Innocētius Zosimus and other auncient fathers what better reason haue they to kepe the infantes from the cuppe then the Anabaptistes haue to kepe them from theire baptisme If they allege their impotencie of remembring our lordes death the Anabaptistes will lihewise allege their impotencie of receiuing and vnderstāding doctrine that Christes institution in this behalfe semeth to require Thus th' aduersaries of the churche them selues doo agnise that the vse of the cuppe in the Sacrament perteineth not to all of necessitie So haue they neither godly charitie to ioyne with the churche neither sufficient reason to impugne the churche And although herein we could be content infantes not to be spoken of yet it maye easely be proued that the communion vnder bothe kyndes hath not euer ben generall And as we doo not cōdemne it but confesse it might be restored agayne by th'auctoritie of the churche lawfully assembled in a generall councell vppon mature deliberation before had and a holesome remedie against the inconueniences thereof prouided euen so are we hable to shewe good auctoritie for the defence of the one kynde now vsed in the churche And because M. Iuell beareth the world in hand nothing can be brought for it of oure syde some places I will allege here that seme to me very euidently to proue that the vse of bothe kyndes hath not alwayes ben thought necessary to all persons and that the communion vnder one kynde hathe ben practised and holden for good within the six hundred yeres after Christ that he would so faine bynde vs vnto Proufes for communion vnder one kinde Here maye be alleaged first the example of our lord him selfe out of the 24. chapter of S. Luke which is spoken of before where it is declared that he gaue the Sacrament to the two disciples at Emaus vnder the forme of bread only which place ought to haue the more weight of auctoritie in a catholike mannes iudgement because it is brought by the councell of Constance and also by the councell of Basile for proufe of the communion vnder one kynde That it was the Sacrament the auncient doctours doo affirme it playnely and the wordes cōferred with the wordes of our lordes supper doo agree and that it is not nedeful of oure owne head to adde thereto the administration of the cuppe as oure aduersaries doo by their figure synecdoche it appeareth by that those two disciples declared to the twelue Apostles assembled together in Ierusalem how they knew our lorde in fractione panis in breakinge of the breade to them which can not be taken for the wine and as sone as they knewe him in breaking of the breade he vanished awaye from theire syght er that he tooke the cuppe in to his handes and blessed it and gaue it vnto them as it appeareth euidently ynough to S. Augustine to Bede and to all other that be not willfully opinatiue Agayne what nede is it to vse violence in this scripture and ioyne vnto it a patche of oure owne deuise by so simple a warrant of a figure sith that according to the minde of the learned fathers Christ gaue here to the two disciples not a piece of the sacrament but the whole Sacrament as it is proued by th'effecte of the same and th'effecte presupposeth the cause For saint Augustine confesseth by that Sacrament of breade so he calleth it De cōsensu Euangelistarū li. 3. ca. 25. Vnitate corporis participata remoueri impedimentum inimici vt Christus posset agnosci that thereby they were made partakers of the vnitie of Christes bodye that is to saye made one bodye with Christ and that all impediment or lette of the ennemie the deuil was taken awaye so as Christ might be acknowleged What more should they haue gotten if they had receiued the cuppe also Here might be alleaged the place of the Actes in the 2. chapter where mention is made of the communion of breakinge of the breade the cuppe not spoken of which the heretikes called Waldēses dyd confesse that it must be vnderstanded of the Sacrament in confessione ad Vladislaū and likewise the place of the twentith chapter and specially that of the seuen and twentith chapter of the Actes Where Chrysostome and other fathers vnderstād the breade that saint Paul in perile of shipwracke tooke gaue thankes ouer brake and eate to be the holy Sacrament It is not to be merueiled at albe it S. Paul deliuered to the Corinthians the institution of oure lordes supper vnder hothe kyndes that yet vppon occasion geuen and when condition of tyme so required he ministred the communion vnder one kynde sith that with out doubte he tooke that holy mystery vnder one kynde for the whole Sacrament as we perceiue by his wordes 2. Cor. 10. where he sayeth Vnus panis et vnum corpus multi sumus omnes qui de vno pane participamus One breade and one body we being many are all that doo participate of one breade Where he speaketh nothing of the cuppe And likewise by his wordes where he speaketh disiūctiuely as the greke and the true latine texte hath Quicunque manducauerit panem 1. Cor. 11. vel biberit calicem domini indignê reus erit corporis et sanguinis domini Who so euer eateth the bread or drynketh of the cuppe of our lord vnworthely he shall be gylty of the bodye and bloude of our lorde Whereon dependeth an argument of the contrary that who so euer either eateth this bread worthely or drinketh this cuppe worthely he eateth and drinketh righteousnes and lyfe For thys purpose we haue a notable place in the hebrew gospell of S. Matthew which S. Hierome sayeth he sawe in the librarie of Caesarea and translated it This place is cited by S. Hierome in his booke de ecclesiasticis scriptoribus in Iacobo fratre domini The wordes touching the communion that S. Hierome rehearseth agree thoroughly with those of S. Luke 24. chapter Matthaeus sic refert Dominus autem etc. Matthew reporteth thus When oure lorde had geuen his shrowde vnto the bishopes seruant he went to Iames and appeared vnto him for Iames had made an oth that he would not eate breade from that howre he dranke of the cuppe of our lorde vntill he saw him raysed from the dead It foloweth a litle after Afferte ait dominus mensam panem Statimque addit Tulit panem benedixit ac fregit dedit Iacobo iusto dixit ei frater comede panem tuum quia resurrexit filius hominis à dormientibus Bring the table and set on bread quoth our lorde and by and by it is added he tooke bread and blessed it and brake it and gaue it to Iames the iust and sayde vnto him my brother eate thy breade for the sonne of man is risen agayne from the dead No man can doubte but this was the Sacrament And wine was there none geuen for any thing that may be gathered For it is not likely that S. Iames had
by no meates vnneth susteined with comforte of drinke Then it foloweth Which thing we see to be so at departing of many who being very desyrouse to receiue their viage prouision of the holy communion when the Sacrament was geuen them haue cast it vp agayne not that they dyd this through infidelitie but for that they were not hable to swallow downe the Sacrament deliuered to them but onely a draught of oure lordes cuppe How so euer this be taken it is plaine by this councell as by many other auncient councelles and doctours that the maner of the catholike churche hath ben to minister the Sacrament to the sicke vnder one kynde Now where as some saye that the Sacrament to be geuen vnder the forme of bread was first dipte in the bloude of oure lorde and would haue so vsed nowe also for the sicke and that it is so to be taken for the whole and intiere Sacrament as though the Sacrament vnder forme of bread were not of it selfe sufficient let them vnderstand that this was an olde errour condemned aboue twelue hundred yeres past by Iulius the first that great defender of Athanasius who hereof in an epistle to the bishoppes through Egypte De conse distinct 2. can cum omne crimen wrote thus Illud verò quod pro complemento communionis intinctam tradunt eucharistiam populis nec hoc prolatum ex euangelio testimonium receperunt vbi Apostolis corpus suum dominus commendauit sanguinem Seorsum enim panis seorsum calicis commendatio memoratur Where as some delyuer to the people the sacrament dipte for the full and whole communion they haue not receiued this testimonie pronounced out of the gospel where oure lorde gaue his body and his bloude For the geuing of the bread is recorded aparte by it selfe and the geuing of the cuppe aparte lykewise by it selfe And where as some afterwarde in the tyme of Vitellianus would haue brought in agayne this abrogated custome it was in like maner condēned and abolished in tertio Concilio Braccarensi Can. 1. Now I referre me to the iudgemēt of the reader of what opinion so euer he bee whether for proufe of the communion vnder one kynde we haue any word sentence or clause at all or no and whether these wordes of M. Iuell in his sermon Fol. 16. in the ende be true or no where he sayeth thus it was vsed through out the whole catholike churche six hundred yeres after Christes ascension vnder bothe kyndes with out exception That it was so vsed yea six hundred yeres and long after we denye not but that it was so alwayes and in euery place vsed and with out exception that we denye and vpon what growndes we doo it let M. Iuell him selfe be iudge If some of oure allegations may bee with violence wrested from oure purpose verely a great number of them can not the auctoritie of the auncient fathers who wrote them remayning inuiolated Where of it foloweth that after the iudgement of these fathers where as Christ instituted this blessed Sacrament and commaunded it to be celebrated and receiued in remembraunce of his death he gaue no necessary commaundement either for the one or for both kyndes besyde and without the celebration of the Sacrifice but lefte that to the determination of the churche Now that the churche for th'auoyding of vnreuerēce periles offences and other weighty and important causes hath decreed it in two generall councelles to be receiued of the laye people vnder one kynde onely we thinke it good with all humblenes to submite oure selues to the churche herein Matth. 18. which churche Christ commaundeth to be heard and obeyed saying he that heareth not the churche let him be to the as a heathen and as a publican In doing whereof we weigh aduisedly with oure selues the horrible danger that remaineth for them who be auctoures of schisme and breakers of vnitie Now for answere to M. Iuelles place alleaged out of Gelasius which is the chiefe that he and all other the aduersaries of the churche haue to bring for theire purpose in this pointe this much may be sayde First Gelasius his canon guilefully by M. Iuel alleaged truly examined that he alleageth Gelasius vntruly making him to sownde in english otherwise then he doth in latine M. Iuelles wordes be these Gelasius an olde father of the Church and a bysshop of Rome sayeth that to minister the communion vnder one kinde is open sacrilege But where sayeth Gelasius so this is no syncere handeling of the matter And because he knewe the wordes of that father imported not so much guilefully he reciteth them in latine and doth not english them which he would not haue omitted if they had so plainely made for his purpose The wordes of Gelasius be these Diuisio vnius eiusdemque mysterij sine grandi sacrilegio non potest peruenire The diuision of one and the same mystery can not come with out great sacriledge Of these wordes he can not conclude Gelasius to saye that to minister the communion vnder one kynde is open sacriledge Gelasius rebuketh and abhorreth the diuisiō of that high mysterie which vnder one forme and vnder bothe is vnum idemque one and the same not one vnder the forme of breade and an other vnder the forme of wine not one in respecte of the bodye and an other in respecte of the bloude but vnum idemque one and the selfe same The wordes afore recited be taken out of a fragment of a Canon of Gelasius which is thus as we fynde in Gratian. De consecrat distin 2. can cōperimus Comperimus autem quòd quidam sumpta tantum corporis sacri portione à calice sacrati cuoris abstineant Qui proculdubio quoniam nescio qua superstitione docentur adstringi aut integra sacramenta percipiant aut ab integris arceantur quia diuisio vnius eiusdemque mysterij sine grandi sacrilegio non potest peruenire Which may thus be englished But we haue founde that some hauing receiued onely the portion where in is the holy bodye absteine from the cuppe of the sacred bloude who with out doubte for as much as I knowe not with what superstition they be taught to be tyed either let them receiue the whole Sacramentes or let them be kepte from the whole because the diuision of one and the same mystery can not comme without great sacriledge Here might be sayde to M. Iuell shewe vs the whole epistle of Gelasius from whence this fragmēt is taken that we maye weigh the circumstance and the causes why he wrote it conferring that goeth before and that foloweth and we will frame you a reasonable answere But it is not extant and therfore your argument in that respecte is of lesse force But for auoyding of that oure aduersaries would hereof conclude it is to be vnderstanded that this canon speaketh agaynst the heretikes named Manichaei who in the tyme of Leo the first about fourty yeres before
praecipuè ecclesia Romana quae Caput est omnium ecclesiarum and specially the church of Rome which is the Head of all the churches Naming the church of Rome he meaneth the bishop there or his legates to be sent in his stede Thus it is proued by good and auncient auctorities that the name and title of the Head ruler president chiefe and principall gouernour of the church is of the fathers attributed not onely to Peter but also to his successours bishops of the See Apostolike And therefore M. Iuell may thinke him selfe by this charitably admonished to remember his promise of yelding and subscribing I will adde to all that hath ben hytherto sayde of this matter a saying of Martin Luther that such as doo litle regarde the grauitie of auncient fathers of the olde church may yet somewhat be moued with the lightnes of the young father Luther Patriarke and fownder of their newe churche Lightnes I may well call it for in this saying which I shall here rehearse he doth not so soberly allowe the Popes Primacie The popes primacie acknovvleged by Martin Luther as in sundry other treatises he doth rashly and furiousely inueigh against the same In a litle treatise intituled Resolutio Lutheriana super propositione sua 13. de potestate papae his wordes be these Primum quod me mouet Romanum pontificem esse alijs omnibus quos saltem nouerimus se pontifices gerere superiorem est ipsa voluntas Dei quam in ipso facto videmus Neque enim sine voluntate Dei in hanc monarchiam vnquam venire potuisset Rom. Pontifex At voluntas Dei quoquo modo nota fuerit cum reuerentia suscipienda est ideoque non licet temerè Romano pontifici in suo primatu resistere Haec autem ratio tanta est vt si etiam nulla scriptura nulla alia causa esset haec tamen satis esset ad compescendam temeritatem resistentium Et hac sola ratione gloriosissimus martyr Cyprianus per multas epistolas confidentissimè gloriatur contrà omnes episcoporum quorumcunque aduersarios sicut 3. Regum legimus quòd decē tribus Israel discesserunt à Roboam filio Salomonis tamen quia voluntate Dei siue auctoritate factum est ratum apud Deum fuit Nam apud theologos omnes voluntas signi quam vocant operationem Dei non minus quà m alia signa voluntatis Dei vt praecepta prohibitiua etc. metuenda est Ideo non video quomodo sint excusati à schismatis reatu qui huic voluntati contraueniētes sese à Romani pontificis auctoritate subtrahunt Ecce haec est vna prima mihi insuperabilis ratio quae me subijcit Romano pontifici Primatū eius confiteri cogit The first thing that moueth me to thinke the B. of Rome to be ouer all other that we knowe to be bisshops is the very will of God which we see in the facte or dede it selfe for without the will of God the B. of Rome could neuer haue commen vnto this monarchie But the will of God by what meane so euer it be knowen is to be receiued reuerently And therefore it is not lawfull rashly to resiste the B. of Rome in his primacie And this is so great a reason for the same that if there were no scripture at all nor other reason yet this were ynough to stay the rashnes of them that resiste And through this onely reason the most gloriouse martyr Cyprian in many of his epistles vaunteth him selfe very boldly against all the aduersaries of Bishops what soeuer they were As in the thirde booke of the kinges we read that the ten tribes of Israel departed from Roboam Salomons sōne Yeat because it was done by the will or auctoritie of God it stoode in effecte with God For among all the diuines the will of the signe which they call the working of God is to be feared no lesse then other signes of Gods will as commaundemētes prohibitiue etc. Therefore I see not how they may be excused of the gilte of schisme which going against this will withdrawe them selues from the auctoritie of the B. of Rome Lo this is one chiefe inuincible reason that maketh me to be vnder the bisshop of Rome and compelleth me to confesse his Primacie This farre Luther Thus I haue briefly touched some deale of the scriptures of the canons and councells of the edictes of Emperours of the fathers sayinges of the reasons and of the manifolde practises of the church which are wonte to be alleaged for the Popes Primacie and supreme auctoritie With all I haue proued that which M. Iuell denyeth that the B. of Rome within sixe hundred yeres after Christ hath ben called the vniuersall bishop of no small number of men of great credite and very oftentymes Head of the vniuersall church both in termes equiualent and also expressely Now to the nexte article Or that the people was then taught to beleue Iuell that Christes body is really substantially corporally carnally or naturally in the Sacrament Of the termes really substantially corporally carnally naturally fovvnde in the Doctours treating of the true being of Christes body in the blessed Sacrament ARTICLE V. CHristen people hath euer ben taught that the body and bloud of Iesus Christ by the vnspeakeable working of the grace of God and vertue of the holy Ghoste is present in this most holy Sacrament and that verely and in dede This doctrine is fownded vppon the plaine wordes of Christ which he vttered in the institution of this sacrament expressed by the Euangelistes and by S. Paul As they were at supper sayeth Matthewe Iesus tooke breade and blessed it and brake it Matth. 26 and gaue it to his disciples and sayeth Take ye eate ye this is my body And takyng the cuppe he gaue thankes and gaue it to them saying Drynke ye all of this For this is my bloude of the newe testament which shall be shedde for many in remission of synnes With like wordes almost Marke Luke and Paul Marc. 14. Luc. 22. 1. Cor. 11. doo describe this diuine institution Neither sayde our lord onely This is my body but least some shuld doubte how his wordes are to be vnderstanded for a playne declaration of them he addeth this further Wich ys geuen for you Luc. 22. Likewise of the cuppe he sayeth not onely This is my bloude But also as it were to putte it out of all doubte Which shall be shed for many Now as faithful people doo beleue that Christ gaue not a figure of his body but his owne true and very body in substance and like wise not a figure of his bloude but his very pretiouse bloude it selfe at his passion and death on the crosse for our Redemption so they beleue also that the wordes of the institution of this Sacrament admitte no other vnderstāding but that he geueth vnto vs in these holy mysteries his selfe same body and his selfe same bloude in truth of
adoration of christes bodie in them present And thus for the Eleuation or holding vp of the sacrament we haue sayde ynough Or that the people did then fall downe and worship Iuell the Sacrament with godly honour Of the vvorshipping or adoration of the Sacrament ARTICLE VIII IF the blessed SacrameÌ„t of the aulter were no other then M. Iuell and the rest of the Sacramentaries thinke of it then were it not well done the people to bowe downe to it and to worship it with godly honour For then were it but bare bread and wyne how honorably so euer they speake of it calling it symbolicall that is tokening and sacramentall bread and wyne But now this being that very bread which god the father gaue vs from heaueÌ„ as Christ sayeth Ioan. 6. This bread being the fleshe of Christ which he gaue for the life of the world this being that bread and that cuppe 1. Cor. 11. whereof who so euer eateth or drinketh vnworthely shall be gylty of the body and bloud of our lord in this Sacrament being conteined the very reall and substantiall body and bloud of Christ as him selfe sayeth expressely in the three first euangelistes and in S. Paul this being that holy Eucharistia which Ignatius calleth the fleshe of our Sauiour Iesus Christ In epistola quadaÌ„ ad Smyrnenses vt citatur à Theodori to in Polymorph Lib. 4. coÌ„trà haereses ca. 34. that hath suffered for our synnes which the father by his goodnes hath raysed vp to life againe This being not common bread but the Eucharistia after consecration consisting of two thinges earthly and heauenly as Irenaeus sayeth meaning by the one the outward formes by the other the very body and bloud of Christ who partely for the godhed inseparably thereto vnited and partly for that they were conceiued of the holy ghoste in the most holy virgine Mary are worthely called heauenly This being that bread which of our lord geuen to his disciples not in shape but in nature chaunged by the almighty power of the word In Ser. de coena do is made fleshe as S. Cyprian termeth it This being that holy mysterie wherein the inuisible priest tourneth the visible creatures of bread and wyne in to the substaÌ„ce of his body and bloud by his word with secrete power Homil. 5. de Pascha as Eusebiê° Emisenus reporteth This being that holy foode by worthy receiuing whereof Christ dwelleth in vs naturally that is to witte is in vs by truth of nature and not by concorde of will onely Lib. 8. de trinitate as Hilarius affirmeth Againe this being that table whereat in our lordes meate we receiue the worde truly made fleshe of the most holy virgine Mary as the same Hilarie sayeth This being that bread which neither earing nor sowing nor worke of tyllers hath brought forth but that earth which remained vntouched and was full of the same that is the blessed virgine Marye as Gregorie Nyssene describeth Lib. de vita Mosis cap. 48. CoÌ„stitut Apostol li. 8. c. vlt. In Leuit. lib. 1. ca. 4. This being that supper in the which Christ sacrificed him selfe as Clemens Romanus and as Hesychius declareth Who furthermore in an other place writeth most plainely that these mysteries meaning the blessed sacrament of th'aulter are sancta sanctorum the holiest of all holy thinges because it is the body of him selfe of whom Gabriel sayd to the virgine Luc. 1. the holy ghost shall come vpon the and the power of the highest shall ouershaddowe the therefore that holy thing which shall be borne of the shall be called the sonne of God and of whom also Esaie spake Holy is our lord and dwelleth on high verely euen in the bosome of the father On the holy table where these mysteries are celebrated the lambe of God being layed and sacrificed of priestes vnbloudely as that most auncient and worthy councell of Nice reporteth Briefly in this highest SacrameÌ„t vnder visible shape inuisible thinges soothly the very true reall liuely natural and substantiall body and bloude of our Sauiour Christ being conteined as the scriptures doctoures councelles yea and the best learned of Martin Lutheres schoole doo most plainely and assuredly affirme This I saye in conclusion being so as it is vndoubtedly so we that remaine in the catholike churche and can by no persecution be remoued from the catholike faith whom it liketh M. Iuell and his felowes to call papistes beleue verely that it is our bownden duetie to adore the Sacrament and to worship it with all godly honour By which word Sacrament notwithstanding in this respect we meane not the outward formes that properly are called the sacrament but the thing of the sacrameÌ„t the inuisible grace and vertue therein conteined euen the very body and bloud of Christ And when we adore and worship this blessed Sacrament we doo not adore and worship the substance it selfe of bread and wine because after consecratioÌ„ none at all remaineth Neither doo we adore the outward shapes and formes of bread and wine which remaine for they be but creatures that ought not to be adored What Christen people adore in the Sacrament but the body it selfe and bloud of Christ vnder those formes verely and really conteined lowly and deuoutly doo we adore And therefore to speake more properly and according to skill least our aduersaries might take aduaÌ„tage against vs through occasion of termes where right sense onely is meant we proteste and saye that we doo and ought to adore and worship the body and bloud of Christ in the Sacrament And here this much is further to be sayde that in the Sacrament of the aulter the body of Christ is not adored by thought of mynde sundred from the word but being inseparably vnited to the word For this is specially to be considered that in this most holy Sacrament the body and bloud of Christ are not present by them selues alone as being separated from his soule and from the godhed but that there is here his true and lyuing fleshe and bloud ioyned together with his godhed inseparably and that they be as him selfe is perfite whole and inseparable Which is sufficiently confirmed by sundry his owne wordes in S. Iohn I am sayeth he the bread of lyfe Againe this is bread comming downe from heauen that if any eate of it he dye not I am the liuely bread that came downe from heauen if any eate of this bread he shall lyue euerlastingly And to shewe what bread he meant he coÌ„cludeth with these wordes And the bread which I shall geue is my fleshe which I shall geue for the life of the world By which wordes he assureth vs plainely that his fleshe which he geueth vs to eate is full of lyfe and ioyned with his godhed which bringeth to the worthy receiuers thereof immortalitie as well of body as of soule Which thing fleshe and bloud of it selfe could not performe as our lord him selfe declareth plainely where he
in the throne and to the lambe for euer And the fouer and tvventie elders fell dovvne on their faces and adored him that lyueth vntill vvorldes of vvorldes But it shall be more tediouse then nedefull to recite places out of the scriptures for proufe of th'adoratiō of Christ there may of thē be fownde so great plentie Contrarietie in the first diuisers of the nevve gospell Yet because Luther was either so blinde or rather so deuilishe as to denye th'adoration where notwithstāding he cōfessed the presence of Christes true and natural body in the Sacrament I will here recite what the Sacramentaries of Zurich haue written against him therefore What saye they is the bread the true and natural body of Christ and is Christ in the supper as the Pope and Luther doo teache present Wherefore then ought not the lord there to be adored where ye saye him to be present Why shall we be forbydden to adore that which is not onely sacramentally but also corporally the body of Christ Thomas toucheth the true body of Christ raysed vp from the dead and falling downe on his knees adoreth saying My God and my lord The disciples adore the lord as well before as after his Ascension Matth. 28. Act. 1. And the lord in S. Iohn sayeth to the blinde man Ioan. 9. beleuest thou in the sonne of God and he answered him saying Lord who is he that I may beleue in him And Iesus sayed to him Thou hast bothe sene him and who speaketh with thee he it is Then he sayeth lord I beleue and he adored him Now if we taught our lordes bread to be the natural body of Christ verely we would adore it also faithfully with the papistes This much the Zuinglians against Luther Whereby they prooue sufficiently th'adoration of Christes body in the Sacrament and so consequently of Christ him selfe God and man because of the inseparable coniunction of his diuine and humaine nature in vnitie of persone so as where his body is there is it ioyned and vnited also vnto his godhed and so there Christ is present perfitely wholly and substantially very god and man For the cleare vnderstanding whereof the better to be atteined the scholastical Diuines haue profitably deuised the terme concomitantia plainely and truly teaching that in this Sacrament after consecration vnder the forme of breade is present the body of Christ and vnder the forme of wine his bloud ex vi sacramenti and with the body vnder forme of bread also the bloud the soule and godhed of Christ and likewise with the bloud vnder the forme of wyne the body soule and godhed ex concomitantia as they terme it in shorter and playner wise vttering the same doctrine of faith which the holy fathers dyd in the Ephesme councell against Nestorius Whereby they meane that where the body of Christ is present by necessary sequell because of the indiuisible copulation of bothe natures in the vnitie of person for as much as the Word made fleshe neuer lefte the humaine nature there is also his bloud his soule his godhed and so whole and perfite Christ God and man And in this respecte the terme is not to be misliked of any godly learned man though some newe Maisters scoffe at it who fill the measure of their predecessours that likewise haue ben offended with termes for the apter declaration of certaine necessary articles of our faith by holy and learned fathers in generall councelles holesomly deuised Of which sorte ben these homousion humanatio incarnatio transubstantiatio etc. Now here is to be noted how the Zuinglians whom M. Iuell foloweth in th'article of adoration confute the Lutherans as on the other syde the Lutherans in th'article of the presence confute the Zuinglians As though it were by gods speciall prouidence for the better staye of his churche so wrought that bothe the truth shuld be confessed by the enemies of truth and also for vttering of vntruth the one shuld be condemned of the other that by the warre of heretikes the peace of the churche might be established and by their discorde the catholike people might the faster grewe together in concorde Now hauing sufficiētly proued by the scriptures and that with the Zuingliās also adoration and godly honour to be due vnto Christes body where so euer it please his diuine maiestie to exhibit the same present let vs see whether we can finde the same doctrine affirmed by the holy and auncient fathers What the Apostles taught in their tyme concerning this Article we may iudge by that we reade in Dionysius that was S. Paules scholer and for that is to beleued He adoreth and worshippeth this holy mysterie with these very wordes Ecclesias hierarch cap. 3. Sed ò diuinum penitus sanctumque mysterium etc. But ô diuine and holy mysterie which vouchesafest to open the cooueringes of signes layd ouer the vtter thy light to vs openly and plainely and fill our spirituall eyes with the singular and euident brightnes of thy light Origen teacheth vs how to adore and worship Christ in the Sacrament before we receiue it after this forme of wordes Hom 5. in diuersos Euangelij locos Quādo sanctum cibum etc. when thou receiuest the holy meate and that vncorrupt banket when thou enioyest the bread and cuppe of lyfe thou eatest and drinkest the body and bloud of our lord then our lord entreth in vnder thy roofe And therefor thou also humbling thy selfe folowe this Cēturion or captaine and saye Lord I am not vvorthy that thou enter vnder my roofe For where he entreth in vnworthely there he entreth in to the condemnation of the receiuer What can be thought of S. Cyprian but that he adored the inuisible thing of this Sacrament which is the body and bloud of Christ seing that he confesseth the godhed to be in the same nolesse then it was in the person of Christ which he vttereth by these wordes In Ser. d◠coena do Panis iste quem dominus discipulis porrigebat etc. This bread which our lord gaue to his disciples chaunged not in shape but in nature by the almighty power of god is made fleshe And as in the person of Christ the manhode was sene and the godhed was hydden euen so the diuine essence hath vnspeakeably infused it selfe into the visible sacramēt Chrysostom hath a notable place for the adoration of Christes body in the Sacrament in his commentaries vpon S. Paul In 10. cap. prioris ad Corinth where he affirmeth also the real presence and the sacrifice Let vs not let vs not sayeth he be willing impudently to kill our selues And when thou seest that body set forth saye with thy selfe for cause of this body I am no lenger earth and ashes no lenger captiue but free This body fastened on the Crosse and beaten was not ouercome with death After this he exhorteth all to adore and worship our lordes body in the Sacrament This body sayeth he the wise men worshipped
whom mention is made in the article afore this writeth in the life of saint Basile that a litle before he gaue vp his ghost he receiued a portion of the holy Sacrament which long before he had willed to be kepte to the intent it might be put in his graue with him at his buriall Which no man can cauille to be any other then the forme of breade onely It hath ben a custome in the latine churche from th'apostles tyme to oure dayes that on good Fridaye as well priestes as other christen people receiue the Sacrament vnder the forme of bread onelye consecrated the daye before called the daye of oure lordes supper commonly Maunde thursdaye and that not without signification of a singular mysterie And this hath euer ben iudged a good and sufficient communion And that in the greke churche also euen in the tyme of Chrysostome the cōmunion vnder the forme of breade onely was vsed and alowed it appeareth by this notable storye of Sozomenus a greke writer Historîae ecclesiast lib. 8. ca. 5. in graeco which because it is long I will here rehearse it onely in english remitting the learned to the greke When Ihon otherwise named Chrysostome gouerned the church of Constantinople very well a certaine man of the Macedonian heresie had a wife of the same opinion When this man had heard Ihon in his sermō declare how one ought to thinke of god he praysed his doctrine and exhorted his wife to conforme her selfe to the same iudgement also But when as she was leadde by the talke of noble womē rather then by her husbandes good aduertisemētes after that he sawe councell tooke no place excepte quoth he thou wilt beare me companie in thinges touching god thou shalt haue no more to doo with me nor lyue any further with me The woman hearing this promysing faynedly that she would agree vnto it conferreth the matter with a woman seruant that she had whom she estemed for trusty and vseth her helpe to deceiue her husband About the tyme of the mysteries she holding fast that which she had receiued stouped downe making resemblance to praye Her seruant standing by geueth to her secretly that which she had brought with her in her hand That as she put her teeth to it to byte it hardneth in to a stone With that the womā sore astoyned fearing leastsome euill shuld happē vnto her therefore which came by the power of God ranne forthwith to the bishop and bewraying her selfe sheweth him the stone hauing yet in it the printes of her bitte representing a straunge matter and a wonderouse colour and so with teares of her eyes besought forgeuenes promising her husband she would consent and agree to him If this seme to any incredible sayeth Sozomenus that stone is witnes which to this daye is kepte among the iewelles of the churche of Constantinople By this storye it is cleare 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Sacrament was then ministred vnder one kynde onely For by receiuing that one forme this woman would haue persuaded her husband that she had communicated with him and with that holy bishop Elles if bothe kyndes had then ben ministred she shuld haue practised some other shifte for the auoyding of the cuppe Which had not ben so easye The place of S. Basiles epistles ad Caesariam can not be auoyded by no shifte nor sophistrie of the gospellers These be his wordes All they which lyue the solitaire life in wildernes where is no priest keping the communion at home communicate them selues And in Alexandria and in Egypte eche one of the people for the most parte hath the communion in his house Here I might aske M. Iuell how they could kepe wine cōsecrated in small measures as shuld serue for euery mannes housel a parte in those countries of extreme heate specially in wildernes where they had neither priest nor deacon as in that place S. Basile writeth For lacke of whom they kepte it in store a long tyme that they might not be destitute of it at neede Agayne here I might aske him whether it was the forme of bread only or of wine also which christen men and specially women were wont deuoutely to receiue of the priestes Vide articulū priorem in their cleane lynnen or napkyns to beare home with them taking great heede that no fragments of it fell downe on the grownde as bothe Origen and also S. Augustine doo witnesse I thinke he will confesse that lynnen cloth is not a very fytte thing to kepe liquour in Though I might bring a great number of other places for the vse of one kynde which after the most common rule of the churche was the forme of breade yet here I will staye my selfe putting the reader in mynde that the communion hath ben ministred to some persons vnder the forme of wine onlye and hath ben taken for the whole Sacrament specially to such as for drynesse of their throte at their death could not swallow it downe vnder the forme of bread Serm. 5. de lapsis Whereas it appeareth by S. Cyprian and also by S. Augustine that the sacramēt was geuen to infantes in their tyme we fynde in S. Cyprian that when a deacon offred the cuppe of oure lordes bloude to a litle mayde childe which through defaulte of the nource had tasted of the sacrifices that had ben offered to deuilles the childe tourned awaye her face by the instincte of the diuine maiestie sayeth he closed fast her lippes and refused the cuppe but yet when the deacon had forced her to receiue a litle of the cuppe the yeax and vomite folowed so as that sanctified drinke in the bloude of oure lorde gowshed foorth of the polluted boilles If the Sacrament had ben geuen to this infant vnder the forme of breade before she would haue resused that no lesse then she dyd the cuppe that the deacon then would not haue geuen her the cuppe De cōsec distinct 4 can 4. si qui apud illos haereticos And that this may seme the lesse to be wondered at Ioannes Teutonicus that wrote scholies vpon Gratian witnesseth that euen in his tyme the custome was in some places to geue the Sacrament to infantes not by deliuering to them the bodye of Christ but by powring the bloude in to theire mowthes which custome hath ben vppon good confyderation abrogated in the church of Rome and kepte in the greke church as Lyre writeth vpon S. Ihon. The fourth councell of Carthago decreed Can. 76. if a mā in sicknes who was enioyned publike penaunce do demaunde his housel and er he dye fall in a phrenesie or becomme speacheles that the Sacrament be powred in to his mowthe To take this for the forme of wine we ar moued by the decree of the eleuenth councell Toletane Where it is sayde Can. 11. that the weake nature of man is wonte at the pointe of death to be so farre oppressed with drowth that it may be refreshed
substance which was crucified and shedde foorth for vs. Thus to the humble beleuers scripture it selfe ministreth sufficient argument of the truth of Christes body and bloude in the sacrament against the sacramentaries who holde opinion that it is there but in a figure signe or taken onely Againe we can not fynde where our lord performed the promise he made in the syxth chapter of Iohn The bread which I wil geue is my fleshe which I will geue for the lyfe of the worlde but onely in his last supper where if he gaue his fleshe to his Apostles and that none other but the very same which he gaue for the lyfe of the worlde it foloweth that in the blessed Sacrament is not mere bread but that same his very body in substance For it was not mere bread but his very body that was geuen and offred vp vpon the crosse If the wordes spoken by Christ in S. Iohn of promise that he performed in his holy supper The bread that I will geue is my fleshe had ben to be taken not as they seme to meane plainely and truly but metaphorically tropically symbolically and figuratiuely so as the truth of our lordes fleshe be excluded as our aduersaries do vnderstand them then the Capernaites had not had any occasion at all of their great offence Then shuld not they haue had cause to murmour against Christ as the Euāgelist sheweth The Iewes sayeth S. Iohn Stroue among them selues Cap. 6. saying how can he geue vs his fleshe to eate And much lesse his dere disciples to whom he had shewed so many and so great miracles to whom he had before declared so many parables and so high secretes shuld haue had any occasiō of offence And doubteles if Christ had meant they shuld eate but the signe or figure of his body they would not haue sayde Durus est hic sermo this is a hard saying and who can abyde to heare it For then shuld they haue done no greater thing then they had done oftentymes before in eating the Easter lambe And how could it seme a hard worde or saying if Christ had meant nothing elles but this the bread that I will geue is a figure of my body that shall cause you to remember me To conclude shortely If Christ would so haue ben vnderstanded as though he had meant to geue but a figure onely of his body it had ben no nede for him to haue alleaged his omnipotencie and almighty power to his disciples thereby the rather to bring them to beleefe of his true body to be geuen them to eate Hoc vos scandalizet doth this offende you sayeth he what if ye see the sonne of man ascende where he was before it is the Spirite that geueth lyfe c. As though he had sayde ye consyder onely my humanitie that semeth weake and fraile neither doo you esteme my diuine power by the great miracles I haue wrought But when as ye shall see me by power of my godhed ascend in to heauen from whence I came vnto you will ye then also stand in doubte whether ye-may beleue that I geue you my very body to be eaten Thus by signifyyng his diuine power Christ confownded their vnbeleefe touching the veritie and substance of his body that he promysed to geue them in meate What occasioned the fathers to vse these termes really substantially corporally c. These places of the scripture and many other reporting plainely that Christ at his supper gaue to his disciples his very body euen that same which the daye folowing suffered death on the Crosse haue ministred iust cause to the godly and learned fathers of the churche to saye that Christes body is present in this Sacrament really substantially corporally carnally and naturally By vse of which aduerbes they haue meant onely a truth of being and not a waye or meane of being And though this manner of speaking be not thus expressed in the scripture yet is it deduced out of the scripture For if Christ spake plainely and vsed no trope figure nor metaphore as the scripture it selfe sufficiently declareth to an hūble beleuer and would his disciples to vnderstand him so as he spake in manifest termes when he sayde This is my body which is geuen for you Thē may we saye that in the sacrament his very body is present yea really that is to saye in dede substantially that is in substāce and corporally carnally and naturally by which wordes is meant that his very body his very fleshe and his very humaine nature is there not after corporal carnal or natural wise but inuisibly vnspeakeably miraculousely supernaturally spiritually diuinely and by waye to him onely knowen And the fathers haue ben driuen to vse these termes for more ample and full declaratiō of the truth and also for withstanding and stopping obiections made by heretikes And because the catholike faith touching the veritie of Christes body in the Sacrament was not impugned by any man for the space of a thousand yeres after Christes being in earth and about that tyme Berengarius Berengarius first beganne openly to sowe the wicked sede of the sacramentarie heresie which then sone confuted by learned men and by the same first author abiured and recanted now is with no lesse wickednes but more busely and more earnestly set forth againe the doctoures that sythēs haue written in defence of the true and catholike faith herein haue more often vsed the termes a fore mentioned then the olde and auncient fathers that wrote within M. Iuelles syx hundred yeres after Christ who doubteles would no lesse haue vsed thē if that matter had ben in question or doubte in their tyme. And albeit these termes were straunge and newe as vsed within these fyue hundred yeres onely and that the people were neuer taught for syx hundred yeres after Christ as M. Iuell sayeth more boldly then truly and therefore more rashely then wysely yet the faith by them opened and declared is vniuersall and olde verely no lesse olde then ys our lordes supper where this Sacrament was first instituted Here before that I bring in places of auncient fathers reporting the same doctrine and in like termes as the catholike churche doth holde concerning this article least our opinion herein might happely appeare ouer carnall and grosse I thincke it necessary briefly to declare what maner a true bodie and bloud of Christ is in the sacrament Christ in him selfe hath but one fleshe and bloud in substāce which his godhed tooke of the virgine Mary once and neuer afterward lefte it of The fleshe and bloud of Christ is of double consyderation But this one fleshe and bloud in respecte of double qualitie hath a double consideration For at what tyme Christ lyued here in earth among men in the shape of man his fleshe was thrall and subiecte to the frailtie of mannes nature synne and ignorāce excepted That fleshe being passible vntil death the souldiers at the procurement of the Iewes
crucified And such maner bloud was at his passion shedde foorth of his body in sighte of them which were then present But after that Christ rose againe from the deade his body from that tyme forward euer remaineth immortall and liuely in dāger no more of any infirmitie or suffering much lesse of death but is become by diuine giftes and endowmētes a spirituall and a diuine body as to whom the godhed hath communicated diuine and godly properties and excellencies that ben aboue all mannes capacitie of vnderstanding This fleshe and body thus considered which sundry doctours call corpus spirituale deificatum a spirituall and deified body is geuen to vs in the blessed sacrament This is the doctrine of the church vttered by S. Hierome in his commentaries vppon th'Epistle to the Ephesians where he hath these wordes Lib. 1. ca. 1. Dupliciter verò sanguis caro intelligitur vel spiritualis illa atque diuina de qua ipse dixit Caro mea vere est cibus sanguis meus verè est potus Et nisi manducaueritis carnē meam sanguinem meum biberitis non habebitis vitam aeternam vel caro quae crucifixa est sanguis qui militis effusus est lancea that is The bloud and fleshe of Christ is vnderstanded two waies either that it is that spiritual and diuine fleshe of which he spake him selfe My fleshe is verely meate and my bloud is verely drinke And excepte ye eate my fleshe and drinke my bloud ye shall not haue lyfe in you Or that fleshe which was crucified and that bloud which was shedde by pearcing of the souldiers speare And to the intent a man shuld not take this differēce according to the substance of Christes fleshe and bloud but according to the qualitie onely S. Hierome bringeth a similitude of our fleshe as of which it hath ben in double respecte sayde Iuxta hanc diuisionem in sanctis etiam diuersitas sanguinis carnis accipitur vt alia sit caro quae visura est salutare Dei Luc. 3. alia caro sanguis quae regnum Dei nō queant possidere 1. Cor. 15. According to this diuision diuersitie of bloud and fleshe is to be vnderstanded in sainctes also so as there is one fleshe which shal see the saluacion of God and an other fleshe and bloud which may not possesse the kingdom of God Which two states of fleshe and bloud seme as it appeareth to the vnlearned quite contrarie But Saint Paul dissolueth this doubte in the fiftenth chapter of his first epistle to the Corinthians saying that fleshe of such sorte as we beare about vs in this lyfe earthly mortal fraile and bourthenouse to the soule can not possesse the kingdom of God because corruption shal not possesse incorruption But after resurrection we shal haue a spirituall gloriouse incorruptible and immortall flesh and like in figure to the gloriouse body of Christ as S. Paul sayeth This corruptible body must putte on incorruption and this mortall immortalitie Then such fleshe or our fleshe of that maner and sorte shall possesse the kingdom of God and shal beholde God him selfe And yet our fleshe now corruptible and then incorruptible is but one fleshe in substāce but diuerse in qualitie and propertie Euen so it is to be thought of our lordes fleshe as is afore sayde The due weghing of this differēce geueth much light to this matter and ought to staye many horrible blasphemies wickedly vttered against this most blessed Sacrament Now whereas M. Iuell denyeth that Christen people were of olde tyme taught to beleue that Christes body is really substantially corporally carnally or naturally in the Sacrament I doo plainely affirme the cōtrarie Yet I acknowledge that the learned fathers which haue so taught would not thereby seme to make it here outwardly sensible or perceptible Hom. 83. in Matt 60 ad popul Antiochen For they confesse all with Saint Chrysostome that the thing which is here geuen vs is not sensible but that vnder visible signes inuisible thinges be delyuered vnto vs. But they thought good to vse the aforesayed termes to put awaye all doubte of the being of his very body in these holy mysteries and to exclude the onely imagination phantasie figure signe token vertue or signification there of For in such wise the Sacramentaries haue vttered their doctrine in this pointe as they may seme by their manner of speaking and wryting here to represent our lordes body onely in deede being absent as kinges oftentymes are represented in a Tragedie or meane persones in a Comedie Verely the maner and waye by which it is here present and geuen to vs and receiued of vs is secrete not humaine ne naturall true for all that And we doo not atteine it by sense reason or nature but by faith For which cause we doo not ouer basely consyder and attende the visible elementes but as we are taught by the councell of Nice lifting vp our mynde and spirite we beholde by faith on that holy table put and layde so for the better signification of the real presence their terme sowndeth the Lambe of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that taketh awaye the synnes of the worlde And here saye they we receiue his pretiouse body and bloude 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to saye verely and in deede which is no other wise nor lesse then this terme really importeth And touching these termes fyrst Verely or which is all one Really and substantially me thinketh M. Iuell shuld beare the more with vs for vse of the same sith that Bucer him selfe one of the greatest learned men of that syde hath allowed them yea and that after much writing against Luther in defēce of Zuinglius and Oecolampadius by him set forth and after that he had assured him selfe of the truth in this article by diuine inspiration as most constantly he affirmeth with these wordes In responsione ad Lutherū Haec non dubitamus diuinitus nobis per scripturam reuelata de hoc sacramento We doubte not sayeth he but these thinges concerning this sacramēt be reueled vnto vs from god and by the scripture If you demaunde where this may be fownde in the actes of a Councell holden betwen the Lutheranes and Zuinglianes for this very purpose in Martine Luthers house at Wittenberg in the yere of our lord 1536. you shal fynde these wordes Audiuimus D. Bucerum explicantem suam sententiam de Sacramento corporis sanguinis Domini hoc modo Cum pane vino verè substantialiter adest exhibetur sumitur corpus Christi sanguis Et sacramentali vnione panis est corpus Christi porrecto pane verè adest verè exhibetur corpus Christi We haue heard M. Bucer declare his mynde touching the sacrament of the body and bloud of our Lord in this sorte With the bread and wyne the body of Christ and his bloud is present exhibited and receiued
the table of Christ and doo take of his body and bloud but they doo adore onely and be not also fylled for as much as they doo not folowe him Likewise in his exposition vpon that Psalme In Psal 2◠All the riche also sayeth he there of the earth haue eaten the body of the humblenes of their lord neither haue they ben fylled as the poore vntill the folowing But yet they haue adored and worshipped it that is by adoration they haue acknowleged Christ their lord there present Furthermore writing against Faustus the heretike of the Maniches secte amongest other thinges he sheweth how the Ethnikes thought that christē people for the honour they dyd before the blessed Sacramēt that is of the bread and wyne consecrated dyd honor Bacchus and Ceres which were false goddes honoured of the Gentiles for the inuention of wyne and corne Whereof may iustly be gathered an argument that in those dayes faithfull people worshipped the body and bloud of Christ in the Sacramēt vnder the formes of bread and wyne For elles the infidelles could not haue suspected them of doing idolatrie to Bacchus and Ceres One other most euident place touching this honour and adoration we fynde in him rehearsed by Gratian. lib. Sent. Prosperi De consecrat dist 2 can Nos autem we doo honour sayeth he in forme of bread and wyne which we see thinges inuisible that is to faye fleshe and bloud Neither take we likewise these two formes as we tooke them before consecration Sith that we doo faithfully graunt that before cōsecration it is bread and wyne which nature hath shapte but after cōsecration fleshe and bloud of Christ which the blessing of the priest hath consecrated Leauing a number of places that might be alleaged out of the auncient fathers for the confirmation of this matter to auoyde tediousnes I will conclude with that most plaine place of Theodoritus Who speaking of the outward signes of the Sacrament sayeth that notwithstanding they remaine after the mysticall blessing in the proprietie of their former nature as those that may be sene and felte nolesse then before yet they are vnderstanded and beleued to be the thinges which they are made by vertue of cōsecratiō and are worshipped with godly honour His wordes be these Intelligūtur ea esse quae facta sunt Dialogo 2 creduntur adorātur vt quae illa sint quae credūtur These mysticall signes sayeth he are vnderstāded to be those thinges which they are made and so they are beleued and are adored as being the thīges which they are beleued to be With which wordes Theodoritus affirmeth bothe the reall presence and also the adoration The reall presence in that he sayeth these outward signes or tokens after consecration to be made thinges which are not sene but vnderstanded and beleued whereby he signifieth the inuisible thing of this Sacrament the body and bloud of Christ Adoratiō he teacheth with expresse termes and that because through power of the mysticall blessing the signes be in existence and in dede the thinges which they are beleued to be soothly the body and bloud of Christ For otherwise god forbydde that christen people shuld be taught to adore and worship the insensible creatures bread and wyne Of which he sayeth that they are adored not as signes not so in no wise but as being the thinges which they are beleued to be Now I reporte me to the Christen reader whether this Adoratiō of the Sacrament whereby we meane the godly worship of Christes body in the Sacrament be a newe deuise or no brought into the church but lately about three hūdred yeres past Fol. 20. as M. Iuell maketh him selfe sure of it in his sermon And whereas vtterly to abolishe this adoration Fol. 26. he alleageth great danger of idolatrie in case the priest do not truly cōsecrate thereto may be answered Gen. 29. that Iacob stoode in no danger of conscience for that by the procurement of Laban he laye with Lya in stede of Rachel neither for the same was he to be charged with aduowtrie because he meāt good faith and thought him selfe to haue had the companie of his wyfe Rachel So idolatrie is not to be imputed vnto him that worshippeth Christ with godly honour in the bread not cōsecrate which of good faith he thinketh to be consecrate Touching this case S. Augustine hath this notable saying Inchi 60 We haue nede sayeth he to put a difference in oure iudgemēt and to knowe good from euyll for as much as Sathan chaunging his shape sheweth him selfe as an angell of light least through deceite he leade vs a syde to some perniciouse thinges For when he deceiueth the senses of the bodye and remoueth not the mynde from true and right meaning wherein ech man leadeth a faithfull lyfe there is no perill in religion Or if whē he fayneth him selfe good and doth or sayeth those thinges that of congruence perteine to good angels although he be thought to be good this is not a perilouse or sickely errour of Christian faith But when as by these thinges he begynneth to bring vs to thinges quite contrarie then to knowe him from the good Spirite and not to go after him it standeth vs much vpon diligently to watche and take heede Thus S. Augustine This much for th'adoration of the Sacrament or rather of Christ in the Sacrament maye suffise Or that the Sacrament was then or now ought Iuell to be hanged vp vnder a Canopie Of the reuerent hanging vp of the Sacrament vnder a Canopie ARTICLE IX IF M. Iuell would in plaine termes denye the reseruatiō and keping of the blessed Sacrament for which purpose the Pyxe and Canopie serued in the Churches of England as of the professours of this newe gospell it is bothe in word and also in dede denyed it were easy to proue the same by no small number of auctorities such as him selfe can not but allowe for good and sufficient But he knowing that right well guilefully refrayneth from mētion of that principall matter and the better to make vp his heape of Articles for some shewe against the Sacrament by denyall reproueth the hanging vp of it vnder the Canopie thereby shewing him selfe like to Momus who espying nothing reproueable in fayer Venus fownde faulte with her slypper Whereto we saye that if he with the rest of the Sacramentaries would agree to the keping of the Sacramēt thē would we demaunde why that maner of keping were not to be liked And here vpon proufes made of defaulte in this behalfe and a better waye shewed in so small a matter conformitie to the better would sone be persuaded Diuerse maners of keping the blessed Sacrament In other christen countries we graunt it is kepte otherwise vnder locke and keye in some places at the one ende or syde of the aulter in some places in a chappell buylded for that purpose in some places in the vestrie or in some inward
hanging vp of it or for the Canopie Iuell Or that in the Sacrament after the wordes of Consecration there remayneth only the accidentes and shewes without the substance of breade and wyne Of the remaining of the Accidentes vvithout their substance in the Sacrament ARTICLE X. IN this Sacrament after consecration nothing in substaÌ„ce remayneth that was before neither breade nor wine but onely the Accidentes of breade and wine as their forme and shape sauour smell colour weight and such the like which here haue their being miraculously without their subiecte for as much as after consecration there is none other substance then the substance of the body and bloud of our lord which is not affected with such accidentes as the scholasticall doctours terme it Which doctrine hath alwayes though not with these precise termes ben taught and beleued from the beginning TransubstantiatioÌ„ affirmed and depeÌ„deth of the Article of Transubstantiation For if the substance of bread and wyne be chaunged in to the substance of the body and bloud of our lord which is coÌ„stantly affirmed by all the learned and auncient fathers of the churche it foloweth by a necessary sequell in nature and by drifte of reason that then the accidentes onely remaine For witnes and proufe whereof I will not let to recite certaine most manifest sayinges of the olde and best approued doctours S. Cyprian that learned bishop and holy martyr sayeth thus in sermone de coena domini Panis iste quem dominus discipulis porrigebat non effigie sed natura mutatus omnipotentia verbi factus est caro This bread which our lord gaue to his disciples chaunged not in shape but in nature by the almighty power of the word he meaneth Christes word of ConsecratioÌ„ is made fleshe Lo he confesseth the breade to be chaunged not in shape or forme for that remayneth but in nature that is to saye in substance And to signifie the chaunge of substance and not an accideÌ„tarie chaunge onely to witte from the vse of common breade to serue for Sacramentall bread as some of our newe Maisters doo expounde that place for a shifte he addeth great weight of wordes whereby he farre ouerpeiseth these mennes light deuise saying that by the almighty power of our lordes word it is made fleshe Verely they might consyder as they would seme to be of sharpe iudgement that to the performance of so small a matter as their sacramentall chaunge is the almighty power of gods worde is not nedefull And now if here this worde factus est may signifie an imaginatiue making then why may not verbum caro factum est likewise be expounded to the defence of sundry olde haynouse heresies against the true manhod of Christ Thus the nature of the bread in this sacrament being chaunged and the forme remayning so as it seme breade as before consecration and being made our lordes fleshe by vertue of the word the substance of bread changed into that most excellent substance of the fleshe of Christ of that which was before the accidentes remaine onely without the substance of breade The like is to be beleued of the wyne De consecrat dist 2 caâ— omnia quaecuÌ„que Nothing can be playner to this purpose then the sayinges of S. Ambros. Licet figura panis vini videatur nihil tamen aliud quam caro Christi et sanguis post consecrationem credendum est Although sayeth he the forme of bread and wyne be sene yet after consecration we must beleue they are nothing elles but the fleshe and bloud of Christ After the opinion of this father the shewe and figure of breade and wyne are sene and therefore remaine after coÌ„secratioÌ„ And if we must beleue that which was breade and wyne before to be no other thing but the fleshe and bloud of Christ then are they no other thing in dede For if they were we might so beleue For beleefe is grownded vpon truth and what so euer is not true it is not to be beleued Hereof it foloweth that after consecratioÌ„ the accideÌ„tes and shewes onely remayne without the substaÌ„ce of breade and wyne De SacrameÌ„tis lib. 4. cap. 4. In an other place he sayeth as much Panis iste etc. This bread before the wordes of the SacrameÌ„tes is bread as sone as the coÌ„secratioÌ„ coÌ„meth of bread is made the body of Christ Againe in an other place he sayeth most plainely De ijs qui initiaÌ„tur That the power of consecration is greatter then the power of nature because nature is chaunged by consecration By this father it is euident that the nature that is to saye the substance of breade and wine by consecration being chaunged into the body and bloude of Christ their natural qualities which be accidentes contynewing vnchaunged for performance of the Sacrament remayne without the substance of bread and wyne According vnto the which meaning Theodoritus sayeth videri tangi possunt sicut prius Dialog 2. IntelliguÌ„tur autem ea esse quae facta sunt creduntur The breade and wyne may be sene and felte as before coÌ„secratioÌ„ but they are vnderstaÌ„ded to be the thinges which they are made and beleued We do not in like sorte sayeth S. Augustine take these two formes of breade and wine after coÌ„secratioÌ„ as we tooke them before In lib SeÌ„tent Prosperi de coÌ„se dict 2. ca. Nos autem Sith that we graunt faithfully that before consecration it is bread and wyne that nature hath shapte but after consecration that it is the fleshe and bloud of Christ that the blessing hath consecrated De verbis domini SecunduÌ„ LucaÌ„ Sermone 28. In an other place he sayeth that this is not the bread which goeth in to the body meaning for bodily sustenance but that bread of life qui animae nostrae substantiam fulcit which susteineth the substance of our soule No maÌ„ can speake more plainely hereof then Cyrillê° Hierosolymitanus an olde auctor who wrote in greke and is extant but as yet remayning in written haÌ„de and commen to the sighte of fewe learned men His wordes be not much vnlike the wordes of the scole-doctoures Praebetur corpus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in specie siue figura panis Item praebetur sanguis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Christes body sayeth he is geuen vs in forme or figure of bread Againe his bloud is geuen vs in forme of wine A litle after these wordes he sayeth thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 etc. Ne mentem adhibeas quasi pani vino nudis sunt enim haec corpus sanguis vt Dominus pronunciauit Nam tametsi illud tibi sensus suggerit esse scilicet panem vinum nudum tamen firmet te fides ne gustatu rem dijudices quin potius pro certo ac comperto habe omni duhitatione relicta esse tibi impartitum corpus sanguinem Christi Consyder not sayeth this father these as bare bread and wyne For these are his body
and bloud as our lord sayde For although thy sense reporte to thee so much that it is bare bread and wyne yet let thy faith staye thee and iudge not thereof by thy taste but rather be right well assured all doubte put a parte that the body and bloud of Christ is geuen to thee Againe he sayeth thus in the same place Haec cum scias pro certo explorato habeas qui videtur esse panis noÌ„ esse sed corpus Christi item quod videtur vinum non esse quanquam id velit sensus sed sanguinem Christi ac de eo prophetam dixisse panis cor hominis confirmat firma ipse cor sumpto hoc pane vtpote spirituali Where as thou knowest this for a very certainetie that that which semeth to be wyne is not wyne albeit the sense maketh that accompte of it but the bloud of Christ and that the prophete therereof sayde bread strengthneth the hart of man strengthen thou thy selfe thy harte by taking this bread as that which is spirituall And in 3. Catechesi this father sayeth Panis Eucharistiae post inuocationem sancti Spiritus non amplius est panis nudus simplex Sed corpus etc. The bread of the Sacrament after prayer made to the holy ghost is not bare and simple bread but the body of Christ Now sith that by this doctours plaine declaratioÌ„ of the catholike faith in this point we ought to beleue and to be verely assured that the bread is no more bread after coÌ„secration but the very body of Christ and the wyne no more wyne but his pretiouse bloud though they seme to the eye otherwise though taste and feeling iudge otherwise and to be shorte though all senses reporte the contrary and all this vpon warrant of our lordes word who sayde these to be his body and bloud and that as he teacheth not in the bread and wyne And further sith we are taught by Eusebius Emisenus in his homilies of Easter to beleue terrena coÌ„mutari transire the earthly thinges to be chaunged and to passe againe creaturas conuerti in substantiam corporis Christi the creatures of bread and wyne to be tourned in to the substaÌ„ce of our lordes body and bloud which is the very traÌ„substantiation Transubstantion In Liturgia And sith Chrysostom sayeth Panem absumi that the bread is consumed awaie by the substance of Christes bodye And Damascen Lib. 4. de orthodoxa fi c. 14. In Mar. 14 bread and wine traÌ„smutari supernaturaliter to be chaunged aboue the course of nature and Theophylact the bread transelementari in carnem domini to be quite tourned by chaunging of the elementes that is the matter or substance it consisteth of into the fleshe of our lorde and in an other place In Matth. 26. ineffabili operatione traÌ„sformari etiamsi panis nobis videatur that the bread is traÌ„sformed or chaunged into an other substantiall forme he meaneth that of our lordes body by vnspeakeable working though it seme to be bread The treatises of these greke vvriters haue ben set forth of late by one Claudius de Sainctes Finally sith that the greke Doctours of late age affirme the same doctrine among whom Samona vseth for persuasion of it the similitude which Gregorie Nyssene and Damascen for declaration of the same vsed before which is that in consecration such maner transubstantiation is made as is the conuersion of the bread in nourrishing in which it is tourned into the substance of the nourrished Methonensis like S. Ambrose would not men in this matter to looke for the order of nature seing that Christ was borne of a virgine besyde all order of nature and sayeth that our lordes bodye in this Sacrament is receiued vnder the forme or shape of an other thing least bloud shuld cause it to be horrible Nicolaus Cabasila sayeth that this bread is no more a figure of our lordes bodye Cap. 27. neither a gifte bearing an image of the true gifte nor bearing any description of the passioÌ„s of our Sauiour him selfe as it were in a table but the true gifte it selfe the most holy bodye of our lord it selfe which hath truly receiued reproches contumelies stripes which was crucified which was kylled Marcus Ephesius though otherwise to be reiected as he that obstinatly resisted the determination of the Councell of Florence concerning the proceding of the holy ghost out of the sonne yet a sufficient witnes of the Greke churches faith in this point affirming the thinges offred to be called of S. Basile antitypa that is the samplers and figures of our lordes bodye because they be not yet perfitely consecrated but as yet bearing the figure and image referreth the chaunge or transubstantiation of them to the holy ghost donec Spiritus sanctus adueniat qui ea muter these giftes offered sayeth he be of S. Basile called figures vntill the holy ghost come vpon them to chaunge them Whereby he sheweth the faith of the Greke church that through the holy ghost in consecration the bread and wine are so chaunged as they maye no more be called figures but the very bodye and bloud of our lord it selfe as into the same chaunged by the comming of the holy ghost Which chaunge is a chaunge in substance and therefore it may rightly be termed traÌ„substaÌ„tiation TransubstaÌ„tiatioÌ„ which is nothing elles but a tourning or chaunging of one substance into an other substance Sith for this point of our religioÌ„ we haue so good auctoritie and being thus assured of the infallible faith of the churche declared by the testimonies of these worthy fathers of diuerse ages and quarters of the worlde we may well saye with the same churche against M. Iuell that in this Sacrament after consecration there remayneth nothing of that which was before but only the accidentes and shewes without the substance of bread and wyne And this is a matter to a Christen man not hard to beleue For if it please God the almightie Creator in the condition and state of thinges thus to ordeine that substaÌ„ces created beare and susteine accideÌ„tes why may not he by his almighty power coÌ„serue and kepe also accideÌ„tes without substaÌ„ce sith that the very hethen philosophers repute it for an absurditie to saye primam causam non posse id praestare solam quod possit cum secunda that is to saye that the first cause whereby they vnderstand God can not doo that alone which he can doo with the secoÌ„d cause where by they meane a creature And that this being of accidentes without substance or subiecte in this SacrameÌ„t vnder which the bread not remaining the bodye of Christ is present maye the rather be beleued it is to be consydered that this thing tooke place at the first creatioÌ„ of the world Basilius hexaemeroÌ„ hom 6 Damas li. 2. cap. 7. Paulê° Burgensis Gene. 1. after the opinion of some Doctoures Who do affirme that that first light which was at
also and that chiefly a diuine thinge vnder them according to christes promisse couertly conteined specially this being weyed that this most holy Sacramēt consisteth of these two thinges to witte of the visible forme of the outward elemētes and the inuisible fleshe and bloud of Christ that is to saye of the Sacrament and of the thing of the sacrament Tertullian may seme to speake of these two partes of the sacramēt ioyntly in this one sentēce For first he speaketh most plainely of the very body of Christ in the Sacramēt and of the maruelouse tournīg of the breade into the same the breade sayeth he that he tooke and gaue to his disciples he made it his body Which is the diuine thing of the sacramēt Then forthwith he sayeth that our lord dyd it by sayng This is my body that is the figure of my body By which wordes he sheweth the other parte the sacramēt onely that is to saye that holy outward signe of the forme of breade vnder which forme Christes body into the which the breade by gods power is tourned is conteined which outward forme is verely the figure of Christes body present which our lord vnder the same conteined delyuered to his disciples and now is likewise at that holy table to the faithfull people delyuered where the order of the catholike churche is not broken That Tertullian in this place is so to be vnderstanded we are taught by the great learned bishop saint Augustine and by Hilarius who was bishop of Rome nexte after Leo the first Saint Augustines wordes be these De cōsec dist 2. canon vtrūsub figura Corpus Christi veritas figura est Veritas dum corpus Christi sanguis in virtute Spiritus sancti ex panis vini substantia efficitur Figura verò est quod exterius sentitur The body of Christ is both the truth and the figure The truth whiles the body of Christ and his bloud by the power of the holy ghost is made of the substance of bread and wine And it is the figure that is with outward sense perceiued Where S. Augustine here sayeth the body and bloude of Christ to be made of the substance of bread and wine beware thou vnlearned man thou thinke not them thereof to be made as though they were newely created of the matter of bread and wine neither that they be made of breade and wine as of a matter but that where bread and wine were before after consecration there is the very body and bloud of Christ borne of the virgine Mary and that in substance in sorte and maner to our weake reason incomprehensible Dist 2. cano corpus Christi The wordes of Hilarius the Pope vtter the same doctrine Corpus Christi quod sumitur de altari figura est dum panis vinum videtur extrà Veritas autem dum corpus Christi interius creditur The body of Christ which is receiued from the aulter is the figure whiles bread and wine are sene outwardly And it is the truth whiles the body and bloud of Christ are beleued inwardly Thus the fathers call not onely the sacramēt but also the body and bloud of Christ it selfe in the sacrament sometymes the truth sometymes a figure the truth that is to witte the very and true body and bloud of Christ a figure in respecte of the maner of being of the same there present which is really and substantially but inuisibly vnder the visible forme of the outward elementes And so Tertullian meaneth by his that is the figure of my body as though Christ had shewed by the word Hoc that which was visible which verely is the figure of the body right so as that which is the inuisible inward thing is the truth of the body Which interpretation of Tertullian in dede is not according to the right sense of Christes wordes though his meaning swarue not from the truth For where as our lord sayde this is my body he meant not so as though he had sayde the outward forme of the Sacrament which here I delyuer to you is a figure of my body vnder the same conteined for as much as by these wordes Hoc est he shewed not the visible forme of breade but the substance of his very body in to which by his diuine power he tourned the bread And therefore none of all the fathers euer so expownded those wordes of Christ but cōtrary wise namely Theophylacte and Damascen He sayd not sayeth Theophylact This is a figure In Matth. cap. 26. Lib. 4. ca. 14. but this is my body The bread nor the wyne meaning their outward formes sayeth Damascen is not a figure of the body and bloud of Christ Not so in no wise But it is the body it selfe of our lord deificated sith our lord him selfe sayeth This is my body not the figure of my body but my body and not the figure of my bloud but my bloud etc. And the cause why Tertullian so expownded these wordes of Christ was that thereby he might take aduantage against Marcion the heretike as many tymes the fathers in heate of disputatiō doo hādle some places not after the exacte signification of the wordes but rather folowe such waye as serueth thē best to confut their aduersarie Which maner not reporting any vntruth S. Basile doth excuse in the setting forth of a disputation not in prescribing of a doctrine Epist 64. As he defendeth Gregorius Neocaesariensis against the Sabellianes for that in a contentiō he had with Aelianus an Ethnike to declare the mysteries of the trinitie he vsed the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in stede of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And the learned men that be well sene in the fathers knowe they must vse a discretion and a sundry iudgement betwen the thinges they write agonisticῶs that is to saye by waye of contention or disputation and the thinges they vtter dogmaticῶs that is by waie of setting forth a doctrine or matter of faith Neither in that contention dyd Tertullian so much regard the exacte vse of wordes as how he might wynne his purpose and driue his aduersarie denying that Christ tooke the true body of man and that he suffered death in dede to confesse the truth which he thought to bring to passe by deducing an argument from the figure of his body which consisteth in that which is visible in the sacrament to proue the veritie of his body and therefore in framing his reason by waie of illation he sayeth Figura autem non esset nisi veritatis esset corpus There were not a figure onlesse there were a body of truth or a very body in dede And whereas Tertullian vseth this word figure in this place it is not to be vnderstanded to be such The vvordes figure signe token etc. exclude not the truth as the figures of the olde testament bee as though it signified the shewing of a thing to come or of a thing absent which is wonte to
is not specially forbydden And by that all may be witnesses which are not specially forbyddē all may make their proctoures to answere for thē in iudgemēt which are not forbyddē in the speciall prohibitiō for that the edictes of proctoures and witnesses are prohibitorie L. Iulia. ff de testibus And because Lex Iulia dyd forbydde a womā condēned for adulterie to beare witnesse in iudgement thereof the texte of the Ciuill lawe concludeth that women maye beare witnesse in iudgement Exceptio cōfirmat regulam in nō exceptis And they saye further that exception in one case confirmeth the generall rule and maketh the reste that is not excepted more sure and stable and to be in force in contrary sense to the exception But I will not bring M. Iuell out of his professed studie to farre to seeke lawes For in dede we nede not go to lawe for these matters wherein the church hath geuen sentence for vs but that our aduersaries refuse the iudge after sentence Which if they had done when order permitteth it at the begynning and had plainely as I feare me some of them thinke denyed them selues to be Christians or at least of Christes courte in his catholike churche we shuld not haue stryued so long about these matters We would haue imbraced the truth of God in his church quietly whiles they sought an other iudge according to their appetites and phantasies as Turkes and infidelles doo Now if M. Iuell be not so precise in his iudgemēt of allowing the first six hundred yeres after Christ as to condemne the churche that folowed in the nexte generatiō then we may alleage vnto him the twelfth councell of Toledo in Spaine holden in the yere of our lorde 680. for proufe that many Masses were celebrated in one churche in one daye For the same appeareth plainely by this decree of the fathers there Can. ◠Relatum nobis est quosdam de sacerdotibus non tot vicibus communionis sanctae gratiam sumere quot sacrificia in vna die videntur offerre sed in vno die si plurima per se Deo offerant sacrificia in omnibus se oblationibus à cōmunione suspendunt in sola tantum extrema sacrificij oblatione communionis sanctae gratiam sumunt quasi non sit toties illis vero singulari sacrificio participandum quoties corporis sanguinis Domini nostri Iesu Christi immolatio facta constiterit Nam ecce Apostolus dicit Nonne qui edunt hostias participes sunt altaris 1. Cor. 10. Certū est quòd hi qui sacrificantes non edunt rei sunt dominici sacramenti Quicunque ergo sacerdotum deinceps diuino altario sacrificium oblaturus accesserit se a cōmunione suspenderit ub ipsa qua se indecēter priuauit gratia communionis anno vno repulsum se nouerit Nam quale erit illud sacrificium cui nec ipse sacrificans particeps esse cognoscitur Ergo modis omnibus est tenendum vt quotiescunque sacrificans corpus sanguinem Iesu Christi Domini nostri in altario immolat toties perceptionis corporis sanguinis Christi se participem praebeat It is shewed vnto vs that there be certaine priestes who doo not receiue the grace of the holy cōmunion so many tymes how many sacrifices they seme to offer in one daye But if they offer vp to God many facrifices by them selues in one daye in all those oblatiōs they suspend them selues from the cōmunion and receiue the grace of the holy cōmunion onely at the last oblation of the sacrifice as though they ought not so oftētymes to be partakers of that true and singular sacrifice as the sacrifice of the body and bloude of our lorde Iesus Christ hath ben done For beholde the Apostle sayeth 1. Cor. 10. Be not they which eate sacrifices partakers of the aulter It is certaine that they who dooing sacrifice doo not eate be gylty of our lordes sacrament Wherefore what priest so euer hereafter shal come vnto the holy aulter to offer sacrifice and suspend him selfe from the communiō be it knowē vnto him that he is repelled and thrust awaye from the grace of the communion whereof he hath vnsemely bereued him selfe whereby is meant that he standeth excōmunicate for the space of one yere For what a sacrifice shall that bee whereof neither he him selfe that sacrificeth is knowen to be partaker wherefore by all meanes this is to be kepte that how oftentymes so euer the priest doth sacrifice the body and bloude of Iesus Christ our lorde on the aulter so oftentymes he receiue and make him selfe partaker of the body and bloude of Christ Sacrifice taken for the Masse Here by the word Sacrifice and offering of the sacrifice the fathers vnderstande the dayly sacrifice of the churche which we call the Masse For though the word Missa be of great antiquitie and many tymes fownde in the fathers yet they vse more commonly the word Sacrifice Neither can the enemies of this sacrifice expounde this canon of the inward sacrifices of a mannes harte but of that sacrifice which the priest cometh to the holy aulter to offer of the sacrifice of the body and bloude of Christ our lorde offered on the aulter for so be their wordes where he receiueth the grace of the holy cōmunion which is the participation of the body and bloude of our lorde This much graunted as by any reasonable vnderstanding it can not be drawen nor by racking can be stretched to any other sense we haue here good auctoritie for the hauing of many Masses in one churche in one daye And where as the fathers of that councell allowed many Masses in one daye sayde by one priest there is no reason why they shuld not allowe the same sayd by sundry priestes in one daye If our aduersaries saye this might haue ben done in sundry places whereby they may seme to frustrate our purpose touching this article we answere that besyde th'approuing of the Masse by thē so cōfessed it were vaine and fryuolouse to imagine such gadding of the priestes from churche to churche for saying many Masses in one daye Doubtelesse the fathers of that Toletane Councell meant of many Masses sayd in one place in a daye as Leo dyd for seruing the faithfull peoples deuotion that resorted to churche at sundry houres as we see the people doo now that so all might be satisfied Which shuld not haue ben if one Masse onely had ben sayde If M. Iuell agnise and accepte for good the auctoritie of this Councell as the churche doth then must he allowe these many thinges which he and the Sacramentaries to the vttermost of their power and cunning labour to disproue and deface First the blessed sacrifice of the Masse which the fathers of this councell call the true and singular sacrifice the sacrifice of the body and bloud of our lord IESVS CHRIST the sacrifice of the body and bloud of Iesus Christ our lorde which
the priest offereth on the aulter Nexte the truth and reall presence of the body and bloud of our lorde in the sacrifice offered Then aulters which this councell calleth diuine or holy for the diuine and holy thinges on them offered the body and bloud of Christ Furthermore the multitude of Masses in one daye for they speake of many sacrifices that is many Masses plurima sacrificia Lastly priuate Masses For the wordes nec ipse sacrificans rightly cōstrewed and weighed importe no lesse For where as no worde in this decree is vttered whereby it maye appeare the people to be of necessitie requyred to receiue if the priestes had receiued them selues at euery Masse no faulte had ben fownde And if the people had receiued without the priestes in this case it had ben reason this decree shuld other wise haue ben expressed And so it is cleare that at that tyme priuate Masses were sayde and done Now if M. Iuell refuse and reiecte the auctoritie of the churche represented in that councell then he geueth vs a manifest notice what marke we ought to take him to be of Then may we saye vnto him the wordes of S. Paul 1. Cor. 11. Nos talem confuetudinem non habemus nec ecclesia Dei We haue no such custome neither the churche of God hath not to condemne the churche And in this case he must pardon vs if according to the precepte of Christ Matth. 18. for that he will not heare the churche we take him for no better then a hethen and a publican Or that Images were then set vp in the Churches Iuell to the intent the people might worship them Of Images ARTICLE XIIII THat Images were set vp in churches within syx hundred yeres after Christ it is certaine but not specially either then or sithens to the intent the people might worship them The intēt and purpose hath ben farre other but right godly as shall be declared Wherefore the imputing of this entēt to the catholike church is both false and also sclaunderouse And because for the vse of images these newe maisters charge the church with reproche of a newe deuise breache of Gods cōmaundemēt and idolatrie I will here shewe first the Antiquitie of Images and by whom they haue ben allowed Secondly to what entent and purpose they serue Thirdly how they maye be worshiped without offence Concerning the Antiquitie and originall of images they were not first inuented by man Antiquitie of Images but commaunded by God brought into vse by tradition of the Apostles allowed by auctoritie of the holy fathers and all councelles and by custome of all ages sith Christes being in the earth When God would the Tabernacle with all fourniture thereto belonging to be made to serue for his honour and glorie he commaunded Moses among other thinges to make two Cherubins of beaten golde Exod. 25. so as they might couer bothe sydes of the propitiatorie spreading abroade their whinges and beholding them selues one an other their faces tourned toward the propitiatorie that the Arke was to be couered with all Of those Cherubins S. Paul speaketh in his epistle to the Hebrewes Cap. 9. Exod. 37. Which images Beseleel that excellent workeman made at the commaundement of Moses according to the instructions by God geuen Againe Moses by the commaundement of God made the brasen Serpent Num. 21. and set it vp on high for the people that were hurt of serpentes in wildernes to behold and so to be healed In the temple also that Salomon buylded ◠Reg. 6. ◠Paral. 3. were images of Cherubins as the scripture sheweth Of Cherubins mention is made in sundry places of the scriptures specially in Ezechiel the prophet cap. 41. Iosephus writeth of the same in his third and eight booke antiquitatum Iudaicarum The image of Cherubins representeth angels and the word is a word of angelical dignitie as it appeareth by the third chapter of Genesis where we read that God placed Cherubins before paradise after that Adam was cast forth for his disobedience It were not much besyde our purpose here to rehearse the place of Ezechiel the prophet Ezechi 9. where God commaunded one that was clothed in lynnen and had an ynkhorne by his syde to go through the myddes of Hierusalem and to prynt the signe of Tau In cōmētar in Ezechielem The signe of the Crosse cōmēded to men by gods prouidence that is the signe of the Crosse for that letter had the similitude of the Crosse among the old Hebrewe letters as Saint Hierom witnesseth in the foreheddes of the men that moorned and made moue ouer all the abominations of that citie Touching the signe Image or figure of the Crosse in the tyme of the new testament God femeth by his prouidence and by speciall warninges in sundry reuelatiōs and secrete declaratiōs of his will to haue commended the same to men Euseb eccles hist lib. 9. ca. 9 that they shuld haue it in good regard and remembraunce When Constātine the Emperour had prepared him selfe to warre against Maxentius the tyraunt casting in his mynde the great daungers that might thereof ensue and calling to God for helpe as he lookte vp beheld as it were in a visiō the signe of the crosse appearing vnto him in heauen as bright as fyer and as he was astonied with that straunge sight 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sozomen tripart hist lib. 5. cap. 50. he heard a voice speaking thus vnto him Constantine in this ouercomme After that Iulian the Emperour had forsaken the profession of Christen Religion and had done sacrifice at the temples of painyms mouing his subiectes to doo the like as he marched forward with his armie on a daye the droppes of rayne that fell downe out of the ayer in a shewer fourmed and made tokens and signes of the crosse both in his and also in the souldiers garmentes Eccles histor lib. 10 in fine Rufinus hauing declared the straunge and horrible plages of God whereby the Iewes were frayed and letted from their vaine attempte of buylding vp againe the temple at Hierusalem leaue thereto of the Emperour Iulian in despite of the christians obteyned in the ende sayeth that least those earthquakes and terrible fyers which he speaketh of raysed by God whereby as well the work houses and preparations toward the buylding as also great multitudes of the Iewes were throwē downe cast abroade and destroyed shuld be thought to happen by chaunce the night folowing these plages the signe of the crosse appeared in euery one of their garmētes so euidētly as none to cloke their infidelitie was able by any kynde of thing to scowre it out and put it awaye Histo tripart li. 9. Cap. 29. When the temples of the painims were destroyed by the christians in Alexandria about the yere of our lord 390. in the chiefe temple of all which was of the Idol Serapis the holy and mysticall letters called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
meum c. The priest sayeth Bessarion after the rite or maner of the east churche pronounceth with a lowde voice those wordes this is my body c. Which maner of lowde pronouncing was thought good to be vsed in the Greke churche as it may be gathered by that Bessarion writeth who being a Greke borne and brought vp in learning amongest the Grekes knewe rightwell the order of that churche to the intent the people might therby for the better mainetenaunce of their faith be styrred and warned to geue tokē of cōsent and of beleefe thereto when the priest sayeth he pronounceth those wordes with a lowde voice the people standyng by in vtraque parte that is first at the consecration of the body and agayne at the consecration of the bloude answereth amen as though they sayde thus truly so it is as thou sayest For where as Amen is an aduerbe of affirmyng in Hebrue in Greke it signifieth so much as truly And therefore the people answering Amen to those wordes verely saie they these giftes sette forth are the body and bloude of Christ So we beleue so we confesse This farre Bessarion It is declared by Clement lib. 8. constitut Apostolicarum that the people sayde Amen when the wordes of consecration had ben pronounced Whereby we vnderstande that order to haue ben taken by the Apostles The same custome also maye be gathered out of S. Ambrose who sayeth thus Dicit tibi sacerdos corpus Christi tu dicis Amen hoc est verum quod confitetur lingua teneat affectus de sacramētis lib. 4. ca. 5. The priest sayeth the body of Christ and thou sayest amen that is to saye true Holde with thy harte that which thou confessest with thy tonge He sayeth hereof likewise de ijs qui initiantur mysterijs cap. 9. Frustrà ab illis respondetur Amen c. Serm. 6. de ieiunio 7. mensis Amen is answered in vaine by them who dispute against that which is receiued sayeth Leo. And that the people shuld geue their consent and applie their faith to this truth without errour and deceite and that by saying Amen they shuld then beleue and confesse the breade and wine to be made the body and bloude of Christ when it was made in deede and not elles for so were it a great errour De ecclesiasticis diuersis capitulis cōstitut 123. for this cause Iustinian the Emperour made an ordinaunce that the bishoppes and priestes shuld to this intēt pronoūce their seruice plainely distinctly and so as it might be vnderstanded that the people might answere Amen wich is to be referred to eche parte of the seruice but specially to the consecration that they might beleue and confesse it was the body and bloude of Christ when it was in deede and not so confesse when it was not which might happen if they hearde not the wordes of consecratiō plainely pronounced And hereunto specially that Constitution of Iustinian is to be restrayned as perteining onely to the Greke churche wherein he lyued and not to be stretched further to serue for proufe of all the seruice to be had and sayde in the vulgare tonge in the West churche as to that purpose of our newe teachers it is vntruly alleaged Now in this West churche which is the latine churche the people hauing ben sufficiently instructed touching the beleefe of the body and bloude of our lord in the Sacrament it hath ben thought by the fathers conuenient the wordes of consecration to be pronounced by the priest closely and in silence rather then with open voice Wherein they had speciall regarde to the dignitie of that high mysterie And doubteles for this point they vnderstoode Lib. de spiritu sancto ca. 27. as Saint Basile writeth that the Apostles and the fathers which at the begynning made lawes for the order of Ecclesiasticall thinges maineteined the mysteries in their due auctoritie by keping them secrete and in silence For it is not sayeth he any mysterie at all which is brought forth to the popular and vulgar eares whereof he wrote very truly before Ei quod publicatum est per se apprehendi potest imminere contemptum Ei verò quod remotum est ac rarum etiam naturaliter quodammodo esse coniunctam admirationem That what is done openly and made common and of it selfe maye be atteined it is like to come in contempte and be dispysed But what is kepte farre of and is sildom goten that euen naturally in maner is neuer without wondering at it And in such respecte Christ gaue warning that pretiouse stones be not strewed before hogges If in the olde lawe priestes were chosen as Saint Ambrose writeth to coouer the arke of the Testament because it is not lawfull for all persones to see the deapth of mysteries If the sonnes of Caath by Gods appointment dyd onely beare the arke and those other holy thinges of the Tabernacle Nume 4. Vide Origenē homil 5. in Numer cap. 4. on their shulders when so euer the children of Israel remoued and marched foreward in wildernes being closely folded and lapte within vailes courteines and palles by the priestes and might not at no tyme touche nor see the same vpon payne of death which were but figures of this how much more is this high and worthy mysterie to be honoured with secretnes closenes and silence For this cause as they reporte In fragmēto Caroli Mag. de ritib. veteris ecclesiae sayeth Carolus Magnus that noble vertuouse and learned Emperour wryting to his Schoolemaister Alcuinus our cowntrie man and first teacher of Philosophie in Paris it is become a custome in the church that the Canon and consecration be sayde by the priest secretly that those wordes so holy and perteining to so great a mysterie shuld not growe in contēpte whiles all in maner through common vse bearing them awaye would syng them in the high wayes in the stretes and in other places where it were not conuenient Whereof it is tolde that before this custome was receiued shepherdes when they sang them in the fielde were by Gods hande strooken Luther him selfe in praeceptorio is much against them that would haue the Canon of the Masse to be pronounced with a lowde voice for the better vnderstāding vvhat persons the primitiue church excluded frō presence of the sacramēt The fathers of the primitiue churche had this Sacrament in such reuerence and honour that they excluded some sortes of faithfull people from being present at the celebration of it thinking them vnworthy not onely to heare the mysticall wordes of consecration pronounced but also to see the formes of the outward elementes and to be in the churche whiles that most holy Sacrifice was offered They were these Cathechumeni Energumeni and poenitentes The first were learners of our beleefe who as they were daily instructed beleued in Christ and as Saint Augustine writeth Tractatu in Ioan. 11 bare Christes crosse in their forehead
and marked them selues with the same The second were such as notwithstanding they had ben christened yet for the inconstancie of their mynde were vexed with vncleane sprites The third sorte were they who for their synnes committed had not yet made an ende of doing their open penaunce All these were iudged by the gouernoures of the churche at the begynning vnworthy to be present at these holy mysteries Now if this great reuerence towardes the ho y thinges in them was iustly praised the admitting of all sortes of people not onely to be present and to beholde the same but also to heare and vnderstande the wordes of consecration that hath thus allwaies ben honoured with silence and secretnes can not seme to wise zelouse and godly men a thing commendable specially in these tymes in which the holy Christen discipline of the churche is loosed and vtterly shaken of and no difference nor accompte of any diuersitie made betwen the perfite and godly people and them that ought to doo open penaunce that be possessed with deuilles and be infamouse for heynouse and notoriouse crimes committed Where as in olde tymes when by holesom discipline the faithfull people were kepte in godly awe and obedience that prayer also which was sayde ouer the oblation before consecration was pronounced closely and in silence and therefore it was called of the latines secreta of the Grekes mystica oratio meaning thereby that it ought not to be vttered openly and made common Iuell Or that the priest had then authoritie to offer vp Christ vnto his father Of the priestes auctoritie to offer vp Christ to his father ARTICLE XVII Threefold oblation of Christ CHRIST is offered vp to his father after three maners figuratiuely truly with bloud shedding and sacramentally or mystically In figure or signification he was offered in the sacrifices made to God bothe in the tyme of the lawe of nature and also in the tyme of the lawe written And therefore Saint Iohn calleth Christ the lambe which was killed from the begynning of the world meaning in figure The sacrifices of Abel Agnus occilus est ab origine mudi Apoca. 13. Heb. 10. Lib. 6. ca. 5 Noe and Abraham and all those of the people of Israel commaunded by the lawe of Moses figured and signified Christ For which respecte chiefly the law is reported of Saint Paul to haue the shadowe of the good thinges to come S. Augustine writing against Faustus the heretike sayeth Testamenti veteris sacrificia omnia multis varijs modis vnum sacrificium cuius nunc memoriam celebramus significauerunt All the sacrifices of th' olde testament signified by many and sundry waies this one sacrifice whose memorie we doo now celebrate And in an other place he sayeth De fide ad Petrū diaconum cap. 16. that in those fleshely sacrifices there was a signification of Christes fleshe which he shuld offer for synnes and of his bloude which he shuld shedde for the remission of our synnes Truly and with bloude shedding Christ was offered on the Crosse in his owne persone where of S. Paul sayeth Christ gaue him selfe for vs Tit. 2. Ephes 5. that he myght redeme vs from all iniquitie And againe Christ hath loued vs and hath delyuered him selfe for vs an oblation and sacrifice to God into a swete sauour Sacramentally or in mysterie Christ is offered vp to his father in the dayly sacrifice of the churche vnder the forme of breade and wine truly and in dede not in respecte of the maner of offering but in respecte of his very body and bloude really that is in dede present as it hath ben sufficiently proued here before The two first maners of the offering of Christ our aduersaries acknowledge and cōfesse The third they denye vtterly And so they robbe the churche of the greatest treasure it hath or may haue the body and bloude of our Sauiour Christ once offered vpon the crosse with painefull suffering for our redemption and now daily offered in the blessed Sacrament in remembraunce For which we haue so many proufes as for no one point of our Christen religion moe And herein I am more encombred with store then straighted with lacke and doubte more what I may leaue then what I may take Wherefor thinking it shall appeare to the wise more skylle to shewe discretion in the choise of places rather then learning in recitall of number thoug we are ouer peartely thereto prouoked by M. Iuelles vaunting and insolent chalenge I intend herein to be shorte verely shorter then so large a matter requireth and to bring for proufe a fewe such autorities I meane a fewe in respecte of the multitude that might be brought as ought in euery mannes iudgement to be of great weight and estimation The scripture it selfe ministring euident proufe for the oblation of Christ to his father by the priestes of the newe testament in the Institution of this holy Sacrament in the figure of Melchisedech and in the prophecie of Malachie the prophete the autorities of the fathers neded not to be alleged were not the same scripture by the ouerthwarte and false interpretations of our aduersaries wrested and tourned to a cōtrary sense to the horrible seducing of the vnlearned For where as the holy Euangelistes reporte that Christ at his last supper tooke breade gaue thankes brake it and sayde this is my body wich is geuen for you Luc. 22. Againe this is my bloude wich is shedde for you in remission of synnes By these wordes being wordes of sacrificing and offering they shewe and set forth an oblation in acte and dede though the terme it selfe of oblation or sacrifice be not expressed Albe it to some of excellent knowledge datur here sowndeth no lesse then offertur or immolatur that is to saye is offered or sacrificed specially the additiō pro vobis withall cōsydered For if Christ sayde truly as he is truth it selfe and guile was neuer fownde in his mowth then was his body presently geuen and for vs geuen at the tyme he spake the wordes that is at his supper For he sayde datur is geuen not dabitur shall be geuen And likewise was his bloude shedde in remissiō of synnes at the tyme of that supper for the texte hath funditur is shedde But the geuing of his body for vs and the shedding of his bloud in remissiō of synnes is an oblatiō of the same ergo Christ offered his body and bloude at the supper And thus datur signifieth here as much as offertur Now this being true that our lord offered him selfe vnto his father at his last supper hauing geuen cōmaundement to his Apostles to doo the same that he there dyd whō then he ordeined priestes of the newe testament saying doo this in my remembraunce as Clement doth plainely shewe lib. 8. Apostolicarum cōstitut cap. vltimo the same charge perteining no lesse to the priestes that be now the successours of the Apostles in this behalfe then to
Iuell denyeth Irenaeus receiued the same from Saint Iohn the Euangelist by Polycarpus Saint Iohns scoler He declareth it with these wordes Eum qui ex creatura punis est accepit gratias egit dicens Libro 4. cap. 32. Hoc est corpus meum Et calicem similiter qui est ex creatura quae est secundum nos suum sanguinem confessus est noui testamenti nouam docuit oblationem quam Ecclesia ab Apostolis accipiens in vniuerso mundo offert Deo De quo in duodecim prophetis Malachias sic praesignificauit Non est mihi voluntas in vobis dicit Dominus exercituum Malac. 1. munus non suscipiam de manu vestra He tooke that which by creation is bread and gaue thankes saying this is my body And likewise the cuppe full of that creature which is here with vs and confessed it to be his bloud and thus taught the newe oblation of the newe testament which the churche receiuing of the Apostles doth offer to God through the whole worlde whereof Malachie one of the twelue prophetes dyd prophecie thus I haue no lyking in you sayeth our lord almighty neither will I take sacrifice of your handes because from the rysing of the sunne to the going downe of the same my name is glorified among the nations and incense is offered to my name in euery place and pure sacrifice for that my name is great among the nations What can be vnderstanded by this newe oblation of the newe testament other then the oblation of that which he sayde to be his body and confessed to be his bloude And if he had offered bread and wine onely or the figure of his body and bloud in bread and wine it had ben no newe oblation for such had ben made by Melchisedech long before Neither can the prophecie of Malachie be vnderstanded of the oblation of Christ vpon the crosse for as much as that was done but at one tyme onely and in one certaine place of the world in Golgoltha a place without the gates of Ierusalem neare to the walles of that citie Concerning the sacrifice of a contrite and an humbled heart and all other Sacrifices of our deuotion that be mere spirituall they can not be called the newe oblation of the Newe testament for as much as they were done as well in the olde testameÌ„t as in the newe neither be they all together pure Wherefore this place of Irenaeus and also the prophecie of Malachie wherewith it is confirmed must nedes be referred to the sacrifice and oblation of the body and bloud of Christ dayly throughout the whole world offered to God in the Masse which is the externall Sacrifice of the churche and proper to the newe testament which as Irenaeus sayeth the church receiued of the Apostles and the Apostles of Christ Now let vs heare what S. Cyprian hath written to this purpose Because his workes be common Lib. 2. epist 3. to be shorter I will rehearse his wordes in English If in the Sacrifice which is Christ none but Christ is to be folowed soothly it behoueth vs to obey and doo that which Christ dyd and coÌ„maunded to be done For if Iesus Christ our lord and God very he him selfe be the high priest of God the father and him selfe first offered sacrifice to God the father and coÌ„maunded the same to be done in his remeÌ„braunce verely that priest doth occupie the office of Christ truly who doth by imitation the same thing that Christ dyd And then he offereth to God the father in the church a true and a perfite sacrifice if he begynne to offer right so as he seeth Christ him selfe to haue offered This farre S. Cyprian How can this Article be auouched in more plaine wordes he sayeth that Christ offered him selfe to his father in his supper and likewise coÌ„maunded vs to doo the same Here we haue proued that it is lawfull and hath alwaies from the begynning of the newe tâ—stament ben lawfull for the priestes to offer vp Christ vnto his father by the testimonies of three holy martyrs two Grekes and one Latine most notable in sundry respectes of antiquitie of the rome they bare in Christes churche of learning of constancie of faith stedfastly kepte to death suffred in places of fame and knowledge at Paris at Lions at Carthage Our aduersaries crake much of the sealing vp of their newe doctrine with the bloud of such and such who be writteÌ„ in the booke of lyes not in the booke of lyfe whom they will nedes to be called martyrs Verely if those Moonkes and freres Apostates and renegates wedded to wiues or rather to vse their owne terme yoked to sisters be true martyrs then must our newe Gospellers pull these holy fathers and many thousandes mo out of heauen For certainely the faith in defence of which either sorte dyed is vtterly contrary The worst that I wishe to them is that God geue them eyes to see and eares to heare and that he shut not vp their hartes so as they see not the light here vntill they be throwen awaye into the owtward darkenes Matt. 15. where shall be weeping and grynting of teeth Leauing no small number of places that might be recited out of diuerse other doctours I will bring two of two worthy bishops one of Chrysostome the other of S. Ambrose confirmig this truth Chrysostomes wordes be these Pontifex noster ille est qui hostiam mundantem nos obtulit ipsam offerimus nunc Chrysost in epist ad Heb. Homil 17. quae tunc oblata quidem consumi non potest Hoc autem quod nos facimus in commemorationem fit eius quod factum est Hoc enim facite inquit in mei coÌ„memorationem He is our bishop that hath offered vp the hoste which cleanseth vs. The same doo we offer also now which though it were then offered yet can not be consumed But this that we doo is done in remembraunce of that which is done For doo ye this sayeth he in my remembraunce S. Ambrose sayeth thus In Psalm 38. Vidimus principem Sacerdotum ad nos venientem vidimus et audiuimus offerentem pro nobis sanguinem suum sequamur vt possumus Sacerdotes vt offeramus pro populo sacrificium etsi infirmi merito tamen honorabiles sacrificio Quia etsi Christus non videtur offerre tamen ipse offertur in terris quando Christi corpus offertur We haue sene the prince of priestes come to vs we haue sene and heard him offer for vs his bloud Let vs that be priestes folowe him as we maye that we may offer sacrifice for the people being though weake in merite yet honorable for the sacrifice Because albeit Christ be not sene to offer yet he is offered in earth when the body of Christ is offered Of these our lordes wordes which is geuen for you and which is shedde for you and for many Here S. Ambrose exhorteth the priestes to offer
had done their due penaunce One as he telleth there thinking to haue that blessed body which he had receiued with others in his hande when he opened the same to put it into his mowth fownde that he helde ashes And thereof S. Cyprian sayeth Documento vnius ostensum est dominum recedere cum negatur By the example of one man it was shewed that our lord departeth awaie when he is denyed It is neither wicked nor a thing vnworthy the maiestie of that holy mysterie to thinke our lordes body likewise done awaie in cases of negligence villanie and prophanation Or that when Christ sayde Hoc est corpus meum Iuell this word Hoc pointeth not the bread but Indiuiduum vagum as some of them saye What this pronoune Hoc pointeth in the vvordes of coÌ„secration ARTICLE XIIII VVhat so euer hoc pointeth in this saying of Christ after your iudgemeÌ„t M. Iuell right meaning and plaine christen people 2. Thes â— who through gods grace haue receiued the loue of truth and not the efficacie of illusion to beleue lying beleue verely that in this sacrament after consecration is the very body of Christ and that vpon credite of his owne wordes The benefite of the Geneuian CoÌ„munioÌ„ Hoc est corpus meum They that appoint them selues to folowe your Geneuian doctrine in this point deceiued by that ye teache them hoc to point the breade and by sundry other vntruthes in stede of the very body of Christ in the Sacrament rightly ministred verely present shall receiue nothing at your communion but a bare piece of bread not worth a point As for your some saye who will haue Hoc to point indiuiduum vagum first learne you well what they meane and if their meaning be naught who so euer they be handle them as you lyste therewith shall we be offended neuer a deale How this word Hoc in that saying of Christ is to be takeÌ„ and what it pointeth we knowe who haue more learnedly more certainely and more truly treated thereof then Luther Zuinglius Caluin Cranmer Peter Martyr or any their ofspring Iuell Or that the accidentes or formes or shewes of bread and wyne be the Sacramentes of Christes body and bloud and not rather the breade and wyne it selfe Who are the Sacramenâ—tes of Christes bodye and bloud the accidentes or the bread and vvyne ARTICLE XXV FOr as much as by the almighty power of gods word pronounced by the priest in the consecration of this Sacrament the body and bloud of Christ are made really present the substance of breade tourned into the substance of the body and the substaÌ„ce of wine into the substance of the bloud the breade which is consumed awaie by the fier of the diuine substance as Chrysostom sayeth In homil Paschali and now is becoÌ„me the breade which was formed by the hand of the holy ghost in the wombe of the virgine and decocted with the fyer of the passion in the aulter of the crosse as S. Ambrose sayeth De conse dist 2. ca. omnia can not be the sacrament of the body nor the wine of the bloud Neither can it be sayde that the breade and the wine which were before are the sacramentes for that the breade is becomme the body and the wyne the bloud and so now they are not and if they be not then neither be they sacramentes Therefore that the outward formes of breade and wyne which remaine be the sacrameÌ„tes of Christes body and bloud and not the very bread and wine it selfe it foloweth by sequell of reason or consequent of vnderstanding deduced out of the first truth which of S. Basile in an epistle ad Sozopolitanos Epist 65. speaking against certaine that went about to raise vp againe the olde heresie of Valentinus is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Of which sequell of reason in the matter of the Sacrament many conclusions may be deduced in case of wante of expresse scriptures Which waye of reasoning Basile vsed against heretikes as also sundry other fathers where manifest scripture might not be alleaged And whereas there must be a lykenesse betwen the sacrament and the thing of the sacrament for if the sacrameÌ„tes had not a likenesse of thinges whereof they are sacramentes Aug. epis 22. ad Bonifacium EpiscopuÌ„ properly and rightely they shuld not be called sacramentes as the sacrament of baptisme which is the outward washing of the fleshe hath a likenesse of the inward wasshing of the soule and no likenesse here appeareth to be betwen the formes that remaine and the thing of the Sacrament for they consist not the one of many cornes the other of grapes for thereof cometh not accident but substance hereto may be sayde it is ynough that these sacrameÌ„tes beare the likenesse of the body and bloud of Christ for as much as the one representeth the likenesse of breade the other the likenesse of wyne De conse dist 2. ca. hoc est quod dicimus which S. Augustine calleth visibilem speciem elementorum the visible forme of the elementes Thus the formes of breade and wine are the sacramentes of the body and bloud of Christ not onely in respecte of the thing signified which is the vnitie of the churche but also of the thing coÌ„teined which is the very fleshe and bloud of Christ whereof the truth it selfe sayde Ioan. 6. The breade that I shall geue is my fleshe for the lyfe of the worlde Iuell Or that the Sacrament is a signe or token of the bodye of Christ that lyeth hydden vnderneathe it Of the vnspeakeable maner of the being of Christes bodye and bloud vnder the formes of breade and vvine ARTICLE XXVI THat the outward forme of bread which is properly the sacrament is the signe of the body of Christ we confesse yea of that body which is couertly in or vnder the same In libro Sentent Prosperi which S. Augustine callet carnem domini forma panis opertam the fleshe of our lord couered with the forme of bread But what is meant by this terme Lyeth we knowe not As through faith grounded vpoÌ„ gods worde we knowe that Christes body is in the Sacrament so that it lyeth there or vnderneathe it by which terme it may seme a scoffe to be vttered to bring the catholike teaching in contempte or that it sitteth or standeth we denye it For lying sitting and standing noteth situatioÌ„ of a body in a place according to distinction of membres and circunscriptioÌ„ of place so as it haue his partes in a certaine order correspondent to the partes of the place But after such maner the body of Christ is not in the Sacrament but without circumscription order and habitude of his partes to the partes of the body or place enuironning Which maner of being in is aboue all reache of humaine vnderstanding wonderouse straunge and singular not defined and limited by the lawes or bondes of nature but by the almighty power of God
eccles hierarch cap. 3. Act. 17. whom S. Paul conuerted to the faith of whom it is mencioned in the actes of the Apostles who had cōference with Peter Paul and Ihon th'euangelist and much acquaintance with Timothe Thus doo I geue thee good Christen reader but a taste as it were of proufes with out allegation of the wordes for confirmation of thy faith concerning the blessed Masse out of the Scriptures Apostles and Apostolike men I doo further referre the to Iustinus the martyr and philosopher Lib. 4. cōtra haeres cap. 32. to Irenaeus the martyr and bishop of Lions who lyued with the Apostles scholers To the olde bishop and Martyr Hippolytus that lyued in Origens tyme who in his oration De Consummatione mundi extant in Greke maketh Christ thus to saye at the generall iudgement vnto bishops Venite Pontifices qui purê mihi Sacrificium die nocteque ohtulistis ac praetiosum corpus sanguinē meum immolastis quotidie Come ye Bishops that haue purely offered sacrifice to me daye and nyght and haue sacrificed my pretious body and bloud daily Finally I referre them in stede of many to the two worthy fathers Basile and Chrysostome whose Masses be lefte to the posteritie at this tyme extāt In mystagogicis orationibus Amongest all Cyrillus Hierosolymitanus is not to be passed ouer lightly who at large expoundeth the whole Masse vsed in Ierusalem in his tyme the same which now we fynde in Clement much like to that of Basile and Chrysostome and for the Canon and other principall partes to that is now also vsed in the Latine Churche As for the other doctoures of the churche that folowed the Apostles and those Apostolike mē many in number excellent in learning holy of lyfe to shew what may be brought out of their workes for proufe of this matter that th' oblation of the body and bloude of Christ in the Masse is the sacrifice of the Church and proper to the new testament it would require a whole volume and therefore not being moued by M. Iuelles Chalēge to speake specially therof but as it is priuate after their meaning and many good treatises in defence of this sacrifice being set forth already in printe at this present I will saye nothing thinking hereof as Salust dyd of Carthago that great citie that it were better to kepe silence then to speake fewe Now this presupposed that the Masse standeth vpon good and sufficient groundes for the stay of all true christen mennes beleefe let vs come to our speciall pourpose and saye somewhat of priuate Masse as our aduersaries call it The chiefe cause why they storme so much against priuate Masse is for that the priest receiueth the Sacrament alone which thing they expresse with great vilanie of wordes Now in case the people might be styrred to such deuotion as to dispose them selues worthely to receiue their housell euery daye with the priest as they dyd in the primitiue church when they looked hourely to be caught and done to death in the persecutiō of Paynimes that they departed not hence Sine Viatico without their viage prouision what shuld these men haue to saye In this case perhappes they would fynde other defaultes in the Masse but against it in this respect onely that it is priuate they shuld haue nothing to saye at all So the right of their cause depēdeth of the misdooing of the people which if they would amende these folke shuld be dryuen either to recant or to holde their peace To other defaultes of the Masse by them vntruely surmysed answere shal be made hereafter Now touching this Where no defaulte is committed there no blame is to be imputed That oftentymes the priest at Masse hath no comparteners to receiue the sacramēt with him it procedeth of lacke of deuotion of the peoples parte not of enuye or malice of his parte The feaste is common all be inuited they may come that lyst they shall be receiued that be disposed and proued None is thrust awaye that thus commeth it may be obtruded to none violētly ne offred to none rashely Well none commeth This is not a sufficient cause why the faithfull and godly priest enflamed with the loue of God feeling him selfe hungry and thirsty after that heauēly foode and drynke shuld be kepte from it and imbarred from celebrating the memoire of our lordes death according to his commaundement from his dutie of geuing thankes for that great benefite from taking the cuppe of saluatiō and calling vpon the name of God Psal 115. for these thinges be done in the Masse But the enemies of this holy sacrifice saye that this is against the Institution of Christ God forbydde the Institution of Christ shuld not be kepte But it is a world to see how they crye out for the Institution of Christ by whom it is most wickedly broken For where as in Christes Institution concerning this Sacrament three thinges are conteined which he him selfe dyd and by his commaundemēt gaue auctoritie to the Church to doo the same the Consecration Three essentials of the Masse the oblation and the participation wherein consisteth the substance of the Masse they hauing quite aborogated the other two and not so much as once naming them in their bookes of seruice now haue lefte to the people nothing but a bare Communion and that after their own sorte with what face can they so busely crye for Christes Institution by whom in the chiefe pointes the same is violated Of Consecration and Oblation although much might be sayde here against them I will at this tyme saye nothing Concerning participation the number of communicantes together in one place that they iangle so much of as a thing so necessary that with out it the Masse is to be reputed vnlaufull is no parte of Christes Institution For Christ ordeined the Sacrament after consecration and oblation done to be receiued and eaten And for that ende he sayd Accipite Number of cōmunicants place tyme vvith other rites bee not of Christes institutiō manducate bibite take eate drinke Here in cōsisteth his Institution Now as for the number of the communicantes how many shuld receiue together in one place and in what place what tyme sitting at table as some would haue it standing or kneeling fasting or after other meates and whether they shuld receiue it in their handes or with their mowthes and other the like orders maners and circumstāces all these thinges perteine to the ceremonie of eating the obseruation whereof dependeth of the churches ordinance and not of Christes Institution And therefore S. Augustine writing to Ianuarius sayeth Saluator non praecepit Epist 118. quo deinceps ordine sumeretur vt Apostolis per quos dispositurus erat Ecclesiam seruaret hunc locum Our Sauiour gaue not commaundement in what order it shuld be receiued meaning to reserue that matter to the Apostles by whom he would directe and dispose his churche Wherefore the receiuing
est corpore Christi etc. This is that we saye sayeth he which by all meanes we go about to proue that the Sacrifice of the church is made of two thinges and cōsisteth of two thinges of the visible shape of the elemētes which are breade and wine and the inuisible fleshe and bloude of our lord Iesus Christ of the Sacrament that is the outward signe and the thinge of the sacrament to witte of the body of Christ etc. By this we vnderstand that this word Sacrament is of the fathers two waies taken First for the whole substance of the Sacrament as it consisteth of the outward formes and also with all of the very body of Christ verely present as saint Augustine sayeth the Sacrifice of the Church to cōsist of these two Secondly it is taken so as it is distincte from that hydden and diuine thing of the Sacrament that is to saye for the outward formes onely which are the holy signe of Christes very body present vnder them conteined Hovv the fathers are to be vnderstāded callīg the Sacrament a figure signe token etc. Whereof we must gather that when so euer the fathers doo call this most excellent Sacrament a figure or a signe they would be vnderstanded to meane none otherwise then of those outward formes and not of Christes body it selfe which is there present not typically or figuratiuely but really and substātially onlesse perhaps respecte be had not to the body it selfe present but to the maner of presence as sometymes it happeneth So is Saint Basile to be vnderstanded in Liturgia calling the sacrament antitypon that is a sampler or à figure and that after cōsecration as the copies that be now abroade bee founde to haue So is Eustathius to be taken that great learned father of the Greke churche who so constantly defended the catholike faith against the Arians cited of Epiphanius in 7. Synodo Albe it concerning S. Basile E◠4. c. 14. in caput Matth. 26 Damascen and Euthymius likewise Epiphanius in the second Nicene councell actione 6. and Marcus Ephesius who was present at the councell of Florence would haue that place so to be taken before consecration As S. Ambrose also calling it a figure of our lordes body and bloud lib. 4. de sacram cap. 5. And if it appeare straunge to any man that S. Basile shuld call those holy mysteries antitypa after consecration let him vnderstand that this learned father thought good by that word to note the great secrete of that mysterie and to shewe a distincte condition of present thinges from thinges to come And this consideration the church semeth to haue had which in publike prayer after holy mysteries receiued maketh this humble petitiō vt quae nunc specie gerimus Sabbato 4. tēporū mēsis Septemb certae rerū veritate capiamus that in the lyfe to come we may take that in certaine truth of thinges which now we beare in shape or shewe Neither doo these wordes importe any preiudice against the truth of the presence of Christes body in the Sacrament but they signifie and vtter the most principall truth of the same when as all outward forme shape shewe figure sampler and coouer taken awaie we shall haue the fruitiō of God him selfe in sight face to face not as it were through a glasse but so as he is in truth of his Maiestie So this word antitypon thus taken in S. Basile furthereth nothing at all the Sacramentaries false doctrine against the truth of the presence of Christes body in the Sacrament And because our aduersaries doo much abuse the simplicitie of the vnlearned bearing thē in hand that after the iudgement and doctrine of th' auncient fathers the Sacrament is but a figure a signe a token or a badge and conteineth not the very body it selfe of Christ for proufe of the same alleaging certaine their sayinges vttered with the same termes I thinke good by the recitall of some the chiefe such places to shewe that they be vntruly reported and that touching the veritie of the presence in the Sacrament they taught in their dayes the same faith that is taught now in the catholike churche Holy Ephrem in a booke he wrote to those that will serch the nature of the sonne of God by mannes reason Cap. 4. sayeth thus Inspice diligenter quomodo sumēs in manibus panem benedicit ac frangit in figura immaculati corporis sui calicemque in figura pretiosi sanguinis sui benedicit tribuit discipulis suis Beholde sayeth he diligently how taking bread in his handes he blesseth it and breaketh it in the figure of his vnspotted body and blesseth the cuppe in the figure of his pretiouse bloude and geueth it to his disciples By these wordes he sheweth the partition deuision or breaking of the Sacramēt to be done no otherwise but in the outward formes which be the figure of Christes body present and vnder them conteined Which body now being gloriouse is no more broken nor parted but is indiuisible and subiect no more to any passion and after the Sacrament is broken it remaineth whole and perfite vnder eche portion Agayne by the same wordes he signifieth that outward breaking to be a certaine holy figure and representation of the crucifying of Christ and of his bloude shedding Which thing is with a more clearnes of wordes set forth by saint Augustine in Sententijs Prosperi Dum frangitur hostia De consecrat dist 2 can dum frangitur dum sanguis de calice in ora fidelium funditur quid aliud quám Dominici corporis in cruce immolatio eiusue sanguinis de latere effusio designatur Whiles the hoste is broken whiles the bloud is powred in to the mowthes of the faithfulles what other thing is thereby shewed and set forth then the sacrificing of Christes body on the crosse and the shedding of his bloud out of his syde And by so dooing the commaundement of Christ is fulfylled Doo this in my remembraunce That it may further appeare that these wordes figure signe image token and such other the like sometymes vsed in auncient writers doo not exclude the truth of thinges exhibited in the Sacrament but rather signifie the secrete maner of th'exhibiting amōgest all other the place of Tertullian in his fouerth booke contrâ Marcionem is not to be omitted specially being one of the chiefe and of most appearaunce that the Sacramentaries bring for proufe of their doctrine Tertullianes wordes be these Acceptum panem distributum discipulis suis corpus suum illum fecit hoc esse corpus meum dicēdo id est figura corporis mei The breade that he tooke and gaue to his disciples he made it his body in saying this is my body that is the figure of my body The double taking of the worde Sacrament afore mentioned remembred and consideration had how the sacramentes of the Newe testament comprehend two thinges the outward visible formes that be figures signes and tokens and
which is at this present receiued and may of mannes nature be sene is called an image In this saying of Origen this word image doth not in significatioÌ„ diminishe the truth of thinges so as they be not the very thinges in dede for the thinges that Christ dyd in fleshe were true thinges but when they are termed the image of thinges thereby is signified so farre as the condition and nature of man can beholde and see them This is most plainely vttered by Oecumenius a Greke writer vppon these wordes of saint Paul to the Hebrewes Non ipsam imaginem rerum Hebr. 10. Not the image it selfe of thinges id est verità tem rerum that is the truth of thinges sayeth he and addeth further Res appellat futuram vitam imaginem auteÌ„ rerum Euangelicam politiam vmbram verò imaginis rerum vetus Testamentum imago enim manifestiora ostendit exemplaria adumbratio autem imaginis obscurius haec manifestat nam haec veteris testamenti exprimit imbecillitatem The sense of which wordes may thus be vttered in English S. Paul calleth the lyfe to come the thinges and the ordinance or disposition of the thinges in the gospell he calleth the image of thinges and the olde testament he nameth the shadowe of the image of thinges For an image sheweth samples more manifest but the adumbration or shadowing of the image sheweth these thinges but darkely for this doth expresse the weakenes of the olde testament By this place of Oecumenius we see that although it be proper to an image to exhibite the truth of thinges and therefore by interpretation he sayeth Imaginem id est veritatem the image that is the truth yet the proper and right taking of the word signifieth the waye or maner of a thing to be exhibited not the thing it selfe that what the image hath lesse then the thing it selfe it is to be vnderstanded in the maner of exhibiting not in the thing it selfe exhibited Hitherto we haue brought examples to declare that the wordes figure and image signifie the truth of thinges exhibited in dede though in secrete and priuie maner Certaine fathers vse the wordes signum sacramentum that is signe and Sacrament in the same signification Saint Augustine in libro SententiaruÌ„ Prosperi De consecra dist 2. can VtruÌ„ sub figura sayeth thus Caro eius est quam forma panis opertam in sacramento accipimus sanguis eius quem sub vini specie sapore potamus carâ— videlicet carnis sanguis est sacramentúm sanguinis carne sanguine vtroque inuisibili spirituali intelligibili signatur visibile domini nostri Iesu Christi corpus palpabile plenum gratia omnium virtuâ—um diuina maiestate It is his fleshe that we receiue do â—â—â—ered with the forme of bread in the Sacrament and his bloud that vnder the shape and sauour of wyne we drinke soothly fleshe is a sacrament of fleshe and bloud is a sacrament of bloud by the fleshe and the bloud bothe inuisible spirituall intelligible our lord Iesus Christ his visible and palpable body full of the grace of all vertues and diuine Maiestie is signified or as it were with a signe noted In these wordes of Saint Augustine we see the fleshe of Christ called a sacrament of his fleshe and the bloud a Sacrament of his bloud in as much as they be coouered with the forme of bread and wyne yet verely and in substance present and likewise he letteth not to call this veritie or truth of the thinges them selues thus couertly exhibited a signe of Christes visible and palpable body so that the naming of a signe doth not importe a separation from the truth but sheweth a distincte maner of the truth exhibited And therefore according to the truth of the maner of exhibiting it is not the fleshe of Christ but the sacrament of the fleshe of Christ for that the fleshe doth not exhibite it selfe in his owne shape but in a Sacrament And therefore in an other place he writeth thus Sicâ—t ergâ— coelestis panis De consecra dist 2. can Hoc est quod dicimus qui caro Christi est suo modo vocatur corpus Christi cum re vera sit sacramentum corporis Christi illius videlicet quod visibile quod palpabile mortale in cruce positum est vocaturque ipsa immolatio carnis quae sacerdotis manibus fit Christi passio mors crucifixio non rei veritate sed significante mysterio Sic Sacramentum fidei quod Baptismus intelligitur Fides est As the heauenly bread sayeth Saint Augustin which is the fleshe of Christ in his maner is called the body of Christ when as in very dede it is the sacrament of Christes body euen of that which is visible which is palpable and being mortall was put on the crosse and the sacrificing it selfe of his fleshe which is done by the priestes handes is called the passion the death the crucifying of Christ not in truth of the thing but in mysterie signifying So the Sacrament of faith which is vnderstanded to be baptisme is faith By heauenly bread he vnderstanded not wheaten bread but that heauely meate which he sayeth to be the fleshe of Christ and this farre he affirmeth the truth of his fleshe it selfe which he sayeth to be called suo modo in his maner the body of Christ as who should saye whose truth notwithstaÌ„ding if ye beholde on the behalfe of the maner of exhibiting in very dede it is a Sacrament of Christes body which is in visible shape so as he speaketh of Christes body that hath suffred In Psa 98. In 1. cap. Ephes Agayne S. Augustine sayeth in an other place Non hoc corpus quod videris comestari estis Not this body which ye see shall ye eate And Saint Hierom sayeth diuinam spiritualem carneÌ„ manducandam dari aliam quideÌ„ ab ea quae crucifixa est that diuine and spirituall fleshe is geuen to be eaten other beside that wich was crucifyed Wherefore in respecte of the exhibiting the fleshe is diuided that in it selfe is but one and the fleshe exhibited in mysterie is in very dede a Sacrament of Christes body visible and palpable which suffred on the crosse And thus it foloweth of conuenience whereas the fleshe is not the same according to the qualities of the exhibiting which was crucifyed and which now is sacrificed by the handes of a priest againe where as the passion death and resurrection are sayde to be done not in truth of the thing but in mysterie signifying it foloweth I saye that the fleshe is not the same in qualities so as it was on the crosse though it be the same in substance Many mo auctorities might be alleaged for the opening of this matter but these for this present are ynough if they be not too many as I feare me they will so appeare to the vnlearned reader and to such as be not geuen to earnest studie and diligent
parte of Christes glorie is impayred Iuell Or that then any Christian man called the Sacrament his lord and God Of calling the Sacrament lord and God ARTICLE XXI Sacramēt tvvo vvayes taken THis word Sacramēt as is declared before is of the fathers taken two wayes Either for the onely outward formes of bread and wine which are the holy signe of the very body and bloud of Christ present and vnder them conteined Or for the whole substance of the Sacrament as it consisteth of the outward formes In sent Prosperi de conse dist 2. lib. 4. cap. 34. and also of the very body and bloud of Christ verely present which S. Augustine calleth the inuisible grace and the thing of the Sacrament And Irenaeus calleth it rem coelestem the heauenly thing as that other rem terrenam the earthly thing Taken the first waie no Christen man euer honoured it with the name of lord and God For that were plaine Idolatrie to attribute the name of the Creator to the creature But taken in the secōd signification it hath alwayes of Christen people and of the learned fathers of the churche ben called by the name of lord and God And of right so ought it to be for elles were it impietie and a denyall of God not to call Christ the sonne of God by the name of lord and God who is not onely in truth of fleshe and bloud in the Sacrament after which maner he is there ex vi Sacramenti but also for the inseparable coniunction of bothe natures in vnitie of person ex necessaria concomitantia whole Christ God and man That the holy fathers called the Sacrament taken in this sense lord and God I might proue it by many places the rehearsall of a fewe may serue for many Origen in an homilie speaking reuerently of this blessed Sacrament sayeth In diuerfos Euangelij locos homil 5. that when a man receiueth it our lord entreth vnder his rooffe and exhorteth him that shall receiue it to humble him selfe and to saye vnto it Domine non sum dignus vt intres sub tectum meum Lord I am not worthy that thou enter vnder my rooffe S. Cyprian in Sermone de lapsis telleth how a man who had denyed God in tyme of persecution hauing notwithstanding the sacrifice by the priest done priuely with others receiued the Sacrament not being able to eate it nor to handle it opening his hādes fownde that he bare asshes Where he addeth these wordes Documento vnius ostensum est dominum recedere cum negatur By this example of one man it is shewed that our lord departeth awaie when he is denyed The same S. Cyprian in th' exposition of the Pater noster declaring the fourth petition of it Geue vs thys daye our daily bread vnderstandeth it to conteine a desyre of the holy communion in this blessed Sacrament and sayeth Ideo panem nostrum id est Christum dari nobis quotidie petimus vt qui in Christo manemus viuimus à sanctificatione corpore eius non recedamus Therefore we aske our daily bread that is to saye Christ to be geuen vnto vs that we which abyde and lyue in Christ depart not from the state of holynes and communion of his bodye Here S. Cyprian calleth the Sacrament Christ as he is in dede there present really so as in the place alleaged before he calleth it lord And I wene our aduersaries will imbarre the Sacrament of the name of Christ no lesse then of the name of lord or God Onlesse they make lesse of Christ then of lord and God Verely this holy martyr acknowlegeth this sacrament not for lord and Christ onely but also for God by these wordes in his sermon de coena Domini Sicut in persona Christi humanitas videbatur latebat diuinitas ita sacramento visibili ineffabiliter diuina se infudit essentia As in the person of Christ the manhode was sene and the godhed was hydden so the diuine essence or substaunce of God hath infused it selfe into the visible sacrament vnspeakeably Chrysostom doubteth not to call the Sacrament God in this plaine saying Nolimus obsecro nolimus impudentes nos ipsos interimere In priorē ad Cor. Homil. 24 sed cum honore munditia ad Deum accedamus quando id propositum videris dic tecum propter hoc corpus non amplius terra cinis ego sum non amplius captiuus sed liber Let vs not let vs not for gods sake be so shamelesse as to kill our selues by vnworthy receiuing of the sacrament but with reuerence and cleanenesse let vs come to God And when thou seest the sacrament set forth saye thus with thy selfe by reason of this body I am no more earth and asshes no more captiue but free And least this sense taken of Chrysostom shuld seme ouer straunge this place of S. Ambrose who lyued in the same tyme and agreeth with him thoroughly in doctrine may seme to leade vs to the same Quid edamus quid bibamus De ijs qul mysterijs initiantu◠cap. 9. Psal 33. alibi tibi per prophetā Spiritus sanctus expressit dicens gustate videte quoniam suauis est Dominus beatus vir qui sperat in eo in illo Sacramento Christus est quia corpus est Christi What we ought to eate and what we ought to drinke the holy ghost hath expressed by the prophete in an other place saying Taste and see how that our lord is sweete blessed is the man that trusteth in him In that Sacrament is Christ because there is the body of Christ Here S. Ambrose referring those wordes of the psalme to the sacrament calleth it lord and that lord in whom the man that trusteth is blessed who is God Agreeably to this sayeth S. Augustine In collectaneis in 10. cap. prioris ad Corinth in a sermō de verbis Euangelij as Beda reciteth Qualem vocem Domini audistis inuitantis nos Quis vos inuitauit Quos inuitauit Et quis praeparauit Inuitauit Dominus seruos praeparauit eis cibum seipsum Quis audeat māducare Dominum suum Et tamen ait qui manducat me viuet propter me What maner a uoice is that ye haue heard of our lord inuiting and bydding vs to the feast who hath inuited whom hath he inuited And who hath made preparation The lord hath inuited the seruantes and hath prepared him selfe to be meate for them Who dareth be so bolde as to eate his lord And yet he sayeth he that eateth me shall lyue for cause of me In Ioan. lib. 4. cap. 15. Cyrillus accompteth the sacrament for Christ and God the word and for God in this saying Qui carnem Christi manducat vitam habet aeternam Habet enim haec caro Dei verbum quod naturaliter vita est Proptereà dicit Quia ego resuscitabo eum in nouissimo die Ego enim dixit Ioan. 6. id est
after the sense of the Gospellers nevve and vsed by Sathan 9. b. In vvhat sense and consideration the Masse called Priuate of some Doctours 9. b. VVhat the Lutherans call Priuate Masse 9. b. Priuate Masse in vvorde but in dede the sacrifice of the churche impugned by M. Iuell 10. a. Proufes for the Masse briefly touched 10. a. The chiefe cause vvhy the Gospellers storme against priuate Masse 11. b. Three essentials of the Masse 12. b. Number of communicantes place tyme vvith other rites bee not of Christes Institution 12. b. VVhy the Sacrament is called a communion 14. a. There is a communion betvven the faithfull though they be not together 14. b. Necessitie of many communicantes together contrary to the libertie of the gospell 15. a. For mengling vvater vvith the vvyne in the Sacrament a place alleaged out of Clement 15. b. Many maye cōmunicate together not being in one place together 16. a. etc. Proufes for priuate communion and consequently for priuate Masse 17. b. etc. Reseruation of the Sacrament 19. b. Vncleane doinges bevvrayed at Martyrs toumbes 20. b. Light of the vvest churches taken from Rome 21. b. The fathers oftentymes complaine of the peoples forebearing the cōmunion but no vvhere of the priestes ceasing from offering the Sacrifice 23. a. The peoples forebearing the cōmunion is no cause vvhy the priest shuld not saye Masse 24. a. Masse done vvithout a number of communicantes in the same place 24. b. 25. 26. etc. A true declaration of Chysostomes place nullus qui cōmunicetur 30. b. 2. Christes vvordes drynke ye all of this bynde not the laitie to the vse of the cuppe 33. a. Luther and his ofspring doth not necessitate communiō vnder both kyndes 34. a. etc. Lutheres cōferēce vvith the Deuill agaīst the Masse 34. b Causes mouing the church to communicate vnder one kinde 36. b. The exacte streightnes of certaine Gods ordinances may vvhithout offence in cases be omitted 37. a. b. etc. Proufes for Cōmunion vnder one kinde 40. b. 41. etc. Our lordes cuppe onely in certaine cases ministred 46. a. b The administration of the bread styped or dipte in the cuppe vnlavvfull 46. b. The Canon of Gelasius guilefully by M. Iuell alleaged truly examined 47. b. 48. etc. 3. Churche Seruice in due order disposed in the Greke churches before the latine churches 51. a. Vsage of church Seruice in any vulgare barbarouse tonge vvith in 600. yeres after Christ can not be proued 52. a All people of the Greke church vnderstoode not the greke Seruice 53. b. 54. etc. M. Iuelles allegations soluted 57. a. etc. Iustinianes ordinance truly declared 58. b. M. Iuell noted of insinseritie and halting 58. b. 59. a. The nūber of lāguages by accōpte of the antiquitie 59. a. b All people of the Latine churche vnderstoode not the Latine Seruice 60. a. 61. 62. etc. The antiquitie of the Latine Seruice in the church of England 63. a. Cednom the diuine poete of England 65. b. The first entree of the English Seruice 66. a. The place of S. Paule to the Corinthians maketh not for the Seruice in the Englishe tonge 66. b. 67. etc. The vvorde Spirite in s Paul diuersely takē of diuerse 68. a The benefite of prayer vttered in a tonge not vnderstanded 71. a. Such nations as vse church Seruice in their ovvne tonge continevve in schismes 73. b. 4. Of syx grovvndes that the Popes Supreme auctoritie standeth vpon the first and chiefe Gods ordināce according to the scripture expounded 75. b. etc. The 2. Councelles 77. b. The 3. Edictes of Emperoures 79. a. The 4. Doctours 79. b. etc. The 5. Reason 81. a. The 6. practise of the church syxfolde 83. a. etc. 1. Appellations to the Pope 84. a. Euill lyse of the b. of Rome ought not to seuer vs from the faith of the churche of Rome 85. b. The 2. practise corrections from the Pope 87. a. 3. Confirmations by the Pope 78. b. 4. The Popes approuing of Councelles 88. a. 5. Absolutions from the Pope 89. a 6. Reconciliations to the Pope 89. b The Pope aboue a thousand yeres sithens called Vniuersall bishop and head of the vniuersall churche 90. b. Peter and consequētly the Pope Peters successour called head of the church both in termes equiualent and also expressely 91. b. etc. Peter and his successour called head of the churche expressely 93. a. etc. The Popes Primacie acknovvleged and cōfessed by Martin Luther 94. b. 5. VVhat occasioned the fathers to vse these termes really substantially corporally etc. 97. b. Berengatius the first Sacramentarie 98. a. The fleshe and bloud of Christ of double cōsideratiō 98. b. Bucer cōfesseth the body of Christ to be in the Sacramēt in dede and substantially 100. b. 6. Christes being in heauen and in the Sacrament at one tyme implyeth no contradiction 105. a. Christes body in many places at once 105. b. 106. etc. Truth confessed by the enemie of truth 107. b. God vvorking aboue nature distroyeth not nature 108. b Being in a mysterie vvhat it is 109. a. 7. Eleuation of the Sacrament proued 109. b. 110. etc. 8. VVhat Christē people adore in the Sacramēt 112. b. 113. etc. Contrarietie in the first deuysers of the Nevve Gospell 115. a. Adoration proued by the scripture and that according to the Zuinglians against luther 115. a. etc. The terme concomitantia by the Diuines profitably deuysed 115. b. Adoration of Christ in the Sacrament auouched by the fathers 116. b. etc. 9. Sundry maners of keping the blessed Sacrament 121. b. Hanging vp of the Sacrament in a pyxe ouer the aulter is auncient 122. b. 10. The remayning of the onely Accidentes vvithout substāce in the Sacramēt depēdeth of the Article of transubstantiation 124. a. Transubstantiation and the truth of our lordes body and bloud auouched 124. 125. etc. Transubstantiation taught by the olde fathers and by the Doctours of the Greke church of late age 126. 127. Accidentes beleued of some learned fathers to remaine vvithout substance at the begynning 127. b. 11. VVhat the diuiding of the Sacrament in three partes signifieth 128. a. The diuiding of the Sacrament in three partes probably thought to be a Tradition of the Apostles 128. b. 129. a. 12. Hovv the fathers are to be vnderstanded calling the Sacrament a figure signe token etc. 130. a. etc. The vvordes figure signe token remembrance etc. exclude not the truth of being 134. a. 135. etc. 13. Lydford lavve vsed by the Gospellers 139. a. Pluralitie of Masses in one churche in one daye 139. a. etc. This vvord Sacrifice taken for the Masse 143. b. 14. Antiquitie of Images 145. a. The signe of the Crosse commended to men by Gods prouidence 145. b. Literae Hieroglyphicae 146. b. Images from the Apostles tyme. 147. b. Three causes vvhy Images haue ben vsed in the churche 150. a. Pictura loquens poëma tacens 150. b. Hovv Images maye be vvorshipped vvithout offēce 152. a 15. Three sundry opiniōs concerning the scriptures to be had in a vulgare
the body and bloud of Christ for the people And willeth them to be more regarded then commonly they be now a dayes for this sacrifices sake though otherwise they be of lesse deserte Now for proufe of the sacrifice and oblation of Christ by the doctoures mynde vpon the figure of Melchisedech Lib. 2. epist 3. first S. Cyprian sayeth thus Qui magis sacerdos Dei summi quà m Dominus noster Iesus Christus qui sacrificium Deo patri obtulit et obtulit hoc idem quod Melchisedech id est panem vinum suum scilicet corpus sanguinem Who is more the priest of the highest God then our lord Iesus Christ who offered a sacrifice to God the father and offered the selfe same that Melchisedech dyd that is bread and wine that is to saye his owne body and bloud S. Hierome in an epistle that he wrote for the vertuouse women Paula and Eustochium to Marcella hath these wordes Recurre ad Genesim Melchisedech regem Salem Huius principem inuenies ciuitatis qui iam in typo Christi panem vinum obtulit mysterium christianum in Saluatoris sanguine corpore dedicauit Retourne to the booke of Genesis and to Melchisedech the king of Salem And thou shalt fynde the prince of that Citie who euen at that tyme in the figure of Christ offered bread and wine and dedicated the mysterie of Christians in the body and bloud of our Sauiour Here this learned father maketh a plaine distinction betwen th' oblation of the figure which was bread and wine and the oblation of the truth which is the mysterie of Christen people the bloud and the body of Christ our Sauiour Of this S. Augustine speaketh largely in his first sermon vpon the 33. Psalme and in the 17. booke de ciuitate Dei cap. 20. Of all other Oecumenius speaketh most plainely to this purpose vpon this place of S. Paul alleaged out of the Psalme Tu es Sacerdos in aeternum secundum â—rdinem Melchisedech Thou art a priest for euer after the order of Melchisedech his wordes be these Significat sermo quòd non solum Christus obtulit incruentam hostiam siquidem suum ipsius corpus obtulit verum etiam qui ab ipso furgentur sacerdotio quorum Deus Pontifex esse dignatus est sine sanguinis effusione offerent Nam hoc significat in aeternum Neque enim de ea quae semel a Deo facta est oblatio et hostia dixisset in aeternum sed respicieÌ„s ad praesentes sacrificos per quos medios Christus sacrificat sacrificatur qui etiam in mystica coena modum illis tradidit huiusmodi sacrificij The meaning of this place is sayeth he that not onely Christ offered an vnbloudy sacrifice for he offered his owne body but also that they which after him shall doo the office of a priest whose bishop he vouchesaueth to be shall offer without shedding of bloud For that signifieth the word for euer For concerning that oblation and sacrifice which was once made by God he would neuer saye in aeternum for euer But he sayd so hauing an eye to those priestes that be now by the mediation of whom Christ sacrificeth and is sacrificed who also in his mysticall supper taught them by tradition the maner of such a sacrifice Concerning the prophecie of Malachie for proufe of this oblation though the place of Irenaeus aboue recited may stand in stede of many auctorities yet I will not lette to rehearse the sayinges of a father or two for confirmation of this Article Chrysostom sayeth very plainely In Psal 95 In omni loco sacrificium offertur nomini meo sacrificium purum Vide quâm luculenter quanque dilucide mysticam interpretatus est mensam quae est incruenta hostia In euery place a sacrifice shall be offered to my name and that a pure sacrifice See how plainely and clearely he interpreted the mysticall table which is the vnbloudy sacrifice Saint Augustine hath many euident sayinges touchig this matter in his workes One shall suffise for all which is in a litle treatise he made contra Iudaeos vttered in these wordes Cap. 9. Aperite oculos tandem aliquando videte ab Oriente sole vsque ad Occidentem non in vno loco vt vobis fuit constitutum sed in omni loco offerri sacrificium christianorum non cuilibet Deo sed ei qui ista praedixit Deo Israel Open your eyes at last you Iewes and see that from the rysing of the sunne to the setting not in one place as it was appointed to you but in euery place the sacrifice of the Christen people is offered not to euery God but to him that prophecied of these thinges before the God of Israel And euen so with that protestation which saint Augustine made to the Iewes I ende this tediouse matter consisting in maner altogether in allegations to M. Iuell Open open your eyes at last M. Iuell and see how all the holy and learned fathers that haue preached the faith of Christ from the rysing of the sunne to the setting haue taught this doctrine by word and writing lefte to the posteritie that they which vnder Christ doo vse the ofâ—â—ce of a priest after the order of Melchisedech haue not onely auctoritie but also expresse commaundement to offer vp Christ vnto his father The proufe of which doctrine although it depend of the weight of one place yet I haue thought good to fortifie it with some good number that it may the better appear to be a most vndoubted truth not moued greatly with the blame of tediousnes where no thankes are sought but onely defence of the catholike Religion is intended Or that the priest had then auctoritie to communicate and receiue the Sacrament for an other as they doo Iuell Of the priestes saying Masse for an other ARTICLE XVIII VVhat you would saye M. Iuell I wote not what you saye well I wote The priest receiueth not the SacrameÌ„t for an other Verely we do not communicate ne receiue the Sacrament for an other Neither hath it euer ben taught in the catholike churche that the priest receiue the Sacrament for an other We receiue not the Sacrament for an other no more then we receiue the Sacrament of Baptisme or the Sacrament of penaunce or the Sacrament of Matrimonie one for an other In dede the priest sayeth Masse for others where he receiueth that he hath offered and that is it you meane I gesse In which Masse being the externall sacrifice of the Newe testament according vnto Christes institution the thing that is offered is such as maketh our petitions and requestes acceptable to God as S. Cyprian sayeth In sermone de coena domini In huius corporis praesentia non superuacué mendicant lachrymae veniaÌ„ In the presence of this body teares craue not forgeuenes in vaine That the oblatioÌ„ of the Masse is done for others then for the priest alone