meriteth consideration and so much the more because the Paschal Lamb Typified Christ who is called our passover and the Lamb of God who taketh away the sin of the World and tho' I do not observe this thereby to plead that the celebration of the Lords Supper should be no more frequent than the Passover yet it may be conducive for softning the rigide censures of some against others who cannot celebrat this Sacrament oftner than once a year though they willingly would Page 147. Since our Saviour hath taken off the confinement as to time and place it follows that they who celebrate it seldomer than the Jews did their passover must needs have less regard to the memory of Christs death and the deliverance wrought by it than the Jews had to their deliverance out of Aegypt there being no other imaginable reason that can tempt them to neglect purifying of themselves c. Ans This reflection is more severe than well proved for even those who have some measure of regard to the memory of Christs death may have such impediments invincibly crossing their desires that sometimes they cannot celebrate so often as once a year which may be the affliction of some ministers but not their sinful neglect nor oblivion of Christs death but. 2ly It 's rare to celebrate it more seldom than once a year in any congregation of our Communion where the congregations are brought to any tollerable Settlement I grant the time was that the people of our perswasion both Ministers and others were so pursued by Bishop's Courts because of their meeting together and adhering to their sound principles that some were imprisoned many Excommunicated and their Families broken other hunted as Patridges on the mountains and especially if they were found celebrating the Lords Supper if these be the times that the Author chargeth us with the guilt of seldom celebrating it is not fair for he knoweth as well as I who were to blame and I know where the Righteous God placeth the guilt Page 148. And there can be no better way of determining when we are oblidged to do it than by observing when God in his goodness gives us opportunity for either we are oblidged to do it or else we may choose whether ever we will do it or not Ans I am well satisfied with this proposals of opportunity providing that all consider and a be consider at a that every thing be considered to make it an opportunity indeed and a seasonable occasion for this celebration But First There may be a seasonable opportunity for the Ministers part when it is not an opportunity for the people There may be an opportunity for the Minister and some of the people when it 's not so with others of the people and renting of Societies must be guarded against There may be a fit Season both for Minister and people and yet all of them be obstructed by external lets Yet 2ly The Author 's calling this the opportunity whensoever they meet together as Page 149. I say this cannot generally hold for Christians may have occasion to meet together even for worship when there is no opportunity for celebrating the Lords Supper as when God requireth them to meet together for prayer and fasting and the day spent in such humbling exercises as are then suitable But. Page 149. The very design of our publick meetings on the Lords Day and not on the Jewish Sabbath is to remember and to keep up in our minds a sense of what Christ did and suffered for us till he come again Ans That the Lords day is designed for a memorial of Christs Resurrection all acknowledge but that it 's instituted for a memorial of his Sufferings and Death is new and unwarrantable if this had dropt from a Dissenters pen we had heard it again on both sides of our head Page 150. It seems then probable from the very institution of this Sacrament that our Saviour designed it should be a part of Gods Service in all the solemn Assemblies of Christians as the passover was in the yearly Assemblies of the Jews Ans The paralel made by the Author between the Jewish Assemblies and Christian Assemblies runeth not even and to make it straight it must run thus our Saviour designed our Sacrament should be a part of Gods Service in all the solemn Assemblies of Christians as the passover was in all the Solemn Assemblies of the Jews the paralel holdeth not otherwise and then it followeth that the passover was a part of Gods Service in all the Solemn Assemblies of the Jews which could not be since the passover was but once a year 2ly If then the passover service as to the time when were designed as a pattern for the time when our Sacrament should be celebrated then it will follow that our celebrating should be but once a year so that whatsoever was designed by Christ it 's evident our Author's design is at a great loss by what he now sayeth Page 150. And the same is further manifest in the second place from the examples of the Apostles and of the Churches of God in the New Testament they cannot be supposed but to have understood what Christ meant by these words Do this in remembrance of me and if it appears that they did make this feast a constant part of their ordinary worship we may safely conclude that Christ meant it should be so also and here it is observable that we do not find any Solemn Stated meeting of Christians for worship in the whole New Testament without it At first the disciples had their meetings every day and then they likewise daily received this Sacrament Acts 2 46. and they continued daily with one accord in the Temple and in breaking of bread from House to house Their meeting together was on purpose and with express design to celebrate this Feast 1 Cor. 10. 20. When ye come together therefore into one place this is not to eat the Lords Supper and downward Page 151 Then surely the Apostles saying that when you come together into one place this is not to eat the Lords Supper c. Gives us ground to conclude that in his opinion eating the Lords Supper ought to be one constant end of our coming together Page 152. When the meeting of Christians came to be fixed to the first day of the week or the Lords day the breaking of bread was likewise brought to the same day so Acts 20. 7. And upon the first day of the week when the disciples came together to break bread Paul preached unto them Ans By all this the Author is labouring to get the time of celebrating the Lords Supper fixt which he hath said Christ did not prefix 2ly He passeth now from his first overtur that opportunity was the time when this celebration should be for a Stated time is now his pursuite 3ly As to this Stated time he hath two of them in hand the one is every day the other is the Lords
of Saints on earth some times know not what to ask of God 2ly That the Spirit helpeth their infirmities 3ly That this help of the Spirit is so efficacious and prevalent these Prayers are the mind of the Spirit and called his intercession 4ly That these prayers by this assistance are according to God or the will of God For the first of these they know not what to ask observe it s not said they know not how or in what Spiritual or acceptable manner but what to ask 2. The forms of Prayer prescribed by God were then extant known and regarded by the Saints yet they knew not what to ask 3. This ignorance what to ask could not be as to generall petitions for the Lords Prayer expresseth all the general Petitions which we are to pray for 4. Neither the Apostle nor any other Saints should ask any thing of God but what was comprehended in these general Petitions 5 Therefore their ignorance what to ask must be what particular mercies to ask hic et nunc according to their various necessities 6. Tho they did know their various emergent particular necessary mercies were virtually contained in the form of the Lords Prayer yet they thought it not sufficient only to repeat the words thereof but found it their duty to have an explicite Distinct conception of these particular mercies their present exigencies required 7. The apostle and other Saints found themselves at a loss without Divine Assistance to discern what particular Mercies were most necessary and Seasonable for them to Pray for and therupon acknowledge they know not what to ask The second thing to be observed in this text is the Supply of this defect by the Spirit of God enabling them what to ask as they ought because he helpeth their infirmities whatever other help they had by the Spirit as to their tryalls 2ly Yet this helping of their infirmities is also relative to their Praying as is evident by the particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for we know not what we should Pray so that this help is a cure to their ignorance a levamen or support as the word beareth curing this infirmity but the Spirit helpeth 3. This help is given to all the Children of God or Saints as this text nameth them the Apostle including himself with the rest to restrict this help to some eminent Set of believers were meer violence to the text and full scope of the place for this help belongeth to them who are Saved by hope Vers 24. And afterward Vers 28. To such as love God and are the called according to his purpose 4. When the Spirit helpeth what they shall Pray this is a distinct help from the manner of Praying Spiritually with the heart grace desire fervencie for this Praying with grace in the heart is expressed by these words with groans that cannot be uttered so that the help of the Spirit is not only to Pray with grace in the heart but as to the matter of Prayer also 5. Seing the Spirit of God giveth help to his Children as to what they shall ask then there is no warrand or reason to restrict this help to mental Prayer only but that he helpeth them to Pray which way soever God calleth them to Pray he who giveth what to ask giveth also to speak it when he requireth speaking and that the Spirit of God is concerned in the very words of the prayers of his Children hath been made out already from Gal 4 6. Hose 2. 23. And they shall say Thou art my God Jer. 3. 19 Thou shalt call me my Father c Isa 12. 1. And in that day thou shal say O Lord I will praise thee though thou wast angry with me thine anger is turned away◠and thou comfortedst me This is not prescribing them a form but what the Spirit of God shall prompt them to speak to him we speak words which the holy ghost teacheth 1 Cor. 2 13. The third thing in the words is that the Prayers of believers by this Assistance is called the Intercession of the Spirit which should be carefully understood because its Christ who is our intercessor yet the Spirit of Christ given to all who are in him being the Spirit of Grace and supplications is so much interested in the Prayers of his People both as to matter and manner that its called his intercession albeit Payer be formally the act of the believer 2. Seing the Spirit of God is so deeply concerned in the Prayers of believers that their Prayers by his help is said to be the mind of the Spirit and the Prayer being dignified with the name of the Spirits intercession then it must follow that the believer is enabled in all the necessary parts of Prayer as God calleth him Object But many pretenders to the Spirit of Prayer do profane Prayer and utter such words as the Spirit of God will never espouse Ans That many pretend to the Spirit of Prayer who are Sensuall not having the Spirit who will deny we undertake no defence of such persons but regret it as no Small part of the worlds Sin and misery 2. But because there are such profaners of the holy Spirit it doth not follow that we may neglect despise that most necessary assistance seing God hath so clearly and fully promised the Spirit of Prayer to all his children and we commanded to pray in the Holy Ghost 3 Men who speak in Prayer before others should be warrantably assured that God requireth it of them for if God do not call to speak in Prayer they cannot safely expect his assistance therein all the Children of God are not called to speak in Prayer publickly their hearts may be enabled to conceive prayer in secret who could not do so in publick God not requiring it of them it were presumption to attempt that which God calleth them not unto 4 If any man use expressions in prayer contrary to the revealed will of God and the analogie of faith or such as are not agreeable to the nature of prayer or scurrilous impertinencies such as inevitably rendreth the Prayer contemptible such a man is so far from Praying by the Spirit of God that where it can be hindred he should not be suffered so to profane that holy duty 5 As God distributeth Spirituall gifts to his children according to the service he hath for them so they are dispensed according to the measure of the gift of Christ tho all the Children of God have some measure yet not all alike measure therefore some may abound more both in the gift and grace of prayer than others who are also sincere 6. Many have no expressions in Prayer but such as are Orthodox and pertinent to the nature of Prayer yet if they be but plain without the words of mans wisdom especially if they be spiritual savouring of the power of the Spirit of Grace carnal men are ready to call such Prayers flat mean and indecent for no other reason but that a
Day 4ly His arguments for every dayes celebration are Acts the 11. 46. They continued daily c. And 1 Cor. 10. 20. When ye come together c. 5ly The Apostles understood what Christ meant by these words Do this c. And if they made this Feast a constant part of their ordinary worship we may conclude Christ meant it should be so 6ly No Solemn Stated meetings of Christians without this Sacrament His arguments for the first day of the weeks being the time of celebration are Actâ— 20. 7. From which he saith two things may be observed 1st that the first day of the week was the Disciples time of publick worship 2d That the breaking of bread or Celebrating the Holy Eucharist was a part of that worship the Scripture is as plain for the one as the other 1st Now let the Reader observe that the Author having given up all claime to Scripture precept for the time of celebrating the Lords Supper he searcheth for it in Examples 2ly He bringeth Examples of different times from the Apostles practice 3ly He cometh close up to a Divine Institution for both these differing times because for every days partaking he saith the Apostles knew what Christ meant and if they made it a constant part of their worship Christ saith he meant it so also And for the other viz. The first day of the week he saith the Scripture is as plain for the Sacrament that day as for observing the day it self 4ly There being here two Apostolick practices of equal authority which of them is preceptive or oblidging to us If the Author say the latter of the two then how will he answer himself saying that the Disciples did meet every day 2 that at every meeting they did celebrate 3. And being a constant part of their ordinary worship we may safely conclude that Christ meant it should be so by the Authors arguments Then the daily celebration appeareth to have the greatest authority of the two what then shall be done next for fixing of the time No doubt he had best leave it as Christ himself did not confining us to a prefixed time and it 's evident that we cannot have the times when determined by Apostolick practices because in their own time the times of celebration were not one It will appear also by a more particular consideration of the places quoted Acts 2 46. Is expounded by judicious commentators to be only the Disciples ordinary food expressed by breaking of bread from House to house and as the remainder of that Verse sheweth they did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart The breaking of bread doth not alwayes signifie the Lords Supper Luke 24. 30. is ordinary food But the 42. Verse of the 2d of the Acts is the place where the Sacramental breaking is more clear and they continued stedfastly in the Apostles Doctrine and fellowship in breaking of bread and in Prayer but then it is not daily and 1 Cor. 11. 20. Sayeth no more but that sometimes yea frequently they did meet for the celebration of the Lords Supper but that they did never meet for worship on any other account but to celebrat the Lords Supper is dangerous for the Gospel was to be preached fully Christ commanded to teach all things whatsoever he had commanded them Matth. 28. and Acts 10. 42. He commanded us to preach to the people the Doctrine of Salvation and Christs gracious Transaction with sinners according to the Covenant of Grace was greater work and therefore more insisted upon by the Apostles than only the Sacramental Seal of the Covenant Therefore to say that their ordinary publick Assemblies for worship was on purpose as the Author saith Page 150 And one main design of their coming together Page 151 cannot be allowed for what is the Seal without the Doctrine and Covenant whereunto it is a Seal Observe also that tho' they came together at sometimes purposely for celebration of the Lords Supper as 1 Cor. 11 20. and Acts 20. 7. Yet this will not prove that all their meetings in Assemblies were on this account The Apostle Paul being by Gods merciful providence present with the people it was very expedient then to celebrate that they might be instructed by him in the right manner of celebration now leaving them Let the Reader also remember that by the Author the celebration of the Lords Supper was brought unto and fixed on the first day of the week Acts. 20. 7. And yet still he pursueth their celebrating at every meeting which was oftner than the first day of the week how he will reconcile and cement both I leave to himself for it 's past my reach to reconcil these The Primitive Christians did celebrate at every meeting 2. They did meet every day and 3. nevertheless it was fixed to the Lords day 4. And our Saviour design'd it should be a part of Gods Service in all the Solemn Assemblies of Christians which are on other days than the Lords day Let it be observed also that if they did meet daily for this purpose to celebrate then why is there any such peculiar remark on meeting on the Lords day for that purpose if all their meetings had been to celebrate There is reason from that Scripture Acts 20. 7. To conclude that there were ordinary Christian Assemblies on the first day of the week which were established by Christ himself before Paul was a Preacher for a religious memorial of his Resurrection and deliverance from all his Sufferings and on that day they did celebrate the Lords Supper But I could never see a Cogent argument from that Scripture proving the celebrating every Lords day because on that Lords day they did celebrate for there were most blessed Meetings on the Lords day when Christ himself was with his Disciples after his Resurrection And yet neither mention nor probability of celebrating his Supper as John 20. 19. On the first day of the week Jesus was with his disciples where there was a competent number as at the first Institution yet nothing of this celebration so Verse 26. after eight days again his Disciples were within and Thomas with them then came Jesus the doors being shut and stood in the midst yet nothing of this celebration so that we have neither prescription by Christ nor practice to give us example for celebrating every Lords day which is the more to be remarked that some of these times he did meet with them the Disciples were at meat when Christ came in among them as Mark 16. 14. And yet nothing of this Sacramental meat therefore the celebration was not every Lords day If any object that this celebration could not be where Christ was visibly present because he had said he would Drink no more of the fruit of the Vine until c. Ans Yet the Disciples might have celebrated by themselves but no mention of it is made But Page 150. Our Author saith that we do not find any Solemn Stated
good and wise men declare it to be the safest and best or that you have long professed it but see with your own eyes give it heart and time when no mortal eye can be witness as you have a value for these immortal substances that are yet breathing in your bodies for the retaining whereof you have no price to give and for the annihilation whereof you have no price to give but must endure an eternity whether we will or not what can we think of but is a very trifle when this eternity and what concerneth it is considered The necessity therefore of establishment in that religion which the eternal God hath appointed as the way to lead us to a blessed Eternity is great if we consider First the innat Atheism of our depraved natures whereby there is not only a privation of that primaeve knowledge God honoured man with but many perverse and erroneous apprehensions of God of happiness in him and the way to it Atheistical doubts concerning God Christ Heaven and Eternity These seeds of Atheism not only lurk undiscerned by many but often make horrid eruptions shaking yea overturning all the religion some have professed for many years because they have made it no part of their religion to be fixed in it then they are ready to cry out is there a God is there a Christ is there an Eternity can there be a Resurrection is there a Heaven or Hell Yet some are tormented with the fears of that the very being whereof they doubt orhers again forsaken of God speak blasphemously of the God of Heaven avow Atheism and tempt others to it while people are not established and their house never built on the rock they are obnoxious ro the worst of these Wo's nor hath religion power upon their Souls not knowing whether it be true or false many living as unconcerned with the religion they profess as if they had none being uncertain but all may prove otherwayes in the end and this uncertainty is an argument in reserve that the Devil improveth against seriousnes in religion labour therefore to have your feet fix'd on the rock that cannot sink under you that so your goings may be established knowing in whom ye have believed And that you may be established believe the Scriptures to be the very word of God the Scripture of Truth that cannot be broken trust fully the testimony and Veracity of God for if you fluctuate and waver in this every wind of temptation will be ready to shâ—ke you at the very Root and build what you will all will be overturned if this foundation be not firmly laid that all Scripture is by Divine inspiration And because I had known many poor Souls oppressed with temptations to doubt of all that is wâ—itten their hope and comfort burn'd up and almost consumed with such fiery darts before they would utter them to any and some such at this day fainting under such suggestions as they are ashamed to make known to their dearest Friends for the establishment and help of such to believe the Scripture of Truth First observe what you have by nature of the Image of God yet remaining what awfull indelible impressions you have of a God over you which you cannot shake fully off it 's written on your heart that there is a God that he is infinitely great and Omnipotent that he is just Holy wise and good now that which you yet find written on your heart you find the same in the written word of God whether would you go What can you betake your selves to but to the Testimony of God written both in your hearts and in the word of God revealed to us If you should reject the Scriptures you reject also the witness of God in your Souls this meditation God hath made very conducive for quieting and fixing some Souls Consider also that what the word of God publisheth of the depravation of our nature you find even as it 's written natural enmity against God which inclineth us if we could to hide our selves from him as Adam to say depart from us for we desire not the knowledge of thy ways we are informed by the word of God that the heart is deceitful above all things that every imagination of the thoughts of our heart are only evil continually that we rebell and are disobedient to God that we are slow of heart to believe and bent to backsliding c. All these things and many moe we find by nature and wofull experience What is predicted and promised in the word of God concerning the salvation of sinners by a Redeemer his death Resurrection conquest and Kingdom c. Are exactly found as the written word of God hath revealed them what God hath promised of pouring out his Spirit in the latter days is found as it 's written the power of God still appearing in converting sinners making many new creatures and all things new with them making them love what they hated and hate what they loved making a warfare against sin daily where sin was committed with greediness c. This Sanctifying grace of the Spirit is a continued witness multitudes of miracles both under Old and New Testaments were wrought for confirmation of Gods Holy Word and promise which without violence to our very reason cannot be denied either to be wrought or the finger of God being wrought these are blessed helps which our merciful God hath provided for confirming unstable Souls and to secure us that the Scriptures are the word of God our maker and judge and above all to depend on the Spirit of Christ which leadeth into all Truth When God in his mercy hath determined and fixed your judgements that the Scriptures are Gods word and Truth so as you can with confidence adventure Soul and Eternity according to the doctrine there delivered then make choise of the Truth receive it in love and gratitude blessing God for so great a benefit that many millions of Souls are deprived of be diligent in reading of it labouring and praying to understand it make Gods Testimonies the men of your counsel let it dwell richly in you seek the law of God written in your hearts sell not the Truth at any rate be not ashamed of any of his words lest he be ashamed of you let no flatteries or threats of men make you wander from the commandments of your God Search out especially for the great Salvation recorded in the word of God and published by a Gospel Ministry search until you find the sent Saviour of the world accept of him subject and devout your selves to him joyn and give your own selves to the Lord do this personally distinctly and deliberatly and leave it no longer as a duty you hope will be done but while it 's called to day allow it heart and time as the most enriching work you ever were or shall be about under the Sun blessing God that he allows and requires to subscribe our selves the Lords and to
as a rule to direct us in Prayer but to be a Badge of our profession is a groundless conjecture for Baptism and Summaries of our Christian Religion are Badges of our profession 2. And since the Author understandeth still the Form of words the Apostles confute him for they kept the true Badge of their profession and yet used not these very words in Prayer He saith this Form of prayer is a Summary of our Duty as Christians Ans Where then is the Decalogue which in many Ages hath been called a Summary of our duty but the Lords Prayer only a Summary Petendorum of things to be sought of God as the decalogue of faciendorum and the belief of credendorum why doth the Author confound these things which hath been judiciously distinguished in all Ages since we were Christians He saith it 's no more lawful to alter it than to lay it aside Ans We do not alter it by enlarging upon it the prayer remains the same after all our enlargments and we return to it again and again as our fixed Rule but if he call that an altering the prayer to use other words he contradicteth himself as is proved already Page 36. The Author's arguments drawing to an end he giveth a gentle touch to the different words in the Institution by way of objection but passeth that which is most material as is observed already Next he appeareth for peoples joyning of voices and Responses in prayer As we have the command of God and the example of his Saints for offering up our Prayers to him in a set and prepared form of words so we have the like example for joyning voices upon occasion Ans 1. The Author engageth this part of his work with a modest blush passing from the word command and betaking himself to example and that but upon occasion and yet more diminutively afterward on some occasions adding also that generally it is sufficient that the people joyn in their hearts with the words of publick prayer 2. If no more be necessary but the people joyning in their hearts why is more urged Shall we still be troubled with unnecessary Impositions can the Author call this an Institution of Christ seing Worship is sufficiently performed without it and not being the Institution of Christ what name can himself give it but the invention of Man 3. When these occasions offer who knoweth and who determineth these occasions whether God or men let the Author once clear this that we may know what occasions he understandeth But he proveth that the people joyned their voices by Judg. 21. 2. And the people came to the house of God and lift up their voices and wept sore Ans He doth no more but repeat this Scripture and so leaves it and so shall I for this Text saith nothing to the manner of Worship in that Assembly neither who did speak and order it nor how many spoke so that any inference from it can be nothing to his purpose Acts 4. 24. They lift up their voice to God with one accord and said Lord Thou art God c. Ans The Author saith the Apostles and their Disciples lift up their voice On what account the Disciples of Christ are termed the Disciples of the Apostles I understand not the Author hath no warrand for this being all Christs Disciples 2. That they lift up their voice with one accord is no more but to joyn in their hearts with him that speaketh as if they had been of one heart for if all had spoken at once whether inspired or not confusion had apparently ensued which the Apostle is against 1 Cor. 14. 33. Acts 16 25. Paul and Silas prayed and sung praises unto God Ans This is near trifling with holy Scriptures there being nothing in this Text but that they prayed and praised together in joynt privat Worship and what then cannot two do this and not speak both at once So Rev. 6. 10. They cryed with a loud voice saying How long O Lord c. Ans This is yet further off his purpose for who on Earth knoweth the manner how unbodied Spirits speak to God having neither voices nor tongues as we have I weary to waste time upon such Allegations What remaineth of this Section is for Responses in Prayer which hath no better warrand than Responses in singing fully answered already Psal 106. 48. Let all the people say Amen Ans Let the Author remember his own words Pag. 36. Generally its sufficient the people joyn in their hearts c. 2ly It 's to be observed that the Lords Prayer according to the Institution Luk. 11. hath not the word Amen added which the Institution recorded by Matth. hath so that comparing these two its evident that a liberty is allowed us as to the use of that word yet this liberty alloweth no man to condemn the use thereof seing the Institution by one of the Evangelists hath that word expresly 3ly As the people joyn in the whole Prayer with the Minister so also when he uttereth Amen Page 39. We have a strange manner of Responses from 2 Chron. 5. 13. The Priests and Levites praising God and saying For he is good for his mercy endureth for ever then Solomon performed another part of the service Chap. 6. 3. He blessed first the people Secondly He blessed and thanked God And lastly Offered that Divine Prayer of Dedication then follow the Burnt-offerings and Sacrifices Chap. 7. And then last of all follows the peoples part Chap. 7. 3. They bowed themselves with their faces to the ground c. Ans Let the Reader observe that all these quotations are for proof of Responses and yet there is not one Response amongst them all For 1. The Levites singing praises to God can be no Response to men nor any colour for it in the Text. 2. Solomons solemn Prayer to God can be no Response to men nor the least colour for it in the Text. 3. The Burnt-offerings and Sacrifices can be no Response to whom could Sacrifices Respond I must here stop my Pen to prevent irritation tho some would be ready to expose the Author by this Response and all of them here mentioned 4. The peoples bowings and Worshiping God can be no Response to men for they are found Worshiping only God upon the extraordinary appearing of his Glory I need say no more of this it speaketh for it self But Page 40. Answering to prayers is no legal abolished Ceremony this is manifest from 1 Cor. 14. 16 Else when thou shall bless with the Spirit how shall he that occupieth the room of the unlearned say Amen at the giving of thanks Ans 1. Let it be observed again that the Author is seeking for Responses from this Text in Prayer but the Text speaketh of giving Thanks and Praising and the following Verse also if it be said Prayer and Praises are one this cannot be for Praises and Prayer are made two distinct parts of Worship 2. The scope of this Scripture
attendants were fed Mal. 1. 7 Ye offer polluted bread upon mine Altar Ans We have now no altar but Christ and no sacrifices but Spiritual therefore the Altar for sacrifice is no pattern to us under the Gospel 2ly The Altar of Old was for offerings to God the Lords Table is God's offering meat to us I hope the Author is not of that mind that we offer up Christ again as a sacrifice in the Sacrament so that there is nothing here for the kneeling required But I might add 3ly That any Reader may be surprized to find the Author quoting Scripture for this kneeling seing he will not assert that the Scriptures requireth kneeling at the Lords Supper 2 On this account the Israelites came to the Altar and worshiped before it as being Gods Table for which he quoteth 2 Chron. 6. 12. And he stood before the Altar of the Lord The Author writeth no more of this Verse but passeth to the next where he findeth kneeling I shall therefore set down the whole two Verses as they are Dictated by God and he stood before the Altar of the Lord in the presence of all the Congregation of Israel and spread forth his hands Verse 13. for Solomon made a brasen Scaffold of five cubits long and five cubits broad and three cubits high and had set it in the midst of the Court and upon it he stood and kneeled down upon his knees before all the Congregation of Israel and spread forth his hands towards Heaven The Reader may now observe that Solomon stood before the Altar but it 's not said that he kneeled down before the Altar 2. That the Scaffold whereon he stood was in the midst of the Court and therefore not so framed as to be nearest unto the Altar 3. That he spread forth his hands to Heaven and therefore directed no worship toward the Altar but to the God of Heaven It 's said he kneeled before all the Congregation of Israel Yet he did not worship them and no more is said 1 King 8. 54. The Altat was before him when he was kneeling but he kneeled not to the Altar therefore his worship being neither directed to Altar nor Congregation tho' before them both but worshiping the God of Heaven and earth he kneeled and spread forth his hands to God in that praying posture of kneeling for the spreading of his hands and kneeling was to one and the same object Another Scripture quoted by the Author is 2 King 18. 22. Ye shall worship before this Altar in Jerusalem Ans The Author should have been so just to his Reader as let him know who spake these words for they are not the words of God neither Hezekiah himself nor any inspired man of God ever uttered them and yet Page 127. It 's reiterated with confidence as God commanded them to do 2 King 18. 22. shall the words of an ignorant blaspheming Athiest be called the commands of God who as our commentators well observe knew not what he said can the Author have a quiet Conscience to allow the world to take this for the command of God which hath no authority but the rambling invective of a cheating Railer I need say no more of this it speaketh too much of it self 3ly The Communion Table is called the Lords Table 1 Cor 10. 21. Ans Quid sequitur The Author quoteth this Scripture and saith not one word more of it but leaveth his Reader to guess and so shall I too but that which is in the Text maketh against the Author the Lords Table being no Altar for Sacrifices to God 4ly Page 119. The Israelites partaking of the Altar is proposed as an Example for our partaking of the Lords Table 1 Cor. 10. 16. The Cup of blessing which we bless is it not the Communion of the blood of Christ The bread which we break is it not the Communion of the Body of Christ Verse 18. Behold Israel after the flesh are not they which eat of the Sacrifices partakers of the Altar Ans All being yeilded that is found in these Verses no gain to the Author emergeth such as Sacrificed did partake of the Altar what then we have no word of authority to Eat at the Lords Table because Sacrificers of Old did partake of the Sacrifices we have Christ's Command to eat at his Table but 2. It had been necessary to consider the Scop and sense of the Text for the Apostle is warning the people of God to â—ee from Idolatry Verse 14. Wherefore dearly beloved flee from Idolatry and not to partake of Sacrifices offered to idols for these who eat and partake of these Sacrifices offered to Idols do declare their regard to that Altar and profession unto which these Sacrifices belong therefore these who eat of these Sacrifices are said to partake of that Altar and the Apostle fully clearing the sense of his own words addeth Verse 20. The things which the Gentiles sacrifice they sacrifice to Devils and not to God and then Verse 21. Ye cannot drink the Cup of the Lord and the cup of Devils ye cannot be partakers of the Lords Table and of the Table of Devils the sense then is plain as the Israelites of Old eating of the sacrifices commanded of God did thereby declare their adherence to the True God and his Altar so these who eat of the sacrifices offered to Idols and Devils do in so far abandon the profession of Christianity and betake themselves to an idolatrous Altar and profession let the Author cast up our Commentators and he will see what is now said besides that the Text of it self makes it plain And again I say however it be taken there is nothing in it for the Author's purpose of worshiping before the Altar so that I am surprized to see it adduced for that end 5. In allusion to this religious Eating with bodily worship it is prophesied of our Saviour Psal 22 29. all they that be fat upon earth and Verse 26 The meek shall eat and worship since then Scripture sets forth to us religious Eating at the Lords Table with worship and the Holy Communion is such an Eating at his Table it follows that the Scripture warrands our worshiping when we eat Ans This is a prophesie of the conversion of Heathens as appeareth Verse 27. all the ends of the world shall remember and turn unto the Lord and all the kindreds of the Nations shall worship before thee Let the Reader remark that the worship is to be performed to God neither before Altar nor Table but they shall worship before thee the eating here spoken of is partaking of Christs benefits and being turned to the Lord they shall worship him but that it shall be either before Altar or Table is manifest adding to the Text so this argument faileth also tho' the Author sayeth that the Scripture sets forth to us a religious eating at the Lords Table with worship for which he hath brought no proof nor never will Page 120. We