Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
lord_n	christian_a	day_n	sabbath_n	12,184	5	9.9778	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A35959	Truths victory over error, or, An abridgement of the chief controversies in religion which since the apostles days to this time, have been, and are in agitation, between those of the Orthodox faith, and all adversaries whatsoever, a list of whose names are set down after the epistle to the reader : wherein, by going through all the chapters of The confession of faith, one by one, and propounding out of them, by way of question, all the controverted assertions, and answering by yes, or no, there is a clear confirmation of the truth, and an evident confutation of what tenets and opinions, are maintain'd by the adversaries : a treatise, most useful for all persons, who desire to be instructed in the true Protestant religion, who would shun in these last days, and perillous times, the infection of errors and heresies, and all dangerous tenets and opinions, contrary to the word of God.	Dickson, David, 1583?-1663.; Sinclair, George, d. 1696.	1684 (1684)	Wing D1412; ESTC R3405	145,943	378

of the Ceremonial Law Exod. 16. 23. Thirdly because it was written with Gods own hand and inserted into the midst of the rest of the moral precepts and was put into the Ark of the Testimony with the other nine which honour was never conferred upon any precept meerly Ceremonial 4 Because all the reasons of this Command are intirely Moral He rested after six days and allowed us six days to work therefore in all equity we ought to rest after so many days work and give God a seventh 5 Because Christ confirms this Command in saying pray that your flight be not in the winter neither on the Sabbath day where the Lord insinuateth that as travelling is troublesome to the body in winter so would it be to the minds of the Godly to travel on that day specially and solemnly set apart for Gods worship Now if there were no sabbath to continue after Christs ascension or if it were not to be sanctified there would be no occasion of this grief and trouble that they behoved to travel on the Sabbath and durst not tary till that day were by-past and so no cause to put up this prayer which yet by our Lords exhortation seemeth to infer that the Sabbath was to be as certain in its time as the Winter And doubtless this cannot be meaned of the Iewish Sabbath for that was to be abolished shortly Next travelling on the Iewish Sabbath was to be no cause of grief unto them if indeed all days were alike neither would it be scroupled in such a case by the Apostles to whom he is now speaking Quest. XII WAS this one day in seven from the beginning of the World to the Resurrection of Christ the last day of the week Yes And was it from the Resurrection of Christ changed into the first day of the week Yes And is it to be continued to the end of the World as the Christian Sabbath Yes Gen. 2. 2 3. 1 Cor. 16. 1. 2. Acts 20. 7. Rev. 1. 10. Matth. 5. 17 18. Well then do not the Sabbatarians err who maintain that the Iewish Sabbath or the seventh day from the Creation is to be observed Yes Do not others likewise err who maintain that the observation of the Lords Day is only of Ecclesiastick and Apostolick institution Yes These Authors you see do confound and make two things really distinct to be but one namely Ecclesiastick and Apostolick institution By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the fourth Command standing wherein one day of seven is appointed the numbering is left free to God himself that the right and power may be reserved to Christ the Law-giver and to his Spirit for the change of the day and continuing the worship prescribed in the fourth Command 2 From the name it self for our Sabbath is called the Lords Day Rev. 1. 10. I was in the Spirit on the Lords Day or on that Lords Day or Dominick Day or day which is the Lords pointing out a day singularly and a day which in a particular special manner is called His day even as the Lords prayer and the Lords Supper are so called because appointed by Christ the Lord. 3 Because God only can abrogate the Lords day the Adversaries granting so much therefore he that hath power to rescind hath power likewise to establish 4 Because there is an implicit Command concerning the observation of the Lords day 1 Cor. 16. 2. As I have saith Paul given order to the churches of Galatia even so do ye the first day of the week let every one of you lay by him From which place we reason thus that not the seventh but the first day is the chief solemn day for worship after Christs Resurrection because the Apostles did pitch particularly and eminently upon that day and that in diverse Churches as the fittest time for expressing their Charity He doth not think it indifferent what day it be done on nor that all dayes are alike but pitcheth on the first day not in one Church only but in many Next this command supposeth them to be already acquainted with some special priviledges of the first day beyond others and that there must be some peculiar thing in this day making it fit yea more fit for such a purpose rather than any other day 5 Because as the seventh day was instituted in remembrance of the works of Creation so the first day after the work of redemption was finished succeeded as most convenient for collating and comparing both Mercies together 6 Because Christ on the first day of the week appeared most frequently to his Disciples and blessed it with his presence Matth. 28. 9. Acts 1. 3. Iohn 20. 19 26. 7 Because on that day the holy Ghost descended upon the Apostles And on the same day Peter baptized three thousand Acts 2. 1 2 3 4 41. 8 Because the Church in the time of the Apostles did observe the first day of the week as holy Acts 20. 7. But the practise of the Apostles approven in Scripture is equivalent to a Divine Institution 9 Because Christ was seen of his Apostles fourty dayes after his Resurrection and spoke to them of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God during which time he hath taught them all things needful to be known and among the rest it is probable the change of the Sabbath and the institution of the first day of the week and that immediatly after his resurrection he hath either immediatly by himself institute that day or hath inspired his Apostles to observe it from that same very time 10 Because the Lord hath remarkably owned this Christian Sabbath in being remarkably avenged upon the breakers and profanners thereof as it is clear from several Histories Quest. XIII IS this Sabbath then kept holy unto the Lord when men after a due preparation of their hearts and ordering of their common affairs before hand do not only observe an holy rest all the day from their own works words and thoughts about their worldly employments and recreations but are also taken up the whole time in the publick and private exercises of his own worship except what is spent in the duties of necessity and mercy Yes Exod. 16. 23 25 26 29 30. Exod. 31. 15 16 17. Isa. 58. 13. Neh. 13. 15 16 18 19 21 22. Well then do not some err who think that after publick worship is ended the rest of the Lords day may be spent in ordinary exercises recreations and such like sports as are not unlawful on other dayes unless they be forbidden by the Church or Common-wealth wherein men live Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Lord says in the fourth Commandment in it thou shalt not do any work But ordinary recreations games and sports are our own works 2 Because Nature it self requires that we bestow as much of the Sabbath day on God who is the Lord of Time and of all things which we have as we can and use to bestow

upon our own affairs on other days 3 Because the Lord says if thou turn away thy foot from the Sabbath from doing thy pleasure on my holy day and call the Sabbath a delight the holy of the Lord honourable and shalt honour him not doing thy own wayes nor finding thy own pleasure nor speaking thy own words then shalt thou delight thy self in the Lord and I will cause thee to ride upon the high places of the Earth and feed thee with the heritage of Iacob thy Father for the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it Isaiah 58. 13 14. See Ierem. 17. 22. Deut. 5. 12 13 15. Numb 15. 32 33 36. And Neh. 13. 15. to verse 23. In those dayes saw I in Iudah some treading Wine-presses on the sabbath and bringing in Sheaves and lading asses as also wine-grapes and figes and all manner of burdens which they brought into Ierusalem on the sabbath day and I testified against them in the day wherein they sold victuals CHAP. XXII Of Lawful Oaths and Vows Question I. IS the name of GOD that only by which men ought to swear Yes Deut. 6. 13. Well then do not the Papists err who in their swearing joyn with their calling upon the name of GOD the calling on Saints departed and their Reliques Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because swearing is a part of divine worship which is only due to God Deut. 6. 13. Deut. 10. 20. Isaiah 65. 16. 2 Because God only is the judge of hidden and secret truth and the Avenger to take vengence on them that do not swear in truth Therfore he only is to be called on as witness of those things which are asserted and promised which was the practise of the Apostle Paul Rom. 9. 1. Rom. 1. 9. Phil. 1. 8. 3 Because God condemns swearing by them that are no Gods Ier. 5. 7. Quest. II. IS an Oath warranted by the word of GOD under the New Testament as well as under the Old in matters of weight and moment Yes Heb. 6. 16. Isaiah 65. 16. Gal. 1. 20. Rom. 1. 9. Rom. 9. 1. 2 Cor. 1. 18. 23. and 2 Cor. 11. 31. with 2 Cor. 12 19. 1 Thes. 5. 27. Rev. 10. 6. Well then do not the Quakers and Anabaptists err who maintain that there is no lawful use of an Oath under the New Testament Yes Do not likewise the Papists err who make it a degree of perfection to abstain from all Oaths Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 From Isaiah 65. 16. where it is promised under the time of the Gospel that the Nations to be converted to Christ shall swear by the name of God as is clear also from Ierem. 4. 2. 2 Because the calling upon the name of God with due fear and reverence in swearing is commanded in the third Command as the profanation of his name is forbidden but Christ came not to abolish the moral Law 3 From the approven examples of the Saints which occurr in the New Testament Gal. 1. 20. Rom. 1. 9. and 2 Cor. 1. 13 18. Rev. 10. 6. 4 Because the end of an Oath is approven by God and is in all ages necessary to all men being the end of all controversie Heb. 6. 16. 5 Because an oath rightly taken is an Act of Religion whereby we glorifie God and adore his attributes We thereby first solemnly acknowledge his Beeing and Existence Secondly his Ubiquity that he is present in all places and at all times and within our hearing Psalm 139. 7. His Omniscience that he is the searcher of the heart The Apostle calls him Kardiognostes Acts 15. 8. We acknowledge fourthly his Truth and Veracity he is a witness brought into the Court that cannot lie nor be impos'd upon as saith the Apostle be not deceived God is not mocked Gal. 6. 7. Fifthly his Supremacy over all creatures for verily men swear by the greater Heb. 6. 16. We acknowledge sixthly his vindictive justice as he is a Revenger of Perjury Seventhly we acknowledge his Providence and Fatherly care of the concerns of mankind owning the cause of the Righteous 6 Because there being an express law for swearing to wit rightly Deut. 10 20. it must either belong to the Moral Law to the Judicial Law or Ceremonial Law The Adversaries will not call it a part of the Judicial Law which was given to the Iewes as a Body Politick which expired together with the state of that People It is no part of the Ceremonial Law for what was purely Ceremonial was purely Typical but the Law concerning an oath was not a Type of any thing to come And if it was a Type where will you find its Antitype in all the Gospel or the thing represented by it Therefore it must be a part of the Moral Law Deut. 6. 13. Ier. 4. 2 and consequently perpetual which Christ came not to destroy It is confirmed hence that it was of Authentick use and held sacred among the Patriarchs before the delivery of the Levitical Law as it is clear from Abraham the father of the faithful and Abimelech Gen. 21. 23 24 31. Consider also that other instance in Abraham Gen. 24. 2 3 9. who would not give his servant an oath rashly nor exercise his authority to impose on his conscience It is evident also from the example of Isaac who made a Covenant and swore to Abimelech Gen. 26. 28 31 And from the example of Iacob who made a Covenant with and swore to his Uncle Laban by the fear of his Father Isaac Gen. 31. 53. That is by God who is called our fear by reason of the filial awe and fear we ought to stand in before him Isaiah 8. 13. 7 Because the reasons and usefulness of Oaths are perpetual and the same to us under the Gospel as they were to them under the Law There is as much need of oaths for ending of strife in this litigious age as there could be in former times 8 Because oaths were once lawful therefore they are lawful still unless the Adversaries prove them repealled which they must do not by stealing out of the Scripture single words by themselves making one part contradict another 9 Because we need not fear to imitate any thing which is done in Heaven Our Lord has taught us to pray thy will be done in Earth as it is done in Heaven But the Angel says Iohn Rev. 10. 5 6. which I saw stand upon the Sea and upon the Earth lifted up his hand to Heaven and swore by him that liveth for ever and ever That Angel calls himself our fellow-servant and of our brethren the Prophets and of them which keep the sayings of this Book Rev. 22. 9. And therefore the Angels being of the same fraternity with us do not act under different dispensations from us Quest. III. IS an Oath to be taken in the plain and common sense of the words without Equivocation or Mental reservation Yes Psalm 24. 4. Exod. 20. 7. Lev. 19. 12. Ier. 4. 2.

which the kingdom of Satan is erected and by which it is upheld are Ignorance and Errour And the two great Pillars which support the Kingdom of Christ are Knowledge and Truth Therefore our blessed Saviour resolving to subvert the kingdom of Satan among the Gentiles tells the Apostle in his first Commission that he was about to send him to open their eyes namely their understanding by the Preaching and Knowledge of the Gospel and to turn them from darkness to light from natural blindness and worldly ignorance unto the right and true knowledge of GOD. This is the first step of our Manumission from that spiritual thraldom The Understanding is the Guide and Pilot of the whole man It is that faculty which sits at the helme of the Soul But as the most skilful Pilot may mistake his course in the dark so may the Understanding when it wants the light of Knowledge This is an accomplishment so desirable that the Devil knew not a more alluring bate to tempt our first Parents in Paradise Ye shall be as Gods sayes he knowing good and evil When the Lord had refer'd it to Solomons option what to choose he choose Wisdom and Knowledge When once the Devil understood that by the Preaching of the Gospel his kingdom was ruined he invents two new stratagems to overthrow Religion even in the infancy and beginning of it to wit Persecution and Heresie Open persecution began in Nero a very imp and graff of the Devil When this Hirricano and many others of that kind were past and when the Churches of Christ were once at rest he sends in a Deluge of Arianism which in a short time so prodigiously spread and over-ran the Christian World that it seemed to carry all before it an assault that did not strike at the uppermost boughs of Religion but at the Root and Beeing of Christianity But this second proved more sad than the first for where Persecution kills one thousand Heresie kills ten thousand The one is the Wild-Boar of the Forrest the other is the little Fox that eateth up the Grapes of the Lords Vineyard The one kills the bodies of Men and Women the other poisoneth the Souls of Christians In times of greater Light as these and former times have been reputed to be Satan comes not abroad usually to deceive with his gross forgeries and cloven foot for every one almost would discern his haltings but with more mystical yet strongdelusions and invincible chains of darkness wherewith he binds his captives the faster to the judgement of the great day And therefore the Watch word given in the bright and shining times of the Apostles was to try the Spirits and believe not every Spirit and take heed of Spirits who indeed were only fleshly and corrupt men yet called Spirits because they pretended to have much of the Spirit and their doctrine seemed only to advance the Spirit the fitest and fairest cobwebs to deceive and inveigle the world in these discerning times that possibly could be spun out of the poysonful bowels of corrupt and fleshly men for Heresie is a work of the flesh The times are now come wherein by the refined mystical divinity of the old Moncks all the ordinances of Christ in the New Testament are allegorized and spiritualized out of the world They reject the outward word because of an inward teaching They reject the outward Baptism because of the inward Baptism They reject the Lords Supper because of the spiritual bread from heaven the Lord Jesus They abolish the outward Sabbath because of a spiritual and inward Sabbath of rest in the bosome of Christ. This is very consistent with the observing the outward Sabbath But they wickedly sever and separat what GOD hath joyned together But as to what relates to the present Treatise I am not ignorant that many eminent and learned Divines far beyond whatever I could profess have beatten this path and travelled round the world of Polemick Divinity But their writings being so Voluminous and large that he who desires to have a full sight at one look of the chief controversies can no more have it than a man from the Peak of Teneriff can get a clear sight of the whole Globe of the Earth Which things though they be principally worth the knowing nevertheless for so much as their number and variety are an impediment to themselves and the multiplicity of matter makes the mind abruptly flit from one thing to another Therefore I have imitated Geographers who after they have surveyed the whole Globe of the Earth draw Universal descriptions thereof and comprehend the the whole image of that great Terra-queous Body within a narrow circumference of a Card or Mapp In so doing I may perhaps contribute some what towards the satisfaction of some who neither can nor are able to trace the wearisome foot steps of those eminent Divines who have written fully This Treatise being Historical none can expect but I must have consulted others and gleaned off their writtings what things were needful I cannot here as in writing Philosophy or any such like Science set up new Theorems or Axioms which have not been heard of before This were to make a new Religion a new System and Body of Divinity such as some giddy-headed Hereticks are thinking upon I must confine my self to the good old way and follow the heatten path-road wherein men of sound principles have walked before me This Book is not designed for men of knowledge and learning who are more conversant in such matters than I am but for the unlearned and new-beginners who need to be instructed with the sound principles of the true Protestant Religion I hope none will think I have done amiss in mentioning so many Religions which had been better unnamed some may think than named This might have some weight if there were no more Religions in the world at this time but one only to wit the true Protestant Religion But seeing I cannot name so many here as there are this day owned and professed in the Christian Church I cannot be to blame This Book will be useful for understanding the Confession and knowing the design of it For how many read it and commend it that never knew the nature of it Though there be a multiplicity of questions and many in number yet all of them to my best remembrance are taken word by word out of the Confession The answers are by Yes or No. To which are subjoyned immediately the proofs of the Confession These words which are often repeated Well then do not the Papists err are nothing els but sure Conclusions drawn from two manifest propositions The design of this Treatise is good The method is plain and easy The order of the Questions follow the order of the purposes in the Confession The probations are such as are made use of in the Confession and by the Orthodox Divines against the Adversaries They are either the very words of the Scripture in Terminis or

is none were able perfectly to keep nor to be justified thereby Acts 15. 10 11. 14 Because whosoever transgresseth the Law in the least is under the curse of it Gal. 3. 10. Deut. 27. 26. And deserveth death and a curse Rom. 6. 23. Ezek. 18. 4 20. But all men even the Regenerate sin dayly and transgress the Law of God and so are guilty of all Iam. 1. 13 compared with Iames 2. 10 and with 1 Iohn 1. 8. 15 Because Good works do not go before justification but follow after it Titus 1. 15. Heb. 11. 6. Rom. 14. 23. Rom. 3. 9 10 23. 16 Because the righteousness of God which is by Faith in Jesus Christ is manifested unto all and upon all by Moses and the Prophets For all the Apostles do witness that whosover believeth in Jesus Christ shall have remission of sins Rom. 3. 21 24 25. Acts. 10. 43. 17 Because Justification is from the free Grace of God Rom. 3. 24. Not by the Works of the Law otherwise Grace should be no more Grace nor work any more work Rom. 11. 6. 18 Because the good works of Believers are unclean and defiled Isa. 64. 6. Gal. 5. 17. 19 Because it is said by the Spirit of God the just shall live by Faith Hab. 2. 4. Gal. 3. 11. 20 Because it is written that Abraham believed God and it was imputed to him for righteousness Gen. 15. 6. Rom. 4. 3. But to him that worketh not but believeth on him that justifies the ungodly his Faith is counted for Righteousness Rom. 4. 5. 21 Because believers must not glory in themselves but in God only Rom. 4. 2. Rom. 3. 27. 22 Because by the obedience of ONE many shall be made righteous as was foretold by the Prophet Isaiah 53. 11. And is asserted by Paul Rom. 5. 17. 23 Because Justification by Faith and not by Works is expresly taught at large by the Apostle in that third to the Romans and third to the Galatians CHAP. XX. Of Christian Liberty and Liberty of Conscience Question I. IS GOD alone Lord of the Conscience and hath left it free from the Doctrines and Commandments of men which are in any thing contrary to to his Word or beside it in matters of Faith or worship Yes Iam. 4. 12. Acts 4. 19. Acts 5. 29. Matth. 23. 8 9 10. 2 Cor. 1. 24. Matth. 15. 9. Well then do not the Papists err who contradict this both in doctrine because they teach that the Pope of Rome and Bishops in their own Diocesses may by their own authority praeter Scripturam beside the Word make Laws which oblige and bind the Conscience under the pain of everlasting death and in practise because they have obtruded and do obtrude many Ecclesiastical Rites and Ceremonies as necessary in worship without any foundation in Scripture Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because there is one Law-giver who is able to save and to destroy Iames 4. 12. Therefore no Pope no Prelate nor any meer man can be a Law-giver 2 Because Christ rejects the Commandments of men from the worship of God Matth. 15. 9. 3 Because the Apostles refused to obey the orders of the Council since they were contrary to the Commands of God Acts 4. 19. Acts 5. 29. 4 because the Lord threatens to do a marvellous work among his people because they drew near to him with their mouth as the most part of the Ceremonial service is but a drawing near to God with the mouth but had their hearts removed far from him Isaiah 29. 13 14. 5 Because Christ expresly forbids such subjection and obedience to the Commands of men Matth. 23. 9 10. 1 Cor. 7. 23. 6 because the Apostles themselves forbids all will-worship such as the Popish Ceremonies are Col. 2. 18 21 22 23. 8 Because the Apostle Paul withstood these false Brethren unawars brought in who came in privily to spie out his liberty which he had in Christ Jesus that they might bring him into bondage to whom he gave place by subjection no not for an hour that the truth of the Gospel might continue where he lays so much weight upon Christian liberty that if that were taken away the truth of the Gospel would perish likewise Gal. 2. 4 5. 9 Because the Apostle commands Believers to stand fast in their liberty wherewith Christ hath made them free and not to be intangled again with the yoke of bondage Gal. 5. 1. 10 Because Ceremonies are superstitious being a vice opposite to Religion in the excess commanding more in the Worship of God than he requires in his Worship Quest. II. IS not the requiring of an implicit Faith and an absolute and blind obedience to the Church or any Man a destroying of liberty of Conscience and Reason also Yes Rom. 10. 17. Rom. 14. 23. Isaiah 8. 20. Acts 17. 11. Iohn 4. 22. Hos. 5. 11. Rev. 13. 12 16 17. Ier. 8. 9. Well then do not the Papists err who require an Implicit Faith to all the Decrees and Ordinances of their Church and Pope and a blind obedience to their commands without a previous judgement of discretion Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because no man performing any duty out of blind obedience can be perswaded in his mind of the will of God therein and so he that doubteth is damned because it is not of Faith Rom. 14. 23. 2 Because all things must be examined and proven by the Rule of the Word Isaiah 8. 20. 1 Iohn 4. 1 2. 3 Because the Apostle says prove all things and hold fast that which is good 1 Thes. 5. 21. 4 Because blind obedience makes us the servants of Men which is contrary to 1 Cor. 7. 23. And against the command of Christ forbidding us to call any man Father on earth Matth. 23. 9. 5 Because absolute obedience is only due to God whose commands are all most just himself being the alone Law-giver Iames 4. 12. 6 Because every man ought to be ready to render a reason of the hope which is in him 1 Peter 3. 15. This no man can do who receives the Commands of Superiors with an Implicit Faith Quest. III. DO they who upon pretence of Christian Liberty practise any sin or cherish any lust destroy thereby the end of Christian Liberty Yes Gal. 5. 13. 1 Peter 2. 16. 2 Peter 2. 19. Iohn 8. 34. Luke 1. 74 75. Well then do not the Libertines err who maintain that the true Christian Liberty which we ought to follow and use is to take away all difference between Good and Evil to esteem nothing of sin nor to be touched with any Conscience or sense of it that every man ought to follow the swing of his own lust Yes Do not likewise the Antinomians err who maintain almost the same very Tenet and opinion Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because we being called to liberty ought not to use our liberty for an occasion of the flesh Gal. 5. 13 And that with well

and propriety which they had to them Acts 5. 4. 2 Because the eight command which is of perpetual use to all men supposeth a distinction and propriety of Goods For if all Goods were common it were impossible to steal 3 Because there should be no giving of Almes there should be no Hospitality which is contrary to the Apostle Eph. 4. 28. Heb. 13. 2. CHAP. XXVII Of the Sacraments Question I. ARE the Sacraments holy signs and seals of the Covenant of Grace immediatly instituted by GOD to represent Christ and his benefits and to confirm our interest in him Yes Do the Sacraments put a visible difference between those that belong unto the Church and the rest of the World Yes Do the Sacraments solemnly engage men and women to the service of God in Christ according to his word Yes Rom. 4. 11. Gen. 17. 7 10. Matth. 28. 19. 1 Cor. 11. 23. 1 Cor. 10. 16. 1 Cor. 11. 25 26. Gal. 3. 7. Rom. 15. 8. Exod. 12. 48. Gen. 34. 14. Rom. 6. 3 4. And 1 Cor. 10. 16 21. Well then do not the Socinians err with the Anabaptists who maintain that the Sacraments are not seals of the Covenant of Grace instituted by God to represent Christ and his benefits but only bare tokens and Tests of our Christian profession Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because Circumcision is expresly called a sign and seal of the righteousness of Faith Rom. 4. 11. Now if Circumcision was a seal and sign why ought not Baptism and the Lords Supper to be signs and seals also 2 Because the names and properties of the things signified are given to the Sacramental signs Thus Circumcision is called the Covenant Gen. 17. 10. The bread is called the Body of Christ Matth. 26. 26. And Baptism is called the washing of regeneration Titus 3. 5. For no other reasons but because they represent and confirm things spiritual to Believers 3 Because the cup of blessing in the Sacrament is the communion of the blood of Christ and the bread is the communion of the body of Christ 1 Cor. 10. 16. 4 Because the Sacraments bring into our memories Christ and his benefits and therefore as it were they set him before our eyes and so increase and confirm our faith 1 Cor. 11. 24 25. Quest. II. IS the Grace which is exhibited in or by the Sacraments rightly used conferred by any power in them No. Rom. 2. 28 29. 1 Peter 3. 21. Well then do not the Papists and Lutherians err who maintain that the Sacraments of themselves are true immediate and effectual causes of our Iustification and give life Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the holy Scripture attributes our Justification to Faith only as an instrumental cause and to no other thing Rom. 1. 17. Rom. 3. 28. Gal. 2. 16. And therefore the Sacraments cannot be the efficient causes of our Justification and life 2 Because the Scripture makes an express difference between the work of a man dispensing the Sacraments and the work of the holy Ghost Matth. 3. 11. 3 Because signs and seals of Grace cannot confer and effectuat Grace But the Sacraments are but signs and seals of Grace because to signifie and to have vertue and power to do differ in nature and in kind 4 Because many are partakers of the Sacraments who yet are not partakers of the Grace of GOD as Simon Magus Acts 8. 13. Ananias and Saphira Acts 5. 4 9. And how many thousands do eat and drink unworthily drinking and eating damnation to themselves 1 Cor. 11. 29. 5 Because many have been justified before ever they did partake of a Sacrament as Abraham Rom. 4. 11. And Cornelius with his fellows Acts 10. 46. Quest. III. DOTH the efficacy of a Sacrament depend upon the piety or intention of him that doth administer it No. Matth. 3. 11. 1 Cor. 12. 13. Well then do not the Donatists and Anabaptists err who maintain that the Sacraments dispensed by a wicked and graceless Minister are of no vertue or efficacy Yes Do not also some others now a days err who are not far from the same opinion Yes Do not lastly the Papists err who maintain that to the perfection of a Sacrament the actual intention of the Minister at least his vertual intention of doing that which the Church doth is necessary Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because Iudas who was a Thief and a Traitour did according to the command of Christ baptize as well as the rest yet Christ never called in question his Baptism 2 Because the efficacy of the Word doth not depend upon the piety goodness worthiness or good intention of the Instrument Phil. 1. 16 Therefore neither doth the efficacy of a Sacrament depend upon the intention of him that doth administer it 3 If the efficacy of Baptism depended upon the good intention of the Minister then no Christian could be sure that he is baptized seeing no man can be sure of or know the Ministers intention 4 Because the operation and efficacy of the Sacraments depend upon the operation of the Holy Ghost and the Word of institution Matth. 3. 11. 1 Cor. 12 13. 5 Because the Papists themselves which is argumentum ad hominem cannot be sure that the bread in the Eucharist is Transubstantiat into the Body of Christ. And therefore in their Adoration and falling down to the Host they commit most damnable Idolatry in worshipping that which is neither GOD nor any divine thing I say they cannot be sure because the Priests intention may be deficient while he is consecrating the Bread Quest. IV. ARE there only two Sacraments ordained by Christ in the Gospel I answer two only namely Baptism and the Lords Supper Matth. 28. 19. 1 Cor. 11. 20 23. Well then do not the Romanists err who make seven Sacraments by adding to Baptism and the Lords Supper Confirmation Pennance Extream Unction Ordination and Matrimony Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because no other Sacraments save Baptism and the Lords Supper are instituted by Christ in all the holy Scripture 2 Because the description and definition of a Sacrament as you will find it in the first Question doth agree only to Baptism and the Lord Supper 3 Because Christ was a Copartner and sharer of Baptism and the Lords Supper which in his own person he did sanctifie and by them did testifie and profess his communion with his people of the New Testament but never was a sharer of any of these five Bastard Sacraments Quest. V. MAY Baptism and the Lords Supper be dispensed by any but by a Minister of the Word lawfully ordained No. Matth. 28. 19. 1 Cor. 11. 20 23. 1 Cor. 4. 1. Heb. 5. 4. Well then do not the Anabaptists err who maintain that the Sacraments may be dispensed and administred by any Believer Yes Do not likewise the Papists and the Lutherians err who maintain that it is lawful for Laicks or Women to administer the

2. 1 2. 9 Because Moses cryed unto the Lord in behalf of Pharoah Exod. 8. 12. Abraham prayed unto God for Abimelech Gen. 20. 17. Iacob blessed Pharoah Gen. 47. 7 10. 10 Because many blessed Martyrs going to death have prayed for their persecuting Magistrates following the example and command of our blessed Saviour Luke 23. 34. Matth. 5. 44. Quest. VIII OUght any man at his own hand or at the instigation of other men to assassinate or kill a Magistrate or any private or publick person under the pretence they are Hereticks and Persecutors of the truth No. Exod. 20. 13 Prov. 1. 10. 11. Well then do not those men of the Romish-Church err and others too who own this dangerous Tenet Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because all sort of murder is expresly forbidden in the sixth command thou shalt not kill Exod. 20. 13. Where there is a clear distinction made by Thou between a private man and a publick Magistrate that doth it by divine authority 2 Because though Saul was a man rejected of God 1 Sam. 15. 26. yet David says to the Amalekite how wast thou not affrayed to stretch forth thine hand to destroy the Lords anointed 2 Sa. 1. 14. see 1 Sam. 24. 5. 1 Sam. 26. 9. 3 Because whatever may be alledged from Phineas his fact Num. 25. 8. from Ehuds fact in stobbing Eglon Iudges 3. 21. from Samuels fact in killing Agag 1 Sam. 15. 33. and from Elijahs fact in killing the Priests of Baal 1 Kings 18. 40. they will not by any means favour private mens assassinations for certainly Phineas had a divine motion as Ehud had stirring him up which was evident by the Lords approving the fact and rewarding it Samuel no doubt was moved hereunto by an inward motion and instinct of God and the conduct of his Spirit as was Elijah so that their facts and suck like were altogether particular and cannot be abused by imitation and followed by every one as rules whose calling is not properly to use the sword of justice 4 Because it would bring a Mass of confusion to the utter ruine of all Societies if every man at his own hand might execute vindictive justice upon offenders who deserve it or upon pretence they do deserve it which is to fight against God who is the God of order politick as well as Ecclesiastick and not of confusion 5 Because the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God Ia. 1. 20. 6 Because it is a contempt of publick laws and publick order It is an usurpation of the Magistrates sword which God hath put into his hand for punishing and protecting It is an invasion of Gods right and prerogative of executing vengeance which he hath so expresly reserved to himself Psalm 94. 1. Rom. 12. 19. Deut. 32. 35. Prov. 25. 21 22. 6 Because Solomon sayes my son if sinners entice thee consent thou not if they say come with us let us lay wait for blood let us lurk privily for the innocent walk not thou in the way with them Prov. 1. 10 11. 7 Because a righteous man regardeth the life of his beast much more ought a righteous man to regard the life of his neighbour Prov. 12. 10. The sin of murder may be many wayes aggravated First by the quality of the person murdered whether he be a superiour as a Magistrate or Minister or parent or whether he be of a near relation as a brother or near kinsman Secondly from the manner extream cruelty being used or sudden and unexpected death putting a man into eternity in the twinckling of an eye To which we may add deliberation and premediate murder of which Solomon speaks in the forecited place Quest. IX ARE Ecclesiastick Persons exempted from due obedience to the Magistrate No. Rom. 13. 1 1 Kings 2. 26. Acts 25 9 10 11. 2 Peter 2. 1 10 11. Iude verse 8. 9 10 11. Well then do not the Papists err who maintain that the Clergy as they call them and their goods are altogether free by the Law of God from Secular Powers Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the command of obedience is general and universal let every soul be subject Rom. 13. 1. 2 Because Christ commanded the Pharisees who were of the Clergy to render unto Cesar the things which are Cesars Matth. 22. 21. Nay Christ himself payed tribute money to wit a Stater in value two shillings and three pence which Peter found in the fishes mouth when he opened it Matth. 17 27. 3 Because Paul did acknowledge himself subject to the Magistrate when he appealled unto Cesar Acts 25. 11. 4 From the example of the Priests who were subject to their Kings Did not Abiather at Solomons command go to Anothoth 1 Kings 2. 26. Quest. X. HAth the Pope any Power or Iurisdiction over Magistrates in their dominions or over any of their people No. Rev. 13. 15 16 17. 2 Thes. 2 4 Well then do not the Papists err who maintain that the Pope of Rome as Pope hath full power by divine right over the whole World as well in matters Civil as Ecclesiastical Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because Christ expresly discharges his Disciples from taking to themselves any such power or dominion Matth. 20 25 Mark 10 42 2 Because the Kingdom of Christ is not of this World Iohn 18. 36. Neither ought the Popes Kingdom to be of this World who calls himself the Vicar of Christ. That is one who supplieth Christs room and taketh pains for him his Depute here on Earth 3 Because when the people would have made Christ a King he departed again into a mountain himself alone Iohn 6. 15. 4 Because the Apostle Peter discharged this Dominion 1 Peter 5. 1 2 3. 5 Because its never heard that any of the Apostles did ever use any civil power or command or sate as judges in civil matters but stood alwayes to be judged by Civil powers as is evident from the History of the Acts. 6 Because GOD hath put a difference between the Government of the Church and the Civil Government and hath given to each their own proper and distinct Officers Neither can the one invade the other without very great sin 2 Chron. 19. 8 9 10 11. 7 Because it is the mark of Antichrist to exalt himself above all that is called God 2 Thes. 2. 4. CHAP. XXIIII Of Marriage and Divorce Question I. IS Marriage between one man and one woman Yes Is it lawful for a man to have more than one wife or for a woman to have more than one husband at the same time No. Gen. 2. 24 Matth 19 5 6. Prov 2 17 Well then do not the Anabaptists and Familists err who maintain that it is lawful for a Christian not only to have more wives at the same time but as many as he desires Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the having of two wives or many wives is contrary to the first

institution of Marriage for the Lord gave to Adam one wife only Gen. 2. 24. 2 Because the Law of God forbidds expresly Bigamie or two wives Lev. 18. 18. 3 Because the Lord doth find fault sharply with Polygamie many wives Mal. 2. 14 15. 4 Because Christ says he that puts away his wife except in the case of Adultery and marries another committeth adultery Matth. 19. 9. But if it were lawful to have at one time more wives than one he should not be guilty of adultery in marrying another whether he put away the former wife or not 5 Because Bigamie and Polygamie take away the true peace of a wedded life as is evident from the examples of Iacob Gen. 30. And of Elkana 1 Sam. 1. 6. 6 Because the invention of Bigamie was the device of a wicked man Lamech Gen. 4. 19. Quest. II. IS it lawful for all sorts of people to marry who are able with judgement to give their consent Yes Heb. 13. 4. 1 Tim. 4. 3. 1 Cor. 7. 36 37 38. Gen. 24. 57 58. Well then doth not the Popish-Church err that forbids and discharges marriage to their Church men Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because marriage is honourable among all men and the bed undefiled Heb. 13. 4. 2 Because the Apostle commands for avoiding fornication every man to have his own wife and every woman to have her own husband 1 Cor. 7. 2. 3 Because the Apostle reckons up the forbidding of marriage among the doctrines of devils 1 Tim. 4. 3. 4 Because a Bishop must be the husband of one wife 1 Tim. 3. 2. 4. Titus 1. 6. 5 Because the Apostle reckons over the qualifications which are requisite for Bishops wives 1 Tim. 3. 11. 6 Because it can be gathered from Scripture that some of the Apostles and other Ministers of the Gospel have been married persons Concerning Peter the matter is evident Matth. 8. 14. Mark 1. 30. And we read that Philip the Evangelist had four daughters all of them Prophetesses Acts 21. 9. And sayes not the Apostle have we not power to lead about a sister a wife as well as other Apostles and all the brethren of the Lord and Cephas 1 Cor. 9. 5. Quest. III. OUght marriage to be within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity forbidden in the Word No. Can incestuous marriages ever be made lawful by any law of man or consent of parties so as these Persons may live together as man and wife No. 1 Cor 5. 1. Amos 2. 7. Mark 6. 18. Lev. 18. 24 25 26 27 28. Well then doth not the Popish-Church err that speaks in the decrees of the Council of Trent after this manner If any man affirm that these degrees only of Consanguinity or Affinity which are set down in Leviticus may hinder a contract of Marriage to be made or may dissolve a marriage contract already made and that the Church hath not power to dispense with some of these degrees that is to say to permit incest or may not make new Laws and constitute far more forbidden degrees than are exprest in Leviticus let him be an Anathema and accursed Yes By what reasons are they confuted Before this be done take notice that there are here two heads to be considered First Whether or not we must stand to the forbidden degrees of Consanguinity and Affinity exprest in Leviticus Secondly Whether to these degrees set down as forbidden in Leviticus new degrees may be added by the Church of Rome which will render a marriage incestuous To which we answer that it is not in the power of any creature to dispense that is to say to suffer that to be used which is forbidden by the Law of God with any of these Laws in Leviticus which forbid incestuous marriages And next we affirm neither is it in the power of any creature to add to these degrees forbidden in Leviticus any other which are not forbidden 1 Because such a power of dispensing is not to be found in all the Scripture 2 Because the Lord sayes expresly what thing soever I command you observe to do it thou shalt not add thereto nor diminish from it Deut. 12. 32. But the Lord himself hath made these Laws and established these Marches so sure that no Council no Pope no Creature can either dispense with any of them or add new ones to them See Leviticus 18. 3 Because these Laws are of common and perpetual right and therefore cannot be dispensed with For the breach of them is reckoned up amongst the abominations wherewith the Nations about polluted and defiled the land Lev. 18. 24. 25 27. Quest. IV. IS it lawful to marry a second wife after the first is dead Yes Is it lawful after divorce to marry another as if the offending party were dead Yes Matth. 5. 31 32. Rom. 7. 2. 3. Matth. 19. 9. Well then do not the Novatians the Puritans of old truely so called and the Tertullianists err who absolutely condemned second marriages Yes This absurd tenet is confuted from Rom. 7. 2 3. and from 1 Cor. 7. 39. Do not likewise the Papists err who deny that after divorce second marriages are permitted to Christians Yes But here by two distinctions they explain their mind First They distinguish between Cohabitation the Bed and the Ty. The first is the dwelling together of man and woman in one family The second is the right of giving and requiring due benevolence The third is that whereby both are made one whereby the one cannot but be the others while they are both living They distinguish next between persons that are believers and that are unbelievers If then both parties or one of them be unbelievers they grant that the marriage is valide both as to Cohabitation to the marriage bed and to the Ty or Bond. But if both parties be Christians they think that the marriage may be dissolved as to bedding together and Cohabitation yet the Bond standeth sure and abideth unloosable especially if the marriage be contracted after Baptism and therefore a second marriage after divorce is unlawful to any of them But this is easily confuted 1 Because Christ permitted marriage after divorce Matth. 5. 31 32. Matth. 19. 9. Here Christ forbidding a man to put away his wife and to marry another in express words excepts the case of Fornication Therefore he suffers a man to put away his wife in the case of Fornication and to marry another 2 Because the Apostle says but if the unbelieving depart let him depart for a brother or sister is not under bondage in such cases 1 Cor. 7. 15. Therefore if a brother or sister when there is such a wilful and obstinate desertion be not under bondage then surely the Bond is dissolved and all remedies being tryed in vain for bringing back the obstinate party I doubt not but the innocent party may marry another without blame If this be then much more may the innocent party marry another when a Divorce is obtained Quest.