him § 6. Now the principallest and chiefest of these prescribed Times was the first Day of the Week on which they constantly met together to perform their Religious Services So writes Justin Martyr On the Day that is called Sunday all both of the Country and City assemble together where we preach and pray and discharge all the other usual parts of Divine Worship Upon which account those parts of God's Publick Worship are styled by Tertullian The Lord's Days Solemnities Aurelius who was ordained a Lector or a Clark by Cyprian is described in the Execution of his Office by reading on the Lord's Day And Victorinus Petavionensis represents this day as an usual time wherein they received the Lord's Supper Which was observed by the Heathen in Minucius Felix who mentions the Christians assembling to eat on a Solemn Day And Pliny reports that the Christians in his time met together on an appointed day to sing Praises unto Christ as a God and to bind themselves by a Sacrament § 7. This was the Day which Clemens Alexandrinus calls the Chief of Days our Rest indeed Which they observed as the highest and supremest Festival On Sunday we give our selves to Joy saith Tertullian And before him St. Barnabas We keep the Eighth Day with Gladness And Ignatius We observe the Lord's Day banishing every thing on this day that had the least tendency to or the least appearance of Sorrow and Grief inasmuch that now they esteemed it a Sin either to fast or kneel Even the Montanists themselves those rigid Observers of Fasts and Abstinences Abstained from Fasting on this most glad and joying day This day they accounted Holy as Dionysius Bishop of Corinth in his Letter to the Church of Rome saith To day being the Lord's Day we keep it holy The way wherein they sanctified it or kept it holy was the employing of themselves in Acts of Divine Worship and Adoration especially in the Publick Parts thereof which they constantly performed on this day as has been already proved and in that forementioned Letter where Dionysius Bishop of Corinth writ unto the Church of Rome that that day being the Lord's Day they kept it holy The manner of sanctifying it is immediately subjoined In it saith he we have read your Epistle as also the first Epistle of Clemens And Clemens Alexandrinus writes That a true Christian according to the Commands of the Gospel observes the Lords Day by casting out all 〈◊〉 Thoughts and entertaining all good ones glorifying the Resurrection of the Lord on that day § 8. The Reafon why they observed this Day with so much Joy and Gladness was that they might gratefully commemorate the glorious Resurrection of their Redeemer that happened thereon So writes St. Barnabas We keep the eighth day with gladness on which Christ arose from the Dead So says Ignatius Let us keep the Lord's Day on which our Life arose through 〈◊〉 And so says Clemens Alexandrinus He that truly observes the Lord's Day glorifies therein the Resurrection of the Lord. Justin Martyr relates that On Sunday the Christians assembled together because it was the first Day of the Week on which God out of the confused Chaos made the World and Jesus Christ our Saviour arose from the Dead for on Fryday he was Crucified and on Sunday he appeared to his Apostles and Disciples and taught them those things that the Christians now believe And to the same purpose Origen adviseth his Auditors to pray unto Almighty God especially on the Lord's Day which is a Commemoration of Christ's Passion for the Resurrection of Christ is not only celebrated once a year but every seven days § 9. From hence it was that the usual Appellation of this Day both by the Greek and Latin Churches was The Lords Day So it is styled by Clemens Alexandrinus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords Day And amongst the Latins by Victorinus Petavionensis Dies Dominicus the Lords Day As also by an African Synod And by Tertullian Sometimes it is simply called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and Dominicus that is the Lords without the addition of the Word Day as it is thus called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by Ignatius And Dominicus by Cyprian § 10. So that the Lords Day was the common and ordinary Title of this blessed and glorious Day though sometimes in compliance with the Heathens that they might know what Day they meant thereby they called it in their Phrase Sunday so termed because Dedicated to the Sun Thus Justin Martyr informing the Heathens of the Time and Manner of the Christians Assemblies tells them That on the Day called Sunday they met together for their Religious Exereises And That on Sunday they assembled together And so Tertullian upon the same occasion lets the Heathens know that the Christians indulged themselves on Sunday to Mirth and joyfulness But though they so far complyed with the Heathens as to call this Sunday yet I do not find that they ever so far indulged the Jews as to call it the Sabbath Day for through all their Writings as may be especially seen in Tertullian and Justin Martyr they violently declaim against Sabbatizing or keeping the Sabbath Day that is the Judaical Observation of the Seventh Day which we must always understand by the Word Sabbatum in the Writings of the Ancients not the Observation of the first Day or the Lords Day for that was constantly celebrated as it has been already proved and by those who condemn the Observance of the Sabbath Day the Sanctification of the Lord's Day is approved and recommended as by Justin Martyr and Tertullian in those Passages already cited unto which we may add that clear Passage of Ignatius Let us no longer Sabbatize but keep the Lords Day on which our Life rose Or as it is more fully expressed in his interpolated Epistle Instead of Sabbatizing let every Christian keep the Lords Day the Day on which Christ rose again the Queen of Days on which our Life arose and Death was conquered by Christ. § 11. So that their not Sabbatizing did not exclude their keeping of the Lords Day nor the Christian but only the Judaical Observance of the Sabbath or Seventh Day for the Eastern Churches in compliance with the Jewish Converts who were numerous in those Parts performed on the Seventh Day the same publick Religious Services that they did on the First Day observing both the one and the other as a Festival Whence Origen enumerates Saturday as one of the four Feasts solemnized in his time though on the contrary some of the Western Churches that they might not seem to Judaise fasted on Saturday as Victorinus Petavionensis writes We use to fast on the Seventh Day And It is our custom then to fast that we may not seem with the Jews to observe the Sabbath So that
Title 〈◊〉 to Christ in the Old Testament for that Place in Zach. 6. 12. Behold the Man whose Name is the 〈◊〉 they Translated according to the Septuagint Behold the Man whose Name is the East which misapprehension of the Word Branch arose from the different Significations or Applications of the Greek Word by which the Septuagint expressed it In the Original Hebrew the Word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies an arising or sprouting out as doth a Branch from a Root The Word by which they rendred it in Greek is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in a large Sense comprehends all sorts of arising and springing out but strictly and generally is applyed to the arising and first appearing of the Sun and by a Metonymy is appropriated to the East because the Sun arises in that Quarter The Fathers therefore not knowing the Original and finding Christ to be called in their Ordinary Version 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 presently concluded that according to the usual signification of the Word he was there termed by the Prophet The East whom they conceived to be so called because he was to arise like a Star And as the Sun that arises in the East penetrates thro' the World with its warm and illuminating Rays So Christ the Sun of Righteousness would arise with more Warmth and Light and pierce farther than the material Sun even into the Depths of Mens Hearts and Minds Hence the East is called by Tertullian A Type of Christ and for this Reason we may very well suppose that they prayed towards the East as well as built their Churches toward it which that they did we shall shew in its proper place II. Another Reason might be with respect to the Similitude of the Rising of the Sun with our Spiritual arising out of the Darkness of Sin and Corruption which I find thus expressed by Clemens Alexandrinus Let Prayers be made towards the East because the East is the Representation of our Spiritual Nativity As from thence Light first arose shining out of Darkness so according to that Rising of the Sun the Day of true Knowledge arose on those who lay buried in Ignorance whence the ancient Temples looked towards the West that so they who stood against the Images therein might be forced to look towards the East III. Origen advises to pray towards the Eastern Climate to denote our Diligence in the Service of God in being more forward to arise and set about it than the Sun is to run his daily Course for which he produces an Apocryphal Text Wisdom 16. 28. That it might be known that we must prevent the Sun to give thee thanks and at the Day-spring pray unto thee IV. Another Reason for their praying towards the East was their Opinion of the Excellency of this Quarter above others which Argument Origen thus delivers as well as I can Translate it Whereas there are four Climates the North and South the West and East who will not acknowledge that we bught to pray looking towards the East Symbolically representing thereby our Souls beholdthe arising of the true Light If a Man which way soever the Doors of his House are placed would rather make his Prayers towards the Windows saying That the sight of the Sky hath something more peculiar 〈◊〉 it to stir up his Affection than his looking against a Wall Or if it so happen that the Windows of his House do not look towards the East that happened from the Arbitrary Structure of the Builder but not from Nature which prefers the East before the other Quarters and Nature is to be preferred before that Building Or if any one will pray in the open Field will he not pray rather towards the East than towards the West And if in these things the 〈◊〉 is preferred before the West why is it not so also in every other thing besides For these four Reasons now but principally I suppose for the first they usually prayed towards the East inasmuch that for their Worshiping towards this Quarter and for their Religious Observation of the Lord's Day or Sunday so called because Dedicated to the Sun they were accused by the Heathens of Reverencing and Adoring the Sun § 3. The Congregation being thus turned towards the East they put themselves into a 〈◊〉 of Prayer stretching out their Hands and lifting up their Eyes towards Heaven as Clemens Alexandrinus writes We lift up our Head and stretch out our Hands towards Heaven And so Tertullian We pray looking upto Heaven 〈◊〉 expanded Hands by this devout 〈◊〉 imitating the lifting up of their Hearts to God in the 〈◊〉 Wherefore as now to quicken the Peoples Devotion the 〈◊〉 before Prayer excites them thereunto by saying Let us pray So in the African Churches in Cyprian's Days the Minister Prefac'd in his Prayer by saying to the People Lift up your Hearts To which the People to testifie their Consent answered We lift them up unto the Lord. § 4. After this the Minister began to Pray But before we handle his Prayer it may not be unnecessary to consider in what Habit he Officiated whether in a Surplice or no. His usual Garb was a Pallium which is the same with what we call a Cloak This as being the most simple and plain Garment was commonly worn by the Christians the usual Garb throughout the whole Roman Empire was the Toga which was more gay and splendid than the Pallium wherefore those who came over from Paganism to Christianity for the Indication of their Humility and Contempt of the World quitted the Toga as too pompous and mundane and assumed the Pallium or Cloak as more grave and modest from which change of Apparel and renouncing of a sumptuous Habit to embrace a poor and mean one the Heathens derided and exposed the Christians even to a Proverb a Toga ad Pallium which sarcastical Language engaged Tertullian to write a little Tract in Defence of the Cloak which is still extant in his Writings under the Title of De Pallio But Salmasius and Dr. Cave think this severe Habit was not worn by all 〈◊〉 but only by those of them that lead a more austere and mortified Life such as the Clergy and some self-denying Personages 〈◊〉 the Laity and that therefore it is called by Tertullian in the sorementioned Tract Sacerdotis Habitus or Priests Apparel as it is in all ancient Manuscripts and in the first Edition of Beatus Rhenanus and not Sacer Habitus The Holy Apparel as it is in the later Editions But whether it were so or no I shall not here debate This is sufficient for my purpose that the Clergy usually wore a Cloak But now that in times of Publick Prayer they should put a Surplice or any other kind of Linnen Garment over their Cloaks neither Tertullian nor any other speak the least Syllable of it Instead of putting another Vestment on their Gown or Cloak
of that which we now distinguish by the Names of Confirmation and Absolution it necessarily results that Confirmation was not like Baptism only once performed but on many Persons frequently reiterated All Persons after Baptism were confirmed that is by the Imposition of Hands and Prayer the Holy Ghost was beseeched to descend upon them and so to fortifie them by his Heavenly Grace as that they might couragiously persevere in their Christian Warfare to their Lives end but if it should so happen as oftentimes it did that any so confirmed should fall from the Christian Faith and be for a time excluded the Churches Peace when they were again admitted Hands were again imposed on them and the Holy Spirit again Invocated to strengthen them with his Almighty Grace by which they might be upheld to the Day of Salvation and so as often as any Man fell and was restored to the Churches Communion so often was he confirmed and the Holy Ghost entreated more firmly to establish and settle him CHAP. VI. § 1. Of the Lord's Supper The Time when administred § 2. Persons that received it none present at the Celebration thereof besides the Communicants § 3. The manner of its Celebration In some places the Communicants first made their Offerings § 4. The Minister began with a Sacramental Discourse or Exhortation Then followed a Prayer consisting of Petitions and Praises which consecrated both the Elements at once § 5. After that the Words of the Institution were read § 6. Then the Bread was broken and the Wine poured out and both distributed Diversity of Customs in the manner of the Distribution § 7. The Posture of Receiving § 8. After they had communicated they sung a Psalm and then concluded with Prayer and a Collection for the Poor § 1 THE first of the Christian Sacraments having been so largely discussed I now come to treat of the other viz. The Lords Supper in the handling of which I shall enquire into these three things 1. The Time 2. The Person And 3. The manner thereof First As for the time of its Celebration In general it was at the conclusion of their Solemn Services as Justin Martyr writes that after they had read sung preached and prayed then they proceeded to the Administration of the Eucharist But as for the particular part of the Day that seems to have been according to the Circumstances and Customs of every Church In Tertullian's Age and Country they received it at Supper-time from which late Assembling it is probable that the Heathens took occasion to accuse them of putting out the Lights and promiscuously mingling one with another Which Accusation may be read at large in Justin Martyr's Dialogue with Tryphon in Minutius Felix and the Apologies of Tertullian and Athenagoras But whether this was then their constant Season in times of Peace I know not this is certain that in times of Persecution they laid hold on any Season or Opportunity for the enjoying of this Sacred Ordinance whence Tertullian tells us of their receiving the Eucharist in their Antelucan Assemblies or in their Assemblies before day And Pliny reports that in his time the Christians were wont to meet together before it was light and to bind themselves by a Sacrament Cyprian writes that in his Days they administer'd this Sacrament both Morning and Evening And That as Christ administer'd the Sacrament in the Evening to signifie the Evening and end of the World So they celebrated it in the Morning to denote the Resurrection of their Lord and Master All that can be gathered from hence is That they did not deem any particular part of the Day necessary to the Essence of the Sacrament but every Church regulated its self herein according to the Diversity of its Customs and Circumstances § 2. As for the 〈◊〉 communicating they were not indifferently all that professed the Christian Faith as Origen writes It doth not belong to every one to eat of this Bread and to drink of this Cup. But they were only such as were in the number of the faithful such as were baptized and received both the Credentials and Practicals of Christianity That is who believed the Articles of the Christian Faith and lead an holy and a pious Life Such as these and none else were permitted to Communicate Now since none but the Faithful were admitted it follows that the Catechumens and the Penitents were excluded the Catechumens because they were not yet baptized for Baptism always preceded the Lords Supper as Justin Martyr says It is not lawful for any one to partake of the Sacramental Food except he be baptized The Penitents because for their Sins they were cast out of the Church and whilst excluded from the Peace thereof they could not participate of the Marks and Tokens of that Peace but were to be driven therefrom and not admitted thereto till they had fully satisfied for their Faults lest otherwise they should profane the Body of the Lord and drink his Cup unworthily and so be guilty of the Body and Blood of the Lord. Hence when the other parts of Divine Worship were ended and the Celebration of the Eucharist was to begin the Catechumens Penitents and all except the Communicants were to depart as Tertullian says hereof Pious Initiations drive away the Profane These being Mysteries which were to be kept secret and concealed from all except the Faithful inasmuch as to others the very method and manner of their Actions herein were unknown which was observed by the Pagans who objected to the Christians the Secrecy of their Mysteries which Charge Tertullian does not deny but confessing it answers That that was the very Nature of Mysteries to be concealed as Ceres's were in Samothracia § 3. The Catechumens with others being gone out and none remaining but the Faithful the Celebration of the Eucharist next followed which brings me to the Inquiry of the Third thing viz. The manner of the Celebration thereof But before I meddle therewith I shall briefly premise this Observation viz. That in some places as in France and Africa the Communicants first made their Offerings presenting according to their Ability Bread or Wine or the like as the first Fruits of their Encrease It being our Duty as Irenaeus writes to offer unto God the first Fruits of his Creatures as Moses saith Thou shalt not appear empty before the Lord. Not as if God wanted these things but to shew our fruitfulness and gratitude unto him Wherefore Cyprian thus severely blam'd the Rich Matrons for their scanty Oblations Thou art rich and wealthy saith he and dost thou think duly to celebrate the Lord's Supper when thou refusest to give Thou who comest to the Sacrament without a Sacrifice what part canst thou have from the Sacrifice which the Poor offer up These Offerings were employed to the Relief of the Poor and other Uses of the Church and it seems probable that a
sufficient Quantity of that Bread and Wine was presented to the Bishop or to him that officiated to be employed for the Sacramental Elements whose Consecration next succeeded which in the main was after this following Manner § 4. It is very likely that in many places the Minister first began with an Exhortation or Discourse touching the Nature and end of that Sacrament which the Congregation were going to partake of that so their Hearts might be the more elevated and raised into Heavenly Frames and Dispositions This may be gathered from the History of an Exorcist Woman related by Firmilian who took upon her to per. form many Ecclesiastical Administrations as to Baptize and Celebrate the Lord's Supper which last she did without the wonted Sermon or Discourse Which seems to intimate that in those days it was customary in Lesser Asia and perhaps at Carthage too for the Minister to make a Speech or Exhortation before the Participation of the Sacrament But whether this Practice was universal or more ancient than 〈◊〉 I cannot determin this that follows was viz. A Prayer over the Elements by him that Officiated unto which the People gave their Assent by saying Amen This Prayer is thus described by Justin Martyr Bread and Wine are offered to the Minister who receiving them gives Praise and Glory to the Lord of all through the Son and the Holy Ghost and in a large manner renders particular Thanks for the present Mercies who when he hath ended his Prayers and Praise all the People say Amen And when the Minister hath thus given Thanks and the People said Amen the Deacons distributed the Elements And again Bread and Wine are offered to the Minister who to the utmost of his Abilities sends up Prayers and Praises and the People say Amen and then the Consecrated Elements are distributed From this Description by Justin Martyr of the Sacramental Prayer we may observe these few things pertinent to the matter in hand I. That there was but one long Prayer antecedent to the Distribution of the Elements For he says That the Minister having received the Bread and Wine he offered up Prayers and Praise unto God in a large manner and when he had ended the People said Amen II. That this long Prayer consisted of two Parts viz. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as he calls them that is Petition and Thanksgiving in the former they prayed for the Peace of the Church the Quiet of the World the Health of their Emperors and in a Word for all Men that needed their Prayers as it is represented by Tertullian We pray saith he for the Emperors for all that are in Authority under them for the State of the World for the Quiet of Affairs and for the Delay of the Day of Judgment In the latter they gave God thanks for sending Christ and for the Institution of that comfortable Sacrament desiring his Blessing on and Consecration of the Elements then before them III. That by this one Prayer both the Elements were consecrated at once for he says That the Minister took both Elements together and blessed them and then they were distributed He did not consecrate them distinctly but both together § 5. After Prayer was ended they read the Words of Institution that so the Elements might be consecrated by the Word as well as by Prayer Whence Origen calls the Sacramental Elements The Food that is sanctified by the Word of God and Prayer And that is hallowed by the Word of God and Prayer And 〈◊〉 writes That when the Bread and Wine perceive the Word of God then it becomes the Eucharist of the Body and Blood of Christ. § 6. The Elements being thus Consecrated the Minister took the Bread and brake it The Bread which we break or or the broken Bread as it is styled by Irenaeus and then gave it to the Deacons who distributed it to the Communicants and after that the Cup which the Deacons in the like manner delivered So it was in Justin Martyr's time and Country The Element saith he being blessed the Deacons give to every one present of the Consecrated Bread and Wine But in Tertullian's Time and Country the Minister and not the Deacons distributed the Elements We receive saith he from no ones Hands but the Bishops And yet at the same Place not many years after The Deacons offered the Cup to those that were present So that herein there was a Diversity of Customs in some places the Deacons delivered the Elements in others the Bishop or the Minister that consecrated them But whether it was done either by Bishop or Deacons it seems probable that which of them soever did it they delivered the Sacramental Bread and Wine particularly to each Communicant I find but one Example to the contrary and that was in the Church of Alexandria where the Custom was to permit the People to take the Bread themselves from the Plate or Vessel wherein it was consecrated as is insinuated by Clemens Alexandrinus but in most other Churches it is likely that the Elements were particularly delivered to every single Communicant So it was in the Country of Justin Martyr where the Deacons gave to each one of the consecrated Bread and Wine So at Carthage in the time of Cyprian The Deacons offered the Cup to those that were present In the time of which Father it was usual for Children and Sucking Infants to receive the Sacrament unto whom it was necessary particularly to deliver the Elements since it was impossible for them to take it orderly from the Hands of others And therefore when a little sucking Girl refused to taste the Sacramental Wine The Deacon violently forc'd it down her Throat So it was also at Rome as appears from what Cornelius reports of his Antagonist Novatian that when he administer'd the Sacrament and divided and gave to each Man his part with his two Hands he held those of the Receiver saying to him Swear unto me by the Body and Blood of the Lord Jesus Christ that thou wilt never leave my Party to return to that of Cornelius so forcing the miserable Receiver instead of saying Amen to say I will not return to Cornelius § 7. As for the Posture of receiving at Alexandria the Custom was to stand at the Table and receive the Elements which may be supposed to have been 〈◊〉 this manner The Bread and Wine being consecrated the Communicants came up in order to the Communion Table and there standing received the Elements and then returned to their places again But whether this was universal I know not or whether any other postures were used I cannot determin only as for kneeling if the Sacrament was Celebrated on the Lords Day as usually it was or on any other Day between Easter and Whitsontide then no Church whatsoever kneeled for as Tertullian writes On the Lords Day we account it a
Sin to worship kneeling which custom we also observe from Easter to Whitsontide § 8. The Elements being thus blessed distributed and received they afterwards sung an Hymn or Psalm to the Praise and Glory of God as Tertullian writes Then every one sings an Hymn to God either of his own Composition or out of the Holy Scriptures Then followed for a Conclusion a Prayer of Thanksgiving to God Almighty for his inestimable Grace and Mercy as the same Tertullian saith Prayer concludes this Feast To which was subjoined a Collection for the Poor When as Justin Martyr reports Every one that was able and willing gave according to his Ability and that that was gathered was committed to the care of the Bishop who relieved therewith the Orphans and Widows the Sick and Distressed Prisoners Travellers Strangers and in a Word all that had need thereof CHAP. VII § 1. Of the Circumstances of Publick Worship § 2. Of the Place thereof In Times of Peace fixed Places for that end metonymically called Churches § 3. How those Churches were built § 4. No Holiness in those Places § 5. Of the Time of Publick Worship § 6. The First Day of the Week an usual Time § 7. Celebrated with Joyfulness esteemed holy and spent in an holy manner § 8. Their Reasons for the Observation of this Day § 9. The usual Title of this Day The Lord's Day § 10. Sometimes called Sunday but never the Sabbath-Day § 11. Saturday another Time of Publick Worship § 1. HItherto I have spoken of the several particular Acts of the Publick Worship of the Ancients I now come according to my propounded Order to enquire into the necessary Circumstances thereof By which I mean such things as are inseparable from all humane Actions as Place and Time Habit and Gesture As for Habit as much of that as is Controverted I have spoken to already in that Chapter where I discoursed of the Ministers Habit in Prayer And as for Gesture I have already treated of Worshipping towards the East And of their Posture at the Reception of the Lord's Supper There is nothing more disputed with reference thereunto besides the bowing at the Name of Jesus and the worshipping towards the Communion Table but both these being introduced after my prescribed time viz. above three hundred years after Christ I shall say nothing to them but pass on to the Discussing of the two remaining Circumstances of Publick Worship viz. Place and Time § 2. First As for Place This all will readily grant to be a necessary Circumstance of Divine Worship for if we serve God it is impossible but that it must be in one place or other Now one Query with respect hereunto may be Whether the Primitive Christians had determined fixed Places for their Publick Worship Unto which I answer That usually they had though it is true indeed that in times of Persecution or when their Circumstances would not permit them to have one usual sixed Place they met where-ever they could in Fields Deserts Ships or Inns Yet in times of Peace and Serenity they chose the most setled convenient Place that they could get for the Performance of their Solemn Services which place by a Metonymy they called the Church Thus at Rome the place where the Christians met and chose Fabian for their Bishop was the Church At Antioch Paulus Samosasatenus Bishop thereof ordered certain Women to sing Psalms to his Praise in the midst of the Church At Carthage the Baptized Persons renounced the Devil and all his Works in the Church And thus Fertullian very frequently calls their definite places for Divine Worship Churches § 3. As for the Form of these Churches or the Fashion of their Building I find this Description of them in Tertullian The House of our Dove like Religion is simple built on high and in open View respecting the Light as the Figure of the Holy Spirit and the East as the representation of Christ. The meaning whereofis that their Churches were erected on high and open places and made very light and shining in imitation of the Holy Ghost's Descent upon the Apostles at the Day of Pentecost who came down with Fire or Light upon them and that they were built towards the East in resemblance of Christ whom they apprehended in Scripture to be called the East concerning which Title and the reason thereof I have already discoursed in that Head concerning praying towards the East unto which place to avoid repetition I refer the Reader § 4. But tho' they had these fixed Places or Churches for Conveniency and Decency yet they did not imagin any such Sanctity or Holiness to be in them as to recommend or make more acceptable those Services that were discharged therein than if they had been performed elsewhere for as Clemens Alexandrinus writes Every place is in Truth holy where we receive any knowledge of God And as Justin Martyr saith Through Jesus Christ we are now all become Priests to God who hath promised to accept our Sacrifices in every or in any part of the World And therefore in times of Persecution or such like Emergencies they scrupled not to meet in other places but where-ever they could securely joyn together in their Religious Services there they met though it were in Fields Deserts Ships Inns or Prisons as was the Case and Practice of Dionysius Bishop of Alexandria So that the Primitive practice and Opinion with respect to this Circumstance of Place was That if the State of their Affairs would permit them they had fixed Places for their Publick Worship call'd Churches which they set apart to that use for Conveniency and Decencies sake but not attributing unto them any such Holiness as thereby to sanctifie those Services that were performed in them I know nothing more with respect to Place that requires our Consideration I shall therefore now proceed to enquire into the Time of Publick Worship under which will be comprehended the Primitive Fasts and Feasts § 5. Time is as necessary a Circumstance to Religious Worship as Place for whilst we are in this World we cannot serve God at all times but must have some determinate time to serve him in That God's People therefore under the Law might not be left at an uncertainty when to serve him it pleased the Almighty to institute the Sabbath the Passover and other Feasts at which times they were to congregate and assemble together to give unto God the Glory due unto his Name And for the same end under the Evangelical Administration there are particular Days and Seasons appointed for the Publick and Solemn Worship of the Glorious and Eternal Lord according to the Sayings of Clemens Romanus God hath required us to serve him in the appointed times and seasons For which Reason we ought to serve him at those determinated times That so worshipping him at those Commanded Seasons we may be blessed and accepted by
besides the Lord's Day Saturday was an usual Season whereon many Churches solemnized their Religious Services As for those other times in which they Publickly assembled for the Performance of Divine Worship they will fall under the two General Heads of Times of Fasting and Times of Feasting of which in the following Chapters CHAP. VIII § Of the Primitive Fasts two-fold Occasional and Fix'd Of Occasional Fasts what they were and by whom appointed § 2. Of fixt Fasts two-fold Weekly and Annual Wednesdays and Fridays weekly Fasts till what time of the Day observed and why observed § 3. One necessary Annual Fast viz. Lent Why they fasted at Lent and how long lasted § 4. Of the manner of their Fasts Three sorts of Fasts viz. Statio Jejunium and Superpositio What those several Kinds were and at what times observed § 1. IN this Chapter I shall make an Enquiry into the Primitive Fasts which may be considered in a two-fold respect either as Occasional or Fixt Occasional Fasts were such as were not determined by any constant fixed Period of Time but observed on extraordinary and unusual Seasons according as the Variety and Necessity of their Circumstances did require them Thus in Times of Great and Imminent Danger either of Church or State when by their Sins they had kindled God's Wrath and Fury against them that they might divert his Vengeance and appease his offended Majesty they appointed set Days and Times for the Abasing of themselves before the Lord for the seeking of his Face by Prayer and Fasting abstaining from the Food of their Bodies and practising all external Acts of Humiliation as so many Indications of the internal Contrition of their Hearts and Souls So Cyprian in the time of a sharp Persecution advised his Flock To seek to appease and pacifie the Lord not only by Prayers but by Fastings and by Tears and by all kind of Intreaties And when the same Father foresaw an approaching Persecution he writ to Cornelius Bishop of Rome That since God was pleased in his Providence to warn them of an approaching Fight and Tryal they ought with their whole Flocks diligently to fast and watch and pray to give themselves to continual Groans and frequent Prayers for those are our Spiritual Arms that make us firmly to stand and persevere Tertullian jeers the Heathens That in times of Danger or great necessity after they had voluptuously and sensually glutted themselves they then ran to the Capitol and with all outward Signs of Humility deprecated Gods Judgments and implored his mercy whilst in the mean time they were Enemies unto him But says he We on such Emergencies and Occasions abstain from all things give our selves wholly to fasting roll our selves in Sackcloth and Ashes thus incline God as it were to repent to have Mercy and Compassion upon us for by this way God is honoured These Occasional Fasts were appointed by the Bishops of every Church as they saw fit and necessary So writes Tertullian The Bishops are wont to ordain Fasts for their Churches according as the Circumstances of the Churches require § 2. The next sort of Fasts were set or fixed ones that is such as were always observed at the same Time and Season and these again were two fold either Weekly or Annual First Weekly These were kept every Wednesday and Friday as Clemens Alexandrinus relates that they fasted on every Wednesday and Friday These Fasts were commonly called Stations in allusion to the Military Stations or the Soldiers standing when on the Guard Thus Tertullian mentions Their Stationary Days And writes that Wednesdays and Fridays were Stations On these Stationary Days their Fasts ended at three a Clock in the Afternoon whence they are called by Tertullian The half Fasts of Stations Though some on Fridays lengthened out their Fasts till Evening Why they fasted on Wednesday rather than on any other Day of the Week I cannot find but on Friday they chose to fast because Christ was Crucified thereon § 3. The next sort of fixed Fasts is such as are annual of which kind they had but one viz. Lent And indeed besides this they had no other necessary fixed Fast 〈◊〉 Weekly nor Yearly the Faithful were not strictly obliged to the observation of any other as will be evident from what follows It is true they fasted Wednesdays and Fridays but this was ex Arbitrio of their own Free Will and Choice not ex imperio of Command or Necessity For when the Montanists began to impose as a Duty other stinted Fasts they were for so doing branded as Hereticks Who saith Apollonius concerning Montanus is this new Doctor His Works and Doctrin evidently declare him this is he that teaches the Dissolution of Marriages and prescribes Fasts And for the same Practice they were accused by the Orthodox for Galaticising or committing the Error of the Galatians in observing Days and Months and Years But that the Ancients esteemed Lent to be the only necessary fixed Fast and any other even the Stationary Days to be indifferent will appear most evidently from this ensuing Passage of Tertullian Tertullian being now a Montanist and defending their prescribed Fasts against the Orthodox thus jeeringly exposes the Opinions of his Adversaries with respect to the necessary determined times of Fasting Forsooth saith he they think that according to the Gospel those days are to be prescribed Fasts wherein the Bridegroom was takeu away i.e. Lent and those to be the only Fasts of Christians the Legal and Prophetical Fasts being abolished and that for others we may indifferently fast according to our Will not out of necessity or command but according to our Circumstances and conditions and that so the Apostles abserved commanding no other fixed and common Fasts besides this no not the Stationary Days which indeed they keep on Wednesdays and Fridays and do all observe but yet not in obedience to any Command or to the end of the Day but Prayers are concluded at three a Clock in the Afternoon according to the Example of Peter in the Acts. So that from hence it is evident That the Orthodox apprehended themselves to be free from the necessary Observation of the Stationary Fasts and to be only strictly obliged to fast on those Days wherein the Bridegroom was taken away or on Lent from which Periphrasis of Lent we may collect both the Reason and the Duration thereof First the Reason thereof or the Ground on which they founded the necessity of this Fast and that was on that saying of Christ in Matth. 9. 15. The Days will come when the Bridegroom shall be taken from them This they imagined to be an Injunction of Christ to all his Followers to fast at that time when the Bridegroom should be taken away The Bridegroom they esteemed to be Christ the time when he was taken away his Crucifixion Death and continuing under the Power of Death to the instant of his
other Churches kept it the Lords Day after This Diversity of Customs created a violent Disorder and Confusion amongst the Christians for the Church of Rome would impose their Usages on the Churches of the Lesser Asia unto which the latter peremptorily refused to submit To appease these Heats and Storms Polycarp Bishop of Smirna came to Rome to confer with Anicetus Bishop of that Church about it who 〈◊〉 that every Church should be left to follow its own Custom as accordingly they were to the times of Pope Victor who revived this Controversie and was so turbulent and imperious as that he excommunicated the Asiaticks for refusing to comply with the Church of Rome in this matter condemning them as Hereticks loading them with the long and frightful Name of Tessareskaidekatitae or Quartodecimani so called because they kept their Easter Quarta Decima Luna upon the Fourteenth Day after the appearance of the Moon or at the Full Moon on what Day soever it happened But however the Asiaticks stood their Ground and still maintained their old Custom till the Council of Nice Anno 325. by their Authority decided this Controversie decreeing that throughout the whole Christian World Easter should be observed not on the Day on which the Jewish Passover fell but on the Lord's Day ensuing as it was ever after observed and followed § 3. The next Feast that was observed was Whitsunday or Pentecost in Commemoration of the Holy Ghosts Descent on the Apostles which also was very ancient being mentioned several times by Tertullian and reckon'd by Origen for one of the four Festivals observed in his time the other Three being Sundays Saturdays and Easter § 4. As for Christmass or the time of Christs Nativity there is a Passage in Clemens Alexandrinus which seems to intimate that it was then observed as a Festival For speaking of the Time when Christ was born he says that those who had curiously search'd into it affixed it to the 25th Day of the Month Pachon But the Basilidian Hereticks held otherwise who also observed as a Feast the Day of Christs Baptism From which Words who also if that be the meaning of the Words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one might be apt to infer that the meaning of Clemens Alexandrinus was that the Basilidians not only feasted at the time of Christs Nativity but also at the time of his Baptism But whether this Interpretation will hold I leave to the Learned Reader to determin On the contrary there are other Considerations which more strongly insinuate that this Festival was not so early solemnized as that when Origen reckons up the Feasts observed in his Age he mentions not one Syllable of Christmas and it seems improbable that they should Celebrate Christs Nativity when they disagreed about the Month and Day when Christ was born Clemens Alexandrinus reckons from the Birth of Christ to the Death of Commodus exactly one hundred ninety four Years one month and thirteen days which years must be computed according to the Nabonassar or Egyptian Account who varied from this in our year in that they had only 365 days in a year never taking notice of the odd Hours or Quadrant of a Day that every fourth Year makes a whole Day and are accordingly by us then added to the Month of February which maketh the Bissextile or Leapyear So that though the Egyptians always begun their Year with the first day of the Month Thoth yet making no Account of the Annual odd Hours that Month wandereth throughout the whole Year And whereas now the first Day of that Month is the first Day of our March about Seven Hundred Years hence it will be the first of September and after Seven Hundred Years more or near thereabouts it will come to the first of March again Wherefore that we may reduce unto our Style this Calculation of Clemens Alexandrinus we must deduce for those odd Hours which are not accounted one Month and Eighteen Days and so reckoning the Birth of Christ from the Death of Commodus which happened on the first Day of January to be One Hundred Ninety Four Years wanting five or six Days it will appear that Christ was born on the 25th or 26th of the Month of December according to the Julian Account which is the Epoch we follow But as the same Father farther writes in the same place There were some who more curiously searching after the Year and Day of Christs Nativity affixed the latter to the 25th of the Month Pachon Now in that Year in which Christ was born the Month Pachon commenced the twentieth Day of April So that according to this Computation Christ was born the 16th Day of May. Nay there were yet some other ingenious Men as the same Father continues to write that assigned Christ's Nativity to the 24th or 25th of the Month Pharmuthi which answers to our 16th or 17th of April So that there were Diversities of Opinion concerning the Time of Christs Birth which makes it very probable that there was then no particular Feast observed in Commemoration of that Glorious and transcendent Mercy § 5. There is yet another Feast called by us Epiphany wherein there is a Commemoration of Christs Baptism which I find to have been peculiarly Solemnized by the Basilidian Hereticks For thus Clemens Alexandrinus reports it to be a particular Custom of theirs to keep as a Festival the day of Christs Baptism The Day on which Christ was baptized they said to be the fifteenth of the Month Tyby in the fifteenth Year of the Reign of the Emperor Tiberius which answers to our One and Thirtieth of December or as others imagin'd it On the Eleventh of the Month Tyby which was the Seven and Twentieth of our December § 6. Besides these forementioned Festivals there were none others observed to the Honour of the blessed Jesus nor of the Virgin Mary nor of the Holy Apostles and Evangelists and which may be a little observable it is very seldom if ever that the Ancients give the Title of Saints to those Holy Persons but singly style them Peter Paul John c. not St. Peter St. Paul or St. John § 7. But now there was another sort of Festivals which every Church Celebrated in the Commemoration of its own Martyrs which was on the Anniversary Day of their Martyrdoms They assembled together where they recited the Martyrs Glorious Actions exhorted to an Imitation of them and blessed God for them So says Cyprian The Passions of the Martyrs we Celebrate with an Anniversary Commemoration And so writes Tertullian Vpon the Annual Day of the Martyrs Sufferings we offer Thanks to God for them When this Practice began cannot certainly be determined it is first found mentioned in the Letter of the Church of Smirna to the Church of Philomilium touching the Death of Polycarp wherein they write That they had gathered up his Martyr'd Bones and buried them in a
this Enquiry with an earnest Perswasion to Peace Vnity and Moderation § 1. HAving in the precedent Chapters enquired into the several Parts of Divine Worship and the Circumstances thereof I now come to close up all with a brief Appendix concerning Rites and Ceremonies by which I mean two different things By Rites I understand such Actions as have an 〈◊〉 Relation to the Circumstances or manner of Worship As for Instance The Sacrament was to be received in one manner or other but whether from the Bishop or Deacon that was the Rite Lent was to be observed a certain space of Time but whether One Day or Two Days or Three Days that was the Rite thereof So that Rites 〈◊〉 necessary Concomitants of the Circumstances of Divine Worship Appendages to them or if you rather please you may call them Circumstances themselves By Ceremonies I mean such Actions as have no regard either to the Manner or Circumstances of Divine Worship but the Acts thereof may be performed without them as for instance In some Churches they gave to Persons when they were baptized Milk and Hony And Before they prayed they washed their Hands Now both these Actions I call Ceremonies because they were not necessary to the Discharge of those Acts of Divine Worship unto which they were affixed but those Acts might be performed without them as Baptism might be entirely administred without the Ceremony of giving Milk and Hony and Prayers might be presented without washing of Hands Now having explained what I intend by those two Terms of Rites and Ceremonies let us in the next place consider the Practice of the Primitive Church with reference thereunto And first for Ceremonies § 2. It is apparent that there were many of that kind crept into the Church of whom we may say that from the beginning they were not so For when the Quire of the Apostles was dead till which time as Hegesippus writes the Church remained a pure and unspotted Virgin then the Church was gradually 〈◊〉 and corrupted as in her Doctrin so also in her Worship an Infinity of Ceremonies by degrees insensibly sliding in very many of which were introduced within my limited time as the eating of Milk Hony after Baptism the abstaining from Baths the Week after the washing of their Hands before Prayer their sitting after Prayer and many other such like which through various ways and means winded themselves into the Church as some came in through Custom and Tradition one eminent Man perhaps invented and practised a certain Action which he used himself as Judging it fit and proper to stir up his Devotion and Affection others being led by his Example performed the same and others again imitated them and so one followed another till at length the Action became a Tradition and Custom after which manner those Ceremonies were introduced of tasting Milk and Hony after Baptism of abstaining from the Baths the whole ensuing Week of not kneeling on the Lords Day and the space between Easter and Whitsuntide of the Signing of themselves with the Sign of the Cross in all their Actions and Conversations concerning which and the like Tertullian writes That there was no Law in Scripture for them but that Tradition was their Author and Custom their Confirmer Of which Custom we may say what Tertullian says of Custom in general that commonly Custom takes its rise from Ignorance and Simplicity which by Succession is corroborated into use and so vindicated against the Truth But our Lord Christ hath called himself Truth and not Custom wherefore if Christ was always and before all then Truth was first and ancientest it is not so much Novelty as Verity that confutes Hereticks Whatsoever is against the Truth is Heresie although it be an old Custom Others again were introduced through a wrong Exposition or Misunderstanding of the Scripture so were their Exorcisms before Baptism and their Unctions after Baptism as in their proper places hath been already shewn Finally Others crept in through their Dwelling amongst the Pagans who in their ordinary Conversations used an Infinity of Superstitions and many of those Pagans when they were converted to the Saving Faith Christianiz'd some of their innocent former Ceremonies as they esteemed them to be either 〈◊〉 them deceut and proper to stir up their Devotion or likely to gain over more Heathens who were offended at the plainness and nakedness of the Christian Worship of which sort were their washing of Honds before Prayer their sitting after Prayer and such like Concerning which Tertullian affirms that they were practised by the Heathens So that by these and such like Methods it was that so many Ceremonies imperceptibly slid into the Ancient Church of some of which Tertullian gives this severe Censure That they are deservedly to be condemned as vain because they are done without the Authority of any Precept either of our Lord or of his Apostles that they are not Religious but Superstitius affected and constrained curious rather than reasonable and to be abstained from because Heathenish § 3. As for the Rites and Customs of the Primitive Church these were indifferent and arbitrary all Churches being left to their own Freedom and Liberty to follow their peculiar Customs and Usages or to embrace those of others if they pleased from whence it is that we find such a variety of Methods in their Divine Services many of which 〈◊〉 be observed in the precedent part of this Discourse as some received the Lords Supper at one time others at another Some Churches received the Elements from the Hands of the Bishop others from the Hands of the Deacons some made a Collection before the Sacrament others after some kept Lent one Day some two days and others exactly forty Hours some celebrated Easter on the same Day with the Jewish Passover others the Lords Day after and so in many other things one Church differed from another as Firmilian writes that at Rome they did not observe the same Day of Easter nor many other Customs which were practised at Jerusalem and so in most Provinces many Rites were varied according to the Diversities of Names and Places So that every Church followed its own particular Customs although different from those of its Neighbours it being nothing necessary to the Unity of the Church to have an Uniformity of Rites for according to Firmilian the Unity of the Church consisted in an unanimity of Faith and Truth not in an Uniformity of Modes and Customs for on the contrary the Diversity of them as Irenaeus speaks with reference to the Fast of Lent did commend and set forth the Vnity of the Faith Hence every Church peaceably followed her own Customs without obliging any other Churches to observe the same or being obliged by them to observe the Rites that they used yet still maintaining a loving Correspondence and mutual Concord each with other as Firmilian writes that in most Provinces
many Rites were varied according to the Diversities of Names and Places but yet saith he never any one for this broke the Peace and Vnity of the Church One Church or Bishop did not in those days Anathematize another for a disagreement in Rites and Customs except when Victor Bishop of Rome through his Pride and Turbulency excommunicated the Asiatick Bishops for their different Observation of Easter from the Church of Rome which Action of his was very ill resented by the other Bishops of the Christian Churches and condemned by them as alien from Peace and Unity and contrary to that Love and Charity which is the very Soul and Spirit of the Gospel even the Bishops of his own Party that celebrated Easter on the same Day that he did censured his 〈◊〉 and violence as unchristian and uncharitable and writ several Letters wherein they severely checkt him as Eusebius reports in whose time they were extant all which are now lost except the Fragment of an Epistle written by Irenaeus and other Bishops of France wherein they affirm that Victor was in the right with respect to the time of Easter that it ought to be celebrated as he said on the Lords Day but that yet he had done very 〈◊〉 to cut off from the Vnity of the Church those that observed it otherwise that it had never been known that any Churches were excommunicated for a disagreement in Rites 〈◊〉 of which there was not only in the time of Easter 〈◊〉 self but in the Fast that preceded it Some fasted one day others more some forty hours which variety of Observations began not first in our Age but long before us in the times of our Ancestors who yet preserved Peace and Vnity amongst themselves as we now do for the Diversity of 〈◊〉 commended the Vnity of Faith And as for this 〈◊〉 concerning the time of Easter the Bishops which governed the Church of Rome before Soter viz. Anicetus Pius Higynus Telesphorus and Xystus they never celebrated it the same time with the 〈◊〉 neither would they permit any of their People so to do but yet they 〈◊〉 kind and 〈◊〉 to those who came to them from those 〈◊〉 where they did otherwise observe it and never any for this Cause were thrown out of the Church even your Predecessors though they did not keep it yet they sent the Eucharist to those that did keep it and when in the times of Anicetus blessed Polycarp came to Rome and there were some Controversies between them they did not seperate from one another but still maintained Peace and Love And though Anicetus could never perswade Polycarp nor Polycarp Anicetus to be of each others mind yet they communicated one with another and Anicetus in Honour to Polycarpus permitted him to Consecrate the Sacrament in his Church and so they departed in mutual love and kindness and all the Churches whether observing or not observing the same Day retained Peace and Vnity amongst themselves § 4. But though one Church could not oblige another to a Conformity in Rites and Customs yet a particular Church or Parish could enforce its own Members to such a Conformity an instance whereof we meet with in that famous Controversie about the Time of Easter It was the Custom of the Asiaticks to celebrate that Feast at the Full Moon or at the same time with the Jewish Passover on whatsoever day of the Week it happened It was the manner at Rome to observe it the Lords Day after and both these Churches quietly followed their several Usages without imposing them on each other But yet the Churches of Asia permitted none of their Members to solemnize it after the Roman manner neither did the Churches of Rome or of the West license any of their Inhabitants to celebrate it after the Asiatick manner for if either of them had granted any such thing there must have ensued Confusion and Disorder to have seen Easter differently observed in one and the same Church whilst some Members of a Parish where Fasting to behold others Feasting would have been a perfect Ataxy and Irregularity Therefore though Anioetus Bishop of Rome retained Peace and Unity with Foreign Churches that differed from him as to the Time of Easter without obliging them to a Compliance with the Roman Custom yet he peremptorily required it of the Members of his own Church and would never permit them to Solemnize that Feast on the same time with the Asiaticks So that though every Church had the Liberty to use what Rites she pleased yet every particular Member had not but was obliged to observe the Manners and Customs of that Church where he lived or where he occasionally communicated A Church Collectively or the Majority 〈◊〉 a Church with their Bishop could change their old Customs and introduce new ones as was done in the Affair of Easter the Asiaticks at length submitting to the Roman Usage but till that was done every particular Member was required to follow the old Customs of that Church to which he belonged and not to bring in any Innovations or new Rites because as was said before that would beget Tumults and Disorders and the Persons so acting would be guilty of that Strife and Contention which is condemned by those Words of the Holy Apostle 1 Cor. 11. 16. But if any Man seem to be contentious we have no such custom neither the Churches of God Which is as if the Apostle had said If any Men either to shew their Wit or to head and strengthen a Party will contradict what we have said and affirm it to be decent and comely either for Men to pray covered or Women uncovered This should silence such Contentious Opposers that there is no such Rite or Custom in any of the Churches of God but their Practice is the very same with what we have directed unto and therefore to that they ought peaceably and quietly to submit and yield Thus now I have finished this Enquiry and have as far as I could search'd into what was first proposed If I have not illustrated any Point as clearly as might be expected the reason is because I found nothing farther pertinent thereunto in those Writings to which I am confined if I had I should freely have mentioned it Whether I have been mistaken in the Sense and Meaning of any Passage I must leave unto my Readers to judge all that I can say is that I am not conscious to my self of any wilful and designed Mistakes having throughout this whole Discourse endeavoured deavoured to find out the plain and naked Truth without being byass'd to any Party or Faction whatsoever and that if any one shall be so kind and favourable as to convince me of any Slips or Errors which I may have committed through Inconsideration or want of a due Understanding I shall thankfully acknowledge them and willingly renounce and leave them § 5. What hath been related concerning the Constitution Discipline Unity and Worship of the Primitive
a Collection of many particular Churches who mentions in the Singular Number the Church of God in Africa and Numidia Else I do not remember that ever I met with it in this Sense in any Writings either of this or the rest of the Fathers but whenever they would speak of the Christians in any Kingdom or Province they always said in the Plural The Churches never in the Singular The Church of such a Kingdom or Province Thus Dyonisius Alexandrinus doth not say the Church but the Churches of Cilicia And so Irenaeus mentions The Churches that were in Germany Spain France the East Egypt and Lybia So also Tertullian speaks of the Churches of Asia and Phrygia and the Churches of Greece And so of every Country they always express the Churches thereof in the Plural Number V. The Word Church frequently occurs for that which we commonly call the Invisible Church that is for those who by a Sound Repentance and a Lively Faith are actually interested in the Lord Jesus Christ According to this signification of the Word must we understand Tertullian when he says that Christ had espoused the Church and that there was a Spiritual Marriage between Christ and the Church And that of Irenaeus That the Church was fitted according to the form of the Son of God And in this Sense is the Word oftentimes used in others of the Fathers as I might easily shew if any one did doubt it VI. The Word Church is frequently to be interpreted of the Faith and Doctrine of the Church In this Sense Irenaeus prays That the Hereticks might be reclaimed from their Heresies and be converted to the Church of God and exhorts all sincere Christians not to follow Hereticks but to fly to the Church Upon which account Hereticks are said to have left the Church as Tertullian told Marcion that when he became an Heretick he departed from the Church of Christ and their Heresies are said to be dissonant from the Church as Origen writes that the Opinion of the Transmigration of Souls was alien from the Church There are yet several other Significations of this Word though not so usual as some of the forementioned ones nor so pertinent to my Design so that I might justly pass them over without so much as mentioning them But lest any should be desirous to know them I will just name them and then proceed to what is more material Besides then those former Significations the Word according to its Original Import is also used for any Congregation in general sometimes it is applyed to any particular Sect of Hereticks as Tertullian calls the Marcionites the Church of Marcion At other times it is attributed to the Orthodox in opposition to the Hereticks as by the same Tertullian Sometimes it is appropriated to the Heathen Assemblies as by Origen at other times in Opposition to the Jews it is ascribed to the believing Gentiles as by Irenaeus In some places it is taken for the Deputies of a Particular Church as in Ignatius In other places it signifies the Assembly of the Spirits of just Men made perfect in Heaven which we commonly call the Church Triumphant as in Clemens Alexandriaeus Once I find it denoting the Laity only in opposition to the Clergy And once signifying only Christ as the Head of the Faithful § 2. But the usual and common Acceptation of the Word and of which we must chiefly treat is that of a Particular Church that is a Society of Christians meeting together in one place under their proper Pastours for the Performance of Religious Worship and the exercising of Christian Discipline Now the first thing that naturally presents its self to our Consideration is to enquire into the Constituent Parts of a Particular Church or who made up and composed such a Church In the general they were called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Elect the Called and Sanctified by the Will of God And in innumerable places they are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Brethren because of their Brotherly Love and Affection and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Faithful in opposition to the Pagan World who had no Faith in the Lord Jesus Christ nor in the Promises of the Gospel But more particularly we may divide them into two Parts into the People that composed the Body of the Church and those Persons who were set apart for Religious and Ecclesiastical Employments Or to conform to our ordinary Dialect into the Clergy and Laity which is an early distinction being mentioned by Clemens Romanus and after him by Origen and several others § 3. Each of these had their particular Offices and both together had their joynt Employments to all which I shall distinctly speak in the ensuing Tract as they naturally resolve themselves into these Three Particulars I. The Peculiar Acts of the Clergy II. The Peculiar Acts of the Laity III. The Joint Acts of them both By the Resolution of which three Questions some Discovery will be made of the Constitution and Discipline of the Primitive Church and of their Practice with respect to many Points unhappily controverted amongst us § 4. I begin with the first of these What were the Peculiar Acts of the Clergy Now here must be consider'd the Functions of every particular Order and Degree of the Clergy which we may say to be three viz. Bishops Priests and Deacons whose Employments we shall severally handle as also several other Points which under those Heads shall offer themselves unto us I shall begin first with the Bishop but for the better understanding both of him and the rest it will be necessary first of all to consider the condition of the whole World as it was before the Preaching of the Gospel in a state of Paganism and Darkness having their Understandings clouded with Ignorance and Error alienated from God and the true Worship of him applauding their own bruitish Inventions and adoring as God whatever their corrupted Reason and silly Fancies proposed to them as Objects of Adoration and Homage Into this miserable state all Mankind except the Jews had wilfully cast themselves and had not Christ the Son of Righteousness enlightned them they would have continued in that lost and blind condition to this very day But our Saviour having on his Cross Triumph'd over Principalities and Powers and perfectly conquered the Devil who before had rul'd effectually in the Heathen World and being ascended into Heaven and sat down at the Right Hand of the Father on the day of Pentecost he sent down the Holy Ghost on his Apostles and Disciples who were then assembled at Jerusalem enduing them thereby with the Gift of Tongues and working Miracles and both commissionating and fitting them for the Propagation of his Church and Kingdom who having received this Power and Authority from on high went forth Preaching the Gospel First to the Jews and then
Diocess as also but one Church where they all usually met do not unavoidably reduce this Bishoprick to the Circumference of a modern Parish I leave every Man to judge § 10. The next Diocess to be considered is Carthage which next to Rome and Alexandria was the greatest City in the World and probably had as many Christians in it as either especially if that is true which Tertullian insinuates that the tenth part thereof was Christian for he remonstrates to Scapula the Persecuting President of that City that if he should destroy the Christians of Carthage he must root out the Tenth part thereof But yet how many soever the Christians of that Bishoprick were even some years after Tertullian's days they were no more in number than there are now in our Parishes as is evident from Scores of Passages in the Writings of Cyprian Bishop of that Church For 1. The Bishop of that Diocess could know every one therein 2. The Bishop of that Diocess was the common Curator of all the Poor therein relieving the Poor and Indigent paying of their Debts and aiding the necessitous Tradesmen with Money to set up their Trades As Cyprian when he was in his exil'd State sent Caldonius Herculanus Rogatianus and Numidicus to his Church at Carthage to pay off the Debts of the indebted Members thereof and to help those poor Mechanicks with a convenient Sum of Mony who were willing to set up their Trades If Cyprian's Diocess had consisted of scores of Parishes how many Thousand Pounds must he have expended to have paid off the Debts of all the insolvent Persons therein and to have 〈◊〉 every poor Trader with a sufficient Stock to carry on his Employment 3. All the Diocess was present when the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper was administred So saith Cyprian We celebrate the Sacrament the whole Brotherhood being present 4. When Celerinus was ordained Lector or Clerk by Cyprian he Read from the Pulpit so that All the People could see and hear him 5. In all Ordinations all the People were consulted and none were admitted into Holy Orders without their Approbation as is assured by Cyprian Bishop of this Diocess who tells us that it was his constant custom in all Ordinations to consult his People and with their common Counsel to weigh the merits of every Candidate of the Sacred Orders And therefore when for extraordinary Merits he advanced one to the Degree of a Lector or Clerk without first communicating it to his Diocess he writes from his Exil'd State to his whole Flock the Reason of it 6. When that See was vacant all the People met together to chuse a Bishop Whence Pontius says that Cyprian was elected Bishop of this Diocess by the favour of the people And Cyprian himself acknowledges that he was chosen by the Suffrage of all his People 7. All the People of this Diocess could meet together to send Letters to other Churches an instance whereof we have in that gratulatory Letter still extant in Cyprian which they all sent to Lucius Bishop of Rome on his Return from Exile 8. All the People were present at Church-Censures and concurred at the Excommunication of Offenders Thus Cyprian writing from his Exile to the People of this his Diocess about the Irregularities of two of his Subdeacons and one of his Acolyths and about the Schism of Felicissimus assures them that as to the former when ever it should please God to return him in Peace it should be determined by him and his Colleagues and his whole Flock And as to the latter that then likewise that should be transacted according to the Arbitrament of the People and the common Counsel of them all 9. At the Absolution of Penitents all the People were present who examined the Reality of the Offender's Repentance and if well satisfied of it consented that they should be admitted to the Churches Peace Therefore when some Presbyters in a time of Persecution had with too great 〈◊〉 and Precipitancy assoyled some of those that through the Violence of the Persecution had succumbed Cyprian writes them from his Exile an objurgatory Letter commanding them to admit no more till Peace should be restored to the Church when those Offenders should plead their Cause before all the People And touching the same matter he writes in another place to all the People of his Diocess that when it should please God to restore Peace to the Church then all those matters should be examined in their Presence and be judged by them Lastly Nothing was done in this Diocess without the Consent of the People So resolved Bishop Cyprian from the first time I was made Bishop said he I determined to do nothing without the consent of my People And accordingly when he was exil'd from his Flock he writ to the Clergy and Laity thereof that when it should please God to return him unto them all Affairs as their mutual Honour did require should be debated in common by them Now whether all these Observations do not evidently reduce the Diocess of Carthage to the same Bulk with our Parishes I leave to every one to 〈◊〉 For my part I must needs profess that I cannot imagin how all the People thereof could receive the Sacrament together assist at the Excommunication and Absolution of Offenders assemble together to elect their Bishop and do the rest of those forementioned particulars without confining this Bishoprick within the Limits of a particular Congregation § 11. As for the Diocess of Alexandria though the numbers of the Christians therein were not so many but that in the middle of the Fourth Century they could all or at least most of them meet together in one place as I might evince from the Writings of Athanasius were it not beyond my prescribed time yet in the third Century they had divided themselves into several distinct and separate Congregations which were all subjected to one Bishop as is clearly enough asserted by Dyonisius Bishop of this Church who mentions the distinct Congregations in the extremest Suburbs of the City The Reason whereof seems to be this Those Members of this Bishoprick who lived in the remotest parts of it finding it incommodious and troublesom every Lord's Day Saturday Wednesday and Friday on which days they always assembled to go to their one usual Meeting-place which was very far from their own Homes and withal being unwilling to divide themselves from their old Church and Bishop lest they should seem guilty of the detestable Sin of Schism which consisted in a Causeless Separation from their Bishop and Parish Church as shall be hereafter shewn desired their proper Bishop to give them leave for Conveniency sake to Erect near their own Habitations a Chappel of Ease which should be a Daughter-Church to the Bishops under his Jurisdiction and guided by a Presbyter of his Commission and Appointment whereat they would
usually meet tho' on some Solemn Occasions they would still all assemble in one Church with their one Bishop That for this Reason these separate Congregations were introduced at Alexandria seems evident enough because Dyonisius Alexandrinus saith that these distinct Congregations were only in the remotest Suburbs and the Christians hereof were not as yet arrived to those great numbers but that seventy years after they could meet all together in one and the same place as might be proved from that forementioned place of Athanasius So that these distinct Congregations were only for the Conveniency and Ease of those who lived at a great distance from the Bishop's Church being introduced in the third Century and peculiar to the Bishoprick of Alexandria All other Bishopricks confining themselves within their Primitive Bounds of a single Congregation as we have before proved the largest of them did even Antioch Rome and Carthage § 12. If then a Bishoprick was but a single Congregation it is no marvel that we find Bishops not only in Cities but in Country Villages there being a Bishop constituted where-ever there were Believers enough to form a competent Congregation For says Clemens Romanus the Apostles going forth and preaching both in Country and City constituted Bishops and Deacons there Much to which purpose Cyprian says That Bishops were ordained throughout all Provinces and Cities Hence in the Encyclycal Epistle of the Synod of Antioch it is said That Paulus Samosatenus had many Flatterers amongst the adjacent City and Country Bishops of this sort of Country-Bishops was Zoticus Bishop of the Village of Comane And we may reasonably believe That many of those Bishops who in the Year 258 were assembled at Carthage to the number of fourscore and seven had no other than obscure Villages for their Seats since we find not the least notice of them in Ptolomy or any of the old Geographers § 13. But let the Bishops Seats have been in any place whatever their Limits as hath been proved exceeded not those of our Modern Parishes I do not here mean as was said before that the Territory of some of them was no larger no I readily grant that for it is very probable that in those places where there were but few Believers the Christians for several Miles round met all 〈◊〉 at the greatest place within that Compass where probably there were most Christians whence both the Church and its Bishop took their Denomination from that Place where they so assembled But this is what I mean that there were no more Christians in that Bishoprick than there are now in our ordinary Parishes and that the Believers of that whole Territory met altogether with their Bishop for the Performance of Religious Services Thus it was in the Age and Country of Justin Martyr who describing their solemn Assemblies writes That on Sunday all the Inhabitants both of City and Country met together where the Lector read some Portions of the Holy Scriptures and the Bishop preached unto them administred the Eucharist and sent by the Deacons part of the Consecrated Elements to those that were absent So that the Inhabitants both of City and Country assembled all at the Bishop's Church hearing him and communicating with him following herein the Exhortation of Saint Ignatius to the Magnesians Let nothing saith he be in you that may divide you but be united to the Bishop and those that preside over you As therefore our Lord Jesus Christ did nothing without his Father neither by himself nor his Apostles so do you nothing without the Bishop and Presbyters but assemble into one Place and have one Prayer one Supplication one Mind and one Hope CHAP. III. § 1. What the Bishop's Office was § 2. Always Resident on his Cure § 3. How the Bishop was Chosen Elected or Presented by the Majority of the Parish § 4. Approved by the neighbouring Bishops § 5. Installed by Imposition of Hands How many Bishops necessary to this Installment § 6. When a Bishop was promoted he certified it to other Bishops § 7. A brief Recapitulation of the peculiar Acts of the Bishop § 1. THE Bishop's Flock having been so largely discussed it will now be necessary to speak something of the Bishop's Duty towards them and of the several Particulars of his honourable Office I shall not here be tedious since about this there is no great difference only briefly enumerate the several Actions belonging to his Charge In brief therefore the particular Acts of his Function were such as these viz. Preaching of the Word Praying with his People administring the two Sacraments of Baptism and the Lord's Supper taking care of the Poor Ordaining of Ministers Governing his Flock Excommunicating of Offenders Absolving of Penitents and in a word whatever Acts can be comprised under those three General Heads of Preaching Worship and Government were parts of the Bishop's Function and Office I have but just named these things because they are not much controverted and my Design leads me chiefly to the Consideration of those matters which have been unhappily disputed amongst us § 2. To the constant Discharge of those forementioned Actions did the Primitive Bishops sedulously apply themselves continually preaching unto their People praying with them and watching over them and to that end residing always with them which Incumbency or Residency on their Parishes was deem'd so necessary that Cyprian enumerating the Sins that brought the Wrath of God upon the Churches in that bloody Persecution of Decius mentions the Bishops Non-Residencies as one Their leaving their Rectories and deserting their Flocks and wandring about the Country to hunt after Worldly Gain and Advantage And therefore the said Cyprian writing to the Roman Consessors who were inveigled into the Schism of Novatian tells them that since he could not leave his Church and come in Person unto them therefore by his Letters he most earnestly exhorted them to quit that 〈◊〉 Faction so that he look'd on his Obligation of Residency at his Church to be so binding as that in no Case almost could he warrant the leaving of it which Determination of his might be the more fix'd and peremptory because that not long before he was so severely tax'd by the Roman Clergy and by many of his own Parish for departing from them for a while though it was to avoid the Fury of his Persecutors who had already proscribed him and would have executed him as a Malesactor had he not by that Recess from his Church escaped their murderous Hand So that the Primitive Apostolick Bishops constantly resided with their Flocks conscientiously applying themselves with the utmost Diligence and Industry to the Promotion of the Spiritual Welfare of those that were committed to their trust employing themselves in all Acts of Piety and Offices of Charity so leading a laborious and mortified Life till either a natural or a violent Death
of the Bishop We have proved that there was but one Bishop to a Church and one Church to a Bishop we have shewn the Bishop's Office and Function Election and Ordination what farther to add on this Head I know not For as for those other Acts which he performed jointly with his Flock we must refer them to another place till we have handled those other Matters which previously propose themselves unto us The first of which will be an Examination into the Office and Order of a Presbyter which because it will be somewhat long shall be the Subject of the following Chapter CHAP. IV. § 1. The Definition and Description of a Presbyter what he was § 2. Inferior to a Bishop in Degree § 3. But equal to a Bishop in Order § 4. The Reason why there were many Presbyters in a Church § 5. Presbyters not necessary to the Constitution of a Church § 6. When Presbyters began § 1. IT will be both needless and tedious to endeavour to prove that the Ancients generally mention Presbyters distinct from Bishops Every one I suppose will readily own and acknowledge it The great Question which hath most deplorably sharpned and sour'd the Minds of too many is what the Office and Order of a Presbyter was About this the World hath been and still is most uncharitably divided some equalize a Presbyter in every thing with a Bishop others as much debase him each according to their particular Opinions either advance or degrade him In many Controversies a middle way hath been the safest perhaps in this the Medium between the two Extremes may be the truest Whether what I am now going to say be the true 〈◊〉 of the Matter I leave to the Learned Reader to determin I may be deceived neither mine Years nor Abilities exempt me from Mistakes and Errors But this I must needs say That after the most diligent Researches and impartialest Enquiries The following Notion seems to me most plausible and most consentaneous to Truth and which with a great facility and clearness solves those Doubts and Objections which according to those other Hypotheses I know not how to answer But yet however I am not so wedded and bigotted to this Opinion but if any shall produce better and more convincing Arguments to the contrary I will not contentiously defend but readily relinquish it since I search after Truth not to promote a particular Party or Interest Now for the better Explication of this Point I shall first lay down a Definition and Description of a Presbyter and then prove the parts thereof Now the Definition of a Presbyter may be this A Person in Holy Orders having thereby an inherent Right to perform the whole Office of a Bishop but being possessed of no Place or Parish not actually discharging it without the Permission and Consent of the Bishop of a Place or Parish But lest this Definition should seem obscure I shall 〈◊〉 it by this following Instance As a Curate hath the same Mission and Power with the Minister whose Place he supplies yet being not the Minister of that place he cannot perform there any acts of his Ministerial Function without leave from the Minister thereof So a Presbyter had the same Order and Power with a Bishop whom he assisted in his Cure yet being not the Bishop or Minister of that Cure he could not there perform any parts of his Pastoral Office without the permission of the Bishop thereof So that what we generally render Bishops Priests and Deacons would be more intelligible in our Tongue if we did express it by Rectors Vicars and Deacons by Rectors understanding the Bishops and by Vicars the Presbyters the former being the actual Incumbents of a Place and the latter Curates or Assistants and so different in Degree but yet equal in Order Now this is what I understand by a Presbyter for the Confirmation of which these two things are to be proved I. That the Presbyters were the Bishops Curates and Assistants and so inferiour to them in the actual Exercise of their Ecclesiastical Commission II. That yet notwithstanding they had the same inherent Right with the Bishops and so were not of a distinct specifick Order from them Or more briefly thus 1. That the Presbyters were different from the Bishops in gradu or in degree but yet 2. They were equal to them in Ordine or in Order § 2. As to the first of these That Presbyters were but the Bishops Curates and Assistants inferiour to them in Degree or in the actual Discharge of their Ecclesiastical Commission This will appear to have been in effect already proved if we recollect what has been asserted touching the Bishop and his Office That there was but one Bishop in a Church That he usually performed all the parts of Divine Service That he was the general Disposer and Manager of all things within his Diocess there being nothing done there without his Consent and Approbation To which we may particularly add 1. That without the Bishop's leave a Presbyter could not baptize Thus saith Tertullian The Bishop hath the Right of Baptizing then the Presbyters and Deacons but yet for the Honour of the Church not without the Authority of the Bishop and to the same Effect saith Ignatius It is not lawful for any one to baptize except the Bishop permit him 2. Without the Bishop's permission a Presbyter could not administer the Lord's Supper That Eucharist says Ignatius is only valid which is performed by the Bishop or by whom he shall permit for it is not lawful for any one to celebrate the Eucharist without leave from the Bishop 3. Without the Bishops Consent a Presbyter could not preach and when he did preach he could not chuse his own Subject but discoursed on those Matters which were enjoyned him by the Bishop as the Bishop commanded Origen to preach about the Witch of Endor 4. Without the Bishop's Permission a Presbyter could not absolve Offenders therefore Cyprian severely chides some of his Presbyters because they dared in his absence without his Consent and Leave to give the Church's Peace to some offending Criminals But what need I reckon up particulars when in general there was no Ecclesiastical Office performed by the Presbyters without the Consent and Permission of the Bishop So says Ignatius Let nothing be done of Ecclesiastical Concerns without the Bishop for Whosoever doth any thing without the knowledge of the Bishop is a Worshipper of the Devil Now had the Presbyters had an equal Power in the Government of those Churches wherein they lived how could it have been impudent and usurping in them to have perform'd the particular acts of their Ecclesiastical Function without the Bishop's Leave and Consent No it was not fit or just that any one should preach or govern in a Parish without the permission of the Bishop or Pastor thereof for where Churches had been regularly formed under the Jurisdiction of their proper Bishops it
according to the Process or next station of Glory be admitted into the Presbytery for Glory differs from Glory till they increase to a perfect man Now in this Passage there are two things which manifest that there were but two Ecclesiastical Orders viz. Bishops and Deacons or Presbyters and Deacons the first is that he says that those Orders were resembled by the Angelick Orders Now the Scripture mentions but two Orders of Angels viz. Archangels and Angels the Archangels presiding over the Angels and the Angels obeying and attending on the Archangels According to this resemblance therefore there must be but Two Ecclesiastical Orders in the Church which are Bishops or 〈◊〉 byters presiding and governing with the Deacons attending and obeying The other part of this Passage which proves but two Ecclesiastical Orders is his likening of them to the progressive Glory of the Saints who at the Judgment Day shall be caught up in the Clouds and there shall first as Deacons attend and wait on Christ's Judgment-Seat and then when the Judgment is over shall have their Glory perfected in being placed on the Celestial Thrones of that Sublime Presbytery where they shall for ever be blest and happy So that there were only the two Orders of Deacons and Presbyters the former whereof being the inseriour Order never sat at their 〈◊〉 Conventions but like Servants stood and waited on the latter who sat down on 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Seats in the form of a Semicircle whence they are frequently called Consessus Presbyterii Or the Session of the Presbytery in which Session he that was more peculiarly the Bishop or Minister of the Parish sat at the Head of the Semicircle on a Seat somewhat elevated above those of his Colleagues as Cyprian calls them and so was distinguished from them by his Priority in the same Order but not by his being of another Order Thus the foresaid Clemens Alexandrinus distinguishes the Bishop from the Presbyters by his being advanced to the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the first Seat in the Presbytery not by his sitting in a different Seat from them For thus he writes He is in truth a Presbyter of the Church and a Minister of the Will of God who does and teaches the things of the Lord not ordained by Men or esteemed just because a Presbyter but because just therefore received into the 〈◊〉 who although he be not honoured with the first Seat on Earth yet shall hereafter sit down on the Twenty and Four Thrones mentioned in the Revelations judging the People So that both Bishops and Presbyters were Members of the same Presbytery only the Bishop was advanced to the first and chiefest Seat therein which is the very same with what I come now from proving viz. That Bishops and Presbyters were Equal in Order but Different in Degree That the former were the Ministers of their respective Parishes and the latter their Curates or Assistants Whether this hath been fully proved or whether the precedent Quotations do naturally conclude the Premises the Learned Reader will easily determine I am not conscious that I have stretched any Words beyond their natural Signification having deduced from them nothing but what they fairly imported If I am mistaken I hope I shall be pardoned since I did it not designedly or voluntarily As before so now I profess again that if any one shall be so kind and obliging to give me better Information I shall thankfully and willingly acknowledge and quit mine Error but till that Information be given and the falsity of my present Opinion be evinc'd which after the impartialest and narrowest Enquiry I see not how it can be done I hope no one will be offended that I have asserted the Equality or Identity of the Bishops and Presbyters as to Order and their difference as to Preeminency or Degree § 4. Now from this Notion of Presbyters there evidently results the Reason why there were many of them in one Church even for the same Intent and End tho' more necessary and needful that Curates are now to those Ministers and Incumbents whom they serve it was found by Experience that variety of Accidents and Circumstances did frequently occur both in times of Peace and Persecution the Particulars whereof would be needless to enumerate that disabled the Bishops from attending on and discharging their Pastoral Office therefore that such Vacancies might be supplied and such Inconveniencies remedied they entertained Presbyters or Curates who during their Absence might supply their Places who also were helpful to them whilst they were present with their Flocks to counsel and advise them whence Bishop Cyprian assures us that he did all things by the Common Council of his Presbyters Besides this in those early days of Christianity Churches were in most places thin and at a great distance from one another so that if a Bishop by any Disaster was Incapacitated for the Discharge of his Function it would be very difficult to get a neighbouring Bishop to assist him To which we may also add that in those times there were no publick Schools or Universities except we say the Catechetick Lecture at Alexandria was one for the breeding of young Ministers who might succeed the Bishops as they died wherefore the Bishops of every Church took care to instruct and elevate some young Men who might be prepared to come in their place when they were dead and gone And thus for these and the like Reasons most Churches were furnished with a competent number of Presbyters who helpt the Bishops while living and were fitted to succeed them when dead § 5. I say only most Churches were furnished with Presbyters because all were not especially those Churches which were newly planted where either the Numbers or Abilities of the Belîevers were small and inconsiderable Neither indeed were Presbyters Essential to the Constitution of a Church a Church might be without them as well as a Parish can be without a 〈◊〉 now it was sufficient that they had a Bishop a Presbyter was only necessary for the easing of the Bishop in his Office and to be qualified for the succeeding him in his Place and Dignity after his Death For as 〈◊〉 writes Where there are no Presbyters the Bishop alone administers the two Sacraments of the Lord's Supper and Baptism § 6. As for the time when Presbyters began to me it seems plain that their Office was even in the Apostolick Age tho' by their Names they were not distinguished from Bishops till sometime after The first Author now extant who distinctly mentions Bishops and Presbyters is Ignatius Bishop of Antioch who lived in the beginning of the Second Century But without doubt before his time even in the days of the Apostles where Churches increased or were somewhat large there were more in Holy Orders than the Bishops of those Churches We read in the New Testament of the Bishops of Ephesus Acts 20. 28. and Philippi Philip. 1. 1. which
must be understood of what was afterwards distinctly called Bishops and Presbyters So likewise we read in St. Timothy 1 Tim. 4. 14. of a Presbytery which in all the Writings of the Fathers for any thing I can find to the contrary perpetually signifies the Bishop and Presbyters of a particular Church or Parish And to this 〈◊〉 may add what Clemens Alexandrinus Reports of St. John that he went into the neighbouring Provinces of Ephesus Partly that he might constitute Bishops partly that he might plant new Churches and partly that he might appoint such in the number of the Clergy as should be commanded him by the Holy Ghost Where by the Word Clergy being oppos'd to Bishops and so consequently different from them must be understood either Deacons alone or which is far more probable Presbyters and Deacons CHAP. V. § 1. The Order and Office of the Deacons § 2. Subdeacons what § 3. Of Acolyths Exorcists and Lectors thro' those Offices the Bishops gradually ascended to their Episcopal Dignity § 4. Of Ordination First of Deacons § 5. Next of Presbyters 〈◊〉 Candidates for that Office presented themselves to the Presbytery of the Parish where they were Ordained § 6. By them examined about 〈◊〉 Qualifications viz. Their Age. § 7. Their Condition in the World § 8. Their Conversation § 9. And their Vnderstanding Humane Learning needful § 10. Some Inveighed against Humane Learning but condemned by Clemens Alexandrinus § 11. Those that were to be Ordain'd Presbyters generally pass'd thro' the Inferiour Offices § 12. When to be ordained propounded to the People for their Attestation § 13. Ordain'd in but not to a particular Church § 14. Ordain'd by the Imposition of Hands of the Presbytery § 15. The Conclusion of the first Particular concerning the Peculiar Acts of the Clergy § 1. NExt to the Presbyters were the Deacons concerning whose Office and Order I shall say very little since there is no great Controversie about it and had it not been to have rendred this Discourse compleat and entire I should in silence have pass'd it over Briefly therefore their original Institution as in 〈◊〉 6. 2. was to serve Tables which included these two things A looking after the Poor and an attendance at the Lord's Table As for the Care of the Poor Origen tells us that the Deacons dispensed to them the Churches Money being employed under the Bishop to inspect and relieve all the Indigent within their Diocese As for their Attendance at the Lord's Table their Office with respect to that consisted in preparing the Bread and Wine in cleansing the Sacramental Cups and other such like necessary things whence they are called by Ignatius Deacons of Meats and Cups assisting also in some places at least the Bishop or Presbyters in the Celebration of the Eucharist delivering the Elements to the Communioants They also preached of which more in another place and in the Absence of the Bishop and Presbyters baptized In a word according to the signification of their Name they were as Ignatius calls them the Churches Servants set apart on purpose to serve God and attend on their Business being constituted as Eusebius terms it for the Service of the Publick § 2. Next to the Deacons were the Subdencons who are mentioned both by Cyprian and Cornelius As the Office of the Presbyters was to assist and help the Bishops so theirs was to assist and help the Deacons And as the Presbyters were of the same Order with the Bishop so probably the Subdeacons were of the same Order with the Deacons which may be gathered from what we may suppose to have been the Origin and Rise of these Subdeacons which might be this That in no Church whatsoever was it usual to have more than Seven Deacons because that was the original Number instituted by the Apostles wherefore when any Church grew so great and numerous that this stinted Number of Deacons was not sufficient to discharge their necessary Ministrations that they might not seem to swerve from the Apostolical Example they added Assistants to the Deacons whom they called Subdeacons or Under Deacons who were employed by the Head or Chief Deacons to do those Services in their stead and room to which by their Office they were obliged But whether this be a sufficient Argument to prove the Subdeacons to be of the same Order with the Deacons I shall not determine because this Office being now antiquated it is not very pertinent to my Design I only offer it to the Consideration of the Learned who have Will and Ability to search into it § 3. Besides those forementioned Orders who were immediately consecrated to the Service of God and by him commission'd thereunto there were another sort of Ecclesiasticks who were employed about the meaner Offices of the Church such as Acolyths Exorcists and Lectors whose Offices because they are now disused except that of the Lector I shall pass over in silence reserving a Discourse of the Lector for another place only in general these were Candidates for the Ministry who by the due discharge of these meaner Employs were to give Proof of their Ability and Integrity the Bishops in those days not usually arriving per Saltum to that Dignity and Honour but commonly beginning with the most inferiour Office and so gradually proceeding thro' the others till they came to the supreme Office of all as Cornelius Bishop of Rome Did not presently leap into the Episcopal Throne but first passed thro' all the Ecclesiastical Offices gradually ascending to that Sublime Dignity The Church in those happy days by such a long Tryal and Experience using all possible Precaution and Exactness that none but fit and qualify'd Men should be admitted into those Sacred Functions and Orders which were attended with 〈◊〉 dreadful and tremendous a Charge And this now brings me in the next place to enquire into the Manner and Form of the Primitive Ordinations which I chuse to discourse of in this place since I shall find none more proper for it throughout this whole Treatise § 4. As for the various Senses and Acceptations which may be put on the Word Ordination I shall not at all meddle with them that Ordination that I shall speak of is this the Grant of a Peculiar Commission and Power which remains indelible in the Person to whom it is committed and can never be obliterated or rased out except the Person himself cause it by his Heresie Apostacy or most extremely gross and scandalous Impiety Now this sort of Ordination was conferred only upon Deacons and Presbyters or on Deacons and Bishops Presbyters and Bishops being here to be consider'd as all one as Ministers of the Church-Universal As for the Ordination of Deacons there is no great Dispute about that so I shall say no more concerning it than that we have the manner thereof at their first Institution in Acts 6. 6. which was that they were
not the Bishop without the People nor the People without the Bishop but both conjunctly constituted that Supreme Tribunal which censured Delinquents and Transgressors as will be evident from what follows All the Power that any Church-Court exerted was derived from that Promife and Commission of Christ in Matth. 16. 18 19. Thou art Peter and upon this Rock will I build my Church and the Gates of Hell shall not prevail against it And I will give unto thee the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven and whatsoever thou shalt bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven whatsoever thou shalt loose on Earth shall be loosed in Heaven Now this Power some of the Ancients mention as given to the Bishops Thus Origen writes That the Bishops applyed to themselves this Promise that was made to Peter teaching That they had received the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven from our Saviour that so whatsoever was bound that is condemned by them on Earth was bound in Heaven and whatsoever was loosed by them was also loosed in Heaven which says he may be Orthodoxly enough applyed to them if they hold Peter's Confession and are such as the Church of Christ may be built upon And so also says Cyprian The Church is founded upon the Bishops by whom every Ecclesiastical Action is governed Others of the Ancients mention this Power as given to the whole Church according to that in Matth. 18. 15 16 17 18. If thy Brother shall trespass against thee go and tell him his Fault between thee and him 〈◊〉 if he shall hear thee thou hast gained thy 〈◊〉 but if he will not hear thee take with thee one or two more that in the mouth of two or three Witnesses every Word may be established and if he shall neglect them tell it unto the Church but if he neglect to hear the Church let him be unto thee as an Heathen and a Publican Verily I say unto you Whatsoever ye shall bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven and whatsoever ye shall loose on Earth shall be loosed in Heaven By the Church here is to be understood the whole Body of a particular Church or Parish unto which some of the Fathers attribute the Power of the Keys as Tertullian If thou fearest Heaven to be shut remember the Lord gave its Keys to Peter and by him to the Church And Firmilian The Power of remitting Sins is given to the Apostles and to the Churches which they constituted and to the Bishops who succeeded them Now from this different attribution of the Power of the Keys we may infer this That it was so lodged both in Bishops and People as that each had some share in it The Bishop had the whole Executive and part of the Legislative Power and the People had a part in the Legislative tho' not in the Executive As for the Executive Power by which I understand the formal Pronunciation of Suspensions and Excommunications the Imposition of Hands in the Absolution of Penitents and such like that could be done by none but by the Bishop or by Persons in Holy Orders Deputed and Commission'd by him as the Sequel will evince But as for the Legislative Decretive or Judicatorial Power that 〈◊〉 both to Clergy and Laity who conjunctly made up that Supreme Consistorial Court which was in every Parish before which all Offenders were tried and if found Guilty sentenced and condemned Now that the Clergy were Members of this Ecclesiastical Court is a thing so evidently known and granted by all as that it would be superfluous to heap up many Quotations to prove it so that I shall but just confirm it after I have proved that which may seem more strange and that is That the Laity were Members thereof and Judges therein being Sharers with the Clergy in the Judicial Power of the Spiritual Court And this will most evidently appear by the consideration of these following Testimonies The first shall be out of that place of Clemens Romanus where he writes Who will say according to the Example of Moses If Seditions Contentions and Schisms are hapned because of me I will depart I will go wheresoever you please and I will do what are enjoyned me by the People so the Church of Christ be in Peace So Origen describes a Criminal as appearing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Before the whole Church And Dyonisius Bishop of Alexandria in his Letter to Fabius Bishop of Antioch speaks of one Serapion that had fallen in the Times of Persecution who had several times appeared before the Church to beg their Pardon but no one did ever take any notice of him But Cyprian is most full in this matter as when two Subdeacons and an Acolyth of his Parish had committed some great Misdemeanors he professes that he himself was not a sufficient Judge of their Crimes but they ought to be tried by all the People And concerning Felicissimus the 〈◊〉 he writes to his People from his Exile that if it pleased God he would come to them after Easter and then that Affair should be adjusted according to their Arbitrement and Common Counsel And in another place he condemns the rash Precipitation of some of his Presbyters in admitting the Lapsed to Communion because of some Pacificatory Libels obtained from the Confessors and charges them to admit no more till Peace was restored to the Church and then they should plead their Cause before the Clergy and before all the People And concerning the same matter he writes in another Letter to the People of his Parish That when it should please God to restore Peace to the Church and reduce him from his Exile that then it should be examined in their Presence and according to their Judgment So that the Consistory Court was composed of the People as well as of the Bishop each of whom had a negative Voice therein On one side the Bishop could do nothing without the People So when several returned from the Schism of Fortunatus and Bishop Cyprian was willing to receive them into the Churches Peace he complains of the unwillingness of his People to admit them and the great difficulties he had to obtain their Consent as he thus describes it in his Letter to Cornelius Bishop of Rome O my dear Brother if you could be present with me when those Men return from their Schism you would wonder at what pains I take to perswade our Brethren to be patient that laying aside their Grief of Mind they would consent to the healing and receiving of those that are sick I can scarce 〈◊〉 yea I extort a Grant from my People that such 〈◊〉 received to Communion And on the other side the People could do dothing without the Bishop as when one of the three Bishops that 〈◊〉 Ordained Novatian came back to the Church and desired admission the People alone could not receive him without the Consent of the Bishop 〈◊〉 for else they would
since it was decreed by an African Synod that every one's Cause should be heard where the Crime was committed because that to every Pastor was committed a particular Portion of Christ's Flock which he was particularly to rule and govern and to render an account thereof unto the Lord. And so another African Synod that decreed the Rebaptization of those that were Baptized by Hereticks thus conclude their Synodical Epistle to Pope Stephen who held the contrary Whereas we know that some Bishops will not relinquish an Opinion which they have embraced but keeping the Bond of Peace and Concord with their Colleagues will retain some proper and peculiar Sentiments which they have formerly received to these we offer no violence or prescribe any Law since every Bishop has in the administration of his Church free liberty to follow his own Will being to render an account of his Actions unto the Lord. After these two Synodical Determinations it might be thought needless to produce the single Testimony of Cyprian but that it shews us not only the practice of the Bishops of his Age but also of their Predecessors Amongst the ancient Bishops of our Province saith he some thought that no Peace was to be given to Adulterers for ever excluding them from the Communion of the Church but yet they did not leave their Fellow-Bishops or for this break the Vnity of the Catholick Church and those that gave Peace to Adulterers did not therefore separate from those that did not but still retaining the Bond of Concord every Bishop disposed and directed his own Acts rendring an account of them unto the Lord. Thus every Church was in this Sense independent that is without the Concurrence and Authority of any other Church it had a sufficient Right and Power in its self to punish and chastise all its delinquent and offending Members § 2. But yet in another Sense it was dependent as considered with other Churches as part of the Church Universal There is but one Church of Christ saith Cyprian divided through the whole World into many Members and one Episcopacy diffused through the numerous Concord of many Bishops A Particular Church was not the whole Church of Christ but only a Part or Member of the Universal one and as one Member of the natural Body hath a regard to all the other Members thereof so a particular Church which was but one Member of the Universal had relation and respect to the other Members thereof Hence tho' the Labours and Inspections of the Bishops were more peculiarly confined to their own Parishes yet as Ministers of the Church Universal they employed a general kind of Inspection over other Churches also observing their Condition and Circumstances and giving unto them an account of their own state and posture as Cyprian inspected that of Arles giving this as his Reason for it that altho' they were many Pastors yet they were but one Flock and they ought to congregate and cherish all the Sheep which Christ redeemed by his Blood and Passion And the Clergy of the Church of Rome thanked Cyprian that he had acquainted them with the state of the Church in Africa for say they We ought all of us to take care of the Body of the whole Church whose Members are distended through various Provinces If the Bishop of one Church had any difficult Point to determine he sent to another Bishop for his Advice and Decision thereof As when Dyonisius Bishop of Alexandria had a critical Cause to determine he sent to Xystus Bishop of Rome to know his Opinion and Counsel therein And so when there was some difference at Carthage about the Pacificatory Libels of the Martyrs Cyprian writ to the Church of Rome for their Advice therein For saith he Dearly beloved Brethren both common Reason and Love require that none of these things that are transacted here should be kept from your Knowledge but that we should have your Counsel about Ecclesiastical Administrations In these and in many other such like Cases which would be needless to enumerate there was a Correspondence between the particular Churches of the Universal one § 3. But that that chiefly deserves our 〈◊〉 was their Intercourse and Government by Synodical Assemblies that is by a Convocation of Bishops Presbyters Deacons and Deputed Lay-men of several particular Churches who frequently met together to maintain Unity Love and Concord to advise about their common Circumstances and Conditions to regulate all Ecclesiastical or Church-Affairs within their respective Limits and to manage other such like things of which I shall more largely treat in the end of this Chapter That which must be spoken of in this Section is the several kinds or sorts of Synods the most august and supreme kind whereof was an Universal or 〈◊〉 Synod which was a Congregation of the Bishops and Deputies of as many Churches as would please to come from all Parts of the World Of this sort I find but one within my limited space of the first three Hundred Years after Christ and that was the Council of Antioch that condemned Paulus Samosatenus Or if this will not pass for a General Council there was no such one before that of Nice which was held Anno 325. and so there was no one of this kind within that time to which I am confined But those Synods which were very frequent within my prescribed time were Provincial Synods that is as many particular Churches as could conveniently and orderly associate themselves together and by their common Consent and Authority dispose and regulate all things that related to their Polity Unity Peace and Order What extent of Ground or how many particular Churches each of such Synods did contain cannot be determined their Precincts were not alike in all places but according as their Circumstances and Conveniencies would permit so they formed themselves into these Synodical Assemblies and were governed in common by those Synods who were called the Synods of such or such a Province As we read in Cyprian of the Province of Arles and the Bishops therein And Cyprian frequently speaks of the Bishops of his Province as the Bishops 2 in our Province and 3 throughout our Province and throughout the Province And tells us that his Province was very large and that it was the custom of his Province and almost all other Provinces that upon the Vacancy of a Parish the neighbouring Bishops of that Province should meet together at that Parish to Ordain them a new Bishop § 4. How often these Provincial Synods were convened is uncertain since that varied according to their Circumstances and their 〈◊〉 Customs Firmilian Bishop of Caesarea in Cappadocia writes that in his Province they met every Year And whosoever will consider the frequent Synods that are mentioned in Cyprian will find that in his Province they met at least once and sometimes twice or thrice a Year § 5. As for
of the Church And Cyprian writes that the Devil found out Heresies and Sehisms by which he might subvert the Faith corrupt the Truth and divide the Unity But now for Distinctions sake the Breach of this Unity was commonly called Heresie and the word Schism generally applyed to the Breach of the Churches Unity in another sense of which more in the other Sections § 4. If in the next place we consider the Word Church collectively as denoting a Collection of many particular Churches in which Sense it is once used in Cyprian Then its Unity may have consisted in a Brotherly correspondence with and affection toward each other which they demonstrated by all outward Expressions of Love and Concord as by receiving to Communion the Members of each other as Irenaeus mentions was observ'd between the Churches of Rome and Asia in mutually advising and assisting one another by Letters or otherwise of which there are frequent instances in the Ancients and especially in Cyprian's Epistles and in manifesting all other Marks and Tokens of their Love and Concord Now this Unity was broken when Particular Churches clash'd with each other when from being possess'd with Spirits of Meekness Love and Charity they were inflamed with Hatred Rage and Fury against each other A sad Instance whereof we have in that Controversie betwixt Cyprian and Stephen or rather between the Churches of Europe and Africa touching the Validity of Heretical Baptism wherein those good Men were so far transported with Bitterness and Rancour against each other that they interchangeably gave such 〈◊〉 Language and invidious Epithets as are too odious to name which if the Reader be curious to know he may find too much of it in Cyprian's Epistles Or if several particular Churches had for the promotion of Peace Unity and Order regularly disposed themselves into a Synodical Government and Discipline as was always done when their Circumstances and Conveniencies would permit them then whoever broke or violated their reasonable Canons were censured as turbulent and factious as it hath been evidenced in the former Chapter and needs no farther Proof in this because that the Schism of the Ancients was not a Breach of the Churches Unity in this Sense viz. as denoting or signifying a Church Collective § 5. But Schism principally and originally respected a particular Church or Parish tho' it might consequentially influence others too Now the Unity of a particular Church consisted in the Members Love and Amity toward each other and in their due Subjection or Subordination to their Pastour or Bishop Accordingly the Breach of that Unity consisted in these two things either in a Hatred and Malice of each other or in a Rebellion against their Lawful Pastour or which is all one in a causeless Separation from their Bishop and those that adhered to him As for the first of these there might be Envies and Discords between the Inhabitants of a Parish without a formal Separation from Communion which Jars and Feuds were called Schism an Instance whereof we find in the Church of Corinth unto whom St. Paul objected in 1 Cor. 11. 18. When ye come together in the Church I hear that there be Divisions or as it is in the Original 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Schisms amongst you Here there was no separate Communion for they all came together in the Church and yet there were Schisms amongst them that is Strifes Quarrels and Discords And as far as I can perceive from the Epistle of Clemens Romanus which was writ to appease another Schism in the same Church of Corinth there were then only Turmoils and Differences without any actual Separation But on this I shall not enlarge because it is not what the Ancients ordinarily meant by Schism § 6. But that which they generally and commonly termed Schism was a Rebellion against or an ungrounded and causless Separation from their Lawful Pastour or their Parish-Church Now because I say that a causless Separation from their Bishop was Schism it will be necessary to know how many Causes could justifie the Peoples Desertion of their Pastour and these I think were two or at most three the first was Apostacy from the Faith or when a Bishop renounced the Christian Faith and through fear of Persecution embraced the Heathenish Idolatries as was done in the case of Martialis and Basilides two Spanish Bishops and was justified by an African Synod as is to be seen throughout their whole Synodical Epistle still extant amongst those of Cyprian's The second Cause was Heresie as Irenaeus saith We must fly far off from all Hereticks And Origen allows the People to separate from their Bishop if they could accuse him of false and 〈◊〉 Doctrine A third Cause was a scandalous and wicked Life as is asserted by an African Synod held Anno 258. whose Exhortations and Arguments to this purpose may be seen at large in their Synodical Epistle still extant in Cyprian Epist. 68. p. 200. out of which several Passages pertinent to this occasion have been already cited in the sixth Chapter of this Treatise to which I must refer the Reader Of this mind also was Irenaeus before them who writes That as for those Presbyters who serve their Pleasures and have not the fear of God before their Eyes who contumeliously use others are lifted up with Pride and secretly commit wickedness from 〈◊〉 such Presbyters we ought to separate Origen indeed seems to be of another mind and thinks that the Bishops Immorality in Life could not justifie his Parishes Separation He saith he that hath a care of his Soul will not be scandalized at my Faults who am his Bishop but considering my Doctrine and finding it agreeable to the Churches Faith from me indeed he will be averse but he will receive my Doctrine according to the Precept of the Lord which saith The Scribes and 〈◊〉 sit on Moses his Chair whatever therefore they say unto you hear and do but according unto their Works do not for they say and do not That Scripture is of me who teach what is good and do the contrary and sit upon the Chair of Moses as a Scribe or Pharisee the Precept is to thee O People if thou canst not accuse me of false Doctrine or Heretical Opinions but only beholdest my wicked and sinful Life thou must not square thy Life according to my Life but do those things which I speak Now whether Irenaeus or an African Synod or Origen be to be most credited I leave the Learned to judge tho' I think they may be both nearer reconciled than they seem to be Irenaeus and that Synod affirming that the People of their own Power and Authority might immediately without the concurrent Assent of other Churches upon the Immorality and Scandal of their Bishop leave and desert him Origen restraining the People from present Execution till they had the Authority of a Synod for so doing for thus he must be understood or else
whatsoever and therefore neither an African Synod nor Antonius an African Bishop would communicate with the Legates of Novatian Nor would Cornelius joyn in Communion with Felicissimus a Schismatick of Carthage when he came to Rome but as he was excluded from Communion in his own Church so likewise was he in that of Rome 2. It was the Custom when any Bishop was Elected to send News of his Promotion to other Bishops as Cornelius did to Cyprian that so he might have their Confirmation and their future Letters to the Bishop of that Church to which he was promoted might be directed unto him as Cyprian did unto Cornelius which Custom of sending Messengers to other Churches to acquaint them of their Advancement to the Episcopal Throne was also observed by the Schismaticks and in particular by Novatian who sent Maximus a Presbyter Augendus a Deacon Machaeus and Longinus unto Cyprian to inform him of his Promotion to the See of Rome Now if any Bishop or Church did knowingly approve the Pretensions of the Schismatical Bishop they broke the Concord of the Church and became guilty of Schism as may be gathered from the beginning of an Epistle of Cyprian's to Antonius an African Bishop wherein he writes him That he had received his Letter which firmly consented to the Concord of the Sacerdotal Colledge and adhered to the Catholick Church by which he had signified that he would not communicate with Novatian but hold an Agreement with Bishop Cornelius And therefore when Legates came to Cyprian both from Cornelius and Novatian he duly weighed who was legally Elected and finding Cornelius so to be he approved his Election Directed his Congratulatory Letters unto him refused to communicate with the Schismatical Messengers of Novatian and exhorted them to quit their Schism and to submit to their lawfully elected Bishop So that in these two respects the Schism of a particular Church might influence others also involving them in the same Crime creating Quarrels and Dissentions between their respective Bishops and so dividing the Dischargers of that Honourable Office whom God had made one for as Cyprian says As there is but one Church throughout the whole World divided into many Members so there is but one Bishoprick diffused through the agreeing Number of many Bishops § 11. But now that we may conclude this Chapter the Sum of all that hath been spoken concerning Schism is that Schism in its large Sense was a Breach of the Unity of the Church Universal but in its usual and restrained Sense of a Church Particular whosoever without any just reason through Faction Pride and Envy separated from his Bishop or his Parish Church he was a true Schismatick and whosoever was thus a Schismatick if we may believe Saint Cyprian He had no longer God for his Father nor the Church for his Mother but was out of the Number of the Faithful and though he should die for the Faith yet should he never be saved Thus much then shall serve for that Query concerning the Churches Unity The next and 〈◊〉 thing that is to be enquired into is the Worship of the Primitive Church that is the Form and Method of their Publick Services of Reading Singing Preaching Praying of Baptism Confirmation and the Lord's Supper of their Fasts and Feasts of their Rites and Ceremonies and such like which I thought to have annexed to this Treatise but this being larger than I expected and the Discourse relating to the Primitive Worship being like to be almost as large I have for this and 〈◊〉 other Reasons reserved it for a particular Tract by its self which if nothing prevents may be expos'd hereafter to publick View and Observation FINIS THE SECOND PART OF THE ENQUIRY INTO THE Constitution Discipline Unity Worship OF THE Primitive Church That Flourished within the First Three Hundred Years after CHRIST Faithfully Collected out of the Extant Writings of those Ages By an Impartial Hand LONDON Printed for Jonathan Robinson at the Golden Lyon and John Wyat at the Rose in St. Paul's Church-Yard 1691. The Second Part of the Enquiry into the Constitution Discipline Unity and Worship of the Primitive Church CHAP. I. § 1. Of the Publick Worship of the Primitive Church § 2. In their Assemblies they began with Reading the Scriptures Other Writings Read besides the Scriptures § 3. Who Read the Scriptures from whence they were Read and how they were Read § 4. Whether there were appointed Lessons § 5. After the 〈◊〉 of the Scriptures there followed Singing of Psalms § 6. What Psalms they Sung § 7. The manner of their Singing § 8. Of Singing Men and of Church Musick § 9. To Singing of Psalms succeeded Preaching On what the Preacher discoursed How long his Sermon was § 10. The Method of their Sermons § 11. Who Preached usually the Bishop or by his Permission any other either Clergyman or Layman § 1. HAving in a former Treatise enquired into the Constitution Discipline and Unity of the Primitive Church I intend in this to enquire into the Worship thereof which naturally divides its self into these Two Parts Into the Worship its self and Into the necessary Circumstances thereof as Time and Place and such like both which I design to handle beginning first with the Worship its self wherein I shall not meddle with the Object thereof since all Protestants agree in the Adoring God alone through Jesus Christ but only speak of those Particular Acts and Services whereby in the Publick Congregations we honour and adore Almighty God such as Reading of the Scriptures Singing of Psalms Preaching Praying and the Two Sacraments every one of which I shall consider in their Order as they were performed in the Ancient Parish Churches And First § 2. When the Congregation was assembled the first Act of Divine Service which they performed was the Reading of the Holy Scriptures In our Publick Assemblies says Tertullian The Scriptures are Read Psalms Sung Sermons Preached and Prayers presented So also Just in Martyr writes that in their Religious Assemblies first of all The Writings of the Prophets and Apostles were read But besides the Sacred Scriptures there were other Writings read in several Churches viz. The Epistles and Tracts of Eminent and Pious Men such as the Book of Hermas called Pastor and the Epistle of Clemens Romanus to the Church of Corinth which were read in the publick Congregations of many Churches § 3. He that read the Scriptures was particularly destinated to this Office as a Preparative to Holy Orders as Aurelius whom Cyprian design'd for a Presbyter was first to begin with the Office of reading The Name by which this Officer was distinguished was in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In Latin Lector both which signifie in English a Reader or as we now call him a Clark The Place from whence the Clark Read was an Eminency erected in the Church that so all
in claritate receptus in gloria venturus Salvator eorum qui salvantur Judex eorum qui 〈◊〉 mittens in ignem aeternum transfiguratores veritatis contemptores patris sui adventus ejus Irenaeus lib. 3. cap. 4. p 172. Regula est autem Fidei ut jam hinc quid credamus profitearur illa scilicet qua creditur unum omnino Deum esse 〈◊〉 alium praeter mundi creatorem qui universa de nihilo produxerit per verbum suum primo omnium amissum id verbum Filium ejus appellatum in nomine Dei varie visum Patriarchis in Prophetis semper auditum postremo delatum ex spiritu patris Dei virture in Virginem Matiam carnem factum in utero ejus ex ea natum egisse Jesum Christum exinde proedicasse novam legem novam promissionem Regni Coelorum virtutes fecisse fixum cruci tertia die resurrexisse in coelos ereptum sedere ad dexteram patris misisse vicariam vim spiritus sancti qui credentes agant venturum cum claritate ad sumendos sauctos in vitae eternae promissorum coelestium fructum ad 〈◊〉 judicandos igni perpetuo facta utriusque partis resuscitatione cum carnis 〈◊〉 Haec regula a Christo instituta nullas habet apud nos quaestiones nisi quas haereses 〈◊〉 quae haereticos faciunt 〈◊〉 de 〈◊〉 advers 〈◊〉 p. 73. Unicum quidem Deum credimus sub hac 〈◊〉 dispensatione quam 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dicimus ut unici Dei sit Filius Sermo ipsius qui ex ipso processerit per quem omnia facta sunt sine quo factum est nihil hunc missum a patre in Virginem ex ea natum hominem Deum filium hominis filium Dei cognominatum Jesum Christum hunc passum 〈◊〉 mortuum sepultum secundum scripturas resuscitatum a Patre in coelo resumptum sedere ad dexteram patris venturum judicare vivos 〈◊〉 qui exinde miserat secundum promissionem suam a patre spiritum sanctum Paracletum sanctificatorem fidei eorum qui credunt in patrem filium spiritum sanctum Hanc regulam ab initio Evangelii decucurrisse c. Tertul. advers Praxean p. 316. Regula Fidei una omnino est sola immobilis irreformabilis credendi scilicet in unicum Deum omnipotentem mundi conditorem 〈◊〉 ejus Jesum Christum natum ex Virgine Maria crucifixum sub Pontio Pilato tertio 〈◊〉 resuscitatum a mortuis receptum in coelis sedentem nunc ad dexteram patris venturum 〈◊〉 vivos mortuos per carnis etiam resurrectionem Tertullian de Virginib veland p. 385. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Origen Comment in 〈◊〉 Tom. 32. p. 397. Vol. 2. Unus Deus est qui omnia creavit atque composuit quique ex nullis fecit esse universa Deus a prima creatura conditione mundi omnium justorum Adam Abel Seth Enos c. quod hic Deus in novissimis diebus 〈◊〉 per Prophetas suos ante promiserat 〈◊〉 Dominum 〈◊〉 Jesum Christum 〈◊〉 quidem vocaturum Israel secundo vero etiam gentes post perfidiam populi Israel Hic Deus 〈◊〉 bonus pater domini nostri Jesu Christi Legem Prophetas Evangelia ipse 〈◊〉 qui Apostolorum Deus est veteris novi Testamenti Tum deinde quia Jesus Christus ipse qui venit ante omnem 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ex patre est Qui cum in omnium conditione 〈◊〉 ministrasset per ipsum enim omnia 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 novissimis temporibus seipsum 〈◊〉 homo factus est incarnatus est cum Deus 〈◊〉 homo mansit quod Deus erat Corpus assumpsit corpori nostro simile eo solo 〈◊〉 quod natum ex Virgine Spiritu sancto est quoniam hic Jesus Christus natus 〈◊〉 est in veritate non per imaginem communem hanc mortem vere 〈◊〉 est vere enim a morte resurrexit post resurrectionem conversatus cum 〈◊〉 suis assumptus 〈◊〉 Tum deinde honore ac dignitate Patri ac Filio sociatum tradiderunt Spiritum sanctum in hoc non jam manifeste discernitur utrum 〈◊〉 aut innatus Sed inquirenda jam ista pro viribus sunt de Sacra Scriptura sagaci perquisitione investiganda sane quod iste Spiritus 〈◊〉 unumquemque sanctorum vel Prophetarum vel Apostolorum inspiravit non 〈◊〉 Spiritus in veteribus alius vero in his qui in adventu Christi inspirati sunt manifestissime in Ecclesiis praedicatur Post haec jam quod anima substantiam vitamque habens 〈◊〉 cum ex hoc mundo discesserit pro 〈◊〉 meritis dispensabit sive vitae aeternae ac 〈◊〉 haereditate potitura si hoc ei sua 〈◊〉 praestiterint sive igne aeterno ac 〈◊〉 mancipanda si in hoc eam scelerum culpa detorserit Sed quia erit tempus resurnectionis mortuorum cum corpus hoc quod in 〈◊〉 seminatur surget in incorruptione quod seminatur in ignominia surget in gloria Origen in Proaem lib. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Credis in Deum Patrem Filium Christum Spiritum Sanctum remissionem peccatorum Vitam AEternam per Sanctam 〈◊〉 Cyprian Epist. 76. § 6. p. 248. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gregor 〈◊〉 § 7. These are all the Creeds that I have met with in which the Words are various but generally recurring to the 〈◊〉 Sense It would be too tedious to translate them all wherefore I shall sum them up in the Creed commonly call'd the Apostles and thereby shew their Congruity and Agreement as also what is in the Apostles Creed more than in these Now the Articles of the Apostles Creed that are to be found in the 〈◊〉 Creeds are as follows I believe in God the Father Almighty Maker of Heaven and Earth and in Jesus Christ his only Son our Lord who was conceived by the Holy Ghost born of the Virgin Mary suffered under Pontius Pilate was crucified dead and buried The Third Day he rose again from the Dead ascended into Heaven sitteth at the Right Hand of God the Father Almighty from whence he shall come to judge both the Quick and the Dead I believe in the Holy Ghost the Holy Catholick 〈◊〉 the Forgiveness of Here are now two Clauses of our 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 viz. He descended into 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Communion of 〈◊〉 § 8. If we would know how they were 〈◊〉 we must first consider how the whole Creed was framed which I conceive was done these two ways First Some of the Articles were derived down from the very Days of the Apostles Secondly Others were afterwards added in opposition to Heresies as they sprung up in the Church First Some of the Articles were 〈◊〉 down from the very Days of the 〈◊〉 such were these I believe in God the 〈◊〉 or as
the Greek Creeds read it in one 〈◊〉 the Father in opposition to the Polytheism of the Heathens and in Jesus Christ his only 〈◊〉 Son our Lord I believe in the Holy 〈◊〉 the Resurrection of the Body and the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lasting For in the Days of the 〈◊〉 as well 〈◊〉 afterwards it was the Practice at Baptism to demand the baptized 〈◊〉 assent 〈◊〉 the fundamental Articles of the 〈◊〉 Faith us Philip did the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 amongst which Fundamentals we may be 〈◊〉 they reckoned the Doctrine of the 〈◊〉 because they were baptized in the Name and Dedicated to the Service of the 〈◊〉 and that of the Unity of the Godhead because it was the great 〈◊〉 and design of their Preaching to overturn the Pagans multiplicity of Deities and that of the Resurrection of the 〈◊〉 and the Life everlasting because that was the Characteristick or Peculiar Doctrine of the 〈◊〉 Religion by which it was eminently 〈◊〉 from other Sects and Opinions and was the only Comfort and support of the Christians under their Sufferings and Martyrdoms according to that of St. Paul 1. 〈◊〉 15. 29. If the Dead rise not at all why are they then baptized for the Dead As for the other Articles of the Creed viz. Such as are predicated of Christ as His being conceived of the Holy Ghost born of the Virgin Mary c. and those other two The Holy Catholick Church and The Forgiveness of Sins I conceive them to be introduced the second way viz. in opposition to Heresies as they sprung up in the Church as was conceived by the Holy Ghost in opposition to the 〈◊〉 Ebionites and Cerinthians who taught that Christ was born in the ordinary and common way as other Men and Women are Was born of the Virgin Mary suffered under Pontius Pilate c. in contradiction to the Docetae Simonians and others who affirmed Christ to be a Man not really but only Phantastically or in appearance of which Hereticks 〈◊〉 speaks and 〈◊〉 them his forementioned Creed seems particularly to be levelled The Remission of Sins against the Basitidians who held that not all Sins but only involuntary ones would be remitted or rather against the Novatians who denied remission to the Lapsed The Holy Catholick Church to exclude thereby all 〈◊〉 and Schismaticks from being within the Pale thereof By these two ways then was the Creed composed and by the latter hereof were those two Articles introduced of Christ's Descent into Hell and of the Communion of Saints The Communion of Saints was brought in last of all The Descent into Hell towards the 〈◊〉 end of the Fourth Century into the manner and occasion whereof as also the intent and meaning of this Article I had designed once to enquire having made some Collections concerning it but finding I should be then forc'd to pass the Limits of my prescribed time I have thought it expedient to omit it and to return to those Points from whence I have so long digressed CHAP. IV. § 1. Of Godfathers § 2. 〈◊〉 preceded Baptism The Form and Reason thereof § 3. Next came Baptism its self The Sacramental Water 〈◊〉 by Prayer § 4. The Person Baptized in the Name of the Trinity § 5. 〈◊〉 or dipping generally used § 6. Sometimes Perfusion or Sprinkling The Validity thereof considered § 7. After Baptism followed Prayers § 1. HAving in the former Chapter made a little Digression I now return to the matter that first occasioned it which was the Questions proposed to the Persons to be Baptized unto which Adult Persons answered for themselves and Susceptors or Godfathers for Children Of these Susceptors or Sponsors 〈◊〉 speaks where he thus adviseth the delay of Childrens Baptism What necessity is there that Sponsors should expose themselves to danger who through Death may 〈◊〉 of the Performance of their Promises or may be deceived by the wicked Disposition of those they promise for Whether the use of Sponsors was from the Apostles Days I cannot determine unless the Negative may be conjectured from Justin 〈◊〉 Tertullian's Senior by Fisty Years who when he enumerates the Method and Form of Baptism says not one Word of Sponsors or Godfathers as may be seen in his Second Apology Pag. 93 94. § 2. When these Questions and Answers were ended then followed Exorcization the manner and end whereof was this The Minister put his Hands on the Persons Head that was to be Baptized and breathed in his Face implying thereby the Exorcization or expelling of the Devil or Evil Spirit from him and a preparing of him for Baptism and Confirmation when and where the good and holy Spirit was conferred and given This Practice I find mentioned by Clemens Alexandrinus who speaks of the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Exorcism before Baptism but more fully by some of those Bishops that were present at that famous Council of Carthage held Anno 258 in whose Determinations Exorcization is required as previous and antecedent to Baptism Thus in that of Crescens Bishop of Cirta I judge saith he that all Hereticks and Schismaticks who would come to the Catholick Church are not to be admitted till they have been first Exorcized and 〈◊〉 So also said Lucius Bishop of 〈◊〉 It is my Opinion that all Hereticks are to 〈◊〉 exorcized and baptized And thus more clearly Vincentius Bishop of Thibaris We know Hereticks to be worse than 〈◊〉 If therefore they would turn and come to the Lord we have a Rule of Truth which the Lord commanded the 〈◊〉 saying Go in my 〈◊〉 lay on Hands and cast out Devils Mark 16. 17. And in another place Go and teach all Nations baptizing them in the Name of the Father of the Son and of the Holy Ghost Matth. 28. 19. Therefore first let them come by Imposition of Hands in Exorcism and then by the Regeneration of Baptism that so they may be made Partakers of Christ's Promises but otherwise I think they cannot From this last Determination we may observe the Reason of these Exorcisms which arose from a misunderstanding of Christ's Valedictory Speech to his Disciples in Mark 16 17 c. In the 16th Verse of that Chapter 〈◊〉 them to go forth preaching the Gospel and to Baptize which was to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 perpetual Ministration to the end of the World Then he proceeds to tell them v. 17 18. that for the speedier propagation of the Gofpel and that the Heathens 〈◊〉 the more readily embrace it he would confer on them and the first Preachers 〈◊〉 of the Gift of working Miracles that in 〈◊〉 Name they should cast out Devils and speak with new Tongues as they most 〈◊〉 did at the Day of Pentecost That they should take up Serpents as Paul did at 〈◊〉 without receiving any Injury and if they 〈◊〉 any deadly thing it should not hurt them They should say Hands on the Sick and they should recover All which they did as Ecclesiastical Histories 〈◊〉 testifie and St. Mark closes
They had no need again to be Baptized saith he having been baptized by 〈◊〉 but only what was 〈◊〉 or lacking was performed by Peter and John which was that by Prayer and Imposition of Hands the Holy Ghost should be conferred on them which Custom as he there adds is now observed by us that those who are Baptized in the Church are offered to the Governours thereof by whose Prayer and Imposition of Hands they receive the Holy Ghost and are compleated with the Lord's Seal To this Practice also Firmilian refers that action of St. Paul in Acts 19. 5. Where on those who had been only Baptized by John's Baptism 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Holy Ghost by Imposition of Hands And Cyprian applies to Confirmation the Descent of the Holy Ghost 〈◊〉 10. 44. in miraculous 〈◊〉 and Gifts of Tongues on Cornelius and his Friends though they were not then Baptized So much now for the Reasons of Confirmation all that I shall do more is to add two or three Observations concerning it § 7. The first whereof is That Confirmation was an immediate Consequent of Baptism it was not deferred till many Years after but was presently administred as Tertullian writes As soon as we come out of the Baptismal Laver we are anointed and then we are confirmed Else if they had not been so soon confirmed they must notwithstanding their Baptism according to their Opinions as it hath been before demonstrated have continued graceless without the Adorning Gifts of the Holy Spirit a long time even as long as their Confirmation was delayed which to imagine concerning them is unreasonable and uncharitable Indeed in case of Necessity when they had neither time nor 〈◊〉 it was waved 〈◊〉 Immersion was with respect to Baptism but yet if the sick Person happened to recover he was then to be confirmed as is evident from the Case of Novatian whom 〈◊〉 accuses because that when he was restored to his Health again he was not confirmed according to the Canon of the Church But otherwise 〈◊〉 immediately or 〈◊〉 the same time followed 〈◊〉 § 8. From the former Observation there follows this that not only the Bishop but also his Presbyters or Curates did by his 〈◊〉 and in his Absence confirm For if Confirmation always succeeded Baptism then whenever Baptism was there was also Confirmation Now 〈◊〉 for Baptism we may reasonably suppose that in a Church there were some fit to be 〈◊〉 at least once a year and sometimes it might happen that either the See was 〈◊〉 or the Bishop through Persecution might be 〈◊〉 from his Flock so long a time as Cyprian was double the space and if so must no Persons have been Baptized within that time by reason of the Bishop's unavoidable Absence That seems a little hard since as was said before they esteemed Baptism and Confirmation necessary to Salvation and to deprive 〈◊〉 Souls of Salvation that died within that 〈◊〉 because they had not been confirmed by 〈◊〉 Bishop which was impossible would be too severe and uncharitable Besides that Presbyters did Baptize we have proved already and since Confirmation was done at the same time with Baptism it is very reasonable to conclude that he that did the one performed the other also But that Presbyters did confirm will appear most evidently from this very Consideration viz. That the Imposition of Hands 〈◊〉 Persons just after Baptism which we call Confirmation and the Imposition of Hands at the 〈◊〉 of Offenders which we call 〈◊〉 was one and the self same thing Confirmation and Absolution being 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that we make use of to distinguish the 〈◊〉 times of the Performances of the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Ceremony The Thing or 〈◊〉 was not different Imposition of Hands was used both at one and 〈◊〉 other 〈◊〉 the same Mystical Signification viz. The Conferring 〈◊〉 the Holy Ghost and his Graces on that 〈◊〉 on whom 〈◊〉 were imposed Only now to distinguish the time of this 〈◊〉 of Hands whether after Baptism or at the 〈◊〉 of Offenders these two Terms of Confirmation and 〈◊〉 are used by us the former to signifie that used just after Baptism and the latter that 〈◊〉 was employed at This now viz. That Confirmation and 〈◊〉 were one and the self same thing I 〈◊〉 presently prove And then in the next 〈◊〉 I shall shew that with the Bishop and sometimes without the Bishop Presbyters did Absolve by Imposition of Hands And if these 〈◊〉 Points can be clearly manifested it will 〈◊〉 follow that Presbyters did confirm for if there was no difference between Confirmation and Absolution but only with respect to time and 〈◊〉 Presbyters at one time viz. at Absolution conferred the Holy Ghost by Imposition of Hands it is very unreasonable to deprive them of the same Power at the other time which was at Confirmation If Presbyters could at one Season bestow the Holy Spirit it is very probable that they could do the same at the other also Now as to the first Point viz. That there was no difference between Confirmation and Absolution but that they were one and the self same thing This will appear most evidently from the consideration of that famous Controversie touching the Validity of Hereticks Baptism between Stephen Bishop of Rome and Cyprian Bishop of Carthage or rather between the Churches of Europe and Africa the Sum whereof was this Stephen Bishop of Rome 〈◊〉 That those who were baptized by Hereticks and came over to the Catholick Church should be received only by Imposition of Hands Cyprian Bishop of Carthage contended that besides Imposition of Hands they should also be baptized unless that they had been before baptiz'd by the Orthodox in which Case Imposition of Hands should be esteemed sufficient Now this Imposition of Hands they sometimes term that which we 〈◊〉 Confirmation and sometimes Absolution 〈◊〉 using either of those Expressions and indifferently applying them according 〈◊〉 they pleased in one place giving it the Title of Confirmation and in another that of Absolution which that they did I shall endeavour to evince by shewing First That they called this Imposition of Hands Confirmation Secondly That they called it Absolution First I shall prove that they called it Confirmation unto which end let us consider these following 〈◊〉 Those says Cyprian which are baptized without the Church when they come unto us and 〈◊〉 the Church which is 〈◊〉 one they are to be baptized because the Imposition of Hands by Confirmation is not sufficient without Baptism for then they are fully sanctified and become the Sons of God when they are born 〈◊〉 both Sacraments 〈◊〉 as it is written 〈◊〉 a Man be born again of the Water and of the Spirit he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God To the same effect says 〈◊〉 Bishop of 〈◊〉 Those 〈◊〉 greatly 〈◊〉 who affirm that they ought only to be confirmed by Imposition of Hands and so to be received since it is manifest they must be 〈◊〉 with both Sacraments in
Resurrection during which time they thought themselves by the forementioned Command obliged to fast Secondly From hence we may observe the Duration of this Fast or how long it was continued and that was from the time that Christ the Bridegroom was taken away to the time that he was restored again that is from his Passion to his Resurrection Now according to their Various Computations of the beginning and end of Christ's being taken away so was the Duration of their Fast some might reckon from Christ's Agony in the 〈◊〉 others from his being betrayed by Judas 〈◊〉 again from his being fastned to the Cross and others from his being actually dead and so according to these Diversities of Computations were their Fasts either lengthened or shortned This we may probably suppose to be the occasion of the different Observations of this Fast with respect to its Duration as we find it in Irenaeus Some says he esteem that they must fast but one Day others two others more and some allow to this Fast forty Hours Which last space of Time seems to have been their general and common Allowance Whence this Fast was afterwards called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Quadragesima that is not a Fast of Forty Days in imitation of Christ's Fasting in the Wilderness but a Fast of Forty Hours beginning at Friday Twelve a Clock about which time Christ was dying and ending Sunday Morning when Christ arose So that from Twelve a Clock Good Friday as we call it when Christ the Bridegroom was taken away they fasted in obedience to his Command as they imagined till Sunday Morning when he was found again by his Resurrection at which time they forgot their Sorrow and Mourning concluded their Fast and began the joyful Festival of Easter or of Christs Resurrection § 4. As for the manner of their Fasts we may observe them to be of three sorts viz. Statio Jejunium and Superpositio Station Fasts and Superposition all which three are at once mentioned by Victorinus Petavionensis We fast says he till the ninth hour or till evening or their is a Superposition till the next morning I. There was the Fast of Stations which ended at Three a Clock in the Afternoon or at the Ninth Hour as it is called in the forecited Passage of Victorinus Petavionensis This sort of Fasting was used on 〈◊〉 and Fridays which Days as we have shewn before were called Stationary Days and on them Divine Services were ended at Three a Clock in the Afternoon for which Reason Montanising Tertullian terms them The Half Fasts of Stations II. The next sort was strictly called Jejunium or a Fast which according to the 〈◊〉 place of Victorinus Petavionensis lasted till Evening Of this sort it is probable their Occasional Fasts were as Tertullian writes In times of necessity and danger we dry up our selves with Fasting abstain from all Meat roll our selves in Dust and Ashes and by these means cause God to have mercy upon us Though it is also likely that in times of more eminent Danger they extended these Fasts unto that of Superposition The Second sort of Fasts was observed by some on Fridays who turned the Station into a Fast as Victorinus Petavionensis writes On Friday in Commemoration of the Lord's Passion I either keep a Station or observe a Fast. III. The last sort of Fasts was called Superposition or as by the Greeks 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which lasted till the Morning of the next Day according to that of Victorinus Petavionensis Let Superposition be done till the next Day As for the times when this Fast was observed I find that in some of the Western Churches they so kept every Saturday throughout the Year fasting thereon till Midnight or till the beginning of Sunday Morning as Victorinus Petavioniensis says Let Superposition be done on Saturday lest we should seem to observe the Jewish Sabbath But not only in these but in other Churches also they so fasted on Easter Eve or on the Saturday preceeding that Sunday which being Lent was so necessary and usual that Tertullian enumerating those particular Acts of Divine Worship that a Christian Woman could not freely perform if married to a Pagan Husband reckons this as one That on Easter Eve she could not stay up and watch that Night But to please her Husband must be diverted from this necessary Fast that usher'd in the Glorious Festival of Easter which brings me in the next place to enquire into this and their other Feasts of which in the ensuing Chapter CHAP. IX § 1. Of the Primitive Feasts two-fold Occasional and Fix'd § 2. Of Easter § 3. Of Whitsunday § 4. Of Christmas On what Day of the Year Christ was born § 5. Of Epiphany § 6. Besides these no other Feasts in Commemoration of Christ the Virgin Mary or the Apostles The Apostles not called Saints in the Primitive Writings § 7. Festivals in Commemoration of the Martyrs Observed on the Annual Day of their Martyrdom Persons appointed to take an exact Account of the Day of their Decease § 8. Why those Festivals were observed The Day of the Martyrs Death termed their Birth days § 9. The Place where these Festivals were Solemnized Of the Buryingplace of the Ancients § 10. The manner of the Observation of these Festivals § 1. AS the Primitive Fasts were two-fold so likewise were their Feasts either Occasional or Fixed As for those that were Occasional I shall pass them over because not controverted and come immediately to enquire into their Fixed Feasts which as their Fasts were also two-fold either Weekly or Annual Of their Weekly Feasts which were Sundays and in the Oriental Churches Saturdays I have already discoursed so that there only remains an Enquiry into their Annual Feasts which befides the Martyrs Festivals were two viz. Easter and Whitsunday or at most Three viz Easter Whitsunday and Christmass of each of which in their Order § 2. I begin with Easter as being the antientest Feast of all concerning which Tertullian writes We Celebrate Easter in the first Month every Year Cyprian mentions their Easter Solemnities And Origen reckons Easter as one of the four Festivals observed in his time But that they Solemnized Easter is a thing so well known that it will be unnecessary to prove it especially since every one knows or at least might easily know those sharp Contests and Debates that were in the Church about the time when it should be kept the whole Affair hath been at large related by several Hands in our own Tongue amongst others by the most learned Dr. Cave in his Apostolici in the Life of Irenaeus to which I refer the Curious contenting my self with giving a very brief Account of the Controversie which was this The Churches of the Lesser Asia kept their Easter the same day that the Jews kept their Passover on what day of the Week soever it happen'd The Church of Rome with