cases those who had builded Houses were to Dedicate them or to Consecrate them and wherefore because they were hoven in a manner and as it were offered to the Lord for seeking and worshipping Him in them So Altars Numb 7. 84. were said to be Dedicated when they were set apart for Gods service and Consecrated for that use So Neheâ— 12. 27. the Walls were Dedicated and the Levites brought out for that end which Dedication no doubt had a Religious use and Will any think that they began with Prayer or praise as David did and left off such Exercises afterward see also 2 Sam. 6. 20. where mention is made oâ— Davids blessing his House Esther and the Maids of her House and the rest of the Jews in their several Families fasted and prayed We see it spoken of by the Prophets as Jer. 10. ult and Zech. 12. 12. and that as a Prophesie of the Converts carriage under the New Testament We find it also mentioned 1 Tim. 3. 4. and 5. v. 8 and Titus 1. 6. 3. Ye will see it thus practised and pressed before the Flood God was honoured and worshipped in families after it before the Law by Abraham Iob and others in their Families under it there was the Observation of it and that by peculiar Ordinances as namely by the Passover yea it is mentioned and that most expresly in the very Law as is said it was kept up under the Captivity and after the return renewed by Zachariah especially yea it is also renewed in the New Testament whereby it appeareth to be of very special Observation from all which it is not a little commended to us 4. If we consider the many wayes whereby the Scriptures press this duty it will be found that there is hardly any duty more cleared and pressed then it It s pressed 1. By Command 2. By examples of Godly-men held forth as Paterns for imitation 3. By promises made to it and 4. By blessings conferred on the conscientious practisers of it Genes 18. Deut. 11. verse 18. 19. 20. 21. 5. As evidencing sincerity Genes 18. Ioshua 24. 6. As making Folks lyable to the curse and wrath of God when neglected Ierem. 10. 25. 7. As a fruit of the Spirit and as a companion of true repentance Zach. 12. 8. As a specially commending and adorning qualification of persons that have it and scandalous where it is wanting and as declaring one unmeet for publick charge Gen. 18. 1. Tim. 3. 4. Tit. 1. 6. Hence the Argument runneth strong That duty which in Scripturs is commanded by many examples commended and by other motives pressed the neglect whereof bringeth guilt and offence upon the persons neglecting is no doubt a necessary duty but Family-worship is such therefore it is a necessary duty 1 That it is commanded what we have said from this fourth Command may sufficiently make it out yet we further add Deut. 6. 7. 8. and Deut. 11. 18. 19. In which two places it is clear that observing of the Law is not onely to be studied by a Master of a Family himself alone but that the Religious duties of frequent speaking of it diligent teaching of it whetting and pressing of it on his Family
as to these 3. No breach of any command hath more aggravations for 1. It is against reason and equity when God hath given us so many and so good reasons for it 2. It 's high Ingratitude the Sabbath being a Mercy and a great Mercy indeed it is to be priviledged with access to converse with God a whole day of every week in duties of worship 3. It 's against Love God's Love hath instituted it and our Love should in a special manner vent it self to him on it 4. It 's cruelty against our selves for the Sabbath kept holy is backed with the promise of of a special blessing and we by this sin prejudge our selves of that yea the Sabbath rightly spent is a mean both of holiness and of nearness to God of conformity to him and of communion with him it promoteth both So that it is eminently verified here that these who sin against this command sin against and forsake their own Mercy 4. No sin doth more evidence universal untenderness and as it 's a sin in it self so it evidenceth especially when gross a very sinful and some way Atheistical frame and disposition as may be gathered from Neh. 13. Yea. 5. It occasioneth and breedeth other sins it habituateth to sinning and hardneth against challenges so that men ordinarily become very gross and loose and fall in scandalous sins who neglect the sanctification of the Sabbath which is the quickner and fomenter some way of all duties and knitteth the two Tables of the Law together hence it cometh to pass that we often hear men that have turned to be very loose gross and scandalous and some of them on Scaffolds and at Gibbets cry out of Sabbath breaking imputing the one to the other as a main cause for by this sin men grow stout against challenges and formal in secret duties and so at length sit quite up 6 No sin hath more sharp challenges for it and more sad Judgements avenging it then sins against this command have there been any men deeply challenged for sin or at death whether ordinary or violent brought to express and utter their challenges but sins against this command have been main ones The slighting of the Lords Sabbath made Jerusalem to be burnt with fire Jer. 17. last for this sin they are threatned with terrible plagues Ezek. 20 21. 24. not only in temporal things â— 23. but with spiritual plagues to which they are given up v. 25. 26. You know that a man was stoned for gathering of sticks on the Sabbath Num. 15. see also Exod. 16. 28. and Ezek. 22. 8. where the Lord accounteth Sabbath-breaking a refusing to keep his Commandements and Laws and a despissing of his holy things O is it possible that a man can be well that breaketh the Sabbath or to whom it is not a delight If any should ask here if indeed the breaches of this command be greater sins then the breaches of the commands of the second Table and if so if God will be avenged on these severely For Answer premitting this one word that in comparing breaches of the commands of the two Tables we would compare sins of a like nature together that is sins of presumption with sins of presumption and sins of infirmity with sins of infirmity we say that a presumptuous sin against the fourth Command if it were but to go unnecessarily to the door or to gather sticks is a greater sin then a presumptuous murther because it striketh more immediately against God And that a sin of infirmity against the fourth command is greater then a sin of Infirmity against the sixth Yet we grant that presumptuous Murther is a greater sin then a sin of in firmity against the fourth command because presumption and high handedness in the manner of sinning in a sin little on the matter comparatively daâ—eth God as it were and striketh immediately against him and so is an additional high aggravation of it beside What it is in the nature of it And though our censures against presumptuous breaches of the Sabbath which are now as great sins as formerly as is clear from what is just now said be often more mitigated now under the Gospel neither was it as we conceive ordinary to stone the presumptuous prophaneners of the Sabbath even amongst the Jews yet will this be no good reasoning men do not now execute punishments upon Transgressours of the first Table as on Transgressours of the second therefore Transgressions of the second Table are greater sins then Transgressions of the commands of the first for so we would be in hazard to postpone all the Laws or Commands of the first Table to these of the second but we are to consider that temporal punishments are heightened or lessened according as the peace and order of civil Societies may be more or less therein concerned so that it is not by these measures that we are to make the estimate of the greatness or smalness of sins in the sight of God and in order to his righteous and absolute judgments and therefore it`s enough that we enquire what God hath done and will do and what sinners may expect from him however men may over-look and pass them by yet before God they are often taken notice of and plagued even in this life and will be for ever hereafter if they repent not We may now therefore in the close exhort beseech obtest and charge you all as in the sight of God who is a severe avenger of them that ye would be aware of the sins whereby this command is transgressed Particularly guard against 1. Not preparing for it or not remembring of it many prophane the Sabbath ere they come to publick yea before it come in some respect 2 Carnal thoughts and a common frame of heart yea even to speak so a particular frame that looketh but to our own condition or case As not stirring it self to be over and above that to be affected with God and his glorious works of Creation and Redemption to give him praise for his marvellous goodness on that day there is alass generally little delight and praise in his worship even on his own holy day 3. General unedifying discourses of the news of the time of health and other things not necessary to that day 4. Little profiting under the Gospel and not growing in knowledge and practise many a Sabbath is thus prophaned few getting or seeking the blessing of it or on it 5. Going to the fields and visiting of Neighbours to put off a piece of time that so much time may be saved on other dayes of the Week wherein many men think they have more to do and not seeking to edifie or to be edified when they visit Certainly by this going abroad and runing up and down the streets unnecessarily ye indispose your selves ye offend others and tempt them to follow you ye slight either duties in your families or in secret or it may be both in a great measure I suppose
sanctified use of what he enjoyeth which another cannot 5. He may have peace whether he have or want in the injoyment of creaturs or in their scarcity because he hath a right to them for it is not from want of right to creature comforts that scarcity of them cometh but God like a wise and skilful Physitian keepeth back meat for health where there is abundance in the right and to be given also when needful so that comparing him with a wicked man whether he have or want whether he enjoy more plentifully or be in scarcity he hath still the better of him by fare which should make us all love godliness the more which hath so great an advantage as this attending it Thus much in short of the promise annexed to this Command To descend to speak particularly of all the several relations comprehended under it as of Magistrates and Subjects Church-Officers Pastors Guids and Rulers and ordinary Church members Husbands and Wives Parents and Children Masters and Servants c. and of their respective duties would be a large task and draw us forth a great length beyond our design in this undertaking and somewhat to this purpose being already spoken from the third and fourth Chapters of the Epistle to the Colossians which the blest Author was then in his Sabbath afternoon-Sermons opening up to the same Congregation that heard him lecture on the Commands and all of them being too many at least more known then alass they are practised thought indeed we know no more in Gods account then we singly desire design and endeavour through grace to practise and they all and they only having a good understanding that keep his Commandements John 13. 17. Psal 111. 10. and since withall if the generals we have hinted at in the exposition of this Command be well understood seriously pondered and consciensciously in the Lords strength practically improved they will not a little through his blessing contribute for helping us sutably to acquit our selves in the discharge of all the particular duties of these several relations we shall now forbear to be particular and shall only say in the general of these station and relation duties that as if a serious Christ an and truly goodly man be sought after he is in a special manner to be found in them so when sanctifiedly sutably and seasonably performed they in a special manner adoâ—n the Doctrine of God and keep it from being blasphemed and bear a very real and evident testimony to the truth and reality of Religion in the Professors of it and withal are a notable mean of convincing men and even of winning and gaining them who obey not the Word as maâ— be clearly gathered from Luke 3. 10 11. 12. 13. 14. Tit. 2. â— 5. 10. 1 Tim. 5. v. 14. 6. v. 1. 1. Pet. 2. v. 13. 14. 15. 3. v. 1. 2. compared together Before we proceed further amongst many Questions that might arise here one word to these two 1. Whether ought a Father to love his Son or a Son to love his Father most Answ The Son ought to love his Father most as representing most of God and the Father ought to love his Son most as comprehending most of himself such mutual respects may exceed one another on different accounts 2. Quest Whether is the Father or Magist are most to be obeyed if they command contrarily Answ If that which is commanded be a thing belonging to the Magistrates place to command in as where such a one should live what charge or office he should bear in the Common-wealth and such like caeteris paribus the Magistrate is to be obeved for these things are sought by the Magistrate from him not as a Son but as a member of the Common-wealth whose good principally should be eyed and had respect to but if it be a thing that belongeth to the Father and not to the Magistrate to command in as what Husband or Wife a Child should marry and such like that belongeth to the Father as a Father and so is to be obeyed notwithstanding of the contrary command of the other The scope of this Command being to moderate men in their excessive desires after honour and to direct and regulate them in giving respect to others and in seeking of it to themselves and to inform us that by no means we should wrong the estimat on of others more then their persons and estates ere we lay aside speaking of it it will be meet to speak a little of humility and the contraries and opposits thereof That humility relateth to this Command and is comprehended under it appeareth from Rom. 12. 10. Phil. 2. 3. And is a grace so necessary and useful to Christians that it ought especially to be headed and taken notice of It may be considered in a threefold respect 1. In respect of God this humility ought to be in reasonable creatures to God as their Creator they being nothing and less then nothing before him and useful or gainful for nothing to him 2. It may be considered as it respecteth others and that not in a complementing manner but as it comprehendeth our humbling of our selves in our carriage towards them and from the sense of our short-comming of them and being inferiour to them in some things wherein we preferr them to our selves Phil. 2. 3. 3. It may be considered not only as it moderateth us in our common carriage towards God or towards our Neighbour but also as it concerneth our selves for by it we are kept within bonds as to our thoughts of our selves and what is ours or in us upon the discovery of many infirmities we are encompassed with see Rom. 12. 3. Humility considered the first way is not properly contained under this Command but cometh in under the first Command of the first Table but humility in the two last respects as it moderateth our thoughts and esteem of our selves and fâ—ameth our actions sutably and according to â—ight reason in reference to others or our selves cometh in here and is enjoyned in this command and concerning it these following things are to be observed 1. Thus Humility of one man towards another differeth from Humility towards God because of the great dispâ—oportion that is between God and Creatures infinitely more then any that is amongst Creatures themselves there is in nothing comparison to be made with God neither is there any possibility of profiting him Job 25. 7. but there may be comparing and usefulness too amongst Creatures which this humility taketh not away see Job 29. throughout the Chapter 2. This Humility is not opposite to magnanimity boldness and zeal but is well consistent with these as is clear in Christ the Apostles and others of the Saints for boldness and magnanimity is an adventuring in Christs strength upon what one is called to according to warrantable grounds and humility although it leadeth us to entertain due thoughts of our own infirmities yet it moderateth us in that
and his trusting to his own understanding 3. It preventeth leaning to estate and riches and so he preferreth not himself as being the better because of these And in the last place there is a pride whereby men having done any remarkable thing are inclined either to seek applause esteeming highly of what they have done and seeking out their own glory which Solomon faith is no glory but is rather as if a man should eat too much honey and so turneth rather to their shame or to receive it inordinately which Paul would have done had he suffered them of Lystra Acts 14 to have sacrificed to him which pride with all its viâ—ious attendants this humility preventeth and suppresseth For 1. it mindeth not high things Rom. 12. 3. Neither 2. vaunteth it self when it passeth by wrongs and forgiveth them or when it doth suffereth any other thing commendable it thinketh not of it self above what is meet but soberly Rom. 12. 3. 3. After acts of charity the right hand knoweth not as it were what the left hand hath given it forgetteth good works as to any self esteem of them which pride remembreth and keepeth as it were a register of but ascribeth all to Grace Not I but grace in me saith the humble man with Paul 2 Cor 3. 5. and 1 Cor. 15. 10. In a word this humility is extensive to every thing in a mans deportement as a man and to all duties which concern him as a Christian whether in reference to the worship of God or the doing duty to men even as on the contrary pride self-conceit and presumption are very extensive and immix themselves in all that a man doth and are as the dead flies that make all to stink And as it is commendable likewise it is very necessary as to many things as 1. In external things that relate to our conversing with others it is necessary as to a mans credit à nd just reputation the proud man is often in Gods righteous Judgment despised Then it is necessary for things relating to our selves as for our entertaining peace with God for keeping us within bonds for guarding against snairs for keeping up communion with God and for fitting to the suitable discharge of all duties called for It would make us preach and you hear more profitably it would settle and establish against the reelings that are in this time that put many into a distemper and a sort of spititual distraction and madness it is the humble that God giveth grace to to whom he revealeth his secret who have largest promises and commendations c. Let us therefore learn to be humble and sober without affecting to be wise above what is meet this grace of humility in the lively exercise of it is in a special manner called for by the Lord at this time of the reeling and falling of many the want whereof useth to precede and predispose for a fall To close this we shall only add That wherever there may be a pride there is also an humility opposite to it Man may be proud in respect of outward things as of estate riches descent employment c. And also in respect of things of the mind yea even of spiritual things As 1. of parts and gifts as knowledge quickness of wit fruitfulness of invention c. 2. Of Graces and holiness 3. Of experience eminent manifestations spiritual exercises c. wherewith God may make some to shine very far above and beyond others 3. A man may be proud of some good deeds done by him wherein possibly God hath made him somewhat more then ordinarily instrumental 4. There is a proud curiosity leading to seek after the knowledge of secret things or of things too high for us or of things revealed and competent for us to know in another way then God hath allowed or leading men to adventure and step further then they are called which is condemned by the Lord Exod. 19. 21. where he forbiddeth the people to break through and gaze Now there is to pride in all these respects an opposit humility which maketh a man walk softly and esteem soberly of himself notwithstanding of any difference God hath made betwixt him and others in what thing soever and to wait till his mind and will be made known in his own way and by instruments made choise of by himself and puteth on to serious endeavours of practising it when known which pride doth not Thus we see both how extensive and how necessary to Christians in whatsoever stat on they are this excellent grace of humility is which is a special ornament of Christians and a notable piece of beautiful conformity to meek and lowly Jesus The Sixth Commandment Exodus 20. verse 13. Thou shalt not Kill IN the fifth Command the Lord generally prescribed humility and that respect which is to be shown by every one to another in their several stations and relations he proceedeth now more particularly to give directions in these things that are most dear and necessary to men first in the matter of life command sixth 2. In the matter of chastity and tempâ—â—â—nce Com. 7. 3. In what concerneth their Estate Com. 8. 4. In what concerneth truth and more especially our neighbours name Com. 9. Lastly in what concerneth the inward frame of our hearts towards our own estate and the estate of others Com. 10. For understanding this Command Thou shalt not kill we may consider 1. It 's Object 2 It 's act to kill 3. It 's subject to speak so Thâ—u As for the first this Command cannot be considered as relating to Beasts as if they were not to be killed because God gave man all the Beasts for his use to feed on them Gen. 9. 3. and we are to eat of whatever is sold in the shambles by his allowance whoâ—e is the earth and the â—uâ—ness thereof 1 Cor. 10. 25. Beside man in all these Commands is properly directed in reference to his Neighbour and not to beasts Yet I grant by striking a beast a man may offend as 1. when that stroke wrongeth his Neighbour to whom that beast belongeth 2. when in our striking there is 1. unreasonableness as iâ— we would require that capacity in a beast that is in reasonable creatures and so are ready to offend when they answer not our expectation 2. when there is a breaking out into anger and passion at brutes as when a horse rydeth not well a Dog runneth not well a hawk flyeth not well c. which speaketh an impotency in us who are so easily mastered by irrational passions which will sometimes also seize upon us even in reference to senseless and lifeless Creatures when they do not accommodate us to our minds 3. when there is bitterness and cruelty in striking Something of this the Lord reproveth by making Balaams Ass speak and rebuke the madness of that Prophet who unreasonably smoâ—e the Ass and wish d he had had a Sword to kill her Numb 22. 29. whereas a just
Cruelty that delighteth in the hurt and prejudice of another all these and others of this kind go generally under the name of Hatred and Anger If any ask here Is there no anger lawful Answ Yes for there is somewhat of it natural yea and sometimes it lawfully immixeth it self in duty as in zeal when God is dishonoured which was in Moses Exod. 32. And no doubt Indignation at wicked men in some cases is lawfulâ— and also required But carnal Anger is forbidden which 1. Is a desire of reveng where there hath no wrong been done to us 2. When the revenge desired is disproportioned to and greater then the wrong 3. When it is preposterousty desired without intervening Justice 4. When it is not desired for the right end to wit the mans gaining but only for the satisfying of our carnal humor 5 When it is immoderate and corrupt in the manner of it so as the name of God is dishonoured by it This unlawful Anger when it is 1. against a Superiour it is called grudge 2 when against an Equal rancour 3. when against an Inferiour disdain and contempt these two last follow ordinarily upon the first 2. This Command is broken by injurious words as in that fifth Chaper of Matthew He that shall say to his brother thou fool is guilty O what guilt will there be found to have been in imprecations cursings wrathful wishes disdainful and passionate speeches when Christ will call men to an account for the breach of this Command 3. It is broken in gestures such as high looks fierce looks gnashing with the teeth Acts 7. 54. foaming with the mouth and such like wherewith even our blessed Lord and his Servants have been followed and as there may be Adultery in looks so there is also murther in them such looks had Cain Gen. 4. 5. 4. It is broken in deeds even when death followeth not as in wounding smiting oppressing cruel withdrawing of the means of life extortion exaction byting usurie litigious wrangling violent compulsion raising and racking of Land or House-rents beyond the just valve and squeezing and exacting upon poor Labourers and Tenants without any due regard to them or their labours which last is a frequent sin but little regarded a crying sin but little cared for next it is broken by witholding what might be useful and refreshful as by neglecting the sick and distressed want of hospitality specially to the poor All these are sinful breaches whether directly or indirectly incurred neither is it sufficient that we simply abstain from committing some of these but we must also make conscience to practise all contrary duties The last thing proposed to be spoken to was the person thou where in a word we are to distinguish private men from publickemen who are Magistrates and bear the Sword whom this Command doth not restrain from executing of Justice yet these may also sin in their passions and unjustly put forth their authority and be carnal in punishing and passing sentence even when there is ground in Justice and thus Magistrates may become guilty though in the executing of Justice not simply but by reason of other concurring circumstances Thus must shortly on this Command The Seventh Commandment Exodus 20. 14. Thou shalt not commit Adultery THE Lord having spoken of such sins as do more respect mans being simply in the former Command he cometh now to direct in those things that concern a man in his life in the ordering of his conversation and as it will be found one way or other that by our passion hatred and anger in one degree or other the former Command isi broken often so this sin that in the very name of it is abominable is not so unfrequent even amongst Christians as might in all reason be supposed and expected The vile sin of inordinate Concupiscence and Lust entred into Mankind exceeding early after Adam's fall and in nothing the bitter fruit of Original sin and that pravity of our nature sooner kyeths and did kyth then in it Hence is it that Adams and Evahs nakedness and their being ashamed is spoken of in Scripture which implyeth a sinfulness and inordinateness in them which formerly they were not tainted with as also a shame or plague following upon it and this corrupt nature being still in man it is hard to speak of or to hear these things holily and therefore there is a necessity both of holiness and wisdom here lest we break this Command even when speaking of it and hearing it spoke of yet the breach of it being a sin so rife and the Spirit in Scripture thinking it needful to speak of it yea it being put in a particular and distinct Command by it self and our most holy and blessed Lord Jesus having himself commented on it Matth. 5. there is a necessity of saying somewhat of it but so as to contain within the bounds of Scripture expressions O! be therefore afraid of sinning in hearing remember and consider that the Lord seeth and in a special manner abhorreth such vile Imaginations as shall be irritated and excited even from his holy command enjoyning the contrary which is indeed both an evidence and a part of the sinfulness of sin as the Apostle speaketh Rom. 7. To take therefore a view of it let us consider the scope of the Command which we conceive is in a special manner and obviously holden forth in these few places of Scripture commending holiness in respect of a mans person and condemning uncleanness in all its branches 1 Thess 4. v. 3 4 5. 7. For this is the will of God even your sanctification that ye should abstain from fornication that every one of you should know how to possess his vessel in sanctification and honour not in the lust of concupiscence even as the Gentiles which knew not God for God hath not called us unto uncleanness but unto holiness Ephes 5. 3. 4. 5. But fornication and all uncleanness or covetousness let it not be once named amongst you as becometh Saints Neither filthiness not foolish talking nor jeasting which are not convenient but rather giving of thanks For this ye know that no whoremonger nor unclean person nor covetous man who is an idolater hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God Galat. 5. 19. Now the works of the flesh are manifest which are these adultery fornication uncleanness lasciviousness Rom. 13. v. 13. Let us walk honestly as in the day not in rioting and drunkenness not in chambering and wantonness not in strife and envying Coloss 3. v. 5. Mortifie therefore your members which are upon the earth fornication uncleanness inordinate affection evil concupiscence and covetousness which is idolatry In which places as we see the sin forbidden in this Command held out under the Most odious designations to wit a work of the flesh fornication adultery uncleanness lasciâ—iousness inordinate affection evil concupiscence c. branches of this sin and a decent walk commanded as contrary to the same
Accuser or Pursuer when unjustly he seeketh what doth not belong unto him or chargeth another with what he should not or justly cannot 6. By the Defender when he denyeth what he knoweth or minceth it c. And by all of them when business is delayed and protracted through their respective accession to it as well as when justice is more manifestly wronged this is the end of Jeâ—â—ros advice to Moses Exod. 18. 23. that the people may return home being quickly and with all convenient diligence dispatched which to their great loss and prejudice many wayes the unnecessary lengthening of Processes obstructeth and maketh Law and Lawyers appointed for the ease and relief of the people to be a grievous and â—exatious burthen to them for which men in these stations and capacities will have much to answer to God the righteous Judge of all the Earth when they shall be arraigned before his terrible Tribunal where there will be no need of leading witnesses to prove the guilt since every mans conscience will be in place of a thousand witnesses neither will the nimblest wit the eloquentest tongue the finest and smoothest pen of the most able Lawyer Judge Advocate Notary or Litigant that shall be found guilty there be able to fetch himself fair off O then all the fig-leaves of their fairest and most flourishing but really frivolous pretences wherewith they palliate themselves will be instantly blown away by the breath of that Judges mouth and so be utterly unable to cover the shame of their nakedness in the manifold breaches of this Command then the greatest stretches of Wit and highest strains of Eloquence made use of to the prejudice of truth and justice will be found and pronounced to be poor filly and childish wiles yea very fooleries and bablings after which they will not speak again but laying their hands on their mouths eternally keep silence It will therefore be the wisdom and advantage of the guilty in time to take with it and resolving to do so no more to betake themselves for the pardon of it to that Advocate with the Father even Jesus the Righteous who throughly pleadeth and without all peradventure or possibility of loosing it doth alwayes carry the Cause he undertaketh to plead In sum that which in this Command in its positive part is levelled at as the scope thereof is the preserving and promoting of truth honest simplicity and ingenuity amongst men a sincerely and cordially loving regard to the repute and good name of one another and a sweet inward contentation joyful satisfaction and complacency of heart therein with a suitable love to and care for our own good name The Tenth Commandment Exodus 20. 17. Thou shalt not covet thy Neighbours house thou shalt not covet thy Neighbours Wife nor his man-servant nor his maid-servant nor his â—x nor his ass nor anything that is thy Neighbours VNto all the other Commands the Lord hath subjoyned this for mans humbling and deep abasement in his fight and it reacheth further in then all of them being as the words bear not about any â—ew object for it is concerning wife house c. but about a new way of acting in reference to that object and condemning directly a sin not so condemned in any other of the fore-going five Commandments so that it also seems to be added to the other as a full and more clear explication of that spiritual obedience that is required in all the rest In it we have to consider 1. the act 2. the object The act is not to coâ—et the Apostle expresseth it Rom. 7. 7. Thou shalt not lust which implyeth an inordinateness in the heart as being dissatisfied with what it hath and so the positive part is contentment and satisfaction with a mans own lot Hebr. 13. 5. Let your conversation be without covetcusness and be content with such things as ye have so that whatsoever motion is inconsistent with contentment and inordinately desireth or tendeth to a change of our condition falleth in as condemned here The object is instanced in some particulars generally set down such as our Neighbours house his wife then his servants c. under which as the general following cleareth are comprehended all that concerneth him his place and credit or any thing that relateth to any of the former Commands Thou shalt not grieve that he is well nor aim at his hurt nor be discontent that thy own lot seemeth not so good And as for the reason why this Command is added its scope holdeth it forth which seemeth to be this I not onely require you as if the Lord had said not to steal from him and not to let your mind run loose in covering what is his as in the eighth Command not only to abstain from Adultery or determined Lust in the heart as in the seventh Command and not onely the abstaining from wronging of his life as in the sixth Command and of his name that way spoken of in the ninth Command or wronging of them that are in place and power by such heart lusts in us as are forbidden in the fifth Command but I require such holiness that there be not any inordinate lust or motion entertained not having a being in the heart although it never get consent but on the contrary that in reference to all these Commands in your carriage towards your Neighbour there be in you a full contentation with the lot that God hath carved out to you without the least inordinate motion or inclination to the contrary which may either be inconsistent with love to him or with contentment and a right composure of spirit in your selves From this we may see that this Command is unreasonably and unjustly divided by Papists into two Commands the one relating to the Neighbours house the other to his wife and what followeth For 1. this concupiscence or lust looketh not onely to the seventh and eighth but to the fifth and sixth and ninth Commands there being an inordinate affection towards thy Neighbours life and honour or estimation also and it is instanced in these two because they are more discernible and common This then sheweth that God taketh in this inordinateness of the heart under one Command in reference to whatsomever object it be otherwayes we behoved to say that either the Commands are defective or that there is no such inordinateness to other objects of other Commands which is absurd or by the same reason we must multiply commands for them also which yet the adversaries themselves do not 2. The Apostle Rom. 7. 7. comprehendeth all inordinateness of heart towards whatsomever object it be in that Command Thou shalt not lust which is as Thou shalt not deâ—iâ—e his wife so nothing else what is thy Neighbours 3. The inverting the order which is here in Deut. 5. 21. where the wife is put first not the house sheweth that the Command is one otherwayes what is ninth in the one would be tenth in the other and contrarily
about the duties of the Law with subordination to Christ and his Grace I answer they differ in these four things which shew that these duties are not onely to be done but to be done in a way consistent with and flowing from Grace which also follows from this that in the Preface to the Commandments he stileth and holdeth himself forth as Redeemer to be the object of our duty and the motive of it 1. They differ I say first in the End or account upon which they are performed we are not to perform duties that life pardon or enjoying of God may be meritoriously obtained by them but to testifie our respect to him who hath provided these freely for us that we should not rest in duties which are engraven on these Covenant-Blessings 2. They differ in the Principile by which we act them 't is not in our own strength as the works of the first Covenant were to be performed but in the strength of Grace and by vertue of the promises of Sanctification comprehended in the second Covenant 2 Cor. 7. 1. 3. They differ as to the manner of their acceptation duties by the first Covenant are to abide their tryal upon the account of their own worth and the inherent perfection that is in them and accordingly will be accepted or rejected as they are conform or disconform to the perfect Rule of Gods Law but by the second Covenant the acceptation of our performances prayers praises are founded on Christs Righteousness and Gods mercy in him in whom only are they sweet-smelling Sacrifices and accepted as our persons are for he hath made us to be accepted as to both only in the beloved Ephes 1. 4. 4. They differ in respect of the motive from which they proceed or the great motive of our obedience in the Covenant of Grace is not fear of threatnings and wrath in case of disobedience which by the Covenant of Works is the main thing sways men to duties noâ— is it a purchase of Heaven to themselves by their holiness which also by that Covenant is a predominant motive of mens obedience but it is love and gratitude and that not simply to God as Creator but as Redeemer as the Text here sheweth I brought thee out of the House of Bondage it is that we may set forth the praises of him who called us and that we may glorifie him that has bought us where Duties have these qualifications they are consistent with Grace and subservient to it but when those are wanting or excluded Christ is wronged and men turn legal and in so far fall from and overturn Grace These Conclusions as necessary Caveats being laid down we shall propose these distinctions for clearing of them 1. We would distinguish betwixt a Law and a Covenant or betwixt this Law considered as a Law and as a Covenant a Law doth necessarily imply no more then 1. To direct 2 To command inforcing that obedience by Authority a Covenant doth further necessarily imply promises made upon some condition or threatnings added if such a condition be not performed now this Law may be considered without the consideration of a Covenant for it was free to God to have added or not to have added promises and the threatnings upon supposition the Law had been kept might never have taken effect but the first two are essential to the Law the last two to Believers are made void throngh Christ in which sense it is said that by him we are freed from the Law as a Covenant so that Believers life depends not on the promises annexed to the Law nor are they in danger by the threatning adjoyned to it Hence we are to advert when the Covenant of Works is spoken of that by it is not meaned this Law simply but the Law propounded as the condition of obtaining life by the obedience of it in which respect it was only so formally given to Adam This then is the first destinction betwixt the Law and the Covenant of Works 2. Distinguish betwixt these Ten Commandments simply and strictly taken in the matter of them and more complexly in their full Administration with Preface Promises Sacrifices c in the first sense they are a Law having the matter but not the form of the Covenant of Works so Moses by it is said to describe such righteousness as the Covenant of Works doth require yet he doth not propond it as the righteousness they were to relye on but his scope is to put them to a Mediators by revealing sin through the Law Rom. 10. 3. In the second sense it is a Covenant of Grace that same in substance with the Covenant made with Abraham and with the Covenant made with Believers now but differing in its Administration 3. Distinguish betwixt Gods intention in giving and the Believers in Israel their making use of this Law and the carnal multitude among that people their way of receiving it and corrupt abusing it contray to the Lords mind In the first sense it was a Covenant of Grace in the second it turned to be a Covenant of Works to them and therefore it is that the Lord rejects as we may see Jsaiah 1. 13. 66. 2. 3. Jer. 7. 22. their Sacrifices and Services as not commanded because rested on by them to the prejudice of Grace and contrary to the strain and scope of this Law complexly considered 4. Distinguish betwixt the Moral and Ceremonial and Judicial Law the first concerns manners and the right ordering of a Godly Conversation and because these things are of perpetual equity and rectitude the obligation of this Law as to that is perpetual and therefore in the exponding of it these two terms Moral and of Perpetual Authority are all one and to be taken so 2. The Judical Law is for regulating outward Society for Government and doth generally excepting what was peculiar to the people of Israel agree with the Moral Law this as given to them is not perpetual their policy being at an end 3 The Ceremonial Law is in Ceremonies Types and Shadows pointing at a Saviour to come this is also abrogate the substance being come but there is this difference that the Judicial Law is but Mortua dead and may where 't is thought fit with the fore-going caution be used under the New Testament but the Ceremonial Law is Mortifera deadly and cannot without falling from grace Gal. 5. 2 4. be revived 5. When we speak of things Moral we are to distinguish between things Naturally Moral that is such as love to God and our Neighbour and such-like which have an innate rectitude and holiness in them which cannot be separate from them and things positively Moral that have their obligation by a special positive superadded Sanction sothat their rectitude flows not from the nature of the things themselves as in the former As for instance in the fourth Commandment it is naturally Moral that God should be woshipped Nature teacheth it but that he is to be worshipped