of that which we now distinguish by the Names of Confirmation and Absolution it necessarily results that Confirmation was not like Baptism only once performed but on many Persons frequently reiterated All Persons after Baptism were confirmed that is by the Imposition of Hands and Prayer the Holy Ghost was beseeched to descend upon them and so to fortifie them by his Heavenly Grace as that they might couragiously persevere in their Christian Warfare to their Lives end but if it should so happen as oftentimes it did that any so confirmed should fall from the Christian Faith and be for a time excluded the Churches Peace when they were again admitted Hands were again imposed on them and the Holy Spirit again Invocated to strengthen them with his Almighty Grace by which they might be upheld to the Day of Salvation and so as often as any Man fell and was restored to the Churches Communion so often was he confirmed and the Holy Ghost entreated more firmly to establish and settle him CHAP. VI. § 1. Of the Lord's Supper The Time when administred § 2. Persons that received it none present at the Celebration thereof besides the Communicants § 3. The manner of its Celebration In some places the Communicants first made their Offerings § 4. The Minister began with a Sacramental Discourse or Exhortation Then followed a Prayer consisting of Petitions and Praises which consecrated both the Elements at once § 5. After that the Words of the Institution were read § 6. Then the Bread was broken and the Wine poured out and both distributed Diversity of Customs in the manner of the Distribution § 7. The Posture of Receiving § 8. After they had communicated they sung a Psalm and then concluded with Prayer and a Collection for the Poor § 1 THE first of the Christian Sacraments having been so largely discussed I now come to treat of the other viz. The Lords Supper in the handling of which I shall enquire into these three things 1. The Time 2. The Person And 3. The manner thereof First As for the time of its Celebration In general it was at the conclusion of their Solemn Services as Justin Martyr writes that after they had read sung preached and prayed then they proceeded to the Administration of the Eucharist But as for the particular part of the Day that seems to have been according to the Circumstances and Customs of every Church In Tertullian's Age and Country they received it at Supper-time from which late Assembling it is probable that the Heathens took occasion to accuse them of putting out the Lights and promiscuously mingling one with another Which Accusation may be read at large in Justin Martyr's Dialogue with Tryphon in Minutius Felix and the Apologies of Tertullian and Athenagoras But whether this was then their constant Season in times of Peace I know not this is certain that in times of Persecution they laid hold on any Season or Opportunity for the enjoying of this Sacred Ordinance whence Tertullian tells us of their receiving the Eucharist in their Antelucan Assemblies or in their Assemblies before day And Pliny reports that in his time the Christians were wont to meet together before it was light and to bind themselves by a Sacrament Cyprian writes that in his Days they administer'd this Sacrament both Morning and Evening And That as Christ administer'd the Sacrament in the Evening to signifie the Evening and end of the World So they celebrated it in the Morning to denote the Resurrection of their Lord and Master All that can be gathered from hence is That they did not deem any particular part of the Day necessary to the Essence of the Sacrament but every Church regulated its self herein according to the Diversity of its Customs and Circumstances § 2. As for the 〈◊〉 communicating they were not indifferently all that professed the Christian Faith as Origen writes It doth not belong to every one to eat of this Bread and to drink of this Cup. But they were only such as were in the number of the faithful such as were baptized and received both the Credentials and Practicals of Christianity That is who believed the Articles of the Christian Faith and lead an holy and a pious Life Such as these and none else were permitted to Communicate Now since none but the Faithful were admitted it follows that the Catechumens and the Penitents were excluded the Catechumens because they were not yet baptized for Baptism always preceded the Lords Supper as Justin Martyr says It is not lawful for any one to partake of the Sacramental Food except he be baptized The Penitents because for their Sins they were cast out of the Church and whilst excluded from the Peace thereof they could not participate of the Marks and Tokens of that Peace but were to be driven therefrom and not admitted thereto till they had fully satisfied for their Faults lest otherwise they should profane the Body of the Lord and drink his Cup unworthily and so be guilty of the Body and Blood of the Lord. Hence when the other parts of Divine Worship were ended and the Celebration of the Eucharist was to begin the Catechumens Penitents and all except the Communicants were to depart as Tertullian says hereof Pious Initiations drive away the Profane These being Mysteries which were to be kept secret and concealed from all except the Faithful inasmuch as to others the very method and manner of their Actions herein were unknown which was observed by the Pagans who objected to the Christians the Secrecy of their Mysteries which Charge Tertullian does not deny but confessing it answers That that was the very Nature of Mysteries to be concealed as Ceres's were in Samothracia § 3. The Catechumens with others being gone out and none remaining but the Faithful the Celebration of the Eucharist next followed which brings me to the Inquiry of the Third thing viz. The manner of the Celebration thereof But before I meddle therewith I shall briefly premise this Observation viz. That in some places as in France and Africa the Communicants first made their Offerings presenting according to their Ability Bread or Wine or the like as the first Fruits of their Encrease It being our Duty as Irenaeus writes to offer unto God the first Fruits of his Creatures as Moses saith Thou shalt not appear empty before the Lord. Not as if God wanted these things but to shew our fruitfulness and gratitude unto him Wherefore Cyprian thus severely blam'd the Rich Matrons for their scanty Oblations Thou art rich and wealthy saith he and dost thou think duly to celebrate the Lord's Supper when thou refusest to give Thou who comest to the Sacrament without a Sacrifice what part canst thou have from the Sacrifice which the Poor offer up These Offerings were employed to the Relief of the Poor and other Uses of the Church and it seems probable that a
sufficient Quantity of that Bread and Wine was presented to the Bishop or to him that officiated to be employed for the Sacramental Elements whose Consecration next succeeded which in the main was after this following Manner § 4. It is very likely that in many places the Minister first began with an Exhortation or Discourse touching the Nature and end of that Sacrament which the Congregation were going to partake of that so their Hearts might be the more elevated and raised into Heavenly Frames and Dispositions This may be gathered from the History of an Exorcist Woman related by Firmilian who took upon her to per. form many Ecclesiastical Administrations as to Baptize and Celebrate the Lord's Supper which last she did without the wonted Sermon or Discourse Which seems to intimate that in those days it was customary in Lesser Asia and perhaps at Carthage too for the Minister to make a Speech or Exhortation before the Participation of the Sacrament But whether this Practice was universal or more ancient than 〈◊〉 I cannot determin this that follows was viz. A Prayer over the Elements by him that Officiated unto which the People gave their Assent by saying Amen This Prayer is thus described by Justin Martyr Bread and Wine are offered to the Minister who receiving them gives Praise and Glory to the Lord of all through the Son and the Holy Ghost and in a large manner renders particular Thanks for the present Mercies who when he hath ended his Prayers and Praise all the People say Amen And when the Minister hath thus given Thanks and the People said Amen the Deacons distributed the Elements And again Bread and Wine are offered to the Minister who to the utmost of his Abilities sends up Prayers and Praises and the People say Amen and then the Consecrated Elements are distributed From this Description by Justin Martyr of the Sacramental Prayer we may observe these few things pertinent to the matter in hand I. That there was but one long Prayer antecedent to the Distribution of the Elements For he says That the Minister having received the Bread and Wine he offered up Prayers and Praise unto God in a large manner and when he had ended the People said Amen II. That this long Prayer consisted of two Parts viz. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as he calls them that is Petition and Thanksgiving in the former they prayed for the Peace of the Church the Quiet of the World the Health of their Emperors and in a Word for all Men that needed their Prayers as it is represented by Tertullian We pray saith he for the Emperors for all that are in Authority under them for the State of the World for the Quiet of Affairs and for the Delay of the Day of Judgment In the latter they gave God thanks for sending Christ and for the Institution of that comfortable Sacrament desiring his Blessing on and Consecration of the Elements then before them III. That by this one Prayer both the Elements were consecrated at once for he says That the Minister took both Elements together and blessed them and then they were distributed He did not consecrate them distinctly but both together § 5. After Prayer was ended they read the Words of Institution that so the Elements might be consecrated by the Word as well as by Prayer Whence Origen calls the Sacramental Elements The Food that is sanctified by the Word of God and Prayer And that is hallowed by the Word of God and Prayer And 〈◊〉 writes That when the Bread and Wine perceive the Word of God then it becomes the Eucharist of the Body and Blood of Christ. § 6. The Elements being thus Consecrated the Minister took the Bread and brake it The Bread which we break or or the broken Bread as it is styled by Irenaeus and then gave it to the Deacons who distributed it to the Communicants and after that the Cup which the Deacons in the like manner delivered So it was in Justin Martyr's time and Country The Element saith he being blessed the Deacons give to every one present of the Consecrated Bread and Wine But in Tertullian's Time and Country the Minister and not the Deacons distributed the Elements We receive saith he from no ones Hands but the Bishops And yet at the same Place not many years after The Deacons offered the Cup to those that were present So that herein there was a Diversity of Customs in some places the Deacons delivered the Elements in others the Bishop or the Minister that consecrated them But whether it was done either by Bishop or Deacons it seems probable that which of them soever did it they delivered the Sacramental Bread and Wine particularly to each Communicant I find but one Example to the contrary and that was in the Church of Alexandria where the Custom was to permit the People to take the Bread themselves from the Plate or Vessel wherein it was consecrated as is insinuated by Clemens Alexandrinus but in most other Churches it is likely that the Elements were particularly delivered to every single Communicant So it was in the Country of Justin Martyr where the Deacons gave to each one of the consecrated Bread and Wine So at Carthage in the time of Cyprian The Deacons offered the Cup to those that were present In the time of which Father it was usual for Children and Sucking Infants to receive the Sacrament unto whom it was necessary particularly to deliver the Elements since it was impossible for them to take it orderly from the Hands of others And therefore when a little sucking Girl refused to taste the Sacramental Wine The Deacon violently forc'd it down her Throat So it was also at Rome as appears from what Cornelius reports of his Antagonist Novatian that when he administer'd the Sacrament and divided and gave to each Man his part with his two Hands he held those of the Receiver saying to him Swear unto me by the Body and Blood of the Lord Jesus Christ that thou wilt never leave my Party to return to that of Cornelius so forcing the miserable Receiver instead of saying Amen to say I will not return to Cornelius § 7. As for the Posture of receiving at Alexandria the Custom was to stand at the Table and receive the Elements which may be supposed to have been 〈◊〉 this manner The Bread and Wine being consecrated the Communicants came up in order to the Communion Table and there standing received the Elements and then returned to their places again But whether this was universal I know not or whether any other postures were used I cannot determin only as for kneeling if the Sacrament was Celebrated on the Lords Day as usually it was or on any other Day between Easter and Whitsontide then no Church whatsoever kneeled for as Tertullian writes On the Lords Day we account it a
there to read of the Bishops of the Parish of Alexandria of the Parish of Ephesus of the Parish of Corinth of the Parish of Athens of the Parish of Carthage and so of the Bishops of the Parishes of several other Churches by that Term denoting the very same that we now call a Parish viz. a competent number of Christians dwelling near together having one Bishop Pastor or Minister set over them with whom they all met at one time to worship and serve God This may be evinc'd from the intent of the Word it self which signifies a Dwelling one by another as Neighbours do or an Habitation in one and the same place as the Church of Smirna writ to the Church that Parished in Philomelium 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And the Epistle of Clemens Romanus is to the Church of God Parishing at Corinth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is dwelling or living in Philomilium and Corinth so that a Parish is the same with a Particular Church or a single Congregation which is yet more evident from a Passage in the Differtations of Apollonius against Alexander a Cataphrygian Heretick wherein it is said That because that Heretick had been a Robber therefore that Parish to which he belonged would not receive him that is that particular Church or Congregation to which he appertained excluded him from Communion because of his Depredations and Robberies so that a Parish and a Particular Church are Synonimous Terms signifying one and the same thing and consequently a Bishop having but one Parish under his Jurisdiction could extend his Government no farther than one single Congregation because a single Congregation and a Parish were all one of the same Bulk and Magnitude § 2. But that the Bishops Diocess exceeded not the Bounds of a modern Parish and was the same as in Name so also in Thing will appear from these following Observations as 1. All the People of a Diocess did every Sunday meet all together in one place to celebrate Divine Service Thus saith Justin Martyr On Sunday all Assemble together in one Place where the Bishop preaches and prays for as Ignatius writes Where the Bishop is there the People must be and there is a necessity that we do nothing without the Bishop since it is unlawful to do any thing without him for where the Pastour is there the 〈◊〉 ought to follow wherefore as Christ did nothing without the Father so do you nothing without the Bishop and Presbyters but assemble into the same place that you may have one Prayer one Supplication one Mind and one Hope for if the Prayer of one or two have so great a force how much more prevalent must that be which is made by the Bishop and the whole Church He then that doth not assemble together is proud and hath condemned himself For it is written God resisteth the proud Let us not therefore resist the Bishop that we may be subject to God So that these Passages clearly prove That all the Members of the Bishops Church assembled together in one place to send up their common Prayers to the Throne of Grace and to discharge those other Religious Duties which were incumbent on them which convincingly evidences the Bishops Church to be no bigger than our Parishes for if it had been bigger it would have been impossible that the Members thereof should have constantly assembled together in one place as we see here they did 2. The Bishop had but one Altar or Communion Table in his whole Diocess at which his whole Flock received the Sacrament from him There is but one Altar says Ignatius as there is but one Bishop At this Altar the Bishop administred the Sacrament to his whole Flock at one time So writes Cyprian We celebrate the Sacrament the whole Brotherhood being present And thus it was in Justin Martyr's Days The Bishop's whole Diocess met together on Sunday when the Bishop gave them the Eucharist and if any were absent he sent it to them by the Deacons Certainly that Diocess could not be large where all usually communicated at one time and the Deacons carried about the Consecrated Eucharist to those that were absent which would have been an endless and painful Task for the Deacons had their Bishoprick contained more Christians in it than one Congregation would have held Tertullian writes that in his Time and Country the Christians received the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper from the hands of the Bishop alone Now in those days and places they communicated at least three times a week viz. Wednesdays Fridays and Lord's Days which had been impossible to have been done if the Bishop had had Inspection over more than one Congregation as is obvious to every ones Reason for the Bishop being Finite and Corporeal as well as others could not be present in many places at once but must be confined to one determinated fixed place in which alone he could administer and dispense the Eucharist And for this Reason it is that Ignatius exhorts the Philadelphians to use the one 〈◊〉 that is not to leave the Bishop and communicate elsewhere but to partake of that single Eucharist which was administred by him For as he proceeds to say in the same place There is but one Body of our Lord Jesus Christ one Cup one Altar and one Bishop As there was but one Bishop in a Church so there was but one Altar a Bishop and an Altar being Correlates So that to set up another Altar was a Periphrasis of a Schismatick or of one that causelesly separated from his lawful Bishop and sat up another which was that they called Schism as we shall shew in its proper place Thus Cyprian describes a Schismatick as one that contemns his Bishop leaves the Ministers of God and dares to set up another Altar And particularly he brands Novatian as such an one because he erected a profane Altar that is an Altar in opposition to the Altar of Cornelius his lawful Bishop For as he saith in another place No man can regularly constitute a new Bishop or erect a new Altar besides the one Bishop and the one Altar For which Reason he calls the Altar that is erected by Schismaticks against the One Altar of their lawful Bishops A profane Altar Which agrees with that of Ignatius that He that is within the Altar is pure but he that does any thing without the Bishops Priests and Deacons is impure and as he says in another place Whosoever is without the Altar wants the Bread of God 3. The other Sacrament of Baptism was generally administred by the Bishops alone within their Respective Diocesses So saith Tertullian Before the Bishop we renounce the Devil and the World For as Cyprian says The Bishops ought only to baptize And to the same effect writes Fortunatus Bishop of Thucabori that our Lord Jesus Christ
must be understood of what was afterwards distinctly called Bishops and Presbyters So likewise we read in St. Timothy 1 Tim. 4. 14. of a Presbytery which in all the Writings of the Fathers for any thing I can find to the contrary perpetually signifies the Bishop and Presbyters of a particular Church or Parish And to this 〈◊〉 may add what Clemens Alexandrinus Reports of St. John that he went into the neighbouring Provinces of Ephesus Partly that he might constitute Bishops partly that he might plant new Churches and partly that he might appoint such in the number of the Clergy as should be commanded him by the Holy Ghost Where by the Word Clergy being oppos'd to Bishops and so consequently different from them must be understood either Deacons alone or which is far more probable Presbyters and Deacons CHAP. V. § 1. The Order and Office of the Deacons § 2. Subdeacons what § 3. Of Acolyths Exorcists and Lectors thro' those Offices the Bishops gradually ascended to their Episcopal Dignity § 4. Of Ordination First of Deacons § 5. Next of Presbyters 〈◊〉 Candidates for that Office presented themselves to the Presbytery of the Parish where they were Ordained § 6. By them examined about 〈◊〉 Qualifications viz. Their Age. § 7. Their Condition in the World § 8. Their Conversation § 9. And their Vnderstanding Humane Learning needful § 10. Some Inveighed against Humane Learning but condemned by Clemens Alexandrinus § 11. Those that were to be Ordain'd Presbyters generally pass'd thro' the Inferiour Offices § 12. When to be ordained propounded to the People for their Attestation § 13. Ordain'd in but not to a particular Church § 14. Ordain'd by the Imposition of Hands of the Presbytery § 15. The Conclusion of the first Particular concerning the Peculiar Acts of the Clergy § 1. NExt to the Presbyters were the Deacons concerning whose Office and Order I shall say very little since there is no great Controversie about it and had it not been to have rendred this Discourse compleat and entire I should in silence have pass'd it over Briefly therefore their original Institution as in 〈◊〉 6. 2. was to serve Tables which included these two things A looking after the Poor and an attendance at the Lord's Table As for the Care of the Poor Origen tells us that the Deacons dispensed to them the Churches Money being employed under the Bishop to inspect and relieve all the Indigent within their Diocese As for their Attendance at the Lord's Table their Office with respect to that consisted in preparing the Bread and Wine in cleansing the Sacramental Cups and other such like necessary things whence they are called by Ignatius Deacons of Meats and Cups assisting also in some places at least the Bishop or Presbyters in the Celebration of the Eucharist delivering the Elements to the Communioants They also preached of which more in another place and in the Absence of the Bishop and Presbyters baptized In a word according to the signification of their Name they were as Ignatius calls them the Churches Servants set apart on purpose to serve God and attend on their Business being constituted as Eusebius terms it for the Service of the Publick § 2. Next to the Deacons were the Subdencons who are mentioned both by Cyprian and Cornelius As the Office of the Presbyters was to assist and help the Bishops so theirs was to assist and help the Deacons And as the Presbyters were of the same Order with the Bishop so probably the Subdeacons were of the same Order with the Deacons which may be gathered from what we may suppose to have been the Origin and Rise of these Subdeacons which might be this That in no Church whatsoever was it usual to have more than Seven Deacons because that was the original Number instituted by the Apostles wherefore when any Church grew so great and numerous that this stinted Number of Deacons was not sufficient to discharge their necessary Ministrations that they might not seem to swerve from the Apostolical Example they added Assistants to the Deacons whom they called Subdeacons or Under Deacons who were employed by the Head or Chief Deacons to do those Services in their stead and room to which by their Office they were obliged But whether this be a sufficient Argument to prove the Subdeacons to be of the same Order with the Deacons I shall not determine because this Office being now antiquated it is not very pertinent to my Design I only offer it to the Consideration of the Learned who have Will and Ability to search into it § 3. Besides those forementioned Orders who were immediately consecrated to the Service of God and by him commission'd thereunto there were another sort of Ecclesiasticks who were employed about the meaner Offices of the Church such as Acolyths Exorcists and Lectors whose Offices because they are now disused except that of the Lector I shall pass over in silence reserving a Discourse of the Lector for another place only in general these were Candidates for the Ministry who by the due discharge of these meaner Employs were to give Proof of their Ability and Integrity the Bishops in those days not usually arriving per Saltum to that Dignity and Honour but commonly beginning with the most inferiour Office and so gradually proceeding thro' the others till they came to the supreme Office of all as Cornelius Bishop of Rome Did not presently leap into the Episcopal Throne but first passed thro' all the Ecclesiastical Offices gradually ascending to that Sublime Dignity The Church in those happy days by such a long Tryal and Experience using all possible Precaution and Exactness that none but fit and qualify'd Men should be admitted into those Sacred Functions and Orders which were attended with 〈◊〉 dreadful and tremendous a Charge And this now brings me in the next place to enquire into the Manner and Form of the Primitive Ordinations which I chuse to discourse of in this place since I shall find none more proper for it throughout this whole Treatise § 4. As for the various Senses and Acceptations which may be put on the Word Ordination I shall not at all meddle with them that Ordination that I shall speak of is this the Grant of a Peculiar Commission and Power which remains indelible in the Person to whom it is committed and can never be obliterated or rased out except the Person himself cause it by his Heresie Apostacy or most extremely gross and scandalous Impiety Now this sort of Ordination was conferred only upon Deacons and Presbyters or on Deacons and Bishops Presbyters and Bishops being here to be consider'd as all one as Ministers of the Church-Universal As for the Ordination of Deacons there is no great Dispute about that so I shall say no more concerning it than that we have the manner thereof at their first Institution in Acts 6. 6. which was that they were