Lords day on neither whereof they fasted Neverthelesse in other places this reason prevailed not By Tertullian it appeareth De Orat. C. xiiii that in his time and the parts where he lived the Eucharist was celebrated on dayes of Fasting And in the same place he disputeth against those that forbore the Kisse of Peace used in some places afore receiving the Eucharist in some places after it Conc. Laod. Can. xix Innocent I. ad Docent 1. upon dayes of Fasting which was an observance of Fasting-dayes derived from the Synagogue where their fashion was not to salute one another when they fasted Maimoni Taanioth C. iii. n. 8. C. v. n. 11. And S. Basil Epist cclxxxix 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Yet we communicate foure times a week Lords dayes Wednesdayes Fridayes and Sabbaths and on other dayes if the memory of a Martyr fall out In fine certain it is which S. Augustine delivereth in this point Epist cxviii Alia quae per loca terrarum regionésque variantur sicuti est quòd alii jejunant Sabbato alii non alii quotidie communicant corpori sanguini Dominico alii certis diebus communicant alibi nullus dies intermittitur quo non offeratur alibi Sabbato tantùm Dominico alibi tantùm Dominico siquid aliud hujusmodi animadverti potest totum inquam hoc genus rerum liberas habet observationes Other things which change according to places and countreys of the world as that some fast on Saturday some not some participate every day of the Lords body and bloud some receive on certain dayes in some places no day is intermitted but it is celebrated otherwhere onely on the Sabbath and Lords day otherwhere on the Lords day alone and if any thing else of this sort can be observed all matters of this kind I say are of free observance This indifference or this difference notwithstanding we shall perceive the whole custome of the Ancient Church was to celebrate the Eucharist if not every day yet upon all Lords dayes if not rather by consequence upon all Festivals or all dayes of more solemn Assemblies as the Crown of the Service for which they assembled both upon example of the Primitive time The practice of them that celebrated and received the Eucharist every day standeth upon the example of the Primitive Christians at Jerusalem Of whom when it is said that they continued constant in the doctrine of the Apostles and communion and in breaking bread and prayers and that continuing with one mind in the Temple and from house to house they did eat their meat with gladnesse and singlenesse of heart to what purpose shall we imagine that Breaking bread and Communion is mentioned besides the Service of the Temple but to signifie the Service of the Eucharist proper to the Faith of Christians in which they communicated among themselves as with the Jews in the Service of the Temple knowing that at the first it was used at meals as it was instituted among Christians This notwithstanding in other places it seemeth the Eucharist was celebrated but upon Lords dayes as well in the times of the Apostles as in the Church that succeeded Acts xx 7. On the first day of the week the Disciples being assembled to break bread that is to celebrate the Eucharist as the Syriack translateth it Here the first day of the week seemeth to stand against the rest in terms of difference as if upon other dayes they did it not And that is the day which S. Paul appointeth the Church of Corinth as he had done the Churches of Galatia to make their Collections for the poore which Tertullian sheweth was done at their Assemblies 1. Cor. xvi 2. Tertull. Apolog. C. xxxix and in Plinie's Epistle concerning the Christians of his Government Quòd essent soliti stato die ante lucem convenire That they were wont on a set day to assemble before light What day but the Lords day can we think might be Set for this purpose Justice Martyr for certain mentioneth no other Assemblies of Christians but on the Lords day in the place aforenamed And in the Constitutions of the Apostles ii 58. where he exhorteth to Assemble every day morning and evening as was said afore the Eucharist is mentioned to be celebrated but upon Lords dayes as it followeth afterwards Plinie's words in that place are these at large Epist xcvii l. x. Quòd essent soliti stato die ante lucem convenire carménque Christo quasi Deo dicere secum invicem séque Sacramento non in scelus aliquod obstringere sed nè furta nè latrocinia nè adulteria committerent nè fidem fallerent nè depositum appellati abnegarent His peractis morem sibi discedendi fuisse rur súsque coeundi adcapiendum cibum promiscuum tamen innoxium The Christians confessed that they were wont to assemble on a set day before light and to sing praise among themselves to Christ as to God and to tye themselves upon a Sacrament not to any wickednesse but not to commit thefts robberies or adulteries not to falsifie their trust or deny a thing deposited being demanded This done that their custome was to depart and meet again to eat together but in a vulgar and innocent sort Grotius of late upon Matth. xxvi 25. seemeth to conceive that at the beginning the Eucharist was not celebrated but at meals as it was instituted by our Lord. And that so it was celebrated not onely under the Apostle as Acts xx 11. 1. Cor. xi or under Ignatius but in Justine Martyr and Tertullians time appeareth by their words Justin Dial. cum Tryph. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Therefore that Prayers and Thanksgivings made by the worthy are the onely complete Sacrifices and acceptable to God I also affirm for these alone Christians also have received order to perform and that upon remembrance both of their dry and moist nourishment at which there is also remembrance of the Passion which God by God himself suffered The like Apol. ii the words shall follow afterwards Tertullian de Cor. c. 3. Eucharistiae Sacramentum in tempore victûs omnibus mandatum à Domino etiam antelucanis coetibus nec de aliorum manu quà m Praesidentium sumimus The Sacrament of the Eucharist commanded by our Lord both to all and at meat time we receive also at our Assemblies afore day but at no mans hands but our Presidents They are the words whereupon he groundeth For Tertullian reckoneth it among Traditions that is Customes of the Church not commanded in Scripture Which notwithstanding nothing hindereth but the same might be practised in the Apostles time and remembred in the Scriptures To which opinion I rather incline Otherwise whence should the Custome rise in Justine and Tertullians time to celebrate the Eucharist at their Morning Assemblies when it was still in use at Supper time in their Feasts of Love That is it which Ignatius calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the ancient translation
for us But as this Sacrament was frequented no otherwise then as the most solemn part of Gods publick Service at religious Assemblies for that purpose whatsoever was expressed more or lesse of the subject of it concerning the Creation and Redemption of the world yet in all manner of Liturgies of all Christian Churches there is none that I have seen which doth not premise this Thanksgiving and praise to God to the celebration of that Sacrament And it is very remarkable that in that distance of times and places from which we receive the severall forms yet extant with so much difference as must needs proceed from thence yet there are two particulars of it in which all the Forms that are extant agree the one the beginning of it with Sursum corda or Lift up your hearts the people answering as we use it and then to let us understand to what purpose they are exhorted to do it Let us give thanks to our Lord God specifying the Prayer which I now describe The other is the Communion of the Church militant with the fellowship of Angels in this Office expressed in the Trisagion or Seraphicall Hymne Holy Holy Holy Lord God of Sabbaoth for though there is much difference between Forms that are extant yet it will be hard to find any of them wherein both those have not a place which had the forms been arbitrary could not have come to passe Here a question lies to mine apprehension very much concerning this purpose whereas the Creatures of bread and wine are deputed to the effect of becoming the body and bloud of Christ to them that receive them aright by the appointment of our Lord executed by the Church how it can be conceived that by giving thanks to God to the purpose specified they are on the part of the Church deputed to such effect To me it seemeth unquestionable that the Thanksgiving wherewith our Lord in the Gospel is said to have celebrated this Sacrament at his last supper contained also Prayer to God for the effect to which the elements when they became this Sacrament are deputed And that the Church upon his example hath alwayes frequented his institution with the like rehearsing his institution out of the Gospel and praying for the effect of it at the present after the Thanksgiving hitherto described And so whereas in the sense of the Church of Rome the elements are consecrated that is transubstantiated into the body and bloud of Christ by rehearsing the affirmative words of Christ This is my body this is my bloud as operative In the true sense of the Church they are consecrated that is deputed to be this Sacrament and to the effect of it by the Prayer of the Congregation grounded upon the institution of Christ and the promise which it implyeth Let me suppose in the first place that the elements by being deputed to become this Sacrament are not abolished for their substance nor cease to be what they were but yet begin to be what they were not that is visible signes not onely to figure the Sacrifice of Christ his Crosse which being so used they are apt to do of themselves setting the institution of Christ aside but also to tender and exhibite the invisible Grace which they represent to them that receive For though no man can receive the body and bloud of Christ that is not disposed with a living Faith to receive the same yet on Gods part it is undoubtedly tendred to those that are not so disposed otherwise how saith the Apostle that those that eat and drink unworthily are guiltie of the body and bloud of Christ as not discerning the same And otherwise how saith our Lord of the elements at the instant of delivering them this is my body this is my bloud in the present tense Let me suppose in the second place that our Lord in celebrating this Sacrament made use of the received custome of his people which was as still it is in receiving all good things at Gods hands to premise Thanksgiving or Blessing as they call it before they used them In particular at Feasts before supper was done they took bread and broke it and gave it about and the cup of wine likewise having blessed God for the use of those excellent creatures Upon solemnities and particular occasions mention was made of that which the time required This is the ground of those two points of the Thanksgiving discussed afore the use of those creatures and the redemption of the world which our Lord specified upon the exigenc◠of the generall custome and the particula◠occasion and the Primitive Christians according to Justine Martyr frequented upon his example But as in the like case at the miracle of the Loaves when it is said that our Lord looked up to heaven and blessed Matt xiv 19. or gave thanks as it is John vi 11. i◠cannot be doubted that besides blessing God for his creatures he prayed also for the purpose of that which he intended to do No more is it to be doubted that the Thanksgiving which he made over those elements for that which they represented contained also Prayer that by them it might be communicated to his disciples The tenour and consequence of our Lords words requires no lesse For that which is affirmed must be true before it be truly affirmed and the processe of this action blessing and delivering the elements and commanding to receive them as his body and bloud importeth that he intended to affirm that so they were in the true sense which the words import at the instant of delivering them And by what consequence could his disciples conceive them to be deputed for signes to exhibite his body and bloud upon his giving of Thanks over them for the redemption of the world unlesse we suppose his Thanksgiving whereof the Gospel speaketh to contain also Prayer that they might become effectuall to that purpose And herewith agreeth that of the Apostle Every creature of God is good and none to be rejected being received with Thanksgiving for it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer For here the Thanksgiving wherewith the creatures are sanctified to the nourishment of our bodies containeth also prayer grounded upō the Word of God whereby he appointeth them for that purpose Accordingly therfore the Thanksgiving wherewith these elements were sanctified by our Lord to be the nourishment of the soul must contain prayer not grounded upon the institution of God to that purpose because the act of Christ for the present went before his institution for the future but as joyned to his command grounding a word of promise to the Church whereupon it was to do likewise And herewith agree those Forms of Thanksgiving or as they call them Benedictions which the Jews at this day practice from very ancient time as they pretend For the foot and close of divers the most remarkable of them is with prayer for the blessing of God upon that wherefore they give
Thanks For example among the daily xviii Blessed be thou O Lord our God that removest sleep from our eyes and slumbring from our eye-lids And let it please thee O Lord our God and God of our Fathers to practise us in thy Law and to make us cleave to thy precepts and bring us not into sinne and transgression and temptation and contempt and so forth ending thus Blessed be thou O Lord that givest good graces The blessing of the Law that is the Thanksgiving to God for it is this Blessed art thou O Lord our God the King of the world that hath sanctified us with his precepts given us command concerning the matters of the Law And sweeten O God the words of the Law in our mouth and in the mouth of thy people the house of Israel And make us all and our children and our childrens children knowers of thy Name and learners of thy Law for it self Blessed art thou O Lord that teachest thy people Israel the Law So in the Blessing of wine so in the Blessing after meat And so for the resemblance of the Blessing of our Lord over the elements with these and the exigence of the businesse may we justly presume that it ran in the like form to the purpose of it And last of all herewith agreeth the practice of the ancient Church wherein for certain the Thanksgiving described afore was joyned with prayer for the effect of that which was done So saith Justine that the President sent forth PRAYERS AND THANKSGIVINGS to God So in Tertullian de or at C. xiiii Sacrisiciorum orationes and in the next words Eucharistia stand both for the same So in the ciiii of the Africane Canons these Thanksgivings are called Prefaces to my thinking because this Thanksgiving was alwayes premised to the prayer which the Eucharist was consecrated with I will here propound that Form of Prayer which followeth after the rehearsall of the institution of this Sacrament in the place alledged of the Constitutions of the Apostles For a Prayer to the like effect is to be found in all the Eastern Liturgies Which if we compare with the Testimonies of Ecclesiasticall Writers which divers have produced to prove that the elements are not consecrated by the affirmative words of Christ as operative but by the prayers of the Church it will appear that it is the prayer whereof we now speak alwayes used in the Church to obtain of God the promise which the institution of Christ supposeth that the elements present might be deputed to the effect of becoming visible signes tendring exhibiting the invisible grace which they figure Which is that which in this matter is called Consecration as I suppose Having repeated the institution of this Sacrament out of the Gospels where we left afore it followeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Therefore mindfull of his Passion and death and rising from the dead and ascension into heaven and of his second appearance at which he is to come with glory and power to judge the quick and dead and to render to every man according to his works we offer to thee our King and God according to his appointment this bread and this cup giving thanks to thee through him that thou hast vouchsafed us to stand before thee and to minister unto thee And beseech thee that thou wouldest look favourably upon these Oblations present before thee thou God that wantest nothing and accept them to the honour of thy Christ and send down the holy Spirit witnesse of the passions of the Lord Jesus upon this Sacrifice to exhibite this bread the body and this cup the bloud of thy Christ That they which pertake of it may be confirmed in godlinesse obtain remission of sinnes be delivered from the devil and his deceit be filled with the holy Ghost become worthy of thy Christ and obtain life everlasting thou being reconciled to them God Almighty It is clearly true in the sense and language of the ancient Church which S. Ambrose saith De iis qui myst init C. ix Ante consecrationem alia species nominatur post consecrationem corpus Christi significatur Before Consecration another species is named that is the bread after it the body of Christ is signified And de Sacr. v. 4. Dixi vobis quòd ante verba Christi quod offertur panis dicatur ubi Christi verba depromta fuerint jam non panis dicitur sed corpus appellatur I told you that before the words of Christ that which is offered is called bread after the words of Christ â—â—e produced it is no more called bread it is called his body Therefore whereas in this prayer the elements are named by their kind of bread and wine it is plain that all that while they are not conceived or intended to be consecrated And what doubt can there be in that when we see a prayer follow wherein is desired that the elements may become the body and bloud of Christ And he that shall turn over the Copies of Liturgies which we have extant from the Eastern Churches shall find them to agree in this That after the institution is rehearsed out of the Gospels professing that what is presently done is in obedience to the same prayer is made first that by the holy Ghost the elements may be sanctified to become the body and bloud of Christ and then that they may be to such effects of grace as are specified in the form rehearsed to them that communicate Onely in the Missall of the Maronites printed at Rome there be divers forms of Consecration which they call Anaphora under the Apostles names and other Eastern Doctours wherein this prayer seemeth to be wilfully changed to make them conformable to the doctrine of the now Church of Rome It was printed there for the use of that nation in the yeare MDXCIV In the ancient form of the Latine Church there seemeth not by the now Canon of the Masse but by the remembrance of it extant in ancient Church-writers to have been some difference from this and that difference seemeth to have occasioned the errour of the now Church of Rome concerning Consecration by operative words Neverthelesse the words of S. Ambrose or whosoever writ those books de Sacram. are these v. 4. Vis scire quia verbis coelestibus consecratur accipe quae sint verba Dicit Sacerdos Fac nobis hanc hostiam asscriptam rationabilem acceptabilem quod est figura corporis sanguinis Domini nostri Jesu Christi Qui pridie quà m pateretur Wilt thou know that it is consecrated by the heavenly words heare what be the words The Priest saith Make this Sacrifice imputable accountable acceptable for us which is the figure of the body and bloud of our Lord Jesus Christ. Who the night before he suffered so forth proceeding to rehearse the institution out of the Gospel In the Canon of the Masse is added ratam or ratified Fac nobis hanc hostiam asscriptam ratam rationabilem
much to my purpose For it is plain that this is not the doctrine of the now Church of Rome when being to shew how the elements are consecrated he produceth the prayer of the Church joyned to the institution of Christ Which is to say that by virtue of Christs institution executed by the Church with prayer to God to ratifie and accept the elements presently offered to be the figure and remembrance of the body and bloud of Christ they are deputed to become this Sacrament In the Canon of the Masse these words are somewhat changed from that which is set down in S. Ambrose for they are read thus Vt nobis corpus sanguis siant dilectissimi Filii tui Domini nostri Jesu Christi That they may become to us the body and bloud of thy most beloved Sonne our Lord Christ Jesus And it seemeth that they were changed on purpose that this Sacrament might not be called a Figure of the invisible Grace of it But in the mean time it is manifest that here prayer is made for the effect of Christs institution in these elements and that nothing can be more crosse to this doctrine of the now Church of Rome then their own Service S. Ambrose observed that after the institution is rehearsed the elements are called the body and bloud The reason seems to be because they were intended to be deputed to become this Sacrament by prayer grounded on the institution of Christ which it is joyned with But it should seem that after the institution there followed in the ancient form of the Latine Church a prayer to the purpose though not in the terms of that which now followeth in the Canon of the Masse the close whereof is this Vt quot quot ex hac altaris participatione Sacrosanctum Filii tui corpus sanguinem sumserimus omni benedictione coelesti gratiâ repleamur That as many as shall receive the holy body and bloud of thy Sonne by participating of this altar may be fulfilled with thy heavenly benediction grace Which is plainly in lieu of the second point of that prayer alledged out of all the Eastern Liturgies desiring the like effects of grace by the means of this Sacrament upon them that communicate If any man think that the Forms hitherto described import that the ancient Church intended to consecrate the elements in the sense of the now Church of Rome that is to abolish the corporall substance of them and substitute that of the body and bloud of Christ in stead not in the true sense to depute them to become visible signes tendring and exhibiting the invisible Grace which they figure he shall much prejudice the truth which we professe The due advantage whereof hath been long since proved to be this that the errour pinned upon it is not to be found so much as in the Service of the Church where it is bred maintained Whē Prayer is made cōcerning the elements in the Canon of the Masse Vt nobis corpus fiant dilectissimi Filii tui Domini nostri Jesu Christi That they may become to us the body and bloud of thy welbeloved Sonne our Lord Christ Jesus These words to us make an abatement in the proper signification of the body and bloud For the elements may be said to become the body and bloud of Christ without addition in the same true sense in which they are so called in the Scriptures But when they are said to become the body and bloud of Christ to them that communicate that true sense is so well signified and expressed that the words cannot well be understood otherwise then to import not the corporall substance but the spirituall use of them In the Greekish form prayer is made that the elements may be made or become or be changed or translated into the body and bloud of Christ That also among our Writers of Controversies is acknowledged to be verified and is indeed easily verified though we suppose them not to cease to be what they were but to become what they were not that is visible signes exhibiting the invisible grace which they figure To which meaning that which alwayes follows in that form directs us when prayer is made that the elements may become the body and bloud of Christ so that they which receive them may be fulfilled with the blessings of his grace Which is to say that they may become that which they are called to wit the body and bloud of Christ not in respect of the corporall substance and kind whereof they consist but in respect to the spirituall communion which they exhibit And indeed when S. Ambrose saith that after consecration the body of the Lord and his bloud onely is named and signified and expressed this also seems to import a great abatement of the proper signification of the body and bloud of Christ As being so called and named and signified to us not because the substance of their nature and kind is abolished but because it comes no more into consideration as not concerning the spirituall benefit of them that communicate Which seemeth to be the true reason why Church-writers continually call the elements by the names of that which they exhibit without such addition as might import that abatement whereof now we speak who neverthelesse otherwhiles stick not to acknowledge that the species of the elements that is in their sense not the outward appearance of the accidents as those of the Church of Rome disguise the true meaning of the Latine word but the inward nature and substance of their kind doth remain as it was It remaineth now to declare both the right purpose and true meaning of that prayer for all States of the Church which in all Liturgies that I have seen is made at consecrating the Eucharist and before the receiving of it In that which hath been hitherto represented out of the Constitutions of the Apostles as in the most of the Eastern Liturgies immediately after the Consecration hitherto described The beginning of it there is thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Further we pray thee O Lord for thy holy Church from end to end which thou hast purchased with the precious bloud of thy Christ that thou wouldst keep it unmoved unwaved till the end of the world And for all Bishops that divide the word of truth aright Further we pray thee for the meannesse of me that offer to thee For the whole Presbytery for the Deacons and all the Clergy that Further for the King and Powers that they may keep peace toward us Further we offer to thee for all the Saints that have pleased thee from the beginning of the world Further we pray thee for all this people reckoning virgins widows married and infants Further we intreat for this city for the sick the banished slaves travellers and those that are at home that Further we pray thee for those that hate us and persecute us for thy name for those that are without and go astray
read the Lessons such as sung the Psalmes and a great part of the Prayers were done by Deacons And though many men are so eager to have all Ministers to be the mouth of the Congregation in conceiving Prayers at the instant yet no man shall perswade me that their meaning is to place the best of their performance either in the conceptions or in the language wherein they expresse the desires thereof to God for these sure make no difference to him so their be no offense The best they can contribute is the devotion of the heart which they pray with wherein they are but one of the Congregation the meanest of it may bring as good as they are able to do But in Preaching a mans knowledge in the Scriptures his abilities to expresse his knowledge to the capacitie of his Audience his discretion in addressing it to their particular without offense will either be seen or missed And therefore whosoever commendeth the price and value of the work for due reasons must needs call to mind how difficult it is For he that cometh to expound the Scripture to the people must understand it aright before he cometh to expound it and that understanding cometh not in these dayes by the immediate inspiration of the Spirit but is allotted to humane indeavours in these that in the fear of God take pains about the means which he hath provided for it And in delivering no more then a mans knowledge there fall out many times these failings which like Eli's sonnes may make the Offering of God to be loathed and the Ministrie of God contemptible And though all Scripture as saith the Apostle 1. Tim. iii. 15. is profitable for Doctrine for Reproof for Correction for Instruction in Righteousnesse yet may all this be so unseasonably ministred that the effect may prove offense though the end be amendment It cannot be said with justice that this truth is acknowledged here to abate the esteem of this work which tendeth indeed to inhance the diligence of them which do it But this must be averred that unlesse men and abilities be provided for the work as well as the work for them it may prove a sword in a blind mans hand to wound the Church as well as the enemies of it Though all that hitherto hath been said to the nature and use of these particulars of Publick service pretendeth to shew no more but this that they are all principals and substantials no accessories in it That the praise of God in Psalmes the reading of the Scriptures is not by the nature of the work and the Primitive Custome of the Church to while out the time till the Congregation be assembled That the prayers of the Church are not in the main intent of them to usher in the Sermon or to leave impression of it in mens minds afterwards but for the procuring of all necessaries of the Congregation and each particular of it so farre as generall order can comprise Hitherto hath nothing been said of the chief part of Publick Service among Christians that is of Celebrating and receiving the Lords Supper the Eucharist which from the beginning of the Profession and Name of Christians was frequented as the chief part of Publick Service in most of their Assemblies now because it is not of such continuall use is not mentioned among the rest at the beginning of our Service For the present I presse no more but the words of the Apostle as they seem to be expounded by a passage of Ignatius to shew what effect the prayers of the Congregation have in the Consecration of that Sacrament and the effect of it For it is a fearfull word of the Apostle 1. Cor. xi 20 21. where having charged the divisions among them to be the cause that their Assemblies were not for the better but for the worse he proceedeth thus When ye come together therefore into one place this is not to eat the Lords Supper For in eating every one taketh before other his own supper and one is hungry and another is drunken It is plain it was the Lords Supper they intended to celebrate therefore if they received it not through their own fault it must needs be sacriledge on their hands The fault is plain enough as well neglect of the Congregation out of the schismes that were among them as their excesse in particular Take the words of Ignatius to expound the Apostle they are the words of one that drank at his spring and spake to the same purpose Epist ad Ephes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let no man be deceived if a man be not within the Altar he cometh short of the bread of God He that is within the Altar with Ignatius is he that communicateth with the Church in imitation of those under the Law that feasted upon the reliques of Peace-offerings to which the Love-feasts of Christians used with the Eucharist practised correspondence There was one Altar from whence all men communicated of those Sacrifices which those that forsake saith Ignatius may take upon them to celebrate the Eucharist but the bread they receive is not the Lords it is profane To the same purpose Ep. ad Smyrn 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let that be counted a firm Eucharist which is held under the Bishop or him to whom he committeth it The celebration of the Eucharist is not sound nor effectuall but under the Bishop that is in the unitie of the Church therefore sacriledge in them that attempt it His reason is to our purpose for if the prayer of one or two have that force saith he that God standeth in the midst of them how much more shall the Prayer wherein the Bishop and Church agreeth prevail That Prayer wherein they agree prevaileth to make the Sacrament the bread of God to them that agree in it therefore that wherein they agree not leaveth it as it was no bread of God but the subject of their Sacriledge If this be not enough to inforce the virtue of publick Prayers nothing will serve the turn It is the agreement of the Congregation in their Prayers that maketh the Elements the Supper of the Lord with S. Paul the bread of God with Ignatius to them that agree those that agree not fail of the Grace fail not of committing sacriledge Having thus farre derived the substance of that which is to be done at Christian Assemblies from the practice of the Apostles themselves and after them of the Primitive Christians it will be requisite before we go further upon the president of their practice to consider the weight and extent of the reasons upon which the Apostle proceedeth in ordering the manner of performing the particulars whereof hitherto hath been said among the Corinthians The chief whereof is the edification of Gods people upon which he pitcheth the issue of his foregoing dispute vers 26. which may seem to extend no further then the information of the mind and understanding in matters of Religion belonging to knowledge
God of themselves without respect of advancing that Service which he requireth Last because it hath been shewed that Order as well as Comelinesse is the Rule to direct the form of Gods Publick Service and because without Order nothing becometh it though with Order apt to become it that which hath been said is to be understood of those Rites and Ceremonies which Publick Order inforceth that is which are either injoyned by Law or practised by Custome which it alloweth As for the voluntary observations of particular persons they are by their nature subject to abuse as is to be seen in the Superstitions of the Church of Rome which all reason sheweth had their beginning from the well-meant devotions of private persons And therefore it is plain that they may prove a just subject of that offense to the weak which the Apostle forbiddeth which those that are practised upon Publick Orders declaring the due meaning of them cannot as my purpose is now to declare because it is an objection which if it take place as some think must needs overthrow the most part of that which hath been said to the Order and Circumstances of Publick Service It is to be known that there were two sorts of Jewish Christians under the Apostles according to the difference of whom both their doctrine and practice especially of S. Paul is to be valued For on the one side the Apostles in the Councel at Jerusalem ordered Acts xv 20. that those which were converted from the Gentiles should abstain from things dying in the bloud and sacrificed to Idoles S. Paul circumcised Timotheus xvi 3. purified himself according to the Law xxi 26. In respect to the same sort he is bold to say Rom. xii 6. He that regardeth a day regardeth it to the Lord and he that regardeth not a day regardeth it not to the Lord He that eateth eateth to the Lord for he giveth God thanks and he that eateth not to the Lord he eateth not and giveth God thanks And that it seemeth upon the consideration that followeth in the next words because though not without blame for the ignorance of their freedome yet living and dying to the Lord they had a pious intention in generall to excuse their defect in particular But in regard to the other sort it is the same Apostle that saith Gal. iiii 10 11. Ye observe dayes and moneths and times and years I am afraid of you lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain And Coloss ii 16. Let no man therefore judge you in meat or drink or in respect of a Feast or New-moon or Sabbath expressing further what he meaneth when he saith Let no man judge you vers 5. Beware lest any man spoil you and vers 20. Why as living in the world are you subject to Ordinances touch not tast not handle not And to Titus i. 10 There are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers especially they of the Circumcision whose mouthes must be stopped And wherein he expresseth vers 15. Vnto the clean all things are clean Shewing that they were not to be tolerated but opposed in that which they taught of differences of times and meats according to the Law of Moses According to his practice in Titus whereof Gal. ii 34. But neither Titus who was with me being a Greek was compelled to be circumcised and that because of false brethren slily foisting in that came in privily to spie out our freedome which we have in Christ Jesus that they might bring us into bondage This difference in the Apostles practice and doctrine must needs proceed from the difference of persons they had to do with The one like men that were new come out of the dark could not look right upon the light of that freedome which the Gospel estateth and not satisfied of the right of Christians for their particular practice made a conscience of dayes and meats according to the Law The other renouncing their freedome and in love with their own servitude took upon them to dogmatize and maintain the necessity of such observations upon those desperate consequences which the Apostle expresseth Those are the weak and these the strong according to the Apostle because though for reason weakest for a false opinion is a further weaknesse then a doubt of the truth yet for will most resolute to stand in it Those in action doubtfull these in opinion erroneous These are the men whom the Apostle chargeth by the Law of Love not to scandalize shewing that in two things it might be done First Rom. xiv 15. If thy Brother be grieved with thy meat then walkest thou not charitably destroy not him with thy meat for whom Christ died Which Origen conceiveth to point at such as took distast at the Profession of Christ so as to forsake it upon occasion of such slight offenses And the vehemence of those terms which the Apostle useth seemeth to import no lesse But by the words of the Apostle vers 15. If thy Brother be GRIEVED with thy meat and vers 10. Why JUDGEST thou thy Brother why settest thou thy Brother at nought it appeareth that all discouragement of these weak ones is in the sense of the Apostle a degree of this offense But there is another expressed vers 22 23. That whereas it behoveth all men to be resolved of what they do that it is acceptable to God vers 5. by the indiscreet example of one that understood his own freedome he that did not might be moved to use it with a doubtfull conscience which the Apostle declareth to be sinne By the way that offense whereof the Apostle writeth 1. Cor. viii 9. x. 27. is of another nature not pertinent to this purpose for here the offense is an example that moveth a man to do that which is lawfull with a doubtfull conscience there it is an example which moveth a man to do that which is unlawfull with an erroneous conscience that is to say when the example of him that hath knowledge eating that which was sacrificed unto Idoles without difference moveth the simple to participate in the worship of Idoles by feasting on their Sacrifices Thus it is supposed that offense is given to the weak by the orders of this Church when those that are not satisfied in the things ordered either take distast thereupon at the Church and the Communion of it or are moved by example to do that which is ordered with a doubtfull conscience Where it must be excepted that no man can use this argument of scandall to the weak but he must acknowledge the things ordered to be lawfull For the weak whom the Apostle forbiddeth to offend is he that is not perswaded of the lawfulnesse of that which is lawfull indeed Besides he that pretendeth the scandall of the weak by example moving to proceed upon a doubtfull conscience is not subject to that kind of offense For in that he complaineth he sheweth he is aware enough of the danger And it is without the
Service of God observed from the beginning of the Church And because they contain matter of Supplication for the diverting of Gods judgements and obtaining of his blessings nothing could be more sutable then to adde them to the daily Morning Service on Wednesdayes and Fridayes as the exercise of that continuall humiliation before God to which the observation of these dayes was intended to the unspeakable benefit of the Church and the continuall discharge of those most excellent offices of Fasting Prayer Alms among Christians It is past mine apprehension to imagine wherein any man will pretend to fault the act of Confession of sinnes in the Publick Service of God before celebrating and receiving the Eucharist For if Repentance be a disposition requisite to make men capable of the grace which it exhibiteth shall it not be exercised at the Publick Service of God which our common profession acknowledgeth so necessary rather then onely presumed to be performed in particular And if it prove by the verdict of all consciences to be darkned from time to time by the intercourse of daily offenses joyned with unthankfulnesse and unfruitfulnesse is not that Order for the edification of the Church which reviveth and refresheth and inlighteneth it at so solemn an act of religious Service as this Sure I am that whosoever will lay his hand upon an honest heart shall not say that the form which we use is taken out of the Masse when he considereth that which the Reformation teacheth and professeth of free pardon of sinnes through Christ to be so comfortably expressed in it And seeing it hath been shewed afore that in the practice of the Ancient Church to them which for notorious or acknowledged offenses were under the state of Penance the means of forgivenesse was partly ministred in the publick Prayers of the Church and the Ministers of it what can be more sutable to this practice and the grounds of it on behalf of those that acknowledge themselves sinners but are not reduced by the Church under that discipline then that prayer or blessing wherein he that celebrateth the Eucharist imploreth that Grace on their behalf at Gods hands To me it seemeth that the rehearsall of the Decalogue in the beginning of that which some still call the latter Service together with the answers of the people craving pardon and grace to observe them for the future is to the very purpose of this Confession of sinnes and to actuate our repentance by calling to mind our offenses by retail though it is in the Order of our Service somewhat removed from it as being thought fit for other reasons to be used when the Eucharist was not celebrated Notwithstanding were it left to my choice I confesse I should think the most proper place for this Confession of sinnes to be that which it holdeth in the first Edition of Edward VI. after the consecration of the elements and before receiving them with that prayer which beginneth We do not presume after the same For the reason why it hath been otherwise ordered seemeth to have been to avoid offense lest it might be thought to import Transubstantiation in those words spoken after Consecration So to eat the flesh of thy dear Sonne Jesus Christ and to drink his bloud The cause of which offense if any such may be imagined seemeth to me utterly voided in the words added there so to eat the flesh of thy dear Sonne Jesus Christ and to drink his bloud IN THESE HOLY MYSTERIES Thus much let me be bold to affirm that it would be a great fault in the Church to celebrate this Sacrament without something answerable to that Thanksgiving wherewith it was first instituted by our Lord and practised by the whole Church Suppose it contain no mention of the Creation and the blessing of Gods creatures because as hath been said it seemeth to have been practised heretofore in relation to mans bodily sustenance wherewith it was instituted practised at the first Without Thanksgiving for the redemption of the world it is not duly received therefore with it it is duly celebrated Of this Thanksgiving for the redemption of the world there is due remembrance in the very end of the Exhortation from those words And above all things therefore it seemeth that the Preface wherein that Thanksgiving is contained and expressed after Lift up your hearts had followed very seasonably after remembrance of the cause and ground of it But the substance of that which is done is alwayes the same Further how little soever the grace of Gods goodnesse depend on that which by man is ordered for the fittest and though it is not pretended that any Law of God in the Scriptures inacteth this Sacrament to be celebrated with that Thanksgiving from which it is called the Eucharist or that Prayer for the effect of Christs Institution at the present which is the close of it yet since it hath been shewed that so this Sacrament hath been celebrated from the beginning of the Church and that for so good reasons upon our Lords example at the institution of it and since this course so much concerns the edification of the Church it seemeth altogether requisite that the Elements be not supposed deputed for such a blessing to the Congregation by the mere act of receiving them to such purpose but should be actually and formally deputed by remembring the Institution of our Lord and by the prayer of the Church professing the execution and begging the blessing of the same which I suppose is called Consecration among us Gregory the great and Isidore tell us that the Apostles and S. Peter by name celebrated the Eucharist with the Lords Prayer alone but that alone must be understood to except other accessories to the manner of celebrating consisting in the Eucharist or Thanksgiving whereof the Prayer of Consecration was the foot and close Rabanus de Instit Cler. lib. 32. Cum benedictione enim gratiarum actione primùm Dominus corporis sanguinis sui Sacramenta dedicavit Apostolis tradidit quod exinde Apostoli imitati fecere successores suos facere docuerunt quod nunc per totum Orbem terrarum generaliter tota custodit Ecclesia For our Lord at first initiated and delivered to his Apostles the mysteries of his body and bloud with blessing and Thanksgiving which thence the Apostles imitated and did and taught their successours to do and which now the whole Church generally observeth all the world over That which hath been said is enough to show that it was alwayes celebrated with this Thanksgiving the foot whereof as hath been shewed was the Prayer of the Church for the effect of the Institution of our Lord at the present Where are they now that take upon them to say that all our Service is taken out of the Masse how will they discharge themselves in this most eminent point or how will they be able to digest this untruth which the least insight of the Masse will thrust