of Constantinople left his charge entred into a Monastrie and lamented that he had consented to the abolishing of Images Gregorius B of Neocesarea one of the chiefe disallowers of Images in the Councill holden at Constantinople gaue in his supplicant bill in the second Councill of Nice confessed his error and subscribed to the decreet of that vnhappie Councill by whose example the bishops of Nice Hierapolis of the Isles of Rhodes and Carpathus were mooued to doe the like Let this bee a warning to them who are in eminent places that they fall not from the trueth of GOD lest by their fall they procure a great ruining and desolation to the house of GOD. The LORD keepe vs from defection to whome bee praise and glory for euer AMEN A TREATISE Of Satisfaction and Indulgences SATISFACTION of olde was publicke repentance made for grieuous faultes such as murther adulterie apostasie And this publicke humiliation made in sight of the people with fasting teares basenesse of apparrell and such other tokens of an humbled minde with a sense of sorrow for by-past offences it was called satisfactio as Augustine writeth quia satisfiebat Ecclesiâ—… that is because the Church was satisfied yea and the slander was remooued This humiliation foresaide in the Greeke Church was called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or a punishment because it was inflicted as a punishment in Church discipline to terrifie others from committing the like offences Now seeing this Ecclesiasticall discipline was very rigorous and indured many yeeres as the Canons of Councils clearely declare It pleased the Church vpon weightie considerations to relent somewhat of the severitie of the first prescribed discipline yea and the people ofâ—… times intreated the Pastor by earnest requests that the time of publicke repentance might be shortned because they saw great tokeâ—…s of vnfained repentance in the offender This dispensation with the rigour of olde discipline was called indulgentia but in Poperie which was beginning in this Centurie to haue great vpper hand the abuse of these two words hath vtterly vndone the ancient puritie of religion and discipline The word satisfaction which of old was referred to the people now in Poperie is referred to God in this maner They teach the people that the sinnes committed before Baptisme are abolished in Baptisme but sinnes committed after Baptisme wee must obteine pardon for them by our own satisfactions namely by fasting praying almesdeedes pilgrimages and such other workes done by our selues And to maâ—…e this doctrine the more plausible vnto the people they bring in the similitude of a man sailing in a ship if he fall out of it into the sea the ship say they goeth away without recouerie and incace he find not another vessell to support his distressed estate and to bring him to land he must needes perish and drowne euen so say they if after baptisme we commit any transgression we must either be supported by our owne satisfactions els wee must perish in our sinnes No similitude can be more repugnant to Scripture than this For albeit there bee many vessels whereinto mens bodies may bee preserued from the danger of drowning yet is there not many vessels whereinto our soules can bee saued from damnation but â—…ee are saued onely by our spirituall Baptisme whereby the filth of our soules is washen away in the blood of Christ. And like as God commanded not NOE to make two arkes but one alanerly for the safetie of a fewe so hath GOD appointed only one way for safetie of our soales so that if wee sinne after Baptisme wee must haue refuge to the sweete promises of remissiion of sinnes made to vs in Baptisme In what sense indulgentia was taken of old I haue already declared In the Romane Church Indulgences and Pardones are a dispensation of the merites of Christ and his Saintes to the vtilitie of sinners This presupponeth that the merites of Christ and his Saintes are put in the custodie of the bishop of Rome and that his treasures can keepe them Concerning the merites of CHRIST they say that there was such precious vertue in his blood that one droppe of it was sufficient to redeâ—…me all the world now say they what shall become of all the rest of his blood which he shed in great abundance shall all this precious blood be lost and where can it be better kept than in the treasures of CHRISTS Vicar to be dispensated to the vtilitie of sinners when need requireth To this vaine assertion of Papistes I answere that the LORD neuer dealt sparingly neither with our bodies nor soules The LORD hath prouided greater abundance of aire for the refreshment of our bodies than all the breathing senses of men and beasts is able to draw in The LORD rained downe MANNA from heauen in greater plentie than might haue sufficed the people of the Iewes in the wildernesse euen so when the LORD is content to shed great abundance of his precious blood he hath done it to set foorth the great riches of his mercie toward our soules but not to make a mortall man a dispensator of one drop of his blessed blood Nothing is more repugnant to holy Scripture conteined in the old and new Testament than this that the dispensation and application of Christs blood should be committed vnto a mortall man In the old Testament the high Priest who entred once in the yeere into the moste holy place sprinckled the blood of the sacrifice with his own fingers vpon the Arke euen so the blood of the euerlasting Couenant which Christ caried vp to heauen is sprinckled on the Saints of God on the earth but by whom only by the fingers of our high Priest the Lord Iesus In the new Testament wee see that albeit many things were committed to the dispensation of the holy Apostles yet some things were reserued to the Lords owne dispensation allanerly Christ gaue power to his disciples to wish peace to euery house which receiued them but the dispensation and application of this peace Christ reserued vnto himselfe because hee alone and not his disciples knew who was the true Childe of peace In like manner power of preaching the Gospel was committed to the Apostles but the conferring of the gift of faith which is wrought by hearing belongeth onely to CHRISTS euen so the preaching of saluation by the merites of CHRISTES blood is committed to many but the application of that precious blood to the safetie of our soules is onely proper to Christ himselfe who shed that blessed blood for our saluation The merites of the Saintes also that is the workes of supererogation are thought to enter into the Popes treasurie and to be at his dispensation Of this we haue spoken somewhat alreadie But what presumption is this that they dare mixe together the blood of the Saints and Christs blood and the merits of Saintes with the merite of Christ and cast all in ore heape and treasure The verses of Praxilla
Romane Church supposeth that the wordes of Consecration are these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. that is Take eat this is my bodie And againe these wordes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Drinke all of this for this is my blood of the New Testament which is shedde for manie for remission of sinnes But the Graecian Church thought that the blessing or consecration was not only made by the words afore-saide but also by prayer as Iustinus Martyr calleth the elements 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is The foode blessed by the Worde of prayer Let no man separate the thinges that CHRIST hath conjoyned together to wit prayer and the wordes of the holie institution and wee shall easilie accorde about the consecration of the elementes The time in the which the elementes are thought to be consecrated is not the time in the which these wordes This is my bodie c. are begun to bee vttered but rather when they are ended So that the consecration is not an action fashioned by partes but wholly in one minute and at once perfected when the wordes are ended Albeit I agree to this opinion with full consent of my mind yet I could wish that the Romane Church who haue auouched the same would make no exception against their owne doctrine But when they speake of the intention of the consecrating Priest which is continually vnknowne to the people the people are left in a doubt whether they are partakers of Christes bodie or not And this is not the forme of the teaching of Christ to leaue the people in a suspence and doubting but to manifest clearely vnto them the mysterie whereof they doubt if so bee it bee necessarie to bee knowne as Christ manifested to his Disciples the parable of the sower and the seede and of the husbandrie and the tares c. The first word of Consecration is the principall word impugning Transsubstantiation for the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a demonstratiue pronowne and it pointeth out something and Scripture conferred with Scripture is the best Commentarie to declare what is pointed out by the worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Apostle Paule in his first Epistle to the Corinthians expoundeth the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is This bread and the seconde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hee expoundeth it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is This cuppe So we see that the substance of the elementes in the Sacrament of the Supper are neither changed nor euanished but remaining in their former substaÌ„ce they are honoured with a great honour to bee made Sacramentes of the Lordes blessed bodie and blood but their substance is not changed as saide is The next words of coÌ„secration are these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is is my body The bread is the Lordes body because it is the Sacrament of the Lords body like as the Sacrament of faith to wit Baptisme saith August after a maner is faith euen so the Sacrament of the Lordes body after a maner is the Lordes body the wordes secundum quendam modum and quodammodo that is to say after some maner of way so oft repeted by August is forget by papists insomuch that they remember when August saith ferebatur Christus in manibus suis quando commendans ipsum corpus suum ait hoc est corpus meum that is Christ was borne vp in his owne handes when as deliuering his owne bodie hee saieth This is my bodie but they forgette the expositorie wordes in the which Augustine manifesteth his owne meaning namelie these Accepit in manus suas quod norunt fideles ipse se portabat quodammodo cum diceret hoc est corpus meuâ—… that is Hee tooke into his handes as is knowne to the belieuers and did beare after a maner himselfe in his owne hands when he said This is my body It is better in singlenesse of hart to make a true rehearsall of the words of ancient fathers in that same sense the they spake than with deceitfull speaches to abuse the simplicitie of the Reader who possibly will not take paines to search out in what sense Augustine said that Christ did beare himselfe in his owne hands In like maner Augustine writing against Adimant saieth that the blood is the life euen as Christ was the Rocke Nowe the Apostle saieth not Petra significabat Christum but saieth Pâ—…ra erat Christus quae rursus ne corporaliter acciperetur spiritualâ—…m illam vocat id est spiritualiter intelligi docet that is the Apostle saith not the rocke signified Christ but hee saieth the rocke was Christ which againe lest it should bee taken in a corporall sense hee calleth it a spirituall rocke teaâ—…hing vs that wee should spiritually vnderstand it Then if we fellow the exposition of ancient Fathers it cannot be inferred of these wordes this is my bodie that the bread is transsubstantiated into the substance of Christes bodie for such vaine conceits neuer entered into their mindes Papistes doe grant that after consecration Sainct Paule calleth the elementes bread and wine because they haue the shewe and shape of bread and wine as the brasen Serpent was called a Serpent and Angels in Scripture are called men because they so appeared But this is a friuolous shift because the Apostle when he speaketh of bread and wine after the words of consecration he speaketh expressely of bread that is eaten and of wine that is drunken This cannot bee the shape and accidentes of the elementes but their verie substance The Angels did not appeare only in the shape of men but also had mens bodies indeede so that their feete were washed and they did eate and drinke with Abraham and Lot The brasen Serpent was not in shewe but in substance and altogether of brasse These examples helpe not An euill cause hath more neede of a true confession than of a false defence as August writeth and Chrysost. saith most truely that albeit a bitter roote may sende foorth sweete and pleasant fruites yet a roote of bitternesse can neuer produce sweete and pleasant fruites warning vs thereby to beware of men who disseminate and propagate erroures and obstinately striue against the knowne trueth of God The last wordes of the consecration are these Doe this in remembrance of mee Marke the worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for albeit Christ only suffered but once yet it is his will that wee should keepe a continuall remeÌ„brance of his death because the death of Christ is the fountaine of our life Now when we offer the Sacrifice of thankesgiuing vnto God in the holy Supper because hee hath saued vs by the death of our Lord and Sauiour Iesus Christ. This Sacrifice which wee offer differeth from that which Christ offered vpon the Crosse because that Sacrifice was but onely once offered and was receiued into the most holy place as Chrysostome speaketh but this which we offer is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
other parts make seruice in his Church without letters of recommendation 14. Let a Pres byter leauing a lowe place and presuming to an higher incurre that same punishment which a Bishop deprehended in the like fault should incurre 15. A Presbyter who attaineth to a Church by giuing money for it let him be deposed 16. Let tythes bestowed vpon Churches by aduise of Bishops be faithfully distributed to the poore by the Presbyters 17. The families of Bishops shall bee instructed in the summe of the true faith In the knowledge of the retribution to be giuen to good men and the condemnation of vngodly people and of the resurrection and last judgement and by what kinde of workes eternall life may bee promerited and that the Homelies containing these instructions shall bee translated into Rusticke Latine language to the end that euery person may vnderstand them Marke in what estimation the Latine language hath bene at this time that instructions in Rusticke and Barbarous Latine are counted better than instructions in good French Language 18. It is the duetie of the Bishop to instruct his Presbyters concerning the Sacrament of Baptisme what it is that they should desire the people baptized to renounce namely they should renounce the deuill all his works his pomps Now the works of the Deuill are murther fornication adulterie drunkennesse and other such like faultes But the pompes of the Deuill are pride ostentation swelling conceites vaine glory lostinesse and such other faultes as spring vp from such groundes 19. Presbyters are precisely to bee admonished that when they say the Masse and doe communicate they doe not distribute the Lords bodie indiscretely to children and to all persons who happen to bee present who if they bee entangled with great sinnes they procure vnto themselues rather damnation than any remedie to their soules according to the saying of the Apostle Whosoeuer eateth this Bread and drinketh this Cuppe vnWorthilie hee shall bee guiltie of the bodie and blood of the LORD Let a man therefore trie himselfe and so let him eate of this Bread and drinke of this Cuppe By this let the judicious Reader marke that euen in the dayes of Carolus Magnus priuate Masses had no place but they who were duely prepared did communicate with the Priest 20. Presbyters shall not suffer the holy Chrisme to be touched by euery man 21. Presbyters shall not resort to Tavernes to eate or drinke 22. Bishops and presbyters shall prescribe to sinners who haue confessed their sines pennance discretly according to the weightinesse of their fault 23. Chanons who dwell in Cities let them eate in one Closter and sleepe vnder one roofe to the ende they may bee readie to celebrate their Canonicall houres From the 24. Can. vnto the 32. are contained Constitutions concerning Monkes and Nunnes which I ouer-passe with silence fearing to bee prolixt Can. 32. All men should studie to peace and concorde but especially Christians forsaking hatred discorde and enuie 33. Lordes and Iudges should bee obedient to the wholsome admonitions of their bishops and bishops on the other part should reuerentlie regarde them to the ende they may bee mutually supported euery one with the consolations of another 34. Lordes and Iudges are to bee admonished that they admitte not vile and naughtie persons to beare witnesse in their judicatories because there are manie who for a contemptible price are readie to make shipwracke of a good conscience 35. Let no man for his decreet receiue a rewarde for diuine Scripture in manie places for biddeth this as a thing that blindeth the eyes of the wise 36. Let euerie man bee carefull to support indigent persons of his owne familie and kinred for it is an impious and abominable thing in the sight of God that men abounding in riches should neglect their owne 37. Christians when they make supplications to God let them in humble manner bowe downe their knees following the example of the Martyr Steuen and of the Apostle Paul Except vpon the Lordes daye and other solemne dayes on the which the vniuersall Church keepeth a memoriall of the Lordes resurrection and at such times they are accustomed to stand and pray 38. Faithfull people must be admonished not to enter into the Church with tumult and dinne and in time of Prayer and celebration of the Masse not to be occupied in vaine confabulations and idle speaches but euen to abstaine from wicked cogitations 39. Let not the Consistories and Iudgement seates of secular Iudges bee in the Church or portches thereof in any time to come because the house of God shoulde bee an house of Prayer as our Lord Iesus Christ saieth 40. Let it bee forbidden that Merchandize be vsed vpon the Lordes daye or Iustice Courtes because all men should abstaine from seruile laboures to the ende this day may bee spent in praysing and thanking God from Morne till Euen 41. Incestuous persons parracides and murtherers are found who will not hearken to the wholsome admonitions of Church men but perseuere in their vitious conuersation who must bee reduced to order by the discipline of the secular power 42. Let the people bee admonished to abstaine from Magicall Artes which can bring no support and helpe to the infirmities of men and beastes but they are the deceitfull snares of the Deuill whereby hee deceiueth mankind 43. A frequent custome of swearing is forbidden wherein men vpon euery light occasion willing to purchase credite to that which they speake they take God to bee witnesse of the veritie of their speaches 44. Manie frie subjectes by the oppression of their Masters aro-redacted to extreame pouertie whose causes if our clement Soueraigne please to examine hee shall finde that they are vnjustlie redacted to extreame indigence 45. A false measure and a false ballance is an abomination vnto the Lord as Salomon recordeth The 46. Canon containeth a regrate that tythes were not duely payed to the Church notwithstanding that the Church had giuen in their complaint to the ciuill Magistrate whereby it came to passe that not onely Lightes in the Church and steependes to the Clergie beganne to inlacke but also the very Paroch Churches became ruinous 47. When generall Fastinges are appointed for any impendent calamitie let no man neglect the fellowship of the humbled Church for desire to fearce his bellie with delicate foode 48. Drunkennesse and surfetting are forbiddē as offensiue both to soule and and bodie and the ground of many other sinnes 49. Lords and Masters are to bee admonished not to deale cruelly and vnmercifully with their subjectes yea and not to seeke that which is due vnto themselues with excessiue rigour 50. Let Laicke people communicate at least thrise in the yeere vnlesse they bee impeded by some hainous sinnes committed by them 51. In the last Canon mention is made that they diligently examined the cause of them who complained to the Emperour that they were disherited by the donation of landes which their fathers and friends had bestowed
clothed in his fathers house that he would not eat any longer of husks and the food of Swine euen so our heauenly father hath fed vs with that Manna that came downe from heauen and it is no time nowe to vs to be fed with the huskes of PLATOES schoole any longer The cause wherefore foolish people are so addicted to Purgatorie albeit it be but an Ethnicke inuention is this a carnall affection that men carie toward their defunct parents or friendes to whome they are so affectionat that if any action done by liuing men could helpe them that are deade they would doe it with all their heart and of olde time it was a custome that when men were recently departed this life their friends would thrust the sacrament in the mouth of the dead body meaning thereby to procure some reliefe to the soule which custome was damned in the third Councill of Carthage Canon 6. In respect Christ biddeth giue the sacrament with this commandement Take eat but dead bodies can neither take nor eate Alwayes it was carnall affection not ordered with knowledge that mooued friends so to doe And in our dayes men that are in heauinesse and full of affection toward their owne friendes are both timorous and credulous so timorous that they feare that their friendes after death should be pined in Purgatorie so credulous that they beleeue that the prayers and almes deades of the liuing their saying of Masses or buying of pardons can helpe the dead either to mitigat their paine or to procure vnto them haistie reliefe out of paine If these two grounds could be remoued that simple people would not preposterously bee both timorous and credulous the conceit of Purgatorie would cease Papists themselues that are corrigible I would exhort before I answere to their arguments that they would doe this honour to Iesus Christ not to make his majestie like vnto ADONIIAH 1. Reg. 1. This proud man called IOAB the Captaine of the hoste and ABIATHAR the Priest and the kings sonnes except SALOMON to banket and by not inuiting to that banket SALOMON and BATHSHEBA his mother and NATHAN the Prophet and ZADOCK and BENAIAH no doubt but hee was minded to bring innocent people vnder the guiltinesse of treason as their speeches to DAVID clearely declare that they forsawe this inconuenient But Iesus Christ is not like vnto ADONIIAH to seek e a quarrell against innocent people whom he himselfe hath purged from all sinne in the precious fountaine of his blood 1. Ioh. 1. Will the Lorde Iesus after hee hath purged vs from all spot of sin in the fountaine of his owne blood send vs to Purgatorie when wee die and not call vs to that celestiall banket of endlesse pleasure in heauen seeing the not calling of vs to that banket importeth a disliking and casting off of vs as ADONIIAH disliked SALOMON and his mother and NATHAN the Prophet the rest whom he inuited not to his banket Surely whomsoeuer the Lord hath loued so dearely that hee hath purged them from all spot of sinne by his blood he will not be vncouth to them by sending them to Purgatorie when they should be inuited to his banket Now in this disputation of Purgatory fire a solide ground is to be laide downe that euery man may know of what sort of paines after this life we dispute All paines are either temporall or eternall Of eternall paines there is no disputation in this treatise Temporall paines say we are inflicted vpon men onely in this life for their amendement if they bee of the number of Gods elect or else are forerunning tokens of euerlasting wrath if they be of the number of the reprobate For this cause the Apostle saith that there is no chastisement joyous for the present vntill it bring foorth the good fruite of righteousnesse Heb. 12. ver 11. And heere hee declareth clearely that temporall chastisements are inflicted vpon the godly for their amendement On the other part the prophecie that was in the mouth of ZARESH the wife of HAMAN albeit grounded onely vpon experience yet it declareth that the downe-casting of wicked men is a forerunning token of a greater downe cast to followe after Ester chap. 6. ver 13. And this is a shorte summe of our opinion anent temporall punishments But Papistes defend that euen after this life there is temporall punishments in Purgatorie the suffering where of satisfieth God for off◅nces committed by men when they were aline and purgeth them that their soules may be meet to goe to heauen This opinion of theirs is linked with another absurde opinion that when out sinnes are freely forgiuen wee are not absolued both from guiltinesse and paine but from guiltinesse only but it remaineth still that we should suffer paines yea such paines whereby we satisfie for our sinnes committed after Baptisme what is this else but to make vs our own sauiours in a part and manifestly to contradict both scriptures and fathers for the scripture plainly saith There is no condemnation to them that are in Christ who walke not after the flesh but after the spirit Rom. 8. And AVGVSTINE saith Culpa est quod injustus es poena quod mortalis es Christus suscipiendo panam non culpam poenam debevit culpam August de verbis domini serm 37. that is thy fault is this that thou art vnrighteous thy punishment that thou art mortall but Christ by taking vpon himselfe our punishment and not our fault hath abolished both our fault and our punishment Arguments brought in to prooue Popish Purgatorie are of three ranckes First some arguments taken out of the wordes of Canonicke and Apocryph scripture Secondly out of the writings of fathers Thirdly out of visions dreames and apparitions where of some are put in write for a memorial to the posteritie In the booke of the Psalms it is written Wee passed through fire and water into thy rest Psal. 65. ver 12. alias Psal. 66. ver 12. Here say they meńtion is made of Purgatorie fire But AVGVSTINE writing vpon this Psalme doth expone it otherwise The fire saith hee burneth the water rotteth both are to be feared the burning of trouble and rotting of water When there are disasters and vnhappie things in this world they are like vnto fire when we are in prosperitie and al things plenteously abound this is like water This is the exposition of AVGVSTINE In the prophecie of ZACHARIE it is written Thou also shalt be saued through the blood of thy couenant I haue loosed thy prisoners out of the pit wherein is no water Is this also spoken of Purgatorie There is in that chapter a prophecie of Christ of his office humilitie power loue and the operatiue vertue of his blood by which blood beeing his own blood the blood of the euerlasting couenant of God we who were sinners and bond-men of Satan are set at libertie and wee who were heires of hell and condemnation are fred from
all the rest in absurditie that he prayed for the soule of TRAIAN the third persecuting Emperour and obtained pardon to it as a voyce that came downe from heauen witnessed saying I haue heard thy prayers and granted pardon to TRAIANVS but in time to come make no prayers for wicked men All these fables are like vnto the gourd of IONAS that had a worme within it which smote it so that it withered incontinent Ion. 4. euen so in al these fables there are circumstances declaring that God would not heare the prayers made for impenitent sinners after they had died in sinne Heare I leaue Papists dreaming vpon Purgatory and confirming it with dreames yet vncertaine where it is As for vs we will leane alanerly vpon the blood of Christ which purgeth vs from all sinnes 1. Loh 1. and we know certainely that our high Priest the Lorde Iesus with his owne finger sprinkleth his owne blood vpon our soules that we may be found a pure virgine to Christ 2. Cor. 11. that being purged from all sinne we may enter into that holy celestial Ierusalem whereinto no foule and vncleane thing getteth entresse Apocal 21. Now he who hath prepared this holy mansion for vs prepare vs also for it to whome be praise and glory for euer Amen CENT 3. A Treatise of Reliques of Saints SVch is the corruption of mans nature that in nothing can we keepe the golden mediocritie commanded by God Sometimes wee hate and persecute Gods seruants at other times wee giue vnto them the honour that is due to God alone And in this great confusion and disorder howe can order bee kept yea these idolaters themselues who at sometimes honour the saintes with excessiue and vncompetent honour they keepe not one and the selfe-same order Sometime they begin at excessiue honour and they end at excessiue contempt as the men of Listra first they called PAVL BARNABAS gods and afterward they stoned PAVL as an euill doer Act. 14. At other times they begin at excessiue contempt and they mount vp to excessiue honour as the people of the Isle of Malta first counted PAVL to be a murtherer after to be a god Act. 28. Many other examples may be giuen specially in the person of MOSES vnder the Lawe and of the Apostles vnder the Gospell The carnal Iewes that came out of Egypt murmured many times against MOSES but their more carnall and vnhappy posteritie preferred MOSES to Christ Ioh 9. ver 29. saying We know that God spake to Moses but this man know wee not from whence he is This is the malice of Satan changing our prison but not suffering vs to be set at libertie For when a man is incarcerate in any vpper house and then his prison is changed and hee is prisoned in the lower prison where there is lesse libertie of aire and great stincke filth the estate of this man is not better but worse by his change euen so when men haue misregarded in most contemptible maner the seruants of God this is a snare of the deuill but when they giue vnto them the honour that is due to God this is a greater snare for they who called PAVL a mutherer who was indeed the prisoner of Christ at that time they lied yet they attributed nothing to PAVL but that sin wherunto by nature hee was inclined and also practised before his conuersion Act. 9. but when they called him a god they attributed vnto him that honour that was not competent to a mortall man Act. 28. Albeit we be not able to comprehend the deepe and subtle slights of Satan yet in the first entrie we may grope some deceitfulnesse in Satans dealing because hee dealeth one way with Gentiles and Pagans who knew not God and another way with Iewes and Christians who had some knowledge of the true God He stirreth vp the Gentiles forthwith to call men Gods by whose hands the Lord wrought a miraculous worke Act. 14. and Act. 28. but hee dealeth otherwise with the Iewes who had some knowledge of God not incontinent to equall MOSES to God but to preferre him vnto other teachers and to Iesus whome they denied to be God In like maner he moued the Iewes to deck and beautifie the sepulchres of the Prophets Mat. 23 which seemed to be no fault but Satan was craftily vnder colour of honouring the seruants of God leading them to persecute the master himselfe euen Christ Iesus the great prince of all Pastours And therefore Christians should beware of the slights of the deuill because vpon very small and not disalowable beginnings as would appeare he laboureth to leade them in end to horrible idolatrie Againe Satan is so craftie and deceitfull that he wil build vpon another mans foundation It was not Satan but the Lord himselfe that would haue the funerals of his Saintes reuerently handled God saide vnto IACOB that IOSEPH should close his eyes and that the Lord himselfe would reduce him backe againe to Canaan that is the Lord would attend vpon his funeral in his backe comming againe Gen. 46. ver 4. yet that craftie aduersarie Satan building as it were vpon the Lordes owne ground vnder pretence of honour to bee done to the bodies of the Saintes as the temples whereinto the holy Ghost dwelt he hath brought men so farre forwarde that they haue opened the graues of the Saints raised their bones caried them in procession and made their prayers before them with hope to be the better heard of God because they bowe themselues before the reliques of Saintes Also Satans craft appeareth in this that as the Philistims did not send SAMPSON immediatly to grind in their mill vntill they had first pulled out his eyes Iudg. 16 21. euen so Satan mooued not men to bowe their knees and to say their prayers before dead mens bones at the first instance vntill he had of along time blind-folded their eyes with a mistie cloud of ignorance so that all things were welcome that pleased their blind guides to thrust into their hands And so we shall see Godwilling that in the first 300. yeeres after the ascension of our Lord there was no adoratiō of reliques Now let the history speak for it self In the old Testamēt we read that some mens bones were raised out of their graues to dishonor thē as the bones of the priests of Bethel which were burned vpon the altar of Bethel by IOSIAH 2. Reg. cap. 23. 16. but in that same chapter it is expresly noted that the bones of the true Prophet who came from Iudah and foretold all these things ibid. ver 17. these bones I say were not raised to honour them as the bones of the idolatrous priestes were raised out of their graues to dishonour them The body of MOSES buried in the plaine of Moab Deut 34. ver 6. whose sepulchre was vnknowne to man but knowne to Satan yet he who knew it had not libertie to open it to
Constantine The Arrians finding themselues to be vtterly rejected by Athanasius they addressed themselues to Constantinople vnder the conduct of Eusebius bishop of Nicomedia and threatned Alexander that incase hee woulde not voluntarily receiue Arrius into the fellowship of the Church then they should bring him in authorized with the Emperours commande to the grieuance of his heart Alexander clothed himselfe with the armour of GOD and all the night long prayed in this sence LORD if Arrius be to be receiued to morrow into the communione of thy CHURCH then let thy seruant depart in peace and destroy not the just with the wicked but LORD if thou wilt spare thy CHURCH whereunto I am assured thou wilt be fauourable then LORD turne thine eyes toward the wordes of the Eusebians and giue not thine inheritance to a desolation and reproach and cut of Arrius lest while he entreth into the CHURCH his heresie also seeme to enter with him and so no difference seeme to bee betwixt Pietie and Jmpietie The day next following the prayer of Alexander Eusebius bisshop of Nicomedia with his retinue came with great confidence pompe to performe all which they had threatned they would doe But Arrius was compelled to goe to a secret place whereinto his bowels gusihed out and hee concluded his wretched life with ignominie and shame To Alexander succeeded Paulus His lot was to gouerne this Church vnder the reigne of an Arrian Emperour Constantius who rejected him and seated Eusebius bishop of Nicomedia in his place But this great parrone of the Arrian Heresie scarcely was placed in Constantinople when he ended his life The Homousians receiued againe Paulus to bee their bishop The Arrians choosed Macedonius This was the câ—…use of great debate in Constantinople and the people diuided in factions hatefully inuaded one another The Emperour hearing of the tumult sent Hermogenes the generall commander of his horsâ—…-men to remoue Paulus from Constantinople Hermogenes was very ready to execute the Emperours commandement but the people being affectioned toward their Pastor arose vp with popâ—…re tumult compassed the house of Hermogenes set it on 〈◊〉 slâ—…w himselfe and fastned a corde to his legges and trailed him along the streetes For this cause the Emper. Constantius willing to punish the authors of this tumult hastened to come to Constantinople The people went foorth to meete him and with reares confessed their fault and craued pardon The Emperour absteined from punishing them vnto the death but he cutted off the one halfe of the victuall which the liberalitie of his father had bestowed vpon Constantinople to bee payed yeerely out of the tributes of Aegypt He banished Paulus the second time and seated Macedoâ—…ius in Coâ—…stantinople not without effusion of blood Paulus was againe restored by the meanes of the Emp. Constans but after the death of Constans he was banishâ—…d to Cucusus a towne of Armenia where he was strangled by the bloody Arrians The Church of Constantinople was miserably troubled with Arrianisâ—…ne vnder the reignes of Constantius Valens The reignes of Graiianus and Theodosius was a breathing time to the professors of the true Faith At this time Nazianzenus a constant defender of the Faith was chosen Bishop of Constantinople who notwithstanding voluntarily left the great Citie in regarde the Bishops assembled in the second generall Councill gaue not a full and uniuersâ—…ll consent to his admission Yet gaue they all without hesitation their consent to Nectarius a man of noble birth of the countrey of Cilicia at that time 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and who had receiued no ecclesiastical preferment before that time This man I say they made Bishop of Constantinople with full consâ—…nt and allowance both of the Councill and people ouerpassing Nazianzenus so fraile are the cogitations of men euen in generall Councils that they are oft times more ruled with affection then reason Nectarius continued in that office vntill the third yeere of the reigne of Arcadius that is vntill the yeere of our LORD 401. In his time the confession of sinnes done in secrete to presbyter poenitentiarius was abrogated in the Church of Constantinople vpon this occasion as Socrates writeth A certaine noble woman was confessing in secret her sinnes to presbyter poenitentiarius and shee confessed adultery committed with one of the Church Deacons Eudaemon this was the name of the father confessor gaue counsell to Nectarius to abrogate this custome of auricular and secrete confession because the Church was like to bee slandered and euill spoken of by these meanes Socrates can scarse giue allowance to this fact of Nectarius in respect that by abrogation of this custome the vnfruitfull works of darknesse were lesse coargued and reproued But Socrates considered not that CHRIST when hee talked with the Samaritane woman at the Well sent away his disciples to buy bread to the ende the poore Samaritane sinner might more freely poure out her secrete sinnes in the bosome of CHRIST who knew all thinges that were done in secrete It is not my purpose to contend with Socrates he is writing an historie I am writing but a short Compend of an historie hee taketh libertie to declare his judgement concerning this fact of Nectarius in abrogating confession of secrete sinnes to pres byter poenitentiarius No man can blame mee to write my judgement concerning auricular confession It is in our dayes not like vnto the mantle where with Sem and Iapheth couered the nakednesse of their Father Noe but it is in very deed a lap of the mantle of the deuill couering the nakednesse of his children that is the horrible treasons that are plotted in secrete by the children of the deuill against Christian Magistrates Nowe is auriculare consession for greater causes to bee abrogated then of olde presbyter poenitentiarius was discharged by Nectarius Bishops of Hierusalem TO Thermon succeeded Macarius anno 318. about the 7. yeere of the reigne of Constantine In his time it is thought that Helena the mother of Constantine founde the Crosse of CHRIST but Ambrose writes that shee worshipped it not for that saith he had beene Gentilis error vanitas impioram that is an errour of Pagans and vanitie of vngodly people But now to lay aside the inexcusable fault of adoration of the tree wherevpon our LORD suffered What necessity had Helena to bee so serious to seeke out this tree and to commit it to the custodie of all posterities seeing that Ioseph of Arimathea who sought the body of IESUS at the hands of Pilate to the end he might burie it honourably yet sought he not the tree whereon CHRIST was crucified which with little adoe might haue bene obtained Secondly during the time that the Crosse was easie to bee found and eâ—…sie to haue bene discerned from other crosses How could the blessed virgine the mother of the LORD and holy Apostles haue committed such an ouersight in not keeping
Malachie who saieth Cursed bee the deceiuer which hath in his flocke a male and voweth and sacrificeth vnto the LORD a corrupt thing This grounde being first laide that the principall purpose where â—…t the Prophet aimeth is not vnknowne it is the more eâ—…sie to step toâ—… to the wordes The Prophet bringes in the Lord saying Call vpon mee in the dry of thy trouble c This presupponeth that wee shall bee exercised with manifolde troubles as our maister CHRIST IESUS was crowned with thornes before hee was crowned with glorie yea and that wee shall bee so dashed with the vehement tempest of troubles that except wee bee well taught in the Schoole of GOD wee shall not know what hand to turne vs vnto as the ship-man did who sailed with Jonas euery man prayed to his owne GOD onely Ionas who was taught in the right Schoole directed his prayers to the liuing GOD who made the Heauen the Earth and was heard when he prayed out of the Whales bellie Nowe seeing that GOD inuiteth vs to bee his Disciples and hee will teach vs to whom and in what maner wee should pray in time of our troubles let vs lend our eare to our great School-maister not be ashamed to opeÌ„ our eâ—…re and to bind vp our mouth with silence when the LORD speaketh and count all the speeches of Fathers that repugne vnto this great Oracle of GOD to be like vnto eares of corne withered thinne and blasted with the East wind wherein there is no nourishing food In the second part of this Treatise it is to bee proued that Prayer is a spirituall sacrifice onely to bee offered to GOD and to none other neither in Heauen nor in earth for three principall reasons First in Scripture wee are taught to pray to him onely in whom wee trust and consequently to pray onelie to GOD. The Apostle Paul saith But howe shall they call on him in whom they haue not belâ—…eued Yea and the Prophet Ieremie saith Cursed bee hee that trusteth in man and maketh flesh his ariâ—…e and with-dr weth his heart from the LORD GOD is the just proprietare and owner of our soules for hee hath bought and purchased them with his owne blood and the LORD wil part stakes with no man neither can hee admit a corriual in points of his honour as the naturall mother coulde not abide to see her sonne diuided because hee appertained totally and wholly vnto her selfe so can not GOD abide that his glory be giuen vnto another or yet that any part of that thing that is once dedicated to GOD should bee conuerted to another use In holy Scripture wee reade of three moste abominable Altars to wit of the Aâ—…tar of Damascus and the Altar of Bethel and the Altar at Athens to the vnknowne GOD. The Altar of Damascus was abominable because it was builded to the worship of a false god The Altar of Bethel was abominable because on it the true GOD was worshipped in a forbidden maner And the Altar of Athens to the vnknowne GOD was abominable because they neither knew whom they worshipped nor yet the right maner of his worshipping Therefore in the matter of the worshipping of GOD let vs set our compasse right lest a little aberration procure a great ship-wracke and in the matter of Prayer let vs call vpon him onely in whome wee trust as wee are taught by the holy Apostle And let vs offer spirituall sacrifices acceptable to GOD through IESUS CHRIST The seconde argument whereby I proue that our prayers should bee made onely to GOD is this Wee should pray only to him who is Omnipotent and can support vs in al our distresses ergo wee ought to pray onely to GOD. The antecedent of this argument is euident by the latter part of that short prayer indited by CHRIST to his Disciples For thine is the Kingdome and the Power and the Glory for euer In that short forme of perfect prayer the first words leadeth vs to a consideration of the loue of GOD toward vs who is content to be our Father in IESUS CHRIST In the last wordes his power is described to bee infinite such as becommeth him who is King of Heauen and Earth who like as hee hath made all thinges so likewise hath hee an absolute Souereignitie ouer all thinges both in Heauen and in Earth Now that Omnipotencie is an attribute onely belonging to the diuine nature the very Gentiles could not denie it who attributed the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 onlie to God And it is certaine that all the Angels of Heauen could not haue supported the disasterous estate of man after his fall if God himselfe had not put hande to worke who onely knew the way howe his justice and mercy coulde kisse one another in the person of the Mediator Therefore seeing God onely is Omnipotent and none but hee what fooles are wee to put our trust vnder the shadow of the bramble as the Sichemites did and not to dwell in the secrete of the moste High and abide in the shadow of the Almightie I doe no wrong to the Angels in Heauen when I compare them to brambles in comparison of the eternall God their power is finite and bounded thâ—…ir prouident care ouer vs hath a beginning namely the time of their employment whereinto GOD appointed them to attend vpon vs but the power of GOD is infinite in his prouident care he appointed a kingdome for vs before the foundation of the worlde was laide Let vs therefore trust vnder this shadow of the Almighty and call vpon him in whom we trust Thirdly it may bee proued that wee should pray to GOD onely and to none other because their is neither commandemeÌ„t nor example nor promise to be heard in Scripture except that prayers bee made to the Creator onely and not vnto the creatures of GOD. And in this argument I find that some learned Papists giue ouer reasoning in the contrary and they render reasons wherefore there is no example in the old or new Testament of Inuocation of Saints namely this that in the old Testament the-Patriarchs and Prophets who departed this life went not presently to Heauen and had not the fruition of the presence of GOD incontinent but they went to Limbus patrum where their soules remained vntill CHRIST died and arose againe from death and then hee carried their soules to Heauen And this is the cause say they wherefore there is no example found in the old Testament of Inuocation of Saintes Likewise they say concerning the new Testament that if the Apostles had set downe any precept concerning Inuocation of Saintes it woulde haue seemed vnto the people that they were desirous that this honour should bee done vnto themselues after their death These are the foolish conjectures of Eccius Neuertheles the places that Papists cite out of Scripture to proue inuocation of Saints declare with what
conscience a great number of them entrea◅e this argument In like maner the factes and wordes of ancient Fathers are miserably abused When Papistes reade in the Epistles of Augustine that the Emperour went vnto the tombe of the Apostle Peter sometime a fisher and laide aside his Emperiall Diademe and humbly bowed his knees and prayed at the sepulchre of P◅ter they clap their handes and shout for joy as if their cause were wonne But such transparent visardes will blind no mans eyes except onely the eyes of simple ignorant people and the eyes of those who are wilfully blinded because the praying at the sepulchre of Peter will not proue that the Emperour prayed vnto Peter but onely to GOD. And this custome was the more tolerable because Christians for the space of three hundreth yeeres were accustomed to heare GODS worde preached to receiue the Sacramentes yea and to pray in such places whereinto Martyres had glorified GOD by patient suffering of death for CHRISTES sake In all these actions they worshipped GOD whose worde they hearde preached in that place whose blessed Sacraments they receiued also in that place and they bowed their knees and prayed to GOD and not to the Martyres in that place yea and when the persecution ceased and Temples were builded there was a reuerent commemoration of the names of the Martyres without any inuocation and praying vnto them as Augustine expresly declareth Nowe let this grounde bee deepely setled and rooted in our heartes that GOD is the onely Fountaine and giuer of all good giftes who also knoweth all our miseries and is Omnipotent and can support them at such time as his Majestie knoweth to be expedient For the vision of GOD as saith the Prophet hath the owne appointed time and at the last it shall speake and not lie though it tarie Waite for it shall surely come and shall not stay And so much the more let vs with patient expectation awaite vpon the support that commeth from the throne of the grace of GOD because the LORD neuer commeth to vs with an emptie hande and neuer visiteth vs out of season as earthlie Phisitions doe oft times but euen when hee findeth vs lying in our graues and rotting in the stinke of a tab◅rnacle forsaken by the ghost who was wont to dwell into it then can hee raise vs out of graues as hee did LAZARUS This grounde beeing deepely fixed in our heartes I proceede to the n◅xt heade to declare that no man can approach neere to GOD without a MEDIATOR and that CHRIST is the onely MEDIATOR both of our Redemption and also of our Intercession and none other except hee onelie As concerning the first assertion that wee haue neede of a MEDIATOR there is no man so voide of vnderstanding who will denie it Like as in the fabricke of the worlde fire and water are elementes of so discrepant qualities that the Lord would not set them contiguouslie together lest the one should haue comsumed the other Therefore the Lord in his vnspeakeable wisedome hath set an element of a mid nature betwixt them to wit the Aire In the vppermoste parte of it not abhorring from the qualities of the fire and in the lower region of it conforming to the qualities of the water Euen so there can bee no fellowship betweene the holy God and sinnefull man without a Mediator And it was well said by Iosua Yee cannot serue the Lord for hee is an holy God he will not pardon your iniquitie nor your sins Therefore necessitie driueth vs in the Treatise of Inuocation to speake of the Mediator I will not paine my selfe to proue the thing that is not denied Papistes themselues grant two thinges First that Christ is the onely Mediator of our redemption Secondly that Christ is the onely Mediator of intercession betwixt God and vs. But herewithall they affirme that the Saints are mediators betwixt Christ vs. Of that which is fully grāted that Christ is the only Mediator of our redemption I infer according to the grounds of holy Scripture that Christ is also the onely Mediator of intercession For these two are vnseparably lincked together and he who hath the one honour hath both In the Epist. to the H◅brues it is said that Christ is the onely Mediator of our redemption and hereof it is inferred that hee is the onely Mediator of our intercession the wordes of the Apostle are these speaking of Christ But this man because hee indure◅h for euer hath an euerlasting Priesthood In these wordes Christ is set downe as the onely Mediator of our redemption Now marke that which followeth as a necessary consequence vpon the fore-mentioned grounde Wherefore hee is able also perfectly to saue them that come to GOD by him seeing hee euer liueth to make intercession for them Heere Christ is pronounced to bee the onely Mediator of our intercession and this conclusion is gathered vpon this ground because hee hath saued vs by his euerlasting sacrifice which is as much as to say because hee is the Mediator of our redemption Againe holie Scripture will inuert this order and set intercession in the first place and vpon this ground that Christ is the only Mediator of our intercession will conclude that Christ is also the onlie Mediator of our redemption Marke the words of the holy Apostle My babes these thinges write I vnto you that yee sinne not and if any man sinne wee haue an Aduocate with the Father IESUS CHRIST the Iust and hee is the reconciliation for our sinnes and not for ours onely but also for the sinnes of the Whole Worlde In these wordes Christ is first called our Aduocate and hereof is inferred that hee is our propitiation which is all one as if hee had saide CHRIST is the onely Mediator of our redemption In the Law of Moses the high Priest was only but a type of the true Mediator of intercession yet while hee was presenting the blood of the sacrifice of propitiation into the most holy place all the people stood without and neither Priest nor people remained within the court where the Altar of brunt offering was vntill the high Priest came foorth out of the moste holy place Now seeing our Lord Iesus hath offered a sacrifice for our sins ◅nd hath caried the blood of the euer lasting Couenant vnto the moste holy place that is vnto Heauen and is actually performing the office of our great Aduocate and making intercession for vs let no man presume to step to the Alt◅r and to take vpon him to bee a Mediator of redemption or intercession our high Priest is doing that worke in his owne person tarie vntill hee come foorth out of the moste holy place and then there shall bee no more disputation anent Mediators of interc◅ssion Augustine vtterly excludeth Peter and Paul from this honour to bee counted Mediators of our intercession because like as they prayed for others euen so in like maner
are transported with incertainetie of doubtfull opinions so that albeit they bee met together to settle others in the certainetie of the true Faith yet they themselues are so wauering minded that they can neuer bee at rest Like as the Arrians not content with the summe of Faith set downe at Nice assembled themselues many times set downe 9. diuers formes of Faith as Socrates recordeth yet coulde they neuer agree vpon one certaine forme of Faith which they woulde not alter Likew◅se in the affaires of Discipline so great discrepance of opinion was founde that neither Councill agreede with Councill nor Bishop with Bishop nor yet Bishops with Councils The Councill of Ancyra thought expedient for order taking with those who had sacrificed vnto Idoles in time of persecution that vnto Bishops should bee adjoined Chorepiscopi that is Countrey Bishops or Landward Bishops to whom they gaue not power to ordaine Elders and Deacons but onely Readers and Subdeacons Damasus Bishop of Rome coulde not agree to this subordinate order of Bishops called Chorepiscopi The Councils of Neocaesarea Antiochia liked of this forme of gouernament Other Councils in not making mention of this name declared their misliking so that this abuse likewise of diuersity of opinions frequently altered both in Doctrine and Discipline impaired much the authoritie of Councils Before I declare who hath power to conuocate Generall Nationall Councils something is to bee premitted concerning the assemblies vpon the LORDS holy Sabboths These assemblies of all other were counted moste holy in so much that when the Princes of the people of Israel were to conueene with Moses to consult concerning matters of ciuil gouernament they were warned so to doe by the blowing of one of the siluer trumpets onely but when both the siluer trumpets did blowe then the people were warned to conueene at the doore of the Tabernacle for the exercise of diuine seruice which as it was of all Conuentions most holy so in like maner it was foresignisied in most solemne maner These holy meetinges were warranded by the LORDES expresse commandement Remember the Sabboth day to keepe it holy c. And in the new Testament Christians hauing receiued power to meete together in CHRISTES Name with promise that CHRIST woulde bee amongst them they conueened secretely to the hearing of the worde and ministration of the Sacramentes albeit they were most straitely inhibited so to doe by the Edictes of persecuting Tyrantes and these who were comprehended and put to death for their conuentions profession they died Holy Martyres how soeuer the Pagans did put them to death as traitors because they disobeyed the Emperours commandement both in their conuentions and profession Yet this ground beeing once laide that they died Holy Martyrs it wil follow that Christians haue power to conucene to heare the worde preached especially vpon the LORDES day albeit all the Princes of the worlde woulde forbid them to meete And this libertie granted by CHRIST and sealed vp by the blood of innumerable martyrs Confirmed also by the lawes of Christian Princes euer since the reigne of Constantine it will continue vnto the blessed appearance of the LORD IESUS to judge the world albeit all the enemies of the Gospell of CHRIST shoulde grinde their teeth and fret against this libertie These fore-saide weekely conuentions are necessarie at all times and in all ages euen albeit there were no H◅retique nor Scismatique in the worlde to diuert people from the trueth of GOD because euen the best of vs all is but like vnto a barren husbandrie that hath neede continually to bee dressed and laboured and watered with the streames of the riuers of the Sanctuarie of our GOD lest wee wither in the barrennesse of a corrupt nature But Councils Generall or Nationall are not necessarie at all times but onely when the peace of the Church is troubled with Heresie and Schisme or an uniuersall ouer-spreading scab of corrupt maners and at such times it is meete that Pastors acquaint the supreame Magistrate with the danger who hath not neede at all times to conuocate a Councill except the maladie that hee would rem◅die be vnsupportable After this wise forme of dealing did Constantine send Osius Bishop of Corduba to Aegypt to see if by his trauels the Heresie and Schisme springing vp in Alexandria could bee timously suppressed but when the good Emperour sawe that this Gangrene dayly increased then there was no remedie but to gather a Generall Councill for suppressing of Heresie and for keeping of intestine peace into the Church of CHRIST Now to proue that Nationall and Generall Councils ought to bee gathered by Monarches and Princes In the olde Testament the great Conuentions at Carmell Silo and Mizpeh were assembled by Princes and the assembly conueened at Mizpeh by Samuel hee gathered it as a ciuill Gouernor of the land and not in so farre as hee was a Prophet for as yet Saul was not allowed by the people to bee king The Conuention appointed at Gilgal was with the expresse consent and allowance of King Saul who was also personally present at that Assemblie In the new Testament the assembly of the Apostles at Hierusalem albeit it was gathered without the knowledge and allowance of the Emperour Cluadius in whose time it was assembled Yet the Apostles had such extraordinary warrandes of the Spirite such extraordinary giftes and their painefull trauels fell in such an extraordinary time when there was no Christian Magistrate fauouring the Gospel that hee who furnished vnto them courage to preach without libertie granted vnto them by Princes furnished also courage and grace vnto them to meete at Hierusalem for the well of the Church without the fore-knowledge and allowance of the Emperour Claudius But thinges done extraordinarily leane vnto their owne extraordinary warrandes and are no impediment to vs to proceede and to speake of thinges that are ordinary And it is to be noted that euen during the time of the 10. Persecutions Christians neglected not to seeke the support of Emperours against Heretiques whē it could be obtained as clearelie appeareth by the ninth Persecuting Emperour Aurelian who with his ciuil authority assisted the Synode of Antiochia against Samosatenus as hath beene declared in the thirde CENTURIE and the Church had craued the support of the Emperours authoritie to that effect From the dayes of the Emperour Constanti◅e vntill the yeere of our LORD 1215. the Emperours were in use to conuocate Councils But Innocentius the thirde to whose tuterie Fredericke the seconde was recommended by his father Henrie the sixt more like to the successour of Iudas then the successour of Peter made Otto Duke of Saxon Emperour in prejudice of Fredericke vntill the spirit of dissention fell betwixt Otto and Pope Innocentius the thirde Then was Otto excommunicated and the Empire was giuen to Fredericke the seconde to whom it rightly belonged Notwithstanding Pope Innocentius tooke vpon him boldnes to
called Circulatores who after long abstinence from all kinde of delicate pleasures they left the wildâ—…rnesse and came to townes sate in tabernes resorted to stoue-hoâ—…ses and yet were not intangled with any kind of desire of earthly pleasures as dead men to the world but when occasion of prayer was offered vnto them the â—…ldest and weakest of them did plucke vp his heart and with vigore and courage did performe that Holy sâ—…ruice Euagrius commending these Circulatores with excesâ—…iue praises borroweth a similitude from Plato whereby hee would declare that as a man who hath vnclothed himselfe of his vpper garmentes and in ende hath cast off his shirt also this man is naked indeede euen so these Circulatores after they had forsaken all carnall delites in ende they forsooke also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is vaine glorie which is like vnto the shirt of a man and the last of all garmentes casten off The similitude is very good if it had bene rightly applied but I cannot see howe it can bee rightly applied to these Circulatores who needed not to haue come to townes as to stages and theaters to make oftentation of their abstinence if they had not beene couetous of vaine glorie The orders of Monkes that sprang vp after the three hundreth yeere of our LORD were like vnto rootes planted in an Orchard which spreade out in many branches such as the Basilidians Ambrâ—…sians the Augustine Monkes Hieronymianâ—… Grâ—…gorians and Benedictines But the Augustines and Benedictines were beyond the rest The order called Grandimontenses the Orders of Premonstratenses in the low countreys of Germanie neere to Leâ—…dium of Guilelmitae in Aquitania Milites D. Jacobi and Calatrinenses in Spaine All these followed the rules of the Augustine Monkes But the Orders of the Cluniacenses in France of the shadowed valley who dwelt in Italie and vpon the Apenneine of Cistertienses in Burgundie of Bernardâ—…ines Coelestines of Iustinians of Mount Oliueâ—… of Humiliati and diuers others all these were branches of the order of S. Benedict And this diuersitie of names was imposed to Monkes liuing vnder the rules of Augustine and Benedict partly to declare the places wherein and partly the persons by whom the dissolute conuersation of the Monkes of these two orders was reduced to the strickt abstinence of their first institution Many other Orders I haue of purpose ouer-passed with silence because the number is exceeding great onely of the Charterous Monkes of the Franciscans and Dominicans and of the vnhappie order of the Layolites and a few more wee shall speake hereafter GOD willing Now to keepe some order in this Treatise I shall fiâ—…st declare GOD willing the meanes whereby the Monasticke forme of liuing was increased magnified and admired euen beyond all measure Secondly of the degrees of the decay of their fame which insued soone after the excessiue commendation of that state And thirdly the vild and vnsufferable abuses of the Monâ—…sticke life of late dayes whereby Monkes are become a heauie and loath some burthen ouer-charging the world and like vnto the offensiue Locustes who euen when they haue flowne away they leaue behind them such detriment and losse to parts whereinto they haue beene that of a long time they cannot be forgotten againe First the Monastries of olde were called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or places of honestie whereinto all lasciuiousnesse wantonnesse and riote was abhorred as it was wont to be detested iâ—… Selga a towne of Pisidia in so farre that the Apostle Paul himselfe abhorreth not from the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whereby hee betokeneth wantonnesse Likewise they were called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for their solitarie liuing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for their meditation and continuall holy exercises In these places men were well brought vp and were furnished with knowledge were meete to stop the mouthes of Heretiques who in the fourth CENTURIE did abound In these places were continuall exercises of Prayer Reading Meditation and abstinence from all kind of delicate pleasures And men brought vp in Monasteries were meete to vndertake the weighty charge of Pastors and Bishops Epiphanius from his youth was brought vp in the Monastries both of Palestina and Aegypt And Nazianzenus drew with him Basilius Magnus to the Wildernesse where they laide aside all the bookes of Gracian Philosophers and searched out the mysteries of the Kingdome of GOD out of the bookes of Holie Scripture and very diligently read the bookes of ancient Fathers who before their time had written Commentaries vpon diuine Scripture so were they both well prepared for great emploimentes by thirteene yeeres continuall exercise of reading in the Wildernesse Barses Eulogius Lazarus Leo and Prapidius of Monkes in Syria and Persia were made Bishops And this was the first honour of Monastries that in them as it were in Colleges of Learning men were well exercised and prepared for the Pastorall office Secondly the great giftes of GOD that appeared in some of them who professed the Monasticke life brought this kind of liuing in wonderfull great admiration amongst the people especially the gift of working of miraculous workes In this point like as I am not altogether incredulous to doubt of euerie miracle which GOD wrought by the hands of Monkes so likewise will I not bee so childish credulous as to beleeue euery thing that Ecclesiasticall Writers doe record of them as namelie the thirtie yeeres silence of THEONAS conjoined with a Propheticall gift GOD suffered not ZACHARIAS the father of IOHN BAPTIST albeit justly punished with dumnesse for his incrudelitie to bee so long silent seeing the talentes of GOD are giuen to bee occupied and not to be hidden in the ground The miracle of Apelles an Aegyptian Monke who brunt the Deuill in the face with an hote yron who appeared vnto him in the similitude of a beautifull woman and tempted him to vngodly lust is it not a childish fable and repugnant also to Scripture wherein the weapons are described wherewith wee shoulde fight against spirituall wickednesse and all are pieces of spirituall armour onely The miraculous transporting of Ammus ouer a broocke to the ende hee shoulde not drawe off his owne hose and see his owne naked legges is not agreeable to the ende that GOD hath in working of miracles namely to confirme the weakenesse of Faith but not to foster vaine conceites in mens hearts Was it a fault of CHRISTES Disciples to see their owne naked legges when our LORD IESUS washed them The superstition of the Monke Dorotheus hating sleepe as hee hated the Deuill when as our Maister IESUS CHRIST abhorred not from refreshing his owne bodie with naturall rest The multiplied number of prayers which PAULUS in Pherma as a dayly taske offered to GOD numbring his prayers by the like number of three hundreth stones put in his bosome and after euery prayer casting out a stone vntill his bosome was emptied of all
lying narration with lying miracles wrought at the sepulchres of Iosâ—…phat some time King of India and Barlaam an Eremite whose bones hee alleadgeth were transported by King Baracbias out of the Wildernesse into the Countrey of India but I leaue Damascene lying and I proceede Vnder the shadowe and coloure of all this counterfeit glorie aboue mentioned from the sixe hundreth yeere of our LORD vntill our owne time horrible abominations hath beene hatched so farre surpassing the defections preceeding the sixe and seuenth hundreth yeere of our LORD as the darknes of the winter night goeth beyonde the darkenesse of the summer night Beside the doctrine of Images where of Monkes were the principall authors yea and Paulus Cyprius before hee coulde procure the gathering of the second Councill of Nice entred into a Monastrie as it were into the shop and office house of Sathan and with his vntimous sorrowing moued the Empresse Jrene to gather the Councill fore-saide But beside this I say Monks were the first forgers of the doctrine of Transsubstantiation for Damascene expreâ—…ely writeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the very Bread and Wine are changed into the Bodie and Blood of the LORD And againe he saieth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the Bread and the Wine are not a figure of the Bodie and Blood of CHRIST but the verie Dei-fied Bodie of our LORD This errour was receiued dispersed and propagated the more willingly in Monastries because it was forged by the braine of a Monke Likewise the doctrine of the merite of mens workes cuen such workes as are superstitious and not commanded in the Law of GOD This doctrine I say as a banner displaide against the merites of the sufferings of CHRIST it was chiefely spred out in Monastries wherein the grand our of great and legible letters made their opinion knowne to the worlde ORDO SERVAT US DUCIT AD VIT AM that is The keeping of order to wit Monasticke rules leadeth to life Other points of erronious corrapt doctrine where of they are not the first inuenters they are the principall propagators of them as namely prayer for the dead and the opinion of purgatorie these errours inuented of old had died out long agoe as the fires of Aetna and Vesuvius haue done if that the fables of Monkes dayly renewed had not beene like vnto fewell intertaining the flame of foolish opinions The vilde and vnchaste conuersation of the Monkes from the sixe hundreth yeere of our LORD vntill our time he who vndertaketh to describe it vndertaketh an â—…nnecessarie worke as they did who of olde commended Hâ—…rcules whom no man did 〈◊〉 euen so they who presume to describe the vnchastitie of Monastries and Nunneries they spend time in vaine to prouâ—… that thinâ—… which no man can denie yea and their owne speaches contâ—…ine a confession oâ—… the Guiltines of vnchaste liuing When any of their number is dâ—…prehended in whoredoâ—…e and aduâ—…rie they do not aggre gâ—… thâ—… fault as a shame and dishonouâ—… done vnto their holy Order but rather extenuâ—…e the horrour of sinne saving it is better to bee a secrete whore-monger than an open Heretique The commendation that the Poet Nigellus giueth to the Nunnes of the Gilbertine order in our neighbour Countrey is but slender namely this that when they were aged they left off bearing of children This Order began in ENGLAND ANNO 1140. The Monkes and Nunnes of our owne Countrey where they were best knowne they were worst liked and â—…hey might haue suffered a triall of anie persons except of neighbours and such as knew them well In other Countreyes albeit the turpitude of an vnchaste life was couered with lesse transparent vailes alwayes GOD is like vnto himselfe and hee hateth the workers of iniquitie Let S. Adonei a Monke of Rowâ—…m bee an examplarie type of the maners of manie others when hee fell ouer the bridge in the night time and drowned in the water of Seane the good and euill Angels stroue for his soule because it was to bee doubted whether his foote-steps led to the Church or to his harlot And in ende the decision of this controuersie was referred to RICHARD Duke of Normandie It appeareth by this fable inuented by Normand Monkes that their purpose was not only to excuse the villanie of Adonei and to count him a Saint but also to encourage themselues to lasciuiousnesse because the good Angels woulde striue for the soule of a villane who was cled with an holie Monkish habite and at last the decision of the controuersie must bee referred to some mortall man not vnlike vnto Paris who was more fauourabiie inclined to Venus then hee was either to Iâ—…no or Minerva Now it is time to speake of the multiplied number of the orders of Monkes not to make a perfect reherâ—…all of them but to let the Reader vnderstand that the woride groned vnder the charge of an importable burthen which neither were they willing to shake off nor able to beare it Ouer and beside the multiplied number of the branches of the Augustine and Benedictine Orders aboue specified other Orders also sprang vp such as the order of the Charterus Monkes where of Brâ—… a man bo ne iâ—… Colne was the author ANNO 1080. It is rumored that a certaine man in Paris died who was renowned for the honestie of an vnreproueable life notwithstanding after his death in audience of the people who were assembled to performe the last funerall duetie to him hee sate vp in the bire and vttered terrible wordes that hee was accused and in the righteous judgement of GOD condemned Bruno was present and heard these tragicall wordes and saide vnto the people If so bee that this man bee condemned it is not possible that any man can bee saued except hee renounce the worlde And so being accompanied with a few followers he went into a Wildernesse neâ—…re to Gratianopolis and was the author of a new Order of the Charterus Monkes whose continuall abstinence from flesh vnmanerly silence and purging with fire the footesteps of women was in their opinion a renouncing of the world If this bee true the people of Aethiopia called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 haue renounced the worlde and are neerer to the Kingdome of GOD then the Charterus Monkes By the like Diabolicall inuention the Order of Catherina de Senis was found out ANNO 1455. The marks of CHRISTS sufferinges the spousing Ring shee receiued from CHRIST with foure pretious Pearles of inestimable value the emptying her body of her owne heart to the ende the heart of CHRIST might bee thrust in place of it What are all these forgeries but as the filthie exhalation of a stirred mire of vncleanenesse yet are these fables published to the worlde in that booke laden with lies called Chronica Chronicorum yea and this woman was canonized by Pope Pius the seconde ANNO 1470. And the Order of S. Catherene was receiued amongst other holy orders Hospitalarii Templarii Teutonici gladiatores
Verely vcrely I say vnto thee except that a man be borne of Water the Spirit he cannot enter into the Kingdome of God was the occasion that both August in the 4. Centurie and Chrysostome in the 5. Centurie thought that they who died without Baptisme were in the estate of those who are condemned howbeit the want of Circumcision 40. yeeres in the wildernesse not vpon contempt but onely vpon necessitie because they knewe not what time the cloud would remooue was not preiudiciall vnto the soules of the Infants all this time yea and if they had circumcised their children and had not permitted them to rest after the wound their children had died in the Wildernes Many faults are laid to their charge such as Idolatrie Fornication murmuring c. Why is not this fault also laide to their charge that they circumcised not their children in the Wildernesse Doubtlesse the Apostle in this point hath seene them to be faultlesse that they despised not the Sacrament of the Couenant of GOD but they were hindred byâ—… the necessitie of their iourneying to circumcise their children This intermission of the Sacrament was helped at Gilgal and the Campe remooued not vntill the time they who were circumcised were whole This historie might haue taught both Augustine and Chrysostome to vnderstand that the Couenant of GOD is not annulled when the holy Sacrament is neither neglected nor contemned but children are preueened by death before they can be presented to the holie Sacrament Notwithstanding these same Fathers were compelled to make exceptions from their owne rigorous sentence for they who gaue their liues for the testimonie of CHRIST before they were baptized in CHRISTS Name the forementioned Fathers were compelled to say that their Martyrdome supplied the want of Baptisme and that they were baptized in their owne blood Moreouer Ambrose who was more ancient than either Augustine or Chrysostome writing of Valentinian the second who was slaine before hee was baptized he sayes of him that as Lazarus rested in the bosome of ABRAHAM euen so the Emperour Valentâ—…nian rested in the bosome of IACOB But now to leaue speaking of ancient Fathers who were compelled both to correct other mens opinions and to make exceptions from their own opinions In this Centurie whatsoeuer was incommodiouslie spoken by ancient Fathers it is not amended but made worse by their suffrage and vote all bypast sini es are said to bee pardoned in Baptisme as Pharao was drowned in the red Sea but no word of comfort to them who beeing hindered by necessitie are preueened by death before they be baptized The simple forme of baptizing in water in the Name of the Father Sonne and holy Ghost was long agâ—…e perueâ—…ted and men added oyle vnto the institution of CHRIST wherewith diueâ—…se parts of the bodie of him who was baptized was annointed but in this Centurie none amendement of preceeding errours but a continuall progresse to further superstition Albeit it came to passe by the prouidence of GOD that the holy Supper continued ministred vnto the people in both formes and the holy Cup was not withdrawne from the people by no Ecclesiasticall ordinance before the Councill of Consiance ann 1414. Notwithstanding the holy Supper was abused in making it both a Sacrament distributed to the liuing and likewise a sacrifice offered for the quicke and the dead especially for those who were alledged to betoâ—…mented in Purgatorie Surely this was a beginning of the dishaunting of the Lordes holy Sacrament for the people beeing once informed that there was as great berefite redounding to their soules by seeing the sacâ—…ifice celebrated and farre lâ—…sse hazard and danger than to communicate of the Sacâ—…ament of CHRIST his bodie and blood the ignorant people were gladly conâ—…ent to bee oft present at the sacrifice but they lothed the frequent 〈◊〉 of the blessed Sacrament of the Lords Communion Finallie in this Centurie good thinges were abused euill ma'adâ—…es were increased desection from the Faith was mightily aduanced all thinges tended vnto a lamentable decay and I conclude this second booke of the Arrian and Eutychian persecution with this exhortation to beware of the beginnings of Apostacie for albeit the shadowes of the Euening doe not vtterly spoyle vs of light yet within a shorte time after our eyes are so dimmed with multiplied and thickned shadowes that we stagger and we know not where we are walking The Lord of his vnspeakable fauour continue with vs and our posteritie the light of his euerlasting trueth AMEN FINIS Faultes escaped In the 4. Centurie in the treatise of Coâ—…ncills PAG. 126. LIN. 10. patrone read patterne In the 5. Centurie Chap. 1. PAG. 5. LIN. 15. 〈◊〉 read Rithimer In the Inscriptions of the Treatises PAG. 38. LIN. 3. Fourth read Fifth Ibidem in the treatise of mans Free-will PAG. 43. LIN. 28. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In the treatise of Originall sinne PAG. 52. LIN. â—…4 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ibidem Cent. 5. PAG. 56. LIN. 1 than read noâ—… Cent. 6. In the treatise of the worshipping of Images PAG. 42. LIN. 3. 〈◊〉 read 〈◊〉 PAG. 53. LIN. 3. knee read kine Ibidem in the treatise of Satisfaction PAG. 57. LIN. 20. Christs read Christ. Ibidem PAG. 60. LIN. 29. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 CENTVRIE VI. CHAP I. OF EMPEROVRS Anastatius AFTER ZENO succeded ANASTATIVS and gouerned 27. yeeres Hee was a patrone of the heresie of Eutyches He banished Euphemius B. of Constantinople because hee would not redeliuer vnto him that letter which he had subscribed before his Coronation wherein he was bound to attempt nothing against the true faith naâ—…ely against the Council of Chalccdone In like maner hee banished Macedonius the successour of Euphemius for the same cause for he had the custodie of the hand-write of Anastatius and the Emperour gaue secret Commandement to make him out of the way at Gangra the place of his banishment Xenoeas B. of Hierapolis a firebrand of Sathan stirred vp the Emperours minde to great rage partly by gathering a Councill at Sidon wherein they damned the actes of the Councill of Chalcedon partly by stirring vp the Emperor to wrath against good men such as were principall defenders of the true faith â—…mely Flavianus B. of Antiochia Helias B of Ierusalem The people of Aâ—…chia were very friendly to their Pastor finding that a great number of Monkes fauouring Eutyches errour had assemblâ—…d in the towne of Antiochia to compell Flavianus their bishop to accurse and abiure the Councill of Chalcedon they set vpon the Monkes and slâ—…we a number of them others leaped into the riuer of Orontes where they found a meet buriall for seditious Monkes On the other part a great number of the Monkes of Syria Caua came to support the troubled estate of Flavianus For these things as if he had bene a contentious man
full of pride and he followed the footsteps of Joannes Cappadox and would bee called vniuersall bishoppe against whome Gregorius 1. contended mightily euen as Lactantius of olde contended against the Pagans impugning the error more mightily than solidly confirming the trueth It is supponed that he ministred 13. yeeres vnder the Emperour Mauritius To whom succeeded Cyriacus Patriarches of Alexandria AFTER Iohn called Tabennesiota succeeded another Iohn who kept the true faith and was banished by Anastatius because he would not damne the Councill of Chalcedone To John succeeded Theodosius an obstinate defender of the errour of Eutyches He was familiarly acquainted with Severus of Antiochia and Anthimus of Constantinople whereby the miserie of these dayes may bee easily espied whereinto three notable heretiques gouerned principall townes such as Constantinople Alexandria and Antiochia He was so obstinate in his errour that he was rather content to be banished vnder the reigne of Iustinian than to renounce his errour After him succeeded Zoilus and after him Appollinarius who was present at the fift generall Councill To whome succeeded Eulogius and after him Petrus who ministred vnder the reigne of Mauritius Patriarches of Antiochia AFTER Palladius succeeded Flavianus who suffered great troubles for the true faith namely by the cruell persecution of the Emperour Anastatius and the calumnies of Xenaeas B. of Hierapoâ—…is a stranger indeed from the couenant of GOD as his name importeth for hee blamed Flavianus most vniustly of the heresie of Nestorius but when Flavianus both by worde and write had cleared himselfe of that calumnie the malice of Xenaeas ceased not for he brought with him to Antiochia a great number of Monkes to compell Flavianus to abiure the Councill of Chalcedone The towne supported their bishop against a raskall number of seditious and hereticall Monkes Notwithstanding the Emperour Anastatius infected with the heresie of Euâ—…yches counted Flavianus who was most vniustly persecuted to be the author of this tumult and banished him and placed Severus in his roome The Emperour Iustinus the elder displaced Severus and punished him and appointed Paulus to be bishop of Antiochia To Paulus succeeded Euphrasius who died in that feareful calamitie of the towne of Antiochia when it was shaken and ouerthrowne with earthquake as Evagrius witnesseth Euphraimius was a ciuile gouernour in the East parts who pitied the decayed estate of the towne of Antiochia furnished all necessarie things for the repairing of the towne of Antiochia for which cause the people was so affectioned to him that they would haue him to bee their bishop So Euphraimius becomes bishoppe of Antiochia or Theopolis for at this time it had both thâ—…se names Evagrius writeth that hee vndertooke the charge of the Apostolicke chaire in which wordes it is manifest that not onely the chaire of Rome but also the chaire of Antiochia was called the Apostolicke chaire The towne of Antiochia at this time was taken by Cosroes King of Persia set on fire and many of thâ—… people were cruelly slaine Euphraâ—…us their bishop at this time left the towne a perilous example except the people had beene in safetie and he onely persecuted yet he left behinde him so much as might redeeme all the Church goods AFTER Eâ—…phraimius followed Domnius And after him Anastatius He ministred vnder the Emperour Iustinian at what time the â—…mperour fell into the errour of them who saide that our LORD IESVS in his very conception adioyned vnto his diuine natâ—…e an immortal body which was subiect to no humane infiâ—…mities Anastatius opponed himselfe to the Emperours opinion the bishops followed Anastatius not the Emperour for this cause Iustinian was purposed to haue banished him but he escaped this trouble by the Emperours death Neuerthelesse hâ—…e was banished by Iustinus the younger for some alleadged cause of dilapidation of Church-gooods and Gregorius was placed in his roome Gregorius ministred in Antiochia 23. yeeres vnder Justinus 2. Tiberius and Mauritius hee was in great account with Mauritius to whome he foretolde that he would be promoted to the Imperiall dignitie And Mauritius imployed him in great and weightie businesse such as in pacifying the tumult of his armie which made insurrection against Germanus their captaine Also hee sent him ambassadour to Cosroes King of Persia who was astonied at the grace that was in his speaches Notwithstanding he was accused by Asterius a Deputie of the East of the filthie sinne of incest but he cleared his owne innocencie so euidently that his accuser was with ignominie scourged and banished Hee died of the gowtes infirmitie after his death Anasiatius whome Iustinus banished for dilapidation of Church-goods beeing yet aliue was restored to his owne place againe To whom succeeded Euphemius Patriarches of Jerusalem AFTER MARTYRIVS succeeded HELIAS a feruent defender of the true faith Neither would hee condescend to the banishment of EVPHEMIVS bishop of Constantinople nor to the admission of Severus to be bishop of Antiochia therefore the Emperour Anastatius banished him To him succeeded Iohn of whose politicke dealing in circumueening Anastatius the Emperours captaine I haue sufficiently declared in the preceeding historie To John succeeded Peter after him Macarius after Macarius Eustochius who impugned the bookes of Origen draue out of his bounds the Monks of Nova Laura defenders of the opinions of Origen Theodorus Ascidas B. of Caesarea in Cappadocia tooke this in an euill part The Emperour Iustinian caused a generall Councill to bee gathered at Constantinople whereinto not only the bookes of Origen were damned but also Theodorus himselfe the defender of them This displeased the Emperour Iustinian because hee loued Theodorus dearely therefore hee procured that Eustochius B. of Ierusalem should be remooued and Macarius restored againe After whome succeeded Ioannes Neamus and Isieius In this Centurie whereas I pretermit the names of other Pastors and Doctors in the Church I haue done it vpon this consideration I find in this Centurie that by the irruption of barbarous people such as the Gothes Uandales Hunnes Auares Schythians Lombards youth was hindred from studies many memorable bookes were burnt ancient languages were vtterly spoyled learning was greatly diminished flatterie of preuailing powers increased ambition in the West heresie in the East turned the estate of the Church vpside downe so that scarcely could men of good giftes and keeping integritie of faith be furnished vnto the principall Apostolick chaires Now after a maner the sunne is going downe the shadowes waxe great the darknes approacheth the Antichrist is at the doore worthy to bee welcomed with darknesse and decay of knowledge What shall I now write of other Pastors and Doctors shall I followe the foolish conceates of Historiographers in whose opinion the gift of miracles increased when the gift of knowledge decayed but the contraâ—…e is knowne by Scripture that the holy Apostles whome CHRIST induced
his treasures can keepe them Concerning the merites of CHRIST they say that there was such precious vertue in his blood that one droppe of it was sufficient to redeeme all the world now say they what shall become of all the rest of his blood which he shâ—…d in great abundance shall all this precious blood be lost and where can it be better kept than in the treasures of CHRISTS Vicar to be dispensated to the vtilitie of sinners when need requireth To this vaine assertion of Papistes I answere that the LORD nâ—…uer dealt sparingly neither with our bodies nor soules The LORD hath prouided greater abundance of aire for the refreshment of our bodies than all the breathing senses of men and beasts is able to draw in The LORD rained downe MANNA from heauen in greater plentie than might haue sufficed the people of the Ieweâ—… in the wildernesse euen so when the LORD is content to shed grâ—…at abundance of his precious blood he hath done it to set foorth the great riches of his mercie toward our soules but not to make a mortall man a dispensator of one drop of his blessed blood The chiefe questions betwixt vs the Romane Church anent Originall sinne are two First whether or no concupiscence which remaineth in the godly after their baptisme be in a proper acception called sinne or not for the Romane Church saith that it is called sinne by the Apostle because it came of sinne and it tendeth to sinne but not because it is sinne is a proper acception And the Council of Trent pronounceth an anathema against them who thinke otherwise than they haue determined The second controuersie is whether or no the naturall concupiscence mouing vs to euill can be called a sinne before wee giue the consent of our mind to it The Romane Church thinketh it no sinne vntill we yeeld the consent of our hearts vnto it The third question anent sinnes coÌ„mitted before after baptisme what way they are remitted because this question pertaineth more properly to another treatise I shal oueâ—…passe it at this time Now anent the first question I affirme that the Apostle Paul when he calleth concupiscence sin hee calleth it sin in a proper acception of the word sin Many names are giuen to sin in Scripture which expresseth what it is properly but especially these 3. names 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Concupiscence is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a transgression of the Law as the Apostle manifestlly witnesseth when he sayeth I had not knowne lust except the Law had saide Thou shalt not lust therefore concupiscence is sinne in a proper acception In like manner concupiscence or originall sinne is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is an aberration to wit from the Lawe and Commandement of GOD and in exprâ—…sse wordes the Apostle speaking of Originall sinne sayeth Wherefore as by one man sinne entered into the worlde and death by sinne and so death went ouer all men forasmuch as all men haue sinned c. In this place concupiscence is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is an aberration from the Commandement of GOD and consequently a sinne in a proper acception of the worde sinne Remember also that the Apostle is speaking of all men yea and of himselfe also in the estate whereinto hee was presently when he wrote this epistle that is after he was baptized Then let vs marke the third word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth a snappering and a falling to wit from the Lawe and Commandement of GOD and this word also is attributed vnto Originall sinne in these wordes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is through the offence of one man many bee dead so that all these three wordes concurring in one doe declare that concupiscence euen after baptisme in a proper sense is sin because it is a breaking of the Lawe an aberration from the Lawe and a falling from the Lawe Nowe the curses of the Councill of Trent which they cast out so prodigally against vs are not worthie one figge because they are not grounded in reason but are expresly repugnant to the written worde of GOD. The second question is this whether or no is concupiscence a sinne before we yeeld the consent of our heart vnto it To this I answere that if they vnderstood by concupiscence a bad inclination it is sinne euen in infants who doe not knowe what it is to consent either to good or euill but if they meane of the first motion or cogitation of sinne presented vnto the soule apparently this question belongeth rather to actuall than to originall sinne but whether it belongeth to the root of sinne or to the branches of sinne I shall produce three reasons wherfore the first motion of sinne is sinne euen before we yeeld vnto it the consent of our heart First because a consent is an indifferent thing called good or euill according to the nature of that thing whereunto we giue our consent and consequently the consent is euill because that motion of sinne whereunto wee consented was euill and if it had not beene euill in it selfe the consent of our heart giuen vnto it had neuer beene called euill Secondly Fathers from whome Papistes haue learned this Theologie that in them who are regenerated concupiscence is not to bee counted a sinne vntill a man giue the consent of his heart vnto it these same Fathers I say after they had pierced deeper into this question they corrected themselues as clearely appeareth by the wordes of Augustine against Iulâ—…anus a Pelagian saying Desiderium mali malum est etiamsi ci non consentiatur donec co perveniamus ubi nec habeatur that is the desire of euill is euill albeit consent be not giuen vnto it vntill wee attaine vnto that estate whereinto we shall be free of it Thirdly the Apostle IAMES when he damneth actuall sin he agreageth it by three circumstances to wit by the conception of it the birth of it and the punishment of it the conception of it is by concupiscence and this the Apostle setteth downe as the first circumstance of the amplification of sinne and not as a thing indifferent vntill wee giue consent vnto it how beit it is true that actuall sinne is not committed vntill consent be giuen to concupiscence yet in it selfe it is a sinne and the conception and root of sinne as the Apostle speaketh It is no point of wisdome to extenuate or to obscure and hide our sinnes for GOD can set them all in order before our face as the psalmist speaketh and if this bee all the gaine and aduantage wee haue by denying and obscuring a part of our sinnes it were better to lay all open before the great Phisitian of our soules to the end that in due time we may be cured by his medicinall plasters Augustine maketh rehearsall of three medicinall cures against concupiscence in these wordes In corpore mortis
This ordination was annulled and it was ordained that none of these Leuites shoulde bee promoted to the honour of a Deacon In the fift Session a Deacon of the Church of Agabra complained of the ordination of three persons in that Church one was ordained to bee Presbyter and two to bee â—…euites The bishop beeing blinde laide his handes vpon them but one of the Presbyters pronounced the blessing Nowe the Presbyter who had pronounced the blessing was dead before the Councell of Hispalis therefore they remitted him to his owne judge but the three persons afore-saide admitted to Church-offices they deposed them from their offices as persons vnlawfullie admitted In the sixt Session it was found that Fragitanus a presbyter of the Church of Corduba was moste vnjustlie both deposed and banished by his bishop For remedie that the like mis-order shoulde haue no place in time to come it was statuted and ordained That a bishop without aduise of his Synode shoulde not presume to depose a presbyter In the seuenth Session Chore-episcopi and Presbyters are debarred from the high priueledges of the Episcopall office namelie from the consecration of presbyters of holie Virgines Churches and Altâ—…rs from laying hand vpon men conuerted from heresie and conferring vnto them the holie Spirit from making of Chrisme and signating with it the fore-heads of them who are baptized from absoluing publikelie in time of Masse anie penitent person and sending testimonials to foraine partes called Formatae epistolae and finallie from baptizing consecrating the Sacrament blessing the people and teaching them receiuing penitentes when the bishop was present Now the ground of all these prohibitions is not brought out of holie Scripture but from the authoritie of the Apostolicke chaire Earlie beganne the Antichâ—…ist to establish an Hierarchie in the Church which neither Christ nor His Apostles had commanded The eight Session intreated concerning Helisens a seruant whome the bishop of Agabra had set at libertie and hee on the other part abused his libertie so farre that hee prâ—…sumed by Magicall Artes to cut off the bishop who had beene so beneficiall vnto him hee was ordained to bee redacted againe to his former seruile estate that hee might learne obedience to his superiours by the heauie yoke of seruile subjection In the ninth Session it is forbidden that bishops shoulde haue Leke-men to bee masters of their house but oneliâ—… some of their owne Clergie shoulde bee dispensators of their householde affaires because it is written Thou shalt not plowe with an Oxe and an Asse together By the way marke that nothing was so miserablie abused at this time as testimonies of holie Scripture In the tenth Session the Monasteries latelie builded in the Bâ—…tike prouince were allowed and confirmed In the eleuâ—…nth Session the Monasteries of Virgines are recommeÌ„ded to the ouer-sight of the Abbot gouerning the Monasterie of Monkes with caueates that all appearance of euill should bee prouidentlie eschewed In the twelfth Session one professing the heresie of Acephali compeared who denied the distinction of two natures in Christ and affirmed that the diuinitie of Christ did suffer vpon the Crosse but hee was seriouslie dealt withall and conuicted by testimonies of holie Scripture and Fathers so that hee renounced his hereticall opinion and embraced the true Faith and the whole Councell gaue praise and thankes vnto God for his conuersion Iâ—… the thirteenth Session there is a prolixe refutation of the opinion of those who supponed that the two natures of Christ were confounded and that the diuinitie suffered Isidorus seemeth to bee the compiler of this Treatise against Acâ—…phali giuen in to the Councâ—…ll of Hispalis and manie doe thinke that he collected into one volume the Councels that preceeded his time for hee was a man more learned than his fellowes in his dayes IN the yeere of our Lord 639. and vnder the reigne of Sisenanâ—… king of 〈◊〉 by the kinges commandement moe than 70. bishops and pâ—…esbyters were conuened in the towne of 〈◊〉 vpon occasion of diuersitie of Ceremonies and Discipline in the countrey of Spaine First they set downe a short confession of the true Faith which they ordained to be embraced and kept Secondly that there should be an vniforme order of praying singing of Psalmes solemnities of Masses Euen-song-seruice throughout all Spaine and Gallicia like as they all professed one Faith and dwelt in one kingdome lest diuersitie of ceremonies and rites should offende ignorant people and make them to thinke that there was a schisme in the Church It was statuted and ordained That at least once in the yeere prouinciall Councels should be assembled and incase anie controuersie should fall out in matters of Faith a generall Councell of all the prouinces of Spaine should be assembled Here let the judicious Reader marke that in processe of time almoste all thinges are subject to alteration and Councels of olde called Nationall now abusiuelie beginne to be called Generall The order of incomming of bishops to the Councell and sitting in the first place and of the presbyters after them and sitting in a place behinde the bishops and of deacons who should stand in presence of bishops and presbyters is described at length in the third canon That the festiuitie of Easter or Pashe daye should bee kept vpon the day of Christes resurrection Concerning the diuersitie of rites vsed in baptisme some vsing the ceremonie of thrise dipping in water others one dipping onelie It was thought most expedient to be content with one dipping because the Trinitie is so viuely represented in the names of the Father Sonne and holie Ghost that there is no necessitie by three dippinges in water to represent the Trinitie and for eschewing all appearance of schisme and lest Christians should seeme to assent vnto heretiques who diuide the Trinitie For all these causes it was expedient to keepe vniformitie in the ceremonies of Baptisme It was statuted and ordained That vpon fryday immediately preceeding Easter day the doctrine of the suffering of Christ of repentance remission of sinnes should be clearly taught vnto the people to the end that they being purged by remission of sins might the more worthily celebrate the feast of the Lords resurrection and receiue the holie Sacrament of the Lords bodie and blood The custome of putting an ende vnto the fasting of Lent vpon fryday at nine a clocke is damned because in the daye of the Lordes suffering the Sunne was couered with darknesse and the elementes were troubled and for honour of the Lords suffering that daye should bee spent in fasting mourning and abstinence and hee who spendeth anie part of that day in banqueting let him bee debarred from the Sacrament of Christes bodie and blood on Pashe day That the Tapers and Torches which shined in the Church in the night preceeding the daye of the resurrection shoulde bee solemnly blessed to the end that the mystery
argumentes whereby the seconde Councell of Nice endeuoured to approue the adoration of images are all refuted in the Councell of Frankford as I haue declared alreadie in a Treatise concerning worshipping of Images Concerning the argument taken from the authotitie of Epiphanius who in his booke called Panarium reckoneth not the worshippers of images in the roll of Heretiques it is answered by the Councell of FRANKFORD that incase Epiphanius had counted the haters of the worshippers of images Heretiques hee had likewise inferted their names in the catalogue of Heretiques but seeing hee hath not so done the Councell of Nice had no just cause to triumph so much in this friuolous argument which maketh more against them that it maketh for them More-ouer in the Councell of FRANKFORD the Epistle of Epiphanius written to Ihonne bishop of Hierusalem was read wherein hee disalloweth the verie inbringing of images into Churches and this Epistle was translated out of Grieke into the Latine language by Ierom. The Epistle is worthie to bee read Reade it in the Magdeburg Historie Cent. 8. Chap. 9. TREATISES Belonging to the VIII CENTVRIE A TREATISE Of Transsubstantiation SATHAN is a vigilant enemie setting himselfe in most opposite manner against euerie thing that is a comfort and refreshment vnto the sheepe-folde of God Now the principall comforts of the sheepe of God are the pastures wherein they feede and the waters wherewith they are refreshed Doubtlesse these two comforts are the preaching of the word and the ministration of the Lordes holy Sacraments If Sathan by any meanes can hinder the true preaching of the worde and the right ministration of the Sacramēts then his malice against Gods people is descried as the malice of the Philistimes of olde against Isaac and his cattell was manifested when they stopped with earth the foūtaines of water which Abraham had digged whereof the cattell of Isaac were accustomed to drink It cannot bee sufficiently expressed in words what malice Sathan hath born against the true preaching of the word of God the right ministration of the Sacraments The sixt persecution of Ethnick Emperoures was so directly set against the Preachers of Gods worde as the worlde might easily discerne that the intention of Maximinus was to vndoe the sheepe-folde of God for lacke of pastures and of refreshing waters For this cause let not our cogitations be rauished with admiration when we heare or reade that manie questions haue beene mooued concerning the holie Sacrament of the Lords Supper If there were not plenty of spirituall consolation to bee receiued by the right participation of this holy Sacrament Sathan had neuer busied himselfe so earnestly against it as if the throate of his kingdome were cut if this Sacrament be rightly ministred by the Preachers rightlie receiued by the people Let the Christian Reader remember that of olde vnder the tenne persecuting Emperoures the receiuing of the holy Sacrament of the Lordes Supper was called the banquet of Thyestes This proceeded from none other ground but from the malice of the Deuill hating the Lords holy banquet Secondly the Manichean heretiques so peruerted the Lords holy Sacrament that Augustine to whom their secret mysteries were not vnknowne was compelled to call their Communion Execramentum and not Sacramentum that is an execrable thing and not a Sacrament Thirdly the Donatists in ministring the Lords Sacraments were in an opinion That the Sacrament was onely effectuall when it was ministred by one of their owne number But seeing the malice of Sathan is an infinite thing and hath not a period wherein it endeth For defacing of the right vse of the holy Sacrament Sathan filled the heart of an hereticall Monke called Damascene with a lewde opinion to affirme That the bread in the holy Sacrament was transsubstantiate into the body of Christ and that the wine was transsubstantiate into His blood Which opinion I may justly call a Noueltie because it was neither in worde nor writ hearde before the seuen hundreth yeere of our Lord. But it is the custome of Papists to follow Nouelties and in the meane time to bragge of Antiquitie What abuses of the holy Sacrament followed after the seuen hundreth yeere of our Lord God willing shall bee declared in its owne time for the present thus much I say That vpon a time I saw the images of Cain and Abel pictured by an vnlearned painter with such habite as the Germanes are appareled with in our dayes These pictures made mee not to thinke that the Germane habite was in vse in the dayes of Cain and Abel but rather that the painter was a foolishe man destitute of vnderstanding Euen so when I reade the works of Damascene albeit I was at that time but young in yeeres yet I thought not that the opinion of Damascene was agreeable to Apostolicke doctrine but rather that Damascene was a foolishe and doating Monke and somewhat ambitious also desiring to be coūted the author of some new opinion which no man had maintained before him IN this TREATISE I shall first declare God willing what it is that they call Transsubstantiation secondly howe absurde an opinion it is and thirdly with what relùctation it was insinuated into the bosome of the Latine Church but euer vntill this daye was rejected of the Grieke Church Nowe Transsubstantiation as they saye is an euanishing of the substance of bread and wine after the wordes of consecration and a substitution of the bodie blood of Christ in place of the euanished substance of bread and wine the accidents of bread and wine alwayes remaining without inherence into anie subject Albeit the worde Transsubstantiation seemeth to import a change of one substance into another and the moste part of them define it to bee a chaunge of the substance of bread into the substance of Christes bodie yet some of them doe forsee a great inconueniencie if Transsubstantiation be defined to a chāge of the substance of bread into the substance of Christes bodie namely this that Christes bodie in heauen cladde with a most glorious and celestiall brightnesse and Christes bodie in earth ouershaddowed with the accidentes of bread and wine shall not bee counted one and the selfe same bodie in respect that the bodie of Christ that is in heauen was formed by the holy Spirit of the substance of the Virgine Marie and the bodie of Christ in the Sacrament woulde bee founde to bee made of the substance of bread This is the cause wherefore they who are more subtile than the rest abstaine from the grosse definition afore-saide Howsoeuer concerning the word Transsubstantiation I admonish the Reader that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is an euanishing or disparition hath no affinitie with Damascenes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth a change of one thing vnto another thing that is better so that there is no good agreement amongst themselues concerning the signification of the word Transsubstantiation Concerning consecration of the elementes there are diuerse opinions The
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sub 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is wee offer in remembrane of his death and this which wee offer is a type to wit commemoratiue of that which he offered But because they hing by an haire and if any ancient Father cast out one worde albeit it were hyperbolically spokeÌ„ they fasten their gripes vpon it as if it made altogether for them Now Chrysostome saieth This Sacrifice which we offer is one and the selfe same Sacrifice which Christ offered Is it not good reason hee haue libertie to expounde the meaning of his owne words and so he doeth Our Sacrifice and Christs Sacrifice is one because we celebrate a remembrance of that Sacrifice once offered vpon the Crosse and of none other But that Sacrifice which Christ offered vpon the Crosse hath no neede to be reiterated saith Chrysostome in that same Homilie because it is like vnto a medicine which beeing once applyed hath a perfect vertue to saue vs from all our sinnes Hitherto I haue declared that the words of Consecration if they bee expounded as auncient Fathers expounded them they make nothing to proue the doctrine of Transsubstantiation Nowe let vs proceede further to see howe this definition of Transsubstantiation agreeth with the doctrine of the Apostles and of other auncient Fathers The Scriptures of God neither acknowledge an euanishing of the substance of bread and wine neither yet a chaunge of their substance into the substance of Christs bodie and blood For as much as the Apostle Paul speaking of the sacred elementes of the Lordes Supper at that time when they seale vp our conjunction with Christ which is not before the blessing breaking and distribution but after these holy actions the Apostle calleth the eating of the blessed bread 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the drinking of the blessed Cuppe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a communion of the Lords bodie and blood not excluding the substance of the elementes but expressely pointing out the wordes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the bread and the cuppe The moste ancient Fathers are moste vnacquainted with this Noueltie of Transsubstantiation for they all in one voyce for the space of 500. yeeres doe consent that the substance of bread and wine remaineth in the Sacrament after the wordes of Consecration albeit the vse of the elementes bee changed Iustinus Martyr saith that the elementes in the Sacrament of the Supper are made the flesh and the blood of Iesus in that same forme that the eternall worde of God was made flesh but so it is that the substance of the diuine nature neither euanished nor yet was changed into the substance of flesh And in like manner the bread is made the body of Christ neither by the euanishing of the substance thereof nor yet by changing the substance thereof into another substance In like manner Ireneus when he saith that the holy Eucharist consisteth of things earthly and of thinges celestiall by mentioning of earthly things hee would declare that the substance of the bread and wine remaineth after the consecration And lest any man by shifting wordes shoulde saye that Ireneus meaneth not by earthly thinges the substance of bread and wine but rather the accidents hee expresseth his owne meaning in the 32. chap. that he is speaking of the bread and the cuppe Ambrose speaking of the operatiue vertue of the Lords word in the Sacrament he saith that the elementes remaine that same thing which they were they are changed into another thing because the substance of the elements remaineth and their vse is changed Like as a regenerated man in substance both of soule and body is that same man that hee was before yet in qualities and conditions there is a great change And who can interprete the words of Ambrose better than hee himselfe doeth illustrate them by the foresaide similitude Theodoretus in his first Dialogue saith that God hath honoured the elements in the Sacrament with the name of His bodie blood not by changing of their nature but by adding grace vnto nature And in his second Dialogue he saith that after the wordes of consecration the elementes remaine in their former substance shape and forme The wordes of Theodoretus are not more effectual to instruct vs in the right judgement concerning the nature of the Sacrament than the very purpose whereat hee aimeth in those his Dialogues They are written of purpose to refute the heresie of Eutyches who affirmed that after the diuine nature assumed the humane nature all became diuinitie and there was not two distinct natures in Christ but one only Theodoretus for refutation of this heresie bringeth a comparison taken from the Sacrament of the Lords Supper in the which the bread in substance remaining bread assumeth a name and vse that it had not before by diuine institution to be called the bodie of the Lord Euen so the diuine nature of Christ assumed the humane nature without any change of the one natuâ—…e into the other Moreouer he proueth the veritie of Christs humane nature by this That the elements in the Sacrament of the Supper are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is signes types and figures of the bodie and blood of Christ. And incase he had not a true body how could the elements in the Sacrament be figures of his bodie These speaches of Theodoretus doe import two thinges First that the elementes in the Sacrament of the Supper remaine still in their owne substance and their substance is neither changed nor euanished Secondly that in the holy Sacrament of the Supper there are signes not accidentall but the elementes in their owne substance remaining are signes of the body and blood of Jesus Christ. And howe these two things can agree with the doctrine of Transsubstantiation let the judicious Reader consider Augustine in like manner is so farre from imagining that the substance of the bread is euanished or turned into another substance that he putteth a difference betwixt Sacramentum and res Sacramenti counting the elementes Sacramentum and the bodie blood of Christ res sacramenti Now concerning the elements that is the bread and the wine he affirmeth that some doe eate them vnto saluation others doe eate them vnto damnation but as concerning the body and blood of Christ which Augustine calleth res sacramenti in expresse tearmes he saith No man receiueth them but onely to eternall life Of this it is euident that Augustine calleth that Sacramentum which is eaten either worthily or vnworthily either to saluation or to damnation And he is speaking of the substance of bread and wine which can bee eaten drunkeÌ„ and not of accidents which no man can eat or drinke But wherefore doe I spende time to cite testimonies of Fathers to prooue that after the wordes of blessing the elements in the holy Supper neither change their substance nor yet doeth their
A SHORT COMPEND OF THE HISTORIE OF THE FIRST TEN PERSECVTIONS MOVED AGAINST CHRISTIANS DIVIDED INTO III. CENTVRIES WHEREVNTO ARE ADded in the end of euery Centurie treatises arising vpon occasion offered in the historie clearely declaring the noveltie of Popish Religion and that it neither flowed from the mouthes of Christs holy Apostles neither was it confirmed by the blood of the holy Martyrs who died in these ten persecutions IEREM 6. ver 16. Thus saith the Lord Stand in the wayes and behold and aske of the old way which is the good way and walke therein and ye shall find rest vnto your soules but they said we will not walke therein LVC. 10. ver 42. Marie hath chosen the good part which shall not be taken away from her EDINBVRGH Printed by Andro Hart and are to be solde at his shop on the North side of the high streete a litle beneath the Crosse ANNO DOM. 16. 13. TO THE MOST NOBLE VERtuous and elect Ladie MARIE Countesse of Mar wisheth Grace Mercie and eternall Felicitie IT hath pleased God most noble and elect Ladie to prolong my life these yeeres bypast vnder many infirmities of a dayly decaying tabernacle yet my good God hath not left me destitute of comfort to the end I might fulfil my course with joy One of my chiefe comforts vnder God was your La. reuerent hearing and faithfull practising of the worde of God I delited to see that thing begun in earth which shal be perfited in heauen The glorified Saintes in heauen they cast down their crownes at the feete of the Lambe who sits vpon the Throne When noble persons in earth humblie kisses the feete of the Son of God beares ' his light burden and submittes themselues vnto his easie yoke then some resemblance of the heauen is found in the earth The rarer this vertue is the more I reverenced it in your La person and the oftener I commended your noble houshold to God and to the worde of his grace which is able to build further and to giue you an inheritance among all them which are sanctified The Queene of Adiabene HELENE when she left her owne countrie and came to dwell at Ierusalem she filled the bellies of the poore with the cornes of Egypt and the fruits of Cyprus forit was a yeere of vniuersal famine and spared for no cost to doe good to the Saincts that were in Ierusalem therefore her name is vntill this day in reuerent remembrance And in our dayes honorable Ladies who refreshes the barren soules of ignorant people in this land with examples of humilitie modestie godlinesse and all other Christian vertues many generations after vs shall call them blessed The Lord in mercie augment the number of honorable persons who rejoyce to goe vnto the house of the Lord. These are the toppes of the mountaines which beeing once free and not couered with ouerflowing waters it is a comfortable presage that the great flood that drowned the world shall be abated These are the Minerals of gold and siluer which are not easily found out but after they are discouered they replenish the land with infinit treasures of riches The Prophet ZACHARIE when he saw in that celestiall vision IEHOSHVA his body honoured with change of apparell wished also the Diademe to be set vpon his heade but if he had seene the Diademe set vpon his head and the body lapped vp with ragges of vile apparel hee had wished the body also to be honoured with ornaments proportionallie agreeing to the heade It hath pleased the wisedome of our God in this part of the countrie whereinto I dwell first to decke with glorious ornaments the head the Lord in mercie cloth the body also with change of rayment to the end that Satan that vigilant enemie who delighteth in the filthie ragges of our beggerly apparel may be grieued for our change from worse to better I speake the truth in Christ I lie not my conscience bearing me witnesse that it is lawfull to me toreuerence the image of Christ where euer I see it clearely shining either in rich or in poore And so much the more because it was my lot to conferre with many persons of a contrarie religion whom I found to be like reprobat siluer fra whō the drosse could not be separated What is next If they will harden their heartes against the truth of God then let the dead burie their dead but let the noble house of Mar follow Christ. Receiue from my hands Madam this short cōpend of the ten first great persecutions with certaine treatises added to the compend of the historie and be not afraid to follow the religion and faith of the Apostles and Euangelists because their eares heard the words of the great shepheard of our soules their eyes saw God manifested in the flesh they were chosen to be faithful witnesses to the world of the doings sufferings and doctrine of Christ the holy Ghost was sent to teach them in all trueth Here we may rest vpon a sure foundation against the which the gates of hell cannot preuaile Next to the Apostles their true successours are to be had in reuerent regard who sealed vp that faith which they receiued from the Apostles with riuers of blood for the space of three hundreth yeeres To this antiquitie of Apostolicke doctrine let vs firmely adhere This is the clearest mirrour whereinto the precepts of wholesome doctrine are contained After the holy Apostles had finished their course the disciples of the Apostles were worthie men yet not like vnto the Apostles who had bene both called taught immediatly by Christ. If any doūg was in their sacrifices it was couered by the glory of their sufferings the fire wherwith they were burnt the water wherinto they were drouned the aire wherinto their bodies were hanged vp the mountaines wildernes through which they wandered the darke prisons whereinto they were enclosed as people vnworthie of libertie whom notwithstanding the Son of God had made sree and they were free indeede Yea all the verie elements the light of Heauen wherefra by most vnrighteous violence the righteous heires of heauen were excluded all these I say were witnesses of their glorious sufferings Vnder pretence of climming to this antiquitie the Papists would cloacke the turpitude of their new found doctrine So did the Hagarenes boldly vsurpe the name of Saracenes yet they were but the brood that spran◅s out of the bellie of HAGAR the handmaid of SARAH And the Priests boy in the daies of ELI came vnto the Caldron while the flesh of the peace offering was seithing and thrust in his flesh-hooke all that the flesh-hooke brought vp the Priest tooke for himselfe This thing was done by violence but the Priest had not just right to euerie piece of the sacrifice that the flesh-hooke brought vp The Romaine Church in our dayes hath borrowed the flesh-hooke of the Priestes boy and violently arrogates vnto themselues the faithfull keeping
of ancient Apostolike traditions When we demand where is the charter containing their title and right we see nothing but the flesh-hook with three teeth in their hand The Church cannot erre We are the true Church And Cursed be he who saith that in matters of faith our general Councils can erre Madame accept vnder your La. fauourable protection these my trauels in weakenesse not vnlike to the writer alwayes containing a faithfull testimonie of my humble endeuoure to confirme the branches of your noble housholde in the true faith of Christ. Nowe the great Mediator of the couenant of God stablish all your heartes in the certaintie of his vndoubted trueth vnto the ende and in the ende Amen Your La. humble seruant P. SYMSON The Preface THE estate of the Church of Christ whereoâ—… we 〈◊〉 to be counted feeling members hath bene very troublous froÌ„ the beginning of the world not like vnto the estate of Moab setled vpon her dregs not powred out from vessell to vessel Ierem 48. 11. yet the more afflicted the more beloued of God Whose face watred with teares is faire and whose mourning voyce is pleasant in the sight of God Cantic 2. 14. And like as doing of good willingly hath a great recompense of reward from God eucn so patient suffering of euill for righteousnes sake is highly commended in Scripture and richly rewarded in heauen Yea the very Ethnicke Philosopher PLATO to whome the glorie of the sufferings for Christ was vnknowne affirmeth that men who suffer scourging binding tormenting boring out of eyes and finally strangling of their breath for righteousnes sake are exceeding happie or as the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 imports thrise happie PLATO in Repub. Howbeit the superlatiue degree of suffering that can bee found amongst the Ethnickes could neuer equall the glorie of the sufferings of Christian people They who were initiated in the mysteries of MITHRA this word in the Persian language signifieth the sunne could not be admitted to that honour before they had bin tried by suffâ—…ring of four score diuerse sorts of tormentes such as long abstinence from meate and drinke solitarie liuing in the wildernesse a long time triall of suffering the feruent heate of fire and the coldnesse of water and many other torments vntill the number of four score had bene completely filled out Nazian in Iulianum These voluntarie sufferings like as in the beginning they wanted the warrand of Gods calling so likewise in ende they shall want the hope of Gods reward But the mouth of God himselfe pronounceth Christians to be blessed who die in the Lord for they rest from their laboures and their workes follow them Apoc. 14 13. The manifold persecutions of the Church may bee diuided into three ranckes some of them were fierce and bloody some were craftie the third was and is both cruâ—…ll and craftie The ten Ethnick Emperours NERO DOMITIAN TRAIAN c. were so prodigall of the blood of the Lordes Saintes that they powred it out like water vpon the ground The Arrian Emperours were subdolous and craftie but the persecution of the Antichrist which is the third goeth beyond the rest both in crutltie and craft The experience we haue had in our own dayes of the crueltie of the supposts of the Antichrist and their craftie conuey of their malicious interprisesintended against our Soveraigne Lord his royall race and noble Counsellers doth clearâ—…y prooue that the malice and craft of the Antichrist goeth as farre beyond the malice craft of all Emperours as the flood of NOAH goeth beyond the inundation of Nilus ONVPHRIVS confoundeth the first two ranâ—… of the persecutions by a secret preterition of the name AVREâ—…AN and counteth DIOCLETIAN to be the ninth persecuting Emperour and the ARRIAN persecution for the tenth I can neither haue a good liking of his opinion nor of himselfe His opinion smelleth of nouâ—…ltie himselfe was an aduocat for heretiques and all bad reprobat causes he will pleade the cause of HONORIVS condemned as an herctique in a generall Councill and the cause of GREGORIE the seuinth and impudently dare denie that euer there was a Pope of the feminine sexe sitting in the chaire of Rome True it is that all the Emperours who liued after the ascension of our Lord into heauen vntill the Halcyon dayes of CONSTANTINE the great onely some few except such as NERVA and PHILIPPVS and few moe might haue their names most iustly inrolled into the Catalogue of persecuting Emperours because they suffered the fire that others had kindled to burne on still and quenched it not by the might of their authoritie But these are chiefly counted persecutours who either kindled the fire as NERO did or else by nâ—…we edicts and commandements set foorth in their names they added fâ—…well to the fire to the ende that the augmented flame of the fornace might strike the greater terrour into the heartes of Christians A short compend of the first ten great persecutions I haue collected out of sundrie authors whereinto necessitie driueth me to write of persecuting Emperours so far as appertaineth to the historie of the Church and no further and of persecuted Christians specially teachers against whome the rage of persecuting Tyrants was most baâ—…efully bent The names of the heretiques also behoued to be remembred the most malignant vleer that euer bred in the Church of Christ. These are the wandering stars of whome the Apostle Iude speaketh to whome is reserued the blacknesse of darkenesse for euer Epist. Iud. ver 13. I haue made litle mention of Councils except of that famous Councill holden at Ierusalem by the Apostles Acts 15. Prouinciall and nationall Councills during the space of the first three hâ—…ndreth yeeres were few in number by reason of the rage of persecuting Emperours and some of them that were gathered were obscure and the lâ—…sse regarded in respect of their contradiction one to another There was a Council gathered at Rome another in Caesarea Palestinae another in France the fourth in Pontus and one in Asia all these were gathered for one and the selfe same purpose to deliberate anent the keeping of Pasch day Euseb. lib. 5 cap. 23. In Rome VICTOR was in one opinion POLYCRATES in Asia held another opinion IRENAEVS in France was wiser then the rest and was more carefull to keepe vnitie in the Church of Christ then to dispute contentiously anent keeping of dayes The nationall Councill of Philadelphia in Arabia against ARTEMON and BERYLLVS wherein ORIGEN was present Euseb. hist. eccl lib 6. cap. 37. A Councill holden at Rome by CORNELIVS and another in some partes of Africke for the timous suppressing of the error of NOVATVS Cyprian epist. lib. 1. Epist 2. A notable Councill holden at Antiochia against PAVIVS SAMOSATENVS a pernicious heretique Euseb lib. 5. cap 29. All these were gathered for suppressing of heretiques Some Councils were gathered by CYPRIAN B of Carthage for rebaptising of those who were baptized by heretiques This weakenesse both in CYPRIAN and
in other B shops of Africke was after corrected by the Church In the treatises that I haue subjoyned after euery Centurie I had regard to discouer the fountaines of errours that began to spring vp in the first three hundreth yeeres after our Lordes ascension to heauen Howe ancient so cuer the small beginnings of errours doe seeme yet are they posterior vnto that wholesome summe of true doctrine deliuered to the worlde by Christe and his Apostles Who so listeth to vse the like order in all the rest of the Centuries vntill our owne dayes no necessitie shall driue him to vse HERODOTES modest excuse in the description of the riuers of Nilus and Boristhenes whose fountaines in his dayes were vnknown and therefore his preterition of a thing vnknown was to be fauourably comported with by the reader but the welspring of all the rest of popish errors according to the order of time wherein they began to set foorth their head may bee as easily pointed out by the finger as these whereof I make mention in the first three hundreth-yeeeres The Râ—…etoricall ornaments of NAZIANZENVS speaking to the deade and bringing in a virgin crauing helpe at the blessed virgin the mother of our Lord inâ—…ourageth LINDANVS to count invocation of Saintes to be an ancient Apostolicke tradition Nazianzenus in laudem Cypr. yeâ—… could be not be ignorant that invocation of Saintes began not to take roote before the foure hundreth yeere of our Lord and that in great weakenesse of doubtsome speaches O anima Constantini 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is O soule of CONSTANTINVS if thou hast any sense or feeling to wit of things done amongst vs Nazian oratione 〈◊〉 contraJulianum Therefore the treatise of invocation of Saintes may more conveniently he subjoyned to the fourth Centurie The other cause wherefore I haue compiled these treatises is to declare how circumspectly we should beware of the small beginnings of defection from ancient veritie because the beginning of errour is like vnto a soft vapour rising out of the sea thickning in the aire conuerting into a cloud and in end sending downe mightie stormes and tempests vpon the earth Who could haue once imagined that Natalitia Martyrum a thing in iâ—… selfe not vnlawfull could haue turned to that horrible abuse that now is in Poperie that all these holy Martyrs are made mediators of our intercession Or who could haue imagined that the reuerent keeping of the reliques of Saints could haue turned in end vnto adoration and knceling before them with confidence to be the better heard of God The Lord grant we may beware in time of the beginnings of defections both in doctrine and in maners that haue crâ—…pt in of late dayes into this lande Amen To the Reader IT was admired of old that APHRAATES who liued in the cottages of the wildernesse al his time yet once he was found in the streetes of Antiochia in the dayes of the Emperour VALENS Theodor. hist. eccl lib. 4. cap. 26. hee excufed the change of his former behauiour by the similitude of a modest virgin lurking quietly in secret corners of her fathers house so long as it is in safetie but if it bee set on fire it is skaithfull modestie to lurke any longer necessitie compelleth her to runne out to the streetes to crie and giue warning of the peâ—…ill ofher fathers house This example of APHRAATES might sufficiently excuse mine vnaccustomed boldnesse to set foorth my head that hath bene lapped vp so long in hurtfull silence But now the power of darknesse in creaseth and as the Prophet saith Woevnto vs for the day declineth and the shadowes of the euening are stretched out Ierem. 6. 4. Yea the shadow of mount Athos reacheth to the Isle Lemnos a sure fore-running token of the going downe of the Sunne Now it is time to creepe out of our subterraneall caues and to giue warning to sloken the fire in time before it spread further and bring greater desolation to the House of our GOD. Papists are waxed insolent of late dayes like vnto Serpentes in Summer weather taking courage and biting the heeles of horses that the riders may fall not sparing both in worde and write to reproach our religion as a thing not countenanced with antiquitie and our Ministrie as altogether naked and voyde of the knowledge of ancient learning Shall wee nowe stand as idle men doe in market places one looking vpon another Rather then wee should sustaine such apparent dammage and skaith through vntimous silence I had rather step foorth with the Lacedemonian souldier impotent of his legges and neither meete to fight nor able to flie yet had he this comfort that possible he might blunt the edge of his enemies sworde and make others ashamed who were meeter for fighting then he was Take in good season my weake trauelles Christian Reader I haue many honest witnesses who knowe that I was neuer purposed to send foorth vnto the open view of the world any thing that came from me Howe this compend came into the Printers hande I remit vnto his faithful testimonie It was my purpose in write to haue giuen warning vnto noble houses who had bene my ordinarie auditors to beware of the contagion of lying doctrine that is nowesecretly spreading in our land this being done the ordinarie exercises of my calling would haue beene my chiefe imployment if the Lord pleased Therefore gentle Reader take in the better parte the Goates haire Rammes skinnes that I present to couer the Tabernacle of my God I referre the ornaments of gold siluer and precious stones for beautifying the inner parts of the Tabernacle to others vpon whome God hath vouchsafed greater gifts Exod. 25. Farewell CENTVRIE I. Chap. 1. Augustus Caesar. OVR Lord Iesus the true Prince of peace was borne in BethleheÌ„ Iuda of a maid in a very peaceable time in the 42. yeere of the reigne of AVGVSTVS CAESAR Euseb. eccl hist. lib. 1. cap. 5 at what time the temple of IANVS was cloied locked vp Functii Chron. which in time of warres was continually patent and open At the time of this blessed Nativitie the Angels of God rejoyced Luc. 1. the deuils trembled Some affirme that all the Oracles of IVPITER APOLLO and HECATE were silent and gaue no responses alwayes it is certaine that many yeeres before the Lordes blessed Nativitie the Lord permitted the world to be wonderfully blinded with the delusions of the deuill The top of IVPITERS oake in Dodona was shaken the caldron was smitten with the rodde that was in the hand of IVPITERS image The Prophetesses forewarned by these fore-running tokens of inspiration were readie to vtter IVPITERS oracles and the deceiued people were humblie kneiling and attending vpon the response that should be giuen Nazianz in Iulianum Annot. Nonni the tripode in Delphis the laurell and fountaine in Daphne APOLLO his deceitfull ensignes the ram-faced image of IVPITER AMMONIVS in Cyrenia with many moe places whereinto the sound of the deuils
trumpet was heard to these places I say did people bewitched by Satan resort in frequent numbers to bee taught by the mouth of him who was a liar from the beginning and who remaineth a liar albeit he speake at some time the trueth because he speaketh it animo fallendi vpon a purpose to deceiue It is very credible that the blessed Seede who came to breake the heade of the Serpent did stoppe his mouth also in the time of his blessed Natiuitie The countrie of Iudeâ—… at this time was subject to the Romanes and payed tribut to CAESAR Luc. 2. The deputies of AVGVSTVS in Iudea and Syria were CYRENIVS COPONIVS AMBIBVCHVS and ANNIVS RVFVS one succeeding to another Ioseph Antiq. lib. 18. cap. 3. HEROD the sonne of ANTIPATER by fauour of ANTONIVS obtained this honour to be gouernour of the nation of the Iewes but the honourable name of a King hee receiued from AVGVSTVS CAESAR this was ratified for his further assurance by the Senat of Rome Ioseph Antiq. lib. 15. cap 10. for which cause HEROD to testifie his thankfull minde toward ANTONIVS builded a Castle in Ierusalem very neere to the temple called Arx Antonia And to the honour of AVGVSTVS he builded Caesarea Palestinae sometime called the towre of STRATON Now a forreiner and stranger of his fathers side an Idumean of his mothers side an Arabian Sozom. lib. 1. cap. 1. and an aliant both from the stocke of DAVID and also from the Commonwelth of Israel was reigning in Iudea and the scepter was sliding from Iuda now I say was it time that SHILOCH should come according to IACOBS prophecie to whome the people should be gathered Gen. 49. 10. Now was it time that the promised Mâ—…SSIAS should come and sit in the Throne of his father DAVID and of his Kingdome there should be none end And indeed how can the Kingdome of Christ haue an end who acquireth a new title and right of gouernement by death which is the last period of other Kings gouernements and in death they leaue a vacant roome to a successour but Christ Iesus by dying and rising againe hath a right to rule both ouer deade and quicke Rom 14. 9. Yea in verie death it selfe he was practising his kingly office in most effectuall maner and tramping Satan vnder feete and vndoing the power of death Hos. 13. 14. In AVGVSTVS time also IOSEPH was admonished in a dreame to take the babe and his mother and to flee into Egypt Mat. 2. 13. SOZOMEN not content with the certaintie of Scripture addeth a particular nomination of the towne Hermopolis in Thebaida whereinto Christ sojourned vntil the death of HEROD the great This he had by the vncertaintie of tradition The miracle of the hudge and high tree Prestis that bowed the top lowlie to the ground and worshipped her maker Christ and afterward had a medicinable vertue in fruit leafe and barke to cure diseases rather derogateth credit to that Egyptian tradition then assureth vs of the veritie of that report Sozom. lib. 5. cap. 21. HEROD before his departure from this life had put to death three of his sonnes ARISTOBVLVS ALEXANDER and ANTIPATER and by testamentall legacie had diuided his dominions amongst his remanent sonnes ARCHELAVS HEROD ANTIPAS and PHILIP which testament being ratified by AVGVSTVS Iudea Samaria and Idumea were alloted to ARCHELAVS the Tetrarchie of Galile to ANTIPAS and Iturea and Trachonitis to PHILIP Ioseph Antiq. lib. 17. cap. 13. IOSEPH being returned from Egypt when he heard that ARCHELAVS did reigne in Judea in stead of his father HEROD feared to dwell in Iudea but beeing warned of God in a dreame went to the partes of Galile and dwelt in a citie called Nazaret Mat. 2. ver 22 23. All this was done in the dayes of AVGVSTVS After he had reigned 56. yeeres or as Iosephus writeth 57. yeeres viz. with ANTONIVS 14. yeeres and after he ouercame ANTONIVS and CLEOPATRA Queene of Egypt in sea-warfare ouer against Epirus he had the imperiall soveranitie himselfe alone all his dayes and died in the 77. yeere of his age Ioseph Antiq. lib. 18. cap. 3. Tiberius AFter AVGVSTVS reigned TIBERIVS NERO 22. yeres 7 moneths 7. dayes Bucolc Index The Romane Deputies that were sent to Iudea in the time of his reigne were VALERIVS GRATVS PONTIVS PILAT and VITELLIVS VALERIVS GRATVS for loue of gaine remooued the Priests of the Iewes from their offices at his owne pleasure ANANVS ISMAEL ELEAZARVS SIMON the sonne of CAMITHVS all these were denuded of their priestly dignitie when as two of them viz. ELEAZARVS and SIMON had continued scarse one yeere in office In end IOSEPHVS CAIAPHAS is aduanced to the priesthood This is the cause wherefore the Euangelist Iohn calleth CAIAPHAS the high Priest of that same yeere Iohn 18. ver 13. Matters of religion were now come to an horrible abuse and were not ordered according to Gods holy ordinance but according to the appetite of the Romaine Deputies Ioseph antiq lib. 18. cap. 3. After GRATVS PONTIVS PILAT was sent to be Deputie in Iudea a man vigilant and actiue in all civile adoes as the blood of the Galileans mixed with their sacrifices clearely prooueth Luc. 13. 1. but in the cause of Christ remisse negligent and slacke After the issue of ten yeeres VITELLIVS is appointed Deputie in Iudea and PONTIVS PILAT addresseth toward Rome By gratifying of the Iewes in a matter of small importance he conquessed great fauour The priestly garments were wont to be kept in the Castle called Antonia but VITELLIVS gaue commandement to the Captaine of the Castle to let the high Priest haue the vse of them when he pleased and to choose what place he liked best for the custody of the priestly garments He disauthorized CAIAPHAS following as appeareth the example of VALERIVS GRATVS and gaue his office to IONATHAN the sonne of ANANVS sometime high Priest Ioseph antiq lib. 18. cap 6. In the 15. yeere of the reigne of TIBERIVS Christ our Lord and Sauiour was baptized by IOHN in Iordan was led to the wildernesse fasted fourtie dayes was tempted of the deuil and began to preach Euseb. hist. eccl lib. 1. cap. 10. Mat. 3. and 4. In the eighteenth yeere of TIBERIVS the Lord Iesus was crucified and offered a sacrifice for our sinnes which hath a perpetuall vertue to saue such as beleeue Heb. 7. He arose againe the thirde day from death The high Priestes and rulers of the people gaue money to the souldiers to obscure the glory of his resurrection yet it was sufficiently knowne not onely to Christes disciples by his frequent apparitions to them but also to PONTIVS PILAT the Romaine Deputie himselfe who had giuen out a sentence of death against Christ. PILAT by letters signified to TIBERIVS the miracles of Christ his resurrection and that he was supponed of many to bee God but the Senat of Rome refused to acknowledge the divinitie of Christ because hee was worshipped as God before
historie of the Romaine Emperours and I haste to that which is the principall purpose of this compend howe wicked NERO kindled the first great Fornace of horrible persecution against the Christians It cannot be denyed but in the dayes of TIBERIVS our Lord Christ Iesus was crucified in the dayes of CALIGVLA and CLAVDIVS the hands of that cruell persecuter HEROD was mightily strengthened by the fauour countenance and bountifulnesse of both these Emperours so that hee layed handes vpon the pillars of the house of God and so I deny not but the Church of God before the dayes of NERO was in the fornace of trouble but nowe come the dayes whereinto the Romain Emperours like vnto NEBVCHADNEZAR werefull of rage and the forme of their visage was changed against the Christians and they commanded that the fornace should be hoate seuen times more then it was wont to be hoate Daniel chap. 3. ver 19. This historie hencefoorth conteineth on the one parte the great wrestling of persecuting Emperours against God not like to the wrestling of IACOB with God Genes 32. The place of IACOBS wrestling was Peniel where he sawe God the forme of wrestling was with many teares and strong supplications Hos. 12. the ende was that the Angel should not hastely depart from him leauing him comfortlesse the successe was the obtaining of a blessing which was the armour of God to saue him against the hatefull malice of ESAV but by the contrare NERO DOMITIAN TIAIAN ANTONIVS and the rest set their faces against the heauen commanded the holy One of Israel to departe out of the worlde endeuoured to quench the sauing light of his Gospell and by so doing brought downe vpon themselues in stead of a blessing that wrath that is reueiled from heauen vpon all them who detaine the trueth of God into vnrighteousnes Rom. 1. ver 18. On the other part is set downe the constant faith and patient suffering of the Saintes who hated not the burning bush because it was set on fire but they loued it because in it they were refreshed with the comfortable presence of the great Angell of God Exod. 3. who would not for gaining of their life 's once fashion themselues according to the similitude of Idolaters in outward and externall things TERTVLLIAN in his booke de corona militis declareth that true Christian souldiers abhorred from setting a garland of flowres vpon their heades when they receiued wages for their painfull seruice in warfare because it was the habite of Idolaters who sacrificed to IVPITER O happie men of God whose vertues the dead coloures of Painters cannot represent and the feastered maners of this corrupt age cannot imitat Oh when shall our shadowes departe when shall the fresh oyle of the grace of God bee powred into our lampes that the light of our faith patience and constant perseuerance may shine clearely to the world as theirs did The occasion of this first great persecution of NERO was his owne barbarous and cruell fact he caused the towne of Rome to bee set on fire which wasted the buildings of the towne for the space of sixe daies Bucol Index chron Funct chron Chytr chron to eschew the vile infamy of this barbarous fact he layde the blame vpon the Christians gaue foorth edicts and commandements to persecute them to the death NERO was so hatefull an aduersarie to all righteousnes that EVSEBIVS following the example and words of TERTVLLIAN affirmeth that if the Gospel had not bene an excellent good thing it had not beene condemned by NERO Euseb. eccles hist. lib. 2. cap. 25. It is supponed that PETER was crucified and PAVL was beheaded at Rome in time of this persecution And EVSEBIVS is in that opinion lib. 2. cap. 25 If this betrue the very deade bones of PETER PAVL are witnesses against the Romaine Church if they continue not in that same faith that PETER PAVL sealed vp with their blood The estate of the Iewes vnder NERO was very hard in respect of the oft change of the Romaine Deputies For in NEROES time continued FELIX for a space whome the Emperour CLAVDIVS had sent to Iudea after him FESTVS ALBINVS and FLORVS This last Deputie was fashioned according to the similitude of the maners of NERO his master the Prouerb holdeth true in NERO FLORVS Such man such master In the time that FELIX was Deputie a certaine Egyptian man pretending to bee a Prophet promising great things perswaded foure thousand of the Iewes to follow after him Acts 25. but FELIX sent foorth companies of horsemen and footmen who slew foure hundreth of the people that followed the Egyptian and tooke two hundreth of them aliue the rest were scattered but the seducing Prophet escaped and could not bee found Ioseph antiq lib. 20. cap. 6. When FESTVS was Deputie King AGRIPPA hearde the Apologie of PAVL and said that in a part PAVL perswaded him to be a Christian Acts 25. This AGRIPPA I say the sonne of HEROD whome the Angell of God slewe Acts 12. was aduanced to great honoures by the Emperour CLAVDIVS as his father had beene before him by the fauour of CAIVS and he possessed not only his fathers dominions but also the Tetrarchie of Iturea and Trachonitis sometime belonging to PHILIP the sonne of HEROD the great His might and riches procured trouble to the nation of the Iewes Hee had a palace situat vpon the West-side of the Temple of Ierusalem in regard it was builded vpon a mountaine he had a delectable profpect of the towne of Jerusalem yet not content with this he mounted vp the walles of the Palace by a new building so high that they who were in the palace might haue seene the altar and sacrifices of the Iewes offered in the inner court which at that time was called Atrium Iudeorum This doing grieued the harts of the Iewes They on the other part to cut off the sight of those who dwelt in the palace from beholding their sacrifices raysed vp the wall of the inner court on the West-side to such eminencie that no man could behold the sacrifices of the Iewes from the palace King AGRIPPA and FESTVS with authoritie cōmanded the Iewes to demolish their new builded wall In end this matter was referred to the Emperour NERO who being solisted by his wife POPPEA gratified the Iewes in this point compelled them not to cast downe their wall Ioseph antiq lib. 20. cap. 7. FESTVS died in Iudea and ALBINVS was sent to bee Deputie in Iudea ANANVS was the high Priest of the Iewes in these dayes and finding opportunitie of time to practise the malice of his heart against IAMES the sonne of ALPHEVS surnamed IVSTVS an holy Apostle kinseman of our Lord Iesus When ALBINVS was vpon his journey had not as yet arriued neither to the coastes of Egypt nor of Iudea this ANANVS I say caused IAMES surnamed IVSTVS the brother of our Lord to be stoned
to death Ioseph antiq lib. 20. cap. 8. EVSEBIVS writeth that he was thrown down froÌ„ the pinacle of the Temple Euseb. eccl histlib 2. cap. 23. This crueltie of ANANVS albeit it displeased both king AGRIPPA and ALBINVS the deputie of the Romaines the people of Ierusalem yet wicked men are wiser in their owne generation then the children of light ANANVS sawe that if he had lingred vntill the Romaine Deputie had arriued he could not haue procured the death of a man counted so just and so welbeloued of the people as the Apostle IAMES was It is to be marked that EVSEBIV in the forementioned place describeth the martyrdome of IAMES surnamed IVSTVS before the edict of the persecution of NERO after which followed the martyrdome of PETER and PAVL in the 12. yeere of NERO his reigne Epiphan contrahares neuerthelesse the Romaine Church had forged epistles decretall whereinto CLEMENS Bishoppe of Rome writeth to IAMES surnamed IVSTVS after the death of PETER What credite these decretall epistles deserue it shall bee declared hereafter Godwilling But FLORVS who succeeded to ALBINVS was an avaritious and cruell man he exhausted the treasure that was in the Temple and tooke out of it sixteene talents of siluer And when the lewes at Ierusalem murmured against him hee came to the towne in great wrath and permitted the souldiers to slay and to spoyle the citizens of Ierusalem at their pleasure Likewise he afflicted with vnaccustomed crueltie men of noble birth by scourging crucifying them Ioseph de bello Iudaico lib. 2. cap 25. This was the ground of the warre betweene the Romanes and the Jewes wherin Ierusalem came to that lamentable ruine foretold by our Sauiour Christ Mat 24. Nowe to returne to the Emperour himselfe and forme of his death After he had reigned 13. yeeres and eight monethes the Senate of Rome proclaimed him to bee an enemie to mankinde and condemned him to be whipped with wands to the death to be harled through the citie For feare of which punishment he was forced to flie and by slaying of himselfe made an end of his most wretched life Iustin. Uespasian AFter NERO OTTO VITELLIVS and GALBA contended for the empire and were all hastely cut off and made out of the way and FLAVIANVS VESPASIAN was chosen Emperour by the Romaine armie he reigned 10. yeeres Bucol Index Chron. The nation of the Iewes at this time for the most parte was giuen ouer into a reprobate minde according as it was foretolde by the Prophet ZACHARIE Then saide I I will not feede you that that dieth let it die and that that perisheth let it perish and let the remnant euery one eate the flesh of his neighbour Zach. 11. 9. Like as the intollerable crueltle of FLORVS had irritat the nation of the lewes euen so on the other side the vnsupportable obstinacie of the Iewes had incensed the wrath of the Rom. unes against them They were now become so head-strong that they rejected the sacrifice that was wont to bee offered for CAESAR Ioseph de bello Iudsico lib. 2. cap. 30. The calamitie of the Iewes who dwelt in Alexandria and in Damascus was but the beginning of sorrowes fiftie thousand Iewes were slaine in Alexandria ten thousand in Damascus Ioseph debel Iud. lib. 2. cap. 36 41. Besides this many signes wonders both in heauen and earth did proclaime their future desolation and destruction A Comet was seene in heauen hanging ouer the towne of Ierusalem for the space of a yeere and hauing the similitude of a sword in the Temple at the mid time of the night a cleare light was sene shining round about the Altar in brightnesse not vnlike vnto the light of the day and the great brasen port of the Temple opened of the owne accord about the sixt houre of the night chariots of fire were seene compassing townes and a voyce was heard in the sanctuarie warning to flit and to transport with many other feareful signes and wonders Ioseph de bello Iud. lib 6 cap. 31. But a people senslesse whose eyes were dimme whose eares were dull of hearing whose heart was fatte and locked vp by Satan in infidelitie they could take no warning of the wrath to come because the Lord was minded to destroy them FLA. VESPASIAN and his sonne TITVS VESPASIAN leading an armie of threscore thousand armed men from Ptolemaida besieged the townes of Galile and Trachonitis so many as would not willingly be subject to the Romanes the townes of Gadara Tiberias Iotopata Tarithea Gamala all these were brought vnder the renerence of VESPASIAN and IOSEPHVS who had beene lurking in a caue after the towne of Iotopata was conquessed was taken aliue and kept in bands by the Romanes he foretolde that VESPASIAN should bee Emperour and saluted him CAESAR and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 while NERO was yet aliue de bâ—…llo Iud. lib. 3. cap. 27. When this prophecie came to passe indeede and hee was chosen to bee Emperour hee sent for IOSEPHVS and commanded that hee should be loosed from bands but TITVS his sonne thought more expedient that his bands should be cut off from him rather then loosed to the end he might be counted a worthy man who neuer deseuned captiuitie nor bands de bello Iud. lib. 4. cap. 39. FLAVIVS VESPASIAN returned to Rome and left behind him his sonne TITVS to sub due the Iewes to besiedge the towne of Ierusâ—…lem but the Christians who dwelt at Ierusalem were warned by God to depart out of the towne of Ierusalem so they left it and dwelt beyond Iordan in a towne of Decapolis called Pella Euseb eccles hist lib. 3. cap. 5. Separation of the corne from the chaffe goeth before the vnquenchable fire wherewith the chaffe shall be burnt TITVS began to besiege Ierusalem in the first yeere of the reigne of his father at the time when the people were gathered to celebrate the feast of the Passeouer Euseb. lib. 3. cap 7. The terrour of the sworde of the Romaines without the feare of mercilesse brigands within in the bowels of the towne preuailing the flewere of the dead wanting the honour of burial infecting the aire and devouring the liuing with contagious sickenesse theviolent plague offamine breaking asunder the bands of Nature and constraining women to eate the birth of their owne bellies Ioseph de bello Iud. lib. 6. cap. 21. AH these calamities seased vpon them at once in the just judgement of God They despised the father of eternitie and the Prince of peace saide to PILAT. We haue no King but CAESAR Ioh 19. 15. now they find that the mercies of CAESAR were cruell his sonne TITVS who was commended in all mens mouths as meeke merciful liberal and eloquent and was called amor delitiae humani generis that is the loue and most daintie thing of all mankinde yet God made him a terrible scourge to the nation of the Iewes who forsooke the Lord Iesus and preferred CAESAR
me Luc 1 ver 43. So might old customes speake to olde commandements Whéce coÌ„meth this to me that coÌ„mandement my mistresse Lady wil tolerat me to be within the doores of the house of God wherein she hath such soueraignitie and swey In the fourth heade we are to intreate by what meanes ancient errours may be distinguished from ancient veritie And first veritie is not in all pointes like vnto an olde man whose strength is dayly abated by debilitie and weaknesse till at length the old man die goe to the graue yea rather veritie the older it be the vertue strength and vigour of it is the better knowne but errours when they waxe old they become weake they die and euanish and are vile as a filthy and stinking carion so as if any man in our dayes should open the graue of ARRIVS and renue his vngodly opinion he should see all Christians shake their heades stop their eares and grip after a maner their noses with their handes that the abominable flewer of that filthie carion should not be felt but by the contrarie the sweete smell of the ancient Veritie of Christ is like a precious oyntment powred out filling the house of God with no lesse delite now then it did of old when it was first preached by the Apostles in Ierusale Acts 2. And as the house of DAVID dayly waxed stronger the house of ISHBOSHETH dayly waxed weaker 2. Sam. 3. 1. such like is the estate of the Veritie and the lie Secondly veritie and errour are best distinguished when they are riped vp into the very ground and frivolous superficiall trialls are laide aside As NEHEMIA did when hee tried after the captiuitie who had a right of Priesthood to stand at the altar to offer sacrifices he commanded them to produce their writes and genealogies and make good their lineal descent from the loynes of AARON which right â—…ey who could not find out were put from the Priesthood Nehem. 7. ver 64 Euen so they who pretend veritie of ancient doctrine let them verifie clearely by the written word that this their doctrine came from the mouth of Christ his holy Apostles For as the procreation of AARON gaue a right to stand at the altar so also the doctrine that came froÌ„ the mouth of Christ and his Apostles hath an vndoubted right to be sounded in the Church of God Remember now that wise NEHEMIAH was not superficiall in his triall The sons of HABAIAH the sons of HAKKOZ the sons of BARZILLAI could haue shewed in write that they were come of the descent of LEVI and of the familie of COAH but that which was of greatest moment of all that they were descended from that branche of the familie of COAH which was separated to the scruice of the altar to wit from AARON Numb 16. ver 40. that they could not proue So the Papistes of our time can prooue that their doctrine hath had place sixe seuen or eight hundreth yeeres and more also before our dayes but that which is of greatest weight to wit that their doctrine came from the mouth of Christ and his holy Apostles in that probation they succumbe Thirdly let vs trie and discerne the lie from the veritie as AVGVSTVS CAESAR discerned him who falsly called himselfe ALEXANDER the sonne of HEROD and the sonne in law of ARCHELAVS King of Cappadocia and husband of GLAPHYRA Ioseph antiq lib. 17. cap 14. This ALEXANDER son of HEROD the great with his brother ARISTOBVLVS were both executed to the death by the commandement of their father But after the death of ALEXANDER an artificer bearing that same name and in stature beauty lineaments and all agreeing proportion so neerely resembled the very similitude of ALEXANDER the sonne of HEROD that they who best knew HERODS son did most confidently affirme that this same artificer was he indeede and he himselfe affirmed that he was HERODS sonne and had escaped death by the fauour of the executioner Alwayes when he was brought to Rome to the Emperour AVGVSTVS would not be deceiued with the liklyhood of his face but groped his hand and found it to be hard like to the hand of an artificer and discerned him to be a deceiuing fellow and punished him This I grant may be applyed more properly to Christ then to vs. For albeit we be easily deceiued seduced with lies yet the great King of heauen Christ Iesus cannot be deceiued hee will not regard the brasen face of the lie calling it selfe trueth but he will wisely grope the hand of the lie examine what operations it hath wrought among the people it hath blinded mens vnderstanding it hath har dened their heartes it hath learned them to be proud obstinat contemners of the trueth of God finally it hath learned theÌ„ to honour creatures with impairing of the glory of the Creator Then wil the great King say O full of al deceit thy hand and thy operations that thou hast wrought amongst men testifieth that thou art not of God Neuerthelesse the members of Christ also in some meane measure may be groping the hand of the lie finding it to be hard dric voyde of all sap moysture of spirituall grace we may say in our harts O doctrine of lies barren withered within thy selfe and communicating no grace vnto thy hearers the Lord separat vs from thee thee from vs that we may adhere firmly vnto our Lord and Sauiour Christ Iesus vnto the end Finally when wee haue done all that we can doe to discerne the lie from the veritie yet let vs not liue in securitie as though wee could neuer be deceiued IOSVA that holy man of God was deceiued with old garments old bottels of wine old bread and shoes because he consulted not with the mouth of God Ios. 9. ver 14. Then aboue all things we should seeke counsell at the mouth of God by earnest prayer diligent reading of the written word attentiue hearing of godly sermons and if we seeke we shall finde and if wee knocke it shall be opened vnto vs. And the Lorde direct vs both in seeking and finding with the gratious conduct of his holy Spirit Heere I purposed to haue finished my treatise of antiquitie but when I remember with whome I haue to doe and that they will say I haue purposely passed by the principall demonstration of antiquitie in the Romaine Church therefore I haue subjoyned the foure forged fained and counterfaite maskes of antiquitie in Poperie which will neuer proue them to be an ancient church The false interpretation of Scriptures the booke of the Canons of the Apostles the decretall epistles falsly ascribed to the fathers of the first three hundreth yeeres of our Lord and the booke of DIONYSIVS AREOPAGITA Anent the false interpretation of Scriptures Godwilling I shall speake in the treatise of heresie Anent the booke of the Canons of the Apostles if there were no more but onely the last
I am the lesse moued with their speaches because it is the custome of lamed creeple men to be mounted vp on horsebacke an euil cause supporteth the own infirmitie by the loude trumpet of rayling wordes yet haue they not cleared to the world that wee maintaine obstinatly any point of doctrine repugnant vnto the articles of true faith and vnto the principall grounds of Christian religion preached by Christ and committed to write by the holy Apostles Let them be as prodigall in their curses as they please crying out against vs 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I answere with simplicitie of a humble mind 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this word written with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and not with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth a thing hanged vp in the Lordes Temple and dedicat to God Haue we not seene with our owne eyes deepe woundes made in the flesh of man that haue beene needled by skilfull Chirurgians and in end cured and healed and the skinne of man cutted in twaine by the sword vnited againe by the needle medicinable plasters That doctrine which endenoureth to needle the wounded world and to vnite it againe vnto that holy doctrine taught by the Apostles and Euangelistes and professed in the first hundreth yeere of our Lord shall we call it hereticall Shall we be so babish that wee cannot discerne the sword from the needle conjunction from separation healing from hurting welfare from woe If we knew Christ Iesus and the power of God working by his word we had not so rashly condemned the trueth of God The Iewes spake as confidently against Christ as euer the Councill of Trent hath spokeÌ„ against vs We hâ—…ue a law according to our lawe hee ought to de because hee made himselfe the Sonne of God Ioh. 19. ver 7 Vnder pretence of zealous keeping of the Law made against blasphemers Leuit 24. 15. they condemned the holy One of God as a blasphemer But his father by loosing the sorowes of death receiuing him into heauen placing him at his owne right hand annulled ipso facto that rash sentence giuen out in earth against the innocent Lamb of God Euen so the Lord in his owne appointed time by receiuing our soules into those celestiall mansions prepared for his owne Saintes shall vndoe the rash decreetes that are giuen out against vs in the earth In all ages this matter hath bene contrauerted and Heretiques haue obstinatly maintained their bad and reprobat opinions and as obstinatly refused the odious and vile name of Heretiques and this question in our dayes is like to a flame of fire which no aboundance of water can sloken The definition of an heresie we haue alreadie set downe in the 3 chap resteth nowe in this treatise to ponder the name it selfe to consider the ground of heresie the propagation and preuailing power of it at sometimes the greater and more preuailing power of the curse of God making heresie in end to wither as the figge tree did that was cursed by Christ And finally to declare what should be the cariage both of Pastours magistrats and people toward Heretiques 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a word of the Greeke language and very ample in signification for it signifieth a choosing Now it is certaine that it is no fault to a man to take a choise when God doth offer it vnto him as when it was offered to SALOMON to aske what hee liked best he choosed rather to craue wisdome then riches from God 1. Reg. 3. and when DAVID choosed rather to fall into the hands of God then of man 2. Sam. 24 ver 14. DAVID in choosing the pest rather then the sworde or famine tooke a choice which was offered vnto him by God And the pondering of the generalitie of the worde may declare that in things indifferent wherinto God hath granted vnto men a libertie free choice such as eating of flesh or abstinence from it marying or not marying a man may take his choice in these things at such times as he findeth it granted by God as well as DAVID and SALOMON and a man is not to be called an Heretique because he marieth because God hath giuen him libertie to marie or not to marie as a man listeth best prouiding alwayes he seeke counsell of God to dispose him in such indifferent things that way whereby he shall be most meete and able to glorifie God For true it is that the Euangelist writeth No man hath seene God at any time the onely begotten Sonne of God who is in the bosome of his Father he hath reueiled him Ioh. 1 which words plainly doe testifie that in matters of faith God hath not giuen vnto a man a free choice to embrace what opinion he pleaseth but God hath tied bound vs in matters of faith to the mouth of his deare Sonne to the ende we should thinke no other thing of God then Iesus Christ hath reueiled vnto vs. Now anent the ground of heresie I followe the opinion of AVGVSTINE in his booke of exposition of some places of the epistie to the Galathian wherein hee compareth Heretiques to the sonnes of KETVRA whome ABRAHAM maried after the death of SARA Gen. 25. These children were procreated of an old father and of a yong mother euen so Heretiques pretending antiquitie of Scripture but forging vnto them a new yong sense whereinto Scripture was not written they become defenders of a false opinion The words of S. AVGVSTINE are these Ex occasione antiquaeveritatâ—…s in novitio temporalique nati sunt mendacio that is through occasion of antiquitie of the trueth they are borne into the noveltie of a temporall lie so that AVGVSTINE his judgement soundeth to this that Heretiques pretend antiquitie of scripture for their father but they are more like to KETVRA then ABRAHAM following rather the noueltie of error then the antiquitie of veritie In this maner IRENEVS thinkèth that heresies do spring vp of a false vnderstanding of holy Scriptures vsing the comparison of men who breake the golden image of the king after it is molten againe fashion it according to the similitude of a Foxe now it can not be called the kings image any longer albeit it be composed of that selfe same golde whereof the kings image was made euen so when wordes of Scripture are drawen to a new false hereticall sense count that new sense heresie not Scripture Iren adversus Ualent lib. 1. cap. 1. Now these opinions of IRENEVS and AVGVSTINE concerning the originall ground of heresie do well agree with the word of Christ himselfe written in holy Scripture Are ye not therefore deceiued because ye know not the Scriptures neither the power of God Marc 12. 24. The Sadduces knew wel eneugh the wordes of scripture but not the right sense and meaning of them And therfore it is great wisdome to mixe our reading with prayer to the ende that the Lorde who guided the
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is consubstantiall with the father yet they graunted that hee was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is of like substance with the Father But AETIVS ACATIVS and EVNOMIVS another race of ARRIANS thought that the Sonne was neither 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nor yet 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to his Father and for this cause they were called Anomoeâ—… The thirde faction of Aâ—…rianes were MACEDONIVS and his adherents who were inconstant and wauering minded in their opinions concerning the Sonne of God sometime leaning to the Homooâ—…sians sometime to Homoiousians and sometime to Anomoei according as any occasion of griefe was presented to them by any one partie they leapt to the opinion of another partie but these wandering starres and wauering fooles obstinately spake against the diuinitie of the holy Ghost This diuision amongst themselues was the first forerunning token of the decay of this heresie What desolation also came vpon Nicomedia the principall towne of Bithynia appointed by the Emperour CONSTANTIVS for the meeting of Arrian Bishoppes the historie doth record The Lorde shooke the towne of Nicomedia with an earthquake and disappointed the meeting of the Arrians Socrat. ecclef hist. lib. 2. cap. 39. THEODORETVS differeth from SOCRATES anâ—…nt the place appointed for the convention of Aâ—…rian Bishops alwayes he granteth that it was shaken with earthquake and ouerthrowne Theodoret. lib. 2 cap. 26. In the last roome let vs consider after what maner of way should Heretiques bee dealt with by Pastours magistrates and people As concerning the Pastour because he should be a man of knowledge and able to convict those that gainsay the trueth Tit. 1. the Pastour should conferre with the Heretique admonish him once or twise to returne to the soundnesse of faith Tit. 3. Wherin it is to be noted that the worde in the Greeke language betokening admonition is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which word pointâ—…th out the end and purpose of the preachers trauailes rather then his painfull trauailes for the end should be to put a right minde into him or to bring him to his right wittes againe for an Heretique is a mad fellow indeede and out of his right wit as NAZIANZEN spake of Aâ—…OLLINARIS who denied that Christ had a soule as we haue but his diuine nature joyned with his body supplied the roome of his soule NAZIANZEN writeth of him that when he spake of the minde of Christ he was mad and by his minde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And it is a very hard matter to reduce a mad man to his right wit againe therefore let a preacher take it to hart that to conuert a Heretique is a difficill worke for he is dealing with a man possessed with a strong deuill who cannot be cast out by Christs disciples except Christ himselfe put hand to the worke Mat. 17. This the Apostle writeth not to make Pastours to despaire and giue ouer the care of conquessing of Heretiques but to doe this worke circumspectly and warily with humilitie and reuerent feare crauing that our Lord and master Christ Iesus would kyth his strength in our weakenesse otherwise this turne can not be done Yet lest any faithfull preacher should be vtterly dismaide in regarde of thâ—… difficultie of the worke two things are to be considered first the Apostolicke commandement warning vs to admonish him once or twise which warning seing it is not giuen in vaine it should be obeyed Secondly God hath blessed the trauailes of some of his seruants by them some Heretiques haue bene reclaimed to the right faith as namely BERYLLVS Bishop in Bostra in Arabia who denied that Christ was existent before he tooke flesh of the virgine yet by the painfull trauailes of ORIGEN hee was conuerted to the true faith againe Euseb. eccles hist. lib. 6. cap. 33. And this is the cause wherfore I separat BERYLLVS from ARTEMON in the subsequent historie In like maner God blessed the trauailes of DIONYSIVS Bishop of Alexandria by whome in a place of Egypt called Arsenoâ—…is Coracione was conuerted who had bene before infected with the errour of NEPOS an Egyptian Bishop and father of the Chiliastes Euseb. eccl hist. lib 7. cap. 24. And therefore let not the faithful Pastours despaire because the worke is difficil but obey Gods commandement and commit the issue to God himselfe Concerning Magistrats like as they prescribe to all men their duties so in like maner God who is their onely superiour prescribes their dutie to them in all things and in this mater also for the Lord commanded the false prophet who allured the people to follow other gods to be slaine Deut. 13. ver 5. What rewarde then belongeth vnto Heretiques their successouts for it is all one to worshippe a false god and to worship the true God falsly and if the false prophets who entâ—…sed the people to worshippe a false god should die what other sentence can be giuen out by the magistrates against an hereticall teacher who entiseth people to worship the true God falsly but onely that he should be slaine Hee is worse then a murtherer who killeth a mans body for there may bee some valuation of the harme and skaith that a murtherer hath done but who can value and ponder the harme that an Heretique doeth who by false doctrine murthereth the soules of infinite numbers of people hee is worse then an infidell forasmuch as hee hath obtained a more abominable name then an infidell For an infidell as S. AVGVSTINE speaketh cannot be called desertor fidei oppugnator â—…ius that is a forsaker and impugner of the faith because hee neuer embraced it but an Heretike is a backslider from the faith which sometime he professed and an hatefull impugner of the same Finally he is more pernicious then a Schismatike who laboureth to cut the band of loue wherwith we are coupled with our brethren but an Heretike endeuoureth to cut the very throate of faith wherewith we are coupled with our God Also a schisme hath many times beene found without an heresie but an heresie was neuer founde without a Schisme Then this question may be conceiued in these tearmes What shall be done with a man who is worse then a murtherer worse then an infidell worse then CORE DATHAN and ABIRAM who by a pernicious schisme rent the vnitie of the holy people yea what shall be done with them who like vnto Foxes sucke out the blood of Christ out of the soules of the poore sheepe of Christ Now let God answere from his Sanctuarie Let such a false prophet be slaine Deut 13. True it is indeede that the doubtsome judgements of ancient and learned fathers haue made this question more debatable then otherwise it needed to haue beene For S. AVGVSTINE in the booke of his Epistles is found till haue altered his opinion anent the punishment of Heretiques twise or thrise In the Epistle written to DONATVS Deputie of Afâ—…ke he would haue Heretiques to bee dantoned but not to bee slaine writting
the name of Christians is strengthened by the Emperours commandement The trumpets of the Monarches of the world sound the alarme against him who made them Kings and rulers on the earth The poore innocent Lambes of the sheepfold of Christ appointed for the shambles strengthened their heartes in God in the power of his might and chused rather to suffer aduersitie with their brethren then to enjoy the pleasures of sinne for a season Heb. 11. ver 25. they were content to bee racked and would not be deliuered that they might be partakers of a better resurrection Heb. 11. ver 35. whose bodies lacerat with stripes vntill their very inward bowels were patent to the outward sight witnessed the vnrent firmnesse and stabilitie of their faith They were so supported with the power of that grace that commeth from aboue that they were not terrified with the multiplied numbers of cruell torments newly excogitate for dashing that inuincible courage of faith which was seene in Christians Yea further then this When the persecuting enemies were compelled to change the high tuned accent of their menassing speeches and to craue but a litle conformitie to the Emperours desire in swearing by his fortune the holy men of God would not once seem to fall away from their profession by answering with timorous and doubtsome wordes but glorified God with a cleare and constant confession of their Christian faith POLYCARPVS B. of Smyrna and IVSTINVS MARTYR a man of singular erudition were both martyred in the feruent heate of this persecution But aboue all other places the consuming flame of the fornace brast out most vehemently in France that happie nation whereinto both of old and late time so many were found worthie to giue their blood for the Name of Christ. VETIVS EPAGATHVS MATVRVS PROTHENVS ATTALVS SANCTVS and PHOTINVS B. of Lions all suffered for the testimonie of Christ in France And BLANDINA a worthie woman suffered many torments and renued her spirituall courage by continuall iteration of these wordes Christianasum that is I am a Christian Euseb. eccl hist. lib 5. cap 1. Bucolc Index In like maner Christians were persecuted with the slaÌ„derous speches of Pagans objecting vnto them the bankets of THYESTES the chambering of OEDIPVS that is the eating of mens flesh incestuous copulations Euseb. ibid. But men who are giuen to the mo-mentaneal delites of sin are not willing to die because that by death they are separat from all bodily pleasures The Christians by patient and willing suffering of death for Christs sake clearely witnessed vnto the world that they were not addicted to the deceitfull pleasures of sinne Iustin. Martyr Apol Neuerthelesse these slanderous speeches were credited by the Pagans and tooke such deepe root in their heartes that these who seemed before to be more meeke and moderat then others now they became full of madnesse and rage against Christians and that which was foretolde by our master Christ it was fulfilled at this time to wit The time shall come that whosoeuer killeth you shall thinke hee doth God seruice Iohn 16. 2. the huge number of martyrs that were slaine in the furie of this persecution are both accuratly and at great length set downe by that holy man of God who lately wrote the booke of the martyrs I onely point out shortly the estate of the Church at this time In this Emperours time good men were not inlacking who admonished him to appease his wrath against Christians such as CLAVDIVS APOLLINARIS B. of Herapolis and MELITO B of Sardis But nothing could asswage his cruell heart vntill hee was casten intâ—… the fornace of grieuous troubles himselfe for his armâ—… that fought against the Germanes and Sarmatians fell into great distresse for want of water but was supported by the prayers of the Christian legion that was in his armie For they bowed their knees to Christ and prayed for helpe and the Lorde Iesus sent raine in aboundance to refresh the armie of the Romanes and dashed the Barbarians with thunder and fire In remembrance whereof the Christian legion was after that time called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Fulmâ—…natrix Euseb. lib. 5. cap. 5. After this victorie he asswaged his anger and wrote to the Senat of Rome to deale gently with Christians by whose prayers hee acknowledged both himselfe and his armie to haue receiued deliuerance from God Commodus COMMODVS the sonne of ANTONINVS reigned 13. yeeres Euseb. eccl hist. lib. 5 Cap. 27. Many of the Roman's not without a cause called him INCOMMODVS He presumed to doe great things and to change the names of months and would haue the month of December to be called Câ—…mmodus like as the two names of two months Quâ—…ntilis Sextilâ—…s had bene changed in time bypast and called Iulins and Augustus for honour of these two welbeloued Emperours But hee was not so well fauoured of the people that this ordinance could haue place any longer then during his owne lifetime The Churel in his dayes was not altogether free of persecution for APOLLONIVS a man of noble birth in Rome and a man of great erudition fuffered death because hee would not forsake the Christian religion His accuser also was punished to the death Euseb. lib. 5. cap. 21. Such aduantages Iudges might easily haue taken finding so many discrepant lawes some made in fauour and some conceiued in disliking of Christians Pertinax and Julianus AELIVS PERTINAX Imp. 6. months DIDIVS IVLIANVS 21 months Chytr Chron. EVSEBIVS maketh no mention of D. IVLIANVS but of PERTINAX alanerly to whome succeeded SEVERVS Euseb. eccl hist. lib. 5. cap. 27. Chap. 2 IN this second Centurie the Bishops of Rome for the most part prooued faithfull and worthy seruants of Christ. A great number of them were baptized with the Baptisme of Christ dranke of the cup that Christ drank of and were drenched with their owne blood and they watred the Church of Rome with the streames of their blood as Egypt is watred and made fruitfull with the inundation of Nilus Men of blessed remembrance DAMASVS writeth that from S. PETER to TELESPHORYS all the Bishops of Rome were martyrs Others added that vntill the dayes of SYLVESTER who liued in the time of the reigne of CONSTANTINE all the Bishops of Rome had the honour of martyrdome But in these hyperbolicke speeches neither hath the distinction betweene a Martyr and a Consessour beene rightly considered albeit well marked by Eusâ—…b eccl hist. lib. 5. cap. 2. neither hath the historie of the reigne of ANTONINVS PIVS bene rightly pondered in whose dayes HYGINVS and PIVS liued and were not slaine for the testimony of Christ. Alwayes it is a maleuolous minde that holdeth backe from worthie men their due praise and commendation both in doing of good and patient suffering of euill for Christes sake In rehearsing the names of the Romaine Bishops I thought meete to follow IRENEVS and EVSEBIVS rather then PLATINA In the first Centurie after
very calamitie hinging ouer their heades there is a secret voyce of God calling them to humiliation and repentance with fasting and abstinence from all lawfull pleasures when the Priest bloweth the trumpet in Sion and sanctifieth a fast vnto the Lord he layeth not the yocke of mens commandements vpon the consciences of men but the yocke of God's commandements For the Prophet bringeth in the Lord saying that he calleth them to mourning lamentation and to abstinence The Lord is our Soueraigne commander and Lawgiuer hauing power to bid to forbid at his blessed pleasure Vnder this yocke will we gladly stoupe but the yocke of bondage that men would lay vpon our consciences the Apostle PAVL expresly forbiddeth vs to admit but to stand to our libertie Galat. 5. ver 1. And so I conclude this treatise misliking disaprouing the loose raines of fleshly wantonnesse but wishing from my heart that the bit of the Lord may bee cast in our jawes to turne vs from the delite of earthly pleasures to the delite of that celestiall citie that hath a foundation and whose builder is God Amen Of Succession IT hath bene the custome of godly men in all ages who were descended from the loynes of godly fathers not to brag of their parentage but to be so much the more ashamed of sinne that the vnreproouable liues of their predecessors were a great testimony cóuicting them of some piece of defection Therefore the Prophet ISAIAH bringeth in the Lordes penitent people in humble maner acknowledging that they were not worthy that ABRAHAM and ISRAEL should once knowe them to be their posteritie but they entreat the Lord by a free forgiuenesse of sinnes to become their father Isa. 63. 16. But on the other part a wicked generation descended from godly parents could boast of their parentage ' and say to Christ himselfe ABRAHAM is our father Iohn 8. ver 39. and againe We are not borne of fornication wee haue one father which is God ibid. ver 41. Notwithstanding of all this confident bragging of their parents the Lorde Iesus who judgeth righteously saith to carnall Iewes Yee are of your father the deuill and the lusts of your father ye will doe He hath bene a murtherer from the beginning abode not in the trueth because there is no trueth in him When he speaketh a lie then speaketh hee of his owne for hee is a lyar and the father thereof Iohn 8. ver 44. This place of scripture will clearely prooue that God will nothing regard the vaine ostentation and vaunting speeches of men who brag of their descent from godly parents and their succession to godly preachers yet the dissimilitude of their faith and maners from the faith and maners of their predecessours declareth that they are the very children of the deuill In this age I find succession whereof the Romanes bragge so much to be in some reuerent regard For IRENEVS Bishop of Lions in France reasoning against VALENTINVS MARCION whose errours haue beene before declared to confute these Heretiques hee bringeth in the succession of the Romaine Bishops After PETER saith he were LINVS and ANACLETVS and CLEMENS and EVARISTVS and ALEXANDER and SIXTVS and TELESPHORVS and HYGINVS PIVS and ANICETVS and ELEVTHERIVS the twelfth from the Apostles Now saith IRENEVS these receiued the wholesome doctrine from the Apostles and deliuered it faithfully to others yea some of them also sealed it vp withtheir blood Yet none of them spake such things concerning God the father his sonne Christ Iesus as VALENTINVS MARCION and BASILIDES haue spoken Therefore he condemneth their doctrine to be false and hereticall Iren lib. 3. cap. 3. contra Valent. Now the followers of the Romaine church demand why we do not as reuerently esteeme of the succession of Romane Bishops now as IRENEVS did of old why do we not count them to be Heretiques who bring in a new doctrine not agreeing with the doctrine of the B. of Rome as IRENEVS counted VALENTINVS MARCION and BASILIDES Heretiques because they vttered a strange doctrine which the B. of Rome had not receiued from the handes of the Apostles To this I answere that we count reuerently of al the Bishops of Rome who kept faithfully that forme of wholesome doctrine which they receiued from the Apostles Yea and we count them Heretiques also who departe from that veritie which LINVS ANACLETVS CLEMENS and the rest receiued from the Apostles But the question standeth in this whether these holy fathers of whom JRENEVS maketh such reuerent record receiued from the mouthes of the Apostles preached to the world such heades of doctrine as are now sounded in the Romaine church that is inuocation of Saints worshipping of images pluralitie of mediators of intercession purgatorie and infinite other things As concerning the Apostles the summe of their doctrine is contained in their writings they taught not LINVS ANACLETVS CLEMENS otherwise then they taught the rest of the Romaines the Corinthtans Galatians Ephesians the inhabitants of Pontus Cappadocia Asia Bithynia 1 Pet. 1. And in all their writings there is no mention of inuocation of Saintes worshipping of images c. The cause wherefore godly father 's rejoyced in the succession of the Bishops of Rome was this because they were nearest to the danger of persecuting tyrants and kept the faith of Christ most inviolablie Many of them were martyres such as ALEXANDER SIXTVS TELESPHORVS and ANICETVS Others were Confessours who suffered prisonment pouertie and diuerse other rebukes albeit they were not put to death for the Name of Christ. And what marucll was it that these who loued Christe had their hearts inflamed with a loue of this holy succession whose commendation was puritie of wholesome doctrine receiued from the Apostles whose glory was sufferings and whose preeminence was examples of constant continuance in the true faith And like as the dayes of MOSES and IOSVA were happie dayes they had among them the Tabernacle of God and therewith also the Arke and propitiatorie which was the glorious ornament of the Tabernacle so were the dayes of these holy fathers happie dayes hauing personall succession from the Apostles and therewith succession of true doctrine the glorious ornament of personall succession As concerning the decretall Epistles falsly ascribed to them wee shall speake hereafter in the heade of supremacie Godwilling But when all these things are inlacking for which the succession of the Romaine Bishoppes was regarded in this Centurie and men erring in the true faith of a long time possessed the chaire of Rome what auaileth it to glorie of that olde commended succession when the glory of true doctrine patient suffering constant perseuerance in the Apostolicke doctrine is vtterly lost among them so that the succession whereof the Romaine Church now glorieth is not vnlike their transubstantiation wherein are accidents without a subject in their succession are persons of men succeeding one to another without puritie of doctrine In Scripture we finde succession
to be counted of according to the greatnes of the promises annexed to the succession as namely the succession of DAVID of whom God said His seede also will I make to endure for euer his throne as the dayes of heauen Psal. 89. 29 againe ver 35. 36. I haue sworne once by my holynesse that I will not faile Dauid saying his seede shal endure for euer and his throne shall be as the Sunne before me Here are ample promises to DAVID his succession confirmed by the Lordes oath by the Sun Moone as faithfull witnesses in heauen And that which was more then all the rest this succession of DAVID was a line leading to the great King Christ Iesus who should sit in the throne of his father DAVID of his kingdome there should be none end Luc. 1. for all these causes the succession of DAVID was greatly regarded Yet it is to be marked that all the promises othes testimonies honors did not carie with them a necessity that euery successour of DAVID should be in faith and religion like vnto DAVID but rather God foreseeing the contrarie faith If his ch◅ldren forsake my Law and walke not in my Judgements if they breake my statutes and keepe not my ordinances then w◅ll I visit their transgression with the rod and their iniquitte with strokes ibid ver 30. 31. 32. I suppone that no succession euer had more glorious and ample promises then the succession of DAVID yet these promises inferred no necessitie that euery king sitting on the throne of DAVID should bee heire also of the religion and faith of DAVID as well as of his kingdome And therfore to inferre vpon this ground that ample promises are made to the Apostles their successours that euery one who succeedeth to the Apostolick chaire shall keepe the true faith of the Apostles it is but a foolish and impertinent conclusion If any man shall replie that this was a succession of ciuill gouernours but the question now contrauerted is anent succession of Bishops and men in a spirituall calling True it is that DAVIDS successors succeeded to a ciuill gouernment yet seeing this succession was ratified by the oath of God and led also to Christ who is soueraine Lorde both of soule and body whatsoeuer priuiledge of standing in a good estate can be alledged in any succession the patterne of it is to be found in the succession of DAVID But this priuiledge that the successors of DAVID cannot erre in the true faith is not found no not in the great succession of DAVID Now to come to ecclesiasticall succession The priesthood of AARON was institute by God Numb 17. ver 5. It was confirmed by the miracle of the budding rodde ibid. ver 23. The vsarpers of AARONS office without a calling were also miraculously destroyed by fire that came downe from heauen Numb 16. Others were debarred from it euen in the dayes of NEHEMIAH Nehem. 7. ver 64. This succession of AARON was personall the son succeeding to the father in the Priesthood except some mutilation of a member or impotencie did hinder or any such like cause After AARON ELEAZAR and his son PHINEAS ABISHVA PHINEAS son and BVKKI HVZZI ZERACHIA MERAIOTH AMARIA ACHITVB ZADOK AHIMAAZ 1. Chron. 6. ver 50. 51. 52. 53. Many others after them were Priests of the stock of AARON yet did not all keepe fast the faith and religion of AARON yea some Priestes of AARONS stocke were notable Idolaters men-pleasers such as VRIAH in the dayes of AHAZ king of Juda who set vp an altar at the kings commandement according to the similitude of the altar of Damascus and offered sacrifices thereon 2. Reg. 16. Anent the succession of the Prophets euen when one good man succeeded to another good man the historie of scripture clearely declareth that men pointed out by God himselfe successours to an office yet by this are they not made succ◅ssours to their giftes for ELIZEVS was pointed out by God as successor to ELIAS in his prophetical office 1. Reg. 19. ver 16. yet by this was he not successor to his gifts as ELIZEVS petition of a double measure of the spirit of ELIAS clearely declareth 2. Reg. 2 ver 9 If the gift did necessarly accompany the succession what needed ELIZEVS to be carefull of the gift seeing he was sure of the succession The holy Apostles of Christ haue had a successiō shal haue vnto the end of the world to whō belōgeth the promise of Christ Behold I am with you vnto the end of the world Mat. 28. 20 But who are to be called true successors of the Apostles we haue declared already in the 1. Centurie taking our groūd out of scripture Act. 20 29. And out of Nazian in laudem Athanasii that darknes succeeding to light is not counted the true successor of lignt for the dissimilitude that is betweene darknes light But heere the question ariseth whether or not al Churches keeping the holy Apostolicke doctrine are bound to shew in write their succession from the Apostles◅ as the Priestes of the stocke of AARON after the captiuitie produced in write their lineal descent from AARON Nehem. 7. To this Tertul answereth lib. de pres◅ript adversus baret that Churches truely keeping the Apostolicke doctrine albeit they could not shew in write their succession from the Apostles yet are they to be counted Apostolicke Churches propter consang uinitatem doctrinae that is for their consanguinitie of doctrine But to come neerer and to examine whether the Romaine church hath kept Apostolicke doctrine in their succession without all spot of heresie as they affirme or not And first the chaire of Rome was not free of the heresie of EVTYCHES as clearly appeareth by the sixt generall Councill which was the third of those Councils which were gathered at Constantinople in the 12. yeere of the empire of CONSTANTINVS POGONATVS Ann. 681. Buco◅ In this Councill MACARIVS Patriarch of Antiochia and STEPHANVS his disciple stood vp pertinaciously defended the error of EVTYCHES were excommunicate by the Councill yet they had defended their opinion by the Synodicke letter of HONORIVS sometime B. of Rome written to SERGIVS B. of Constantinople Wherein it was clearely knowne that HONORIVS was infected with the errour of EVTYCHES for the which cause HONORIVS B. of Rome after his death in the sixt generall Councill was also excommunicat as an Heretique Tom Concil hist. Magdeb. This is not vnknown to some writers who notwithstanding defend this opinion that the Bishop of Rome cannot erre in maters of ◅aith ONVPHRIVS saith that the Acts of the sixt generall Councill containing a condemnatory sentence against HONORIVS Bishop of Rome were corrupted by the Grecians and that the Canons of this Councill as they are set foorth are supposititious and false Forsooth ONVPHRIVS is a worthy aduocate to pleade such a bad and reprobat cause The faith of the Romanists leaning vpon two
a worthy Presbyter in Casarea whose life and death EVSEBIVS hath described in a seuerall treatise all these I say were crowned with martyrdome Euseb lib. 8. cap. 13. MAXIMIANVS Emperour of the West whose persecution EVSEBIVS describeth not at such length as the persecution of DIOCLETIAN in the East hee was like vnto a wilde Boare trampling vnder his feete the vine-yarde of God Hee slewe MAVRITIVS a noble Captaine with a legion of Christian and Thebane souldiers because they would not consent to offer sacrifice vnto idoles This was done beside the riuer of Rhonne hist. Magd. Cent. 4. The martyres of France Italic and Germanie specially at Colen and Triers where the blood of Christians was shed in such aboundance that it ranne like small brookes and it coloured great and maine riuers the multitude I say of these holy martyres and the diuersitie of tormentes dayly excogitate against them what memorie is able to comprehend or what tongue is able sufficiently to expresse In ende when these two Emperours were drunken with the blood of the Saintes of God and sawe that the numbers of Christians dayly increased they beganne to relent their forie and madnesse a litle beeing at last content that the punishment of Christians should bee the thrusting out of their right eyes and the maiming of their left legges with condemning them to the mines of Mettalles Euseb. lib. 8. cap. 12. The mercies of the wicked are cruell saith SALOMON Prou. 12. ver 10. Before two yeeres were fully compleete after the beginning of this tenth persecution these two furious persecuters for what cause God knoweth gaue ouer their imperiall function and remained not Emperours any more but as priuate persons Euseb. lib. 8. cap. 13 DIOCLETIAN after he had denuded himselfe of the imperiall dignitie liued almost 9. yeeres MAXIMIAN within foure yeeres after was slaine by the commandement of CONSTANTINE Bucolc The imperiall dominion then remained with CONSTANTIVS CHLORVS and GALERIVS MAXIMINVS These two diuided the whole monarchie betweene them CONSTANTIVS contented himselfe with France Spaine and Brittaine GALERIVS MAXIMINVS had the rest CONSTANTIVS tooke CONSTANTINVS his sonne to bee CAESAR vnder him and GALERIVS MAXIMINVS chused his two sonnes MAXIMINVS SEVERVS to be CAESARS vnder him The Romaine souldiers also set vp MAXENTIVS the son of MAXIMIANVS HERCVLEVS to be their Emperour against whom GALERIVS sent his sonne SEVERVS who beeing slaine he chused LICINIVS in his stead Of these fiue who reigned all at one time the like whereof came not to passe at any time before two Emperours and three Caesars three of them viz. GALERIVS and MAXIMINVS his sonne and LICINIVS prosecuted the persecution begun by DIOCLETIAN neere the space of 7. or 8. yeeres which was to the yeere of our Lord 318. The other two CONSTANTIVS and his sonne CONSTANTINE were fauourable to Christians Constantius Galerius Maximinus CONSTANTIVS CHLORVS reigned as Emperour 13. yeeres Others say 16 some say 11 yeeres Hee ended his life in peace at Yorke Hist. Magd. Hee was not onely friendly to Christians but also hee counted them the only faithful subjects to Emperours And such as hee perceiued that for loue of honour gaine or any worldly commoditie would make shipwracke of a good conscience and sacrifice to idoles albeit they had allowance by his owne fained commandement giuen out for exploration of the religion of his Captaines and souldiers rather then seriously and from his heart allowing the worshipping of idoles these I say who made no conscience to worship idoles for conquessing fauour at the Emperours hands he disauthorized them remoued them from offices and counted them men who were false to God and would neuer be true to him Euseb. de vita Constantini lib. 1. MAXIMINVS elder yonger in the East parts of the world were cruell persecuters Because ecclesiastical writers do not clearly distinguish the crueltie of the father from the crueltie of the son I shal comprise al vnder the name of GALERIVS MAXIMINVS the father of the other MAXIMINVS He was not vnlike vnto PHARAO for when the correcting hand of God was vpon him then he relented his furie but when the plague ceased hee returned againe to his wonted malice First God smote him with a wonderfull vncouth disease so that his flesh began to putrifie innumerable multitude of vermine swarmed out of his inward parts then hee commanded that the persecution should cease and that Christians should pray for him he published edicts of peace in their fauours throughout all his dominions But scarce continued he in this good resolution 6. months when as he sent out contrarie edicts and caused them to be engraued in brasse which thing was not done at any time before to be set vp in euery citie Euseb. lib. 9. cap. 7. whereupon ensued grieuous persecution SILVANVS B. of Emisa LVCIANVS B. of Antiuchia who suffered martyrdome at Nicomedia after hee had giuen in his apologie to the Emperour and PETER B. of Alexandria Euseb. lib 9. cap. 6. The martyrdome of king ANTHEAS and 37. thousand moe martyrs with him 1 passe by as a thing vncertaine because EVSEBIVS could not haue ouerpassed with silence such a rare and wonderful crueltie committed in his owne time if it had bene of veritie done as some alledge Other thirtie thousand are said till haue beene martyred in sundrie places and this is very probable because the martyres who suffered in this tenth persecution were innumerable QVIRINVS B. of Scescania a towne of vpper Pannonia was throwne into the flood hauing an hand mill hanged about his necke and so was drowned I leaue a recitall of the names of all the rest of the martyres of whom I reade to haue suffered martyrdom at this time like as I haue done in all the preceeding persecutions Now to speake somewhat of the cruell edict of this Emperour ingraued in brasse and hanged vp in all principall cities specially in Tyrus In it he gloried that peace wealth prosperitie and plentie of all good things were in his time and he attributed the glory of all this aboundance to the deuote worshipping of the heathen gods At this time saith EVSEBIVS was that fulfilled which the Lord Iesus foretold that the tribulation of those dayes should be so great that except those dayes had bene shortened no flesh could haue bene saued but for the Electes sake those dayes should be shortened yea and if it were possible the very Elect should be deceiued Mat. 24. ver 22. ver 24. But the Lord pitying the infirmitie of his Saintes and to stop the blasphemous mouthes of heathen people turned suddenly al their joy into mourning and lamentation with famine pestilence warfare and vncouth diseases whereby the eyes of men and women were blinded the Lord dantoned the insolent pride of this bloodie Tyrant It is to be noted that in time of this publicke calamitie Christians and no others but they onely were found to be fraughted with loue and full of
the ministration of the holy communion is called the oblation of the altar the table whereupon the bread and wine were laide was called the altar the bread and the wine are called the offering or the sacrifice because part of it was distributed in the holy communion to keepe a memoriall of the Lordes death and the rest was giuen to the sustentation of the poore and in that respect also it was called a sacrifice as the scripture speaketh To do good to distribute forget not fo with such sacrifices God is pleasâ—…d Heb. 13. ver 16. The last part of the decreet is blasphemous and falsly attributed to FABIAN because the sinnes of men and women who beleeueâ—… and repent are forgiuen onely for the mâ—…rite of that bloodie sacrifice which the Lord Iesus offered vpon the crosse for our sinnes But our furnishing of elements to the communion and sustentation of the poore cannot merite forgiuenesse of sinnes The successour of FABIANVS was CORNELIVS the 20. Bishop of Rome He had a great strife against NOVATVS his complices He assembled a Councill at Rome of 60. Bishops besides Elders and Deacons by whome the heresie of NOVATVS was condemned and the Novatians were separated from the fellowship of the Church Euseb. lib. 6. cap. 43. CORNELIVS was banished from Rome by the Emperour DECIVS and sent to a towne in Hetruria called Centumcellae where he had great comfort by the mutuall letters that passed betweene him and CYPRIAN Bishop of Carthage When the Emperour gote knowledge of this he sent for CORNELIVS accused him as a man who not onely despised the worshipping of the gods was disobedient to the Emperours commandement but also that hee was a trafficker against the estate of the empire by receiuing sending letters beyond sea CORNELIVS answered that he wrote os matters pertaining to Christ the saluation of mens soules not of matters belonging to the estate of the empire Notwithstanding the Emperour DECIVS commanded that he shuld be scourged with plumbats this was a sort of grieuous whip and afterward that hee should be led to the temple of MARS with commandement to put him to death incase he refused to worship the image of MARS Thus was CORNELIVS beheaded for the name of Christ after hee had gouerned 2. yeeres 3. dayes Platin de vit Oras EVSEBIVS writeth 3. yeeres lib. 7. cap. 2. LVCIVS the 21. Bishop of Rome was successour to CORNELIVS and continued in the gouernement of the Church of Rome 3. yeeres 3 months 3. dayes Platin. Euseb. onely 8. months lib. 7. cap. 2. One decretall epistle is asligned vnto him written vnto the Bishoppes of Fâ—…ance and Spaine whereinto hee braggeth that the Bishops of Rome cannot erre in matters of faith Tom 1. Concil but the ineptitude of a barbarous Latine stile whereinto the Epistle is dited declareth it hath bene written by an vnlearned Asse and not by LVCIVS Bishop of Rome STEPHANVS 22. Bishop of Rome ruled that Church 2. yeres Euseb. eccl hist. lib. 7. cap. 5. Platin. 7. yeeres 5. months 2. dayes He was greatly commoued against CYPRIAN B. of Carthage because that by his opinion of rebaptizing those who were baptized by Heretiques the vnitie of the Church of Christ was perturbed and rent PLATINA writeth that CYPRIAN before his martyrdome forsooke his opinion of rebaptizing and was content by imposition of handes according to the custome of the Romaine Church to receiue such as had bene baptized by Heretiques Platin. in vit Lucii The constitution anent consecrated garments that men in spiritual offices should weare in the Church no else where lest they incurre the like punishment with BALTASAR who abused the holy vessels of the house of God Dan. 5. in my opinion is not judiciously attributed by PLATINA vnto this Bishop STEPHANVS because the ordinance smelleth rather of Iudaisme then of Christian religion and the reason subjoyned to the constitution is altogether impertinent It was sacriledge indeede and a proude contempt of God in the person of BALTASAR to drinke common wine with his harlots in the vessels of gold dedicated to the holy seruice of God but an holy preacher to walke in that same apparell in the streete whereinto hee preached and ministred the communion in the Church this is no sinne nor a thing forbidden by any Apostolicke precept But PLATINA is dreaming when hee ascribeth such friuolous constitutions to a Bishop preparing himselfe for death for PLATINA supponeth that hee was martyred in the dayes of GALLIENVS Let the reader marke vpon what sandie ground of fâ—…iuolous constitutions and falsly alledged Popish faith is grounded The decree of STEPHANVS anent mariage bearing that the Priestes Deacons and Subdeacons of the Orientall Church were coupled in matrimonie but in the Romaine Church no person in a spirituall office froÌ„ the Bishop to the Subdeacon had libertie to marrie Tom 1. Concil â—…x Gratiano if it were true as it is assuredly false the Oriental Church hath a great commendation because they would not be wiser then God and they would not lay the yocke of the ordinances of men vpon the consciences of their Church-men but prohibition of mariage which I haue prooued to be a doctrine of deuils cannot be referred to so ancient a beginning The Romaine church desirous to be masked with a shewe of antiquitie they haue attributed Canons to the Apostles which are not found in their writings Yet it is a shame to the forgers of these canons to be found the principall impugners and transgressers of them cap. 5 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say A Bâ—…shop elder or Deacon who vnder pretence of religion repudiateth his owne wife if he cast her off let him be excommunicated and if hee perseuere in so doing let him be deposed How can this constitution of STEPHANVS agree with the Canons of the Apostles Heere I appeale the consciences of honest and vpright men if they finde not that the lie iâ—… not onely repugnant vnto the veritie but also vnto it selfe The supposititious Canons of the Apostles the supposititious constitutions of STEPHANVS cannot both consist I know what they answere viz. that the Canons of the Apostles speake of those Bishops Elders Deacons who had wiues when they were admitted to ecclesiastical offices these should not repudiat their wiues vnder pretence of religion but anent others who were vnmaried in the time of their admission the 25. Canon declareth otherwise 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to vnmaried men who are promoted to the clergie we command that if they please they shall marie but onely readers and singers to wit shall haue this priuiledge It is an vnsufferable thing to heare such leuitie and inconstancie imputed to the holy Apostles that they debarred no man from the office of a Bishop Elder or Deacon because he was a maried man O but if any man enter vnmaried to be a Bishop Elder or Deacon then he must not marie If mariage had bene
discouer the reliques of his body left it should haue bene an occasion of idolatrie because MICHAEL the Archangell of God stroue against him in this point epist. ◅ud ver 9. The graue of the Prophet ELIZEVS was opened not of purpose to raise his bones and to honour them but vpon a great suddentie to cast in another dead man and albeit the Lord wrought a great miracle by touching of ELIZEVS bones 2. Reg. 13. ver 21. yet no man was so foolish as to raise them out of the graue or to carie them into the Temple to be adored and worshipped The bones of IOSEPH that were in a chest and transported out of Egypt by MOSES Exod. 13 ver 19. yet in the wildernesse were not worshipped no not by these carnall Iewes who worshipped the golden calfe And so the historie of the old Testament may be laide aside as an holy historie furnishing no fuel to hold in this fire of Popish superstition anent adorations of dead mens bones In the new Testament like as the doctrine of resurrection was clearely preached and beleeued amongst all Christian people so likewise a great care was had that the bodies of the Saintes should be honourably buried as bodies appointed to an happie resurrection This perswasion grounded in the heartes of Christians made them to count death a sleep the graue a bed resurrection a wakening of men out of their sleepe Ioh. 11. Act. 7. Now this sleepe differeth from other sleepes in this that when a seruant conueyeth his masters sonne to bed to sleepe and rest pos◅bly this same seruant will waken him againe in the morning that he may rise and walke but when we are conueyed to the graue by the Lordes seruants these seruants will not get that honour to raise vs vp againe out of our bed but let vs sleepe on still vntill it shall please our Lord and master Christ Iesus to come againe and raise vs vp out of our bed and sleepe But foolish seruants to be troubling the graues of the Saintes and digging out their bones which they cannot cloth with flesh sinewes and skin neither can they breath a spirit in them it is both foolish superfluous and vntimous diligence whereof no example is to be found in the new Testament In the ecclesiasticall historie it is to be noted that the fathers who liued neerest vnto the dayes of the Apostles were also freest of this superstition of worshipping of bones and other reliques In the fourth persecution POLYCARPVS Bishop of Smyrna was martyred as hath bene declared at what time great care was taken both by Iewes and Paganes that the dead body of POLYCARPVS should not come into the handes of Christians and to this purpose it was burned with fire The Christians who waited on diligently to honour that blessed body which had patiently suffered rebuke for the cause of Christ in end they got his bones which albeit they counted to bee more pretious then gold and siluer yet they worshipped them not as EVSEBIVS clearely declareth lib. 4. eccles hist. cap. 16. but they buried them honourablie into a convenient place Moreouer that day whereinto hee was burnt for the Name of Christ was called by the fathers natalis or natalitium POLYCARPI that is the birth-day of POLYCARPVS because by his death he made it manifest that he was the true childe of GOD begotten and borne of the vncorruptible seede of the Word And in that place where his bones were buried and vpon the very day of his martyrdome Christians conveened to glorifie God for the constant suffring of the Martyr to exhort others with constant perseuerance to be ready to do the like Euseb. ibid. These things no man can justly vituperat in the ancient Church because their purpose was to glorifie GOD by meanes not vnlawfull and to f◅ster in the heartes of the people the assurance of the resurrection of the dead by honourable buriall of such as died for Christ And so much the more they were moued so to do because the persecuting Pagans hindered the Christians from burying their dead to the end they might quench the hope of the resurrection in their hearts as Euseb. lib. 5. cap. 1. clearely declareth speaking of the Martyrs in France who suffered death in the fourth persecution vnder ANTONINVS VERVS whose bodies were left vnburied for a ti◅e and afterward were burnt with fire and resolued into ashes and the ashes were cast into the riuer of Rhodanus ne ullam amplius resurrectionis spem habeant that is to the end they should haue no more hope of the resurrection And doubtlesse there is no Christian heart that liued in these dayes but behoued to encrease their cair in burying the bodies of the Saints because in want of buriall the Pagans wold haue quenched the hope of refurrectiō The custome of transporting the bones of the holy men of God from one place to another more honourable place as seemed to the transporters it was not so ancient as it can be prooued by examples for the space of three hundreth yeeres after the ascension of our Lord yet these bones were transported after a manner as the bones of IOSEPH from Egypt to Canaan to be buried in a more honourable place Iosu. 24. vers 22. without any kind of adoration as the bones of BABYLAS B. of Antiochia in the dayes of IVLIAN the apostat Theodoret. lib. 3. cap 3. 10. The bones of PAVL B. of Constantinople were transported and buried in the Church of Constantinople that was builded by his persecuter MACEDONIVS Sozom. lib. 7. cap. 10. This was done in the dayes of THEODOSIVS the Emperour and the wordes are to be marked transtulis corpus ejus in Ecclesia condidit quam MACEDONIVS persecutor ejus adificaverat that is to say he transferred his body and buried it into the Church which his persecuter MACEDONIVS had builded In the dayes of the Emperour ARCADIVS the reliques of SAMVEL were brought to Constantinople Theodor. lector collect lib. 2. in the daies of THEODOSIVS 2. his son the bones of CHRYSOSTOM were transported to Cōstantinople Al this time bones other reliques were trāsported buried but not set vp vpon altars nor worshipped If it be objected that IEROME disputing against VIGILANTIVS defendeth the custom of women who in the very day time went to the graues of the martyres with lighted torches of waxe to honour them by so doing To this I answere that the wordes of IEROME make litle against our opinion First because his wordes import that the bones of the saintes were lying in their graues Secondly the women who lighted these waxe torches IEROM granteth that they had a zeale to God but not according to knowledge Thirdly IEROM in cōpating these lighted torches to the pretious oyntment powred out by MARIE vpon Christs head Ioh. 12. whereof Christ had no neede and no more haue the martyres neede of waxe torches to bee lighted at the places of their
vnder the coÌ„duct of the SVLTAN of Babylon wherein an hundreth thousand men were slaine Thus was Ierusalem recouered out of the hands of the Saracens with great effusion of blood and GODFREY crowned king of Ierusalem But it was so deare bought and so soone lost againe for this kingdome continued not 100. yeeres that God gaue cleare testimonies to the world that he liked not that vnhappie Counciâ—…l of Claremontâ—… whereby the peace of the world was perturbed and blood was shed aboundantly like water powred out vpon the ground the mindes of the infidels so exasperat against Christians that albeit they haue payed vs home againe with the conquest of Thracia Bulgaria Macedonia Gracia Ploponesus and a great part of Hungaria and illyricum yet are not their hearts satisfied but set on edge through remembrance of the armie that came to besiege Ierusalem I leaue off to speake of the vnprosperous successe of CONRADVS 3. and howe his armie besieging Iconium was impoysoned by the falshood of EMANVEL Emperour of Constantinople and the successe of LEWES king of France and ROGERIVS duke of Sicil to whome all things succeeded not to their contentment as the siege of Damascus clearly declareth No better successe had PHILIP king of France and RICHARD king of England who enterprised likewise to recouer againe all that was lost but king RICHARDS shipwrack captiuitie ransome 〈◊〉 that the voyages to the holy lande seldome had a good succâ—…sse The calamitie of BARBAROSSA who seemed to prosper but was pitifully drowned in the passage of a riuer And finally the compelled returning of FRIDERICKE the 2. in the mids of his victories to saue his owne dominions from the outrage and oppression of the Pope the bad successe I say of all these expeditions and other moe declareth that God gaue not his blessing to the Councill of Claremont So that in very deede the aduancement of the Bishop of Rome tendeth to the calamitie of the whole world The second tragedie that followed the high aduancement of the B of Rome was bellum pontificium others call it bellum Imperatorium a cruell and hatefull warfare betweene the Emperours and Bishops of Rome wherein no sort of villanie falshood barbarous crueltie was left vnpractised against noble and worthy Emperours GREGORIE 7 caused the Emperour HENRY 4. at Canusium in sharpe winter weather to stand barefooted and to craue absolution from him He vttered a false prophecie of the Emperours death within yeere and day which when the issue declared to be a lying prophecie he took him to his shifting mental meaning that he spake of the spirituall death of the Emperours soule and not ofhis bodily deathPope PASCALIS 2. stirred vp HENRY 5. against his owne naturall father HENRY 4. and caused raise the body of the noble Emperour HENRY 4 out of his sepulchre so that it remained 5. yeeres vnburied Pope ADRIAN 4. was offended because the Emperour BARBAROSSA held his left stirrop in stead of the right stirrop when the Pope mounted vp vpon his horse Pope ALEXANDER3 trampled vpon the same Emperours necke Pope GREGORY 9. by his cursings compelled the Emperour FREDERICKE 2. to leade an armie to Asia against the Turkes and Saracens and in his absence like vnto a deceitfull traitor inuaded the kingdome of Naples and the rest of the dominions which in heritage belonged to the Emperour Thus we see clearly in this second tragedie that the B. of Rome was like vnto the melt in the body when it waxeth great by swelling and hardnesse all the rest of the noble parts are lessened and become weake euen so the excessiue preferment of the Bishoppes of Rome was the vndoing of the Emperours and princes of the earth The Bishops of Rome not contented with the two tragedies already mentioned to wit to haue filled the world with blood and to haue trampled the Emperouâ—…s princes vnder foot they added the third tragedie woâ—…st of all They would be lawgiuers sitting in the very chaire of Christ and making of none effect the ordinances of Christ to the ende that place might be giuen to their constitutions INNOCENTIVS 3 in the Councill of Lateran confirmed the blasphemous doctrine of transubstantiation Ann. 1215. In the generall Councill holden by GREGORIE 10. Ann. 1273. forgiuenes of sinnes was promised in most ample maner to those that would bee marked with the badge of the crosse and would goe and fight against the Saracens But Christ promiseth remission of sinnes to such onely as repent their sinnes beleeue in him in token of true repentance to these who beare the easie yocke light burden of Christ Mat. 11. ver 28 29. 30. In the generall Council gathered by CLEMENS 5. in Vienne Ann. 1311. it was ordained that the Pope should not be subject to the Emperour but rather the Emperor to the Pope that the Emperor shal giue his oth of alledgance to the Pope expresse contrary to the written word of God Let euery soule be subject vnto the hier powers Ro. 13 ver 1. Ioh 23. with aduise of SIGISMVND gathered a generall Councill at Constance Ann. 1414. wherein the very testamental legacie of Christ was altered and impaired by sacrilegious prelats in taking from the people the vse of the holy cup in the sacrament And the clause Non obstante set down in their act made the whole people of Christendome to tremble that they durst not set their mouthes against the heauen and correct the ordinance of Christ and that in such rude maner that notwithstanding that Christ instituted this sacrament vnder formes both of bread wine yet the church thought meete that the sacrament shal be giuen to laicke people vnder the forme of bread only The late Councils of Basil Florence are flat repugnant one to another in the head of supremacie And last of all the Councill of Trent wherein some piece of reformation was expected made it knowne to the world that the whore will neuer reforme the Borthell and the Antichrist will not be consumed with the breath of his own mouth but with the breath of the mouth of Christ which thing the Lord performe in his owne time Amen FINIS A SHORT COMPEND OF THE HISTORIE OF THE FIRST TEN PERSECVTIONS MOVED AGAINST CHRISTIANS DIVIDED INTO III. CENTVRIES WHEREVNTO ARE ADded in the end of euery Centurie treatises arising vpon occasion offered in the historie clearely declaring the noveltie of Popish Religion and that is neither flowed from the mouthes of Christs holy Apostles neither was it confirmed by the blood of the holy Martyrs who died in these ten persecutions IEREM 6. ver 16. Thus saith the Lord Stand in the Wayes and behold and aske of the old Way which is the good Way and Walke therein and ye shall find rest unto your soules but they said We will not walke therein LVC. 10. ver 42. Marie hath chosen the good part which shall not be taken a Way from her EDINBVRGH Printed by Andro Hart
and are to be solde at his shop on the North side of the high streete a litle beneath the Crosse ANNO DOM. 1613. A SHORT COMPEND OF THE ARRIAN and EVTYCHIAN PERSECVTIONS Comprised in the IIII. V. and VI. CENTVRIES Whereunto is added TREATISES DECLARING THE noueltie of POPISH Religion EDINBURGH PRINTED BY ANDRO HART Anno Dom. 1615. TO THE MOST NOBLE VERTVOVS AND ELECT LADIE MARIE COVNTES OF MARRE Wisheth grace mercie and eternall felicitie THE prouident care of our GOD most noble Ladie hath appointed that the vertues of his Saintes like vnto gold should bee tried in the furnace purged from drosse counted pretious In the first 300. yeeres of our LORD the faith patience of Christians was tried with the yoke of tenne cruell persecutions In the next 300. yeeres the knowledge of the Church was tried by heretiques who by the mistie cloudes of errour endeuoured to blind-fold the eyes of men and to lead them captiue from the simplicitie of the trueth of God But in these ages also the power of the light of God was manifested euer dissipating darknesse as the Sunne rising abolisheth the darknesse of the night This is an incouragement to vs when wee see false Teachers dayly renewing their Fortes to fight against the trueth as the Philistimes did who faught against Dauid in the valley of Rephaim after they had bene oft ouercome by him The last period of all their obstinate reluctation against the Anointed of the Lord was losse and hurt vnto them selues and dishonour to their gods whom they were compelled to leaue behind them and Dauid tooke them and brunt them with fire and the place was called Baal perat-zim that is the rupture of Baal The aduersaries of the Gospell in our land by renewing their forces againe are procuring a newe name vnto their idoles They cannot bee content with the names of Baal-Pâ—…or Baal-Meon Baal-Thamar Baal-Chatsor Baal-Gad But they will spread out their banners in the valley of Rephaim against our Soueraigne LORD his Highnesse Statutes and Lawes longing for the last name Baal-Peratzim The grandour of the speeches of Scottish Papists is not vnknowne to mee but tumour and swelling in the flesh is seldome joined with salubritie and health It is time for mee to bee afraide of the din of emptie pitchers when I finde them furnished within with holie Lampes and to be backed with the sound of holy Trumpets blowne by the Commandement of GOD I meane such as were in the Armie of Gedion Of this I am fully perswaded that the light of GOD the trumpet of GOD the sword of GOD and Gedion shall haue the vpperhand in GODS appointed time Some of them seeme to be deuout and they lament for vs as Iaakob lamented for his sonne Ioseph whom he supposed to haue beenedead But our lamentation for them is grounded on better knowledgâ—… as the lamentation of Ioseph was when he fell vpon his Fathers face and wept vpon him and kissed him Alwayes Madame consider that the sense of feeling the chiefe of all senses the most vnseparable companion of the spirituall life is most inlaking in them who striue against the Gospell of CHRIST preached in this land They haue so many easie remedies at hand to vnladen their soules of the heauy burthen of sinne such as sprinckling of holy water auricular confessions and pennance indulgences and pardons that they neuer suffer men to enter into a deepe consideration of their own miserie of the superabundant compassions of GOD freely pardoning sinne but they are content with the superfice and scruif of new inuented remedies In the meane time Madame receiue vnder the shadow of your Ladysh fauourable protection this Booke also Of the Arrian and Eutychian persecution wherein as in a viue mirrour is represented the falshood deceite and subtilty of lying Teachers and likewise their mercylesse inhumanity and cruelty against GODS seruants when they are assisted by the supporting strength of secular powers And let your La. and your noble house continually beware of Teachers whom yee find to bee deceitfull and bloody for they walke in the way of Cain Now the mercies of the LORD IESUS the author and finisher of our faith attend vpon my Lord your Husband vpon your Ladiship and all your noble house for now and euer AMEN Your La. humble seruant P. SIMSON TO THE READER IN writing of COMPENDES euery man who hath presumed to doe such a worke hath found difficulties and it hath not beene an easie thing to any man to satisfie either himselfe or others beeing inuironed with many straites If he be short in his Compend hee seemeth obscure if hee write at length then his Compend seemeth to haue need of an other Compend to abridge his prolixity Yet in all these difficulties it is better to set forward to doe some good both to our selues and others then to spend our time in idlenes lest our cogitations bee like vnto the vpper and lower Milne-stones lacking good graine to grind vpon they rub violently one vpon another vntill both be broken and incase our cogitations bee not well exercised our thoughtes will bee spent vpon vaine things which wil procure harme both to our soules and bodies In my TREATISES I haue ouerpassed with silence the question anent Festuall dayes lest I should seeme â—…t one time to contend both against friends foes as some men haue done who if they had more increased their charitie and diminished the feruent heat of their contentious spirits they had benefited the Church of Christ more then they haue done Would GOD LUCAS OSIANDER had walked in the foote-steps of Christian loue Now I will begge this fauour at thee Christian Reader that my weake trauels may be taken in good part The house of our GOD in this land is large and ample praised bee his moste holy NAME therefore it hath need of bright-shining torches for the Halles Parlours and Chambers and it hath need of smaller Lightes for Sellers and office houses let my pennie Candle giue light in the lowest Seller of the House of our GOD and mine heart is fully content Farewell CENTVRIE IIII. CHAP. I. OF EMPEROVRS CONSTANTINE THE CHURCH of CHRIST flourished in time of the ten persecutions as a Palme tree groweth vnder the burthen and spreads out her branches by increasing growth toward Heauen Sathan on the other part that pearcing and crooked serpent who striues against the militant Church of GOD both by might and slight when his might faileth it is time to trie his slight which hee did by the Canker-worme of hereticall doctrine Now therefore let vs intreat of the ARRIAN and EUTYCHIAN Persecutions in the three subsequent CENTURIES Other Heretiques albeit they were fierce and cruell such as the Donatists yet their crueltie was like vnto the stighling of a fish when the water is ebbed and she is not couered with the deepenesse of ouer flowing water the more stir she maketh the nearer she is vnto her death
Thessalomca the Emp. was moued with excessiue anger so that 7000. innocent people were sâ—…in inuited to the spectacle of Playes called Ludi circenses in the Grieke laÌ„guage 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For this fault the good Em. was reproued by Ambrose Bish. of Millane confessed his fault in sight of the people with teares and made a lawe that the like coÌ„mandements anent the slaughter of people should not hâ—…ue hastie execution vntill the time that 30. dayes were ouerpassed to the ende that space might bee left either to mercie or to repentance In like maner he was angry out of meaâ—…ure against the people of Antiochia for ouerthrowing the brasen portrate of his beloued bedde-fellow Placilla The Emp. denuded their towne of the dignitie of a Metrapolitane Citie conferring this eminent honour to their neighbour towne Laodicea Moreouer he threatned to set the towne on fâ—…e and to redact it vnto the base estate of a Vil age But Flauiannus Bishop of Antiochia by his earnest trauailes with the Emperour mitigated his wrath for the people repented their foolish fact were sore afraide the good Emp. moued with pitie pardoned the fault of the towne of Antiochia His lenitie toward the Arrians whom he permitted to keepe conuentions in principall Cities was with great dexteritie wisedome reproued by Amphilochius Bishop of Iconium For hee came in vpon a time and did reuerence to the Emperour but not vnto Arcadius his sonne albeit alreadie associated to his Father in gouernament declared Augustus whereat Theodosius being offended Amphilochis very pertinentlie and in due season admonished the Emperour that the GOD ofHeauen also would be offended with them who tolerated the blasphemers of his onely begotten Sonne the LORD IESUS CHRIST Wherupon followed a lawe discharging the conuentions of Heretiques in principall Cities In all these infitmities it is remarkeable that the good Emperour 〈◊〉 gaue place to wholsome admonitions The excessiue raines hee was compeâ—…led to vndertake in Waâ—…re-fare hastened his death for hee contracted sicknesse soone after his returning from the battell faught against Eugâ—…nius and died in the 60 yeere of his age and in the 16. yeere of his reigne He left behind him his two sons Arcadius to gâ—…uerne the East and Honorius to gouerne the West CHAP. II. Of Pastors and Doctors AFTER Eusebius Miltiades gouerned the Romane Church 4. yeeres 7. moneths and 8. dayes as Platina writeth His ministration was in the dayes of the reigne of Constantine to whom the Emperour remitted the controuersie betwixt Cecilianus and the Donatistes to bee judged by him and his Collegues Rheticus Maternus and Marinus The Donatistes would not acquiesce to the determination of Miltiades and his Collegues The good Emperour appointed this cause of new againe to be judged in Aâ—…les by a number of Bishops of Spaine Italie and France because the Donatists would not acquiesce to the determination of Miltiades and his Collegues In the Councill of Aâ—…les Cecilianus was likewise absolued and the Donatistcs againe succumbed in their probation Notwitstanding they appealed to the Emp. Constantine and when the Emp. heard the cause of Cecilianus pleaded before himselfe the Donatists could not proue that either Cecilianus had beene admitted Bishop of Carthage by a man who was Proditor or yet that hee had admitted any other man culpable of the like fault to an Ecclesiasticall office If the Bishop of Rome had beene supreame Iudge in all Ecclesiasticall causes Constantine had done him wrong to appoint other Iudges to cognosce in this cause after the Bishop of Rome and his Collegues had giuen out their definitiue sentence His ordinance anent prohibition of fasting vpon the LORDS day was expedient at that time to bee a distinguishing note of true Christians from Manichean heretiques whose custome was vpon the LORDES day to fast The purple garment the palace of Lateran the superioritie of the towne of Rome and gouernament of the West which honours some alledge were conferred by Constantine to Miltiades and Silvester is a fable not worthie of refutation all these honours the Emperours of the West successours of Constantine possâ—…ssed and not the Bishop of Rome for the space of many hundreth yeeres To Miltiades succeeded Silvester and ministred 23. yeeres 10. monethes 11. dayes In his time was the Heretique Arrius excommunicated by Alexander without the fore-knowledge of the Bishop of Rome It was enough that after excommunication intimation was made to other bishops which duety the Bishop of Alexandria neglected not Learned men should be ashamed of fables to say that Constantine was baptized by Siluester for Siluester was dead before Constantine was baptized And Platina himselfe is compelled to grant that Marcus the successor of Siluester gouerned the Church of Rome in Constantines dayes And Eusebius testifieth that Constantine was baptized in Nicomedia immediately before his death Concerning the donation of Coâ—…stantine wherein he conferreth the dominion of the West to the Bish. of Rome it is like vnto a rotten egge which is cast out of the basket lest all the rest bee set at the lesse auaile No ancient writter maketh mention of any such thing Yea Constantine in his testamentall legacie allotted the Dominion of the West to two of his sonnes namely to Constantinus younger and to Constans How then had hee by an anteriour disposition resigned these Dominions to the Bishop of Rome If Papistes bee not better countenanced by Antiquitie in other thinges then in this point they haue no great cause to bragge of Antiquitie To Siluester succeeded Marcus and ministred 2. yeeres 8. monethes and 20. dayes After Marcus Iulius gouerned the Romane Church 15. yeeres Sozomenus attributes to Iulius 25. yeeres His ministration was in the dayes of the Emperour Constantius and his brethren Hee was a defender of the true Faith and a Citie of refuge to those who were persecuted by Arrians as namely to Athanasius Bisshop of Alexandria Paulus Bishop of Constantinople Asclepas Bishop of Gaza Marcellus Bishop of Aneyra and Lucius Bisshop of Adrianopolis All these were vnjustly deposed from their offices by the Arrians and had recourse to Iulius Hee was neither ashamed of the Gospell of CHRIST nor of his afflicted seruantes In the Councill of Sardica great honour was conferred vnto him to wit that men vnjustly condemned by Arrians shoulde haue refugâ—… to Iulius to whom they gaue power of newe againe to judge their cause This was an Act of the Councill of Sardica and not of the Nicene Councill as was confidently alledgâ—…d in the Councill of Carthage and a personall honour conferred to one man alone for respectiue causes but not extended to his successours as though all the Bishops of Rome at all times shoulde bee Iudges of appellation The Arrians were sore grieued for this that Iulius both in worde and deede and writ assisted Athanasius and his complices The chafing letters and mutuall expostulations that passed
to wit in those that are dead If they had followed the certaintie of Scripture what needed such doubtsome and staggering speeches When a tall Cedar falleth many little trees are bruised by the fall of it and when worthie men doe fall into an errour it is offensiue to manie The dolorous examples of Iacob Dauid Salomon and the plurality of their wiues contrary to the first institution of GOD proueth this to bee true Helcana the father of Samuel was not free of this fault And when the Apostle Paul writeth of the giftes that are requisite in a bishop hee would haue him to bee the husband of one wife which exhortation had beene vnnecessary except the preposterous following of the faultes of holie Fathers had beene so uniuersally ouer-spread that scarce the Pastors themselues were free of the contagion of this disease But the GOD of Heauen hath permitted this to bee for our triall euen to trie whether wee loue the LORD our GOD with all our heart or no for if wee loue the LORD with all our heart wee will neuer prefer men to GOD nor mens examples to GODS Commandements how holy and godly so euer they haue beene But now to returne to these two learned Fathers of whom I began to speake Some excuse this weakenesse by the libertie of Rhethoricall ornamentes And indeede incase a lap of this transparent-couering bee not spred ouer the speeches of Nazianzenus who preferreth the paineâ—…ull trauâ—…ls of Basilius to the trauels of the Apostle Paul who filled the world with the preaching of the Gospel from Iudea to Ilyricum If I say this forme of speaking bee not excused by Rhethoâ—…icall ornamentes and namely the figure Hyperbole no Christian man coulde gladly lende his eare to such speeches But now to leaue the sandie ground of mens speaches to conuert our selues to the doctrine of diuine Scriptures as to a sure foundation wherevpon if wee leane we shall not bee deceiued The LORD saith in his word Call vpon meâ—… in the day of thy trouble and I will deliuer thee and thou shalt glorifie mee From this ground of holy Scripture let our Treatise arise wherein GOD willing first wee shall consider the purpose of the Prophet next wee shall declare that Prayer is a part of spirituall worship onlie belonging to GOD thirdly that IESUS CHRIST is the only mediator of our intercession and last that prayers to Angels to the blessed Virgine the mother of our LORD and to the Saintes departed hath no grounde in Scripture and this custome was disliked by many of the ancient Fathers Now the purpose of the Prophet in the fifty Psalme is manifest namely this to conuict Hypocrites who contenting themselues with outward sacrifices neglected the spiritual worship of GOD wherein GOD hath principall delight as CHRIST saith GOD is a Spirit and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and trueth But Hypocrites will needes present vnto GOD chaffe in stead of Corne drosse in stead of Golde and an outward scroofe of externall worship in stead of the very substance of his spirituall seruice To draw them from this grosse imagination he brings in GOD himselfe speaking from his holy Sanctuarie and declaring that outward sacrifices haue bene oft times intermitted without any reproofe of them who beeing compelled by necessitie and not willingly left off the offering of sacrifices In Aegypt the Iewes coulde not offer such beasts as the Aegyptians worshipped els they would haue stoned them to death In Babylon they had not an Altar whervpon they coulde offer sacrifices to GOD lawfully And at some times when both Alter and sacrifices were at hand yet Dauid complaineth that by violence he was debarred from the Courtes of the LORD All these times GOD did not reproue his people for omitting of externall sacrifices because they were constrained by necessitie to intermit such outward exercises In the meane time they worshipped GOD in spirit and trueth and it lay not in the power of their hatefull enemies to hinder them from worshipping GOD spiritually Secondly the Prophet brings in the LORD declaring that hee had no pleasure in bloody sacrifices because hee neither eateth flesh nor drinketh blood and in case hee delited in such things hee would not require them at mens handes seeing that all the foules in the Mountaines and all the beastes in the Forrest are the LORDS and hee may use them according to his owne will and blessed pleasure But the LORD did institute such kind of sacrifices to last for a time as shadowes of thinges to come but they coulde neuer sanctifie the commers the reunto Therefore if they bee separated from CHRIST to whom they led the people as Types and Figures of his euerlasting sacrifice the LORD had no kind of regarde of them True it is that Sathan hath a delite in bloody sacrifices euen in so far as they are bloody and a destruction of the creatures of GOD as the sacrifices in the valley of Ben-hinnon doe testifie and the sacrifices offered to Diaâ—…a in Taurica chersonesus and the bloody tribute paied by the Athenians to Minos King of Candie by the expresse aduice and counsel of Apollo as Chrysostome clearelie affirmeth And this declareth that the deuill who was a murtherer from the beginning hath a delite in bloody sacrifices But God delited not in such sacrifices except only in so far as they were types and figures leading to the sacrifice of Christ. Yea the sacrifices of the Law were like vnto the fire set vpon the top of the marble towre of Pharos for the wellfare of ships and to direct them vnto the right harboure of Alexandria and like vnto the fire set vp vpon the vttermoste wall of HIERUSALEM on the North side called by Cosmographers Turris furnorum This serued to direct the foote-steps of them who in the night season were journeying to the holy Citie that they shoulde not aberre from the right entrie of the gates of HIERUSALEM Notwithstanding children sate about these fires and warmed themselues and knewe none other use wherefore they were appointed saue onely to warme those who were acolde in winter nightes euen so carnall Iewes reposed vpon sacrifices but marked not the right ende wherefore they were appointed by God But the Prophet leades a carnall people from externall sacrifices vnto spirituall exercises and namely vnto prayer and thankesgiuing and consequently to the obedience of faith the very vndoubted grounde of prayer and thankesgiuing for in these exercises consist deeper pointes of the worship of God then in outward sacrifices whether we looke to God or to our selues when wee looke to God hee is a spirit and consequently hee deliteth in spirituall seruice and when wee looke vnto our selues wee haue an earthly bodie and a spirituall soule and if we present vnto God the seruice of the most base part of our person and not the best part then wee fall vnder the curse threatned by
betwixt the Riuers Arnon Iordan and Iabbok by one apparent right the king of Ammon claimed that these lands should be restored vnto the Ammonites to whom of old they did belong but Iphtah refused to giue ouer the possession of these landes wherein the Reubenites and Gaaites dwelt and that for three great reasons First they receiued these landes out of the handes of their GOD by whose expresse commandement and warrant MOSES faught against Sihon king of Hesbon Secondly since the dayes of MOSES vntill the dayes of the gouernament of IPHTAH that is the space of three hundreth yeeres the people of Israel peaceablie possessed those landes And thirdly euen in the dayes of Moses these landes were taken out of the handes of the Amorites who were possessors of them at that time and not from the Ammonites For the like reasons I say we cannot agree to the doctrine of Inuocation of Saints First because wee haue receiued a perfect forme of prayer out of our LORDS hands wherein we are taught to pray onely to our Heauenly Father and not to Saints Secondly because the Church for the space of three hundreth yeeres after the LORDS ascension used no other forme of prayer then this to pray to GOD alone through IESUS CHRIST Thirdly if Papistes will needes make anie controuersie in this matter let them controuert with CHRISTS Apostles who haue left vnto their true successors this forme of prayer which we now use and such new young school-maisters as Papistes are wee cannot admit Against the seconde of the three preceeding reasons if they object that in the dayes of Cyprian the Christian Virgine whom Cyprian before his conuersion pursued with Magicall arts labouring to circumueene her shee prayed for helpe to the Virgine Marie as Nazianzenus writeth To this I answere that this narration which Nazianzenus hath found in some Apocryph booke is rejected by the learned as an vncertaine thing whereof Ierom writing of the conuersion of Cyprian maketh no mention Secondly this forme of prayer that a weake and timorous Virgine used was no liturgie nor forme of prayer used amongst Christian people in their holy assemblies and that thing which any one person doth of infirmitie and weakenesse is not to bee counted an ancient doctrine in the Church Seeing the Apostle warneth vs to absteine from all appearance of euill at least Papistes in their Inuocation of Saintes shoulde haue absteined from formes of speaking used in prayers made vnto the eternal GOD lest they should seeme to giue the glory onely due to the Creator to the creatures But in the matter of Inuocation of Saintes they haue set themselues forward with such impetuous speate that they cannot absteine from the honourable stiles giuen to GOD but these also must bee giuen to the Saintes The Prophet Dauid calleth the LORD his Rocke his Fortresse his Strength his Shield the Horne of his Saluation and his Refuge And in another Psalme GOD is our hope and helpe ◅rength in troubles readie to be found Are not all these honourable stiles and many more attributed to the Saintes in the ordinary prayers of the R◅ane Church Is not the Virgine Marie called the Queene of Heauen the prouident gouernor of Heauenly and Earthly powers the mother of mercie obteiner of pardon mediatrix to GOD-ward restorer of the grace to bee hoped for the mother of the militant Church the aduocate of the world Such pretious ointment as this is more meete to bee poured out vpon the feete of CHRIST then vpon the head of the Virgine Marie but a prodigall waster neither regardeth what hee giueth nor to whom they are but one steppe from calling the Virgine Marie directly eternall GOD for they put the gouernement of Heauenly and Earthly things vpon her shoulder they call her Queene of Heauen and the prince of peace What remaineth to bee said but one word that shee is almighty GOD and this stile also will bee necessarily inferred vpon the preceeding honourable titles attributed to her The honourable stile of an Aduocate Bellarmine is the bolder to attribute vnto the Virgine Marie because that Ireneus writeth Et sicut ill◅ seducta est ut effugeret DEVM sic h◅c suasa est ◅bedire DEO uti Virginis Euae Virgo Maria fieret advocata that is and like as she to wit Eva was seduced to depart from GOD euen so this woman to wit the Virgine Marie was perswaded to obey GOD to the end that the Virgine Marie might be an aduocate for the Virgine Eva. I am certaine that Bellarmine vnderstood not the meaning of Ireneus better then hee vnderstood the sence and meaning of his owne words In the words immediately preceeding Ireneus declares that like as sinne came in by disobedience in eating of the fruite of the forbidden tree euen so righteousnesse came in by him who manifested his obedience in another tree that is in suffering death vpon the Crosse. What neede had Be◅larmine to wreast the wordes of Ireneus after hee had set downe so cleare a commentarie of his owne words for hee calleth the Vi◅gine Marie an aduocate in respect of her blessed birth who by his obedience satisfied for the sinne that Adam brought in by his disobedience Now it is true that superstitiō is like vnto the Feau◅r called Hectica in the beginning hardly discerned but easie to bee cured and in end easily discerned but not easily cured Euen so it was hard to know what would bee the issue of the disputation of Origen when he disputed concerning the affection that Saintes departed carried towarde the members of the Militant CHURCH of GOD but it was easie to stay the course of this errour when hee who was the first author of it durst not auow it but in secret disputations said that possibly such a thing might bee But in our dayes the Feauer is growne to such an height that it is easier to discerne the errour then to find out a way to correct it What is then to bee done at this time where into errour hath preuailed so farre and of so long time that it is like vnto a Gangrene dayly becomming worse and worse so that it is apparently a remedilesse euill shall wee cease from damning superstition and let the people pray as they list It is better to follow the example of the holy Prophet Helias albeit Idolatrie was vniuersally ouer-spred in the kingdome of Israel yet he reproued the people for halting betweene two opinions and hee bowed his knees to GOD and prayed that the LORD would send fire from Heauen to burne the sacrifice and to seale vp in the hearts of the people that the GOD who made the Heauen and the Earth was the onely true GOD and onely to bee worshipped Euen so beside reprouing of superstitious Inuocation of Saints which also I haue done according to the measure of my knowledge in this Treatise I pray to the eternall GOD that hee
would send from the Heauen the diuine flame of his celestiall loue to the ende that the fleshly conceits of mens hearts may bee brunt vp and that they may bee fully perswaded that the LORD who made the Heauen and the Earth is hee alone to whom spirituall sacrifices are to bee offered and that through IESVS CHRIST to whom with the Father and the Holy Spirit bee praise and glorie now and euer AMEN A TREATISE Of the authoritie of COUNCILS IN the first three hundreth yeeres of our LORD Councils were few in number and verie obscure and few of them had great authoritie except the Councill holden in HIERUSALEM by the Apostles yet was the first age after CHRIST the golden age whether wee consider doctrine or maners in doctrine more sincere in maners more vnreproueable then any age after following in so much that all the accusations forged against their doctrine and conuersation were but calumnies and lyes The banquets of Thyestes and the chambring of Oedipus perpetually objected to the Christians of the primitiue Church what were they but cauillations in thinges whereof they had no vnderstanding They knew not what the spirituall eating of the flesh of CHRIST did meane neither knew they how necessary it was for Christians to keepe holy assemblies in the night time when they had not libertie to doe it in the day time And they spake euill of things they could not nor would not comprehende as the Gracians and Romanes counted the Hebrues Barbarians because they had no regard to vnderstand their language But out of all question the first age was the golden age of the worlde after it was renewed by the comming of CHRIST in doing of good more willing in suffering of euill more patient then anie age that followed the first 300. yeeres of our LORD And that thing where into the primitiue Church seemeth to be inferiour to posteriour times to wit in number and splendor of Councils in that same point it hath a prerogatiue such as Iuda had ouer Israel there were more altars in Israel then in Iuda but that one altar in Hierusalem was better then all their altars And the Councill holden in Hierusalem by the Apostles in the dayes of the Emperour Claudius was better then all the Councils either Generall or Nationall that euer were gathered since those dayes Now before I speake in particular of thâ—… necessitie of Councils of their authoritie of the abuse of Councils and power to conuocate them and who should haue vote in Councils somewhat is to bee premitted concerning the name giuen vnto Gâ—…nerall or Nationall assemblies Gratianus busieth himselfe in manie vnnecâ—…ssarie thinges and in this also to secke out the Etymologie of the Latine word Concilium and hee deduceth it from the word Cilium called in the Greeke language 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the eye lid and the compound word Concilium signifieth the companie of men who agree in one minde as the eye liddes doe when they couer the eyes they couer both together and when they open againe to giue place vnto the sight of the eyes they open both at once And so Gratianus thinketh that Concilium is Coelus consentientium that is a company of men who agree in one mind The fourth Councill of Garthage requireth beside consent and agreement in one minde a consent to the veritie and trueth of GOD therefore they say that the assemblie of Heretiques should not bee called Concilium but Conciliabulum But in acurate seeking out of Etymologies scarce can Plato himselfe in his Dialogue called Cratylus escape the blame of curiositie the Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is plainer and is borrowed by the Latinists who usually call a Councill Synodus and it is used in this sence to betoken a meeting of men in spitituall offices for timous suppressing of corruptions either in Doctrine or maners springing vp into the Church The necessitie of Councâ—…ls may bee proued by these arguments following First those ordinarie meanes which the Prophets and Apostles who had their callinâ—… and gifts immediatly from GOD did use for suppressing of false doctrine and corrupt maners should of necessitie continue in the Church But so it is that conuentions assemblies was one of these ordinary meanes ergo they should continue in the Church The seconde part of the argument is proued by the example of the great assemblie gathered at Silo in the dayes of Iosua to suppresse the apparent defection of the Reubenites Gadites and halfe tribe of Manasses from the true worship of GOD as seemed vnto them And this Assemblie had allowance of GOD forasmuch as it was ordered with wisedome the glory of GOD was onely respected and the ende of it was peace in ISRAEL Next the great assemblie of the ten tribes at mount Carmell procured by Helias the Prophet but gathered by the commandement of Achab the king of Israel declareth that assemblies of Church-men and others of chiefe authoritie was an ordinarie meane to reforme abuses in Religion albeit no reformation followed after this assemblie yet the enemies of the true Religion were conuicted in their consciences false teachers were disgraced and punished and the zeale of Helias toward the glory of GOD had allowance by a miracle of fire from Heauen In like maner Samuel by gathering a great assemblie of all Israel at Mizpah procured a reformation both in Religion and maners amongst them Dauid in transporting the Arke to the citie of Dauid Salomon in the dedication of the Temple both used the support of holie assemblies gathered to that effect And in the new Testament the Apostles Elders and Deacons met together in an holie assemblie at Hierusalem and timouslie suppressed the doctrine of false teachers who affirmed that the Gentiles could not bee saued by faith in CHRIST onely except they had also beene circumcised and kept the law of Moses All these examples and manie more contained in holy Scripture teach vs that the meeting of holie assemblies was an ordinarie meane to suppresse corruption in doctrine and maners and to aduance the kingdome of GOD. Secondlie that thing which godlie Emperours did for the suppressing of Heresies following the examples of the Prophets Apostles especiallie when no better meanes could be found out is necessarilie to bee obserued But so it is that the godlie Emperours Constantine Theodosius Valentinian the third and Theodosius the second the sonne of Arcadius and Martianus conuocated Councils for suppressing of the Heresies of Arrius Macedonius Nestorius and Eutyches and no better meanes could be found out neither as yet can bee founde out for suppressing of Heresies Therefore the custome of conuocating Councils at times requisite is necessarilie to bee obserued Other arguments albeit they haue not so necessarie a consecution as the former notwithstanding they proue that lawfull Councils are a terrour to the kingdome of the Deuill and that the instrumentes of Sathan such as Iulian the
Nestorius Hee was present likewise at the second Councill of Ephesus and consented to the restitution of Eutyches Hee was deposed in the Councill of Chalcedon receiued in fauour againe after humble confession of his fault This is that famous author whome the Romane Church citeth for the fable of the Assumption of the Virgine MARIE When hee returned to Ierusalem a number of turbulent Monks arose vp against him and desired him to accurse the Councill of Chalcedon which when hee refused to doe they chused another bishop called Theodosius but the Emperour Martianus commandement was strait to fetch Theodosius aliue vnto him therefore he fled and Juvenalis returned againe vnto his place The names of Anastatius and Martyrius who followed Iuvenalis for their assenting to Basiliscus and to Petrus Gnapheus are not worthie to be insert in this catalogue Of other Pastors and Doctors THeodoritus was B. of Cyrus a towne in Syria whose builder seemes to haue beene Cyrus King of Persia a man of excellent learning liued vnder the Emperours Theodosius 2. Valentinian 3. and Martianus Hee had the ouersight of eightie parishes lying within his ample diocie He is bold to affirme in a cerraine Epistle written to Leo bishop of Rome that by his trauailes a thousand soules within his bounds were reclaimed from the heresie of Marcion Hee fell into many lamentable troubles The ground of all was the extraordinare loue hee caried toward his owne Patriarch Iohn B. of Antiochia For like as he accompanied him to the Councill of Ephesus so likewise hee concurred with him in the deposition of Cyrillus B. of Alexandria and Memnon B. of Ephesus but the Councill gathered at Ephesus tooke triall in the cause of Cyrillus and Memnon and absolued them and damned Iohn B. of Antiochia his complices Theodoritus was one of the number The second trouble followed vpon the necke of the first for by instigation of his patriarch John he wrote against the 12 heades or 12. theses of Cyrillus written against Nestorius wherein he mistaketh the doctrine of Cyrillus as if he had falne into the errour of Apollinaris but after that Cyrillus wrote a declaration of his owne meaning it was found that both Cyrillus and Theodoritus professed one faith and they were reconciled Neuerthelesse Theodoritus was damned in the second Councill of Ephesus for writting against Cyrillus neither beeing cited accused nor conuict of any fault Theodoritus complained to Leo B. of Rome of the outrage of Dioscorus bishop of Alexandria who had damned him in a Councill before hee was heard Leo absolued him and the Councill of Chalcedon after hee had pronounced Anathema against the errours of Nestorius and Eutyches they in like maner absolued him And finally after his death in the 5 generall Councill his writings against the 12. heades of Cyrillus were damned All these troubles proceeded from one and the selfesame ground to wit vpon the extraordinarie loue hee caried toward his patriarch Iohn This one thing laid aside he was nothing inferiour to the most wise acurate and learned writers of the ancient time In the first of his learned dialogues called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he prooueth that the Word became flesh without changing of the diuine Nature into the humane Nature or the humane Nature into the diuine Euen as in the Sacrament of the Supper of the LORD the bread becomes the body of the LORD not by changing the substance of it but by assuming by grace an other vse than it had the very symbol obtaineth the name of the thing represented by the symbol When Papists doe read the dialogues of Theodoritus let them leaue off to brag of the antiquitie of the doctrine of Transsubstantiation and take them to the Monke Damascene the first author of their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he continued at least 30 yeeres in his ministrie and ended his life as is supponed vnder the reigne of Leo the first Augustine in his young yeeres was infected with the errour of the Manicheans His mother Monica watered her face many times with teares in her prayers begging at GOD his conuersione to the trueth GOD heard her prayers hee was sent to Millan to be a teacher of Rhetoricke by the preaching of Ambrose B. of Millan and the deuote behauiour of the people in singing Psalmes to the praise of GOD the like whereof Augustine had neuer seene in any place before for men in earth praising GOD with ardent affection seemed to represent the Angels of heauen who incessantly praise GOD with vnspâ—…akable delite Also with the reading of the life of Antonius the heremite he was wonderfully moued begâ—…n to dislike his former conuersatioÌ„ which he had spent in worldly pleâ—…sures and went vnto a quiet garden accompanied with Alipius with many teares he bewaâ—…led the insolencie of his bypast conuersation wishing the time to be now come whereinto without farder delay his soule should be watred with the dew of the conuerting grace of GOD. And as he was powring out the griefe of his wounded heart to GOD with a flood of teares hee heard a voyce saying vnto him tolle lege and againe tolle lege that is to say take vp and read take vp and read At the first heating he took it to haue bene the voyce of boyes or maides speaking in their play such wordes one to another but when he looked about and could see no body he knew it to be a celestial admonition warning him to take vp the booke of holy Scriptuâ—…e which he had in the garden with him and read Now the first place that feâ—…l in his hands after the opening of the booke was this Not in gluttonie nor drunckennes nor in chambering nor wantonnesse nor in strife or enuying but put on the Lord Jesus Christ and take no thought of the flesh to fulfill the lâ—…stes thereof At the reading whereof he was so fully resolued to forsake the vanities of the world to become a Christian that immediatly thereafter he was baptized by Ambrose B. of Millan with his compenion Alipius and his sonne Adeodatus After this he returned to Africke and was coadiutor to Valerius B of Hippe as Chrysâ—…stome was to Flauianus in Antiochia and â—…fter them also with extraordinarie giftes of knowledge but the writers of this time especially Evagrius who concludeth his historie with the death of Mauritius bringeth in many famous men in this Centurie gifted with power to worke miraculous workes But when I consider the ende of these miraculous workes they are brought in either to confirme the sanctimonie of the monasticke life the adoration of the Grosse or some other grosse superstition Zosymas a Monke is commended by him for his propheticall foreknowledge of the ruine of Antiochia and for the miracle of the Lion who slewe the Asse that caried his victualing to Caesarea and likewise the Lion by his mandate was compelled to beare that same burden which the Asse had borne to the portes
of Caesarea No man is so senslesse or ignorant but may perceiue that this lying miracle is brought in to the confirmation of the excellency of the monastick life The miracle of Thomas B of Apamea tendeth to the adoration of the tree of the Crosse. The miracle of the fire that came out of Barsaunphius shop at Gaza consumed the most part of them who were in companie with Eustochius B of Jerusalem is a notable lie and tendeth onely to confirme superstitition The miracle of the Image of the virgine MARIE detesting Anatolius an hypocrite an Idolater and a sorcerer and yet insinuating himselfe in familiar acquaintance with Gregorius B. of Antiochia in the dayes of the Emperour Tiberius any man may perceiue that this miracle is forged not so much for detestation of hypocrisie Idolatrie and sorcerie as for worshipping the Image of the Virgine with a deuote minde The miracle of Simeones who in his youth miraculously tamed a Pard and fastened his girdle about the necke thereof and brought it like a catte into the Monasterie and afterward liued vpon the toppes of pillars and mountaines sed with branches of trees 68. yeeres this fable whereunto it tendeth all men doe see And finally the golden Crosse sent by Cosroes to Sergiopolis tendeth not onely to the invocation of Saintes but also to put our trust and confidence in them as the last wordes of the Epistle of Cosroes and his wife Sira clearly proporteth No we let the iudicious Reader pardone mee in preâ—…ermitting many things written by others lest I should wearie them by filling their eares with fables and lyes CHAP. III. Of Heresies IN this and the next Centurie I finde that the error of Eutyches is like vnto a root of bitternesse which budding out with new branches not seene before but fostered with the venemous sappe of the old root that seemed to bee abolished did mightily perturbe the Church The errour of the Monothelites was but a branch of the errour of Eutyches but this belongeth to the seuenth Centurie In this Centurie a great number of people especially of Monkes fauouring the heresie of Eutyches spake against the Councill of Chalcedone these were called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because they had no principall heade vpon whom they depended and they were anteâ—…iour to Anthimus or Anthimius B. of Constantinople and to Theodosius B. of Alexandria and Severus B. of Antiochia therefore they were not called Anthimians Theodosians or Severues but indeede they might haue beene called Eutychians alwayes the vulgare name giuen vnto them was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Another branch which sprang vp from the root of Eutyches heresie was the errour of those who supponed that the flesh of CHRIST was voide of all kinde of humane infirmitie expresly contradicting holy Scriptures which attributeth to the body of CHRIST hunger and wearines and other infirmities which he voluntarily accepted for our sakes And where it is said that the LORD IESVS did eate and drinke To this they answered that hee seemed to eate and drinke as hee did after his â—…esurrection but hee had no necessitie of eating and drinking but the veritie of his death stoppeth the mouthes of these heretiques for CHRIST was content to taste of all our infirmities death it selfe not except that we might know he will be a mercifull high Priest because he hath tasted of our infirmities and can haue compassion of those who are in trouble In this opinion was the Emperour Iustinian in his olde dayes whose vices did almost equall his vertues especially in comporting so much with Theodora the Empresse to the great aduancement of the errour of Eutyches and hinderance of the Gospell In this Centurie the defenders of the bookes of Origenc such as Theodorus Ascidas B. of Caesarea Cappadocia and the Monkes of Nova Laura whom Eustochius B. of Jerusalem eiected out of their monasteries were counted heretiques as wil be declared hereafter Godwilling in the head of Councills Finally there were some heretiques who durst derogate perfection of knowledge to the Sonne of GOD in his diuine Nature these were called Agnoitae whome I leaue as buried in the dust and according to their name neuer worthy to haue beene knowne in the world CHAP. IIII. Of Councills THE schisme that fell out in the election of Symmachus was the cause of the gathering of the Councill of Rauenna Laurentius was his competitour In this Councill it was found that Symmachus was first ordeined and that the most part both of Clergie and people adherâ—…d to him therefore he was declared to be bishop of Rome and Lanrentius was ordeined bishop of Nuceria The multiplied number of Councills in Symmachus time all conueened by the authoritie of Theodoricus King of Gothes who reigned in Italie All this number of Councills I say was assembled for matters of litle importance except the fourth and fifth Councill whereinto a lible of accusations was giuen in against Symmachus but he compeared not before the Councill to answere yet was hee absolued by the most part of the Councill beeing his owne fauourers chiefly for this reason because they thought that the high Pricst should be iudged by no man but his doings should bee examined onely before the Trihunall of GOD. Marke how this matter goeth the bishoppes of Rome are lying vnder the feet of the Gothes neither haue they libertie to assemble themselues together except that licence be sought and obteined from Theodoriâ—…us King of Gothes Not withstanding supremacie that great Idole whereat they aimed continually runneth so high in their heades that the flatterers of the bishop of Rome would absolue him as a man whose actions came not vnder the iudicature of mortall men His accusers protested in write that if the successours of PETER should bâ—…e iudged by no man then with the â—…est of the priui'edges of their chaire they had also a pâ—…iuiledge to sinne and to doe what they pleased The Councils of Spaine called Ilerdensc and Valâ—…ntinum assembled in Valentia are very obscure Councils In the one â—…ight bishoppes were present in the other sixe bishoppes Many new and superstitious Canons were made in these assemblies and farder I see nothing In the first called Ilerdense a prohibition of mariage in time of Lent and three weekes before the sestiuitie of Iohn the Bapâ—…st and betwixt the dayes of the Aduent of our LORD and the dayes called Epiphania In the other Councillit was appointed that in the ordinarie seruice the Gospell should be read after the Epistle partly in respect that all the people of GOD haue entresse to heare the wholesome precepts of their Sauiour and partly in respect that by such hearing some were found to bee conuerted to the faith where of it may bee perceiued that the Gospell was read vnto the people into a knowâ—…e and intelligible language els it could not worke faith in the heartes of the hearers In the twentieth yeere of the reigne of the
this ordinance but the ambassadours of Leo B. of Rome spake against it fearing lest the increasing magnificence of such an Emperiall towne should in ende bring Constantinople to the preheminence of the first seat Supremacie was long agoe the very aple of their eye and they could not abide that afarre off a diminution of this should be once pointed aâ—… Neuerthelesse this ordinance had alowance of the Councill notwithstanding of the contradiction of the Romane ambassadours In codice Romano saith learned Morneus all this action is lest out In the sixt Session of this Councill the Emperour Martianus with Pulcheria the Emprice were both present and craued of the Councill that ordinances should bee made for restraining the filthie Iucre and ambition of Monks and Clergie men who intangled themselues with seculare businesse for desire of gaine and riches whereupon followed this constitution that men who haue addicted themselues either to the Monasticke life or the Clergie they should not bee promoted to other dignities meaning ciuile offices because that is a distraction of them from their calling TREATISES BELONGING TO THE fourth CENTVRIE A TREATISE Of mans Free-will SVCH is the corruption of mans nature that wee seeke without our selues the fountaine of all euill and within our seluâ—…s the fountaine of all good whereas good reason requireth that we should transferre the cause of all iniquitie and infirmitie vpon our selues as the forlorne sonne did who blamed no person of his pouertie nakednes and contemptible estate except himselfe who had in most prodigall maner wasted his fathers goods and on the other part we should seeke the fountaine of all good things in GOD. For like as all waters haue their beginning from the Occan Sea and they powre their waters into the same Euen so all good gifts come from the Father of lighâ—… and they should bee vsed to the aduancement of his glory No heresie in the fift Centurie aduanced the freedome of mans free-will with so excessiue commendations as the herâ—…sie of the Pelagians did attributing vnto it power to fulfâ—…l all the Commandâ—…ments of GOD albert more easily and bettâ—…r beâ—…ing supported by the grace of God than otherwise but in so doing as Augâ—…stine writeth They did nothing els but hindered the worke of their owne saluation for nature beeing wounded sored vexed and the habilitie of it lost it hath more neede of a true confession than of a false defence But to the end that we may be truely reconciled to our GOD let vs fixe our eyes vpon two things First vpon our owne indigence and miserie and next vpon the abundance of the Lords mercies compasâ—…ons for the â—…ense of miserie only reduced not the forlorne son vnto his fathers house but with it was ioyned a consideration of the goodnes of his father In this treatise when I endeuoure to proue the imbecillitie of mans nature to doe good I wish no man to open one of the eyes of his minde and to close the other for the sight of our owne miserie without a consideration of the LORDS mercie can worke nothing in vs but desperation In this question if Philosophie were laid aside and our eares were patent to the instruction contained in GODS holy Scriptures doubtlesse wee should knowe GOD and our selues better than we doe But when both the teacher and likewise the auditours are accurate Philosophers I can finde few of the Craecian bishops who can abstaine from the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which Signifieth free-will for desire they haue to conquesse Philosophers to the Kingdome of GOD they giue too much to nature but holy Scripture is the true measuring line of the house of GOD whereunto if we firmly adhere and comprehend the right meaning of it we shall not be deceaued Now to keepe some order in this Treatise three things Godâ—…lling shall be entreated first what was the estate of mans will before his fall secondly what is the estate of mans will after his â—…ll thirdly what is the estate of mans will after his regeneratoâ—… As coÌ„cerning the estate of mans free-wil before his fall no man maketh question but ADAM had a free bent inclination to good which inclination to good notwithstanding it was wel set bently to good yet it differeth froÌ„ the free-will whereunto we shall be restored at the blessed appearance of our Lord Iesus Christan this respect because the free-will of man was in the custodie of nature at the first creation but at the second appearance of CHRIT yea and after our regeneration also it is into a surer custodie to wit in the custodie of grace therefore it commeth to passe that albeit a man fall from the first estate of his creation yet at the latter day hee cannot fall because his free will is in a better custodie than it was into before Yea and after our regeneration albeit wee haue an inclination to fall and to wander and to depart from our GOD yet the mightie assistance of CHRIST in whose hands the custodie of our free-will is committed may suffer vs to be moued but not to bee remooued from his eternall trueth and from our sure foundation Now before we leaue speaking of the estate of our first creation let vs remember that remarkable sentence of AUGUSTINE Sed quia nos creavit it a simus grati ut non simus quia sanat ingratâ—… that is because hee hath created vs let vs be so thankfull that we bee not vnthankfull because he hath healed vs. The good estate whereinto GOD first created vs should not impaire the goodnes of GOD in our regeneration but rather amplifie and increase the same Like as when GOD builded vp the Tabernacle of DAVID that was fallen and made it large and ample by the calling of the Gentiles no man had iust occasion to extenuat the glory of the second worke in respect of the glory of the first worke euen so let vs so talke of the estate of mans first creation that wee bee not found vnkinde to CHRIST for the worke of our regeneration The estate of a mans free-will after his fall is not to bee doubted of if so be our eares bee not locked vp from harkning to the voyce of GOD speaking to vs from his holy Sanctuarie for it is said in the booke of the Psalmes that The Lord looked downe from heauen vpon the children of men to see if there were any that would vnderstand and secke God and in the next verse he saith All are gone out of the way all are corrupt there is not one that doth good no not one In these two verses the corruption of mans nature after the fall is vtterly damned in so much that in our vnderstanding there is nothing but horrible darknes and in our will and affections nothing but an inclination to euill Who dare now stand vp be a procutour for a sinfull nature corrupt in all the faculties thereof according to a definitiue
are iustified by faith onely The Apostle wisely considered that no man could liue spiritually except hee had a fellowshippe with GOD. Againe there is no fellowshippe that mortall and sinfull men can haue with GOD without remission of sinnes Neither is there any remission of sinnes without 〈◊〉 Mediatour and Aduocate And wee can take no holde of this Mediatour except onely by faith so that by faith wee liue and by faith we are made iust in the sight of GOD. Then this place of Scripture teacheth vs that it is faith onely that leadeth vs vnto CHRIST in whome wee finde righteousnesse and life but by a due and competent order to wit by stripping vs naked of all conceate of our owne strength and righteousnesse to the ende wee may haue the greater delite in the saluation that is offered to vs in CHRIST Faith is not like vnto a robber who strippeth a mannaked without any purpose to clothe him with a better garment But faith doth to vs as the father of the forlorue sonne did to him and as the Angell of GOD did to IEHOSVA the high Priest Both these were vnclothed of their beggerly rayments but onely of purpose to clothe them with better apparell so doth faith strippe vs naked of all vaine conceate of our owne righteousnesse to the ende it may leade vs to the wardrope of GOD there to bee cladde with the garment of the righteousnesse of CHRIST which is able to couer our nakednesse and to present vs holy blamelesse and vndefiled before his father Before I leaue the wordes of the Prophet HABACCVK let vs yet againe ponder the Emphaticke worde Behold for by seeing and hearing some good lessons may bee learned Beholde men who haue leaned vpon the staffe of GOD in our owne time how peaceably haue they concluded their dayes with SIMEON reioycing that they had scene the saluation of GOD. And on the other side men who haue leaned to their own righteousnesse albeit only in a part what agonie trouble of conscience haue they found in their last battell vntill they haue forsaken all confidence in their owne merits and leaned onely vnto the merites of the passion of our sweet LORD and Sauiour IESVS CHRIST The Papistes in our COVNTRIE for the most part haue beene like vnto the fishes called Amphbia which can liue both in the Sea and on the Land but when any man approaches neere to doe them harme they trust more to the sca than to the land euen so when the terrors of death beginnes to shake our countrey people then they leaue confidence in their owne merites and betake themselues vnto the deepe Ocean sea of the mercies of GOD in IESVS CHRIST In the second heade I promised to speake of the difference betwixt Iustification Sanctification betwixt the righteousnes of the Law and the Gospell Our Iustification is a free forgiuenes of our sinnes for CHRISTS sake and a free imputation of his righteousnesse to vs. Our Sanctification is an inherent holinesse begunne in vs by the operation of GODS Spirit to bee a testimonie that wee are in CHRIST The not obseruing of the difference betwixt these two hath beene and as yet is the ground of great errours True it is that these two gifts are freely bestowed vpon vs at one and the selfe-same time yet are they distinct in order of causes because Iustification is the ground from whence Sanctification as an effect doth flow And like as the starres called Pleiades or Vergiliae they doe arise and manifest themselues vnto the worlde all at one time yet are they distinct starres and Electra is not Alcinoe nor Alcinoe Celeno nor Celeno Mâ—…ia And the like may bee spoken of the other tâ—…ree whose apparition and disparition albeit it bee inseparable yet are they distinct starres Euen so Iustification and Sanctification are inseparably linked together yet are they two distinct giftes of GOD. I will vse yet another similitude for declaration of the same purpose If a sword be laide into the fire vntill the mettall thereof be firie coloured this sworde at one time hath two powers one to cut and another to burne yet is not cutting burning nor burning cutting but these two distinct powers are at one time inseparably in one subiect Euen so are wee at one and the selfe same time both iustified and sanctified yet are they still two different giftes of GOD. Nowe the doctrine of Iustification rightly taught is our cihefe incouragement to Sanctification and on the other parte the doctrine of Sanctification rightly taught giueth vnto vs the greatest assurance of our Iustification A man who is assured that his sinnes are freely forgiuen that hee is beloued of GOD in CHRIST yea and that hee hath put on CHRIST as the Apostle speaketh he may with courage and gladnesse addresse himselse to lead an holy life being fully perswaded that GOD will accept of his willing obedience albeit it can not be perfect in all points so long as wee dwell into this sinsull tabernacle And on the other side when the spirit of sanctification worketh in our members it is a token that we are incorporated into the stocke of CHRIST by true faith For like as the spirit of man quickneth no member that is cut off from his bodie euen so the spirit of CHRIST worketh not true sanctification in any person who is not made a member of Christes body by true iustifying faith For this cause the Romane Church blames vs vndeseruedly as though by teaching that we are iustified only by faith we had impaired the zeale of the people in doing of good workes To this I answere that more credite is to be giuen to the holy Apost PAVL who was taught in all trueth immediatly by Christ himselfe nor to the calumnies of the aduersaries of the doctrine of grace for the Apostle exhorting the Romanes to agodly conuersation he saith I beseech you brethren sor the mercies of God that yee offer vp your bodies an holy liuely and acceptable sacrifice to God and what mercies are those I pray you whereof the Apostle speaketh but the mercies whereof hee hath intreated in the former parte of that Epistle to wit GOD hath freely elected vs he hath freely instified vs he hath freely sanctified vs and hee shall freely in his appointed time glorifie vs. Nowe in regard of all these mercies let vs endeuoure to leade a holy conuersation as it becommeth them who are partakers of so great mercies This holy exhortation could not haue beene drawne from a more pithie more persuasiue and mouing ground Therefore wee will walke in the footsteps of the holy Apostles and continue still exhorting the people to leade an holy conuersation in regarde of the rich mercies of GOD in CHRIST who hath freely elected them to eternall life and freely iustified them by faith in CHRIST alanerly Whereas they obiect that experience it selfe testifieth that people are not nowe so bent and readie to doe good
like maner I say to Papistes that their naked assertions not confirmed by testimonies of holy Scripture are nothing to vs but wee may lay them aside with as great libertie as they are prodigall in allcadging them Wee will answere to such arguments as seeme to be countenanced with some appearance of Scripture Now they say that the worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 frequently vsed in Scripture importeth the merite of our good workes because GOD vouchsafeth vpon them a rewarde To this I answere that if Scripture be conserred with Scripture that same thing which in one place is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a reward in another place it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is an heritage in these wordes Come yee blessed of my father inherite the Kingdome prepared for you from the foundations of the world When that thing which properly is an inheritance is called a reward it is spoken metaphorically in respect it is giuen in the end of the world as an hire is giuen to a feruant in the end of the day The second argument proouing the merite of mens works and consequently Iustification by workes in a part is this that some men in Scripture are called worthie as when it is saide to the Angell of the Church of Sardis Thou hast a few names yet in Sardis which haue not defiled their garments and they shall walke with me in white for they are worthie To this I answere the godly are called worthie not in themselues but in Christ who hath made them Kings and Priestes vnto GOD. In themselues they are called vnworthie as when it is said No man was found wortbie to open and to read the booke And in another place it is saide that the afflictions of this present time are not Wortlne of the glorie that it to be shewed vnto vs. Nowe it is knowne that patient suffering of euill for Christes sake is a degree of greater obedience than willing doing of good and if the suffering of the Sainctes be not worthie of the glory that is to be reueiled how much lesse can our doings bee worthie of that glorious inheritance The third argument is taken from the nature of a conditionall couenant bound vp betwixt two parties which doe import that condition should bee keeped but so it is that GOD hath couenanted with such as liue a godly life that they shall dwell in the holy mountaine of God therefore by vertue of this Couenant men who ieades a good life are worthie to dwel in heauen To this I answere that this couenant foresaid is either Legal or Euangelicall if it be Legall we cannot fulfill the condition thereof because the Law requireth a perfect obedience which we cannot attaine vnto If it bee an Euangelicall couenant the Mediator of the newe couenant IESVS Christ is present at the couenant making for whose sake I grant that GOD promiseth vnto vs a dwelling place in heauen and for his sake also he performeth his promise giueth vnto vs a resting place in his holy Mountaine and in all this haue we no cause to reioyce in our selues but in the mercies of our GOD. Concerning our satisfactions whereby the Romane Church saith That sinnes committed after baptisme should be pardoned This belongeth to another Treatise of Indulgences and satisfactions for the present I ouerpasse this point of mens merites with silence The Romane Church that Mistresse of errour hath not onely learned vs to leane vpon our owne merites but also to leane vpon the merites of other men such as holy Prophets Apostâ—…es and Martyres because some of them haue not onely fulfilled the Commandements of GOD but also haue done more than the Law of GOD commanded For example the Lawe of GOD forbiddeth to commit adulterie fornication and all kind of vncleannesse but many of the Apostles Prophets Martyres not only abstained from all kind of whordome but also from mariage such workes are called in the Romane Church workes of supererogation these doe come into the treasure of the Bishop of Rome as the Vicar of Christ and he is a dispensator of them to such as haue need O deepenesse of errours forged by Sathan repugnant vnto it selfe If abstinence from mariage bee a worke of supererogation then either must mariage euen in men hauing a spirituall calling bee counted a thing lawfull and agreable to GODS holy Law or else the abstinence from it cannot bee called a worke of supererogation I grant that some fathers counted abstinence from mariage a worke of Evangelicall perfection like as the selling of all their possessions and distributing them to the poore but it entred not in their hearts to call such workes of Evangelicall perfection workes of supererogation to bee sent to the treasure of the bishop of Rome that he might bee a dispensator of them to such as had neede But nowe suppone that any such workes had beene in the Sainctes of GOD howe can they bee imperted and communicated to others Can the oyle of the wise Virgines bee distributed to the foolish Virgines It cannot be because it cannot suffice them both Likewise when wee compeare before the iudge of the worlde wee must compeare clad with the innocencie of CHRIST and not with the merites of his Sainctes for the Apostle saith Put on the Lord Iesus but hee saith not Put on the merites of the Sainctes Moreouer wee must bee acceptable as the holy Prophets Apostles and Martyres were acceptable but so it is that they were acceptable to GOD onely in Christ as the Apostle saith If any man sinne we haue an aduocate with the Father Iesus Christ the iust Here none exception is made of Prophets Apostles Martyres but all must be acceptable to GOD for Christs sake allanerly Finally the holymen of God when they die they rest from their labours and their workes follow them If the soules of the holy fathers doe goe to heauen to the bosome of ABRAHAM to the paradise of GOD howe can wee thinke that their workes doe goe to the treasure of the bishop of Rome except they would say that the soules of all the holy fathers are gone to the treasure of the bishop of Rome also and their works and merites following them are altogether lighted in his treasure But lest I should anticipate the treatise of Indulgences I referre all farder discourse vnto the owne place Intreating the Lord Iesus of his vnspeakable fauour to remooue the mistie cloud of ignorance from our soules that our heartes bee not transported from the loue of the Creator to the loue of the creatures but that we may seeke saluation in Christ in whom only it may be found to whom be praise for euer AMEN FINIS A SHORT COMPEND of the grouth of the ROMANE ANTICHRIST Comprised in the VII VIII and IX CENTURIES WHEREVNTO ARE ADDED TREATISES CLEARLY declaring the noueltie of POPISH RELIGION EDINBVRGH PRINTED BY ANDRO HART ANNO 1616. TO THE
shall happen at anie time those persons or their children to bee indigent who haue doted anierent to the Church let them render a just deserued retribution to their bene-factors in sustaining them to whose beneuolence they are addoted The Deacons are decerned to be inferiour to Presbyters Let the Leuites bee content to bee cloathed with their ORARIVM onelie vpon their left shoulder and not vpon their right shoulder and let it neiâ—…her bee beautified with coloures nor with golde PLATINA in the life of ZOSINVS calleth it LINOSTIMA Let Clergie-men haue the vpper-moste part of their heads bare and shauen and the lower-part rounded not following the example of the Readers of GALLICIA who did shaue onehe a little of the vpper-moste-part of the haire of their head conforming themselues in so doing to the custome of some Heretiques which dishonour is to bee remoued from the Churches of Spaine No strange women shall cohabite with Church-men onelie their mother or sister or her daughter or fathers sister maye dwell with them amongst which persons the bandes of nature permitteth not to suspect anie sinne according to the constitutions of auncient Fathers Some of the Clergie who are not married are intangled with the forbidden lust of strange women let the bishop separate them sell the women and redact the men infected with their lust for a space vnto pennance If a man of the Clergy marrie a wife or a widow or a deuorced woman or an harlot without aduise of his bishop let the bishop separate them againe Clergie-men who haue cloathed themselues with armour voluntarilie and haue gone to warre-fare let them bee deposed from their office and bee thrust into a Monasterie there to remaine all the dayes of their life Church-men who are found spoyling the sepulchres of persons departed let them bee deposed and be subject vnto three yeeres pennance By the coÌ„mandement of king Sisenandus Churchmen are eximed from all publike indictioÌ„s labours to the end with greater libertie they may attende vpon spirituall seruice Let bishops haue some of their owne Clergie to bè rulers of their house-holde-affaires according as the Councell of Chalcedon hath ordained A man is made a monke either by his parents deuotion or by his own profession but whether he be embarked into the Monastike life the one way or the other there is no regresse againe vnto a seculare estate Persons of the Clergie who are desirous to enter into a Monasteriâ—… and to lead a comtemplatiue life let not their bishops hinder the purpose of their minde because they haue intention to enter into a better trade of liuing Bishops haue power to constitute Abbots to gouerne Monasteries and to correct enormities that shall happen to fall out amongst them but not to redact them to seruile offices nor to conuert the rents of the Abacie to their owne vse as a possession duelie belonging to themselues The Monkes who leaue their Monasterie returne againe to a secular life and marrie wiues let them be brought backe againe to their owne Monasterie there to doe pennance and to lament for their by-past sinnes Religious men who wander vp and downe in a nation and are neither members of the Clergie nor Monkes of anie Monasterie let the bishop restraine their licentious libertie and appoint them either to serue in the Clergie or in a Monasterie except such as through infirmitie or age haue gotten an exemption They who haue confessed the committing of anie deadlie sinne cannot be promoted to Ecclesiasticall honours Secular men who in receiuing their pennance haue beene content to bee shauen and to put on a religious habite if they reuolt againe and will needes become Laikes and bee incorrigible then let them be counted apostates and excommunicate from the fellowship of the Church Widowes who haue put on a religious habite and vowed chastitie if they marrie they haue damnation according to the wordes of the Apostle 1. Tim. 〈◊〉 12. Iewes are not to be compelled to receiue the Christian faith but these who alreadie by constraint haue receiued it in the dayes of the noble king Sisebutus seeing they haue beene alreadie partakers of our Sacramentes let them bee compelled to perseuere lest the Name of the Lord Iesus be blasphemed and the faith which they haue embraced be counted vile and contemptible They who receiue bribes and rewardes from the Iewes to cloake their vngodlinesse and to foster them in their infidelitie let them bee accursed and counted strangers from the Church of Christ. Iewes after their conuersion to the Christian faith if they bee found to haue circumcised their sonnes or seruantes by the commandement of the moste religious king Sâ—…senandus it is ordained That the circumcised children of the Iewes shall bee separated from the fellowship of their parentes and the sâ—…ruants shall bee set at libertie for the injurie done vnto their bodie by circumcision Iewes who are punished to the death for any contempt done by them against CHRIST after their baptisme this punishment shall not prejudge their children from right to enjoye their goods if they bee faithfull because it is written The sonne shall not beare the iniquitie of the father Ezech. 18. 20. Let not Iewes after their conuersion haunt the companie of other superstitious Iewes as yet addicted to the abolished lawe of ceremonies lest they be perucrted if they transgresse this ordinance such of them as haue professed Christianitie shall bee giuen in seruice to Christians others shall bee appointed to bee publikely scourged Iewes who haue maried Christian women if they will not embrace Christian religion let them be separated from their wiues companie and let the children bee brought vp in the faith of their Christian mothers Iewes who haue once professed Christian faith and haue sliden backe againe from it shall not bee admitted witnesses before a Iudge albeit they professe themselues to bee Christians because like as their faith is suspected so in like manner their humane testimonie is to be doubted of Let no Iew bee preferred to any publike office Let no Iew presume to buy a Christian seruant which if hee doe the seruant shall bee taken from him and shall bee set at libertie Bishops who haue not benefited the Church by any proper donation of their owne goods they should not empouerish their Church by setting at liberty Church seruantes which thing if hee presume to doe his successour shall reduce those seruants againe to the possession of the Church whom iniquitie without any just right hath absolued A Bishop who setteth a seruant at libertie hauing first by permutation set another of the like worth and merite in his place shall denie libertie to the fore-saide seruant either to accuse or to beare witnesse against the Church whereinto he was a seruant else hee shall forfeit his libertie and bee reduced to his former seruile condition in
Papistes woulde make it to sâ—…eme probable that the Antichrist is one singulare man onelie is taken from the force of the prepositiue article 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A childish argument indeede as who woulde saye that it were not lawfull to praye in anie chamber except in one onâ—…lie in respect of the prepositiue article set before 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in these wordes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Enter into thy chamber The time of the continuance of the Antichristes persecution three yeeres and an halfe is borrowed from Augustine who supposeth that the horne which shall speake words against the moste High and who shall chaunge times and lawes as thinges giuen vnto his handes vntilla time and times and the diuiding of a time by this horne I saye Augustine supposeth the Antichrist to be presented how beit others more judiciously haue referred this prophesie to Antiochus Epiphanes who blasphemed God chaunged Sabboâ—…hs and Festiuall dayes yea and by his impious lawes presumed to abrogate the law of the Almightie God and immediatelie after such presumptuous attempts God shortened his dayes for within the space of three yeeres and some fewe dayes hee ended his life in moste miserable manner They haue no better grounde to affirme that the Antichrist shall be of the Tribe of Dan than this Because the Tribe of Dan is not reckoned amongst the rest of the Tribes Apocal. 7. yet this was not done to exclude this Tribe from the sauing marke of Christ but to giue place to the Tribe of Leui and not to exceede the number of twelue Tribes for Holie Scripture which commendeth the faith of Barak of the Tribe of Nephtali and Gideon of the Tribe of Manasse and Iphtah of the Tribe of Gad commendeth also the faith of Samson of the Tribe of Dan Hebr. cap. 2. vers 11. One thing I cannot passe by The inuenters of such fables that the Antichrist shoulde bee of the Tribe of Dan borne in Babylon c. in some thinges haue ouer-seene themselues miserablie namelie when they affirme that the Antichrist shall build the Temple of Hierusalem and shall sit there in the Temple of God and the nation of the Iewes shall adhere vnto him and immediatelie after this the ende of the worlde shall come and Christ shall destroye the Antichrist by the Spirit of his mouth Heere marke the great contradiction that is betwixt the prophesie of Paul concerning the conuersion of the Iewes before the seconde comming of Christ and the foolish opinion of Papistes Paul saieth that the Iewes shall bee conuerted to the true faith before the Great daye of the LORDES seconde appearance but Papistes saye that the Iewes shall bee adhering to the Antichrist when Christ shall come to judge the worlde and to destroye the Antichrist by the brightnesse of his comming These two opinions cannot both consist therefore let the fable inuented by men fall that place may bee giuen to the trueth of God who is blessed for euermore AMEN A TREATISE Of the Antichrist CONTROVERSIES in ciuill matters are not all of like moment therefore it was ordained by the counsell of Iethro that great matters shoulde be brought to Moses and that inferiour Magistrates should judge in small causes But in controuersies of religion all causes both great and small are to bee brought vnto the mouth of Christ our true Moses who will speake from his Sanctuarie vnto vs and giue vnto vs resolution of all our doubtes out of His blessed worde In this TREATISE especially let vs runne to the month of Christ speaking by his Apostle Paul and vttering a notable prephesie concerning the comming of the Antichrist in the wordes following Let no man deceiue you by anie meanes for that day shall not come except there come a departing first and that that man of sinne bee dâ—…sclosed euen the sonne of perdition Who is an aduersarie and exalteth himselfe against all that is called God or that is worshipped so that hee doeth sit as God in the Temple of God shewing himselfe that hee is God Remember yee not that when I was with you I tolde you these things And nowe yee knowe what with-holdeth that hee might bee reuealed in his time For the mysterie of iniquitie doeth alreadie worke onelie hee who nowe with-holdeth shall let tell hee bee taken out of the way And then shall the wicked man bee reuealed whom the Lord shall consume with the Spirit of His mouth and shall abolish with the brightnesse of his comming Euen him whose comming is by the working of Sathan with all power and signes and lying wonders And in all deceiueablenesse of vnrighteousnesse amongst them that perish because they receiued not the loue of the trueth that they might bee saued And therefore God shall sende to them strong delusion that they shall beleeuelies That all they might bee damned who beleeued not the trueth but had pleasure in vnrighteousnesse The occasion mouing the Apostle to embarke into this Prâ—…pheticall prediction concerning the comming of the Antichrist was this Because some in Thessalonica spake of the second comming of Christ that it was neare approaching and euen at hand The Apostle on the other part woulde assure the Thessalonians that before the comming of that Great day there should first be a defection from the true faith and that the Antichrist should be disclosed It is not the purpose of the Apostle to disswade anie man from remembring the terrour of that Great daye wherein the verie Elements shall melt and if so be what manner of men aught we to be in holy conuersation looking for and hastening vnto the comming of the day of our Lord yea and the obliuion of the second comming of Christ is the principall grounde of the securitie of the euill seruant But the Apostle ledde by the conduct of the Holy Spirite fore-seeing that two things were needfull to bee remembered to wit the seconde comming of the Lord Iesus and the preceeding comming of the Antichrist hee would haue them so to remember the one that they should not forget the other lest whilest wee runne fast to the marke without marking the perilles that are in the waye wee fall into the snares of the Deuil Our maister Christ when he corrected the foolish precipitation of the sonnes of Zebedeus who woulde haue sitten at the right and left hand of Christ in His kingdome before they had beene baptized with his baptisme and before they had drunken of the cuppe of the sufferings of Christ hee disswadeth them not from continuall fastning their eyes vpon the glorie of Christes Kingdome but rather so to looke vnto the marke that they ouer-leape not the waye leading to the marke God hath indâ—…edep epared a kingdome for vs but by many tribulations we must enter into that kingdome The apostasie whereof the apostle prophecieth is not a desection in manners onely but also a departing from the faith as
and the holie Sacramentes were seldome ministred and with filthie addition of ceremonies inuented by the braine of man to Baptisme and a sacrilegious with-holding from the people the cuppe in ministring vnto them the holie Supper and so the fountaines of liuing water were stopped and cisternes were opened and the wholsome foode of GODS people was turned into ashes and in steade of preaching GODS Worde sincerelie all Church-seruice was turned into a dumbe guise of the Masse and in reading of prayers and passages of Scripture into an vnknowne language so the people for fault of good instruction withered as grasse when it is not refreshed with dewe and raine Yea and SALOMON saieth Where there is no vision the people decay PROV 29. 18. The thirde and moste venomous consequence of the Masse is procession and adoration for hosties consecrated in time of Masse although not broken and eaten they are counted CHRISTES bodie and carried about in procession and worshipped This was not the ancient custome of the Church for the sacrament consisting in the action and vse thereof so long as the blessing and the actions of breaking distributing and eating lasted the bread was counted holie and represented the bl◅ssed bodie of IESVS but after these holie actions were ended the rest of the bread that was not vsed in the Sacrament it was distributed to the poore but it was not kept in boxes to bee carried in procession and to bee adored and worshipped by ignorant people And of all thinges that are deficient in Poperie I haue of◅ times obserued that antiquitie whereof they principallie bragge is moste deficient and lacking in them The ground of Popish procession no doubt was the sending of the Sacraments to those who were sicke and absent by some necessitie But they reade not in IVSTINVS nor in any other ancient writer that people who met the deacon carrying the Eucharist to sicke persons fell downe vpon their knees and worshipped it This abominable idolatrie more vile than the idolatrie of the Gentiles was not of ancient time in vse in the Church Nowe the LORD who hath redeemed our soules from death and who hath called vs from darknesse vnto His marucilous loue establishe our soules in the trueth of GOD through CHRIST IESVS our LORD AMEN FINIS THE VIII CENTVRIE CHAP. I. OF EMPEROURS PHILIPPICVS AFTER IVSTINIAN the second was slaine PHILIPPICVS reigned two yeeres and nine monethes Great dissention fell out betwixt the Emperour Philippicus and Constantine Bishop of Rome for razing as appeareth the pictures of Fathers who were present at the sixt Generall Councell which beeing pictured in the Temple of Sophia were abolished by the commandement of Philippicus Constantine Bishop of Rome declared the Emperour an heretique and commanded that his name shoulde bee rased out of charters This was the first great direct and violent opposition that the Bishops of Rome attempted against noble Emperours Philippicus was taken and his eyes were put out by Anastasius otherwise called Artemius his Secretarie who reigned in his stead ARTEMIVS ARTEMIVS otherwise called Anastasius reigned one yeere and three monethes hee deposed Ihonne patriarch of Constantinople who kept not the true faith and placed Germanus in his steade Hee was taken by Theodosius and sent prisoner to Nice and from thence to Thessalonica where hee was compelled to renounce his Emperiall dignitie and to be cloathed with the habite of a Monke THEODOSIVS THEODOSIVS reigned scarce one yeere and when hee heard that Leo Isaurus gouernour in the East partes was saluted Emperour by the armie hee willinglie gaue ouer his Emperiall dignitie and liued a priuate and peaceable man LEO ISAVRVS LEO ISAVRVS reigned twentie foure yeeres great commotions were in his time both in Church and policie In Church-affaires hee was an hater of Images and burnt images made of wood other images hee melted and misfashioned against whome Gregorius the seconde puft vp with antichristian pride hee opponed himselfen ◅t only allowing worshipping of images but also forbidding to paye tribute to the Emperour Leo. The Emperour on the other part irritated with the proude attempts of Gregorius the second he vsed indirect meanes to cut him off but the enterprises of his deputies Marinus Paulus Eutychius and their followers succeeded vnprosperously Moreouer the Bishop of Rome sought support from the Lombardis who had beene at all times preceeding enemies to the chaire of Rome yet in Leo his dayes they were bounde with the bishop of Rome in a couenant of friendship for none other cause but this onely to shake off the yoke of the Emperours obedience And when the bishop of Rome sawe that the Emperour had great businesse in warres against the Saracens he thought it a sit occasion to drawe the dominion of Italic vnto his owne subjection and therefore with aduise of his Clergie hee both excommunicated the Emperour as a destroyer of the images of the Saincts and disauthorised him of his Emperiall soueranitie So early began the increasing grandour of the Antichrist to sende foorth the thuńder-boltes of cursinges against the annointed of the Lord. In this Emperours dayes the Saracenes passed ouer the Straites inuaded the kingdome of Spaine slewe Rodericus king of Gothes and his sonne and put an ende to the kingdome of the Gothes in Spaine after they had reigned 346. yeeres and being incited by Eudo Duke of Aquitania they marched towardes France but thorowe the valour of Carolus Martellus a man of noble birth in France they were so encountered that three hundreth thousand and threescore and ten thousand Saracenes were slaine and the countrey of France was made free of the feare of the Saracens CONSTANTINVS COPRONYMVS AFTER LEO his sonne CONSTANTINVS COPRONYMVS reigned 35. yeeres Chytreus reckoneth onlie 23. yeeres because hee hated the worshipping of images which errour had taken deepe roote in this age the writers of the historie of this time haue dipped their pennes in gall and worm-wood to blaspheme the honourable name of Constātinus but whatsoeuer Paulus Diaconus or zonaras haue written to his disgrace his name will bee in honourable account and regarde in the Church of CHRIST The Senate and the people of Constantinople addicted to the worshipping of images hated the Emperour and were glad of the false rumoured tithings of his death when hee went to fight against the Arabians they chose Artabasdus to bee Emperour in his steade But Constantine returned to Constantinople besieged the towne and recouered his owne kingdome againe Hee gathered a Generall Councell in Constantinople anno 755. wherein the worshipping of images was damned as shall bee declared God willing in its owne place In this Emperours dayes were warres betwixt the kings of Lombardis and the Bishops of Rome but the Romane Bishops begged the helpe of Carolus Martellus against Luitprand and the helpe of Pipinus against Aistulphus and the helpe of Carolus Magnus against Desiderius all kinges of Lombardis and so by continuall imploring the helpe of the Nobles Kinges of France the
is the true bread The doctrine of Transsubstantiation importeth also accidentes without a subject as hath beene touched in a part before in the definition of Transsubstantiation This is admirable that the Scholasticke Doctors who make Aristotle to be Master Caruer of this most holy banquet who haue acquainted themselues better with his Preceptes than with the heauenlie doctrine of the Apostles yet in this point they haue forgotten euen the doctrine of their Schoole-master Aristotle who saieth that accidentes can haue no subsistence but into a subject as if a man bee talking of blindnesse hee must also talke of eyes that are blinded and if hee talke of deafenesse hee must also talke of the eare and if hee talke of lamenesse hee must talke of some member of the bodie that is maimed and finallie if hee talke of a disease hee must also talke of some bodie either of man or beast that is diseased and this hee must doe either expressely or couertly because accidentes haue no subsistence without a subject There can bee nothing imagined more absurde more repugnant to reason than to talke of whitenessâ—… roundnesse and rednesse and in the meane time to saye there is nothing that is white round or redde The recourse which they haue to the Omnipotent power of God who is able to make accidents to subsist without a subject declareth that they neuer rightly considered the cause wherefore the Omnipotent power of GOD is mentioned in holie Scripture to wit to bee one of the strong pillars of our faith which faith commeth onely by hearing Then let this order bee kept First let GOD speake in His owne worde Secondlie let vs beleeue the worde of GOD by faith Thirdlie let the assured pillars of the Omnipotent power and infalâ—…ible trueth of GOD vpholde our faith as it did the faith of ABRAHAM But let vs not grounde vpon the Omnipotent power of GOD in matters whereof wee haue no assurance in His written worde as some of the wise men of PERSIA did who assured both themselues and others that incase they woulde distribute all their goods to the poore and throwe themselues headlonges from eminent places then their soules shoulde bee transported immediatelie to Heauen This madnesse fell out about the yeere of our LORDE and Sauiour IESVS CHRIST 759. What was this leaning of theirs to the Omnipotent power of GOD without assurance of his word but only the conceits of braine-sicke men And so let Papistes talke what they please In this purpose that God by his Omnipotent power can make accidentes to subsist without a subject I will conclude that the Omnipotent power of God is ordained to bee a confirmation to our faith and not to be a citie of refuge to foolish fables The doctrine of Transsubstantiation also importeth that the body of Christ at one time may bee in infinite places which repugneth vnto the nature of a true body which like as it is circumscribed and may be seene so likewise at one time it is onely in one place as Augustine writeth to Dardanus in these wordes Tolle spatia locorum corporibus nusquam â—…runt nec â—…runt that is to say Take from bodies the rowmes of places and they shall be no where and consequently they shall not bee at all And Theodoretus prooueth that the body of Christ is a true humane body albeit it be glorified euen in the latter daye when hee commeth to judge the quicke and the dead because it shall bee seene according as it is written Matth. 26 64. Yee shall see the sonne of man comming in the cloudes of heauen and like as it may be seene so likewise it is circumscribed and consequently it is in a place and is not turned into his diuine nature which is both 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is it cannot be seene and it cannot bee circumscribed as the humane nature is It is well remarked by that learned Preacher Du Moulin that in the last edition of S. Augustines workes at Parise anno 1571. a notable place of the foresaid epistle of Augustine to Dardanus is vtterly left out by aduice of the Fathers correctors of the writings of the Auncientes namely this Destrai naturam humanam Christi si non detur ei certum spatium quo more aliarum rerum corporearum contineatur that is The humane nature of Christ is destroyed if a certaine place be not attributed vnto it wherein it is contained according to the custome of other corporall thinges What credite is to bee giuen vnto Popishe Doctors when they cite testimonies of auncient Fathers after they are deprehended to be deceitfull deprauers of their bookes Ancient Fathers a long â—…ime before the question of Transsubstantiation of the substance of the elementes in the holy Supper came in head they were reâ—…soning of the two natures in Christ to wit the diuine and humane nature and that the one nature was not turned into the other they could not find a fitter similitude than that which is borrowed from the Sacrament as I haue alreadie declared Alwayes they thinke that if any man shall imagine that by vertue of these wordes This is my body the substance of bread was chaunged into the substance of Christes body as many doe thinke euen vntill this day then in steade of one Transsubstantiation of the substance of bread into the substance of Christs body there should be two Transsubstantiations and the substance of Christs body should againe be turned into bread for like as Christ speaking of bread saith This is my body euen so Christ speaking of his body calleth it corne of wheat in these words Verily I say vnto you except wheat corne fall into the grounde and die it abideth alone but if it die it bringeth foorth much fruit If by vertue of the former wordes bread bee changed into the substance of Christes body then in like manner by vertue of these words for both are spoken out of one blessed mouth the body of Christ should be turned into the substance of corne of wheat I grant there is a difference betwixt a Sacrament and a metaphore yet in neither of them is there such vertue in the word is to change the substance of any thing IN the last head let vs consider with what strife and reluctation this erronious doctrine was intruced vpon the Church I holde the Monke Damascene to bee the first author thereof who perceiuing that his opinion was repugnant to the doctrine of ancient Fathers namely to the doctrine of Basilius Magnus who calleth the bread and the wine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is figures of the body and blood of Christ. He forgeth a friuolous shift to excuse his contradiction to Basilius because saieth hee Basilius calleth them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 before the wordes of the blessing but after the pronouncing of the wordes of the blessing they are no longer figures but the very body and
commanded to confesse his faults to his neighbour whome hee hath offended Luke 17. 4 And it belongeth nothing to auricular confession except Popish Priestes would confesse in particular all their sinnes to the people like as the people confesseth all their secret sinnes in particular to the Priestes And our Lord and Master Iesus Christ when hee receiued a particular confession of secret sinnes from the Samaritan woman hee sent away his Disciples to Samaria to the ende the weakenesse of a poore penitent sinner should not bee troubled by a particular confession of secret sinnes before them who knewe not thinges which were done in secret But let vs confesse secret sinnes to God who knoweth things that are done in secret But sinnes whereby the Church of God is openly slandered let them also bee openlie confessed Seeing that auricular confession hath no testimonie in Scripture it followeth to search out by diligent examination whether or no it had place after the dayes of the Apostles in the first three hundreth yeeres of our Lord. Wee reade of the first Christned Emperour Philippus who slewe Gordianus and was slaine by the Emperour Decius anno 250 that hee was desirous about Easter time to bee admitted vnto the participation of the holy Sacrament but this benefit was refused vnto him vntill the time that he made his publicke repentance and vntill hee stood in the place where 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 were accustomed to stand They were so called because they were demaunded concerning the sinnes which they had committed and the sense and feeling of griefe that God had wrought in their heartes for their preceeding offences This was not a secret and auricular confession but an open confession of publike sins in sight open audience of the people So we see that for the space of two hundreth and fiftie yeeres after the Lords ascension auricular and secret confession of sinnes to the Bishop or Presbyter was vnknowne in the Church Nowe if at any time open confession of sinnes shoulde haue ceassed and giuen place to secrete and auricular confession it was in time of the tenne Persecutions because that Christians were drawne continually before the judgement seates of vnbeleeuing Iudges from whom the weaknesse and faultes of Christians might haue beene obscured if auricular confession had beene in vse at that time But the Fathers who liued in that age were so carefull to purge the Church from slander that they preferred the puritie of the Church vnto their owne liues True it is that euen before the ten Persecutions had an ende some good Christians woulde consult with their Pastors wâ—…ether it was expedient to confesse their sinnes openly before the people to the edification and good of the Church or secretly onely to God But this secrete consulting with the Pastor what was most needfull to bee done was not an auricular confession to him of all secret sinnes but rather an aduisement concerning some sinnes whether the sinner himselfe and the Church might receiue greater benefite by open confession before the people or by secret confession to God onely The wordes of Origen very pertinently cited by Chemnisius are these Consider circumspectly to whom thou shouldest confesse thy sinne Trie first thy Physition if hee vnderstand and fore-see thy disease to bee such as should bee confessed in the Congregation of the whole Church and so be cured whereby possibly others may be edified and thou thy selfe may bee easily healed then saieth hee make haste to vse the counsell of thy Phisition If the custome of the Primitiue Church were proponed in simplicitie and sinceritie it shoulde bee founde that the newe toye of auricular confession cannot bee shrowded vnder the vaile of great Antiquitie Whatsoeuer a fewe men wounded more deepely with a sense of sinne than others they did voluntarily in powring out their sinnes in the bosome of their Pastors albeit they had neither sacrificed vnto Idoles nor yet giuen vp their names in the Romane deputies rolles promising conformitie but only they confessed other faults of lesse moment to their Pastors with dejected and humbled mindes seeking comfort to their afflicted soules This is a matter rarely contingent wherewith wee are acquainted in our dayes as familiarly as Cyprian was in his time Yet was there no mandate and Church commandement ordaining people so to doe in Cyprians dayes And people likewise who powreth out the dolour of their wounded coÌ„sciences for secret sinnes in our bosome they doe it voluntarily and vncoacted hoping for some mitigation of their griefe through vnburthening of their heart by confession as Nazianzenus writeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is It is some medicinall cure of heart griefe to powre out our words into the verie aire After the three hundreth yeere of our Lord and after the tenne Persecutions ceassed the discipline of making open repentance for open sinnes continued in the Church as is euident by the Act of the Councell of Nice in the 11. Canon in the which a forme of Publicke satisfaction is prescribed vnto them who in time of the Persecution of Licinius had sacrificed to Idoles But concerning a particulare confession of secrete sinnes to the Pastor there is no mention in the Councell of Nice The Historie hath declared that auricular confession had place in the East Churches in the dayes of Nectarius bishop of Constantinople whose Ministerie was vnder the reigne of the Emperour Theodosius Here two thinges are to bee noted First that the discipline of the East and West Churches was different and in the West Church there remained a publicke confession of notorious and publicke sinnes in so much that the Emperour Theodosius himselfe confessed his fault openly and in sight of the people at Millane for the slaughter of the innocent people of Thessalonica Secondly it is to bee marked that Nectarius in abolishing the custome of auticular confession he acknowledged it to bee but an humane and not a diuine constitution for who dare abolishe either in doctrine or discipline the constitutions and ordinances of God Lindanus a man in the Latine Language more eloquent than godly cannot suffer that it shall be thought that Nectarius abolished auriculare confession but rather that hee abolished the custome then in vse that one shoulde onely bee Presbyter Poenitentiarius to whome secrete sinnes shoulde bee confessed and that in time to come a man should make choise of any presbyter whom he pleased to be his father Confessor But let the historie bee judge Socrates saith that Eudaemon gaue councell to Nectarius to abrogate presbyter poenitentiarius to remit euery man to the triall of his owne conscience when he approached to the participation of holy mysteries Satisfaction in the Romane Church is an obedience to the injunctions of the Priest by performance wherof they are in hope to obtaine forgiuenesse at the handes of God for sinnes committed after Baptisme But besides the Nouelâ—…y that is in Popish Satisfaction it is also a blasphemous opinion
Hincmarus bishop of Laudunum as a man disobedient to his Metropolitane and a man who for priuate injuries had excōmunicated all the Presbyters of his Church debarring them from saying of Masse baptizing of Inphantes absoluing of Penitents and burying of the dead And Hincmarus bishop of Rhemes proponed vnto the Councell 50. Canons which hee desired to bee read in the Synode and they allowed all the Canons written by the bishop of Rhemes Also they condemned Hincmarus bishop of Laudunum of petulancy and compelled him to subscribe obedience to Charles his King and to his Metropolitane hee was also depriued of his office and his eyes were thrust out But Pope Ihonne the ninth vnder the reigne of Carolus Crassus restored him to his office againe beeing the more affectioned vnto him because he had appealed from his owne bishop and from the decreet of a Synode in his owne countrey to be judged by the Chaire of Rome IN the yeere of our Lord 899. and in the eight yeere of the reigne of the Emperour Arnulphus in the Towne of Triburium twentie and two Bishops of Germanie were assembled who made many constitutions a great number whereof Caranza is compelled to ouer-passe with silence lest he shoulde make a superfluous repetition of Canons mentioned before First it was concluded in this Councell That excommunicate persons if they repent not are to be subdued by the Emperour Canon 10. That a Bishop shall not be deposed before his cause be judged by twelue Bishops and a Presbyter by sixe Bishops and a Deacon by three Bishops 11. A Church man who committeth slaughter shall be deposed albeit he hath beene inforced vnto it 12. Baptisme shall not be ministred except at Easter Whitsonday without necessitie require 13. Tythes are to bee payed for the sustentation of the Ministerie the support of the poore and the fabricke of the Church 15. Let mens bodies bee buried in that Paroch vnto the which they payed their Tythes 16. No buriall place shall bee solde for money 17. Let Laicke people be buried in the Church yarde not in the Church but if they be buried alreadie let not their bodies bee remoued 18. The vesselles wherein holy mysteries are celebrated are Challices and Platters whereof Sainct Bonifacius a Bishop and Martyr being demanded If it was lawfull to celebrate the Sacrament in vesselles of wood He answered That of olde there were golden bishops and woodden vessels but nowe by the contrary saith he the Bishops are woodden bishops and the vesselles are vesselles of golde And Sepherinus ministred the Sacrament in vessels of glasse Neuerthelesse this Councell straitly inhibiteth the Sacrament to be consecrated in vesselles of wood 19. Let not wine without water bee offered in the holy Challice because both blood and water flowed out of the side of Christ. 20. Priestes are shauen to the end they may carrie vpon their heads a similitude of the crowne to wit of thornes wherewith the Lord was crowned who is their lot and portion 21. Let not Presbyters who are called before Iustice seates bee compelled to sweare but let them bee put in remembrance of their holy consecration in stead of an oath 22. The triall of persons defamed by the burning iron is ceassed but let no man giue out rashe judgement in se◅ret matters 27. They who haue vnder-taken a spirituall ofsice shoulde not goe to warre-fare nor accept vpon them ciuill offices according to the seuenth Canon of the Councell of Chalcedon 31. A thiefe or a robber who is slaine in the perpetration of his diabolicall fact let no man praye for his soule nor distribute almes for his reliefe 35. Let no justice Courtes bee holden on the Lordes daye neither on Festiuall nor Fasting dayes 39. A man who marrieth a woman of a strange countrey but not of a strange religion shall be compelled to cohabite with her 40. It shall not be lawfull for a man to marie a woman whome hee hath polluted in adulterie during her husbandes life-time 45. Hee who hath defiled two sisters let him bee subject to pennance all his dayes and remaine continent 46. A woman that hath committed adulterie and for feare of her husband who persueth her vnto the death shee fleeth vnto Bishops to seeke reliefe let them trauell seriouslie for the safetie of her life and if that can bee obtained let her be restored to her husband againe but if that cannot bee obtained let her not bee restored but her husband during his life time shall not marie another 54. A forme of externall repentance is prescribed to them who of precogitate malice and of purpose haue committed slaughter TREATISES Belonging to the IX CENTVRIE A TREATISE Of Extreame Unction THE Councell of TRENT entraiting of this subject of Extreame Unction setteth downe a glorious Preface before their Canons That Sathan that vigilant enemie who is readie at all occasions to take his aduantadge he is most readie in the last conflict to assault poore soules when naturall powers are weakened and the feare of approaching death doeth perturbe the cogitations of sinfull people then hee endeuoureth to brangle their faith and to bring them to a distrust of the mercies of GOD. But on the other part saye they Christ hath instituted the Sacrament of Extreame Unction as an armour to guarde vs at our last breath against the subtile inuasions of that deceitfull aduersarie This Preface importeth that all the weapons of our spirituall warrefare both defensiue and offensiue wherewith wee faught against spirituall wickednesse in our life-time are not sufficient to guarde vs in our last combate except wee bee annointed with oyle at our last departure Neuerthelesse the holie Scripture expresselie saieth I am the resurrection and the life hee that beleeueth in mee though hee were dead yet shall hee liue and whosoeuer liueth and belecueth in mee shall neuer die Ioann Chap. 11. verse 25. 26. In which wordes it may bee euidentlie perceiued that the word of GOD apprehended by faith can saue vs both in life and death The Romanistes in proouing Extreame Unction to bee a Sacrament of the Newe Testament in the which there is a signe instituted by GOD and to the signe there is added a promise of forgiuenesse of sinnes and consequentlie of eternall life They are like to the drunkardes of our Nation who when their stomacke is ouer-laden with too much drinke then they laye them downe to sleepe but incase by any occasion they be wakened before the drinke be digested and gone out of their heads they arise like madde men and make such a stirre and businesse that all men wishe that they were in their bedde againe Euen so the Romane Church hath beene so miscarried with the traditions of men with the writinges of auncient Fathers especiallie in poinctes of doctrine in the which they were weake and with the authoritie of Councels that they layed them downe and slept securelie as people who were perfectlie instructed in the way of GOD. But nowe they