Proselyte that sojourned for a time or were settled among them And will offer an offering made by fire of a sweet savour unto the LORD Any of the fore-mentioned Offerings which could be offered as is here directed by none but one that was subject to their Law For though another Proselyte who worshipped the true God but was not Circumcised might bring a Burnt-offering yet they say it was without a Meat-offering and Drink-offering and no Peace-offerings were accepted from him As ye do so he shall do Offer according to the Rules above given which is farther explained in the following Verses Verse 15 Ver. 15. One Ordinance Viz. About Sacrifices Shall be both for you of the Congregation i. e. For you Israelites And also for the Stranger that sojourneth with you Here the LXX translate it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Proselytes that are added or joyned to you or are juris vestri participes as Mr. Selden expounds it L. II. de Jure Nat. Gent. cap. 2. p. 147. An Ordinance for ever c. Never to be repealed as long as your Religion lasts As ye are so shall the Stranger be before the LORD in Matters of Religion and Divine Worship though not in all Civil Things For no Proselyte they think could be chosen a Member of the Sanhedrim or great Council at Jerusalem The Jews extend these words to the way and manner of being made Proselytes by Circumcision Baptism and Sprinkling of Blood as the Jews were originally they say initiated into their Religion Selden Lib. I. de Synedriis cap. 3. p. 34. Ver. 16. One Law and one manner shall be for you Verse 16 and for the Stranger that sojourneth with you This general Rule was made to invite and incourage Strangers to become Proselytes to the Jewish Religion and to engage the Jews to be kind to them they being admitted to an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Philo calls it an equal Priviledge with those who were born Jews Yet this the Jews say is to be received with some distinctions For the Laws of Moses either concerning the Duties they owed to God and one to another or concerning Magistracy and Marriages they say those of the first sort belonged to Proselytes as much as to original Jews yet with some temperament as Mr. Selden observes Lib. II. de Jure Nat. Gent. cap. 4. But in those of the second sort they had not an equal priviledge for they were not to have any sort of Command either Civil or Military and though they might marry with the Jews yet not with the Priests and some Marriages were permitted to them which were forbidden to the Israelites See there p. 167. Ver. 17. And the LORD spake unto Moses saying Verse 17 These Commands were given in all likelyhood at the same time with the foregoing Ver. 18. Speak unto the Children of Israel and say Verse 28 unto them See v. 2. When ye come into the Land whither I bring you See there also only add this That the Jews acknowledge such kind of Offerings as here follow and First-fruits were due by the Law only from the Corn c. that grew in the Land of Canaan but by the Decree of their wise Men they were to bring them out of Syria and out of the Land of Og and Sihon as Maimonides saith in his Treatise called Biccurim cap. 2. Verse 19 Ver. 19. When ye eat i. e. When it is ready to be eaten for they offered it before they ate of it Of the Bread of the Land So Corn is called CIV Psalm 14. and the meaning seems to be that when they made Bread of the new Corn of the Land they should out of the Dough first make a Cake and offer it to the LORD before they baked Bread for their own use Ye shall offer up an Heave-offering unto the LORD This is explained in the next verse of offering a Cake out of the first Dough whether it were of Wheat or Barley or Rye or Oats or that which they call Cusemim which they describe to be a kind of Wheat or Barley different from that which is commonly known by those names For of these five kinds of Grain the Talmudists say this Cake was to be offered and that out of the Gleanings and the Sheaf left in the Field and out of the Corners of the Field Verse 20 Ver. 20. Ye shall offer up a Cake of the first of your Dough for an Heave-offering Not upon the Altar but it was given to the Priests on whom God bestowed all their Heave-offerings XVIII 8. yet they are said to be offered unto the LORD because they were heaved or lifted up to him as the Creator of Heaven and of Earth and then given to his Ministers who had it in his right As ye do the Heave-offering of the Threshing-floor so shall ye heave it That is as the First-fruits of the Harvest were given to the Priests and not offered upon the Altar so should this be given them XXIII Lev. 16 17. And so was the First-fruits of their Oyl and their Wine c. XVIII Numb 12 13. All which the Jews call the great Terumah or Heave-offering Ver. 21. Of the first of your Dough shall ye give unto Verse 21 the LORD an Heave-offering in your Generations This being a new Law not given before he repeats it that they might be the more observant of it As we may see they were by this that it was one of the things which rendred a Woman infamous though not so as to give her the bitter Water if she did not separate this Cake from the first Dough of the new Corn to be presented to God but either made her Husband believe she had done it when she had not or ate it her self as Mr. Selden observes L. III. Vxor Hebr. cap. 17. And therefore at this very day the Jews are so nice in this point that they take enough to make a Cake as soon as the Meal is mingled with Water The proportion is not mentioned in the Law but their wise Men say it was to be the forty fourth part of the whole Dough. See Buxtorf Synagog Jud. cap. 34. The Cabbalists observing that this verse begins with the Letter Mem and ends with Mem conclude after their way that therefore they were to give the fortieth part because Mem is the numeral Letter for forty Ver. 22. And if ye have erred and not observed all Verse 22 these Commandments which the LORD hath spoken unto Moses Which have been now given concerning Sacrifices for to such Commandments these words seem to have respect Maimonides in his Treatise of the Worship of the Planets and the Jews generally saith this concerns Idolatry Ver. 23. Even all that the LORD hath commanded you by the hand of Moses That is all the Commandments in the Book of Leviticus about such Matters Verse 23 of God's Worship and Service From the day that the LORD commanded Moses The word Moses is not in the Hebrew and the
them So this word bring near signifies to offer them unto God As they were VIII 10 11. Before Aaron the Priest In his presence That they may minister unto him Unto Aaron and the rest of the Priests who were the immediate Ministers of God and the Levites were given to minister unto them Which they did many ways especially while they remain'd in the Wilderness where they had a peculiar Charge which otherwise would have been incumbent on the Priests not only to guard the Tabernacle and keep a Watch night and day about it but also to take it down and to carry it when they removed and to set it up again when they rested as we read in the following part of this Chapter and in the next When they came into the Land of Canaan and were settled there they had less to do of this kind But as the Charge of the Tabernacle still lay upon them as it had done before so did other Works in the Courts of the LORD'S House and in the Chambers where they waited on the Priests which are particularly mentioned in 1 Chron. XXIII 28 29 c. And in David's time their Work was still more increased for he appointed them to be Singers in the House of the LORD and to play upon several sorts of Instruments 1 Chron. XXV which they did Morning and Evening 1 Chron. XXIII 30. Porters perhaps there were before who stood at the several Gates of the Tabernacle as afterward of the Temple and are said therein to minister in the House of the LORD 1 Chron. XXVI 12. as also Guards of the Treasury of God's House and of things dedicated to him v. 20. But as he increased the number of them so he settled them in their Courses that there might be a constant Attendance with greater ease As for those of them that were made Judges and Officers not only in Matters concerning the LORD but in the Service of the King as we read there 1 Chron. XXVI 29 30. it no more belongs to what is said of them here than what follows there v. 31. that there were found among them mighty Men of Valour See upon v. 10. Verse 7 Ver. 7. And they shall keep his Charge and the charge of the whole Congregation It highly concerned Aaron in particular and the whole Congregation in general that the Tabernacle should be well guarded And this was the Levites great business at present who took this Charge from off their hands by attending that Service which all of them were bound to perform Before the Tabernacle of the Congregation This exactly expresses in what their Ministry consisted which was not performed in the Tabernacle where the Priests only officiated in the Holy Place as the High Priest in the most Holy but before it in the External Part of it where they assisted the Priests in their Service To do the Service of the Tabernacle Such Service as I have mentioned before v. 6. Ver. 8. And they shall keep By guarding them and keeping a continual Watch about them Verse 8 All the Instruments of the Tabernacle of the Congregation Every thing belonging to it And the charge of the Children of Israel to do the Service of the Tabernacle By which Service at the Tabernacle they took upon them the Charge which otherwise was incumbent on the whole Congregation who were to take care that the holy Things were kept both safe and secure and also separate to the Sacred Uses to which they were appointed These words which are often repeated to do the Service of the Tabernacle are to be carefully noted because the Levites did not serve in the Tabernacle which belonged only to the Priests but served the Tabernacle by guarding it and taking it down and carrying it c. as was said before Ver. 9. And thou shalt give the Levites unto Aaron Verse 9 and to his Sons They were first presented unto God v. 6. and God bestowed them as a Gift upon the Priests See VIII 19. They are wholly given unto him out of the Children of Israel To attend upon the Priests and to obey their Orders for which they paid them nothing but they were to do it freely being given to them to be their Servants by God who paid them their Wages Ver. 10. And thou shalt appoint Aaron and his Sons Verse 10 and they shall wait on their Priests Office Or thou shalt appoint them to wait on their Priesthood Which he had shown before was very different from the Levitical Office but to make them more mindful of their Dignity he repeats it again that Aaron and his Sons alone should officiate as Priests viz. in offering Sacrifice in setting the Bread upon the Holy Table looking after the Lights and burning Incense Which they were to perform in their own Persons and not appoint any others as their Deputies to do them for none of these things could be performed by the Levites Whose business it was to look after the fine Flour of which the Bread was made to prepare it and the Frankincense which was to be burnt and abundance of such like things which are particularly mentioned 1 Chron. IX 27 28 29 31 32. But they could not make the Anointing Oyl or the sweet Perfume mentioned XXX Exod. 23 34. for they were most holy and therefore the Priests only could compound them And the Stranger that cometh nigh By Stranger is meant any one though a Levite that was not of the Sons of Aaron who alone had the priviledge to approach unto God Shall be put to death God himself sent out a Fire to consume Korah and his Company who presumed to offer Incense being but bare Levites and not Priests Chap. XVI Verse 11 Ver. 11. And the LORD spake unto Moses saying To make the Matter more clear he further tells Moses the reason why he took the Levites from among the the Children of Israel to be his after a peculiar manner Verse 12 Ver. 12. And I behold I have taken the Levites from among the Children of Israel Take notice of the Reason why I have taken the Levites from among the rest of the Israelites v. 9. for it is by my Order and Appointment Instead of all the First-born that openeth the Matrix c. To make an exchange with them for all their First-born which I have heretofore challenged as my own and now take the Levites in their stead Therefore the Levites shall be mine As all the First-born were which now shall be theirs and the Levites be mine Ver. 13. Because all the First-born are mine By Verse 13 a special Right which is mentioned in the next words For on the day that I smote all the First-born in the Land of Egypt The Title whereby he laid a Claim to all the First-born was that great Miracle as R. Levi of Barcelona calls it which he wrought when he destroyed all the First-born of their Neighbours in Egypt and touched not one of theirs By which sparing Mercy he acquired
the LORD and the Camp of the Levites to be from the entrance of the Mount of the House of the LORD to that East-Gate of the Temple And the Camp of Israel they thought extended from the Entrance of Jerusalem to the Mount of the House of the LORD Now Lepers were so unclean that they were not admitted into any of these three Camps but shut out of them all See XIII Lev. 46. But he that had an Issue XV Lev. 2. was only shut out of the two first Camps the Camp of the LORD and the Camp of the Levites but he might be in the Camp of Israel And he that was defiled by the dead XXI Lev. 1. was only excluded from the first the Sanctuary but not from the other two See Drusius also upon IV. 25. Ver. 3. Both Male and Female shall ye put out For Verse 3 Women had Issues for instance as well as Men XV Lev. 2 and 19 c. That they defile not their Camps The Camp of Israel consisted of four Camps and therefore he speaks in the Plural Number that of Judah that of Reuben that of Ephraim and that of Dan II Numb 3 10 18 25. Which would have been so defiled if they had suffered these unclean Persons to stay among them that none would have been fit to go to the Sanctuary In the midst of which I dwell By his special Presence in the Sanctuary which was incompassed by these Camps out of reverence to which such unclean Persons were to be kept at a greater distance than other Men and Women Ver. 4. And the Children of Israel did so and put them without the Camp c. There was an order for this before particularly for putting out the Lepers Verse 4 XIII Lev. 46. which could not be put in Execution till the Camp was formed as now it was Verse 5 Ver. 5. And the LORD spake unto Moses saying It is uncertain when this was spoken but I see no reason why we should not think it was at the same time with the other things here mentioned Verse 6 Ver. 6. When a Man or Woman shall commit any sin that Men commit In the Hebrew the words are plainly these shall commit any sin of Man that is against his Neighbour As in III Joel 19. Violence of the Children of Judah is truly translated Violence against the Children of Judah For it is apparent from the next Verses 7 8. that Moses here speaks of Offences against their Neighbours To do a Trespass against the LORD Such Offences against their Neighbours as were also great Offences against God For the Chaldee understands these words of Frauds and Cheats put upon Men by a false Oath And there is a good warrant for this Interpretation from VI Lev. 2 3. where Moses gives the same command which seems here to be repeated only because he had something to add unto it v. 8. And that person be guilty Or rather be sensible of his guilt See VI Lev. 4. Verse 7 Ver. 7. Then they shall confess the sin that they have done Or rather If they shall confess c. For so the Particle Vau sometimes signifies particularly XII 14. where we as well as the LXX translate it If her Father had spit in her face See what I have noted upon VI Lev. 4. And he shall recompense c. Rather Then he shall recompense the Injury he did to his Neighbour in the manner here directed which hath been explained VI Lev. 5. See there Ver. 8. But if a Man have no Kinsman to recompense Verse 8 the Trespass unto By this it is apparent that if a Man to whom an Injury had been done was dead he that committed it was bound to make Satisfaction to his Heir whosoever he was by restoring the Principal and adding a fifth part to it Now the Israelites never wanting some of their Kindred to succeed to their Inheritances the Hebrew Doctors expound this of the Proselytes of Righteousness who might possibly dye without any heir because they had no Kindred but such as were born after their Regeneration In which Case the Goods that had been illegally taken from such a Proselyte by a Jew did not become his own unless he paid the Price of them with such an addition as is here required c. See Selden L. VI. de Jure Nat. Gent. cap. 4. p. 684 685. Edit Lond. Let the Trespass be recompensed unto the LORD By bringing to him the Principal and the fifth part Even unto the Priest Whom God deputed to receive it as his Minister And it was as the Jews rightly expound it equally distributed among all the Priests who were then waiting in their Course Which is a new addition to the Law in VI Lev. and the reason it is likely why that Law is here repeated Besides the Ram of the Atonement c. Mentioned VI Lev. 6 7. where see what I have noted Ver. 9. And every offering of all the holy things of the Children of Israel Upon the occasion of the foregoing Laws concerning a Recompense to be made Verse 9 to the Priest where a Man that had been wrong'd was dead and no Heir to him could be found he explains some other Laws wherein the Priests were concerned who were to have all the Heave-offerings as the word Trumoth here used signifies XVIII 8. Which they bring unto the Priest To be offered unto God Shall be his Who offers it For there being many Priests who waited in their Courses at the Tabernacle all of which could not officiate at the same time but some at one time some at another this Law determines that the particular Priest who performed the Office of Sacrificing should have to himself that part of the holy Things which fell to the Priests share and it should not be divided among them all Thus L'Empereur upon Bava kama c. 9. sect 12. expounds these words better than any I have met withal Verse 10 Ver. 10. And every mans hallowed thing shall be his As the former Verse speaks of the holy Things of the Children of Israel in general so this of what any particular Person offered which still with greater reason was to belong to the Priest that offered it For the Labourer is worthy of his hire and therefore he that did the work of Sacrificing had the Reward of it R. Solomon applying this to Tithes hath a gloss upon these words which though not pertinent is very remarkable He that doth not duly pay his Tithe in the end his Land shall yield him but a tithe of what it was wont to yield And so R. Bechai upon XIV Deut. expounds these words when a Man divideth not as he ought he shall have nothing but the holy things that is the Tithe of what he used to have according to V Isa 10. Whatsoever any Man giveth the Priest it shall be his These words are only a fuller Explication of this Law as the same L'Empereur observes that the rest of the Priests might
fine Flour sifted from the Bran this of course Flour that had nothing taken out of it as the Mischna saith in Sota cap. 2. Where the reason given for this Barly-offering is because she was supposed to have committed the Act of a Beast which is not confined to one therefore she was to Sacrifice the Food of a Beast for so Barly was in Judaea Many such pretty rather than solid Reasons are collected out of their Authors by Simeon de Muis in his Varia Sacra upon this place The simplest Reason seems to be that a viler sort of Sacrifice was most sutable to her vile Condition for which reason also there was no Oyl nor Frankincense permitted to be offered with it as it here follows He shall pour no Oyl upon it nor put Frankincense thereon This Sacrifice was different from all other of this kind See Lev. 11. For though that mentioned V Lev. 11. was to have no Oyl nor Frankincense with it yet it was of fine Flour and not Barly And though the Sheaf mentioned XXIII Lev. 10. was of Barly yet it was sifted and besides Oyl and Frankincense were used with it which are here forbidden The reasons of which are given by the Jews according to their various Fancies And some of them are ingenious enough as that a good Name being compared to Oyl VII Eccles 1. it is here omitted because the Woman had lost her Reputation Maimonides is a little more judicious for looking upon Oyl and Frankincense as added unto Sacrifices for the Honour and Dignity of them he thinks God would have this Splendor as his word is to be wanting to such a Woman's Sacrifice because of the baseness of her behaviour which was the occasion of it As if she had been told to stir her up to repentance because of the filthiness of thy actions thy Oblation is more imperfect than others More Nevoch P. III. cap. 46. But none I think hath given a better account of this than St. Chrysostom Orat V. ad v. Judaeos because the Woman was loaded with Sorrow and heavy Accusations and evil Suspicions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the form of the Sacrifice imitated the Domestick Calamity for every one knows that Oyl and Frankincense was signs of Joy and Gladness and therefore not used upon so sad an Occasion as this was For it is an Offering of Jealousie These and the following words give the reason why Oyl and Frankincense were to be omitted because it was an Offering for one suspected of Adultery And in such Cases God had before ordained there should be no Oyl nor Frankincense used V Lev. 11. Delicacies being improper in Offerings for Sin An Offering of Memorial bringing Iniquity to remembrance For she appeared before God as a Sinner and if she were not guilty yet she was loaded with an Accusation and a just Suspicion of Guilt to which if she had given any occasion this Sacrifice reminded her of it and awakened her Conscience to reflect upon it Ver. 16. And the Priest It is the Opinion of Verse 16 P. Cunaeus Lib. I. de Rep. Hebr. cap. 12. that the Priest here mentioned was to be a Member of the Great Sanhedrin to whom the Judgment of the matter belonged But another very learned Person thinks with more reason the Priest whose Lot it was to attend at that time in his Course is here meant See Mischna cap. 1. Sotae Sect. 5. Annot. 8. Wagenseil Shall bring her near Rather bring it that is her Offering near to the Altar at the Door of the Tabernacle And set her Rather set the Offering for she is ordered to be set before the LORD afterwards v. 18. Before the LORD At the Altar which was at the Door of the Tabernacle See I Lev. 3. At the East-gate of the Temple saith the Mischna which was called the Gate of Nicanor for there Women also after Child-bed were purified and the Lepers cleansed Ver. 17. And the Priest shall take holy Water From Verse 17 the Laver For no Water was holy but that which was made so by the Laver as the Jews say in Jalkut Therefore Onkelos instead of holy Water hath Water from the Laver. In an Earthen Vessel Which had never been employed to any other use as the Mischna saith and contained about a Pint of our Measure This I take to have been appointed as a further Expression of the Vileness of her Condition for the reasons which the Jewish Doctors give of it are not to be regarded The best that I have observed is to declare that she should be broken in pieces like that Earthen Vessel if she was guilty of that which she denied And of the dust Another Token of her Vileness this being the Serpent's Food That is in the Floor of the Tabernacle c. To make her afraid of the Judgment of God For if there were no dust in the Tabernacle they were to fetch it from some other place as Maimonides relates their practice Hilcoth Sota cap. 4. and lay it upon the Floor of the Tabernacle and then take it and put it into the Water And put it into the Water Sprinkle a little of it upon the Water that it might be more easily drunk but so much that it might be plainly seen For there were three things the Jews say of which a less quantity was not admitted than might be seen viz. this Dust and the Ashes of the red Heifer XIX 17. and the Spittle in the Face of him that would not marry his Brother's Wife XXV Deut. 9. But if the Priest put the Dust into the Vessel first and then poured the Water upon it he did not do amiss as the Jews say in the ancient Book Siphri See Wagenseil upon Mischna Sotae cap. 2. sect 2. Annot. 11 12. It hath been observed by some that such ways of Trial were in use among the Gentiles which if they could be proved to have been as ancient as Moses his days it would make it probable that this was ordered by God to divert the Jews from following the Superstitions of other Nations to make this Discovery and bring them to appear before him at his Tabernacle and there use such Rites as were of his appointment See our Learned Dr. Spencer L. III. Dissert I. cap. 2. p. 539 c. Ver. 18. And the Priest shall set the Woman before the LORD At the Door of the Tabernacle of the Congregation where a great many Women who were called together on purpose stood about her that Verse 81 they might be taught not to do after her Leudness as the Prophet Ezekiel speaks XXIII 48. As many others also as would might be present except only her Maids and Domestick Servants who were put out lest they should disturb her mind too much as Mr. Selden interprets the words of the Mischna about this matter Lib. III. Vxor Hebr. cap. 15. Which another very learned Man J. Wagenseil interprets the quite contrary way lest her Mind should place any hope in
Words and Actions as Mr. Selden observes Lib. III. de Synedr Cap. XIII n. 1. and Cap. XV. n. 3. And so among the Latins the word inchoare when applied to Sacred things signifies to perfect or consummate as Servius observes upon the VI Aenead And both Civil and Sacred Initiations were accompanied with great Joy and Gladness But this is not to be understood as if the Dedication of the Altar was the setting of it apart and sanctifying it for the Service of God which had been done before and VII days spent therein XXIX Exod. 27. VIII Lev. 11. but as the word properly signifies the beginning to use it after it had been so sanctified In the day that it was anointed At the time that it was set apart and all other things ordered for the Safe-guard of the Tabernacle See v. 1. Even the Princes offered their Offering Presented their Gifts as the LXX translate it which they desired God would accept upon this great occasion Before the Altar At the Door of the Tabernacle near unto which the Altar stood XL Exod. 6. for he speaks of the Altar of Burnt-offerings Verse 11 Ver. 11. And the LORD said unto Moses they shall offer their Offering Here again Rasi observes that Moses would not receive their Offering till he knew the Mind of God Who directed in what manner and order their Gifts should be offered to him Each Prince on his day for the dedication of the Altar This made the Dedication a very long Solemnity which continued twelve days When these XII days began it is not easie to determine but it seems to me a very reasonable Computation which Fortunatus Scacchus hath made of this whole business Myrothec Sacr. Elaeochrism Lib. 2. Cap. LXXIV Where he supposes that the Tabernacle being erected the first Day of the first Month of the second Year after they came out of Egypt seven days were spent in the Consecration of it and of the Altar c. And on the eighth day Moses began to consecrate Aaron and his Sons which lasted VII days longer Then the fifteenth day of that Month was the first day of Unleavened Bread Which God commanded as we read here Chap. IX to be observed in the first Month and lasted till the Two and twentieth The rest of the Month we may well suppose was spent in giving receiving and delivering the Laws mentioned in the Book of Leviticus After which on the first day of the second Month he began to number the People according to the Command in the beginning of this Book Which may be supposed to have lasted three days And then on the fourth the Levites were numbred On the next day we may suppose they were offered to God and given unto the Priests on the sixth Day they were expiated and consecrated as we read in the next Chapter And on the seventh Day their several Charges were parted among them of which we read Chapter IV. After which the Princes he supposes began to offer upon the eighth Day of the second Month for the Dedication of the Altar which lasted till the nineteenth Day inclusively and on the twentieth Day of this Month they removed as we read X. 11 12. from Sinai to the Wilderness of Paran Ver. 12. And he that offered his Offering the first Verse 12 day By God's order no doubt Was Nahshon the Son of Amminadab of the Tribe of Judah He held the principal place among the Israelites being the NASI the Prince or Captain as we translate it II Numb 3. of the Children of Judah who had the first Standard And yet he alone of all the Twelve great Men here mentioned is not called NASI Prince of Judah as all the rest are called Princes of their Tribe v. 18 24 30 c. but simply Nahshon of the Tribe of Judah The Jews give several reasons of it but perhaps it was because he offered first which was honour enough and there needed no more to be said of him Ver. 13. And his Offering was one silver Charger Verse 13 the weight thereof was an hundred and thirty Shekels and one silver Bowl c. It appears by the Metal that this Charger and Bowl were of that they were for the use of the Altar of Burnt-offerings in the outward Court for all the Vessels of the Sanctuary were of Gold And I take this Charger or broad Dish or Platter to have been offered for receiving the Flesh which was offered at the Altar or the fine Flour for the Meat-offerings And the Bowl received the Blood or was used for pouring out Wine Both of them were full of fine Flour mingled with Oyl for a Meat-offering Which was to attend upon the Burnt-offering and the Peace-offering mentioned v. 15 17. See IV. 7. where I observed it was not difficult to procure this fine Flour in the Wilderness Verse 14 Ver. 14. One Spoon of ten Shekels of Gold full of Incense Both the Metal of which it was made and that which was in it shows this Spoon was for the use of the Golden Altar in the Sanctuary Which may incline one to think that both Altars were now dedicated that is first began to be used for the Service of the whole Congregation See v. 88. Verse 15 Ver. 15. One young Bullock one Ram one Lamb of the first Year There are so many Sacrifices mentioned here and in the two following Verses no less than XXI in all that together with the silver and gold Plate they look like too great a Present to be made out of one Man's private estate And therefore some have thought that the rest of the great Men of the Tribe of Judah joyned with Nahshon in their Contributions towards it and that it was offered in his own and their Names For a Burnt-offering This is first mentioned as being the most ancient sort of Sacrifice long before we read of any other and being an Acknowledgment of God's Soveraign Dominion over all Verse 16 Ver. 16. One Kid of the Goats for a Sin-offering This in all likelyhood was first offered though the other be first mentioned For in the next Chapter we find the Burnt-offering enjoyned in the first place but the Sin-offering offered before it VIII 8 12. The like I observed before VI. 16. See there Ver. 17. And for a Sacrifice of Peace-offerings two Oxen five Rams five He-goats five Lambs of the first year These Sacrifices were more numerous than the Burnt-offering or the Sin-offering because the Verse 17 Priests and the Princes and as many of the People as they invited had their share of them and feasted before the LORD upon them with great rejoycing Which Custom as Mr. Selden observes flowed from hence to the Gentiles who dedicated their Altars and Temples and Statues c. with much ceremony and the ancient Greeks 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with more sumptuous Sacrifices See L. III. de Synedriis cap. 14. num 111. Where he also shows how they were dedicated among the Romans with Plays
Bullock For a Verse 8 Burnt-offering as is manifest from v. 12. With his Meat-offering Which always attended upon Burnt-offerings XV. 9. And another young Bullock shalt thou take for a Sin-offering This being offered for the whole body of the Levites is the same Sacrifice that is ordered when the whole Congregation of Israel sinned through Ignorance IV Levit. 13 14. Ver. 9. And thou shalt bring the Levites before the Tabernacle of the Congregation To the Door of it where the Altar of Burnt-offerings stood XL Verse 9 Exod. 6. And thou shalt gather the whole Assembly of the Children of Israel together The Hebrew words COL ADATH which we translate the whole Assembly frequently signifies all the Elders of Israel As in XV. 4. XXV 7. XXXV 12. And it cannot well have any other sense in this place as appears from the next Verse Verse 10 Ver. 10. And thou shalt bring the Levites before the LORD Present them to him at the Altar And the Children of Israel The Elders of the People mentioned in the foregoing Verse For all the Children of Israel could not possibly do what is here enjoyned but some of them in the name of the rest and none so proper as their Rulers and Governors who were their Representatives Shall put their hands upon the Levites As Men used to do upon their Sacrifices Which signified the devoting of that Beast to God by him who laid his Hand on it at the Altar for such Purposes as he brought it And this was done by private Men in their Burnt-offerings and Peace-offerings as well as in their Sin-offerings see I Levit. 4. III. 2. VIII 13. but the Jews observe that the whole Congregation laid their Hands only upon the Sin-offering that was offered for them IV Lev. 15. Therefore the Levites are here to be considered under that notion as is manifest from v. 19. where God is said to have given them to Aaron c. to make an Atonement for the Children of Israel For the Levites being given to God instead of the First-born by the Sanctification of which First-born to God as it is called XIII Exod. 1. the whole Family was sanctified and their Sin after a sort expiated the Offering of the Levites after this manner to God was to have the same effect that the Offering of the First-born had viz. the Sanctification and Atonement of the Children of Israel Ver. 11. And Aaron shall offer the Levites before the Verse 11 LORD for an Offering of the Children of Israel The Hebrew words are more significant Aaron shall wave the Levites before the LORD for a Wave-offering c. I have often observed before that this Waving or Agitation too and fro before the Altar of which see XXIX Exod. 24. was a solemn Consecration of a thing to God as a Sacrifice And therefore the Levites were presented unto him under the same Consideration as the First-born were But it was impossible for Aaron to wave them as he did some parts of a Sacrifice and therefore it is probable that he lifting up his Hands and turning about to all sides as he did when he offered a Wave-offering they at his Command imitated the same motion and so were offered up to God and became wholly his See ver 21. That they may execute the Service of the LORD Or as it is more significantly in the Margin that they may be to execute c. Which expresses the Intention of this waving them before the LORD that being wholly given up to him they might become meet to execute that Service to which he appointed them at his House Ver. 12. And the Levites shall lay their Hands upon the Heads of the Bullocks It being evident from v. 19. that the Levites were considered as an expiatory Sacrifice Verse 12 and yet not being to be devoted to Death no more than the First-born were these two Sacrifices one for Sin the other a Burnt-offering were substituted in their stead Upon which therefore they were to lay their Hands that the Sin which the Children of Israel laid upon them v. 10. might be transferred to these Beasts by laying their Hands upon them to be actually sacrificed unto God by shedding their Blood The one for a Sin-offering and the other for a Burnt-offering unto the LORD The Burnt-offering was mentioned first v. 8. being the most ancient of all Offerings from the beginning of the World But the Sin-offering is offered first to make the other acceptable And so it was when Aaron was consecrated VIII Levit. 14.18 and when he offered for himself IX Levit. 8 12. and for the People v. 15 16. and to name no more in the Cleansing of a Leper XIV 19. To make an Atonement for the Levites The Sin-offering properly made the Atonement and the Burnt-offering declared its acceptance Verse 13 Ver. 13. And thou shalt set the Levites before Aaron and his Sons As they were brought before the LORD because they were to be given unto him v. 9. So now they were set before Aaron and his Sons because they were given by God to them v. 19. And offer them for an Offering unto the LORD Or as it is in the Hebrew and wave them for a Wave-offering unto the LORD Some imagine that as Aaron waved them before v. 11. so now they were in like manner waved by Moses But it seems to me more probable that the meaning is they being waved c. should be set before Aaron and his Sons and presented to them as God's Gift according to his order III. 9. And so these words ought to be translated after thou hast waved them for a Wave-offering That is after Aaron by his Order had waved them And thus the like words must be understood v. 15. See there Ver. 14. Thus shalt thou separate the Levites from among Verse 14 the Children of Israel By the fore-mentioned Purification v. 7. and Oblation v. 10 11. And the Levites shall be mine They became his by this solemn Oblation of them to him v. 11. Ver. 15. And after that shall the Levites go in To Verse 15 the Court of the Tabernacle where they were to attend upon the Priests and assist them in their Ministry and in taking down the Tabernacle when it was to remove To do the Service of the Tabernacle of the Congregation In the Court of the Priests where the Altar of Burnt-offering stood For into the Sanctuary it self none but the Priests entred and there was no Ministry there in which the Levites were to assist And thou shalt cleanse them and offer them for an Offering Or rather after thou hast cleansed them and offered c. according as was directed v. 7 11. Ver. 16. For they are wholly given unto me c. Verse 16 God commanded them before to be taken from among the Children of Israel III. 45. and now they are given to him The word is repeated twice in the Hebrew given given which we translate wholly given because the Children of Israel
of them both together In the first Month of the second year after they were come out of the Land of Egypt In which Month they were commanded to keep the Passover in memory of their wonderful Deliverance from the Land of Egypt Verse 2 Ver. 2. Let the Children of Israel also keep the Passover at his appointed season Aaron having been lately consecrated and having offered all sorts of Sacrifices for himself and for the People and God having declared his acceptance by Fire from Heaven VIII IX Lev. God commanded the People should keep the Passover which he had lately admonished them was one of the Feasts of the LORD XXIII Lev. 5. But the first order for the observation of it being that they should keep this Service when they came to the promised Land XII Exod. 25. they might thence conclude there lay no Obligation upon them to keep it here in the Wilderness And therefore by a Special Precept they are required to keep it when the year was come about to the time of its first Observation that the memory of so singular a Benefit might not presently slip out of their mind See XIII Exod. 5. Ver. 3. In the fourteenth day of this Month at Even Verse 3 ye shall keep it in his appointed Season So it was ordained XII Exod. 6. XXIII Lev. 5. According to all the Rites of it With unleavened Bread and bitter Herbs and the other Rites mentioned XII Exod. 9 10. And according to all the Ceremonies thereof If there be any difference between Ceremonies and Rites I should think this belongs to their Eating it in haste with their Loyns girt Shoes on their Feet and Staves in their hands XII Exod. 11. Unto which they were not bound when they came into the Land of Canaan when they were no longer Travellers but it is likely were observed here in the Wilderness when they were in an unsettled Condition Ver. 4. And Moses spake unto the Children of Israel Verse 4 that they should keep the Passover According to all the Rites and Ceremonies belonging to it Ver. 5. And they kept the Passover on the fourteenth day of the first Month at Even It was not hard to procure so much Flour as would serve to make Verse 5 unleavened Bread for that Even from some of their Neighbours about the Wilderness See IV. 7. In the Wilderness of Sinai Where they rested almost a whole Year But after they removed from thence were so uncertain in their Motions from place to place that they did not Circumcise their Children who consequently could not eat of the Passover And therefore we never read of its being kept after this during their forty Years stay in the Wilderness nor would they have been obliged as I said to keep it now without this Special Command Yet their Doctors say That this is written by Moses as a reproach to the Israelites that they observed no Passover in the Wilderness but this one alone Yet there are Christian Writers who deliver it as the Opinion of the Hebrews themselves that they kept another Passover a little before they ended their Wandrings in the Wilderness viz. in the first Month of the Year wherein Miriam died See Selden de Synedr Lib. II. cap. 2. n. 1. According to all that the LORD commanded Moses so did the Children of Israel They kept the Passover on the fourteenth Day at Even but perhaps did not keep the Feast of Unleavened Bread for seven Days following For here is no mention of that and it had not been easie to provide so much Bread the want of which was supplied by Manna Verse 6 Ver. 6. And there were certain Men who were defiled by the dead Body of a Man And by a late Law for there is Nothing about this in the Original Law of the Passover XII Exod. no Unclean Person might eat of Holy Things VII Lev. 20. That they could not keep the Passover on that day On the fourteenth Day of the first Month at Even when the rest kept the Passover who were not defiled And they came before Moses and before Aaron on that day On the very Day that the Passover was kept Ver. 7. And these Men said unto him Though Verse 7 they came before them both whom they found sitting together yet they applied themselves to Moses only as the Supreme Judge in such singular Cases For the Judges which were constituted by the Advice of Jethro could not resolve this hard question and therefore they resorted to Moses unto whose Judgment all difficult Causes were reserved XVIII Exod. 22 26. See Selden L. II. de Synedriis cap. 1. n. 3. We are defiled by the dead Body of a Man And therefore some may think should have been excluded out of the Camp according to what was ordained V. 2. and consequently kept from coming with such Questions or about any other Business to Moses But it must be considered that when this hapned the Law now mentioned was not given for this was in the first Month of the second Year and that Law was not given till the second Month when the Camps were formed Wherefore are we kept back It was against their will that they were defiled by the dead Body of a Man which perhaps they were bound to bury and therefore they expostulate with Moses about their being denied the Liberty which others had pleading in effect it was not their Fault that they were defiled by the Dead but rather their Unhappiness and therefore why might they not challenge a Right in this Sacrifice as well as others seeing they had not forfeited it by any voluntary Guilt That we may not offer an Offering of the LORD The Passover is called the KORBAN of the LORD because it was to be killed and its Blood sprinkled which shows it to be properly a Sacrifice and then eaten by God's Commandment in a grateful remembrance of an exceeding great Benefit which shows it to be an Eucharistical Sacrifice For though the first Sacrifice in Egypt was to procure Deliverance to them and to avert the Evil which fell on the Egyptians by the destroying Angel Yet ever after it was a Thanksgiving for Deliverance then wrought by God's special favour to them Of which there was a compendious Commemoration made in their Paschal Rites XII Exod. 25 26 27. In his appointed season among the Children of Israel For if they did not perform this Service now they knew it was not lawful to be done at any other time Verse 8 Ver. 8. And Moses said unto them stand still Or wait here a while In which words Moses himself acknowledges the difficulty of the case which he could not resolve till he had first consulted the Divine Majesty about it Which teach Judges not to be ashamed to confess their Ignorance and take advice in Matters dubious as the Hierusalem Targum here observes But I see no such good ground for the other part of his Observation on this Verse that there being four difficult
was kindled Or When the LORD heard it he demonstrated he was highly offended by sending a Fire among them And the Fire of the LORD burnt among them Some take this Phrase Fire of the LORD to signifie a great Fire as Mountains of the LORD are high Mountains Which came either from Heaven like Lightning as in 2 Kings I. 12. or from the Pillar of Cloud and Fire over the Tabernacle where the Glory of the LORD appeared some times like unto Fire And consumed them that were in the uttermost parts of the Camps Where the mixt Multitude were as I observed X. 25. who came out of Egypt and may well be supposed to have stirred up the Israelites to complain of their tedious Journey which had not yet brought them near to the Land of Cannan And perhaps some of them lagged behind on purpose that they might complain of Weariness as some take it or rather of want of stronger Food But Bochartus hath demonstrated that this word which we translate the uttermost parts signifies in all or throughout Of which he gives many Instances out of Lud. de Dieu upon XXXIII Ezek. 1. See XIX Gen. 4. XLVII 2 c. Hierozoicon P. I. L. II. cap. 34. And therefore so it should be here rendred Consumed some in every part of the Camp where they began to make Complaints one to another of their being still in a Wilderness Ver. 2. And the People cried unto Moses Of whose Verse 2 power with God they had great Experience but had reason to distrust their own Interest in him because of their murmuring Humour For it is like they are the same People that cried now to Moses who before complained v. 1. And when Moses prayed unto the LORD As they begg'd he would The Fire was quenched Went out and no signs of it appeared So the Hebrew Phrase signifies it sunk What number of them was burnt we are not told it is likely nor many because the terrour of it instantly made them deprecate God's Displeasure by Moses their Intercessor which put a stop to it Ver. 3. And he called the name of the place Taberah Which for another reason was also called Kibroth-hattaavah v. 34. They are mentioned indeed in IX Deut. 22. as if they were two distinct places but Verse 3 it is plain by the story that the things which occasioned both these Names hapned in one and the same station And therefore they were only different Names for the same Place unless we suppose Kibroth-hattaavah to have been the name of that particular piece of Ground in that place where the Lusters were buried Because the Fire of the LORD burnt amâ—ng them This is the reason of the Name of Taberah which signifies a burning which was imposed on this place to preserve the Memory both of God's Judgments and of his Mercy Verse 4 Ver. 4. And the mixt Multitude that was among them The Hebrew word hasaphsuph is well translated by Bochartus Populi colluvies undecunque colâ—cta the Dregs or Scum of the People gathered together from all parts For the doubling of words increases their sense in the Hebrew Language and makes the same with the Superlative Degree in other Tongues Of which he gives many Instances in his Hierozoicon P. II. Lib. V. cap. 6. See XIII Lev. 19. where Adamdameth signifies exceeding red as hasaphsuph here doth a very great collection of all sorts of People both Egyptians and other Neighbouring Nations who were invited by their wonderful Deliverance out of Egypt to joyn themselves to the Israelites as Proselytes to their Religion See XII Exod. 38. The Jews in Tanchuma say there were Forty thousand of them and Jannes and Jambres at the Head of them Fell a lusting He doth not say for what and the Jews have taken the liberty to fancy what they please Some of them say that they lusted after such Women as Moses had lately forbidden them to marry So the Paraphrase of Vzielides Moses heard the People weeping because those that were near of kin to them were forbidden in Marriage And he makes as if these Proselytes petitioned Moses to abrogate those Laws about Incest Such Conceits others have indulged to themselves as Mr. Selden shows Lib. II. de Synedr Cap. IV. p. 202. when the words in the end of this Verse and v. 13 18. plainly show they lusted for Flesh to eat And the Children of Israel also Though the mixt multitude were the first Fomentors of this Discontent yet it run among the Children of Israel throughout the whole Camp And rose so high that they fell into a great Passion Wept again They had shed some Tears it seems before when they complained verse 1. but now they wept aloud out of Anger Vexation and Grief Or else this weeping again refers to their first Murmuring a Year ago like unto this XVI Exod. 3. And said They could not refrain from bursting out into such discontented Language as argued they were extreamly angry or rather inraged Who shall give us flesh to eat It is an Expression of a vehement impatient Desire mixed with Despair after flesh-Meat Which they needed not to have wanted if they would have killed their Cattel which they brought with them out of Egypt in great abundance XII Exod. 38. but they preserved them for breed when they came to Canaan and if they killed them daily they would not have lasted long to suffice Six hundred thousand People besides Women and Children See v. 21 22. Besides this while they continued in the Wilderness they were not permitted to eat any Flesh but only their share of the Peace-offerings that were offered at the Altar XVII Levit. 3 4 5. Which lasted the Jews think till they came to the Land of Canaan when this Restraint was taken off XII Deut. 15 16. And indeed the Wilderness was so barren a place that they could there have no great increase of Cattel scarce sufficient for Sacrifice They were angry therefore that they were not yet brought to a Country where they might have had all sorts of Flesh without killing their own Cattel and have taken their fill of that and all other Food as appears by the next Verse at as easie rates as they had done in Egypt Whereas now they despaired as I said of getting any such Food for so such Questions as this signifie CXIII Psal 5. LIII Isa 8. VIII Joh. 16. Verse 5 Ver. 5. We remember the fish This shows that all kind of Food is comprehended under Flesh for which they longed particularly this which is one sort of Flesh 1 Corinth XV. 39. Which we did eat in Egypt freely Or for nothing For they could easily catch them in the River of Egypt which abounded with them XIX Isa 8. and in the Sea also which was not far from them wherein was exceeding great plenty of excellent Fish The Cucumbers and the Melons c. None of which grew here in the Wilderness but were there in such Plenty and Perfection that they were the
kindled greatly Which brake forth shortly after in a great plague upon them v. 34. And Moses also was displeased The same Phrase with that v. 1. It was evil in the Eyes of Moses i. e. Grieved him so that it made him wish himself rid of the burden of their Government Ver. 11. And Moses said unto the LORD I suppose Verse 11 he went into the Sanctuary to bewail himself and pray God to relieve him See v. 24. Wherefore hast thou afflicted thy Servant By committing this People to his charge And wherefore have I not sound favour in thy sight By granting the Prayer which he made at his first Call to this Office III Exod. 2. IV. 10. That thou layest the burden of this People upon me i. e. The principal Care of such an untractable Multitude upon one Man to whom they resorted in all difficulties XVIII Exod. 22 26. Ver. 12. Have I conceived all this People have I begotten Verse 12 them Are they my Children that I should make provision for the Satisfaction of all their desires That thou hast said unto me carry them in thy Bosom as a nursing Father beareth the sucking Child unto the Land c. Take a tender Care of them as a Parent doth of a little Infant and conduct them into Canaan c. Nothing can more lively express the Affection that Princes ought to have for their People if they have any regard to the Will of God than this Divine Command to Moses Verse 13 Ver. 13. Whence should I have Flesh to give unto all this People It is impossible for me to do what they desire For they weep unto me saying Give us Flesh that we may eat And yet they will not be satisfied without it He seems to be affected with their weeping as the most loving Parents are with the Tears of a sucking Child when it cries for that which they have not for it Verse 14 Ver. 14. I am not able to bear all this People alone because it is too heavy for me Let me have some joined to me to take part of this trouble with me and help to manage them in such Mutinies For it is beyond my strength to undergo the toil of hearing all their Complaints and appeasing their Tumults Some may imagine there was no reason for this request he having several Persons already appointed to assist him by the advice of Jethro XVIII Exod. But Rasi thinks those Men were burnt in the late fire because they did not suppress the beginning of this Mutiny v. 1. but perhaps join in it And so Bechai But the true account is rather this that they were set only to hear and judge smaller Causes all the weighty and difficult Causes being still brought before Moses to whom also the last Appeal was made in every Cause Which was so great a burden that he complained for want of help in those great things which lay wholly upon him See XVIII Exod. 22. Ver. 15. And if thou deal thus with me If thou leavest me still alone in this Office Kill me I pray thee out of hand if I have found favour in thy sight I shall take it for the greatest Verse 15 kindness to be taken immediately out of the World And let me not see my wretchedness Live to be a most miserable Creature For to see wretchedness is to be wretched as to see death is to dye LXXXIX Psal 48. And what could make such a tender Parent as he was more miserable than their perpetual untowardness together with the intolerable trouble it would give him to see heavy Punishments continually befal them for their Wickedness and the Enemies of God rejoyce in their Ruin Ver. 16. And the LORD said unto Moses Here Verse 16 is not the least sign of God's dislike of this Expostulation of Moses with God which seems not very dutiful because the Vexation this stubborn People gave him was really so great that he had reason to desire to be eased of it Which though he begged with much earnestness yet no doubt with no less submission to God's holy Will and Pleasure Gather unto me These words are interpreted by the Talmudists as if the meaning was that they may be a Sanhedrim to my Land i. e. a holy perpetual standing Council to endure throughout all Generations For wheresoever we meet with this word li unto me they think it signifies a thing to be established by God to all Generations The Examples they alledge of it are these of Aaron and his Sons he saith they shall Minister unto me in the Priests Office XXVIII Exod. 41. and of the Levites he saith III Numb 12. they shall be mine or unto me and of the Israelites XXV Lev. 55. unto me the Children of Israel are Servants The like is said of the First-born III Numb 13. of the Sanctuary XXV Exod. 18. of the Altar XX Exod. 24. of the holy Oyntment XXX Exod. 31. of the Kingdom of David 1 Sam. XVI 1. and of the Sacrifices XXVIII Numb 2. See Mr. Selden Lib. II. de Synedr cap. 4. n. 2. Seventy Men of the Elders of Israel This Number is generally thought both by the Jewish and Christian Writers to be derived from the number of Persons that came down into Egypt with Jacob XLVI Gen. 27. Who saith R. Bechai were a kind of Prototype of this Number in future Ages For hence they were governed by so many Elders when they were in Egypt III Exod. 16. where there is no mention indeed made of Seventy but he gathers it from what followed and those were the Seventy whom we find at the giving of the Law a little after they came out of Egypt XXIV Exod. 1 9. who are called Nobles or Great Men v. 11. So that this number was not now first constituted but rather continued and confirmed Whom thou knowest to be the Elders of the People For there were many Elders out of whom Seventy were chosen See XXIV Exod. 1. And Officers over them That is saith R. Bechai whom thou knowest to be of the number of those who when they were Officers in Egypt over the People were beaten by Pharaoh's Task-masters V Exod. 14. Which word Officers doth not signifie Men that had any Judicial Authority but only such as had an inspection over others to see they did their Work and to give an account of them But it is very likely they were Persons of note who had more than ordinary Understanding and Breeding which advanced them to be Inspectors of others And therefore the Talmudists rightly observe that the Elders and Officers here mentioned were no doubt Men of Wisdom and Judgment who knew how to use the Authority that was committed to them And it is not improbable as some of them affirm that they were chosen out of those lesser Courts which were erected by the Advice of Jethro See Selden in the same place sect 5. who at large confutes Baronius and others who say that the number of the great Sanhedrim which
Moses Which is among you By a visible Token of his glorious Presence in the Sanctuary where he dwelt among them XXV Exod. v. 8. And have wept before him saying Why came we forth out of Egypt As if he had undone them by their Deliverance from thence Both Onkelos and Jonathan translate this verse in such a manner that one cannot but think they had a Notion in their Days of more Persons than one in the Godhead For these are the words of the latter of them Because you have despised or rejected as Onkelos the WORD of the LORD for glorious is his Majesty which dwelleth among us For I cannot see how the word MEMRA can signifie any thing in this place whatsoever it may do in some others but a Person equal to JEHOVAH And yet the Anonymus Writer against the Trinity confuted by de Voisin hath the strange unaccountable boldness to pass it by with this silly gloss Proprie de Lege accipi potest c. it may be properly understood of the Law which may be contemned or transgressed as if this could be called the glorious Majesty of the LORD which dwelt among them What will not Men say or do to serve a Cause Verse 21 Ver. 21. And Moses said the People among whom I am Over whom I preside as their Governor Are six hundred thousand Footmen Who were able to carry Arms besides Women and Children and Slaves and the mixt Multitude who in all may well be supposed to have made Thirty hundred thousand And thou hast said I will give them Flesh that they may eat an whole month i. e. How can this be Which is a down-right distrust of God's Promise if we regard merely the words and do not consider that they were spoken hastily and something inconsiderately while his Mind was very much disturbed by the Tumult which the People made For which reason a severe notice is not taken of it but he only put in mind of God's Eternal Power v. 23. Which may make it probable that they were only words of Admiration how such a Provision should be made for such a vast number and those uttered on a sudden Verse 22 Ver. 22. Shall the Flocks and the Herds be slain for them to suffice them In the Hebrew the words are If the Flocks and the Herds be slain for them will they be sufficient for them That is there will not be enough for a whole Month. And so the next Passage is to be translated If all the Fish of the Sea be gathered for them will they be sufficient for them Ver. 23. And the LORD said unto Moses is the LORD's Hand waxed short i. e. I need not tell thee that my Power is as great as ever Thou shalt see now whether my Word shall come to pass Verse 23 unto thee or not For thou shalt be convinced of it by the speedy performance of my Promise Ver. 24. And Moses went out I supposed v. 11. Verse 24 that Moses went into the Sanctuary to make his Addresses to God for relief and if that be true then that is the place from whence he now went out But there is this Objection against it That if he had gone to consult God in the Sanctuary as he did on some occasions VII 89. it would not have been said that he went out but that he came out For that is the usual Expression in this matter Therefore we may rather think he now went out of his own Tent where the People stood murmuring v. 10. And told the People the Words of the LORD Both concerning them and concerning himself And gathered the seventy Men of the Elders of the People That is sent out his Summons to them to attend him though two of them it appears afterwards did not come v. 26. And set them round about the Tabernacle That is required them to come thither and there place themselves that the People might understand they received their Authority from God and that from thence he might send his Holy Spirit upon them For God alone who was their King could appoint who should bear Rule among them There also were the great Assemblies held See XXVII 2. Ver. 25. And the LORD came down in a Cloud The SCHECHINAH or Divine Majesty appeared from Heaven in a Cloud or in the Pillar of the Verse 25 Cloud as it is in XII 5. And spake unto him As he had promised v. 17. declaring it is likely the Reason and Intention of his appearing on this occasion And took of the Spirit that was upon him and gave it unto the seventy Elders See there v. 17. And it came to pass that when the Spirit rested upon them i. e. As soon as they received it They prophesied Either by setting forth the Promises of God in such a strain as none else could imitate or giving such admirable Instructions to the People as manifested they were raised above themselves or perhaps by declaring things to come particularly that they should have Quails as we render the word in great abundance very shortly as some of the Jews take it though that could not gain them just credit as the other Gifts till their Predictions were fulfilled And these the Jews call the second degree of Prophecy Concerning which Maimonides speaks in his Preface to his More Nevochim but more fully in his second Part of it Cap. XLV Where he saith the first degree was that which moved and enabled Men to some heroick Undertaking with assurance they were put upon it from God as to deliver Men from Tyranny and Oppression Which was the Spirit of the LORD that came upon GIDEON and SAMSON and the rest of the Judges of Israel who were carried by an extraordinary Power to perform such things as otherwise they thought not themselves fit to undertake And the second degree was when a Man found a Power upon him exciting him to speak either Psalms or Hymns or wholesome Precepts of living or about Political Affairs and Civil Government far beyond his Natural Capacities and all this waking and in the full vigour of his Senses This is also called the Holy Spirit and in this number he places these LXX Elders Who were endued with the Spirit of Moses for the Government of the People with him in such measure that they attained to be Prophets Just as in the New Testament the Prophets are placed next to the Apostles so these Men were next to Moses And ceased not In which Translation we follow the Chaldee Paraphrasts as several others do But the LXX translate it and they added no further which the Hebrew words will well bear taking the meaning to be that they prophesied that day but not after And this is the sense of the Talmudists particularly of Jarchi Who in his Gloss upon this place saith All these Elders prophesied only this first time that the Spirit rested on them as they stood about the Tabernable but they did not prophesie after that The like say several others
mentioned by Mr. Selden L. II. de Synedr Cap. IV. Sect. 2. And indeed the Spirit was not sent upon them to make them Prophets but to make them Governors and Judges And therefore the Gift of Prophecy which God gave them for the present was only to procure them Reverence from the People as an evident Sign that they were chosen by God to be Co-adjutors to Moses in the exercise of his Supream Authority over them And thus I find Theodoret understood it Quaest XX. in Num. The LXX did not prophesie beyond this day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. because God promoted them not to prophesie but to govern Which St. Paul also reckons among other Gifts bestowed upon Christians 1 Corinth XII 26. Now that it might appear God had conferred this Divine Gift of Government upon them they also prophesied the first day that they received it And I do not see why our Translation did not cease may not be interpreted to this sense that is they did not cease all that day while they stood about the Tabernacle Verse 26 Ver 26. And there remained two of the Men. Of the LXX Elders whom Moses ordered to appear and set themselves about the Tabernacle So the Hierusalem Targum these were of the number of the LXX wise Men neither did the LXX wise Men go from the Tabernacle while Eldad and Medad prophesied in the Camp And so R. Levi ben Gersom notes It seems to be plain out of the Text that these two were of the LXX Elders Which our Translators thought necessary to express by adding those words of the For in the Hebrew there is no more said but only there remained two Men. In the Camp Among the rest of the People from whom they would not come Out of Modesty saying They were not equal to such a dignity as the words are in the Gemara Babylonica Tit. Sanhedrin Or perhaps they loved a private life and were afraid of being envied by the People Whom they saw to be so unruly that it made them decline the burden as Saul did when he hid himself among the stuff The name of the one was Eldad and the name of the other Medad We do not find the names of any other of the LXX Elders but only these two who Jonathan saith were Moses his Brothers by the Mother's side And St. Hierom himself mentions such a Tradition that they were his Brethren But there is no certainty of this nor of what others of the Jews say concerning them See Selden Lib. II. de Synedr Cap. 4. Sect. 3. It may be they are mentioned in honour of their vertuous Modesty which made them think themselves unworthy of so high a dignity And the Spirit rested upon them As it did upon those who were about the Tabernacle v. 25. Whereby God marked them out to be in the number of those whom he had chosen to be Assistants unto Moses And they were of them that were written c. Whose Names Moses put into the Summons which he sent to those whom he judged fit to be advanced to this Authority The Jews particularly Solomon Jarchi say they were chosen by the way of casting Lots and according to their manner they tell the Story thus in the place mentioned before in the Gemara Moses say they was in doubt how he should execute God's Command v. 16. because if he did not chuse an equal number out of every Tribe it might be ill taken And if he chose Six out of each of the XII Tribes they would exceed the number of LXX if but five they would fall short of it He resolved therefore at last to chuse VI out of each Tribe which in all were LXXII Persons And in LXX Schedules he wrote the Name of Elder but the other two were Blanks Then mixing all these in an Urn he bad them come and draw And to every one who drew a Schedule that had the Name of Elder in it he said God hath sanctified thee but to him that drew a Blank he said God hath not chosen thee And those two Blanks some of the Jewish Doctors say came into the hands of Eldad and Medad who therefore were left behind in the Camp And this Conceit our very learned Dr. Lightfoot himself entertained saying in his short account of this Chapter That six of a Tribe made up the number of the Sanhedrim which was chosen and two over And those two were Eldad and Medad who were written for Elders but the Lot cast them out that there might be but LXX Yet did the LORD honour them with the Spirit of Prophecy But as this whole Story of the manner of Chusing the Elders is very dubious so other Jews of great Authority say that Eldad and Medad were of the number of the LXX that were chosen Particularly Jonathan saith expresly they were of the number of those whose Schedules came up with the Name of Elder in them But they did not go to the Tabernacle because they had no mind to be Governours Nay the Talmudical Gloss upon the fore-named place of the Gemara saith that when LXX of the LXXII had drawn two of them had Blanks whereby Eldad and Medad knew that the two remaining Schedules had the Name of Elder in them and therefore would not draw them because they were sure not to have Blanks The very same Mr. Selden shows is in other noted Books of theirs So that it is generally received they were in the number of those LXX which were chosen to be joined with Moses in the Government See L. II. de Synedr Cap. 4. Sect. 7. And they prophesied in the Camp Which was a greater thing than if they had prophesied at the Tabernacle Denoting them to be Men so highly in the Favour of God that he would distinguish them from other Men wheresoever they were and not want their Service The Hierusalem Targum relates what each of them foretold for to that he restrains their Prophesying and what they both foretold but it is not worth the mentioning Ver. 27. And there ran a young Man and told Moses Verse 27 and said Eldad and Medad do prophesie tn the Camp The Jews who will seem ignorant of nothing say it was Gershom the Son of Moses who carried these Tydings to his Father Ver. 28. And Joshua the Son of Nun. From Verse 28 whence some conclude that he was none of the LXX Elders though a Man of a most excellent Spirit And indeed this is likely enough he being to succeed Moses and so to become the Head of them The Servant of Moses Who ministred to him as a constant Attendant on his Person XXIV Exod. 13. One of his young Men. The word one is not in the Hebrew which may be translated from among his young Men i. e. The rest of those that waited on him My Lord Moses forbid them Perhaps he thought they could have no Authority not being at the Tabernacle Or rather that their Prophesying too much lessened the Authority
Sea to the middle of Arabia Petraea Nor would the Locusts have come this way had not this Wind brought them from their ordinary Course From the Sea Viz. From the Red-sea yet not excluding the Persian Gulph Which must not be understood as if they came out of the Sea but from the Sea-coast And it is very probable out of Africa where they abound So the aforesaid Ludolphus expounds it in his late Dissertatio de Locustis Pars II. cap. 39 c. And let them fall by the Camp Or poured them down upon the Camp as Dust or Rain falls thick upon the Ground For both these Comparisons the Psalmist uses in the place before-named LXXVIII 27. And this is expressed in Exodus XVI 13. by covering their Camp As it were a days journey on this side and as it were a days journey on the other side A days Journey as Bochartus makes account is at least Twenty Miles See the place before-named Hierozoic P. II. Lib. I. cap. 15. p. 105. Or as Ludolphus makes the Computation Sixteen Miles in his Dissertation de Locustis P. II. cap. 44 c. Take it either way it shows there was a vast number of them For he adds Round about the Camp So that which way soever they went for sixteen or twenty Miles together there lay heaps of them upon the Ground which if we understand this of Quails cannot be conceived without a heap of Miracles And if we resort to that what need was there of a Wind to bring them when God must be supposed miraculously to have created them as he did Manna And yet such a quantity of Quails was not to be found any where without a Miracle as would cover the Heavens forty Miles according to Bochartus on all sides But that which would have been on many accounts miraculous if we understand it of Quails will be found less wonderful or rather natural if it be understood of Locusts who come in very great and thick Clouds which darken the Sky as all Authors tell us See Ludolphus Comment in Histor Aethiop p. 188. And as it were two Cubits high upon the face of the Earth This Interpreters look upon as impossible for then the Quails would have been choaked and stifled if they had been heaped so deep one upon another And therefore they have devised the addition of a new word and refer this not to their falling upon the Ground but to their flying in the Air two Cubits high above the Earth that so they might the more easily be taken by their Hands So the Jews and so Val. Schindler in his Lexicon upon the word Selau But besides that there is nothing of this in the Text and is contrary to what the Psalmist says that they fell in the midst of their Camp verse 28. and that they came down like Rain which always falls upon the Ground there are many other Difficulties in this Interpretation as he shows p. 189. and defends what he there asserts in his Dissertation de Locustis P. II. cap. 49 50. And therefore it is better to expound it of Locusts who though they fall one upon another to a great depth are not thereby suffocated by reason of the length of their Feet and the thinness of their Wings Ver. 32. And the People stood up or rather rose Verse 32 up all that day and all that night and all the next day They were intent upon the gathering of them for thirty six hours And they gathered the Quails By this it is evident that they gathered something lying upon the Ground and not flying in the Air for we do not gather things there but take or catch them He that gathered least Viz. The Master of every Family for himself and for those belonging to him For we are not to suppose that every Man in Israel gathered so many as follows Gathered ten homers A vast quantity if they were Quails which would have served them not for a Month but for a Year or two as Ludolphus observes p. 190. of his Commentary on his Aethiopic Hist Besides we do not use to measure Fowl but to number them And therefore Bochart being sensible of this impropriety takes the word homer here to signifie an heap Which is confuted by Ludolphus in his Dissertatio de Locustis P. II. cap. 54 55 c. And they spread them all abroad for themselves round about the Camp This is another plain indication that they were Locusts which they spread to be dried in the Sun but if they had been Quails would have been very preposterous for it would have made them the sooner stink Interpreters therefore commonly pass by this and give no account why they spread them abroad and the Vulgar Latin omits this word spread Whereas all Authors tell us this is the principal way of preparing Locusts and preserving them for a Month or more Which they boil'd or other ways made fit to eat when they had occasion See Ludolphus in his fore-mentioned Commentary and in his Defence of it lately in his Dissertatio de Locustis P. II. cap. 97 98 c. Verse 33 Ver. 33. And while the flesh was yet between their teeth While they were eating and therefore were in good health and had a good Stomach Ere it was chewed Before they had swallowed it The Wrath of the LORD was kindled against the People They felt unexpected effects of God's displeasure being taken perhaps with a sudden vomiting of which they died v. 20. This was in the Conclusion of the Month for so long he there saith they should eat flesh And the LORD smote the People with a very great Plague He sent a Pestilence among them as Aben Ezra supposes Or as others think they wasted away in a Consumption the Vomiting perhaps continuing so that they could never retain any Meat till they died This they gather from CVI Psal 15. where the Psalmist saith He sent Leanness into their Soul But Bochartus and Menochius think he burnt them up with a Fire from his Presence as at the beginning of this Murmuring verse 1. where it is said as it is here The Anger of the LORD was kindled But Bochartus grounds this chiefly upon LXXVIII Psal 21. where it is said A Fire was kindled in Jacob which he refers to this Story It may seem strange to some that now they should be punished so heavily when about a Year ago they murmured for Flesh as they did now and he gave it them in the Even together with Manna in the Morning without any Punishment at all But it is to be considered that as it was a greater Fault to fall into the same Sin again after God had been so good to them so they were not in such Necessity now as they were then when they were really pinched with hunger whereas now they were fed with Bread from Heaven and therefore cried for Meat not out of need but wantonness And it may be added That they were not then so well taught
the word may be understood with God's whole Family that is with all the Children of Israel and faithfully discharged the Trust reposed in him by acquainting them with all God's Will and executing all his Commands and doing nothing of himself as now he was fasly accused but only what God required This is a high Testimony to him and the Jews when they are in the humour of exalting Moses say he was more faithful than the Angels of the Ministry They are the words of R. Jose in Siphri and if he had said As faithful as the Angels of the Ministry it might have passed for a good Explication Ver. 8. With him will I speak mouth to mouth Verse 8 In a most familiar manner as one Friend discourses with another So it is explained XXXIII Exod. 11. From whence Abarbinel in his Rosch Amana gathers That Moses his Prophecy differed from others in these four things First That God spake to others by a Mediator that is as he explains it by some Angel but to him by himself without the intervention of any other Secondly That they never prophesied but their Senses were all bound up either in Visions or in Dreams whereas he was as perfectly awake as we are when we discourse one with another Thirdly That after the Vision was over they were often left so weak and feeble that they could scarce stand upon their feet as appears from X Dan. 8 11. but Moses spake with the Divine Majesty without any consternation or alteration his conversation with him being like that of one Friend with another And lastly No Prophet but he could understand the Mind of God when they pleased for he communicated himself to them only when he thought good whereas Moses might at any time resort to God to enquire of him and receive an answer See IX 8. To the same purpose also Maimonides writes in his Book de Fundamentis Legis cap. 7. Even apparently Plainly clearly and distinctly so that there was no difficulty to apprehend his meaning nor need of an Explication Thus he proclaimed his Name to Moses XXXIV Exod. 6 7. And not in dark Speeches Or in Parables and Enigmatical Representations Such as the Ladder which Jacob saw in a Dream the Boiling-pot which was shown to Jeremiah the Wall the Plumb-line and the Basket of Summer-fruits which Amos saw the Beasts which were represented to Daniel the Lamps Mountain Horses and Chariots to Zachariah the Roll of the Book which Ezekiel was to eat By all which the Prophet as Maimonides observes whose Illustrations these are of these words was given to understand some other thing which was intended to be made known to him by these Figures More Nevoch P. II. c. 43. who in his Book concerning the Foundations of the Law further observes that some of these Prophets had both the Parable as he calls it and its Interpretation represented to them others the Parable only without any Exposition and to some was only delivered the Explication And the Similitude of the LORD shall he behold I am apt to think the word not should be here again repeated as it must be in some places to make out the Sense as XXV Prov. 27. which will make the meaning plainly this he shall not behold the LORD in Similitudes and Resemblances as other Prophets did For the Hebrew word Temunah signifies the Shape of a thing represented either to the outward Senses or to the Imagination not the thing it self Therefore it would be to equal Moses with the rest of the Prophets to say he should see the Similitude of the LORD for so did they Amos for instance saith he saw the LORD standing upon the Altar IX 1. that is some Angelical Appearance in a glorious shape And Eliphaz saith That a Spirit passed before him the form or aspect whereof he could not discern only the Temunah we render it an Image was before his Eyes IV Job 15 16. But God did not thus reveal himself to Moses by Images and Similitudes of Things but spake to him himself as it goes before mouth to mouth Which led Maimonides into the opinion which he often repeats that when God is said to speak to any other Man it was by an Angel and that he never spake to any one himself but only to Moses Nor did any Man before him say that God spake to him or that he sent him on a Message unto others but Moses was the first that had this honour More Nevoch P. I. c. 63. and P. II. cap. 39. But if we follow our Translation which should run thus But the Similitude of the LORD shall he behold it relates to that wonderful Apparition of God to him in the Bush III Exod. 6. as Maimonides thinks More Nevochim P. I. cap. 5. where he saith God poured upon him as much as he could contain but especially to that Revelation which God made of himself to him when he told him that he could not see his Face but should behold his back Parts XXXIII Exod. 20 23. Which was a Priviledge granted to none but him And thus the Similitude of the LORD or his Likeness signifies the LORD himself XVII Psal ult When thy Likeness shall awake that is thou thy self appear for me I shall be satisfied Wherefore then were ye not afraid to speak against my Servant Moses Who is my prime Minister employed by me in the highest Services Ver. 9. And the Anger of the LORD was kindled against them As appeared by what follows And he departed He withdrew his Presence from Verse 9 the Door of the Tabernacle immediately before they could make any answer Which was a token of exceeding great Displeasure as it is in us when we will not so much as hear what Men say for themselves when they have highly and notoriously offended us and we reprove them for it but turn away from them Verse 10 Ver. 10. And the Cloud departed from the Tabernacle It was not merely taken up from it as it was wont to be when they were to remove their Camp but quite disappeared for a time or stood at a great distance from them till Miriam was removed from the Tabernacle and carried out of the Camp For that was one reason of its departure the Divine Majesty not designing to stay where so impure a Creature was And this was also a manifest token of God's high Displeasure against them which moved him to forsake them And behold Miriam became leprous Or was become leprous A proper Punishment for pride and evil speaking Which was not inflicted upon Aaron because he was to judge of Leprosie and was not the first in the Transgression And besides it is likely God would not have one that was but newly made his High-Priest become vile and contemptible White as Snow Which was a mark of an incurable Leprosie when all the Body was over-spread with it IV Exod. 6. 2 Kings V. 27. And Aaron looked upon Miriam As the Priest was bound to do whose Office
the Divine Majesty in Detestation of the Impiety and to declare their Sorrow and Indignation and Dread of God's Judgments as appears from XXXVI Jerem. 24. Where the Stupidity of Jehojakim and his Servants is represented by this that when they heard the words which the Prophet declared in God's Name against Judah they were not afraid nor rent their Garments Verse 7 Ver. 7. And they spake unto all the Company of the Children of Israel saying This showed great Courage that they durst declare their Opinion contrary to the Sense of so great a multitude The Land which we passed thorough to search it is an exceeding good Land This is opposed to what their Fellows had said that it was a Land which eat up its Inhabitants XIII 32. Quite contrary they assure them it was very very good as the words are in the Hebrew And so expressed by the Chaldee and the LXX exceeding exceeding good That is every way desirable for thus the Hebrews express the Superlative Degree Verse 8 Ver. 8. If the LORD delight in us then he will bring us into this Land and give it us If we do not forfeit his Favour he will make us so happy as to drive out the Canaanites and settle us in the Possession of this Land A Land which floweth with Milk and Honey As their Companions themselves had confessed XIII 27. Ver. 9. Only rebel ye not against the LORD By slighting his Goodness by Murmuring and discontented Speeches and talking of going back to Egypt v. 2 3 4. Verse 9 Neither fear ye the People of the Land This is opposed to what the rest of the Spies had said concerning the mighty Power and Strength of the Inhabitants of Canaan XIII 28 29 31 c. For they are Bread for us We shall as easily vanquish them as we eat our Meat Their Defence is departed from them In the Hebrew the words are their Shadow whereby Men being defended from Heat in those Countries it signifies the Protection which God gives Men from those things that might hurt them Which Divine Protection they tell the People was now withdrawn from the Canaanites who had filled up the measure of their Iniquities XV Gen. 16. and now were exposed as a Prey to the Israelites And the LORD is with us For on the contrary they entreat the People to consider that God who was departed from the Canaanites was with them to aid and assist them in the Conquest of the Country And for both these reasons they needed not to fear them So they conclude their Speech like Men of an undaunted Spirit in these words fear them not Ver. 10. But all the Congregation The Hebrew Verse 10 words Col Ha Edah as I observed v. 1. signifies all the great Men the Rulers of the rest Bad stone them with stones Ordered the People to stone them to Death as they had done it is likely if they had not been deterred from the Attempt by the Appearance of the Divine Majesty For the Hebrew word amar as Maimonides observes in his More Nevochim P. I. cap. 65. is used not only concerning that which is spoken or thought but of what is decreed and resolved And he produces these words as an instance of it together with II Exod. 14. 2 Sam. XXI 16. And the Glory of the LORD appeared The SCHECHINAH which resided within the Tabernacle upon the Mercy-Seat now openly appeared in a bright flaming Light like Fire And in all probability after such an amazing manner as terrified them from their Design Thus it appeared on Mount Sinai to fright them from approaching near unto it XXIV Exod. 17. from whence Moses saith the LORD thy God is a consuming fire IV Deut. 24. and thus it appeared afterward XVI Numb 19 42. In the Tabernacle of the Congregation Or rather upon the Tabernacle for in the Tabernacle the People could not have seen it as now they did over the most Holy place which the Cloud constantly covered over the Mercy-Seat where the Divine Glory dwelt See IX 15. Before all the Children of Israel Both to fright them as I said from their purpose of stoning Joshua and Caleb and to show his Anger and Displeasure at their Rebellion which it is likely appeared by the Flashes that came from the glorious Flame Verse 11 Ver. 11. And the LORD said unto Moses In answer I suppose unto his Prayer v. 5. How long will this People provoke me Shall I always bear with their most undutiful Behaviour which will provoke the greatest Patience unto Anger How long will it be ere they believe me Dost thou not see that their belief is incurable For all the Signs which I have shewed among them Since they continue in it notwithstanding all the Wonders I have done to convince them of my Power and Faithfulness Ver. 12. I will smite them with a Pestilence Send Verse 12 a Pestilential Disease among them to sweep them away at once as the fifteenth Verse interprets it See XXXII Exod. 10. And disinherit them And so deprive them and theirs of the Country which I promised to their Fathers for an Inheritance XV Gen. 7. This was not an irrevocable Decree but a Threatning which God changed into another severe Punishment And will make of thee a greater Nation and mightier than they Fulfil my Promise to Abraham by making thee the Father of a more numerous People and more powerful than they whom I reject Ver. 13. And Moses said unto the LORD then Verse 13 the Egyptians will hear it for thou broughtest up this People by thy might from among them It is an abrupt kind of Speech proceeding from the great disturbance which this Threatning made in his Mind being as much as if he had said If thou thus destroy them the Egyptians when they hear of it will Triumph and thou wilt lose all the Honour thou hast got by the wonderful Deliverance thou didst work for thy People from their Bondage Ver. 14. And they will tell it to the Inhabitants of Verse 14 this Land Or rather they will say to the Inhabitants of this Land i. e. the Canaanites with whom the Egyptians had frequent Commerce For they have heard c. The word for is not in the Hebrew and the Sense will be more plain if we omit it and translate the whole thus They will say to the Inhabitants of this Land they have heard that thou LORD art among this People That is that there was a glorious Token of thy Presence among us That thou LORD art seen face to face And spakest to us from Mount Sinai out of that glorious Cloud which there appeared unto all the People XIX Exod. 18. XX. 1. XXIV 16 17. IV Deut. 12. And that thy Cloud standeth over them X Numb 34. And that thou goest before them by day time in a Pillar of a Cloud and in a Pillar of Fire by Night XIII Exod. 21. Verse 15 Ver. 15. Now if thou shalt kill all this People Or rather But thou hast
killed all this People As one Man On a sudden with one stroke as if they had all but one Life Then the Nations which have heard the fame of thee will speak saying Of which the Nations that have heard the fore-named Report of thy Majesty will make this Construction Verse 16 Ver. 16. Because the LORD was not able to bring this People into the Land Because he whom they called Omnipotent was indeed defective in his Power which at last failed him so that he could not compleat what he had undertaken Which he sware unto them XV Gen. 17 18. XXIV 7. Therefore he hath slain them in the Wilderness Killed them all before they came to the Land he had solemnly promised to them for that was an easier work than to make good his word The sum of this Argument is That it would be a great disparagement to the Divine Majesty if he now destroyed this Nation because his Enemies would conclude he had deluded them with false Promises which he wanted Power to effect Ver. 17. And now I beseech thee let the Power of Verse 17 my LORD be great That is let it appear to be unlimited by bringing them into the Land which he sware to give them v. 16. or by pardoning their Sin which had provoked his high displeasure against them v. 11. For by Power may be meant either that which is properly called by that Name viz. his Omnipotence which can conquer all Opposition Or his Mercy and Clemency in overcoming his Anger and bearing with an ungrateful People Which agrees very well with what follows but both tend to the same meaning that he would not destroy them but bestow the Land of Canaan upon them according to his Intentions According as thou hast spoken saying Which will be suitable to thy blessed Nature which thou didst proclaim to me when thy Glory passed by me XXXI Exod. 22. XXXIV 5 6. Ver. 18. The LORD is long-suffering and of great Verse 18 mercy forgiving iniquity c. In these very words though something more largely God proclaim'd his Name to Moses when he showed him his Glory XXXIV Exod. 6 7. where they are explained And by no means clearing the guilty Even these words according to the Interpretation I have there given of them are a plain Argument to move the Divine Goodness to pardon their Sin But the next words visiting the iniquity of the Fathers upon the Children c. seem to be directly contrary to the intention of his Petition till it be considered that they had not now committed Idolatry against which Sin God in these words particularly declares his Severity and that Moses did not now plead for an absolute Pardon without any Punishment at all but only that he would not destroy the whole Nation as one Man and utterly disinherit them as he seemed resolved to do v. 12 15. This Threatning he hoped his gracious Nature would incline him to revoke notwithstanding which he might visit the Sin of the Fathers upon the Children unto the third and fourth Generation That is punish them and their Posterity a long time And so this latter part of the verse is to be interpreted according to what I observed XXXIV Exod. 7. in making desolate he will not make quite desolate though he visit the iniquity of the Fathers upon the Children c. Verse 19 Ver. 19. Pardon I beseech thee the Iniquity of this People So far as not to destroy them utterly According to the greatness of thy Mercy Which God himself had proclaimed v. 18. As thou hast forgiven this People from Egypt even until now This looks like an Argument against them for they having provoked him so often as they had done since they came out of Egypt in the space of one Year and a little more See v. 22. and been as often forgiven it might seem more reasonable that he should now punish them and not forgive them any more But he appeals to that long-suffering Goodness which he mentions as the prime Character of the Divine Nature v. 18. which though it had been exercised by them many ways yet he hoped would still bear longer with them Ver. 20. And the LORD said I have pardoned according to thy word Granted thy desire not to destroy them utterly and altogether v. 12 15. Ver. 21. But as truly as I live all the Earth shall be Verse 20 filled with the Glory of the LORD In the Hebrew Verse 21 the words run plainly thus As true as I live and that all the Earth shall be or hath been filled with the Glory of the LORD For so the Egyptians themselves confessed v. 14. that the fame of it was come to them and afterwards he did many more wonderful things when he brought them into Canaan Unto which if these words be taken in the Future Tense he hath respect when he saith As true as that he would in a most glorious manner subdue the Canaanites not one of these murmuring Israelites should come into that good Land Ver. 22. Because all these Men c. The sence Verse 22 would have been clear if we had left out the word because as we might have done the Hebrew Particle ki being sometimes only an expletive or if we had translated it that as it signifies in XXII Gen. 17. and many other places For the meaning plainly is though the words be something intricate That all the Men of whom he is speaking should perish and not one of them come into Canaan Which have seen my Glory Which appeared to them in the Cloud upon Mount Sinai and resided in the Tabernacle And my Miracles which I did in Egypt Mentioned in the IV VII VIIIth and following Chapters of the Book of Exodus And in the Wilderness Where he divided the Red Sea for them to pass through on dry Land and gave them Manna constantly from Heaven with Water out of a Rock which followed them whithersoever they went c. And have tempted me now these ten times That is very oft as this Phrase ten times signifies XXXI Gen. 7 41. IV Nehem. 12. XIX Job 3. But some of the Hebrews will not be satisfied with this Explication but indeavour to find out precisely just ten Provocations of which they were guilty Though to do this they are forced to begin with one which fell out before they came to the Red Sea XIV Exod. 11 12. and all the other Nine they find in the Wilderness See Pirke Avoth cap. 5. and Paulus Fagius his Scholia upon it with Genebrard upon the LXXVIII Psal v. 46. Mr. Mede hath observed that to tempt God in Scripture Language is to provoke him by some presumptuous Fact to anger as it were to try whether he will punish or not or in fewer words to dare God Book I. Discourse 26. p. 153. And the following words in the next verse justifie this Notion in this place And have not hearkned to my Voice This seems particularly to refer to their Disobedience when he
good Words to which they would no longer trust Or given us Inheritence of Fields and Vineyards But told us it shall be bestowed forty years hence when we are all dead This still shows they took him for a Deluder of them with deceitful Promises Wilt thou put out the Eyes of these Men Some of them spake this in the name of the rest who were now with Dathan and Abiram and the meaning is Dost thou think to blind us so that none of us shall discern this Imposture Or shall we suffer thee to lead us about like blind Men whither thou pleasest sometimes towards Canaan and now back again towards the Red Sea and Egypt We will not come up A peremptory Resolution not to own his Authority which they denied at the first v. 12. Ver. 15. And Moses was very wroth For such behaviour Verse 15 and Language was so provoking that it was no wonder it incensed the meekest Man upon Earth XII 3. Yet the LXX translate the words as if he only took it very heavily 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it made him exceeding sad And said unto the LORD respect not their Offering He calls the Incense which they were about to offer by the Name of Mincha which commonly signifies a Meat-offering but sometimes any inanimate thing that was consumed in honour of God as Incense was and must so signifie in this place for they offered nothing else And when Moses desires it may not be accepted he means a great deal more that God would give some Sign of his dislike to it Hence it seems plain to me That Dathan and Abiram as well as Korah quarrelled at the confining the Priestood unto Aaron's Family for Moses calls this their Offering by the Acceptance or Rejection of which this Controversie was to be decided I have not taken one Ass from them This seems to be an Appeal to God against their unjust Charge that he acted Arbitrarily and did with them what he list v. 13. From which he was so far that he declares before God he had not taken i. e. received by way of Gift or Reward So the LXX and the Vulgar understand it the smallest thing for such a single Ass was much less extorted any thing from them Nor have I hurt any one of them None can say that I have done any kind of Evil to them but contrarily all good Offices For that he did not seek himself appeared in this That he had not advanced his own Family to the Priestood but left them in the number of the other Levites upon the same level with Korah and his Company Ver. 16. And Moses said unto Korah be thou and all thy Company before the LORD c. He repeats what he had said to him before v. 6 7. only adding that he would have Aaron also there together with Verse 16 them So it follows Thou and they and Aaron to morrow Before the LORD i. e. In the Court of the Tabernacle See v. 7. where by an extraordinary Commission from the Divine Majesty this Trial was to be made And therefore Aaron himself did not now go into the Sanctuary to offer Incense which was the proper and only place allowed by the Law but stood with them without As in another great necessity he offered Incense in the midst of the Congregation v. 46 47. Both which was done by a Dispensation from him that made the Law Ver. 17. Take every Man his Censer and put Incense Verse 17 in them and bring ye before the LORD every Man his Censer Let every Man of them stand before the LORD at the Door of the Tabernacle to do the Office of Priests to which they pretended as good a right as Aaron and his Sons Two hundred and fifty Censers This shows that the Incense being offered by so great a number as it appears it was v. 35. they did not offer it in the Sanctuary which would not contain so many Persons Thou also and Aaron each of you his Censer This seems to signifie as if Korah was commanded to stand by Aaron since he pretended to be his equal which made the Hand of God the more remarkable upon him when he was struck with Lightning and no harm came to Aaron who stood by him But it may be doubted what way Korah perished Ver. 18. And they took every Man his Censer That is the Two hundred and fifty Men did as they were commanded but Korah went first to muster up as Verse 18 many as he could get together against Moses v. 19. and then seems to have gone to his Tent v. 24. Herein these Men submitted to the way of decision which Moses propounded though they had so boldly denied his Authority For they could not but think that God whom they owned to be among them v. 3. would approve of them if they were in the right and make good their Allegation That all the Congregation were holy by accepting their Incense as much as Aaron's To whom they did not deny an equality with themselves but only a Superiority And put fire in them From the Altar of Burnt-offering which stood in the Court at the Door of which they were placed I Lev. 5. for Aaron durst not take it from any other place his Sons having lost their Lives for offering with strange Fire The remembrance of which it is likely deterred these Men from doing other wise who did not as yet put in the Fire but only took their Censers and put Incense in them which is all that is ordered in the preceding Verse and put Fire in afterwards And stood in the door of the Tabernacle of the Congregation with Moses and Aaron As if they were nothing inferiour to them Verse 19 Ver. 19. And Korah gathered all the Congregation against them The LXX translates it Korah gathered all his Congregation i. e. all the Men of his Faction But the Hebrew words import that he gathered all the Congregation of Israel at least all the great Men who are sometimes called by the Name of all the Congregation XIV 1. whom he got together that they might be Witnesses at least of the issue of this Trial though their coming together with Korah and his Company rather than with Moses and Aaron is too plain an Indication that they were inclined if not to throw off yet to doubt of their Authority Vnto the door of the Tabernacle of the Congregation Where they themselves stood v. 18. And so did Moses and Aaron but the Israelites that Korah had gathered together stood on his side as appears from the foregoing words and from v. 24. And the Glory of the LORD The SCHECHINAH or Divine Majesty came forth out of the most Holy Place where it usually resided Appeared unto all the Congregation Openly shewed it self in the sight of all the People and it is likely in such an amazing manner as it had done before XIV 10. But where it appeared we are not told I suppose in the Cloud which was just
not think such things incredible as Huetius hath shown in his Quaestiones Alnetanae L. I. cap. 12. n. 24. Ver. 9. And Moses brought out all the Rods from before Verse 9 the LORD unto all the Children of Israel Before whom they were exposed to open view that they might see the difference God had made And they looked and took every Man his Rod. Viewed them and taking them into their Hands examined them and found they were the very same Rods which they had delivered unto Moses with their Names on them without any alteration Ver. 10. And the LORD said unto Moses bring Verse 10 Aaron's Rod again Which either Moses held in his Hand or delivered it to Aaron as he did the rest to the several Princes of the Tribes who showed it to the Children of Israel with the Buds Blossoms and Almonds upon it After which God commanded it to be returned unto him Before the Testimony To be laid up in the place where it was before it was thus changed v. 4 7. To be kept for a Token against the Rebels That it might be produced as a sufficient Conviction of their Impiety if any presumed hereafter to rebel against Aaron's Authority Or rather that it might prevent all Insurrections against it for the future For it remained we find in the most Holy Place for some time as appears both from the Apostle IX Hebr. 4. and from the reason of its being put here that it might be preserved as a Sign or Proof of Aaron's Authority and Suppress all opposition to it But how long it continued we cannot tell for it is not mentioned when the Ark was brought into the Temple of Solomon 1 Kings VIII 9. nor is it certain whether it continued in that verdure wherein it now appeared with the Buds Blossoms and Fruit though it is highly probable it did because it was to be a Testimony that the Honour of the Priesthood should continue to Aaron's Family alone through all Generations There are those who take this Rod which blossomed and was laid up in the most Holy Place to have been the Rod of Moses wherewith he wrought so many Miracles in Egypt and at the Red Sea Concerning which the Jews tell very many incredible things as that it came from a Branch of the Tree of Life which an Angel gave to Seth who planted it in the Wilderness where Moses found it grown to a Tree and cut this Rod from it For when they came to Marah and could not drink the Waters because they were bitter God showed them this Tree that with it he might make them sweet Upon which Tree he afterward placed the brazen Serpent by looking on which the People were healed c. Thus the Cabbalists generally tell this Tale but some of them much otherwise who say it was given to Adam and by him to Enoch and so on till it came to Joseph in whose House the Egyptians found it when he died and brought it to Pharaoh from whom Jethro stole it c. with a great deal of such like stuff Which Abarbinel saith is to be understood mystically But all the ground they have for this Fancy of the Rod here laid up being Moses's Rod is from XX. 8 9. where it is said That Moses took the Rod from before the LORD wherewith he brought Water out of the Rock and this Rod is said v. 11. to be Moses his Rod. Dr. Owen upon the Epistle to the Hebrews follows this Conceit and endeavours to find many Mysteries in it But it is evidently false for as there is not the least intimation here that it was the Rod of Moses but quite contrary it is called the Rod of Aaron v. 6. so it had not been a sufficient Argument to convince the Infidelity of the Israelites if Aaron's Rod had not been of the same kind with all the rest For they might have ascribed what came to pass to the singular quality or vertue of that Rod especially if it were Moses his Rod wherewith Wonders used to be wrought and not to a special Hand of God appearing to establish the Authority of Aaron And besides a Rod full of Blossoms and Fruit had been very unfit to be used to smite the Rock withal for which purpose that Rod which seems to have been his Pastoral Staff wherewith he smote the Rock in Horeb was most proper XVII Exod. 5 6. And thou shalt quite take away their Murmurings from me i. e. Silence all their Cavils against Aaron and his Family which the LORD here declares he would no longer bear if they continued in them after this demonstration of his Will and Pleasure For here were a great many miraculous things concurred together to convince them that to oppose Aaron was to oppose God himself The Jews reckon up eight First That Aaron's Rod should bring forth Buds Blossoms and Fruit all in one Night when the other Rods which were of the same nature brought forth nothing And then secondly That the Buds brought forth Leaves for so they interpret those words v. 8. the Rod of Aaron was budded i. e. brought forth Leaves for the next words speaks of its budding which followed after And thirdly That it thrust out Leaves before the Blossoms which is contrary to the Nature of the Almond Tree And next that it put forth Blossoms all the Rod over as they interpret those words bloomed Blossoms And then that a dry Stick as they understand it should produce Fruit and this Fruit Almonds which such Trees they think as that Rod was taken from did not bear And further That it produced ripe Almonds as the Hebrew word Schekedim imports And lastly That Moses showed the People all these at one view the Leaves Buds Blossoms and Fruit in perfection By which multiplicity of Miracles the Dignity of Aaron was so demonstrated that we do not find they at any time hereafter adventured to rise up against him For besides all those Wonders now mentioned it may be that it was not the Season of the Year for Almonds nor so much as for the budding of that Tree which made it the more astonishing But the greatest thing of all was the continuing of this Miracle to future Ages which might well make them afraid to open their Mouths again in Murmurings against Aaron That they die not Be not consumed in a moment as God had more than once formerly threatned XVI 21 45. and now declared if they did not mend their Manners and cease their Murmurings about this matter he would instantly execute Ver. 11. And Moses did so as the LORD commanded so did he Both brought the Rod again to him and laid it up before him and told the Children of Israel the reason of it which occasioned what Verse 11 follows Ver. 12. And the Children of Israel spake unto Moses Verse 12 saying Behold we die we perish c. Moses having told them that he laid up the Rod for this end to be a Witness against them that if
am thy part and thine inheritance among the Children of Israel For they were maintained in his House and lived upon his Altar and fed from his Table as it is explained in XIII Josh 14. The Sacrifices of the LORD God of Israel made by fire are their inheritance as he said unto them Which is given as the reason why Joshua gave them no Inheritance And see v. 33. of that Chapter where the LORD God of Israel is said to be their Inheritance Who it appears by the foregoing part of this Chapter and other places made such an ample Provision for them that if he had given them any part of the Land of Canaan together with it there had been too great an inequality between them and the rest of the Tribes of Israel For without any share in the Land their Portion was far richer than that of any other Persons whatsoever I have said enough to prove this already but it may not be amiss to set it before the Reader again a little more distinstly As they had yearly the First-fruits of the whole Country which was at least the sixtieth part of the Fruits it produced and the tenth part of the Tithe given to the Levites as it follows below v. 26. and all Free-will-offerings together with the Money which arose out of Persons and Things devoted unto God and all the Firstlings of Cows Sheep and Goats and the Redemption-Money for the Firstlings of such Creatures as were unclean So they had all the Meat-offerings Offerings for Sin and Trespass-offerings together with the Breast and Shoulder of all Peace-offerings and the Skins of all Burnt-offerings and the Loaves made of the first Dough and the Shew-bread and as Josephus and others expound XVIII Deut. 3. a considerable part of every beast that was killed for private use besides the Cities and Land about them which were assigned to the Levites Which if well weighed there will appear a vast difference between the Priests and the rest of the People For the First-fruits alone if they were not less than the sixtieth part of the product of the Country might seem sufficient especially if the Firstlings be added the Priests not being the sixtieth part of the People no nor the hundred part as learned Men have computed See Bonfrerius Ver. 21. And behold Now he gives the Levites Verse 21 notice of the Recompence he would make them for their Service as he had told the Priests what they should have for theirs And Aaron hath the delivery of this Grant made to them from God that they might see he did not mind himself and the Interest of his own Family only I have given the Children of Levi all the tenth in Israel See XXVII Lev. 30. and 2 Chron. XXXI 5 6. where they are distinctly mentioned Aben-Ezra thinks the tenth rather than any other part was assigned because it was a perfect Number Ten being in simple Numbers the highest to which we can arise without repeating the Numbers under it For it is as he speaks the beginning of the second Combination and the end of the first whereupon all Numbers do depend Which our Mr. Mede hath expressed in my judgment far better who looks upon it as God's favourable dealing with men in requiring but the Tenth which is in truth the least part of their Goods according to the first Division For when we proceed beyond Ten we begin to make a new Division as Eleven is ten and one c. But we need not have recourse to such Niceties See upon Genesis XXVIII 22. For an Inheritance Instead of a share in the Land of Canaan which other Tribes had divided among them And a larger Inheritance this was than any other Tribe possessed for this was the smallest Tribe of all as appears by comparing the account which is given of them in the beginning of this Book For all the Males of this Tribe from a Month old and upward were but Two and twenty thousand III. 29. Whereas in the Tribe of Judah alone there were above Threescore and fourteen thousand Men of War I. 26 27. And yet the Levites had a tenth part of the product of the whole Country and the twelve Tribes had only the other nine parts among them Such a care had God of those who were peculiarly devoted to his Service For the Service which they serve c. As a Reward of their Service of which see Chapter IV. Verse 22 Ver. 22. Neither must the Children of Israel henceforth come nigh the Tabernacle of the Congregation Or rather Therefore the Children of Israel must not come nigh so as to perform any of the Offices belonging to the Priests and Levites who were appointed to do every thing belonging to the Service of God there and had their Reward for it also appointed Lest they bear sin and die Be punished with Death which is often threatned to such Presumption Ver. 23. But the Levites shall do the Service of the Verse 23 Tabernacle of the Congregation It was their work and no Bodies else and therefore no other Persons were to meddle with it That is they alone guarded the Tabernacle and afterwards the Temple opened the Gates of it kept out all Strangers i. e. all but Priests and Levites carried the Tabernacle and its Vessels when they were to be removed c. And they shall bear their Iniquity They shall die for it if they permit any one else to come there and do their work See v. 1. It shall be a Statute for ever throughout their Generations that among the Children of Israel they have no Inheritance As all other Persons were excluded from serving in the Tabernacle so they who served there were shut out from having any Inheritance among their Brethren This was made an unalterable Law which provided another separate Maintenance for them by the Tythes of all the Land as here it again follows Ver. 24. But the Tythes of the Children of Israel which Verse 24 they offer as an Heave-offering unto the LORD That the People might not grudge to pay them the Tythes for their Service he represents them as an Heave-offering which they offered to God in Gratitude to him of whom as the Supreme Landlord they held that Land Not that they were heaved up or waved before the LORD but they were of the same Nature with those things that were so offered to him i. e. Holy Things separate to his uses all which are called by this Name of Terumah v. 8. And particularly all the Offerings which God required to be freely brought for the building him a Sanctuary are called by this Name of Terumah or Heave-offering XXV Exod 2. See there I have given to the Levites to inherit The Israelites gave them to God and he gave them to the Levites for their Inheritance who had as much right to them as the other Tribes had to their Land Which was the reason he ordered they should have no Portion of the Land of Canaan with the other
Tribes as it here follows therefore have I said unto them among the Children of Israel shall they have no Inheritance For he had given them the Tythes to inherit But R. Solomon Jarchi observes also that the Levites themselves had no right to them till they had taken out the tenth part from their Tenth and given it to the Priests as is here immediately directed Verse 25 Ver. 25. And the LORD spake unto Moses saying In all the foregoing part of the Chapter v. 1 8 20. the LORD spake unto Aaron though by Moses but here his Order is particularly directed to Moses because that which follows would better come from him than from Aaron Who was employed in acquainting the Levites with the Donation God had made of the Tythes to them v. 21. but it would not have been so proper for him to tell them what was to be given out of the Tythes to himself and to the Priests Verse 26 Ver. 26. Thus speak unto the Levites and say unto them When ye take of the Children of Israel the Tythes which I have given you from them for your Inheritance In these words Moses confirms the report which Aaron had made to them that the Tythes of the Land should be theirs and their Brethren the Children of Israel have no right to them Then shall ye offer up an Heave-offering for the LORD As the Israelites made their grateful Acknowledgments to God by offering their Tythes to him for the use of his Servants the Levites v. 24. so it was but fit that the Levites should be so grateful as to offer to him the Tythe of their Tythes as it here follows for such uses as he should appoint Even a tenth part of the Tythe For the tenth part which God reserved to himself out of the Land which he gave the Children of Israel was a kind of Rent paid to him their Supreme LORD And he assigning this Rent over to the Levites for their Maintenance thought good notwithstanding to reserve a Tythe of this tenth part to himself that thereby he might as it were hold his Possession and keep Seisin as the Lawyers speak of his own Inheritance Ver. 27. And this your Heave-offering shall be reckoned Verse 27 unto you Be accepted by God as the Offerings heaved up to him in the Sanctuary are v. 24. though it be but the hundredth part of the whole Fruit of the Land As though it were the Corn of the Threshing-floor and as the fulness of the Wine-press As if you paid such a Tythe as the Israelites do to you out of all their own Fields and Vineyards That is they were to believe their Offering of this small part to be as acceptable to God as that of all the Tribes of Israel and that they should have the same right to what remained when they had done this as the People had to all the rest of the Fruits of the Earth when they had paid the tenth part to the Levites Ver. 28. Thus you also shall offer an Heave-offering Verse 28 unto the LORD of all your Tythes which ye receive of the Children of Israel He would have them know that he ordered this because he would not have the Levites alone offer nothing to him from whom they received so much but they also should make him a grateful Acknowledgment as well as others And ye shall give thereof the LORD 's Heave-offering It is called so often the LORD 's Heave-offering that they might the more willingly pay it out of a thankful sense of what they owed to him the Donor of all To Aaron the Priest This Tythe is thought by some to have been designed for the High-Priest alone Two great Men in their time were of this Opinion viz. Nicolaus Lyra and the famous Alphonsus Tostatus And another very learned Person of our own Bishop R. Montagu thinks it not altogether improbable that such a Provision as this might be made for the High-Priest and his Family State and Dignity he being a Man of great Power and Might only less than the Kings of Israel and the inferiour Priests having a noble Maintenance without this from the First-fruits and Offerings of the People But there is nothing to support this but the mere Letter of the Text for Josephus expresly says the contrary Lib. VI. Archaeolog cap. 4. and so do the generality of the Jewish Writers and St. Hierom also that all the Priests had their share in this Tenth paid by the Levites Which till it was paid the Levites might not spend to their own use any part of their Tythe And to secure this the Priest was to be with the Levites when they took Tythes as we read X Nehem 37 38 to take care that they set out a tenth part of them for the Priests Whereby the Priest the Son of Aaron I cannot think is meant the High-Priest himself for that had been below his Dignity but some Priest I suppose appointed by him who took care of the Concerns of the whole Order of Priesthood and particularly of the High-Priest's interest who it is probable had a principal share among the rest in this Revenue perhaps a tenth part out of their Tenth But for this I have no Authority though I take it for certain that when he saith this Tenth should be given to Aaron the Priest the meaning is that as it was not for himself alone but all his Sons had a share in it so he himself was not excluded from an honourable portion of it It may seem strange perhaps that there is no particular portion set out for the High-Priest by himself if this be not it But it is to be considered that all the forenamed Provision From v. 8. to v. 20. was made for him in the first place and for the Priests together with him For so the words runs Vnto thee have I given them and to thy Sons v. 8 9 c. And he had this priviledge also that he did not Minister by Lot as the other Priests did in their several Courses but when he pleased and might take to himself what Sacrifices he thought good to offer V. 9 10. as Maimonides tells us in Cele Mikdasch cap. 5. where he speaks concerning the High-Priest's Prerogatives Ver. 29. Out of all your Gifts Not only out of Verse 29 their Tythes but out of all their other Possessions which God gave them their Fields for instance which were in the Suburbs of their Cities Ye shall offer Make a Present to the Priests Every Heave-offering Some portion of every thing God gives you to possess Of the LORD As a thankful acknowledgment of the Divine Bounty to you upon whom he hath bestowed so many good things See v. 28. Of all the best thereof And that not of the refuse but of the best of the Tythe and other things that were given them By which is not to be understood that they were bound to pick out the very best Wheat suppose and separate it from the worse which
20. But the Man that shall be unclean By a dead Body a Bone or a Grave c. And shall not purifie himself By the Water of Separation appointed for that purpose Verse 20 That Soul shall be cut off from among the Congregation As a Contemner of this Law of God Because he hath defiled the Sanctuary of the LORD c. This and the following words are only a Repetition of what was said v. 13. for the greater confirmation of it Ver. 21. And it shall be a perpetual Statute unto them Verse 21 that he that sprinkleth the Water of Separation shall wash his Clothes Be reputed unclean until he hath washed his Clothes which I suppose comprehends his Body also v. 19. And he that toucheth the Water of Separation As a Man might chance to do when he mingled the Water and Ashes together v. 17. Shall be unclean until Even And wash his Clothes it must be supposed from the foregoing words For mere staying till Even purified no Body without some Rite of Cleansing And there was more reason for him that touched the Water immediately to wash his Clothes than for him who only sprinkled with it Ver. 22. And whatsoever Or whomsoever Verse 22 The unclean person toucheth shall be unclean He doth not mean by the unclean Person him who was made unclean by touching the Water of Separation for his Uncleanness was so slight that any one would think he should make no Body unclean by his touch but the unclean Person spoken of all along in this Chapter who was defiled by touching a dead Body He whom such a Person touched was made unclean and therefore was to wash his Clothes and not be thought clean until the Even And the Soul that toucheth it Or toucheth him Shall be unclean until Even Not only he whom the unclean Person touched but he who touched the unclean Person or any unclean thing was to be unclean till the Even and wash his Clothes as I said before for his Cleansing No other Cleansing was necessary for such kinds of Uncleanness as these For Sacrifices were required only for the uncleanness of Lepers and of a Childbed-woman and of a Flux of Blood or Seed all others were purged without Sacrifice By this nice care which is here taken about the smallest bodily Defilements God intended I make no doubt to make them sensible how necessary it was to preserve inward Purity without which they could not be acceptable to God though they approached to his Sanctuary For these Laws extending to what was done at home as well as abroad were a plain Instruction both that it was not sufficient to be pure in the Eyes of Men and that nothing could be concealed from the Divine Majesty who sees what passeth in secret CHAP. XX. Chapter XX Ver. 1. THEN came the Children of Israel even Verse 1 the whole Congregation into the Wilderness of Zin From Rithmah or Kadesh-barnea they came at last into this Wilderness after many Removals to other Stations of which Moses gives an account in the XXXIIId Chapter from v. 19. to v. 36. For God led them by the Cloud quite back again to the Red Sea XIV 25. and from thence brought them into this Wilderness of Tzin Which is quite different from that mentioned XVI Exod. call'd Sin for this lay on the Confines of Idumaea as appears from v. 14 15. In the first Month. Of the fortieth Year after they came out of the Land of Egypt For Moses gives an account of the Transactions only of the two first Years after they came from thence and of the last the rest he passeth over in silence being spent in tiresome Journeys whereby all above Twenty years old were consumed by one Disease or other In those Travels he shows how at several Removals mentioned Chapter XXXIII they were led back from Kadesh-barnea unto Ezion-Geber that is from the North to the South of the Shore of the Red Sea in which Journey they compassed the Land of Edom many Days II Deut. 1. that is many Years For from the time they left Kadesh-barnea till they returned back again was thirty eight Years II Deut. 14. And the People abode in Kadesh Not in Kadesh-barnea which was their fifteenth Station and in the Confines of the South part of Canaan XXXIV 4. XV Josh 3. But another Kadesh on the Confines of the Land of Edom towards the Red Sea XXXIII 36. II Deut. 3. XI Judges 17. And Miriam died there Four Months before her Brother Aaron XXXIII 38. and eleven Months before Moses being elder than either of them For she was near an Hundred and thirty Years old as may be gathered from II Exod. 4 7. where it appears she was not a Child when Moses was born And was buried there In Kadesh where she died But we read of no mourning for her as there was for Aaron a little after v. 29. Verse 2 Ver. 2. And there was no Water for the Congregation The Water that hitherto followed them from the Rock in Horeb now failed Which hapning just at the Death of Miriam the Jews have a foolish conceit that as her Piety procured it for them so she being dead it was taken from them and was restored again for the Piety of Moses and Aaron It is more reasonable to think that God suffered the Water to be discontinued for a time that he might try the Faith of this new Generation whether they were any better than their rebellious Fathers and withal to convince them that the Water out of the former Rock was not contained in it if he had not produced it who could bring forth Water out of any other place as well as that Or they being now going towards Canaan and near a Country where Water might be had for Money or they might have found it by digging for it God thought fit to let the Miracle cease that they might see he would shortly provide for them otherways For it is very likely that in their last Station where they were before this at Ezion-Geber XXXIII 36. the Water that had followed them in all their Journeys thither fell there into the Red Sea and so was swallowed up they being as I said to return towards Canaan by places where Water might be procured without a Miracle For being upon the edge of the Land of Edom when Aaron died in their next Removal v. 28. XXXIII 37. we read expresly that they presently after came to a Land of Rivers of Water X Deut. 7. And indeed not long after they removed from Mount Hor where Aaron died we find in the next Chapter to this that they came to Oboth XXI 10. which signifying Bottles it is no unreasonable Conjecture that here they met with Water with which they filled their empty Bottles And next to that Station they came to Jie-Abarim v. 11. heaps of Fords or as the Chaldee expounds it The Ford of those that pass over And then to the Valley of Zared v. 12. or to the
so many Wonders it was not seemly it should lye in his own Tent as a common Staff but in the House of God as a Sacred Wand This indeed is no where mentioned no more than many other things which notwithstanding are plainly intimated Ver. 10. And Moses and Aaron gathered the Congregation before the Rock As God had commanded v. 8. Verse 10 And he said unto them Moses who was the chief Actor said unto them Hear ye now ye Rebels The Talmudists fancy that this is the great Sin for which Moses and Aaron were denied to go into Canaan because he called God's People Rebels From whence they have framed this Maxim He that treats the Church contemptuously which ought to be honoured is as if he blasphemed the Name of God But they subvert the Truth who build it upon no better Foundations For Moses the great Minister of God only uses God's own Language to their Fathers XVII 10. where he bids him lay up Aaron's Rod as a Token against the Rebels And if this were a Sin Moses committed it again not long after this and in an higher strain which no Body can think he would have done if it had cost him so dear when he saith IX Deut. 24. Ye have been rebellious against the LORD ever since I knew you Must we fetch you Water out of this Rock In these words also some of the Jews particularly Nachman think they find the Sin of Moses and Aaron who here they fancy ascribe to themselves that which they ought to have acknowledged the Work of God alone But this is without any ground for the plain meaning of the words is quite contrary Is it in our power to bring Water out of a Rock So the Vulgar Latine translates it it being a Speech of those that wonder like that 1 Kings XXI 19. Hast thou killed and also taken possession As if Moses had said Strange that you should think it possible for us to bring you Water out of a Rock which is the work only of an Omnipotent Power Ver. 11. And Moses lift up his hand and with his Rod he smote the Rock twice It seems the Water did not gush out at the first stroke which made him repeat it Verse 11 And the Water came out abundantly and the Congregation drank and their Beasts also So that their present Necessity was supplyed and they also filled their Vessels when they left this place to serve them till they met with the convenience of Water as they did I showed upon v. 2. Ver. 12. And the LORD spake unto Moses and Verse 12 Aaron because ye believed me not Here Interpreters have been much troubled to find what it was for which God was offended at Moses and Aaron for though the Text tells us expresly it was for their Unbelief whereby they gave great Scandal and did not sanctifie him as they did formerly before the Israelites yet it doth not clearly appear wherein this Unbelief declared it self Abarbinel hath collected several Opinions of the Jewish Doctors about this matter which are no less than ten after which he delivers his own which seems to me as unsatisfactory as the rest were to him for it is far fetcht with too much nicety and subtilty and relies also upon Uncertainties The plainest account of it I think is this which none of them take notice of That the Water now ceasing at the same time that Miriam died Moses was very sad both for her Death and perhaps for the Ceasing of the Water And being unexpectedly assaulted by the People who ought to have had a greater Reverence for him in a time of Mourning especially it was the occasion of a greater Commotion of Anger and Indignation than was usually in him Which gave him such a Disturbance in his Mind and so disordered his Thoughts that when God bad him take his Rod and go and speak to the Rock he fell into some doubt whether God would grant them the Favour he had done before either because they were so wretched a People that it was not fit God should do any thing for them or because he thought perhaps Water might be otherways procured for them And because of this doubting I suppose it might be that upon the first striking of the Rock no Water came forth God also perhaps so ordering it that he might try him and hereupon his Diffidence increased into Unbelief and a settled Perswasion they should have no Water His Anger also at such a rebellious Generation it is likely made him the more distrustful that God would do nothing for them For both these are mentioned by the Divine Writers that touch upon this History that he did not believe and that his Spirit was so provoked that he spake unadvisedly with his lips CVI Psalm 32 33. which was when he spake those words v. 10. Must we fetch you Water out of this Rock i. e. is that a likely matter They being words of the same sort with those of Sarah XVIII Gen. 13. Shall I of a surety have a Child who am old that is I cannot believe it And when he saw the Water did not come out at the first stroke he might be so rash as to say Now it is plain God will give you none but let you perish or words to that effect I know nothing more probable than this unless the Reader likes the Opinion of Joseph Albo better which is the ninth Opinion mentioned by Abarbinel That Moses and Aaron having had such long Experience of God's goodness to this People and of his readiness to help them ought not to have gone and made their Complaints to God about the want of Water v. 6. but immediately of themselves gone to the Rock being confident of God's Power and Mercy which had never failed them and called for Water to come out of it For now the Tabernacle was built and they had God dwelling among them which they had not when he smote the Rock at first which ought to have bred in them the highest Assurance that God would supply them Dr. Lightfoot hath another Conjecture which I shall propound that the Reader may judge which is most likely That Moses and Aaron began to distrust God's Promise of entring into the promised Land at the end of forty Years imagining that if they brought Water again out of the Rock it must follow them as long as the other had done For this he makes the sence of their words What ye Rebels must we bring Water out of a Rock as we did at Horeb Are all our Hopes and Expectations of getting out of the Wilderness come to this We never fetcht you Water out of a Rock but once and that was because ye were to stay a long time in the Wilderness c. Now that is gone must we fetch Water out of another Rock O ye Rebels have ye brought it to this pass by your Murmurings that we must have a new stay in the Wilderness Are we to begin our abode
dried up in Summer they were called Chersydrus because then they lived in dry places and in the hot Season had a most sharp stinging Poison Which as Nicander saith made such Inflamations as brought upon him that was stung by them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 innumerable griefs See Hierozoicon P. II. Lib. III. cap. 13. where he shows also they were flying Serpents of which the Prophet Isaiah speaks XIX 29. XXX 6. and that now was a hot Season wherein they were wont to be most venomous For Aaron dying the first day of the fifth Month which answers to the nineteenth of our July and they mourning for him thirty days after which followed their encounter with the Canaanites and then this murmuring and this punishment it must fall out in the latter end of August when the Dog-days were going out See Vossius de Orig. Progressu Idolol Lib. IV. cap. 56. And they bit the People This Aben-Ezra and others think was a Punishment suitable to their Sin which was evil speaking against the LORD by calumniating his Providence For Solomon compares a Calumniator to a Serpent which bites if it be not charmed X Eccles 11. It is a strange fancy of Fortunatus Licetus that Moses here speaks of a Disease bred in the Body which in Children is called Dracunculus and not of the biting of Serpents from without Lib. de Ortu Spontaneo Viventium cap. 51. For which there is no ground at all and on the contrary nothing more certain than that in Arabia and Egypt and other Countries of Africa there are such Serpents as are here described Yet Bartholinus seems to think that his Opinion may be defended against Ezekiel de Castro who confuted it See Epistol Medic. Centur. I. Epist 32. And much People of Israel died The whole Wilderness through which the Israelites marched so many years was full of fiery Serpents and Scorpions as Moses his words import VIII Deut. 15. which makes it the more wonderful that we never hear of their being bitten and killed by them until now But it is to be considered that they were protected by the Cloud from this and from all other dangers as the Hebrews well observe which now withdrew its shadow from them and let in the Serpents upon them Or rather as Moses here expresly saith God who had hitherto kept them off now sent them and perhaps brought them from remote parts of the Wilderness to infest the whole Congregation Verse 7 Ver. 7. Wherefore the People came to Moses and said we have sinned It doth not appear whether they were immediately sensible of their Sin and confessed it upon the biting of the Serpents and the direful effects of it or staid till there 〈…〉 â—reat Mortality among them It is likely they 〈…〉 made their Addresses to him but before a Remedy was found out by erecting the brazen Serpent many of them perished For we have sinned against the LORD and against thee They make a particular Acknowledgment of their Guilt as a Token of the Sincerity of their Repentance Pray unto the LORD that he take away the Serpents from us In the Hebrew the words take away the Serpent in the singular Number about which the Jews make a great many curious Observations as if there was one evil Angel that governed them all And if there be any truth in this Observation we Christians cannot but think these words point to the old Serpent the Devil who lost Sting by the lifting up Christ on the Cross as the brazen Serpent it here follows was lifted up for the Cure of the biting of those Serpents But the simple truth is that in this Language the Singular Number is often used collectively for the Plural As in VIII Exod. 6. The Frog came up and covered the Land i. e. a vast multitude of Frogs And so Moses speaks in the place just now named VIII Deut. 15. where he calls this Wilderness wherein they travelled a place of a fiery Serpent and Scorpion i. e. saith Jonathan full of such Creatures And Moses prayed for the People Here R. Becai and others observe the great Meekness and Charity of M ses and thence draw this Instruction That he of whom any one asks pardon for an Offence ought not to be hard-hearted but ready to forgive Thus Abraham prayed for Abimelech XX Gen. 17. Job for his Friends XLII 10. It would be a sin to do otherwise 1 Sam. XII 19 20 23. Ver. 8. And the LORD said unto Moses In answer to his Prayer Make thee a fiery Serpent The Figure of one of those Serpents which bite the People Abarbinel thinks that upon Moses his Prayer the Serpents were removed but still there remained many among the People sorely afflicted by the venomous effects of their biting for whose Cure God graciously gave this direction It is something strange that any learned Christian should so much admire the Egyptian Learning as not to forbear the mention of their incantations of Serpents when they speak of this relation which Moses makes concerning the brazen Serpent which God ordered him to set up Yet Sir John Marsham in his Chronicon sect 9. when he comes to treat of this Station of the Israelites at Tsalmona hath a long discourse to show how famous the Egyptians and other Nations were in this sort of Magick and thus concludes it that Moses putting this brazen Serpent upon a Perch non tam Serpentes igneos incantabat ne nocerent quà m eorum venenum extinguebant did not so much charm these Serpents that they should not hurt as extinguish their Venom This seems to me a Scurvy intimation that Moses had their Practises in his Mind but went beyond them He should have said Moses abominated their wicked Arts if they had any such in those days and directed the Israelites to look up to God for healing So the Jews themselves particularly Aben-Ezra who takes notice that some Superstitious People fancied that this Serpent was a Talisman made to receive I know not what Influence from the Stars But God forbid saith he God forbid we should have any such thought This was made by the Divine order the reason of which let us not scrupulously search They thought that is there was something extraordinary in it as Jonathan plainly declares in his Paraphrase of the last words of this verse he shall be healed if he direct his heart to the Name of the WORD of the LORD Where no Christian can forbear to think of our Blessed Saviour the Eternal WORD who was prefigured as I shall show in the following verse by the erecting of this Serpent here mentioned upon a Pole that all might look upon him and live And set it upon a Pole So high that every one in the Camp might see it For the word signifies such a Pole as made their Ensign or Banner to which all the Army was to resort Concerning this word Nes See Booetius Lib. II. cap. 4. And it shall come to pass that every one
XXXIIId Chapter of this Book See v. 41 42. And pitched in Oboth Where it is probable they found Water of the want of which they complained See XX. 2. Ver. 11. And they journeyed from Oboth and pitched Verse 11 in Jie-Abarim Not that Mount Abarim where Moses died XXVII 12. but another place in the Confines of Moab as it here follows See what I have observed XX. 2. In the Wilderness which is before Moab Called the Wilderness of Moab II Deut. 8. Towards the Sun-rising On the East part of it as Jephthah observes a great many Years after this That they came by the East side of the Land of Moab XI Judges 18. Ver. 12. And from thence they removed As they Verse 12 were about to remove from this last place they received a Command from God not to meddle with the Country of Moab II Deut. 9. Which is the reason as Abarbinel observes that Moses here sets down briefly whence and whether they went and where they pitched that it might appear they did not transgress that Command And pitched in the Valley of Zared Or as some translate it in Nachal-Zared which is called Dibon-Gad XXXIII 45. For this place had two Names as the same Author observes and it was just eight and thirty Years since the Spies went up to Survey the Country from Kadesh-barnea till their passing this Brook as we translate it II Deut. 14. But I take Dibon-Gad rather to have been a place which lay upon the Brook Zered Ver. 13. And from thence they removed and pitched Verse 13 on the other side of Arnon The Hebrew word meheber may be translated on this side or on the other side And some think they were now on this side of the River and not yet gone over it Nor did they immediately come hither from their former Station but first to Almon-Diblathaim XXXIII 46. which is also called Beth-Diblathaim in the Wilderness of Moab XLVIII Jerem. 22. and Diblah VI Ezek. 13. And then passing by Ar in the Confines of Moab and approaching to the Country of the Children of Ammon God commanded them not to invade the Ammonites being Descendants from Lot as well as the Moabites II Deut. 18 19 37. but to pass over the River Arnon II Deut. 24. to that side of it which belonged to the Amorites For this River at that time divided the Moabites from the Amorites as it here follows Which is in the Wilderness that cometh out of the Coasts of the Amorites Runs by the Wilderness of Kedemoth unto which the Amorites extended their Dominion II Deut. 26. For Arnon is the Border of Moab between Moab and the Amorites This River flowed from the Mountains of Arabia where it had its rise and fell into the Dead Sea as Josephus saith Lib. IV. Antiq. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 bounding the Country of the Moabites and of the Amorites the Country of Moab lying on one side of it and that of the Amorites on the other For though the Moabites formerly possessed the Country on both sides of Arnon as far as Heshbon yet the Amorites had driven them out of that part of it which lay next to them and made the River the Boundary of their two Kingdoms v. 26 27. This Moses recites the more exactly that it might appear the Israelites invaded none of the Moabites Possessions but what was now possessed by the Amorites By which Jephthah defended the Right of the Children of Israel in future times against the Ammonites who pretended this Country belonged to them XI Judges 13 14 15 c. Ver. 14. Wherefore it is said in the Book of the Wars Verse 14 of the LORD A proof of this Moses thought good to alledge out of an Authentick Record in those Countries containing the History of all the Wars that had been in those Parts which are here called the Wars of the LORD because he is the great Governour of the World as Abarbinel interprets it from whom and by whom are all things who putteth down one and setteth up another as the Psalmist speaks at his good pleasure This Book he thinks was written by some of the Wise men of those Naons and so thinks Nachmanides who looking upon this Conquest made by Sihon as a very memorable thing put it down in their Annals which after the way of those Countries were written he thinks in a Poetical manner There are those who are of opinion that this Book was written by Moses himself who left in it directions to Joshua how to proceed in the Wars of the LORD when he conquered Canaan So Dr. Lightfoot conjectures and Bonfrerius doth not much differ from him But I take the former account to be the more probable that Moses justifies what he writes concerning this Conquest out of their own Books which he quotes just as St. Paul in the New Testament doth one of the Greek Poets What he did in the Red Sea These are the words of the Book out of which he quotes a small Fragment And the Marginal Translation of them is most proper Vaheb in Supheh only the word eth is omitted which makes the Sence to be this against Vaheb in Supheh That is he came some such word must be understood against Vaheb a King of the Moabites and overthrew him in Suphah a place in the Frontiers of Moab See I Deut. 1. Others understand by Vaheb the place where Sihon gave the Moabites this blow which he did by falling upon them on a sudden with a terrible Fury So Nachmanides understands these words besuphah he stormed the City and made a furious Assault when they thought not of it For Suphah signifies a Whirlwind or stormy Tempest V Isai 28. And in the Brooks of Arnon The same Nachmanides takes the word veeth which we translate and in to signifie rather and with and these being still the words of the Book before-mentioned the sence is this In the same manner he smote the Brooks or Torrents of Arnon upon which he fell like a Tempest and carried all before him Verse 15 Ver. 15. And at the Streams of the Brook None I think hath given a better account of these words than the same Nachman who by Esched hannechalim which we translate the Streams of the Brooks understands either a Cliff from whence the Torrents flowed as Aschdod and Happisgah III Deut. 17. are the Hills from whence the Springs gushed or the Valley through which the Torrents ran where they made a great broad Water which is here called an Effusion of Torrents as R. Levi ben Gershom interprets the Hebrew words Esched hannechabim That goeth down to the dwelling of Ar. Which extends it self as far as Ar a City of Moab v. 28. R. Levi ben Gersom takes the word Schebet which we translate dwelling to signifie a Place as well as Ar towards which these Torrents bent their Course And lyeth upon the Borders of Moab Which leaneth or belongeth unto Moab being in the Border of that Country Thus far are
so that he durst not yield to them though it appears by what follows he was strongly inclined to follow them Verse 19 Ver. 19. Now therefore I pray you tarry you also here this night Take a Lodging with me as your Predecessors did v. 8. That I may know what the LORD will say unto me now Whether the LORD will alter his Mind as he hoped he might otherwise he would have rested in the first Answer he received from God and not tried again if he could prevail by his Importunity to get leave to go as these great Promises of Riches and Honour made him desire Ver. 20. And God came unto Balaam at night Notwithstanding which God was pleased again to visit him with his Presence at least by one of his Angelical Ministers Verse 20 And said unto him If the Men come to call thee Press thee again to comply with them Rise up and go with them Since thou hast such a Mind to go follow thy Inclinations These words seem to be spoken angrily though not sarcastically as some would have them like those 1 Kings XXII 15. But yet the word which I shall say unto thee that shalt thou do Some take these words to be not so much a Command as a Prediction that he should not be able to say a word but what he was ordered by God Ver. 21. And Balaam rose up in the morning and Verse 21 sadled his Ass Commanded his Ass to be made ready for he had Servants to wait upon him v. 22. And great Persons in those Countries were wont to ride upon Asses of which we find Examples before this in Abraham XXII Gen. 1. and in Moses IV Exod. 20. and in after times the Judges of Israel were thus mounted V Judges 10. and their Children X. 4. XII 14. And went with the Princes of Moab They set out perhaps together or he desired them to go a little before and he would follow them For it appears by the following part of this Relation that he did not make a part of their Train but travelled at least some part of the way with his two Servants alone Ver. 22. And God's anger was kindled because he went This may seem strange since he had a permission to go along with them But the meaning is Verse 22 not that God was displeased because he did as he was permitted but because he went so readily without offering to stay at home as he had been commanded at the first and because he carried along with him an evil Mind desirous to get the Money and the Honour that was proferred him and consequently with an Inclination to curse Israel and with hopes that he might by some means or other compass that wicked end This is plainly signified by the Angel's words v. 35. where he permits him still to go on but with a Caution not to attempt to speak a word otherwise than he bad him This is more plainly evident from XXIII Deut. 5. And the Angel of the LORD The same Angel which is thought to have spoken to him v. 12 20. Stood in the way In the very path wherein his Ass was going For an Adversary against him To stop his proceedings that he might not go on in his sin and perish as R. Solomon glosses Now he was riding upon his Ass and his two Servants were with him He was in his Journey upon the Rode but separated from the rest of the Company having only his own two Servants with him who waited on him Verse 23 Ver. 23. And the Ass saw the Angel of the LORD standing in the way The LORD saith the same R. Solomon let the Ass see what his Master could not his Mind being blinded by his Converse with Daemons or rather God deprived him for the present of the power of seeing what stood just before him And his Sword drawn in his hand Threatning to kill him if he went forward And the Ass turned aside out of the way Out of the Rode wherein they were travelling And went into the Field Which lay on the side of the High-way And Balaam smote the Ass to turn her into the way As the manner is still when such Creatures are unruly Ver. 24. And the Angel of the LORD stood in the Verse 24 path of the Vineyards It is uncertain whether the Ass turned into the way again or went on in the Field till they came to these Vineyards A Wall being on this side and a Wall on that side In a very narrow Passage Ver. 25. And when the Ass saw the Angel of the Verse 25 LORD Which opposed him here again as he had done in the broad High-way She thrust her self unto the Wall To avoid the Angel And crusht Balaam's foot against the Wall The Angel and his drawn Sword which it is likely he brandished took up so much of the way on both sides that there was not room for the Ass to pass without going too close to Wall And he smote her again Being very angry at her untowardness Ver. 26. And the Angel of the LORD went further Verse 26 and stood in a narrow place Through which Balaam was to pass Where there was no way to turn either to the right hand or to the left Where the Angel took up the whole Passage and left no space on either side for the Ass to go Verse 27 Ver. 27. And when the Ass saw the Angel of the LORD And no way to avoid him She fell down under Balaam Being unable either to turn back the way was so narrow or to go forward because the Angel filled up all the Passage And Balaam's anger was kindled and he smote the Ass with a Staff Harder than he had done before Verse 28 Ver. 28. And the LORD By his Angel as Bochart interprets it Opened the Mouth of the Ass Which naturally is a dumb Creature having no Organs of Speech but by an extraordinary power of God who made Man's mouth had her Tongue so moved to the Palate Teeth and Lips and the Air was so compressed within her Mouth as to form words as plain as we speak And she said unto Balaam That an Ass should by the power of God be made to speak one would think should not seem incredible to Christians when Heathens did not disbelieve such things but received them as undoubted Truths Witness what they say of the Ass upon which Bacchus rode and the Ram of Phryxus and the Horses of Achilles and Adrastus and the Bull of Europa and the Lamb in Egypt when Bocchoris reigned there and the Elephant of Porus in India All which are reported to have spoken and vast numbers of other Instances are heaped up by two eminently learned Frenchmen Bochartus in his Hierozoicon P. I. Lib. II. cap. 14. and Huetius in his Alnetanae Quaestiones Lib. II cap. 12. n. 26. which things are alledged out of their Books not to prove all such Stories to be true but that they thought them true thought it did not exceed
20. and did not send the Angel to forbid what he had allowed Verse 35 But the word that I shall speak unto thee that thou shalt speak These words are something different from those in v. 20. importing both that he should not presume to speak a word but what he ordered and that he should not forbear to speak what he bad him And Balaam went with the Princes of Balak Whom he overtook after this stop either at the place where they lodged or where they staid for him but he did not tell them what he met withal in the way Ver. 36. And when Balak heard that Balaam was Verse 36 come By some Messenger sent before to acquaint him with his coming He went out to meet him Partly out of joy and partly out of respect to him Vnto a City of Moab which is in the border of Arnon This City seems to have been Ar XXI 15. Which is in the utmost Coast He did him the honour to meet him at the very entrance of his Country and did not think it sufficient to send some of his Court to receive him Ver. 37. And Balak said unto Balaam did not I Verse 37 earnestly send unto thee to call thee After this Complement was paid to Balaam the King could not forbear to let him know he did not think himself well used by him whom he had earnestly intreated to come to him and at the first he would not Wherefore camest thou not unto me As soon as I sent for thee Am I not able indeed to promote thee to honour Dost thou doubt of my power to make thee a great Man if thou gratifiest me in my desire And his readiness he showed by this honourable Reception of him Verse 38 Ver. 38. And Balaam said unto Balak Lo I am come unto thee Say no more of that but be satisfied that I am now come Have I now any power at all to say any thing Yet he would not have him expect that he should do all that Balak desired or he himself was inclined to do for he was under an higher over-ruling Power which he could not gainsay The word that God putteth in my mouth that shall I speak He seems to acquaint him that he had received such a Command from God v. 35. and he must be obedient Verse 39 Ver. 39. And Balaam went with Balak This did not discourage the King of Moab from carrying Balaam along with him into his Country where he hoped he might be perswaded to do as he would have him And they came unto Kirjath-huzoth The Royal City it is likely for it signifies in our Language the City of Streets that is a large City which had many Streets and consequently Inhabitants in it Verse 40 Ver. 40. And Balak offered Oxen and Sheep In thankfulness that he had procured Balaam's assistance as he hoped against his Enemies And sent to Balaam They were such Sacrifices as the Jews called Peace-offerings of which the Offerers had a share for themselves and for their Friends and the Sacrifice being over Balak invited Balaam to come to the Feast he made thereupon And to the Princes that were with him The Princes I suppose of Midian and of Moab who were sent on the Embassy to him and had succeeded in it v. 7 15. Ver. 41. And it came to pass that on the morrow Verse 41 Having rested one Night after his Journey Balak would have him immediately go about his business and see what he could do for him Balak took Balaam Into his Chariot And brought him up into the High-places of Baal All Nations worshipped their Gods in High-places and Baal was the God of this Country who was worshipped in more High-places than one unto all which he brought Balaam that he might see where he could take the fullest view of the Israelites and which of them would be fittest for his purpose These High-places were full of Trees and very shady as I observed XXVI Lev. 30. which made them the fitter both for the solemn Thoughts and Prayers of such as were devout and for the filthy Inclinations and Intentions of the wicked Baal was the Name of several Gods both Male and Female as our Selden shows in his Syntagma II. de Diis Syris cap. 1. And I suppose Chemosh the God of Moab is here called by this Name signifying a Lord though that great Man seems to take it for Baal-Peor cap. 2. of that Book That thence he might see the utmost of the People i. e. All their Armies to the very skirts of their Camp CHAP. XXIII Chapter XXIII Verse 1 Ver. 1. AND Balaam said unto Balak build me here Upon one of the High-places which Balaam it is likely pitched upon as fit for his purpose Seven Altars The number Seven was much observed we find among the Hebrews by God's order See IV Lev. 6. but we never read of more than one Altar built by the Patriarchs when they offered their Sacrifices nor was more than one allowed by Moses Therefore in this there was something of the Heathen Superstition who worshipping the Sun who is principally meant by Baal offered also to all the seven Planets Unless we allow the Conjecture of Fortunatus Scaccus who imagines that as Moses erected twelve Pillars according to the number of the Children of Israel when he entred them into the Covenant of God XXIV Exod. 4. so Balaam ordered seven Altars to be erected according to the number of the principal Houses of Moab Myrothec Sacr. Elaeochrism P. II. cap. 59. But there is no ground for the conceit of Abarbinel who in his Preface to Leviticus sect 4. saith Balaam ordered this in emulation of the seven acceptable Altars to God built by seven Men famous for Piety viz Adam Abel Noah Abraham Isaac Jacob and Moses There is more certainty in this that these Altars were erected in honour either of the most High or of the greatest of their Gods For according to the account which both Festus and Servius have given us of the ancient times they sacrificed to the Caelestial Gods Only upon Altars which were so called because they were arae altae built high and lofty whereas to the Terrestrial they sacrificed upon the Earth and to the Infernal Gods in holes digged in the Earth And prepare me here seven Oxen and seven Rams To offer one of each upon the several Altars as it follows v. 2. This number was used by pious Persons both in these days XLII Job 8. and in after times 1 Chron. XV. 26. Ver. 2. And Balak did as Balaam had spoken Caused Verse 2 the Altars to be built which was soon done either of Stones or of Turf and the Sacrifices to be brought And Balak and Balaam offered on every Altar a Bullock and a Ram. Kings in ancient times were Priests also as appears by Melchizedek But perhaps Balak only presented the Sacrifices to be offered for him and for his People and Balaam performed the Office of a Priest The only doubt
bring forth a plentiful Crop XXXII Isa 20. There are those who refer both these to their numerous Posterity Procreation of Children being sometimes expressed in Scripture by the Metaphors of Waters and Fountains and Cisterns as every one knows And both the LXX and Onkelos interpret this of one particular Person that should arise of their Seed For thus the former of them renders this part of the verse There shall come a Man out of his Seed who shall rule over many Nations And the latter of them paraphrases in this manner There shall be a great King who shall be anointed of his Children and shall have Dominion over many People which the Hierusalem Targum saith expresly is Christ For thus this verse begins in that Paraphrase A King shall arise out of his Sons and their Redeemer from among them c. and thus concludes it and the Kingdom of the King Messias shall be magnificently exalted And his King shall be higher than Agag This seems to have been the Name of all the Kings of the Amalekites for we read of one called Agag long after this time 1 Sam. XV. 8 9. as Abimelech was the Name of the Philistine Kings and Pharaoh of the Egyptian And at this time no Nation thereabouts was in greater Reputation than the Amalekites v. 20. who thought themselves able to obstruct the Israelites passage into Canaan and gave a very early proof of the high opinion of their own Power and Prowess by attacking the Israelites as soon as they came out of Egypt Balaam therefore foretels the King of Israel should be the greatest of all other for he was acquainted with none higher than Agag which some think hath a peculiar respect to their first King Saul who subdued the Amalekites and took Agag captive But his Successor was far greater than he and the Jews themselves think this hath its full completion in the LORD Christ And his Kingdom shall be exalted They shall increase and multiply till their Kingdom be greatly enlarged as it was in the days of David and Solomon who were but Shadows of the great King MESSIAH Ver. 8. God brought him out of Egypt he hath as it Verse 8 were the strength of an Vnicorn All the power of Egypt could not detain them in slavery but they came out from thence with a strong and high hand XIII Exod. 9. XIV 8. and are grown a mighty People See the foregoing Chapter v. 22. where this hath been explained He shall eat up the Nations his Enemies Utterly destroy the seven Nations of Canaan And shall break their bones So that they shall never recover their Strength And pierce them through with his Arrows Having given them their deadly wound Or as some translate the Hebrew words break their Arrows in pieces i. e. quite disarm them Verse 9 Ver. 9. He couched he lay down He prophesies that the Israelites having conquered the Canaanites should settle in their Land and take their rest and live securely Which he speaks of with such confidence as if it were already done As a Lion and as a great Lion See XXIII 24. the signification of Ari and Labi Who shall stir him up Give them any disturbance It is observed of Lions that they do not betake themselves to remote or secret places when they go to sleep but lye down any where as Oppianus describes them Lib. III. as if they understood that let them sleep where they pleased no Body durst meddle with them See Bochartus in his Hierozoicon P. I. Lib. III. cap. 2. And therefore being applied to the Israelites signifies such an absolute and secure possession of the Land of Canaan that none should have the boldness to assault or give them any disquiet Which came to pass chiefly in the days of David and Solomon Blessed be he that blesseth thee and cursed is he that curseth thee These are the very words wherewith Isaac concluded his blessing of his Son Jocob XXVII Gen. 29. Which God now confirmed from the Mouth of one of their Enemies who spake at this time by his Spirit Ver. 10. And Balak's anger was kindled against Balaam Verse 10 He could no longer forbear to express his Indignation to be thus treated by Balaam whom he had sent for a great way and entertained for some time and therefore stopt him from proceeding for the present any further in his Prophecy And smote his hands together A token of vehement Anger XXI Ezek. 17. And Balak said unto Balaam It is likely he was so full of Wrath that he could not speak presently but expressed it only in his Looks and Actions I called thee to curse mine Enemies and thou hast altogether blessed them Thou hast not said one word to my purpose but all quite contrary These three times Though I have been at great expence and built Altars and offered many Sacrifices in three several places But at what distance of time one from another doth not appear Ver. 11. Therefore now flee thou unto thy place Get Verse 11 thee home immediately and stay not a Moment longer here For that is imported in the word flee which indicates that he could not indure the sight of him while he remained thus angry And as he banished him his Presence so he commanded him to make all possible haste out of his Country I thought to promote thee to great honour And to bestow as much Wealth upon him as he desired which is included in the word honour XXII 17. But lo the LORD Whom thou pretendest to obey Hath kept thee back from honour By not permitting thee to comply with my desire It is uncertain whether these words were spoken in anger and scorn or seriously and in good earnest believing he was hindred by the LORD's will and pleasure from cursing Israel Which he had more reason to believe than he had to hope he might obtain liberty to curse them XXIII 27. and therefore was without all reason in this Passion against Balaam Verse 12 Ver. 12. And Balaam spake unto Balak Prayed Balak to hear him patiently a few words before he departed Spake I not also to thy Messengers which thou sentest unto me saying Did I not before I saw thee tell those that came to invite me to thee the very same which I told thee afterwards Verse 13 Ver. 13. If Balak would give me his House full of Gold and Silver I cannot go beyond the commandment of the LORD to do more or less So he told his Messengers XXII 18. Of my Mind According as I please But what the LORD saith that will I speak So he told Balak himself XXII 38. All which he recalls to his Mind to show him that there was no Cause for his Anger he having performed as much as he undertook which was to follow God's directions as he had done strictly And it is likely that by this just Representation of what had passed between them he brought Balak to a cooler temper so that he suffered him to go on
order the Judges to assemble and call before them such as were suspected and having examined the Fact accordingly proceed against them and punish such as had offended Thus the Samaritan Copy reads it expresly and so Onkelos and the Paraphrast called Vzielides and the Hierusalem Targum and the Arabick Translation of Saadia Gaon and both the Talmudists and Karaites agree in this sence as Mr. Selden shows at large Lib. II. de Synedriis cap. 1. n. 10. And Joh. Coch upon the Gemara of the Sanhedrim cap. 4. sect 4. where he observes that Aben-Ezra and Solomon Jarchi thus interpret it and takes the meaning to be certain that the Heads of the People should divide themselves into several Courts of Judgment and examine who had committed Idolatry and after Conviction cause them to be hang'd For there is great reason to think the Constitution of Judges by Jethro's advice continued all the time they were in the Wilderness who might easily find out the Guilty in their several Divisions Before the LORD i. e. Before the Sanctuary as Men who had forsaken the Worship of their God and by his Sentence were adjudged to die Against the Sun Openly that all the People might see and fear to Sin So both R. Solomon and Aben-Ezra expound it For this was a peculiar mark of the Divine Displeasure against Idolaters and Blasphemers that they should be hanged up and publickly exposed after they had suffered death For none were hang'd alive among the Hebrews but first stoned which was the common Punishment of the fore-named Offenders and then hanged up in the eyes of all as R. Solomon expounds this Phrase against the Sun That the fierce anger of the LORD may be turned from Israel By their Zeal to vindicate the Divine Honour Verse 5 Ver. 5. And Moses said unto the Judges of Israel Some take these for the LXX Elders mentioned XI 25. Slay ye By hanging them up as some understand it But the Hebrew word imports killing with the Sword which they commanded their Officers to do with the assistance of such as abhorred the wickedness of their Neighbours Every one his Man The LXX Elders being appointed to be coadjutors to Moses in the Government made a division of the People it is most likely into so many districts and each of them having the charge of one all the People therein are called his Men of whom he was to give an account That were joyned unto Baal-Peor Who were so well known that there was no danger of slaying the innocent Verse 6 Ver. 6. And behold This which follows is the more wonderful if the Judges had already begun to execute the foregoing command and argues Zimri to have been very impudently wicked who thought himself so great a Man that no Judge durst meddle with him One of the Children of Israel came and brought unto his Brethren In the Camp of Israel or into the Tent where his own Family dwelt A Midianitish Woman By which it appears that both Nations Moab and Midian were in this Plot against Israel In the sight of Moses A high contempt of his Authority and of God's also whose Servant Moses was And in the sight of all the Congregation of the Children of Israel This seems to be a further aggravation of his Sin that he was not content to go to the Women who invited them v. 2. but brought one of them along with him into the Camp of Israel and this he did before the face of all the People as well as of Moses and that when they were mourning for this Sin as it here follows Who were weeping before the door of the Tabernacle of the Congregation This shows that though there were great numbers ingaged in this Defection yet the generality of the People clave unto the LORD and bewailed the Wickedness of their Brethren most earnestly imploring God's Mercy towards them Ver. 7. And when Phineas the Son of Eleazar the Son Verse 7 of Aaron the Priest c. A Man of great Authority being next to the High-Priest whom he succeeded in his Office as he did Joshua if we may believe some Writers in the Government of all Israel He rose up His Spirit as St. Luke speaks of St. Paul was stirred in him and being inspired with an holy Zeal was moved to do what follows From among the Congregation Who were weeping at the Door of the Tabernacle or rather from among the Judges with whom he was assembled being one of them So Jonathan he rose up from the midst of the Sanhedrin For as Bonav Cornel. Bertramus thinks Eleazar after the death of Aaron appointed his Son Phineas to be Prince of the Levites Which he thinks appears not only from his rising up here from the midst of the Judges of Israel but from the Embassy wherein he was employed by Joshua unto the Reubenites c. beyond Jordan XXII Josh 14. and from 1 Chron. IX 20. where he is said to be Ruler over the Korahites Which signifies he thinks such a preheminence as Eleazar himself had over the Levites while his Father Aaron lived De Repub. Jud. c. 15. And indeed the Psalmist saith that Phineas stood up and executed Judgment CVI. 39. Which seems to import that he acted as a Judge but by an extraordinary motion which made him kill the Offenders with his own Hands without a Judicial Process against them And took a Javelin in his hand Or a Sword as Josephus calls it which he snatcht out of the hand of Moses as the tradition is in Pirke Elieser cap. 47. Verse 8 Ver. 8. And he went after the Man of Israel into the Tent. It is an unusual word in the Hebrew which we translate Tent importing a private secret place like a Cave as Kubba or Kobba is thought to signifie which the Arabians call Alcobba From whence comes the word Alcove which signifies as Bochart observes conclave camerati operis quo lectus circumdatur A Room of arched Work which incloses a Bed in it See his Hierozoicon Pars I. p. ult And thrust both of them through the Man of Israel and the Woman This he did saith Philo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the command of Moses But should rather have said by a Divine Instigation which he followed when the rest of the Judges were afraid as some conceive to meddle with so great a Man as Zimri was And upon this Fact the Jews ground that which they call the Judgment of Zeal which authorized them who were full of Zeal to punish such as blasphemed God or prophaned the Temple c. in the presence of ten Men of Israel without a formal Process against them Thus Matthias killed a Jew who sacrificed after the manner of the Greeks 1 Maccab. II. 24. and three hundred others were killed by their Country-men as is related in the Book commonly called the Third Book of Maccabees And upon the pretence of such Zeal St. Stephen was stoned and St. Paul intended to be killed c. as Grotius
rather to insinuate that he was not guilty of such a Crime as might make Men justly forfeit what they had for their Children as well as for themselves For all the Family of Dathan and Abiram perished and it is taken notice of as a singular Mercy that the Children of Korah did not XXVI 10 11. But died in his own Sin i. e. For his own Sin which God had declared should not affect the Children XIV 31. For to that General Sin in which all the People were engaged these words seem to refer And so it was his own sin not with respect to the rest of the People for they were all alike guilty but with respect to his Children it being a personal Guilt in which they were not concerned The Jews commonly say that Zelophehad was the Man that was stoned for gathering Sticks on the Sabbath-day For which they have no authority but a fancy of R. Aquiba who is sharply reproved for it by another considerable Rabbi who saith it is a rash Judgment for if it were true since the Scripture conceals it he ought not to have revealed it but hath reproached a just Man for any thing that appears See Selden Lib. II. de Synedr cap. 1. sect 9. And had no Son As was found when the People were numbred XXVI 33. Ver. 4. Why should the name of our Father be done Verse 4 away from among his Family One Family of the Tribe of Manasseh viz. the Hepherites being in danger to be wholly extinguished R. Judah will have the word Name in this place to signifie as much as hereditary possession and so he thinks it signifies XXV Deut. 6. as Mr. Selden observes out of Pesikta Lib. de Successionibus cap. 14. Because he hath no Son Merely for want of Issue-Male when he hath left many Daughters Give unto us therefore a possession among the Brethren of our Father Let us come in for a share among those that are descended from Manasseh Which if they did the Name of their Father could not be thereby preserved but by the Son of one of these Daughters taking upon him not the Name of his Father that begat him but of his Mother's Grand-father viz. Hepher which was ordered afterwards by a general Law XXV Deut. 6. Verse 5 Ver. 5. And Moses brought their Cause before the LORD This was too difficult a Cause though there seemed to be a great deal of Reason on their side to be judged by the great Court before-mentioned and therefore it was referred to Moses alone as other weighty Causes used to be See XV. 32. XXV 4. for neither Eleazar nor any other Person before whom it was brought v. 2. are here mentioned as the Judges of this matter And he durst not judge it though the equity appeared very plain without bringing it before the LORD for his direction which he could have upon all important occasions XXV Exod. 22. VII Numb 89. Verse 6 Ver. 6. And the LORD spake unto Moses saying This shows that the Cause was devolved upon Moses alone for the LORD tells him and no other Person how it should be determined Verse 7 Ver. 7. The Daughters of Zelophehad c. The LORD approves of their Claim and gives a Sentence in their favour Thou shalt surely give them a possession of an inheritance among their Father's Brethren Because the word for them in the Hebrew is of the Masculine Gender some think it signifies they were to be considered as if they had been Sons And thou shalt cause the Inheritance of their Father to pass unto them So that they were to enjoy what would have faln to his share had he been alive ob indutam defuncti patris personam as the Lawyers speak because they stood in the place of their dead Father and represented his Person And accordingly they put in their Claim at the Division of the Land and had their Portion therein according to this Decision XVII Josh 2 3 c. How the Portion was divided among them according to the Hebrew Doctors Mr. Selden shows at large in his Book de Successionibus in bona defunctii cap. 23. Ver. 8. And thou shall speak unto the Children of Israel Verse 8 saying Upon this occasion he passes this special Case into a General Law to be hereafter observed If a Man die and have no Son then ye shall cause his Inheritance to pass unto his Daughter It being a reason as Maimonides observes More Nevochim P. III. cap. 42. that what a Man leaves should come to his Family and to those who are next of Kin to him for the nearer any Person is to us we are inclined by natural affection to have the greater regard to him But all this is to be understood of Land as for Money and moveable Goods which were of his own getting the Father might dispose of them by his Will to whom he pleased Ver. 9. And if he have no Daughter then ye shall give his Inheritance unto his Brethren Unless his Father was alive who undoubtedly the Jews say was Verse 9 the next Heir but not mentioned because it was not necessary Or as some say because it was too sad a thing to speak of a Fathers burying all his Children without Issue See Selden de Success in bona defuncti cap. 12. Where he observes that according to the Rule v. 11. it must come to the Father because he is nearest of kin to it And therefore the Jews interpret this as if Moses had said If he have Daughter he shall give his inheritance to the next of his Kindred to his Father for instance and afterwards ye shall give it to his Brethren i. e. the Children of his Father And the same is to be said of the Grandchildren unto whom the Brethren of a Father dying without issue are heirs For the Grandfather stands in the same relation to a Father that a Father doth to his Son Verse 11 Ver. 11. And if his Father have no Brethren then ye shall give it to his Kinsman that is next of Kin to him of his Family and he shall possess it To his Brothers Children or to those who are descended from them or from his Fathers ' Brethren But no consideration was to be had of his Mother's Kindred as the Jewish Lawyers say who could never be capable of the Inheritance Which they gather not only from these words which determine the Inheritance to his Family i. e. the Family of the Father before-mentioned not to the Family of the Mother but from the frequent mention of the Father of Mischpachoth which we translate Families or rather Kindreds of the Fathers in the Books of Moses Chronicles Ezra and others From whence this solemn Maxim of the Talmudists The Family or Kindred of the Mother is never called by the name of Kindred That is it hath not the effect of a Kindred in Successions to Inheritances Which is the same with that in the ancient Book Siphri Families follow the Fathers as Mr. Selden
That the People may begin to submit to his Authority and learn to obey his Commands as well as thine Ver. 21. And he shall stand before Eleazar the Priest Verse 21 c. For the incouragement of Joshua to undertake this Charge he assures him he shall never want direction from God what to do when he was in any doubt but in the manner here prescribed most certainly receive it And what is here said concerning him belongs to all their succeeding Governours And it is observed by Maimonides and other Jewish Doctors that the High-Priest stood before the Kings of Israel out of great respect to them but no King is said to stand before the High-Priest but only in this case when he was to consult the holy Oracle That it might appear the Honour was given not to the Priest but unto the Divine Majesty whom he consulted by the Priest Who shall ask counsel for him after the judgment of Vrim Because the word Thummim is here wanting some understand these words as if he had said the High-Priest shall ask counsel for him by the illumination of the Spirit of God So Conradus Pellicanus But the word Thummim in all likelyhood is here to be understood though not expressed being always joyned with Vrim except in this and one other place where Vrim only is named after a short manner of speaking in XXVIII Exod. XXXIII Deut. II Ezra VII Nehem. For they were inseparable from the Breast-plate of Judgment as it is called XXVIII Exod. 30. See there with which the High-Priest appeared before God when he consulted him in great Affairs concerning the Publick Safety more especially in times of War of which we have many Instances in I Judg. 1. XX. 18. 1 Sam. XIV 18. XXVIII 6. David indeed is said to consult God by the Ephod but it must be observed that the Breast-plate was annexed to it which Abiathar brought along with him when he fled from Saul who commanded the Priests to be slain 1 Sam. XXII 2 9. XXX 8. 2 Sam. V. 19. And it is further to be noted that though David thus frequently consulted God this way being engaged in Wars yet we never read that Solomon asked counsel by it being a peaceable King Grotius also observes that Joshua now and the Kings of Judah afterwards therefore stood before the Priest that they might be near to the Vrim and Thummim which he had upon his Breast without which he could not receive any answer De Imperii Sum. Potest c. cap. 6. Before the LORD The High-Priest never inquired by Vrim and Thummim but standing before the LORD that is before the Ark where the SCHECHINAH was At his word shall they go out and at his word shall they come in That is saith Grotius in the place fore-named at the Word of the LORD by the Judgment of Vrim which goes just before Others at the word of the Priest which comes to the same And this the Hebrew Doctors understand concerning the People of Israel making War which is wont to be meant in Scripture by the words going out and coming in And they distinguish between the War that was made by the Divine Commandment against the VII Nations of Canaan and against Amalek and that which was voluntary against any of their Neighbours or others as there should be reason In the former case they think there was no need to ask whether they should make War or no because it was commanded and Joshua and the Kings afterward did it when they pleased But in the other they were not to make War without this Divine Order See Selden Lib. III. de Synedr cap. 12. n. 4. But it is plain from I Judg. 1. that they consulted the LORD also in the first sort of War with the People of Canaan how to manage it to the best Advantage Both he and all the Children of Israel with him even all the Congregation By the first word he the Jews understand Joshua and all the succeeding Princes of Israel who were bound to advise with God by Vrim and Thummim before they made War And by the next words all the Children of Israel with him they understand the Priest that was particularly anointed to go with the People to War XX Deut. 2. And by the last words the whole Congregation they understand the LXX Elders or the great Sanhedrim So Maimonides Abarbinel and a great many others expound these words as Mr. Selden shows in the same place from which they have framed this general Maxim That no private Man might consult this Oracle but the King and the Head of the great Sanhedrim and he that was appointed by all the People in their name And that Col haedah all the Congregation signifies frequently the great Assembly of the Elders and Judges See also Bertram de Repub. Jud. p. 72. Here the Jews start a difficulty as they account it why we never read in the whole Book of Joshua that he consulted the LORD after this manner but as soon as ever he was dead they did I Judg. 1. From whence Abarbinel concludes that Joshua was bound to do this only at the first entrance upon his Office that all Israel might know he was Moses his Successor and that God was with him but that afterward the Spirit of Prophecy rested upon him and conducted him without this Oracle But if nothing was done that is not recorded in the Scripture he might as well have said that Joshua never consulted the Oracle at all for we do not read he did though he be here so ordered R. Levi ben Gersom therefore seems to me to speak more reasonably when he says that those words in the beginning of the Book of Judges do not import that they did not consult God by Vrim in the Life of Joshua but only that after his Death the Children of Israel would not adventure to proceed in the War of Canaan without the same direction And there is something else which they might have observed from this verse with great reason which is how much inferiour Joshua was to Moses though he succeeded him in the Conduct of the People For Moses never made use of the Vrim and Thummim to consult God by the High-Priest but went directly and immediately to God himself whereas Joshua was not admitted to such Familiarity nor had he such frequent Revelations from God as Moses had Yet sometimes God vouchsafed him the honour to speak to him as we find in the beginning of Joshua III. 7. IV. 1 15 c. And there was a most illustrious appearance of God to him before Jericho V. 13 c. Ver. 22. And Moses did as the LORD commandded him and he took Joshua and set him before Eleazar and before all the Congregation According as he was ordered v. 18 19. In this we see the great Verse 22 Integrity the sincere Humility and Self-denial of Moses that he readily submitted to have the Government of Israel translated from his own Family and Tribe
unto another who was of the Tribe of Ephraim Whereby his own Children were reduced to a mean condition being not so much as Priests but mere Levites This demonstrates he acted not from himself because he acted not for himself but was contented to have the Supreme Authority placed where God pleased both in Church and State and to leave his own Family in an inconsiderable employment This shows him to have had a Principle which raised him above all other Law-givers who always took care to advance their own Families and establish them in some share of that greatness which they themselves possessed This likewise demonstrates that the future Rulers of this Nation had no temptation to advance the Credit of Moses beyond what it really was since they were not descended from him but were of other Tribes Ver. 23. And he laid his hands upon him and gave Verse 23 him a charge as the LORD commanded by the hand of Moses He did all things which the LORD required to create him his Successor as the Jews speak For thus by laying on of hands they in after times made a Man a Member of the Sanhedrin both of the great and of the small which continued to the time of the destruction of the second Temple as Mr. Selden shews Lib. II. de Synedr cap. 7. n. 1. And this solemn Designation of Joshua to the Government by the Divine Authority was a clear Indication that God continued to be their King as he became in a special manner when he brought them out of Egypt as I observed upon III Exod. 10. and he still reserved it to himself to appoint Governours under him out of what Tribe he pleased as he did Joshua at this time out of the Tribe of Ephraim and not Caleb who was of the Tribe of Judah and also a Man as valiant as he was vertuous XIV Josh 11. For there was no Tribe that could lay claim unto this Dignity without the Gift of God And this is one of the principal Reasons why the government of this People before they had Kings was as Josephus calls it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the Empire of God because he stirred them up Judges to rule them when he pleased Which being of his immediate appointment are so far acknowledged by him that when they were weary of Samuel's Government and desired a King God declared that it was not Samuel but himself whom they rejected And another reason was as our Mr. Thorndike observes because God by his Oracle of Vrim and Thummim prescribed how they were to proceed in their Publick Affairs Review of the Right of the Church pag. 133. CHAP. XXVIII Chapter XXVIII Verse 1 Ver. 1. AND the LORD spake unto Moses saying Having numbred the People and appointed his Successor to bring them to their Inheritance which he had ordered to be divided among them proportionable to the number of each Tribe nothing was more necessary than to perswade them to be truly religious whereby they might be preserved in the enjoyment of it Unto which Moses is commanded to direct them in this and in the following Chapters Which may be thought to have been delivered also in the eighth Month of the last Year of their Travels in the Wilderness Ver. 2. Command the Children of Israel and say unto Verse 2 them These Commands had been given before but are here repeated because this was a new Generation who either had not heard them when they were first delivered Eight and thirty years ago or at least had need to have their Memories refreshed Some things also are now more particularly explained concerning the Sacrifices which were to be offered at certain times and they are reduced into a certain order some being daily others weekly others monthly and some anniversary All which were of such importance that Moses being shortly to leave them thought good to repeat most of them once more in the Book of Deuteronomy My Offering and my Bread The word and is not in the Hebrew but the words are my Offering my Bread Which Isaac Abarbinel thus excellently explains Concerning Offerings for Sin and Trespass-offerings and the rest I shall not need to admonish you but concerning my daily Sacrifices which properly of themselves are my own Oblation my daily Bread or my Food which the Divine Presence dwelling among them required XXIX Exod. 42 44 45. And so others by the word Bread understand Meat or Food in general as we translate it v. 24. though it may have a particular respect to the Meat-offering which was made of Meal and always accompanied the Burnt-Offerings Which seem here to be peculiarly meant though some think these words relate to all the Sacrifices some part of which were God's Portion For my Sacrifices made by fire The whole Burnt-offerings are most properly called Ische Sacrifices made by fire being all consumed upon the Altar where the heavenly Fire burnt continually ready for that purpose For a sweet savour unto me So the Burnt-offering is called I Lev. 9 13 17. See there I shall only add the Paraphrase of the Hierusalem Targum which is this My offering of Bread which ye offer on the Altar doth not the fire devour it And yet it is acceptable to me from you as an Odor in which I am well pleased Shall ye observe to offer unto me Be very careful to see duly performed This being the Food saith Abarbinel which to speak after the manner of Men was offered by God's Fire upon his own Altar for his Dinner and Supper In due season For that reason this Sacrifice was to be constantly offered saith the same Author that the Divine Fire which came down from Heaven to consume the Sacrifices might not be disappointed and burn there in vain without any thing to do From this place the Jews endeavour to make out their Custom of having Stationary men as they call them to attend the daily Sacrifice taking Moatho in its season as if it had been Omatho in its stations but chiefly relying upon the first words of this verse command the Children of Israel who could not all be present at the daily Sacrifice and therefore some particular Persons were chosen to represent all the rest For they thought it very undecent to have a Sacrifice made for a Man and he not stand by it and therefore the first Prophets ordained Twenty four Courses of Men chosen out of the Priests Levites and People to stand in the Temple when the daily Sacrifice was offered in the name of all Israel and pray that God would accept it for them as if they were all present This account the Mischna gives of them in Taanith and other places where they say these Men were held so necessary that it was an usual Speech among them without Stations the World could not stand For without Sacrifices that is the Worship of God the World would be undone and Sacrifices could not be maintained without Stations See Voysin de Jubilaeo cap. 25.
then the Song before-mentioned began with the Trumpets and other Instruments of Musick but not till then For the Burnt-offering was not perfect till the Drink-offering which was to accompany it was offered whereby it was compleated See Dr. Light-foot in his Temple Service cap. 7. sect 2. Ver. 10. This is the Burnt-offering of every Sabbath Verse 10 besides the continual Burnt-offering and his Drink-offering The daily Sacrifice was not to be omitted on the Sabbath but this was to be added to it and thence by the Jews called Musaph Of which sort there were seven more which were to be added to the Sacrifice of the day viz. that in the New Moon v. 11. at the Passover v. 19. and the Feast of Pentecost v. 26. in the beginning of the Year XXIX 1. on the Day of Expiation v. 7. on the Feast of Tabernacles there were peculiar Sacrifices for seven days together XXIII Lev. 35. and on the last day of the Feast another XXIX Numb 35 36 37. All these were called Musaphim or additional Sacrifices to the daily Sacrifice Verse 11 Ver. 11. And in the beginnings of your Months ye shall offer a Burnt-offering unto the LORD This solemn Sacrifice seems to have been ordained by God to prevent the Idolatry which was usual among the Gentiles who worshipped the New Moon with great Rejoycings when it first appeared Otherwise the first day of every Month was no Festival but only a day on which extraordinary Sacrifices were offered with blowing of Trumpets as seems to be directed X. 10. See there which was usual at all solemn Sacrifices as I noted before otherways the Feast of blowing with Trumpets was only on the New Moon of the seventh Month and no other And therefore it is observable that there is no mention made of the first day of the Month among the Festivals appointed in XXIII Lev. And consequently Servile work was lawful on this day and nothing more required but only the following Sacrifices The Jews at this day say this Solemnity was appointed rather for the Women than the Men for which they give a fabulous reason who are bound to abstain from all work but the Men only from the most laborious such as Plowing the Ground c. See Buxtorf's Synag Judaica cap. 22. Two young Bullocks and one Ram seven Lambs of the first year without spot All these were Burnt-offerings which were offered besides the daily Sacrifice and besides the two Lambs if the first day of the Month fell out to be a Sabbath In which case and all others where several Solemnities met together on the same day the daily Sacrifice was offered first and then the rest of the Sacrifices peculiar for that day were to be performed every one in their order As for Example If the Sabbath and new Moon and the Feast of Trumpets sell out on the same day they began with the daily Morning Sacrifice after which followed the Sacrifices proper to the Sabbath and after that the Sacrifice appointed on the New Moon and then those that belonged to the Feast of Trumpets and all was concluded with the Evening Sacrifice as Abarbinel observes in his Preface to the Book of Leviticus Ver. 12. And three tenth deals of flour That is Verse 12 three tenth parts of an Ephah v. 5. For a Meat-offering mingled with Oyl for one Bullock i. e. For each Bullock there was to be this proportion of Flour which is exactly according to the general Rule before given XV. 9. And two tenth deals of flour mingled with Oyl for one Ram. This is the proportion there prescribed for a Ram as the other for a Bullock XV. 6. Ver. 13. And a several tenth deal of fine flour mingled Verse 13 with Oyl for a Meat offering unto one Lamb. Unto each of the seven Lambs before-mentioned v. 11. a Meat-offering was to be joyned in less proportion than the other according to the Rule there given XV. 4. For a Burnt-offering of a sweet savour c. See v. 6. Ver. 14. And their Drink-offering shall be half an hin Verse 14 of Wine unto a Bullock See XV. 10. And the third part of an hin for a Ram. See there v. 7. And a fourth part of an hin for a Lamb. See there v. 5. They that allegorize these things think the New Moon signifies the Resurrection to a new Life in the other World where every one shall receive a Reward according to his measure Thus Procopius Gazaeus in whom they that think such Expositions useful may find entertainment This is the Burnt-offering of every Month throughout the Months of the year There are more Sacrifices appointed on the New Moons than on the Sabbath it self because they returned seldomer And the Gentiles multiplying Sacrifices on such occasions if the Jews had not been thus imployed in the Worship of God they might have been tempted to pay their Services to Idols Verse 15 Ver. 15. And one Kid of the Goats for a Sin-offering This Sacrifice of a Goat for a Sin-offering saith the same Procopius is coupled with the rest being a shadow of the Passion of Christ for whose sake all our Sacrifices are acceptable unto God the Father Vnto the LORD It is well observed by Grotius that these words unto the LORD were added to put them in mind at this time of the right Object of Worship when they were in danger to offer Sacrifice to the Moon after the manner of the Heathen This is the more to be regarded because a Goat being appointed to be offered at two other Solemnities and to be offered for a Sin-offering v. 22 30. it is not said unto the LORD though certainly so intended because there was no danger at those times to direct their Sacrifices to a wrong Object as there was upon the New Moons when the Heathen offered a Goat unto the Moon it being a Creature whose Horns are like to those of a New Moon R. Bechai long ago observed this A Goat saith he was offered to extirpate the Religion of those who worshipped the Moon which makes the Scripture say expresly unto the LORD And Maimonides more largely in his More Nevochim P. III. cap. 46. where after he had taken notice of the difference between Sin-offerings and Burnt-offerings the latter of which being wholly burnt might be properly said to be unto the LORD whereas Sin-offerings were commonly eaten by the Priests he adds That this Sin-offering is peculiarly said to be unto the LORD least any one should think this Goat to be a Sacrifice to the Moon after the manner of the Egyptians Which was not necessary to be said of the Goats offered at other Solemn Times because they were not in the beginning of the Month nor distinguished from other days by any natural sign but only by the appointment of the Law which uses these words concerning this Goat peculiarly to pluck out of Mens thoughts those inveterate and pernicious Opinions of the Gentiles who had long sacrificed to the Moon at this
time as they did to the Sun at his rising and when he entred into the several Signs Besides the continual Burnt-offering and his Drink-offering This is so often particularly mentioned lest any should imagine it might be spared when there were such liberal Offerings of several kinds Ver. 16. And on the fourteenth day of the first Month Verse 16 is the Passover of the LORD See XII Exod. 6 18. XXIII Lev. 5. where it is called the LORD's Passover See XII Exod. 27. Ver. 17. In the fifteenth day of this Month is the Feast The fourteenth day at Even the Feast of the Passover was kept as appears from XII Exod. 14. Verse 17 But on the fifteenth day began another Feast called the Feast of unleavened Bread See XXIII Lev. 6. Seven days shall unleavened Bread be eaten See XII Exod. 15. XIII 6 7. XXIII Lev. 6. Verse 18 Ver. 18. On the first day shall be an holy Convocation ye shall do no manner of servile work therein See XII Exod. 16. XXIII Lev. 7. Verse 19 Ver. 19. But ye shall offer a Sacrifice made by fire for a Burnt-offering unto the LORD The Solemnity was ordained before and Offerings also in general prescribed to be made seven days See XXIII Lev. 8. but the particular Sacrifices not set down tell now Two young Bullocks one Ram and seven Lambs of the first year they shall be unto you without spot The same Sacrifices which were appointed to be offered upon every first day of the Month v. 11. Verse 20 Ver. 20. And their Meat-offering shall be of flour mingled with Oyl three tenth deals shall ye offer for a Bullock and two tenth deals for a Ram. The very same which were appointed on the first day of every Month v. 12. Verse 21 Ver. 21. A several tenth deal shalt thou offer for every Lamb throughout the seven Lambs Just as it was in the forementioned Sacrifice v. 13. And though the Drink-offerings be not mentioned they must be understood to be the same because they always accompanied the Meat-offerings of Burnt-Sacrifices which were not compleat without them Verse 22 Ver. 22. And one Goat for a Sin-offering to make atonement for you As it was in the New Moon v. 15. But Meat and Drink-offerings did not accompany Offerings for Sin save only in the case of a Leper who was to bring three Offerings a Sin-offering a Trespass-offering and a Burnt-offering for his cleansing with three tenth parts of an Ephah of Flour XIV Lev. 10 c. Ver. 23. Ye shall offer these beside the Burnt-offering Verse 23 of the Morning which is the continual Burnt-offering There are two things that are here to be remarked that these Offerings as I noted before should not put by the continual Burnt-Sacrifice but be added to it and that all these were offered in the Morning after the daily Morning Sacrifice and were not part of the Evening Sacrifice which concluded all Ver. 24. After this manner ye shall offer daily throughout Verse 24 the seven days Upon every one of the days of unleavened Bread v. 17. which though it was a great Expence yet was but a fitting Acknowledgment of God's wonderful goodness to them in bringing them out of the Land of Egypt with all their Flocks and their Herds which was the foundation of all their happiness afterwards by making them a free People The Meat of my Sacrifice made by fire Here is the very same word with that v. 2. where he calls this Sacrifice his lechem which we there translate his bread but here very properly his meat or food Which was set upon his Table the Altar every day and by his fire from Heaven consumed which according to the language of Men was called his eating of it as the Heathen Gods also are said to eat the Fat of their Sacrifices XXXII Deut. 38. Of a sweet savour unto the LORD Very acceptable to him as hath been often observed It shall be offered beside the continual Burnt-offering and his Drink-offering There is the greatest care taken by the frequent repetition of this that they should not think to save their daily Sacrifice by these others which were to be added to it and not to supply the place of it See v. 15. Verse 25 Ver. 25. And on the seventh day ye shall have an holy Convocation ye shall do no servile work therein This last day of the Feast was equal to the first XXIII Lev. 7 8. and is called a Feast unto the LORD XIII Exod. 6. Verse 26 Ver. 26. Also the day of the First-fruits Called the Feast of Harvest the First-fruits of their Labours XXIII Exod. 16. and the Feast of Weeks when they brought the First-fruits of Wheat-harvest XXXIV Exod. 22. XVI Deut. 10. The Jews in their Writings commonly call this Feast by the name of Atzereth and so do the Chaldee Paraphrase upon this place though Abarbinel observes that this alone of all the three great Feasts is never called so in the holy Scripture It is hard therefore to tell why the Jews call it so in a singular manner but our learned Dr. Lightfoot hath made several probable Conjectures about it one of which and most pertinent to this place is because there was a restraint as the word signifies upon the People from bringing their First-fruits till this Feast If any did they received them not from them but laid them by till this day came See Temple Service chap. 14. sect 4. When ye bring a new Meat-offering unto the LORD Mentioned XXIII Lev. 16. Which were two Loaves made of their first Corn v. 17. where they are called the First-fruits unto the LORD After your Weeks be out That is the seven Weeks which they were to number from the morrow after the Sabbath XXIII Lev. 15. i. e. after the first day of unleavened Bread When they offered another sort of First-fruits which must be carefully distinguished from those here mentioned viz. of the Barley Harvest which began at the Passover when they were to bring a Sheaf of their First-fruits unto the Priest XXIII Lev. 10. the presenting of which Sheaf was an Introduction to Harvest and procured them liberty to begin to put the Sickle into the Corn which now after seven Weeks they reaped and carried in at this Feast when they brought these new First-fruits unto the LORD All which is a Description of that which in the New Testament is called the Feast of Pentecost being fifty days as we read there in Leviticus after the other great Feast Ye shall have an holy Convocation ye shall do no servile work See XXIII Lev. 21. Ver. 27 But ye shall offer the Burnt-offering for a Verse 27 sweet savour unto the LORD Over and above the Burnt-offering which was prescribed to be offered with the two loaves before-mentioned XXIII Lev. 18. unto which this was an additional Sacrifice plainly distinct from it Two young Bullocks one Ram seven Lambs of the first year The very same that were ordered to be
on this day made Ye shall not do any work therein It was to be observed as strictly as a Sabbath XVI Lev. 31. XXIII 32. Wherein they were to abstain not meerly from servile Work but from all manner of Work whatsoever XVI Lev. 29. XXIII 28 30. Verse 8 Ver. 8. And ye shall offer a Burnt-offering unto the LORD for a sweet savour Endeavour to procure acceptance of the rest of the Sacrifices of the Day with this whole Burnt-offering beside the daily Sacrifice as it follows v. 11. One Bullock one Ram and seven Lambs of the first year c. The same that were appointed on the foregoing Solemnity v. 2. except the monthly Offering v. 6. to which was added another Ram for a Burnt-offering XVI Lev. 5. as a devout Acknowledgment that they owned him alone for their Soveraign LORD Verse 9 10. Ver. 9 10 And their Meat-offering shall be of fine flour c. The Meat-offering attending these Burnt-offerings were to be in the same proportion as was before ordered v. 3 4. Verse 11 Ver. 11. One Kid of the Goats for a Sin-offering As was appointed in the foregoing Solemnity v. 5. Beside the Sin-offering of Atonement Mentioned XVI Lev. 9 c. whose Blood was carried by the High-Priest into the most holy place which was done in no other Sacrifice but that and the Bullock which was offered as a Sin-offering for the Family of Aaron on the same day XVI Lev. 14. And the continual Burnt-offering and the Meat-offering of it and their Drink-offerings These were no more to be omitted on the great Day of Atonement than on any other day but the Service of the day was to begin with the continual Burnt-offering and then followed the Burnt-offerings with the Meat and Drink-offerings belonging to them and the Sin-offering here prescribed and then the Sacrifice of Atonement and all that is ordered in the XVIth of Leviticus for the Expiation of the Sins of all the People of Israel Which Sacrifice the present Jews now wanting and yet being sensible of the necessity of some Satisfaction but not believing in our blessed Saviour who hath fully made it for all Mankind they are in a lamentable plunge and are put to most wretched shifts to devise something to supply the place of the Sacrifice of Atonement which was wont to be made for them One is their own death it being the continual Prayer of every one of them upon their Death-bed Let my death be the expiation for my sins Another is which is so absurd that Leo Modina saith they do not use it now in Italy nor in the Eastern Countries the killing of a white Cock if one can be got by the Men and a white Hen by the Women on the Eve of this Day saying Let this Cock be an exchange for me let it come in my stead let it be my Expiation let it die but I and all Israel live happily as Buxtorf shows in his Synagog Judaica cap. 25. Which I should not here mention were it not to show that they have the very same Notion still of a Sacrifice for Sin even now that they can only make an imitation of it which we have of the Sacrifice of Christ who was put in our place and offered himself to God in our stead and that it ought to be pure and innocent which is offered instead of a Sinner Ver. 12. And on the fifteenth day of the seventh Verse 12 Month ye shall have an holy Convocation ye shall do no servile work See XXIII Lev. 35. And ye shall keep a Feast unto the LORD seven days viz. The Feast of Tabernacles XXIII Lev. 34. which was after the Harvest and Vintage XVI Deut. 13. and kept seven days with great Joy and gladness of Heart but they were not bound to abstain from servile work all this time but only on the first day and on the seventh Verse 13 Ver. 13. And ye shall offer a Burnt-offering a Sacrifice made by fire of a sweet savour unto the LORD The same kind of Sacrifice which was prescribed on the other Festivals to be offered up wholly in honour of God But here is a far larger proportion than in any other Solemnity Thirteen young Bullocks two rams and fourteen Lambs of the first year c. On the other Festivals two Bullocks sufficed XXVIII 11 19 27. and on the Festival in the beginning of this Month only one was appointed but here are thirteen and so they continued to be offered seven days successively with the decrease only of one Bullock every day till on the seventh day only seven Bullocks were offered which in all made LXX Bullocks The Rams also and the Lambs were in a double proportion to what was usual throughout the whole Festival Which was a vast charge but more easie at this time of the Year than any other because now their Barns were full and their Wine-presses over-flowed and their Hearts might well be supposed to be more enlarged then at other times in thankfulness to God for his great Benefits Yet this very gross troublesome and expensive way of serving God made the best Men among them groan and long for the coming of Christ in whose days their own Doctors say no Sacrifices shall remain but those of Thansgiving and Praise and Prayer With which they have been forced to be content for above Sixteen hundred years and instead of these additional Sacrifices unto the daily have added peculiar Prayers which they also call Musaphim unto the common Prayers they use every day See Buxtorf concerning the Feast of the New Moon in his Synagog Jud. cap. 22. Ver. 14 15. Their Meat-offering shall be of fine flour Verse 14 15. c. The same proportions which are ordered by a general Rule to every Sacrifice of a Bullock and of a Ram Chap. XV. Ver. 16. And one Kid of the Goats for a Sin-offering Verse 16 beside the continual Burnt-offering c. There is no augmentation of the Sin-offering but it is the same with that on other Festivals v. 5. And all these Sacrifices it appears by this were to be added to the daily Sacrifice Ver. 17. And on the second day ye shall offer twelve Verse 17 young Bullocks c. Here one Bullock less than on the day before is ordered to be offered and so on every succeeding day there is still a decrease of one Bullock which is all the difference between the Offerings on the seven days of this Feast upon every one of which there was the same number of Rams and Lambs without any diminution Which Moses thought fit to set down distinctly from this verse to the thirty fifth that there might be no mistake But little need be noted upon them Ver. 18. According to their number after the manner Prescribed v. 14 15. Ver. 35. On the eighth day ye shall have a solemn Assembly Verse 18 There is a peculiar word here used to denote Verse 35 this to be a great day as I noted upon
XXIII Lev. 36. See there Ye shall do no servile work therein It was to be observed as the first day of the Feast of Tabernacles both of them being called a Sabbath 23 Lev. 39. Verse 36 Ver. 36. But ye shall offer a Burnt-offering a Sacrifice made by fire of sweet savour unto the LORD Here is a peculiar Sacrifice appointed upon this day in the same terms as upon the first day of the Feast of Tabernacles v. 13. One Bullock one Ram seven Lambs of the first year c. But though this was an extraordinary day and a distinct Festival as I showed upon XXIII Lev. 39. yet here are fewer Sacrifices prescribed on this day than upon any of the foregoing seven For on every one of them two Rams were offered and fourteen Lambs and here but half so many And seven Bullocks were the fewest that were offered upon any of those days and on the first day thirteen but here only one By which God consulted perhaps the weakness of Mankind who naturally grew weary both of the Charge and of the Labour of such Services when they are long continued And therefore he made them every day less toilsom and expensive and put them in mind likewise that the multitude of Sacrifices did not procure their acceptance with God and that in length of time they would come to nothing and be utterly abolished to establish something better in their room Ver. 37. Their Meat-offering and their Drink-offerings for the Bullock for the Ram and for the Lambs and shall be according to their number after the manner In such proportions as God had before Verse 37 ordained in the XVth Chapter of this Book in the beginning of it as I have often observed Ver. 38. And one Goat for a Sin-offering beside the Verse 38 continual Burnt-offering c. This is never omitted upon any Festival XXVIII 15 22 30. XXIX 5 11 16 19 c. to put them in mind that after all their Services they stood in need of forgiveness Ver. 39. These things shall ye do or offer unto the Verse 39 LORD in your set Feasts All these Feasts were fixed and stated at certain times on which God was to be worshipped after the manner here prescribed in these two Chapters For all these Offerings except one Sin-offering upon each set day were wholly Burnt-offerings as I have already observed which may properly be said to be done that is offered unto the LORD neither People nor Priest having any share in them Besides your Vows and your Free-will-offerings for your Burnt-offerings Besides these every Man might offer other Burnt-offerings either in performance of a Vow or freely out of his Affection to God See XV. 3. For your Meat-offerings and for your Drink-offerings There were five several sorts of Meat-offerings which were left to every Man 's free will to bring as he pleased See the second Chapter of Leviticus where they are described And for your Peace-offerings These are described in the third Chapter of that Book A great number of which it is likely Men offered voluntarily upon all the fore-mentioned Festivals For otherwise they would have had no means to feast with God at his House nor to entertain their Friends and Neighbours as the custom was at such times of Publick Rejoyceing Which they did upon that part of the Peace-offerings which was given them after the Fat was offered to God and the Wave-breast and Heave-shoulder given to the Priest VII Lev. 15 c. 34. Verse 40 Ver. 40. And Moses told the Children of Israel according to all that the LORD commanded Moses He acquainted all the People by the Heads of their Tribes perhaps of whom we read in the beginning of the next Chapter with all these Commands of God which concerned his Worship and Service CHAP. XXX Chapter XXX Verse 1 Ver. 1. AND Moses spake unto the Heads of the Tribes There were wont to be extraordinary Assemblies of these or other great Men upon special Occasions as Mr. Selden observes Lib. II. de Synedr cap. 14. n. 4. who are sometimes called as they are here the Heads of all their Tribes and the Elders V Deut. 23. and in other places the Heads of the People XXX Deut. 5. the whole Congregation of the Children of Israel XVIII Josh 1. XXII 12. the chief of all the People XX Judg. 2. all Israel 1 Sam. VII 5. all the Princes of Israel the Princes of the Tribes 1 Chron. XXVIII 1. all the Elders of Israel and Heads of the Tribes and chief of the Fathers 2 Chron. V. 2. the counsel of the Princes and Elders X Ezra 8. And it is commonly said by the Hebrew Doctors concerning such Assemblies that wheresoever the Children of Israel were met together or the greater part of them there the SCHECHINAH that is the Divine Majesty or the Holy Ghost as they sometimes speak was wont to rest Concerning the Children of Israel saying Acquainted them with a Matter which concerned all the People willing them to communicate it to them This is the thing which the LORD hath commanded It is very probable there had been some Case propounded to him about Vows concerning which he here gives such Rules as might direct them in time to come Ver. 2. If a Man It is reasonable to think that Verse 2 this includes the other Sex also provided they be in their own power and not subject to another and be in their right mind Vow a vow unto the LORD Promise solemnly unto God something that is for his Honour and Service for that seems to be meant by unto the LORD As that he will offer some Sacrifice at the Feasts above-mentioned more than is prescribed or afflict his Soul on some other day besides the great Day of Atonement See v. 13. Or swear an Oath to bind his Soul with a bond Whether it be a simple Vow or bound also with a solemn Oath which made a double Obligation by calling God to witness the Sincerity of his Intentions He shall not break his word In the Hebrew it is he shall not prophane his word for it being solemnly passed to God it made him vile and contemptible if he did not keep it The Jewish Doctors very prudently advise their Scholars not to accustom themselves to make Vows but to content themselves with doing what the Law commands and abstaining from what it forbids But if they did make them to look upon it as an high affront to God not to perform them He shall do according to all that proceedeth out of his mouth If the thing be lawful and possible And if he appointed no time for the doing of it he was to think himself obliged to do it presently without delay XXIII Deut. 21. Verse 3 Ver. 3. If a woman also vow a vow unto the LORD As most Interpreters think the word Man in the foregoing verse comprehends Women who were in as perfect liberty as the Men he speaks of so the word Woman here comprehends all
Princes of the Congregation went forth to meet them without the Camp Hearing they were returned victorious they went to congratulate them before they came at the Camp for which there was also another reason mentioned v. 19. This shows that Eleazar was not so infirm as some suppose and affords an argument to strengthen their Opinion who think Joshua was now General of the Host otherwise he would have been mentioned together with Moses and Eleazar as going to meet them being chosen his Co-adjutor and therefore Superiour to all the Princes that are here joyned with them Ver. 14. And Moses was wroth with the Officers of Verse 14 the Host with the Captains over Thousands and Captains over Hundreds which came from the Battle Who were more to blame than the Soldiers whose duty it was to obey not to give orders which they received no doubt from the Officers to kill only the Men. Here now is an Argument to the contrary that Joshua did not Command in chief but this being only a Detachment as they now speak from the Host of Israel was led by some inferiour Officer The first Captain of Thousands perhaps for if Joshua had been there Moses would have expostulated with him or rather there would have been no cause for this Rebuke he being a Man in whom was the Spirit XXVII 18. Ver. 15. And Moses said unto them have ye saved all the Women alive Unless he had commanded them to be killed one cannot see that they deserved to be Verse 15 chidden because they proceeded according to the Rules of all worthy Warriours who killed only those who could bear Arms against them But either he had given some Directions who should be killed or he expected they should have considered that the Women had killed more by their Blandishments than their Husbands could do by their Arms for they had not killed one Man v. 49. and therefore should have been destroyed as the most mischievous for so it follows in the next verse Verse 16 Ver. 16. Behold Reflect upon what is lately past and consider These caused the Children of Israel through the counsel of Balaam to commit Trespass against the LORD in the matter of Peor and there was a Plague among the Congregation of the LORD By these they had been inveigled into an heinous Sin and made obnoxious to a very heavy Punishment which God inflicted upon them on that account For though the Moabitish Women had a great hand in it XXV 1. yet those of Midian seem to have been the chief Seducers v. 6 17 18. and perhaps he feared might be so again Verse 17 Ver. 17. Now therefore kill every Male among the little ones That the Nation might be extirpated as far as lay in their power And kill every Woman that hath known Man by lying with him For these it is to be supposed had been the most instrumental in the Crime before-mentioned either by prostituting themselves or their Daughters to the Lust of the Israelites and thereby drawing them to Idolatry In which Sin they were so settled that there was no hope of reclaiming them but they might rather if they had been saved alive have inticed the Israelites to commit the same again Ver. 18. But all the Women-children that have not Verse 18 known a Man by lying with him keep alive Being young there was some hope they might be brought off from Idolatry and become Proselytes to the true Religion For your selves To be sold as Slaves to any other Nation or to be kept as Servants or taken to be their Wives after such preparation as the Law required XXI Deut. 16 17 c. This was a peculiar Case wherein a middle course was held between those that were of the Seven Nations of Canaan and those that were not If they were not of those Seven Nations the Israelites might take the Women and little Ones unto themselves XX Deut. 14 15. If they were every thing that breathed was to be destroyed v. 16 17. But here the Midianites being guilty of a very great Crime against the LORD and against his People are punished more heavily than other Nations though not so heavily as those of Canaan were to be For they killed all the Women that were not Virgins as well as all the Males both little and great but spared the rest together with the Cattle c. Such an Execution was made in after times upon one of the Cities of Israel upon an high Contempt of Publick Authority in a very great Exigency XXI Judges 11. There is a Rule in XX Deut. 10. that when they came to fight against any City they should proclaim Peace to it and if they would accept it they should only make the Inhabitants Tributaries to them From whence a Question arising whether this extended to the Seven Nations of Canaan it is resolved by Maimonides that it did which he proves from XI Josh 19 20. But so great was the Sin of this People that they neither sent offers of Peace to them now nor were they to make any Peace with them hereafter XXIII Deut. 6. And the reason is there given because they hired Balaam to curse them which is as true of the Midianites as of the Moabites Notwithstanding which Maimonides determines that though the Israelites did not send Messengers of Peace to them yet if they of their own accord sent to desire Peace of the Israelites they were not to reject them See Cunaeus de Repub. Hebr. Lib. II. cap. 20. Verse 39 Ver. 19. And do ye abide without the Camp seven days As unclean Persons For though it was lawful to kill Men in a just War against them yet 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Philo speaks because of the most ancient and common Kindred between all Mankind if was fit Men should use some Purification to cleanse themselves from that which looks like a Crime though it was none Whosoever hath killed any Person and whosoever hath touched any slain purifie both your selves The whole Army that went to the War were to stay without the Camp seven days and such of them as had had their Hands in Blood or had touched a dead Body though killed by another were to use a special Purification which was made by the Water of Separation mentioned XIX 9 c. And your Captives Or the Prey that they had taken of Garments and other things mentioned in the next verse and so the word is translated v. 26. For we cannot think that the Persons they had taken being Gentiles were to be purified with that Water which was peculiar to the Jews On the third day and on the seventh day So the Law was XIX 11 12. And such Purifications were common among the Gentiles especially the Greeks upon the like occasions as Mr. Selden observes L. IV. de Jure Nat. Gent. cap. ult Grotius L. II. de Jure Belli Pacis cap. 24. n. 10. To whom add our late learned Dr. Spencer L. III. Dissert 3. sect 1. where
War and of those who staid at home but were able to go to War who were above Six hundred thousand XXVI 2 51. of which Twelve thousand who were employed in this Expedition were the fiftieth part And give them to the Levites Who were far more numerous than the Priests and therefore had a greater proportion of the Tribute Which keep the charge of the Tabernacle of the LORD See I. 50. III. 6 7 8. Ver. 31. And Moses and Eleazar the Priest did as Verse 31 the LORD commanded Moses This Command is peculiarly to Moses v. 25. but Eleazar was to assist him in the execution of it v. 26. and accordingly they took the Sum of the Prey both of Man and Beast and divided them between the Souldiers and People and levied a Tribute upon each for the LORD who ordered them to his Ministers Ver. 32. And the booty being the rest of the prey which the Men of Israel had caught i. e. Besides what was necessarily spent for their Subsistence during the War and while they lay out of the Camp v. 19. Was six hundred thousand and seventy thousand and five thousand sheep A vast stock far exceeding the number of Men of War which were in Israel Verse 33 Ver. 33. And threescore and twelve thousand beeves It seems their Country had good Pasture in it as well as Sheep-walks For as Arabia Foelix it is certain had agros latissimos fertilissimos as Pliny speaks Lib. VI. cap. 28. most spacious and Fertile Fields so Arabia Petraea in which Midian was did not wholly want them Verse 34 Ver. 34. And threescore and one thousand Asses The Countries about Judea abounding with Camels also particularly Arabia in which Job had a great number it may seem strange that we read of none here especially since they had vast numbers in following times VI Judges 5. VII 12. and the Ishmaelites with whom they were Associates in Trade had them long before this time XXXVII Gen. 27 36. But it is likely they did not yet find it for their profit to feed Camels of which they learnt to make a Trafick afterward no more than Mules of which we read nothing here nor indeed in Judea till the times of David It may be supposed that if they had Camels they were of that kind called Dromedaries which were famous in this Country in after Ages LX Isa 6. and that the People who escaped the slaughter fled away upon them And that there were other Beasts in this Country besides Beeves and Asses and Sheep and Goats seems to be plain from v. 30. where after the mention of these he adds of all manner of Beasts he should take a Portion for the Levites But of Camels or Dromedaries I suppose none were found Ver. 35. And thirty two thousand persons in all of women that had not known Man c. It appears by this to have been a very populous Country in which were so many Virgins Verse 35 Ver. 36. And the half which was the portion of them Verse 36 that went out to war was in number three hundred and seven and thirty thousand and five hundred Sheep There is no difficulty in this or in the following verses this being exactly the half of the whole number of Sheep mentioned v. 32. Ver. 37. And the LORD's Tribute of the Sheep Verse 37 was six hundred and threescore and fifteen Which is exactly one in five hundred out of this half of the Booty as God ordered v. 28. Ver. 38. And the Beeves were thirty and six thousand Verse 38 whereof the LORD's Tribute was threescore and twelve The very same proportions are observed here as in the Sheep which appears by comparing this verse with v. 33. And the two next verses 39 40. give the same account of the Asses and the Persons which were as exactly divided and the LORD had the same portion of them as v. 34 35. compared with these demonstrate Ver. 41. And Moses gave the Tribute which was the Verse 41 LORD 's Heave-offering unto Eleazar the Priest c. This is recorded to show how faithful Moses was in performing obedience to God's Commands v. 29. and far from desiring the smallest Portion for himself out of so great a Booty Which if he had acted by his own private Spirit he would scarce have avoided Ver. 42. And of the Children of Israel's half which Verse 42 Moses divided from the Men that warred There is nothing here nor in the following verses to v. 48. but a Repetition of what was said concerning the other half before-mentioned to show that the same exactness was observed both in the Division of the Prey among the People and in taking out of it such a Portion as God assigned to the Levites which was one out of fifty as out of the Men of Wars part one out of five hundred v. 28 30. Verse 48 Ver. 48. And the Officers which were over thousands of the Host the Captains of thousands and Captains of hundreds came near unto Moses The first words of this verse seem to suppose that there were other great Officers as well as the General who were above the Captains over thousands and the Captains over hundreds which is very probable Verse 49 Ver. 49. And they said unto Moses thy Servants c. The greatest Men speak with the greatest Reverence to Moses who was in the place of God Have taken the sum of the men of war which are under our charge Made a muster of them as we now speak at our return from the War And there lacketh not one man of us A wonderful Victory which shows the War was the LORD's v. 3. Who struck such a Terror into them that one would think they turn'd their backs and did not strike a stroke against the Israelites Verse 50 Ver. 50. We have therefore brought an Oblation for the LORD For the Uses of the Sanctuary either in purchasing Sacrifices or maintaining God's Ministers c. For KORBAN signifies every thing that is given to God though not sacrificed upon the Altar What every man hath gotten All of them offered something to the LORD out of the Spoil he had gotten according to the Piety of ancient Times XIV Gen. 20. For we find no Precept in the Law for this and yet it was constantly practised by David in after times 2 Sam. VIII 11 12. and by the Officers of his Army 1 Chron. XXVI 26 27. and by other Men Samuel Saul Abner c. v. 28 c. Jewels of Gold Vessels as the Hebrew word signifies or all manner of Ornaments made of Gold the Particulars of which follow viz. Chains Bracelets c. But the Hierusalem Vaâ—gum takes these Jewels as we translate it to have been the golden Attire about the Heads of their Women Chains These are commonly thought to have been the Ornaments or their Arms. But they may as well be thought to have been used about their Legs or their Necks Bracelets These it is apparent were Ornaments about
their Wrists or Hands XXIV Gen. 47. XVI Ezek. 11. Rings They were Ornaments of the Fingers XLI Gen. 42. III Esther 10. Ear-rings Nothing more common in those Countries especially among the Midianites and Ishmaelites as we find VIII Judges 24 25 26. where there is a different word used to express this Ornament yet the word Hagil here used certainly signifying something round and the Ornaments incompassing the Arms and other parts being before-mentioned it cannot well be thought to denote any thing but Rings in their Ears And so we translate it XVI Ezek. 12. And Tablets Some Ornaments about the Breasts See XXXV Exod. 22. To make an Atonement for our Souls before the LORD For the Guilt of which Moses accused them v. 14. or any other which they had contracted in the War Verse 52 Ver. 52. And all the Gold of the Offering which they offered up to the LORD c. was sixteen thousand seven hundred and fifty shekels It hath been observed before that Three thousand Shekels made a Talent and therefore their Offering amounted to above Five Talents and an half Verse 53 Ver. 53. For the men of war had taken spoil every man for himself Or rather had taken the Spoil mentioned v. 12. of which part of the Booty no Division was made between the Men of War and the People v. 26. but they kept it intirely to themselves and now very gratefully made a Present of a considerable part of it to the LORD See v. 12. where the word Spoil is used strictly for a part of the Booty distinct from the other two the Captives and the Prey and so it signifies here Verse 54 Ver. 54. And Moses and Eleazar the Priest took the Gold This was said before v. 51. and therefore the sence here is that having received it as an Offering to the LORD they brought it into the Tabernacle of the Congregation as it here follows in the conclusion of this verse Of the Captains of thousands and of hundreds It was not their Oblation only but the Oblation of every one of the Men of War v. 50 51. But the Commanders received it from the common Soldiers and presented it unto Moses and Eleazar from the whole Host And brought it into the Tabernacle for a Memorial for the Children of Israel before the LORD That God might be mindful of them i. e. propitious to them who were so grateful to him for his Benefits The Hierusalem Targum upon v. 50. fancies these Officers to have represented to Moses their great Chastity when they made this Offering saying We broke into the Chambers and Closets of the Kings of Midian and there we saw their beautiful and charming Daughters from whom we took the golden Ornaments upon their Heads and in their Ears and on their Arms their Fingers and Breasts but did not cast a wanton look upon one of them And therefore they hoped this Oblation they made would rise up for them in the Day of the great Judgment as a Reconciliation for their Souls before the LORD CHAP. XXXII Chapter XXXII Ver. 1. NOW the Children of Reuben and the Children Verse 1 of Gad. Here the Children of Reuben who was Jacob's First-born are mentioned in the first place but in the rest of the Chapter v. 2 6 25 29 32. the Children of Gad are constantly first mentioned because they were the first Movers of that which follows as the Hebrews conjecture Had a very great multitude of Cattle More than any other Tribe And when they saw the Land of Jazer Which was lately taken from the Amorites after they had slain Sihon their King XXI 32. This City and Country belonging to it were near to the Spring of the River Arnon and there is frequent mention of it in the Book of Joshua and in Isaiah XVI 8 9. and Jeremiah XLVIII 34. And the Land of Gilead A noble Country so called from the Mountain Gilead which bounded it on the East as Jordan did on the West the River Jabbok on the South and Mount Libanus on the North. That behold the place was a place of Cattle Which in the fourth verse is called a Land of Cattle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the LXX translate it fit for feeding of Cattle being famous for Pasture and other grazing Ground For Bashan was in this Country III Deut. 12 13. where every one knows the largest and fattest Oxen were bred XXII Psal 12. and Sheep also XXXII Deut. 14. and therefore is joyned with Gilead VII Micah 14. which being woody and mountainous in some part of it was no less famous for breeding Goats See IV Cantic 1. which delight to brouse on such Trees as Mount Gilead abounded withal See Bochartus in his Hierozoicon P. I. Lib. II. cap. 51. Verse 2 Ver. 2. And the Children of Gad and the Children of Reuben Neither here nor in the foregoing verse is there any mention of the Children of Manasseh half of which had their Portion in this Country because they were neither the Contrivers nor Movers of this but it is most probable had a lot assigned them here because these Countries were too much for the other two Tribes alone and they of Manasseh had much Cattle also Came and spake unto Moses and Eleazar and the Princes of the Congregation Who were wont often to assemble to dispatch Publick Affairs XXVII 2. XXX 1. Ver. 3. Ataroth A place which was part of the Verse 3 Portion of Gad as appears by v. 34. And Dibon This is mentioned as a place in the Kingdom of Sihon XXI 30. and was given to Gad also as we read v. 34. And Jazer See v. 1. and 35. where we find this also belonged unto Gad. And Nimrah Called Beth-Nimrah v. 36. and given to the same Tribe It is usual I observed before for the Hebrews to cut off the first part of the Names of places for brevity sake XXV 1. but this place is elsewhere called at length Beth-Nimrah XIII Josh 27. where it is mentioned as a part of Sihon's Kingdom and signifies as much as Domus Pardorum an Habitation of Leopards So Bochartus who observes that when both Isaiah XV. 6. and Jeremiah XLVIII 34. speak of the Waters of Nimrim they mean this very place Which was given to Gad but in the days of those Prophets mentioned as in the Country of the Moabites who had usurped upon their Neighbours the Gadites and taken this Place from them as they had done Jazer also as appears from the places above-mentioned XVI Isa 8 9. XLVIII Jerem. 34. And Heshbon The principal City of Sihon King of the Amorites XXI 26 27 28. and was given to the Reubenites v. 37. And Elealah This is frequently mentioned with Heshbon as a Place adjoyning to it v. 37. XVI Isa 9. And Sheban Called also Shibmah v. 37. and Sibmah XVI Isa 8 9. XLVIII Jerem. 31. where it appears to have been a Place famous for Vines and in the days of that Prophet was faln into the Hands of the
Moabites as were Heshbon and Elealah also And Nebo Which was given to the Reubenites v. 38. And Beon There is no mention of this place any where else but it is probable was part of the Reubenites Portion being mentioned together with other Places that were given unto them and possibly may be the Place called Baal-Meon v. 38. which they changed into Beon because of the name of Baal but the Moabites when it fell into their hands restored part of its old name calling it Beth-meon XLVIII Jerem. 23. Verse 4 Ver. 4. Even the Country which the LORD smote before the Congregation of Israel And gave it to them for a Possession as he intended to do the Land of Canaan See XXI 24 25. Is a Land for Cattle and thy Servants have Cattle Is very fit for us v. 2. Verse 5 Ver. 5. Wherefore said they if we have found grace in thy sight A Phrase often used by humble Petitioners even by Moses himself when he speaks to God XI 15. Let this Land be given unto thy Servants for a Possession The Israelites in common possessed it hitherto as belonging to them all XXI ult But they desire to have it assigned to them as their particular Portion And bring us not over Jordan We desire nothing in the Land of Canaan Ver. 6. And Moses said unto the Children of Gad and the Children of Reuben shall your Brethren go to War Can you think it reasonable that the rest of the Tribes should fight still for what they are to possess Verse 6 And shall ye sit here And you take up your rest here and settle in their Conquests which they have already made Ver. 7. And wherefore discourage ye the hearts of the Verse 7 Children of Israel from going over into the Land which the LORD hath given them He seems to have suspected that mere cowardise and a vile love of ease made them desire to stay where they were and go no further Which ill Example might dishearten all the rest of their Brethren and make them have the same Inclination to settle in the Land they had conquered and not engage in a War with the Canaanites Ver. 8. Thus did your Fathers i. e. They disheartned Verse 8 all their Brethren When I sent them from Kadesh Barnea to see the Land XIII 3 26. Ver. 9. For when they went up unto the Valley of Eschol Verse 9 Men do not go up into a Valley therefore the meaning is they went up to search the Country as it is said they did XIII 21 22. and went on in their search till they came to the Valley or Brook of Eschol XIII 23. where they cut down a Branch with a Cluster of Grapes to show what Fruit the Country afforded And saw the Land Had taken a full view of the Country They discouraged the hearts of the Children of Israel Represented the People and the Cities to be so strong that they should not be able to deal with them XIII 28 29. That they should not go into the Land which the LORD had given them And therefore perswaded them not to attempt to possess themselves of it For they said expresly we are not able to go against the People for they are stronger than we XIII 31. Verse 10 Ver. 10. And the LORD's anger was kindled at the same time and he sware saying XIV 21 28. Verse 11 Ver. 11. Surely none of the Men that were come out of Egypt from twenty years old and upward XIV 22 29 35. Shall see the Land which I sware unto Abraham Isaac and Jacob. XIV 23. Because they have not wholly followed me See there v. 22. Verse 12 Ver. 12. Save Caleb the Son of Jephunneh XIV 24. The Kenezite A great deal hath been said by many to prove that Caleb is called a Kenezite because his Father's Name was Kenaz And this they prove because Othniel's Father was Kenaz and he was Caleb's Brother XV Josh 17. his younger Brother I Judg. 13. III. 9. So that their Father must have two Names Kenaz and Jephunneh But it is very strange if this be true that Caleb is no where called the Son of Kenaz but constantly the Son of Jephunneh even there where Othniel is just before called the Son of Kenaz 1 Chron. 4.13 15. nor is Othniel any where called the Son of Jephunneh but always of Kenaz And indeed there is a demonstration against this Opinion for Othniel married Caleb's Daughter which by the Law of Moses was utterly unlawful whatsoever the practice might have been before the Law was given Therefore others think it more probable that Othniel was one of his Brother 's younger Sons for Uncles and Nephews are often called Brethren as Abraham and Lot were and that from this Brother whose Name was Kenaz Caleb is also called a Kenezite But this is very absurd for the Name of Kenezzi in the Hebrew denotes the Descendants from one who gave this denomination to the Family which one Brother could not do to another It is most probable therefore that Kenaz was some common Ancestor both of Othniel and Caleb from whom Othniel's Father took also his Name Accordingly we find Jephunneh called a Kenezite in XIV Josh 14. where it is said that Hebron became the Inheritance of Caleb the Son of Jephunneh the Kenezite And Joshua the Son of Nun for they have followed the LORD Fully XIV 24 30 38. Ver. 13. And the LORD's anger was kindled against Verse 13 Israel He had said this before v. 10. but repeats it again to make them the more sensible of a thing that was done Thirty eight years ago and to deter them from giving him the like provocation And he made them wander in the Wilderness forty years till all that had done evil in the sight of the LORD were consumed XIV 31 32 33. XXVI 64 65. Ver. 14. And behold Mark what I say Verse 14 You are risen up in your Fathers stead an increase of sinful Men to augment yet the fierce anger of the LORD towards Israel Are multiplyed to as great a number as your Fathers only to succeed them in their sins and thereby bring down still more heavy Punishments upon the Nation Ver. 15. For if ye turn away from after him As your Fathers did who refused to go and possess the good Land which he had bestowed upon them Verse 15 He will yet again leave them in the Wilderness Lead them back again into the Desert where your Fathers perished and there forsake you And ye shall destroy all this People Who following your example will refuse to go over Jordan v. 5. to take possession of the Land of Canaan Verse 16 Ver. 16. And they drew near unto him As Petitioners are wont to do when they are assured of their Integrity and hope to obtain their request XLIV Gen. 19. And said we will build Sheepfolds here for our Cattle There are five words in the Hebrew Language for Folds for Sheep and Cattle all signifying a place
fenced in that they might lye safely and be defended from Wild-beasts And so this word gedera plainly imports See Bochartus in his Hierozoic P. I. Lib. I. cap. 45. And Cities for our little ones Which stood in need only of repairing and fortifying v. 17. for they already dwelt in those Cities of the Amorites XXI 25. Verse 17 Ver. 17. But we our selves will go ready armed before the Children of Israel until we have brought them unto their place That is a considerable number of them as many as should be thought necessary III Deut. 18. in all Forty thousand IV Josh 12. And our little ones shall dwell in the fenced Cities Where it was necessary to leave some Men to guard them from their bad Neighbours and to take care of their Cattle Because of the People of the Land That is the Moabites who were the ancient Owners of this Country XXI 26. and the Edomites who had showed no good will to the Israelites as they passed through the Wilderness Ver. 18. We will not return unto our Houses until Verse 18 the Children of Israel have inherited every Man his Inheritance Be settled in the possession of the Land of Canaan as we desire to be in this Country Ver. 19. For we will not inherit with them on yonder Verse 19 side Jordan or forward We will not desire any share in the Country beyond Jordan though it lye near to us nor in that Country which lyes still further Westward Because our Inheritance is faln on this side Jordan eastward We look upon this as our Inheritance with which we shall be fully satisfied here in the Land of Gilead Which lay Eastward of Jordan and of the Land of Canaan Ver. 20. And Moses said unto them if ye will do Verse 20 this thing Be as good as your word If ye will go armed before the LORD to war To go before the LORD was to go before the Ark which was the Symbol of God's Presence over which his Glory resided And it is to be observed that these two Tribes Reuben and Gad together with Simeon alway lay encamped before the Sanctuary as appears from the second Chapter of this Book v. 10 14 15 16 17. And accordingly when the Camp removed they marched immediately before it as is particularly noted X. 18 19 20 21. So that here he requires them only to hold their usual place when they went to the War against the Canaanites And accordingly it is expresly said they did together with half the Tribe of Manasseh who were joyned with them pass over before the LORD unto battle IV Josh 12 13. Verse 21 Ver. 21. And will go all of you As many as shall be required and can be spared v. 17. Armed over Jordan before the LORD until he hath driven out his Enemies from before him Not only bring us into Canaan but continue with us till we have expelled the Inhabitants of that Country Which he incourages them to undertake by representing the Canaanites as the Enemies of the LORD who would therefore fight for them Verse 22 Ver. 22. And the Land be subdued before the LORD By this Expression and that in the foregoing words it appears that the Ark was carried along with them to the War every where till it was ended as it was when it begun at the taking of Jericho VI Josh 6 7 c. Then afterward ye shall return and be guiltless before the LORD and before Israel and this Land shall be your possession Not only be free from all blame in this desire but have what you desire Before the LORD By his order and appointment Verse 23 Ver. 23. But if you will not do so If this be not your intention or if you go back from your word Behold Observe what I say Ye have sinned against the LORD and be sure your sin will find you out Your Guilt is exceeding great and shall be most certainly punished as it deserves Verse 24 Ver. 24. Build ye Cities for your little ones and Folds for your Sheep c. As for the rest of their Proposals about their Children and Cattle he consented to them without any Exception Ver. 25. And the Children of Gad and the Children of Reuben spake unto Moses saying The word for Verse 25 spake in the Hebrew being jomer in the Singular Number instead of jomru in the Plural their Doctors take it for an Indication that some one principal Person spake in the name of all the rest But there is no need of this for the Singular Number in this Language is often used for the Plural and they never spake all of them together but some one in the name of their Brethren And it had been better if they had observed that this signifies one and all as we now speak were of the same mind Thy Servants will do as my LORD commandeth And as they themselves had proposed v. 17. Ver. 26. Our little Ones our Wives our Flocks and Verse 26 all our Cattle shall be there in the Cities of Gilead Here they promise to leave all that was dear to them in this Country and go to serve their Brethren Ver. 27. But thy servants will pass over every man Verse 27 armed for war c. We our selves will go and fight for our Brethren It hath been often said v. 17 21. that this doth not signifie all the Men of War among them should go but as many as could be spared and as were thought sufficient For it is manifest the far greater half of them were left in this Country to defend their Wives and Children and look after their Flocks and Herds as will appear by computing all the Men of War that were found in the Tribes of Gad and of Reuben which were above Fourscore and four thousand XXVI 7 18. to which if we add half of the Tribe of Manasseth who were in all above Fifty two thousand there were much above an Hundred thousand Men able to bear Arms and not above Forty thousand of them marched into Canaan as was before observed Verse 28 Ver. 28. So concerning them Moses commanded Eleazar the Priest and Joshua the Son of Nun and the chief Fathers of the Tribes of Israel He left this in charge with the principal Persons who had the government of Affairs under him particularly with Joshua who was not unmindful of it but remembred these Tribes what Moses had said when he was about to attempt the Conquest of Canaan I Josh 13 14 c. Verse 29 Ver. 29. And Moses said unto them if the Children of Gad and the Children of Reuben will pass with you over Jordan c. He repeats to these great Men who were to see it executed what he had said to the Gadites and Reubenites themselves v. 21 22. Then ye shall give them the Land of Gilead for a possession They had not a right to it till they had performed the Condition upon which it was granted viz. till their Brethren were in possession of
that care was not taken for places to lay them in Verse 5 Ver. 5. And ye shall measure from without the City It is not said as in the foregoing verse from the wall of the City therefore I take it to signifie from the outside of the Suburbs before mentioned On the East side two thousand Cubits and on the South side two thousand Cubits c. So there was in the whole three thousand Cubits round about the City a thousand for the Suburbs properly so called and two thousand more for their Pasture called properly the Fields of the Suburbs XXV Lev. 34. This is the most natural and easie Explication of this place And the City shall be in the midst So that there was exactly every way such a Circuit of Ground about it This shall be the Suburbs of the Cities Here the word Suburbs comprehends the Fields also And Maimonides saith that by the Constitution of the Elders they set forth also a Burying place for every City beyond these Limits For they might not bury their Dead within the Suburbs or Fields which they ground upon the foregoing verse which appoints them for other uses Schemita ve jobel cap. 13. Ver. 6. And among the Cities which ye shall give unto Verse 6 the Levites there shall be six Cities for Refuge Three in the Land of Canaan and three on the other side Jordan v. 14. The names of which are set down XX Josh 7 8. And those on the other side Jordan were set apart by Moses himself before he died IV Deut. 43. The reason of their being called Cities of Refuge is given in the next words Which ye shall appoint for the Man-slayer Such a Man-slayer as is afterward described who killed another against his will That he may flee thither And there be preserved and kept in safety if he was not found guilty of wilful Murder The Cities of the Levites were appointed for this purpose rather than any other because they were a kind of Sacred Places inhabited by Sacred Persons And here Men might spend their time better than in other Cities being among God's Ministers who might make them sensible of the negligence which Men were commonly guilty of in such Cases and of such Sins as they might have otherwise committed And to them ye shall add forty two Cities Which had all the same Priviledge if we may believe the Hebrew Doctors but not equally with the six For in the six a Man-slayer was to have an House to dwell in for nothing but in the other forty two he was to pay for it And the Levites could not refuse him entrance into the six but as for the rest it was in their choice whether they would receive him or no. Thus Maimonides out of their ancient Authors See Selden Lib. IV. de Jure Nat. Gent. juxta Discipl Hebr. cap. 2. where he observes that the Altar also was a place of Refuge according to XXI Exod. 14. but with many Exceptions both with relation to the parts of the Altar and to the Persons who fled thither and to the quality of the offence and their stay there which very much lessened the Priviledge of this Refuge Verse 7 Ver. 7. So all the Cities which ye shall give to the Levites shall be forty eight Cities c. Accordingly we read Joshua gave them so many XXI Josh 41. Thirteen of which the Priests had and the rest the Levites And in the days of the Messiah whom they vainly still expect other Cities shall be added to them saith Maimonides which shall belong to the Levites Verse 8 Ver. 8. And the Cities which ye shall give them shall be of the possession of the Children of Israel And so it is said XXI Josh 3. that the Children of Israel gave unto the Levites out of their Inheritance these Cities and their Suburbs Where we read also they were given them by Lot as the Children of Israel had their Inheritance given them From them which have many ye shall give many and from them that have few ye shall give few According to the Rule in distributing their Inheritances to the Israelites XXXIII 54. Every one shall give of his Cities unto the Levites according to the Inheritance which he shall inherit Thus they gave Nine Cities out of the two Tribes of Judah and Simeon XXI Josh 16. and but Four out of Benjamin which was a small Tribe v. 18. out of the Tribes of Issachar and Asher Four apiece v. 28 31. and out of Naphtali no more than three vers 32. Ver. 9. And the LORD spake unto Moses saying This being a matter of great importance that guiltless Men should not suffer nor the guilty escape Punishment Verse 9 the LORD gives Moses further direction about it as he promised he would in XXI Exod. 13. Ver. 10. Speak unto the Children of Israel and say Verse 10 unto them Repeat this Command to them which God himself repeated to Joshua XX. 1 2. When ye be come over Jordan into the Land of Canaan When they had possession of it and divided it and were settled in it So it is explained XIX Deut. 1 2. Ver. 11. Then shall ye appoint you Cities to be Cities Verse 11 of Refuge for you This seems to signifie that all the Cities of the Levites were in some sort a protection to the Man-slayer as I said upon v. 6. Such places the Temples were among the Athenians as Sam. Petitus observes in Leges Atticas p. 12 13. yet not all of them for he can find only six that of Mercy and that of the Eumenides and Minerva and those dedicated to Theseus one of them within the City the other without the Walls and that in Munychia That the Man-slayer may flee thither which killeth any person at unawares Or as it is XX Josh 3. unwittingly XIX Deut. 4. ignorantly that is besides his intention having no such design nor hatred to him as is there expresly said and here below v. 22. This is repeated v. 15. And the Instances of it are such as these mentioned by Georg. Ritterhusius de Jure Asylorum cap. 4. If a Man cutting Wood the Hatchet flying from the Helve should hit a Man and kill him or a Huntsman shooting at a Deer in a Thicket should kill a Man whom he did not see lying there An Example of which we have in Adrastus mentioned by Herodotus Lib. I. Ver. 12. And they shall be unto you Cities for Refuge Verse 12 from the Avenger From him who had a right to call a Murderer to account for the Blood he had shed and is therefore called the Avenger of Blood v. 19. who being stimulated with Anger and Grief for the Death of a near Relation might in a heat of Rage hastily kill him who was not guilty of Murder And therefore this provision is made for the preservation of an innocent Person against the violent Prosecution of the Avenger In the Hebrew the word for Avenger is Goel which signifying a Redeemer
two preceding verses I shall not here examine It is sufficient to note that Onkelos hath expressed the Hebrew Text word for word and the LXX do not depart from the sence of it Verse 10 Ver. 10. Even as the LORD commanded Moses so did the Daughters of Zelophehad Accordingly they followed this direction when they came into the Land of Canaan and had received their Portion there Now there being no such words added here as there are in other Cases this shall be unto the Children of Israel a Statute of Judgment XXVII 11. much less a Statute of Judgment throughout your Generations XXXV 29. it led I conjecture the Talmudick Doctors into the fore-mentioned Opinion that this Law concerned only the present Generation Ver. 11. For Mahlah Tizzah and Hoglah and Verse 11 Milkah and Noah the Daughters of Zelophehad Thus they are called both in XXVI 33. XXVII 1. though they are not there mentioned in the same order for Tirzah is there named last who here is named in the second place Perhaps they are set down here in the order wherein they were disposed in Marriage and Tirzah who was the younger was married in the second place Were married unto their Fathers Brothers Sons For Hepher no doubt had other Sons besides Zelophehad who had Issue-male though Zelophehad had not What their Names were or how many of them we do not know but some suppose them to have been six one of which died in the Wilderness without Issue See Selden de Successionibus cap. 23. where he discourses at large of the Portion which fell to them in the Land of Canaan Ver. 12. And they were married into the Families Verse 12 c. In the Margin more exactly out of the Hebrew to some that were of the Families i. e. to one of the Families of Manasseh from whom several Families descended XXVI 29 c. And their Inheritance remained in the Tribe of the Family of their Father The word for Tribe signifies sometimes merely a Family in a Tribe And so the LXX as Grotius observes in the place before-named in this very business uses sometimes the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and sometimes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the former of which signifies a part of a whole Tribe And thus Josephus also uses the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to signifie a Family Mr. Selden hath the same Observation in his Book de Successionibus cap. 18. that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is sometimes translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and then it signifies not a Tribe but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 familiam cognationem seu genus sanguine proximum a Family a Kindred or those that are next in Blood But there is no need of these Observations if the words be translated as they may rightly and their Inheritance remained in the Tribe and the Family of their Father See v. 6. Verse 13 Ver. 13. These are the Commandments and the Judgments which the LORD commanded by the hand of Moses to the Children of Israel in the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho He began to deliver the Precepts here intended at the XXVIth Chapter See v. 3. and continues them to this place By Commandments seem to be meant the Precepts about the Worship of God Chapt. XXVIII XXIX XXX and by Judgments the Civil Laws about dividing their Inheritances and regulating their Descent to their Posterity and establishing Cities of Refuge for Man-slayers which are expresly called a Statute of Judgment XXVII 11. XXXV 29. Some other things are interspersed as God's Commandment to number the People which was in order to the assigning them their Inheritances proportionable to their Families to execute Judgment on the Midianites and to set down in Writing their Travels in the Wilderness of which I have given an account in their proper places FINIS By reason of the Distance of the Author these ERRATA have hapned which the Reader is desired to Correct Page 5. Line 7. read are reckoned Page 73. Line 29. r. See Levit. II. 15. Page 74. Line 22. r. were signs Page 82. Line 12. r. Rabboth Page 96. Line 4. r. aquatiles Line ult r. so that they might not Page 107. Line 13. r. other shoulder Page 110. Line 2. r. Chaskuni Page 123. Line 31. r. XL. Exod. Page 140. Line 30. r. may teach Page 152. Line 5. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Page 158. Line 31. r. Acropolis Page 163. Line 10. r. Choten Page 166. Line 31. r. the following story Page 167. Line 3. r. Rise up Page 171. Line 22. r. it is likely Page 190. Line 12. r. Setting forth the Praises Line 20. r. such credit Page 191. Line penult r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Page 195. Line 21. r. whose Presence Page 198. Line 1. r. kadim Page 201. Line 11. r. but besides that there is Line 12. r. and it is Page 210. Line 28. r. as were never bred Page 216. Line 18. r. not deigning to stay Page 221. Line 21. after July begin a new line Page 227. Line 2. r. Torquatus Page 228. Line 3 4. r. a stony place Page 241. Line 1. dele and that Page 251. Line 7. r. Bitter Line 31. r. Spirit with him Page 282. Line 1. r. The Man shall be Page 284. Line 31. r. And the Garment the Jews say in the Selvedge c. Page 284. Line 33. r. Talith Page 316. Line 19. r. it being broke out Page 332. Line 3. r. where as Page 333. Line 21. r. within the veil Page 335. Line 11. r. Zeback Page 358. Line 7. r. more fit to treat Page 367. Line 7. r. as we may call it Page 387. Line 26. r. Successors of Esau Page 402. Line 19. r. by way of apposition Page 404. Line 24. r. the words are Page 406. Line 30. r. Bootius Page 420. Line 6. r. from Arnon Page 426. Line 1. r. whence Hesychius Line 22. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Page 433. Line 18. r. Kosem Page 446. Line 9. r. proffer'd him Page 468. Line 9. r. per juga Page 469. Line 7. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Page 470. Line 15. r. Sepher Cosri Page 482. Line 2. r. Dei nutu Page 501. Line 4. r. Baal-Peor Line 26. r. were called Baalim Page 519. Line 30. r. are reckoned Page 523. Line 14. r. Zelophehad Page 532. Line penult r. who was born Page 539. Line 21. r. being but reason Page 555. Line ult r. pouring out upon Page 556. Line 4. r. Heliogabalus Page 564. Line 18. r. and so doth Page 598. Line 19. r. and what I have Page 618. Line 22. r. Jogbehah Page 634. Line 22. r. to have been places Page 635. Line 9. r. anciently called Abel-shittim Page 673. Line 14. r. XXXI XXXII 2. Books written by Symon Patrick D. D. now Lord Bishop of Ely and Printed for Richard Chiswell THe Parable of the Pilgrim written to a Friend The Sixth Edit 4 to 1681. Mensa Mystica Or a Discourse concerning the Sacrament of the Lords Supper In which
the Ends of its Institution are so manifested our Addresses to it so directed our Behaviour there and afterward so composed that we may not lose the Profits which are to be received by it With Prayers and Thanksgivings inserted To which is annexed Aqua Genitalis A Discourse concerning Baptism In which is inserted a Discourse to perswade to a confirmation of the Baptismal Vow 8 vo Jewish Hypocrisie A Caveat to the present Generation Wherein is shewn both the false and the true way to a Nations or Persons compleat Happiness from the sickness and recovery of the Jewish State To which is added A Discourse upon Micah 6.8 belonging to the same matter 8 vo Divine Arithmetick A Sermon at the Funeral of Mr. Samuel Jacomb Minister of St. Mary-Woolnoth-Church in Lombard-street London With an Account of his Life 8 vo A Sermon preached at the Funeral of Mr. Tho. Grigg Rector of St. Andrew-Vndershaft London 4 to An Exposition of the Ten Commandments 8 vo Heart's Ease Or a Remedy against all Troubles With a Consolatory Discourse particularly directed to those who have lost their Friends and Relations To which is added Two Papers printed in the time of the late Plague The sixth Edition corrected 12 mo 1695. The Pillar and Ground of Truth A Treatise shewing that the Roman Church falsly claims to be That Church and the Pillar of That Truth mentioned by St. Paul in 1 Tim. 3.15 4 to An Examination of Bellarmin's Second Note of the Church viz. ANTIQVITY 4 to An Examination of the Texts which Papists cite out of the Bible to prove the Supremacy of St. Peter and of the Pope over the whole Church In Two Parts 4 to A private Prayer to be used in difficult Times A Thanksgiving for our late wonderful Deliverance A Prayer for Charity Peace and Unity chiefly to be used in Lent A Sermon preach'd upon St. Peter's Day printed with Enlargements 4 to A Sermon Preached in St. James's Chappel before the Prince of Orange Jan. 20. 1688. on Isaiah 11.6 A Second Part of the Sermon before the Prince of Orange on the same Text. Preached in Covent-Garden A Sermon Preached before the Queen in March 1688 9. on Colos 3.15 A Sermon against Murmuring Preached at Covent-Garden in Lent 1688 9. on 1 Cor. 10.10 A Sermon against Censuring Preached at Covent-Garden in Advent 1688. on 1 Cor. 4.10 A Fast-Sermon before the King and Queen April 16. 1690. on Prov. 14.34 A Thanksgiving-Sermon before the Lords Nov. 26. 1691. for reducing of Ireland and the King 's safe Return On Deut. 4.9 A Fast-Sermon before the Queen April 8. 1692. On Numb 10.9 Easter-Sermon before the Lord Mayor 1696. on 2 Tim. 2.8 A Sermon before the Lords Nov. 5. 1696. on Dan. 4.35 A Commentary on the First Book of Moses called Genesis 4 to 1695. A Commentary on the Second Book of Moses called Exodus 4 to 1697. A Commentary on the Third Book of Moses called Leviticus 4 to 1698. A Commentary on the Fourth Book of Moses called Numbers 4 to 1699. Memoirs of the most Reverend Father in God Thomas Cranmer sometime Lord Archbishop of Canterbury Wherein the History of the Church and the Reformation of it during the Primacy of the said Archbishop are greatly illustrated and many singular Matters relating thereunto now first published In Three Books Collected chiefly from Records Registers Authentick Letters and other Original Manuscripts By John Strype M. A. Fol. Origo Legum Or a Treatise of the Origine of Laws and their Obliging Power As also of their great Variety and why some Laws are immutable and some not but may suffer change or cease to be or be suspended or abrogated In seven Books By George Dawson Fol. The History of the Troubles and Trial of the most Reverend Father in God William Laud Lord Archbishop of Canterbury Wrote by himself during his Imprisonment in the Tower To which is prefixed the Diary of his own Life faithfully and entirely Published from the Original Copy and subjoined a Supplement to the preceding History The Archbishop's Last Will His large Answer to the Lord Say's Speech concerning Liturgies His Annual Accounts of his Province delivered to the King And some other things relating to the History Fol. Animadversions on Mr. Hill's Book Entituled A Vindication of the Primitive Fathers against the Imputations of Gilbert Lord Bishop of Sarum in a Letter to a Person of Quality 4 to Of Sincerity and Constancy in the Faith and Profession of the True Religion in several Sermons by the most Reverend Dr. John Tillotson Late Lord Archbishop of Canterbury Being the first Volume Published from the Originals by Ralph Barker D.D. Chaplain to his Grace The Second Edition 8 vo Sixteen Sermons preach'd on several Occasions By the most Reverend Dr. John Tillotson late Ld. Archbishop of Canterbury Being the second Volume Published by Ralph Barker D. D. Chaplain to his Grace 8 vo Sixteen Sermons preached on several Subjects being the Third Volume by the same Author Published by Dr. Barker 8 vo Several Discourses viz. Of the great Duties of Natural Religion Instituted Religion not intended to undermine Natural Christianity not Destructive but Perfective of the Law of Moses The Nature and Necessity of Regeneration The Danger of all known Sin Knowledge and Practice necessary in Religion The Sins of Men not chargeable on God Being the fourth Volume by the same Authour Published by Dr. Barker 8 vo Reflections upon a Pamphlet Entituled Some Discourses upon Dr. Burnet and Dr. Tillotson occasioned by the late Funeral Sermon of the former upon the latter By the Right Reverend Father in God Gilbert L. Bishop of Sarum 8 vo His Sermon preached before the King at Whitehal on Christmas-day 1696. 4 to Gal. 4.4 His Sermon preached before the King at Whitehal on the Third Sunday in Lent being the Seventh of March 1696. 1 Ephes 5.2 His Essay on the Memory of the late Queen The second Edition 8 vo Dr. Williams now Ld. Bishop of Chichester his 8 Sermons at Esquire Boyle's Lecture for the year 1695. 4 to Any of them may be had single to perfect sets His 1st 2d 3d 4th Sermons at the same Lecture for the year 1696. 4 to His Sermon preached at St. Lawrence Jewry before the Lord Mayor c. on Saturday the 28th of September 1695. at the Election of the Lord Mayor for the Year ensuing Joshua 22.31 4 to His Sermon preached before the honourable House of Commons on Wednesday Dec. 11. 1695. being a solemn day of Fasting and Humiliation appointed by his Majesty for imploring the Blessing of Almighty God upon the Consultations of this present Parliament 4 to 1 Sam. 11.30 His Sermon upon the Resurrection preached before Sir Edward Clark Lord Mayor c. on Easter-Monday April 5. 1697. on Acts 10.40 41 42. Reflections upon a Libel lately Printed Entituled The Charge of Socinianism against Dr. Tillotson Considered 4 to The Church History of Ethiopia wherein among other things the two great splendid Roman Missions into that Empire are placed in their true Light to which are added an Epitome of the Dominican History of that Church And an Account of the Practices and Conviction of Maria of the Annunciation the famous Nun of Lisbon Composed by Michael Geddes D.D. Chancellor of the Cathedral Church of Sarum 8 vo Fourteen Sermons preached in Lambeth Chappel before the most Reverend Dr. William Sancroft late Lord Archbishop of Canterbury In the Years 1688 and 1689 by the Learned Henry Wharton M. A. Chaplain to his Grace with an Account of the Author's Life 8 vo Dr. William Owtram's 20 Sermons On several Occasions The 2d Edition 8 vo Sermons preached on several Occasions By John Conant D.D. The first and second Volumes Published by Dr. Williams now Ld. Bishop of Chichester 8 vo The Fathers vindicated Or Animadversions on a late Socinian Book Entituled The Judgment of the Fathers touching the Trinity against Dr. Bull 's Defence of the Nicene Faith By a Presbyter of the Church of England 8 vo A Fifth Volume of Archbishop Tillotson's Discourses published by his Chaplain Dr. Barker on these following Subjects viz. Proving Jesus to be the Messias The Prejudices against Jesus and his Religion consider'd Jesus the Son of God proved by his Resurrection The Danger of Apostacy from Christianity Christ the Author and Obedience the Condition of Salvation The Possibility and Necessity of Gospel-Obedience and its consistence with Free Grace The Authority of Jesus Christ with the Commission and Promise which he gave to his Apostles The Difficulties of a Christian Life consider'd The Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus Children of this World wiser than the Children of Light 8 vo 1698. A second Volume of Sermons preached in Lambeth Chappel before Archb. Sancroft 1690. By the Learned Mr. Henry Wharton his Graces Chaplain Which with the first Volume lately published are all that he preached A New Account of India and Persia being Nine Years Travel began 1672. and finished 1681. Containing Observations made of those Countries namely Of their Government Religion Laws Customs Of their Soil Climates Seasons Health Diseases Of their Animals Vegetables Minerals Jewels Of their Housing Cloathing Manufactures Trades Commodities And of the Coins Weights and Measures used in the principal Places of Trade in those Parts By John Fryer M. D. Cantabrig and Fellow of the Royal Society Fol. 1698. SCRIPTORUM ECCLESIASTICORUM Historia Literaria facili perspicua methodo digesta Pars Altera Qua plusquam DC Scriptores novi tam Editi quam Manuscripti recensentur Prioribus plurima adduntur breviter aut obscure dicta illustrantur recte asserta vindicantur Accedit ad finem cujusvis Soeculi CONCILIORUM omnium tum Generalium tum Particularium Historica Notitia Ad Calcem vero Operis Dissertationes tres 1 De Scriptoribus Ecclesiasticis incertae aetatis 2 De Libris Officiis Ecclesiasticis Graecorum 3 De Eusebii Caesariensis Arianismo adversus Joannem Clericum Adjecti sunt Indices utilissimi Scriptorum Conciliorum Alphabetico-Chronologici Studio labore Gulielmi Cave S.T.P. Canon Windesoriensis Fol. Dr. Cave's Primitive Christianity The Fifth Edition 1698. Bp Wilkins of the Principles Duties of Natural Religion The 3d Edition A Sixth Volume of Archbishop Tillotson's Discourses Published by Dr. Barker Being upon the Divine Attributes and Perfections 1699.
the most convenient Quarters for their Army See I Deut. 33. Verse 34 Ver. 34. And the Cloud of the LORD was upon them by day when they went out of the Camp It seems this Removal of their Camp from Sinai was in the day time as some times they removed in the night IX 21. and the Cloud being taken up from off the Tabernacle so moved over the Ark as to overspread them all by day As the Pillar of Fire was over them by night to give them assurance of the Divine Protection See Note upon XIII Exod. 21. and CV Psal 39. Verse 35 Ver. 35. And when the Ark set forward There being the letter Nun turned the wrong way in the Hebrew word for set forward as there is in the word for complained in the first verse of the next Chapter the Jewish Doctors fancy it denotes here God's gracious converting his Face towards them at the Prayer of Moses and in this following Story the Peoples aversion to God and ungrateful turning away their hearts from him Moses said It was his Custom to pray in this manner upon such occasions as R. Levi ben Gersom expounds it Rose up This is an expression saith Abarbinel like that in XXXIII Isa 10. Now will I rise saith the LORD and will be exalted c. Where his taking vengeance upon his Enemies is called his rising According to XXXI Job 14. What shall I do when God riseth up c. The next words Let thy Enemies be scattered c. justifie this sense LORD It seems very strange to me that any should alledge this place as a proof that the Ark is called JEHOVAH when the Prayer of Moses is so plainly directed to the LORD himself who was there in a glorious Symbol of his Presence and not to the Ark. Considering also that in other places where this very form of Speech is used the LORD and the Ark are most manifestly distinguished the one from the other See 2 Chron. VI. 41. and CXXXII Psal 8. And yet an Anonymus Anti-Trinitarian Writer confuted by Joseph de Voisin fifty Years ago observing that the Chaldee here instead of the LORD hath the WORD of the LORD is so absurd as to say that the Ark is called the WORD Because God saith he p. 234. ante illam responsa vel oracula sua dabat c. before the Ark gave his Answers or Oracles when the Priest in dubious Matters consulted the Mouth of the LORD Which Exposition carries its own Confutation in it for if the High-Priest consulted the Mouth of the LORD as he speaks then by the WORD which gave the Answer must be meant the LORD himself To whom Moses here directs his Prayer as the Hierusalem Targum excellently Paraphrases this verse And it came to pass when the Ark was taken up that Moses lifted up his hands in prayer and said Rise now O WORD of the LORD in the strength of thy Power and scatter the Enemies of thy People c. And let thine Enemies be scattered This is a Prayer that God would put all those to flight as he had done the Amalekites Exod. XVII who opposed their passage to the promised Land As after they came thither they used this Prayer LXVIII Psal 1. for his Aid against all those who sought to disposess them of it And let them that hate thee flee before thee This is a Repetition of the same Prayer as is usual For thy Enemies and those that hate thee signifie the very same XXI Psal 8. IV Daniel 19. I Luke 71. Verse 36 Ver. 36. And when it rested As it did wheresoever the Cloud staid and moved no further He said He prayed again So the Hierusalem Targum understands both this and the former verse Moses lifted up his hand in Prayer and said c. and Jonathan Vzielides Moses stood in Prayer and begged Mercy of God saying c. Return O LORD unto the many Thousands of Israel Which Onkelos thus Paraphrases Come again and dwell with thy Glory in the midst of us And so he did the Cloud wherein the Divine Majesty resided setling upon the Tabernacle over the Ark of the Testimony as soon as it was again pitched Others translate it Give rest O LORD which the Hebrew words will bear secure us that is in Peace against the Incursions of our Enemies and all other Dangers R. Levi ben Gersom expounds it bring back the Israelites into the Land of Promise where their Forefathers dwelt when they were few in number whose Posterity was now increased to ten thousand thousands as the last words are in the Hebrew And there are those who will have this to be a Prayer for their Increase and Multiplication into many more Thousands than they were already And thus the Hierusalem Targum who still by the LORD understands his WORD Return now O WORD of the LORD from the vehemence of thy Anger and come back to us in thy merciful Goodness bless the Myriads and multiply the Thousands of Israelites CHAP. XI Chapter XI Ver. 1. AND when the People complained Or as Verse 1 it is translated in the Margin were as it were Complainers or Mutterers Which words D. Kimchi in his Michol brings as an Instance to prove that the Particle Caph which we translate as doth sometimes serve only to signifie the truth of a thing and to confirm it and imports nothing of likeness For the Discontent of the People did not rest in their Minds but broke out into open Murmurings and undutiful Complaints The like he observes XXV Gen. 31 33. and V Hosea 10. The Princes of Judah were like them that remove the bound Where we make it to signifie a Similitude but should only have taken it as a strong Affirmation of the truth of the thing See Theod. Hackspan Disput IV. de Locutionibus Sacris n. 4. Complained Of their long March for three Days together with their little Children Cattel and all their Baggage So it is commonly thought but I can see no good ground for it For no doubt the Cloud stood still though it did not come down and settle as I said X. 33. that they might make some convenient Rests in their Journey else how should they gather the Manna that fell every Night about their Tents and would keep but one Day as we read XVI Exod. I conclude therefore that this Muttering was the beginning of those loud Complaints which were made a little after v. 4 5 c. because they were not brought by this Removal to a place where they might have had other Food than Manna of which they now grew weary having lived upon it near a whole Year It displeased the LORD In the Hebrew It was Evil in the Ears of the LORD That is though it was only a Muttering which did not come to the Ears of Moses as this Complaint shortly after did yet the LORD took notice of it and was much offended at it as it here follows And the LORD heard it and his Anger
common Food of the Egyptians Who were noted anciently for the Meanness of their Diet as Casaubon observes in Lib. IX Athenaei Deipnos Cap. XI p. 674. Some fancy these things were the cheaper there because the Egyptians durst not eat either Fish or Leeks or Onions as is said by Juvenal Sat. XV. Pliny Lib. XIX Cap. 6. and Herodotus Lib. II. C. 37. where he saith it was not lawful for the Egyptians to taste of Fish But in my opinion these words of the People demonstrate rather that they were not so superstitious in the days of Moses for they were not the words merely of the Israelites but of the mixt multitude who were the Beginners of this Mutiny and of this sort of undutiful Language Which one would think they put into the Mouths of the Israelites who could not otherwise have had the Impudence to magnifie their Condition in Egypt where they groaned under the sorest Slavery It is a strange fancy of one of the Doctors in the Tulmud in the Title Jona who by Fishes understands Harlots whom these Crew of mixed People lusted after The Onions The Hebrew word Chatzir properly signifies Grass Which being no part of Humane Food the LXX here render the word Onions as agreeable to the other words that accompany it But the learned Ludolphus thinks they had no other reason for it and therefore out of the Arabian Language rather interprets it Lettice or Sellets in general which were most excellent in Egypt Dissert de Locustis P. II. Cap. 14. Ver. 6. But now our Soul is dried away They speak Verse 6 as if they were starved and as we speak had neither Life nor Soul left in them Such is the vile Nature of discontented Ingratitude which makes Men that are advanced from a poor to a plentiful Condition contemn their present Enjoyments and praise their former wretched state There is nothing at all besides this Manna before our Eyes They were angry that they were come to a place where they found nothing but that of which they were now grown weary and therefore speak of it with disdain Verse 7 Ver. 7. And the Manna Upon this occasion he describes more fully what kind of thing it was which they despised That it might appear how justly God was displeased with them for their Ingratitude Was as Coriander-seed Not in Colour for that was like Bdellium as it here follows but in its Shape and Form being round XVI Exod. 14. And the Colour of it as the Colour of Bdellium Of a pure White Colour and bright like Pearl So that it was very grateful to the Eye as well as pleasant to the Taste See XVI Exod. 31. Verse 8 Ver. 8. And the People went about Round their Camp XVI Exod. 13. And gathered it Fresh every Morning which made it still more acceptable XVI Exod. 18 19. And ground it in Mills Into Flour with an Hand-mill Or beat it in a Mortar Bruised it with a Pestle in a wooden or stone Mortar And baked it in Pans Or else boiled it as R. Bechai expounds it in a Pot. And made Cakes of it Or made Cakes of it in an Oven or in a Pan. That is saith the same R. Bechai it was of such an excellent Composition that it might be dressed divers ways or eaten as it fell For if they would they might use it saith he for Food immediately as they gathered it or they might grind it or bruise it and then either boil it or bake it and it was agreeable in what way soever it was prepared Which Moses mentions to show how ungrateful they were to God who by one thing entertained them with great variety And the taste of it was as the taste of fresh Oil. When it was newly faln it tasted like Honey but when it was prepared by Boiling or Baking it tasted like fresh Oil See XVI Exod. 31. Or to some it had the taste of Honey to others of fresh Oil. The Jews indeed say it had all sorts of Tastes according to every Man's desire So the Author of the Book of Wisdom speaks XVI 20 21. from the ancient Tradition of the Hebrews Whereby I suppose they meant no more but that it pleased every Man's Palate and had in it all that could be desired in any Meat being grateful to the taste of young and old and refreshed the Spirits and kept up the Flesh of their Bodies in good plight For it is not unreasonably observed by the aforesaid R. Bechai that it is compared by Moses to fresh Oil which is fat as well as sweet to show how unjust their Complaint was that they had no Moisture left in them but were dried away v. 6. Ver. 9. And when the dew fell upon the Camp in the Verse 9 Night There was a great Providence of God in this saith the same Bechai which sent it in the Night while they slept quietly in their Beds that when they rose in the Morning they might find their Food ready for them And thus saith he it was when they came to Canaan the Rains were wont to fall in the Night-season and not in the Day-time that they might not be hindred from their work in the Fields and in their Plantations The Manna fell upon it That is upon the Dew for it did not fall upon the Camp but round about it See XVI Exod. 14. This is a further Aggravation of their Ingratitude that they despised this rare Food which came not out of the Earth or the Waters but from above out of the Air And therefore was more pure and spiritous than Cucumbers and Leeks c. Which crude and gross sort of Food their depraved Minds preferred before this Celestial Nourishment Which by Falling on the Dew was kept clean and pure for their use Huetius observes that several Authors both ancient and modern mention Manna as a thing which sometimes falls in those Countries particularly in Arabia and upon Libanus which they call aerial Honey or dewy Honey and Syrian Dew which was fit for Food But it never fell in such quantity nor so constantly every day for the space of XL years and so delicious and hearty All this was miraculous as was also its melting when the Sun shone upon it and that it putrified before the next day except on the Sabbath and yet kept in an Urn many years See Alnetanae Quaest L. II. Cap. XII N. XVII Verse 10 Ver. 10. And Moses heard the People weep throughout their Families Or for their Families or about the State and Condition of their Families as some of the Jews understand it though to a foolish sense See Selden L. II. de Synedr Cap. IV. p. 203. who they pretended could not live any longer upon Manna Every Man in the door of his Tent. It may be understood of Moses his Tent about which the heads of the several Families were gathered as mutinous Souldiers are wont to be about the Door of their Chief Commander And the Anger of the LORD was