Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
lord_n chief_a john_n sir_n 17,976 5 6.4565 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
B01854 An illegal way to get another mans estate ... by William Ball. Ball, William.; Standen, William, fl. 1653.; Bullock, Edward. 1653 (1653) Wing B590; ESTC R170436 6,984 16

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

appeare and proved by a latter Deed in the said Bill and answer mentioned bearing Date the 30. day of May Eliz. 32. The Decree in Chancery made by the Lord Keeper Egerton complained of by the Petitioner Edward Bullock to have been corrupt ☞ and to have ratified a Morgage of the said Lands as in the Petition suggested doth not on any point or clause instance one tittle of a Morgage of the Mannors and Lands aforesaid much lesse ratifie any such pretended Morgage but the said Decree made by the aforesaid Lord Keeper by and with the assistance of Sir John Popham Knight chiefe Justice of the Queens Bench and of Sir Edmond Andersonne Knight chiefe Justice of the Queens Court of Common Pleas doth ratifie and confirme the Mannors and Lands aforesaid in equity unto Edmund Standen Complainant against the unjust claimes and pretences of William Bullock the now Petitioners Father as by the said Decree it doth and may appear grounded upon the reasons therein specified some whereof are also mentioned by Sir Edward Cooke in the third book of his Reports in Twines Case This was made appeare and proved by the said Decree exemplified under the Great Seale of Queen Eliz. Dated the 5. day of June Since when restored in the 39. yeer of the said Queens Reigne and left sometime of late with the Commissioners aforesaid William Bullock the now Petitioners Father pretended a Lease of 800. yeers of the aforesaid Mannors and Land demised unto him by Thomas Bullock aforesaid had there been a Morgage of the said Mannors and Lands as is now pretended he needed not to have seined such a Lease but to have desired Redemption and to tha● end the said William Bullock suborned and endeavoured to suborne Evidence or Witnesses and for forging or feining of the Lease aforesaid and for other his notorious practises the said William Bullock was censured in the Starre-Chamber This was made appeare and proved by a Deecree of Starre-Chamber exemplified under the Great Seale of 〈…〉 30. of 〈…〉 of the said Queens Reigne Si●●● re●●●●● and left 〈◊〉 of late with the Commissioners aforesaid At the time of the purchase Mistresse Dorothy Bullock wife of Thomas Bullock aforesaid had Right of Dower and enjoyed Dower afterwards for a long season This was made appeare and proved by a Deed of Assignement of Dower under the said Dorothy her hand and seale Dated the first day of July Eliz. 37. At the time of the Purchase there were four Leases in being for 15. or 16. yeers of a good part of the Demeasnesse of the Premisses at small Rents which the Lessees whereof William Bullock aforesaid was one were to enjoy against the Purchasor Standen although the vendor Bullock should dye This was made appeare and proved by the Covenants in the Copy of the Deed of Bargaine and Sale aforesaid also by the aforesaid answer of Thomas Bullock exemplified c. also by the Decree in Chancern fo●●erly mentioned also by the deposition of John ●anner taken by Order of the former Committee for I●●●●●ity The mannors and Lands aforesaid are si●uat in the Forrest of Windsor and at the time of the sale of them to Edmund Standen aforesaid subject to the strict execution of the Forrest Laws which made them of lesse value and esteeme This was made appeare and proved by the severall Depositions of Stephen Rose Wiliam Bullock Anne Hamlyn John Planner and Richard Bullock taken by Order of the Committee aforesaid The Mannors and Lands aforesaid are averred to have been according to constant Report sold out-right T●● 〈…〉 s●●●●● of Anne Hamlyn 〈…〉 ●ge●●on 〈◊〉 by Order of the Committee aforesaid The suits between Edmond Standen and Will 〈◊〉 the now Petitioners Father were not upon any Morgage but upon other points and debates at Law mentioned before Numb 7. This was made appeare and proved by the Chancery and Starre Chamber Decrees aforesaid and also it doth and may farther appeare by severall non-suits in the Kings-Bench and Common-Pleas as also by a verdict Iudgment and Execution Termino Paschae Iac. 3. against the said William Bullock The Mannors and Lands in the Petition mentioned are not now worth 800 l. per annum after above 60. yeers improvement as it is generally knowne in the Country where the Lands lye and if the Deponents on Bullocks behalfe have averred and deposed otherwise 〈◊〉 persons ought not in Justice to be credited who 〈◊〉 ●●●sed gaine-sayed undeniable Records touching 〈…〉 Concerning the Woods and Tim●● 〈…〉 ●●tition mentioned all Impartiall men kno●● 〈◊〉 Woods at the time of the sale of the Ma●●●● and Lands 〈…〉 〈◊〉 sayers of Records as aforesaid may 〈…〉 Given under my h●●d the 31. day of March 1653. W●●●●●●●●●den